HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit.pdfGarfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 ·/;";f'e~1.TY!Je:R~.sid~~!i~I··.~ui.rdiiJg.·.·
'. .. . '. WOltfC;/~ssiticaUoiJ;'NeYi ··p~rrriii[Statu$:A~tiv~ .' " "'," /',"" '"w'" ,,,,,~,,,,' 'c>"',' Issue Date: 3/31/2011 Expires: 09/27/2011 Project Address Parcel No. Subdivision
Section Township Range 1655 CR 109 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601· 239512302002 LOUGH SUBDIVISION Owner Information Address Phone Cell Brent Lough 1655 CR 109 948-2810 Glenwood Springs CO
81601 Contractor(s ) Phone Primary Contractor Proposed Construction I Details Demo existing home and construct new single family residence on crawlspace with covered patiOS. Valuation:
$ 276,354.56 Total Sq Feet: 3392 FEES DUE Fee Plan Check Fee Residential Building Fee Total: Thursday, March 31,2011 Amount $1.290.22 $1,984.95 $3,275.17 FEES PAID Inv Total Paytype
Amt Paid Amt Due Inv # BLRE-3-11-20904 $ 3,275.17 Check # 2379 Check # 2355 $1,984.95 $1,290.22 $ 0.00 Required Inspections: Fo"",p"lion. "II, 1 (888)868·5306 Inspection IVR See Permit
Record Building Department Copy 2
I 2 108 am Street, Suite 401 , Glemvood Springs, CO 81601 P":970-945-8212 Fx:970-384-3440 Inspection Line:888-868-5306 www.garfield·coun!)..com BUILDIIN G PERMIT APPLICATIONI Parcel
N~h3i~r6iri~~oE;ressors office 970-945-9134) I Lot If-I Block No: Subd.l Exemption: /JlUr;"ft JOi 'C:,dSS? an f:''.Bz..has C8ien assiglled. please provide CR. myy or Sireel Na~; ;:'~3
and legal description ( -4 3 °rt;r;:;+o.nL.o(l~ H I ~o."!~~di0~. ':' e~/~ ~1tJ~UIi) Ait Ph: tf7tJ ;W8-2J'It! 4 Contractopw }I t!r !2 Mailing Address: Ph: Alt Ph: 5 Manufactured home
installer: Mailing Address: Ph: Lic #: 6 Architect: t!):JH ~ Mailing Address: Ph: AltPh: 7 E70JUJJ &v.t!/I/Pf?/INr. 1!2~gt';;:;/; /lve Piftff-9r,/3 ~~~1J3 8 Sq. Ft. of'Buil ding: 33~
z..... Sq. Ft. or Acres of Lot: 4. 4 rs~ Height: zEF No. of Floors: '2--9 Use OfBUilding~ I Class of Work: ~\ esidential DComme rcial DOther ew DAlteration DAddition ORepair ~cmo DMove
10 Describe Wor~"">J i ~N'~9h .... ct. vlItw sft<. 11 G,i~ge: I SePtic~s Type of Heat: ~t I IV i & DAtlachcd DDetached ,; ISDS DCommuni ty t. Gas DPropane DElectric DOther 12 Driveway
Permit: 6P1'/;~ . Owners valuation of Work: 3 30j {)oo. DO NOTICE Authority. This application for a Building Permit must be signed by the O"l1er of the property, described above, or
an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate lener of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Lenl Access. A Building
Pennit cannot be issued .... ithout proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Qcher Permits. Multiple separate permits
may be required: (I) Stale Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit requi red for use on the property identified abm·e. e.g. State or County HighwayJ Road Access
or a Slate Wastewater Discharge Pennil Vojd Pu mit. A Building Permit becomes null and ,"oid ifthc ..... ork authorized is nOi commenced within 180 days of tho: dale: ufi ssuallcc: Hlld
if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the infonnation contained above
is true and correct. I understand that the Building Deparunent accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or Oil my bcbal f(submittals),
based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming rompleteness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting pennissioll to me, as
Owner, to construct the structure{s) and facilities detai led on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. . In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, I agree
that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, Sla te or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use
regulations (County Regulation{s». I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s)
and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property,
described abo\'e, to inspect the ..... ork. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Pennit does not pre\'cnt the Building Official from: (I) requiring the cOlTection
of errors in the submittals. if any, di sco\'ered a ner issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or faci lity(ies) ifsuch is in violation of Counly Regulatioo(s)
or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including subminals, and inspections of the ..... ork by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility
or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the O ..... ner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations
rest "'ith me and my authorized agents, including 'withOlJt limitation my architect designer. engineer andl or builder. I HEREBY'nDG~ UNDERSTAND THE 'DTIC1 /ERTlfIC;7N ABOVE, OWNERS
S ilNA H iRE DATi.-o/rP~~ :~.· (::1: ,1 $ \Z'tO Z:z. ~ STAFF USE ONLY .k;p 3 . ~, . II Ch'*B7"l tit> I'HJ-l.qS Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation : Plan Chcck Fec: Permit Fee: Manu
home Fee: Mise Fees: Z7c:' .35YSb ,zqO. z.z.. 1991f .QS--Total Fees: fees Paid: Balance Due: DP No & Issue Date: .SDS No & Issued Date: 3>275'. /7 IlQo.22 I q 8J 4.ct5 -\Q5S rq50 Setbacks:
OCC Group: Const Type: Zoning: ..I./Z-C IgC ?U-O ~~. ,,-..//' b';i'~~.(.. ~ ?/Z~/P~,D~ "'L.~ ?/Z~;? APPROVAL /DATE , APPROVAL , DATE /
Building Plan Review Description of Work: Demo existing home and construct new single family residence on CI Bin#: Location Address: 1655 CR \09 SPRINGS, CO 81601 Apli1ic" tion Date:
0112212011 Building /_____ Engineered Foundation tJ(/i Driveway Permit /' Surveyed Site Plan /Septic Permit and Setbacks /Grade/Topography 30% /Attach Residential Plan Review List /Minimum
Application Questionnare /Subdivision Plat Notes ;VIA Fire Department Review /7 ( Valuation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker /Attach Conditions /Application Signed /Plan
Reviewer To Sign Application 7 Parcel/Schedule No. fV/4 40# Snow load Letter -Manu. Homes /Solis Report Contacts Owner: Brent Lough Applicant: Brent Lough Applicant Phone: 946-2810 Email:
blridgerunne r@gmail.com Planning/Zoning /Property Line Setbacks /30ft Stream Setbacks /Flood Plain /Building height /" Zoning Sign-off !VI I? Road Impact Fees N/,f HOAlDRC Approval
/Grade/Topography 40% /Planning Issues /-----Subdivision Plat General Comments: l/" Iet,,-/t(JY1 ?"'m~j j;e j2-tv/uu Ife 2 7 0, JSi(. .>"Z 198t;.~f /zfo. Z-1-7OT4Z-52-75'./7 /t1A;;;"ltI
-/ZPO .Z-l-/1'8'1J'>
Applicant: Job Address: Subd-Lol/block: FEE ESTIMATE FOR S/F STICK BUILT HOMES (ALL FEES ARE ESTIMATES UNTIL FINAL PLANS ARE REVIEWED) LOUt;tf Ii-( FINISHED LIVING SPACE: 33crz-sf X
