HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield County
[ NO. 10243
Building & Sanitation Department
108811 Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003
r'c}..u:t.Q
J o b Address 002}f Llrf£ ~\M C1v.1 Lot 2-l \)o.U..H.1 \) \o.t.U \)~
f'Jalure of Work BuilrlingPermit z<tol-/~J-04:-DzJ -ph .D
Use of Build in g S}f \ >..)\ 0per1 =po .. ,"h(J '\-Q....-'\+. t??fO 1\ ~
Owne r 'bax:l-er 1 UL
Contractor 6 V'"O\C Q t\-c yY'\.QA)
Amo unt of Pe rmit $ L. q [S L ./o 7
' D ate /J -Z 6 :OCf
C l erk ~
GARFIELD COUNTY DUILDING PERM IT APPLI CATION
J.O~ a·· Htnet, h"utte 201, Glenwood Springo, CO 81601
Pho ne: 9 7 0·945-8212 I Flu<: 970·384-3470 /lnspe<:Uon Line: 970-384-5003
PennitNo: J 02.'-/3 Parcel/ScheduleNo:lf ~'tD71'6 (O'fOU
Job Address: »f CO Zit C (il (!~Crv/e.--fa.ra . Go '8 /~
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Owner:
Describe Work:
Class of Work:
0
Garage:
0
'1-Driveway Permit
N CE
New
Single
Double
(J
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
I SSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO.
0 Alteration
Addition 0 Move
On-Site Sewage
Disposal
Carport:
0 Site Plan
Permit Fee:
o Remove
0
(J
Single
Double
nilS PERMIT BECOMES HULL AND VOlD IF WORK OR COftSTRUCTIOlf
Atn'HORlZED I S NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 1 80 DAYS, OR, I F
CONSI'RUCTION OR WORK I S SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMEN CED.
Total Fee: Dated. Permit Issued :
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLI CATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TR!JE AND CORRECT. ALL.
PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING TfUS TYPE OF WORK Wll..l.. BE
COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE
GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUHE TO GIVE AUTHORITY
TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL WE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LOCAL LAW REGU TINO <YINSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE
~ QFC N.
)/
OCC Gro p:
/(CJ
Zo ing: Setbacks:
ISDSNo.&~~ ----
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION I S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF W E CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT'
STRUCTURE AS DETAJI..ED ON PLANS AND SPECI FICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF TiiE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SI GNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY Willi ALL. BUILDING CODES AND LAND .
REGUlATIONS ADOPTED BY OARFtEI..D COUNTY PURSUANT TO Aurn:ORITY GIVEN.LN 30.28.2 01 CRS AS AMENDED. 'll{E SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THA
THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WJ'Il{ IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRII '
STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM 'll{E COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME N1JLL AND VOlD.
'll{E ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND oTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT TiiE BUII..DING OFFIC IAL FROM .THEREAF
REQUI RING THE CORRECTI ON OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BE
CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OFTHS CODE OR ANY O'll{ER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THI S JURISDICTI ON. .
THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECI FICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF'
RESPONSIBIUTIES OR LlABUTIES BY GARFI ELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS '
IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFI CIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESI GNER, BUI LDER. AND 0\'!NifR. MMENTS ARE INTENI
TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. ~f''§ .
Gnrfom.003 ;;-o)
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL)f~:..:l-;;:1 :;:_.,..,.·=-----
~. i ~ 5), \)\l S\ )\)l~ (, cJ; <lid--3 s ~~ ,
f{nlrA ~~~#-&l ~/ <if 12-4Cj.(; 7
VVVJ f ( j'ZX (Ole.
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and fl.Ilished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the d emonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State
Agencies where applicable. ·
A CERTIFICATE OFOCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL B E
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # } 0 Z-4 3
f'el ~· ~-4 A --1 .. 'Q . •.. ·je"l
Signature Date
Bpcont0ct2004
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Pt..
Applicant•~~~~tJi~~~--
Address~~~___;;;;..:....:.~~.a..=--._
Subdivision /6us e ljj&e~ V l) U D
Lot/Block L£91 Z-1
Contractor G:rtlriee ~ Date. _ __..~-"--...._,..__ ____ _
Finished (Livable Area): f48
Main ;sz.s-~ 7C/--::.
Upper
Lower
Other
Basement:
Total Square Feet
Valuation
Unfinished
11 3,281 (t!1L
Conversion ofUnfmished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage: f t/6 .X I r~~ I G, ZCJO ~
Valuation
Crawl Space:
Valuation
Deck;s!Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open 17X.../2().:J-=-
Valuation
Total Valuation /131 zS/ td-
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan
and it's di scovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result
in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this infonnation before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it h as been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider_
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans
to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are _r equested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to ·indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
······· ---------·· ·-· ·-··-··--·-··-... ---------------------------·-·-.··----·-···------. -··--------------------·-·-··· ·-·--····----~---------....... ····-·-··-····-
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required. ·
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind
speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE
Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft.
of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a
subdivision final platshall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's
signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a
building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of
the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within' envelope.
Yes
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special
setbac s do apply.
Yes -f---
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent properties), streams or water courses? ·
Yes "f
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
Yes y
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the IR.C or per stamped engineered design?
Yes '(
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes y
7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces an'l(ffits?
Yes _____ _
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads,' (a
minimum of40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wind loads?
Yes '(J
9. Does the plan include a building section drawiog indicating foimdation, wall, floor, and roof
conStruction?
Yes Y
I 0. Does the building section drawiog include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes'---+----
II. Does the building section drawiog or other detail include the method of positive connection of
all columns and beams?
Yes. ___ ~-------
12. · Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the
top of a flttt roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes __ J__,__ __ _
13. Does the plan iriclude any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes 'f No ______ _
3
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the IRC?
Yes 'fJ No -------
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeyg rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes No .
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes >"' No _____ _
Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and speci{)?afety glazing for these areas?
Yes L No ______ _
Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
Yes 'f No I ~~--------
Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
· covenants?
Yes f No. _____ __
Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility
to obtain written pennission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not
be accepted without it. ·
Yes 'f No _____ _
Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes Y No Ifno-Explain: _______ _
Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes '/
Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft.
long?
Yes "l No ____ _
4
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes }0 No
l ------------
25. · Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone district?
Yes 'f No _________ _
26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes Y No ____ _
27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to
the appliqa_tion of these changes?
Yes 7 No ---------
28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as
well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pickup your
building permit?
Yes 'f No. ____ _
29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be
called in to 384-5003.
Yes y No _____ _
30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee?
Yes Y No ____ _
31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IR C
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupanc)' of the building?
Yes 'f No ----------
32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC?
Yes Y No ·-------
5
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal c)f a bu"ilding permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
Yes (0 No _____ _
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at time of applicable inspection.
Yes )0 · No _____ _
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the ParceVSchedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal.
of a buildin~permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes + No ________________ _
36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes Y No (please check with the
building department about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on ·doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading
permit?
Yes Jt7
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
_L ~Y ability.
~~~~~---~4~~~~-~-~~V~~_u ______ _
.Signature of Owner Date
Pho:ne: Cf 10 ~ S~ '}-S' SSS __________________ (evenings)
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginnillg the plan review process. Delays
in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If
it is determineq by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the
application and plans to determine minimum .compliance with the adopted codes, the application
6
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
BprninreqFeb2005
7
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
ApplicantG'LAce ;/,1¥-e.S
Building
~E n gineered Founda tion
..tiltt_Dri veway Permit
_6urveyed Site Pla n
--AL.t:S e ptic Permit and Se tb acks
1\},4-Gradeffopography 30%
~A tt a ch Resid enti a l Plan Review Li s t
~Minimum Appli c ati o n Questionn aire
_...-----Subd ivi s io n Pl a t No tes
t/ 1-Fire D ep artme nt Re vie w
_LV alu ation D e termination/Fees
~ed Line Pla ns/S ta mp s/Stic ker
___d'it ac h Conditi o ns
......-A pp lic a ti o n Signed
_6Ian Re vi ew er T o Si gn Appli cati o n
.........P arcel/S che dul e No .
~0 # Snow load Le tte r-M a nf. Hm s .
~ Soil s Re po rt
GENERAL NOTES:
Date 7-111-o
----I~~O AI DR C Approva l
--+-Gradeffopograp hy 40 %
__ Subd ivis io n Plat Notes
: ....
