HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.2 MVMD Service Plan 1982) r
i
1
L
!.
'J'
.·
: .-
~:>~;;, ~-· ,, ~-·
,.,..,,.
,,:_:;.·.i:~:··~:i;· ··\·.
. :•'
.. . ·-~
,,.
.! ···:..;.
. ...... -:i' . ;-·
·.·" .
. ,_ : ~~'i.':•·.
1 ', .(. (·~;~:;~: l~'z:.\/ :;,, ~i,:)itii~i/.~;·: ~-'.. · '' · .. 0
; . i: · -~0~ , ; :-.. ·:;~ ;•':::~ci ;, '--··· '··w.··~·\~"";··""", ....... ,,.",.,,· .. ;;t;,,,,,,,,...,,.;:,..·MID VALEEY .>::!;;:, .. ·•• .. ~ ..... ,~·-. 1_,_~ ~: 'j-,~.'.~i:,~r/f~. -_ .. _. = ~ t;~t~:.;· :·~~·:~-~~~:ii·F,~~~'.:; -· .. ~ ·~~. · " ,_. !{'-._~:.~~!!;.-.. :~~;~s· -~-~~·1 .c:-~: .... ~ .: . · ~ .:~ ·,:..; _,,, .~ .. ~ \t·. · (~:~~
'" lWi·f~i·":>,. ·!cyMETROPOLITAN .. Ir>ISTRIC'F-..
.... "-:"s•:q::1"'''"'il~~~~»R'~\!i.i1if..¥;., · · ~:t&W~:~~;tff: .. ,;,&~1¥:.~~ii~~~tt4:'.'.tt~~,;
SERVICE ~PLAN.
'• J~.,~~~ w· .. ,~ '\''" r'~~-·.-. :1~r .. ::~, .: . . ,, _ . .... . , , ....... ·. :·(: 1
'f :~::~·:::-.:i~'J:Jl: .. ,. , -.. :~:';~~2~;~;'. ;;JJs:~k~!.t~~:~: ...
·1· -~~ir~·~ 1'J~~~f:£~~~1.1~~:~ 1
-:, -;~f".J+ ,·' · ·:-.:--:· .:1: :~.;!l·~~~iYr+~.,i~~~f,~~» ~~7:r> ~~~;~~-t~-Y-;-; .·;-3~~-. , /,ff•,-,•~ ~--···~~~' ~ •• ·~~ ''' '> • • 0
J'tf'. •f''' •• :;~"\, l'' .. • •f.>T ,-';<' •" '• ~" ril-~-,_~~K~~~~:-.~, .J~~~~~i~·J;;:1 ,;;;_ ... ·: ~ .. ,. ~ '·-~ , .. ·. ,,~~~ .... ~?.~~~r~~7:~~'.i~~t~~·'.' :,.'!::·$~· ~~~~; -·<?!' :..:' .. J.~:. ;;,-;, __ ~-
··: 't-_-. ~.~",.·;t~"~.~--:~_~· ,_:_ ,~;-;_.~v:,;: _)_ ~~·-·: ~ ~ ~;~~~ , : '-: -:;~·~~·;·~;f;~.~ -~-~:::,.:·1~. ~,--:~i%~~:. ~:,:·:'-.. _ .. , ·~·-:,~~ ·
;:·'fi:4::~1:ft'~~~~h~·~:· ,,,,J;•. -~~;-;·:~·~~111.f ... ~~,.. 1:' ... -:.,;,. :·, .... ". -t~. £'~;i!J-'~ ... \~Ji!:?.t.-1 ~;;. •";:"i~·* \f·~~~r-.~. :~~:. .. :''" <--::'-;·~::..<f· ·:. ]/:-.·)~-~~;::.·~). ,:·'?:;~1:i:N~!:;,;>-~'~. ~:, .. , .. , ~ -~·,_":,~:~::,~·:: ,_,~~~:/' "'"''~" > .. ,~~::"'!:·
~--· j ..
··-··
.-1 ·,~·t,
·;·_, -. , ..
·'•".'•.'''
. '.''i>· ;/< APRIL 1982
·. ~·.
·.'.-·'-""=":-~~Y~~~;:~-~-'. .-•. r ••
, .. ,,. -.....
'.'<:~· ~~-'-} .-:.:
. ::.~.···
' ~I:.-/. ···:
....
-SCHMUESER ,;J& . -~:ASSOC .. ;.iINC~
•'•w· '"""'~!liiil'i•~•"'' ,.,,..,. _. .. " ..... ·-' ~-· .,. "·-.,l 1· > ~,;;lj ,J'r~.'/l·~r~;~~~~~::) 'r,:1\~-f:f.-1.~"fl.:1.f.i' ':.~W.ii~~~~~li~~i~1'~~~(1:~.~;;~~~:~;.~;..~:fl;.__1;v. .. ;~ ~~::';.~~!:.'
!J~s11~~~:6 -·-\~~~---$;-¥-i ... ,~.i;'~~'.~-fk:i1fl.i) .. ~~~,··i:~-""6·~·"~~-~111·~~~·~ .. :1,i<\·,~11r~··l'--.··,;\·,.~ ... ~;--:·~-i.t1 ... zj:&:;'.'·:'~f~v.#.~i'1"' .. -~.··. · :~:~!~:1~:1;~7~~:~_:.~·~{~~}m'iffrr~i~1/~Vi~~~'._)~::~~i?.~.:~~.~;:~0-t1.~~;,i~ZB~11~~;.~J;,~~;.~~~~i~~'.~~~~~~i~~i~~;~ti·
l
l
8'5. CHMU~;ER & ASSOCIATES, INC.1
1
· .1+ 201 CENTENNIAL STREET
' -H SUITE 306
'/:f-}jj_l/ GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
' .,_] ------------------~·-'cffi."' (303) 945-5468
I
. I
I l
l
l
1
' J
. I
I
L J
! !
' '
. I
i
'. J
I
I 1
L _ i
May 28, 1982
Mid Valley Metropolitan District
Formation Committee
P.O. Bex 160
El Jebel, CO 81628
Gentlemen:
Submitted herewith is the Service Plan for organization of the
Mid Valley Metropolitan District.
The report has been written with the purpose of establishing the
need for the Metropolitan District, proposing the physical
facilities required for the formation of the District, and pro-
viding a financing overview for the District.
We trust that the data contained in this report will satisfy your
requirements and will provide the informa~ion necessary to suc-
cessfully bring to reality the proposed Metropolitan District.
Respectfully Submitted,
SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Dean W. Gordon, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Louis Meyer, E.I.T.
I
I
I
i ___ J
1
I
I
'l
. I
)
l
1
I
: l
' l
'' j
I
' 1
I , I
. I
, I
!
i
' l
, I
i ; J
J
' J
Project llB1501A
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER II
CHAPTER III
CHAPTER IV
CHAPTER V
CHAPTER VI
CHAPTER VII
CHAPTER VIII
CHAPTER IX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
THE NEED FOR A METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
A. Existing Water Service Facilities
B. Existing Sewer Service Facilities
C. Existing Parks and Recreation
Facilities
LAND UTILIZATION AND POPULATION GROWTH
A. Existing Land Usage
B. Proposed Land Usage
PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM
A.
B.
c.
D.
E.
General
Water Resources
Water Demand
Water Rights
Proposed Water Facilities
PROPOSED WASTEWATER SYSTEM
A. General
B. Wastewater Loading
C. Design Criteria
D. Wastewater Treatment Plant
E. Interceptor Trunklines, Outfalls
F. Collection Sewers
PROPOSED PARKS AND RECREATION
FACILITIES
PHASED CONSTRUCTION AND COST ESTIMATES
FINANCING AND OPERATION PLANNING
-1 -
Page No.
1-1
2-1
III-1
III-1
III-2
IV-1
IV-1
V-1
V-1
V-1
V-2
V-5
VI-1
VI-1
VI-1
VI-2
VI-2
VI-2
VII-1
VIII-1
IX-1
l
c l
1
l CHAPTER X DISTRICT POLICIES X-1
c l APPENDIX A OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST A-1
APPENDIX B ITEMIZATION 0 WASTEWATER TREATMENT
c 1
APPENDIX c
CAPITAL COST B-1
PARTIAL EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE C-1
]
' l
l
: )
: l
' j
' I
, I
, I
' I
' I
' J
. I
'J
i l
, I
, I
, I
)
I
I
' l
. I
' 1
. ,
I
' J
. I
i
' J
' )
I ' ,
I
' I
I L _I
I
' J
)
)
I
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO.
IV-1 Land Use El Jebel Area
.rv-2 Projected Development Use
V-1 Water Resources
VIII-2 Water System Cost Estimate
VIII-2 Wastewater System Cost Estimate
Schedule A Phase 1 Water and Sewer Debt Service
Schedule
Schedule B Phase II Water and Sewer Debt Service
Schedule
Schedule C Combined Phase I and II Water and Sewer
Service Schedule
Schedule D Cash Flow Projections
Schedule E Combined Mill Levy and Service
Charge Rates
Schedule F Park and Recreation 0 & M Estimated
Mill Levies
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
B-1
B-2
C-1
0 & M For Ultimate Wastewater Facilities
0 & M For Initial Wastewater Facility
0 & M For Ultimate Water Facilities
O & M For Initial Water Facility
0 & M For Ultimate P & R Facilities
Aerated Lagoon Cost Breakdown
Phase I
Aerated Lagoon Cost Breakdown
Phase II
Partial Equivalent Schedule
-3 -
PAGE NO.
IV-1
IV-2
V-4
VIII-1
VIII-2
IX-2
IX-3
IX-4
IX-5
IX-6
IX-7
A-1
A-1
A-2
A-2
A-2
B-1
B-2
C-1
l
l
l
I
. I
· 1
. ]
I
. l
: l
. j
. I
' j
: l
I
. I
I ' ;
. I
I
cJ
. I
J
I
I I • j
I
' I
I
I
L j
j
FIGURE NO.
IV-1
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
LIST OF FIGURES
Land Use Summary
Vicinity Mi'IP
El Jebel Valley Floor
Boundary Map
Water System Phase I Construction
Water System Phase II Construction
PAGE NO.
IV-3
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
Wastewater Facilities Phase I Construction A-6
Wastewater Facilities Phase II Construction A-7
-4 -
c I
c l
rel
l_
: l
' j
: l
! I , I
i J
, I
l i
r I
L J
in The Roaring Fork Journal announcing the formation of the
Metropolitan District.
The objectives of this service plan are as follows:
1.) Establish the need for water, sanitation and parks
and recreation services within the proposed
District.
2.) Outline conceptual engineering data for con-
struction of water and wastewater systems.
3.) Demonstrate the economic viability of the
District based upon estimated costs and revenues
related to an anticipated development schedule.
rl I. INTRODUCTION
' l
. J
']
'l
, I
: I
l
' l
(_ J
I
' ; J
, I
! ' ,
' !
i ' ,
' l
i
, I
. I
J
. I
i .. I
In accordance with the revised statutes known as "T~e Special
District Act" provision 32-1-202, the following service plan has
been prepared for the purpose of organizing a special district,
known as the Mid-Valley Metropolitan District. The formation of
the District is being proposed by a steering committee composed
of twelve major landowners in the southwest end of Eagle County.
