Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-NW12-WEPII_Final_022912_ReducedFileSize (4)Western Expansion Project Pipeline Nationwide Permit #12 Verification Request and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Prepared for: Enterprise Mid-America Pipeline Prepared By: WestWater Engineering February 2012 WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists Nationwide Permit #12 Verification Request and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Western Expansion Project Pipeline (WEPII) Prepared for: Enterprise Mid-America Pipeline Prepared by: WestWater Engineering February 2012 INTRODUCTION WestWater Engineering (WWE) biologists were requested by Enterprise Mid-America Pipeline (MAPL) to file a Nationwide Permit #12, Utility Line Activities, verification request and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination for the MAPL Western Expansion Project II (WEP II) pipeline alignment. On behalf of MAPL, WWE biologists identified potential Waters of the United States (WoUS) and performed wetland delineations along the proposed alignment. Applicant: Enterprise Mid-America Pipeline Address: P.O. Box 4324 Houston, TX 77210 Property Owners: Appendix D Project Location: The proposed pipeline begins approximately 1.5 miles south of Thompson, Utah, and travels east, paralleling Interstate -70 (I-70) to just east of exit 227, where the pipeline crosses the interstate and heads northeast. The proposed pipeline then parallels Highway 6, where it crosses into Colorado before turning north and paralleling Mesa County Road 201 (Baxter Pass Road) along West Salt Creek to Atchee, Colorado. From Atchee, the pipeline traverses west over Baxter Pass, then travels back to the north, where it follows West Evacuation Creek and then Evacuation Creek to Dragon Station near Dragon, Utah (Appendix B, Figure 1). The proposed WEP II pipeline traverses through four different Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Field Offices, including the Moab Field Office (MFO) and Vernal Field Office (VFO) in Utah, and the Grand Junction Field Office (GJFO) and White River Field Office (WRFO) in Colorado. The proposed pipeline is approximately 95.3 miles long, beginning in Section 29, Township 21 South, Range 20 East, Salt Lake Meridian, and ending in Section 2, Township 12 South, Range 25 East, Salt Lake Meridian. Approximately 50 miles of the proposed pipeline is in Utah, while the remaining 45 miles of the proposed pipeline is in Colorado. The location of the proposed pipeline is shown on maps provided in Appendix B. Total Project Site Acreage: Approximately 1480 Acres Project Description: Enterprise MAPL proposes to obtain a Right -of -Way Grant and Temporary Use Permit (TUP) from the BLM to construct, operate, maintain, and abandon in- place a 95.3 -mile, 16 -inch natural gas liquids pipeline in Uintah and Grand Counties in the state of Utah and in Rio Blanco, Garfield, and Mesa Counties in the state of Colorado. The WEP II Project will cross lands administered by the BLM's VFO, WRFO, GJFO, and MFO. The proposed pipeline would satisfy increased producer demand and increase current capacity by WestWater Engineering 1 of 317 3/1/2012 15,000 barrels per day based on the increased natural gas liquids production in Utah and Wyoming (POD WEPII). The WEP II Project will cross federally administered lands over 918 acres or 62 percent of the total right-of-way (ROW). The remainder of the land crossed by the proposed pipeline is privately owned. A list of private land owners is attached in Appendix D. On land administered by the federal government, construction of the proposed pipeline will require a 125 -foot wide construction ROW which includes a 50 -foot wide permanent ROW and a 75 -foot wide temporary use area. The permanent ROW will consist of 573 acres, of which 364 acres will be on lands administered by the BLM. The temporary use areas, including temporary construction ROW will consist of 906 acres of which 554 acres will be on federally administered lands. On private lands, the construction ROW will be similar to those on BLM-administered lands but will vary according to landowner agreements. In addition to the permanent ROW, and some access roads, temporary use areas (TUA) will be required in certain areas such as in areas with rugged terrain, waterbody crossings, road crossings, and at pipeline point of intersection (PI) locations, as shown on maps contained in Appendix B. WETLAND DELINEATION Delineation Methods — WWE biologists performed a wetland evaluation of the project area March 2011 through August 2011. During biological surveys, personnel identified potential WoUS and adjacent wetlands within ROW and various access points of the pipeline alignment (Figure 1). Drainages that were considered WoUS were photographed, documented and recorded in Appendix A. Areas that showed wetland characteristics within ROW were identified as potential jurisdictional wetlands to be verified during the wetland delineation. The delineation was performed by WWE in August 2011, in accordance with Corps of Engineers (COE) standards included in the "Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, January 1987" and the Regional Supplement to the COE Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0, September 2008). Wetlands were delineated within ROW provided by MAPL. The wetland boundary delineation included identification of plant species, species composition, and soil structure. Soil borings (24 ± in. deep) were taken with an auger for observation of wetland soil characteristics and hydrology indicators within the potential wetland. Flagging tape was used to mark wetlands. Wetland boundary flags and Ordinary High Water Mark (OHW) of WoUS were located by using an Ashtech Pro Mark 100 sub -meter accuracy GPS unit. Narrow creeks with fringe wetlands were walked and tracked with sub -meter handheld GPS units. Wetland areas along these creeks were estimated by imposing a 3 -foot buffer on the center of the track line utilizing ARCGIS software. These creeks and their 18 -inch wetland fringe were not flagged and are referred to as Wetland Fringe throughout the report. Because of the continuous and linear nature of the wetlands in the canyon, wetlands were labeled by the mile post nearest to their center point along the proposed pipeline alignment. Smaller wetlands were labeled by the closest mile post (Figures 2 through 43). Latitude and longitude locations for wetland boundaries and data points within the ROW are listed in Appendix E. Data WestWater Engineering 2 of 317 3/1/2012 points at each wetland and upland site were recorded on COE data sheets, attached in Appendix C. Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination forms were completed for this project and are attached to this report. The PCN form for this project is located in Appendix F. Waters of the U.S. (WoUS) Potential WoUS were identified in accordance with Army COE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook (COE 2007). Aerial photos and topographic maps were examined for blue line streams, marked wetlands, potential WOUS, and drainages. All blue line stream locations (intermittent, ephemeral, and perennial) along with other areas of interest were mapped for on -the -ground observer verification. Blue line stream, potential WOUS, and drainage locations were recorded with hand held Global Positioning System (GPS) units. Photos were taken of the crossing points as well as up and down stream of the crossing point. Recorded WoUS drainages are summarized with corresponding photos in Appendix A. Flows in the Colorado River Basin were well above average during the 2011 runoff season. The Surface Water Supply Index (SWSI) was +3.4 for the month of July, indicating an abundant supply. Cumulative flows in the Colorado Basin were nearly 200% of the average in July (CDWR 2011). It is assumed that WoUS and wetlands would exhibit the same higher than average water levels. Delineation Findings — One wetland was observed along the southern portion of the pipeline in Utah. It is a small fringe wetland associated with Cisco Wash. Vegetation in the wash was patchy and inconsistent. Wetland vegetation persisted in only part of the ROW. It appeared that intense runoff flows had scoured much of the channel (Figure 2). The majority of wetlands in or near the project area associated with north and south sides of Baxter Pass. On the south side of the pass, the pipeline intercepts West Salt Creek (WSC) in Section 3, Township 8S Range 104W. From this point, the alignment parallels County Road 201 and WSC. At the point of intercept, Mile Post (MP) 690 (Figure 1), West Salt Creek is a dry wash that flows only in early spring and in conjunction with localized precipitation events. From the point of intercept there are no wetlands associated with WSC until just north of the confluence of South Canyon approximately 4 miles upstream, MP 700.4 (Figures 3 and 4). Wetlands in this area appear to be associated with a shallow groundwater table and the braided channel of WSC. Wetland vegetation consists primarily of salt tolerant species, inland salt grass (Distichlis spicata) baltic rush (Juncus balticus) and some scattered common three square (Schoenoplectus pungens) shrub cover was made up Tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima) and some coyote willow (Salix exigua). Soil redoximorphic features were relied on as average occurrence of hydrology. Most of the OHW mark along the creek had been washed out by this year's above average runoff flows. Approximately 2 miles upstream the creek becomes incised, loses wetland characteristics, and returns to being a dry wash (see dry creek in Figures 5 and 6). Evidence of flow was present; WestWater Engineering 3 of 317 3/1/2012 however, hydrophytic vegetation and soil features were not. The channel remains dry for 3 miles to the north. Starting near MP 706.4 and from there north upstream, surface water is present and hydrophytic vegetation establishes a fringe wetland along the WSC. The incised channel and capillary rise limits the fringe wetlands to approximately 18 inches on either side of the creek. This remained consistent throughout the next 4.5 miles of the pipeline up to Atchee (Figures 6 through 15). As the pipeline proceeds up stream and up gradient, fringe wetlands associated with WSC widened along the natural flood plain. The last mile of WSC channel below Atchee appeared to be more stable. In this area the creek became less entrenched. Dense thickets of hardstem bulrush (Schoenoplectus acuts), common three square, and coyote willow cover were common. It is important to note that while the channel became less entrenched, the flood plain was laterally contained in an entrenched valley (Figures 15 through 19). From Atchee, the pipeline heads northwest up Railroad Canyon towards the top of Baxter Pass. An unnamed tributary is crossed twice north of the delineated stock pond and enters the ROW on one other occasion (Figures 20 and 21). There is a narrow fringe wetland supported by the creek above the stock pond. Two springs and adjacent wetlands were identified along the south side of Baxter Pass on CR 201. Both springs were delineated in the event road improvements are necessary to bring equipment up the pass (Figures 22 and 23). One access road is utilized other than CR 201 on the south side of Baxter Pass. The road is an established jeep road located on private property and no improvements to the existing road are anticipated at this time (Figure 24). At the top of Baxter Pass the pipeline descends to the north paralleling West Evacuation Creek (WEC) and a power line cut down to McAndrews Lake. Fringe wetlands along the creek are narrow and adjacent to a small entrenched channel. Fringe wetlands adjacent to WEC and nearby springs are dominated by common spike rush (Eleocharis palustris) and Northwest Territory sedge (Carex utriculata). Several natural depressions occur near the creek creating wet meadows along the power line cut; however, the majority of the wet meadow wetlands are on the edge or just beyond the edge of the ROW (Figures 25 through 30). Several springs were observed on the north side of Baxter Pass along CR 201. There are no road improvements planned at this time; however, springs and their adjacent wetlands were identified in the event that road improvements become necessary in the future (Figures 31 and 32). Most of the springs occur near the bottom of the pass at the last switchback before descending to McAndrews Lake (Figure 33). McAndrews Lake is a private lake used to supply late season irrigation and agricultural water to the valley below. Fringe wetlands around the lake are comprised of cattails (Typha latifolia), hardstem bulrush, Baltic rush, and common spike rush. Other wetlands associated with the lake WestWater Engineering 4 of 317 3/1/2012 are a meadow on the south side of the lake dominated by meadow foxtail (Alopecurus pratensis) and Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), and the fringe wetland along West Evacuation Creek as it flows into the lake (Figure 34 and 35). The meadow, creek and area around the lake are open range and heavily grazed. Enterprise intends to bore under McAndrews Lake to minimize impacts to this area. Below McAdrews Lake, wetlands are confined to a narrow fringe along WEC. There is a temporary use area (TUA) on the east side of CR 201 just south of the ranch house. The field appears to be an agricultural field that has been out of production for some time. An irrigation ditch enters the field from the south and runs along the hillside to the east. The field appears to be in transition from former agricultural production to uplands. The field is dominated by baltic rush, but failed to show redoximorphic soil features or a source of hydrology other than the irrigation ditch (Figure 36). WEC parallels between CR 201 and the ROW for the next half mile (Figure 37). Near milepost 717.65, WEC crosses under CR 201 to the east. The stream is totally diverted from its natural channel into an irrigation ditch. There is a diversion structure in the ditch that could allow flows back into the channel, but at the time of the survey there was nothing more than seepage in the channel. It appears that water flows into the irrigation ditch to the east and then back across the field into the natural drainage near MP 718 (Figure 38). The field and irrigation ditches appear to have been neglected for some time. Much of the field displays hydrophytic vegetation and redoximorphic soil features. Because the natural creek captures flow, and irrigation water could not be separated at the source, the entire field was considered jurisdictional wetland. Meadows were dominated by baltic rush, while creek channel and ditches were dominated by coyote willow. As WEC flows north it becomes a willow dominated drainage within an entrenched valley. Small meadow wetlands occur in the entrenched valley periodically. Banks in these areas are steep and unstable. Wetlands in these areas are considered jurisdictional and are shown in Figures 39, 41 and 42. Figures 39 and 41 depict alignment crossings and Figure 42 shows an alignment and road crossing. The wetland at milepost 719.21 is a 5.8 acre willow dominated area that has irrigation water flowing through it. The source of hydrology is a manmade ditch that has been diverted from the original WEC channel that is located on the east side of CR 201. The water flows around the interior of the wetland polygon and branches off into multiple ditches. On the north end of the wetland, the water is collected in a ditch and passed back under CR 201 into the main channel of WEC on the east side of CR 201 (Figure 40). The last delineated wetland on the alignment is swale that is crossed near mile marker 725.46. This wetland is dominated by baltic rush and foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum). The swale was WestWater Engineering 5 of 317 3/1/2012 dry at the time of survey; however, there were signs of soil deposition and redoximorpic soil indicators (Figure 43). Thorough investigations were conducted for the remainder of the pipeline alignment. There are several areas where the pipeline crosses jurisdictional WoUS, but there were no signs of wetland vegetation (See WoUS in Appendix A). Debris left from spring flooding indicated extremely high flow runoff events throughout the valley. Wetlands delineated within the ROW for the WEP II project are summarized in Table 1. Wetlands that were observed in the project area, in Table 1, are outside of the ROW after the pipeline alignment had been adjusted to avoid wetland areas and the ROW necked down in wetlands to minimize impacts. Table 1. Wetlands Delineated within the ROW of the Proposed WEPII Pipeline Project Wetland Type In ROW (acres) Total Wetlands Observed (acres) *Wetland Fringe 0.19 1.04 Wetlands 4.39 47.65 *Wetland Fringe refers to drainages that are jurisdictional WoUS with a narrow fringe wetland. Impacts to Wetlands Wetlands and WoUS crossing areas will be temporarily impacted. The area of disturbance will depend on the method of crossing. Enterprise MAPL has tried extensively to avoid impacts to wetlands by necking down through crossings. Where wetland impacts are unavoidable, minimizing impacts at crossings has been a focal point for this review. Enterprise plans to prioritize and implement four different crossing methods in order to minimize impacts. Where it has been determined that space is available and at larger wetland areas horizontal directional drilling (HDD) crossing method will be implemented (Appendix F). Feasibility of HDD crossings was determined by the following criteria: 1) On-site field trip (completed the week of September 26th); 2) A Geotechnical investigation (completed November 2011); and 3) A cost comparison of HDD vs. other crossing methods at each location (completed December 2011). Additional criteria that precluded HDD at WoUS and wetland crossing were: • Proximity to other pipelines. There are several existing buried pipelines along the proposed alignment, adequate space and safety issues are primary considerations when crossing existing pipelines. • Pipeline angles and turns preclude the additional work space required for HDD crossings. • When available work space is inadequate within the ROW the option for HDD was not proposed. • When a potential to impede Rio Blanco CR 201 traffic would occur HDD was not proposed. WestWater Engineering 6 of 317 3/1/2012 • HDD requires significant increases in work space and staging areas. If potential HDD areas would result in increased impacts to WoUS or Wetlands, HDD was not proposed. • The steep topography along portions of the alignment resulted in inadequate space or access and unsafe conditions for HDD. • Safety for essential personnel and equipment were considered foremost at any potential HDD crossing. Constricted workspace or unsafe working conditions eliminated HDD from consideration. If HDD was determined not to be feasible at a given location the area will be crossed via open - cut -ditch (OCD) methods 9000, 9001, or 9003 depending on the presence of wetlands. When water is present the crossing will be an OCD with either an active flume or dam and pump to control the flowing water, methods 9002 A -D (Appendix F). All sections of the ROW containing wetlands were evaluated for the potential to "neck down" the disturbance area whenever practicable. The ROW was confined to the minimum width necessary to safely construct the pipeline and minimize disturbance based on site specific conditions (See Attached PCN form and Table 2). Open cut ditch crossings will be dug 3 -feet wide and a minimum of 3 -feet deeper than the lowest part of dry drainage channel. Channels containing wetlands or flowing water will have the pipeline buried at least 5 -feet deeper than the lowest part of the channel. Top soil and vegetation will be removed and set aside until ditch work has been completed. Equipment mats shall be used under all vehicles in wetland areas to minimize disturbance. All soil removed from the ditch will be placed in uplands until the pipeline is in place and back filling begins. Top soil and vegetation, previously set aside, will be distributed once the ditch has been back filled and the area returned to its pre-existing topography. In the event there are no upland areas within range of the excavation equipment, stockpiled soils will be placed on landscaping fabric or mats in wetlands for protection until the ditch is backfilled. Engineer drawings detailing the crossing methods are attached in Appendix F. Wetland impact acres were calculated by the amount of wetlands within ROW, neck down areas are 75 feet wide and the rest of the ROW remains 125 feet wide. Although Enterprise is planning to minimize impacts to wetlands, it is assumed that there will be some temporary impacts during construction to wetlands that occur within the ROW. Wetlands that occur in the ROW that are not actually crossed by the pipeline are indicted in Table 2 with an "NA" as a crossing method. Enterprise estimates that each in -stream crossing will be completed within 72 hours of commencement. Re -contouring and re -vegetation operations in the channel and along the banks will also be completed in that time frame. Temporal impacts through the stream channel and adjacent wetlands appear to be negligible considering the amount of time it will take to cut the ditch, lay pipe, back fill, and reestablish preexisting contours and wetland vegetation. Permanent impacts to WoUS or adjacent wetlands are not planned. At typical crossing areas, disturbance WestWater Engineering 7 of 317 3/1/2012 will be limited to 100 feet. When crossing wetlands within the project area, crossings will be necked down an additional 25 feet to a 75 foot wide potential disturbance area (see crossing methods Appendix F). Wetland fringe are typically associated with narrow entrenched creeks that have a 18 inch wide wetland fringe on each side. Disturbance area for these creeks was calculated by the linear length of stream within the ROW multiplied by an average 3 -foot width that was commonly observed for fringe wetlands throughout the pipeline alignment. Pipeline disturbance area was calculated based on a 6 -foot wide ditch through the wetland centered on the alignment (Appendix F). Fill quantities were based on the dimensions of the ditch; 3 -feet wide at the bottom, 6 -feet wide at the surface, and 6 -feet deep. With these dimensions fill was calculated at 1 -cubic yard per running foot of ditch (Table 2). WestWater Engineering 8 of 317 3/1/2012 Table 2 Wetlands within ROW Subject to Temporary Disturbance during Pipeline Construction Land Ownership Milepost Wetland Type Wetland Label Water body Label Waterbody Name Longitude Latitude Crossing Technique ROW Necked Down (Yes/ No) Wetland within ROW (acres) Wetland within ROW (sqft) Pipeline Disturbance within ROW (sqft) Proposed Backfill in pipeline alignment (CY) Potential Wetland Disturbance in ROW (acres) Impact Minimization Rationale within the Right -of -Way Moab Field Office (Grand County, Utah) State of Utah 658.26 Perennial Stream / Wetland Fringe Wet 658.26 28* Cisco Wash -109.3315507 38.96109806 9002A or D Yes 0.009 392 78 13 0.01 Necked down 75 feet. Grand Junction Field Office (Garfield County, Colorado) Private 700.62 700.75 Narrow Wetland Fringe None 120* West Salt Creek -108.9536073 39.44640245 9002A or D No 0.042 1908 60 10 0.042 The construction right-of-way configuration and alignment in this area is defined by the meandering and incised characteristic of West Salt Creek within the narrow valley floor. Other constraints include a gas well, multiple pipelines, and County Road 201 (Baxter Pass Road). To minimize waterbody crossings potential wetland effects in this area, Enterprise co -located the pipeline to the east side of their existing pipeline easement and away from the main channel of West Salt Creek. Co -locating the alignment with the existing easement minimizes disturbance to previously undisturbed areas that will be affected by the Project; however, multiple crossings of West Salt Creek are unavoidable in this area. Potential effects of the Project to West Salt Creek and associated fringe wetlands in this area will be minimized by the following Best Management/Construction Practices: 1. At the time of construction Enterprise's Chief Inspector, Environmental Monitor (EM), and Construction Contractor will review the surveyed/staked right-of-way and confine the construction right-of-way to the width necessary to safely construct the pipeline. 2. Construction mats will be utilized to minimize disturbance to wetland/waterbody crossings based on site-specific conditions as determined appropriate by Enterprise's EM. 3. At the waterbody channel crossings the pipeline will be installed to a sufficient depth to minimize the potential for future exposure from scour or channel migration. 4. Construction traffic will be limited to that needed to construct the pipeline and restore the right-of-way. Non-essential traffic will by- pass this portion of the construction right-of-way by utilizing the Baxter Pass road between about MPs 699.7 and 702. 5. Restoration efforts will include recontouring all disturbed areas to restore the approximate preconstruction grades and contours. Incised stream banks will be restored to a stable slope/configuration. 6. Appropriate bank stabilization and erosion control measures will be installed to minimize the potential for stream bank erosion and sedimentation. 7. Enterprise's EM will determine appropriate seed mixtures at the crossings and if willow sprigging is warranted based on site-specific conditions to enhance streambank stability and enhance wetland restoration. Private 700.85- 701.86 Wetland Fringe Wet 701.51 121* West Salt Creekand -108.953586 39.44839066 9002A or D Yes 0.028 1212 90 15 0.03 Private 700.87- 701.03 Salt Meadow Wet 701.51 122- 123* West Salt Creek 9002A or D Yes 0.68 29.433 1968 328 0.68 Private 701.47- 701.51 Wetland Fringe Wet 701.51 124* West Salt Creek 9002A or D No 0.12 5,227 180 30 0.12 Private 701.51- 701.61 Salt Meadow Wet 701.51 125* West Salt Creek 9002A or D No 0.47 20,473 1,548 258 0.47 Private 701.61- 701.65 Wetland Fringe Wet 701.51 127- 128* West Salt Creek 9002A or D No 0.05 2,171 306 41 0.05 Private 701.92- 701.98 Wetland Fringe Wet 701.51 129* West Salt Creek 9002A or D No 0.097 4,234 246 41 0.10 The alignment and right-of-way configuration at this crossing of West Salt Creek was limited by the same constraints listed above for the previous crossings of the creek. In addition, at this location the construction right-of-way configuration is also constrained by the crossing of Baxter Pass Road (County Road 201) as well as the multiple other gas line crossings that are required on the west side of the road. Further, a well pad is also located west of the road which limits the area available for a TUA. Because of these constraints, the full 125 -foot width of the construction right-of-way is necessary to safely complete the waterbody, road, and pipeline crossings. The Best Management / Construction Practices listed above would be utilized to minimize effects from the Project at this crossing. [ 111111W Totals for wetland 701.51 1.445 33,346.43 4,338 713 1.45 Large salt meadow and fringe we Iand a)ong"fest Salt Creek wit mu p' crossings Private 706.75-W 706.76 Narrow etland Fringe None 151 * West Salt Creek -108.936821 39.5164688 9002A or D No 0.02 677 60 10 0.02 Although this narrow feature will be crossed by the proposed pipeline, it primarily occurs on the non -working side of the right-of-way where disturbance will be limited and construction traffic will not occur. Therefore, the WestWater Engineering 9 of 317 3/1/2012 Land Ownership Milepost Wetland Type Wetland Label Water body Label Waterbody Name Longitude Latitude Crossing Technique ROW Necked Down (Yes/ No) Wetland within ROW (acres) Wetland within ROW (sqft) Pipeline Disturbance within ROW (sqft) Proposed Backfill in pipeline alignment (CY) Potential Wetland Disturbance in ROW (acres) Impact Minimization Rationale within the Right -of -Way construction right-of-way was not necked down at this feature. To minimize potential effects to this feature, spoil storage will not occur within it, except for wetland topsoil and spoil material during trenching activities at this site. Private 707.30 Narrow Wetland Fringe None 153* West Salt Creek -108.934698 39.5240083 9002A or D Yes 0.005 237 60 10 0.005 Necked down 75 feet. GJFO BLM 707.39- 707.43 Narrow Wetland Fringe None 154* West Salt Creek -108.9334949 39.52541386 9002A or D No 0.026 1119 60 10 0.026 The construction right-of-way configuration and alignment in this area are dictated by the meandering and incised characteristic of West Salt Creek within the narrow valley floor. Other alignment/right-of-way configuration constraints include multiple pipelines and County Road 201 (Baxter Pass Road). To minimize waterbody crossings and wetland effects in this area, Enterprise co - located the pipeline to the east side of their existing pipeline easement and away from the main channel of West Salt Creek. Co -locating the alignment with the existing easement minimizes impacts to previously undisturbed areas, which will be affected by the Project; multiple crossings of West Salt Creek are unavoidable in this area. Between about MPs 707.5 and 707.6 the working side of the construction right-of-way was flipped to avoid impacting fringe wetland L -RSB. Potential effects to West Salt Creek and associated fringe wetlands in this area will be further minimized by the following Best Management/Construction Practices: 1. At the time of construction Enterprise's Chief Inspector, Environmental Monitor(EM),and Construction Contractor will review the surveyed/staked right-of-way and confine the construction right-of-way to the width necessary to safely construct the pipeline. 2. Construction mats will be utilized to minimize disturbance to wetland/waterbody crossings based on site-specific conditions as determined appropriate by Enterprise's EM. 3. At the waterbody channel crossings the pipeline will be installed to a sufficient depth to minimize the potential for future exposure from scour or channel migration. 4. Construction traffic will be limited to that needed to construct the pipeline and restore the right-of-way. Non-essential traffic will by- pass this portion of the construction right-of-way by utilizing the Baxter Pass road between about MPs 699.7 and 702. 5. Restoration efforts will include recontouring all disturbed areas to restore the approximate preconstruction grades and contours. Incised stream banks will be restored to a stable slope/configuration. 6. Appropriate bank stabilization and erosion control measures will be installed to minimize the potential for stream bank erosion and sedimentation. 7. Enterprise's EM will determine appropriate seed mixtures at the crossings and if willow sprigging is warranted based on site-specific conditions to enhance streambank stability and enhance wetland restoration. GJFO BLM 707.45 707.47 Narrow Wetland Fringe None N/A West Salt Creek -108.9325446 39.52642483 N/A No 0.01 441 0.01 Private 707.72 -Wetland 707.73 Narrow Fringe None N/A West Salt Creek -108.9298376 39.53045357 N/A No 0.013 579 0.013 Private 707.78 -Wetland 707.79 Narrow Fringe None N/A West Salt Creek -108.9286786 39.53169598 N/A No 0.003 153 0.003 GJFO BLM 707.91 707.93 Narrow Wetland Fringe None N/A West Salt Creek -108.9267568 39.53365432 N/A No 0.012 525 0.012 GJFO BLM 707.98 Narrow Wetland Fringe None 157* West Salt Creek -108.9257157 39.53456484 9002A or D No 0.01 432 60 10 0.01 GJFO BLM 708.80- 708.84 Wetland Fringe Wet 708.8 158a West Salt Creek -108.9248378 39.54282465 9002A or D &E Yes 0.083 3,625 210 35 0.072 Totals for this section of West Salt Creek 0.182 7,788 450 75 0.171 Section of West Salt Creek associated with shallow ground water table and braided sections of stream. A Private 710.73 710.74 Wetland Fringe Wet 710.73 162* Unnamed Drainage -108.9132376 39.56430584 9002A or D &E No 0.067 2.935 180 30 0.067 The full 125 -foot construction right-of-way width was maintained at this unnamed drainage crossing at the toe of Railroad Canyon for the following reasons: 1) to facilitate the adjacent crossing of Baxter Pass Road (County Road 201); 2) to safely complete the crossing of other existing pipelines in this immediate area; 3) to accommodate the installation of multiple PIs including the sharp PI at MP 710.8; and 4) the limited workspace available in this area since no other TUAs are proposed to stage construction activities and to store the additional spoil materials required to complete the road and pipeline crossings and to install the PIs. Private 712.43 712.44 Wetland Fringe Wet 712.44 163 Unnamed Drainage -108.9264402 39.57415846 9002A or D &E No 0.059 2,584 132 22 0.059 The full 125 -foot construction right-of-way width was maintained at this unnamed drainage crossing in Railroad Canyon for the following reasons: 1) to accommodate the installation of multiple PIs at the crossing; and 2) additional spoil storage requirements in this area because the alignment/construction right- of-way traverses the side slopes of Railroad Canyon to avoid additional impacts WestWater Engineering 10 of 317 3/1/2012 Land Ownership Milepost Wetland Type Wetland Label Water body Label Waterbody Name Longitude Latitude Crossing Technique ROW Necked Down (Yes/ No) Wetland within ROW (acres) Wetland within ROW (sqft) Pipeline Disturbance within ROW (sqft) Proposed Backfill in pipeline alignment (CY) Potential Wetland Disturbance in ROW (acres) Impact Minimization Rationale within the Right -of -Way to the unnamed drainage. Private 713.11 Narrow Wetland Fringe None 164 Unnamed Drainage -108.9311026 39.58077198 9002B or D No 0.01 444 60 10 0.01 The full 125 -foot construction right-of-way width was maintained at this unnamed drainage crossing in Railroad Canyon for the following reasons: 1) to accommodate the installation of multiple PIs at the crossing; 2) the crossing of other existing pipelines in this area; and 3) the limited workspace available in this area since no other TUAs are proposed to stage construction activities and to store the additional spoil materials required to complete the pipeline crossings and to install the PIs. White River Field Office (Garfield County, CO) Private 714.37 Narrow Wetland Fringe None 166 West Evacuation Creek -108.95801 39.58869165 9003 No 0.001 60 0.001 This feature is just clipped by the edge of the construction right-of-way and is located in an area of the alignment where there are multiple PIs that typically require extra work space for excavation and associated spoil storage. Additionally, this area is within the very narrow valley bottom along the very upper reaches of West Evacuation Creek where the alignment crosses the valley bottom side slopes which will also require additional grading activities to provide a safe level working plain. Therefore, necking down the construction right-of-way to avoid this feature may not be possible. However, during construction, Enterprise will evaluate this area with the Chief Inspector, Environmental Monitor, and the Construction Contractor to determine if a neckdown is feasible or if alternative measures such as minimizing vegetation clearing and the use of construction mats could be utilized to minimize impacts. Private 714.71- 714.77/ TUA 714.68-W Spring / Meadow Wet 714.71 - West Evacuation Creek -108.9576727 39.59555102 HDD No 0.385 16,769 0 Disturbance to this wetland from trench/grading activities will be avoided through implementation of the proposed Woodpile HDD. However, the full construction right-of-way width along the HDD alignment has been maintained because it is required for construction traffic ingress/egress and for contingency purposes in case the HDD fails. Additionally, the TUA that is located in the wetland is required for the Columbine HDD pullback, which is located a short distance to the north of the Woodpile HDD. To minimize effects to the wetlands from these activities, the wetland will be matted and vegetation clearing will be limited to the essential areas necessary to accommodate the Columbine HDD pullback or construction traffic, as determined necessary by the EM. The HDD pullback string would also be set on rollers which would minimize wetland disturbance and construction traffic during pullback operations. Private 714.85- 714.86 Narrow Wetland Fringe Wet 714.84 N/A West Evacuation Creek -108.9579757 39.59798831 N/A No 0.017 749 0.017 This wetland is located along the pullback of the Columbine HDD. The full 125 -foot construction width has been maintained across this wetland to accommodate the HDD pullback string and to facilitate construction traffic and conventional construction in the immediate area. To minimize potential impacts to this wetland, vegetation clearing would be limited to that necessary to accommodate the HDD pullback string. The wetland would be matted and rollers would be used on the HDD pullback string to minimize potential impacts from rutting and compaction. Private 714.94- 714.95/ TUA 715.14-W Narrow Wetland Fringe None N/A West Evacuation Creek -108.95831 39.59978 N/A No 0.006 240 0 This fringe wetland is associated with West Evacuation Creek. At about MP 714.95 the creek/wetland is on the very edge of the proposed 125 -foot construction right-of-way in the immediate vicinity of the Columbine HDD exit point. Enterprise has not designated any TUAs in this area, which is in the upper reaches of West Evacuation Creek in a very narrow valley bottom, to minimize grading of the valley side slopes and disturbance to the creek/wetland. Because workspace requirements for the HDD are critical in this area, the construction right-of-way has not been necked down; however, to minimize disturbance to the creek/wetland, Enterprise will evaluate this specific area at the time of construction with the Chief Inspector, Environmental Monitor, and the Construction Contractor to determine if narrowing the construction right-of- way to avoid the creek/wetland is feasible, or if alterative measures are necessary to minimize disturbance to this feature. Alternative measures or BMPs would include minimizing vegetation clearing and grading activities and the use of construction mats to minimize disturbance to this feature. Private 715.40- 715.41 Meadow Wet 715.43 - West Evacuation Creek -108.9621482 39.60658945 N/A No 0.027 1183 0.027 These wetlands are located in a very narrow valley bottom associated with the upper reaches of West Evacuation Creek. Between about MPs 715.4 and 715.56, these features are on the edge of the proposed 125 -foot construction right-of- WestWater Engineering 11 of 317 3/1/2012 Land Ownership Milepost Wetland Type Wetland Label Water body Label Waterbody Name Longitude Latitude Crossing Technique ROW Necked Down (Yes/ No) Wetland within ROW (acres) Wetland within ROW (sqft) Pipeline Disturbance within ROW (sqft) Proposed Backfill in pipeline alignment (CY) Potential Wetland Disturbance in ROW (acres) Impact Minimization Rationale within the Right -of -Way Private 715.46- 715.53 Narrow Wetland Fringe None N/A West Evacuation Creek -108.9632239 39.60690405 N/A No 0.02 813 0.02 way in the vicinity of the Columbine HDD entry point. Enterprise has not designated any TUAs in this area to minimize grading of the valley side slopes and disturbance to the creek/wetlands. Due to workspace requirements for the HDD activities, construction traffic, and conventional pipeline construction activities, the construction right-of-way has not been necked down in this area. To minimize disturbance to the creek/wetlands Enterprise, will evaluate this specific area at the time of construction with the Chief Inspector, Environmental Monitor, and the Construction Contractor to determine if narrowing the construction right-of-way to avoid the creek/wetland is feasible, or if other measures are required to minimize effects to these features. Alternative mitigation measures or BMPs would include minimizing vegetation clearing and grading activities to those necessary to safely install the pipeline across feature BB -RSB and the use of construction mats to minimize disturbance. Private 715.54- 715.55 Meadow Wet 715.55 - West Evacuation Creek -108.9643202 39.60751878 N/A No 0.01 436 0.01 PrivateWetland 715.57 -Narrow 715.58 Fringe 715.55 167* West Evacuation Creek -108.9645648 39.6078445 9002A or D No 0.01 493 60 10 0.01 Private 716.14- 716.15 Fringe Wet 716.13 N/A West Evacuation Creek -108.9719682 39.6145785 N/A Yes 0.001 50 0.001 This wetland is slightly within the non -working side of the construction right - of -way. During construction, Enterprise will not affect the wetland. Private 716.20- 716.21 Meadow Wet 716.2 N/A West Evacuation Creek -108.9724935 39.61537155 9000 No 0.033 1.428 90 15 0.033 This feature is in the middle of the construction right-of-way where it is not feasible to avoid it through a construction right-of-way neckdown. Construction mats will be utilized to minimize disturbance to the wetland. Private TUA 716.22-N Narrow Wetland Fringe None West Evacuation Creek -108.9727825 39.61533329 N/A No 0.014 618 0.014 This feature is associated with West Evacuation Creek, which has been ditched in this pasture. The TUA that affects this feature is required for the McAndrews Lake