HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.21.11 Email from Dough DennisonMolly Orkild- Larson
From: Doug Dennison (ddennison @billbarrettcorp.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 4:25 PM
To: Molly Orkitd- Larson
Subject: Re: Bailey Compressor Station Amendment
Old (existing) is 720 sf and new will be 400 sf. Both buildings are basically 2 or 3 empty rooms with no built -in fixtures
and will be outfitted with lockers for gear, benches for changing clothes, racks for computer equipment and a few desks.
Doug Dennison
Sent from my BlackBerry
970 - 270 -2853
From: Molly Orkild- Larson {mailto. morkild- larson@garfield- county.coml
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 03 :54 PM
To: Doug Dennison
Subject: RE: Bailey Compressor Station Amendment
Well, no. 1 need to know what the sf of the gathering area (inhabitable space) in the old and new buildings are and will
be.
From: Doug Dennison jmailto :ddennisonObillbarrettcoro.com}
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 3:26 PM
To: MoIIy Orkild- Larson
Subject: RE: Bailey Compressor Station Amendment
MoIIy,
The building that is out there now is 12 x 60 and we will be replacing it with a 10 x 40, so we will be reducing the number
of sq ft. Hope that answers your question. Thanks.
Doug Dennison
Environmental - Governmental Affairs Liaison
112 Red Feather Trail
Silt, CO 81652
CeII: 970 -270 -2853
Grand Junction Office: 970- 314 -9873
Tel: 970-876 -1959, ext. 28
Fax: 970- 876 -0981
Email: ddennison(cbillbarrettcorp.com
Bill Barrett Corporation
From: MoIIy Orkild- Larson jmailto: morkild - (arson @garfield- county.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 11 :37 AM
To: Doug Dennison
Subject: RE: Bailey Compressor Station Amendment
Doug:
1
Have you been able to check on what the inhabitable sf is for the old and new control buildings are?
Molly
From: Doug Dennison [mailto :ddennison@billbarrettcorp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 3:28 PM
To: Molly Orkild- Larson
Subject: Re: Bailey Compressor Station Amendment
I believe the buildings are the same size but will confirm with our ops staff.
Doug Dennison
Sent from my BlackBerry
970 - 270 -2853
From: Molly Orkild- Larson f mailto: morkild- Iarson@garfield- county.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 03:27 PM
To: Doug Dennison
Cc: Fred Jarman <fjarmanPgarfield- county.com>
Subject: RE: Bailey Compressor Station Amendment
I'm flushing this application out further so bear with me. Number 8 of the non - substantial criteria states, "Does not increase the floor area of the
use by more than five (5) percent or decrease the open space on the site by more than five (5) percent." The floor area under Number 8 refers to
"habitable" floor area which both the existing and proposed Control Building have or will have through the assembling of personnel in these
buildings. Does the new Control Building increase the "habitable" square footage from the existing building by 5%?
From: Doug Dennison [mailto :ddennison @billbarrettcorp.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 12:36 PM
To: Molly Orkild- Larson
Subject: Re: Bailey Compressor Station Amendment
Molly,
The new building will be used in exactly the same way as the existing one. It is not a full -time office for any of our
personnel - they all have offices in our Silt facility- but simply keeps equipment out of the weather and gives them a
place to do their work when they are at the compressor station. The reason we are replacing the building with one that
is certified by CDOH is that one of the county building inspectors told our guys that any modular building used in the
state has to have this certification. I don't think the certification is specific to whether the building will be inhabited but
applies to all modular structures no matter the intended use. That is consistent with my recollection of what we heard
from the state when the county was adopting the temp housing regulations. Hope this helps. Let me know if you need
more info. VII have spotty cell coverage the rest of today but can call on Monday. Thanks.
Doug Dennison
Sent from my BlackBerry
970 - 270 -2853
From: Molly Orkild- Larson (mailto: morkild- larson@garfield- county.com]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 12:12 PM
To: Doug Dennison
Subject: Bailey Compressor Station Amendment
Doug:
2
I need t get clarification on number three of your application. It states, ".....The Control Building that is currently
installed at the location serves as a place for personnel to occasionally assemble and to keep computers monitoring the
facility in a safe and weather proof environment."
Is the replacement building also going to serve as an office and break room? Is the reason for getting certification from
the Colorado Division of Housing for this building because it is to be inhabited by your employees?
Let me know,
Thanks,
Molly
3