The Special District will provide long range planning and im-
provements in water and sanitation facilities and park's and
recreation facilities.
El Jebel is located approximately four miles west of Basalt
on Highway 82 at the point of access to Missouri Heights. The El
Jebel "Sub Area" as identified by the Eagle County Sub Area plan
includes the Roaring Fork Valley Floor from the Garfield County
Line to the Emma Curve and the Missouri Heights Mesa to the
north. El Jebel is primarily a bedroom community for employees
working up-valley in the Snowmass/Aspen Communities.
Presently, 550 existing dwelling units on the valley floor,
plus an existing commercial and urban core, comprise the nucleus
of a ~inor urban center. Demand for residential housing, commer-
cial space and light industrial space is strong and will continue
to be strong for the next 20 years. Because of the existing ur-
ban infrastructure and the projected growth of El Jebel to a com-
munity of 8000 the formation of a district providing municipal
water, wastewater and parks and recreation services becomes the
first logical step in the development process. Without these
services, well planned development will not occur.
The Mid-Valley Metropolitan District will encompass portions
of the valley floor from the Garfield County Line to the Emma
Curve but beca~se of obvious physical restraints, it will not be
feasible to include the Missouri Heights area. Because of the
1000' difference in elevation and the difference in zoning, the
initial capital costs and operation and maintenance costs re-
quired to serve both areas with common utility systems becomes
prohibitive. This conclusion is consistant with the recommenda-
tion from a reconnaissance report entitled "Municipal Water
Supplies in Southwest Eagle County" prepared for the Basalt Water
Conservancy District by the David Fleming Company. The Fleming
report published in 1978 recommends that Missouri Heights and the
Roaring Fork Valley Floor be divided into two service areas .
The Mid-Valley Metropolitan District Formation Committee has
given all landowners within this area the opportunity to be in-
cluded within this District. Notices were sent to all landowners
within the area explaining the purpose of the District along with
estimated construction costs of proposed facilities and approxi-
mate charges for user fees, mill levy assessment and tap fees.
All landowners were invited to public meetings to further explain
the purpose of the District and answer questions that the land-
owners may have had. In addition, public notices were published
. 1
l
1
I
l
I
. I
. 1
I
. J
l
I . ,
l
I
. j
I
. J
. ' I
I
L j
-l
I
l !
i
I
I j
. J
I
' i
. I
Description of the Perimeter of the Mid-Valley Metropolitan
District located in Eagle County, Colorado. 1
Beginning at the intersection of the Garfield/Eagle County line
and the center of the Roaring Fork River thence Northerly along
said County lin~ 1,600 feet mere or less to the Northerly right-
cf-way line cf Colorado State Highway 82; thence from the County
line S. 72010 1
33"E., 730 feet more or less along the Northerly
right-of-way line of said Highway 82; thence N. 00000 1
01"E.,
3,184.29 feet; thence N. 89°42'43"E., 448.71 feet; thence S .
00°38'47"W., 662.75 feet; thence N. 89°39'06"E., 1,373.74 feet;
thence N. 00036 1
45"E., 1,322.61 feet; thence S. 88030'30"E.,
1,317.87 feet; thence S. QQ026'34"W., 1,321.88 feet; thence S.
00~34'35"W., 428.63 feet; thence S. 89°53'4311
E., 240.06 feet;
thence S. 01018'47"E., 2,606.72 feet; thence N. 89°56'52"W.,
731.79 feet; thence .S. 02057•oo•w., 326.29 feet to the Northerly
right-of-way line of Colorado State Highway 82; thence along the
Northerly right-cf-way line of said Highway 82, S. 72°16'12"E.,
2,135.25 feet; thence Southeasterly on a curve to the right
having a radius of 2,905 feet through a central angle of 5055•0011
an arc distance of 299.99 feet to a point of tangency; thence
S.66°21'12"E., 15.30 feet; thence Southeasterly on a curve to the
right having a radius of 2,905 feet and having a chord distance
of 54.08 feet bearing S. 57007 1
03•E., and an arc distance of
54.08 feet to a point of tangency; thence S. 66035•0011
E., 156.80
feet; thence Southeasterly on a curve to the right having a
radius of 5,770 feet and having a chord distance of 375.79 feet
bearing S. 64043'02"E., and an arc distance cf 375.86 feet to a
point of tangency; thence departing the Northerly right-cf-way
line of said Highway 82 N. 89047 1
00"E., 151.53 feet; thence N.
89037'13"E., 207.71 feet to Angle Point #1, Tract 43, and also
being a point on the Westerly right-of-way line cf Eagle County
Road S-13; thence Southerly along the Westerly right-cf-way line
of said County Road S-13, 235 feet more er less to a point on the
Northerly right-cf-way line of Colorado State Highway 82; thence
Southeasterly along the Northerly right-cf-way line of said High-
way 82, 130 feet more or less; thence S. 53oo3 1
00"E., 265.10
feet; thence departing the Northerly right-cf-way line of said
Highway 82, N. 02027 1
oo•w., 150.50 feet; thence s. 86°07'00"E.,
337.40 feet; thence N. 07000 1
oo•w., 307.20 feet; thence s.
86C07'00"E., 595.92 feet; thence North, 331.50 feet tc Angle
Point #2, Tract 38; thence East, 2,577.30 feet as per the Office
cf U.S. Supervisor of Surveys Supplemental Plat, Sheet #2, dated
August 25, 1927, of Independent Resurvey of T.8S., R. 87W., cf
the 6th Principal Meridian, Colorado to Angle Point #1, Tract 38
(Plat calls 40.00 chains [2,640.00 feet] with 0.95 chains [62.70
1 Because response has not been received from all property
owners within the Districts perimeter boundary, the properties
that will be excepted have not been listed. It is expected that
before submittal to the District Court that this legal descrip-
tion will be amended to show the final District Boundary and
those properties that will be excepted.
JJ-1
l
i
'l
rl
. l
11
. I
' 1
I
' '
r \
. j
. I
r ·1
. I
~ _ _J
r I
i j
1 , __ j
. I
!
L.J
I
i
\ __ j
,J
feet] shortage; 2,640.00 feet -62.70 feet= 2,577.30 feet);
thence South 1,595.22 feet as per said Supplemental Plat to Angle
Point #6, Tract 38; thence East, 182.82 feet as per said Sup-
plemental Plat tc Angle Point #6, Tract 46; thence South,
1,320.00 feet tc Angle Point #5, Tract 46, being also Angle Point
#1, Tract 48; thence S. ooc22•5o"E., 2,308.77 feet; thence S •
00°23'00"E., 280.00 feet tc Angle Point #4, Tract 48, being also
Angle Point #1, Tract 52; thence S. oo0
43'00"E., 1,276.44 feet as
per said Supplemental Plat; thence S 89°50'00"E., 2,513.79 feet
along the Northerly line cf Tract 51 to Angle Point #1, Tract 51;
thence South, 2,950.86 feet along the Easterly line cf said Tract
51 and the Easterly line cf Tract 59 tc Angle Point #6, Tract 59
as per the aforementioned Supplemental Plat; thence West, 579.20
feet along the Southerly line cf Tract 59 to a point in the cen-
ter of the Roaring Fork River; thence Northeasterly along the
center cf the Rearing Fork River tc the point and place cf
beginning.
n-:-i
1
j
' l
' 1
I
. I
' l
' \ . I
f J
. l
' 1
I
l )
' )
. l
f
I
' 1
\
I
j
. '
I .J
. I
I
L J
I , I
I
. I
III. THE NEED FOR A METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
A. Existing Water Service Facilities
The proposed Mid-Valley Metropolitan District service
area is presently being served by numerous small private
water systems, each constructed and operated with little
regard to physical and legal impacts on other systems.
There are approximately 192 residential and commercial units
within the District ranging from the 90 unit KOA Campground
and Trailer Park to many individual residential units.
The majority of existing units within the proposed
service area are supplied with water from wells drilled in
the Roaring Fork alluvium. The physical and legal relia-
bility of each well varies in each case, but in most cases
the wells are not up to municipal standards.
From a legal viewpoint, many of the wells serving the
area have adjudication dates that are not senior enough for
a dependable municipal supply. Wells with junior water
rights will become increasingly susceptible to being "called
out" as development takes place and more senior water rights
in the Colorado River Basin are protected. The formation of
the Mid-Valley Metropolitan District would ensure that
sufficiently senior water rights would be obtained to meet
municipal standards.
From a physical viewpoint, the existing wells again
vary in both quality and quantity of water produced. If a
proliferation of small wells would occur, the well yield of
existing wells could decrease and well drawdown may increase.
In addition, well water quality may become susceptible to
contamination from sewage if existing and projected residen-
tial and commercial areas are not tied into a central waste
water system.
With heavy growth occuring in the past 10 years and
expected to continue in the future, the need for compre-
hensive long range planning to insure the physical and
legal reliability of a safe domestic water system becomes
critical •
B. Existing Sewer Service Facilities
Th~ proposed Metropolitan District service area is
presently served by sewer systems with private treatment
facilities and by individual septic systems. The KOA Camp-
ground is served by a packaged treatment facility that is
consistantly in violation of its discharge permit standards.
The individual septic systems and leachfields are not moni-
tored properly to prevent contamination of well water. The
State Health Department may in the future restrict the number
of separate treatment facilities within the proposed service
area, and the Eagle County 208 Plan in effect states that the
m.1
l
I
' l
')
' l
r )
' )
i )
: l
r I
,J
I
'
' j
' i
: I
, I
i
i J
I ' j
'·
county does not want to see a proliferation of packaged
treatment plants. Agai~, well planned development within the
area is dependent upon consolidation of the separate t_reat-
ment facilities into one regional facility designed to meet
discharge permits at peak flows.
c. Existing Parks and Recreation Facilities
At the present time, there are no parks and recreation
facilities within the proposed District boundary, nor is
there a vehicle by which future facilities can be planned
to compliment the projected growth when it occurs.
1
J
' 1 i
. J
1
. J
I )
l
' J
l
, I
i
. I
l
" I
' l
' '
' j
' I
i
' '
( 1
I
l j
l
I
. I
~ j
IV. LAND UTILIZATION AND POPULATION GROWTH
A. Existing Land Usage
According to recent figures from the Eagle County Plan-
ning Office, the existing development use for the El
Jebel area is as follows:
USE
TABLE IV-I
LAND USE
EL JEBEL AREA
QUANTITY % DEVELOPED
Dwelling Units
Commercial Limited
Commercial General
Industrial
550 each
29.10 acres
10.80 acres
34 acres
35 unbuilt lots
40%
56%
83%
B. Proposed Land Usage
The El Jebel area has grown at an accelerated rate
for the past ten years and is expected to continue this
growth pattern for the next 20 years. Most of the
growth has occurred in the El Jebel Mobile Home Park,
Sopris Village and the KOA Campground and Mobile Home
Park. As growth continues, both up valley in Snowmass/
Aspen and down valley in Carbondale and Glenwood
Springs, demands will continue to be placed on El Jebel
as a low cost housing alternative or working mans
community.