HDD and immediately abuts the nonworking side of the construction right-of-way. No grading activities will occur in this area and potential effects to this feature (ditch) from construction traffic will be effectively mitigated by using construction mats to bridge over it. i - Total-s°/1k 'W^eat Evacuation Creek in this section 0.524 21,412.43 150 25 0.133 West Evacuation Creek from the top of B Ater Pass tt( Lake McAndrew Private 716.23- 716.27 Lake Fringe Wet 716.24 McAndrews Lake -108.9729468 39.61587542 HDD Yes 0.09 3,993 0 Construction effects to these features would be avoided because these features are located along the McAndrews Lake HDD drill path. Therefore, grading and trenching activities would not occur. Although a 20 -foot permanent easement would be acquired along the centerline of the HDD, operational effects to these features are also expected to be avoided since these are generally emergent features where vegetation maintenance during operation should not be necessary. Private 716.33- 716.38 Lake Fringe Wet 716.32 McAndrews Lake -108.9736123 39.61725359 HDD Yes 0.114 4,985 0 Private 716.51 Narrow Wetland Fringe None 168 Unnamed Drainage -108.974946 39.62001552 HDD Ycs 0.001 75 0 Private 717.25 Narrow Wetland Fringe None 171 West Evacuation Creek -108.9821013 39.6300741 9002A or D No 0.01 456 216 36 0.01 In this area, West Evacuation Creek and the associated wetland system run parallel to the proposed alignment. To minimize disturbance to the creek and the wetland, Enterprise switched the working side of the construction right between approximately MPs 717.22 and 717.66 from the east side to the west side. The working side crossover configuration at the crossing of West Evacuation Creek at MP 717.25 requires the full 125 -foot width of the construction right-of-way to make the working side switch; therefore, it is not feasible to narrow the construction right-of-way at this location. Private 717.83- 717.84 Meadow Wet 717.9 - West Evacuation Creek -108.9842369 39.6386365 N/A Yes 0.018 790 0.018 Necked down 75 feet. Private 717.88- 718.02 Meadow Wet 717.9 - West Evacuation Creek -108.9845116 39.6393702 9001 Yes 1.079 47,022 3,344 573 1.079 Private 718.25 Meadow- Wet - West Evacuation Creek -108.9882334 39.64384301 9002A or D &E Yes 0.028 1,201 96 16 0.028 Necked down 75 feet. White River Field Office (Rio Blanco County, CO) WRFO BLM / Private 719.21- 719.30 Meadow 7 9 21 - N/A -108.992934 39.65661408 9001 Yes 0.80 34,673 2.778 463 0.80 Necked down 75 feet. WRFO BLM 721.67- 721.68 Wetland Fringe Wet 721.66 185 West Evacuation Creek -108.9986713 39.69172462 9002A or D &E Yes 0.027 1,144 162 27 0.027 Necked down 75 feet. WRFO BLM 723.03 Wetland Fringe Wet 723.03 187* West Evacuation Creek -109.0067512 39.70857722 9002A or D &E Ycs 0.016 700 0.016 It is not feasible to neck down the construction right-of-way to minimize impacts at this wetland. The proposed pipeline is aligned on the immediate west side of County Road 25, which is encompassed by the working side of the right- WestWater Engineering 12 of 317 3/1/2012 Land Ownership Milepost Wetland Type Wetland Label Water body Label Waterbody Name Longitude Latitude Crossing Technique ROW Necked Down (Yes/ No) Wetland within ROW (acres) Wetland within ROW (sgft) Pipeline Disturbance within ROW (sgft) Proposed Backfill in pipeline alignment (CY) Potential Wetland Disturbance in ROW (acres) Impact Minimization Rationale within the Right-of-Way way. Therefore, to maintain public access and facilitate Project construction activities, the full width of the non-working side of the construction right-of - way is necessary and cannot be minimized To minimize Project effects to this feature, Enterprise will mat the wetland as determined necessary by the EM. Totals for West Evacuation Creek in this sectionwilmirom ; `" immrsi1,115 1.978 West Evacuation Creek from Lake McAndrews to the confluence of Evacuation Creek WRFO 725.46- Wet Based on the construction right-of-way configuration at this wetland crossing, it was only feasible to neck down the construction right-of-way by 25 feet for a total construction right-of-way width of 100 feet. At this crossing the proposed BLM 725.47 Swale 725 46 N/A N/A -109.0334442 39.73372659 9001 Ycs 0.07 3,036 240 40 0.07 centerline is located in the middle of the proposed construction right-of-way and only allows a 50-foot working side; therefore, additional reductions are not possible to facilitate safe construction. Land Ownership - Current status of landownership, individual owners are listed in Appendix D. Milepost - Range of mileposts are provided where 1) wetlands enter in/out of ROW for a distance. Wetland Type - Narrow fringe wetlands are associated with a drainages documented during surveys in 2011and are generally only 18 inches either side of a narrow water channel. Wetland Label - A unique ID generated by WestWater Engineering, associated with larger wetland areas crossed more than once. None — indicates wetlands that were crossed only once by the pipeline or that entered the ROW but were not crossed by the pieline. Water Body Label - Jurisdictional COE drainages labeled numerically from south to north along the pipeline alignment, complete list of COE drainages is contained in Appendix A. Drainages that entered the ROW that did not cross the pipeline alignment are labeled N/A. No ID (-) indicates it is not a drainage. Waterbody Name - refers to the name of the water body on the USGS topographical maps. Latitude and Longitude - GPS location of WoUS or wetlands entering the ROW or being crossed by the pipeline. Crossing Technique - Refers to the crossing method design as depicted in the engineered drawings in Appendix F. ROW Necked Down (Yes/No) - ROW was necked down to 75 feet from 125 feet whenever it was practicable. Wetlands within ROW (acres/sqft) - Area of wetland contained within the ROW. Pipeline Disturbance within ROW - The WoUS area within the ROW that will be temporarily disturbed by digging, placement, and back fill of the pipeline. Proposed Backfill in Pipeline Alignment - Estimated fill that will be required to back fill into the ditch in WoUS crossing areas. Potential Wetland Disturbance in ROW — The total amount of wetland within the ROW that has the potential to be disturbed during pipeline construction. * Indicates water present in drainage at time of survey. Crossing Technique Reference: Drawings are located in Appendix F. Active flow crossing methods, flume or dam and pump, will only be used in the event there is flowing water at the crossing. In the event there is not flowing water techniques 9000, 9001, or 9003 will be used based on the appropriate setting and minimizing temporary impacts to wetlands. Drawing Number Description HDD Horizontal Directional Drill under WoUS and adjacent wetlands 9000 Wetland non-flowing no neck down 9001 Wetland non-flowing necked down 9002A Active flow Flumed crossing with adjacent wetlands 9002B Active flow Flumed crossing no adjacent wetlands 9002C Active flow Dam and Pump no adjacent wetlands 9002D Active flow Dam and Pump with adjacent wetlands 9002E Entrenched Crossing - if flow is present this method will be used in conjunction with either the flumed or Dam Pump method. 9003 Dry Drainages with no adjacent wetlands N/A Drainages containing WoUS and or Wetlands in the ROW that will be avoided and protected by BMP's, all equipment impacts will be minimized by the use of mats and fabric. WestWater Engineering 13 of 317 3/1/2012 Threatened and Endangered Species (TESS) WWE biologists conducted pedestrian surveys to identify and locate plant and wildlife species and habitats. Surveys for raptors, TESS plants, and BLM sensitive wildlife species were conducted in accordance with the survey protocols provided by each BLM field office. Other sensitive wildlife species to be surveyed for were provided by BLM biologists. Federally -listed threatened, endangered, and candidate for federal listing species with potential to occur in Uintah and Grand Counties in Utah and Mesa, Garfield, and Rio Blanco (RBC) Counties in Colorado are listed below in Table 3 (USFWS 2010 and UDWR 2011). Table 3. WEP II Federally listed Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Species Common Name Scientific Name Status County/State Black -footed ferret Mustela nigripes E Uintah, UT (EXP), RBC, CO Bonytail* Gila elegans E Uintah, Grand, UT Garfield, Mesa, RBC, CO Canada lynx Lynx Canadensis T Uintah, UT Garfield, Mesa, RBC, CO Colorado pikeminnow* Ptychocheilus lucius E Uintah, Grand, UT Garfield, Mesa, RBC, CO Dudley Bluffs bladderpod Physaria congesta T RBC. CO Dudley Bluffs twinpod Physaria obcordata T RBC, CO Greater Sage -grouse Centrocercus urophasianus C Uintah, Grand, UT RBC, CO Humpback chub* Gila cypha E Uintah, UT Garfield, Mesa, RBC, CO Razorback sucker* Xyrauchen texanus E Uintah, UT Garfield, Mesa, RBC, CO Ute ladie's-tresses orchid Spiranthes diluvialis T Uintah, UT RBC Garfield CO White River beardtongue Penstemon scariosus C Uintah, UT RBC CO Yellow -billed cuckoo Coccyzus americanus C Uintah, Grand, UT Garfield, Mesa, RBC CO. Clay Reed -mustard Schoenocrambe argillacea T Uintah, UT De Beque phacelia Phacelia submutica C Garfield, Mesa CO Parachute beardtongue Penstemon debilis C Garfield CO Shrubby Reed -mustard Glaucocarpum suffrutescens E Uintah, UT Pariette Cactus Sclerocactus brevispinus T Uintah, UT WestWater Engineering 14 of 317 3/1/2012 Table 3. WEP II Federally listed Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Species Common Name Scientific Name Status County/State Colorado hookless cactus Uinta Basin hookless cactus/ Intermediate fishhook cactus Sclerocactus wetlandicus (parviflorus) T Uintah, UT Garfield, Mesa, CO Gray Wolf Canis lupus E Uintah, Grand, UT Brown (Grizzly) Bear Ursus arctos T Uintah, Grand, UT (EXT) Jones Cycladenia Cycladenia humilis var jonesii T Grand, UT Mexican Spotted Owl Strix occidentalis lucida Grand, UT Garfield, CO Gunnison Sage -grouse Centrocercus minimus C Grand, UT DEFINITIONS: T - A taxon that is listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as "threatened" with becoming endangered. E - A taxon that is listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as "endangered" with the possibility of worldwide extinction. C - A taxon for which the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has on file sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to justify it being a "candidate" for listing as endangered or threatened. E Experimental (EXP) - An "endangered" taxon that is considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to be "experimental and non-essential" in its designated use areas in Utah. E, T, or C Extirpated (EXT) - An "endangered," "threatened," or "candidate" taxon that is "extirpated" and considered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to no longer occur in Utah. E or T Proposed (PRO) - A taxon "proposed" to be listed as "endangered" or "threatened" by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. * = Water depletions in the Upper Colorado River system may affect these species or their designated critical habitat located downstream in the Green, White and Colorado Rivers. Threatened and Endangered Species Findings Biological surveys were conducted by WWE. Findings were broken down by BLM field office territories within the project area, WRFO, VFO, GJFO, and the MFO. All reports can be accessed from the Environmental Assessment (EA) being prepared by Edge Environmental. Cultural Resources A cultural resource Class III survey has been conducted for this pipeline alignment by Western Archaeological Services, Inc.; the conclusions of their reports are documented in the EA prepared by Edge Environmental, Inc. WestWater Engineering 15 of 317 3/1/2012 REFERENCES COE. 2007. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. Prepared Jointly by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. CDWR. 2011. Colorado Division of Water Resources. Reports and Publications. http://water.state.co.us/Home/Pages/default.aspx POD. WEPII. DRAFT Plan of Development. Western Expansion Project II (WEPII). Enterprise Mid-America Pipeline, August 2011 USFWS. 2010. Threatened, Endangered, Candidate, and Proposed Species by County, July 2010. Available online at http://www.fws.gov/mountain- prairie/endspp/countylists/colorado.pdf. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, Grand Junction, Colorado. UDWR. 2011. Utah's Federally (US F&WS) Listed Threatened, Endangered, and Candidate Species. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources http://dwrcdc.nr.utah.gov/ucdc/viewreports/te_list.pdf. WestWater Engineering 16 of 317 3/1/2012 Il.. PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL' DETERMINATION FORM This preliminary JD finds that there "tray be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: rDistrict Office J File/ORM # 1 1 PJD Date: 1 I State CO City/County [Mesa Garfield, Rio Blanco Namel — Nearest Waterbody: ( (Colorado River/ White River dd sof Person James White P.O. Box 4324 Location: TRS, LatLong or UTM: Appendix E j - -- - ----- - ---- Requesting PJD Houston, Tx 77210 Identify (Estimate) Amount of Waters in the Review Area: Stream Flow: Name of Any Water Bodies Tidal: on the Site Identified as Non-Wetland Waters: Non-Tidal: 4539 linear ft 3 width 0.31 acres Per. (seasonal) Section 10 Waters: I Cowardin Wetlands: 5,79 . acrc(s) kiverine r Office (Desk) Determination r Field Determination: I. Class: Date Field Trip: e o I j !SUPPORTING DATA: Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included hi case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): 111 1171 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: I WeatWater Engineering 1T Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. r Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. r Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ri Data sheets prepared by the Corps IT Corps navigable waters' study: r✓, U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic 17 USGS NHD data. 17 USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC Atlas: snaps. I— ; U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite quad name: 1 . 1 y �--- 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: http:rnvebsoilsurvey.nres.uada.govlapp/ r7. National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Pubtp://www.fws.govlwetlands/ r State/Local wetland inventory map(s): r FEMA/FIRM maps:( F. 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:l. 7 Photographs: 7 Aerial (Name & Date): USDA NAIP 2009 I7 Other (Name & Date): IWWE March- August, 2011 III IT Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: r Other information (please specify): IMP a RTAN NOTE: The Informal rnr•car.•.orthis form has not neces•:ril beenvertfi:o : • or.sand hould not he relied . later 'urisdicti.iald•terminatio s. Il Signature and Date of Regulatory Project Manager Signaturcps. (REQUIRED) (REQUIRED Date of Person Requesting Preliminary 7I) unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) . EXPLANATION OF PRELIMINARY AND APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIONS: 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (ID) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "preconstruction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general pennit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the fallowing: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the tenns and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the tenns and conditions of that pennit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved 1D constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) aecepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdietional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terns and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictWA smprrhed g 6 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administiiiiiedprit it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CNyikriyiligtion exists over a °ite or to rovide o i 1 deli. . tion of'urisdictional waters on the site, the Co .s willsous. a ...r.ved JD to accom fish that result as soon as is .racticable PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: Appendix A - Sites District Office (Sacramento District File/ORM # PJD Date: State CO City/County Mesa, Garfield, Rio Blanco Person Requesting PJD Leonard W. Mallet Est. Amount of Site Aquatic Resource Class of Number Latitude Longitude Cowardin Class in Review Area Aquatic Resource Notes: n/a n/a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) applies to Colorado Mesa, Garfield, and Rio Blanco Counties as well as Grand and Uintah Counties in Utah. This PJD is being submitted in conjunction with a NWP #12, Utility Line Activities, verification and Pre -Construction Notification for the Enterprise Mid-America Pipeline (MAPL) Western Expansion Project II (WEPII). Detailed information pertinent to WoUS crossings are in the attached documents, Appendix A. Wetlands throughout the alignment consisted of fringe wetlands adjacent to streams, meadow and salt meadow wetlands near streams, lake fringe, and seep and spring fed wetlands. The pipeline crosses four named perennial streams, Cisco Wash, West Salt Creek, West Evacuation Creek, and Evacuation Creek. WestWater Engineering 18 of 317 3/1/2012 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers South Pacific Division Nationwide Permit Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form This form integrates requirements of the Nationwide Permit Program within SPD, including General and Regional Conditions. Please consult instructions prior to completing this form. Box 1 Project Name Western Expansion Project Pipeline II (WEP II) Applicant Name James White Applicant Title Environmental Scientist Applicant Company, Agency, etc. Enterprise Mid-America Pipeline Applicant's internal tracking number (if any) Mailing Address P.O. Box 4324 Houston, Tx 77210 Work Phone with area code 713-381-1785 Home Phone with area code Fax # with area code E-mail Address jawhite@eprod.com Relationship of applicant to property: ❑Lessee I Other: Owner Purchaser Application is hereby made for verification that subject regulated activities associated with subject project qualify for authorization under a Corps nationwide permit or permits as described herein. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the proposed activities. I hereby grant to the agency to which this application is made, the right to enter the above-described location to inspect the proposed, in -progress or completed work. I agree to start work only after all necessary permits have been received. Signature of applicant crr LJAste.i Date (m/d/yyyy) 2/g%Zo1z Box 2 Authorized Agent/Operator Name (If an agent is acting for the applicant during the permit process) Agent/Operator Title Agent/Operator Company, Agency, etc. Mailing Address Work Phone with area code Home Phone with area code Fax # with area code E-mail Address I hereby authorize the above named authorized agent to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this permit application. I understand that I am bound by the actions of my agent and I understand that if a federal or state permit is issued, I, or my agen, must sign the 'ermit. Signature of applicant Date (m/d/yyyy) I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in this application, and that to the best of my knowledge and belief, such information is true, complete, and accurate. Signature of authorized agent Date (m/d/yyyy) Page 1 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 19 of 317 WestWater Engineering 18 of 321 3/1/2012 February 2012 Box 3 Name of Property Owner(s), if other than Applicant: APPENDIX D IS A COMPLETE LIST OF LANDOWNERS Owner Title Owner Company, Agency, etc. Mailing Address Work Phone with area code Home Phone with area code Box 4 Name of Contractor(s) (if known): Contractor Title Contractor Company, Agency, etc. Mailing Address Work Phone with area code Home Phone with area code Box 5 Site Number of . Project location(s), including street address, city, county, state, zip code where proposed activity will occur: UTAH UINTAH & GRAND COUNTIES, COLORADO MESA, GARFIELD AND RIO BLANCO Waterbody (if known, otherwise enter "an unnamed tributary to"):Cisco Wash, West Salt Creek, and West Evacuation Creek, and Evacuation Creek Tributary to what known, downstream waterbody:Colorado River Latitude & Longitude (D/M/s, DD, or UTM): Zoning Designation (no codes or abbreviations): Assessors Parcel Number: Section, Township, Range: USGS Quadrangle map name: Watershed and other location descriptions, if known: Directions to the project location: See attached NWP verification request Page 2 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 20 of 317 3/1/2012 Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features, see instructions): 95.3 MILE PIPELINE Project Purpose (Description the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions): THE PROPOSED PIPELINE WOULD INCREASE NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION IN UTAH AND WYOMING Page 3of13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 21 of 317 3/1/2012 Use Box 6 if dredged and/or fill material is to be discharged: Box 6 Reason(s) for Discharge into waters of the United States: FILL ASSSOCIATED WITH EXCAVATION PLACEMENT OF PIPE AND FILL COMPOSED OF NATIVE MATERIAL RETURNED INTO THE DITCH Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards: Reference Table 2 in the delineation Total surface area in acres of wetlands or other waters of the U.S. filled (see instructions): Reference Table 2 in the delineation Indicate the United body type in ACRES and LINEAR FEET (where appropriate) the proposed impacts to waters States, and identify the impact(s) as permanent and/or temporary for each listed below: of water Permanent Temporary Water Body Type Acres Linear feet Acres Linear feet Wetland Riparian streambed Unveg. streambed Lake Ocean Other Total: Potential indirect and/or cumulative impacts of proposed discharge (if any): All impacts are temporary, fill quantities and disturbance area are calculated in Table 2 for each crossing and any area potentially impacted within the ROW Required drawings (see instructions): Vicinity map: 7 Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) To -scale Plan view drawing(s): x Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) To -scale elevation and/or Cross Section drawing(s): X Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) Has a wetlands/waters XYes, Attached If a delineation of the U.S. delineation (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) has been completed, has it been of approved jurisdictional determination (m/d/yyyy): been completed? by the Corps? number: X No No verified in writing Corps file Yes, Date Page 4 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 22 of 317 3/1/2012 Please attach' one or more color photographs of the existing conditions (aerials if possible). for mail copy separately if applying electronically Page 5of13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 23 of 317 3/1/2012 Dredge Volume: Indicate in CUBIC YARDS the quantity of material to be dredged or used as fill: See Table 2 Indicate type(s) of material proposed to be discharged in waters of the United States: Native material returned into ditch For proposed discharges of dredged material into waters of the U.S. (including beach nourishment), please attache a proposed Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) prepared according to Inland Testing Manual (ITM) guidelines (including Tier I information, if available). 2or mail copy separately if applying electronically Is any portion of the work already complete? If yes, describe the work: YES ® NO Box 7 Intended NWP number (1.st)3: 12 Intended NWP number (2"d): Intended NWP number (3rd): 3 Enter the intended permit type(s). See NWP regulations for permit types and qualification information (http://www.usace.army.mil/inet/functions/cw/cecwo/reg/nationwide permits.htm). Box 8 Authority: Is Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act applicable?: ❑ YES ❑ NO Is Section 404 of the Clean Water Act applicable?: ❑ YES NO Box 9 Is the discharge of fill or dredged material for which Section 10/404 authorization is sought part of a larger plan of development?: YES M NO If discharge of fill or dredged material is part of development, name and proposed schedule for that larger development (start-up, duration, and completion dates): Location of larger development (If discharge of fill or dredged material is part of a plan of development, a map of suitable quality and detail of the entire project site should be included): Total area in acres of entire project area (including larger plan of development, where applicable): 1,480 acres Page 6of13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 24 of 317 3/1/2012 Box 10 Threatened or Endangered Species Please list any federally -listed (or proposed) threatened or endangered species or critical habitat within the project area (use scientific names (e.g., Genus species), if known): a. See NWP 12 verification report b. c. d. e. f. Have surveys, using U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/NOAA Fisheries protocols, been conducted? a Yes, Report attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) ❑ No If a federally -listed species would be impacted, please provide a description and a biological evaluation. a Yes, Report attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) ❑ Not attached Has the USFWS/NOAA Fisheries issued a Biological Opinion? Yes, Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) // No If yes, list date Opinion was issued (m/d/yyyy): Has Section 7 consultation been initiated by another federal agency? a Yes, Initiation letter attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) No Has Section 10 consultation been initiated for the proposed project? Yes, Initiation letter attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) // No Box 11 Historic properties and cultural resources: Please list any historic properties listed (or eligible to be listed) on the National Register of Historic Places: a. See Cultural Resources Report b. c. d. e. f. Are any cultural resources of any type known to exist on-site? a Yes No Has an archaeological records search been conducted? I/ Yes, Report attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) ❑ No Has a archaeological pedestrian survey been conducted for the site? I/ Yes, Report attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) ❑ No Has a Section 106 MOA been signed by another federal agency and the SHPO? ❑ Yes, Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) ❑ No If yes, list date MOA was signed (m/d/yyyy): Has Section 106 consultation been initiated by another federal agency? Yes, Initiation letter attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) ❑ No Page 7of13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 25 of 317 3/1/2012 Box 12 Measures taken to avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the United States (if any) • See attached Table "Wetlands that Would Be Affected by the WEP II Pipeline" prepared by Edge Environmental Include multiple copies of Box 13 for separate sites. Box activities. proposed Indicate (uplands5). 5 13 Proposed Compensatory Mitigation (site of ) related to fill/excavation and dredge Indicate in ACRES and LINEAR FEET (where appropriate) the total quantity of waters of the United States to be created, restored, enhanced and/or preserved for purposes of providing compensatory mitigation. water body type (wetland, riparian streambed, unvegetated streambed, lake, ocean, other) or non -jurisdictional Indicate mitigation type (on- or off-site by applicant, mitigation bank, in -lieu fee program): Water Body Type Created Restored Enhanced Preserved Mitigation type Example: wetland 0.8 acre 0.2 acre - - On-site by app Example: riparian_ stream - 3.0 acres/1300 if - ILFP Totals: For uplands, please indicate if designed as an upland buffer. If no mitigation is proposed, provide detailed explanation of why no mitigation would be necessary: All impacts are temporary, disturbed areas will be returned to their natural contours. See reclamation plan in the Enviromental Assessment. Has a draft/conceptual mitigation plan been prepared in accordance with the Army Corps of Engineers District guidelines? ❑ Yes, Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) ❑ No Mitigation site Latitude & Longitude (D/M/S, DD, or UTM) : USGS Quadrangle map name: Assessors Parcel Number: Section, Township, Range: Other location descriptions, if known: Directions to the mitigation location: Page 8 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 26 of 317 3/1/2012 Page 9 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 27 of 317 3/1/2012 Box 14 Water Quality Certification (see instructions): Applying for certification? ® Yes, Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) ❑ No Certification issued? ❑ Yes, Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) Exempt? Yes ❑ No If exempt, state why: Agency concurrence? ❑ Yes, Attached No No Box 15 Coastal Zone Management Act (see instructions): Is the project located within the Coastal Zone? Yes ❑ No If yes, applying for a coastal commission -approved Coastal Development Permit? Yes, Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) No If no, applying for separate CZMA-consistency certification? Yes, Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) No Permit/Consistency issued? Exempt? Yes No If exempt, state why: N/A Yes, Attached (or mail copy separately if applying electronically) No Box 16 List of other certifications or approvals/denials received from other federal, state, or local agencies for work described in this application: Agency Type Approval4 Identification No. Date Applied Date Approved Date Denied 4 Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building, and flood plain permits Page 10 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 28 of 317 3/1/2012 NWP General Conditions (GC) checklist: 1. Navigation: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No No navigable waterswill be impacted 2. Aquatic Life Movements: Project would be in compliance with GC? Z Yes ❑ No No aquatic movement will be impaired 3. Spawning Areas: Spawning areas present? ❑ Yes ® No Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No No spawing areas are present 4. Migratory Bird Breeding Areas: Migratory bird breeding areas present? Z Yes ❑ No Project would be in compliance with GC? Z Yes ❑ No Migratory bird areas will not be impacted 5. Shellfish Beds: Shellfish beds present? ❑ Yes ® No Project would be in compliance with GC? ❑ Yes ® No N/A 6. Suitable Material: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No Native material will be used as fill 7. Water Supply Intakes: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No No public water supply intakes will be impacted 8. Adverse Effects From Impoundments: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No Water will be temporary impounded only when dam and pump crossing method is implimented 9. Management of Water Flows: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No Bed and banks will be stabilized or returned to original contours. 10. Fills Within 100 -Year Floodplains: Project would be within 100 -year floodplains? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No See storm water management plan BMP's 11. Equipment: Project would be in compliance with GC? ❑ Yes ❑ No See attached engineered drawings, Appendix F Page 11 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 29 of 317 3/1/2012 12. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No See storm water management plans BMP's 13. Removal of Temporary Fills: Project would be in compliance with GC? Z Yes ❑ No All temporary fills will be matted or protected until temporary stock piles can be returned to the ditch 14. Proper Maintenance: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No No structures will be constructed 15. Wild and Scenic Rivers: Project would be within a National Wild and Scenic River System (including proposed system)? ❑ Yes ® No Project would be in compliance with GC? Z Yes ❑ No N/A 16. Tribal Rights: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No N/A 17. Endangered Species: see Box 10 above. 18. Historic Properties: see Box 11 above. 19. Designated Critical Waters (check those that apply) Includes: 1) ❑ NOAA-designated marine sanctuaries, 2) ❑ National Estuarine Research Reserves, 3) ❑ State natural heritage sites, 4) ❑ Officially designated waters Applicant is aware of the restrictions a) and b) below? ® Yes ❑ No a) NWP 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49, and 50: No NWP can be authorized. b) NWP 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, and 38: Notification is required. 20. Mitigation: see Box 13 above. 21. Water Quality (401 Certification): see Box 14 above. 22. Coastal Zone Permit: see Box 15 above. 23. Regional and Case -By -Case Conditions: Complete the Regional Conditions checklist below. Project would be in compliance with any Case-by-case conditions? Yes ❑ No N/A 24. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits: Applicant is aware that if total proposed acreage of impact exceeds acreage limit of NWP with highest specified acreage, no NWP can be issued? ❑ Yes ❑ No 25. Transfer of Nationwide Permit Verifications: Applicant is aware of this permit transfer requirement? ® Yes ❑ No Page 12 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 30 of 317 3/1/2012 26. Compliance Certification: Applicant is aware of this post -construction requirement? ® Yes ❑ No 27. Pre -Construction Notification: If a PCN is required, the PCN includes: (check those that apply) ® Delineation of wetlands and other waters of the U.S. ❑ If project results in the loss of greater than 1/10 acre of wetlands, a compensatory mitigation plan or statement describing how the mitigation requirement will be satisfied ® For non -Federal applicants, a list of threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat that might be affected by the proposed work ❑ For Federal applicants, documentation demonstrating compliance with the Endangered Species Act ® For non -Federal applicants, a list of historic properties listed on, or determined eligible for listing on, or potentially eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places that may be affected by the proposed work; or a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property ❑ For Federal applicants, documentation demonstrating compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act 28. Single and Complete Project: Project would be in compliance with GC? ® Yes ❑ No NWP Regional Conditions (RC) checklist: II. Sacramento District (SPK) in Colorado: SPK Regional conditions to be applied only in Colorado in the Sacramento District: a. Are utility line and/or road activities crossing perennial water or special aquatic sites located within the Colorado Basin proposed under NWPs 12 and/or 14? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, notification pursuant to General Condition 27 is required using either the South Pacific Division Preconstruction Notification (PCN) Checklist or a completed application form (ENG Form 4345). In addition, the PCN shall include: 1. A written statement explaining how the activity has been designed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States; 2. Drawings, including plan and cross-section views, clearly depicting the location, size and dimensions of the proposed activity. The drawings shall contain a title block, legend and scale, amount (in cubic yards) and size (in acreage) of fill in Corps jurisdiction, including both permanent and temporary fills/structures. The ordinary high water mark or, if tidal waters, the high tide line should be shown (in feet), based on National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) or other appropriate referenced elevation; and 3. Pre -project color photographs of the project site taken from designated locations documented on the plan drawing. b. Are bank stabilization activities proposed under NWP 13 within streams which average less than 20 feet across (measured between the ordinary high water marks) and require placement of greater than 1/4 cubic yard of suitable fill material per running foot below the plane of the ordinary high water mark? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, notification pursuant to General Condition 27 (as described above) is required. Page 13 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 31 of 317 3/1/2012 c. Is the activity proposed under NWP 27? ['Yes ® No 1. Does the activity include a fishery enhancement component? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, notification pursuant to General Condition 27 (as described above) is required. The Corps will send the PCN to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) (formerly Colorado Division of Wildlife) for review. In accordance with General Condition 27, CPW will have 10 days from the receipt of Corps notification to indicate that they will be commenting on the proposed project. CPW will then have an additional 15 days after the initial 10 -day period to provide those comments. If CPW raises concerns, the applicant may either modify their plan, in coordination with CPW, or apply for a standard individual permit. 2. Does the activity involve the length of a stream? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, the post -project stream sinuosity will not be significantly reduced, unless it is demonstrated that the reduction in sinuosity is consistent with the natural morphological evolution of the stream (sinuosity is the ratio of stream length to project reach length). 3. Does the activity involve a structure? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, the structure will allow the upstream and downstream passage of aquatic organisms, including fish native to the reach, as well as recreational water craft or other navigational activities, unless specifically waived in writing by the District Engineer. The use of grout and/or concrete in building structures is not authorized by NWP 27. 4. Does the activity involve construction of a water park (i.e., kayak courses) or flood control project? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, the construction of water parks and flood control projects are not authorized by NWP 27. d. Is the activity proposed under NWPs 29 and/or 39? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, notification pursuant to General Condition 27 (as described above) is required. A copy of the existing FEMA/locally-approved floodplain map must be submitted with the PCN. When reviewing proposed developments, the Corps will utilize the most accurate and reliable FEMA/locally-approved pre -project floodplain mapping, not post -project floodplain mapping based on a CLOMR or LOMR. However, the Corps will accept revisions to existing floodplain mapping if the revisions resolve inaccuracies in the original floodplain mapping and if the revisions accurately reflect pre -project conditions. e. Will the activity involve the removal of temporary fills? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, General Condition 13 (Removal of Temporary Fills) is amended by adding the following: When temporary fills are placed in wetlands in Colorado, a horizontal marker (i.e. fabric, certified weed -free straw, etc.) must be used to delineate the existing ground elevation of wetlands that will be temporarily filled during construction. f. Will the activity occur within a spawning area? ❑ Yes // No If yes, General Condition 3 (Spawning Areas) is amended by adding the following: In Colorado, all Designated Critical Resource Waters (see Enclosure 1) are considered important spawning areas. Therefore, in accordance with General Condition 19 (Designated Critical Resource Waters), the discharge of dredged or fill material is not authorized by the following NWPs in these waters: NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49, and 50. In addition, in accordance with General Condition 27, notification (as described above) is required for the use of the following NWPs in these waters: NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, and 38.. g. Will the activity use broken concrete as fill material? ❑ Yes ® No Page 14 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 32 of 317 3/1/2012 If yes, notification pursuant to General Condition 27 (as described above) is required. Permittees must demonstrate that soft engineering methods utilizing native or non -manmade materials are not practicable (with respect to cost, existing technology, and logistics), before broken concrete is allowed as suitable fill. Use of broken concrete with exposed rebar is prohibited in perennial waters and special aquatic sites. h. Will the activity involve work with heavy equipment in perennial or intermittent waters of the United States? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, General Condition 11 (Equipment) is amended by adding the following condition: If heavy equipment is used for the subject project that was previously working in another stream, river, lake, pond, or wetland within 10 days of initiating work, one of the following procedures is necessary to prevent the spread of New Zealand Mud Snails and other aquatic hitchhikers: 1. Remove all mud and debris from equipment (tracks, turrets, buckets, drags, teeth, etc.) and keep the equipment dry for 10 days; or 2. Remove all mud and debris from equipment (tracks, turrets, buckets, drags, teeth, etc.) and spray/soak equipment with either a 1:1 solution of Formula 409 Household Cleaner and water, or a solution of Sparquat 256 (5 ounces Sparquat per gallon of water). Treated equipment must be kept moist for at least 10 minutes; or 3. Remove all mud and debris from equipment (tracks, turrets, buckets, drags, teeth, etc.) and spray/soak equipment with water greater than 120 degrees F for at least 10 minutes. i. Is the activity located with a fen and/or a wetland adjacent to a fen? ❑ Yes ® No j• If yes, all NWPs except 3, 6, 20, 27, 32, 38, and 47, are revoked. For NWPs 3, 20, 27, and 38, notification pursuant to General Condition 27 (as described above) is required and the permittee may not begin the activity until the Corps determines the adverse environmental effects are minimal. A fen is defined as: Fen soils (histosols) are normally saturated throughout the growing season, although they may not be during drought conditions. The primary source of hydrology for fens is groundwater. Histosols are defined in accordance with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service publications on Keys to Soil Taxonomy and Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/taxonomy). Is the activity proposed within 100 feet of the point of groundwater discharge of a natural spring? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, all NWPs, except NWP 47, require notification pursuant to General Condition 27 (as described above). A spring source is defined as any location where ground water emanates from a point in the ground. For purposes of this condition, springs do not include seeps or other discharges which lack a defined channel. Additional Information Regarding Minimization of Impacts and Compliance with Existing General Conditions: 1. Permittees are reminded of the existing General Condition No. 6 which prohibits the use of unsuitable material. Organic debris, building waste, asphalt, car bodies, and trash are not suitable material. Also, General Condition 12 requires appropriate erosion and sediment controls (i.e. all fills must be permanently stabilized to prevent erosion and siltation into waters and wetlands at the earliest practicable date). Streambed material or other small aggregate material placed along a bank as stabilization will not meet General Condition 12. Also, use of erosion control mats that contain plastic netting may not meet General Condition 12 if deemed harmful to wildlife. 2. Designated Critical Resource Waters in Colorado. In Colorado, a list of designated Critical Resource Waters has been published in accordance with General Condition 19 (Designated Critical Resource Waters). This list will be Page 15 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 33 of 317 3/1/2012 published on the Albuquerque District Regulatory home page (http://www.spa.usace.army.mil/reg/). A copy is attached (see Enclosure 1). 3. Federally -Listed Threatened and Endangered Species. General Condition 17 requires that non-federal permittees notify the District Engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the project. Information on such species, to include occurrence by county in Colorado, may be found at the following U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service website: http://www.fws.gov/mountain%2Dprairie/endspp/name county search.htm. Page 16 of 13 Revised November 9, 2011. For the most recent version of this form, visit your Corps District's Regulatory website. WestWater Engineering 34 of 317 3/1/2012 Enclosure 1 DESIGNATED CRITICAL RESOURCE WATERS IN COLORADO The following waters within the State of Colorado are designated as critical resource waters. In accordance with General Condition 19 (Designated Critical Resource Waters), the discharge of dredged or fill material is not authorized by the following nationwide permits in these waters: NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49 and 50. In addition, in accordance with General Condition 27 (Pre -Construction Notification), notification to the District Engineer is required for use of the following nationwide permits in these waters: NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37 and 38. a. Outstanding Natural Resource Waters: • Cache la Poudre Basin: All tributaries to the Cache La Poudre River system, including all lakes and reservoirs, which are within Rocky Mountain National Park; • Laramie River: All tributaries to the Laramie River system, including all lakes and reservoirs which are in the Rawah Wilderness Area; • North Fork Gunnison River: All tributaries to North Fork Gunnison River system, including lakes, reservoirs and wetlands within the West Elk and Raggeds Wilderness Area; • North Platte River: All tributaries to the North Platte River and Encampment Rivers, including all lakes and reservoirs, which are in the Mount Zirkle Wilderness Area; • San Miguel River: All tributaries, lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands within the boundaries of the Lizard Head and Mt. Sneffels Wilderness Area; • Roaring Fork River: All tributaries to the Roaring Fork River system, including lakes, reservoirs and wetlands within the Maroon Bells/Snowmass Wilderness Area; • Uncompahgre River: All tributaries to the Uncompahgre River system, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands within the Mt. Sneffels and Big Blue Wilderness Areas; • Upper Arkansas River Basin: All streams, wetlands, lakes, and reservoirs within the Mount Massive and Collegiate Peaks Wilderness Areas; • Upper Colorado River: Mainstem of the Colorado River system including tributaries, lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands within Rocky Mountain National Park; • Upper Gunnison River Basin: All tributaries, lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands in the La Garita Wilderness Area. All tributaries to the Gunnison River system, including lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands within West Elk, Collegiate Peaks, Maroon Bells, Raggeds, Fossil Ridge, Oh -Be -Joyful and Big Blue Wilderness Areas; • White River: Trapper's Lake and tributaries to Trapper's Lake; • Yampa River: All tributaries to the Yampa River, including lakes, reservoirs and wetlands within Zirkle Wilderness Area. b. Gold Medal Waters. Gold Medal Waters, as identified by the State of Colorado, are defined in the Colorado Fishing Season Information brochure, on the Colorado Division of Wildlife website (http://wildlife.state.co.us) or can be obtained at any Colorado Division of Wildlife or Corps office in Colorado. c. Cutthroat Trout Waters. Waters designated as Cutthroat Trout Waters by the Colorado Division of Wildlife, Colorado Wildlife Commission, as listed in the Colorado Division of Wildlife's regulation at Chapter 0, Appendix C, which can be accessed via the following website address: http://wildlife.state.co.us/NR/rdonlyres/4D6FFAC6-64EB-4516-A5E9-AE91 B7392A95/0/Ch00.pdf WestWater Engineering 35 of 317 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS Photos of ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages WestWater Engineering 36 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-1 Upstream, MP 636.04 COE-1 Downstream, MP 636.04 COE-1 Across, MP 636.04 yam,,' it �' _ •% Z l" _ .-... '� _ l- \,...,.... {I' �J .. COE-2 Upstream, MP 636.21 COE-2 Downstream, MP 636.21 COE-2 Across, MP 636.21 • .. ! � ` r ., tEt k1w COE-3 No OHWM, MP 636.22 COE-4 Upstream, MP 636.47 COE-4 Downstream, MP 636.47 COE-4 Across, MP 636.47 moi_ �l- .- COE-5 Upstream, MP 637.24 COE-5 Downstream, MP 637.24 COE-5 Across, MP 637.24 - k_. r_.".,- ,. 4 ,'- . T=om._ COE-6 Upstream, MP 638.95 COE-6 Downstream, MP 638.95 COE-6 Across, MP 638.95 - Y _ r Try J, \ MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 37 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-7 Upstream, MP 639.63 COE-7 Downstream, MP 639.63 COE-7 Across, MP 639.63 40111116 _ COE-8 Across, MP 639.91 in . .1" , m t ham'. _ __ :�-._.. _...�,-_.:..- ,-rte _ _. COE-8 Upstream, MP 639.91 COE-8 Downstream, MP 639.91 . COE-9 Upstream, MP 640.76 � .. ` - z . x S �J' }.Myr "�4}�� _y n- r '9T 1 W r4 _ 1�.0 -s+'� v y... ✓r '. )i' g,. k . .. COE-9 Downstream, MP 640.76 COE-9 Across, MP 640.76 .. _x' " `{(� 4 �•. tk' , . yi 'b 'iM kr,e`i ,1 � jL ` ' .. S: -'•t-- y '.' �� .•r. 'R4 - u -.i .a..ti` qjy .b e-.. nom'. r, ., 1 +j �p - y:ti. Y k 4 'F C c ' ... ..\". yTR " ! N ; ,2'.. ,l , ." ,. S : _ �' _`,� Y-. COE-10 Upstream, MP 642.72 COE-10 Downstream, MP 642.72 COE-10 Across, MP 642.72 - -' - •i..+. ".. --_ ` COE-11 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 644.3 —sir,- _ - COE-11 Across, No OHWM, MP 644.3 ,.-s _ COE-11 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 644.3 COE-12 Upstream, MP 645.14 COE-12 Downstream, MP 645.14 COE-12 Across, MP 645.14 r „� =c r !' 1 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 38 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-13 Blue Line, Actual drainage no longer flows here, but at COE-14, No OHWM, MP 647.6 COE-14 Upstream, MP 647.61 COE-14 Downstream, MP 647.61 COE-14 Across, MP 647.61 COE-15 Upstream, MP 647.94 COE-15 Downstream, MP 647.94 COE-15 Across, MP 647.94 n - . '. -ice - - . COE-16 Upstream, MP 648.21 COE-16 Downstream, MP 648.21 COE-16 Across, MP 648.21 r-. COE-17 Upstream, MP 648.57 4. � COE-17 Downstream, MP 648.57 • At.-,, a H _h .fir 1V. _ COE-17 Across, MP 648.57 tom•^+ • -...-.-- r4 r ?.-`. COE-18 Upstream, MP 649.22 COE-18 Downstream, MP 649.22 COE-18 Across, MP 649.22 +-I'•" �C _ 4., T .: �- •fir . r MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 39 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-19 Upstream, MP 649.82 COE-19 Downstream, MP 649.82 COE-19 Across, MP 649.82 COE-20 Upstream, MP 650.3 COE-20 Downstream, MP 650.3 COE-20 Across, MP 650.3 COE-21 Upstream, MP 650.43 COE-21 Downstream, MP 650.43 COE-21 Across, MP 650.43 COE-22 Upstream, MP 652.38 COE-22 Downstream, MP 652.38 COE-22 Across, MP 652.38 r COE-23 Seep, Upstream, MP 652.57 COE-23 Seep, Downstream, MP 652.57 COE-23 Seep, Across, MP 652.57 COE-24 Upstream, MP 652.57 COE-24 Downstream, MP 652.57 COE-24 Across, MP 652.57 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 40 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-25 Upstream, MP 653.19 COE-25 Downstream, MP 653.19 COE-25 Across, MP 653.19 w COE-26 Upstream, MP 654.12 COE-26 Downstream, MP 654.12 COE-26 Across, MP 654.12 .' :. COE-27 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 655.69 COE-27 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 655.69 COE-27 Across, No OHWM, MP 655.69 P, I - -, P +t COE-28 Upstream, MP 658.26 COE-28 Downstream, MP 658.26 COE-28 Across, MP 658.26 • ,.. , �. COE-29 Upstream, MP 658.39 COE-29 Upstream, MP 658.39 COE-29 Across, MP 658.39 _ _ d —• + .. �. �.''. - ' y� V'' I. .`a .y•_ a _. Vn]tit .61E 1FZG-ly"- e- `dR .' S6 v COE-30 Upstream, MP 660.25 COE-30 Downstream, MP 660.25 COE-30 Across, MP 660.25 a u .c p• . 1 _•'`i, f^, , ft y `M.. .des .. r e_ ._ . MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 41 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-31 Upstream, MP 661.15 COE-31 Downstream, MP 661.15 COE-31 Across, MP 661.15 ' - ^• fit Ypl _ '1 p •'t { h -_ - +9 • Y 'ii', f COE-32 Upstream, MP 662.38 COE-32 Downstream, MP 662.38 ` es.91 1 1 1 , COE-32 Across, MP 662.38 $ �r NaT f � $ #1'� 1lry 10_ : �. Vic_ COE-33 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 664.17 COE-33 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 664.17 COE-33 Across, NO OHWM, MP 664.17 .tj�.. .. - - t !fA - ,i[ .may,,, Ail '�n`' .`.. ..... - fir .�. j 1-` fi'. -. s , Yd. �4 i4 I - a .r , r6'9rnf1 M:ga COE-34 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 664.43 COE-34 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 664.43 COE-34 Across, MP 664.43 _�- COE-35 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 665.44 - COE-35 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 665.44 No photo COE-35 Across, No OHWM, MP 665.44 ' COE-36 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 666.14 - COE-36 Across, No OHWM, MP 666.14 COE-36 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 666.14 ilk MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 42 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-37 No OHWM, MP 666.67 COE-38 No OHWM, MP 666.82 COE-39 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 666.97 COE-39 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 666.97 COE-39 Across, No OHWM, MP 666.97 COE-40 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 667.79 COE-40 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 667.79 COE-40 Across, No OHWM, MP 667.79 COE-41 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 668.48 COE-41 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 668.48 COE-41 Across, No OHWM, MP 668.48 • COE-42 Upstream, MP 668.91 COE-42 Downstream, MP 668.91 COE-42 Across, MP 668.91 COE-43 Upstream, MP 669.1 COE-43 Downstream, MP 669.1 COE-43 Across, MP 669.1 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 43 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-44 Upstream, MP 669.24 COE-44 Downstream, MP 669.24 COE-44 Across, MP 669.24 • •• COE-45 No OHWM, MP 669.37 .. ;=: COE-46 No OHWM, MP 669.8 Yom_ COE-47 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 670.74 COE-47 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 670.74 COE-47 Across, No OHWM, MP 670.74 [ .:1, , A *➢. _ i-- ...�. _. yam^ v Y COE-48 Downstream, MP 670.89 f J 4 a -,, § F ._ f : COE-48 Upstream, MP 670.89 COE-48 Across, MP 670.89 .. r mak• `" '�.x . N. .� - ,.. - x' -fir Y- COE-49 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 671.33 COE-49 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 671.33 COE-49 Across, No OHWM, MP 671.33 - _- — _ - t..r .. . c._ •\ ' `M x.rr4 - .;� pp NA COE-50 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 671.65 COE-50 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 671.65 COE-50 Across, No OHWM, MP 671.65 - _ •:. -.,� ` t all rr , 1 y::+Y .3rv• 9 -; ►1 y ` , �, -ate b 12. eilolr6 LL-1E 'IF. no- -'gid :. 1... 4 Fs1 x510 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 44 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-51 Upstream, MP 671.74 COE-51 Downstream, MP 671.74 COE-51 Across, MP 671.74 ..- r., . - r i ''!,C :' • ---, lfpir. A .� .mac r �, , ,II ;,'F � Ja- i? '1• ,. :. r -,dry �mar - a.,y 31. — ,; kyr 3 � �,,,�`�'i�F�= ' � ',s sem+ n'' Y, may. _ 4s r Y +es�=1ti y'.� �. aA" COE-52 Upstream, MP 671.94 COE-52 Downstream, MP 671.94 COE-52 Across, MP 671.94 I s 4' . E..p ` r + • ,. I. � 4kV COE-53 Across, MP 672.43 i COE-53 Upstream, MP 672.43 4a azo s 0'1 '_ COE-53 Downstream, MP 672.43 n a 51dQ.4 poi � 1 COE-54 Upstream, MP 672.75 COE-54 Downstream, MP 672.75 COE-54 Across, MP 672.75 ^a yY� rt'. ^,i A I��E- ,'`5 •�t SI 'k Z,,' Y.ryM ' .. ' t ,.- 'i. ✓ \ t'• 9i/ ,t:,i.._ - ,•,K -tk. `.r.IVY 7 .Y <.Y -0' = -fi '* _ , ?: f,''�' t ,i ;.,/� fi � Il � , f.. 1 I •�, , X: .� iik ./ ' . 7 i d' 1.1P' . 4.:. ' - lOoh y :' � i H ��, - (J.;x •. *•p i ` •Ylkehfi • 'Y f j , - 1i •' ..Y. y r- COE-55 Upstream, MP 673.02 COE-55 Downstream, MP 673.02 COE-55 Across, MP 673.02 _ a' } 1 .. ' -��' _ ., ;," ;, ,; —__ [S6 AOS Ate+ y + _ '.s.G' hyo -.. -.L i1i . -�9i'�'. COE-56 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 673.54 COE-56 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 673.54 COE-56 Across, No OHWM, MP 673.54 _ I , r. . MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 45 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-57 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 675.5 COE-57 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 675.5 COE-57 Across, No OHWM, MP 675.5 .t - . 1, 5, _ - .• 1 1�! - COE-58 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 676,56 COE-58 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 676.56 COE-58 Across, No OHWM, MP 676.56 • yd 14 +0.F yy1 L. 1 COE-59 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 677.66 COE-59 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 677.66 COE-59 Across, No OHWM, MP 677.66 _.y�_•.� _}fit N b ..� •" ��': '•_ ,_ i -'rn^ -- •1�iill�r _ COE-60 Upstream, MP 678.68 1(� :.('. -„°':'N.' Y # Yti . •,✓. • Fe" ^ ,SP -' - r, ,t .. ate'%”- a COE-60 Downstream, MP 678.68 COE-60 Across, MP 678.68 •"M F'(. - _. [ ,, k J r �.� _ _ 4 "- i � � COE-61 Across, No OHWM, MP 679.53 COE-61 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 679.53 COE-61 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 679.53 iik M 1 _ V n`-4-•-J }• - } om rtyy � * `i. `•�' r,•g .� 1+� - - r-, y�.A• '� a 5104 n1 l''' a A 3 - ..- S� may,. �� l�� W COE-62 Upstream, MP 679.97 COE-62 Downstream, MP 679.97 COE-62 Across, MP 679.97 P .E ya. 1 _ ,' } �}] - a .rs ap MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 46 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-63 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 680.65 COE-63 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 680.65 COE-63 Across, No OHWM, MP 680.65 £Nh COE-64 Upstream, MP 681.06 COE-64 Downstream, MP 681.06 COE-64 Across, MP 681.06 `•. -''r 1 a, r ,( ..._ `icy-. ,� - 3 Y d l,'r 1 ti -.5 —.4 - a !04'!2011 i4 ^, COE-65 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 681.73 COE-65 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 681.73 COE-65 Across, No OHWM, MP 681.73 '� .a.. - .. COE-66 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 684.53 9k,, .01i;. -f •'1, } X44 4 xu, COE-66 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 684.53 COE-66 Across, No OHWM, MP 684.53 3��tr. •.,a. COE-67 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 685.18 ({ n V � ^'k - i C 4 � r I ,S ` COE-67 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 685.18 COE-67 Across, No OHWM, MP 685.18 COE-68 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 685.47 - --- .4 .:.:.servo• x� .._. . COE-68 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 685.47 COE-68 Across, No OHWM, MP 685.47 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 47 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-69 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 686.83 COE-69 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 686.83 COE-69 Across, No OHWM, MP 686.83 _i` 04 ' i , y. -f. , Ir.._ ' fit' „ ...-.�"t11,2120.11' I1 06`'6. 7Y !" ... .4 e gyp. r r t4�i} COE-70 Upstream, MP 686.98 COE-70 Downstream, MP 686.98 COE-70 Across, MP 686.98 ; .';-• - - - - t Y `se• -, F - e_ u.. - . ' v. '.'/ �0� a> :vF P _. ,e F"4; p-k-•,.-'� T'¢ Rzv ,.-Y� µms. f1�IE.+i , r k b �:�.Yw' r s� Ni J• p�g��gpp - i ., i 'A �°: .. 9r .. „ ;':. ww _L {. f ,, i.K, �z�n; FV 4 �fy� .�lY� 7►' t.,n- •4 L nil tkCye10 F2ir'. L i.iA' l: JU - COE-71 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 687.14 .0 .' COE-71 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 687.14 COE-71 Across, No OHWM, MP 687.14 - . . i r w-} • , � : 3 rd.' 3' .�r r.s _ F S� ice. it `4d •d' , 8 p�•75 r " '`„-,�- S5 r 'X t yY : �' �f��., iik— MOAT ` `'.. COE-72 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 687.26 COE-72 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 687.26 COE-72 Across, No OHWM, MP 687.26 - - -.-.r,. '. ,.. - -.-_ �. r L yr1`s _.. L _ M 31' 1 � k.: - .�- - irc.y 1 3' z. c w °'moi u -am 1 �f ,. t cA I , .,-+ 051}1F _ .}, COE-73 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 687.43 COE-73 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 687.43 COE-73 Across, No OHWM, MP 687.43 - •Wi _ _Ptd Ti u. �, f — Y' ° :. - P t'.`.``` r r '`s r =a ^" '. a.t - ter' 'r' - -� it • • 4 ti - - , .I COE-74 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 687.68 COE-74 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 687.68 COE-74 Across, No OHWM, MP 687.68 bas.. .�i OM1! e -. _ r - - " H.o+ ..r*, s a 'eV . - - * A'It ,i se,E. 1� f� _ - _ '.yy�5'�st' ° - • r .. - ` 13110,1 - ,.. _ MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 48 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-75 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 687.83 COE-75 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 687.83 COE-75 Across, No OHWM, MP 687.83 -4 44:„..r k; _ 4 Lam.. rid !R. �3 ti' A rIr. 2 go I 3 r 'uiI., , y j; , 4 M -J _ I- _ �, w r,.. • '�• l►. .rte - . - • yv I l p t. `' y r r SC , 7d c ' c t�' F tt •;: q K6 Ai i.7, >W •, SJ s I 0, i s. n; COE-76 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 687.98 COE-76 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 687.98 COE-76 Across, No OHWM, MP 687.98 ¢: rte' t• .• .tw a '�t .i` • - r _ • �y y Pt - I fad ft 5d' - `moi ! 4 -,". '$ � 4 , r rat V I Y' ;,Et dal n . _ , "` I: + o51 P aaa as a�a •�3� .I iJU .i' .a. fi w r ;�� _ - -_ 4 r e ` OVI� aill e •4 I COE-77 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 688.14 COE-77 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 688.14 COE-77 Across, No OHWM, MP 688.14 '� - 4.......4. .4r € a• . • •ey, y ...�.` _ F `Xn. a .� R '0 1"f1yiW,k�.• ,,it o,,_ : :z+ '"-'•••*."-' w��' s a • ! a;-IY' L M:114 _ ,. `t 7• tea-' {„.,-" `- 'meq _� � �-�,�•�{c n xd h" ¢ -:._ R gro •f., f f yy, K` i 1 , �l ,3 ?, - I ; i y . 1, �. r Q s._. • til y" . , a { tJ l '..GYM { _.,-- •R r f ! ( $�1_ar •.ti., .•. a wft^y "y 1 f '4 k s '� ;_ J �j� t. �= , SSL •e {pll'u' Vii' � ' 'yrs L• ' 'x iix "s Y., 'lam h . _ N II • COE-78 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 688.47 COE-78 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 688.47 COE-78 Across, No OHWM, MP 688.47 r _ ♦ _ ... - ., - - _ _ ' * .. .. . .,i. x _u a. ff. eY �^.F - .1 `.• ' -Y • i :x •=5.,• - -, CM 1 -..f ,` ;, : 1 Y / rT 4:^` •ery • '�0. — T }ir� �'. :. aux r y � 1 � 1 1 4917 COE-79 Upstream, MP 688.64 COE-79 Downstream, MP 688.64 COE-79 Across, MP 688.64 ..4„„c _ - - w.. _ • Y 4 +- �.. + t- a- - • .<, ) - s J.. - '. Tk Ila 111.11 9 Y Igler l ti.. r� te r. .. . - ' 'gip - 1 4.. it TTy r , , , 05/13/2011 1 COE-80 Upstream, MP 688.67 COE-80 Downstream, MP�688.67 COE-80 Across, MP 688.67¢ • v ... „-..A--,--'.y�_.,jy + '� k$ J /j . . _ _ , gIbu uJh Lk_ c_, I_ di .i.r t v'� J !•" Yom. may - ✓a ♦• •}IIF f .-.. { ryr' ±. y• . •-• • `'^'•''0,,J,_, ) ! •ter;, MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 49 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-81 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 689.06 COE-81 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 689.06 COE-81 Across, No OHWM, MP 689.06 COE-82 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 689.33 COE-82 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 689.33 COE-82 Across, No OHWM, MP 689.33 COE-83 Upstream, MP 689.44 COE-83 Downstream, MP 689.44 COE-83 Across, MP 689.44 COE-84 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 689.72 COE-84 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 689.72 COE-84 Across, No OHWM, MP 689.72 COE-85 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 689.86 COE-85 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 689.86 COE-85 Across, No OHWM, MP 689.86 COE-86 Upstream, MP 690.03 COE-86 Downstream, MP 690.03 COE-86 Across, MP 690.03 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 50 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-87 Upstream, MP 690.09 COE-87 Downstream, MP 690.09 COE-87 Across, MP 690.09 1 '•iia+: _ iJ M ... -'t- 9 "., COE-88 Upstream, MP 690.37 COE-88 Downstream, MP 690.37 COE-88 Across, MP 690.37 � x v•v maw.,' _ —,y. _ r-'-- — .M R _ - ,times f_ y .' ` r.�..V I 'i. <. _ r � } $ . .r .1 1 o i ,.. ..+i fi. yl� .i—`if'. .. _ .. v -x1. ♦ J"J."af♦i'.. }'. COE-89 Upstream, MP 690.62 COE-89 Downstream, MP 690.62 COE-89 Across, MP 690.62 �. COE-90 Downstream, MP 690.63 -- COE-90 Upstream, MP 690.63 COE-90 Across, MP 690.63 AL { s COE-91 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 690.78 COE-91 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 690.78 COE-91 Across, No OHWM, MP 690.78 r., ,1 -r. COE-92 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 691.14 COE-92 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 691.14 COE-92 Across, No OHWM, MP 691.14 _�~ I,.{' Ire , .. _• ' MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 51 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-93 Upstream, MP 691.22 COE-93 Downstream, MP 691.22 COE-93 Across, MP 691.22 4i, ,.. , .e. , . ... , . _ , . ...„ ., . i „ _ 4. . ....„..... 0,-........s :, , ..,:4 COE-94 Upstream, MP 691.62 COE-94 Downstream, MP 691.62 COE-94 Across, MP 691.62 • -IN .•irmilmoRT;;,r, V rinimprY COE-95 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 691.81 COE-95 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 691.81 COE-95 Across, No OHWM, MP 691.81 ,l,i +•tet • . . COE-96 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 691.82 COE-96 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 691.82 COE-96 Across, No OHWM, MP 691.82 ' r..... a'. y. -ar"" 11% 1 _,� ?"! '"''tea, COE-97 Upstream, MP 692.02 COE-97 Downstream, MP 692.02 COE-97 Across, MP 692.02 R, .. �.,... ' J rJ �a� � •.,.. - — c x _ COE-98 Upstream, MP 693.65 COE-98 Downstream, MP 693.65 COE-98 Across, MP 693.65 { f q :v :a" > MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 52 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-99 Upstream, MP 693.99 COE-99 Downstream, MP 693.99 COE-99 Across, MP 693.99 .. '4. V. "• cgs ' "`' �.r tib` ,k ! i-� "� A P , 4Kh11`. COE-100 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 694.02 COE-100 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 694.02 COE-100 Across, No OHWM, MP 694.02 f 1 i . COE-101 Downstream, MP 694.84 COE-101 Across, MP 694.84 COE-101 Upstream, MP 694.84 COE-102 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 694.89 COE-102 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 694.89 COE-102 Across, No OHWM, MP 694.89 R -:-No `rC e< 4 ,,S photo a '" Y F. _ h°+ yrs!' J COE-103 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 695.21 COE-103 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 695.21 COE-103 Across, No OHWM, MP 695.21 COE-104 Upstream, MP 696.43 COE-104 Downstream, MP 696.43 • COE-104 Across, MP 696.43 . r f r MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 53 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-105 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 696.6 COE-105 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 696.6 COE-105 Across, No OHWM, MP 696.6 aft &x ¢t�y COE-106 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 696.64 COE-106 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 696.64 COE-106 Across, No OHWM, MP 696.64 J •. +mss. . � ,Tx,' - •-, dig '. LP _�.,. i T.. ,is . r a '�` Axa 5 COE-107 Downstream, MP 696.87 ,.1.•., a. M COE-107 Across, MP 696.87 a r COE-107 Upstream, MP 696.87 COE-108 Upstream, MP 697.53 COE-108 Downstream, MP 697.53 • COE-108 Across, MP 697.53 .. . Y ,VF 5{ ra'Y..., )•� !kms k .?.....,:,,,...7LLrG� aR- oR, •am �./'/-f-!-• arY .. r ` r ':rid 1 P+ sf--, - r '-c- - � :: .''.x'.y�� y .1. L ✓'q°! ! f., COE-109 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 697.82 COE-109 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 697.82 COE-109 Across, No OHWM, MP 697.82 .. - ' • t lit t • `,�q.'$v" ". Y �•. .. • ,. w,.... r. _. .. an..... i•'� ;... v '.- Yt�'''4 ... „„ .L-.... :. - .. . COE-110 Upstream, MP 698.34 COE-110 Downstream, MP 698.34 COE-110 Across, MP 698.34 `," y >. :ice 4- �► - ./�...:•.:_ '-� ' . I Ma L y+'!l�%>'. .0 ""/ t ...-•`a" __- � def ",art ..✓ S„ f „' F, e Y p.+. 'W MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 54 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-111 Upstream, MP 698.9 COE-111 Downstream, MP 698.9 . l ... a'..V _ COE-111 Across, MP 698.9 isor— — , A It4,. 1 0 or.' — , At ' — , 1 . .� . .: COE-112 Upstream, MP 698.92 COE-112 Downstream, MP 698.92 COE-112 Across, MP 698.92 -, qi COE-113 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 699.37 COE-113 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 699.37 COE-113 Across, No OHWM, MP 699.37 k ' X .4.+ -e'NsA['Jl.m sK'YI%iiu'.'rYbfW.xiwvi�iY._ii"'�'��:1;-)4 •.�Yr t.-4 ' +.. COE-114 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 699.46 COE-114 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 699.46 COE-114 Across, No OHWM, MP 699.46 COE-115 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 699.53 COE-115 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 699.53 COE-115 Across, No OHWM, MP 699.53 , , 4 �Z! -. L �� 4�yL�r .. ... I F' t.P'R�i •�- _..{�.,1 .. `,�%RI. COE-116 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 700.06 COE-116 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 700.06 COE-116 Across, No OHWM, MP 700.06 ..I,... .; - 64.yip MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 55 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-117 Upstream, MP 700.09 COE-117 Downstream, MP 700.09 COE-117 Across, MP 700.09 ,/ Ik, . .�,cp .;; _ � 4M1yy ,. r 5 Ty �,....N., ,�;,, / ,/,1;r j t �, . *yPy 5, !1 '` . sa. mak K IV M1 �y rail• 'AO r r I ` � COE-118 Upstream, MP 700.25 COE-118 Downstream, MP 700.25 COE-118 Across, MP 700.25 s 5 • }fi$^L-E�. -_ _ _ - !t+ g=. r. 3� f_ 'i _-.,Ly-1§ Z- :::-. �, : n ro 0 _'y _ . L y�.,� ,F- ate. C 14's° .+4 S-`T'�P s a sc t •} 4 COE-119 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 700.41 COE-119 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 700.41 COE-119 Across, No OHWM, MP 700.41 f I I COE-120 Upstream, MP 700.61 COE-120 Downstream, MP 700.61 COE-120 Across, MP 700.61 -� 4„„-may11o� : • , t COE-121 Upstream, MP 700.84 COE-121 Downstream, MP 700.84 COE-121 Across, MP 700.84 met. . - Jam 7 '• COE-122 Upstream, MP 700.87 COE-122 Downstream, MP 700.87 'IS. air1 .. . COE-122 Across, MP 700.87 ...A. {f.�. ..vim*`.. y-•._ 40 '%”,' ~ a 4 ice- • i•.� F r - A;-. P' MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 56 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-123 Upstream, MP 700.92 COE-123 Downstream, MP 700.92 COE-123 Across, MP 700.92 COE-124 Upstream, MP 701.47 COE-124 Downstream, MP 701.47 COE-124 Across, MP 701.47 COE-125 Upstream, MP 701.51 COE-125 Downstream, MP 701.51 COE-125 Across, MP 701.51 COE-126 Upstream, MP 701.56 COE-126 Downstream, MP 701.56 COE-126 Across, MP 701.56 COE-127 Upstream, MP 701.61 COE-127 Downstream, MP 701.61 COE-127 Across, MP 701.61 COE-128 Upstream, MP 701.63 COE-128 Downstream, MP 701.63 COE-128 Across, MP 701.63 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 57 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-129 Upstream, MP 701.93 COE-129 Downstream, MP 701.93 COE-129 Across, MP 701.93 COE-130 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 702.2 COE-130 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 702.2 COE-130 Across, No OHWM, MP 702.2 COE-131 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 702.47 COE-131 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 702.47 COE-131 Across, No OHWM, MP 702.47 COE-132 Upstream, MP 702.54 COE-132 Downstream, MP 702.54 COE-132 Across, MP 702.54 COE-133 Upstream, MP 702.7 COE-133 Downstream, MP 702.7 COE-133 Across, MP 702.7 COE-134 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 703 COE-134 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 703 COE-134 Across, No OHWM, MP 703 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 58 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-135 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 703.23 COE-135 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 703.23 COE-135 Across, No OHWM, MP 703.23 wr ee r - _ Y Ear s�-r _ 'y . "` .' t r• - COE-136 Across, MP 703.37 COE-136 Upstream, MP 703.37 '1IPIPW, -„. ' . - 154. - COE-136 Downstream, MP 703.37 COE-137 Downstream, MP 703.52 _. • . ^' "'A�•�'+ir.. 3 rte - ille F'•..� r - ; .1^.14 -?i' ' . COE-137 Upstream, MP 703.52 y - . COE-137 Across, MP 703.52 _ COE-138 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 703.83 COE-138 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 703.83 COE-138 Across, No OHWM, MP 703.83 ` F lib ,ar d R - _ n . :::: ' .. - COE-139 Across, MP 704.11 COE-139 Upstream, MP 704.11 COE-139 Downstream, MP 704.11 _ r n COE-140 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 704.38 COE-140 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 704.38 COE-140 Across, No OHWM, MP 704.38 •,��„ `+a 'ii MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 59 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-141 Upstream, MP 704.41 COE-141 Downstream, MP 704.41 COE-141 Across, MP 704.41 Al COE-142 Downstream, MP 705.16 COE-142 Across, MP 705.16 COE-142 Upstream, MP 705.16 In � • -_ S • 'ryp �,' ,. i:sn :". _ » is S '1 �.' r•_ -4 ,kl .. ,.�r,1-,•—.1_r L-' • S. r t'•,��* f .. >• _jam, ,� ':�5q .-., at, k COE-143 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 705.53 COE-143 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 705.53 COE-143 Across, No OHWM, MP 705.53 ' • t� P o 40fi .:w hit ....y..... -; . _ , r'4�a iaare,ll�a::: �.. x.•-�,�te#8k.. t �.,,a::_ .: .. y d, 1 COE-144 Across, No OHWM, MP 705.73 COE-144 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 705.73 COE-144 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 705.73 1. r • ,,.. . dx °'`` ,.� Y;' r .. COE-145 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 705.75 y, YA. COE-145 Across, No OHWM, MP 705.75 COE-145 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 705.75 1`_44,,"\5,7 f } . F.x R�31`[d .,„a s'4ar�,.X _ �+ . 4 ,-+P•. � 4, rr COE-146 Upstream, MP 705.79 COE-146 Downstream, MP 705.79 COE-146 Across, MP 705.79 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 60 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-147 Upstream, MP 705.88 COE-147 Downstream, MP 705.88 COE-147 Across, MP 705.88 COE-148 Upstream, MP 706.03 COE-148 Downstream, MP 706.03 COE-148 Across, MP 706.03 COE-149 Upstream, MP 706.25 COE-149 Downstream, MP 706.25 COE-149 Across, MP 706.25 COE-150 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 706.65 COE-150 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 706.65 COE-150 Across, No OHWM, MP 706.65 COE-151 Upstream, MP 706.76 COE-151 Downstream, MP 706.76 COE-151 Across, MP 706.76 COE-152 Upstream, MP 707.2 COE-152 Downstream, MP 707.2 COE-152 Across, MP 707.2 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 61 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-153 Upstream, MP 707.29 COE-153 Downstream, MP 707.29 COE-153 Across, MP 707.29 COE-154 Upstream, MP 707.39 COE-155 Upstream, MP 707.7 COE-154 Downstream, MP 707.39 COE-154 Across, MP 707.39 COE-155 Downstream, MP 707.7 COE-155 Across, MP 707.7 COE-156 Upstream, MP 707.72 COE-156 Downstream, MP 707.72 COE-156 Across, MP 707.72 COE-157 Upstream, MP 707.97 COE-157 Downstream, MP 707.97 COE-157 Across, MP 707.97 COE-158 Upstream, MP 708.18 COE-158 Downstream, MP 708.18 COE-158 Across, MP 708.18 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 62 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-158a Upstream, wetland, MP 708.81 COE-158a-Downstream,wetland, MP 708.81 COE-158a Across, wetland, MP 708.81 COE-159 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 708.89 COE-159 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 708.89 COE-159 Across, No OHWM, MP 708.89 COE-160 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 708.95 COE-160 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 708.95 COE-160 Across, No OHWM, MP 708.95 COE-161 Upstream, MP 709.52 COE-161 Downstream, MP 709.52 COE-161 Across, MP 709.52 COE-162 Upstream, MP 710.73 COE-162 Downstream, MP 710.73 COE-162 Across, MP 710.73 COE-163 Upstream, MP 712.43 COE-163 Downstream, MP 712.43 COE-163 Across, MP 712.43 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 63 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-164 Upstream, MP 713.1 COE-164 Downstream, MP 713.1 COE-164 Across, MP 713.1 COE-165 Upstream, NoOHWM, MP 713.4 COE-165 Downstream, NoOHWM, MP 713.4 COE-165 Across, NoOHWM, MP 713.4 COE-166 Upstream, MP 714.37 COE-166 Downstream, MP 714.37 COE-166 Across, MP 714.37 COE-167 Upstream, MP 715.58 COE-167 Downstream, MP 715.58 COE-167 Across, MP 715.58 COE-168 Upstream, MP 716.48 C- OE-168 Downstream, MP 716.48 C- OE-168 Across, MP 716.48 COE-169 Upstream, NoOHWM, MP 716.51 C- OE-169 Downstream, NoOHWM, MP 716.51 C- OE-169 Across, NoOHWM, MP 716.51 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 64 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-170 Upstream, NoOHWM, MP 716.96 COE-170 Downstream, NoOHWM, MP 716.96 COE-170 Across, NoOHWM, MP 716.96 COE-171 Upstream, MP 717.26 COE-171 Downstream, MP 717.26 COE-171 Across, MP 717.26 COE-172 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 717.39 COE-172 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 717.39 COE-172 Across, No OHWM, MP 717.39 COE-173 Upstream, MP 717.91 COE-173 Downstream, MP 717.91 COE-173 Across, MP 717.91 COE-174 Upstream, MP 717.97 COE-174 Downstream, MP 717.97 COE-174 Across, MP 717.97 COE-175 Upstream, MP 718.25 COE-175 Downstream, MP 718.25 COE-175 Across, MP 718.25 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 65 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-176 Upstream, MP 718.73 COE-176 Downstream, MP 718.73 COE-176 Across, MP 718.73 COE-177 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 718.82 COE-177 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 718.82 COE-177 Across, No OHWM, MP 718.82 COE-178 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 718.98 COE-178 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 718.98 COE-178 Across, No OHWM, MP 718.98 COE-179 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 719.04 COE-179 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 719.04 COE-179 Across, No OHWM, MP 719.04 COE-180 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 719.61 COE-181 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 719.73 COE-180 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 719.61 COE-180 Across, No OHWM, MP 719.61 COE-181 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 719.73 COE-181 Across, No OHWM, MP 719.73 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 66 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-182 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 719.95 COE-182 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 719.95 COE-182 Across, No OHWM, MP 719.95 •it ( C- ' _ ii COE-183 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 720.21 COE-183 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 720.21 COE-183 Across, No OHWM, MP 720.21 •'10 0.. _..n 1 PI • ,� 1 : T .. N.i .•r. aar -- a .� COE-184 Upstream, MP 721.21 COE-184 Downstream, MP 721.21 COE-184 Across, MP 721.21 4 S" Ardiliiiiniiiiiiiiiiiiialligik• COE-185 Upstream, MP 721.66 "el COE-185 Downstream, MP 721.66 -. ori COE-185 Across, MP 721.66 rr t n . !'t. .. X11 .. rl,. 41$,. , COE-186 Upstream, MP 722.54 COE-186 Downstream, MP 722.54 COE-186 Across, MP 722.54 , :� ... COE-187 Downstream, MP 723.03 �i , r . -44 il yt. Ala, 4. 4.4 COE-187 Across, MP 723.03 COE-187 Upstream, MP 723.03 ,�.`ri, r• �y y�j�� :ti � r- � l .r .rte f f �- . -4'=.4.. •'1 , i,• •.M. y �. M. ,k.,_-�� '• t K.. I 7ic'r _ -i_ �a%°F�'�,e� `•� '. ',VP .3 k"ri A ';r,�y 4 � 4 _ d..�fnGt. v, �'sr �� ° �'�" n'v w.L'; �k .., .. _ __,. _..._. _ w jE 1 d, 1 .�l'� d'7N' • ,. _ . 'k.A ,k tir.w . ,'%:<."�` k:: 2v• �,. �', �-��„ •=r MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 67 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-188 Upstream, MP 723.13 COE-188 Downstream, MP 723.13 COE-188 Across, MP 723.13 COE-189 Upstream, MP 723.32 COE-189 Downstream, MP 723.32 COE-189 Across, MP 723.32 COE-190 Upstream, MP 723.62 COE-190 Downstream, MP 723.62 COE-190 Across, MP 723.62 COE-191 Upstream, MP 723.91 COE-192 Upstream, MP 724.13 COE-191 Downstream, MP 723.91 COE-191 Across, MP 723.91 COE-192 Downstream, MP 724.13 COE-192 Across, MP 724.13 COE-193 Upstream, MP 724.4 COE-193 Downstream, MP 724.4 COE-193 Across, MP 724.4 • MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 68 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-194 Upstream, MP 724.66 COE-194 Downstream, MP 724.66 COE-194 Across, MP 724.66 COE-195 Upstream, MP 724.93 COE-195 Downstream, MP 724.93 COE-195 Across, MP 724.93 COE-196 Upstream, MP 725.29 COE-196 Downstream, MP 725.29 COE-196 Across, MP 725.29 COE-197 Upstream, MP 725.35 COE-197 Downstream, MP 725.35 COE-197 Across, MP 725.35 COE-198 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 726 COE-198 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 726 COE-198 Across, No OHWM, MP 726 COE-199 Upstream, MP 726.14 COE-199 Downstream, MP 726.14 COE-199 Across, MP 726.14 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 69 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-200 Upstream, MP 726.31 COE-200 Downstream, MP 726.31 COE-200 Across, MP 726.31 COE-201 Upstream, MP 726.97 COE-201 Downstream, MP 726.97 COE-201 Across, MP 726.97 COE-202 Upstream, MP 727.44 COE-202 Downstream, MP 727.44 COE-202 Across, MP 727.44 COE-203 Upstream, MP 727.46 COE-203 Downstream, MP 727.46 COE-203 Across, MP 727.46 COE-204 Upstream, MP 727.65 COE-204 Downstream, MP 727.65 COE-204 Across, MP 727.65 COE-205 Upstream, MP 727.69 COE-205 Downstream, MP 727.69 COE-205 Across, MP 727.69 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 70 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-206 Upstream, MP 727.76 COE-206 Downstream, MP 727.76 COE-206 Across, MP 727.76 !I Ai:11 • Jy, T 911":::711- V t t.