HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.pdfGarfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address Parcel No 1 CR 315 217715100054
RiFLE, CO 81650-a wner I nfo rmar I on Add ress Rivers Edge, llC PO Box 1556 Rifle CO 81650 Contractorls) Phone Proposed Construction I Details Portable scale house on concrete foundation
-Scott Gravel Pit Location FEES DUE FEES PAID Fee Amount InvTotal PemlitNO. BLCO-3.-:11~1950 Pennit Type: Cornmercial Building Walk Classilication:. New Penni/Status: Active Issue Date:
4/20/2011 Expires: 10/17/2011 Subdivision MCLEARNS ORCHARD LANDS Ph Primary Contractor Valuation: Total Sq Feet: $ 18,122.00 200 Paytype Amt Paid Amt Due Doe Section Township Range Ce
I I Required inspections: F.,'",pOO"OO"'''' 1 (888)868-5306 Inspection IVR See Permit Record Commercial Building Fee Plan Check Fee $307.25 $199.71 $506.96 Inv # BLCD-3·11-20894 Building
Department $ 506.96 Credit Card $108.71 Copy Total: $ 398.25 Wednesday, April 20, 2011 2
/)lJ\(I ' 1\ , \O~ d9\ /j0f0~h ~~0t '2:i,u/Uoz :,)d '.1 ISlIO,) g:::2t 09bl-:,)JI~ O Pll lI SS I )'" n,\ SOSI :,) )1: (1 ,"l ns"l 11"" U\ ,IH : ~,)J.:.I ,lS! I" :;'1".:1 ,1 lU(Hlll tllq,
/3 J_\GI\ ,\(Hld,l\ /;/h0f ~L r&~"J,, n'jU'/fH :d ll() .l~ ,) ,-:>0 : ~ ~1,l l~q l ;'1S O()( S ' 00/21 ' 001;:J /) /g 9 -S7! '862. ;;'I IIO ,l,) lllql:H IL'~ t :P!"d S,l J :! CJI; '
9 0S :~J,l J 11:11) ,1, S'1.~o£ I L 'bb I -22/'81 :.)J.1 I!HLlJJ :,l')~1 ~p.1 ll.) 1I1:ld : 1I 0!l I~ np,, \ p J I'l.II!P\ :SUO!l!IHlO:J 11!!:'IJJ s A.!\O .J.Sl.:1.1V'lS , d)-t~G51 \II")1J
~ .,.. ' ~J-.)f: 1~ \ I -O'€-I'l <\<;:\ H:,.'Q)O I 'It I)J1J I'£. -:::>0 "d ]J, \ --(1 //-5? -£: ! \l lli\ 'OU\ ,)Li lJ,lCO :\, ~O JJ()' '!lll (!"\JS ~ :IU'\ -j(]\\ (1\ 'l ~ i \ \ I
J,'t:f.t' .... r ;.' .~ \Ui~.!; \W U('llrllltill :lit"P; I ;;Wl'l1j.'UI ,,,,t:.';':\ !,.vuPlpm IU pIt! .'~ll It:l I' 1'.~; '-I'''lll'P;;:.'~ ';\(\11<' I p,n ~ 111:1 P',1D, plil .':1'
:' ·P',I.)I'.'.1 11" I .... ,~\I;'qd!!ftl:> J' ~I < llllql'lII',b.~J 1l'\l1 ,'fp"1 \\N 'i-'l' I J,'I\ \.() .'11; ,\ ',~L'I; rd;>J.'~II' J' '11<li~"HlI" ·',I,llJ.' .lO ,; i,ll," ) ....
tp ';\1 \; Ipqrq J(' \,llI ql'\i<'d",~J,I1 ,','111'1.1.'.",1' \li' ,"'ll;iI,"UI','" !('t~ oj' Hi"llI~II~,b(] ftl!l'illofj .'1I. \t' 1J,'" ;>tl:,lP ~t\I'i:','J'l:l PUI' "P'Ul\lIQ:l' f
.tnpnl " UI 'UI'I!t:Jlldd, ~ltr yl \I.~ : ,: 0 ";~i "IQ:"'IIII,k ).'IIW \UI_ ,!\ ' I' )l!"!iqn~,,'}: \:1;1',,) .I" l\1I1:rjP' I!I "! q,'T:' .II I ".'! ) \\11 prJ J" , I' I.'m;,'!-,J:'
,'If: ,it' ."r .10 1 Il,lI:,'! ..1\'[hl,' ;'(lI1,ld, .,,, ,;::) J\' :;>,'u;:n,'l J.~"lI' ["'.t,, H' "'II' \ t; !' .11 '~ !I',l!t!lqn' .'tp u, 'l,I,;J,' ,I" tI,'::,',' L II',' ,'q: 7't;[.III1I>.'J
I 11 :thlJ.l 1 \~1.1 H.H 1 ftupjlt, g " lfT HI:' I ;>.IJ '''l ""'I' l:t\U.' d f\lll'i II~! I .'11 : tl .~' t:1'n"'l ,~ l!llnr :'fp.'1 \·.oc'j.'t' .I,'lIWlI I "W'" ,'Iii l,'.,{.1-ul II;
'.' '''q:' p.'+n""1' . ';;J,,;,I"l.1 " lll J.~:\l:' n: a:"\II,wJ"(1 f,llll'pl1n .'\1' (>: IH'I"'~:aLl.'d \tWl;" ·:{I".! ·~t~ I ""1 ·'IQr.)q,ld; ;.'IP'· .\;i';0 I ~ Itt,'1 U'Ir.t'~ ~
·;ml1".l tjl l I .',)ut'lJd~lI P,' t:: int: .~H ..... \0<]\' 1"" llJ ";>1' .( '.'. I \1!P '::1 1'111 1 ~ ),'ll'!.'I'.I\' ,'11-.1 11 ;>~r .I" H. '1\)1',1\'1; (':·t'(ll;r'~" l ,'\l i ,ll
' \HIll(' .) "'1; Uh OJ) .':> 11"1 l\ndr. 'p,,~, !\ ;» Jr, P'~I'I:.'.b n' .''1 \"ll! ! !llU.'J ;",li!PI!l1!1 ,'II' lnp ·.. . ;':P,'I \.nl:~)r I It' ll\(lllrp ; ~• . '~ \\tln,'. ) 1,
.\:"1 :1'111;; ... .1 .~' n ['til'[ ·'Ii.]l:,~lj ddr ptil' ~UclIl1'lnf. ;'l.1 ~(j~1 -:>r \',) ~t\lPI!11[1 ';:t:IlPl l'I;'llW'!) .'q . j't: r '1.1 (,\ , ' ·'W f;l!Ilt'jl if,.-) \ \"j
11':>"1.1\ ,'11'1' V .I,'P,',! iu:,}p !'!I<'!~ ' 1('Jd IPt\' ild~t1p.' IP', 'ili.'f,r ill! 1'<11 111''1: ,'.'If.r ! 'iIllU,"J ';lill'[lIlU .'1 11.1" .' ,'lI\'I1'~ l .'tl' .I" u<l!\CJ"['i'll\":-ul
'H~''''~I1 !.!)'II.'(J fU1l'pl1U ,'Ill i{1 r.' \\,'1 \;>J 'P'll!,Uql; ~ .'tl' rl' J"~II!'!:>I' ,,'!IIjI)::t pl:r \ ~ ),'JllI"rd,' ·',1. :.'ldl"I:l1,' n; 'Pt: ,,( ) 'r -.'a: " t:"i '~nlu.,J
;;\II'ln~.If 1'.~1~"·1 , ... ,: !II' lI\\U.'J f\lIPllr:f! \' 'm\Il~:>ljdd \ ~ltr.1" It \(l,llkh: I'm' '1!'!:ltll'l1i' ,' IJl .Ill ""li.'l"l dt!l<',' f'llt:II1:'~ \ : .'~:j\~,1.W ". q
UI'I n.1~11 \1,' ;l \\\1 IH,d!' 1\'~) '\1 '! ~ll' ! li,lI\l'~') .n eq.w iw \I\' J(I ,l:lI \'1 p,'llHuqn' r~i'p J,'Ii!1O [ll\; '\!"tlr" ~I1,' ,'d, p,:\ ~tll'll l ,"'q , \ill" :':u"lr
'U(ll:~"q,kl \ .'lJ: ~lt!".'."'l' ill"lU)Jl'.! " (J f,li1!'PT1fj ·' lf . H'll! pU~'l'J"I·tll~ 1 -j:>.'JJ I';o Pl!!' .'1'.1 ; ' I ,-1(1<]1' 1','tllrHh" UI'ICr:UJ<l,lUI ;1tl ii'll: pur
u\'llI""lldd \ ' 'nil Pl' ,'>; ;>\l'lII l:'W \111.1,'.' ':(I'-Pl, ,OUY)I:IU ~] ~D n:,'UI.',~li.':U\ll!l:' ).',)1' '\1:J' 11:-. 1.1(' 1"'IPd r JPl l"'tlilj'li'l'ql Jl' I"'l'lI.'d'f;'
' I 'Iw,' .I : 1'\:: .'-'lH'n,·'! .I I .'liT .'t[' .I ll ' -;IT II~ I \lap) \' I',',l::,'lmtl(): 111\' ' I P;>lu.'lpm ~h'I·. " 11.1 1 J'l lII pm' II nti ,,':U\\,,'q !HU.I"d j':HIPlll1fj,
'j'I~!'","T,',"<TI ~p"";';,-'\ \1: 11;.',] ,';':JI'IPH(j J,'lr\\,'l"l \\ " !rl~ r ;1\ ",'>.1.'\ I';'() ~ in'lI;':1l1 \1(il1<' ) J,' "II'I~ 'f'-~ '.' 1"']1' l"'ll!1l'.'),: \lPd,'HI '~
1J 1 n<' ,',1\ ;" ,1 l','J'np,'J HW,.'lI .E,'lPiII:l" ,'I 'lIau,'d S(JSI \\IIIW,) E" I ·Ilau·'d ]l'-'EJ!"'~EI .,11';~ I I ) :p.'.Iml> .... 1 ;1'1 \ ;: .. 1 ~1!\\IJ,'d "ll'Jl"I", " I-1lljE:I
\ "I!m,I"eI .I.~IPO ;u,':lIw:d"CI j':li1rlll1f] ,~l)l \<) '1i.'I:,'.,dq:1 II' !'-" ",(umi J'~I \u.,do.ld .'tt' 1': ".',~:ot· ,':I'l1b,'P1' rlll' P'';,'I.!I' ,1(10).illlPllil" 1' ....
1:"·1 ;\(1 )('llt:\':> ;Iau.'tl f: tnplm1j \ ·".1J,l \ W ... "j 'U('l>l"'lIdJ\ '1\1; til l " 1',' ['1 HUt! ~ q 1" i\W ·J ... U" 0 ;>tj! .:(11'·. .. \1;';1 .. ' \]Unlp!lr ,I' J·":·..
. i ;>ll'Jnb~ r ·.I,'ll \\() .... 11' 10 !t:II: )"ll "I \-"'I,"'q ;>Jl111'uf'I' ,'II! ,II ~pf;; p.VUl'lplli til' J\ \ ','It'lll' p:>qlJ.)<.:>r iu,'d,ud "lj' .fl' .I.'ll \1(1 .'Ill \0,
1';I\:f>l' .'q 1"!1lU !I;\I): d ;,;wppnfl r )(1.1 l\iHll'.'lJlkh 'ItU . \ 1!,IIl!Jllq :nu 0.\ oo'OJZS : ~.l O, \\ .1 11 UOI ll~ lll r: \ S.l;"l U_ \\O t:}N US I K'l : 1)U U'~ cl l\t:,\\
;"I,\UO :1 ~ J;'IIIiOD J!.11."l;'l I~ ;'IucdO.lclD >:eO'W\D :W:'J I-I .In :'Jd'\l i"< OI.l.'<fC! N (1 0.:1 :!..\. -=nn T'lOJ 1\IlUlHlIUI0,) D SOSID I P:'J!j:'lPl :'Jsra:-P:'Jlj:1I;)1YD
_ , ~ :'''!!ld:'JS ::'Jiir.Jl'Q !I S NQ "S(lOH Ol''</':JS 3'9V.l.'dQd w.)( ,0 1 M7JN \\') I I :)j.l O.\\ :'Jq ~.lJ!,;,!O O! "{'J I ,:1\01\0 0U1;"10D JJI~d:'J~:ID 1I0!1!PP\ 'D 1I 0JJ
1~.I:'Jll \ ' D .\\;>\}([ I J:'JI]lOD p:! ;,)J;1 H!lllO'-~ P~! l\J:'J')J''';'~JD \ ' I :>j.l O.\\ .10 ,,<-:!;U :fiU)Pl!1l8 AO ;"1".1 (, P I -"I NO 8 -b 'J¥ 0) '('-7 00(', <: I :~J()O!:L~
0 'o ,'\, )/, :]4;11;'01--/• ~L. :Iol .10 ~;',Ll \ .iO ·I.::! 'bS :iiU) PI!1l8 .10 '13 'hS )0. B I """~ , L'309 21>"-OL6 'r:r-cnz. ' '3'd 1 -nw\ Uo--'B-'+\I.Q... :qd 1[\ .... :lId QOst'oi?
' 0 -1 .... '1 ·'" 's<-: :'>.rpP\ · nU!I!"I'\ /' :J:'J;'Iu)fiu ] -.. L " Ir"" -V,. " --",,--.. • I ) ' l'r'T'~ HJII/;/:L'1iQ(1II7:7..1 ~ :Lfd 11\ 'l]d : ~s='J PP\ ' ;;l!!I!I~ I ,\ :j:'):'Jl!lfJ,I
\ ~ 8 I :t: :'J!'1 :lJJ :,,!',"JpP\ ~U!I! q \ : P lll:1~ U ! ."IUOlI p:'J.l l1l."!e,.J1HI!' I\' ~" Cl" O~pO-\>SG-O L0 ~O S /8' '\"9 ' 90L-I 9 /0<: 3S>\;;/'dO.l.S 2!OW rT~ :ljJ lj \ Q\fj-t-:J!
