Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 tl" Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 I NO . 10259 I I ,. GARFI E LD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLIC ATIO N 108 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I Ins pection Line: 970-384-5003 • Pennlt No : 4 r .... ""f . ., l o~sq Parce l/Sch edule No: "~9~14 l0 \0ll Job Address: Lot No: E!ock No: 2 Owner: 3 4 5 6 Use of Buil ding: 7 Describe Work: 8 Cl ass of Work: 0 9 Garage: 0 10 0 11 12 0 A SEPARAT E E L ECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTR1Jr.TION AUTHORIZED I S NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR. IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK I S COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER S PECI FI ED HEREIN OR NOT. T HE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT P i ME TO GIVE AUTHORI1Y TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL TilE PROVISI S F ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LA\' GULATING CONSTR N OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CON UCTION. C ar .b~&.~ t~ Zo ning: M a nu . H ome: AGREEMENT 0 S ingl e 0 Double Date d Penull Iss ued: Const. Type: Setb acks : ISDS No . & Fee: f,s (Je..-n 0\ ~ PERM ISSION I S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPEC IFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE B UILDING D EPARTMENT. I N CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORI1Y GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTIIER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WTrn IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION , AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM TH E COUNTY AND THAT T H EN AND TH ERE IT SHALL B EC OME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPEC IFICATIONS AND OTHE R DATA SHALL NOT PREV ENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLAN S. SPECIFICATIONS AND OT HER DATA OR FRO M PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VI OLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATION S AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNIY FOR ERRORS. O MISSI ONS OR DISCREPEN CIES . TH E RESPO NSI BILITY FO R THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFI CIALLY \VITH T H E ARTICTECT. DESIGNER. B UILDER. AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. ~-.. O~vt J HE/;/z~/;7;HAT I HAVEREADANDUNDERSTAND l5d$N6qVEt'~3tf a-I d-olo ~ 1-7 z _o. 7/ v k=# B 3 3 1 c.h*l~43 ~--ey~ ~e__ I The following items are r equired by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Elec trical Inspector ; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where r eadily vi s ible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house , complete exterior si ding, exterior doors and windows ins talled, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a s ink with hot & cold runnin g water, no n-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and fin is hed walls , ready for s to ve and refri ge rato r, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be compl ete, w ith washbowl, tub or shower, to il et stool, hot and cold runnin g water, non-absorbent floors and wall s finishe d and a privacy d oor; 5 . All steps outside or ins ide over three (3) steps must have handrail s, guard ra ils o n balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to a ll IBC and IR C re quirements; 6. Outs id e gradi ng done to where water will detour away from the b uilding; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and gradin g may be made upon th e demons tration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until a ll the required it ems are completed and a f in al inspection made; 8 . A final inspection s ign off by th e Garfield Coun ty Road & Bridge D epartm ent for driveway install ati o n, where app li cable; as well as a ny final si gn off by the Fire District, and/or State A ge ncies where appli cable . A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Wll.L NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. . ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR U SE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OFOCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. Wll.L BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditi ons fo r occupank , use a nd the issuan ce of a Certifi cate o f Occupancy r the dwellin g under b uilding permit # ~D a 5Cj ( S igna ture Da te B papplicati onfe b2006 , VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Subdivision lfr.~{j;r..__, --e.o (\_\ t~ ~f t Lot/Block !;I _ -M€--5"~ Contractor~~ Drz.s;1A. FinishedM~~~e ff;?'