74.68= 253,3/4. S-~ I UNFINISHED BASEMENT: o -sf X 41.00= ______ _ CRAWLSPACE: :22,-/0 sf X 9.00= -~-~~----~ 20. /(;;O. rJ f) I GARAGE: ------V------sf X 18.00= -------UNCOVERED PATIOIDECK:
_-=' ::JD~::::': ~~s!:f.. -X 12.00= _______ COVERED PATIOIDECK: _/= 2£;'-='----S-f X 24.00= Z8:[D. () () MIS~ _____________ _ MIS~ _____________ _ TOTAL VALUATION: ~ 7~ ,351 s-{o i THIS
SECTION WILL BE DETERMEND BY GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING PLAN REVIEW FEE: 0 :z 10. Z ZPERMIT FEE: I, '! 8' Cf. 9.5' TOTAL: 5, Z. 75. /Z PERMIT: SEPTIC= PERC: )Jew ~t9t '7?iNk
2000 {;;,A-L miG? I/o c-)c/"{i /teto
GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www.garfield-county.com SINGLE
FAMILY OR DUPLEX BUILDING PERMIT NOTE: In order to understand the scope of work intended and to expedite the issuance of a permit, it is important that complete information be provided.
Please review this document to determine if you have adequate information to design your project and to facilitate a plan review. SINGLE FAMILY OR DUPLEX BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
CHECKLIST This checklist is to be used with all single family dwelling construction. APPLICATION FORM: Please make sure the following information is provided on the application. • Parcel
number obtained from the County Assessor's Office. • Job address (assigned physical address) • Legal Description: lot, block, filing, subdivision or tract, section, township and range.
• Owners name, mailing address, phone, fax, or cell. • Contactors name, mailing address, phone, fax, or cell. • Architect/Engineer's name, mailing address, phone, fax or cell. • Building
size, height, number of stories, lot size. • Use of building (residential) • Class of Work (new, addition, alteration, repair, demo, move, other) • Description of work. • Type of heating
(natural gas, propane, electric, other). • Sewer system (Community or ISDS), also see other items below. • Garage (attached or detached). • Driveway permit (please see other items below)
• Valuation (labor and materials) see attached worksheet. OTHER ITEMS: • If you anticipate obtaining a water-tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City
will provide water service. (Required to submit building permit application). • ISDS requires a septic permit application to be submitted with the building permit application. • A separate
electrical permit must be obtained from the State of Colorado Electrical Board. • Prior to submittal of a building permit, you are required to show proof of legal and adequate access
to the site. This may include proof of right to use a private easement, County Road & Bridge permit, or Colorado Department of Highway permit, including a Notice to Proceed. The County
Road & Bridge Department can be reached at 970-625-8601. • If you anticipate excavating or grading prior to issuance of a building permit, you will be required to obtain a separate grading
permit. • If you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written approval, if required. • Provide copies of any Resolutions and/or Land Use Permits
associated with this property. • Additional Dwelling Units may require Administrative Review. • Minimum dwelling dimension is 20 It wide x 20 feet long. • A Colorado State Licensed Electrician
and Plumber must perform installation and hook-ups, unless the homeowner is performing the work.
BUILDING PLANS: Two (2) sets of plans must be submitted. Plans must be 18"x24" minimum size, complete, identical, legible, and to scale. All plans will be checked at the counter for
completeness. If any of the required information is missing, the building permit application cannot be accepted. SITE PLAN: Please make sure the following information is provided on
the site plan. • Property address/legal description. • North Arrow and Scale on each page. • Show all property lines, building envelopes, flood plain, and easements. • Provide setback
distances from boundaries, buildings, septic, well, and waterways. • Location and direction of the county or private road and driveway accessing the property. • Proposed and existing
structures include sheds, barns, decks, patios, and any other buildings. • Existing and proposed grade, positive drainage around structure (to be contained on site). • Streams, rivers,
creeks, springs, ponds and ditches. • Existing and proposed wells, septic tanks, leach fields, and other systems. (if applicable) • Retaining walls (engineer stamped detail required
for walls over four (4) ft, measured from bottom of footing to top of wall). NOTE: Any site plan depicting the placement of any portion of the structure within fifty (50) feet of a property
line or not within an established building envelope shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a licensed surveyor. For structures to be built within a building envelope, provide a copy
of the recorded subdivision final plat with the proposed structure located in the building envelope. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: Please provide the following information on the architectural
plans. • Minimum four (4) elevations (N,S,E,W) Indicate height of building measured from existing grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or to the top
of a flat roof. • Floor plans for each level including dimensions and scale noted. • Clearly label each room or space (bedroom, bath, kitchen, closet, etc). • Show the location of the
mechanical equipment. • Building cross sections with construction details. • Window sizes, types, and operation noted on the floor plans or elevations. • Specify roof slope/pitch, roof
covering, and siding materials. • Stair and guard details specifying rise, run, height and spacing. • Attic, roof, and crawlspace ventilation details. Indicate size and location of ventilation
openings. • Minimum insulation shown for walls, floors, roofs/ceilings, slabs, basements and crawlspaces. • Provide stove and fireplace make, model, EPA or Colorado Phase II Certification.
Masonry fireplaces shall be designed to the International Residential Code (IRC) requirements. STRUCTURAL PLANS: Please provide the following information on the structural plans. • Design
specifications to include roof and deck snow load, wind and seismic design, frost depth. • Foundation plan showing complete footing and foundation dimensions. • Footing and foundation
details specifying reinforcement and referenced on plans. • Framing plans for each floor level and roof. All beams, columns, joists, rafters, and trusses specified. Pre-manufactured
structures require the engineers stamp, signature, and date. • Framing /connection details, braced wall lines, shear wall schedule, location and hold downs.