«I(j\1 9 :qd :S<.. ..... IPP\ ;;l1!!!'T\ :.101 :'J1:.1l1l0,) t \ \. :lId 11 \ LO(',O -OI Z -QLb 'j'9(O<l <:\,3/1 1'd \:.n7. dC101:\9 MS '3i,l'S\I')Q'Q QO'zj :iJ cl ><..,".11'1'\ fiU11
II']\ \.1.'01\\1).1-1,' (/0,1,.', :J ,"U\\O 0,:)'3'1::\\\1 'S I£ (l'J 10000 lI(llldu"~,)i' !r~.'i rur j( > l iii,) ,~) .'IfII' \ ",,' ,I/,r:: , /I' ~ jil,' },' ) ,'I'; '",II( """,/,;
'1','/1,,1,1/I"',~, /'" ,'I"~ ",'.fP/'" 111'1.'1 :~ ~;'.Ipr\ · qll r /IS QCJO/_>/LL 7'(. tli1 fJOtU;'),] 'pqnS l"\ :'i.111m :p\ 71(ll l 'Tf!f.,:t", J. ')i(·' I" ." " ,'r .1lff /1 ,',I'II'tl';1'
\ U":/I'" .1"/11 , 11111 :0 \ !;' :'IJI cl .\:(j lJ. \-~ fl ;r"v:nWH1;j-:)'\IO ~lll (J ill O:l' AlU nO:l· P I ;'U_1U3' I\\A,;'\ V/J ~ ;' -~'YX -,"\ " :,'iI!'jll ll!,' pd' /'j utt~'-t."r
'(I _ fJ --',1 : I : ,\ -~ if, -{/_ (): l,'d l(j~j,\ 0 .) "'~'I/,, /(/s. /11J/I,I\I/')/,1} /IJi ,'111:\' ' 1,)·~· 1/5 , \ .\ (1 /LLn.c>~ pzay...LX7~ ,
Building Plan Review Description of Work: Portable scale house on concrete foundation -Scott Gravel Pit Locat Bin#: Location Address: 1 CR315 RIFLE, CO 81650 Case Manager: David Bartholomew
Plan Case Number: BLDG-3-11-6774 Parcel: 217715100054 Application Date: 0311612011 __ /'--__ Engineered Foundation y Driveway Permit _____ Surveyed Site Plan ""/It Septic Permit and
Setbacks /GradefTopography 30% !VIA • Attach Residential Plan Review List /Minimum Application Questionnare tV/A Subdivision Plat Notes 10)/If Fire Department Review /Valuation Determination/Fees
/Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker /Attach Conditions /Application Signed I Plan Reviewer To Sign Application /Parcel/Schedule No_ tv! /l , 40# Snowload Letter -Manu_ Homes 7 Soils Report
Contacts Owner: Rivers Edge, LLC Applicant: Rivers Edge, LLC Applicant Phone: Email: Planning/Zoning /Property Line Setbacks /30ft Stream Setbacks /Flood Plain /Building height /Zoning
Sign-off jJ/t1 Road Impact Fees !fA HOAlDRC Approval /GradefTopography 40% //Planning Issues /-----Subdivision Plat General Comments: V tfJ,t.#?on /!),Hfl;-~e, 'fwlttV Fee 7l'T4'l~,
!ftltl--I~ 12 z.. -:-307,. z.5' /'19. 7/
CONDITIONS OF PERMIT BLCO-3-11-1950 Old Castle SW Group Rivers Edge, LLC Scale House/Office Bldg. 00001 CR 315 Rifle, Colorado 1) ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE 2009 IBC, IMC, IPC, IFGC,
IECC, IFC AND MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. 2) ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS OF THE CURRENT LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT. 3) ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL
REGULATIONS. 4) EXCAVATION OBSERVATION REPORT REQUIRED AT FOOTING INSPECTION. S) LOCKS, LATCHES, LANDINGS PER 20091BC, SECTION 1008. 6) LIGHT AND VENTILATION PER 2009 IBC, CHAPTER 12.
7) ELECTRICAL ROUGH IN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO FRAME INSPECTION. 8) ELECTRICAL FINAL APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
GARFIELD COUNTY , Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www.garfield-county.com COMMERCIAL
OR MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING PERMIT NOTE: In order to understand the scope of work intended and to expedite the issuance of a permit, it is important that complete information be provided.
Please review this document to determine if you have adequate information to design your project and to facilitate a plan review. COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
CHECKLIST This checklist is to be used with all commercial or multi-family construction. APPLICATION FORM: Please make su re the following information is provided on the application
. • Parcel number obtained from the County Assessor's Offi ce. • Job address (assigned physical address). • Legal Description: lot, block, filing, subdivision or tract, section, townsh
ip and range . • Owners name, mailing add ress, phone, fax, or cell. • Contactors name, mailing address , phone, fax, or cell. • Architect/Engineer's name, mailing add ress, phone, fax
or cel l. • Bui lding size, height, number of stori es, lot size. • Use of building (commercia l) • Class of Work (new, addition, alteration, repair, demo, move, other) • Description
of work . • Type of heating (natural gas, propane, electric, other) • Sewer system (Community or ISDS), also see other items below. • Garage (attached or detached) • Driveway permit
(please see other items below) • Valuation (labor and materia ls) OTHER ITEMS : • If you antiCipate obtaining a water-tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that
the City wi ll provide water service. (Required to submit bui lding permit applica ti on). • ISDS requi res a septic permit application to be submitted with the building permit application.
• A separate electrical permit must be obtained from the State of Colorado Electrical Board. • Prior to submittal of a building permit, you are requi red to show proof of legal and adequate
access to the site. This may include proof of right to use a private easement, County Road & Bridge permit, or Colorado Department of Highway permit, including a Notice to Proceed. The
County Road & Bridge Department can be reached at 970-625-8601 . • If you anticipate excavating or grading prior to issuance of a building permit, you will be required to obtain a separate
grading permit. • If you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written approval, if requ ired. • Provide copies of any Resolutions and/or Land
Use Permits associated with this property. • Projects with more than ten (10) occupants require plans sealed by a Colorado Licensed DeSign Professional. Occupant load shall be calculated
by IBC Table 1004 .1.1. • A Colorado State Licensed Electrician and Plumber must perform installation and hook-ups.
BUILDING PLANS: Two (2) sets of plans must be submitted. Plans must be 18"x24' minimum size. complete. identical, legible. and to scale. Certain projects may also require a third copy
of the plans be submitted to the local Fire District for review prior to permit issuance. All plans will be checked at the counter for completeness. If any of the required information
is missing, the building permit application cannot be accepted. SITE PLAN: Please make sure the following information is provided on the site plan. o Property address/legal description.
o North Arrow and Scale on each page. o Show all property lines, building envelopes. flood plain, and easements. o Provide setback distances from boundaries. buildings, septic, well,
and waterways. o Location and direction of the county or private road and driveway accessing the property. o Proposed and existing structures include sheds, barns, decks, patios. and
any other buildings. o Existing and proposed grade, positive drainage around structure (to be contained on site). o Streams, rivers, creeks. springs, ponds and ditches. o Existing and
proposed wells, septic tanks, leach fields, and other systems. (if applicable) o Retaining walls (engineer stamped detail required for walls over four (4) ft, measured from bottom of
footing to top of wall). NOTE: Any site plan depicting the placement of any portion of the structure within fifty (50) feet of a property line or not within an established building envelope
shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a licensed surveyor. For structures to be built within a building envelope, provide a copy of the recorded subdivision final plat with the proposed
structure located in the building envelope. COVER SHEET: o Project identification. o Project address and/or legal description. o Design specifications to include building use and occupancy
classification, type of construction. building height and area calculations, occupant load, and fire sprinkler systems. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: Please provide the following information
on the architectural plans. o Per C.R.S. 12-4-112; Structures designed with an occupant load exceeding ten (10) require Colorado State Licensed Design Professional stamped plans. o Minimum
four (4) elevations (N,S,E,W) o Floor plans for each level including dimensions and scale noted. o Clearly label each room or space (office, storage, mechanical, elevator. etc). o Wall
types; clearly labeled and referenced. Identify all fire resistive wall construction. o Construction details for all fire resistive elements referenced on floor plans and cross sections.
Include wall, floor/ceiling. roof/ceiling, shaft wall assemblies, and structural frame. Provide the fire resistive listing number referenced on each assembly detail. (ex. UL P123) o
Window & door sizes, types, and operation and direction of swing noted on the floor plan. o Specify roof slope/pitch, roof covering, and siding materials. o Energy design specifications/details
for R-values. U-factors, and SHGC's per IECC. o Stair and guard details specifying rise, run. height and spacing o Accessibility; show compliance with accessibility requirements for
all elements of the building per IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI A 117.1. ADA. FHA. and UFAS.
STRUCTURAL PLANS: Please provide the following Information on the structural plans. • Per C.R.S. 12-4-112: Structures designed with an occupant load exceeding ten (10) require Colorado
State Licensed Engineer stamped plans. • Engineered foundation design per soils report. Geotechnical report referenced. • Design specifications to include roof and deck snow load. wind
and seismic design, frost depth. • Foundation plan showing complete footing and foundation dimensions. • Footing and foundation details specifying reinforcement referenced on plans.
• Framing plans for each floor level and roof. All beams, columns, joists, rafters, trusses and all live/dead loads specified. • Framing /connection details referenced on plans. • Pre-manufactured
structures require an engineers stamp, signature, and date. MECHANICAL PLANS: Please provide the following information on the mechanical plans. • Per C.RS. 12-4-112; Structures designed
with an occupant load exceeding ten (10) require Colorado State Licensed Engineer stamped plans. • Energy design calculations and details verifying compliance with the 2009 IECC. • Floor
plans for each level showing size, location and materials of all ductwork, plenums, return and outside air intake registers. • Size and location of all combustion air ductwork and openings.
• Size, type and termination of all gas appliance flues and vents. • Location of all fire and combination smoke/fire dampers. • Equipment schedule for all mechanical equipment (boiler,
furnace, exhaust fans, etc). • Commercial kitchen hood location, hood and duct sizes, CFM calculations. PLUMBING PLANS: Please provide the following information on the plumbing plans.
• Per C.RS. 12-4-112; Structures designed with an occupant load exceeding ten (10) require Colorado State Licensed Engineer stamped plans. • Floor plans for each level showing DWV layout
and sizing, materials, slope and sewer location. • Water piping materials, length and size of pipe, water meter location, fixture unit demands, location and type of backflow prevention
devices. • Gas piping materials, length and size of pipe, gas meter location, and BTU/hour demands. • Additional piping plans for roof/deck drains, condensate, medical gas, etc. • Plumbing
fixture schedule for all plumbing equipment. • Commercial kitchen plumbing fixtures, food preparation equipment, grease interceptors, etc. ELECTRICAL PLANS: Please provide the following
information on the electrical plans. • Per C.RS. 12-4-112: Structures designed with an occupant load exceeding ten (10) require Colorado State Licensed Engineer stamped plans. • Floor
plans for each level showing location of lighting fixtures, switches, receptacles, emergency exit signs and lighting, and panel location. • Diagram showing service entrance, conduit/wire
size, main disconnect size, grounding electrode/conductor size, feeder conduit/wire size. transformers and generators. • Panel schedule showing bus/breaker sizes, circuit description,
voltage, phase. amperage, etc.
NOTE: If any required information is missing, delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. If determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review
the application and/or plans for compliance , the application may be placed on hold until the required information is provided. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit.
The building department will collect a Plan Review fee at time of application submittal. The Permit Fee, as well as any Septic or Road Impact fees will be collected when the permit is
issued. The permit application must be signed by the owner or by a person having written authority from the owner to act as their rep resentative. I hereby acknowledge I have read, understand
, and will abide with the requirements of this checklist. Signature of Owner Date Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone 970-945-8212
Fax: 970-384-3470 www.garfield-county.com
1111 ~r.'.1I,lr""'I~II\~.I"!/~IITII.I'I·.lrl·dTi"T~ .. m·" ."" RecQptionn: 784390 . 04/07f201Q 04:2$:02 PM Jean Alberico 1 of 24 Ree Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:C.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATEOFCOLORADO
) )SS County of Garfield ) At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield COWlty Courthouse,
in Glenwood Springs on, Monday, the 15th day of March A.D. 2010, there were present: "-,Jo",hn,,-,-!MlliO!art,,,i!!!n~ ___________ , Commissioner Chairman =M",ik",e""S",am~s",o",n,---_________
:--, Commissioner .T.". ,re,..sIL·H '-""ou"lp"'tc--___________, Commissioner "'D""eb"'o"..'r.a..h. . ""O"'u""inn=-__________, Assistant County Attorney ..,Je",an";'-LAl,.b",e""n,c,·"
,o_ __________~ , Clerk of the Board "'E"'d->O""r"'ee"'n....,C""ab"'s"'e.".nt'.l-) _________ , County Manager when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit:
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-17 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT FOR EXTRACTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES & DEVELOPMENT IN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN FOR THE "SCOTT
GRAVEL PIT" LOCATED Y, MILE EAST OF THE MAIN INTERSTATE INTERSECTION OF RIFLE COLORADO BETWEEN THE COLORADO RIVER AND INTERSTATE 70 IN SECTION 15, TOWNSIDP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 93 WEST OF
THE 6TH PM, GARFIELD COUNTY PARCEL NO# 2177-151-00-007 and 2177-151-00-054 Recitals A. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield COWlty, Colorado, received an application from Rivers
Edge, LLC for a Land Use Change Permit for Extraction of Natural Resources and Development within the 100-year Floodplain for the operation of the "Scott Gravel Pit". B. The 93-acre
tract is located approximately Y, miles east of the main interstate intersection of Rifle Colorado between the Colorado River and Interstate 70 in Section 15, Township 6 South, Range
93 West of the 6th PM, Garfield County and legally described in Exhibit C attached hereto. C. The subject property is located within the Rural zone district and a Land Use Change Pennit
for Extraction of Natural Resources requires a Major Impact Review Process and Development in the I ~O-year Floodplain requires an Administrative process which were 1
.111 ftf,U,I,\',I'.r.','NIW'/, lII'IIi_" lIN 1'I~,II"I~llrnm"t .,11, Recept!on~: 784390 04/07/2C10 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 2 of 24 Rea Fee:$0.00 000 Fee:O_00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO reviewed
together by Garfield County. D. The Board is authorized to approve, deny or approve with conditions a Land Use Change Permit for "Extraction of Natural Resources" pursuant to Section
1-301 and 4-106 of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of2008, as amended. E. The Garfield County Planning Conunission opened a public hearing on 6124109 and continued the
public hearing to 9123109, 10128109, and 1127110 respectively upon the question of whether the Land Use Change Permit application for Extraction of Natural Resources and Development
in the 100-year Floodplain should be granted or denied, during which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the application.
