HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication.pdfPermit No:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8" Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970.945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / inspection Line: 970-384-5003
1 oO a
Job Address: D3/ 6 ' r 6.4 n C'7„,
Parcel/Schedule No: 6/��.5 /3 303-y
c 3 L° 1
Subd. / emption:
1 Lot No: R hl I i Blo9 o: V ` :.Jr OAK EXM EA W 5
IC ANN C. H-
2
Owner:
PKISCS CREEK CoitST2520
Address
3, GRAND 'r�Ph:
1I
�1
Ry5" 45N3
Wk Ph:
3
Contract
SAME)
Address:
SUITt 2I01GNS
Ph:
Lic. No.
4
Architect Engineer:
- t
liCiARTI ASSbe.
Address:
Soil Cry fip 15';
Ph:Lic.
1115-6305
No.
18'1yu
5
Sq. Ft. of Building:
3'S�o1 •? sr
Sq. Ft. of Lot:
el 3`4 sr-
Height: (
aa-'- G (all
No. Floors:
of/ + 54.5c:
6
Use of Building:
�i-
C SlDEN I r!AL ' 1I' CAN . rst Gpra.e�,l)
'!
7
Describe Work: f V l
CON5`fR'ACA' 5 it\IGA,8 FAniti(ZeSi DENCE
8
Class of Work: X New ❑ Alteration o Remove
❑ Addition ❑ Move
9
10
Garage: ❑ Single
❑ X Double
Carport: ❑ Single
❑ Double
o Driveway Permit ❑ On -Site Sewage
Disposal
K Site Plan
11
Valuation of Work: $
Adjusted Valuations: S 7`I ®Z<3 .��
i
12
Special Conditions:
A
ISSUED
THIS
AUTHORIZED
CONSTRUCTION
PERIOD
1
APPLICATION
PROVISIONS
COMPLETED
GRANTING
TO
LOCAL
OF
SEPARATE ELECTRICAL
BY THE STATE
PERMIT BECOMES
IS NOT
OR
OF 180 DAYS
HEREBY CERTIFY
AND
OF LAWS
WITHIN
OF A PERMIT
VIOLATE OR CANCEL
LAW REGULATING
CO R -
"
NOTICE
PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
OF COLORADO.
NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF
WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE
DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY
THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE
N. EKIG srkRszAK
3o
Plan Check Fee:
Jj„ t , •7
//49 G•+
Permit Fee:
1'7 8 �q � 9�
Total Fee:
795/ ,77 + /9
Dated PermitmIssued:
8Z,92 --^ f9 3 t!, / _ q
'� / Cl 1
0C up..
Const. Type:
Zoning:
Setbacks:
Manu. Home:
ciyi Vo& d.
fX/ W
����L ! 8z, 92
ISD�No. 86 Fee:
aDj
r'r re
E OF -
•
_
, ,..,3 I.. _____..scn....tys
B
APPROVAL/DATE
D E' PLNG. DEFT.
APPROVAL/DATE
ENT
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE
STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF
THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER
REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING
CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY
RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND
IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED
TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST.
Garfom.003
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): C3 S
6341- GI1317c0
CA. s�(as/D
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and �he issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # L DO
Signature
Bpapplicationfeb2
Date
9// /0
Applicanttt
s
Address ) O
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
t
Date ` -'3I.Otto
Finished (Livable Area):
1511
Main
Upper
Lower
Other
Total Square Feet
Valuation
Subdivision 1
kLiAtk
Lot/Block
r' (ek9 8
Contractor
o N2 ✓'
3082 y 746x' z3o,14,3,-Re
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage:
Crawl Space:
Valuation L, d( i /8
Valuation
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation C
Open
Valuation
Total Valuation
8746
z: 7111
741 OZI,Re
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan
and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result
in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review maybe given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans
to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
1
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind
speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE
Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft.
of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a
subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's
signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a
building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of
the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within tlt�envelope.
Yes
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special
setbacksoapply.
Yes
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent pipperties), streams or water courses?
Yes (X\
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the propert
Yes ["
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcin Leel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes ["
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and tbip'clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes 1'
7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces and soffits?
Yes
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wvynd loads?
Yes C'
9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
Yes
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roofrgiters or joists or trusses?
Yes
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all colun>pand beams?
Yes ("
12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the
top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes C�y
13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes No x
3
14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the IRC?
