HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.pdfGarfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address HIDDEN VALLEY DR GLENWOOD SPRINGS,
CO Owner Information Parcel No. 239510109066 Address Pennjtivo.BLRE~5"10"1548 permit TYpe: Residential. Building Issue Date: 5/21/2010 Subdivision Section SPRINGRIDGE RESERVE PUD P 10
Phone Walk c;tassi(ication: New Permit Status:. Active Expires: 11/17/2010 Township Range 7 89 Cell Tim & Martha Rahmeier 1306 Mountain DR Glenwood springs CO 970-945-8828 Contractor(s
) Phone Primary Contractor Required Inspections: Koru (970)963-9389 Yes Fo"o"p.,tloo".tI, 1 (888)868-5306 Proposed Construction I Details Single family dwelling on slab on grade with
attached garage and covered patios. Valuation: $ 208,621.76 Total Sq Fee!: 3508.25 FEES DUE Fee Plan Check Fee Residential Building Fee Total: Friday, May 21, 2010 Amount $1,042.70 $1,604.15
$2,646.85 FEES PAID Inv Total Pay type Amt Paid Amt Due Inv # BLRE-5·10-20215 $ 2,646.85 Check # 6405 Check # 1304 $1,604.15 $1,042.70 $ 0,00 Inspection IVR See Permit Record Building
Department Copy 2
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Pho ne: 970-94 5-8212 1 Fa x: 970-384-3470 I I nspechon L'm e: 9 70 -384 -5 003 www.garfield·county.c
om B I Parce l No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970-945-9 134) ;Jj?510101obb 2 Job Address: iiI aOO{J j;J beevAt l le yVid7J~~ or ~treet Name & City) or and
legal description "-' \~ 12-~l\ \J'/\ \.J fCl 3 Lot No: hk Block No: SubdJ Exemption 5';7 R. /rJ61Z lo6E fE'it'P-vt 4 ~;'7 (P';iA: of':",';) r IEiZ r:30~ AZT;J 7)12 _ 6W~ Ph 1t!':> /5gd8
Alt Ph1t.1 r J '7 J. 9 5 Contractor: fL tJ IZ IA , /..-TO. 1jailin~1tess: 51.( rrt:Y t!i)Al ,..Ph: 17 IN'5T_ ~ '1&"30Sn Alt Ph'6t8 013~3 6 @chitestJ'Engineer: A. ~;~n:t.!td;;; AIl;;
Ph iJ'-I~ 8,)40 Alt Ph: £.t::f} Jl~0€ UI-f -6W5 7 Sq. Ft. of Building:3So8 , ;;J~ Sq. Ft. or Acres of Lot: /.497 A£!.. Height: (.).. 0 I No. of Floors:..;L 8 Use of Bui lding: 51rJ6L£
FAt« (L. 'f 7?NUt-'N6 9 Describe Work: N£:IJ 6.".) STJ2.u ~ 77 o;J /5nt{L F72Amb) IO Class of Work: ,)(New CJ Alteration o Addition II Garage: Septic: ¥ Attached 0 Detached o lSDS bt,{:ommunity
12 Driveway Permit: t:xE::1vt.PT 4 S ?e/2 , iA~ ' ill-/LLOwners va luation or Work: $ "I)O,'oOD NOTICE Authority. This application for a Building Permit must he Sib'lled by the Owner
of the propeny, described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner. a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this
Application. Lecal Acct's~. A Building Pt:nnit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the propeny for purposes of inspections by tht: Building Depanment. O ther
Permits. Multiple separate pennits may be required: (I) State Electrical Pennil, (2) Coullly ISDS Peml;t, (3) another pennit required for use on the propeny identified above, e.g. State
or Coullly Highway! Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Penni!. Void Permit. A Building Pennit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of
the date ofissuanec lind if work is suspended or abandolled for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTI,,' ICATION I hereby cenify thai I have read this Application and that the
infonnation contained above is troe and correct. I understand that the Building Depanment accepts the Applicatioll, along with Ihe plans and specifications and other data submined by
me or on my behalf(s ubmillals), based upon Iny cenification as 10 accuracy. Asswning completeness of the subminals and approval of this Application, a Building Pemlit will be issued
granting pc:nnission to me, as Owner, to constnlct the strueture(s) and facilities detailed on the subminals reviewed by the Building Depanment. In consideration of the issuance of the
Building Pennit, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state Of local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations
and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s». I acknowledge Ihal the Building Pennit may be suspended or revoked, upon nOlice from Ihe County, if the location, construction
or use of the strucrure(s) and faeility(ies), described above, are nOI in compliance wilh County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant pennission to the Building
Department 10 enter the propeny, described above, to inspect Ihe work. I funher acknowledge that the issuance or the Building Pennit docs not prevent the Building Official from: (I)
requiring the correction of errors in the subminals, if any, discovered after issuance: Of (2) stopping construction or use of the st ructure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violatiOll
of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Depanmenl do not constitule an acceptance
of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge thaI responsibility for compliance wilh rederal, slate and local laws
and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agenlS, including without lIimit ation my architect designer, engineer and! or bui lder. HERE~ A(K~~ IT:AT~ H~ V~; AND UNDERSTAND
THE ;T/: ~I/FI~A;N ABOVE OWNERs'SIGI"IATU E DATE ST AFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: loB ~'2.1 7~ Plan Check Fee: 1,042.7C Permit Fcc: IlPD4.{5 Manu home Fee: Misc
Fees: DP No & Issue Dale: -\~O' ISDS No & Issued Date: ;.t/" ISDS Fee: Total Fees: Z~% ~5 Fces Paid: Balance Due: Setbacks: OCC Group: Const Type: 'kt<C IJl P ~G;lJ APPROVAL '--) DATE
APPRO\?llL DATE
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned
by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior
doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove
and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and
privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all !BC and IRC requirements including
guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating
circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department
for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE
ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUpy OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY
OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A e.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by
the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. 10 DATE