F. The Garfield County Planning Conunission closed the public hearing on the 27th day of January, 2010 and forwarded a reconunendation of approval with conditions to the Board of County
Commissioners. G. The Board of County Commissioners opened a public hearing on the 15th day of March, 20 I 0 upon the question of whether the Land Use Change Permit application for Extraction
of Natural Resources and Development in the 100-year Floodplain should be granted or denied, during which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express
their opinions regarding the application. H. The Board of County Conunissioners closed the public hearing on the 15th day of March, 20 I 0 to make a final decision. I. The Board on the
basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following determinations of fact: I) Proper posting and public notice was provided as required
for the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners. 2) The meeting before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive or complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues
were submitted and that all interested parties were not heard at that meeting. 3) The proposal has adequately addressed the visual impacts for the proposed mining operations along the
entryway to Rifle. 4) The wetland slopes may be reduced (as proposed and shown on Map F-I attached as Exhibit A) from the requirements in Section 7-840(H) of the ULUR which results in
the reduction in wildlife habitat along certain sections of shoreline due to proximity to the Rifle Airport. It 2
.111 "I'. r.V,I'.mrIMIII"lIrlllll', II\'.,III'~, ~T'IiI,I/'1I. m"l .,11' Receptjon~: 784390 04/07/2010 04:23;02 PM Jean Rlberico 3 of 24 Ree Fee:$0_00 Doc Fee:0.00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO
has been detennined that these modifications will allow for an aesthetically pleasing site that blends with the surrounding area, provides for wildlife habitat and provides for futnre
re-use of the site. 5) The irrigation requirements may be modified from the requirements in Section 7-840(H)(2) of the ULUR. It has been detennined that these irrigation modifications
will allow for an aesthetically pleasing site that blends with the surrounding area, provides for wildlife habitat and, provides for future re-use of the site. 6) If the required conditions
have been met, it has been detennined that the gravel extraction proposal works to meet the County's existing zoning and futnre land use objectives of the City of Rifle. 7) The review
of the Development within the 100-year Floodplain (nonnally reviewed as an administrative review) has been reviewed as part of this review and has been found to meet the requirements
in the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and shall be issued as a Land Use Change pennit under this review. 8) It is understood that the property has an existing Special
Use Permit for the stomge of portable toilets via Resolution 2003-37 which shall be allowed to continue concurrently with this Land Use Change Penni!. 9) The above stated and other reasons,
the proposed Land Use Change Pennit has been detennined to be consistent with the standards and provisions of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and is in the best interest
of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County so long as all of the conditions of approval are met. RESOLUTION NOW THEREFORE, BE
IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colomdo, that: A. The forgoing Recitals are incorpomted by this reference as part of the resolution. B. The Land
Use Change Pennit Extraction of Natnral Resources and Development in the I ~O-year Floodplain is hereby approved subject to compliance with the following conditions: 3
.111 ~I' Uol.\I,I'''~rI'm'NI,ltl'lln'''I'''''' I"'~ I .... i'1I"I!I'\I .1111 Receptjon~: 764390 04/07/2010 04;23:02 PM Jean Alberioo 4 of 24 Ree Fee-S0.00 Doc F~e:O.00 GARFIELD COUNTY
CO I) That all representations of the Applicant, either within the application or stated at the hearing before the Board of County Conunissioners, shall be considered conditions of approval
unless explicitly altered by the Board. 2) Hours of Operation: The gravel pit shall be aIlowed to operate Monday -Saturday from 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM with crushing, digging, and heavy hauling
only occurring between 7:00 Am to 6:00 PM. There shall be no operations on Sunday except emergency maintenance. 3) The Applicant shall obtain a new State Highway Access Pennit from CDOT
to be submitted to Garfield County prior to the issuance of a Land Use Change Pennit and any conditions required by that pennit shall be conditions also required by Garfield County.
No mining work /site prep shall be allowed to begin until the improvements required by CDOT have been installed and approved by CDOT according to their pennit. 4) The use of temporary
concrete /asphalt batch plants shall only be allowed on the property (located only within the flood-fringe area of the 100-year floodplain) between July 15th and November 15th of any
given year in order to avoid the nesting /fledgling period for the resident American Bald Eagles and to lessen the impact to the City of Rifle. Any change to this timeline shall be determined
by the Board of County Commissioners in a public meeting. Any change shall require justification for 'good cause shown' including a reconunendation from either the Colorado Division
of Wildlife (CDOW) or the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to change this timeframe. 5) This Land Use Change Pennit approval shall be limited to a term of eight years from the date
of approval of the Land Use Change Pennit. If the operations are to extend beyond this time frame, the property owner shall be required to return to the BOCC to demonstrate that the
mining operations comply with any new regulations adopted by Garfield County. 6) There shall be no bulk storage of fuel on site that is located within the 100-year floodplain. 7) The
Applicant shall install flood monitoring system through the use of "staff gauges" that will provide an early warning system to allow the removal of all equipment /fuel tanks from areas
where flooding might occur. These gauges will be installed with cement bases and painted vertical pipes (gauges) to ensure their pennanence. No Land 4
1III w. ~l.~,lr.IA~"~~ ,11'N 1'1'1, [11,' rYlll"Il"~rI~ 111"6 .1111 Rec~ptjon~: 784390 04(07/2010 04:23;02 PM Jean Alberico 5 of 24 Reo Fee:SO.00 Occ Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTy CO Use
Change Permit shall be issued by the County until such gauges· have been installed and verified by a site visit with County Staff. 8) Due to the close proximity to 1-70, all crushing
shall occur in enclosed equipment that is equipped with wet scrubbers (water spray facilities) to keep the aggregate moist. Further, the Applicant shall submit all the air emission permits
for the equipment to be used on site to the County prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit. 9) All noise generated from the operation shall not exceed the Industrial Zone noise
standards defined in the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) such that noise shall not exceed 80 dB(A) from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM and 75 dB(A) from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM. 10) The Operator or Property
Owner shall submit an annual report to the County Building and Planning Department with GPS measurements shown on a map showing the current disturbance, what areas have been backftlled,
where topsoil stockpiles are located, all site structures, what areas have been seeded, mulched and what is plarmed for the ensuing 12 months. 11) The County can request a site inspection
with 24 hour's notice to the Operator or Property Owner. Full access to any part of the site will be granted. On request, all paperwork must be shown. 12) A full list of all other permits
shall be provided to the County within 24 hours of their request. Any person at any time can call the following agencies directly and request an inspection if they believe a condition
of that agencies permit is being violated. a. CDPHE Air Quality Control 303-692-3150 b. CDPHE Water Quality Control 303-692-3500 c. US Army Corps of Engineers 970-243-1199 d. Division
of Reclamation, Mining and Safety 303-866-3567 e. CDOT Grand Junction office 970-248-7000 13) The Property Owner and Operator acknowledge that the County has the following performance
standards that could lead to revocation of the Land Use Change Permit: A. All fabrication, service and repair operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building or obscured by
a fence, natural topography or landscaping. B. All operations involving loading and unloading of vehicles shall be conducted on private property and shall not be conducted on a public
right-of-way. 5
.111 ftl',j,r,j,'/iI'.l\',rlllll'lVllr'" ,,'fIIT'fln" ,n".",,' •• ' '" Reception~: 784390 04/07(2010 04:23:02 PM Jea~ Alberico 6 of 24 Ree Fee:$tL00 Doc Fee:O.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO C.
All industrial wastes shall be disposed of in a manner consistent with statutes and requirements ofCDPHE. D. Every use shall be operated so that the ground vibration inherently and recurrently
generated is not perceptible without instruments at any point of any boundary line of the property E. Every use shall be so operated that it does not emit heat, glare, radiation or fumes
which substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard, Flaring of gases, aircraft warning signal and reflective painting
of storage tanks, or other legal requirements for safety or air pollution control measures shall be exempted from this provision. 14) The County shall be invited to any bond release
inspection of the State Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety. The County will have the opportunity to demonstrate that any item of the permit has not been complied with and that
bond should not be released. Specifically, the Final Reclamation Plan (Map F -1 which is attached as Exhibit A hereto) shall include the following components: A. When reclaimed, at least
21.5% of the 2,441 feet perimeter of Lake 1 shall be constructed to a 5:1 slope, and at least 3.3% of the shoreline on Lake 1 shall be constricted to a 10:1 slope, In Lake 2, at least
20.5% of the total perimeter of3,348 feet shall be constructed to be a 5:1 slope and at least 2.4% of the shoreline shall be constructed to be a 10:1 slope. The remainder of all slopes
will be no steeper than 3:1. See Map F-l of the application for the layout of these areas. This shall be required to be shown on the Final Reclamation Plan (Map F-l) approved herein
and tendered to the DRMS. B. When reclaimed, at least 0.79 acres of wetlands shall be created and their location shall be shown on a map. This shall be required to be shown on the Final
Reclamation Plan (Map F-l) approved herein and tendered to the DRMS. C. The Applicant shall use plant plugs (i.e. real plants) in wetland slope reclamation; D. There is a native shrub,
silver-leaf buffalo berry (Shepherdia argentea) that may be confused with the noxious weed, the Russian-olive tree (Shepherdia argentea). The Applicant needs to be able to distinguish
between the two so that the native silverleaf is conserved and not managed like the Russian-olive. 6
.111 ~T'-"".'IIII"MI\·I'I'M'IIIIII'I'I'IoI-.rr,~TT'td!T'1 "'111m" • • "11 Re¢eption~: 784390 04/07/2af0 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 7 of 24 Ree Fee:$O.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
E. The Applicant shall implement an effective Russian-olive and tamarisk treatment program in order to prevent the threat of spreading noxious weed seeds through gravel to previously
uninfested areas. F. The Applicant shall remove crested wheatgrass from the dry rangeland reseeding mix. G. Mining operations shall be allowed to progress so long as the previous pit
has been reclaimed within 6 months after the commencement ofthe new pit mining operation. If the reclamation has not commenced in six months or has been completed within eighteen (18)
months, all mining operations on the property shall stop until the reclamation I revegetation has occurred to the satisfaction of the County. Completion shall include but not be limited
to top-soiling, seeding, mulching, sapling planting, and water filling ofthe lake. H. The Final Reclamation Plan approved with this Land Use Change Permit shall be the only reclamation
plan used by both Garfield County and Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety. Additionally, a new bond be calculated to cover this plan and secured with DRMS to cover its implementation.
Proof of a recalculated bond shall be provided to Garfield County prior to issuance of a LUCP. I. The Reclamation Plan shall be revised to include planting twenty (20) 2-inch caliper
cottonwood trees around each pond at intervals of 75 feet with cottonwood I willow saplings I cutting clumps between the trees and fringe wetlands on all of the lake perimeters. 15)
The Applicant shall adhere to the commitments contained in the "Bald Eagle Management Plan" which shall serve as conditions of approval attached as Exhibit B to this Resolution. 16)
The Applicant shall obtain all local, state, and federal permits prior to the issuance of the Land Use Change Permit by Garfield County. 7
.111 nl'. r"Y,I''''',~ 1I'~I.,r Ir.UIl ..... !III,I,.,.. IITI', ~'I.I!I"' .1111 ReceptionU: 7a4390 04/07/2010 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 8 of 24 Reo Fee;$O,OO Doc Fee:O.00 GARFIELD COUNTY
CO ~-r:b fJM.j 0 Dated this;...l day of-","T"""~""""~---' A.D. 20~. ATIEST: GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY,COLORADO GARFIELD of the Board Upon motion duly made and seconded
thel.fux.el!~rg-:Re!~HhlIif following vote: ",.CO""M!!!!!M. I.>l !SS"..I"!0!.:lN:",E",R-",C",HA<£>djIR","":,JO,,,-,HN,:,"-,::~F. '-'MAR!!£>"'T"'IN"-'-_______~ , Aye ~CO~M~M~I~SS~I~O~N~E~R~M~I~KE~S~AM
~S~O~N~ _________ ,Aye ~C~O~M~M~I~SS~I~O~N~E~R2T~RE~·~SI~H£O~U~P~T~ ______________ ,Aye STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) I, , County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board
of County Commissioners, in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of
the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs,
this ___ day of , A.D. 20 __ . County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners 8
1111 ~'I'~""~~·I~II'l:;',~'I",\r.I"II.IIV';I"'Un,lll'~ !!I'i .1111 Rec~ption~: 784390 04/07/201004.23-02 PM Jean Alberico 22 of 24 Ree Fee $0,00 Doc Fee:O.OO GARFIELD COUIHY CO
.111 ~oIr ''UlI']IIIII~ WW'I,IIIW I't~ \'f,n,rlil Irl',IIIIIII'" .1111 Reeeption#; 784390 04107/2010 ~4:23;02 PM Jean Alberico ______ 23 of 24 Reo Fee:$O.00 Dgc Fee:O,00 GARFIELD COUNTY
CO LEGAL DESCRIPTION The site is approximately 0.5 miles east of downtown Rifle. Two legal descriptions are given below. The initial legal description defines the area covered by the
Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety permit and is shown on Map C-l which is included in Appendix C. The second legal description is the legal description required by the County.
That description defines the parcels which comprise the Scott Pit area. A general location map is enclosed as Map B-1 in the next section. The surface owner is Rivers Edge, LLC. DRMS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION The point of beginning lies S 31 °23'16" E, 2384.28' from the NW Comer of Section 15; thence N 80°16'34" E a distance of 109.15'; thence N 80°16'34" E a distance of
109. I 5';thence N 69°22'05" E a distance of 136.56'; thence N 80°07'10" E a distance of 103.15'; thence S 86°32'15" E a distance of 146.54'; thence S 70°37'46" E a distance of 135.73';
thence S 67°43'57" E a distance of 135.65'; thence S 89°56'55" E a distance of 85.43'; thence N 45°59'04" E a distance of 173.57'; thence N 88°06'35" E a distance of 250.47';thence N
85°30'25" E a distance of320.08'; thence N 78°32'48" E a distance of350.95'; thence N 71 °17'36" E a distance of 170.46'; thence N 73°22'41" E a distance of 556.03'; thence N 71 °22'1
0" E a distance of 1486.98'; thence S 04°01'47" W a distance of 108.32'; thence S 00°24'58" E a distance of 425.64'; thence S 01 °17'08" W a distance of722.31'; thence S 01 °00'14" W
a distance of 440.96'; thence S 80°26'09" W a distance of 462.78'; thence S 86°31'05" W a distance of264.60'; thence N 89°35'22" W a distance of 308.30'; thence N 84°54'35" W a distance
of232.88'; thence N 80°14'25" W a distance of311.49'; thence N 80°07'07" Wa distance of334.72'; thence N 78°35'36" W a distance of 510.75'; thence N 78°31 '36" W a distance of754.98';
thence N 80°17'33" W a distance of 645.30'; thence N 84°01'46" W a distance of 163.00'; thence N 00°07'09" E a distance of388.30'; which is the point of beginning, having an area of
93.46 acres. PARCELS LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Parcels A and B, hereinafter described, Northerly of the Northerly right of way line of Interstate 70 as described in the rule
and order recorded May 16, 1985 in Book 668 at Page 708. Parcel A All of Lots 1,2,3 and 4 and the East 232 feet of Lot 5, all in the McLeam Orchard Lands according to the map and dedication,
Document No. 38435, in the Clerk and Recorder's Office, Garfield County, Colorado, known as the First Filing thereof (said Lots comprise part of the SE1I4, the SW1I4 and Lot 5 in Section
15, Township 6 South, Range 93 West, 6th P.M. Scott Pit February 08 A-I
.111 ~I' .1'11"' wrlrl·.'IIIWIII\'''lrl'·.I1'\~ 1TIi".11I1r.ITI'i1I1 m''a .1 II I Reception#: 784390 04/07/201004:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 24 of 24 Ree Fee:$O.00 Doc Fee:0.0D G~RFIELO
COUNTY CO ----.-_.----Parcel B The West 143 feet of Lot 5 and all of Lots 6 through 11, inclusive, in Section 15, Township 6 south, Range 93 West, 6th P.M" as platted as the McLearn
Orchard Lands, First Filing, Document No. 38435. Parcel No.1 A tract ofland situate in the SEII4NWII4 and the SW1I4NEI/4 of Section 15, Township 6 South Range 93 West, 6th P.M., more
fully described as follows: Beginning at a point whence the Meander Corner of the West Line of said Section 15 bears: South 59°48' West 1555.1 feet: thence North 200.00 feet; thence
North 77° 15' East 250.00 feet; thence North 75°00' East 340.00 feet; thence South 70°41' East 404.40 feet; thence South 980,00 feet; thence South 85°55' West 170.00 feet; thence South
72°45' West 734.55 feet; thence North 41 °20' West 672.50 feet; thence North 80°49' West 664.62 feet; thence South 52°20' West 180.00 feet, to the point of beginning. Parcel No.2 Beginning
at the Meander Corner of the East line of said Section 15, thence South 87°10' West 1320.00 feet; thence South 85°55' West 534.88 feet; thence North 980.00 feet; thence North 87013'
East 535.00 feet; thence North 72°02' East 1385.10 feet; thence south 1330.00 feet, to the point of beginning. Scott Pit February 08 A·2
.111 ~rolo'nr"'Ir'r,.~r'r.W"TII,vrl.ln'llrrllrl'. ,-." m •• ' "' Reception": 784390 Q4/07/201D 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 12 of 24 Ree Fee:S0.00 Doc Fee·0.00 GA~FIELO COUNTY CO UNITED
COMPANIES OF MESA COUNTY SCOTT GRAVEL MINE BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for United Companies of Mesa County Prepared by WestWater Engineering 2516 Foresight Circle #1 Grand Junction,
Colorado 81505 February 5, 2010
1111 ~fi.'lfI1Im"lPi H'I'II,I'I\ IIIV,lITIfIlr""nl'olrlrm" •• "" Receptlon~: 784390 04/07/2010 04·23·02 PM Jean ~Lberico 13 of 24 Reo Fee;$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO INTRODUCTION
Project Description United Companies of Mesa County (United) is proposing to mine sand and gravel from a site along the Colorado River near Rifle. The proposed Rifle Scott Pit is located
on private land approximately one-half mile east of the 1-70 Rifle interchange between 1-70 and the Colorado River (see map). The site totals approximately 117 acres with approximately
72 acres being riparian woodlands. Of the 117 acres, 25.2 acres are proposed for mining. Mining will be generally concentrated in the area of two formerly irrigated pasture fields on
the property; Mining Area 1 is located west of the oxbow and Mining Area 2 is southeast of the oxbow (see map). After reclamation, a small lake will occupy each of these mine sites.