Although definite zoning patterns have yet to be
established and will not until the Sub Area Plan for El
Jebel is approved by the Planning Commission, this re-
port will utilize a develqpment scenario based upon
typical and emerging development use in the area. This
development scenario is shown in figure IV-1, and sum-
marized in Table IV-2.
Using a projected 1628 units and an average
density of 3.5 persons per unit the Mid Valley
Metropolitan District would service a population of
approximately 5700 people.
Although certain portions of the valley floor in-
cluding the Sopris Village Subdivision and the El Jebel
Mobile Home Community have elected not to be included in
the District initially, it is anticipated that they
. 1
j
. I
. J
: l
']
, I
t 1
: I
• I
l J
. l
' I
'J
' l
: j
: I
I
i )
. I
i . '
may elect to be included within the District in the
future. For this reason, the water and. wastewater
facilities will be designed so that expansion of the
facilities will be possible without placing a financial
burden on initial members· of the District.
ZONING
TABLE IV-2
PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT USE
MID-VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
TOTAL AREA % USABLE DENSITY
ACRES % (UNITS/ACRE)
UNITS
II
Rural-Agricultural 891 75 .2 134
Light Commercial 46 85 5 195
Urban 41 85 6 210
Suburban 853 75 1 639
Heavy Commercial 106 85. 5 450
TOTAL 1937 1628
r l
,
r 1
J
: l
' l
\ c;
)
' J
,--"'/ . I
j
~ l
(
'1
' ' J
,.,
' ,J
i __ j
I
J
I
,,
'
USE
COMMERCIAL
Y COMMERCIAL
IV-I
SE SUMMARY
' ' l
' I
j
: l
.. I
l
' l
~ 1
• 1
I
' ' J
' . I
: ' j
1. I
: I
~ ' j
1
i ! J
ii
' i
, I
v. PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM
A. General
The development of a water supply is dependent upon the
type of development that will occur within the proposed
district boundaries. Because of the suburban and urban
densities projected, it is proposed to provide a complete
municipal water system providing domestic in-house service,
domestic irrigation, fire protection and other typical
municipal uses. The recommended water system will be a
skeleton water system for the projected municipal area com-
plete with water supply, treatment, transmission, distribu
tion and storage facilities.
B. Water Resources
It is essential that the source of water for a municipal
water system must be adequate from both a physical and legal
point of view. For the Mid Valley Metro-District, the water
supply that best meets this criteria is that of alluvial
wells within the Roaring Fork River alluvium. The Roaring
Fork River is the longest and most reliable water source
along the valley floor. The alluvium, or sand and gravel
laid down by the river, is several thousand feet wide and
one hundred feet deep in the El Jebel area. The alluvial
wells will be able to provide high capacity municipal type
wells as demonstrated by Carbondale, Basalt and the Sopris
Village Subdivision, the later having two wells yielding more
than 150 gpm each •
The quality of the Roaring
with location and depth, but is
requiring only chlorination for
C. Water Demand
Fork alluvium water varies
generally of good quality
treatment.
Design water demands are estimated as follows:
Average Daily Flow (ADF)
Domestic Use = 5700 population x 80gpcd = 456,000 gpd
Irrigation= 1621 units x 1500 sfx2.8' x 7.48 gal 320gpm
uni t---:r50 day CF =
Average Winter Flow =
Average Summer Flow =
V-I
340' 000 gpd
240gpm
456 '000 gpd
320gpm
796 '000 gpd
560gpm
, I
I
J
I
. I
' , I
: j
' l
. 1
I
I
\
' J
, ' I
I
I i' j
,' l
I
'"ll_ _J
,, I
\ 1
I
I
J
Maximum Daill'. Winter Demand = 1. 2 x ADF = 593!000 gpd
410gpm
Maximum Daill'. Summer Demand = 1.2 x ADF = 1!035 !000 gEd
720gpm
Average Annual Water Requirements
Domestic .Use = 456,000 gpd x 365 day x 1 A-F
3,259 x 105Gal =
511 A-F
Irrigation Use = 340,000 gpd x 150 day x 1 A-F
3,259 x 105Gal =
157 A-F
Consumptive Use
Domestic = Assume Central WWTF
10% of 511 A-F =
Irrigation = Assume use of Grass, 65% efficient
51 A-F
65% of 157 = 102 A-F
Storage Requirements
Operation Storage = 30% of Maximum Day =
30 % of 1,035,000 gpd = 311!000 Gal
A municipal well with an appropriation date of 1982
would not have sufficient senior water rights for a munici-
pal supply. As conditional water rights, such as those for
energy development and municipalities, are perfected and put
in use, all junior water rights become increasingly suscep-
tible to being called out by senior water right holders.
The water rights for the proposed wells must be pro-
tected year round from being called out by augmenting the
supply with senior water rights. To provide year round
protection for the well diversions, it will be necessary
to implement a plan of augmentation that will provide water
to the Roaring Fork River in sufficient quantity to offset
the Districts 153 AF annual consumptive use. This will be
accomplished by utilizing the District's direct flow irriga-
tion rights from the ditches listed in Table V-1 during the
summer irrigation season. The District will propose to
' I
: I
: I
' I
I I
' I
. I
' J
I I
~ ' j
I I
I I
I J
I l
I
. l. I
,/
,I
transfer direct flow irrigation rights to domestic rights
by taking historically irrigated land irrigated by the
ditches out of irrigation. The amount of acreage taken out
of irrigation by roads, housing driveways, etc. should be
more than enough to accomplish this.
During the winter months, water will have to be stored
in priority and released in quantities to offset domestic
use. The District will have to provide storage to offset a
consumptive use of approximately 25 AF during the six month
period. The Basalt Water Conservency District is now in the
final stages of negotiating with the Bureau of Reclamation
for 500 AF of Ruedi Reservoir water. Once the negotiations
are finalized, the Conservancy District has committed to the
Mid-Valley Metro District Formation Committee sufficient
water to meet their winter augmentation needs.
l
: I
' ' l
' 'l
' l
. I
l
; l
I ! l
' ' ]
' ' l
' )
' ' J
. l
i
i' l
• I J
'.. I
I
~ L _j
The water rights under which property within the pro-
posed District boundaries currently obtain water are as
follows:
Name
Robinson Ditch
Northside
Pioneer Ditch
Harris Reed
Ditch
Robinson Ditch
Robinson Ditch
Patterson &
Cummings Ditch
Patterson &
Cummings Ditch
Robinson Ditch
Robinson Ditch
Robinson Ditch
Northside
Pioneer Ditch
Patterson &
Cummings Ditch
Robinson Ditch
TABLE V-1
WATER RESOURCES
Amount
Source (cfs)
Roaring Fork
River 5.0
Roaring Fork
River · 2.4
Roaring Fork
River 9.0
Roaring Fork
River 2.5
Roaring Fork
River 4.24
Roaring Fork
River 2.6
Roaring Fork
River 1.9
Roaring Fork
River 6 .46
Roaring Fork
River 20.06
Roaring Fork
River 0.837
Roaring Fork
River 0.890
Roaring Fork
River 3.0
Roaring Fork
River 3.0
Adjudication
Date
5/11/1889
5/11/1889
5/11/1889
5/11/1889
12/29/1903
12/14/1907
12/14/1907
12/29/1903
8/25/1936
8/25/1936
8/25/1936
8/25/1936
10/24/1952
Appropriation
Date
6/15/1882
7/20/1883
11/02/1883
4/15/1886
4/25/1889
11/20/1893
11/20/1893
4/25/1899
4/25/1900
9/01/1900
9/05/1916
5/15/1918
8/14/1948
' 1
-' l
' l
.. I
J
: c 1
. I
. ' l
, I
I
' 1 . j
~ I
. J
, ' l
. . i
I ?,
. ' !
• , J
. l
, ' t
i' ',
' ' '
. '
l I
. '
; > !
' '
• . j
i
I
E. Proposed Water Facilities
The proposed water system facilities for the District
will include source of supply, treatment, storage and trans-
mission lines. The physical facilities will be based upon
the following design criteria:
1. Design Criteria
2.
3 .
a. Provide a minimum of 35 psi service pressure
under peak hour demand to the highest
elevation served in the pressure zone.
b. Potable water will be of good quality meeting
all mandatory requirements of the Colorado
Department of Public Health .
c. Fire protection flows will meet or surpass the
ISO (Insurance Services Office) guidelines.
d. Water facilities must be designed for phased
construction to permit gradual investment
approximately paralleling actual needs that
result in an economically feasible plan .
e. Detailed design and materials will conform to
AWWA and ASTM Standards •
Supply and.Treatment
As discussed earlier in this report, supply
will be provided from alluvial wells. The loca-
tion and depth of the wells will determine both
water quality and quantity in addition to pump-
ing costs to storage. During the final phase of
design, after test wells have been drilled, proper
consideration will be given to the layout of the
well system. It is expected that the quality of
the well water will be such that chlorination
will be the only treatment required. Wells will
also lend themselves to phased construction,
and provide flexibility if further areas are an-
nexed into the service area.
Storage
Properly located reservoirs, which provide
adequate storage, allow uniform operation of the
facilities and eliminate the need for costly over-
sized water supply facilities to meet peak hour and
emergency needs. The topography of the area within
the proposed district allows only one pressure
zone. The service area elevations range
V-5
-I
· 1
'J
~ 1 . I
~ ~ 1
' I
, '
i i
'' J
. I 1 , I
' ' L-•'
i 1
' ,
' I 1: j
, I
' I l: j
. '. _j
. : l
.~.
1J
4.
from 6390 feet to 6530 feet mean sea level. With
storage facilities located at approximately 6610
feet, service pressure will range from 35 psi to 94
psi. It is recommended that the ultimate storage
requirement of 1.0 million gallons be provided
with two storage tanks, the exact location of which
will be determined during final design.
Transmission and Distribution
The recommended transmission facilities needed
to serve the District service area are shown in
figures A-4 and A-5. The required capacity will
be determined from fire flow requirements. Dis-
tribution lines within developments will be sized
and located during final design when new develop-
ment occurs and will be the responsibility of the
individual developer.
' 1
f
' 1
I
'l
l
' 1
' J
1
' J
r 1
J
' l
' 1
I
. I
VI. PROPOSED WASTEWATER SYSTEM
A. General
The nature of the development on the valley
dictate the type of sewage handling facilities.
and suburban areas projected within the district
a central collection and treatment system.
floor will
The urban
necessitates
B. Wastewater Loading
c.
Design wastewater flows are estimated as follows:
Average Daily Flow (ADF)
5700 population x 100 gpcd = 570,000 gpd
Peak Flow
=2.5 x ADF = 2.5 x 570,000 gpd = 1,425,000 gpd
Design Criteria
The preliminary wastewater system planning has been
based on the following general criteria.
1. Community -type sewer service would be provided
to all high density developments within the
District. Lower density areas may have individual
wastewater systems until service to the individual
area becomes economically justified.
