HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationCommunity Development Department
108 8th Street, Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945 -8212
www.earfield- countv.com
LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT
APPLICATION FORM
TYPE OF APPLICATION AM
❑ Administrative Review
❑ Limited Impact Review
❑ Development in 100 -Year Floodplain
❑ Development in 100 -Year Floodplain Variance
❑ Major Impact Review
❑ Amendments to an Approved LUCP
❑ LIR ❑MIR ❑ SUP
❑ Minor Temporary Housing Facility
❑ Code Text Amendment
❑ Rezoning
❑ Zone District❑ PUD ❑ PUD Amendment
❑ Administrative Interpretation
❑ Vacation of a County Road /Public ROW
❑ Location and Extent Review
❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Major ❑ Minor
❑ Appeal of Administrative Interpretation
❑ Areas and Activities of State Interest
❑ Accommodation Pursuant to Fair Housing Act
❑ Pipeline Development ❑ Variance
❑ Time Extension (also check type of original application)
INVOLVED PARTIES
Owner /Applicant
Name: Garfield County Community Development Department Director
Mailing Address: 108 8th Street, Suite 401
City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Zip Code: 81651
I: -mail: fjarman@garfield- county.com
Phone: (970 ) 945 -8212
Representative (Authorization Required)
Molly Orkild- Larson, Garfield County Community Development Department 970 625 -5903
Name: Phone: { )
Mailing Address: 0375 County Road 352, Building 2060
City: Rifle State: CO Zip Code: 81650
E mail: morkild- larson @garfield- county.com
PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION
Project Name:
Comprehensive Plan Text and Map Amendment
Assessor's Parcel Number: N/A
Physical /Street Address: N/A
Legal Description: N/A
Zone District: N/A Property Size (acres): N/A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Existing Use: NIA
Proposed Use From Use Table 3 -403): NIA
Description of Project: Amend the text and Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan of 2030.
REQUEST FOR WAIVERS
Submission Requirements
❑ The Applicant requesting a Waiver of Submission Requirements per Section 4 -202, List:
Section: N/A Section:
Section: Section:
Waiver of Standards
❑ The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Standards per Section 4 -118. List:
Section: NIA Section:
Section: Section:
I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is
correct accurate to the best of my knowledge.
�..-�_.__•._ __ -. .
Signature of Property Own
Dat
OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File Number:____ - - - --
Fee Paid: $
C. A, Garfield County
August 30, 2013
Planning Commission
108 8th Street
Gienwood Springs, CO 80651
RE: Comprehensive Plan of 2030 - Major Amendment
Dear Planning Commissioners:
The Garfield County Community Development Department Director submits this application
requesting to amend the Comprehensive Plan of 2030 through the Major Amendment review
process. This amendment proposes to correct and update the text and Future Land Use Map of
the Comprehensive Plan of 2030.
Please find attached the Standards of Approval for the Major Amendment and narrative
addressing each standard.
Sincerely,
rye/ CLiJ - C.A /-1211
Molly Orkild- Larson AICP, RLA
Senior Planner
Standards for Approval — Maior Amendment
A major plan amendment shall be approved if the Planning Commission makes a specific
finding that:
1. The existing comprehensive plan and/or any related element thereof are in need of
the proposed amendment.
Response: The Comprehensive Plan of 2030 is proposed to be amended to correct and
update the text and Future Land Use Map. These changes included:
• Updates to reflect the changes in the Garfield County Land Use and Development
Code approved by the Board of County Commissioners on July 15, 2013;
• Add the Cottonwoods Comprehensive Plan text and Future Land Use Map
amendments approved by the Planning Commission on February 13, 2013
(Resolution PC 2013 -01);
• Update the Future Land Use Map to reflect the Urban Growth Areas for the Town of
Silt and Town of Carbondale;
• Revise Chapter 4 — Amending the Plan of the Comprehensive Plan of 2030; and,
• Correct grammatical and spelling errors.
2. The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding area, and the goals and
policies of the Plan.
Response: Not applicable.
3. The proposed amendment will have no major negative impacts on transportation,
services, and facilities.
Response: Not applicable.
4. The proposed amendment will have minimal effect on service provision, including
adequacy or availability of facilities and services, and is compatible with existing and
planned service provision.
Response: Not applicable.
5. The proposed amendment is consistent with the logical expansion of services.
Response: Not applicable.
6. The county or the general area in which an amendment is proposed has changed or is
changing to such a degree that the amendment is in the public interest.
Response: Not applicable.
7. Strict adherence to the Plan would result in a situation neither intended nor in
keeping with other key elements and policies of the Plan.
Response: Not applicable.
8. The proposed plan amendment has a significant public benefit; will promote the
public welfare and will be consistent with the goals and policies of the Garfield
County Comprehensive Plan and the elements thereof.
Response: Not applicable.