NOTE: If any required information is missing, delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. If determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review
the application and/or plans for compliance, the application may be placed on hold until the required information is provided. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit.
The building department will collect a Plan Review fee at time of application submittal. The permit fee, as well as any Septic or Road Impact fees will be collected when the permit is
issued. The permit application must be signed by the owner or by person having written authority from the owner to act as their representative. Building cannot be occupied until a Certificate
of Occupancy (CO) is issued. Using the building without a CO will be considered an illegal occupancy and may be grounds for vacating the premises. (Final/CO inspection requirements will
be attached to your approved field set of plans.) I hereby acknowledge I have read, understand, and will abide by the requirements of this checklist. s,go""~of~ D}te I Garfield County
Building & Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470 www.garfield-county.com
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2009 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, 2009 IECe. Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snow load (measured at
the roof! Not ground): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 700lft to 8000ft. 75PSF 800lft to 9000ft. 100PSF 9001 to 10000ft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete:
Severe. Termite infestation probability: None to slight. Wind speed: 90mph. Decay probability: None Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.I.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation.
42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 160ver 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building
official Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp: Variable Insulation: Windowsldoors U=.35, Skylights U=.6, TBL 402.1.1, 2009 IECC. Minimum R-Values: • Ceilingslroofs R values
are R-38 stick built structures. R38 log construction and steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-20 wood frame. See Table 402.2.52009 IECC for steel framing • Floors R-values
are R-30 or enough to fill cavity. • Basement wall R-values are R-IO 113. • Slab perimeter R-values and depth is R-IO/24in. • Crawl space wall R-value are RI0I13. Iffloors over crawl
space are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R-20 insulation. Common ceiling/floor
garage to house must have R-20. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY CERTIFICATION AND AFFIDAVIT REGARDING ILLEGAL ALIENS The Contractor, \'lhose name and signature appears beloVl, certifies and agrees
as folloNs: 1. The Contractor shall comply \'lith the provisions of C.R.S. 8-17.5-101 et seq. The Contractor shall not knowingly employ or contract \'lith an illegal alien to perform
\1ork for the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County I Colorado ("BOCe") or enter into a contract \'lith a subcontractor that knmlingly employs or contracts \1ith an illegal
alien. 2. The Contractor represents I warrants, and agrees that it has verified that it does not employ any illegal aliens; that it has participated or attempted to participate in the
Basic Pilot Employment Verification Program administered by the Social Security Administration and Department of Homeland Security; and otherwise shall comply \"lith the requirements
of C.R.S. 8-17.5-102(2) (b). 3. The Contractor shall comply ",i th all reasonable requests made in the course of an investigation under C.R.S, 8-17.5-102 by the Colorado Department of
Labor and Employment. If the Contractor fails to comply with any requirement of this provision or C.R.S. 8-17.5-101 et seq., the BOCe may terminate \'lork for breach and the Contractor
shall be liable for actual and consequential damages to the State. 4. If the Contractor is a sole proprietor, the undersigned hereby swears or affirms under penalty of perjury under
the laws of the StatG of Colorado that (check one): ~ I am a United States citizen, or I am a Permanent Resident of the United States, or I am la\'lfully present in the United States
pursuant to Federal law. I understand that this sworn statement is required by law because I am a sale proprietor entering into a contract to perform \>lOrk for the BOCC. I understand
that state law requires me to provide proof that I am la\'lfully present in the United States prior to starting work for the SOCC. I further acknotoJledge that I \1i11 comply \1ith the
requirements of C.R.S. 24-76.5-101 et seq. and \'Iill produce the required form of identification prior to starting \>lork. I acknotdedge that making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or representation in this St'lOrn affidavit is punishable under the criminal la\'15 of Colorado as perjury in the second degree under C.R.S. 18-8-503. CERTIFIED and AGREED
to this ~ day of Ak1~ , 20/~. CONTRACTOR: (Contractor Full Legal Name) BY:~ SI(Jnat:urefAutrized Rep Irrc'nigration Affidavit (08/06) f'inal EXHIBIT FEIN or Social Security Nuwber Title
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL March 7,2011 Brent Lough 3 II Crystal Canyon Drive Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Ilcr"·..,.i/. ·P,H,,·I,,k Gc"l"d uli,a l, Jm:. 50 7.0 ( ( .. mh-R'lad J 5·.
GloJnll.-Q(HI S ;'r i n,~. C,I"'il'!'" t; J601 1'1'0"";: 9711-Q45-7988 Fa,, : 9 70 ·945. 84.5'" J:m .tj l: l'l'.!ic.,(i!" I,p ~ .. (>t c..:ll.con . Job No.1 00 879-1 Subject: Addendum
to Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed New Residence, Lot A-I, Lough Subdivision, 1655 County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Brent: As requested by Dale Kaup, structural
engineer, we have re-evaluated the potential downdrag on the proposed micropiles from settlement of the subsoils due to future wetting. We recently provided a subsoil study for the new
residence dated February 23, 2011 which included an estimate of I 0 kips per pile allowance for downdrag. We had assumed 6-inch diameter, 50-kip piles. We understand that 25-kip piles
that are 4 inches in diameter are currently proposed. Based on the subsoil profile of 40 to 60 feet of settlement prone soils and the assumption that about half of the depth will become
wetted, we estimate the downdrag force will be about 4 to 6 kips per pile. We recommend that the piles be designed for an average downdrag force of 5 kips. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those previously described, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. If you have any questions or
if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, Rev. by: SLP DEHlksw cc: Kaup Engineering -Dale Kaup (kaupeng(io,rof.net)
~tech HEPWORTH-P,~WLAK GEOTECHNICAL February 23, 20 II Brent Lough 311 Crystal Canyon Drive Carbondale, Colorado 81623 LL,: \i;C,-}-j)-,S-iSi ,'I'l:lll: hr,:;",'ii-hp~t·,,~,:,,~!, (,'))1
Job No, I 00 879-1 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design, Proposed New Residence, Lot A-I, Lough Subdivision, 1655 County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Brent: As requested,
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc, performed additional drilling for a subsoil stndy for foundation design of a new house proposed at the subject site, The study was conducted in accordance
with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated Febmary 1, 2011. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions
encountered are presented in this report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazard impacts on the site are beyond the scope of this study, We previously performed a subsoil study for
underpinning the existing residence dated December 29,2005, Job No, 100879-1. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a one story log structure over a crawlspace located
in the same area as the existing house on the site as shown on Figure I. Ground floors are proposed to be structural over crawlspace, Cut depths are expected to range between about 5
to 10 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type ofconstmction, Due to the settlement prone soils, the
house is proposed to be constructed on a deep foundation consisting of micro-piles, The existing house and former garage will be razed. The existing barn will remain, Ifbuilding conditions
01' foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report, Existing Building and
Site Conditions: The existing house was built in 1997, The house stalied settling noticeably after a crawlspace flood event in August, 2000. The house was subsequently underpinned with
pin piles. The garage experienced movement and a new slab was placed in 2004, The garage continued to settle and the garage doors
-2 -were subsequently removed and replaced with siding, making the garage into a storage shed. The garage continues to settle to this day. The mud room/laundry room between the house
and the garage has been removed. The grading and landscaping around the house is mostly similar to that observed during our 2005 visit. The leach field area downhill ofthe house has
settled 2 to 3 feet. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by drilling an exploratory boring near the northwest (downhill) comer of the existing
house at the approximate location shown on Figure 1. The logs of the previous Borings 1 and 2 and the recent Boring 3 are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered in the recent
boring, below about 7 feet offill, consist of clayey sand and sandy silty clay soils down to about 60 feet where firm bedrock ofthe Eagle Valley Evaporite Formation was encountered.