~q 3 X 7tf q-:. ~ J q 3 (t? C/J 24:- Upper (.a ( 7 J I 1 1 Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: -b 0 Unfinished / LfJ ~ /;{ J/ / C)_o __ fl S q 3 {o <? ~ Conversion ofUnfmished to Finish~d Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garaee: 0 3'-f X. l ~~ -;:;~ /J (( /2. 0L Valuation _ Crawl Space: 537" -1'9 ~ -_l?.;,g (}~ !E- Valuation t Decks/Patios: -{l Covered J-.j () s-.( 2 C/ QE --;:;:_ 1_ 7 20 o.JL Valuation 1 Open l2() X I 2_~-:::.. ~(/l.fo o0 Valuation 1 ~'AC~ ~uwtl ~~­ vALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Subdivision /!'h.~·-Q.o ~(' t~ ~ f t_ Lot/Block tA . fl\e.sq, Contractor~~ 'Des-;1t7L ~xifLNtt Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: t6 0 Unfinished / '!/ ~ tJ J/ / tJi? ~-' S Cf 3 fo <? ~ Conversion ofUnfm.ished to Finisli&d Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation GarMe: ~ 3<-f X. ( ~~--::;.~ / (( /2. 0L Valuation / Crawl Space: 637' --1'9 ~ -_lfJ;g ()(;; !2-- Valuation t Decks/Patios: · fl Covered If() s-.( 2 c.f C2Q --=::. 1. 7 20 o.JL- Valuation 1 Open l2c; X 12...'2-." ~ ~Lillo o0 Valuation 1 Total Valuation t )U;fCf1'1 df I $~B'01 3 c; I~ r~j ~/h,P 3 ?,/2. I~ "'-~ '[#~ 380/ 85 4B1.7L 4800 97ZO GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. I Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line ~nd original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure( s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building e elope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the velope. Yes_*--- 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes tJA 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent proyerties), streams or water courses? Yes _ __,!L_,___ 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes t/ 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Y es'---y;r"---- 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes ~,/ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soj;}its? Yes __ ...,L:.._ __ _ 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes V 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction?/ Yes t- I 0. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof r~s or joists or trusses? Yes V ---'----- 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns anft beams? Yes V ·----"----- 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flay;oof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes._-'V"'---- 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No V 3 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to .comply with thy..IRC? Yes L/' No _____________ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes ,/ No _____ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and venJilation for all habitable rooms? Yes V No ___________ _ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify ;afety glazing for these areas? Yes ~ No ______ _ Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated oonn Jl<e plan? Yes ../ No ------ Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? ./ Yes \!" No ------ Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted ~out it. Yes ~~ No __________ _ Will this be t~nly residential structure on the parcel? Yes v No Ifno-Explain: _________ _ Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes / Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? / Yes ~ No ----- 4 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. Have you~esi ed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructio ode requirements? Yes No ----- Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone di§irict? Yes ~ No ______ _ Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection b)Ythe Garfield County Building Department? Yes <./' No _____ _ Do you underst nd that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicati of these changes? Yes No _____ _ Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road pact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building pe Yes No _____ _ Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 38¥5003. Yes b~ No _____ _ Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $59.00 re-inspection fee? Yes 1L No _____ _ Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of t!Je building? Yes ~ No ______ _ Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? - Yes 1/ No _____ _ 5 33. .Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at ~-~1; Yes V lA-No ______ _ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time applicable inspection. Yes No ______ _ 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building pe~plication? Your attention in t.his is appreciated. Yes ~ -No ______ ~-- 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) tJ/ ft- 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? / Yes ---"-V __ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best pf my abir ·" Phone: Cf7{) · 6\'b'-Oo\10 (days); Project Name: Gv'/ V111-,l...f -kJ1 II ((fM 0 CXJ?'i Project Address:~ {)~ \oA·do~ Date _Ct,--"l"ff>l.l--:__9,_£ 3<L·...::::~:__,~3~1 __ ( evenings) Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqFeb2005 7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant Gi~ Date //•31 ·0(£ Building ~ngin eere d Foundation ~Drivewa y Permit ..