HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.pdfGarfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address 000289 MAROON DR GLENWOOD SPRINGS,
CO Owner Information Parcel No. 218527316038 Address 2150 BOE CR Subdivision FOUR MILE RANCH SUB Lawrence James Rennie Thousand Oaks CA 91362 Section Township Phone Cell 805-52-4360
Contractor(s) Phone Primary Contractor Required Inspections: Range ..•. .:.K.::I::.om:.::::h=a.::us=-=&cW:-=-a=:I"le::r_ •..... •..... _ J.ll70j618·4~ _ ••..•..... _ •. !!'s_ .. _ ..
_. __ ._....... Fo, '",wtio", e,lI, 1 (888 )868-5306 Proposed Construction f Details Finish basement, add lower deck, increase upper deck. Valuation: Total Sq Feet: Plan Check Fee -Basement
Conyers! Residential Building Fee $100.00 $472.05 $572.05 Inv # BLRE-6-1 0-20327 $ 572.05 Total: Check # 9276 Check # 9275 $ 32,941.36 827 $472.05 $100.00 $ 0.00 Inspection IVR ~~~e.!::"_"~_
.. _,~,,, ____ .. ~ _J 05 11!L IMPORTANT: APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR A PERMIT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ON THIS APPLICATION AND
THE FOLLOWING: Applicant Copy 1" Final inspection of the work authorized by this permit is required. A Certificate of Occupancy must be obtained prior to use and occupancy of new buildings,
structures and remodeling work. This permitlplan review expires by time limitation and becomes null and void if the work authorized by the permit is not commenced within 180 days from
the date of permit Issuance or jf the permit Is not obtained within 180 days from the date of plan submittal. This permit expires and becomes nul! and void If any work authorized by
this permit Is suspended or abandoned for 180 consecutive days or If no progressive work has been verified by passing a required County Inspection for a period of 180 consecutive days.
Friday, July 2,2010 1
2 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION !O8 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-82121 Fax: 970-384-34701 Inspection Linc: 970-384-5003 www.garfield-county.com
Parcel No: (this infonnation is available at the assessors office 970-945-9134) '1-1 @>"1-7 '$ f bO 3&3 3 Lot No: "'7 B Block No: J • ~ Subd.1 Exemption: 4 f-{~ k." 7Ca.v1. ~ 4 5 Mailing
Address: /1. fJ Ph;, 70 r (fl ,{<J.G AIJ,..!?,h: . \7.0" p:>1.-, ::-lwi 6J I bo\ -, ',,,,,, '1'I:l1!.. .-r-ete-6 Architect f Eng~~eer: 1:> ().A..JI.-ILA JA--o{) Mailing Address: '" Ph:
a r-ql Alt Ph: ~ WJ(.fJ 0;10 r It{" .rol'S 7 Height: No. of Floors: 8 Use of Building: 9 Desctibe Work: 10 Addition Class of Work: • aNew o Alteration Jl Garage: Septic: ...., I t>r
,-d'Attached o Detached olSDS o Community 12 Driveway Permit: Owners valuation of Work: NOTICE Authority. This application for a Building Permit must be signed by the Owner of the property,
described above, or an authorized agent. If tile signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application.
Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Depanment Other Permits. Multiple
separate permits may be required: (1) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Perm.it, (3) another pennit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway!
Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authoriz.ed is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance
and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICA nON I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information contained
above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals),
based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the slJbminals and approval of this Application, a Building Pennit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner,
to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance ofthc Building Permit, I agree that I and
my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state Or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations
(County Regulation(s»). I acknowledge that the Building Pennit may be sllspended or reVOked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s) and
facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enler the property,
described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Building Official from: (l) requiring the correction of errors
in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any
other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability
by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, J acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, state and local Jaws and County Regulations rest with
me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my architect designer, engineer and! or builder. I HEREB;)t;~THA(f0~Z: AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTI~ &,C;R;F:~T;N ABOVE OWN RlS SIGNATURE
DATE STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: I Plan Che~k.F.ee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: '3;< 1lfl.3 b '00 tf7~, M-, I\\CO . -ISDSFee: Total Fees: Fees Paid:
Balance Due: BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: 57Z. 05 ICD. 00 472-. 05 -\lQI~ -Setbacks: ,-OCC Group:/Z CODSt Type: ..r;z::. B ZomDF50: S /bi? -Nt. ope/Of, pUO -:3 ~LDGDEPT:
, PLNGDEPT: '1~:7~ 7/t)/) t!!Zbaa~ ~~ "ROVAL DATE' APPROVAL DATE I
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned
by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the stmctnre and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior
doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold mnning water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove
and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold mnning water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and
privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all mc and lRC requirements including
gnardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating
circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department
for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, andJor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (e.O.) WILL NOT BE
ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A e.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUpy OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY
OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by
the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a e.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE Bapplicationdecember2007
VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Lawrence Rennie Subdivision 4 Mile Ranch Address 289 Maroon Dr GWS LotIBloek Lot 38 Date 7/112010 Contractor Klombouse & Waller Pete Finished !Livable
Area}: Main sq.1t Upper sq.1t Lower sq.1t Other sq.1t X $74.68 Total Square Feet o sq.1t Valuation 0.00 Basement: Unfinished sq.1t X $41.00 Conversion of Unfinished to Finished 827 sq.ft
X $33.68 Total Valuation 27,853.36 Garage: sq.ftX $18.00 Carport: sq.1t X $12.00 Total Valuation' 0.00 Crawl Space sq.1t X $9.00 Total Valuation 0.00 Decksl Patios Covered sq.1t X $24.00
Open 424 sq.ft X $12.00 Total Valuation 5,088.00 Commercial Type of Construction: Occupancy: sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Valuation 0.00 Total Valuation 32,941.36
Building Plan Review Description of Work: Finish basement. add lower deck. increase upper deck. Bin#: Location Address: 000289 MAROON DR GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Case Manager: David Bartholomew
Plan Case Number: BLDG-6-10-6484 Parcel: 218527316038 Application Date: 06130/2010 tJ/Ii Engineered Foundation /V/Ii Driveway Permit /Surveyed Site Plan 011-Septic Permit and Setbacks
./GradefTopography 30% V Attach Residential Plan Review List a/Minimum Application Questionnare V' Subdivision Plat Notes fI/(I! Fire Department Review /Valuation Determination/Fees
/Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker V Attach Conditions 1/, Application Signed t/Plan Reviewer To Sign Application V Parcel/Schedule No. 114 40# Snowload Letter -Manu. Homes /Soils Report
Contacts Owner: Lawrence James Rennie Applicant: Lawrence James Rennie Applicant Phone: 805-52-4360 Email: PlanninglZoning _--!t/~_ _p roperty Line Setbacks ./30ft Stream Setbacks ~F1oodP""
_____ Building height _--"t/';....._-'zOning Sign-off _-,-(lJ,-I-,ri..!..'4',--_Road Impact Fees __ M,.!.1_" __ HOAlDRC Approval /___ .....;.._GradefTopography 40% ,/_____ Planning Issues
i/------SSubdivision Plat General Comments: Vt'//tu/l.?JII: 5;(, 9'11.3 b ~1'1#11/ee <r'7.:l_ tJ,;F ,'2+tClW!Ce -3d6~9J I ?R5/.d -? lS. n /tflt/__ /p-o. t?'6 ~ .6 7fJ, B'gc 472-.. Dro
June 22, 2010 To: From: Subject: Garfield County Building Department Attn: David Bartholomew Fax No. 970-384-3470 Lawrence Rennie, Owner Fax No. 805-529-2317 Project to Finish Lower
Level of House 289 Maroon Drive, Glenwood Springs, CO Please consider this email your notification that Peter Waller ofKlomhaus and Waller, Inc. is acting as our agent for the project
to finish the lower level and deck extension at our house at 289 Maroon Drive, Glenwood Springs, CO. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to call me at 805-529-4360. Owner: _~~~/.",,'4f...£"""'::::~~-=-" ,.-!-72~'-f?"-.:.!.'1-'-~-,-==. Lawrence Rennie
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED
BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a pennit application and expedite the issuance of a penn it it is important that complete infonnation be provided.