The wastewater treatment facilities will be
located and designed subject to the approval of the
Water Quality Division of the Colorado Department
of Health. The effluent requirements for discharge
to the Roaring Fork River will require secondary
treatment to meet minimum state effluent standards
for all parameters. Detailed design will conform
to the "Design Criteria for Wastewater Works"
published by the Colorado Water Pollution Control
Commission.
The ultimate service population of 5700 people and
an average per capita sewage contribution of 100
gpcd will result in the wastewater treatment plant
to be sized with a design flow of 0.57 MGD.
Interceptor lines and wastewater treatment
facilities shall be designed for phased construc-
tion to permit gradual investment approximately
paralleling actual needs.
c l
. I
' J
l
. I
, ]
' : ]
• I 1
• J
' l
'. : J
. I
! L J
' l
' ' ' !
, ' I
' l
-!
i ) j .\__j
' i
' L i ' '
' I
I
"! l _)
I
' I
D.
E.
F.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
It is anticipated that secondary treatment will be
met by an aerated lagoon process. This process was
based upon the assumption that land would be available
in the northwest corner of the District for the lagoon
system. If adequate acreage is not available and the
cost of obtaining acreage becomes prohibitive, then the
next viable alternative would be a mechanical treatment
plant utilizing a rotating biologiaal contactor (RBC)
process .
Interceptor, Trunklines, Outfalls
The preliminary location of the main interceptor
and trunk lines are shown in figure A-6, A-7. The
topography of the valley floor will permit gravity flow
to the treatment site but prohibitive construction costs
in the area of the existing Sopris Village sewage plan~
may dictate the need for a lift station.
Collection Sewers
Existing collection systems will be incorporated
into the District's Facilities. Construction of
collection systems within future developments will be
the responsibility of the individual developer and will
be designed when the new development occurs.
' l
cl
r J
: l
l
' J
, I
' l
, ]
1
i j
~ I
I
' J
; l
' ' i
I J
'.J
I . I
L._ i
; I
. I
VII. PROPOSED PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
In an area with the nucleus of a small urban community
such as El Jebel, it becomes important to plan for the recre-
ation needs in advance rather than let growth dictate the
needs after the fact. The character of El Jebel will be en-
hanced by preserving the rural character of the valley and
focusing the character on common facilities including a park
system. The proposed district will work closely with Eagle
County in establishing policies and specific goals toward
these common facilities. It is proposed that the District
will be used as a vehicle in which to define receivership and
maintenance and to oversee a function to coordinate recre-
ational activities.
Large community wide parks will be provided for active
and passive recreation, in addition to the small recreation
facilities provided by each development for small children.
A few possible community wide parks that could be pursued are
as follows:
A.
B.
Park site within the Forest Service Tree,Nursery along
the Roaring Fork River.
A major active recreaton area for young adults of 10 to
20 acres should be developed in cooperation with the
school facility on the north side of Highway 82.
""UTT -I
c J
l
I
' j
' J
: l
i j
I
' J
I
c j
1The description of the Mid Valley Metropolitan District was
obtained by first describing the outside boundary of the District
and then noting exceptions of individual properties that will be
excluded from the district. Bearings and distances were obtained
from Eagle County Tax Assessors Maps. In cases where not enough
information was available from tax maps, individual property
deeds were researched. The exceptions were noted by calling out
the individual property owners name and the Book & Page number of
the property deed.
I
l
l
. I
. l
, I
• J
' l
I
' I
, I
. I , ' ,
1
' J
I
L .J
, I
Sector Number 3:
a) Tom J. Wilson & Donald D. Veitch, Book 316, Page 187;
Sector Number 4:
a) Linda Nelson, Book 165, Page 275;
Sector Number 5:
a)
b)
c)
~ d)
, e)
f)
Morning Star Truck Corp.; Book 243, Page 766;
Glen M. & Paula M. Shook; Book 239, Page 657;
Frank H. & Pearl H. Crowley; Book 188, Page 551; 2.00
acres more or less;
Clarence A. & Valborg Spraque; Book 166, Page 199; 0.68
acres more or less;
Jeremy & Angela Foster; Book 327, Page 838;
Basalt State Highway Mobile Home Park; Book 222, Page 981;
Sector Number 6:
a) U.S. Tree Farm; Book 165, Page 547;
Sector Number 7:
a) Sopris Village Subdivision; Book 242, Page 758;
Sector Number 8:
a) Peter J. & Sarah E. Glassier; Book 443, Page 164; 17.l
acres more or less;
b) Jonnie I. Dunning; Book 291, Page 803;
Sector Number 9:
a) Lila L. Ford; Book 224, Page 357; 2.00 acres more or
less;
Sector Number 10:
a) Varnqua G. Bone; Book 220, Page 315; 1.00 acres
more or less;
b) A. Doyle & Sandra Allmon; Book 220, Page 316; 1.00 acres
more or less;
c) McCune Subdivision; Book 268, Page 298; 2.03 acres
more or less;
Sector Number 11:
a) Jacobi Subdivision: Book 199, Page 271, Book 211, Page
948, Book 307, Page 988; 3.42 acres more or less.
l
' l
: l
1
' ' J
I
' J
. I
I
, I
Description of tne Perimeter of the Mid-Valley ~etropolitan
District followed by the notable exceptions within the district
Boundary.l
A tract of land situated in sections 33 and 34, T.7S.,
R.87W. and sections 2, 3, 4, and 11 in T.8S., R.87W., 6th.P.M.
and more fully desc~ibed as follows:
Beginning at a point along the Northerly right-of-way line
of Colorado Highway 82, S. 72°10 1 33"E., 730 feet more or less
from the intersection of the Garfield/Eagle County line and the
said Northerly right-of-way line of Colorado State Highway 82;
thence N. OO"OO'Ol''E., 3,184.29 feet; thence N. 89°42'43''E.,
448.71 feet; thence S. 00°38 147"W., 662.75 feet; thence N.
89°39'06"E., 1,373.74 feet; thence N. 00°36'45"E., 1,322.61 feet;
th~nce S. 88°30'30"E., 1,317.87 feet; thence s. 00°26'34''W.,
1,321.88 feet; thence S. 00°34'35''W., 428.63 feet; thence S.
89°53'43''E., 240.06 feet; thence S. 01°18'47''E., 2,606.72 feet;
thence N. 89°56'52"W., 731.79 feet; thence S. 02°57'00"W., 326.29
feet to the Northerly right-of-way line of Colorado State Highway
82; thence along the Northerly right-of-way line of said Highway
82, S. 72°16'12''E., 2,135.25 feet; thence Southeasterly on a
curve to the right having a radius of 2,905 feet through a cen-
tral angle of 5°55'00" an arc distance of 299.99 feet to a point
of tangency; thence S. 66°21'12''E., 15.30 feet; thence Southeast-
erly on a curve to the right having a radius of 2,905 f·e"et and
having a chord distance of 54.08 feet bearing S. 67°07'03''E., and
an arc distance of 54.08 feet to a point of tangency; thence S.
66°35'00''E., 156.80 feet; thence Southeasterly on a curve to the
right having a radius of 5,770 feet and having a chord distance
of 375.79 feet bearing S. 65°43'02''E., and an arc distance of
375.86 feet to a point of tangency; thence departing the Norther-
ly right-of-way line of said Highway 82 N. 89°47'00''E., 151.53
feet; thence N. 89°37'13''E., 207.71 feet to Angle Point #1, Tract
43, and also being a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of
Eagle County Road S-13; thence Southerly along the Westerly
right-of-way line of said County Road S-13, 235 feet more or less
to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of Colorado State
Highway 82; thence Southeasterly along the Northerly right-of-way
line of said Highway 82, 130 feet more or less; thence S.
53°03'00''E., 265.10 feet; thence departing the Northerly right-
of-way line of said Highway 82, No. 02°27'00''W., 150.50 feet;
thence S. 86°07'00"E., 337.40 feet; thence N. 07°00'00"W., 307.20
feet; thence S. 86°07'00''E., 595.92 feet; thence North, 331.50 .
feet to Angle Point #2, Tract 38; thence East, 2,577.30 feet as
per the Office of U.S. Supervisor of Surveys Supplemental Plat,
Sheet #2, dated August 25, 1927, of Independent Resurvey of
T.8S., R. 87W., of the 6th Principal Meridian, Colorado to Angle
Point #1, Tract 38 (Plat calls 40.00 chains [2,640.00 feet] with
0.95 chains [62.70 feet] shortage; (2,640.00 feet-62.70 feet =
2,577.30 feet); thence South, 2,550.49 feet; thence West, 236.80
' l
' l
' l
l
' J
' l
' l
. I
j
l
i
'
. '
' j
l J
feet; thence S. 05°50 160 11E., 52.54 feet; thence S. 02°30'00"W.,
51.41 feet; thence S. 22°49'00''W., 108.46 feet; thence S.
00°03'00''E., 205.14 feet; thence S. ll 007'00''E., 90.55 feet;
thence s. 17°18'00"W., 79.16 feet; thence s. 28°15'00"W., 90.82
feet; thence S. 82°18'00"W., 162.69 feet; thence s. 60°09'00''W.,
135.86 feet; thence s. 05°37'00''E., 36.85 feet; thence S.
24°07'00''W., 96.33 feet; thence S. 33°18'00"W., 80.60 feet;
thence S. 35°06 100"W., 104.48 feet; thence S. 09°43'00"W., 41.48
feet; thence S. 06°44'00''E., 134.00 feet; thence s. 36°00'00''W.,
197.61 feet; thence s. 13°56'00"E.,-798.06 feet; thence S.
33°00'00"E., 173.01 feet; thence S. 15°08'00"E., 527.30 feet;
thence s. 06°07'00"W., 93.94 feet; thence s. 18°29'00"E., 59.23
feet; thence S. 89°50'00''E., 616.35 feet being Angle Point #4 of
Tract 48, and Angle Point #1 of Tract 52 as per aforementioned
Supplemental Plat; thence S. 00°43'00''E., 1,276.44 feet; thence
S. 89°50'00''E., 2,513.79 feet along the Northerly line of Tract
51 to Angle Point #1, Tract 51; thence South, 2,950.86 feet along
the Easterly line of said Tract 51 and the Easterly line of Tract
59 to Angle Point #6, Tract 59 as per the aforementioned Sup-
plemental Plat; thence West, 579.20 feet along the Southerly line
of Tract 59 to a point in the center of the Roaring Fork River,
thence Northwesterly along the center of the Roaring Fork River,
to a point intersecting the center line of the Roaring Fork River
and the most Southwesterly corner of Lot 6 of the Arlian Ranch
Subdivision; thence N. Ol 033 1
00''E., 425.04 feet; thence ~orth
more or less, 1,170 feet more or less along the Westerly lines of
Lots 6, 4, and 3 of the Arlian Ranch Subdivision, to a point
intersecting the Northerly right-of-way line of Colorado State
Highway 82; thence N. 72°10'33"W., 820 feet more or less, to the
point and place of beginning.
The following are the properties desiring exclusion from the
Mid-Valley Metropolitan District at this time. Included are the
name, deed book and page, and acreage where such information has
been determined, or has been available.