Yes No
15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleepingrooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes No
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and vent tion for all habitable rooms?
Yes n No
17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and speci safety glazing for these areas?
Yes No
18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the pla
Yes No
19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenantsk7
Yes No
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to
obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not
be accepted Yvithout it.
Yes ] No
21. Will this beth nly residential structure on the parcel?
Yes No If no -Explain:
22. Have twq (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes
23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft.
long?
Yes X No
4
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction c de requirements?
Yes No
25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties7e e district?
Yes No
26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection y the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes No
27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to
the applicati of these changes?
Yes `[ No
28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at
the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well
as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building
permit?
Yes No
29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be
called i to 84-5003.
Yes No
30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $5600 re -inspection fee?
Yes No
31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupancwf the building?
Yes ` ' No
32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC?�
Yes No
5
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Departmentt 25-8601.
Yes N No
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at ti e of applicable inspection.
Yes No
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building pe mit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes 1S No
36. Do you know that the local fite 9istrict may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the
building department about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading
permit? y
Yes
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
est of bility.
c -
Signature of Ow
G-30- 0Co
Date
Phone: 9 '' (is -€(5- (days); a 3 b^ 0 5 S (evenings)
Project Name:
Project Address: 03/0 5 L V E R K l N G c T)
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays
in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If
it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the
application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
04K MEM-DOw5 N'ANcl+
6
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant111/4,,£. _„ Date
Building
ngineered Foundation
1U 4Driveway Permit
yr ey T ite Plan 1 Z,
14/(Septic Permit and Setbacks
�ade/Topography 30%
Wit) (.el.;
Attach Residential Plan Review List
w'' Minimum Application Questionnaire
division Plat Notes
MitAire Department Review
aluation De termination/Fees
�R.6'd Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
Attach Conditions
Application Signed
ti "'Pra y eviewer To Sign Application
Parcel/Schedule No.
40#
nowload Letter- Manf. Hms.
Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zuni
Prope Line Setbacks
30f tream Setbacks
F ood Plain
Building Height
Zoning Sign -off
Road Impact Fees
HOA/DRC Approval
Grade/Topography 40%
Planning Issues
Subdivision Plat Notes
OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION
ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE
Date:
Received from:
Receipt for Funds
9/04“, 0 ADO (o
Amount: $ Z50G'. ”
Form of Payment Cash: Check #
For:
Lot(s) Number.
Received:
Dollars
HIECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE
OAK MEADOWS RANCH
ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE
1317 GRAND AVE. #228 PHONE: (970) 945-7148
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 FAX: (970) 945-2303
June 30, 2006
Prince Creek Construction, Inc.
2520 S. Grand Ave. Suite 210
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: APPROVAL. LOT 58. 0310 SILVER KING CT.
Gentlemen:
Based on drawings and plans submitted, the Architectural Control
Committee ("ACC") has approved construction of a single family residence
on Lot 58, 0310 Silver King Ct., Oak Meadows Subdivision.
Work is to be completed within one year of today's date.
Sincerely,
ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE
BY:
Diane Delaney
RUG -16-2007 20:47 FROM:
Date:
To:
cc:
TO:3843470 P.1
RI -ince reek-
Construction_ Inc.
2520 S. Grand Ave.. Suite 210
Glenwood Springs CO 81601
970-94S-454-5
970-945-4848 Fax
Ale) 61
A--11—
Phone:
Fax: %4-- 344 0
From:
Phone: 970-945-4545
Fax: 970-945-4848
Pages: 0g (including cover)
Subject:
EM tNeet2S F12,6011(rA N6Cce
FOR_ em -r- S e G310 Sr tLa a ILoiG Cr;
Peri ritre-4- (co98.
RUG -16-2007 20:47 FROM:
FROM : Kurtz 8 Associates, Inc. PHONE NO. :
TO:3043470 P.2
Mel 104.YWI '-
KURTZ &
ASSOCIATES, Inc.
STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERS
5012 COUNTY ROAD 154
GLENWOOD SPRINGS,
COLORADO 81801
PRONE ( 970) 945.8305
FAX (970) 945-1093
COPY TO:
FAX NO,:
NUMBER OF PAGES
INCLUDING COVER SHEET: Z
FAX TRANSUIESION
DATE:
FROM:
T0:
•
Dg-J6-ao7
ar'a/2 /C✓% -4
c/'.Qe.e at -4
igecier
(1¢x'1448
r'., Ca„
ATTN: 17;.4.l
RECEIVER'S FAX NO,:
PROJECT: Lod Vo,
S$ (G A/Ode)
2 O"C.
AUG -16-2007 20:48 FROM:
FROM : Kurtz & PBS= iates, ll'1C.
rnunc ivu, •
TO:3843470 P.3
aiUcllifS a@VOGO41$¢ii Job Code^OZ/1�"O.0 8y/ 1< oft- /6- 106
Subject O / `r"�'�"'S �AChccked Sheet Of
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
(4-zx(p
rp , -re.
CodTinl,Joi1S
ogC.a. wdNDakl
o Paajt,
Stur k1ALU
REYoNV
c $E YrvP
Teu 1
RooF 'MA
reoViv E (6 -1;�' sf6' L'L
`strF BticC' f4L:Ap6R
4&oJI: 31-4.4 4.IiDG
14s41204) op! t
MAy7 cz• r&ATh
NAIL. LVL• -r _ catsj
V rticAl- `51ap'ar-
CnM3L6 &iJD -Tea
W� iloAQ 4' 4,C.
ZO/2 39Vd
ISNO0 >1332J0 30NIad 31,8bgb6OL5 91:91 tee7/3E/t71
JUN -30-2006 16:02
H—P GEOTECH P.02/16
� Stech
HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
E cpwonl:-F'awlak (ccne hr is !i. in4.
5040 County Road 154
aInwood Springs, (. olrn-r;}c, 81601
Phone: 970-945-1988
Fax: 970.945.8454
cmaiVitroNhpgpurkch
SUBSOIL STUDY
FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 58, FILING 4B, OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION
SILVER KING COURT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 106 0058
JANUARY 13, 2006
PREPARED .FOR:
PRINCE CREEK CONSTRUCTION
ATTN: DAVID RICKS
2520 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 21.0
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
Parker 303.841.7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silver:horne 970.468.1989
JUN -30-2006 1602 H -P GEOTECH
P.03/16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - I -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - J -
SITE CONDITIONS -2 -
FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 -
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS -3 -
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS - 3 -
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 -
FOUNDATIONS - 4 -
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 -
FLOOR SLABS - 6 -
ONDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 7 -
SURFACE DRAINAGE - 7 -
LIMITATIONS - 8 -
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING
FIGURE 2- LOG OP EXPLORATORY BORING
FIGURE 3- LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
JUN -30-2006 16:02 H—P GEOTECH
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
P.04/16
This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located
on Lot 58, Filing 4B, Oak Meadows Subdivision, Silver King Court, Garfield County,
Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to
develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in
accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Prince Creek
Construction dated November 30, 2005. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously
conducted a geologic site assessment and preliminary geotechnical study for the
development of Filing 4 and presented our findings in a report dated April 1:5, 1998, Job
No. 196 420.
An exploratory boring was drilled on the lot to obtain information on the general
subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were
tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and
other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory
testing were analyzed to develop reconunendations for foundation types, depths and
allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the
data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations
and Tither geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and
the subsurface conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a basement level
and located in the building envelope shown on Figure 1. The attached garage and
basement floors will be slab -on -grade. There will be a second story of living space above
the garage. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths
between about 3 to 10 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the
proposed type of construction.
Job Net: 106 0058
cjzmi tech
SUN -30-2006 16:02 H—P GEOTECH
P.05/16
-2-
If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described
above, we should he notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report.
SITE CONDITIONS
The site was vacant and covered with about 1 foot of snow cover at the time of our field
exploration. The ground surface of the lot slopes strong to moderately steep down. to the
northeast at grades up to about 15%. The terrain becomes steeper to the west of the lot.
There is about 16 feet of elevation difference across the lot. There is an existing ditch
between the lot and Silver King Court. An abandoned irrigation ditch is located along the
west side of the lot. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds.
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on December 30, 2005. One
exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the
subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight
augers powered by a track -mounted CME 45 drill rig. The boring was logged by a
representative of ldepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The
samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 1.40 pound
hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described
by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the
relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken
and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure
2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and
testing.
Job No. 10 0058
croech
JUN -30-2006 16:02 H—P GEOTECH
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
A graphic log of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site is shown on Figure 2.