Bald Eagles During late December 2010, Garfield County planning department staff contacted the local Colorado Division of Wildlife (CD OW), Rifle District Wildlife Manager inquiring
about the status of Bald Eagles, which had been nesting near the proposed gravel mining site. The CDOW indicated that an active Bald Eagle nest had been observed during January 2010
within the boundary of the gravel-mining lease. The presence of the Bald Eagle nest became a concern associated with the startup and operation of the Scott gravel mine. At the Garfield
County Planning and Zoning Commission hearing on January 27, 2010, United agreed to formulate and submit a Bald Eagle Management Plan to county, state and federal representatives. The
plan would address Bald Eagle protection and mitigation for potential disturbance factors associated with the gravel-mining operation. PURPOSE OF THE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BALD EAGLE This
goal of this management plan is to provide year-round protection for Bald Eagles that may inhabit habitat within the Scott Pit gravel mine boundaries. Its development is a collaborative
effort between WestWater Engineering (WestWater) biologists, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and CDOW. At the request of United Companies (United), WestWater developed this
management plan as part of Garfield County's gravel mining permitting process. Background During the final stages of Garfield County's permitting process for the Scott Pit, a pair of
Bald Eagles was found to have constructed a new nest within United's lease holdings. The recently (November-December 2009) constructed nest lies within 0.25-mile and O.SO-mile buffer
zones where the CDOW and USFWS recommends limiting potential disturbance to Bald Eagles; this protection includes nest sites. WestWater Engineering 1 3116/2010
.111 11'* ''V'''' "'IN/' ~ 111'1,,1'1'1,1'1111 ~rr""·11r'W,,'n. m" •• , '" Receolion#: 784390 04107/2010 04:23:~2 PM Jean Alberioo 14 of 24 Ree Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY
CO In order to address concerns with potential impacts to nesting Bald Eagles, United agreed to monitor the Rifle Bald Eagle nest to provide background information, which would facilitate
project development that is schedule to begin by United on June IS, 2010. Biological information collected during implementation of the management plan regarding the progress of Bald
Eagle nesting during 2010 would be cooperatively shared with Garfield County, CDOW and USFWS. Overview of Bald Eagle Status and Protection The Bald Eagle is a protected wildlife species;
federal and state natural resource agencies as well as Garfield County have developed measurers to reduce the likelihood of adverse impacts to this species. The concern is that disturbance
due to the initiation of gravel mining may negatively affect nesting Bald Eagles resulting in possible nest failure and subsequent loss of reproductive potential. Possible Bald Eagle
disturbance factors associated with the mining project include the operation of mining equipment, machinery and the presence of personnel within the recommended protective buffer zones.
Since being delisted, the Bald Eagle no longer receives protection under the Endangered Species Act (1973), but still receives protection under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act
and Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The Bald Eagle is also protected under Colorado State statutes. The protection of Bald Eagles prohibits the taking of Bald Eagles, which includes the birds,
nests or eggs. Take is defined as "pursue, shoot, shoot at, poison, wound, kill, capture, trap, collect, molest, or disturb. Disturb means to agitate or bother a Bald Eagle to a degree
that causes, or is likely to cause, based on the best scientific information available, I) injury to an eagle, 2) a decrease in its productivity, by substantially interfering with normal
breeding, feeding or sheltering behavior, or 3) nest abandonment by substantially interfering with normal breeding, feeding or sheltering behavior. In addition to the above protective
measures, the USFWS and CDOW have published guidelines on how to minimize the risk of a take or disturbance to Bald Eagles. With regards to nesting Bald Eagles, the guidelines recommend:
I) keeping a distance between the activity (gravel mining) and the nest (distance buffers), 2) maintaining preferably forested (or natural) areas between the activity and around nest
trees (landscape buffers), and 3) avoiding certain activities during the breeding season. The buffer areas serve to minimize visual and auditory impacts associated with human activities
near nest sites. For mining operations near Bald Eagle nest sites, the National Guidelines recommend that if the activity will not be visible from the nest and there is a similar activity
closer than I mile from the nest a distance of 330 ft may be an appropriate buffer to consider. However, in Colorado the USFWS recommends that companies follow the CDOW recommended buffer
zones and seasonal restriction for raptors. The CDOW recommends a year-round closure to surface occupancy within a Y.,-mile radius of Bald Eagle nest sites and no human activity within
a Y,-mile radius ofa nest site between October IS through July 31. The USFWS recommendations in western states vary from the National Guidelines due to the characteristic ofthe vegetation,
which is less often less forested habitat and little topographical relief to serve as protective buffers. . WestWater Engineering 2 3/16/2010
.111 ~I'. 1'11"' 1'I1~IMI!l1Ir 1II\II,IITil ITWoIITlIlI"lhl'llh m'" .1111 Reeeptionn: 784390 04/07/2010 C4:23,02 PM Jean Alberico 15 of 24 Ree Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY
CO BALD EAGLE NEST MONITORING AND REPORTING Objectives One objective of this monitoring program is to gather infonnation on the nesting chronology of the Bald Eagles as the 20 I 0 breeding
season progresses. Primary infonnation to be gathered includes final nest construction and pre-nesting activities/behavior, detennine the date when egg(s) are laid, detennine hatching
dates, and fledging dates. Infonnation gathered would be used by United to make an infonned decision on when to begin their project development. Since the Rifle Bald Eagles are resident
birds, the data collected could be used by United and the CDOW/uSFWS for future gravel mining operations. Monitoring Area and Nest Site The Rifle Bald Eagle nest is located about I mile
east of Rifle, CO on the south bank of the Colorado River (see map). The nest is near the top of a large cottonwood tree that is part ofa large cottonwood gallery. The area is composed
of typical riparian vegetation and the Bald Eagle nest site is in similar habitat and proximity to the Colorado River as other Bald Eagle nests along the Colorado River in this area.
The nest is a new site and was constructed by a pair of resident Bald Eagles that have nested in the general area for at least the past three years and probably longer. The historic
nest site was destroyed on or about June 18,2009 when erosive actions of the Colorado River undercut the banks and the nest tree fell into the river. Three eaglets, which were within
approximately 5 to 7 days of fledging, were in the nest when it fell into the river; one chick survived the loss of the nest tree. Bald Eagle Monitoring Personnel: Monitoring of the
Rifle Bald Eagle nest will be conducted by wildlife biologists (Van Graham or other qualified biologists) who are associated with WestWater Engineering, Grand Junction, CO. Methods:
The fonnal nest-monitoring program is scheduled to be initiated in early February 2010 and continue through fledging and post-fledging of eaglets, which is likely to occur during June
and continue into July 2010. Observations at the nest site are scheduled to occur once a week during February and March when eggs will be laid (February) and hatching (March) will most
likely occur. Both dates are important to predict an accurate fledging date. After eaglets hatch, monitoring during April and May could be reduced to once every 10 days. During June,
monitoring should be increased to at least once per week. After each monitoring event is completed, results will be e-mailed to United, Garfield County, CDOW and USFWS. Infonnation recorded
during each monitoring event will include the following. • Beginning and ending time of observations (generally 2-4 hrs), • Weather conditions, • Bald Eagle activity in and around the
nest, WestWater Engineering 3 3/16/2010
1111 ~1'"'" I'IIlIfllIl''UIII'l1I'lJ II',', 111\10 ~"II"lrll ~'. m''j .1111 Reception#: 784390 04/07/2Q10 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 16 of 24 Rec Fee:$0 00 Doc Fee,O.00 GARFIELD COUNTY
GO • Number of Bald Eagle observed, • Behavioral characteristics of Bald Eagles with emphasis on reactions to the presence of human activity in the general area, • Nest building/maintenance
activities, • Estimated date of initiation of egg incubation, • Estimated date of hatching of eaglets, • Eaglet and pertinent biological data including survival during pre-fledging period,
• Fledging dates (usually 10-12 weeks after hatching) • Post-fledging monitoring (2-3 weeks after eaglets leave nest). Recommendations: WestWater will provide pertinent information and
a recommendation on project development to United, CDOW and USFWS during June as eaglet fledging approaches. This information can be used by United to plan its project development. Additional
mitigation measures may be developed based on observations and Bald Eagle use ofthe area, which would provide added security to Bald Eagles if fledging has not occurred by June 15,2010.
Monitoring Report: Results of the monitoring will be documented in a final summary report to United, which will be shared with Garfield County, CDOW and USFWS. General Contents of Final
Summary Report I. Introduction II. Monitoring Area and Monitoring Methods III. Results of Monitoring • Summary of Bald Eagle nesting activity at the Rifle nest site, • Nesting chronology
for the Rifle Bald Eagle nest, • Bald Eagle roosting sites within the project area (including appropriate maps). IV. Discussion • An analysis of appropriate project scheduling for human
activities (mining, natural gas exploration, etc.) relative to Bald Eagle nesting. • Effects ofhuman activities on Bald Eagles V. Recommendations for mitigation of potential impacts
to Bald Eagles nesting along the Colorado River relative to human disturbance factors. VI. Justification for recommendations. VII. Appendices of monitoring results (narrative of observations)
and appropriate photographs and maps. WestWater Engineering 4 3/16/2010
.111 ftl' ""1'II""~lr'.,~I'\'hllW,\ 1I1 .. 'IIII·I'nr.rn ... ·r' m_ .' "' Reception": 784390 04/07(2010 04,23:a2 PM Je~n Alberico 17 of 24 Ree Fea:SO.()0 000 Fee:O.00 GARFIELD COUN1Y
CO BALD EAGLE ADAPTATION TO HUMAN PRESENCE Rifle Bald Eagles The new Rifle Bald Eagle nest is located in the top of a mature cottonwood tree approximately 50-60 above the ground. The
vegetation surrounding the nest is composed of a mature cottonwood gallery with an understory of Russian olive, tamarisk and various riparian shrubs and grasses. It is highly likely
that this is the same pair of Bald Eagles that occupied the fonmer nest. This pair of Bald Eagles has adapted to and successfully nested in the presence of significant human activity.
The fonmer nest site was located approximately 0.14 miles (730 ft) from vehicular traffic on 1-70; within 0.25 and 0.50 miles of two active gravel mining operations; within 0.43 mile
of the Union Pacific Railroad; within 0.42 miles of the City of Rifle 's water treatment facility; and within 0.25 miles of industrial sites south of 1-70. The USFWS National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines indicate that Bald Eagles are unlikely to be disturbed by routine use of roads, homes, and other facilities where such use pre-dates the eagles' successful nesting
activity in a given area. It goes on to indicate that in most cases, ongoing existing use may proceed with the same intensity with little risk of disturbing Bald Eagles. The new Rifle
Bald Eagle nest is located along the south bank of the Colorado River approximately 0.5 miles downstream of the former nest site. However, it is in the presence of similar human disturbance
factors with 1-70 at 0.23 miles; within 0.67 and 1.0 miles from gravel mining operations; within 0.2 miles of the Union Pacific railroad; 0.23 miles from the City of Rifle's water facility;
and 0.33 miles from industrial sites south of 1-70. Previous Bald Eagle Nest Monitoring WestWater's biologists have been monitoring four Bald Eagle nests along the Colorado River between
Rifle and DeBeque for the past 2 years. This monitoring has provided valuable information regarding Bald Eagle respnnse to human and industrial disturbance factors. Results of this monitoring
have shown that Bald Eagles adapt to human activities near nest sites that are well within USFWS and CDOW recommended buffer zones. The following is a summary of observation made during
Bald Eagle nest monitoring. 1. Three of the Bald Eagle nest sites are located adjacent to gravel mining operations. At two of the mine sites, Bald Eagles occupied new nest sites while
the mines were actively producing gravel. The following is a summary of nests located adjacent to gravel mine sites. • Average distance from edge of mine pit to nest = 776 ft (0.15 mile).