Building Plan Review Description of Work: Single family dwelling on slab on grade with attached garage and COl Bin #: 8-6 Location Address: HIDDEN V ALLEY DR GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Case
Manager: Andy Schwaller Plan Case Number: BLDG-5-10-6414 Parcel: 239510109066 Application Date: 05/10/2010 Contacts _ Owner: Tim & Martha Rahmeier Applicant: Tim & Martha Rahmeier Applicant
Phone: 970-945-8828 Email: Planning/Zoning __ --"/'--_Engineered Foundation /..f·A, Driveway Permit ____ /__ surveyed Site Plan 'I-t J Septic Permit and Setbacks ____/_ _G rade/ToPOgraPhy
30% ____/. _Attach Residential Plan Review List ____/M_ "I mmum A pp II' cat 'I on Q uestl' onnare ~ Subdivision Plat Notes __ --"If."-'''''i._Fire Department Review __ --"v<"--_valuation
Determination/Fees ---..I.''''~''--Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ___' _:_' A~ttac h Conditions ____ ~lication Signed _____ ,Plan Reviewer To Sign Application __---'C"'/_, parcel/Schedule
No, __ ..L~ Snowload Letter -Manu, Homes __ --''--_Soils Report Wednesday, May 12, 2010 /_____ Property Line Setbacks j.j. It. 30ft Stream Setbacks (.(. i . Flood Plain E).r(. Building
height ~ _____ .LZoning Sign-off II d Road Impact Fees /_____ ,HOAlDRC Approval ____ ~ _ Grade/ToPOgraPhy 40% _---'4:....=...~lssues -----'Subdivision Plat General Comments: f.v fI.-l.»...k1101d:
L!UIJilr r/. 21"32 7~ 63 ~1t{Z. lo7ep 18"(; C.?~ ?J/f:J 2'1 -:::. --/g" t?z l.tv. I iJ 3lD 8 7 tp:32... 208/eZI.7(8
Building Plan Review Description of Work: Single family dwelling on slab on grade with attached garage and COl Bin #: B-6 Location Address: HIDDEN VALLEY DR GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Case
Manager: Andy Schwaller Plan Case Number: BLDG-5-10-64 14 Parcel: 239510109066 Application Date: 0511012010 Contacts Owner: Tim & Martha Rahmeier Applicant: Tim & Martha Rahmeier Applicant
Phone: 970-945-8828 Email: Building Planning/Zoning __ --'/'---_Engineered Foundation I.f A -Driveway Permit _ ___~ _ s urveyed Site Plan •• t " Septic Permit and Setbacks ____/_ _G
radeITOPOgraPhy 30% ____ /_Attach Residential Plan Review List _ ___/_ _ Minimum Application Questionnare ~ Subdivision Plat Notes __ -,-,"!...·J",,-_Fire Department Review __ ---"~'---_valuation
Determination/Fees ___ ..I.r-"'~'---Rled Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ____~ _A ttac h Conditions _ __ --=~lication Signed _____ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application __~ ,,,_,/_P arcellschedule
No. __ .L~ Snowload Letter -Manu. Homes _ _ ----' _ Soils Report Wednesday, May 12, 2010 _____ ,Property Line Setbacks J/. -It. 30ft Stream Setbacks (.(. i Flood Plain Dr r(. Building
height ~ _____ ..£.7,oning Sign-off II d Road Impact Fees /' _____ ,HOAlDRC Approval ____ ~ _ GradeITOPOgraPhy 40% __I' f-=-~Issues -----Subdivision Plat General Comments: f.v f4.-t.»..4.h..
. 1C~rd: WIlIIar f( 2132 71 63 ~1t'(I. 10 I¥> J s't; C.?~ 'Z>lfJ zcJ Tohtl R es Z 739. 2.5 Fe~5 J)ue. 92. '10 -::=. -/gJI~ZI.7v. 1'13(08 71p 32.. 208/eo) .'7~ 10, O() (:) . 00 _ L/8.6z/.7¥
FEE ESTIMATE FOR SIF STICK BUILT HOMES (ALL FEES ARE ESTIMATES UNTIL FINAL PLANS ARE REVIEWED) Applicant: Job Address: ![kalA I lTV. Subd-Lot/block: FINISHED LIVING SPACE: UNFINISHED
BASEMENT: _____.. ..:s::...-f X41.00= ________ CRAWL SPACE: ------------sf X 9.00= GARAGE: ! 0 7~ sf X 18.00= -------~-----~ ;9.3b 0. 00 ; UNCOVERED PATIOIDECK: sf X 12.00= -------~
----------COVERED PATIOIDECK: _~3 /-=8:::;_:::....Sf x 24.00= __7~ .,/;...:......~....::;,~.;. .,.::... .t.>--=O_ MISC: ________________ _ MISC: ________ ___ TOTAL VALUATION: THIS SECTION
WILL BE DETERMEND BY GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING PLAN REVIEW FEE: PERMIT FEE: TOTAL: PERMIT: SEPTIC= PERC:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED
BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided.
When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with
building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given
attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR
ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this documeut to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please
consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires
the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical
codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist
at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be ou drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the
finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor
joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule.
A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind
exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted
must be in compliance with the 2003 IRC, and 2006 fECC. 1. [s a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines
from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or
greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously
surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure
to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed
structure located within JRenvelope. Yes I. 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03
in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. V Yes'_L~\-__ 3. Does the site
plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent propert;t
streams or water courses? Yes 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? j,._ Yes~ 2
5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and! or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No ... K;. 6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of
a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private
easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You
can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-860 l. See phone book for otherage! s Yes_----'4-'f-__ 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing
of all reinforcing steel in accord~e with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes_----'f+--_ _ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under
floor crawl spaces and the clearancey quired between wood and earth? Yes T No ___ _ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces
and soffits? Yes _ _ --"k"l-_ _ No ____ 10. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including
7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? .1-Yes __ ~_+\ ---II. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof constructi0Y.