The soil profile is similar to that encountered in the previous borings. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of sandy silty clay soils,
presented on Figure 4, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The
deeper sample showed a minor expansion potential when wetted. The laboratory test results are summarized in Table 1. No free water was observed in the boring at the time of drilling
and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature ofthe proposed construction,
we recommend a deep foundation consisting of micropiles or screwpiles bearing in the underlying bedrock for support of the proposed residence. Micropiles should be drilled at least 10
feet into the hard bedrock. Screwpiles should be drilled to torque refusal in the bedrock. We expect pile lengths on the order of60 to 70 feet. Capacities of 50 to 80 kips should be
feasible. An allowance of about 10 kips per pile should be included for downdrag on the piles caused by future settlement ofthe soil around the piles. The soils tend to compress after
wetting and there could be some post-construction settlement of developed areas not supported on piles. We recommend that any decks or porches attached to the house be structurally supported
on piles. Placement offoundation walls (grade beams) at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area for frost protection. Foundation walls acting as retaining
structures should be designcd to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcffor the on-site soil as backfill. Exterior Patios: We expect
that some settlement of the soils around the house will continue. We understand that the owner plans to construct exterior patios with sand set Job No.lOO 879-1
-3 -flagstone or pavers which can more easily be periodically releveled if significant settlement occurs. The new fill placed around the new house could be strengthened with biaxial
geogrid or by adding cement to reduce the effects of differential settlement on the patios. All fill materials for support of patios should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard
Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock Underdrain System: Although free water
was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff.
Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure
buildup by an underdrain system. Underdrain for crawlspace areas are not suggested because they tend to collect surface water and increase wetting to the soils. The drains should consist
of drainpipe placed near the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation
and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I % to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should
contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should he at least l'h feet deep. An
impervious membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the retaining wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the underlying
soils. Sunace Drainage: Proper surface drainage is critical to keeping the soils dry below the building. The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: I) Inundation of the building excavations and exterior patio areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior
backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and patio areas and to at least 90% of the maximum
standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with at least 2 feet of the on-site, fmer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
Job No.1 00 879-1 ~tech
-4-3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior ofthe building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of12 inches in the
first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale will be needed uphill to direct sUlface runoff around the residence.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) We understand that the owner will typically use xeriscape to help limit potential wetting of
soils below the building caused by irrigation. Planters should be lined and drain lines provided to route excess irrigation water wen away from the house. Subsidence Potential: Bedrock
ofthe Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the site. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum
and limestoue. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions
can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas oflocalized subsidence. During previous work in the area, several sinkholes were observed scattered throughout the Roaring Fork River
valley. These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in this area. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence
of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions
at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence due to subsurface voids on this site throughout the service life of the
proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock
below the site is desired, we should be contacted. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices
in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained fi'om the exploratory
borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention
or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOB C) developing in the future. Ifthe client Job No.1 00879-1
-5 -is concemed about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our fmdings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions
identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered dUling construction appear
different from thosc described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation 0 f the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use
by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation
and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant
design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata
and testing ofstructural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be offmther assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted,
Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. DEHlksw attachments Figure I -Locations of Exploratory Borings Figure 2 -Logs ofExploratOlY Borings Figure 3 -Legend and Notes Figure 4 -Swell-Consolidation
Test Results Table I -Summary of Laboratory Test Results cc: Kaup Engineering -Dale Kaup (kaupeng@rofnet) Job No. lOO 879·1
I TO COUNTY ROAD 109 BORING 3 BORING 2 22' BENCH MARK: FINISH FLOOR AT DOORWAY; ELEV. = 100.0', ASSUMED. EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING GARAGE 5' 15' EXISTING RESIDENCE PATIO NOT TO SCALE
8' BORING 1 100879-1 ~tech LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 1
0 10 20 30 IJ:j w LL 40 I f-D.. W 0 50 60 70 80 100879-1 BORING 1 ELEV.~ 97.9' ~:::' :.:.:" ....' ". ~.: ::,', .:. ,'.:' ::~., :.:.:'. ~?:~. .::;: ::::., :.:.:'. :..::'.:: ::.'. .,'.
'.:' '::.' :r'· '}:: .:. 5/12 8i12 WC=10.3 00 ... 114 ·200=43 12/12 'NC~9.9 00=116 10/12 WC=27.1 OD"'96 ·200""99 21/12 14/12 WC"'10_3 DO",126 ·200=46 14/12 47112 50/12 WC"'3.3 00=119
75/5 WC=2.3 00=135 BORING 2 BORING 3 ELEV.~ 98.2' ELEV. ~ 89.6' 4/12 12}'12 10/12 13'12 WC=7.1 OD",,108 ·200",,56 9/12 13/12 WC=14.2 WG",7,3 00=118 OD=I08 ·200",63 ·200=61 38/12 15/12
3{l/12 WC=B.5 WC",S.9 00=124 00",115 -200=60 11112 .:;'::. WC",9.7 :.:: 00=118 :.{( ·200=56 ',:,::' . ': :: . .;:.' :.: .. 39M. :.{ WC=3.5 00=118 ',:,::' ':;~:: :''.:'. ' .:. "'" ":~.