' 08/£i"l/2f:lll3 . 21:36 97f:l243S4El7
~ Adc/~s~.IJ OOZ4 G(;[ Vttv~t.}.;} ~ Z,l
Crr.
BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICEASSOCI.ATION
ARCBITECI'URAL COMMITTEE AJ>PLICATION SUBMliTAL FORM
(For New I!ome Cons~ction)
INSTRUCTIONS:
PAGE f:l2
lbis Application & Checklist is to be used for all project subnlittflls to the Battlement Mesa Service Association
ArchiteCtUral Cornm.ittee (BMSA/ AC). Tiris form is .intended to assist in ensuring that the application submittal
is complete. This will help provide.a quicker, more thorough review process. ·
It is ~ded that each Applicam thoroughly review the requirements of the eurrent Archit<mtnnl
Stwdards. the Amended ~.adReMs!ted Declaration ofCovewm~ (indndingResolutions) and tbe.reco.rded
Fill!!} Plat for ~irrespective Jieighborhood prior to preparing a submittal.
. .
Applicants prepmng a submittal should compare theintormation they are about to submit with the requireme;nts
oftbis :funn and "check off' eachreqcired item on the tbrm. If any item is not checked, the .Application sul$ittal.
is not conwiete and should not be submitted. Incomplete Applications will not be processed and will be returned.
.ro the Applical)1.
In addition to the checklist, Applicants should .fill in all of the places on the Application Form where iufbnnaiion.
is requested. ~ Architectmal Committee willUBetbisinfunnationinevaiuatingyour Application. If'mformati.on
is requested but is not applicable to y<~ur specific project submittal. write ~A" ill the space provi~d. If rome
.required infollll31ion is yet to be detenoined (such as exterior paint colors you .may not bave yet selected) write
"TBD" in the appropriated space provided. Yon w:i1l then be required to make a :ronow-up submittal with these
~lections at. a. later date but be.fure installation in the home.
'
· DO NOT fill in any hJfo.lJJJiition iu the "Conditions for Approval'' section of this furnl. This portion of the fonn.
is :fur Architectural Committee use o.nly.
. .
W;heJ) an.. Application is con:pkte, please mail or deliver it to the fuUowing address:
Battlement Mesa Service Association
Arcllltecturai Con:unittee Appli¢atfun
73-G Sipprelle Drive
P.O. Box 6006
Battlement Mesa, Colorado 81636
The Architectural Committee meets twicemontltly on the l" and 3"' Wednes&ty, and Applications are .due
one week prior-t11 the SchedUled Meeting I>at~ £or prior review by Conmlittee mempers. Please contact
Jane Cl:lapman.at (970) 285-9740 to contin:n tha next .scheduled meeting date or to request further iniOi'nWi!m.
We thank yo:u k advance fur your cooperation and in COJmllying with the Ar4!!itt;ctural StuuJards of the
Battlement MeSa Service Association. · ·
Page 1 of 6
. -------··-··-·····-· -------····-----------. -------------------------~~----------------
.. --.. ----.----
88/34/2083 21:36 9782438487 SUNDANCE
BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION.
AR\.:~~m~I'~J!;C'fURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION & CIJECKLJST
(for New Home Construction projects)
PAGE 03
Hop:teOWner: \\91/lU -----f.ftlln.~ · · · Ho11)3MailiDgA~ k<(1Jo.Q 0 f. . . .
HomePhone:WOrk:Phone(rfdesired): OQ3-5SSS
Project~ddressoX OUt <I C:l: (f ~tn_: Loti Z-t .:Block]( Subdivision: J haOo~i fJ-t~ .1/
ProductionHomeP.lanName(ifapplicable)ji 7lufr '"h} . ~ : J_ : _ -=
Busim>sMailingA{](lll; ;g, , /( Ji\QO o J.di ;\-. Ho.mebuilder: . ~ ~Ql11QQ .
BusinessPhone: ~~{= .Fwt~desired): _____________ _
SubmjttalDate:'-. ____ EstimatedStartDate: _____ :EstimatedCompletionDate:~---
StJ.BMlTTAL.REQUIREMENTS: Two Copies each of items 1, 2 & 4 need to be submitted.
· (Check-o:lfitems attached to the Applicat:iQn. Fill in spaces as indicated.)
--""e..-----1.· Site.Plau.D:rawing (I"= lO'or 1" "'2Q' sc~) with the t'Ollowing.infonnat.ion shoWI!:
-.....!:.~ Lot,. Block & Subdivision name.
----"v--':::..... · . · Street Address ofProject. .
--"~0::: ·. Building Setback Lines (also .fill-in the ~oxtest dist8nce Petween prop¢rty line to the
exterior wall closest to that property line). Please be aware that all Bu,ildi.ng-Setback
Lini:S are taken from your Pr~perty Line }>insH Your Property Lin.e is NOT the
Curb .Line!! ·
DwellhlgUDit Qarage
Front Setback:
Left Side Setback:
Right ·side Setback:
Re8r Setbacl<:
~ Utility Ea:;em.ents.
~ · 55' Clear Site-Line at Intersection Corner Lots'·
_ _jk:::r<,:;:. ;__· .·.. Site Grading Elevations & Drainage.
_ _j~~··::.;. , . First (ntliin) l"loor Height in relation to t(!p of street curb a.t ftont•ceilter of lot. -~-~:=:-·-..... · · . Driveways (including width of driveway); WalkWays, Patios, etc •.
_ __.!:::..---:::.....· . . Outbuildings.
Page2 of 6
-·-·-·-----~---.------·------···---------------~------
, aa/e412BB3 21:35 9713243B4El7 SUNDANCE PAGE 04
~ 2. Architectural Drawings (114" =I' or 1/8"-= 1' scale) with the following !nformationshown.
~·Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions (fill-in the :fullo~ square foot ar~as).
Fm Floor Finished Living Area: 1( lo~ j square feet
Second Floor Finished Living Area: ~ ~ square ibet
Lower Floor F"mished Living Area: square feet
TotalFinlshedLivfugArea; ~ r5b square;fi:et
Total Unfinished Living Area: ____ square :!ret
Garage Area: ~ l..f70 square ;fi:et
Builcifug Elevations ~lans indicating doors, wi:n<lows, exterior materials, building height,
roof pitch, roof..momrted evaporative coolers, etc. (:filHn llll!Ximum height below).
Maxim\llll building height to highest ridge line or bttildil.lg structural projection
----feet above top of street curb at front-center of your lot ·
. / En&meeroo (stamped) Foundation Pian. · . .
~Outbuildlngs indicating dimensions, el~vations and overall height to ridge line.
~3. Exterior Materials (fill-in the selections bela~):
~ RoofiogMaterial; 30 ye~~ "~ 9-jjfe
~ PrimarySidiogM~al: A..,ult.<t., ~"'
~ Acc=tSidfugMatetial: ,4.,....,;.,.., Dr.,.,..
Color:
Color:
Color:
l.le .. ~ Lloc..t
~""~
M..;k
~"TriniMaterlal: A ...... r"'"' Dr ...... r..-~.t ·
. ~.· . Mas~>nry Material:__:f.:.:.t..,:,..:r .... R:;.:c:::;:e-k::L-. ___ _
--Al.{Jr-_ . Stucco Materials:_---!:O:.!..fltA'::l;· ;..,_ ____ _
Color.· t,.th.~
Color: f1k .. t-.-..l .
Color: "'q 4 , .c::-: FrontDoorMate.riai: __ ...!S:~t~·.,~l -----
~ GanlgeDoorMaterial:--''----'~:.:.ct.:.::. .. l ____ ~
COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE
COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE
Page3 of 6
···-----------··----. ---··-------···----------------------·-·---------
Color: WI-\;~
Color: M-1-1-c.
COLOR SAMPLE
COLOR SAMPLE
esFB4F2ee3 21:36 9782438487 SUNDANCE PAGE 05
--"'-~--4. LandscapellrrigationPlans with the following information;
~/ Planting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated lawn. tree placement, shrub beds, ground cover,
etc-). -
Prnnt Material .listing by species oftn:es, shrubs and grasses.
V _ Orouudcovcr Material with weed control barrier.
--"'-;;::::.----"'-Fences.
~ Other Landscape Improveme.o:ts (decks, site lighting, ilag poles, etc.).