---surveyed Site Pl an ~ Septic Permit and Setbacks ~Grade!Topograph y 30% _'-'1\t:tach Residential Plan Revi ew List -~imum Appli cation Questionnaire _v·stibdivision Plat Notes -~re Departmen t Rev ie w ~aluation Determination/Fees ~ed Lin e Plans/Stamp s/Sticker _.....-1\Uach Condition s ~pli cat ion Signe d -~R ev i ewer T o Sign Application _~eel/S c hedule No. __ 40# Snowload Lettef-Manf. Hm s. _ _.....------S-==-oil s Rep ort GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Planning Iss ue s __ Su bdi visio n Plat No tes ·~tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SIJBSOIL STVDY !-lepwonh~?av:lal: Geo[e.:hnicai. b.:. 5022 Coun::T RoaO 1.54 Gienwoad s·:dnes. Coiorcd0 S! OOJ Phone: 97~--9~.:'-795.5 Fax: 97"::--94:.-S-;.54 email: hpgeo@hpgemecf:.corr. FOR FOL'NDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT RFM-11, ROARING FORK MESA AT ASPEN GLEN 285BROOKIE GARFIELD COVl\'TY, COLOR<\.DO JOB NO. 106 0298 MAY 10,2006 PREPARED FOR: GUY VITALE c/o G & M DISTRIBL'TERS, INC P.O. BOX509 GALESBURG, IL 61401 TABLE OF CONTE:'\15 Pl!lU'OSE /LND SCOPE OF STIJDY ............................................................................ -1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTJON ..................................................................................... -1 - SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... -2- S"l.JBSIDENCE POTENTIAL ......................................................................................... -2 - FIELD EXPLOR.A.TION ................................................................................................. -3- SUBSTJRF ACE CONDITJONS ...................................................................................... -3 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. -4- FOill\'DATIONS ......................................................................................................... -4- FOill\'DATION /LND RETAThTING WALLS ............................................................ -5- FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... -6- UNDER.DRAIN SYSTEM .......................................................................................... -7- SURF ACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................. -7- LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... -8- REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ -9- F!GlJR.E 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3-LEGEJ\'D Al\'D NOTES FIGURE 4-SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE _.<Ll'iD SCOPE OF STCDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot RFM-11, Roaring Fork Mesa at Aspen Glen, 285 Brookie, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Guy Vitale dated March 30, 2006. Chen-Northern, Inc. previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical engineering study for the development and another geotechnical engineering study for preliminary plat design under their Job No. 4 112 92, dated December 20, 1991 and May 28, 1993, respectively. Preliminary geotechnical reco=endations for the current proposed residence were presented in a letter dated March 31, 2006, Job No. 106 0298. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a partial basement level and crawlspace. The attached garage and basement floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depilis berween abou: 3 to 14 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job No. 1 05 588 -2- If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CON""IHTIONS The site was vacant at the time of our field exploration. There could be some minor fill on the lot from overlot grading as part of the subdivision development. The ground surface slope in the building area is moderate down to the east-southeast at grades up to about 8%. There is about 4 to 5 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building area. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. Scattered cobbles are exposed on the ground surface. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock ofthe Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous studies in the area, several broad subsidence areas and smaller size sinkhole areas were observed mainly on the east side of the Roaring Fork River in the Aspen Glen development (Chen-Northern, Inc., 1993). These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sirikholes "ill not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot M-Il throughout the seiYice life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the OV>'Iler should be made aware Job No. I 05 588 0 -;) - of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLOR>\..TION The field exploration for the project was conducted on April 10, 2006. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure I to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I. D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE COl\'DITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about \1, foot of topsoil overlying medium stiff to stiff, slightly sandy to sandy silty clay. Relatively dense, slightly silty sandy gravel with cobbles and possible boulders was encountered beneath the clays at depths of 13 and 18\1, feet. A layer of loose to medium dense, silty sand was encountered between about 15 and 1 8\--', feet in Boring 1. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, density and finer than sand size gradation ar1alyses. Results of swell- -4- consolidation testing performed on relatively undisrurbed drive samples, presented on Figure 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions ofloading and wetting. The samples sbowed a minor expansion potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table l. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 21 days later and the subsoils were slightly moist. DESIGN RECOMME.NDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about I inch or less. There could be some additional settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assurnin_g an unsupported length of at least 12 -5- feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the finn natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION .A..ND RETAJNING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to m leas1 90%, of the mz.xi.c-r:rum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and wal1. .. way areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor -6- density. Care should be taken nor to overcompa:::t the backfill or use large equipment near the walL since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on rhe wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wali backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab- on-grade construction. The clay soils have variable settlement/heave potential which could result io some slab movement and distress if the bearing soils become wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 L"lCh aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No.4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieYe. -7- All fill materials for suppon of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation and topsoil. UN"'DERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area and where clay soils are present that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least l foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain Jess than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel bacl.-fill should be at least 1 'iS feet deep. An impervious membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURF ACE DRidNAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisrure and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor densitY in -8 - pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Irrigation sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings d.rilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOB C) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for t.l]e exclusive use by our client for design purposes. \\-e are not responsible for technical interpretaTions by others of our informmion. As t'Je project evolves, we should provide cominned consultation and field se;Yices during ~---------------------~----- -9- construction to review and monitor the implementation of ou~ recommenciacions, and w verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommenciations presented herein~ ~We recommend on-site obsen·ation of exca\·ations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P .E~ JZAJkmm cc: Charles Cunniffe Architects -Attn: J anver Derrington REFERENCES Chen-Northern, Inc~, 1991, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Gmjield Countv, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated December 20, 1991, Job No~ 4 112 92. Chen-Northern, L'lc~, 1993, Geotechnical Engineering Study for Preliminary Plat Design, Aspen Glen Development, Gm:field County, Color-ado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated May 28, 1993, Job No~ 4 112 92~ I lvioisture Content = 12.0 perc ent ~ 1 Dry Density = 120 pcf 5 Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay -~ From: Boring 1 at 5 Feet ffi D. 0 " w ' ~ ~ c: 0 ·u; 1 <n '\ !1! I', D. E 0 2 u Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ks! Moisture Content = 6.6 percent ~ 1 Dry Density = 115 pcf c: Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay 0 ·a; c: From: Boring 2 at 5 Feet "' §t 0 w ~ ' c: ~ 0 ·u; 1 !"