:":. 50/12 : WC=5.3 " ': 00",124 ;: . " ·200=70 .: .'. :.: .. :.{ 50/3 ':.":..: NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on FIGURE 3. ~tech LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 0 10 20 30 IJ:j w
u. 40 I f-D.. W 0 50 60 70 80 FIGURE 2
LEGEND: ~ FILL; on-site sand and clay with shale fragments, soft to medium stiff, very moist, brown. D U SAND AND CLAY (SC-CL); clayey sand to sandy clay with shale fragments, silty,
medium dense to stiff to hard, very moist to slightly moist with depth, gray brown to brown. ~ ...•..... '.-' , SILTSTONE BEDROCK; hard, slightly moist, light brown and gray brown. Eagle
Valley Evaporite Formation. p Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I.D. California liner sample. ~ Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT) , 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon
sample, ASTM 0-1586. 5/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 5 blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. NOTES:
1. Exploratory Borings 1 and 2 were drilled on April 27, 2005 and Boring 3 was drilled on February 14, 2011 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory
borings were measured approximately by pacing from the existing building shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer
to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1. Logs are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method
used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water
was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DO = Dry Density ( pel
) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 100879-1 LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 3
0 Moisture Content 7.3 percent Dry Density = 108 pcf 1 -200 = 61 percent ~ Sample of: Gravelly Sandy Silty Clay 2 From: Boring 3 at 14 Feet 3 \ ~ ~ \ ~ 'iF. ~ Z 4 0 \ ~ Compression 00
ffJ i'-upon w 0: 5 welting "-='" \ 0 0 6 7 \ \ 8 . 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf ) Moisture Content = 5.9 percent Dry Density = 115 pcf -200 = 60 percent Sample of: Gravelly
Sandy Silty Clay ~ From: Boring 3 at 24 Feet 'iF. ~ z 0 1 . 00 «z "x-w, a ~~ . z 0 . 00 1 ffJ • w C 0: b "-='" 2 . 0 0 ~ Expansion i'-upon welting 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf)
100879-1 ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 f-EPwO.::rH-,:lAWLAK G£O~ECHN!:::Ai.
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 100879-1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL GRADATION ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE NATURAL GRAVEL SAND
PERCENT COMPRESSIVE BORING DEPTH DRY DENSITY PLASTIC SOILOR CONTENT PASSING NO. lIQUfDUMIT STRENGTH (%) (%) 200 SIEVE INDEX BEDROCK TYPE (ft) (lI) (pd) (lI) (lI) (PSF) 3 9 7.1 108 56
Gravelly Sandy Silty Clay 14 7.3 108 61 Gravelly Sandy SIlty Clay 24 5.9 115 60 Gravelly Sandy Silty Clay 50 5.3 124 70 Sandy Silty Clay '.
\ BULLOCI( HINI(EY Real Estate Lough Residence 1655 County Road 109 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 LUXURY CUSTOM DESIGNED HOME! On 4.453 +/-acres. Custom home is situated across from
Ironbridge Golf Course. Gorgeous views of Mt. Sopris from almost every room! Rent out the 1,159 +/-sq. ft. apartment. Not enough space-store the toys in the 36 x 60, 2-level shop/barn.
The second level is currently used as a basketball court. $1,100,000. For More Information Call: BOB HINKEY -379-0492 "B"'U'"L""'L""'O=C~Ie< '-H;-;"I"N'=I<"E"':y7" 3110 A Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 384-2030
• • • ;"r-f".. .. , . , ...... ' -;... . ~ Lough Residence Price: $1,100,000.00 Sold "As Is" Terms: Cash/New Loan Legal: Lot A-I Lough Subdivision Listing Agent: Bob Hinkey-379-0492
Area: Across from IronBridge Zoning: ARRD Parcel Size: 4.453+/-Acres Road Access:County /Paved Utilities: Gas, Sewer, Community Water Square Feet: House-4,998 +/Apartment-l,159 +/-Year
Built: 1999 Construction: Frame/Log Roof: Compo Shjngle Heat: 2 Gas Fireplaces and infloor Radiant heat Style: Two Story, Log Home HOA Dues: None Bedrooms: 4 Baths: 3 1/2 Garage: The
3-Car Garage has currently been turned into a storage unit Extras: 36 x 60 Shop/Barn Taxes: $4,:n6.04 Year: 2007 Earnest Money: $50,000.00 Payable to: Commonwealth Title Inclusions:
Range, Dishwasher, Refrigerator, Washer, Dryer and Ceiling Fans. Tenant's Personal Property. Property being sold "As Is". Directions: Travel 4 miles south of Glenwood on Highway 82.
Take a right at the stop light onto County Road 154. Turn right onto County Road 109 Travel across the bridge (thls is the back road from West Bank Mesa to Carbondale). Property is located
across from the lronbridge Golf Course on the right hand side. Sign on property. Bob Hinkey Broker Associate/Owner Direct Line: (970) 379-0492 E-mail: b.hinkey@comcast.com "B""U";LO--L;-"O""C""~I~('i
J)'-H:7.I:-N=-"I"<""E'"Y"~ Refll Estate 3110 A Blake Avenue . Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970) 384-2030 Fax: (970) 384-2035 Informa tion contained hcrcio was obtained from sources
deemed re liable and accurAte, btU is nOI gllaranteed by Seller or Lis\inll Broker. [farea calculations or rnnsuremenls or lbc property are a dedsive consi deration in en tering inlO
R conlraCllO purchase, it is Buyer's respo nsibi lity 10 independently verify slich calculations of measurements. Information is stlbjeci lo crrors, omissions, prior sa le, changes or
withdrawal without nOlice
Anyonefor a game of one-on-one! The "Toy Box" is a 36 x 60, 2-level shop/barn. Use the lower-level to store all YOUJ' toys and use as your workshop and sink afew on the top level. Easy
to entertain is this distinguished kitchen. The beautiful hickoJ'y cabinets, tile WQJ'k, granite countertops, and upgraded appliances makes for an all around chefs haven. This openjloor
plan has magnificent custom wood. Relax and enjoy the views ofMt. Sopris sitting by the · gas rockfil·eplace.