_ ' ~ 5. V~e Req~est (if applicable) Give details below:
-~-6. Residential ConstrUction Monetary Deposit:
I/We hereby adwowledge and understand that our failure to co.mpleteHome Construction, Improvement
l>roJects or Landscaping Construction within the time constraints. ~oted in C~on~> ;2". & 3. On Page
_6 of this Applicaiion will res_ult in a Notice and Opportunity for a Hearing before the .lll\1SA Board of
]')Jrectom Ifi!W e aN found fu Violation oftheie Conditions 111: the He.!krln.g it will~ in a .f'ine t11 the·
Owner of not less than $500.00. per month for each full mo~th in e::r;cess of the allottd completion time
frame. ·
--
. I/We .1\eret>y acknowledge that Ilo),O.e Co»stnxction or Improvement Projects or La»dseape Constrnctiein
feat~J,l'e,S which are built in non-conforwance with tbls full application, including the Conditi11»-s. of
. _ ,Approval noted on Page 6 of 6 her.e.in,IIW~ will be cited by the BMSA/ AC in Writtt<:n citatio.n fo:rm at the
tim!! of c!llllcovecy. J:n extenuating cil?enmstailces a Yarian1:e may be nquested fro~ the BMSAJAC,
provided such Varial\ce request item is withm the pu:nriew and appr.oval'j\l.risdicrtion of'fbe BMSA/AC.
If a Variance ill not grant!'d b.Ytl:te Bl\'H;AIACand .ifthe Non..Confonning_Items,aro not co:aected witbin
66 days after the date of written citation,JlWe wiil be sezyedNotice of a Rearing he.fo:rc the lJMSA Dll&l'd
ofDirectono;-and l:fJJWc are found in nolilfion of these Non-Conformmg Items at the ll~rlng 1/We wtn·
l!e ~e4 a minimum of $500.00 per N!)~onfonning Itew' Notwithstanding tbe-fo.rego}ngo J/Yle.
-.a\:knowlwge that tlie BMSA Board ~{j;)Irectors and/or Arciu~tor.d C~;~~lttiie may ~e any legJCtl
tentedy available in the event of a non-colllPiiance. ·
Page4of 6
······-·----~---------------------····-·····--------------------------------------· ······-------------··---~----·-·······-··
.•
68/64/2003 21:36 9702438467
· ... ·
••
AS PER TJIE. A.nCIDIEC'fURAL ST.ANDARDS;PLEASE INDICATE THE
. FOLLOWING POINTS. ON THE PLOT PLAN AND BELOW:
. . ' .
· ~LEVATIONS AT EAcH CORNER OF TilE LOT.·_
·LOCATION.
·1.
2.
4.
5.
6.-,TIIE HIGHPOINT OF UIB LOT.
7 . .:_T.HE LOW POlNT OF TBE LOT,
8.-HEIGIIT OF GARAGE FLOOR.
9.--HBIGHT OF HOUSE MAIN FLOOR:..-
10.-.HEIGIIT OF ROOF ABOVE F'OUNDATION.
( MA.XfMUMc-35 FEET)
11.-HEIGHT OF ROOF ABOVE CENTER
OF THS MID CURB.
· . (MAXIMUM-· 2!? FEET l .
ET,BYATION_ ~FEET)
. _ .. __
· 12.--DRAJNAGE FLOWLINES ON THE PLOT PLAN.
13.--ROOF PITCHES.---1.-----·~
3.----~--..
15,....SQUARE F.EET OF LIVJNG SPAcB.. ..----..-. ---
P~GE 06 .
. ·.
---------··---~---~------------------------------------.·.-... -.------=--~~----···:·--------------------------------------------
---------------------------··· .. --
-. :
68/B4/2BB3 21:36 97824384B7
Thi,ol portion of the Application Form !.s to be completed by the
· An:b.itectural Comntittee (not the Applicant).
CONDTTIONS OF APPROV 4Lvr DISAPPROVAL
PAGE as
l. No sitework or building construction !nay proceed on my Lot (including oo preliminary site clearing,
grubbing, grade alteration. st()ring of material. fuundation excavation,. extension ofuoderground utilities,
etc.) until the l"rojaot has :received a Project approval tro.rn the Architectural CoJl]!Ilittee and bas been
issued a Building Permit (llS required by Gar.field County for new ho:rne or Renovation projects).
2. An general buil~ and site improvementS CO»StrUctionfor any Project shall. be completed artd sbaJl have
issued a Certificate of~ .from the Garfield County Building Department no later t1Jan pne (1) .
nR afte< the issuance date of this Arcl!itectural Commjttee Apor<>m
3. The complete landscaping andrevegetationoftheimproved Lot, to specifieally include the~ side and
rear yard areas; shall be completed no later than six (6) months from the date of the Certificatlli of
o~~-.
4. If the selection of colors and /or landscaping plans axe not included with this application they must bo .
submitted for approval befure any ~on is taken to ~all the missing i'te!Ds-
.5.
6.
7.
App.lf~ A=ft£ f~iUtl:uction•Bilhikt. · M~ tl)e above eou:di~OJIB: . . . S ~/ ~. _ [);:..
By Clt!UJ'III!Ul: . · . ~~ Date: / · ·
. / ' .
AppJilllttion Denied {liiitillls of Atchitectuasl Co~ee Members):
By:
Applictriiott Denied for reasOt:a(#)stat«<' above:·
BYCbllitmant ---'---c,....,-'-......... --------~-
Page6of 6
------------_ _, ______ -----------------------------___________________ _, ___________ -------------------------------·--·---.. ---
~loy. 29. 1007 I: 15~PM-~G£!RA~CLE _I!!HO~M~Es:_ ____ """":'~~---~o. 95046~~~2
RECEIPT
•
" " 0
0 m
~
~
~ a: 0 ~
I
ACCOUNT
AMT. OF
ACCOUNT
AMT.PAIC
BALANOE DUC
CMIH
CHECK
MONEYOAOER
RECEIPT DATE 0 r l ol r<i J'
RECEIVE[) FROM h(/'; () ~"' 1'
1
\
Ar)\88 'F'JU ( r lj_ ( )\l, J ( ~\:, L
o~li JJt • , ..l-L> } • ...... -<..> ' \ I
FOR VI~'\ 'Ja ( J::
A~UNT ~ HOW PAin .,
AMT. OF lifH ACCOUNT CASH
AMT. P.AJD CHECK "sv1 6J.LANCE JUE MONEY ORDER
GRACE .HOMES. I!E.A~ UT4TE & CONSTRUCTION, INC • . · ···.· '' ' ...., '4
Chii<kll: 27850 .. · .· Dale: ·• 112110&
inVr.-,;ce#·
OQ24WCIF
t
JDbtoesulpllon
1 ~5 0024 Ctiff Via., row ft-. · · · . c_jru'---
.,
···>
~ .. '
< • :
V~ndort: 338 Coniolidated Metrt. •• .,.1ltan Dlftrl~
BalanC-6
1,250.00
' \
Retein Discount
j
~ I {'\ I
IQ
·-..
6202
·-·---
~~'I AR8 $~ill
1hts Ch•t.l<
1 ,25{).00
-~··-··
27850
Lower Valley Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
569 South Westgate Drive, S uite 2
Grand Junction, Colorado 81505
Ph (970) 243 -8778 Fax (970) 243 -8499
David Mead
Gatfield County Building Department
Fax: 970-384-3470
1-11-07
RE: Residence at 0024 Cliff View Circle, Grace Homes Vall ey View Village
Subdivision, Battlement Mesa, Colorado.
Building Department:
I have been retained by Grace Homes to provide engineering services for the
above referenced project. I have supervised inspection of the foundat i ons and wa lls prior
to concrete placement to ensure conformance with the drawings that I prepa red and were
submitted for permit.
The foundations are structurally adequate to satisfy the building codes curTent ly
adopted by Garfie ld County.
Please contact me if there are any questions concerning thi s project.
Signed,
Danen R. Adams, P. E.
\ GRAND JUNCTION
' LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. ~ GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS· GEOLOGISTS
1441 J\[otor St.
Grand Junction, CO 81505
Grace Homes
786 Valley Court
Grand Junction, CO 81505
June 22, 2006
Re: Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job #92355-GJ
Valley View Village, Phases C and D, Battlement Mesa, CO
Gentlemen:
T~L: (970) 242-H96H
FA .. X: (970) 242-1561
As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a limited geotechnical exploratory
program at the above-referenced site. Ten shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity of the
proposed buildings, as shown on the attached sketch. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth
of3 feet to I 0 feet. These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln
DeVore on May I 0, 2006. The purpose of these pits was to determine the types and character of the in-place
overlot grading fill placed on the site to the date of our exploration and the types and character of the
underlying subgrade soils, particularly the potential expansive characteristics, and to relate these
characteristics to the proposed foundation system. The slope stability of the embankment fill overlooking
the stormwater detention pond was modeled to confirm that the building setbacks are adequate.