-.. <n "' \ "' D. E 0 u 2 Expansion upon wetting I I I 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -vs! 106 0298 c~&tech HEPWOR'Il+PAWl...AK GEOTECHNICAL SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 SAMPLE LOCATION ~RIN:-\ DEPTH 1 I 5 10 l NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT NATURAL DRY DENSITY HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS GRADATION GRAVEL SAND (%) (%) PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATIERBERG LIMITS LIQ:_riD PLASTIC LIMIT INDEX _i% .l'Yol UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) Job No. lOG 0298 SOIL Oil BEDROCK TYPE 120 i I _1 Sandy Sii!X ~lny___ _ ___ _ !--12.0 ! 12.3 1 0?. 94 1-· -1 1---l-Sii¥~!~~'>nndy_~_illy_(=I;IJ'. -···----·-----·····• I I --\----·-----······--·--·-----·-··· G.G \ 115 \ I 14 I I ~111dy Silly Clay __ 2 __ ~ __ 5_ -·---·-~-__.! 10.9 114 ~ ----~~~~:i;~<;il!~C~I~IY _ __ -------------·---------- --1-----I I I 1-----1---------·-··--···········-·········· ····· --+-I -f I 1--·--------- · ----1---1 I I ---·--1----··-----------·· . -----·-----1 -I I I 1--1----·--1-- [, __ _ --1----1----1---f-----1 I ·-·-···--·--·-·-- I I I I I 1-·--1---·-···-·--------·---·- 1--···----·1----··· .. --1 I I I 1----+-----·-·· ·--~ I I I -l----·---- -----+------+ f---I I -----... ·-·1----- . ·--····1--·---·- LEGEND: ~ TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organics, roots. firm, slightly moist, dark brown. Q CLAY AND SILT (CL -ML); slightly sandy to sandy, medium stiff to stiff, siightiy moist, brown. ~ SAND (SM); silty, loose to medium dense, slightly moist, brown. ~ GRAVEL (GP-GM); sandy, slightly silty, with cobbles and possible small boulders, dense, slightly moist, ~ brown. p Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I D. California liner sample. ~ Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch LD. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 21 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were 21/12 required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. _,. Depth at which boring had caved when measured on May 1, 2006. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on April 1 0, 2006 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations oi exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the srre plan llf(.J\11,. ~r r \_u\.-, 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided . 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. . ? r l ' ! L ~-~---~-------~------ 6040 6035 6030 1i) Q) LL c 0 ~ > Q) 6025 UJ 6020 6015 106 0298 BORING 1 ELEV.= 6036' 21/12 17/12 WC=12.0 DD=120 6/12 WC=12.3 DD=102 -200=94 10/12 56/12 BORING2 ELEV.= 6032' 14/12 WC=6.6 DD=115 -200=69 10/12 WC=10.9 DD=114 -200=67 69/12 Note: Explanation of S)'mbo~s is shown on Figure 3. ~~ LOGS OF EXPLOR!>.TORY BORINGS HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 6040 6035 6030 m Q) LL c 0 ~ 6025 Q) w 6020 6015 Figure 2 ---·--------- -~...-,;g)-- APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 '= 30' LOT M-14 -----.--------.,--- -1----6040 -- 6036_ _ _ _ _ _ ~ I PROPOSE~----r---- RESIDENCE -6036 ' I I '-,'I...__,'-,--JLOTM-11 : _ ___, 6034 LOT M-12 LOT M-10 BROOKIE 106 0298 ~ LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL D ear Sir, Cra wtord D es ig n I)uild, L .. L .C. F.O. !)ox 12 )6, Ca r-bonda le, Co. 8 1 62) 1\e: Vita li R e side nce, Lot I I 1\FM, 0029 !)rookie, Aspen G len F e rmit Number: I 025 9 W e would like to note the fo llowing changes at the a b ove residence: As per the o wne rs request , a basement h as had ro ug h in and fini s h e lectric completed and also fully sheetrocked, and will be fire tape d . Also, from original plan, Sheet # A 2. I Downstairs bath and doset have s witc hed p ositio ns according to revised n oor plan II A2. I . A H al f bath has been added to room numbe r 006. Thank _you for reviewing this change per the reques t o f the owner, Guy Vita li. Yours Sincerely, DEC-13-2007 14:30 From:BASALT TRADE ASSOC. 