Yes __ -'+'t---__ _ 12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters y joists or trusses? Yes _ --Li-'\\:-___
13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns a~beams? Yes _-"~L\-____ 14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height
of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat r 0 , (Building height measurement
usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes_-,<\-_ _ _ 3
15. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and mOde~1 a d Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes ___ No ___________ __ 7 .j-6115' APPL-I 4rJ C£. 16. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply ~~;_th_e_IR_C_?____ NO ____
~~~_· __ ----17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from fTIs and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? 18. Does
the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilatio or all habitable rooms? Yes __ ---t _____ _ 19. Do the plans indicate the location
of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass
doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing fy hese areas? Yes ~ No ___________ __ 20. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas
furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes /A( 21. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivisi
n process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes __ ---I.I-__ __ 22. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is
your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit
application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your
Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation!.substantial modification
of the plans. Yes, ___ -'~+----23 . Will this be t e only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No lfno-Explain:. __________ _ 24. Have two (2) p mplete sets of construction drawings
been submitted with the application? Yes'_~\4-__ _ 4
Yes 25. Do you unf tand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? 26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and
other construction code requirem! ? Yes' __L4 +--__ 27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district~. Yes "t 28.
Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfi I County Building Department? Yes, __ --/AI--_ 29. Do you understand
that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the apPlicati{ ftheSe changes? Yes 30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan
Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road I~ct" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time
you pick up your building permit? Yes-----,---31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it
the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-500]1 Yes~ No ____ _ 32. Are you aware
that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-il)j.Wction fee? Yes _~ t-\-__ _ 33. Are you aware that you are required to call for
all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? V Yes---;!'-+V----5
34. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for f~d that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC?
Yes , . 35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner
are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable i~ection. Yes "\----n::-36. Are you aware, that on the front of the
Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your
attention in this is appreciated. Yes -4' 37. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety I. ssues?. ~. Yes -----l'~\ ----(please
check with the building department about this requirement) 38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuary-of a building
permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes __~ ~_ _ 39 . Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have
to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certifi~ of Occupancy? Yes _~,I\--~__ 40. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the
City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. Yes I hereby acknowledge
that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of m~ ~X • Date 10 Phone:._q,~·=&---.2.<'-----=C--)-=)-_7~7~_( days) ; ___________( evenings) 6
Project Name:_-II-"Z",.-A---,-,I---,f-I,-I,-A-,=e~-(, e"r-z'.---_t~------5''---/7[)~-----'=--t=:.---_____ _ _ _ _ Project Address: /lrf)I/uJ t/P.t-I.-Cf ,I ~PI2iNMllf)6£ r2C~Cfl-i/f:f
Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building
Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more
recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review,
delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqsfMar2009 7
LOT f GRAPHIC SCALE IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE OF-66, SPRINGRIDGE RESERVE PUD, A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 10 ToWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. COUNTY OF
GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO SHRRT I OF 1 PHASE 'AA~"='" ,,-bo.io;iW' T I j) ,< -f) /}c/"IS"""I" """orN,1!rJ(JS " Dol. '/""'''''''''''''' "" ... " 201M . , • .. ·.·=1 '''' ..... "" ""'""
illO,",O"".""",," 9) ~{i:~ S££:t5£! ~5~:{.E.'F.;~~'" SI_, ~<>4 J/id"''''' Awn ... , ""'i<A ,,,."1BIIml • ""'" ",",)0" .oris ./1",""; '1 !i.O • .,S'3I)"$. .>I .... ~ 1M £=t ."""'''' no
.... ,. oJ $",,_ 10 ~"" 'M $ot4~ """,,"'10 "'"""" .""".~ ... ",.., fO ..... fl. ~) 8o;is _/Su"",,-"" n"", If .. oJ Spri"~dF' fl...",. !f~_d u.." __ ,. PI=< $. """_ A.,-,.. mJI' '" 1I<cf"",,"
n;,. 7""251; "" " .. , """ <f Sprmqrl4", :=.;:'~,""~?;:' ,=;f1;:'.(;._~~:, T.t"", PI~' ., Sprir.",...d", .II ....... ff~n""d """ 1J.w1'P"I"~I. _ " _od ~"""'" M. MeS.., _.~ No. S8/O"~:
r". n"'" Ra' ./Sprl~f11'VJ", ,..", S .. ", .......... ",rdod ...... ", • ..,. ,. '9.3 ... R«o"',,~ N~ ~S~'S~ '" "'" ,," ../UI~ ,,=tV &co_ .. ;:;. "==",ij."/. X Fo,fS1;:t :..:'~ ;;::::!l"~";!:':3.