When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the pennit issuance and in proceeding with
building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this infonnation before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given
attention before the new infonnation may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED
FOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also,
please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants
requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to detennine compliance with the building, plumbing and
mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed
checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the
finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the boltom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor
joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule.
A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be . designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind
exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted
must be in compliance with the 2003 IRC, and 2006 IECe. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines
from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater
must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed
building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built
within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a . copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure
located within ths,envelope. Yes_->lL<-__ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03
in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. 1.!)..r. Yes t-'\ 3. Does the
site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties
, streams or water courses? Yes AI 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property?; Yes ____ _ 2
5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and! or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. NO _,/___ 6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of
a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private
easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a pennit from the federal government or any combination. You
can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other agencieJ Yes _ -,v,-__ 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing
of all reinforcing steel in accordare with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes tJ Ii 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor
crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood a;;rd earth? Yes No ___"' __ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces
and soffits? Yes, ____ _ 10. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet
above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? I Cl.-Yes fl '\ 11. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? l Yes f'1
f>( 12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters 0 . oists or trusses? Yes _ J.Y.--P<--__ 13. Does the building
section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns aneteams? Yes ______ _ 14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed
addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roon (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25
feet) Yes aJ Lit 3
(9. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and modela¥ Co lorado Phase II certifications or phase II EP A certifIcation?
Yes Ii _ No ______ _ 16. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? /Yes ______ No __---'V_ ___ rG Does the PlanJ7ns
'l ude a window schedule or other verification that egresslrescue windows from V sleeping roo s and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes __ .:!-__ _ 18. Does the
plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for)lll habitable rooms? Yes __ --',;'c-__ 19. Do the plans indicate the location
of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass
doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes'/No -------20. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces,
boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? I Yes N (.f 21. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel ofland created by the exemption process or the subdivision process,
are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes /~ Do you ~nde~stand that.if?,ou belong to a H?n:eow?ers A~sociation (HOA): i: is you; responsibil.ity to obtam
wntten permIssIon from the assoclatlOn, If reqUIred by that aSSOCIatIOn, pnor to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without
it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if
the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation oysubstantial modification of the plans. Yes .v' 23. Will this
be the 091y residential structure on the parcel? . Yes V No Ifno-Explain: _____ _ 24. Have two (2;;omplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes ____
_ 4
25. Do you under~d that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes, _____ _ 26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building
and other construction code requiremer Yes ' 27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? /Yes ______ _ 28.
Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfielc} County Building Department? Yes __--"-_/_ 29. Do you understand
that approval for design andJor construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes ---/--30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect
a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impas;t" or "Septic System" fees required,
at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes --'-./---31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order
to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. /Yes v' No ____ _ 32.
Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-i",ection fee? Yes _____ _ 33. Are you aware that you are required to
call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? /Yes _____ _ 5
34. Are you aware that the Pennit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority heing given for an}4ent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with
the IRC? Yes ____ _ 35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perfonn installations and hookups, unless you as the
homeowner are perfonning the work? The license number of the person perfonning the work will be required at time of applicable inspectiog./Yes ______~ v_' ____ 36. Are you aware, that
on the front of the Building Pennit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this penni! on prior to submittal of a building pennit
fliplication? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ______II "_ __ 37. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues?
/Yes , (please check with the building department about this requirement) 38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuanc?
a building pennit that you will be required to obtain a grading pennit? Yes ______ _ 39 . Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the
tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate pf Occupancy? Yes ___-'._t ___ 40. If you anticipate obtaining a
water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building pennit application will be accepted without such a letter.