9709274803 Division of Registrations Colorado The on1orar sratt web Portal Division of Registration$· . To:3B43470 Electrical and Plumbing Permits Online P,1/2 ' Page I of2 I ---------------·-·-·---------;- View Permit 609823 Requestor Site Inspections ln8poctod Oate 10/2M20.QI 0.6/0./ia.O_Q? Company Name: GRIZZLY ELECTRIC FiM Name: CHAD Last Name: J EWELL Address: P. 0. BOX 2291 City: 6ASAL T State: CO Zipcode: 8 1621 Phone: ( 970) 927-8006 F~x: 9 70-927-8006 Email Address: GRIZZLY J@ROF.NET License Number: 4893 Property Type: I'RIVATE Property Owner GUY VITAL E Job Site Address: 0029 BROCKIE (RFM LOI 11) City: CARBOND ALE State: CO Zipcode: 8 1623 County: GARFIEL 0 Power: XCEL -CARBONDALE BuHding Type; RESIDENTIAL Construction Type: NEW Mise Construction; RESIDENTIAL NEW Square Feot: 2951 Trim: N Type FINAL ROUGH IN Status ACCEPTED ACCEPTED I I I I hllns://www.dora.statc.co.us/ols/real/eo web JJennit ll:ui.show oage?o user tVlle=Electr ... 12/13/2007 DEC-13-2007 14:31 From:BASALT TRADE ASSOC. 9709274803 Division of Registrations Status/Actions Permit Number: 609823 Type: ELECTRICAL Status: CLOSED Opened: 02/19/2007 Expiration Date: 02/19/2008 Closed: 10/25/2007 Replaces: NONE Replocod By: NONE Email Inspector ] [ OK • Questions? Chock out the Definitions__P....!lg~_ or !'.r.~_quently Asked Questlp_~s..(E.!1Q). To:3843470 • Please take our .S.u(l(ey to tell us about yotlr experience with tho online permils site. P.2'2 Page 2 of2 GcncrotmJ: 12/13/2007 02:26 p.m !'.mt~I.Home PagQ II M~te ~!lme Page II OeP.>.o:!Jl'-<lntHome.l"age IQp_of_Page Privacy Statement 1 Disclaimer Techrlfcal An!•t.rte~ E:-m!!ll.l!:!fP.~~I!I.I!9!1J:esnnology_Section E--Mail the Ql~lsJ.Q~_Q_f_~ogistrations 1560 Broadway, Suite 1500 Denver, co 60202 (30-3) 8Cl4-2085 .. Phon~ (JUJ) l'!Uo!-J:I10 · F;1~ ReJOy~.il1o !TTY (Engl1~h & f~l'i!Cli~,h). Voir.o. VCO. ASCI!, ST$ Anl'ft<li'G~I NiJ01b6t!.) https://www.dora.state.co.us/pls/real/ep web permit gui.show D(t~e?p user type~Electr... 12/13/2007 12/13/2007 15:48 8474529247 AUTO BODY TOOLMART -ft1JYi . rn cu-tt . c90)38L/-3~~YTOO~T 2545 MtLLENNIUM DRIVS, ELGIN, IL 60124 11178 PENROSE ST, UNIT l, SON VALLEY, ~ 91352 PHONE: (800) 382-1200 FAX: (847) 462-9247 INVOICE PAGE 01/01 12/13/07 SOLO TO: ELITE AUTO BODY JOHN VANVONDERBN PO !lOX 8674 ASPEN, CO 81612 CUST ID#! PHONE #: FAX#: ORDER #: PO #: QTY STATUS 1 sa 1 Sll 1 Sll 000218093 (970)925-1398 (970) 925-1398 200712112631009 ITEM # 8746 8746 A 8746 B SHIP TO: AJAX C~STOM PAINT JOHN VANVONDEREN S40S CR 154 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 DESCRIJ?TtON EACH FIRE SUPP.SYS. FOR 8549/8550 FIRE SUPP.SYS. FOR 9548/8550 1499.56 INSTALLATION FOR 8746 1499.44 MERCHANDISE TOTAL: ADJUSTMENTS: FREIGHT: SALES TAX: TOTAL: EXTiiNDED o.oo 1499.56 1499.44 2999.00 o.oo o.oo 2999.00 OCT-12-2006 THU 12:30 PH G & M DISTRIBUTORS FAX NO. 309 342 6736 From the Desk of Guy Vitale Garfield County Planning Commissioner Garfield County Building and Planning Department I 08 8111 Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Sir, October 12, 20 )6 I am the owner of lot 11 (285 Brookie) at the Roaring Fork Mesa in Aspen Glen, Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado. I have completed plans to build a house at 2s:: Brookie and have entered into a construction contract with Mr. Brad Crawford, Crawford DesignBuild LLC. I give Mr. Crawford the authority to sign the necessary permits of Garfield County for 1he construction of my house. If you should have any questions, please call me 309-342-6185. P. 02 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 002.. 9 £?~ Permit No. ____J_I<'l..l2<..::L62.5'""9-+---------------- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: u~~p?~'/~~ ~~~{/7~#~/ :z.) ~tf?~c~~ ofc. 3)4Jitf'-'-a~~ You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 6-f, ·0 7 20 ___ _ Building Inspector -~P'Z'~ ---- Phone (970) 945·8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING PERMIT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at Oo -.;)1 6tUJa lr e Permit No. --~/_0=--.;2-=:,.....s----~'7.__ _______ _ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: Ft (lL ~-l-op 11\1 ~~·cJ-'1.5 Thn..-vv t-or ~~~ +a ~loa~/ [£.· \ \-,_) j +-c.Q.. (' ... o-t2ad +-k55~ble6 VJ/ lrpP fJ rJ ue-J ,.--rrLe $~f You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When corrections have been made, call for inspection at 970·384·5003. Date b-13 20 C!"J Building Inspector ---LUY->~V _________ _ Phone (970) 945·8212 U COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at <20 ~ 9 !fl~;, d~ Permit No. --"'/o'""/'--'0"'-~'-------------- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ,,~~;0--~~~ -f~;X~~ ~~~ ~~¥-6 ,8',1~ ---h ~ 3)~ ~~~a.-~oc ~ ~~~? ~;,~~~ '"g~~-~-~/J~tf-~ ~~~ S)Ct4~--u-~, You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date //-.:;;..9-o 7 20=----- Building Inspector ~;::?;7 ~ Phone (970) 945-8212 Setb,a,cks: Front ~~ ..... --=:------RH _____ LH _____ Zoning ----- <fj[ ~ C.. s..jlYU-f\ r. t...:o.= · INSPECTIONS ~ils Test 'C)~e.. '4--~t·cr"S Weatherproofing __________ _ Footing IQ-13-oG~ Mechanical _______ 7 / ______ _ Foundation 1--i-o?