This particular site was the subject of two previous geotechnical studies conducted prior to initial subdivision
development. The principal report is a preliminary geotechnical study, "Proposed Roan Cliff Village
Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, CO," prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak
Geotechnical, Inc., Job #102 526, dated September 16, 2002. A second geotechnical report was prepared
by Yeh & Associates, "Test Pit Observations, Lots 1-7, 38 and 39, Battlement Mesa, Phase II, Garfield
County, CO," Project #24-116, dated June I, 2005.
The Hepworth-Pawlak report provided the principal geotechnical parameters for the design and construction
of this subdivision. The Hepworth-Pawlak report identified some areas of low expansive clays and one
moderately expansive clay. These expansive clays, combined with the proposed structural fill on the site,
presented some limitations on the construction and ultimate performance of individual residential
construction. The Yeh & Associates report was a very limited study. It appears that five exploration pits
were excavated to a total depth of approximately 6 feet. Bulk samples were obtained, and basic soils
classification and moisture determinations were made. This report did not determine in-place dry density
of the soils, nor were relatively undisturbed samples taken for swelUconsolidation testing, so very little
additional information is provided that can be utilized for predicting residential foundation performance.
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 2
The following laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to determine their relative
engineering properties.
ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification
ASTM D-3080 Direct Shear Strength, Cd
ASTM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density
ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil
FHA Swell by PVC Meter (Shelby Tube Samples)
Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials
or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratory tests are included in this report. The in-place soil
density, moisture content, and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration
pit logs.
This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundations within this
subdivision but it is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. An additional study was conducted
on the slope located at the north end of the development overlooking the stormwater detention pond. The
purpose of this additional study is to provide a factor of safety for the assumed developed conditions
regarding slope stability and placement of the building foundations at the top of the slope. Our conclusions
and recommendations for this site are presented below .
~ f~ To q:;-~n-~~~
{;p;ll1--Excavation Observation: Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel should be contacted to observe
the £ ation soils after the excavation has been com leted and prior to placing forms or concrete. The
u ose of this is to observe the e and condition of the foun atton so1 s ou out t e excavatiOn. If the
Soil Classification: During our field exploration of the existing man-made fills and upper 2 to
3 feet of the native soil, three soil types were identified. These soils are all quite similar, being fine-grained ,
oflow to very low plasticity, and derived from the same geologic source. These in-place materials have been
naturally reworked due to alluvial activity and wind activity. Soil Type No. I is a slightly sandy lean clay.
Soil Type No. II is a somewhat sandier lean clay with some strata being a sandy silty clay. Soil Type No.
III is a low plastic, slightly sandy silt. The actual characteristics of these soils are described on the attached
soil analysis and summary sheets. The principal concern of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore was the
presence of low expansive strata. A number of tests were made on relatively undisturbed samples obtained
using thin-walled shelby tubes and tested in an FHA PVC meter. This method allows a rather quick test to
be performed and can be reasonably correlated back to the test methods utilizing the consolidation test
apparatus. Based upon our testing ofthese soils , the possibility of minor amounts of soil expansion being
encountered is relatively low; however, the potential appears to exist in both the native and man-made fill
soils. Based upon our testing, it would be reasonable to expect between 0.7% and 2.1% swell under
conditions of relatively low surcharge pressure. The corresponding swell pressures range from 286 psf to
645 psf. These particular values may only slightly affect a properly designed and proportioned footing and
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 3
stemwall foundation but would affect more noticeable distortion or movement of a thickened edge slab
(monolithic-type) foundation system.
Man-made Fill: Portions of this site contain newly placed man-made fill, ranging from only a few
inches to as much as 12 I /2 feet measured in test pit # 1 at the northeast corner of the site at the top of the
bank overlooking the stormwater retention pond. It is our understanding that more fill has been placed over
portions of this site since our exploration pits. The site grading map plan, which Lincoln DeVore utilized
during some of our soil density testing of utility trench backfill, indicates that up to 13 feet of fill can be
expected.
It is not known if this man-made fill has been placed under controlled moisture and compactive effort
conditions during this subdivision grading. This office does not have any records regarding the placement
of the fill and is not able to verify the overall condition of fill. Based upon our exploration pits, the majority
of the fill appears to have been placed in manner that would produce percent compaction results in the range
of90 to I 000/o of the standard proctor (ASTM D-698). The native soils typically contain strata with percent
compaction significantly less than 90%, with many of these native strata exhibiting slight to moderately
severe collapsible properties.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has not been provided with any geotechnical reports or specifications for
site improvement, which provide guidelines and requirements for structural fill. It is not known what actual
requirements are in effect for this fill which is expected to support buildings, slabs and subdivision
improvements.
Based upon our experience in this area, it is common to have structural fill placed during site grading at a
minimum of 95% of the soil's maximum standard proctor density (ASTM D-698). It is normally required
that the fill be placed at a moisture content ranging from -2% to +2% of the optimum moisture content
(ASTM D-698). Some modification of these specifications are possible, particularly when dealing with
potentially expansive soils.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore typically recommends that the soils be compacted to a minimum of90%
of the soil's modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). The requirements for the moisture content are
usually± 2% of the optimum moisture, but in the case of slightly expansive soils, the preferred moisture
range would probably increase.
Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation on this site. In
general, the man-made fills and the very upper portion of the native soils were in a slightly damp condition,
with the native soils usually being somewhat drier.
There exists a distinct possibility of perched water tables developing in the native alluvial/debris fan soils
which are present across this entire site. There is also the possibility of a perched water table developing in
the compacted man-made fills. This perched water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due
to the presence of lawns, landscaping and roof runoff.
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 4
While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of our exploration the actual construction
progress would not be affected by any free flowing waters, it is very possible that after development is
initiated and for several years later, a troublesome perched water condition may develop on individual lots
that will provide some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract. Therefore, it is
recommended that the future presence of perched water tables be considered in the design and construction
of all proposed residential structures.
Prevention of perched water tables, and minimizing the effects of any developed perched waters around
residential buildings, is usually accomplished by prudent site grading, good control of roof runoff, and very
good compaction practices regarding backfill against structures, backfill of utility trenches, and extra
compaction effort in the areas between structures, particularly in narrow side yards that tend to have slow
to very slow surface drainage. In the experience of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, good attention to site
grading, drainage, and particularly compaction of all backfills is more effective than the installation of
shallow perimeter drains around foundations. In some instances, particularly in the side yards between two
structures, a shallow drain may be required.
Foundation Type Recommended: The foundation recommendations contained in the Hepworth-
Pawlak geotechnical report provide general design information for a standard continuous spread footing and
stemwall-type foundation system. The preliminary allowable bearing pressure for this foundation system
was given as 1,500 psfto 3,000 psf. Further note was made that if expansive clays are encountered in the
building areas, removal or redesign may be required. The recommendations are general in nature as is typical
with a preliminary geotechnical study.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has significant experience in the Battlement Mesa area, and on a preliminary
basis, provides the following recommendations for lightweight single and attached residential foundation
systems.
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore Foundation Recommendations: Assuming that some amount of
differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foundation system, possibly underlain
by up to 18 inches of structural fill (may be native, reworked soils) and placed in accordance with the
recommendations contained within this report, may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous
spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points
of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill,
may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of 1,500 psf maximum and 500 psfminimum.
Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely
important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within
± 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 150
psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend
somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single story, slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis
of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus one-half live load
for up to three stories.
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 5
If the potential effects of frost heaving are either mitigated or discounted, and if the design of the upper
structure is such that loads can be balanced reasonably well, and if minor amounts of differential settlement
can be tolerated, a floating structural slab or raft type of foundation could be used on this site. If the slab is
to be a floating structural slab (similar in appearance to the "monolithic" slab), the slab should be underlain
by a minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive and non frost-susceptible fill, placed in accordance with
recommendations contained in this report. Such a slab would require heavy reinforcing to resist differential
bending. This structural slab, using the granular structural fill as part of the foundation system, could be
designed assuming the top of the structural fill has a modulus of subgrade reaction ofk = 220 pci. If large
concentrated loads are located in the interior of this fill, or if minor construction problems are encountered
in the placement of the fill, the use of geosynthetic fabric or geogrid as part of the fill construction would
significantly improve the performance of the fill and foundation system.