Account Account: R005066 l,.Q~~tlQD Parcel Number 2395-123-02-002 Situs Address 001655109 COUNTY RD 001655 HARDWICK BRIDGE RD City Glenwood Springs Glenwood Springs ZipCode 81601 81601
Tax Area 010 -1R-DF -010 Legal Summary Section: 12 Township: 7 Range: 89 Subdivision: LOUGH SUBDIVISION lot: A-1 RESUB OF PARCEL A OF COlOHAN EX. TrJln$t~~ Sale Price rllx HisJQ!')I
Tax Year Taxes Qwnerlnfo,l]'lJttion Owner Name lOUGH, BRENT l TRUST & lOUGH, ROXANNE TRUST Owner Address PO BOX 1479 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 Sale Date Q4/0ALZQQs 04/0A!20QIl OAJP4/2Q!)a
Q~~6jl~~a Images • GLfi Doc Type ~WIJ SA s8 QCD Page 1 of 1 AssesSment HistQry Actual (2010) $1,165,700 Primary Taxable $92,790 Tax Area: 010 Mill Levy: 56.9900 Type Actual Assessed
Acres Units Improvement $845,700 $67,320 1.000 land $320,000 $25,470 4.453 Book Page 2010 $5,288.12 ,----.:------.,.--r1-.-""""'"-r--...,..,.--,,'" 2009 $5,296.36 https:/lact.garfield-county.com/asse
ssor/taxweb/account.jsp?accountNum=R005... 3/23/2011
It is my understanding that the piles wereinstalled at least 10 feet into bedrock. The piles are about 70 feet long inthe northwest corner graduating to about 80 feet long at the southeast
corner.A pile load test has been performed under the supervision of Yeh & Associates. Typically, Yehwill provide the test results and pile installation plan to us and we willreview and
provide a letter at that time. Between Yeh andH-P we will provide documentation for the pile foundation. If the County wantsto call me, that would be fine. As of right now, I should
be in the officeuntil about 3 P.M. -Dan 945-7988 office 379-2329 cell
David Bartholomew From: Sent: Brent Lough [blridgerunner@gmail.comJ Monday, April 18, 201111:03AM To: David Bartholomew Subject: Fwd: FW: Lough Test Results Attachments: Lough Residence
MP Test Results.pdf David for your records MP test results from my Res at 1655 CR 109. Thanks Brent ----------Forwarded message ----------From: Shaun Brainard <shaun@bydrillinginc.com>
Date: Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:14 AM Subject: FW: Lough Test Results To: Brent Lough <blridgerunner@gmail.com> Brent, Attached are the official sacrificial micropile test results. Let
me know if you need anything else. Sincerely, ShaUll Brainard From: Richard Johnson [mailto:rjohnson0lyeh-eng.comJ Sent: Monday, April 18, 20119:29 AM To: shaun@bydrillinginc.com Cc:
dan@hpgeotech.com Subject: Lough Test Results ShaUll, Here are the Lough load test results. Everything went great. Dan asked to be cc'd on the results so I included him on this email.
1
Thanks Richard D. Johnson, P.E. Northwest Regional Manager rjohllsoll@veh-eng.com Yeh & Associates, Inc. 1525 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 384-1500 office (970) 384-1501
fax www.yeh-eng.com 2
Brent, Micropile testing was performedon 4/15/11 by Richard Johnson of Yeh and Associates. The pile wassuccessfully tested to a capacity of 60 kips which is two times your workingdesign
load. I will be emailing you by the end of today or tomorrow atthe latest the official testing documentation from Yeh. Sincerely, Shaun Brainard
I~ Yeh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers & Scientists April 18, 2011 Mr. Shaun Brainard B&Y Drilling, Inc. P.O. Box 1878 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Project No. 211-055 Subject: Review
of Micropile Foundation Load Testing, Lough Residence, 1655 County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Brainard, Yeh and Associates conducted micropile load testing on April
15, 2011 at 1655 County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado. We conducted one micropile verification test on a sacrificial pile to verify assumed soil strength parameters. The test was
performed in tension, which we believe is more conservative than a compression test. Therefore, the measured deflection would typically be more than if the micropile were tested in compression.
The verification test was loaded to 2.0 times the design load (60,000 pounds). The total measured deflection was 0.19 inches at the design load. The test was conducted in general conformance
with FHWA guidelines and the test results are attached. We believe test results indicated movements are within acceptable design limits (see attached). Based on our test data, it appears
the micropiles installed by B&Y Drilling, Inc. were in general conformance with plans provided by Yeh and Associates, Inc., dated April 6, 2011. Yeh and Associates did not verify micropile
locations. Survey and micropile layout was assumed to be the responsibility of others. If you have questions or need additional information, please call us at 970-384-1500. Sincerely,
YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Richard D. Johnson, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer 5700 East Evans Avenue, Denver, CO 80222 1525 Blake Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 570 Turner Drive,
Suite D, DUraJlgo, CO 81303
Micropile Verification Test Micropile Designation: Sacrificial Job Number: 211-055 Testers: RDJ/KA Date: 4/15/2011 Load Hold Time Applied PSI Load ALI.OS DL) 2.5 min 4498 400 0.15DL
2.5 min N/A N/A 0.30DL 2.5 min 9000 765 0.45DL 2.5 min 13500 1130 ALI.OS DL) 1 min 4498 400 0.15DL 2.5 min N/A N/A 0.45DL 2.5 min 13500 1130 0.60DL 2.5 min 18000 1494 0.75DL 2.5 min
22500 1859 0.90DL 2.5 min 27000 2223 1.00DL 2.5 min 30000 2466 ALI.OS DL) 1 min 4498 400 0.15DL 1 min N/A N/A 1.00DL 1 min 30000 2466 1.15DL 2.5 min 34500 2831 1.30DL 1 min* 39000 3195
2 min* 3 min* 4 min* 5 min* 6 min* 10 min* 20 min 30 min 40 min 50 min 60 min 1.45DL 2.5 min 43500 3560 AL 1 min 4498 400 0.15DL 1 min 1.45DL 1 min 1.60DL 1 min 1.75DL 2.5 min 1.90DL
2.5 min 2.00DL 10 min 1.50DL 5 min 1.00DL 5 min 0.50DL Smin AL 5min Design Load: 30 kips Bond Length: 68.5 feet Stress Length: 2.8 feet Bar Size: No. 32X Dial1 (Initial) (T ota I Movement)
0.000 N/A 0.019 0.057 N/A 0.060 0.094 0.130 0.170 0.191 N/A 0.198 0.238 0.282 0.283 0.284 0.285 0.286 0.287 0.288 0.319 Dial1 (End) (Residual Movement) 0.019 0.060 0.097 I I I I I I
Calculated (Elastic Movement) 0.038 0.131 0.222 0.317 I I J
MICROPILE VERIFICATION TEST Lough Residence Date: Test Type: 4/15/2011 Tension Project No. 211-055 Micropile Location: Sacrificial Pressure Load Movement Residual Elastic Load/Movement
(psi) (Ibs) (in) at AL (in) (in) (in/kip)* Bond Length = Free Length = Stress Length = Bar Size = 68.5 feet o feet 2.8 feet 32X 400 1130 2466 3560 4498 0 13500 0.057 30000 0.191 43500
0.319 0 0 -0.019 0.038 0.006 -0.060 0.131 0.008 -0.097 0.222 0.009 4896 60000 0.496 -0.179 0.317 0.011 * Must be less than 0.025 In/kip. 1.0 0.8 0.6 -'I L ,',., ., : Measured Elas,tic
Movement : I I 1 I --------------~I ----------------------------~I ----------------------------~I ----------------------------~I ---------------------------_ Measured Residual Movement
: : : : : I I 1 I ----------------------------~-----------------------~--------------~----------------------------~----------------------------~---------------------------~---------------.-----------