The closest is 400 ft and most distant is 1,895 ft. • Average distance of nest to rock crusher = 1,549 ft (0.29 mile). • All three gravel-mining operations were active during the 2009
nesting season. All three nests successfully fledged eaglets in 2009. WestWater Engineering 5 311612010
.11111' .. I'll'" A'l'lllhll'llf Iffll \'W1, mn nw '.-.10." "" •• , '" R.ception~: 784390 04/07/2010 04:23:~2 PM Jean Rlberico ,8 of 24 Reo Fee:$O.0~ 000 Fee:O.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO
2. None of three nest sites located adjacent to gravel mining pits has topographic buffers and minimal visual (vegetation) buffers to limit the view of the nest. All three nests are
within the USFWS recommended 0.25-mile no surface occupancy buffer. 3. The forth nest site is located in riparian vegetation with active natural gas drilling and production close to
the sites and eaglets have successfulIy fledged during 2007, 2008 and 2009. However, no large-scale natural gas development has occurred until after eaglets have fledged. Bald Eagles
have reoccupied the existing nest site in 20 I 0 after a well pad was constructed and wells were completed (outside nesting season) within 400 ft (0.08 mile) of the nest. At the same
site, Bald Eagle fledglings still using the nest (approx. 21 days post-first flight) displayed little to no response to construction of a well pad using large earth moving equipment
which included 2 bulldozers (D-9 cats) and one trackhoe. Noise associated with this project did not appear to affect the eaglets. UNITED COMPANIES MINING PLAN For business reasons, it
is necessary for United to begin its gravel mining operation by June IS, 2010. Protection of nesting Bald Eagles is a high priority for United as it develops its mining operation. United
recognizes that delaying access road construction and gravel mining until eaglets have been fledged and off the nest for approximately three weeks would provide the best protection for
the birds. The following data and information combined with the on-going nest monitoring data provides a biological basis with which United's will make an informed decision with regards
to commencing operations on June 15,2010 and still allow for protection for Bald Eagles. Based on information collected at the former Rifle Bald Eagle nest in 2009, fledging of eaglets
was likely to occur around June 20-25. Unfortunately, the nest tree fell into the river on about June 18; one eaglet managed to survive, however, subsequent observation indicate the
other two eaglets did not survive. If 20 I 0 nesting is successful, it is likely that fledging would occur at or about the same time as last year-June 20-25. United has consulted with
the USFWS and current USFWS nest protection recommendations for project construction (presented below: number 2) partially conflict with United's mining plans by approximately 3-4 weeks
at the end of the breeding season. United's development of this management plan is intended to help resolve concerns with Bald Eagle nest protection. CONSERVATION MEASURERS AND DISTURBANCE
MITIGATION USFWS Site Specific Conservation Measurers The following is a summary of USFWS recommended primary conservation measures for the new Bald Eagle nest near Rifle for United's
Scott gravel pit (Clayton and Krueger 2/2/2010 email). I. Monitor nesting activities to determine key dates, including fledging, number of young fledged, eagle response to project activities,
etc. Provide a copy of the report to USFWS after fledging, WestWater Engineering 6 3/16/2010
1III Ml"oIo tl(tl\r"l/II/l.",III\II"IIIW'oI.'\,I"".I",Y l ..... rn'l .1111 Reeept!on~: 764390 04107/2010 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 19 of 24 Ree Fe8:$0.00 Doc Fee:Q.00 GARFIELD COUNTY
CO 2. Start operations less than 0.25 miles from nest after fledging & eaglets are no longer dependent on nest (fledging + 3 weeks), 3. Complete mining activities closer than 0.25 miles
from nest during non-nesting season (Non-nesting season approx. 7/15 -11130; Nesting season approx. 1211 -7115), 4. Maximize distance to nest for any processing, asphalt, concrete, etc.
equipment; possibly use screening, 5. Minimize cutting of mature cottonwoods for access road and keep it as close as possible to 1-70, 6. United will keep workers out of the oxbow area
during nesting season to avoid disturbing the eagles. United Companies Conservation Measurers United's proposed gravel pits are located for the most part outside a 0.25-mile buffer of
the nest site. The access road to Mining Area 1 is within the 0.25-mile recommended buffer zone and at it closest point approximately 1,000 ft (0.19 miles) from the nest. Approximately
1,600 ft (56 %) of the 2,850 ft new access road would be constructed within 0.25 miles of the nest. No other alternative access roads are available to United. Based on information collected
by WestWater Engineering regarding Bald Eagle adaptations to human disturbance, it is highly unlikely that initiation of project construction during mid to late June would jeopardize
successful fledging of Bald Eagle eaglets. However, it should be noted that WestWater can not state unequivocally that construction activities associated with the Scott pit will not
adversely affect Bald Eagle nesting. The following information summarizes the evidence that supports the opinion that Bald Eagles are unlikely to be affected by project development.
• The closest construction activities (pre-fledging) are approximately 1,000 ft away from the nest, • Activities are similar to historic disturbance factors that this pair of Bald Eagles
have adapted to, • The mature cottonwood gallery provides a visual barrier between gravel mining operations and nest site. • Access road construction will be adjacent to 1-70 and likely
will not be perceived by the Bald Eagles as a significant treat, • The Bald Eagle nest is in the top of a tall cottonwood tree, which provides added security (National Bald Eagle Management
Guidelines 2007). • Activities at the gravel pit will occur late in the breeding season. As eaglets mature, when parental bonds between the young and adults increase, which reduces the
likelihood of nest abandonment, • It is unlikely that noise levels of equipment will greater than that of traffic on 1-70 !'I'd the Union Pacific railroad, WestWater Engineering 7 3116/2010
.llIllfoio l .. nll'llm.'lrl'omt,I"IIfol,,'·,rllll'TI'I1'Tl'* m· .... ,"' Reoeption#: 784390 041011201e 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 20 of 24 Reo Fae:$0.00 000 Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY
CO • Activities at the mine site and access road generally conform with recommended distance butTers (330 ft. if mining activity will not be visible from nest) USFWS National Bald Eagle
Management Guidelines, • Implementation of United' s recommended conservation measurers as presented and discussed below. United Companies has made the following commitments regarding
the protection of Bald Eagles on the Rivers Edge property for the Scott Pit application in Garfield County. I. United commits to not starting any activity on site until June IS, 2010,
and only if the behavior of the eagles, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist, is conducive to startup. At that time, the access road to Mining Area 1, which is parallel and
adjacent to 1-70, would be improved, topsoil will be stripped and the gravel mining operation will start. Portable crushers and screens will be brought on-site to process gravel. A wildlife
biologist(s) will monitor the behavior ofthe eagles during this time and if, in the biologist's professional opinion, the operation must be slowed down or stopped, construction will
be stopped. United commits to following the recommendations of the wildlife biologist at all times. 2. United commits to starting the initial mining no closer than 1,800 feet from the
nest in the western comer of Mining Area 1, as shown on the attached Ball Eagle protection map. The view of this area from the nest is obstructed by a mature cottonwood gallery located
between the nest and the mining area. 3. United commits to not conducting any mining inside the 1/4 mile butTer (very little is proposed in both pits) until the eaglets have fledged
(fledging + 21 days). This permission must be approved by the wildlife biologist, working with the USFWS. 4. United commits to conducting as much mining and processing as possible from
the pit itself, which will be approximately 25 feet below the current ground level. The majority of the gravel in both pits can be mined and processed in this manner. 5. United and the
landowner, Rivers Edge LLC, commit to not allowing any human activity, including foot travel, 50 feet beyond the disturbed area of Mining Area I, the access road and the area for the
scale and office as shown on the attached Eagle Protection Map, unless the activity is approved by the wildlife biologist approved by the USFWS. Weed spraying is a main activity that
falls in this category. 6. United will try to conduct as much as possible of the mining and processing during the non-nesting season for Bald Eagles. 7. Any asphalt or concrete batch
plants that would be moved on site would be a smaller footprint and portable and would only be moved on site for a specific Colorado Department of Transportation (COOT), County or Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) job, which would be temporary. They could only be placed on site after the approval of the wildlife biologist. The plants must be removed by November IS
of each year. 8. Weed spraying on the site can only take place after the Bald Eagles have fledged, as determined by the wildlife biologist, as described above. WestWater Engineering
8 3/16/2010
.111111' .1'1"" 1'I11II1I1'II''olrll 111'1 Ir~IiITi'l I-.'r II"T'rlm· •• ,111 Reception": 784390 Q4/0712010 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberioo 21 of 24 Ree Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY
CO U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Colorado Division of Wildlife Management Plan Review The Scott Pit Bald Eagle Management Plan was reviewed by the USFWS and CDOW during February
2010. The following is a synopsis of recommendations and comments that the FWS emaHed to the Garfield County Planning Department on 2/22/20 I 0 regarding the Scott Pit Bald Eagle Management
Plan. o The FWS and CDOW reviewed the plan provided by Van Graham (WestWater Engineering biologist) and agree that the plan was acceptable. o Based on the monitoring that Van Graham
(or qualified WestWater biologists) plans to conduct this Spring and Summer, the FWS believes there will be good infonnation gained about the eagles to allow the mining to progress as
United Companies have scheduled [see above United Commitment #1, Page 8 (June 15,2010)]. o Provided the birds nest successfully this year, it is anticipated the monitoring in June will
allow the operations to carry on or be curtailed depending on the reaction of the birds [(Bald Eagles) to initial access road construction and gravel mining] (see above United Commitment
1, Page 8). REFERENCES USFWS. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C, West Water Engineering 9 3/16/2010
I." .~•.,~ ~'•.I .• (: -. \ ~. ~ , ", Ii. ' • ~ .'-.... ~~ ••
... ... .... ... ..................... . . .......... . . ...... ... ·.• •.•. .·.·.·...·...·.i.'.i.i.e.i.i.a.t.l.o.i.i.:.$.3.D.5.~.·.• .•. ·•. •. . ........... . .... . -.-''''.'' ""-'-----L
53J5 loodway loodplain 1111 Wfl'oIo lifI1I~'IIiII, ~ 1M LM!,I"Ill. kI\\:W.IWJI:I)~t~II.l. 11111 Reeeptjon~: 784390 04/0712010 04:23:02 p~ Jean Alberico 11 of 24 Rae Fae;$0.00 Doc Fe.:0.00
GARFIELD COUNTY CO
') J . . if/\ .• e 'S~.· Closest Point of La Farge Excavation (Likely to remain unmined Bacl<fi\i<~d For u nell ]'''tInn 14·~~~ 1111 MI',I,tIfnlMIM'~~lt~ ~~ 1+A:r+1~I'~:Ml ~,~ 11111
Reception~: 784390 04/07/2010 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 10 of 24 Rae Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELO COUNTY CO
158 1 Mining Area 2 13.9 acres Pit 8oI!om Elevation: 5289' Phase 4 (mined last) • e~·~" ,,4 t.M{ •• -..' e. ,· .. .-• • • 120' B~r .,imume • ~rge Mamm Creek Possible Mining Area ';.,.,.'{II1aU
C-2: Mine Extents .aGC)n· . Expansion to the Chambers Pit United Companies
LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A The site is approximately 0.5 miles east of downtown Rifle. Two legal descriptions are given below. The initial legal description defines the area covered
by the Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety pennit and is shown on Map C-I which is included in Appendix C. The second legal description is the legal description required by the
County. That description defines the parcels which comprise the Scott Pit area. A general location map is enclosed as Map B-1 in the next section. The surface owner is Rivers Edge, LLC.
DRMS LEGAL DESCRIPTION The point of beginning lies S 31"23'16" E, 2384.28' tram the NW Comer of Section 15; thence N 80°16'34" E a distance of 109.15'; thence N 80°16'34" E a distance
of 109.15';thence N 69°22'05" E a distance of 136.56'; thence N 80°07'10" E a distance of 103.15'; thence S 86°32'15" E a distance of 146.54'; thence S 70°37'46" E a distance of 135.73';
thence S 67°43'57" E a distance of 135.65'; thence S 89°56'55" E a distance of 85.43'; thence N 45°59'04" E a distance of 173.57'; thence N 88°06'35" E a distance of250.47';thence N
85°30'25" E a distance of 320.08'; thence N 78°32'48" E a distance of 350.95'; thence N 71 °17'36" E a distance of 170.46'; thence N 73°22'41" E a distance of 556.03'; thence N 71 °22'1
0" E a distance of 1486.98'; thence S 04°01'47" W a distance of 108.32'; thence S 00°24'58" E a distance of 425.64'; thence S 01 °17'08" W a distance of 722.3 I '; thence S 01 °00'14"
W a distance of 440.96'; thence S 80°26'09" W a distance of 462.78'; thence S 86°31'05" Wa distance of264.60'; thence N 89°35'22" W a distance of308.30'; thence N 84°54'35" W a distance
of232.88'; thence N 80°14'25" W a distance of 311.49'; thence N 80°07'07" W a distance of 334.72'; thence N 78°35'36" W a distance of 51 0.75'; thence N 78°31 '36" W a distance of754.98';
thence N 80°17'33" W a distance of645.30'; thence N 84°01'46" W a distance of 163.00'; thence N 00°07'09" E a distance of 388.30'; which is the point of beginning, having an area of
93.46 acres. PARCELS LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Parcels A and B, hereinafter described, Northerly of the Northerly right of way line of Interstate 70 as described in the rule
and order recorded May 16, 1985 in Book 668 at Page 708. Parcel A All of Lots 1,2,3 and 4 and the East 232 feet of Lot 5, all in the McLearn Orchard Lands according to the map and dedication,
Document No. 38435, in the Clerk and Recorder's Office, Garfield County, Colorado, known as the First Filing thereof (said Lots comprise part of the SE1I4, the SWl/4 and Lot 5 in Section
15, Township 6 South, Range 93 West, 6th P.M. Scali Pit May 2010 A-I
Parcel B The West 143 feet of Lot 5 and all ofLots 6 through II, inclusive, in Section 15, Township 6 south, Range 93 West, 6th P.M., as platted as the McLeam Orchard Lands, First Filing,
Document No. 38435. Parcel No.1 A tract of land situate in the SE1I4NW1I4 and the SW1I4NE1I4 of Section 15, Township 6 South Range 93 West, 6th P.M., more fully described as follows:
Beginning at a point whence the Meander Comer of the West Line of said Section IS bears: South 59°48' West 1555.1 feet: thence North 200.00 feet; thence North 77°15' East 250.00 feet;
thence North 75°00' East 340.00 feet; thence South 70°41' East 404.40 feet; thence South 980.00 feet; thence South 85°55' West 170.00 feet; thence South 72°45' West 734.55 feet; thence
North 41 °20' West 672.50 feet; thence North 80°49' West 664.62 feet; thence South 52°20' West 180.00 feet, to the point of beginning. Parcel No.2 Beginning at the Meander Comer of the
East line of said Section 15, thence South 87°10' West 1320.00 feet; thence South 85°55' West 534.88 feet; thence North 980.00 feet; thence North 87°13' East 535.00 feet; thence North
72°02' East 1385.10 feet; thence south 1330.00 feet, to the point of begimling. SCOII Pit May 2010 A-2
David Bartholomew From: David Bartholomew Sent: To: Monday, March 21,2011 9:04 AM Thomas, Christy Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: RE: Dale Thome Christy, Thank you for your timely response
in this matter. Upon viewing the boards stipulation and final order, it is my understanding Dale Thome is restricted from performing structural engineering. FYI, the Garfield County
Building & Planning Department has received building engineering plans stamped, dated, and signed by Dale Thome. After speaking with Dale, he thought the issue was resolved and will
provide plans stamped by an associate of his firm. We have rejected Dale's plans and will return them to the applicant. Again, thank you for your time in this concern. Feel free to contact
us with any questions or concerns. Regards, David Bartholomew, Plans Examiner Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Office: 970-945-8212
From: Thomas, Christy [mailto:Christv.Thomas@dora.state,co.usl Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 3:52 PM To: David Bartholomew Subject: Dale Thome Per your voice message: Dale Thome's restriction
on his license excludes the practice of structural engineering. You are welcome to review the signed stipulation on our website: http://www.dora.state.co.us/doraimages/If you have further
questions, let me know, Christy L. Thomas Enforcement Supervisor Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies Division of Registrations Business & Technical Section 1560 Broadway, Suite
1500 Denver, CO 80202 P 303.894,7792 I F 303,869,0254 1
Matt Provost From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Matt, Clint J. Allen [clinl.allen@soudermiller.com] Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:14 AM Matt Provost 'Dale W Thome'; Gary Blecha Mor Storage Truss
Approval Consider this e-mail my approval of the field changes to the truss plans for Mor Storage that we discussed this morning. The modification of only including (3) 8d nails in the
gussets at the top and bottom of the vertical truss member is acceptable. If you have any questions regarding this matter feel free to contact me. Thanks, Clinton J. Allen, P E. Project
Engineer Souder, Miller & Associates 52925 Y, Road, Suite B21 0 Grand Junction, CO 81505 www.soudermiller.com (877) 243-6067 (970) 243-6067 (office) (970) 209-4174 (cell) (970) 241-2845
(fax) Souder, Miller & Associates· Notice of Confidentiality and Privileged Status: This electronic mail message, including all attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information or otherwise may be protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or actions which rely
on the contents of this information is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Souder,
Miller & Associates -Statement on Viruses and Harmful Software: While the message and attachment(s) have been scanned with anti-virus software, Souder, Miller & Associates does not guarantee
that this message or any attachment(s) is free of computer viruses or other harmful software. Souder, Miller & Associates does not accept liability for any damages caused by any computer
virus or other harmful software transmitted herewith. 1
Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC Mor Storage Sales 2465 Highway 6 & 50 Grand Junction, Colorado 81504 Attention: Subject: Mr. Gary Blecha Geotechnical Investigation Temporary
Scale House United Gravel Pit Rifle, Colorado Dear Mr. Blecha, 640 White Avenue Grand Junction , CO 8150 1 Phone: 970-255-8005 Fax: 970-255-6818 H udd lestoll Berry@bresnan .net www.HBET-GJ.colll
April 19, 2011 Project#O I 057 -000 I This letter presents the results of a geotechnical investigation conducted by Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC CHBET) for a temporary
scale house building at the proposed United Companies gravel pit in Rifle, Colorado. The scope of our investigation included evaluating the subsurface conditions at the site to aid in
developing foundation recommendations for the proposed construction. Site Conditions At the time of the investigation, the site was generally open and sloped gently down to the north.