- - ! 1 ..Tr } i mii f 44`4" ;z •F af•• Ar -r. '7 pY' Qi 1l aG - COE-207 Upstream, MP 728.02 COE-207 Downstream, MP 728.02 COE-207 Across, MP 728.02 '{.. R 1.••%`.�_ ' �' .0R . - �.. .s.. �-1 ��. Jr► ♦ F - M �'R> "'� ,. +,i t.' a _ti ` `La •` ''' y� M. moi•. t y1T1: 4 aFs a tl�. i• • �.' 4.IV s. ."`' ~•r y-�+ 1•' ♦ '1 .!t ..sT•fRsi--- • ,4 s - df r. , ♦ •�A t Y ,N `. •4 I` r . t `1•m r d 7 ,f `�"w;+�;1.. ytl •i�� t• lT� ! Y- li!'. F Y (F C'.ti fes,' . }yp COE-208 Upstream, MP 728.15 COE-208 Downstream, MP 728.15 COE-208 Across, MP 728.15 -: !rn. �T - 4 }} • �� F,•Yw ,i% t'.4i Y �•'l - ...\ y- .' F•�- 1. . M J COE-209 Upstream, MP 728.54 COE-209 Downstream, MP 728.54 COE-209 Across, MP 728.54 '' '' - , • s= i3 MEW fel I. _ ,, ' COE-210 Upstream, MP 728.89 COE-210 Downstream, MP 728.89 COE-210 Across, MP 728.89 iy .tl- ': . '. ,Y; i )r fes. COE-211 Upstream, MP 729.46 COE-211 Downstream, MP 729.46 COE-211 Across, MP 729.46 est t, a� Y MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 71 of 317 3/1/2012 COE-212 Upstream, MP 729.52 COE-212 Downstream, MP 729.52 COE-212 Across, MP 729.52 COE-213 Upstream, MP 729.7 COE-213 Downstream, MP 729.7 COE-213 Across, MP 729.7 COE-214 Upstream, MP 729.7 COE-214 Downstream, MP 729.7 COE-214 Across, MP 729.7 COE-215 Upstream, MP 730.13 COE-215 Downstream, MP 730.13 COE-215 Across, MP 730.13 COE-216 Upstream, MP 730.17 COE-216 Downstream, MP 730.17 COE-216 Across, MP 730.17 COE-217 Upstream, No OHWM, MP 730.89 COE-217 Downstream, No OHWM, MP 730.89 COE-217 Across, No OHWM, MP 730.89 MP=Pipeline Milepost WestWater Engineering 72 of 317 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment Pipeline Milepost 1 611053 4312186 1.3 4 No blue line on USGS Topo 636.04 2 611331 4312144 1.6 4 No blue line on USGS Topo 636.21 3 611361 4312151 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo 636.22 4 611763 4312108 1.8 6 Blue line on USGS Topo 636.47 5 613008 4311947 1 2 No blue line on USGS Topo. Above ground flow starts 30 ft downstream. 637.24 6 615602 4311718 1 1 No blue line on USGS Topo 638.95 7 616657 4311499 12 6 Blue line on USGS Topo 639.63 8 617093 4311416 7 4 Blue line on USGS Topo 639.91 9 618413 4311150 1.6 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. Culvert upstream. 640.76 10 621091 4311158 12 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. Culvert upstream under I-70. 642.72 11 623592 4311207 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo 644.3 12 624916 4311196 2 16 Blue line on USGS Topo. Little sign of flow here but 50ft upstream it is 24in wide; 16in deep. This ditch has a culvert under I-70. 645.14 13 628738 4310983 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. Pinto wash no longer flows here. There is an old dirt road here. 647.6 14 628769 4310995 20 12 No blue line on USGS Topo. Pinto Wash was channelized upstream and has changed course. 647.61 15 629302 4310871 21 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. Moist sand alkali standing water 60 m upstream. Pinto wash. 647.94 16 629672 4310755 10 3 Blue line on USGS Topo. Pinto Wash. 648.21 17 630209 4310915 1 1 No blue line on USGS Topo. Culvert upstream goes under 1-70. 648.57 18 631226 4310800 20 10 Blue line on USGS Topo 649.22 19 632158 4310695 1 5 No blue line on USGS Topo. Culvert upstream goes under 1-70. 649.82 20 632910 4310619 1.8 5 No blue line on USGS Topo. Culvert under I-70. Old roadbed destroyed upstream. 650.3 21 633112 4310604 2 9 No blue line on USGS Topo. Old roadbed upstream washed out. 650.43 22 636193 4310355 1 4 No blue line on USGS Topo. Storm flow only. Culvert under 1-70. 652.38 23 636476 4310391 1.8 1 Seep. Flowing. 652.57 24 636485 4310374 1.6 1 Blue line on USGS Topo near seep. 652.57 WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 1 of 45 73 of 317 September 2011 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment i Pipeline Milepost Flowing but subsurface 40ft downstream. 25 637413 4310667 1 4 No blue line on USGS Topo. Culvert under I-70. 653.19 26 638831 4311014 6 3 No blue line on USGS Topo. 654.12 27 641211 4311697 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 655.69 28 644558 4313795 16 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. Cisco Wash. Potential fringe wetlands. 658.26 29 644769 4313837 1.1 3 No blue line on USGS Topo. 658.39 30 647102 4315121 1.3 2 No blue line on USGS Topo. 660.25 31 647545 4316375 6 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 661.15 32 648385 4318138 8 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. Danish Wash. 662.38 33 649506 4320707 O NHWM ON VoVM Blue line on USGS Topo. 664.17 34 649722 4321096 O NHWM p No Blue line on USGS Topo. 664.43 35 650465 4322580 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 665.44 36 651037 4323530 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 666.14 37 651510 4324236 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 666.67 38 651654 4324451 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 666.82 39 651776 4324651 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 666.97 40 652521 4325756 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 667.79 41 653156 4326675 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 668.48 42 653624 4327202 5 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. Flowing water. 668.91 43 653827 4327420 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 669.1 44 653986 4327571 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 669.24 45 654126 4327738 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 669.37 46 654590 4328250 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 669.8 47 655627 4329340 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 670.74 48 655790 4329519 5 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. 670.89 49 656298 4330026 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 671.33 WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 2 of 45 74 of 317 September 2011 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment Pipeline Milepost 50 656661 4330398 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 200ft upstream OHWM is 12in wide and lin deep. 671.65 51 656766 4330504 3 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. Stagnant water. Goes subsurface 30ft downstream. 671.74 52 657002 4330747 3 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 671.94 53 657561 4331273 1 1 No blue line on USGS Topo. 672.43 54 657935 4331606 1.2 3 Blue line on USGS Topo. 672.75 55 658247 4331911 12 5 Blue line on USGS Topo. Westwater Creek. No fringe wetland. 673.02 56 658792 4332563 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 673.54 57 660294 4335311 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 675.5 58 661341 4336562 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 676.56 59 662895 4338881 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 677.66 60 664730 4339940 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. Stagnant water a few feet downstream of crossing. 678.68 61 665950 4340510 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. Ends in a dry stock pond. Probably storm flow only. 679.53 62 666539 4340807 6 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. 679.97 63 667573 4341108 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo near but not crossing center line. 680.65 64 668183 4341249 1.6 4 Blue line on USGS Topo. 681.06 65 668842 4341861 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 681.73 66 671515 4345412 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 684.53 67 672164 4346268 O NHWM OI-INoo M Blue line on USGS Topo. 685.18 68 672450 4346632 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 685.47 69 673898 4348328 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 686.83 70 673865 4348589 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 686.98 71 673841 4348867 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 687.14 72 673820 4349069 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 687.26 73 673745 4349335 No No Blue line on USGS Topo. 687.43 WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 3 of 45 75 of 317 September 2011 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment Pipeline Milepost OHWM OHWM 74 673646 4349751 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 687.68 75 673594 4349989 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 687.83 76 673528 4350238 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 687.98 77 673483 4350467 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 688.14 78 673578 4350903 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 688.47 79 673663 4351133 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 688.64 80 673676 4351163 1.2 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 688.67 81 673821 4351706 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 689.06 82 673806 4352169 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 689.33 83 673796 4352342 1 1 No blue line on USGS Topo. 689.44 84 673805 4352807 O NHWM p No Blue line on USGS Topo. 689.72 85 673745 4353036 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line. No OHWM. 689.86 86 673635 4353279 2.5 3 Blue line on USGS Topo. 690.03 87 673655 4353374 4.5 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 690.09 88 673699 4353855 6 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 690.37 89 673906 4354209 3 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. 690.62 90 673926 4354216 2 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. 690.63 91 674056 4354400 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 690.78 92 674340 4355109 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 691.14 93 674413 4355293 4 4 Blue line on USGS Topo. 691.22 94 674665 4356315 9 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 691.62 95 674545 4356812 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 691.81 96 674535 4356846 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 691.82 97 674371 4357316 4 5 Blue line on USGS Topo. 692.02 98 673589 4359326 2 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. 693.65 99 673524 4359763 1.5 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 693.99 100 673536 4359804 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 694.02 101 673582 4360852 2 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 694.84 102 673632 4360885 No No Blue line on USGS Topo. 694.89 WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 4 of 45 76 of 317 September 2011 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment Pipeline Milepost OHWM OHWM 103 673731 4361302 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 695.21 104 673709 4363035 3.5 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. 696.43 105 673749 4363307 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 696.6 106 673758 4363364 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. Channel less than lft wide 696.64 107 673833 4363733 1 2 No blue line on USGS Topo. 696.87 108 674051 4364894 3.5 5 Blue line on USGS Topo. 697.53 109 674169 4365296 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 697.82 110 674781 4365857 6 12 Blue line on USGS Topo. 698.34 111 675189 4366537 6 9 Blue line on USGS Topo. 698.9 112 675218 4366564 6 9 Blue line on USGS Topo. 698.92 113 675423 4367154 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 699.37 114 675484 4367274 O NHWM p No Blue line on USGS Topo. 699.46 115 675532 4367361 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 699.53 116 676037 4367847 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 700.06 117 676066 4367868 8 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. 700.09 118 676120 4367995 2.5 3 Blue line on USGS Topo. 700.25 119 676113 4368147 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 700.41 120 676096 4368319 5 7 Blue line on USGS Topo. 700.61 121 676062 4368533 1.5 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 4ft wide. 700.84 122 676063 4368561 1.5 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 7ft wide. 700.87 123 676065 4368604 1.5 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 8ft wide. 700.92 124 675988 4369107 3.5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 1 ft wide. 701.47 125 675977 4369147 5 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 10ft wide. 701.51 126 675961 4369188 3.5 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 10ft wide. 701.56 127 675943 4369233 6 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 2ft wide. 701.61 128 675939 4369247 6 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 2ft wide. 701.63 WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 5 of 45 77 of 317 September 2011 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment Pipeline Milepost 129 675772 4369446 4 7 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 10ft wide. 701.93 130 675549 4369769 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. Channel less than lft wide x lin deep 702.2 131 675346 4370170 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 702.47 132 675291 4370272 5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. 702.54 133 675153 4370494 6 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 702.7 134 674912 4370930 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 703 135 674814 4371297 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. Channel less than lft wide x lin deep 703.23 136 674828 4371515 4 7 Blue line on USGS Topo. 703.37 137 674858 4371755 4 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 703.52 138 674963 4372237 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 703.83 139 675153 4372659 4.5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. 704.11 140 675315 4373050 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 704.38 141 675317 4373086 6 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. 704.41 142 675742 4374191 2 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 705.16 143 676179 4374593 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 705.53 144 676442 4374768 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 705.73 145 676463 4374780 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 705.75 146 676527 4374794 12 4 Blue line on USGS Topo. 705.79 147 676620 4374889 11 5 Blue line on USGS Topo. 705.88 148 676802 4375014 4 12 Blue line on USGS Topo. 706.03 149 677052 4375296 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 706.25 150 677246 4375946 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 706.65 151 677207 4376122 6 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 2ft wide. 706.76 152 677359 4376841 1 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 707.2 153 677512 4376970 8 7 Blue line on USGS Topo. 707.29 154 677628 4377125 6 7 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 2ft wide. 707.39 155 677899 4377715 2 4 Blue line on USGS Topo. 707.7 156 677926 4377763 2 4 Blue line on USGS Topo. 707.72 157 678246 4378179 5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 0.5ft wide. 707.97 158 678406 4378408 3 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 708.18 WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 6 of 45 78 of 317 September 2011 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment Pipeline Milepost 158a 678324 4379079 12 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. Perennial Stream with adjacent wetlands. 708.81 159 678275 4379174 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 708.89 160 678253 4379237 No OHWM No OHWM No blue line on USGS Topo. 708.95 161 678288 4379980 1 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. 709.52 162 679242 4381509 3 4 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland 9ft wide. 710.73 163 678103 4382553 1.5 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible fringe wetland. 712.43 164 677666 4383276 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible wetland lft wide. 713.1 165 676989 4383411 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 713.4 166 675338 4384084 5 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. West Evacuation Creek. No fringe wetland 714.37 167 674712 4386214 3.5 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. West Evacuation Creek. Possible fringe wetland. 715.58 168 673880 4387558 5 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible fringe wetland. 716.48 169 673884 4387596 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 716.51 170 673451 4388297 O NHWM p No Blue line on USGS Topo. 716.96 171 673184 4388704 3 3.5 Blue line on USGS Topo. West Evacuation Creek. Possible fringe wetland. 717.26 172 673088 4388896 No OHWM No OHWM No blue line on USGS Topo. Narrow gully. 717.39 173 672897 4389725 5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. West Evacuation Creek. Possible fringe wetland. PL parallels creek from here with fringe. 717.91 174 672856 4389812 4 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible fringe wetland. 717.97 175 672619 4390168 2.5 26 Blue line on USGS Topo. West Evacuation Creek. Possible fringe wetland. 718.25 176 672346 4390837 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 718.73 177 672312 4390975 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 718.82 178 672259 4391207 No No Blue line on USGS Topo. 718.98 WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 7 of 45 79 of 317 September 2011 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment Pipeline Milepost OHWM OHWM 179 672224 4391305 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 719.04 180 672080 4392262 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 719.61 181 672045 4392447 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 719.73 182 671987 4392818 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 719.95 183 671903 4393224 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 720.21 184 671692 4394793 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 721.21 185 671587 4395458 5 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. West Evacuation Creek. Possible fringe wetland. 721.66 186 671223 4396756 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 722.54 187 670876 4397327 3.5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. Possible fringe wetland. 723.03 188 670711 4397360 2.5 1.5 Blue line on USGS Topo. 723.13 189 670481 4397578 1.5 2 No blue line on USGS Topo. 723.32 190 670080 4397787 3 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. No OHWM upstream but goes to 3'x2" downstream. 723.62 191 669662 4398026 1 1.5 No blue line on USGS Topo. 723.91 192 669429 4398312 5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. 724.13 193 669071 4398570 1.5 3 Blue line on USGS Topo. 724.4 194 668794 4398882 1 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. 724.66 195 668607 4399284 1 1 No blue line on USGS Topo. 724.93 196 668571 4399818 1 1 No blue line on USGS Topo. 725.29 197 668584 4399914 5 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. 725.35 198 668058 4400689 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 726 199 667937 4400872 2 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. 726.14 200 667854 4401110 8 14 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 726.31 201 667320 4401988 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 726.97 202 666735 4402520 8 5 Blue line on USGS Topo. 727.44 203 666688 4402520 12 4 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. Possible fringe wetland. 727.46 204 666509 4402778 11 5 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. Possible fringe wetland. 727.65 205 666481 4402839 10 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 727.69 206 666468 4402954 15 7 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 727.76 WestWater Engineering WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 8 of 45 80 of 317 September 2011 3/1/2012 APPENDIX A WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WOUS) AND WETLANDS ACOE Potential Jurisdictional Drainages Label Easting Northing Width (ft.) Depth (in.) Comment Pipeline Milepost 207 666275 4403338 3 2 Blue line on USGS Topo. 728.02 208 666145 4403491 5 5 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 728.15 209 665981 4404019 4.5 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 728.54 210 665814 4404494 1 1 Blue line on USGS Topo. 728.89 211 665415 4405319 5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. 729.46 212 665377 4405391 1.5 6 Blue line on USGS Topo. 729.52 213 665222 4405635 5 8 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 729.7 214 665222 4405642 33 14 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 729.7 215 664963 4406256 12 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 730.13 216 664963 4406307 12 10 Blue line on USGS Topo. Evacuation Creek. 730.17 217 664593 4407332 No OHWM No OHWM Blue line on USGS Topo. 730.89 WestWater Engineering Appendix A - Page 9 of 45 September 2011 WestWater Engineering 81 of 317 3/1/2012 f r m vaputs Plateau 2893 rn 2423 m tMP636 Prink MP638 MP639 MP64.1 1P46,40 Qf MP655 MP_143 MP656 MP645 MP650 MP653 L i I Legend COE Milepost Pipeline Private Lands State Lands BLM Lands -� f. ash c `-• °'4111".." t3,1T 1785NMI )061tillir V1r,.s r r W `4L_ sa < 1.t COE Crossings Appendix A - Map A Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Biological Survey e1WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 1 2 3 Miles February 2012 WestWater Engineering 82 of 317 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\GIS\COE Maps \COE Maps Revised 1-23-2012\COE_Map A.mxd January 2012 rbb 3/1/2012 sf 1 2161 rcjColkado Mo nurn`dyd / /f r 1: r is , rr?s /4MP674r: r� fir} �' J= /�i `f�`Q. {� 56-MP673.54 / MP,6731' 1 / 55-MP673.02 le C / 54-MP672.75 � 1( — I,' +� . 53-MP672.43 (� 1r 1 52-MP671.94 MP672 t. ri‘wirita 3 i' 6 /3 $ atirL_ / ti 50-MP671.65 51-MP671.74 sSi la a ! 49-MP,671.33 -71 404r .48-MP670.89 47-MP670.74 ' �p 1 / MP676 MP675- (4/ MP670 J%. 46-M P669 8 44-M- 9.24 / 45-MP669.37 o]k{ ' 42-MP668.91 43-MP669.1 41-MP668.48 38-MP666.82 39-MP666.97 MP666 36-MP666.14 37-MP666.67 35-MP665.44 71� Mi665 MP662 Legend MI COE 0 Milepost Pipeline Private Lands State Lands BLM Lands {a. MP658 P 28-MP658.26 29-M P658.39 11""4„,.L.' MP659 PIP656 Yr COE Crossings Appendix A - Map B Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Biological Survey AWestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 1 2 3 27-MP655.69 s Miles February 2012 Map Source: Z. \Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\GIS\COE Maps \COE Maps Revised 1-23-2012\COE_Map B.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 83 of 317 3/1/2012 111-MP698.9 '112-MP698.92 %C ;MP699 ": api is Plateau 108-MP697.53 109-MP697.82 MP697 106-MP696.64 ,Ix ' [1 104-MP696.43 �, • Sta (0 101-M P694.84 100-MP694.02 GARFIELD 98-M P693.65MESA 83-MP689.44 MP692 97-MP692 02 96-MPP691.82 1; 80-MP688.67 79-MP688.64 78-MP688.47 +92-MP691.14 .x; 91-M PP690.781 89-MP690.62 ts5g ? 86-MP690.03 MP691 90-MP690.63 88-MP690.37 87 MP690.09, : 85-MP689.86 Cleo MP -689 • MP,686 67-MP685.18 _f MF685 MP683 \ *MP682 r g64-MP681.06 165 -Mi P681 tWeti ris- --...„—,. .73 ri s - r1 62-MP679.97. 61-M P679.53 MP680 63-MP680.65 �+ Legend COE 0 Milepost Pipeline -MP678.68 * MP -678' M P677 L MState Lands BLM Lands Private Lands COE Crossings Appendix A - Map C Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Biological Survey AWestWater Engineering i Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 1 2 3 57-M P675.5 MP675 s Miles February 2012 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\GIS\COE Maps\COE Maps Revised 1-23-2012\COE Map C.mxd January 2012 WestWater Engineering 84 of 317 3/1/2012 bb ' - ,....„---.._ 148-MP706.03 -1#1 /Pe° L.. --..4. (r ------i n--, ;(-- 145-MP705.75 147-MP705 88 / ' C -i--1,.- - I 146-MP705.76 144-MP705.73 - 1/ ) __.( ---j ../ - c --,.. r ------ . 1 1 (.1 d COE Crossings Appendix A - Map D Enterprise WEP 11 16 Inch Pipeline Biological Survey VislestWater Engineering *Ir.:Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0.5 Miles February 2012 139-MP704.11 fMP704 _ 138-MP763.83 Legend MI COE Milepost Pipeline Private Lands State Lands BLM Lands 137-MP703.52 4 , --136-MP703.37 1 3 5 - M P 7 0 3 . 2 3 7134-MP703 - 133-MP702.7 _..Gas17V1,0.4 - \ • .130-MP702.2 - Carbone t$ .129-MP701.93 647 128-MP701.63 128-MP701.63 127-MP701 61 126-MP701.56 125-MP701 51 124-MP701.47 123-MP700.92 116-MP700.06 121-MP700.84 122:MP700.87 - 120-MP700.61 ,113-MP699.37 11911\/1P700.41 • WestWater Engineering 85 of 317 1V 118-MP700.25 116-MP700.06 Li Map Source ZAEnterprise(EPCO)\WEP II \GIS \ COE Maps\ COE Maps Revised 1-23-2012 \COE_Map D.mxd January 2012 rbb 3/1/2012 d Valley • r 162-MP710.73 a f. MP709 160-MP708.95 158-MP708.18 155-MP707:7 p•,. ._._ 153-M P707.29 152-MP707.2 Legend L COE Milepost Pipeline Private Lands State Lands BLM Lands aMP707 111 151 MP706.76n -_-1 y,,' i 150-MP706.65' ` j MP706 Lw, *148-MP706.03" WestWater Engineering 145-M P705.75 144-MP705:73 147-MP705.88 146-MP705.79 y / 86 of 317 J 0 COE Crossings Appendix A - Map E Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Biological Survey AWestWater Engineering a Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0.5 Miles February 2012 Map Source:Z:\Z:\Enterprise(EPCO5WEP II\GIS\COE Maps\COE Maps Revised 1-23-2012\COE_Map E.mxd January 2012 rbb 3/1/2012 d Valley o ! • 179-MP719.04 ,177-MP718.82 1 c \ I" ,f R'ti , 175-MP718 225 MP718 174-MP717.97' 4 ( t 173-MP717.91 O rrl )H ate oa 0 Legend [ COE 0 Milepost Pipeline Private Lands State Lands BLM Lands COE Crossings Appendix A - Map F Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Biological Survey WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0.5 1 Miles February 2012 WestWater Engineering 87 of 317 ky �, 166-MP714.37 _ TrevaRt Map Source. Z. \Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\GIS\COE Maps\COE Maps Revised 1-23-2012\COE_Map Fmxd January 2012 rb 3/1/2012 204-M P727.65 203- MP727.46 d Valley 200-MP726.31 4 l 199-MP72.6.14 ar �L � ' �-r� A• M� ^ -v •. 198-MP726 P726- MP725 195-MP724.93 64 644! 193-MP724.4 7'9' 41% ittli 131. 1 d." ✓ 190-MP723.62 y- t �if6i .189-MP723 32 �•ti- �,, 1 188-MP723 13 187 MP723.03-----VN--- 186-MP722.54 -^ . Legend [ COE 0 Milepost Pipeline Private Lands State Lands BLM Lands . 185-MP721.66 ren 84-MP721.21 /21 COE Crossings Appendix A - Map G Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Biological Survey WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0.5 Miles February 2012 183-MP720.21 Map Source: Z2Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\GIS\COE Maps\COE Maps Revised 1-23-2012\COE_Map G.mxd January 2012 rbt WestWater Engineering 88 of 317 3/1/2012 41 _ 217-MP730.89 gor - 3772 X213-MP729.7 /f /2i2-MP729.52 214-MP729.7 Legend COE ED Milepost Pipeline Private Lands State Lands BLM Lands 208-M P728.15 =- M 28.: 207-MP728.02I 206-MP727.76 204-MP727.65' 202-M P, 727.44 0 COE Crossings Appendix A - Map H Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Biological Survey WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0.5 Miles February 2012 .talk- it Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO5WEP II\GIS\COE Maps\COE Maps Revised 1-23-2012\COE_Map H.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 89 of 317 3/1/2012 APPENDIX B WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES (WoUS) AND WETLAND MAPS WestWater Engineering 90 of 317 3/1/2012 ;Ac 45 Dragon Station \`' End Milepost 730.981 White River Field Office u COLORADO rr- I --L-J a; FLA ROCK FLAT ROCK Milepost 711 Atchee Vernal Field Office Milepost 690 ice, Area A N THE SS1ES - 4 r•{J, DANISH FLA 1J J i1 sJ�5 _'moi 4'1_ -" 0 --,,72-/' OATH ... rayon UTAH COLORADO Thompson Cisco 4 Yellowcat Exit L Begin Milepost 635.509 -r- pr 14I_ 1s°9t11 . Tt-,14IIGHN110 tGHLArw Legend 0* Milepost -- WEP II Pipeline r r BLM Field Office Boundaries County Boundaries WestWater Engineering S'7 �r 1'? t01 0 Figure 1 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation Location Map WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 4.5 9 13.5 Miles February 2012 Map Source: Z: \Enterprise(EPCG)\WEP II\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 1 Location Map.mxd January 2012 rbb 91 of 317 3/1/2012 ry Legend Data Point Dry Drainage Whole Milepost Fringe Wetlands Tenth Milepost WEP II Pipeline Delineated Wetland ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 2 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation AWestWater Engineering i Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 50 100 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Backgrou d\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 2.mxd January 2012 rbb 92 of 317 3/1/2012 1 Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 3 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 250 Feet 500 February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterp ise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 3.mxd January 2012 rbb 93 of 317 3/1/2012 MP 702.1 Detail Area MP 701.8 kir MP 701.7 MP 701.4 11 .• alb 1, 051, MP 701.3 y'4 MP 701.2 Legend (� Data Point U Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands n7 Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Anismum DP1-Wet Figure 4 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation eliMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 500 DP1-Up MP 700.9 T � O U 1,000 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 4.mxd January 2012 rbb 94 of 317 3/1/2012 MP 704.5 at. 'At r - IMP 704.2 1 DP35-Up Sly 1 MP704.4 • MP 704.3 (;) 0 Legend Data Point Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area 411,1 •fle; , ••• 6 .- Figure 5 Enterprise WEP 11 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation eWlestWater Engineering .0 Consulting Engineers & Scientists 750 1,500 Feet February 2012 • ,t - 6 Att. • • 14';' /ed.. ,Pgtit "14 WestWater Engineering Map Source: ZaEnterprise(EPC0)11NEPII\Field Data & Background \Field DataMetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-20121Figure 5.mad January 2012 rbb 95 of 317 3/1/2012 Legend 0 Data Point 0 Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline EJROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 6 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 750 1,500 Feet February 2012 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 6.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 96 of 317 3/1/2012 ■■ •■II l 1° r1 1 '- '" .- .▪ � - s' - : rP, ^ - ,-I, r 1 - 1r * u . 1 r .r • 4. �' la 1 1g 1. ■-°•l • f $ .11 -. ' r, . ■ . • 1 r '. • -• ■• •.t •°'1• ..r . {fir . i .., l• i. 1.:11: .111 : .a.. ..411, • :Ili . . • • Detail Area • 1 • 1 • 1 • • * 71•• • ■: d■ 9.1- 4.. • ■ A 911 4 mi •• i • • • Li r i • • • y� ■ itZ R► s. •• N ' �— i 4 . l LA ' r i`r• • �• ,DP36 Up .� 1, ••. A. r; M 4 Detail Area Ip i k Figure 8 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation ete\NestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 Legend Data Point Whole Milepost `) Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterp ise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 8.mxd January 2012 rbb 98 of 317 3/1/2012 Detail Area la '' ' „ 1 „• •M r 1I 1 • W r-. - fir 6 11.1"0 • . • .moi • 41 • , . • ul A • •,' : coo: S ,* MIhJ r N • ilk • rot r"rad b- • • .11- 1• ,Z. • MP 707.1 ■ • • ,414 fig ... rs..r`T 4 . • • L N 1e • • • • • . • • 41.1 ltIS • • a m ▪ • • 1 • • 0 s��' • is ■r Figure 9 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists Legend • Data Point ® Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source:Z:\Enter rise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background \FleId Da 99 of 317 Wetland Delineation \GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 9.mxd January 2012 rbb 3/1/2012 "1 `rr • Detail Area • ,i • 1 ■• • ,p • is ■ ■° *l •g, IP 5 . L ■ • MI A - "t i" t" a G.• ■ • • ■ ■ •�,.141 1 J.r ■ �■ .. •••■ 1 ■t " n , I., . ■ " • r t t • ■ t•Nita WestWater Engineering • .:: L- w :i W's `- "� February 2012 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 10.mxd January 2012 rbb 0 t • ■ in '• �' Aim t 1 t . P' _ • l'' .",F-• *ems � • .. • . . II ■ sial ,. i ,. Legend 0 Data Point W• hole Milepost (*) T• enth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 10 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet 100 of 317 3/1/2012 1vl•40 Detail Area 4+ _• 1 - - J _. • 1 rn. A • . 1 • C»1 "- 7. a • • ,4 3," r' »"} •1 • . •r ▪ • 1 "• s • •. • 1 i _ 1 . ▪ .I; • •1 1 • 1 n. . • .410 ... vI l • . s. � ` . -" 't • ,1 y • . ' . 1 . ' . • • • • • • » for m 1.r F ,1• *MP�707.5V' • t•• •1 ».• 1 •s,I • • • •,1 • • 1..!`` i • i t 1.4 0 Legend Data Point U Whole Milepost `*® Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage - Fringe Wetlands WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 11 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers &Scientists • r WestWater Engineering ■ • Ij`• %•A Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data 101 of 317 125 250 Feet February 2012 Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 11.01xd January 2012 rbb 3/1/2012 rx. . • , • y a • 3 MP 707.8 k • l• . s. 4.• • s, • •� • r l' • Detail Area l 4 l 1l ,,1, y k" • iy ! P It 11 •"• • 1.Ai -...1•—• IV_ _ l r. 1,� , x l I. l •• t le .' „4 . Al •' .r • • Y :m . 1 1 1.1 a. G • —a 4• .•4 • • `1{ " • • E • ' . . "� i .� • *l'r • Iwo rirg „i wk . (e L fr lit .. y 4 r • .4 I: `. •ti • • r. 1u • ? • • S` • • • i • - • • • l•" • 4 r` 4 •• ••R • • : ••- • wMP 707.7 • • •N4 4. • T • I ad sal �•• 1, • • � • • .•1 • ' i6 • •• e • 3. i 9 -.0 ulk Legend ® Data Point Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area 1 • �,kft 4?al . •1 rR' fit M L WestWater Engineering 0 • • Figure 12 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers &Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 12.mxd January 2012 rbb 102 of 317 3/1/2012 • a • • •• • • • w �■ Detail Area ■ re a • TUA I • •• oirk i '.• Jr' L • .. • 'j�• • ow • ▪ • «1 • .r.• ; • •�1 • fir: 'ON, di .F • 6. r • • I dr _ .. I. • ' • • . • _ • .. 1 .� - ' • • .,• • • • - • A Ft • .,w• • ' ..• '�' a A ',A1 L • • • _ • • I. 1 •'� _• 10 0 �rc 2 • • ': 01.7: Legend • Data Point ® Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP 11 Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 13 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists • ~{� .7 l 21•i Zit71 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 13.mxd January 2012 rbb 103 of 317 3/1/2012 4... 6y. MP 708.4 .r w Legend Data Point Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 14 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 250 500 M i Feet February 2012 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP IJ\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 14.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 104 of 317 3/1/2012 •q. • I.-• •s • • Necked Down Area 1 Detail Area 1 Wet 708.8 • • 1 • 111 ,• + p. • • o • •I • • "Pi t + -• ' tlI MP708.▪ 8, • . • • • • • 111 • •ti I • • 4 �+ p• • 1 •• • 11M9 t▪ , ifge E*D 0 Legend Data Point Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area •ir a gir .g .r 1640 •. • •- •411 • ;p • • • l • 5 Figure 15 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 •••s • 1 0. • - i 14 C e • , Y - • _ , N4 r � _ �' ,�� .4741; • Wet1708:8'- �1 • L_,. 7 f S µ• r. E 1.x I+ .7 • 5. • WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 15 r xd January 2012 rbb 105 of 317 3/1/2012 Detail Area 4. MP 709.9 1 DP18-Wet Wet 709.61 0 Legend 0 Data Point Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 16 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers &Scientists Map Source 250 500 Feet February 2012 EnicrprisclEPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 16.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 106 of 317 3/1/2012 1 iP Detail Area 1 > iu. *� iii r �� o iI P t P' tell : �� r . * �+. !;� .,.. t R" ,L.. � x � ,{"� y Iii F � .f` 1` 11 y �' +w'', ...yy'}j^`. le: . .2_,‘,,,,,,,t4.• jai}' . '� A, 4t e �a ., ' } rr rt it .#e't' ! , ° *YiM 48„y. '1* ?Al i Al �'k - tit, ti } Fr k� • a 1 4*..'.• ,1 ;;..'.l I ti� PYA 1.1' r•�'+�if'¢v++ .r i° r�” d" f ;MP710.3 • Wet e7.10.35 ie. 1' t*Stir�"liktitieq,". pa' 41, *i.k *_ ' awl •', sr;'A v } • •F • s r4 '1 'k s . w. ��'4 !" 0 Legend Data Point ® Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 17 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists MP 710W 250 500 Feet February 2012 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 17.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 107 of 317 3/1/2012 Detail Area Legend • Data Point ® Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands 0 Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline EJROW & Wetlands Survey Area 0 Figure 18 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists SI 250 500 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 1 B.mxd January 2012 rbb 108 of 317 3/1/2012 • • • i5..}g t :ill 1•SI "IL 1 Detail Area • 1 • r, • T - •.. • ■ 'r • a r • MP 710.8 rValey Wet 710:76 P38 -Wet Wet 710:73 4 MP 710.7 .• DP5-Wet DP5-Up DP19-Up DP19-Wet Wet ±7,10.66 1 #. k� lir. 0 0 E Legend Data Point Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 19 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists WestWater Engineering 125 250 Feet February 2012 Map Source: Z5Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 19.mxd January 2012 rbb 109 of 317 3/1/2012 Figure 20 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 Detail Area Legend Data Point ED Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Map Source: Z:\Enterpri e(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineati n\GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 20.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 110 of 317 3/1/2012 • • F. 1 tl Detail Area Wet ;713.11 .. " • a•�} • = ' DP20-Wet • • ,>I1••l •f • • , • AMA' .r.� A• , .• 1f • • " •.10 o. ,.II Legend G Data Point 0 Whole Milepost • Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP 11 Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Wet 713.03 0 Figure 21 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation eliMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 W • • s r ' WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 21 mxd January 2012 rbb 111 of 317 3/1/2012 • • 1. • • 1 .• Y . 1 1 • •r„ • 1 a• • • 1 • 1• 111 1.79iM MI 1• • V• R a iv r ryy- P ' 4 is a • " 'lk • 1 ■ ■ • ■ 1 • 1it F� • • ■t OF .• • ■ a. Detail Area rValey • MP 713.3 aTTr.T�r "T r; • •■ r • 9 Y R Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost E*D Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area 0 . . SAP. ...,.. . 1 ir■.-�k� . . •■ 1 ,••r mrlis J _11 • DP6-Up •err:,! . • • e • a h"1 f1 Y�r• til a 4 .r MO 1 .W.- .. , . Or r s I ■ d _ J Wet 713.31 1 Ar rip 3s4. i1 Figure 22 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists R_ • a. riot 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering 114 ■ r • Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 22.mxd January 2012 rbb 112 of 317 3/1/2012 M.� . Detail Area • • 1 • • • R.11� f 1 ■• r r ■ • 1 � ■• • 11 1$ • • d • • • • wi 1 • • 9 • 110 • • • • 1 1 • �r r .� .• It 1• . i 1 " „ • • 40. o✓ 1 ' • 1 • 1 1 • • p • . • Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost E*D Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area 0 • Figure 23 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering •d . ■ • 1 1, 1 •t • 1 9 • • w •r • . • r. • • 1 • • a 9 •" • 1 • _ a 116.`➢•• . I Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data 8 Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 23.mxd January 2012 rbb 113 of 317 3/1/2012 Detail Area MP 713.3 U 0 O Legend Data Point Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland Access Road WEP 11 Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 24 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 750 1,500 Feet February 2012 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCC)\WEP II\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 24.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 114 of 317 3/1/2012 ig' Maw SV _ . 1.P6..+1 '. 7-4 .'a ,4071. aW 0 . DP1O-Up 4 ' F DP10 Wet. �'4,k ..millilia ,' 1. i 1/C*- ' e ° 5 .T .•,1r r ' '41"0,. f i • i• - k1 MP 714.4 ' •*...w'1 ; 1�f1. °''" ,�. } n • 7a'.,, a , ►_. � Legend (J Data Point 0 Whole Milepost (*D Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland Tr, WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area 4 444 TUA' .y s • it la e � *• wig;` t�•�� %.• af a • g+ Figure 25 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 250 500 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012 Figura 25 mxd January 2012 rbb 115 of 317 3/1/2012 0_ r 4. MP 714.8. I 14 err DP12-Up 4,0. l'Y n i '-Spring j F fir • -2".