Sector Number 1:
a) John W. & Coral M. Dillon; Book 287, Page 958;
b) Della J. Arlian; Book 217, Pages 446-449;
c) Leon 0. & Charlotte C. Nelson; Book 217, Page 613;
d) John C. & Shirley W. Dills, Book 252, Page 162;
e) Robert N. Schetter, Book 250, Page 675;
f) Maultbetch & Stroller, Book 258, Page 146;
Sector Number 2:
a) Steve & Joe Shelton; Book 246, Page 424;
~ l
l I
' 1
c j
• 1
I
' , I
' )
I
l_ J
VIII; PHASED CONSTRUCTION AND COST ESTIMATES
The phasing and construction cost estimates fer the pro-
posed water and wastewater facilities are summarized in
Tables VIII-1 and VIII-2.
PHASE I
1983-1992
PHASE II
1993-2003
150
0.5
12"
10 11
150
10"
TABLE VIII-1
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
WATER SYSTEM COST ESTIMATE
UNIT PRICE
ITEM QUANTITY $
GPM Well 3ea. 110,000/ea.
MG Storage 2ea. 250,000/ea.
Transmission 6200LF 211/LF
Transmission 17700LF 20/LF
Sub Total
+ 251> Engr. & Const.
Total Cost
UNIT PRICE
ITEM QUANTITY $
GPM Well 3ea. 110,000/ea.
Transmission
Main 7700LF 20/LF
Sub Total
+ 25% Engr. & Const.
Total Cost
:izrn-1
TOTAL PRICE
$
120,000
500,000
1119,000
3511,000
1,123,000
281,000
1,11011,000
TOTAL PRICE
$
120 '000
15111000
2711,000
691000
3113,000
' 1
' l_ j
' ' i ,J
, I
L j
l j
J
cl
PHASE I
1983-1992
PHASE II
1993-2003
TABLE VIII-2
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
WASTEWATER SYSTEM COST ESTIMATE
UNIT PRICE
ITEM QUANTITY $
Secondary Treat-0.285mgd 635,000/LS
ment Facility
18" Interceptor 2600 LF 31.50/LF
15" Interceptor 9000 LF 28,50/LF
12" Interceptor 1870 LF 24/LF
10" Interceptor 2500 LF 21.50/LF
811
Interceptor 8500 LF 18/LF
12" Outfall 3000 LF 24/LF
Sub Total
+ 25% Engr. & Cont.
Total Cost
UNIT PRICE
ITEM QUANTITY $
Secondary Treat-0.285mgd 473,000/LS
ment Facility
8" Interceptor 2000 LF 18/LF
Sub Total
+ 25% Engr. & Cont.
Total Cost
TOTAL PRICE
$
635,000
82,000
257,000
45,000
54,000
153,000
72,000
1,298,000
354,000
1,622,000
TOTAL PRICE
$
473,000
3,600
509,000
1271000
636,000
I
I
I
7
I
' l
' J
I
L _,l
' l
'J
l
I
I I
, I
' j
' l
i J
' 1
I , I
r !
' 1
' ;
' '
;
, I
, I
, I
' I
1
'1
IX. FINANCING AND OPERATION PLANNING
The public facilities of Mid-Valley Metropolitan District
will be financed in three phases. Two phases will provide
water and sewer to accommodate the ultimate population build
out and a third phase will provide operation and maintenance
for recreation and park facilities dedicated by developers
and held in common by property owners.
Water and Sewer facilities will be constructed in Phase I
(1983) in the amount of $3,900,000. Of this $1,404,000 will
be for water, $1,622,000 in wastewater facilities, and
$874, 000 for interest payments on debt for. the construction/
development period. Phase II, to begin in 1993, will add an
additional $343,000 in water, $636,000 in wastewater and
$276,000 for additional interest requirements. Total financ-
ing for water/sewer facilities will be $5,155,000. See
Schedules A-E on the following pages.
water and Sewer facility financing for this 20 year develop-
ment will require an initial tap fee of $4,000, a monthly
service charge of $20 per month and an initial mill levy of 5
mills. Over time the tap fee will rise to $6,500, the mill
levy to 10 mills and the service charge will drop to $17.50
per month. The financial assumptions include 74 new units
per year within the 1,845 acre district. An overview of
water/sewer financing is included as Schedule "D" of this
section. Schedule "E" is a summary of mill levies and ser-
vice charges.
While park and recreation facilities are not as detailed as
water/sewer requirements in this plan, operation and mainte-
nance and coordination of the use of the facilities will be
needed. Facilities will be dedicated by developers and held
in common by owners. Recreation facility requirements are
not expected to exceed 3.00 mills per year from year 7
through year 20. This would produce approximately $6,700 in
year 7 and $56,000 at the build out period.
The yearly progression for all of the following financial
schedules will be pushed back one year with construction
beginning in 1983 rather than 1982.
n::-I
I l31900r000
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAH DISTRICT El PHASE I ~ATE~ AHD SEWER
\
ESTIMATED DE»T SERVICE SCHEDULE
AS OF DECEM»ER lr 1982 SCHEDULE A
DATE PRIHCIPAL IHTnEST TOTAL AHHUAL
f'
-..i ) 12/ 1/1993 546000.00 546000.00 546000.00
6/ 1/1984 273000;00 273000.00
~ 1 12/ 1/1984 273000.00 273000.00 546000.00
~I 6/ 1/1985 273000.00 273000.00
12/ 1/1985 25000 273000.00 298000.00 571000.00
1: 6/ 111986 271250.00 271250.00 I l2/ 111936 25000 271250.00 296250.00 567500.00
6/ 1/1987 269500.00 269500.00
ii ' 12/ 111987 25000 269500.00 294500.00 564000.00 ~I 6/ 111988 267750.00 267750.00
... ' 12/ 1/1988 25000 267750.00 292750.00 560500.00
[) 6/ 111989 266000.00 266000.00
12/ 1/1989 50000 266000.00 316000.00 582000.00
6/ 111990 262500 •. 00 262500.00
~] 12/ 1/1990 50000 262~00.00 312500.00 575000.00
6/ 1/1991 259000.00 259000.00
12/ 1/1991 145000 259000.00 404000.00 663000.00
'! I 6/ 1/1992 248850.00 248850.00 ~..:: 12/ 111992 165000 248850.00 413850.00 662700.00
.. ,
6/ 1/1993 237300.00 237300.00
I 12/ 1/1993 175000 237300.00 412300.00 649600.00 r. J
6/ 1/1994 225050,00 225050.00
12/ 111994 175000 225050.00 400050.00 625100.00
' 1 6/ 1/1995 212800.00 212800.00
! :1 j 12/ 1/1995 180000 212800.00 392800.00 605600.00
6/ 1/1996 200200.00 200200.00
i. l 12/ 1/1996 280000 200200.00 480200.00 680400.00
6/ 111997 180600.00 180600.00
12/ 1/1997 320000 180600.00 500600.00 681200.00
' l ~.J 6/ 1/1998 158200.00 158200.00
12/ 1/1998 440000 158200.00 598200.00 756400.00
6/ 111999 127400,00 127400.00
' ' 12/ 1/1999 500000 127400.00 627400.00 754800.00 r) I bl 1/2000 92400,00 92400.00
12/ 112000 600000 92400.00 692400.00 784800.00
r.J 6/ 112001 50400.00 50400.00
12/ 112001 720000 50400.00 770400.00 820800.00
.. I . I TOTALS
3900000 8296400.00 12196400.00 12196400.00 u
ACC IHT!
.oo
I 14.0000
~: IRATE:
IL"!;-, J
-ltOHD 't'RS:
59260.00
r i AVE LIFE: 15, 1949
l J FIRST PAYMEHT WAS HOT REDUCED IY ACCRUED IHTEREST
. I ~I
rv ,.,
'•
H12551000
MID VALLE'( METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
PHASE II •ATER AHD SEWER
ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE SCHEDULE B AS OF DECEMBER 11 1993
I DATE P~:INCIPOL INT;:REST TOTAL AH HU AL -. l u 111994 87850.00 87850.00
12/ 1/19'14 87850.00 87850.00 175700.00
' J 61 1/1995 87850.00 87850.00
,.121 1/1995 25000 87850.00 112850.00 200700.00
61 1/1996 86100.00 86100.00
!12/ 1/1996 25000 86100.00 111100.00 197200.00
bf 1/1997 84350.00 84350.00
12/ 1/1997 25000 84350.00 109350.00 193700.00 : l 6/ 111998 82600.00 82600.00
12/ 1/1998 25000 82600.00 107600.00 190200.00
6/ 1/1999 009so.oo 80850.00
. 112/ 1/1999 25000 80850.00 105850.00 186700.00
,,
I 61 1/2000 79100.00 79100.00
12/ 1/2000 25000 79100.00 104100.00 183200.00
I 6/ 112001 77350.00 77350.00
]12/ 112001 25000 77350.00 102350.00 179700.00
6/ 1/2C02 75600.00 75600.00
' 112/ 1/2002 230000 75600.00 305600.00 381200.00
' J 6/ 1/2003 59500.00 59500.00
12/ 1/2003 .250000 59500.00 309500.00 369000.00 ' l 6/ 1/2004 42000.00 42000.00
. 12/ 1/2004 275000 42000.00 317000.00 359000.00
61 1/2005 22750.00 22750.00
1121 1/2005 325000 22750.00 347750.00 370500.00
'' ' J
TOTALS
1255000 1731800.00 2986800.00 2986800.00 : 1
L j·c u-1r: .oo
P.ATE!
14.0000 . I
'1HD 'fRS 1 •
. I ' 12370.00
AVE LIFE:
9.8566
' ' (RST PAYMENT WAS NOT REDUCED BY ACCRUED INTEREST
I
~i
' '
I 5/11/1982 AT 16: 8: 7
, I
, I
l
f..,' .I..,..,, ·j·~·)
MID VALLE·r METROPOLITAH DISTRICT i COMBIHED PHOSE I AflD II NATER AHD SENER
ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
OS OF DECEMBER li 1982 l DATE PRIHCIPAL Il!TEREST TOTAL AHHUAL SCHEDULE C
12/ 1/1993 546000.00 546000.00 546000.00
' 16/ 1/1984 273000.00 273000.00
-ZI 1/1984 273000.00 273000.00 546000.00
61 1/1985 273000.00 273000.00
' \2/ 1/1985 25000 273000.00 298000.00 571000.00
' 16/ 1/1986 271250.00 271250.00
12/ 111936 25000 271250.00 . 296250.00 567500.00
.. IB' V19B7 269500.00 269500.00
' 'I 1/1987 25000 269500.00 294500.00 564000.00
M 111989 267750.00 267750.00
' '(}./ 1/1988 25000 267750.00 292750.00 560500.00
. 16/ 1/1989 266000.00 266000.00
12/ 1/1989 50000 266000.00 316000.00 582000.00
r l 61 1/1990 262500.00 262500.00
' 2/ 1/1990 5.0000 262500.00 312500.00 575000.00
61 1/1991 259000.00 259000.00
' 121 1/1991 145000 259000.00 404000.00 663000.00
' 6/ 1/1992 248850.00 248850.00
12/ 1/1992 165000 248850.00 413350.00 662700.00
r J 6/ 111993 237300.00 237300.00
• 2/ 111993 175000 237300.00 412300.00 649600.00
' i6' 1/1994 312900.00 31290.0.00
' 2/ 1/1994 175000 312900.00 487900.00 800800.00
' 61 111995· 300650.00 300650.00
12/ 1/1995 205000 300650.00 505650.00 806300.00
. ]6/ 1/1996 286300.00 286300.00
. 2/ 111996 305000 286300.00 591300.00 877600.00
' ,61 1/1997 264950.00 264950.00
12/ 1/1997 345000 264950.00 609950.00 874900.00
' 161 1/1998 240800.00 240800.00
12/ 1/1998 465000 240800.00 705800.00 946600.00
' 16/ 1/1999 208250.00 208250.00 d21 1/1999 . 525000 208250.00 733250.00 941500.00
' 16/ 1/2000 171500.00 171500.00
' .2/ 112000 625000 171500.00 796500.00 968000.00
' 161 1/2001 127750.00 127750.00
12/ 1/2001 745000 127750.00 872750.00 1000500.00
l ' /61 112002 75600.00 75600.00
1---121 1/2002
230000 75600.00 305600.00 381200.00
. ,61 1/2003 59500.00 59500.00
;2/ 1/2003 250000 59500.00 309500.00 369000.00
' 161 1/2004 42000.00 42000.00
12/ 1/2004 275000 12000.00 317000.00 359000.00
. 16/ 112005 22750.00 22750.00
L 121 1/2005 325000 22750.00 347750.00 370500.00
I
11-_ fALS
5155000 10028200.00 15183200.00 15183200.00
ACC INT:
.oo . I
F •"Et 34.9050 ~ _ _J t
BOHD YRS: 23730600
"" "
~ .. -. .--.a.. .. ............