It is possible to design either the floating structural slab or the raft type of slab either as a solid or ribbed slab,
but in either case a rimwall must be used for confinement. Any such slab must be specifically designed for
the anticipated loading. Such a foundation system will settle to some degree as the softer, underlying soils
consolidate, but differential movement is held to a minimum. Because the soils may settle in varying
amounts, some minor cracking and heave are possible unless the slabs are specifically designed with the
movement in mind.
Structural Fill/Soil Improvement: For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a
structural fill may be required to replace any upper metastable soils, low expansive soils, or to provide a non
frost heave-susceptible subgrade. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath
concrete slabs on grade. Any existing metastable soil, expansive soil, or frost susceptible soil beneath slabs
should be removed to a minimum depth up to 1-1/2 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation and
at least 2 feet below the bottom slab elevation for a thickened edge structural slab. The excavation/fill width
is to extend at least 16 inches from the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad
in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that
the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to ensure that an
adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the
proposed structural man-made fill.
At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, water soak the overexcavated portion of the site for
at least 1 day prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The purpose of
this wetting or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper
subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby
structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgrade soils are to be mechanically
compacted to a minimum of 86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) for
a depth of at least 6 inches.
Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non-expansive, non
free-draining, man-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared subgrade
soils. Non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the
geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and
GM/GW) or a gravelly sand ( -3/4 inch and SMISW). The structural fill should be placed in the
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 6
overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the
soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement.
These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor
optimum moisture content± 2% ).
Very low expansive to non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved
by the geotechnical engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be
placed as structural fill in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. These soils must not be over-
compacted but compacted wet of the soil's "optimum" moisture content. These soils should be placed at a
minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-
1557). These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being
wet of the optimum moisture content. These soils must be placed at optimum moisture content or up to 4%
over optimum moisture content.
The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting, or
puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the quality of
the compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2-foot vertical
intervals.
It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill,
at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill
beneath the structure.
Reinforcing: All foundation stemwalls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning
at least 1 0 feet. Where the foundation stemwalls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not
be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be
necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in
designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F .P) on the order of 55 pcf would be
appropriate for the native and the man-made fill soils.
Floor Slabs: Non-structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all
structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs
should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed
to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below
floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density
(ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction
(usually proctor optimum moisture content± 2%).
Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both
during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface
soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be
carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within I 0 feet of the building will depend
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 7
on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2% and that
landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts
be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of 10 feet away from the
structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require tbe use of subsurface piping in some
areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge" be used on this site unless specifically sited
by a geotechnical engineer. Planters, if any, should be constructed so that moisture is not allowed to seep
into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements.
The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water
be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of
the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the
backfill areas of adjacent buildings.
Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads,
irrigation piping, and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should
be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water does
not excessively wet the backfill soils.
It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable
saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible,
to include, but not be limited to:
• Metering the irrigation water.
• Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit onsite water usage.
• Encourage efficient landscaping practices.
• Enforcing reasonable limits on the size of high water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building
or foundation.
• Incorporating "xeriscaping" landscaping and irrigation techniques.
A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water
beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the foundation design
engineer or the geotechnical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed
from the crawlspace area.
Provided that all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil
compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished
basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture
related problems which can arise from subsequent area development.
Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all
backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum
modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). The only exception to this would be the components of the
perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be
placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 8
foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% ofits maximum modified proctor
dry density (ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required
compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2%).
Cement Type: Type II, Type 1-11, or Type II-V cement is recommended for all concrete in contact
with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type II, Type I-II, or Type II-V cement
under any circumstances.
Remarks: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a minimum of
3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be
placed on frozen soils.
Slope Stabilitv Analysis: Slope stability calculations were performed on the existing embankments
overlooking the stormwater detention pond. The stability analysis addresses the individual slope and the
"global" condition of the entire embankment. The soils were subjected to wetting due to lawn irrigation and
frequent use of the stormwater detention pond. Saturation ofthe lawn areas and the slope toe atthe detention
pond were modeled using the SEEP/W module. The analysis was performed using the PC software
SLOPE/W module within GeoStudio 2004, Version 6.19, Geo-Slope International LTD, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. The analysis utilized the Limit Equilibrium Theory for the factor of safety, incorporating the
following four methods.
Fellenius or Ordinary Method ~
Bishop Simplified Method ~
Janbu Simplified Method ~
Morgenstern-Price Method
Moment Equilibrium
Moment Equilibrium
Force Equilibrium
Moment and Force Equilibrium
The Morgenstern-Price Method, incorporating both Moment and Force Equilibrium Theory is generally
considered to be the more "accurate" of the four methods. The Fellenius or Ordinary, Bishop Simplified,
and the Janbu Simplified Methods are commonly utilized in older slope stability software and are included
for comparative purposes.
No seismic coefficient was assumed in these calculations. Several models were assumed for the existing
embankments. The critical model assumed that lawn irrigation would be excessive, causing seepage on the
upper slope and complete saturation of the slope toe area.
Based on slope stability calculations, the constructed fill slope is reasonably stable. The analysis indicated
that the embankments have a sufficient factor of safety, equal to or greater than 1.5.
The majority of low factors of safety indicate that the steeper slopes are "sloughing" under the conditions
of nearly saturated embankment fill.
Grace Homes
Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D
June 22, 2006 Page 9
Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner
or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the
attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is
his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out
these recommendations during construction. The fmdings of this report are valid as of the present date.
However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due
to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable
or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering
knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside
our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of3 years.
The recommendations ofthis report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that
the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable
conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned
on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental
recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. ·
Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings,
recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with
generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering.
Respectfully submitted,
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, INC.
GJLD Job# 92355-GJ
CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZON£
TWCE 1H£ 'MOTH OF 1HE ORIGINAL £XCAVA110N UIJIT
(VARICS -1J/N/IJUM OF 5 FffT FROM BU/LDJNG)
SOIL PRf:PMED 6• to 8" D&P TO LANDSCAPE.
USf 'LOW WArtR US[' Tl'PE PLANTS ond/r:u "xeRISCAPING"
TtCHNIQU£5 WITHIN 7H[ 'CRITICAL. DRAINAIE tONE'.
ROCJr OOi.,SPOUT-....
~ I
me NAn~ SOILS BELow THE
1
1
~ 1
1 'CRITICAL DRAJNAG£ ZONE.' TO B£ ' I ~-I RCWORI<E'O & COMPACTED FOR \
A MINIMUM OF 12 INCH£5 \ , n il
SC>L BACKALL ~ (ILL !HICKN£55 u -UFill !HICKN£55 I STRUCTURAL FILL
WA7ER s~~PAGE: ro \ 0.:. ~ ~ :. ~ 0.:. ~ ~ :. ~ ~:. ~ ~ 0oo / FILL TO EXTEND B£NEA TH COMPACTED TO MINIMIZE: ~
1H£FOUNDATION501L5 ~ \I ~G:o~~::o:o-: ·::o:o-:~; ALL FOUNDATION ELEMENTS. g: \ •. •• I ........... •• • ... ('.... •• •• • ···~ •• SEE NOTES
~ \ • • .,.,., • o • • • ..... o • • •• .AJJ. Poo
-="~-\ OOOOODODODOOOODD,••
EXcAvAnONl/MIT-'j~r;;r;.H·;;r;~.:.;"l GEDTEXTILE FABRIC :I \ eooooo .. o oooooeo oooooo0 /
INSTALL DRAIN 0:: \ •·." !'}_!<f!' .O;t!·".:~f~:_;_;•••, • such o.s Contech C-180
AS REQUIRED BY ENGINEER. or Mlrafl 500-X
5EE N01<S FOR DETAilS. ---AS REQUIRED
DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
' 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION
CRtnCAL DRAINAG£ ZON£
MC£ TH£ WIDTH OF 7H£ ORIGINAL £XC1t.VAT10N Ul.f/T
( VARII~S -1JIN/IJUM OF B Fff:T FRoM BUILDING )
SOIL PR£PARED 6" to 8" DEEP TO LANDSCAP£.