~ Electrical Rough (State)_.....J<'-,..-.,..'------- Grout .. ;:f!ectrlcal F~al (State) Underground Plumbing d-.?(6-oz ~ ~r~al J:l ·1.?'-<:11 /Checklist Rough Plumbing G-<2-o?~ Certificate Occu ancy # ~1(5-'¥-~....----- Framing 6 -.2-o?~ Dateli~~LXl\:::1!,:'~~---- lnsulation k -;¥;D1;0ifl Septic System # ------------ Roofing Date ------------- Drywall {/-U·o1 /Qn'k . Final _________ _ Gas Piping C-e -o7f!'h?? OVI-"~ ~ Other ---------------- ' ·0 ·~ ~tv1'Cvn? I c rN) ·to l3 .tK j)~.'-)l, NOTES /2.-11· <t.J? .-...... --............... ~··· MECHANICAL ROOM Boiler Hot water -----~,L----­ F.A. gea/Oii-.------;f----- Fioor draln--\-----f----- Ciearance-~.--+----- Hot water heater ~"-------­ COmbustion air-------- Gas piping, valves------- LPG Drain ------r-- FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combustlbles--f.:_--- Termlnation of c lmney_,{__---- Combustion alr...\.---1------ Hearth (12'' or 20'' Giaosdoor•--------- Certilied by:--------- REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS I Headroom (6'6") --~-/-------~· Railing & guar~L------­ Width ( INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date IssuedJ.;I::~.~.o.l.zoned Area .•..•...............•..••...... Permit No . .fO..~,J$.' .. AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; constru~tion and erection of the structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said re ·~ are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and. construction of • described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the Count) Inspecto,r and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. -.' r Setbat;ks Front Side Sjde Rear ';;_,. This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From Tbe Street Until Final Inspection. ·,. INSPECTION ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING- WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE• GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD oate . ..,.Ja.._-.....,)~.._..-/J/ep..., y F ~ L113 IF PLACED atTSIDE-COVER WITJ' r· Parcel Detail Page I of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information A~se~sqr[frcasurer Property Se:m::h I Assessor Sub~uery: I AssesllQr Sale~ Search Clerk_&, R~~wd>TRec.:ePtiQilS<!<!rc.:ll Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 082 II R820013 II 239319101011 II 67.519 I Owner Name and Mailing Address jLAND, ANDREA F VITALE TRUST I J823 NORTH SOANGETAHA ROAD I jGALESBURG, IL 61401 I Legal Description jsECT,TWN,RNG:I9-7-88 SUB:ROARING I jFORK MESA @ ASPEN GLEN LOT: II I jPRE:R820001 BK:0966 PG:0686 BK:0966 I jPG:0682 BK:0925 PG:0346 BK:0846 I jPG:0615 BK:0835 PG:0305 BK:I865 jPG:0563 RECPT:711491 BK:I865 jPG:0562 RECPT:711490 BK: 1865 jPG:0561 RECPT:711489 BK: 1033 jPG:0931 BK:0921 PG:0661 BK:0921 jPG:0661 Location I Physical Address: llcARBONDALE I I Subdivision: I ROARING FORK MESA @ ASPEN GLEN http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelN umber=2393191 0 I 0 II 12/8/2006 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 I Land Acres: 110.284 I I Land Sq Ft: llo I Section II Township II Range I I 19 II 7 II 88 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: 100,00011 29,oool I Improvements: oil ol I Total: IOO,oooll 29,0001 Sale Date: 119/5/1997 Sale Price: 11112,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I' Buildings: Number of Commllnd lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type Amount I 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole ($1,958.06)1 2005 II Tax Amount $1,958.061 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($2,289.30)1 I 2004 Tax Amount $2,289.301 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,947.88)1 2003 Tax Amount $1,947.881 2002 Tax Payment: Whole ($2,245.16)1 2002 Tax Amount $2,245.161 2001 Tax Payment: Whole I ($2,257 .00)1 2001 Tax Amount $2,257.001 I 2000 Tax Payment: Whole ($2,312.88)1 I 2000 II Tax Amount $2,312.881 I 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole ($2,339.66)1 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!N umber=2393191 0 I 0 II 12/8/2006 Parcel Detail II 1999 II Tax Amount II $2,339.6611 Top of Page A~scssor .Dat<ll:Jas<O.Search .. .O.P!ions I Treasur<OrPatahaseSearch.Options Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options (}artie! cl Cmmty .. Ho_tnePa_gc: Page 3 of 3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. ···········~~~··~-···-·--······-···············~·-··················--····--·····-···· ....................................................................... ~ ... . Copyright © 2005 · 2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www.garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=2393191 0 I Oil 12/8/2006