. ~----
j
C::P.liP.ihtle n
MJD-VALLl!Y METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
Cash Flow Projections
Water/Sewer Systems
Income Exoenses
~11rnl11s
Tap Fee
Taps Assess~ Mill Property Service Tap Total Operation & Debt Total tn .. 11wl ~11m11lAfivP. Year ~ Connectedl Valuation L(':;f Tax Charfe Fee ~ Maintenance Rervice F.xoerise.'i 01" A.r'lit
~11rnl11s (A) (BJ \Er (F
lITT (,J)
lk\ fLi (n11\
--.m
1982 150 $700,000
o.oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti::t74,non1
1983 $4,000 224 700,000 0.0 0 $17 ,9204 $296,000 $313,920 $37,000 $546,000 ii!'HPt,ono (4;9RCl,ORO\ ti:;n4,q?.n
1984 4,000 298 700,000 5.0 $3,500 71,520 296,000 371,020 39,ROO !i4R,OOO SRS,i:;nn
f~14,5RO\ 3CIO,:t4n 1985 4,000 372 1,588,000 5.00 7,940 89,280 296,000 393,220 42,400 571,000 Rl'.l,400 i?.?.n, 1 ROl 170,1i::n 1986 5,500 446 2,476,000
5.00 12,380 107,040 407,000 526,420 45,300 567,500 R1 ?.,ROO (RR,:\fU}l R:t,7RO 1987 5,500 520 3,364,000 5.00 16,820 124,800 407 ,000 . 548,620 48,500 564,000 fi1 '2,500 ffi:t,RROl 1ci,~nn 1988 5,500 594 4,252,000 5.00 21,260 178,200 407 ,ooo 606,460 51,900 560,500 612,400 (!l,Q40l 1 :t,~AO 1989 5,500 668 5,140,000 5.00 25,700 200,400 407,000 633,100 55,500 582,000 1137 ,500 f4,400l ~,si:;n 1990 5,500 742 6,028,000
5.00 30,140
222,600 407,000 659,740 59,400 575,000 634,400 ?.5,:\40 34,QOO 1991 5,500 816 6,916,000 6.00 41,496 248,800-407,000 697,296 63,600 663,000 726,600 (?.~,304\ 5,!lOI; 1992 5,500 890 7,804,000 8.00 62,432 267,000 407,000 736,432 68,000
662,700 7:.t0,700 !i, 7:l?. 11,:l?.R 1993 5,500 964 8,692,000 8.00 69,536 289,200 401,000 765,736 72,800 649,600 72?.,400 4:l,'.l:lR fi4,RR4 1994 5,500 1,038 9,580,000 10.00 95,800 311,400 407,000 814,200 77,900 800,ROO 87R,700 fRd,500) ;:tQ5,1R45
1995 5,500 1,112 10,468,000 10.00 104,680 333,600 . 407,000 845,280 83,300 806,300 889,ROO f44,3?.0l :l50,R44 1996 6,500 1,186 11,356,000 10.00 113,560 355,800 481,000 950,360 89,?.00 877,600 966,800 (1 R,4401 334,404
1997 6,500 1,260 12,244,000 10.00 122,440 378,000 481,000 981,440 95,400 874,900 970,300 11,140 :l45,!i44 1998 6,500 1,334 13,132,000 10.00 131,320 400,200 481,000 1,012,520 102,100 94R,ROO 1,048,700 f:lR, 1 ROl :lOQ,3R4
1999 6,500 1,408 14,020,000 10.00 140,200 422,400 481,000 1,043,600 109,200 941,500 1 ,050,700 f7,100l '.10?., ?.R4
2000 65,00 1,482 14,908,000 10.00 149,080 355,680 481,000 985,760 116,900 968,000 1,084,ROO f9Q,140l ?O::t, 124
2001 6,500 1,556 15,796,000 10.00 157 ,960 373,440 481,000 1,012,400 125, 100 1,000,500 1, 125,ROO fl 13,?.00l Ra,~?4
2002 6,500 1,630 .16,684,000 10.00 166,840 342,300 481,000 990,140 133,800 381,?.00 51 !i,000 475, 140 JiR!i,OR4
2003 1,630 17 ,572,000 10.00 175,720 342,300 0 518,020 143,200 369,000 512,?.00 !i,820 570,RR4
2004 1,630 18,460,000 10.00 184,600 342,300 0 526,900 153,200 359,000 51?.,?.00 14,700 5R5,!iR4
2005 1,630 18,460,000 10.00 184,600 342,300 0 526,900 163,900 370,500 534,000 f7,100\. !i7R,4R4
17 4 new taps per year starting in 1983 2Assessed value at $12,000 per unit (EQR)
3over issue from Phase I to cover debt service
r
acomputation based on four (4) months
Overissue in Phase II to cover cash flow needs
, .
·· .. ·.i:·; . , :
,'~~~~~~~~i~~' ,,ff::~1~(;~,
'·,('
~?.~ill ,,. •.... '~~~_t{;:~~~::~~:.!;tft~~l:i~::~!i.
' l
I
l Schedule E
' l
J MID-ITALLEY ME'.rROPOLITAN DISTRICT
' l Combined Mill Levy and Service Charge Rates
I Water/Sewer Recreation Water & Sewer Tap Fee
Year Mill Levy Mill Levy Montly Rates Rates ' l
1982 0.00
o.oo
' l 1983 0.00
o.oo $20.00 $4000.00
1984 5.00 o.oo 20.00 4000.00
I I 1985 5.00 0.00 20.00 4000.00
. J
1986 5.00 0.00 20.00 5500.00
l 1987 5.00 2.00 20.00 5500.00
' j 1988 5.00 2.00 25.00 5500.00
1989 5.00 2.00 25.00 5500.00
' l 1990 5.00 2.00 25.00 5500.00
1991 6.00 2.00 25. 00 5500.00
!] 1992 0.00 2.00 25.00 5500.0
' ' !
1993 8.00 2.00 25.00 5500.00
' J 1994 10.00 2.50 25.00 5500.00
I I
1995 10.00 2.50 25.00 5500.00 . I
[ J
1996 10.00 2.50 25.00 6500.00
' ' . I
, I 1997 10.00 2.50 25.00 6500.00
' i 1998 10.00 2.50 25. 00 6500.00
' l 1999 10.00 2.50 25.00 6500.00
: I 2000 10.00 2.50 20.00 6500.00 ... I
2001 10.00 3.00 20.00 6500.00
I 6500.00 I
2002 10.00 3.00 17.50 I I
~ J
2003 10.00 3.00 17.50 build out
2004 10.00 3.00 17.50 build out
, I 2005 10.00 3.00 17.50 build out
' J
ft1 I
·r1
!1
•j
..,,, ,.l ..
,,
Lj
~l
;\!! I
~.I
!J
'1 '" I ' ,
~l
' ,
I' l
--I
·. I
' ' ' ,
,,.
I
I
' I
J:r' 1
=,
·~ __ ;
,-I
. I
.,
' I L.!
Year
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
MID-VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
Parks and Recreation O & M
Estimated Mill Levies
Assessed Value
Mills Revenue
$3,364,000 2.00 $6,728
4,252,000 2.00 8,504
5,140,000 2.00 10,280
6,028,000 2.00 12,056
6,916,000 2.00 13,832
7,804,000 2.00 15,608
8,692,000 2.00 17,384
9,580,000 2.50 23,950
10,468,000 2.50 26,170
11,356,000 2.50 28,390
12,244,000 2.50 30,610
13,13.2,000 2.50 32,830
14,020,000 2.50 35,050
14,908,000 2.50 37,270
15, 796,000 3.00 47,380
16,684,000 3.00 50,052
17 ,572,000 3.00 52, 716
18,460,000 3.00 55,380
r-:--
' 1
I
l
l
' l
' l
' 1
I
' J
, I
' J
j
' l
' J
' 1
I
' J
l
)
I j
i
r
' '
' I
i
I
, r
I
, I
I
I J
!
' J
MID-VALLEY ME'rROPOLITAN DISTRICT
Special Assessment District within three mile radius at Mid-
Valley Metro District.
Basalt Rural Fire District
Basalt Sanitation District
Basalt Water Conservency District
Colorado River Conservation District
Town of Basalt
R.E. 1 School District
Colorado Mountain College
']
' l
' 1
r l
: l
i ]
' l
: j
~ l
' ' t_ _J
, I
I ' '
I
LI
I ,J
, I
; i
L._J
MID-VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
of'
Special Assessment District3within three mile radius .Q..11 Mid-
Valley Metro District.
Basalt Rural Fire District
Basalt Sanitation District
Basalt Water Conservency District
Colorado River Conservation District
Town of Basalt
R.E. 1 School District
Colorado Mountain College
]
. l
1.
l
. J
' I
l
l
1
l
. l
j
' 1
i
. J
c 1
'
' 1
I
i J
' I
i
I
' I
X. DISTRICT POLICIES
Basic policies recommended for the Mid Valley Metropolitan
District are:
A.
B.
c.
D.
E.
F.
The District will finance and construct all water and
sewer ("wholesale") facilities required to supply,
treat, store and distribute water to development
boundaries and will define receivership and mainte-
nance for community wide parks.
Developers will be required to construct and dedicate
to the District all water distribution and collection
sewer lines ("retail facilities") within development
boundaries. Builders or developers will be required to
finance all service lines. All such facilities shall be
designed and -0onstructed in conformity to District
standards.