US£ 'LOW WA'JeR USE' TYPE PLANTS and/or •XfRISCAPING•
TECHNIOUES 'MTHIN 7HE 'CRIT1CAL DRAINAGF: ZONE'. ROOF DD,.,SP•OUT---..,
INSTALL DRAIN
AS REQUIRED BY ENGINEER.---
SEE N01<S FOR DETAILS.
GEDTEXTILE FABRIC
such as Contech C-180
or Mlrafl 500-X
AS REQUIRED
DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc.
GEOT>1CHN!dAL ENGINEERS-GEOLOGISTS
EXTERIOR DRAINAGE /
SCAle
NONE
LD#
LANDSCAPING CONCEPT
"''"' 9-16-2005
Fila I
D-DRAIN2
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
NO SCALE
SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Personnel Notes
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
SLOPE LOCATION DIAGRAM
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
OPEN SPACE
PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing
SKETCH From G.J.L.D . Field Personnel Notes
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
L_ TP~I
J..IH(i:),N Pc~~~
Tesr P,.,--s~l()·d6
S Hf-1
'HEPWbP..TH-PAWLAK..
Te,r B~I:.JN/1--9·16 -ch ..
NO SCALE
PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlem ent Mes a C olorado
GRACE HO M ES Inc. Date
Grand Junction, Colorado 6-1 7-2006
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
H
)
DEPT
(FT.
SOIL
LOG
-v
-
-
-5 -
-
-
-
-10 --
-
-
-15
H
)
DEPT
(FT.
-
~
~
~
~
SOIL
LOG
l\ -,
1
1l, -
5 -f---
-
-
-
-10 -
-
-
-
-15
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 1 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORTHEAST CORNER of SITE, LOT 24 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf %
CL LEAN CLAY Sl. SANDY
I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE Sl. MOIST
MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY ST 107.2 15.0%
STRATIFIED ND
Strata of LOW DENSITY 5 96.6 15.4%
CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANDY Sl. MOIST ST 103.7 10.7%
I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE MEDIUM DENSITY
Sl. MOIST Bulk 15.0%
MAN-MADE FILL 10
CL LEAN CLAY Sl. SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY
I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE SI.MOIST Bulk 13.3%
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15
P1t Total Depth: 12-1/2' NO Free Water Ourmg Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: SOUTH PORTION, LOT 24 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf %
CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. MOIST ND 100.5 13.2%
Sl. COMPRESSIBLE ST 105.3 10.4%
ALLUYIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 104.8 10.2%
ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP ND
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA LOW DENSITY 5 97.1 13.6%
ST 86.8 16.5%
STRATIFIED
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
PitTotal Depth: 4' NO Free Water Dur~ng Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
H DEPT
(FT. )
-'
-
-
-5 -'
-
-
-
-10 -
-
-
-
-15
DEPT
(FT. )
H
_I
-
_0
-5 -
-
-
-
-10 -
-
-
-
-15
SOIL
LOG
' I
'
I I
SOIL
LOG
I
I ·~
2
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 3 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 25 & 26 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION lpsf pel %
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING DRY
ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf
ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY NO 88.3 10.1%
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA DRY ST 6.2%
STRATIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY 5 100.4 9.6%
NO
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pot Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water Durong Observatoon: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Proper!)'_ Line LOT 27 & 28 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION IPsf pcf %
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING Sl. DAMP
ML SANDY SILT
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Strata of LOW DENSITY MOIST NO 89.1 19.5%
ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY ST 84.1 9.0%
STRATIFIED 5
MOISTURE ACCUMULATION ABOVE 3'
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pot Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water Durmg Observatoon: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
3
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 5 SHEAR SOIL
DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 14 & 15 Torvane DENSITY WATER
(FT.) LOG DESCRIPTION jpsf pel %
-'\/~ CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY ND 110.3 11.2%
-t ·t'
DRY ST 106.8 6.9%
-ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ND 89.1 12.7%
5-·-STRATIFIED 5
-
-
-
10-10 --
-ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE -NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15-15
Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 6 SHEAR SOIL
DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORTH PORTION, LOT 23 Torvane DENSITY WATER
(FT.) OG DESCRIPTION psi pel %
-I _, ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY
I COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Sl. DAMP NO 89.8 18.1% I Ill -I ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 15.6%
5-1 I MEDIUM DENSITY 5 ·-STRATIFIED -I
-I Strata of LOW DENSITY
'~ ML SANDY SILT DRY ND 92.2 8.1% -Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA MEDIUM DENSITY ST 96.6 4.6%
10-·-10
-
-
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE -NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15-15
Pit Total Depth: 8' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Col!Jrado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
H
)
DEPT
(FT.
SOIL
LOG
_I I
I
-
-
-5 -
-
-
-
-10 -
-
-
-
-15
DEPT
(FT. )
H
I I
I~~
SOIL
LOG
-1-S< -
I ~I'll -
-5 -
-
-
-
-10 -
-
-
-
-15
4
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 7 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 22 & 23 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION [psf _I)Cf %
CUT AREA for SITE GRADING
ML SANDY SILT
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ND 92.2 9.4%
ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 81.1 13.4%
Sl. EXPANSIVESTRATA@4' 645 psf@2.1%Swell 5 93.2 6.0%
107.5 6.9%
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
ND NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
P1t Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water Dunng Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. IS SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 20 & 21 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf J:>cf %
MAN-MADE FILL
CL LEAN CLAY Sl. SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP ND 95.8 15.2%
II Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 2' 286 psf@ 0.7% Swell ST 106.3 13.2%
Strata of LOW DENSITY ND 89.3 11.5%
ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY 5 99.2 4.7%
Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ST
ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
P1t Total Depth: ' 4 NO Free Water Dunng Observation: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
H
)
DEPT
(FT. -· -
-
SOIL
LOG
I
I 1
5 -,.
/ -
-
-
-
-10 -
-
-
-
-15
H
)
DEPT
(FT.
-
-
-
-5 -
-
-
-
-10 --
-
-
SOIL
LOG
~~
-15
5
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 9 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 18 & 19 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION [psi pet %
MAN-MADE FILL
ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY Sl. DAMP
II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ND 87.6 14.9%
ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY ST 90.7 11.0%
CL-ML SILTY CLAY LOW DENSITY 5
II a Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 5' 62 psf@ 0.3% Swell DRY ND 94.5 10.1%
MEDIUM DENSITY ST 89.6 4.1%
. Strata of LOW DENSITY 97.0 6.1%
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
Pot Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water Durmg Observatoon: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
EXPLORATION PIT NO. 10 SHEAR SOIL
PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 16 & 17 Torvane DENSITY WATER
DESCRIPTION psf pet %
MAN-MADE FILL ND 110.3 14.4%
CL LEAN CLAY MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP
I COMPRESSIBLE Strata of LOW DENSITY ND 87.5 19.6%
ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 109.0 7.8%
ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY 5
II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA
10
ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE
NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE
15
P1t Total Depth: ' 3-1/2 NO Free Water Durmg Observatoon: 5-10-2006
Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J.
LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc.
Geotechnical Consultants
Grand Junction, Colorado
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRACE HOMES Inc.
Grand Junction, Colorado
Job No. Drawn
92355-GJ EMM
Date
6-17-2006
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) 51. Sandy Sample No.: I (Typical) 1
Geologic Ori!ijin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 10.7% Pit No.: 1 Depth: 5'
In-Place Density (pcf): 103.7 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTio CLAY
100
!"-. Effective size mm
90 Cu
Cc
80 -
70
Plastic Limit (PL) 1Jl.