Two abandoned buildings were observed north of the proposed scale house location. Vegetation at the site consisted primarily of shOtt field grasses with numerous trees to the north.
Subsurface Investigation The subsurface investigation included two test pits in the vicinity of the proposed new structure. Test Pits TP-I and TP-2 were excavated to depths of 6.5 feet
and 5.0 feet below the existing ground surface, respectively. Typed test pit logs are included in Appendix A. As indicated on the logs, the subsurface conditions at the site were fairly
consistent. The test pits generally encountered 0.5 to 0.75 feet of clayey sand and gravel fill above brown, moist, lean clay with organics topsoil to a depth of 1.5 feet. Below the
topsoil, brown to gray to tan, dry to very moist, soft to stiff lean clay with clayey sand lenses extended to the bottoms of the excavations. Groundwater was not encountered in the test
pits at the time of the investigation.
United Scale House #01057-0002 04/19/11 Laboratory Testing Laboratory testing was conducted on samples of the native clay soils encountered in the test pits. The testing included grain
size analysis, Atterberg limits determination, natural moisture content and density determination, swell/consolidation testing, and maximum density and optimum moisture content (Proctor)
determination. The laboratory testing results are included in Appendix B. The laboratory testing results indicate that the native clay soils are moderately plastic. In addition, the
clay soils were shown to be slightly collapsible with up to approximately 0.5% collapse measured in the laboratory. However, based upon the Atterberg limits of the material, HBET anticipates
that the native clay soils may have a slight potential for expansion after being compacted and introduced to excess moisture. Foundation Recommendations Based upon the results of the
subsurface investigation and nature of the proposed construction, shallow foundations are recommended. Spread footings and monolithic (turndown) structural slabs are both appropriate
foundation alternatives. However, in order to limit the potential for excessive differential movements, it is recommended that the foundations be constructed above a minimum of 12-inches
of structural fill. In general, due to their plasticity, the native clay soils are not suitable for reuse as structural fill. Imported structural fill should consist of a granular, non-expansive,
non-free draining material such as crusher fines, pit-run, or COOT Class 6 base course. However, if pit-run is used for structural fill, a minimum of six inches of crusher fines or Class
6 base course should be placed on top of the pit run to prevent large point stresses on the bottoms of the footings due to large particles in the pit-run. Prior to placement of structural
fill, it is recommended that the bottom of the foundation excavation be scarified to a depth of 6 to 8 inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard
Proctor maximum dry density, within ± 2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTM 0698. Structural fill should extend laterally beyond the edges of the foundation
a distance equal to the thickness of structural fill. Structural fill should be moisture conditioned, placed in maximum 8-inch loose lifts, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard
Proctor maximum dry density for fine grained soils and modified Proctor maximum dry density for coarse grained soils, within ± 2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance
with ASTM 0698 and 01557C, respectively. Pit-run materials should be proofrolled to the Engineer's satisfaction. For structural fill consisting of imported granular materials, and foundation
building pad preparation as recommended, a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 1,500 psf may be used. In addition, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 250 pci may be used for structural
fill consisting of crusher fines, pit-run, or base course. Foundations subject to frost should be at least 36 inches below the finished grade. In general, water soluble sulfates are
common to the soils in Western Colorado. Therefore, at a minimum, Type I-II sulfate resistant cement is recommended for construction at this site. W\2008 ALL PROJECTSI01057 -Mor Storage
Sales101057-0002 United Scale Housel200 -GeoIO\057-0002 LR04191l.doc 2
~i~~e~. A ~~:lo~i-I0002 e ~~,~~1,~~~~,;~~,','i Any stemwalls or retaining walls should be designed to resist lateral earth pressures. For backfill consisting of the native soils or imported
granular, non-free draining, non-expansive material, we recommend that the walls be designed for an equivalent fluid unit weight of 55 pcf in areas where no surcharge loads are present.
Lateral earth pressures should be increased as necessary to reflect any surcharge loading behind the walls. Non-Structural Floor Slab and Exterior Flatwork Recommendations In order to
limit the potential for excessive differential movements of slabs-on-grade, It IS recommended that non-structural floor slabs and/or exterior flatwork be constructed above the native
soils, below the topsoil and/or fill, that have been scarified to a depth of 12-inches, moisture conditioned, and compacted to a minimum of 95% of the standard Proctor maximum dry density,
within ± 2% of the optimum moisture content as determined in accordance with ASTMD698. Drainage Recommendations Grading around the structure should be designed to carry precipitation
and runoff away from the structure. It is recommended that the finished ground surface drop at least twelve inches within the first ten feet away from the structure. Downspouts should
empty beyond the backfill zone. It is also recommended that landscaping within five feet of the structures include primarily desert plants with low water requirements. In addition, it
is recommended that automatic irrigation within ten feet offoundations be minimized or controlled with automatic shut off valves. General Notes The recommendations included above are
based upon the results of the subsurface investigation and on our local experience. These conclusions and recommendations are valid only for the proposed construction. As discussed previously,
the subsurface conditions at the site were fairly consistent. However, the precise nature and extent of any subsurface variability may not become evident until construction. As a result,
it is recommended that a representative of HBET observe the foundation excavation prior to structural fill placement to verify that the subsurface conditions are consistent with those
described herein. In addition, it is recommended that a representative of HBET test compaction of structural fill materials. We are pleased to be of service to your project. Please contact
us if you have any questions or comments regarding the contents of this report. Respectfully Submitted: Huddleston-Berry Engineering Michael A. Berry, P.E. Vice President of Engineering
W;\2008 ALL PROJECTS\O 1057 -Mor Storage Sales\01057-0002 United Sca le House\200 -Geo\OI05 7-0002 LR04 19 1l.doc 3
APPENDIX A Typed Test Pit Logs
~ Huddles.ton-Beny Engi?eering & Testing, LLC ~(f,'t_ -",<i'~))640 'WhIte Avenue, Umt B ~'m~ Grand Junction, CO 81501 ~.:: J~ 970-255-8005 "g,<~ 970-255-6818 '=' CLIENT Mar Storage PROJECT
NUMBER 011 DATE STARTED ~3"'/2<;9"_/1'_'1'___ __ _ COMPLETED ~3"'/2"'9"-/1'_'1 _ _ EXCAVATION CONTRACTOR -'C"'I"'ie'[!ntL-_________ _ EXCAVATION METHOD _____________ _ lOGGED BY J:A"'S'----____
_ CHECKED BY -'M"'A"'B"---__ _ NOTES MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 0,0 Clayey SAND and ,(Fill), brown, dry Lean CLAY with Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, moist TEST PIT NUMBER TP-1 PROJECT NAME United
Scale House PROJECT LOCATION Rifle, CO GROUND ELEVATION ____ _ GROUND WATER LEVELS: PAGE 1 OF 1 TEST PIT SIZE _____ _ AT TIME OF EXCAVATION ""d"-rvL-__________ _ AT END OF EXCAVATION
-'d"rvL-__________ _ AFTER EXCAVATION ---k~ r~~~==~~~~~~~~ lean, CU;,Y (Cl),: clayey sand lenses, brown to gray, moist to very moist, soft to stiff 89 14 GB1: lab Classified 12 32 15
17 87 Bottom of test pit at 6,5 feet
r Huddles~on-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC TEST PIT NUMBER TP-2 ,~ "'~:40WlllteAvenue,UmtB ~'IB~ PAGE 1 OF 1 Grand Junction, CO 81501 '. .1$ 970-255-8005 ,,-,tf8 970-255-6818 '="
CLIENT Mor Storage PROJECT NAME United Scale House PROJECT NUMBER 01057-0002 PROJECT LOCATION Rifle, CO DATE STARTED 3/29/11 COMPLETED 3/29/11 GROUND ELEVATION TEST PIT SIZE EXCAVATION
CONTRACTOR Client GROUND WATER LEVELS: EXCAVATION METHOD AT TIME OF EXCAVATION d!y LOGGED BY AS CHECKED BY MAB AT END OF EXCAVATION d!y NOTES AFTER EXCAVATION ---w '" Z I:~ Iii '" ~IMIT:
"-• -~ !< >-0: 1~ enw w I I-UJ ;::I-::J "-o ~ ~g 3~ I<!) "-0 MATERIAL DESCRIPTION w'" OZ-' ~~ Q t: i= t:: ?J GS ~-' -'::0 ...J:>~ ° "-:::l ",0 6~ ~~ liiO <!) ~z 0~ ~ f< 3 en :::::i -I
...J::s z w en ~ ° "--z 0.0 "-u: ~g Clayey SAND and GRAVEL (FILL), brown, dry ~ t~ Lean CLAY with Organics (TOPSOIL), brown, moist "0; i :i. Lean CLAY (el), clayey sand lenses, brown
to gray to tan, dry to moist, soft to s"tiff r 2.5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 5.0 i Bottom of test pit at 5.0 feet. <OJ ? ! ~
APPENDlXB Laboratory Testing Results
fI~ Hudd!es,ton-Berry Engi~eering & Testing, LLC GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Y ", ~ 640 WIllte A venue, Unit B ~'IB~ Grand Juuction, CO 81501 ~ ~ 970-255-8005 ~ 970-255-6818 CLIENT Mor Storage
PROJECT NAME United Scale House PROJECT NUMBER 01057-0002 PROJECT LOCATION Rifle, CO U,S, SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U,S, SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 3/4 1/23/8 3 6 6101416
20 30 40 5060 100140200 100 I I I • II ,. -t,-; I I 95 ~ " 90 85 80 75 70 I-65 J: (9 iiJ 60 S >-55 'o"c LU z 50 u: Iz-45 LU () oc 40 LU a. 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 100 10 1 0,1 0.01 0,001
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS r COBBLES 1 GRAVEL 1 SAND I SILT OR CLAY coarse fine I coarse medium I fine I Specimen Identification Classification LL PL PI Cc Cu • TP-1, GB1 03/11 LEAN CLAY(CL)
32 15 17 Specimen Identification 0100 060 D30 010 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay • TP-1, GB1 03/11 4,75 0,0 13,1 86,9 -z
~ Huddleston-Beny Engineering & Testing, LLC CONSOLIDATION TEST H I~~' '1:.'\ 640 White Avenue, Unit B ~~ 1B~))?rand Junction, CO 81501 ~ @970-255-8005 ~ 970-255-6818 CLIENT Mar Storage
PROJECT NAME United Scale House PROJECT NUMBER 01057-0002 PROJECT LOCATION Rifle, CO 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 ......... ~ 1\ 1.0 1\ 1\ .... 1.2 ;i ~ \ f-rfJ 1.4 \ 1.6 \ 1.8 \ 2.0 \ 2.2 \
2.4 2.6 100 1,000 10,000 STRESS, psf Specimen Identification Classification id MC% • TP-1 2.5 89 14 >-00 ~ a 00 z a u
~ Huddles,ton-Berry Engi?eering & Testing, LLC MOISTURE-DENSITY RELATIONSHIP I ~~!?I .B... "~, ~ G64r0a nWd hJuiten cAtIvoenn, uCeO, U 8m15t 0B1 . if$ 970-255-8005 ""-:·-'c=",;-tl 970-255-6818
CLIENT Mor Storage PROJECT NAME United Scale House PROJECT NUMBER 01057-0002 PROJECT LOCATION Rifle, CO lOU 1\ \ \ \ Sample Date: 3/29/2011 1\ \ \ Sample No.: 1 145 \ 1\ Source of Material:
TP-1 \ \ \ \ Description of Material: LEAN CLAY(cq 1\ \ \ \ Test Method: ASTM D698A 140 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1\ \ 135 \ \ TEST RESULTS \ \ \ \ Maximum Dry Density 109.6 PCF \ \ Optimum Water
Content 17.6 % \ \ 130 \ 1\ \ GRADATION RESULTS (% PASSING) \ \ I\' #200 #4 3/4" 1\ \, 125 1\ \ 87 100 100 \ \, --'tl \ Co \ \, ,: \ \, >en-ATTERBERG LIMITS z 120 \ UJ \, 0 >-\ \ LL
PL PI '" \ "\ ----0 \ 32 15 17 115 \ \, \ Curves of 100% Saturation \ 1"\ for Specific Gravity Equal to: \ "\ \ 1"\ 2.80 110 \ "\ ~ .\ "-2.70 /"\ \ \ "-2.60 I\, \ 105 \ '\ "-\, '\ \
"\ '\ r\. \ 100 '\ I"-1\ t-... 1\ \. "-I\. " 95 I\. " " I\. " " 90 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 WATER CONTENT. %
COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD 1560 Broadway, Suite 1350 Denver, CO 80202 PERMIT#: 712017 Permit BEMIS ELECTRIC CO., INC. Holder: PO BOX 1908 GRAND JUNCTION 81502 Inspection Report
Date Inspected: 11/09/2011 Phone: (970) 241-1426 Fax: ( ) -Email: bemiselectric@msn.com Site 00001 County Road 315 Rifle, Garfield County, 81652 Owner: United Companies Phone: Status:
Accepted Inspection type: Complete Final Partiallnspection:N NEW OTHER Trim PermitN COMMERCIAL OTHER Inspector: Norman Feck 877-320-9150 Corrections: Comments: Wiring within the structure
was done under another permit. 11116/2011 Page 1
Permit Card POST ON SITE Garfield County Permit NO. BLCO-3-11-1950 Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970)945-B212 Fax: (970)3B4-3470
'''11; . Issue Date: 4/20/2011 AGREEMENT Permit Type: Commercial Building , Worn Classification: New Expires: 10/17/2011 In considerati on of the issuance of the permit, the applicant
hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning. location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further
agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and co nstruction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked
by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NUll AND VOID. Commercial Building Parcel #:217715100054 wner's Name: Rivers Edge, LLC Owner's Phone: oh Address:
1 CR 315 RIFLE, Cp 81650-Total Square Feet: 200 • ~ ......... l1li lit! ft_. , • ,-_. '" , ontrilctor~ Phone Primary Contractor Work Description: -. -Im.pection Scheduling Code ~s~ection
• Comments -'" IVR d' Pass Date._ .F_o-oters f 105 r-oundation Walls 110, Framing 115 ' -OJ( -I'fi-. ~/~. C-, .. ..-~ 6-,).(-/( Drvwall '~ 20 (//f.inal ~i 12,5 ' 111<-.~ 1//-/6'-11 Mise
, ' 1~~\, r -","' ll;iN" Ok.. • /7 _.-Insulation Ib'· .. :v..q' Grout <·;1175 Mechanical 405 UG Plumbing ''<605 Rough Plumbing Ir] 6~0. Gas ' 620" ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306
Pro erty Address N/A Street Direction N/A Street N/A Street Suffix N/A Vicinity RIFLE Business Name N/A Subdivision Name MCLEARNS ORCHARD LANDS Block N/A Lot 1 Condo Name N/A Condo Unit
N/A Dwellina Units 1.00 Acres 36.04 Land Sq Ft N/A Owner Owner RIVERS EDGE LLC Care of 1 N/A Care of2 N/A Owner Address PO BOX 1556 Owner City RIFLE Owner State CO Owner ZIP 81650 Assessor
Parcel Number 217715100054 Tax District 24 Tax Exempt Entity PRIVATE OWNERSHIP City or County Unincoroorated Count ZoninQ Description Rural Land Use 1 FARM/RANCH RESIDENCE-IMPS Land
Use 2 MEADOW HAY LAND-AGRICLTRL Land Use 3 WASTELAND Land Use 4 N/A Land Use 5 N/A Reception No 760306 Book N/A Page N/A Legal Description Section: 15 Township: 6 Range: 93 Subdivision:
MCLEARNS ORCHARD LANDS Lot: 1 THRU:-Lot: 11 ALL LYING N OF 1-70 Section N/A Township N/A Range N/A
Account Account: R024500 L_Q~atiQn Parcel Number 2177-151-00-054 Situs Address City Rifle ZipCode 81650 Tax Area 024 -2HD-RF -024 Legal Summary Seclion: 15 Township: 6 Range: 93 Subdivision:
MCLEARNS ORCHARD LANDS Lol: 1 THRU:Lol: 11 ALL LYING N OF 1-70 Ir~J1~f~r::s Sale Price JadHs\ory Tax Year 2010 2009 Taxes $890.68 $886.36 Page 1 of 1 Owner Name RIVERS EDGE LLC Actual
(2010) $228,270 Owner Address PO BOX 1556 Primary Taxable $19,750 RIFLE, CO 81650 Tax Area: 024 Mill Levy: 45.0980 Sale Date jJ1241200_S 1J 121 12QQs Q2/28/2005 jQl10/2005 Images • S)<Jllct)
• "Is 21J ,. Sk.QO:/I • N WI~GOW:;;II "" '" Type Actual Assessed Acres Units Improvement $220,800 $17,580 1.000 Land $7,470 $2,17036.040 Doc Type sf>., Q.Q.O QC_D QGo. '" 00' =~ ,. ,.