-'''JI>'u"",P''' '.'.'. '_'~' -"",d,'"",'"" ."""' ' ' ' ' ' '_ "',.,..,. S) TM .. , ........ .to.;, _ 00""""', • "''' _"'" '" $,prj. 4"ng ..... rl»g, = (SE) " "".,."., ... '~'P ,r .,
... ,,,,,."'._/_ For "" """"""""" "'ll"",;nq _"' •. ,.,g"" oJ ""'V .nd/Or ,11/. of"""";: SE m"d ~pm II,. .b ... "'''' pl ... .d. ........r ..i ,• ..• d1 '.i"~. ""'. ~ or" , .. T"'" Com","""'"
I="'_ 'y 'J~. h>£ •• """''''''''' SryOM' hi_ rm/.,. No Zl6~E • • Ift<,j". ""t •• J S,pI ........ f8. ~6, 8.) T"" =wi"p «md";or,z ""'P ." ... ""'v ",_"t • • I.nd nm.ov pOd or """d.'Y
""'"'"¥ 'J II", __ ",..".,.., ... 5~'!~~~~5l;l~!:~ , \ CO';"I I " I ->',!, ,I I \0 ///.///1 ~ 1~:":·''<''-1'' " " /" ,., /' I ~\ '" \ /",;" \/I I' '\ '~1h~"'o"!: "~ \ /r ./' ' 'v /•
//I I II. '\ ''"'.. ,,~,,'' ~ I' I' '. . • • //,,'' I " ~ " ,\ /" ,,~. ' /-1 '00 -\\\ \ \ /' /I \ \"1 I ,,\/' ' ! '' I I I I'IIII ' I I\ ~' /\ , ='I£IO T66 I'' \\\ ;J: \ \ I" ~5.225$q,ft
I ( """'"' ..".."...' '"'"'"'", """ Lor 69 I', " ,~, \ ,'"'''''' I I II: ¥<":! I I I I I " .~". /If"-'-~ I! I '< I (,-1 ' .oo" I I .--& //. //~ ! I I 0________ /) : /1, ~I I' ~' /;1'
//"I,-."IL _ /""" /J/pi I ,, //-_"~, "1' ---~.f.-,.~'7 ""-" ~"'-, -#' I; ._. ~l "'~,~' ... ,"., :'" , .7 ,Ir =.1I' ':!r'::cJ'~;-toT as 276.5,''' I I I /I SOPRIS ENGINEERING -LLC CIVlL
CONSULTANTS 502 MAIN STREET. SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (970) 704--0311 !lit fC<NO,,"'" ~"l" ;:~~3 "'. 4 I VICINITY MJiP ~ P~OPF.'R1"Y D!:SClUPTIOIf -" '" SITE SPJVM;J/lDU JlnE:Rl'G
1'l..(J{""n yJ{l1" lln'EUJI'¥£'{1". f'H.<SE' A=_"'" f'Ij rHG I'INIF Fnr"""" RmJI1lJA"Il AI'JVI. ,s. _ .... Im:l'I'1'KJN n.. "".s CO!JNrI"uI'OARI'InJ) ..... rG 01' C(lUI~_ , ........
I. """ "'''' ""1""<4"'", 1«01"'" ... "If"''' ..... "'"'po .... _.G."", _I~"'",,"=("'G)"" nv !l.<HJfGIGIl AN1I " .. I<:"H" !l.<HJfGIS~ _,",, "" .,.""_pol. ... ",, "'" ",.",,1,,",", I,
....1 1"' ... ,.,.". . 'f)'"" . • "',., .... .,. ....... ~ .. '"'_ ",,"_ /__ .. .t.I. """ , ........... ..-.. ,n , .............. "',.._ '" 0", """" .".." "~",, .f"'" _, ........ p i"',,".~""'
...... m''"'._"'"'''" pi .. """"'" """ u-..IV ... ..,..........." _" , .. .".','.' '"''.,','>'' ".,..."...".,."..~..._.p.t. ..." .. ." ",,,,,,od..''''''''''''''''''''_''"''''-''''''
or .-..."" ."" ..-" <Old ,.._, .... pi ... -'" ;n: s, __ '->' P"~' t
Jan Morton From: mike chmura [mike@korultd.com] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:34 PM To: 'Jan Morton' Subject: FW: Springridge Reserve MIKE CHMURA Email : mike@korultd.com Phone: 970.963.0577
Cell: 970 .618 .2383 Fax: 970.963.9389 KORU LIMITED 417 Main Street. Suite Y Carbondale. Colorado 81623 • US http://www.korultd.com Redefining the building experience 1 From: Pat Fitzgerald
[mailto:pat@glenwoodbrokers.com] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:26 PM To: 'mike chmura' Subject: RE: Spring ridge Reserve Page 1 of2 You are approved subject to later receiving a landscape
plan and colors/samples of exteriors of house. The exterior color/samples may be sent to us in the next 45 days but OK to start construction now-thanks; Patrick Fitzgerald Spring ridge
Reserve HOA From: mike chmura [mailto:mike@korultd.com] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:22 PM To: pat@glenwoodbrokers.com Subject: Spring ridge Reserve Hey Pat Still looking for HOA permission
to build on lot 66 in Spring ridge. Please get back to me asap. Thanks Mike 4/16/2010
l N \\ ~~ I I .~.. ,\ , Legeml I , .... ,--" .. GI nwood BrokelS, LID Springridge Reserve Land Plan Land Subject to Conservation Easement --I I I Page 1 of 1 " 2 14 E'ghlh SIrOOI, P,O.
Box 1330. Glenwood Spnn9s, CO 81601 PDlrlc. M. r llzgOlald, Brc lwf Office (970) 945-5554 Cell (970) 379-3363 http://springridgereserve.com/images/Phase_IV_new_mapS.jpg 4/15/2010
August 18, 2009 Red House Architecture Attn: Bruce Bm1h 815 Blake Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 \ I" Job No, 109 244A Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed
Residence, Lot 66, Springridge Reserve, Hidden Valley Drive, Garfield County, Colorado Oem' Mr. Barth: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geoteclulical, Inc. performed a subsoil study for
design of foundations at the subject site, The study was conducted in accordance with our a!,'Teement for geotechnical engineering services to Red House Architecture dated March 24,2009,
The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. We previously performed a preliminary
geotechnical study for the subdivision development (known as Springridge Place, Phase II at that time) which included a geologic site assessment and presented our tmdings in a Teport
dated June 22,2004, Job No, 101 126, Proposed Construction: The proposed residence is assumed to be a one and two story, wood fi'ame structure over a combination of walkout basement
level and crawlspace with an attached garage located on the lot as shown on Figure I, Basement and garage floors are assumed to be slab-on-grade, Cut depths are expected to rmlge between
about 4 to 8 feet. Foundation loadings are assumed to be relatively light and typical of tile assumed type of construction, Ifbuilding conditions or foundation loadings are significantly
different fi'om those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recOImnendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: The lot was vacant at the time of our field
exploration and is located east (uphill) of Hidden Valley Drive as shown on Figure I, An llTigation ditch, approximately 2 to 3 feet deep, crosses through the lot just east (uphill)
of the west lot line, The ditch is over-grown with grass and weeds, and appears to be abandoned, An existing culvert crossing is located at the approximate mid-point of the west lot
line, The overall topography ofthe lot is relatively flat to slightly irregular and was formed by alluvial fan deposits in the upper part ancl vailey bottom alluvium in the lower part.