I I I I I , 1 I I I , I I I I I I , I r r I I r I 0.4 "CD' J: 0.2 " I r r I I ---------------------------~I ----------------------------~I ----------------------------TI ----------------------------r
I ----------------------------I~ ---------------------------I I I I , r I I I I I I I I I ___________________________ 1 ___________________________ J ____________________________ l __________________
________ , 1 _~, .. ___ ..:;;,:. __ :.: _______ 2 ___ '~_1_'~=~ ______________________ _ I I I t I :-§. c 0.0 CD E CD > -0.2 0 ::;; I r ., I I :: : 1 , ! ,," ~'" "C' ,<> ' !: 1 O~OO
20~00 30~00 , 50~00 60 00 , I I I I ---------------------------~----------------------------~----------------------------+----------------------------~---------------------------~--------------------
------, I I I I I I I , , I , I , , I I I I 1 I I I I 1 -0.4 I I , I I . ---------------------------,----------------------------i----------------------------i----------------------------,-----------
-----------------0---------------------------I I I I I , I I , I I I , , I I , , I I -0.6 I I I I I I I r I I ---------------------------~I----------------------------~I ----------------------------T
I ----------------------------r, ----------------------------r, ---------------------------I I , , I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I -0.8 I I I I I ---------------------------~-------------------------
---i----------------------------t----------------------------~----------------------------~---------------------------, I I I , I I I I t 1 r Itt I t I I I I t I I I -1.0 I , t I I Load
(Ibs)
KAUP ENGINEERING INC. Ridge Runner Construction County Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Lough Residence, Garfield County. CO Dear Brent: 1129 Grand Avem.~ . Glenwood Sprin.gs, CO
81601 (970)945-9613, fax (970)945-9e.,,~ Per your request, I met you at the above referenced site for an observation of framing completed to date. Below are the areas we discussed. Item
1: Crawl space floor beams were oversized to accommodate existing framing members from the previous residence. The oversized microlam beams were notched on the bottom in a few locations
to bear on foundation walls and are acceptable due to the oversizing. The oversized glulam beams were supported in custom steel buckets in lieu of beam pockets in the foundation walls
and are acceptable, Item 2: The crawl space wood columns were attached to the wood glulam floor beams with a 2x scab plate nailed to each side of the beam and column. This is an acceptable
substitution, Item 3: The 14" diameter roof log beam was shaped from an oversized 18" to 20" diameter log beam to gain additional head height. This is acceptable as framed, Item 4: The
floor framing at the head of the stairs at the loft was modified to 2x6 joists for a small area to accommodate head heights. This is acceptable as framed. Please call if you have additional
questions.
.g . -, T 'Permft . ..<l} Card l POST ON SITE • " r " ' :' ~ Garfteld County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 J, Glenwood Springs, CO 81 601 ... " Phone: (970)945-8212
Fax: (970)384-3470 > AGREEMENT J the zoning, location; construction and erection of the ' for which this permit is In consideration of the issuance of the permit, tlie applic;:.nt hereby
agrees to comply with all laws an~,;:;~~~~~~~ agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully in the. zoning, location, erection' above described structure, the permit may notice
from the County Building deloa rtn1'a~.\''!.!lg: NULL AND VOID. . Residential QIA ,er's Phone: .,------:t . 948, -:'810 . ---~ \ ----. "' --' .. .~ ~ f! dI\ o{/
'J -------., ... , " ' ,?' dS " ~,' -------------'\ ~~--~' -,~---------------------/I
, ! \ .<.55 n . , " 100.00 \ \ \ ----------490.81 ' r \ !! I --",,,'','.o7a'~ --r-1\ \ .~" LOT A-2 2048 AC, +--\ 1j·OC .\-. I \ \ \ -.J ! ---------///--------/fb.te , N85?/O;'; --____
, __ _ L_____ ';6~. 65 _ /---Yo7"A---___ /_ CCCSS £ASo,tOi; -______ -/-__ . _ ///"~/11.1 /~!ff I /'-/~ V ' ''':) .......... ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ 110 ~ ///L~----------~------.----------------------~~~------~
~~~~----------------------------------.----!~/---~·~:~'.s~~--..-_-. S88"02'40,", ~w ~D ~~ I _s~_ I ~If" /L~ and Not..: £AND iJSE S/.UI4RY ,-'''-'_ I~!..A """'''_nf "" dticrlbed. PPffIIOOPPOOSSEEIDJ
LOOJIT£'JS. J.JNC UNfT'S 2 2
Lough Residence 1655 County Road 109 Garfield County, Colorado Micropile Foundation 1. Cover 2. General Notes 3. Locations 4. Details Sheet Revision 1525 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs,
CO 816011-----+--------+-------1 Drawn by: RDJ Date: Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 Checked by: RDJ April 6, 2011 Cover Project: Sheet Number: Lough Residence lof4
1.0 Micropile Foundation Materials 1.1 Micropile bars -Grade 75 all-thread bar or equivalent in accordance with ASTM A615 and epoxy coated in accordance with ASTM A153 or Williams injection
bars. Injection bars may be bare bar. fy= 75,000 psi 1.2 Grout -Grout may be neat-cement or with sand, with Type II cement in accordance with ASTM C150. Water-cement ratio should be
between 0.4 and 0.6. f'c=3,OOO psi minimum 1.3 End hardware (if necessary) -Nuts shall be in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. Bearing plate sholl be in accordance with
ASTM A36, Grade 36. 1.4 Concrete -Per Structural Engineer 2.0 Micropile Installation 2.1 Micropiles to consist of solid or hollow injection bar. For injection bars, install bor per manufactures
recommendations using grout to flush cuttings. For solid bar, drill hole to depth indicated on plans. 2.2 Install bar to depths specified herein. For solid bar, grout shall be tremie
placed at the bottom of the hole displacing groundwater upward as necessary. Cut bar to elevation as necessary. 3.0 Micropile Foundation Design Parameters 3.1 The micropiles were designed
in general accordance with procedures contained in the FWHA "Micropile Design and Construction Guidelines", Report No. FHWA-NHI-05-039. 3.2 The following strength parameters walls were
assumed for the subsoils based on the "Subsoil Study for Foundation DeSign, Proposed New Residence, Lot A-l, Lough Subdivision. 1655 County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado" by HP
Geotech, Inc., Project No. 100 879-1, dated February 23, 2011. The following bond values were assumed for the soil design parameters based on the soils investigation: Natural Sand and
Clay Bedrock quit (i!W. ignored 44 An experienced geotechnical engineer should verify the above design parameters during construction. 3.3 Groundwater was assumed to be below the bottom
of the micropiles. 3.4 Vertical Deflection 50 0.25 inches Horizontal Deflection ~ 0.50 inches Dale Sheet Revision Revision/Issue 4.0 Verification and Proof Testing 4.1 At least one preproduction
axial verification test shall be performed to verify the contractors installation method and bond stress in accordance with FHWA-NHI-05-039, December 2005. Tension testing is acceptable.