Customers shall be responsible for maintenance and
replacement of all sewer service lines, and water ser-
vice lines. Existing individual residential units which
are on individual water and sewer systems shall operate
and maintain those systems until such time that District
facilities are within 400' of the individual property
boundary and it is economically feasible for the unit to
tie on to the District's water and sewer facilities.
The District shall be responsible for maintenance of all
other facilities.
All lands and easements reasonably needed for the Dis-
tricts physical operation to serve in-District customers
shall be contributed by the individual developers.
All property owners served by the domestic water system
and using water from that system will be required to
deed to the District sufficient legal and physical
water rights to provide for augmentation during the
irrigation season. Where sufficient water rights are
not available, the District may require a cash-in-lieu
payment or purchase of other water rights for dedication
to the District. Winter augmentation water costs will
be included in the operating cost of the water system.
Inclusion of additional property in the District may be
accomplished from time tc time by the Board of Directors
of the District in accordance with Title 32, Article 1,
Part 4, C.R.S. 1973, as presently existing or herein
after amended. It will be the intention of the District
that in reviewing requests for inclusion of additional
property that the Board of Directors of the District
will consider whether:
1. There is sufficient existing need or projected need
for water and sewer services in the area based upon
"7 .. !
c )
c I
: l
r l
r l
: l
: l
: J
: l
c '
' J
: l
: I
L__J
' l
J
, I
i
' J
I
l, _ _J
r l
c_J
l J
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
8.
9 •
plans which have received land use approval by the
Board of County Commissioners of Eagle County.
The water and sewer service presently existing in
the area is adequate for present and projected
needs.
Adequate service is not or will not be available
to the area through existing municipal or Quasi-
municipal corporations within a reasonable time and
on a comparable basis.
The District is capable of providing economical and
sufficient service to the area to be included.
The area to be included in the District has or will
have the financial ability to pay the cost of con-
structing adequate facilities to service such area
either through construction of the facilities on a
pay-as-you-go basis or by dischatging any ind~bted
ness of the District on a reasonable basis.
The facility and service standards within the area
to be included are compatible with the facility of
service standards of the District.
The proposal is in compliance with any duly adopted
county, regional, or state long-range water quality
management plan for the area.
The District has sufficient capacity in its water
and sewer facilities or such capacity will exist,
to provide service to the area to be included with-
out adversely affecting the existing service area
or existing contracts or obligations of the Dis-
trict to provide service.
That the rates, fees, charge and general ad valorem
taxes of residents within the existing District
boundaries will not be adversely affected by the
inclusion of the area within the District bound-
aries.
v . ?
l
MID
SCALE• I = 24,000
A-7
LEGEND
D AERATED LAGOON
PLANT PHASE JI
!!l!!!!!!!!!O~"""' INlfERCEPTOR
-···-OUTFALL
FIGURE A-7
EL JEBEL
VALLEY METROPOLITAN
· . DISTRICT
WASTEWATER FACILITIES
PHASE
rr CONSTRUCTION
. 3-4" :
MID
SCALE•. I '24,000
LEGEND
D AERATED LAGOON
PLANT SITE
i=!!!!!!~"""' IN°TIERCEPTOR
----OUTFALL
FIGURE A-6
EL JEBEL
VALLEY METROPOLITAN
DISTRICT
WASTEWATER FACILITIES
PHASE
I . CONSTRUCTION
MID
SCALE• I : 24,000
'C"--·
A-5
LEGEND
=-== ....... --.. 1211 TRANSMISSION MAIN
"""""""""""'""' 1011 TRANSMISSION MAIN
e STORAGE RESERVOIR
FIGURE A-5
EL JEBEL
VALLEY METROPOLITAN
DISTRICT
WATER SYSTEM
PHASE
:rr. CONSTRUCTION
. . . I -,
MID
SCALE= I = 24,000
"-4
LEGEND
... -. .... -=-.... 12" TRANSMISSION MAIN
""""""""""""""' IO" TR ANS M I SS I ON MAIN • STORAGE RESERVOIR
FIGURE A-4
EL JEBEL
VALLEY METROPOLITAN
DISTRICT
WATER SYSTEM
PHASE
I CONSTRUCTION
l
LEGEND
lt=:=:t:}\=}\J DISTRICT AREA
--···---·-
FIGURE A-3
EL .JEBEL
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN
SCALE•I =24,000 DISTRICT
. BOUNDARY MAP
A-3
Roaring Fork Valley ,from west of El Jebel with Colorado Highway 82 in center,
U. S. Forest Service nursery at right and irrigated land in foreground.
A-2
Community at El Jebel in the Roaring Fork Valley frdm north.
I
FIGURE
I
A-2
EL JEBEL 'VA'LLEY FLOOR
~-·---· .. ~-,.--_.;... _______________________ -1---------·:---~~~~
I l6
,. I
, COLORADO
. '),. 'SPRINGS
I PUEBLD
..
OflffAltCO
I
__,, __ -------1~--------~----------------TlflltlOAD
I -
A-1
I ™ I I
FIGURE A-I
!
EL JEBEL
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN
DISTRICT
VICINITY MAP
)
I
1
J
. I
I
l
. 1
)
l
·. j
' l
I
I
' J
. '
I
. ' . ,
. i
' '
.J
I
' _J
APPENDIX A
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST BREAKDOWN
The Operation and maintenance costs were based upon the fol-
lowing assumptions: Power costs @ $.05/KW-Hour;
C/2 costs @ $400/Ton;
Labor costs @ $12/Hour
TABLE A-1
Operation and Maintenance for Ultimate Wastewater Facilities
(0.57 MGD)
ITEM
Labor
Power
Chlorination
Major Maintenance
Materials
TOTAL
TABLE A-2
COST
($/YEAR)
19,000
16,000
1, 300
1, 000
1 '500
38,800
Operation and Maintenance for Initial Wastewater Facility
(0.285 MGD)
ITEM
Labor
Power
Chlorination
Major Maintenance
Materials
TOTAL
l\ --I
COST
($/YEAR)
9,500
8,000
650
500
150
19,400
' '
I
' l
: l
: l
I l
L J
' I
I ' ,
, I,
' J
: _J
' l
J
, I
:J
TABLE A-3
Operation and Maintenance for Ultimate Water Facilities
(720 gpm)
ITEM
Labor
Transporation
Power
Chlorination
Office Billing & Misc.
Materials
TOTAL
TABLE A-4
COST
($/YEAR)
19,680
2,200
39,500
580
3,000
3,000
67,960
Operation and Maintenance for Initial Water Facilities
(360 gpm)
ITEM
Labor
Transportation
Power
Chlorination
Office Billing & Misc.
Materials
TOTAL
TABLE A-5
COST
($/YEAR)
7,020
390
6,535
400
900
1,000
16,245
Operation and Maintenance for Ultimate Parks and Recreation
, Facilities
ITEM
Labor
Transportation
Equipment
Chemicals
TOTAL
COST
($/YEAR)
24,960
3,000
6,000
3,000
36,960
I ,
I
' l
J
' l
: l
c l
r)
'. l
l
; l
, I
I ' '
' J
' ' '
' j
1
L _ j
: I
' ' J
' 1
' i ; _j
APPENDIX B
MID VALLEY METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
ITEMIZATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPITAL COSTS
TABLE B-1
Aerated Lagoon Cost Breakdown
Phase I
ITEM
1) Dirtwork
2) Aeration Equipment
3) Yard and Piping
4) Headworks
5) Comminutor
6) Chlorination
7) Fencing
8) Building
9) Flow Measurement
10) Landscaping
11) Bentonite
12) Level Control
13) Mechanical &
Electrial
14) Heating &
Ventilation
15) Riprap
44466 CY @ $3/yd
w/blower L.S.
900 LF-12" @ $30/LF
240 LF-6" @ $15/LF
. L. S.
2 @ $15,000/ea.
L.S.
1400 LF @ $15/LF
15' x 30' @ $40/SF
L.S.
L.S.
133,333 SF @ $.15/sf.
140 Tons @ $100/ton
3 @ $7000/ea.
L.S.
L.S.
200 yds. @ $15/Yd.
SUB-TOTAL
Include land costs 25 acres @ $5000/AC
TOTAL
COST/$
= 133,400
= 1001000
= 27,000
= 3,600
= 15,000
= 30,000
= 20,000
= 21,000
= 18,000
= 15,000
= 15,000
= 20,000
= 14,000
= 21,000
= 50,000
= 4,000
= 3,000
= 510,000
= 125,000
= 635,000
l
r I
il
']
l
rl
'.
~ l
[-]
~ 1
: l
'1 u
'l
L J
'J L_ ,
r 1 u
;]
u
u
f]
L.
TABLE B-2
Aerated Lagoon Cost Breakdown
PHASE II
ITEM
1) Dirt work
2) Aeration Equipment
3) Yard and Piping
4) Fencing
5) Building
6) Land.scaping
7) Bentonite
8) Level Control
9) Mechanical &
Electrical
10) Heating &
Ventilation
11) Riprap
43800 CY @ $3/CY
w/blowers
900 LF-12" @ $30/LF
240 LF-6" @ $15/LF
1400 LF @ $15/LF
15' x 30' @ $40/SF
L.S.
130,888 SF@ $.15/SF
140 Tons @ $100/Ton
L.S.
L.S.
L.S.
100 Yd @ $15/YD
SUB-TOTAL
20 Acres @ $5000/AC
TOTAL
R-?
COST/$
= 131,400
= 100,000
= 27,000
= 3,600
= 21 '000
= 18,000
= 7,500
= 20,000
= 14,000
= 7,000
= 25,000
= 2,000
= 1 '500
= 378,000
= 941500
= 473,500
" l
I
1
I
: l
' l
J
' l
: l
' j
, I
l J
)
, I
I
!
L j
i , I
APPENDIX C
TABLE C-1
Partial Equivalent Schedule
CLASS OF USE
A. RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATIONS
EQR VALUE
1. Single Family Residential Units (per
unit). Single family homes, duplexes,
individually billed mobile homes, mobile
homes on single lot, and mobile homes
established as permanent residences.
NOTE: Rental privileges of all kinds are
not included in this value. Only one kitchen
is permitted; if a resident has more than one
kitchen, then additional EQR values should be
assigned in accordance with multi-family resi-
dential units. A kitchen is defined as any
areas having facilities for cooking and dish-
washing.
2. Multi-Family Residential Units
Apartments, condominiums, townhouses, and similar
facilites in the same complex, small cabins in
courts not associated with motels; all units in-
tended for long-term rental.
NOTE: Excludes more than one kitchen per unit;
swimming pools are additive. Includes common
laundry facilities or individual laundry hook-ups.
A bath is defined as any area having a toilet.
a. 4 or more bedroom unit (per unit)
b. 3 bedroom unit (per unit)
c. 2 bedroom unit, 2 bath (per unit)
d. 2 bedroom unit, bath (per unit)
e. Single bedroom or studio unit (per unit)
3. Transient Residential Units
Hotels, motels, mobile home parks, dormitories,
recreational vehicle parks, and similar facilities.