f "-Yes tJln I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability.~... ~ --h((), I ~lh\J ~ ~ ~ 030-(0 Signature of Owner Phone: __1o
_1_'6_,_tf_G_4_,_ I....---_(days); 6 Date ___'_~c_._. _____, (evenings)
Project Name: _---'12t=-'~V\_<l_'_"'_1e ,___'___~-'-_______ ,_-------Project Address: ___~--,----,<1,---,Jv~l:b.ro:.-.. (J_O_1I\_~"--',-'_ ____~ ______ Notes: If any required information
is missing delays in issuing the pennit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a pennit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional infonnation
is necessary to review the application and plans to detennine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building pennits
in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or
delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreqsfMar2009 7
Permit Card Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Stree~ Suite401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 POST ON SITE Permit NO. BLRE-6-1
0-1618 Expires: 12/29/2010 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location;
construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning,
location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELV BECOME NULL AND YOlO,
Residential Building Parcel #:218527316038 Owner's Name: Lawrence James Rennie Owner's Phone: 805-52-4360 Job Address: 000289 MAROON DR GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Total Square Feet: 827 Contractor{sl
Phone Primary Contractor Work Description: Finish basement, add Klomhaus & Waller (970)618-4892 Ves lower deck, increase upper deck. Inspection Scheduling Code Footers Foundation Walls
t I'~F~r~am~in~g ______ ~ _____________ __ Drywall Final Mise Insulation Grout Mechanical UG Plumbing 'I Rough Plumbing if Gas i£ L [CJ; fC--[. ~ . ,c:AfilL ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAV
BE REQUIRED POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306
Hepworth.Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 Coun!)' Rood 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945.7988 Fax: 970-945·8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com PRELIMINARY SUBSOIL STUDY PROPOSED
RESIDENCES LOTS 34 TO 39, 41 AND 42 4 MILE RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 104 257 APRIL 29, 2004 PREPARED FOR: ROOD CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MARK PRZYBYLSKI 0132 PARK AVENUE BASALT,
COLORADO 81621 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF S1UDY .........•..........................•.........•..•...........•.•...........• -I -PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...••....•.•...........•................•..•.••.•..•
.....•.........•.................. -I -SITE CONDITIONS •..............•••...•......•...•.•....••................•...............•...•......................... -2 -SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL
......................................................................................... -2 -FIELD EXPLORATION ........................................ , ............................................
............ -2-SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... -3 -PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................
................. -3 -FOUNDATIONS ................................. ; ....................................................................... -4-FLOOR SLABS ................................
: ......................................................................... -4 -UNDERDRAIN SySTEM ..........................................................................................
-4 -SITE GRADING ......................................................................................................... -5-SURFACE DRAINAGE ........................................................
..................................... -5-LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... -5-FIGURE 1 -LOCATION
OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 through 7-SWEIL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 8 -GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY
OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary subsoil study for proposed residences to be located on Lots 34 to 39, 41 and 42, Four Mile Ranch, Garfield
COlmty, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop reCQmmendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with
our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Rudd Construction, dated April 2, 2004. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory pits was conducted to obtain . information
on the subsurface conditions •. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell
and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for project planning and preliminary design.
This report summarizes the data obtained during this stody and presents our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed development and subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT A single family residence is proposed on each of the subject lots roughly in the area of the exploratory pits shown on Figure I. The proposed residences will consist of two
story, wood frame structures over a walkout basement level with an attached garage. Basement and garage floors will be slab-on-grade. Cut depths are assumed to range between 4 to 10
feet below the original ground surface. We expect relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If development plans change significantly from those
described, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Job No. 104 2S1
-2-SITE CONDITIONS The subject lots are located in the northern part of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision near the Maroon Drive cul-de-sac. A water storage tank fur the subdivision is
located along the uphill side of Lots 35 and 36. The naturaI topography in the area consists of a broad northerly trending ridge. The ground surface in the building areas is relatively
flat and mostly moderately sloping down to the west. Steeper slopes are located west of the building areas of Lots 38, 39, 41 and 42. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds with sage
brush. Maroon Formation bedrock is visible on nearby hillsides. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision.
These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits
associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lots. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized
subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area ~fthe subject lots. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materialJ; however, the exploratory pits were
relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop.
The risk offuture ground subsidence on Lot 34 to 39, 41 and 42 througllont the service life of the proposed res.idences, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware
of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field
exploration for the project was conducted on April 5, 2004. Eigllt exploratory pits (one per lot) were excavated at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions.