Liquid Limit (LL) .all
0> 60-Plasticity Index (PI) 12
c Skempton's Activity 0.3 "iii
l(l 50 -Shrinkage Limit (SL)
0.. -Shrinkage Ratio ~ 40 \ Q)
0.. 30
20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 w. 12.5 9.5 4.~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0-uJJi, 0.02 0.005
Particle Grain ize {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pel pel
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell
3/4" 19 B~ SamJller Displacement 300 psi: psf
1/2" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 Unconfined Compression (qu): ~sf
#20 0.85 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
#40 0.425 100 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 99 CONSOLIDATION: @ psi
#200 0.075 94.2 SULFATE SALTS: <SO ppm
0.02 42 PERMEABILITY:
0.005 30 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec ~
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa,_ Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: I (Typical) 2
Geoloeic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test b~: LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 7.8% Pit No.: 10 Depth: 2'
In-Place Density (pel}: 109.0 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTto CLAY
100 -....., Effective size mm
90 :\.. Cu
"' Cc
80
70
Plastic Limit (PL) 19
Liquid Limit (LL) 35
OJ60 Plasticity Index (PI) 16
c: Skempton's Activity 0.4 ·u;
~ 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL)
0.. Shrinkage Ratio -' m 40 u \ ~
Q)
0.. 30
20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 -Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0 Cohesion: psi 125 75 50 37.5 25 \?, 12.5 9.5 4~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 O.g]Ji, 0.02 0.005
Particle Grain ize {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 • 0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pel pel
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell
3/4" 19 By Samgler Displacement 300 psi: psi
1/2" 12.5 2-1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: psi Remolded Sample
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psi by Consolidometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psi by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): est
#20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psi
#40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psi
#100 0.15 94 CONSOLIDATION: @ psi
#200 0.075 85.3 SULFATE SALTS: <50 ppm
0.02 44 PERMEABILITY:
0.005 34 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @..._g£f
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II (Typical) 3
Geologic Ori9in: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test b~: LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 13.2% Pit No.: 8 Depth: 2'
In-Place Density (pel): 106.3 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY
100
~ Effective size mm
90 1\ Cu
Cc
80 ' Plastic Limit (PL) 20
70 \ Liquid Limit (LL) 29
0)60 Plasticity Index (PI) ~
1:: \ Skempton's Activity 0.2 '(ij
~ 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL)
0.. -1\ Shrinkage Ratio a3 40 -\ e
(])
0.. 30
20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 Shear Angle: deg. I
Tan Shear:
0
125 75 50 37.5 25 1\l, 12.5 9.5 4.~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 O.gJJi, 0.02 0.005
Particle Grain ize {mm}
Cohesion: psf
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 -0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 0.7% Swell
3/4" 19 Bl£ Sam~ler Displacement 300 psi: 286 psf
1/2" 12.5 2-112'' Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): psf
#20 0.85 99 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
#40 0.425 98 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 94 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#200 0.075 73.2 SULFATE SALTS: <50 ppm
0.02 44 PERMEABILITY:
0.005 32 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @......pff
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa_, Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
Soil Sample: SILTY CLAY (CL-ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II a (Typical) 5
Geolo9ic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test bf LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 4.1% Boring NC'Jo.: 9 Depth: 5'
In-Place Density (pel): 89.6 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL ~AND ~ICI tO ~LAT
100 r-..... Effective size mm
90 ~ Cu
"' ~ Cc
80 \
Plastic Limit (PL) 22
70
\ Liquid Limit (LL) 28
rn60 Plasticity Index (PI) ~
c \ Skempton's Activity 0.1 "iii
~ 50 ' Shrinkage Limit (SL)
0.. Shrinkage Ratio -c 40 1\ ~
Q)
0.. 30
20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 ~· 12.5 9.5 4.~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 ow.w, 0.02 0.005
article Grain ize {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 • 0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pel pel
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
1" 25 Size Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 0.3% Swell
3/4" 19 B~ Sam12ler Displacement 300 psi: 62 psf
1/2" 12.5 2-112'' Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): ESf
#20 0.85 99 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf
#40 0.425 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#100 0.15 87 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf
#200 0.075 75.4 SULFATE SALTS: <50 ppm
0.02 40 PERMEABILITY:
0.005 28 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @.__Qg
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
Soil Sample: LOW PLASTIC SILT (ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: Ill (Typical) 4
Geolo9ic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test br LRS
Natural Water Content (w): 6.0% Pit No.: 7 Depth: 3'
In-Place Density (pel): 93.2 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated
COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILT to CLAY
100 -.. 1\. Effective size mm
90 Cu ' Cc
80--
70
Plastic Limit (PL) 20
Liquid Limit (LL) 22
0)60 Plasticity Index (PI) ~
c Skempton's Activity 0.1 'iii
lG 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL) o._
Shrinkage Ratio -5i 40 u
~ \ Q)
o._ 30 -\
20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD
Peak Res.
10 Shear Angle: deg.
Tan Shear:
0 Cohesion: psi 125 75 50 37.5 25 ~~. 12.5 9.5 4.~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 ow&, 0.02 0.005
Particle Grain ize {mm}
Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP:
5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698A D 4718-0% Rock Correction
3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pel pel
2" 50 Optimum Moisture :
1-112" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell:
1" 25 SizeAIIOW§d 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 2.1% Swell
3/4" 19 By Samlll§r Displacement 300 psi: 645 psi
1/2" 12.5 2-112" Expansion @ 300 psi: psi Remolded Sample
3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer
#4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psi by Penetrometer
#10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (qu): ~sf
#20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psi
#40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psi
#100 0.15 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psi
#200 0.075 86.6 SULFATE SALTS: <50 ppm
0.02 36 PERMEABILITY:
0.005 22 K (20 C): Remolded em/sec @..._Qg
SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D
Battlement Mesa, Colorado
GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date
LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006
Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn
Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM
VALLEY VIEW Sub. BATTLEMENT MESA, CO.
FILLED SLOPE OVERLOOKING STORM DETENTION POND
923551nigated.gsz 812712006
SEEP Transient 20
10 I--10
o L--~l ~I __ J~JI __ ~I ~I __ IL-~I ~IL-~1 ~1--~I JI __ ~I ~I --L-1~1 ~1--~IJI __ ~I ~I --~1 ~1 ~0
0 tO 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 I tO 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 21 0 220 230 240 250
FEET -View is to We st
BASIC PROBLEM
SLOPE OVERLOOKING THE STORM WATER DETENTION POND, SEEP\ W ANALYSIS
VALL EY VIEW Sub. BATTLEM ENT MESA, CO.
FILLED SLOPE OVIERLOOKING STORM DETENTION POND
92355 Stabilize lnigaled.gsz 612712006
SEEP Tran sient 2D
n _____5----J_ 0
~; o::~oo " w~ 0
~ ~~ ~~ w
!<::> 0 ~ ~0, I I iL ~!!: iil ~ ~g; ~~ <U> -
!!," ~ ~ ... -0~ 0 -0 ~~ II""' •-wvw~ o w 0 -NATIVE SILT ~8 z
00 00
" occ. li:AN (;lAy II ---~ r l -u oro ro
0
(") ...,.., .. ~ ~--
•v I ,~;-/ :::-. -~00 00 +
c: -i.VELS & IIOUlDERS I
I -Rro ro ~ • .,,.. ""' • DUP lA 40'-30'1 fRE8 WATER TAll& DEVELOP$ & occ.LEAN ClAY
TO PROIItOI! A STARTING POINT rut< "'c """". lllltftlN.I.t OROUN6
SURF ACt! ~~ ~ w
I
1-30 30 w w
LL. 20 20
1--ro ro
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0
o 10 20 30 ~ ro oo 10 eo oo 100 110 120 130 1~ 1ro 100 110 100 100 200 210 220 230 2~ 2ro
FEET -View is to West
SEEP\W ANALYSIS The Site has been developed, the Yard areas are Landscaped and HEAVILY
IRRIGATED. Standing Water is in Front Yard and Seepage is occurring on Slope leading to the Pond. The
Storm Water Detention Pond is heavily used, due to Storm Runoff and Irrigation Runoff. T he soils beneath
the Pond and at the Toe ofthe Slope are SATURATED in about 20 feet into the TOE.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, I nc.
GEOTECIINICAL ENGINEERS -GEOLOGISTS
Figu re I
VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE Phase C & D
GJLD # 92355-GJ, June 28, 2006
c:
.Q
~
iii
' 1-w w u.
VALLEY VIEW Sub. BATILEMENT MESA. CO.
FIUEO SLOPE OVERLOOKING STORM DETENTION POND
92355 Stabilize Irrig ated Slopo.gu 6/2812006
SLOPE MOlgenstem-Price 20
• .
• • ••. 023tt • . . . . . . . .
. ~1 · ...
II!~ ~;
158
"'
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 11 0 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240
FEET -View is to West
SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and
the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1. (F.S. = 1.023) is shown.
0
0
(')
It)
+
We recommend the Pond Sides be well compacted, to preve nt this mode led deep penetrati on of water into
the Slope Toe.
VALLEY VIEW Sub. BATTLEMENT MESA, CO.
FILLED SLOPE OVERLOOKING STORM DETENTION POND
92355 Stabilize Irrigated Slope.gsz 6/2812006
SLOPE Morgenslem-Prtce 20 . ..