Steeper wlluvial covered slopes are located to the northeast. A srnall ephemeral drainage
-2-is located northeast (uphm) of the proposed building site and we observed evidence of a recent debris/mud flow event through the proposed building site which measured about 25 feet
wide and contained small cobble size rocks. Another ephemeral drainage crosses east-west through the lot south (downhill) ofthe proposed building site. The ground surface in the proposed
building area slopes strongly down to the southwest at a grade of around 15%. There is about 12 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building footprint. Steeper slopes are
located north and east ofthe lot. A small sandstone outcrop was observed at the northeast property comer and on the steep slopes to the north and east. Vegetation consists mainly 0 f
grass and weeds with sage brush in the proposed building area, and piiion and juniper trees on the steep slopes above the lot. Sandstone fragments, mostly up to cobbles size, are visible
on the ground surface within the building envelope with a small boulder, measuring 2 feet in size, observed downhill of the proposed building area. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface
conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits just outside of the proposed building footprint at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. The logs of the
pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below about Yz foot of topsoil (root zone), consist ofloose to medium dense, silty to very silty sand with scattered gravel
down to the maximum explored depth of8Yz feet. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the sand, presented on Figures 3 and 4, typically
indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions ofloading and wetting. Two of the samples . also showed minor settlementfheave potential after wetting. No free water was observed
in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist. Foundation Bearing Conditions: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the
nature of the proposed construction, a shallow spread footing foundation or reinforced mat foundation should be feasible for support of the proposed residence with a risk of foundation
settlement and related building distress. Isolated pad footings should be avoided and the building foundation designed to be relatively rigid to help limit building distress due to differential
foundation settlement potential. Reco11l11lendations fur a shallow spread footing or reinfurced mat fuundation are presented in the section below. As an alternative with a lower risk
offoundation settlement, a deep foundation system could be used to support the proposed residence. Typical deep foundation systems which may be feasible at the site include drilled piers
and heavy-duty "screw" piles. In order to evaluate the feasibility of a deep foundation system, at least one exploratory boring should be drilled at the site to identifY the depth of
a relatively incompressible bearing strata below the proposed building footprint. If a deep foundation system is proposed, we should be contacted to provide additional analysis and recommendations.
Job No.109 244A
-3 -Foundation Recommendations: Spread footings or mat foundations should be placed on the undisturbed natural soil and designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,200 pst:
The soils tend to compress after wetting and there could be some postconstruction differential foundation settlement. We expect initial settlements to be up to about 1 inch, and additional
differential settlements of 1 to 2 inches depending on the depth ofwetling ofthe bearing soils. Precautions should be taken to prevent postconstruction wetting of the bearing soils.
Footings should be a minimum width of20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within
the excavation should be removed and the tooting bearing level extended down to undisturbed natural soils. Footing areas should be moistened and compacted prior to constructing footings.
Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations fur frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36. inches below the exterior grade is typically
used in this area Continuous fOlmdation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation and
Retaining Walls: Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral
earth pressure computed on the ba.sis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 peffor backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate
from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed fot a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis
of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcffor backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic
and surcharge pressures such as adjacent fuotings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal
backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An
underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifls and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor
density at a moisture content near optimUD1. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken
not to over-compact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill
should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfIll. ~ Job No.1 09 244A
-4-The lateral resistance offoundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination ofthe sliding resistance ofthe footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfill
against the sides of the fOotings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume
ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive
resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near
optimum. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of tops oil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. The soiis are typically compressible and there
is a risk of slab settlement and distress, especially if the subgrade soils are wetted. Care should be taken to prevent post-construction wetting of the slab subgrade soils. To reduce
the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor
slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on
experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of freedraining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist
ofminus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support offioor slabs should be compacted to at
least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Required fill can consist ofthe on-site soils or imported well graded sand and gravel (such as road base)
devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that
local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade
construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of
drainpipe sUlTounded above the invert level with freedraining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish
grade and sloped at a minimum I % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less
than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and Job No.I09 244A