The pit locations were based on the proposed house locations Job No. 104 257
-3-provided to us. The pits were dug with a Case 580 4x4 backhoe. The pits were logged by a representative ofiIepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with
relatively uudisturbed and disturbed sampling methods. Depths at which the samples were taken are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Pits, Figure 2. The samples were retumed to our laboratory
for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDmONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encouutered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The ~bsoils were variable
and generally consisfof about Y. to 1 foot of topsoil overlying a mixture of clay, sand and rock: fragments. Typically, the soils encouutered in the upper, eastem part of the site (Pits
5 to 8) were more fine-grained than those in the western lower part of the site (pits 1 to 4). Laboratorytestfug performed on samples obtained from the pits included natural moisture
content, density and gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undistorbed samples, presented on Figures 4 through 7, indicate low compressibility
uuder existing moisture conditions and light loading, and generally low expansion/collapse potential after wetting. In general, the samples showed low to moderate compressibility with
increased loading after wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on a bulk sample (minus 6 inch :fraction) of the natoral coarse granular soils are shown on Figure 8. The laboratory
testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encouutered in the pits at the time of excavation and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the proposed development, subsurface conditions encouutered in the exploratory pits, and our experienee in the area.
The recommendations are suitable fur planning and preliminary Job No. 104 257
-4-design, but additional site specific studies should be conducted prior to building constrnction. For the proposed construction, these studies can probably consist of observing the
completed foundation excavation prior to placement of concrete. FOUNDATIONS Bearing conditions will vary depending on the specific lot. Based on the nature of the proposed construction,
spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils should be suitable at the building sites. We expect the fOotings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,500
psfto 3,000 psf. Expansive clays encountered in building areas may need to be removed or the footings designed to impose a minimum dead load pressure to limit potential heave. Nested
boulders and collapsible soils may need treatment such as enlarging footings or placing compacted fill or concrete backfill. Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies
and to resist lateral earth loadings when ~g as retaining structures. Below grade areas and retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by installing an
underdrain system. The footings should bave a minimum depth of 42 inches for frost protection. FLOOR SLABS SIab-on-grade construction should be feasible for bearing on the naturaI soils
below any topsoil. There could be some post construction slab movement at sites with collapsible matrix or expansive clays, especially if the snbgrade is wetted. To reduce the effects
of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due
to shrinkage cracking. A minimum 4 inch thick layer offree-draining gravel should underlie basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not
encountered in the exploratory pits, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff An underdrain
system should be provided to protect Job No. 104 257
-5-below-gmde construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup. The drains should consist of drainpipe surrounded above
the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent fmish grade and sloped at a minimum
1 % to a suitable gmvity outlet. srrn GRADING The risk of c()nstruction-induced slope instability at the lots appear low provided the buildings are located in the area of the exploratory
pits as planned and cut and fill depths are limited. Cut depths for the building pads and driveway access should not exceed about 10 feet Fills should be limited to about 10 feet deep.