The subsoils consist of about 2 feet of topsoil overlying stiff to very stiff; sandy.silty clay
with scattered gravel, cobbles and possible boulders. Relatively dense, clayey sand and
gravel with basalt and sandstone fragments up to boulder size was encountered beneath.
the clays at a depth of 7 feet. Drilling in the basalt rock soils with auger equipment was
difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the
deposit.
P.06/16
Laboratory testing performed onsamples obtained from the boring included natural
moisture content and density. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed ona
relatively undisturbed drive sample of the clay soils, presented on Figure 4, indicate low
compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a high expansion
potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge with a swelling pressure of about
12,000 psf.
No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling or when checked 13
days later and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist.
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
The clay soils encountered at the site possess an expansion potential when wetted.
Surface runoff, landscape irrigation, and utility leakage are possible sources of water
which could cause wetting. To reduce the risk of movement and distress if the hearing
soils become wetted, we recommend that the footings bear on the underlying granular
soils or compacted structural fill. In the garage area, a minimum of 3 feet of compacted
road base could be used in clay bearing areas with an increase risk of differential
movement if the underlying clay soils become wetted. The settlement/heave potential of
the subgrade should be further evaluated at the time of construction.
Job No. 106 0055
Gataech
SUN -30-2006 16:03 H—P GEOTECH
-4-
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the
nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread
footings bearing on the natural granular soils or compacted structural fill.
P.07/16
The design and construction criteria presented below should he observed for a spread
footing foundation system.
1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils or compacted
structural fill should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of
2,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed
and constructed as discussed in -this section will be about 111141 or less.
There could be some additional movement if the clay soils become wetted.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
�) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span
local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12
feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be
designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation
and Retaining Walls" section of this report.
S) The topsoil, at least 3 feet of the clay soils in the garage area and any loose
or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level
extended down to the natural soils. in the garage area, designbearing
levels can be re-established with compacted structural fill. The structural
fill should consist of imported granular soil, such as road base, compacted
lob No. 106 0032
JUN -30-2006 16:03 H—P GEOTECH
-5-
P.08/16
to at least 100% of standard Proctor density at a moisture content near
optimum. The fill should extend laterally beyond the fbotings a distance at
least equal to the depth of fill beneath the footings. Voids created by the
removal of large rocks should be backfilled with compacted road base or
with concrete.
6) A representative of the geotecluiical engineer should observe all footing
excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions.
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be
expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection. should be designed for a lateral
earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf
for backfill consisting of the on-site mainly granular soils or imported granular fill.
Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be
expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should
be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit
weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site mainly granular suits or
imported granular fill. Backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil, predominantly clay
soils 'dr oversized rock.
All foundation and. retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hythostatic and
surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and
equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the
walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a. wall or an upward
sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or
retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure
buildup behind walls.
Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content at to slightly above optimum. Backfill in
Job No. 106 0058
GeMech
JUN -30-2006 16:03 H -P GEOTECH
-6-
pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum
standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overeompact the backfill or use
large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the
wail. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the
material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the
backfill.
P.09/16
The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the
sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth :pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be
calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted
backfill against the sides of the footings can he calculated using an equivalent fluid unit
weight of 350 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended
above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the
design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case
of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads
should be a granular material compacted to at Ieast 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density at a moisture content near optimum.
FLOOR SLABS
The natural granular soils are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade
construction. The upper clay soils are expansive and at least 3 feet of clay Should be,
subR„ xcavated below the garage slab and replaced with compa ee oad base. There is a
ris ci.l:'slab movement and distress if the underlying clay soils become wetted. To reduce
the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all
bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical
movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage
cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be
established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A. minimum 4
inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to
Jot, No. 106 0058
SUN -30-2006 16:03 H—P GEOTECH
facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least
50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
P.10/16
Ail fill materials for support of floor slabs should he compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required till can
consist of the on-site mainly granular soils or imported structural fill, such asroad base,
devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
Al though free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our
experience in the area and where clay soils are present that local perched groundwater can
develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff Frozen gropod during
spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade const7-action,
such as retaining walls, erawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and
hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish
grade and sloped at a minimum .1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve; less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches, The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
lob No. 106 0058
ca'
JUN -30-2006 16:03 H—P GEOTECH
P.11/16
-8-
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture uid
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should he
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas.
Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-
site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the locationindicated
onF.igure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our
services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or
other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is
concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be
consulted. Our findings include extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at
• the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface condition.s may not become
evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction
appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-
evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the
lob No, 106 0058
tech
JUN -30-2006 16:04 H -P GEOTECH
-9-
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a. representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E.
Reviewed by:
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
JZ.Nksw
cc: Kurtz & Associates — Attn: Brian Kurtz
Job No. 106 0058
"'�tech
P.12/16
.TUM -30-2006 16:04
H—P GEOTECH
P.13/16
6912
ABANDONED IRRIGATION DITCH
6912
I-------
I.------
i
fI----
I ..,,,.� BUILDING
6910 ENVELOPE
I
I
6908 "-----I ...........--
LOT 57I
1 I
/ 1 f
I
7 I
I
/ I
I
/
I
K
----- 6910
6908
LOT 58
/I
/
6906
6904
6902
6900
BORING 1 I —
•
I 1
I / 6898
PROPERTY/
SILVER KING COURT
6906 6904
6902
I
6900
6896
6896
6898
LOT 59
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1°:: 20`
106 0058
Hapw '-P wla Geotechnical
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Figure 1
JUN -30-2006 16:04 H—P GEOTECH
P.14/16
BORING 1
ELEV.—. 6902'
LOT 58
6905 6905 —
6900
6895
6890
50/12
WC =123
D0=122
30/6,20/2
•
6900
6895 —
6890
6885 6885
.,,,.,, 6880 6880
6875 6875 —
6870 6870
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3.
Elevation - Feet
106 0058
Hep Nruehr wI
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Figure 2
JUN -30-2006 16:04
H -P GEOTECH P.15/16
LEGEND:
® TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organic, roots, firm, moist, dark brown to black.
7
I
50/9
I
CLAY (CL); silty, slightly sandy to sandy, scattered gravel, cobbles and possible boulders, stilt to very stiff,
slightly moist, brown, siltstone/sandstone and basalt fragments.
SAND AND GRAVEL (SC -GC): clayey, silty, with silty sand (SM) pockets, scattered cobbles and boulders,
dense, slightly moist to moist, browns, basalt and sandstone fragments.
Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample.
Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1580:
Drive sampie blow count; indicates that 50 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were
required to drive the California or SPT sampler 9 inches.
Practical drilling refusal.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory boring was drilled on December 30, 2005 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger.
2. Location of exploratory boring was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided.
3. Elevation of exploratory boring was obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plant provided.
4. The exploratory poring location and elevation should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the
method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between
material types and transitions may be gradual.
6; Nb free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling or when checked 13 days later. Fluctuation in
water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WG = Water Content (95)
DD = Dry Density (pcf)
106 0058
He7wwth,—_P'aw I
LEGEND AND NOTES I Figure 3
SUN -30-2006 16:04
H—P GEOTECH
P.16/16
TOTAL P.16
Moisture Content - 12.3 percent
Dry Density = 122 pct
Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay
From: Boring 1 at 5 Feet - Lot 58
4
•
3
•
o`
•
in 1
ris
a
1.0
Expansion
upon
wetting
C
O
•.
al 1
f
0
U
•
3
0.1 1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf
100
106 0057
Hepworth—Pawl* Geotechnical
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
... ..� J..
I Figure 4
TOTAL P.16
No t Or <
Assessor's Parcel No.7'q--5—/_`3-13-7
Date 9 1 13)
BUILDING PERMIT CARD
Job Address (2) 16 Sf 1\'e(k--t rtq C*117.E 4 Ln+ 5-316% 17 c.L ,I�D�d&&s(aart
Own erA7'tr'Qt J\) ,VV Ciea-flSh J Address % 20 S. Fr fa not Phone #145 -4S -1/C
Contractor ID(A\YJ J'\ Address 't -21D '&LU Phone #
Setbacks: Front Rear RH LH
- x)\ C 'Ca- AA* 30-ram_INSPECTIONS
Soils Test
Footing ✓C"
Foundation F. /y' 07 71°12. -
Grout aS
Underground Plumbing 5O3 '\t 1T (�
Rough Plumbing 'Z -C7 4- J
Framing , c7
Insulation e
Roofing
Drywall `h- (1 'VI �
Gas Piping 5..-2.-o7. �,) SFa&,L
kar-0:
EXTERIOR
Address No. 'V
Drainage
Decks -support 8 clearance to wood
Decks -stairs & rails
Exterior locks
Flashing around doors & windows
Insect screens
I
INTERIOR
GARAGE
Fire wall separation ✓ ."