0:
•
• •
• • •
10 20 30 40 50 00 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 21 0 220 230 240
FEET -View is to West
SLOPE\ W ANALYSIS The previou s SEEP\ W analysis was utilized for the soil moi sture parameters and
the most extensive failur e at or near a Factor of Safety of 1.5 (F.S. = 1.494) i s shown. The computed failure
surface is more than 40 feet from the structure and foundation.
GRAND JUNCTION
LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc.
GEOTECHNICA L ENGINEERS · GEOLOGISTS
Figure II
VALLEY VIEW VILLA GE Ph as e C & D
GJLD # 92355 -GJ, Jun e 28, 2006
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING PERMIT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at __.!)"'--"--0=-9-_</,__--"-~----#7"'7-"'-~-=:..."'-"'---~----',=----=-· __
Permit No. _---L/....::t{)c..::;2'--'-L(_3=-----------
I have this day inspected this structure and these J premises and found the following corrections needed:
~w~~~
~1~t1~
2) jw7·~ 1f'1 521 ~1L
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When corrections have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date ---"3=--+-/_1'----~-20 {) 1
Building lnsp!ctOr -~/Jct"""""':£""'4-<"";j_<f-' --'~---'-->=0""""=-=----
Phone (970) 945-8212
No. ~I O~ZJ=t-J-~8~-Assessor's Parcel No. 2}1-o 7-I~/-0 4 -Qz_ J
Date I!-7-"¥-QLQ
BUILDING PERMIT CARD '"flc_}uLJ_.L
Job Address oov+ c I Iff Ill et.D U0 Lot z_} \/a/Jih( Vttw) UUJafl= Ph· b
ownerlx:n=±er, (~L{ Address1<'ol.P. Yr:U!.R4 C+ Phone# :52...3-.s~~
Contractor 6 Vl2\-f Q_ ~ Address braM ,JiJnChan ~e # ___ _
Setbacks: Front Rear _____ RHt _____ LH _____ Zoning -----
-s[-f 1._.10 ~ ()y~n pC'-·rho ~ INSPECTIONS cL -\-=1--, ~ 0~~
Soils Test __ ~-~-~-----Weatherproofing ___________ _
Footing ---~~..lb,\\--4€,-==fi-h<lcllf-t='---Mechanical'--------r:t-o,.,-=,----
Foundation, ___ _,, __ ~~-IJ---·-____ Electrical Rough (State) --~~:,;;:_1_ ___ _
Grout ______ ~~~=----Electri9a1 Final (State)l-_2:::.-..&::::.'ll~'---:-:-1~=--
Underground Plumbing 1-3-CJ/f}vrl Final v-fo1 /Checklist Completed?~e2..!~-
Rough Plumbing :;! -Z/ ·D 7 /9??! Certificate Occupancy # _S~Q..;,'i::L_ _____ _
Framing ;3-I~-~:> L ,@r1\_ Date '·1·0 "+ ,
Insulation d-ZtJ-67 Wi Septic System # __ --,--11~/Jtt:-------Roofing_~~=~~...,..,..,.,C7r----Date v&1
Drywall 5'-;;23-o?fV'I'VC Final __________ _
Gas Piping :J.-U-o7 ;(}w~.-Other---------------
lluc.cl ~ "'tJ w~ ~ ~
~ ~ pel_ ~ ~ +--v~"
v~OV'-' "po-l C. .0 ·
•xT.RIOR
Address No.-------------
Drainage--------------
Decks-support & clearance to wood ------
Decks-stairs & ralls -----------
Exterior locks------------
Flashing around doors & windows-------
Insect screens ___________ _
INT.RIOR
GARAGE
fire wall separation __________ _
Service doors-1~" min.-----,------
Door (20 min.) w/auto closer-til" min. ____ _
Mech. equip. 18" above floor _______ _
No opening Into sleeping area _______ _
BASEMENT-CRAWL AREA
Access _____________ _
Insulation-------------
Headroom/Stairs ___________ _
Ventilation--'-----------
FINAL CH.CKLIST
MECHANICAL ROOM
Bolter· ___________ _
Hot water _________ _
F.A. gas/oil _________ _
Floor drain _________ _
Clearance•----------
Air con. system•---------
Hot water heater--------
Combustion air ________ _
Gas piping, valves ______ c__
LPG Drain----------
FIREPLACE/STOVE
Clearance to combustibles _____ _
Termination ol chimney• ______ _
Combustion air ________ _
Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) ____ _
Glass doors _________ _
Certified bY•----'-------
REMARKS
(continue on back)
STAIRWAYS
Headroom (6'6") ----------
Railing & guardrails---------
Width•-------------
Rise & run------------
KITCHEN
Clearance above grill ________ _
Exhaust fan __________ _
Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase)-------
BEDROOMS
Egress ____________ _
Smoke detector----------
BATHROOMS
Exhaust fan __________ _
ShaHerproof glass _______ ~
OTHER
1
~
-l
I
" ·------~
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issued.J.J}a_{~~ .. Zoned Area ............................... Permit No ...... l0..M.~3 ........ .
AGREEMENT
lu consideration oftbe issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
lnspecto,nd IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
~:·d~rL€,!:£tio~~"'cn¥tv~1ii fi'a~ .tf ..
Owne:):>0 ct,...,~LL~ Contra<lor~C&. hN$
Setbacks Front Side Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From Tbe Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD I
Footing Driveway !
Foundation
Underground Plumbiug,p J·3·t:.~ /...,. Insulation 3 j:u; /~ 7 ,fin{
Rough Plumbing,y. ;:J''::IH'-.7 "1;1-Y' L\IV\ Drywall 2j1-~jD7 AdnL
Chimney & Vent IJ-IS'D1 fJ1vl-Electric Final (by State Inspector) ~.}i?/-c
Gas Piping* ;:;)-;;ll-o?-rz:JDYV\ /1 Final b -(-0 7 fdrv\.. /
Electric Rough (By State Inspector)~ Septic Final
Framing 1.-'f [;' --tJ 7 f.'ml-Notes:
(To include Roof in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Dat3/7[b7 By F'J/-rs
IF PLACED OUTSIDE -COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
~
Parcel Detail Page I of 3
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Ass~ssorf'l):t>!lSLlrerPropert)'St><trcb I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search
Clerk &:J~ecorder Recep_tion"Search
Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail I Photographs
I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I
I o8o II R043094 II 240718104021 II 51.771 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
IDARTERLLC I
1786 VALLEY COURT I
!GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 I
Legal Description
lsECT,TWN,RNG:18-7-95 SUB:VALLEY I
IVIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C & D I
ILOT:21 PRE:R040986 BK:586 PG:524
IBK:0615 PG:0487 BK:1812 PG:167
IRECPT:700392 BK: 1807 PG:663
IRECPT:699425 BK: 1767 PG:909
IRECPT:691345 BK:l767 PG:899
IRECPT:691343 BK:l767 PG:887
IRECPT:691342 BK:1756 PG:427
IRECPT:688665 BK: 1756 PG:422
IRECPT:688664 BK:1754 PG:986
IRECPT:688326 BK:1546 PG:979
IRECPT:643048 BK:1546 PG:964
IRECPT:643045 BK:1546 PG:954
IRECPT:643041 BK:1546 PG:946
IRECPT:643039 BK:1518 PG:822
http://www .garcoact.corn!assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=2407181 04021 7/24/2006
Parcel Detail
\RECPT:636574 BK:0748 PG:0893
\BK:0642 PG:0065 BK:0641 PG:0278
Location
I Physical Address: jj24 CLIFF VIEW CIR PARACHUTEj
I Subdivision: I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE SUB
PHASESC&D
Land Acres: j 0
Land Sq Ft: jj9,017 I
Section II Township II Range I
18 II 7 II 95 I
Property Tax Valuation Information
II Actual Value II Assessed Value I
I Land: II s,ssoll 1,7001
I Improvements: IJ oil 0
I Total: II s,ssoll 1,7001
II
Sale Date: I
Sale Price: I
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential lo I Buildings:
Number of Commllnd jo I Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
No Tax Records Found
TopotPagt:!
AssG.ssor.Dat<tbas.G .. Search.Optiovs I TIGilsJlreLDataJ:mse.Sear<::h_Qptions
Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options
http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=2407181 04021
Page 2 of 3
7/24/2006