Structoral fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to :fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully
prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil. The fill should be benched into the portions of the lots exceeding 20% grade. The on-site soils excluding oversized rock and topsoil
should be suitable for use in embankment :fills. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation,
rock riprap or other means. SURFACE DRAINAGE The gmding piao for the lots should consider runoff from uphill slopes throughout the subdivision. Water should not be allowed to pond which
could impact slope stability and foundations. To limit infiltration into the bearing soils next to buildings, exterior backfill should be well compacted and have a positive slope away
from the building for a distance of 10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the liruits of all backfiII and landscape irrigation may need to be restricted at
some sites. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty
either express or Job No. 104 257
APPROXIMATE SCAl£ ,. = 60' I I ./....././6190/LOT 36 LOT ~ ....-....-""....-617{{ 61sO" I \ ,.....-.... --" -.-....-....-...../LOT 32 .-/' /' ./LOT 31 --I 6170 I I 6160 .-...-".. I /'
...... /-...-.--/' --~.--L-OT -39-~ ---.--..--...----.:..--.-----LO-T 4-3 LOT ~2 LOT ~1 LOT~ 61~ , 6130 ...-.--6120 ; ...-; -6110 ..... -__ 6100 .--.--( ./6090 LOT /' ./....-.--.6-080
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 104 257 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. lOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 1
o 5 10 o -.... .... 5 -.<: .a.. c 10 104 257 PIT 1 LOT 42 EI.EV.=6132' PIT 5 LOT 37 EI.EV.=6156' -_7.3 PIT 2 LOT 41 EI.EV.=6133' PIT 6 LOT 36 ELEV.=6166' _7.4 0-20-01101-39 . PIT 3 LOT
39 EI.EV.=6116' PIT 7 LOT 35 ELEV.=6191' _6 00-88 -200a93 PIT 4 LOT 38 ELEV.=6135' PIT 8 LOT 34 EI.EV.=6176' _,5.3 00-107 Note: Explanation of s)mbols is shown on Figure 3. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS o 5 10 o l.i. .... 5 :S c~ 10 Figure 2
LEGEND: TOPSOIl; sandy sHty cloy. organic. firm. moist, dark brown. CLAY (CL); slightly sandy to sandy. sHty. medium stlff to stiff. moist, reddish brown. SAND AND CLAY (SC-CL); graWUy.
very stiff/medium dense, slightly moist to moist, light brown ta reddish brown. coIcoreous. BASALT GRAVEl.. AND COBBlES (CL-Ge); in a sandy sHty clay matrix, less matrix/more rock at
Pit 4. very stiff/medium dense, slightly moist to moist. light brown to reddish brown. ~ Z' Diameter hond driven liner sample. r -: Disturbed bulk sample. --' NOlES: 1. Exploratory pits
were excavated on AprU 5. 2004 with a Case 580 backhoe. 2. locations af elCplorotory pits were measured opproxitnately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations
of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolatlon between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the
degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material t:;pes and transitions may be
gradual. 6. No free water was encountered In the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. loborotory Testing Results: we = water Content ( "
) DO = Dry Density ( pef ) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 104 257 HEPWORTH -PAWlAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3
Moisture Content -17.8 percent Dry Density = 111 pef ~ Sample of: Sondy Cloy c: From: Pit 1 at 1.5 Feet ~ 1 6 l!-Id I 0 ...... ~ r-"'r-. ~ ~ ""-OJ 1 .f. . Expansion E upon 0 wetting
0 2 3 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPUED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 10.0 percent Dry Density = 94 pef Somple or. Slightly Sandy Cloy From: Pit 1 at 3 Feet 0 ae 1 ""---t-"-Compression c: " upon
~.. 2 wetting f ... \ ~ 0 3 \ 4 0.1 1.0 10 APPUED PRESSURE -ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH PAWlAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. SWELL-CONSOUDATION TEST -RESULTS Figure 4
Moisture Content = 9.8 percent 0 Dry Density = 76 pet Sample or. Sandy Cloy From: Pit 2 at 4 Feet 1 rat 2 :--.. Compression '" "-upon .2 3 wetting VI .. ~ '\ Q. 8 4 \ 5 1\ 6 1\ 7 0.1
1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 17.2 percent Dry Density = 92 pet Sample or. Sond ond Cloy (matrix) From: Pit 3 at 4.5, Feet 0 "'-I-.... :--. at 1 c " No movement
0 1'\ upon OeJ wetting 2 Q, '\ 8 3 i\ 4 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL-CONSOUDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5
Moisture Content =-7.3 percent Dry Density -95 pet Sample of: Sandy Cloy From: Pit 5 at 6 Feet 0 K 1 I '" Compression upon 2 wetting "-" § 0 :5 " ~ 4 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPUED PRESSURE -ksf
Moisture Content = 17.4 percent Dry Density = 103 pet Sample of: Slightly Sandy Cloy From: Pit 6 at 2.5 Feet 0 --.... r-. .... K 1 r-..... c ~ No movement ~ r\ upon ~ 2 wetting "-§ 0