-5 -have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least l'l> feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as 20 or 30 mil PVC, should be placed beneath the drain
gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed
during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation ofthe foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted.to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90%
of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet ofthe on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the
first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale and possibly deflection wall or berm will be needed uphill to
direct surface runoffand debris/mud flow events around the residence and should be designed by a civil engineer. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits
of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from the building. Consideration should be given to the use ofxeriscape to
limit potential wetting of soils below the foundation caused by irrigation. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering
principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data
obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Figure 1 and to the depths shown on Figure 2, the proposed type of construction, and our experience in the
area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. Ifthe client is concerned
about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at
the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different
from those described in this Job No. 109 244A
-6-report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction
to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional
analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative
of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further assistance, please call our office. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor
L. Knell, P.E. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P .E. TLKJksw attachments Figure 1 -Locations of Exploratory Pits Figure 2 -Logs of Exploratory Pits Job No. 109 244A Figures 3 and 4 -Swell-Consolidatio
n Test Results Table 1 -Summary of Laboratory Test Results
o 109244A LZ\ /-._--LOTS5 ~ech liE:flWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL I I -I, I I I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I ~ /I /"---I I I I I I I , , '-, , , , , , , \ \ , , \ \ \ \ 1 I I I I I 1
1 1 1 , \ I I I I --;'11---1\ \ 7, ,I II I , I I I I I I I I I 11 APPROXIMATE SCALE: j/111 = 501 I 'I I, \ I , I '/LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 1
o 5 10 LEGEND: NOTES: PIT 1 ELEV.=6488' WC=43 00=104 -200=33 1i.l.I!..:c.I WC""3,O 00=106 -200=27 PIT 2 ELEV.=6475' WG=3,4 00-101 -200=33 WC=4,8 00=96 TOPSOIL; root zone, silty sand
with scattered gravel, loose, slightly mOist, red-brown. o 5 10 SAND (SM); stratified, silty to very silty, slighUy clayey, scattered gravel, loose to medium dense, slightly moist, red-brown,
slightly porous, slightly calcareous, trace roots down to about 4 to 6 feet. Alluvial fan deposit. Relatively undisturbed 2-inch diameter liner sample. 1. Exploratory p~s were excavated
on July 31,2009 with a Bobcat 435 mini-excavator. Pits were excavated down to the maximum reach of the excavator. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by taping
from features shown on the site plan provided, 3, Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided. Pit logs are drawn to
depth. 4, The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5, The lines between materials shown on the exploratory
pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual, 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation
in water level may occur with time, 7, Laboratory Testing Results: we = Water Content ( % ) DO = Dry Density ( pef ) -200 = Percent passing No, 200 sieve 109244A ~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY
PITS FIGURE 2 HEPWOIUH"PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
Moisture Content = 4.3 percent Dry Density = 104 pef Sample ot Silty Sand From: Pit 1 at 6 Feet 0 -c-~ -~ 'If/. 1 -z 7 ~ a en 2 v \. [l1 ---EXpanSion \ 0: ~ upon a. \ :;: 3 wetting 8
) 4 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) Moisture Content = 3.0 perce nt Dry Density = 106 pcl Sample 01: Silty Sand From: Pit 1 at 8 Feet 0 --I} ~ *-1 "'--z "" ( '" a i'---~ 2 ~ No
movement 0: a. upon wetting :;: 3 a \ 0 4 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) 109244A ~ech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 3 HEPWORTH-PAWlAK GEOTECHNICAL
MOisture Conlent = 3.4 perce nt Dry Density = 101 pel Sample of: Silty Sand From: Pit 2 at 2 Feet 0 -1 ~ ~ ( Compression 'if-upon ~ z 2 wetting 0 1ii \ CJl w c:: 3 a. :IE \ 0 {) 4 \
5 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) 109244A ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 HEPWO,,:n;:PAWlAK GEOTECHNICAL
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Job No. 109 244A SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRAOATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS Uf'lCONFINEO MOISTURE
ORY PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL PITNO. DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY GRAVEL SAND NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH TYPE (ft) (%) (pcf) ("/0) {%) Sieve (%) ("fo) (ps!) 1 6 4.3 104 33 Silty
sand 8 3.0 106 27 Silty sand 2 2 3.4 101 33 Silty sand 4 4.8 96 Silty sand I
KAUP ENGINEERING INC. Koru, LTD 417 Main Street Carbondale, CO 81623 RECEIVED 1129 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, C~1601 (970)945-9613, fax (970f9~'5'9s33) COUNTY JUN 0 7 2010 QUP 91,
'0 ~ PLANNING June 4, 2010 RE: Rahmeier Residence, Lot 66, Springridge Reserve, CO Dear Mike: Per your request, I reviewed the Field Report dated May 28, 2010 by HP Geotech conceming
the observation of excavated bearing soils. The report confirms the design assumptions and is consistent with the previous reports findings. Please call with any questions or comments.
THUNDER MOUNTAIN TESTING ••• 2973 F. Road • Grand Junction, CO 81504 (970) 256-9965 1 Cell (970) 210-70081 FAX (970) 314-7067 Koru Limited 417 Main Street, Suite Y Carbondale, CO 81623
ATTN: Mr. Mike Chmura RE: Rahmeir Residence 0517 Hidden Valley Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado Dear Mr. Chmura, July 22,2010 Permit #BLRE-5-10-1548 As requested, structural steel special
inspection was conducted per the mc 2006 Edition -Chapter 17: Structural Tests and Special Inspection and Garfield County requirements. I arrived on site at 1:45 PM. I met with you to
review project requirements and specifications. The steel fabricator & erector for this project is Custom Structural Steel, Inc. in Silt, Colorado. The Welding Procedure Specifications
and Welder Qualification Test Reports for certified welders on site were reviewed and found to be in compliance with project specifications. Copies of certifications are on file with
Mr. Bruce Collins at Custom Structural SteeL Visual welding inspection was conducted at the Roof Framing Plan level on the 'W' ASTM A325 High Strength beam to column bolted connections.