4.2 Proof testing sholl be performed on at leost 5 percent of the production or sacrificial piles in accordance with FHWA-NHI-05-039, December 2005. A passing verfication test may be
used in lieu of proof testing. 4.3 The micropiles may be redesigned at the discretion of Yeh and Associates based on test results. 5.0 Special Provisions 5.1 This design is volid only
for this site and is to be constructed by B&Y Drilling. Inc. only. Micropile loads and locations provided by Koup Engineering. Inc. plans dated 2-7-11 . 5.2 Yeh and Associates is not
responsible for design of pile cap ond pile cop reinforcement. 5.3 Others are responsible for field locating all nearby utilities. Conflicting utilities may require redesign, at Yeh
and Associates discretion. 5.4 Yeh and Associates is not responsible for quality control, quality assurance. changed conditions or problems resulting from improper construction techniques.
5.5 Yeh and Associates is not responsible for construction site safety. 5.6 Yeh and Associates is not responsible for foundation and micropile layout. Designed For: Checked by B& Y Drilling,
Inc. I r Jill Yeh and Associates, Inc. General Notes .. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 211-055 1525 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 1 ~==t=============t====l--;p;;;re;;;p;;;ar:;'cdilb~Y~:
--::RD=J:l~D=at:::c:-----+--;p:::ro::-~e:::c:::t:-------------~S:h.. C. :::t~N. .u.m. :::b:--e-r:1 Project Number: 20f4 Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 April 6, 2011 Lough
Residence Checked by: RDJ
10-,. " '-0' I 24 ... • _L l ,~ .... -0. 4 '-0' l 24'-0' Sheet Revision Designed For: Micropile Type • MICROPILE SCHEDULE Bar Size Axial Load per Micropile Minimum Micropile Length Williams
32Xmm injection Varies or NO.8 all-thread bar 30 kips (10 feet into bedrock) N ii=lO ~O~ ~~~0r-.-.. _5.10=~ ~1010 SCALE: 1" = 1 00' Notes: 1. Structural drawings and loads provided by
Kaup Engineering, Inc. plans dated 2.7.11 . 2. Minimum micropile spacing of 2 feet. 3. Micropiles should be installed within 5 degrees of vertical. 4. This drawing should not be used
for micropile layout. I~ Date Revisionllssue Checked by B& Y Drilling, Inc. 1{ehandi\ssociates,Inc. ~~+-------~~~-------+~~~~P~ro~~~-t~Nu-m~be-r:----~~------~ Consulting Geotechnical
Engineers ~--+--------------------T----~ 211-055 1525 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 1 ~--+--------------------T----~ Dmwnby: RDJ Date: Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501
Checked by: RDJ April 6, 2011 Locations Project: Lough Residence Sheet Number: 30f4
Williams ·Cap Reinforcement by Structural Engineer Penetration intf= ~ cap per structural I """'-Micropile Bearing Plate Ground SUrface--.l Injection Bar or /All-thread Ba; J (See Sheet
3) by others Natural Sand and Clay (varies) Total Length (varies) Bedrock Penetration = 10' min_ (See Sheet 3) MICROPILE ELEVATION Penetration into cap per structural 'Cap Reinforcement
by Structural Engineer "--Mi,cr,-uOpouiilce Bearing Plate by others -:::111::::111::::111::::11,-::.:' 0:111:::: III::::III;=, '---=III=;~I= ;' p: 1==111::::111=' -i'~/"'>_ ~T 'I=,'.!
U~~ :w I· -[ ;":: == :1;:;!1~ ", :,,,'-.::_,1 ~:i ;:; "ill Williams Injection B~~ --.... -r:-:.: /,.i'"..: .· rtj T'Grout or All-thread Ba.~ ,,1'.:-: 1:,-.:-(See Sheet 3) k·:--'-.=;-;-:,.,..
:::. I::; r;~ L: r;C 1 '<. iiF: ih, ::~!: C~<~_ I ~ 3_5 .. Min_ Bit v Diameter ~~-" 4 _0" MIN , Column MICROPILE DETAIL Sheet Revision Designed For; f-o-,,-, --.-----"=--=-=----=-R''--V;''':sio-'-W1C
S:-'S''u,= -'----r:C=h-oc----:k::-ed::-by-i B&Y Drilling, Inc. Yeh and Associates, Inc. Project Numbcr; I~ Consulting Geotechnical Engineers 211-055 1525 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs,
CO 81601 f---t-------------t------j Prepared by: RDJ Date: Borehole MICROPILE CROSS SECTION A-A' ~OR-E; G~ .... \)...v.. . .. •••• >.. ~ •• , O. J •• ~~ -~. ~ ~ . v-, . .-' 0 \ ~/~ 3
832 ~; i"~ if A/II ~.~ if ~'" .... ~ ,/~ <'8. ••••••• ~~ ~IONAl~' -NOT TO SCALE Details Project: Sheet Number: Phone: (970) 384-1500 Fax: (970) 384-1501 f--+-----------t----j Checked
by, April 6, 2011 Lough Residence 40f4 RDJ