:5 4 0.1 1.0 10 APPUED PRESSURE -ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. SWEll-CON SOU DATION TEST RESULTS Figure 6
Moisture Content -20.6 percent Dry Density = 88 pef Sample of: Slightly Sandy Cloy From: Pit 7 at 3 Feet 114: 0 c:: ~ 1 ........ ~ co f " No movement Q. upon § 2 wetting 0.1 1.0 10 100
APPUB> PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 15.3 percent Dry Density = 107 pet Sample of: Sandy Cloy From: Pit 8 at 5.5 Feet 114: ~ c:: 0 0 ~ 0--c w" ""-" I 1 c:: Exponsloti , ..2,. upon
f 2 wetting Q. E 0 0 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPUB> PR£SSURE -ksf 104 257 HEPWORTH PAWlAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL-CONSOUDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 7
•• .. 30 .0. . 40 ;r; .~.. II: I-S> ~ I..I.: "-.. ,., .. .. toO 104257 .00 70 ... (!) z B! a-<.. 00 l-.Z.. . U ... .I.I.: "-30 .. to • DIAMElER OF PARllClES IN MIWMElERS ~~~~ GRAVEL
39 % SAND 32 % SILT AND CLAY 29 % UQUID UMIT PLASllClTY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Clo}leY Sand and GrmreJ HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. FROM: Pit 4 at 5 to 6 Feet GRADA l10N TEST RESULTS
Figure 8
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 lob No. 104 257 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPU: LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG UMlTS UNCONFINED Pit Depth MOISTURE
DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING UQUIO PI.ASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL No. CONreNT DENSITY NO. 200 UMlT INDEX STRENGTH (%) (%) TYPE SIEVE (ft) (%) (Dd') . 1%1 (%1 (PSFI 1 1~ 17.8 111 Sandy clay 3 10.0
94 93 Slightly sandy clay 2 4 9.8 76 77 Sandy clay 3 4~ 17.2 92 Sand and clay (matrix) 6 7.0 102 48 Clayey silt and sand 4 5 to 6 39 32 29 Clayey sand and gravel . 5 6 7.3 95 Sandy clay
6 2Y. 17.4 103 94 Slightly sandy clay 7 3 20.6 88 93 Slightly sandy clay 8 SY. 15.3 107 Sandy clay
(:~d)tech HEPWORTH ·PAWLAK GIWTECHNICAL June 17, 2004 Rudd Construction Attn: Mark Przybylski 0132 Park Avenue Basalt, Colorado 81621 H~pworth .. Pawlak Geotechnical. Inc. 5020 CoUnty
Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Co1otado 81601 Phone: 970-945·7988 Fax: 970-945·8454 email: hpgeo®hpgeotech.com Job No. 104257 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot
38, 4 Mile Rauch, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Przybylski: As requested, a representative of Hepworth· Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on
June 14, 2004 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously
performed a preliminary subsoil study for Lots 34 to 39, 41 and 42 and presented our findings in a report dated April 29, 2004, Job No. 104257. The proposed residence will consist of
a two story wood frame structure over a walkout basement level. The attached garage and basement floors will be slab-on-grade. Spread footings sized for an allowable soil bearing pressure
of2,500 were assumed in the design. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in three levels from 2Yz to 6 feet below the alljacent ground surfuce.
The footings and foundation walls were in-p1ace at the titrie of our observation. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation adjacent the foundation consisted of basalt gravel,
cobbles and small boulders in a sandy silty clay matrix. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. A pit excavated on Lot 38 as part
of our preliminary study encountered similar soils to the excavated depth of 7 feet The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on
the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of2,500 psf; Other recommendations presented in our previous report which
are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous
preliminary stody. This study Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989
Rudd Construction June 17, 2004 Page 2 is based on the assumption that soils beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may
be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions
for possible changes to reconunendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants
(MOBC) developiDg in the future. If the client is concemed about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further
assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTII -PAWLAK GEOTCHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E. Rev. by: DEH JZA/ksw Job No. 104 257
Sep.30.2010 11:59 AM J&J Engineering 18055292317 PAGE. 1/2 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET TO: Andy Schwaller, Garfield County Lawrence Rennie, 1 80S 52<; 4360 COMPANY! (;arficld County
<) no /20W flAX NUMBER: TOTAl, NO. OF PA('H'.5, INCUJD!NG covl.m: 1 9703843470 P110Nll NtJ.'IlliUR.: SllNDEK'S IIH'ONE NUMBER. 1 970 945 8212 8055294360 RE· YOlm Rfl.Fl'IJU~NCE NlJM1~nRi
U tililj sink o URGENT 0 l'OR REVIEW X PLUl\$E (:<)MM£N'l' X PLEJ\SB l~E)lLY o PLEA.S}? RHCYCI.I<, Andy, Attached is the Utility sink we would like to use in our wet bar downstairs.