C-1
1. 00
1. 10
1. 00
0.85
0.80
0.65
l
I
. l
' l
, I
, I
r i
• i ,J
, I
I
' J
. I
' ' I
:J
'
' l
B.
NOTE: Includes laundry facilities in mobile homes.
Swimming pools and laundry facilities (except those in
mobile homes) are additive; room counts shall include
rooms furnished to employees. Recreational vehicle
parks include central bath house facility but not
laundry or retail space. See
Paragraph
2
above
a. Manager's unit, use multi-family or
single family residential unit classifica-
tion as applicable (per unit).
b. Motels, hotels, and rooming houses with-
out kitchen facilities.
c.
i. Rooms having 'not more than two bed
spaces (per rental unit).
ii. Rooms having more than two bed
spaces per rental unit (per additonal
two bed spaces).
Motels with kitchen facilities.
i. Units having not more than 2 bed
spaces (per each available space).
ii. Units having more than 2 bed
spaces (per rental unit).
d. Mobile home parks (per each available
space).
e. Dormitories (per each rental bed space) •
f. Recreational vehicle parks.
i. Camping or vehicle spaces without
sewer hookup (per space).
ii. Camping or vehicle spaces with
sewer hookup (per space).
NOTE: Spaces which have year-round mobile
home to be evaluated per mobile home park.
g. Add for laundry facilities in billing
unit complex (per washing machine or avail-
able hookup).
COMMERCIAL CLASSIFICATION
1. Restaurants, Bars and Drive-Ins
Restaurants, bars, lounges, banquet rooms, and
drive-ins.
0.25
0. 10
0.40
0.50
0.85
0. 10
0,35
0.40
1. 05
!W , I
•
••
"' l
"' . l l
; c
r i •!I "":I
,,.1
. I
~ '-J
l
I ""c j
I
'"'.cl
I
.'
!
c.
a.
b.
c.
Restaurants and bars (per 10 seats).
Banquet rooms (per 10 seats}.
Drive-ins (per car stall).
2. Commercial Buildings
Office buildings, retail s•les buildings, multiple
use buildings, laundromats, service stations, shops,
garages, and similar facilities.
a. Offices and office buildings (per 1,000
sq. ft. of gross occupied area).
b. Retail sales area (per 1,000 sq. ft.
of gross sales and display area).
c. Laundromats (per washing machine or
available hookup) •
NOTE: This category does not include
commercial laundries.
d. Service Stations.
i. Per fuel nozzle.
ii. Add for each bay/rack where
0.65
0. 35
0. 15
0.65
0.35
.1 • 60
0.40
cars can be washed. 1.60
e. Non-retail work areas, such as garages,
machine shops, fire stations, and warehouses
(per 1,000 sq. ft.). 0.20
f. Process water from commercial establi-
shments discharged to the collection system
shall be evaluated based on the metered water
inflow (per 1,000 gpd, maximum day). 2.50
CHURCH AND SCHOOL CLASSIFICATIONS
1. Churches (per 100 seats)
NOTE: Rectories or other living areas are
additive.
2. Schools -Day care centers, public and
private day schools.
NOTE: Includes teachers, librarians, custo-
dians, and administrative personnel associated
with the school.function; adminstrative centers,
warehouses, equipment {such as buses) repair and/or
r -"'
1. 50
.,
.~. •
' J
'1 j
.... ' j
~' •
. I
~J
'
-~ l
I
~]
I "'! .
'·· J ~
' ' ' 11
~i
I l
'
' 1
'Ill! i
L J
. '
"'I l
' I
, I
"'",I
~]
' . I
c
... _]
..: I
storage centers, swimming pools, and similar
facilities are additive •
a. Without gym and without cafeteria
(per 50 students).
b. Without gym and with cafeteria or with
gym and without cafeteria (per 50 students).
c. With gym and with cafeteria (per 50
students).
1.50
1.85
2. 10
• 1
1-·------------r;,;:;:;;::=;;:-:~~~
. I) --SCHMUESER
ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS
.1
·I
~J,
I
c 1;
·I
r II
l : I
: I
• I
I
: '1
. II
, r
• I
. i
II
; J
I]
January 27, 1983
Mr. Dan Kerst
817 Colorado Avenue
Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Mid Valley Metro District
Dear Dan,
.Please find enclosed the deeds of the excepted properties within the
Mid Valley Metro District Boundary. The deeds are in the same order
as those listed in the service plan.
Also a revised copy of the district boundary is enclosed. The
description has not been changed, but rather book and page numbers have
been added where previously left out, and the introduction has been
revised to show the section numbers, township, range, etc.
I trust this will meet your needs for the hearing. If you will
require any additional information, please let us know.
Sincerely,
Louis Meyer
Design Engineer
LM:sh
Enclosures
' II
, II
• 1 SCHMUESER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
l fo-----1512 GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 210 •GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 • (303) 945-5468 -----' • J
I'
·.· .. , ,., ·' .
; ... ~·'!
RESOLUTION
OF THE
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY OF EAGLE, STATE OF COLORADO
RESOLUTION NO. 82-/tJ Y
IN RE THE MATTER OF THE"SERVICE PLAN FOR THE MID VALLEY
METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
WHEREAS, pursuant co the provisions of Part 2 of
Article l of Title 32, c.R.S. 1973, as amended, the Board of
County Commissioners of the County of Eagle, Stace of ..
Color.ado, hereinafter referred to as the "Board, 11 did on the
6th day of July, 1982, hold a public hearing on· the Service
Plan for the Mid Valley Metropolitan District; and
WHEREAS, not-ice. of the aforesaid public hearing was
duly published in The Eagle Valley Enterprise, Eagle,
Colorado, a newspaper of general circulation within Eagle
County, said publication occurring on June 10, 17 and 24,
1982, as required by law; forwarded to the Petitioners; and
mailed Co Che governing body of each municipality-and special
district which has levied· an ad valorem tax within Che next
prec.~ding tax year and which has boundaries within a radius
·of three miles of the proposed district, the Eagle· County
.Planning Commission, and Che Department of Local Affairs,
Division of Local Government, State of Colorado; and
WHEREAS, the Board, with the concurrence of the
Petitioners, continued the aforesaid public hearing to the
28th day of July, 1982, in order for the Petitioners to
provide additional information to the Board; and
WHEREAS, the Board on July 28, 1982, approved with
conditions the Service Plan of the Mid Valley Metropolitan
. • . . .
._,,.
District as evidenCed by Resolution No. 82-70, and further,
contin"ued the aforesaid public hearing to the 29th day of
September, 1982, in order for the Petitioners to comply with
the conditions set forth in the aforesaid Resolution; and
WHEREAS, at the continued public hearing on
September 29, 1982, the Petitioners presented the following
exhibit which was admitted into.the record of proceedings at
the conclusion thereof:
Exhibit 24: Memorandum dated September 20,
1982, from Russ Caldwell, Kirchner Moore &
Company, to the Board relative to
collateral requirements for Mid Valley
Metropolitan District; and
WHEREAS, the Board at the conclusion of the
-.·
aforesaid continued public hear.ing, determined that the •
Petitioners had substantially co~piied with the conditions
imposed by the Board pursuant to.".Resolution No. 82-70; .such
determination being contingent upon the Petitioners providing
a revised report from Kirchner Moore & Company further '
clarifying the criteria that said Company shall utilize in
determining the collateral which will be required of certain
major landowners within the boundaries of the Mid Valley
Metropolitan District to gurarantee the retirement of bonaed
indebtedqess for said District 1s improvements; and
'. WHEREAS, the aforesaid revised report was submitted
to the Board for its review and approval on or about
October 12, 1982; and
WHEREAS, based upon. the foregoing, the Board finds,
determines and declares that the·'s;;~vice Plan of the
_;.'.;;V.~.~j;~·
Mid Valley Metropolitan District· be; approved as modified
._-. :-.-.-
here inbelow: : · *-.. :;·~ "\:;.. .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I-T RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF -·· t..... . .
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF EA~!-E;~ STATE OF COLORADO:
--~ ..
THAT, the Board does hereby' determine that all of ·
--~-
the requirements of Part 2 of Art·i~'le ·l of Title 32, C.R.S.
·2
;· , •• '. •• ~: .... ..i-.. . _.,
.. · ..... ~-: . ·,: .. :. · . .. . r .. •
' -.....
: ..
--•'
'·t .
'. '•.
JI··
1973, as amended, relating to the filing of the Service Plan
for the Mid Valley Metropolitan District have been fulfilled,
and that notice of the hearing was duly given in the time and
manner required by law.
THAT, said publication of the Notice of Hearing on
Service Plan in The Eagle Valley Enterprise, a ne1<spaper of
general circulation within the County, is hereby approved.
THAT, the Service Plan of the Mid Valley
Metropolitan District is hereby approved with the following
modifications, which modifications are hereby made a part of
the Service Plan as if the same were sec forth at length
therein:
·.
l. That any increase .in the financing or the
amount of proposed indebtedness as set forth
within ·the Service Plan for the Mid Valley
Metropolitan District and related documents
submitted as exhibits, shall constitute a
change of a basic or essential nature, and a
2.
3.
material modification of the Service Plan,
which will requiFe prior approval of the Board .
pursuant to Section 32~1-207; C.R.S. 1973, as
amended.
That the Board's approval of the Service Plan
for the Mid Valley Metropolitan-District shall
not be construed nor deemed to be construed as
obligating the present Board or future Boards
in any way whatsoever, to approve higher
density rezoning applications on land within
the boundaries of said District; but that such
land use determinations shall be considered
totally separate and independent of the Board's
actions herein.
That the requirements and conditions set forth
in Chat certain. letter dated Octob.er 12, 1982,
3·
,_ ... . .· ,
~.
o) ! lc •
~!rp·,mi :~f~~:t.:·
;p,tr-' . ...
::1~
.. J
.. ?·-·'.1
-·· -~
',<)
from Russ Caldwell, Kirchner Moore & Company,
to the Board attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference, shall be
specifically made a part of the Service Plan of
the Mid Valley Metropolitan District as if the
same was fully·set forth therein, and in
addition, shall be duly complied with by the
Petitioners.
·THAT, the Petitioners have agreed to the
incorporation of the foregoing modifications into the Service
Plan of the Mid Valley Metropolitan District.
THAT, all resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict
with the provisions hereof, are her.eby repealed, except that
this repealer shall not be constr~·~:;i so as to revive any
resolution or part thereof beret.of.ore repealed.
THAT, a certified copy 6! this Resolution be filed
in the records of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, and
submitted to the Petitioners for the purpose of filing in the
District Court.in and for the County of Eagle, State of
Colorado.
MOVED, READ AND AOOPTED by the Board of County
Commissioners of the County of Eagle, State of Colorado, at ..
its regular meeting held the
1982. ··.,.
:::=~ . er 0 the ar OfCOUn t;CO:i:s ion er s
:, :':' ,: . .-.. .... ":' .. ·:.
I :.o·,
,;?3~ day of November,
COUNTY OF EAGLE,· STATE OF COLORADO
By ~nd Through its ·
BOARD.·OF COUNTY COMMISSIOENRS
4
·-By:
Da e
Vot
~ ..
~:-; . .. · ;,.·.· ~-
Chairman