,". 'oo~ ---;0 ,. ,,' '" '" Book Page B: 1 !Q!t.p: 32§ !l:1n5J':_8-41 hUps:/Iact.garfield-county.com/assessor/taxweb/account.jsp?accountNum=R024... 3/16/2011
:[' If II I j , I. ! -I I I I II II A 8 ~ z ~ o u o ~ w
·.' ... • "'-'------, S3c1S loodway loodplain 1111 W. t'll1lMlfI,) 1M lIfIi.f1Ii~ ~~Iflt.It+Ji:I~t~",\, 1111 Reception#: 784390 04'07/2010 04~23:02 PM Jean Alberico 11 of 24 Rae Fee:$0.00
Doe Fae:0.00 ~RFIELD COUNTY CO
I~e', '~ .•. '--.. ) ~ ... .Closest Point of La Farge E)(cavation (Likely to remain llnrr,ineej\l 7.LE)ackij\ll~d For UmJUla,IIOjJ 14·~~ 1111 W*t""'~Ih':~!fl".\i~ lfI~ 1+lI:r+1CI,~~Ml
~I~ II \II Reception~: 784390 04/07(2010 04:23:02 PM Jean Alberico 10 of 24 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARfIELD COUNTY CO
;e '\ ,01' ,/",/I ' i '· '" . , , Mining Area 2 13.9 acres Pit Bottom Elevation: 5289' Phase 4 (mined last) ~ :-~OX , '; lJ, '] dR Pit access ramp 10:1 nPit0 : ..' . .,...-i•n' Sa:•;r
. ,imum• e ~Tge Mamm Creek Possible Mining Area i;:g,1f11'ao C-2: Mine Extents ~C)tt Expansion to the Chambers Pit United Companies
CONDITIONS OF PERMIT BLCO-3-11-1950 Old Castle SW Group Rivers Edge, LLC Scale House/Office Bldg. 00001 CR 315 Rifle, Colorado 1) ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE 2009 IBC, IMC, IPC, IFGC,
IECC, IFC AND MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS. I 2) ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH THE CONDITIONS OF THE CURRENT LAND USE CHANGE' PERMIT. 3) ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH STATE AND
FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 4) EXCAVATION OBSERVATION REPORT REQUIRED AT FOOTING INSPECTION. S) LOCKS, LATCHES, LANDINGS PER 2009 IBC, SECTION 1008. 6) LIGHT AND VENTILATION PER 20091BC, CHAPTER
12. 7) ELECTRICAL ROUGH IN APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO FRAME INSPECTION. 8) ELECTRICAL FINAL APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. APPROVED SUBJEct TO NOTED EXCEmONS &
INSPECTIONS GARFIELD COUNTY BUlL~;'iEP~AR . Date~ ~ By LDCOP NO INSPECTION WITHOUT THESE PLANS ON SITE fII&e of .<,:.>, .0...>.. .......... • M 6 u ...J cc
4" CONC. W/FIBERS APPRovm FilL (2)#5 T$B CONT. R1.7 RIGID INSULATION (PER FOUNDATION PLAN) APPROVED STRl\CTURAL FILL TYPI CA L SE:CT/ON 20'-a' . ......... ~-------------I'" ...... .
-,--_ .......... , ......................... . . .. ............. . :: :: I : : : : I ..:...:..:...:1 :: I I :: , l... 4' Tl-hCK COIllCRf.T£ ---I ...... I ... ' -r-I : I . .. I W/FIB£R5
"\ I :: I I' . :: I I : ~:~ , 1 1 I ~:-:-: :: : L *_ ----t--------_..J ::: R 4.'l RIGI D If.lSULAT,ON )( 24" iNl DE HORlzoIliTAL-J (Wp 4 CORNE.RS) FOUNDATION PLAN e,l'('AIIA'.J,1fYI
Ob5etllllPd1t ~(7'ft fZe9ulf~d -+t Fo-P hYl-, /H5f.u...,.,V>1. I'1-§'O pst. fst-4!' ~TYP. I"' ! 2'-10" U,J S3[' I" -I---J1i "I 31 1 at -\9 ~ I x "", U) ~ :3 +---~ 2 5' , 2 BASE. EABINEt
-' <9 C.()UNfER TOP <;t .-0 " 10'-0" 4'-4" . "ZI'6AS£:-_. CASINET ?'-10" IT,) -"" 0qoX '" 4' COONTERTOP LDdt.~, ~ht$ tL--tw:IIYI1~ p<ff ~q .:r::.8C, 5ec.-nm IODt! F P LAN I-FI I !: '
:z ::J cJ a~. >11. · ~c "UJ o ... • -(11 U,J " S C .J ~ t -' N N , «t o _.' .. '<t ~----IS ~ l< "'"
ENGt ;'JE ::q=.D T~U SSS S @24 01 0.:" , -00 II 2 EA . ROOF v",N i s 30 VR "5 P~ A L T ROOF PRE-ENGINEERED RF TRUSSES HAVE ENGINEERING FOR INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAME INSPECTION f$t (e.wtMeer
rfAYVIped de.f;t-i 0 l(o 518 ' 056 5H EAT H! ~~ INSULA nON R -38 , " SPAN'" g -0 2 < 4 TRUSS BLOCK ,,"G 1/2" jll\ASONITE FASCIA h" MASONITE SOFFIT CWFr:I T \lE~T S ( 2. PeR SIOt) :---:::,
1/z" MASONI TE 5IDI;,JG 7/16" OSB. S~ EATflI NG 2 x 6 STUDS @110 " o.c, " II 1/4 x 2. LAG BOLT II II 11 GA, x 2 x 10 GALV, STE.L 1IZ")( 4Y2" EX.P, l>.NCHO~ ANCHOR SlRAP DETAIL 2>(8 FLOOt>.
JQI5TS@IG " 0,(, I -: 0 : -' 0 0 , N i -<9 :\ ! ;\ r '1 ,. e,: ,j l MOR STORAGE SALES 30 I 0 1-70 BUSINESS LOOP GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81504 phone: (970) 254-0460 fax: (970) 254-4694 I :t
_.--________~ 1~O_-~O _____~ ~-~ , I':~'~ --j2~'-13" ~__~ >~+I ----j5?-"~'.4-.~:-<~~, "---i,I'~'--~2~'-3~-'---J ri Jl I I I I I I : : I I I I I I I I II I 'I-' I I I /fl II I " I, I
"----3/4" T I} C. o~ I I I SHEA~14ING j( I ' I I ! I 'I I I I, I I I I; ' I ~ I I =' 1 " _t_~' IV /-r I I f ( I I ( ,I , !: I ) I IV' I I -,.X±I R-30 I-----11i' TYP ICAL ANO IOR STRAP
LOcATION , ., , /, SH -r,",5ULATIC>oJ TREATED PL.'twOOD E:Ar~Ir.J6 B6.LO\iV' .... , I Ii -, , " , ....--.r,: ~I (::'1 '. t ~i .~ .;' 2:<4 r 2)(8 J Ol5T '2:L.jC.i< '.\l '~ Y?!CAL @FLOOR
JOt 5TS 16" O.C, , ....=l--U '0 n? ~~RES3URE TREATeD ( 4 REQu1 RED) 2xa FLCO!,\ '112" TREATED PLYWOOD ~~~-----ct . 4-n.o55U~E TI\Z;>.T ,. 4-R ZQ~ ! q,,::» ROOR FRAiVllNG PLAN 3-llOd
EA . JolS'S '" -I(OJ EACH St<)C<,
I I !~-PL8< 1 ' I I , ' i I '€): 4PLEX I I<JOA~~ __ I,-II I 1 -I, i I 11~·" I 1 ,I 'I r I, '; I i* ! I , 1-4' STRIP LITE e ; i I ..l 4' STR..I P Lin El ECT RI CA L PLAN • B-/~C--hUCI/I
~t-> /,Vl Irfltwl1 { fZ.!'1u/led rw ~t. tMf"c1tM . I ~ e/~c-lnH.1Y1 AMi ,f'pI'/H'1I'dj (2~~/rtd ~ Cd/r=IJul/J?yMIJ'1I. --,--,r---• I °, i' '01 "'I I I, I r I-_. -I I , , l I I I I I
, , I I , ! , ,I w'-o" +--I i i i , ! r , i i i , I i ,1 r ;.11 [ '-3: ,, .J, , -MOR STORAGE SALES 30101-70 BUSINESS LOOP GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81504 phone: (970) 254-0460 fax: (970) 254
-4694 1 I i I I I ~ I i ,, ,; , , , ; ,, I , W i _ 1+------:021,; -------i I ',: I, ~ :
General Notes and Specifications GENERAL NOTES I. DESIGN OF FOlJNDA nON IS BASED UPON DRY CONDmON. FOUNDA nON EXCAVA nON ro BE VERIF1ED BY ENGINEER OF !lECORD. ALLOWAilLE BEARlNG P!t£SSURE.
........................ ..... 1250 ?SF TO BE FlEW VERIFIED l. sou. 8ENEA TIl :iLABS ON GRADE SKALL BE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER APPROVED MATERlAL, FREE OF FROST. WATER A,,'l1) FOREIGN DEBRIS,
COMPACTED IN ACCORDANCE WTnI SPECIFlCA nONS WIlli M1N1MUM DENSITY ~s FOLLOWS: m~S~~69~ALLS 95%OFMAXlMUM STANDARD PROCTO t:fevt !.tole ~t(~ fZ.~~ SlABS ,,% OF MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR
fl~alffrJ ItT ft1C1hW:' ASTM 01598 -1 I BACKI'fLL ,,% OF MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR 1~1 ptc.f!m. It. 50 ff f (NON-SWELLING MATERlAL) 1. ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN
ADVANCE OF FOR.MING TO INS? THE OPEN EXCAVATION AND/OR PIER DIULLlNG TO DETERMINE ntATTIIE SOIL CONOmONS ARE CONSISTENT WITH DESIGN CRITERIA. IF mE SOD.. PROPERTIES ARE FOUNDTO BE DIFFERENT
FROM TInS CRITERIA, THEN TIlE ENGINEER SffALL BE PROMPTLY NOTIFIED so THAT THE FOUNDATION DESIGN MAYBE REVIEWED. 4. ENGINEER. SHALL Be NOT1F1ED At LEAST 24 HOURS IN A,OVAN'CEOF CONCRETE
PUCEMENT TO INSPECT nm REINFORCEMENT. 5. CONTRACTOR ANDIOR OWNER SHALL VER.IFY ALL. DIMENSIONS IN mE FIELD AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FOR CORRECTION OR VERIFICATION PRIOR
TO COMMENCING WORK IN mE AFFECTED AREA. 6. CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY POssmIE OMISSION PRIOR TO mE CONSTRUCTION OF mE AFFECTED WORK. 7. ALL. INTERIOR UTILITIES
AND UTILcrY CASINGS TO BE LOCAIE> AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE. 8. ALL STRUCTURAL SUBsnnrnONS TO BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER. 9. GROUND SURFACE SHAll BE SLOPED TO DRAIN AWAY
FROM mE STRUcnIRE IN ALL DIRECTIONS AT A SLOPE OF AT LEAST 1 FOOT FOR llIEFlRST 10 FEET AND 2% TIfEREAFTER. ROOF DOWNSPOUTS AND DRAINS SHALL DISCHARGE WEIL BEYOND THE UMlI'S OF ALL BACKFD..L.
FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE TO BE INSPECTED AND CERTIFIED BY BUUDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. INSTALLATION, FUNcnON AND DA YUOfer OF FOUNDATION DRAINS TO 8E INSPECTED AND CERTIftED
PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. 10. DESIGN lIVE LOADS ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1HE INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2006 EDITION WITH llfE FOLLOWING MINlMUM CRITERIA: ( ZeJD f r: ~ (!. ) SNOW LIVE
LOAD 40 P$F .-DRfFTlNG ~ ROOF DEAOL.OAD IOPSF .-IOPSF ATOVERFRAME FLOOR LIVE LOAD 40 PSF FLOOR OEAD LOAD IS PSF WTND V-1s .. V-fin .• ..... ................... .............. 90 MPH
..... _ .. _._75 MPH II. mE CONTRACTOR SHAll BE RESPONS[BL£ to COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF .'-IECIiANICAL OPENINGS, FLOOR DRAfNS, INSERTS, DEPRESSIONS, BURlED CABLES AND UTIUTlES, ETC.