The small sink would sure make it very useful as an ice bucket while leaving the bigger part or the sink open for water access, dirty glasses/dish rinse oIl' and washing. Pete Waller
our contractor asked me to remind you that the permit tor our downstairs remodeling project was taken out betore the wet bar code was changed to specify maximum sink dimensions so hopefully
we are OK. Thanks, Larry Rennie, 1 805 529 4360 Project Address: 289 Maroon Drive, Glenwood Springs, CO, 81601 () . (( . cJ I{-N fU1t.
Se~.30.2010 12:00 PM J&J Engineering 18055292317 PAGE. 2/2 ME RFECT NoV'! .. QI2,m.Ll.J1;h'_~Lii.Y.V.~.~:!.h. 1:,:J:J6Q:~50-3999 NANTUCKET SINKS NS2620 Was: $411,70 Your Price: $288,19
You save:30% § PRINT PAGE Availability: This item is in stock & usually ships samelnext day Oty: 1 \i ADD TO CART T 0 Chec~ Re~L:ri!J1e Stock Availability Please Click 1j.~!!1 FedEx
Ground E~lim~ljj'!;\.Relivery Time Chart image shown may differ from actual product appearance especially finish and color. Perfect mini double sink combo for youU!\ill1I(.jlnd garbage
disposal needs. Small D-shape bowl as well as • small garbage disposal sink,Crafted from 304""11'fj);iuge Slainle •• Steel with a satin finish. Nantucket Sink. are sprayed with a special
insulation to reduce condensation. Rubber padding is applied for noise reduction. 'Grids available for almost all sink bowls, some exceptions exist'Overall Dimensions UR: 25.5 rronUback
20 Inside Bowl Dimensions 17 314 x 16 Big Bowl 11 314 x 6116 Small Bowi Bowi Depth U9 SIS 118 . ' .. 1 1 51 !JI~ (,-:I:. :()1H'II-L 8M-" L +",-r TH';:' -, t OfjJL 1J~ 71J ,",' 1
Account Page 1 of 1 Account: R006393 ,~~_c.a~_i,on ........................................................................... O""ner .. I.nformation Assessment History Parcel Number
2185-273-16-038 Situs Address 000289 MAROON DR City Glenwood Springs ZipCode 81601 Tax Area 008 -1 G-DF -008 Legal Summary Section: 27 Township: 6 Range: 89 Subdivision: FOUR MILE RANCH
SUB Lot: 38 Transfers Sale Price $525,000 Tax History Tax Year Taxes '""W"'""",""."'''" _ ,~~,,~.'","M ",,"."'",,""~~'u~~~~.~~"" *2010 $3,344.44 2009 $3,344.44 * Estimated Owner Name
RENNIE, LAWRENCE JAMES & GLORIA JANICE Owner Address 2150 BOE CR THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91362 Actual (2010) $725,980 Primary Taxable $57,790 Tax Area: 008 Mill Levy: 57.8720 Type Actual Assessed
Acres Units Improvement $480,980 $38,290 1.000 Land $245,000 $19,500 3.527 Sale Date 02/06/2006 09/09/2004 09/08/2004 09/08/2004 Doc Type SWD EAS DR PC Book Page B: 1770 P: 695 B: 1621
P: 126 B: 1621 P: 96 B: 1620 P: 802 Images • Photo • Sketch • GIS https:l!act.garfield-county .com/assessor/taxweb/account.jsp?accountNum=R0063... 6/30/2010