Service doors -11/4" min. V if
Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -144" min. LZ
Mech. equip. 18" above floor
No opening into sleeping area
BASEMENT•CRAWL EA
Access y/AtI
Insulation
Headroom/Stairs
Ventilation
J/
Zoning
Weatherproofing
Mechanical
Electrical Rough (State) i//
Electrical Final State) V
inal/Checklist Completed?
Certificate Occupagcy#�i0
Date (t Oft Septic System # N)}
Date
Final —'a
NOTES
Other
FINAL CHECKLIST
MECHANICAL ROOM
Boller
Hot water
F.A. gas/oil
Floor drain
Clearance
Air con. system
Hot water heater
Combustion air
Gas piping, valves
LPG D in
FIREPLACE/STOVE
Clearance to combustibles
Termination of chimney
Combustion air
Hearth (12" or 20" on sides)
Glass doors
Certified by'
REMARKS
(continue on back)_
STAIRWAYS
Headroom (8'8") �
Railing & guardrails
Width
Rise & run
KITCHEN
Clearance above grill
Exhaust fan
Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase)
BEDROOMS
Egress
Smoke detector
BATHROOMS
Exhaust fan
Shatterproof glass V
OTHER
/*
INSPECTION WILL NOT DE MADE, UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE (REQUIRED POR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD//COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issued�I//�� jJ5!C Q Zoned Area Permit No 1001i S
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Use 5W t CCN • peat_� a..L�- Ptd g&r9 e 1
^'
Address or Legal Description 0_-3I1'031(%trkd L_r • ,Gr OS,La+58!
Owner'Pr in cc_ Coyest . Contractor OW ALA.
.
Setbacks Front Side Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible Front The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing / , AA_ X74,.:
Driveway
Foundation
/7#
Underground Plumbing 5-25 -01 ot{
R
•itsulation g./7,0y j27
R -nigh Plumbing 8, 2.4 to
Drywall 97.1 .01 tent -
Chimney & Vent g:g� -
Electric Final (by State Inspeig/C E24
Gas Piping u 2.oi 43. -SEt Lang.
Final 9-�,r :. .„."---
Electric
Electric Rough (By State InspJ, 6f
Septic Final 400
Framingg-S-o7 3/4,9, eI ��p1/111�i,
(To include Roof in pla a and W tndo4s
and Doors installed) ' �,9�a�o ice`,
Notes:
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado
APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date 9. It .D it By
IF PLACED OUTSI E - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor/Treasurer_Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Reception Search
Basic BuildinLCharacteristics I Tax Information
Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail I Photographs
Tax Area
Account Number Parcel Number
Mill Levy
008
R042466 239515313058
63.502
Owner Name and Mailing Address
PRINCE CREEK CONSTRUCTION, INC
2520 S GRAND AVE N0210
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
Legal Description
SECT,TWN,RNG:15-7-89 SUB:OAK
MEADOWS RANCH, FLG 4B, PHASE II
LOT:58 PRE:R080257 BK:0538 PG:0594
BK:1747 PG:760 RECPT:686860 BK:1704
PG:823 RECPT:677780 BK:1704 PG:723
RECPT:677735 BK:1212 PG:170
RECPT:570677 BK:1153 PG:164
RECPT:553015 BK:1035 PG:0611
BK:0915 PG:0477 BK:0807 PG:0388
BK:0808 PG:0166
Physical Address:
Subdivision:
Land Acres:
Location
310 SILVER KING CT GLENWOOD SPRINGS
OAK MEADOWS RANCH, FLG 4B, PHASE II
0.187
II
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239515313058 8/4/2006
Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3
Land Sq Ft: 118,134
Section
15
Township
7
Range
89
Property Tax Valuation Information
Sale Date:
Sale Price:
11/18/2005
95,000
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
Actual Value
Assessed Value
Land:
69,350
20,110
Improvements:
0
0
Total:
69,350
20,110
Sale Date:
Sale Price:
11/18/2005
95,000
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
Buildings:
0
Number of Comm/Ind
Buildings:
0
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
Tax Year
2005
2005
Transaction Type
Tax Payment: Whole
Tax Amount
Amount
($342.92)
$342.92
Top of Page
Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Search Options
Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options
Garfield County Home Page
The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain
accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices
are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained.
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239515313058 8/4/2006