Bolted connections that apE to exist on this project require bolt tensioning to a "snug tight" condition as referenced in the AISC 9 Edition; Manual of Steel Construction. As a minimum,
10"/0 of all connections, but not less than two bolts per connection were inspected for proper bolt tension requirements as required for periodic inspection per Table 1704.3, Item 2.a
of the mc. Drawings utilized for inspection were provided by Red House Architecture in Glenwood Springs, CO: Job No. 0645 dated 5-7-10. Inspection was conducted at grid lines A -H &
I -8. Bolted connections inspected were observed to be adequately tensioned to project bolt tension requirements of snug tight. Visual welding inspection was conducted at the Foundation
Plan level on the field welded base plate on 1 each column: W6 X 25 at grid line H.3 & 4.7. COlurim was welded by certified welder Mr. Dean Wood with Custom Structural Steel. Inc. Base
plate weld was observed to be acceptable with \1'." fillet weld all the way around as required by shop fabrication drawings provided by Custom Structural Steel. Inc. L. Max:weM AWS CWI
#91040201 ICC Certified #0863569-S1 & S2 Thunder Mountain Testing SCOTT L M/.l'Wk. CWI 91040201 OC1 tIP. D.4I01/12
Permit Card Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 POST ON SITE Permit NO. BLRE-5-1
0-1548 Expires: 11/17/2010 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issu'ance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning. location;
construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning,
location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Residential Building Parcel #:239510109066 Owner's Name: Tim & Martha Rahmeier Owner's Phone: 970-945-8828 Job Address: HIDDEN VALLEY DR GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Total Square Feet: 3508.25
Contractor/s) Phone Primary Contractor Work Description: Single family dwelling on Koru (970)963-9389 Yes slab on grade with attached garage and covered patios. Inspection Scheduling
Code Foundation Walls Framing Drywall Final Mise Insulation Grout Mechanical UG Plumbing Rough Plumbing ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION
IS STARTED For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306
;(1!'7liI;tl/;/6 wACLho7!Z£5 ;--ccf-~/() 9w.KJr: uNo/c.;?" G-R.ou;r/Q :DueL 9 -CLf-/ttJ y.iU ~ -IV F'ioo R K£ PI.. ff tlf:. -IAIAiliJ& K!£ B?AX /V~( -/0 ~61./1/I-;:L(pcJ If... ;&11J~,V
T ;fl1;t:cl//O~£-/eJ ~ UUT iLL Of---/D/~~/6 ;$F ;go/LIZ/(. Hcrl! HI7c tf7~s;:t.{1V?-7/i::~/6)!( ,?:1:(Cl f£-L~C r· r:Aj~L cf l3-r--~?/(
TO: Koru Limited 417 Main Street Suite Y HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 1517 BLAKE AVE., SUITE 101 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 TELEPHONE (970) 945-8676 U FAX (970) 945-2555 DATE~:
___~ A~u~gu~s~t=20~,~2~0~1~0 ______ _ SUBJECT: Lot 66 Springridge Reserve Final Construction Plan Carbondale, CO 81623 JOB NO. __ -=2..:.;10::..:1'-"0..:.,14.:..:.0.::.;0"--____ _ ATIN:
Mike Chmura We are sending the following: o Photocopies 1:8] Prints o Documents o Mylars o Shop Drawings o Other ____________________________________ __________ _ NO. OF LATEST ITEM
ORIGINALS ITEM DATED 2 Final Construction Plan 8/20/10 Please notIfy us at once tfthe matenal receIved IS not hsted above. Transmitted by: o First Class Mail o U.S. Express Mail o UPS
Next Day Air ~ Messenger o Fax o Other ______ __ o Priority Mail o Federal Express o Pi ckup o Hand Deli vered Thank You: _-,T"h,",o-"-m",as,, ,J"".",S",c""ot",1 __ REMARKS
Growth HOlmooy "low Bc'B nnll 95 PERMIT CHANGE REQUEST RAHMEIER RESIDENCE PERMIT #BLRE-5-1 0-1548 8.25.10 We, K~ru Ltd, do hereby request the addition of two retaining walls to the scope
of permitted work at 0517 Hidden Valley Drive, Glenwood Springs, CO. 1. "L" shaped wall Northeast of house 2. Straight wall at Southeast corner of Garage please find attached two copies
of the following: 1) full landscape plan including the two highlighted retaining walls; and 2) stamped engineered plans for construction. Total estimated valuation of additional work
required for permit: $10000.00 Thank You Mike Chmura Project Manager (970) 618-2383
2-#5XCONT TOP ~ BOTTOM .ii-II , -:i ll-,I,I I, IIII"I I, I_II1"1 1,1_11,1 ,11 ,1_11,1 1,1 ,_111,11, 1 ,1 11 • • ~~i+-'f\ c \ ~<2-~T l S (el [CO ___________ ~T~~~A~L~L~~~ __ ----~ SEE
FLANV BRICK VENEER SEE ARCH BEAR ON 4" CMU BELO~ I/7l ~GRADE DRY STACK CMU I::L:LlIC' SOLID GROUTED ~ 8" ~ ~~~A~L~L~~t-. ____ ~~ FOUNDATION DRAIN SEE SOILS REPORT 11/2" I ~" 2'-0 -III
5 VERT ® 1.2"OC 5 HORIZ ® 16"OC 2 I_G{Il 5®1.2"OC c=)~~5~N~~:=E~~~A~L~L~D~E~T~A~I L~ _______________________ ___ Il!' ~ ~ 0 Of-' I(l)l mil!' IL