„: +++� �.,t �i` tee•_ - - M Legend Data Point Whole Milepost J Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland HDD Bore Centerline =low WEP II Pipeline OROW & Wetlands Survey Area lir Figure 26 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation etiMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 250 500 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP IIVField Data 8 Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 26.mxd January 2012 rbb 116 of 317 3/1/2012 Legend (J Data Point 0 Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland TE HDD Bore Centerline WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area TIN Figure 27 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 27.mxd January 2012 rbb 117 of 317 3/1/2012 Detail Area • • 1 .L Legend 0 Data Point 0 Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands © Delineated Wetland HDD Bore Centerline WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area CI 0 Figure 28 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation eliMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 28.mxd January 2012 rbb 118 of 317 3/1/2012 0 717 Legend Data Point Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Delineated Wetland Figure 29 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation fl\NestWater Engineering 7 Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS\Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 29.mxd January 2012 rbb 119 of 317 3/1/2012 i Detail Area Mr Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area 4 . • 0 Figure 30 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation eliMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering r t P Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figore 30.mxd January 2012 rbb 120 of 317 3/1/2012 Wet 715.4 DP29-Up • 4.r fir. "fit! p Legend Data Point ® Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands —111 Delineated Wetland HDD Bore Centerline 11' WEP II Pipeline EJROW & Wetlands Survey Area • 0 Figure 31 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers &Scientists 380 760 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 31.mxd January 2012 rbb 121 of 317 3/1/2012 */$11-11: `I lip 41, 7 # .. �` = . .11 Detail Area ILO s 7alla . 2 0 0 Legend Data Point Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area tl 1� 1 Figure 32 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data 8 Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS\Maps Revised 122 of 317 23-2012\Figure 32.mxd January 2012 rbb 3/1/2012 Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP 11 Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area r„ 1 ' . imp Air 9.91 9 Spring „lir • f i-! (•) Spring r . G_ �,i Wet 7_16.22. w 1. Spring ■ 716.17 °C„ .. e It *1•TUA 1.1 J. 1 • ■I „. s „ TTrr Wet MP 716.2 •1 ° i • 1*le ap a a -i""-'' s -'■r • 1 er 11 11 1, `�.it ' µ, le • _1 1• ■ 1 o-> -, = • • • .04 1144 13 r r '.4 DP30-Up 4r .‘1' 0 Figure 33 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers &Scientists 125 250 - eeeee� Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 33.mxd January 2012 rbb 123 of 317 3/1/2012 Lit • • Detail Area 4 41000411--•=i ti .'z a Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland HDD Bore Centerline WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area TM 1 Figure 34 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterpri e(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 34.mxd January 2012 rbb 124 of 317 3/1/2012 . 4 • Spring c • , , 4 . I. DP27-Up, 164 *'� tirod4 Ale*: dtlit1 rr it .• ,` ?- 1r 4.L MP 716.4 Detail Area Legend Data Point Whole Milepost CD Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland HDD Bore Centerline WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 35 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 250 500 � I Feet February 2012 Wet 716.2 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\ Figure 35.mxd January 2012 rbb 125 of 317 3/1/2012 1 s•,. r r .i Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost E*D Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area 0 J Figure 36 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation eliMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 250 500 � I Feet February 2012 11:41 r 41 X31131a.A.410ty �l i_• ssc TU WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 36.mxd January 2012 rbb 126 of 317 3/1/2012 At Detail Area ■ or 1 Rai r_t 1, N 1 DP25-Up .0 a a • ll' a •p 11 • J 1 Legend • Data Point ED Whole Milepost 0 Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands 11 Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Figure 37 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering 7,0 Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 Map Source. Z: \Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 37.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 127 of 317 3/1/2012 Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost E*D Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area e,x' _ 9 MP717:7 Figure 38 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 250 500 Feet February 2012 Map Source: Z:\Enterprise EPCC)\WEP II\Field Data 8 Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation\GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 38.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 128 of 317 3/1/2012 1 Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost E*D Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area Necked Down Area 1 Figure 39 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data & Background Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 39.mxd January 2012 rbb 129 of 317 3/1/2012 Detail Area Necked Down Area 0 1 Figure 40 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation eliMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 Legend 0 Data Point --- Irrigation Ditch 0 Whole Milepost T101 WEP II Pipeline Tenth Milepost J ROW & Wetlands Survey Area - Dry Drainage Delineated Wetland - Fringe Wetlands Map Source: Z:\Enterpri e(EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 40.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 130 of 317 3/1/2012 • 1• 1 Ir MP 721.7 Necked Down Area 1. . .11_Ls r� r! • Nu 9,1 1° 4 ill . 11 `1 4 • • i ▪ ... -J • i 1 ✓ L 1_ •; i ;ter 'L r «ib • ° IF PAR , • • A I . 0 E*D Legend Data Point Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area '514., . 4 ii, -or .--- . .• to l I. Figure 41 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation floMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 y . NI 1-.,15, MP 721.6• r WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterpris (EPCO)\WEP II\Field Data & Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 41.mxd January 2012 rbb 131 of 317 3/1/2012 o st y Yi lirMP 723.1 1 111 -114% hitC ik- • i-11! "` .;_A Legend Data Point 0 Whole Milepost Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland T- WEP II Pipeline Q ROW & Wetlands Survey Area ;%r. MP 723 CR �";.�• ?6.l • • • 1 ' • A w • r !t 0 Figure 42 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation WestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 125 250 Feet February 2012 r • r: r Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP !Wield Data 8 Background \Field Data\Wetland Delineation \ GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012 Figure 42.mxd January 2012 rbb WestWater Engineering 132 of 317 3/1/2012 . '9 J • I " tt. 441 • tfl Wet 725.46 fix- . . JO � rDP22-Wet' s i . • .p j . . Wett725.46 1 i • r • r • Legend (!J Data Point 0 Whole Milepost C.) Tenth Milepost Dry Drainage Fringe Wetlands Delineated Wetland WEP II Pipeline ROW & Wetlands Survey Area • • . • 1 ■ Figure 43 Enterprise WEP II 16 Inch Pipeline Wetlands Delineation aniMestWater Engineering Consulting Engineers & Scientists 0 125 250 Feet February 2012 N W • S . WestWater Engineering Map Source: Z:\Enterprise(EPCO)\WEP 1I\Field Data & Background\Field Data\Wetland Delineation \GIS \Maps Revised 1-23-2012\Figure 43.mxd January 2012 rbb 133 of 317 3/1/2012 APPENDIX C ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS DATA SHEETS WestWater Engineering 134 of 317 3/1/2012 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Rio Blanco Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP725.46 22W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, LM, SM AP, BE, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T4S R104W Sec. 2 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swale Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.73376742 N Soil Map Unit Name: Uffens loam, 0-5% slopes Long: -109.0333985 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 50 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Hordeum jubatum 50 Yes FAC 3 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 135 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP725.4i Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 5/2 80 7.5YR 5/8 20 C M silt 6-10 10YR 5/2 70 7.5YR 5/8 30 C M silt I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) X Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Obvious drainage US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 136 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Rio Blanco Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP725.46 22U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, LR, JG, BE Section, Township, Range:T4S R104W Sec. 2 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): swale Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.73379912 N Soil Map Unit Name: Uffens loam, 0-5% slopes Long: -109.033455 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (ib No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 20 Yes UPL 1.Artemisia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Sarcobatus vermiculatus 20 Yes FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 40 % 25 Yes FACU 1 •Chenopodium album 2.Kochia scoparia 20 Yes FACU 3•Taraxacum officinale 15 Yes FACU 4.Pascopyrum smithii 10 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 70 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 137 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP725.41 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 10YR 5/3 95 silty loam 5% white nodules 4-12 10YR 5/3 100 silty loam 12-18 10YR 5/3 100 silt Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: White nodules within the sample are likely to be calcium carbonate. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 138 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Version 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP717.45 25W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, JG, LR, AP, BE Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 8 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): entrenched creek Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.63316532 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9827823 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 3. VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 57.1 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 15 Yes FACU 1.Symphoricarpos albus Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Rosa woodsii 10 Yes FAC OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Amelanchier utahensis 5 Yes UPL 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 30 % 30 Yes FACU 1 •Solidago canadensis 2.Cicuta douglasii 20 Yes OBL 3•Agrostis gigantea 20 Yes FACW 4.Equisetum hyemale 20 Yes FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. Phleum pratense 5 FACU 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 95 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 10 % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter Narrow 1 foot fringe on entrenched creek US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 139 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP717.4: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-2 10YR 4/6 95 clay loam 5% organics 2-8 10YR 4/2 75 2.5/ 5 PB 25 C M silty loam Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (T No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No Water Table Present? Yes (( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No (' Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes q No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) X Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (T No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No Water Table Present? Yes (( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No (' Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Next to creek, narrow wetland fringe US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 140 of 317 Arid West - Version 0111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP717.45 25U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, LM, AP, SM, BE, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 8 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):8 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.63320388 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9827001 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: PEMC No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes (' No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 50 Yes UPL 1.Artemisia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Ericameria nauseosa 10 FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Symphoricarpos albus 10 FACU 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 70 % 30 Yes FACU 1 •Agropyron cristatum 2•Bromus inermis 20 Yes UPL 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 50 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 141 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP717.4: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-5 10YR 3/2 80 loam 20% organics 5-15 10YR 5/3 100 sand I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks:On terrace, about 20' above flowing creek; typical terrace vegetation US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 142 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP719.21 23W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):6 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.6563781 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9923034 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: PEMC No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes (' No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3• 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 20 Yes FACW 1.Salix exigua Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 20 % 30 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Carex garberi 25 Yes FACW 3•Distichlis spicata 15 Yes FAC 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 70 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 143 of 317 Arid West Ve��011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP7192 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-8 10YR 3/2 40 silty loam 8-12 10YR 3/2 95 12-18 10YR 3/2 75 Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) IXI Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Near an uncontrolled agricultural ditch at the edge of willows US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 144 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP719.21 23U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, LR, BE, JG Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 8 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.65630521 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9923612 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3• 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 5 Yes FAC 1.Rosa woodsii Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 5 % 40 Yes FACU 1 •Agropyron cristatum 2.Symphotrichum spathulatum 5 Yes UPL 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 45 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 145 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP7192 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 1 OYR 4/3 90 silt 10% organics 6-12 10YR 4/3 90 silt 10% white nodules 12-18 10YR 4/3 80 silt 20% white nodules Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: White nodules are likely to be calcium carbonate or other soluble mineral HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 146 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP717.2_26U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM AP, BE LR, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 17 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.63012925 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9806473 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes (' No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (i No (— Hydric Soil Present? Yes (` No t: Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks:Agricultural field near ranch house, irrigation ditch fed. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 70 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Phleum pratense 10 FACU 3•Lactuca serriola 10 FAC 4.Pseudoroegneria spicata 5 UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Symphotrichum spathulatum 5 UPL 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (— Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 147 of 317 Arid West - VejIH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP717.2 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-18 7.5YR 4/4 100 clay loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: *Fed formerly by irrigation ditch- south to north *In transition to upland- some hydrophytic plants US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 148 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP7 1 7.9_24W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, BE, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 8 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%): 5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.63686552 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9829292 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 1.Salix exigua 80 Yes FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Rosa woodsii 10 FAC OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3• 4. % Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1.Salix exigua 80 Yes FACW Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Rosa woodsii 10 FAC OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Total Cover: 90 % Herb Stratum 1 •Bromus marginatus 30 Yes UPL 2.Carex garberi 15 Yes FACW 3•Lactuca serriola 15 Yes FACU 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Total Cover: 60 % Woody Vine Stratum 1. 2. Total Cover: % % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (i No C Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter Although vegetation does not exceed 50% , the dominant vegetation is representative of hydrophytic vegetation US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 149 of 317 Arid West - VeViV1121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP717.9 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 3/3 85 silty loam 5% organics 6-10 10YR 3/3 95 silty loam 5% organics 10-15 10YR 3/2 95 7.5YR 5/8 5 RM RC clay loam Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes q No C Depth (inches): Remarks: Located within 3 ft. of an uncontrolled irrigation ditch in willow patch HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 150 of 317 Arid West - VeLsi.an 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County: Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP717.9_24U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, AP, LM, LR, BE, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.8 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):6 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.63687547 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9827777 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 30 Yes FACU 1.Ericameria nauseosa Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 30 % 70 Yes FACU 1 •Gropyron cristatum 2.Symphotrichum spathulatum 20 Yes UPL 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 90 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 151 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP717.9 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-10 10 YR 5/3 90 silty loam 10% organics 10-15 10 YR 5/3 100 silty loam I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 152 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP716.32 28W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, LM, SM, AP, JG, LR, BE Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.17 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): fringe lake Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.61784002 N Soil Map Unit Name: water Long: -108.9737234 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (' Yes ( Yes ( No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 90 Yes OBL 1 •Eleocharis palustris 2•Hordeum jubatum 5 FAC 3•Scirpus pungens 5 OBI. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 153 of 317 Arid West - Ve5jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP716.3: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-0.5 organic 0.5-1 10YR 3/2 85 clay loam 15% organic 1-18 2.5/5PB gley I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (` Water Table Present? Yes (I No (^ Depth (inches): 8 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: water at 8" HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (` Water Table Present? Yes (I No (^ Depth (inches): 8 Saturation Present? Yes q No (-` Depth (inches): 8 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Located at the edge of McAndrew's Lake US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 154 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP716.32_28U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, BE, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 1 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): shoreline Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.61784395 N Long: -108.973642 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hepserus-Empedrado, moist Pagoda complex 5-35% slopes NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i No (` Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 40 Yes FACU 1 •Melilotus ofcinalis 2•Salsola collina 15 Yes UPL 3•Pascopyrum smithii 10 FACU 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 65 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 35 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 155 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP716.3: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 10YR 4/2 100 silt loam very dry loose sample Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Rock Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): 4 Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 156 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP716.32 27W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, AP LM, LR, BE, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 17 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):1 0 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.6192223 N Soil Map Unit Name: water Long: -108.97498 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes (' No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 70 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Schoenoplectus acutus 10 OBL 3•Hordeum jubatum 10 FAC 4.Typha latifolia 5 OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Taraxacum officinale 5 FACU 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 157 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP716.3: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 7.5YR 4/3 60 7.5YR 5/8 40 RM RC sandy clay 4-6 3/5 B M glcy X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (` No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (` No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 158 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP716.32 27U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, JG, LR, BE Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 17 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%): 15 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.61922555 N Long: -108.9749553 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Heperus-Empedrado, moist Pagoda complex 5-35% slopes NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 5 Yes FACU 1.Ericameria nauseosa Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. Tamarix ramosissima 1 Yes FACW OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 6 % 80 Yes FACU 1 •Melilotus officinalis 2.Salsola collina 5 UPL 3.1-1ordeum jubatum 5 FAC 4.Poa secunda 5 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 95 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Total Cover: % % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter Influenced by historic higher water levels US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 159 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP716.3: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 10YR 4/2 95 silty loam 5% organic 4-12 10YR 4/2 93 silty loam 2% organic; 5%white nodules Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: 5% white nodules are likely to be calcium carbonate or other soluble mineral HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: -man-made lake shoreline -current high water line 4" below sample -sustained upland vegetation US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 160 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - VeLsioin 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP716.13 30W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, BE, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 21 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.61441755 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9719944 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 30 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Carex garberi 20 Yes FACW 3•Agrostis gigantea 20 Yes FACW 4•Eleocharis palustris 15 OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5_ 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 85 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 161 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP716.1: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-2 l OYR 3/1 40 2.5/5 PB 5 C M clay loam 2-8 4/10 B 50 2.5/5 PB 50 C M clay loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): +2 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (11' No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): +2 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 8 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 162 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 Applicant/Owner: Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP716.13 30U Investigator(s):WWE: BFF, MJV, SM, AP, LM, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 21 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.61440883 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9719173 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i Yes (` Yes ( No (' No t: No C Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 3. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 8 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0 % (A/B) 1.Juniperus osteosperma 50 Yes UPL 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum 50 % 40 Yes FAC 1.Ribes aureum Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Symphoricarpos albus 25 Yes FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Rosa woodsii 20 Yes FACU 4.Juniperus osteosperma 5 UPL 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 90 % 30 Yes OBL 1 •Rumex crispus 2.Juncus balticus 15 Yes FACW 3•Equisetum arvense 10 Yes FAC 4.Achillea millefolium 10 Yes FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 65 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 15 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 163 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP716.1: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 4/3 90 loam 10% organics 6-10 10YR 4/3 90 loam 5% organics 10-12 10YR 4/3 60 7.5YR 5/8 30 RM RC clay loam 10% organics 12-15 10YR 4/3 90 7.5YR 5/8 5 RM RC clay loam 5% organics 15-18 10YR 4/3 40 7.5YR 5/8 40 RM RC clay loam 10% organics Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (Al) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 164 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Versjan 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP715.55 16W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, AP ,JG Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 21 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wet meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):l 5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.6076069 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9644534 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 50 Yes OBL 1 .Carex utriculata 2•Eleocharis palustris 30 Yes OBL 3•Agrostis gigantea 20 Yes FACW 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 165 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP715.5: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 2.5/10 Y 80 sapric snuck 20% organics Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (I No (^ Depth (inches): -1 Saturation Present? Yes q No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 166 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP715.55 16U Investigator(s):WWE;BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, JG, AP Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec.21 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): creekside meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.6075974 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.964346 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 45 Yes FACU 1.Symphocarpos albus Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Artemesia tridentata 20 Yes UPL OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 65 % 30 Yes FACU 1 •Poa pratensis 2.Melilotusofcinalis 15 Yes FACU 3.Achillea milleJblium 10 Yes FACU 4.Hieracium cynoglossoides 10 Yes UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. Urtica dioica 5 FAC 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 70 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 167 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP715.5: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-1 organics 1-20 10YR 2/2 100 clay loam 20-24 10YR 3/4 100 silty clay loam Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Heavily grazed upland area approximately 15 ft. from creek US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 168 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, LR, BE, JG Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wet meadow City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP715.43_15W Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.21 Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.60664022 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9622291W Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling Slope (%):<2 Datum:WGS 84 NWI classification:PEMCh No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes (' No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 70 Yes OBL 1 .Carex utriculata 2.Carex nelsonii 20 Yes OBL 3.Ranunculus cymbalaria 10 OBL 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 169 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP715.4: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 l OYR 3/3 40 l OYR 5/6 40 C M sandy loam 20% 10YR2/1 C M clay Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i' No (^ Depth (inches): -6 Saturation Present? Yes q No (-` Depth (inches): -8 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (ii No C Depth (inches): Remarks: High root fiber content in top 6"; soils colored and obviously hydric, although only moist at time of sampling HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) X High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i' No (^ Depth (inches): -6 Saturation Present? Yes q No (-` Depth (inches): -8 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 170 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP715.43 15U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, LR, JG, BE Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec.21 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%): <2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.60653303 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9620193 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 10 Yes UPL 1.Artemesia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Symphocarpos albus 5 Yes FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 15 % 35 Yes FACU 1 •Poa pratensis 2•Thermopsis montana 20 Yes UPL 3•Melilotus officinalis 20 Yes FACU 4.Lupinas polphyllus 10 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Bromus inermis 10 UPL 6.Elymus trachycaulus 10 FACU 7.Achillea millefolium 5 FACU $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 110 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 171 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP715.4: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-0.5 organic 0.5-8 10YR 2/2 95 clay loam 5% silt 8-10 10YR 2/2 100 clay loam 10-14 10YR 2/2 95 clay loam 5% silt Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: rock Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): 14" Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Located 10 ft. up gradient from heavily grazed wet meadow US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 172 of 317 Arid West - VeLsjap0111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, LM, SM, LR, JG, BE City/County:Garfield Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): roadside wetland Sampling Date:08-19-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP715.4_29W Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 21 Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):20 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.60938105 N Long: -108.9608454 W Datum:WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist Pagado complex 5-35% slopes NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i No (` Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 80 Yes FACW 1 •Carex filifolia 2•Agrostis gigantea 5 FACW 3•Poa secunda 5 FACU 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 90 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 173 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP715.4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 2.5N 80 clay 20% organics Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): +2 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (11' No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +2 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): +2 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 174 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-19-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP715.4_29U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, AP, LM, SM, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.21 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): roadside Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):20 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.60932888 N Long: -108.9608269 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist Pagado complex 5-35% slopes NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i No (` Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No ( Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (_ No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 70 Yes FACU 1 •Poa pratensis 2.Taraxacum officinale 10 FACU 3•Rumex crispus 5 FAC 4.Cynoglossum officinalli 5 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. Urtica dioica 5 FAC 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 95 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 175 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP715.4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-8 10YR 3/2 80 clay loam 20% organic 8-16 10YR 3/2 80 clay loam 10% organic, 10%white nodules Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: White nodules within the sample are likely to be calcium carbonate or other soluble mineral HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 176 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Versipm 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP715.1_14W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, JG, LR, AP Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):25 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Let:39.60218135 N Long: -108.9589255 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist pagoda complex, 5-35% slopes NWI classification:NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 80 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Melilotus officinalis 20 FACU 3•Taraxacum officinale 5 FACU 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 105 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 177 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP715.1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 3/2 60 10YR 2/1 10 C M clay 30% RC 10YR5/8 clay 6-10 10YR 3/2 60 10YR 2/1 10 C M clay 10-12 2.5YR 5/4 50 10YR 4/3 25 C M clay 25%C -M 7.5YR5/8 clay Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes q No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Area off buffer, approximately 10m; obvious signs of depression wetland for portion of growing season US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 178 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Versian 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP715.1_14U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.60220242 N Long: -108.9588818 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist Pagoda complex 5-35% slopes NWI classification:NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i No (` Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 20 Yes FACU 1.Symphocarpos albus Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Rihes aureum 5 Yes FAC OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 25 % 50 Yes FACU 1 •Taraxacum officinale 2.Poa pratensis 30 Yes FACU 3•Melilotus officinalis 15 FACU 4.Achillea millefolium 15 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. S.Hieracium cynoglossoides 10 UPL 6.Cirsium arvense 5 FACU 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 125 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 179 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP715.1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-0.5 organics 0.5-16 10YR 2/2 90 clay loam 10% rock fragments 16-24 10YR 2/2 85 clay loam 15% rock fragments Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: upland near depression wetland US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 180 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point.MP714.84_13W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, JG, LR, AP Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wet meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.59807542 N Long: -108.9580205 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist Pagoda complex 5-35% slopes Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (' No (` Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:PABGb (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes (I No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (' Yes ( Yes ( No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 60 Yes OBL 1 •Eleocharis palustris 2.Carex utriculata 20 Yes OBL 3•Agrostis gigantea 10 FACW 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 90 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust °/o Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 181 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP714.8` Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-2 Organics 2-6 2.5/5 GY 100 M muck muck sapric X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (i No i Depth (inches): +1" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X — _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (i No i Depth (inches): +1" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i` No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 182 of 317 Arid West - Ve5,L 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP714.84_13U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, JG, LR, AP Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec.28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):10 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.59800614 N Long: -108.9580588 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist Pagado complex 5-35% slopes Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i No (` Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:PABGb (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes (I No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 30 Yes UPL 1 •Bromus inermis 2. Urtica dioica 25 Yes FAC 3•Hieracium glossoides 15 UPI. 4.Circium vulgare 5 FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Achillea millejblium 5 FACU 6.Taraxacum officinale 5 FACU 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 85 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust °/o Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 183 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP714.& Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-1 organic 1-8 10YR 2/2 100 clay loam 8-16 10YR 2/2 95 clay loam 5% rock fragments 16-24 10YR 2/2 100 clay loam No rock Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 184 of 3173/1/20 Arid West - Version 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP714.71_11W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, AP, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):10 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.59535507 N Long: -108.9579995 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist Pagoda complex 5-35% slopes NWI classification:NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (' No (` Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (' Yes ( Yes ( No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 40 Yes UPL 1.Carex microdonta 2.Eleocharis palustris 30 Yes OBL 3•Agrostis gigantea 20 Yes FACW 4.Ranunculus cymbalaria 20 Yes OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 110% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 185 of 317 Arid West - VejiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP714.7 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-3 2.5/5 PB 90 3-6 10YR 2/1 90 2.5/5 PB 10 C M sandy clay X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (` 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type:Pebbles Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches):6" Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (` Water Table Present? Yes (i' No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes q No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 186 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP714.71 11U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV,SM, LM, BE, JG, AP, LR Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):10 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.59530772 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cryorthents-rock outcrop complex, 50-90% slopes Long: -108.9580155 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 15 Yes FACU 1.Symphocarpos albus Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Rihes indecorum 10 Yes FAC OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Rosa woodsii 10 Yes FAC 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 35 % 55 Yes FACU 1 •Poa pratensis 2•Hieracium cynoglossoides 30 Yes UPL 3•Senecio serra 10 FACU 4. Taraxacum officinale 5 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Elymus trachycaulus 5 FACU 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 105 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 187 of 317 Arid West - VejiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP714.7 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-8 10YR 2/2 95 clay loam 5% organics 8-24 10YR 2/2 90 clay loam 10% rock fragments I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: Uniform matrix HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 188 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP714.71_12W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.595712 N Long: -108.9578791 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist Pagoda complex 5-35% slopes NWI classification:NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (' No (` Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (' Yes ( Yes ( No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 70 Yes OBL 1 •Eleocharis palustris 2•Carex microdonta 15 UPL 3•Agrostis gigantea 10 FACW 4.Ranunculus cympbalaria 10 OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. 8. Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 105 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust °/o Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 189 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP714.7 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 95 sandy clay 4-6 2.5/5 PB 95 sandy clay 6-12 2.5/5 PB 70 sandy clay 30% rock fragments Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes t^ No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type:Gravel Hydric Soil Present? Yes q No C Depth (inches):12" Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes t^ No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes (0 No C Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (' Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 190 of 3173/1/20 Arid West - Ve i.an 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP714.71_12U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, AP, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%):10 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.59563354 N Long: -108.9578573 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, moist Pagado complex, 5-35% slopes NWI classification:NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 10 Yes FACU 1.Symphocarpos albus Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Rihes aureum 10 Yes FAC OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 20 % 35 Yes FACU 1 •Poa prantesis 2.Achillea millefolium 25 Yes FACU 3•Senecio serra 15 FACU 4.Hieracium cynoglossoides 10 UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5_Thinpyrum intermedium 5 FACU 6.Taraxacum officinale 5 FACU 7.Me/ilotus officinalis 5 FACU $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 15 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 191 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP714.7 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 2/2 90 clay loam 10% rock fragments 6-12 10YR 2/2 85 clay loam 15% rock fragments, silt 12-13 10YR 2/2 85 clay loam moist 13-24 10YR 2/2 80 clay loam 20% rock fragments Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: hill slope on east side of road US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 192 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Versiotn 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) Sampling Date:08-22-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP714.4_10W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, JG, LR AP, BE Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.58958725 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cryorthents-rock outcrop complex, 50-90% slopes Long: -108.957904 W Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling NWI classification:NA Slope (%):20 Datum:WGS 84 No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 50 Yes FAC 1 .Carex microptera 2•Agrostis gigantea 40 Yes FACW 3.Poafrndleriana 20 Yes UPI, 4.Juncus balticus 10 FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Eleocharis paulstris 10 OBL 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 130% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 193 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP714.4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 1 OYR 3/2 50 3/5 GY 50 RM M clay loam Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X n X I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (I No (^ Depth (inches): -2" Saturation Present? Yes q No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 194 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP714.4_1OU Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, JG, AP Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.28 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%):20 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.58974689 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cryorthents-rock outcrop complex 50-90% slopes Long: -108.9582063 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` No (: Yes (' No (i Yes C No (: Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: ***Represents West Evacuation Creek 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 6 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum 20 Yes UPL 1.Artemesia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Ericameria nauseosa 15 Yes FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Symphocarpos albus 10 Yes FACU 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 45 % 25 Yes FACU 1 •Thinopyrum intermedium 2•Melilotus offcinalis 15 Yes FACU 3•Elymus trachycaulus 10 Yes FACU 4•Hieracium cynoglossoides 5 UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5_Erigeron peregrines 5 FACW 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 60 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 45 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 195 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP714.4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-8 10YR 3/6 95 silt loam 5% organics Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks:hillside upland above creek US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 196 of 317 Arid West - Ve5,L 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEPII Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08/17/11 State:CO Sampling Point:MP713.31-21 W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, AP, SM, LM, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.588089 N Slope (%):5 Long: -108.933852 W Datum:WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, Moist -Pagoda complex, 5-35% Slope NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i No (` (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (' Yes ( Yes ( No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 90 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Hordeum jubatum 20 FAC 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 110% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 197 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP713.3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 l 0YR 2/2 80 7.5YR 4/6 10 C RC Silty Clay 10% 2.5 10B Gley Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 198 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEPII Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08/17/11 State:CO Sampling Point:MP71 3.3 1_21U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, AP, SM, LM, BE, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.588078 N Slope (%):5 Long: -108.933820 W Datum:WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Hesperus-Empedrado, Moist -Pagoda complex, 5-35% Slope NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i No (` (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 40 Yes FACU 1 •Poa secunda 2•Taraxacum officinale 20 Yes FACU 3•Trifolium repens 10 FACU 4•Juncus arcticus 10 FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 80 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes r No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 199 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP713.3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6" 10YR 3/4 95 5% white nodules at 4" 6-12" 10YR 3/4 80 7.5 YR 4/6 10 C RC Loam 10% white nodules 12-18" 10YR 3/4 80 7.5YR 4/6 20 C RC Loam Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 200 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08 17 2011 Applicant/Owner: Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP713.31_6W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, LR, AP, BE, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 34 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):20 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.58107707 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cathedral -Veatch complex, 25-85% slopes Long: -108.9365338 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 4. % Sapling/Shrub Stratum VEGETATION Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. % Sapling/Shrub Stratum 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Total Cover: % Herb Stratum OBL 1 .Ranunculus cymbalaria ssp. saximontana 80 Yes 2•Galium trorum 40 Yes FACU 3•Agrostis giantea 20 Yes FACW 4.Melilotus officinalis 10 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Juncus balticus 5 FACW 6.Alopecurus arundinaceus 2 UPL 7. $ Total Cover: 157% Woody Vine Stratum 1. 2. Total Cover: % % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Not size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 201 of 317 Arid West - VejiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP713.3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-2 10YR 3/2 20 clay loam 2-6 Gley 1 2.5/N 100 gley 6-9 Gley 1 2.5/N 100 gley 9-12 7.5YR 2.5/1 100 clay loam 2% organics; gravelly Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ("ii No (' Depth (inches): 1 (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ( No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) X Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes q No C Depth (inches): 1; flowing Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes ("ii No (' Depth (inches): 1 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 202 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Versipm 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP713.31_6U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, JG, AP, BE, LR Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 34 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%):25 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.58109834 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cathedral -Veatch complex, 25-85% slopes Long: -108.936525 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (ii No (i No (i' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 30 Yes FACU 1.Symphoricarpos oreophilus Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Rosa woodsii 20 Yes FAC OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 50 % 40 Yes UPL 1 •Hieracium cynoglossoides 2.Maianthemum stellatum 15 Yes FACU 3•Melilotus officinalli 5 FACU 4•Bromus tectorum 5 UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Thinopyrum intermedium 2 FACU 6.Poa pratensis 2 FACU 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 69 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 15 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 203 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP713.3 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 1 OYR 3/3 90 clay loam 10% white nodules 6-18 10YR 3/3 95 5% white nodules I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: 1% organics in top inch White nodules are likely to be calcium carbonate or other soluble mineral HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 204 of 317 Arid West - Ve5,L 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEPII Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08/17/11 State:CO Sampling Point:MP713.11_20W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, AP, SM, LM, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec. 35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%):15 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.581027 N Long: -108.931571 W Datum:WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Cathedral-Vratch complex, 25-85% Slope Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 50 Yes FACW 1 •Agrostis gigantea 2.Erigeron peregrinus 30 Yes FACW 3•Juncus balticus 20 Yes FACW 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 205 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP713.1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/2 50 2.5/5 PB 40 C M Sandy Oxidation 7.5YR 5/8 Rocky parent material X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +0.5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Pebble Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches):6" Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n X I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +0.5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 206 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEPII Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08/17/11 State:CO Sampling Point:MP713.11_20U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, AP, SM, LM, BE, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%):15 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.581042 N Long: -108.931550 W Datum:WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Cathedral-Vratch complex, 25-85% Slope Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 25 Yes FACU 1 •Melilotus officinalis 2.Trifolium repens 20 Yes FACU 3•Poa secunda 20 Yes FACU 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 65 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 207 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP713.1 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-16 10YR 3/4 95 5% white nodules Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: White nodules within the sample are likely to be calcium carbonate HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 208 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEPII City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08/17/11 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP710.66 19W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, AP, SM, LM, JG, LR, BE Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec. 6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.56338667 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement Loam, 1-8% Slope Long: -108.91343 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 90 Yes OBL 1 •Schoenoplectus acutus 2•Scleria triglomerata 5 UPL 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 95 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 209 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP710.6i Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 7.5YR 4/2 70 2.5 10BG 30 C M sand 4-8 2.5/5 PB 100 C M sand X X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X X X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: N/A Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X IXI I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i' No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes q No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 210 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEPII City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08/17/11 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP710.66 19U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, AP, SM, LM, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec. 6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.563424 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement Loam, 1-8% Slope Long: -108.913482 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 90 Yes FACU 1 •Melilotus officinalis 2.Distichlis spicata 30 Yes FAC 3•Iva axillaris 5 FACW 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 125% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 211 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP710.6i Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 3/2 95 6-18 10YR 3/2 80 20% white nodules I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: N/A Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: White nodules within the sample are likely to be calcium carbonate or other soluble mineral HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 212 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEPII City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08/17/11 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP709.69 18W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF,MJV,AP, SM, LM, BE, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R104W Sec. 4 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%):20 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.553047 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam saline, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.923591 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 60 Yes OBL 1 .Carex utriculata 2.Juncus balticus 40 Yes FACW 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 213 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP709.6! Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 4/10 BG 100 sandy clay Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: N/A Hydric Soil Present? Yes (11' No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n X X I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +4 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 214 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEPII Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) Investigator(s):WWE; MJV/AP City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08/17/11 State:CO Sampling Point:MP709.69_18U Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec. 7 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%):20 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.553007 N Long: -108.923679 W Datum:WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement Loam, Saline, 1-8% Slopes Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i Yes (` Yes C No (' No t: No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 30 Yes FACW 1 .Iva axillaris 2.Distichlis spicata 30 Yes FAC 3 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 60 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 215 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP709.6! Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-18 10YR 5/3 95 sandy loam 5% white nodules Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: N/A Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: White nodules within the sample are likely to be calcium carbonate. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 216 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP701.51 17W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF,MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, AP, JG Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec.14 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2% Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.450101 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam, 1-6% slopes Long: -108.954403 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 80 Yes FAC 1 •Distichlis spicata 2•Chenopodium album 5 FACU 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 85 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 217 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP701.5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-12 10YR 5/3 100 12-18 10YR 5/3 95 7.5 YR 5/8 5 C M silt loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (ii No C Depth (inches): Remarks: obviously periodically inundated area with root concentrations of oxidation within the top 18" of soil HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 218 of 317 Arid West - Ve5,L 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP701.51 17U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, JG, AP Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec.14 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2% Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.450152 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam, 1-6% slopes Long: -108.954466 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 60 Yes FACU 1 •Chenopodium album 2.Kochia scoparia 20 Yes FACU 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 80 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 219 of 317 Arid West - VejiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP701.5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 5/3 100 silt loam 6-18 10YR 5/3 95 silt loam 5% white nodules I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: White nodules within the sample are likely to be calcium carbonate or other soluble mineral HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 220 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP712.44_9U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, AP, JG Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec.35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.57442985 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9263392 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 40 Yes UPL 1.Artemesia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 40 % 20 Yes UPL 1 •Bromus inermis 2•Melilotus offcinalis 15 Yes FACU 3•Pascopyrum smithii 5 Yes FACU 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 40 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 221 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP712.44 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-18 l 0YR 3/4 100 clay loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: Uniform matrix HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 222 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP712.44_9W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, LR, BE, JG, AP Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.57443287 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9264629 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 100 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2. 3 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 223 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP712.44 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 2.5/5 PB 100 sand mucky Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (i No i Depth (inches): +1" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (i No i Depth (inches): +1" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i` No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 224 of 317 Arid West - Ve5,L 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP712.44_8W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, JG, AP, LR Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec.35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):< 2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.57396334 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.926341 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 70 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Scirpus pungens 25 Yes OBL 3. Eleocharis paulstris 20 Yes OBL 4•Schoenoplectus acutus 5 OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Agrostis gigantea 5 FACW 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 125 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 225 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP712.44 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 2.5/5 PG 100 clay loam saturated muck Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +1.5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): +1.5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 226 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP712.44_8U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, JG, LR, AP, BE Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec. 35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.57396514 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9264456 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 50 Yes UPL 1.Artemesia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 50 % 40 Yes UPL 1 •Bromus inermis 2.Achillea millefolium 30 Yes FACU 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 70 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 227 of 317 Arid West - Ve liVil21-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP712.44 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-18 l 0YR 3/4 100 clay loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: Calcium carbonate deposits found throughout the sample depth HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 228 of 317 Arid West - Ve5,L 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP712.32_7W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, AP, SM, LM, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:T5S R103W Sec.6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wet meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.57342562 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.926111 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 90 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Eleocharis palustris 10 OBL 3 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 229 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP712.3: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 2.5/5 PB 90 gley 4-6 10YR 3/1 80 7.5YR 5/6 20 C M sandy clay X X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i' No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes q No C` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 230 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-22-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP712.32_7U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, LR, BE, AP, JG Section, Township, Range:TSS R103W Sec.6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): meadow Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.57339647 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9261692 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 50 Yes FACU 1.Ericameria nauseosa Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Artemesia tridentata 20 Yes UPS OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 70 % 50 Yes UPL 1 •Bromus inermis 2.Achillea millefolium 20 Yes FACU 3•Melilotus officinalis 20 Yes FACU 4.Trifolium repens 10 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Taraxacum officinale 5 FACU 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 105 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 231 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP712.3: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-18 10YR 3/4 100 sandy loam consolidated soil to 18" Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks:Dry upland adjacent to wetland seep below cow pond US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 232 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08 17 2011 Applicant/Owner: Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP710.66_5W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM AP, JG, BE, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec. 6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):30 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.56348465 N Long: -108.9140237 W Datum: WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Torriorthents, cool Rock outcrop complex, 35-90% slopes NWI classification:NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (' Yes ( Yes ( No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 60 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Schoenoplectus pungens 50 Yes OBL 3•Typha latifolia 40 Yes OBL 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 150% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 2 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust °/o Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 233 of 317 Arid West - VejiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP710.6i Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 l OYR 4/1 50 7.5YR 5/8 10 clay 10% organics in top 3" 3/5B Gley2 30 gley X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (11' No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): 0 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 234 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08 17 2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP710.66 5U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, LR, BE, JG Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec. 6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%):35 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.56350542 N Long: -108.913956 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Torriorthents, cool rock outcrop complex 35-90% slopes NWI classification: NA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 90 Yes FACU 1 •Melilotus officinalis 2•Juncus tracyi 10 FACW 3•Carex filifolia 5 UPI, 4.Iva axillaris 2 FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5.Thinopyrum intermedium 2 FACU 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 109 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 235 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP710.6i Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 4/2 100 clay 6-10 10YR 4/2 95 clay 5% white nodules in bottom 2" I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: rock Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): 10" Remarks: White nodules are likely to be calcium carbonate or other soluble mineral HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 236 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP710.73 38W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec.6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):l5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.564388 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9133502 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 25 Yes OBL 1 •Schoenoplectus maritimus 2.Juncus balticus 20 Yes FACW 3•Hordeum jubatum 10 Yes FAC 4.Polypogon monspeliensis 10 Yes FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 65 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 20 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 237 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP710.7: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 7.5YR 3/2 60 2.5/5 G 30 C M sandy clay loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i`No (^ Depth (inches): 4" Saturation Present? Yes (` No (i Depth (inches): 6" 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i`No (^ Depth (inches): 4" Saturation Present? Yes (` No (i Depth (inches): 6" (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 238 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP710.73 38U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec.6 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):20 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.564406 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, 1-8% slopes Long: -108.913338 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 5 Yes UPL 1.Artemisia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 5 % 40 Yes FACU 1 •Melilotus officinallis 2•Iva axillaria 25 Yes FACW 3.Elymus trachycaulus 10 FACU 4.Pascopyrum smithii 5 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 80 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 239 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP710.7: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-12 10YR 4/3 90 sandy loam 12-18 10YR 3/3 90 sandy loam I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 240 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08 17 2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP709.61_4W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, LR, JG, AP, BE Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec. 7 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainage Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.55224434 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, saline 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9234849 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (' Yes ( Yes ( No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 100 Yes OBL 1 •Schoenoplectus pungens 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 100% 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 241 of 317 Arid West - VejiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP709.6 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 7.5YR 4/2 40 7.5YR 5/8 10 RM RC clay bottom 1" sandy clay 2.5 BG 50 M gley Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No C Depth (inches): 0.5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): 0 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (11' No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No C Depth (inches): 0.5 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): 0 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 0 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 242 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP709.61_4U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, AP, JG, BE, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec. 7 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none):convex Slope (%)a 5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.55224715 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam, saline 1-8% slopes Long: -108.9235344 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 40.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 15 Yes UPL 1.Artemesia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Sarcobatus vermiculatus 5 Yes FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Ericameria nauseosa 5 Yes FACU 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 25 % 80 Yes FAC 1 •Distichlis spicata 2•Iva axillaris 20 Yes FACW 3•Grindalia squarrosa 2 UPI. 4.Bromus ciliatus 1 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 103 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 243 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP709.6 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 4/3 100 clay 6-12 10YR 4/3 97 3% white nodules 12-18 10YR 4/3 97 3% white nodules 18-24 10YR 4/3 85 15% white nodules Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (.— No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: Very little organics; the white nodules are likely to be calcium carbonate or other soluble mineral HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 244 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Versiotn 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP707.9-37W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec.18 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.534663 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam,saline 1-8% slopes Long: -108.925747 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 80 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2•Iva axillaria 10 FACW 3 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 90 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 245 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP707.9. Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 l OYR 4/2 60 2.5/5G 30 RM M sandy clay loam Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (i No i Depth (inches): 2" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (' Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (i No i Depth (inches): 2" Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (' Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 6" (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Water flowing in channel. US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 246 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP707.9-37U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R103W Sec.18 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.534663 N Soil Map Unit Name: Battlement loam,saline 1-8% slopes Long: -108.925724 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 25.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3• 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 20 Yes UPL 1.Artemisia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 20 % 25 Yes FACW 1 Iva axillaria 2.Me/ilotus officinallis 20 Yes FACU 3.Elymus trachycaulus 20 Yes FACU 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 65 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 247 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP707.9. Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-18 7.5YR 5/3 90 sandy loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 248 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP706.75 36W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R104W Sec.25 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.51640942 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Long: -108.9383646 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 50 Yes FACW 1 •Juncus balticus 2.Elymus trachycau/us 40 FACU 3•Arctium minus 5 Uri. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 95 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 249 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP706.7: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 7.5YR 4/2 60 2.5/5G 20 RM PL sandy clay loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): 6 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 6 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (11' No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (ii No i Depth (inches): 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes No (^ Depth (inches): 6 Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 6 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 250 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP706.75 36U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R104W Sec.25 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.516466 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Long: -108.938438 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 30 Yes UPL 1.Artemisia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Sarcobatus vermiculatus 20 Yes FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Ericameria nauseosa 10 FACU 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 60 % 30 Yes FACU 1 •Elymus trachycaulus 2.Melilotus officionallis 15 Yes FACU 3•Arctium minus 5 Yes UPL 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 50 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 10 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 251 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP706.7: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 7.5YR 3/3 90 sandy loam 6-12 10YR 4/3 90 sandy loam 12-18 10YR 4/2 90 sandy loam Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 252 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP705.79_3U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, AP, JG Section, Township, Range:T6S R104W Sec. 26 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.5047004 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam, 1-6% slopes Long: -108.9468562 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i Yes (` Yes (^ No (' No t: No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 20 Yes FACU 1.Sarcobatus vermiculatus Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 20 % 10 Yes FAC 1 •Distichlis spicata 2•Iva axillaris 5 Yes FACW 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 15 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 253 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP705.7! Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-4 10YR 4/2 100 silt loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type:gravel Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): 4" Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 254 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP704.4-35U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T6S R104W Sec.35 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):5 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.489539 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Long: -108.961577 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 4 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3• 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 50 Yes FACW 1.Tamarix ramosissima Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 50 % 20 Yes FACU 1 •Pascopyrum smithii 2.Melilotus officionallis 10 Yes FACU 3•Chenopodium glaucum 10 Yes FACW 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 40 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 65 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 255 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP704.4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 7.5YR 5/3 95 sandy loam 6-12 7.5YR 4/3 95 sandy loam 12-18 7.5YR 3/2 95 sandy clay loam Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: Only pit dug to indicate no wetlands along channel. US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 256 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP703.4-34U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec.3 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.475506 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Long: -108.967439 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 20 Yes UPL 1 •Arctium minus 2.Melilotus officinalis 10 Yes FACU 3•Salsola collina 10 Yes UPL 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 40 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (0 Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 257 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP703.4. Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-15 7.5YR 4/3 90 sandy loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type:Rock substrata Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches):15 " Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 258 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP702.5-33U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec.11 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.46433 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Long: -108.962720 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3• 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 20 Yes UPL 1.Artemesia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 20 % 40 Yes FACW 1 .Iva Axillaris 2.Melilotus officinalis 20 Yes FACU 3•Arctium minus 10 UL 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 70 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 60 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 259 of 317 Arid West - Ve jiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP702.5. Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-18 7.5YR 4/3 90 sandy loam Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 260 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP701.51-2W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, LM, MJV, SM, BE, LR, JG, AP Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec. 14 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.44879797 N Long: -108.9533456 W Datum:WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 70 Yes FAC 1 •Distichlis spicata 2.Kochia scoparia 10 FACU 3•Arctium lappa 10 UPI. 4.Chenopodium glaucom 5 FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 95 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 50 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 261 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP701.5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-12 10YR 5/3 100 sand 12-18 10YR 5/3 85 7.5YR 5/8 15 RM RC sand bottom 1" damp Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes q No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) X Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (i No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 262 of 317 Arid West - VeLsi.an 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP701.51_2U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, JG, LR, AP, BE Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec.14 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.44878497 N Long: -108.9533364 W Datum:WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 33.3 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 60 Yes UPL 1.Artemesia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Ericameria nauseosa 5 FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Sarcobatus vermiculatus 5 FACU 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 70 % 30 Yes FACW 1 •Chenopodium glaucum 2.Kochia scoparia 30 Yes FACU 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 60 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 40 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 263 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP701.5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-12 10YR 5/4 100 silt loam 12-20 10YR 5/4 95 silt loam 5% white nodules;bottom 1" 20-24 10YR 5/4 100 clay loam 5% white nodules; top 1" Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: Very little organics present HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes (' No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 264 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Versiotn 111-1-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County: Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner: Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP701.51-1 W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, LR, JWG Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec.14 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.4490056 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Slope (%):<2 Long: -108.9541411 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 70 Yes FAC 1 •Distichlis spicata 2. 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 70 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 30 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 265 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP701.5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 4/2 60 7.5YR 5/8 10 RM M clay loam 2.5BG 25 gley Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric X _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ X otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) X Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) X X I I 1 I Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Co' No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 266 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-17-2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP701.51-1 U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, SM, LM, BE, AP, JG, LR Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec.14 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.44898782 N Long: -108.9541372 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam 1-6% slopes Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification:NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes C No (: No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 20.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 40 Yes UPL 1.Artemesia tridentata Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Sarcobatus vermiculatus 10 Yes FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 50 % 15 Yes FAC 1 •Distichlis spicata 2•Lactuca serriola 5 Yes FACU 3•Lepidium alyssoides 5 Yes UPL 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 25 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 70 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 267 of 317 Arid West - VejiH011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP701.5 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 1 OYR 5/3 100 sand 6-12 10YR 5/3 95 sand white nodules -5% 12-18 10YR 5/3 95 sand white nodules -5% Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: White nodules are likely to be calcium carbonate; damp in bottom 2" HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (i Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 268 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-11-2011 State:CO Sampling Point:MP700.4_32W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, LM, SM, BE, JG, AP Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec. 23 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.44482589 N Long: -108.9540883 W Datum:WGS 84 Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam, 1-6% slopes Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (4 Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 66.7 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 40 Yes FACU 1.Ericameria nauseosa Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 40 % 40 Yes FAC 1 •Distichlis spicata 2•Alopecurus pratensis 15 Yes FACW 3•Melilotus officinalis 10 FACU 4.Lepidium crenatum 5 UPL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 70 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 269 of 317 Arid West - Ve5jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP700.4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-5 10YR 3/3 60 7.5YR 5/8 40 RM RC sand 3N 30 M grey Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (i No C Depth (inches): 6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (' Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n X Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (i No C Depth (inches): 6 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (' Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (' No (-` Depth (inches): 6 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 270 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, LM, SM, BE, JG, AP City/County:Garfield Sampling Date:08-11-2011 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace State:CO Sampling Point:MP700.4_32U Section, Township, Range:T7S R104W Sec. 23 Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave Slope (%):<2 Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:39.44484933 N Soil Map Unit Name: Cameo fine sandy loam, 1-6% slopes Long: -108.9541543 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes t^ Yes (' Yes (^ No (i' No Ci No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (i No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 3 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 40 Yes FACU 1.Ericameria nauseosa Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Atriplex canescens 40 Yes FACU OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Sarcobatus vermiculatus 10 FACU 4.Artemisia tridentata 5 UPL 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 95 % 70 Yes UPL 1 •Bromus tectorum 2.Solidago Canadensis 5 FACU 3.Sporobolus cryptandrus 5 FACU 4.Lolium perenne 5 FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5_ 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 85 % 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes r No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 271 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP700.4 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-16 10YR 4/3 90 sand Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes C No (' Depth (inches): Remarks: Sample taken on terrace l Oft. above creek bed, steep banks did not allow a closer sample in uplands. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) n Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) I I Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No (' Water Table Present? Yes r No (I Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes (1 No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 272 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Grand Sampling Date:08 19 2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP658.26_31 W Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, LM, SM, AP, BE, LR, JG Section, Township, Range:T21S R23E Sec24 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:38.96114791 N Soil Map Unit Name: Toddler-Ravola-Glenton families association Slope (%):<2 Long: -109.3315487 W Datum:WGS 84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (� Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No t^ (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (vii Yes ( Yes (i No No (' No (' Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes (I No C Remarks: 2. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 2 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100.0 % (A/B) 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum % 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: % 50 Yes FACW 1. Juncus tracyi 2•Scirpus pungens 20 Yes OBL 3•Distichlis spicata 10 FAC 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: X Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 80 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 15 % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes l No (' Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 273 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP658.2i Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-8 10YR 4/2 80 7.5YR 5/8 15 C RC sand light gley at auger tip Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i' No (^ Depth (inches): 10 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric H n _ Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) X LJ otherwise noted.) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) Indicators fl fl °Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Reduced Vertic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Other (Explain in Remarks) of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes 61 No C Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) X X n I I Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Biotic Crust (B12) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) I I Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) 1 I Other (Explain in Remarks) I I I Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) I Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) I Shallow Aquitard (D3) I FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (e No (' Water Table Present? Yes (i' No (^ Depth (inches): 10 Saturation Present? Yes q No (-` Depth (inches): 6 (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 274 of 317 Arid West - VeTL 011111-2006 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Arid West Region Project/Site: WEP II City/County:Grand Sampling Date:08 19 2011 Applicant/Owner:Enterprise (EPCO) State:CO Sampling Point:MP658.26_31U Investigator(s):WWE; BFF, MJV, LM, SM, BE, LR, JG, AP Section, Township, Range:T21S R23E Sec.24 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): wash Local relief (concave, convex, none):none Subregion (LRR)D - Interior Deserts Lat:38.96114468 N Soil Map Unit Name: Toddler-Ravola-Glenton families association Slope (%):5 Long: -109.3315687 W Datum:WGS84 Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes (i Are Vegetation Are Vegetation Soil Soil or Hydrology or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? NWI classification: NA No (1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ( No ( (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes (` Yes (' Yes (^ No (ii No (i No (i Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes C No Remarks: 3. VEGETATION Tree Stratum (Use scientific names.) Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 7 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 42.9 % (A/B) 1. Tamarix ramosissima 10 Yes FACW 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum 10 % 20 Yes FACU 1.Ericameria nauseosa Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2.Tamarix ramosissima 15 Yes FACW OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.Artemisia tridentata 5 Yes UPL 4. 5. Herb Stratum Total Cover: 40 % 20 Yes FAC 1 •Distichlis spicata 2.Kochia scoparia 10 Yes FACU 3•Bromus tectorum 10 Yes UPL 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence Index is <_3.0' Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present. 5. 6. 7. $ Woody Vine Stratum Total Cover: 40 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum % Total Cover: % % Cover of Biotic Crust % Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes (s No (- Remarks: Plot size: 1 sq. meter US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 275 of 317 Arid West - Ve jL 011121-2006 SOIL Sampling Point: MP658.21 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture3 Remarks 0-6 10YR 5/3 90 sandy 10% organics 6-12 10YR 5/3 90 sandy loam 10% organics 12-18 10YR 5/3 85 sandy clay loam 15% organics 18-24 10YR 5/3 85 clay loam 15% organics; moist Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix. 3Soil Textures: Clay, Silty Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam, Sandy Clay Loam, Sandy Loam, Clay Loam, Silty Clay Loam, Silt Loam, Silt, Loamy Sand, Sand. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR C) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR D) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) U otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Sandy Redox (S5) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR C) Stripped Matrix (S6) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR B) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Reduced Vertic (F18) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Red Parent Material (TF2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Other (Explain in Remarks) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) Vernal Pools (F9) °Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes (1 No (� Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Primary Indicators (any one indicator is sufficient) Water Marks (B1) (Riverine) Surface Water (A1) Salt Crust (B11) High Water Table (A2) Biotic Crust (B12) Saturation (A3) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Water Marks (B1) (Nonriverine) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Sediment Deposits (B2) (Nonriverine) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) Drift Deposits (B3) (Nonriverine) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Recent Iron Reduction in Plowed Soils (C6) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) 7 n n Sediment Deposits (B2) (Riverine) Drift Deposits (B3) (Riverine) Drainage Patterns (B10) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Shallow Aquitard (D3) FAC -Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes (' No (i Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes C No (' Water Table Present? Yes ( No (% Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes C No (i Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers WestWater Engineering 276 of 3176/1/20 Arid West - Ve ian 111-1-2006 Appendix D LANDOWNERS WestWater Engineering 277 of 317 3/1/2012 Milepost FID Parcel DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 CITY_1 STATE 658.26 State Trust Lands State Utah 701.51 10417 Agricultural Industrial THOMAS, MICHAEL J. & KATHLEEN L. 2866 MERAMEC TERRACE RD ROBERTSVILLE MO 701.51 11968 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 706.7 22656 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 706.75 22656 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 706.92 25243 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 707.13 25243 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 708.1 25194 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 708.26 25194 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 708.8 25194 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 709.61 25133 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 709.69 25133 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 709.69 25194 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO WestWater Engineering 278 of 317 3/1/2012 Milepost FID Parcel DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 CITY_1 STATE 710.25 25194 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 710.35 25194 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 710.66 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 710.73 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 710.76 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 712.27 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 712.32 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 712.44 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 713.03 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 713.11 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 713.28 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO 713.31 25332 Agricultural Industrial FLANIGAN LAND & CATTLE LLC 56 PCT & LAZY 3X LAND & CATTLE, LLC 44 PCT 561 S ROAD MACK CO WestWater Engineering 279 of 317 3/1/2012 Milepost FID Parcel DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 CITY_1 STATE 714.65 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 714.71 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 714.84 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 715.1 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 715.31 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 715.31 25714 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 715.32 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 715.4 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 715.43 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 715.55 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.04 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.06 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO WestWater Engineering 280 of 317 3/1/2012 Milepost FID Parcel DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 CITY_1 STATE 716.09 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.1 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.13 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.17 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.18 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.2 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.22 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.24 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.32 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 716.47 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 717.65 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 717.9 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO WestWater Engineering 281 of 317 3/1/2012 Milepost FID Parcel DESCRIPTION NAME ADDRESS1 ADDRESS2 CITY_1 STATE 718.25 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 719.21 25710 Agricultural Industrial CRIPPLE COWBOY COW OUTFIT, INC. PO BOX 40 RANGELY CO 719.21 25714 Open Space BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24 GLENWOOD SPGS CO 721.66 2568 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 220 MARKET STREET MEEKER, CO 721.67 2568 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 220 MARKET STREET MEEKER, CO 723.03 2568 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 220 MARKET STREET MEEKER, CO 725.46 2568 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 220 MARKET STREET MEEKER, CO WestWater Engineering 282 of 317 3/1/2012 APPENDIX E DATA POINT, SEEPS, SPRINGS, and FLAGGING LATITUDE and LONGITUDE SPREAD SHEET WestWater Engineering 283 of 317 3/1/2012 Appendix E - Data Points, Seeps, Springs, Flagging MP Label Long Lat 658.26 DP31-Wet -109.3315487 38.96114791 658.26 DP31-Up -109.3315687 38.96114468 700.4 DP32-Wet -108.9540883 39.44482589 700.89 DP2-Wet -108.9533456 39.44879797 700.89 DP2-Up -108.9533364 39.44878497 700.91 DP1-Wet -108.9541411 39.4490056 700.91 DP1-Up -108.9541372 39.44898782 702.5 DP33-Up -108.96272 39.46433 703.3 DP34-Up -108.967439 39.475506 704.4 DP35-Up -108.961577 39.489539 705.79 DP3-Up -108.9468562 39.5047004 706.75 DP36-Wet -108.9383646 39.51640942 706.75 DP36-Up -108.9384376 39.51646618 707.9 DP37-Up -108.925724 39.534663 707.9 DP37-Wet -108.925747 39.534663 709.65 DP4-Wet -108.9234849 39.55224434 709.65 DP4-Up -108.9235344 39.55224715 710.66 DP19-Up -108.91343 39.56338667 710.67 DP5-Wet -108.9140237 39.56348465 710.67 DP5-Up -108.913956 39.56350542 710.7 DP38-Up -108.913311 39.5644093 710.7 DP38-Wet -108.9133502 39.564388 712.28 DP17-Up -108.954466 39.450152 712.28 DP17-Wet -108.954403 39.450101 712.34 DP7-Wet -108.926111 39.57342562 712.34 DP7-Up -108.9261692 39.57339647 712.39 DP18-Up -108.923679 39.553007 712.39 DP18-Wet -108.923591 39.553047 712.42 DP8-Wet -108.926341 39.57396334 712.42 DP8-Up -108.9264456 39.57396514 712.43 DP9-Up -108.9263392 39.57442985 712.44 DP9-Wet -108.9264629 39.57443287 712.44 DP19-Wet -108.913482 39.563424 713.1 DP2O-Up -108.93155 39.581042 713.1 DP2O-Wet -108.931571 39.581027 713.31 DP6-Wet -108.9365338 39.58107707 713.31 DP6-Up -108.936525 39.58109834 713.31 DP21-Up -108.93382 39.588078 713.31 DP21-Wet -108.933852 39.588089 714.43 DP1O-Wet -108.957904 39.58958725 714.43 DP1O-Up -108.9582063 39.58974689 714.65 Spring -108.9500623 39.59348115 714.7 Spring -108.9583605 39.59523264 714.71 DP11-Wet -108.9579995 39.59535507 714.71 DP11-Up -108.9580155 39.59530772 714.73 DP12-Wet -108.9578791 39.595712 WestWater Engineering MP Label Long Lat 714.73 DP12-Up -108.9578573 39.59563354 714.84 DP13-Wet -108.9580205 39.59807542 714.84 DP13-Up -108.9580588 39.59800614 715.06 DP14-Wet -108.9589255 39.60218135 715.06 DP14-Up -108.9588818 39.60220242 715.22 Spring -108.9543864 39.6087349 715.23 Spring -108.9542406 39.60907242 715.4 DP29-Wet -108.9608454 39.60938105 715.4 DP29-Up -108.9608269 39.60932888 715.41 DP15-Up -108.9620193 39.60653303 715.42 DP15-Wet -108.9622291 39.60664022 715.54 DP16-Up -108.964346 39.6075974 715.55 DP16-Wet -108.9644534 39.6076069 716.12 DP3O-Up -108.9719173 39.61440883 716.13 DP3O-Wet -108.9719944 39.61441755 716.15 Seep -108.9711023 39.6155093 716.16 Spring -108.9703238 39.61625875 716.17 Spring -108.9712118 39.61605323 716.17 Spring -108.9712337 39.61593868 716.17 Seep -108.9712244 39.61584832 716.22 Spring -108.9711234 39.61637293 716.22 Spring -108.9711851 39.61643781 716.34 DP28-Up -108.973642 39.61784395 716.35 DP28-Wet -108.9737234 39.61784002 716.44 DP27-Wet -108.97498 39.61922223 716.44 DP27-Up -108.9749553 39.61922555 716.5 Spring -108.9736095 39.62034465 717.2 DP26-Up -108.9806473 39.63012925 717.44 DP25-Wet -108.9827823 39.63316532 717.45 DP25-Up -108.9827001 39.63320388 717.68 DP24-Up -108.9827777 39.63687547 717.69 DP24-Wet -108.9829292 39.63686552 719.18 DP23-Wet -108.9923034 39.6563781 719.21 DP23-Up -108.9923612 39.65630521 719.21 DP32-Up -108.9541543 39.44484933 725.45 DP22-Wet -109.0333985 39.73376742 725.46 DP22-Up -109.033455 39.73379912 284 of 317 3/1/2012 Appendix E - Data Points, Seeps, Springs, Flagging MP Label Long Lat 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315268 38.96107551 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315481 38.96107359 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315523 38.96111362 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315708 38.96119781 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.331594 38.9612162 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315889 38.96122381 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315405 38.9612293 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315454 38.96120704 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315359 38.96114762 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315426 38.96109691 658.26 Wet 658.26 -109.3315268 38.96107551 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534605 39.44755571 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534623 39.44755559 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534774 39.44755595 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535053 39.44754311 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535293 39.44753221 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535475 39.44749459 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535844 39.44749181 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9536017 39.44749659 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535933 39.44752666 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535435 39.44757303 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534937 39.44762493 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534812 39.44762193 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534605 39.44755571 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538061 39.44841314 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537256 39.44840804 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9549309 39.45438202 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548864 39.45433441 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548677 39.45429506 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548384 39.45423991 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548555 39.45415217 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548004 39.45407967 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9546685 39.45414693 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9545778 39.4541629 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.954505 39.45403654 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9544851 39.45401079 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9544477 39.45396312 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9544522 39.45389783 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9544097 39.45382536 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9544338 39.45358221 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9544943 39.45354378 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9546299 39.45351107 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9546576 39.45358109 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9546524 39.45357745 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9545753 39.45362163 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9545011 39.45378735 WestWater Engineering MP Label Long Lat 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9545138 39.45385287 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9545856 39.45391479 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9546805 39.45389815 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9547711 39.45392964 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548042 39.45395112 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548398 39.45404101 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548364 39.4540602 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548525 39.45407303 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550522 39.45457725 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9549091 39.45466552 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548479 39.45472369 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9547125 39.45470814 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9545977 39.45456788 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9545823 39.45451494 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550457 39.45471711 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550944 39.45468373 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9551124 39.45472929 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550697 39.45474763 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550862 39.45481718 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9551524 39.45483025 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9551806 39.45490153 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9551477 39.45490095 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9551021 39.45486955 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550646 39.45485078 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550267 39.45482342 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550154 39.45479722 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9549912 39.45474406 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538574 39.44861173 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9539068 39.44858378 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538432 39.4497796 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538258 39.44969351 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537857 39.44961223 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.953626 39.44958012 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535005 39.44951199 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534701 39.4494199 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9536233 39.44935118 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537552 39.44928026 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537063 39.44917869 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538155 39.44915681 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9545823 39.45451494 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.954667 39.45448228 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9548404 39.45448871 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9550457 39.45471711 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9572561 39.45712202 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9572077 39.45708378 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9571774 39.45704578 285 of 317 3/1/2012 Appendix E - Data Points, Seeps, Springs, Flagging MP Label Long Lat 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9571473 39.45700404 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9571006 39.45694703 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9570701 39.4568906 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9570479 39.45686661 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9570233 39.45684257 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.956961 39.45676288 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9569541 39.4566691 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9569407 39.45664252 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9570578 39.45669546 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9570685 39.45681697 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9571766 39.45698141 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9572266 39.45702724 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9572784 39.45710891 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9573341 39.45710922 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9574122 39.45719812 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9573836 39.45724001 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9573446 39.45722238 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9573567 39.45719503 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9572759 39.45714866 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9572561 39.45712202 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534747 39.44837872 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534864 39.44837828 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535375 39.4483739 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535889 39.44837196 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9536319 39.44837556 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9536731 39.44837629 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537189 39.4483778 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537847 39.44838607 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538384 39.44837532 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9539147 39.44835286 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9539191 39.44835328 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.953917 39.44839212 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538372 39.44841558 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538061 39.44841314 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9538155 39.44915681 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.95386 39.44905283 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537244 39.44912224 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9536184 39.44911088 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535409 39.44911511 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534404 39.44912224 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534353 39.44911852 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534527 39.4487925 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534682 39.44879354 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535554 39.44875504 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.953621 39.44875371 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9536921 39.44871261 WestWater Engineering MP Label Long Lat 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537374 39.44868694 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9537894 39.44865844 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9536062 39.44840594 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535588 39.44840584 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9535071 39.4484084 701.51 Wet 701.51 -108.9534731 39.44840816 708.8 Wet 708.8 -108.9245546 39.54295447 708.8 Wet 708.8 -108.9247431 39.54283828 708.8 Wet 708.8 -108.9247953 39.54292742 708.8 Wet 708.8 -108.9246999 39.54297255 708.8 Wet 708.8 -108.9244874 39.54303377 708.8 Wet 708.8 -108.9245546 39.54295447 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9133864 39.56447585 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9133038 39.56437765 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9132308 39.5643874 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9132086 39.56443468 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9131912 39.56444227 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9132091 39.56437707 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9132358 39.56435262 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9132204 39.56433574 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.913224 39.56432263 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9132549 39.56428162 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9133308 39.56434873 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.913392 39.56443014 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.913487 39.56455662 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9134947 39.56456867 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9135903 39.56463978 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9135696 39.5647154 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9135239 39.56467777 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9134433 39.56459624 710.73 Wet 710.73 -108.9133864 39.56447585 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9246834 39.57350986 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9246156 39.57347668 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9246826 39.57348905 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.924742 39.57355213 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9247504 39.57358877 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9247449 39.57361421 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9247283 39.57361756 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9246704 39.57357157 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9246708 39.5735691 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9246956 39.57356334 712.27 Wet 712.27 -108.9246834 39.57350986 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264526 39.57456056 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264197 39.5745013 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264282 39.57440004 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264268 39.57430111 286 of 317 3/1/2012 Appendix E - Data Points, Seeps, Springs, Flagging MP Label Long Lat 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264268 39.57430111 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264241 39.57428586 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264928 39.57430291 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264949 39.57433369 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264829 39.57442631 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264926 39.57448897 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9265316 