WITH MECHANICAL AND eLECTRICAL DRAWlNGS. 12. EXCAVA nONS UNDER EXISTING CONCRETE FOR ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL WORK SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH A LEAN CONCRETE MIX HAVING A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH OF 1000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. THIS LEAN CONCRJiTEF[l.L SHOULDEXl'ENDOUT AND DOWN FROM THE EDGES OF THE FOOTING AT A MIN1MUM SLOPE OF 9 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZON! AL AND SHALL BE PACKED
TIGHT TO nre BOTTOM OF THE FOOTING. Il. TInS FOUNDATION DESIGN IS BASED UPON DRY CONDmONS. ALL EXCAVATION AND COMPACTION RECOMMENDATIONS SHALL BE OBSERVED. ENGINEER TO INSPECT EXCAVATION
FOR COMPLIANCE OF REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS WITH DESIGN. ALL smuCTIJRAL FILL TO BE APPROVED IN WRmNG BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND PLACED ACCOllDlNG TO ENGINEER RECO~ATIC!NS. 14.
THIS FOUNDATION DESIGN DOES NOT pRECLUDE TIlE FOUNDATION FROM pOssmLE MOVEMENT OF 2-OR LESS. FOUNDATION ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONsmLE FOR MOISTIlRE OR WATER IN STRUCTURE SUBSou..s TIlAT
15 NOT EVIDENT UPON EXCAVATION OR DURING CONSTRUCTION. FOUNDATION ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBIE FOR ADVERSE EFFECTS (HEAVING OR SETnlNG) DUE TO MOISTURE IN STRUCTURE SUBSons AfTER CONSTRUCTION
fNCLUDING BUTNOT LIMITED TO: IRRIGATION RUNOFF FROM LAWNS OR LA.'lDSCAPfNQ-SURfACE AND SUBSURFACE (fNCLUDING ADJACENT LAND OWNERS IllRJGA TlON RUNOFF-SURFACE A..'IID SUBSURfACE), ROOF
DRAINAGE WIDCR lIAS CONCENTRATED DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE FOUNDATION, AND CHANGES IN SUBSURFACE MOISTURE CONOmONS DUE TO UNFQRSEEABLE CHANGES 1N1lIE GROUNDWATER LEVELS. IS. SOIIJMOISTIJR£
CONDmONS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BE DOCUMENTED BY ENGINEER :oRIOR TO APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF CERTIF!CAfE OF OCCUPANCY. ALL BACKFILL TO BE COMPACTED AND CERTIFIED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
PRIOR TO APPROVAL AND ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPAa'l'CY.(REFERENCE NOTEM9) IF MOISTURE IS ENCOUNTERED DT.1RING CONSTRUCTION, NOTIFY ENGI:NEER IMMEDIATELY. USE OF THESE i'U,NS AS
PERMIT DOCUMENTS CONSTrruTES ACCEPTANCE OF THESE TERMS. CONCRETE I. ALL CONCRETE DESIGN. MATERIALS AI'IID CONSTRL"cnON SHALL CONFOR.\{ TOACI 5TANDARD J 15-05. THE IRC 2006 EDmON, lllE
C.iSIM.\.WALOF STANDARD ?RACTICE AND THE PROJECT SPECIFlCA TIONS. ALL AGGREGATE SHALL BE ANGlJlAR "''lID SHAll BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A?PllCABLE !BC AND IRC)T ANDARDS. MECHANICALLY VIBRATE
ALL CONCRETE WHEN aElNG ?tACED. l , CEMENT FOR CONCRETE SHALL BE TYPE.a ?ORnANDCEM£NT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM CIS0 A.ND ALL APPLICABLE IlIC A.ND IRC STANDARDS. l . CONCRETE SHALL HAVE
A MINL'-1UM COMP!U.SSIVE SnENGnI IN 28 DAYS AS fOUOWS: fOOTING, WALL, i' IERS )s00 PSI CEMENT TYPEft8 SUBS ON GRADE }500 PSI CEMENT rYPEW 4. ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE. DEFORMED Bll.LET
STEEL CONFORMING TO ASTM A615, GRADE 60, EXCEPT Pll.ASTER TIES, GRADE B£A.\{ STIRRUPS, AND DOWELS MAYBE GRADE 40. ALL REINFORCING STEEL TO BE WELDED SHALL CONFORM: TO ASTM A706, GRADE
60. 5. REtNFORCEMENT SHALL. BE DETAILED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI DET AJl.ING MANUAl, LA TEST EDmON. THE USE OF HEAT WHD..E BENDING BARS wn..L NOT BE pEJU,.oDTTED. FORMWORK SHALL BE
DESIGNED, ERECTED AND REMOVED IN ACCORDANCE WTTHTIIE SPECIFICATIONS. 6. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PLACED SO TIlA T TIlE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE PROTECTION IS PROVtDED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.
CONCRETE SURFACES POURED AGAINST GROUND)" CLEAR FORMED SURFACES EXPOSED TO GROUND OR WEATlIER BARS M6 AND LARGER r CLEAR BARS IfS AND SMALLER I-In" CLEAR. SLABSONGRADE AT CENTERS ALL
BARS TO BE CONTINUOUS AROUND CORNERS 7. RflNFORCEMENTSHALL BE SECURELY neD A.NO SHAU BE SUPPORTED WTTH METAL OR PLASTIC CHAJRS OR HUNG FROM FORMS. s. GRADE BEAMSISTEMWALLS SHALL NOT
HAVE JOTNTS IN A HORIZONTAL PLANE. ANY STOP IN CONCRETE WORK MUST BE MADE A r MID SPAN WITH V£RTlCAL BULKHEADS AND HORIZONTAL KEYS SPACED 6" ON CENTER, UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWlSE. 9. ALL
FOUNDA nON EXCAVATIONS, BACKFrtL AND COMPACTION TO BE INSPECTED AND CERTIFIED BY ENGINEER.. All REPORTS ARE TO BE SUBMITl'ED TO TIlE ENGINEER BEFORE GRADE BEAMS, PADS, FOOTERS, OR PlLE
CAPS ARE POURED. 10. CONTINUOUS HORIZONTAL BARS AND CORNER BAAS INfOOTTNG, STEM WALLS/GRADE BEAMS ANO SLAas SHALL BE LAPPED A MINIMUM OF 36 BAR OIAMETERS AT SPLICES. SPUCE LOCATION SHALL
BESTAQGERED WHERE POSSIBLE. I I. VERTICAL DOWEL BARS IN WALLS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE LAPPED A MlNIMUM OF 46 BAR DlA.t.\1'ETERS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. STEM WALLS/GRADE BEAMS BELOW
GRADE SHALL HAVE BACKfILL PLACED EQUALLY ON Born SIDES UNTn. THE REQUIRED LEVElS ARE REACHED . ll . CONTROL ANOIOR CONSTRUCTION JOINTS IN SLABS ON GRADE SHALL BE SPACED AT INTERVALS
ENCLOSING NO MOllE. THAN 144 SQUARE FEET W!m A MAXIMUM OF 12 FEET fN ANV ONE OIRECTION. CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE FORMED WITH METAL LOAD KEY JOINT. 14. CONSTRUCTION JOINTS (COLD JOfi'llTS)
SHALL 9E PROVIDED IN WAUS AND GRADE BEAMS WHICH ARE OVER 10 FEET fN A STRAIGHT RUN. WATERSTOPS AND KEYWAYS SHALL BE i"ROVIDED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS WHEIl£ INTERIOR SLABS ON GRADE
OCCUR BELOW EXTERIOR GRADE. ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. IS. CAST·IN·PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE SUSIECT TO TESTING BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY AS
FOLLOWS: I TEST CYlINDER FOR FOOTINGS, 1 TESTCYlINOER FOR STEMW AlLS, I TEST CYLINDER FOR FLA twOaK. MANUFACIl(RED WOOD m ussES I. LUMBER FOR WOOD TRUSSES SHALL BE IN ACCORDA.'fCE WITH
MANUFAcruR.ER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. SUBMIT COMPLETE SHOP DRAWD"IaS FOR APPROV~ SKOWING mE ERECTION i"IA.'I, All BEARING CONDmONS, AND CONNECTIONS. CALCULATIOfoo'S W1LL BE REQUIRED FOR
ALL 91000 TRUSSES. 1. ROOF TRUSSES SHALL 8E DESIGNED FOR A tOP CHORD UVE LOAD AS NOTED PLUS 5NOWDRJFT IN ACCORDANCE wrrn IRC 2006. MINIMUM TOP CKORD DEAD LOAD SHALL BE IS i"SF MINIMUM
BOTTOM CHORD DEAD toAD SHAll 8£ IS PSF. I. VERTICAL LIVE LOAD DEFLECTION UMlTA nONS A. ROOF TRUSSES LESS THAN 1 ,Y.j.' S WOOD rn.USS SUPPLIER SHALL DETAIl END BEARlNG OF TRUSSES SO AS
NOT TO EXCEED i"ERPENDlCULAR TO GRAIN LOADING OF WOOD I:'LATES TItAf SUPPORT TIlE TRUSSES PER 450 i"SL SUPPUER SHALL PROVIDE BEARING ENHA.'iCERS IF NECESSARY TO ACCOMPUSH TInS. .5. WOOD
TRUSSES SHALL flA VE BRIDGING AND SRACf!I.'G IN ACCORDANCE WITH ~'\Jt1FACTURER'S REQumEMENTS. DIMENSroNAI UlMRER AND i'!{E·EN'GI'NEERED rOISTIBEA.\-f PROD! iCTS I. ALL WOOD MEMBERS SHALL
BE HEM FIR (HF) OR SPRUCE·flR (SPf) GRADE if:2 MARKED BY A l.ECOGNlZED GRADING AGENCY (WCLm &; WWPA). STRUC1lJRAL WOOD FRAMING AT ROOF TO 3E GRADE "I MINIMUM OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL
2. ALL Sn.LS OR ?lATES RESTING ON CONCRElC wmCH IS IN CONTACT wm-t EARTH OR ::tESTING ON FOL'NDA TlONS, SHALt BE REDWOOD NO. 2. J. MOISTURE CONTENT OF WOOD AT TIME OF PlAC'lN"G SHALL
NOT EXCEED 19%. ~ . ALL MEMBERS GIVEN ON ORA WINGS ARE NOMINAL DIMENSIONS. 5. ALL S\iEATlIDJG SHALL BE APA ItA TED SHEATHlNG. 5. ALL FRAMING ANCHORS, POST CAPS, BASES, HANGERS, STRAPS,
ETS., SHALt BE AS ).I1A.'l1JFACTUR£D BY SIMPSON COMPANY OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL. 7. ALL BOLT fiEADS AND NUTS BEARING ON WOOD SHALL HAVE STANDARD cur WASHERS. ALL BOLT HOLES IN WOOD
SHALL BE DRILLED K2" DIA..\1ETER LARGER llfAN NOMINAl BOLT DIAMETERS. a. BOLTS IN WOOD SHALL NOT BE LESS TIlAN 7 DIAMETERS FROM mE END AND 4 DlAi.\1ETERS FROM THE EDGE OF THE MEMBER.
9. ALL NAlLING SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWlNG NArUNG SCHEOUl.E; BRIDGING TO TRUSS, TOENAIL EACH END.................. . ..................... _ ... (2} 8d BlOCICINO BETWEEN STUDS EACH
END ..... _ ... (2) 16d TOP PLATE TO STUD, END NAlL.............. . .................... (2} 1611 STlJD TO SILL PtA TE... ............................ . ........... ~ ......... ~.~ __
(4) IOd TOE 1IlA1LS OR (2) 16d END NAILS DOUBLE TOP PUT£, fACE NAIL...... . ........ H ... _I6d@I6"O.C. CONTINUOUS HEADER, TWO PIECES ....................... _ ............. _~_ ...
_ ..... I6d@12" O.G. ALONG EACH EDGE ROOF TRUSSES TO BEARING PLATE .... ......... , ....... , .... ,.-......... -.......... SIMPSON H),j'lld CONTINUOUS HEADER TO STUD, TOENAlL Bun.T
UP CORNER STUDS ........... _~ ..... (4)8d ................... I6d@24"0.C. DOUBLE STUDS ... . ..................................... _ . ......... _IOd@12" 0.C. DlAGONAL BRACE(@ALLCORNERS)TOSTUDANDPLA
TE. NOTE: I )COMMON NAILS SHALL BE USED OIRECT . .• I6d (3)@EACH STIJD ENDNAJL 2)WHEN POSSmLE NAD..S DRIVEN PERPENDICUlAR TO mE GRAIN ARE TO BE USED INSTEAD OF TOENAlLS 10. CUTTING,
NOTCHING, OR DRILLTNG OF STUDS OR fLOOR JOISTS SHALL BE PERMTTTED ONt Y AS DETAlLEO OR APPROVED BY TIlE ENGINEER. 11. WOOD BEAMS MADE OF 2 OR MORE lX'S SHALL BE NAlLED TOGETHER WIllI]
ROWS OF 1M AT lr O.C. FOR A nfREE PIECE MEMBER, INSTALL THE SPECIF1ED NAlI..JNG EACH SIDE. 12. WOOD LINTELS AND HEADERS SHALL HAVE A FULL r LENGTI{ OF BEARING AT EACH END, UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED . 11. SPACING OF BRIDGING FOR TRUSSES SHALL NOT EXCEED 8 FEET UNLESS APPROVED BY MANUf"ACl1JRER. 14. SILL PLATES TO BE OOL TED TO FOUNDATION WITH K" DlA. BOLTS AT 4' D.C. MAXIMUM.
EACH S[J.L PLATE TO HAVE A MDI1IMUM Of 2 BOLTS WITH ONE BOLT LOCATED WITHIN 12"OF EACH END OF EACH PIECE. IS. UNLESS NOTED, EXTERIOR WAllS TOHAVE2X6STUDS@WO.C. 16. TOP PLATES OF ALL
WOOD snm WALLS TO BE (2) 2X (SAME WlDTHAS STIJDS) l.AP48" Mn-.' WITH NOT LESS THA T(6) 16d NAILS AT EACH LAP AND NOT MORE mAN 16" BETWEEN NAlLS. SPUCE AT STUDS ONI. Y. 17. FLOOR AND
ROOF JOIST PRODUCTS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY TRUS JOIST MCMILLAN OF BOISE, IDAHO OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL. mESE INCLUDE TJt'S,l.AMlNATED VENEER LUMBER., RIM BOARDS, AND LVL HEADERS.
INSTALlATION DETAILS FOR BLOCKING, BRACING AND CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUJREMEIITS OF me. MANUfACTURER. IS. LOAD BEARING HEADER TABLE; OPENINQ WIDTH )' 0' S' 6' 0' '" ''""
treADER SIZE (2)2X12 HEM·FIR. (2)2X12 H&.'oI-FlR (2)2X12 HEM-FIR (3)2X12 HEM·FIR. (3)2XI2 HEM·F1R (2) I K" X IlXH ML (2) I K" x II~" MI. (2)1 K" XI4"MJ. 19. SHEAR WALLS "'ArtING PArTERN
AS FOLLOWS: EDGE NAlLING: Sd@·r' o.~. INTERIOR NAlLING: 3d@10" O.C. 20. PRE-MA.r.\lUFACTURED JOIST ~ROOUCTS SHALL BE INST AU.ED ACCORDING TO mE .'dANUF ACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. THESE
INCLUDE TIl'S, M1CROLA.\1S, RIM: OOAADS AND LA..\lIINATED l-IEA!JERS. INSTALLATION DETAILS, BLOCKING "'''II> BRACING CONNECTIONS SHALL CONFOR.'-'f TO TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MANtiFACTl1RER.