FOUNDATION DRAIN SEE SOILS REPORT _II 2-#5XCONT TOP. BOTTOM , 'i-fi, • • ~~+\-t1.,et ER-~ e:,{-q I \0 ------T ~ALL -=~=:=-:-:-(,A-------"I< SEE PLAN BRICK VENEER SEE ARCH BEAR ON 4"
CMU BELO~ I7/A ~6RADE DRY STACK CMU I:::LL:l V-SOLI D 6ROUTED ~ 8" ~ ~~~A~L=L~~.-. __ *~ I 112" I ~" 1'-4 " -II I • /x • •• • • 5 VERT @16"OC 5 HORIZ <§) 16"OC 5®16"OC -#5XCONT TFT6
$ SEE PLAN It ~ -\) -910() mit IL m () ~ -I I I • • :1 1:11:1 l A
I ' ~ LEGEND I EXISTING CONGRl H: ,XISTING ASI'HAL I FXISTING EDGE 01-PAVEMENT ------f XISTING BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING MA,IOR CONTOUR EXISTING MINOR CON IOUil ----EXISTING "NCE --9a'----<----0120--•
• • • • 18,33' SLOTIm 2" GRAT['~ _ 4" 2" -I ---I _2.55 vJIES If= VAI(IFS _ 4" MIN. 2...OL IS" MAX. I , -CONCReTE 2" CONCRETE PI~OUI f I"YP.S[CTI@N I ', N I ',. I PROPOSm CONCRE IE PROPOSED
ASloliAL I PROPOSED STRAW 8AII'$ IOROI'OSED SILT FLNCE PROPOSFD FLOW LINE PROpOSI Il MA,IOR CONTOUR PROPOSED MINOlx CON roUR IJlxOPOSED DRAIN ACE 1'11'1, f 12 ' ,G PROPOSeD I INISII
GRADE 1' 1 PROPOSED FLOW LINE liP pROpOSm IIiCH POINT IP pROpOSID lOW POINT " pROpOSCO IINISII I-LOOR lOS PROPOSED 101' 01· SLAB TW PROPOSED TOP OF EXPOSLD WALL nw PROPOSED BOrlOM EXPOSED
WALL 10 O!.o 10 2[) ~o VARIABLE QEPTH SLOTTED TRENCH DRAIN N 1 '_, ~;." -I-I--_I~~~~I IN I."I~E·J' ) 1 inch 10 fL 60" IWE L --12 ''.----36" --1/"-fiNISH I~ IP RAP GI"( AIJ[ ,I: 12" --r
20" era r ABRIC IINF I I NArIVE SOIL RIP RAP LINED S[ C liON A N I '. /SWALE A \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ r \ ,,, to '~ \ \ , /, NOTeS: 1. THI LOCA IIONS m UNDI RGIWUND UIiLl IH·S HAVI
B[I N PLOTTeD [3ASCO ON UTILITY MAPS, CONSTRUCTION PLANS. OllleR INfORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES, AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCArIONS IN SOM! INS 1ANCfS. 1111 SI UTILITies, AS SIIOWN,
MAY NOT R[PR[S[NT ACTUAL neLO CONDITIONS. IT IS nlE RESPONSIAll llY 01 tHE CONTRACtOR 10 CON I IIC I AI( UrIIl lY COMPANIES AND UNCC rm I IFlO lOCATION or UTILlTI[S PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2, ,I, 4. 5, 6. 7, 8. 9. \ ~ \ ~ \ ~ \ ~ FIN ISH Gt~AD I S IID,JACI Nt 10 ALL STI~UCTUR[S St IA!.L 13[ GRADeD IN ACCORDANCE WiTiI lHE G[oTECIINICAL [ NGINEeRS RECOMMENDA-IIONS. TilE
mOUND SURf IICI SlJRIWUNDING111I FX IERIOR 01 n If [HJII DING SII III L GE SLOPED TO DRAIN AWAY rORM tHE FOUNOAl"ION IN ALL DIRCC liONS. MINIMUM SLOPES StI AL!. BI 12 INCHES IN IHI·
t-1 1~SI 10 fEET IN UN PAVED /l1?I I'IS AND j INCH~_ S IN IHI ~1I~SI 10 I'rl I IN P/IV[[) AR[AS, Al l GI~AD I NG SIIAI I Elf PLRFORM[O ON CONfORMANCE Wrill SEr rOIHIl IN TI I[ GARrt[LD
COUNTY GRADING PU~ MI T I~LGULATI O N S. TOPOGRAPIIY AND PIWPCRTY BOUNDARY RI·CEIVED H~OM SIIANNON MU I~PliY LflNDSCAPE ARCH I II CIS. LANDSCAPING INFOI~MA I ION l ~rC[lVLD mOM SIIANNON
MURPIIY LANDSCAP[ ARCl-IIT[CT ARCHITECTURAL i.L[VATION 100' -0" 6480.00' RI. FrR TO smuc nmAI ENGINEERING PLANS BY Oilims mR fOUNDA nON DeTAILS AND SP[CtrICATIONS, R[feR TO STRUCTURAL
[NGIN[ERING PLANS BY OTHERS FOR I~I: TA INING WALL DETAILS AND SPEClrtCArIONS. RE-IAINING WAl l IOUNDAI'IONS IN SOMr CAses MAY l3i BE SlrUArm BrNLAlll VAI~IOU S SURrAC[ WATeR SOURCES
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: DRAINAGF SWALES, DITCH[S, IRRIGATION SPRINKLEI~S, CHANNELS, WAIER rLA l lJR[S AND fOUNTfIINS. AS SUCH, RrrAINING WALL fOUNDATIONS MUST B[ DESIGNED TO WITH
STAND SATtJRA -IEO suo SURFACE CONDITIONS. THE 1:.Ff eCTS Of WI IICIi MAY INCLUDE: IIYDROCOMPACTION, II[A\ltNG, AND OR S[TTLEM[N r. "IIIf LOCA liONS, SLOPLS AND D[P 1 I IS or TI-I[ PROPosm
ROOf D I~AINS, DOWN SPOUTS ANI) DISCIIARC[ LINES SHALL O[ f iELD AOJUS1ED AS NFCESSARY TO ACIIiEVE POSITIVI: DRAINAGE AWAY mOM THE BUilDING IOUNDAriON. AU10 COURl -1 0 (Il II '-"1> -J
-1> '-"J \ CONCI,[l Ie SLi'-B 15. ( , //,0' 1J,S' .~,o' I G:64//,4 "~ ., " < ~ PA110 I I I,. \ r I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I '--____ I, I I :1'\~~1 "-I I I I I I , I I,' 0 Ie ~ .,.,
(/v /v /r v I v I v L I JA v I ,-'w;, v V> /,Q ; r · v I v /v /, /'\, Tke5G fl.WI~1 1.1 W/U, f y Aunwtp-01~ tit S/r11'6 It fP,ZQ]J1' 01 {;-t [ se f-of pl-fl.1 $ f..,y I~r r APPROV~I)
,~JUn.'£(T TO NOn',j , RX('t:I"'noN.~ ~~ lNSJ'H ,n~J'-1 GAl1FI',,1,[l ;'ClUi'ITy IlUILO)i'iG llEI'f"I1~vfl:N'r D-•• <z;.7/~ ~, /t.;:' . F 1,;LD ('01''1' NO !I~SJ'FCTlON 'Nrri!(H I' THI':
~:<. I'LIt '4~ : ()~l '...:rn'" "I 101< AND ON BEHAI I-01 IIiGII COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. r m z o iIi > III cr W 1-~ o z • U -Z 0 0 « 0: 0 ..J 00 Wu I-, 2~ ..JZ ::J::J 0:0 Ou :-.'0
..J W LL 0: « 1.:) IIJ . l!) , -O . 0:: : l!) ' Z l -0:: D. Ul . 10 10 l-0 .J I'I"<OJE:Cl 210101, GR-o