39.57457536 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9265618 39.57464375 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9265904 39.57468761 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9265215 39.5746705 712.44 Wet 712.44 -108.9264879 39.57461316 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9579132 39.5954114 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9578634 39.5953711 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9578622 39.59537257 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9578637 39.59535509 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9578827 39.59534817 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9578983 39.59536725 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9579716 39.595356 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9580778 39.59532652 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9582019 39.59524092 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9582278 39.59518495 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9582968 39.59522639 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.958319 39.59522785 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9583177 39.59524296 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9582995 39.5952442 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9582562 39.59532339 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9582078 39.59531627 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9580938 39.59533307 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9579952 39.5953815 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9579132 39.5954114 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9577908 39.59631875 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9578429 39.59561647 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.957915 39.59566305 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.957897 39.59582544 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9579329 39.59595235 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9579644 39.59609539 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9579264 39.5962749 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9578367 39.59631789 714.71 Wet 714.71 -108.9577908 39.59631875 714.84 Wet 714.84 -108.9579785 39.59815772 714.84 Wet 714.84 -108.9579442 39.59796959 714.84 Wet 714.84 -108.9580694 39.598044 714.84 Wet 714.84 -108.9580366 39.59812922 714.84 Wet 714.84 -108.9579785 39.59815772 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9621059 39.60659064 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9622258 39.60658725 WestWater Engineering MP Label Long Lat 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9623376 39.60658595 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9624127 39.60660581 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9624466 39.60660746 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9625038 39.60665681 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9625493 39.60669882 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9626111 39.6067322 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9626762 39.60674617 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9627536 39.60677858 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9628475 39.6068034 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9629878 39.60683723 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.96297 39.60686334 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9630006 39.60687226 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9630253 39.60685764 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9630536 39.60685763 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9630653 39.60687069 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9630414 39.60687492 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9630264 39.60690144 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9630025 39.60694038 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9629415 39.60691028 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9629415 39.60691028 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9619229 39.60667688 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9619684 39.6065981 715.43 Wet 715.43 -108.9620199 39.60659791 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964571 39.60786243 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645693 39.6078559 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645372 39.60784901 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645367 39.60783049 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645207 39.60781869 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645115 39.60778553 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.96448 39.6077498 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644804 39.6077384 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644836 39.60773294 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644978 39.60774306 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964554 39.6077762 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.96455 39.6078254 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645744 39.607857 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964576 39.607866 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645758 39.60786595 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645714 39.60786243 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645714 39.60786278 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644835 39.60773285 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644804 39.60773817 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644804 39.6077384 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644733 39.60772357 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644789 39.60771293 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964479 39.6077129 287 of 317 3/1/2012 Appendix E - Data Points, Seeps, Springs, Flagging MP Label Long Lat 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645714 39.60786278 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645714 39.60786278 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645761 39.60786658 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964576 39.607866 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964622 39.60787641 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9646127 39.60789331 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645704 39.6079062 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9645714 39.60786278 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644857 39.60771018 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964479 39.6077129 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644596 39.607669 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644157 39.60763457 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644281 39.60763327 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964328 39.60756569 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9643414 39.60755809 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9643196 39.60751779 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9643332 39.60752071 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9643461 39.60752478 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9643919 39.60753461 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644395 39.60755403 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644636 39.6076198 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644914 39.60767056 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644857 39.60771018 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.964479 39.6077129 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644791 39.60771305 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644857 39.60771018 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644976 39.60771895 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644838 39.60773263 715.55 Wet 715.55 -108.9644836 39.60773294 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9727602 39.61549131 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9727878 39.61551213 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9727038 39.61553408 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726608 39.61552607 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726311 39.61551392 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9724935 39.61537155 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9725035 39.61536761 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9725692 39.61540268 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9725551 39.61540959 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9724975 39.61540219 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9724851 39.61539517 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9724935 39.61537155 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726311 39.61551392 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726115 39.61547871 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9725857 39.61541151 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726263 39.6154332 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726267 39.61543556 WestWater Engineering MP Label Long Lat 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726442 39.61544275 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726664 39.61545456 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.972686 39.61549927 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726972 39.61549487 716.2 Wet 716.2 -108.9726979 39.61549621 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.972906 39.61588387 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9730217 39.6158599 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.973107 39.61598334 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9730536 39.61601367 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9730609 39.61603881 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9730603 39.61606069 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9731202 39.61608675 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9731296 39.61609494 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9730194 39.61613799 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9731928 39.61641514 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9731857 39.61641574 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9731375 39.61640552 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9730968 39.61634199 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9730577 39.61629753 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9729954 39.61621515 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9729766 39.61616479 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.972938 39.61610159 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9729283 39.61609062 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9728973 39.61604631 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.9728984 39.61600568 716.24 Wet 716.24 -108.972906 39.61588387 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735848 39.61727997 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735993 39.61726598 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9738138 39.61795105 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9738025 39.617939 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9737379 39.6178997 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9737116 39.61786107 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.973691 39.61781406 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9736644 39.61778815 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9736548 39.61774133 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735903 39.61769356 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735859 39.61765955 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735602 39.61759973 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735491 39.61753733 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735293 39.61746488 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735236 39.61742702 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735298 39.6173911 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.973552 39.61733944 716.32 Wet 716.32 -108.9735848 39.61727997 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9843267 39.63863882 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9843574 39.63868045 288 of 317 3/1/2012 Appendix E - Data Points, Seeps, Springs, Flagging MP Label Long Lat 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9843779 39.63870546 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9843024 39.63874525 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9842589 39.63877737 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9841845 39.63877608 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9841718 39.63884983 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9841715 39.63885998 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857565 39.6410094 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9856289 39.64100623 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9855573 39.6410253 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9844944 39.63936451 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9845238 39.6393742 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9846081 39.63940032 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9846701 39.63945893 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9847226 39.6394845 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9848711 39.6394953 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9847636 39.63953453 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9841715 39.63885998 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9837938 39.63826988 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9836789 39.638029 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9837554 39.63805721 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9838193 39.6380501 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9838609 39.6380837 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9838703 39.63812496 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9838484 39.63814924 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9839008 39.6381748 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9839349 39.63822104 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9839443 39.6382623 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9840177 39.63829645 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9839953 39.63833716 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9840149 39.63839504 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9840782 39.63841258 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9840758 39.63849473 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9840847 39.63855242 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9841888 39.6386282 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9842946 39.63864648 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9848243 39.63964244 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9848654 39.63969247 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9850472 39.63960921 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9851331 39.63974352 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9851537 39.63981361 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9851831 39.63989632 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9852141 39.63992973 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9852685 39.63995506 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857289 39.64067439 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857294 39.64067661 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857311 39.64067783 WestWater Engineering MP Label Long Lat 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9859958 39.64109138 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9859694 39.64109052 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9858476 39.64101669 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857565 39.6410094 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857393 39.64126027 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857402 39.64123109 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9856812 39.64121885 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9856427 39.64115878 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857401 39.64118185 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9858947 39.64120006 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9859374 39.64119953 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9860276 39.64120237 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9860508 39.64124973 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9858618 39.64124195 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9858526 39.64127733 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9858034 39.64127521 717.9 Wet 717.9 -108.9857393 39.64126027 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882685 39.64369172 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882764 39.64364641 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9883273 39.64365667 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9883196 39.64372773 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882858 39.64379628 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882995 39.64387489 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882906 39.64393511 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882875 39.6439942 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882889 39.64400364 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9881901 39.64398369 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882308 39.64394266 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882341 39.64385827 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882309 39.64378829 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882504 39.6437524 718.25 Wet 718.25 -108.9882685 39.64369172 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9934043 39.65779879 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9932592 39.65786912 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9931411 39.65793284 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9930902 39.65800189 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9930902 39.65800189 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9928972 39.65659832 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9929422 39.6566176 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.993092 39.65663999 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9932198 39.6566521 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9933101 39.65674029 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9933659 39.65675974 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9935001 39.65773561 719.21 Wet 719.21 -108.9934928 39.65773101 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9987199 39.69178362 289 of 317 3/1/2012 Appendix E - Data Points, Seeps, Springs, Flagging MP Label Long Lat 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9986873 39.69179021 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9986415 39.69177199 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9986322 39.69171187 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.998686 39.6917294 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9987976 39.6917635 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9989057 39.69181542 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9989312 39.69183851 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9989092 39.69185362 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9988434 39.69183699 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.998795 39.69180041 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9985757 39.69134851 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9986021 39.69131865 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9986175 39.69137781 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9985883 39.69142922 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.9985757 39.69134851 721.66 Wet 721.66 -108.998795 39.69180041 721.67 Wet 721.67 -108.999112 39.69192027 721.67 Wet 721.67 -108.9990245 39.69186634 721.67 Wet 721.67 -108.9989382 39.69186366 721.67 Wet 721.67 -108.9989385 39.69185413 721.67 Wet 721.67 -108.9989385 39.69185413 721.67 Wet 721.67 -108.9990019 39.69184807 721.67 Wet 721.67 -108.9990681 39.69185517 721.67 Wet 721.67 -108.9991039 39.69186851 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0065296 39.70882634 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.006611 39.70879542 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0066403 39.70879754 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0066177 39.70885372 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0066357 39.70890393 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0067222 39.7089231 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0068359 39.70895336 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0069631 39.70899093 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0070125 39.70902362 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0070294 39.70907345 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0070374 39.70908797 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0069579 39.70907074 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0069573 39.70903329 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0068698 39.70899372 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0067605 39.70897061 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0066282 39.70895065 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0064808 39.70889924 723.03 Wet 723.03 -109.0065296 39.70882634 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0334427 39.733727 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.033452 39.73372449 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0334772 39.73377609 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0334336 39.73379528 WestWater Engineering MP Label Long Lat 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0333522 39.733834 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0331711 39.73396889 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0331122 39.73400177 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0330471 39.73386817 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0330935 39.73384774 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0332324 39.73380378 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0332916 39.73377968 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.03339 39.73375121 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0334097 39.73374653 725.46 Wet 725.46 -109.0334427 39.733727 290 of 317 3/1/2012 APPENDIX F ENGINEER DRAWINGS OF CROSSING METHODS WestWater Engineering 291 of 317 3/1/2012 RodneyS Tue, 12/06/11 6:50 AM W:\Enterprise\02757 — WEP Support\CAD\TYPICA S\STD—PIPL SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) STRAW BALE DIKE STRAW BALE DIKE TEMPORARY USE AREA AS — NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) TOPSOIL ,'SUBSOIL A. 4 4 4 4' 4 4 1, WETLAND 4 4 4 1 20' WETLAND LIMIT WORKING MATS cl nln�lnu 1);11F/ii mum ill WNW r • ,,1,111, • .SUB SOIL TOPSOIL 20' CROSSING PIPE WORKING SPACE HARD PLUG -- •..•lowili iliMiuwiuiiwiinl ,II�11'.1'�1I1'I11(11 1l'Ii1111I�1'(�11I�11111l,11��11' ``I'Illl �1'l1x1 l lll WORKING MATS EARTH FILL CAUSEWAY STRAW BALE DIKE SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) CONSTRUCTION ROW WORKING SPACE STREAM MANAGEMENT ZONE 20' MIN. WETLAND LIMIT 20' MIN. -COLORADO 811 $11 Knowwllars beim u CaI1811 you dig. [KW STAR'S OF UTAH www.12.1wastakes.org STRAW BALE DIKE HARD PLUG WORKING MATS EARTH FILL CAUSEWAY STRAW BALE DIKE SILT FENCE •�!V`V... ....... ..... l lunuluu nl uunu mlln nlnumlru nwmu'Inlnu ruu..uynuu■ ' V� CROSSING PIPE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEET FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT) NOTES: 1. IF A WETLAND IS BEING CULTIVATED AND BEING FARMED. NO WETLAND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES ARE REQUIRED. 2. FLAG WETLAND BOUNDARIES PRIOR TO CLEARING. 3. NO REFUELING OF MOBILE EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED WITHIN 100 FEET OF WETLAND. PLACE "NO FUELING" SIGN POSTS 100 FEET BACK FROM WETLAND BOUNDARY. REFUEL STATIONARY EQUIPMENT AS PER THE PROJECT'S SPILL PREVENTION PROCEDURES. 4. INSTALL TEMPORARY SLOPE BREAKER UPSLOPE WITHIN 100 FEET OF WETLAND BOUNDARY IF DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT. 5. INSTALL TIMBER MATS/RIPRAP THROUGH ENTIRE WETLAND AREA. EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR RIGHT—OF—WAY CLEARING MAY MAKE ONE (1) PASS THROUGH THE WETLAND BEFORE MATS ARE INSTALLED. 6. AVOID ADJACENT WETLANDS. INSTALL SEDIMENT BARRIERS (STRAW BALES AND/OR SILT FENCE) AT DOWNSLOPE EDGE OF RIGHT—OF—WAY AND ALONG WETLAND EDGE AS REQUIRED. 7. RESTRICT ROOT GRUBBING TO ONLY THAT AREA OVER THE DITCHLINE AND DITCH SPOIL AREAS AND REMOVED FROM WETLAND FOR DISPOSAL. 8. CONDUCT TRENCH LINE TOPSOIL STRIPPING (IF TOPSOIL IS NOT SATURATED). SALVAGE TOPSOIL TO ACTUAL DEPTH OR A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES 9. LEAVE HARD PLUGS AT EDGE OF WETLAND UNTIL JUST PRIOR TO TRENCHING. 10. PIPE SECTION MAY BE FABRICATED WITHIN THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT TO ALIGNMENT, OR IN STAGING AREA OUTSIDE THE WETLAND AND WALKED IN. 11. TRENCH THROUGH WETLANDS. 12. LOWER—IN PIPE, INSTALL TRENCH PLUGS AT WETLAND EDGES AS REQUIRED AND BACKFILL IMMEDIATELY. 13. REMOVE TIMBER MATS OR PRE—FABRICATED MATS FROM WETLAND UPON COMPLETION. 14. RESTORE GRADE TO NEAR PRE—CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHY, REPLACE TOPSOIL AND INSTALL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL. REFERENCE DRAWINGS REVISIONS EEnterprise Products Partners L.P. ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. A ISSUED FOR REVIEW RM 12/5/11 ZBB 12/5/11 ZBB 12/5/11 DWG. NO. WestWaterfiigineering DESCRIPTION NO. DESCRIPTION 292 of 317 BY DATE CHK DATE APP DATE THIS DRAWING ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C -I0 Centennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 TYPICAL DRAWING TYPICAL WETLANDS CROSSINGS - NO NECK DOWN WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II SCALE: NO SCALE DWG. NUMBER: STD-PIPL-9000 3/1 /2012 REV:A W:\Enterprise\02757 — WEP Support\CAD\TYPICA S\STD—PIPL-9001—REV—B.dwg RodneyS Tue. 12/06/11 6:55 AM • "NE LU LiLI) C} 811 811 Know wItars be1ow. CaI1811 Whin you dig 61.411 MOMS OF UTAH www.12.1westakes.org SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) TOPSOIL . ;SUB SOIL STRAW BALE DIKE STRAW BALE DIKE 4 ' �4 4 4 4 4 4 44 4444 20' 4 WETLAND 20' X4/444 TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) 7 - .SUB SOIL •; TOPSOIL WETLAND LIMIT WORKING MATS I a ri iwei lr It._...11111 u'! EN11n11I11111■1!I, I CROSSING PIPE jWORKING SPACE 75' HARD PLUG STRAW BALE DIKE SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) • .. ; II 1II �'I 1VII 1c n1Ilj�U,;NImMM��iuiumiwiwiiml (�4`1,il.,�11)111r WORKING MATS �1 .. ....... 11 EARTH FILL CAUSEWAY STREAM MANAGEMENT ZONE 20' MIN. CONSTRUCTION ROW WORKING SPACE 20' MIN. STRAW BALE DIKE HARD PLUG WORKING MATS EARTH FILL CAUSEWAY STRAW BALE DIKE SILT FENCE NOTES: 6'� BBBBp'''6666 ..''''I IIII IIIIIIII II11111ll II�I IL IIIMIIIII I' 112111111'LIIIII❑ ruu..uy t WAVIIVAMIVr CROSSING PIPE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEET FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT) 1. IF A WETLAND IS BEING CULTIVATED AND BEING FARMED. NO WETLAND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES ARE REQUIRED. 2. FLAG WETLAND BOUNDARIES PRIOR TO CLEARING. 3. NO REFUELING OF MOBILE EQUIPMENT IS ALLOWED WITHIN 100 FEET OF WETLAND. PLACE "NO FUELING" SIGN POSTS 100 FEET BACK FROM WETLAND BOUNDARY. REFUEL STATIONARY EQUIPMENT AS PER THE PROJECT'S SPILL PREVENTION PROCEDURES. 4. INSTALL TEMPORARY SLOPE BREAKER UPSLOPE WITHIN 100 FEET OF WETLAND BOUNDARY IF DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT. 5. INSTALL TIMBER MATS/RIPRAP THROUGH ENTIRE WETLAND AREA. EQUIPMENT NECESSARY FOR RIGHT—OF—WAY CLEARING MAY MAKE ONE (1) PASS THROUGH THE WETLAND BEFORE MATS ARE INSTALLED. 6. AVOID ADJACENT WETLANDS. INSTALL SEDIMENT BARRIERS (STRAW BALES AND/OR SILT FENCE) AT DOWNSLOPE EDGE OF RIGHT—OF—WAY AND ALONG WETLAND EDGE AS REQUIRED. 7. RESTRICT ROOT GRUBBING TO ONLY THAT AREA OVER THE DITCHLINE AND DITCH SPOIL AREAS AND REMOVED FROM WETLAND FOR DISPOSAL. 8. CONDUCT TRENCH LINE TOPSOIL STRIPPING (IF TOPSOIL IS NOT SATURATED). SALVAGE TOPSOIL TO ACTUAL DEPTH OR A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES 9. LEAVE HARD PLUGS AT EDGE OF WETLAND UNTIL JUST PRIOR TO TRENCHING. 10. PIPE SECTION MAY BE FABRICATED WITHIN THE WETLAND AND ADJACENT TO ALIGNMENT, OR IN STAGING AREA OUTSIDE THE WETLAND AND WALKED IN. 11. TRENCH THROUGH WETLANDS. 12. LOWER—IN PIPE, INSTALL TRENCH PLUGS AT WETLAND EDGES AS REQUIRED AND BACKFILL IMMEDIATELY. 13. REMOVE TIMBER MATS OR PRE—FABRICATED MATS FROM WETLAND UPON COMPLETION. 14. RESTORE GRADE TO NEAR PRE—CONSTRUCTION TOPOGRAPHY, REPLACE TOPSOIL AND INSTALL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL. REFERENCE DRAWINGS REVISIONS EEnterprise Products Partners L.P. ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. B REVISED DEIMENSIONS RS 12/2/11 ZBB 12/5/11 ZBB 12/5/11 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW RM 9/20/11 ZBB 9/20/11 ZBB 9/20/11 DWG. NO. WestWaterfiigineering DESCRIPTION NO. DESCRIPTION 293 of 317 BY DATE CHK DATE APP DATE THIS DRAWING ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C -I0 Centennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 TYPICAL DRAWING TYPICAL WETLANDS CROSSINGS - WITH NECK DOWN WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II SCALE: NO SCALE DWG. NUMBER: STD-PIPL-9001 3/1/2012 REV:B 'SILT FENCE (AS REQ 0 TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHE 4 BALE E ADJA NT WETLAND 4 4 I DIVERSIO TEMPORARY USE AREA 4 NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) 4 SILT FENCE AS REQ D) STRAW BALE DIK SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) HARD PLU NOTE 10 75' CONSTRUCTION ROW (NOTE 7) EQUIPMENT BRIDGE: 40' STEEL RAILROAD FLAT CAR OR EQUIVALENT (TEMPORARY) 4 ` ADJACENT WETLANDS r DIVERSION MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 4) WORKING MATS FLUME PIPE EQUIPMENT BRIDGE • Li:ijiii•�.: :y- I. If IP.91111 NOTES CROSSING PIPE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEET FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT) 1. DEPTH OF COVER IS MEASURED FROM BOTTOM OF FLUME PIPE TO TOP OF CARRIER PIPE. 2. FLUME PIPE SHALL BE STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT WEIGHT OF WATER, AND SPAN DITCH EXCAVATION IN ONE SEGMENT. 3. INSTALL NUMBER OF FLUME PIPES AS REQUIRED TO CARRY FLOW. 4. DIVERSION SHALL BE EARTH OR ROCK—FILLED BAGS OR ROCK COVERED WITH A PLASTIC COVERING DRAPED SD AS TO PREVENT STREAM FLOW INTO DITCH EXCAVATION 5. TOPSOIL AND SUB SOIL TO BE STORED SEPARATELY TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF TOPSOIL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST NOT BE STOCKPILED WITHIN 20 FT. OF THE WATERBODY. 6. STREAM MANAGEMENT ZONE SHALL EXTEND 50' MIN. BEYOND HIGH WATER MARK OR 50' BEYOND ADJACENT, MARKED WETLAND LIMIT. 7. FOOTAGES ARE BASED ON ROW. ADJUSTMENT WILL BE MADE FOR DIFFERING ROW WIDTH. 8. RESTORE THE STREAMBED AND BANKS TO APPROXIMATE PRE—CONSTRUC11ON CONTOURS, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 2' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL. 9. FLUMES ARE TO BE SET WITH 10% OF THEIR DIAMETER BELOW STREAMBED LEVEL WHERE SOIL CONDITIONS PERMIT (OTHERWISE CP STREAM GRADE & SLOPE). 10. ENSURE THAT THE DAMS & VEHICLE CROSSING ARE LOCATED FAR ENOUGH APART TO ALLOW FOR EXCAVATION. 11. PIPE TO BE STRUNG & WELDED FOR READY INSTALLATION PRIOR TO WATER BODY TRENCHING. 12. THE OBJECTIVE SHALL BE TO COMPLETE THE WORK WITHIN THE ACTIVE STREAM CROSSING WITHIN 48 HOURS. REFERENCE DRAWIRGS RENSIONS EEnterprise Products Partners LP ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. RENS® DIIENSIDNS RIAS 12/5/11 2139 1111 2139 12/5/11 A ISSUED FOR REAM RIAS 9/20/I1 2213 2213 9/20/11 CMG. IRR titer uigineenng IEBCRP1MI N0. EEBCRFlION BY OA1E CH1 CAM APP WOE THIS DRAWING PREPARED DY: ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C-10 Centennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 TYPICAL DRAMIND TYPICAL FLUMED STREAM CROSSING ACTIVE FLOW WITH WETLANDS CROSSING WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE 11 scut:: NO SCALE MG. WARM STD-PIPL-9002A REB w.wha below, Q1 0811811 Wore youdIR SILT FENCE r(AS REQ'D) TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) TOPSOIL ,'SUB 501E STRAW BALE DIKE TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) • .SUB SOIL. e +y • HIGH WATER MARK DIVERSION CROSSING PIPE EARTH FILL RAMP UP TO BRIDGE AS REQUIRED TOPSOIL J STRAW BALE DIK SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) HARD PLUG FLUME PIPE NOTE 10 CONSTRUCTION ROW (NOTE 7) .......... 111 11111 10 '2!.. EQUIPMENT BRIDGE: 40' STEEL RAILROAD FLAT CAR OR EQUIVALENT (TEMPORARY) STRAW BALE DIKE HARD PLUG SILT FENCE EARTH RAMP DIVERSION MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 4) FLUME PIPE EQUIPMENT BRIDGE NOTES CROSSING PIPE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEET FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT) 1. DEPTH DF COVER I5 MEASURED FROM BOTTOM OF FLUME PIPE TO TOP OF CARRIER PIPE. 2. FLUME PIPE SHALL BE STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT WEIGHT OF WATER, AND SPAN DITCH EXCAVATION IN ONE SEGMENT. 3. INSTALL NUMBER OF FLUME PIPES AS REQUIRED TO CARRY FLOW. 4. DIVERSION SHALL BE EARTH DR ROCK -FILLED BAGS OR ROCK COVERED WITH A PLASTIC COVERING DRAPED SO AS TO PREVENT STREAM FLOW INTO DITCH EXCAVATION 5. TOPSOIL AND SUB SOIL TO BE STORED SEPARATELY TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF TOPSOIL. EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST NOT BE STOCKPILED WITHIN 20 FT. OF THE WATERBODY. 6. STREAM MANAGEMENT ZONE SHALL EXTEND 50' MIN. BEYOND HIGH WATER MARK OR 50' BEYOND ADJACENT, MARKED WETLAND LIMIT, 7. FOOTAGES ARE BASED ON ROW. ADJUSTMENT WILL BE MADE FOR DIFFERING ROW WIDTH. 8. RESTORE THE STREAMBED AND BANKS TO APPROXIMATE PRE -CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 2' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL. 9. FLUMES ARE TO BE SET WITH 10% OF THEIR DIAMETER BELOW STREAMBED LEVEL WHERE SOIL CONDITIONS PERMIT (OTHERWISE © STREAM GRADE & SLOPE). 10. ENSURE THAT THE DAMS & VEHICLE CROSSING ARE LOCATED FAR ENOUGH APART TO ALLOW FOR EXCAVATION. 11. PIPE TO BE STRUNG & WELDED FOR READY INSTALLATION PRIOR TO WATER BODY TRENCHING. 12. THE OBJECTIVE SHALL BE TO COMPLETE THE WORK WITHIN THE ACTIVE STREAM CROSSING WITHIN 48 HOURS. REFERENCE DRAWINGS REVISIONS EEnterprise Products Partners LP ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. A ISSUED FOR REVIEW RATS 9/20/11 0BB 9/20/11 ZBB 8/20/11 DWG. NO. Water Engineering DESCRIPTION ND. DESCRIPTION 295 of 317 6Y DATE CHR DATE APP DATE THIS DRAWING PREPARED aY: Pill ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C-10 Centennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 TYPICAL DRAWING TYPICAL FLUMED STREAM CROSSING ACTIVE FLOW NO WETLANDS CROSSING WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE 11 SCALE: NO SCALE DWG. NUMBER: STD -PPL -9002B 3/1/2012 RSA C—C�L� 0 811 Know mars below, 811 Call 811 beton you dig. BLUE jTAKE$ O1 NI TAN wrrwr���c:•.. �•, �..,.u. rr. www.6iuellakea,arg 1.632-662.411 I SILT FENCE (AS REQ 0 TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) STRAW BALE DIK TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) SJLT FENCE) A5 REQ D DIVERSION CROSSING PIPE EARTH FILL RAM UP TO BRIDGE AS REQUIRED :; STRAW BALE DIK SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) HARD PLU NOTE 5 CONSTRUCTION ROW (NOTE 5) EQUIPMENT BRIDGE: 40' STEEL RAILROAD FLAT CAR OR EQUIVALENT (TEMPORARY) DISCHARGE POINT WITH ENERGY DISIPATION DEVICE 1111111 1111 1111 DAM MATERIAL (SEE NOTE 1) EQUIPMENT BRIDGE SILT FENCE 71111111.I 1. NOTES CROSSING PIPE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEET FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT) 1. DAM SHALL BE EARTH OR ROCK—FILLED BAGS OR ROCK COVERED WITH A PLASTIC COVERING DRAPED 5O AS TO PREVENT STREAM FLOW INTO DITCH EXCAVATION 2. TOPSOIL AND SUB SOIL TO BE STORED SEPARATELY TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF TOPSOIL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST NOT BE STOCKPILED WITHIN 20 FT. OF THE WATERBODY. 3. STREAM MANAGEMENT ZONE SHALL EXTEND 50' MIN. BEYOND HIGH WATER MARK OR 50' BEYOND ADJACENT, MARKED WETLAND LIMIT. 4. FOOTAGES ARE BASED ON ROW. ADJUSTMENT WILL BE MADE FOR DIFFERING ROW WIDTH. 5. RESTORE THE STREAMBED AND BANKS TO APPROXIMATE PRE—CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 2' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL. 6. ENSURE THAT THE DAMS & VEHICLE CROSSING ARE LOCATED FAR ENOUGH APART TO ALLOW FOR EXCAVATION. 7. PIPE TO BE STRUNG & WELDED FOR READY INSTALLATION PRIOR TO WATER BODY TRENCHING. 8. THE OBJECTIVE SHALL BE TO COMPLETE THE WORK WITHIN THE ACTIVE STREAM CROSSING WITHIN 48 HOURS. REFERENCE IXRAWIHGS RENSIONS EEnterprise Products Partners LP ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. R GELEIE FLUKE REFERENCE RISS 12/7/11 RBB 17/7/11 288 12/7/11 A ISSUED FCR REHM RIAS 12/6/11 2213 17/6/11 2213 17/6/11 titer uigineenng I E8CRPI1611 N0. 6EECRFlION BY OIIIE CH1 CAM APP WOE THIS DRAWING PREPARED DY: ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C-10 Centennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 TYPICAL MAINS TYPICAL DAM & PUMP STREAM CROSSING ACTIVE FLOW NO WETLANDS CROSSING WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II SCALE: NO SCALE DWG. 15.553EltSTD-PIPL-90020 REB Kriow mars below, *1 Call 811 befo a you dig. BLUE STAKE$ or UTAH wrrwr���c:,.. �•, �..,.u. rr. www.biueslakea,arg 1-a00-6..62 411 I SILT FENCE (AS REQ 0 AS TEMPORARY NEEDED FOR SOIL AS STORAGE (SEE y ALIGNMENT SHEETS • • •.:�%.,:•.'; �: , �.,: SUB SOIL''' 4 4 4 4•j STRAW BALE DIKE AS NEEDED FFORUSE SOIL � STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT WETL4 � SHEETS) TDS 4 44 SILT FENCE - A5 REQ D WORKING MATS PUMP(S) CROSSING PIPE :; STRAW BALE DIK SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) HARD PLU CONSTRUCTION ROW (NOTE 5) BYPASS PIPING ROUTE (TYPICAL) DISCHARGE POINT WITH ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICE QUIPMENT BRIDGE: STEEL RAILROAD FLAT CAR OR EQUIVALENT (TEMPORARY) N'Ni. E� STRAW BALE DIKE HARD PLUG II Mil riIIII �ulr 04PunIII1 EQUIPMENT BRIDGE SILT FENCE Li it NOTES CROSSING PIPE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEET FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT) 1. DAM SHALL BE EARTH OR ROCK—FILLED BAGS OR ROCK COVERED WITH A PLASTIC COVERING DRAPED 50 AS TO PREVENT STREAM FLOW INTO DITCH EXCAVATION 2. TOPSOIL AND SUB SOIL TO BE STORED SEPARATELY TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF TOPSOIL EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST NOT BE STOCKPILED WITHIN 20 FT. OF THE WATERBODY. 3. STREAM MANAGEMENT ZONE SHALL EXTEND 50' MIN. BEYOND HIGH WATER MARK OR 50' BEYOND ADJACENT, MARKED WETLAND LIMIT. 4. FOOTAGES ARE BASED ON ROW. ADJUSTMENT WILL BE MADE FOR DIFFERING ROW WIDTH. 5. RESTORE THE STREAMBED AND BANKS TO APPROXIMATE PRE—CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 2' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL. 6. ENSURE THAT THE DAMS & VEHICLE CROSSING ARE LOCATED FAR ENOUGH APART TO ALLOW FOR EXCAVATION. 7. PIPE TO BE STRUNG & WELDED FOR READY INSTALLATION PRIOR TO WATER BODY TRENCHING. 8. THE OBJECTIVE SHALL BE TO COMPLETE THE WORK WITHIN THE ACTIVE STREAM CROSSING WITHIN 48 HOURS. REFERENCE DRAWINGS RENSIONS EEnterprise Products Partners LP ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. A ISSUED FDR REHEW KR aI/1/12 RBB a1l1S112 AS Q1h02 titer ngineenng IEENCRP1MI N0. EEBCRFlION BY OA1E CHN ORIF APP WOE THIS DRAWING PREPARED DY: ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C-10 Centennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 TYPICAL DRAWING TYPICAL DAM & PUMP STREAM CROSSING ACTIVE FLOW WITH ADJACENT WETLANDS CROSSING WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II 5CIILE: NO SCALE OW. NLDISTD- PIPL-90020 v v y 3' MIN NOT TO SCALE PERSPECTIVE VIEW ORIGINAL STREAM / DRAINAGE BANK 4%4 HIGH WRATEMARK NOTES. 1. FINAL TOPOGRAPHY TO BE ROUNDED OFF SUCH THAT THERE ISA SMOOTH TRANSITION FROM EXISTING TO POST -CONSTRUCTION BANKS. -V- MIN PROFILE VIEW tri 00 •`• POST -CONSTRUCTION BANK •.• (30° MAX) ••• SEGMENTABLE "3R" ELBOWS (AS REQUIRED) REVISIONS c REVSED PER CLEW CONENT KR 2/27/12 2e 2/27/12 APR EEnterprise Product:, Partners L.P. TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DETAIL REIMER PER CLEAR COMMENT KR 2/27/12 IR 2/27/12 APR A 188HE0 FON MEN fIR 2/27/12 2B 2/27/12 APR NO. LESCRPIIa1 WestWater Engineering LTE CHK VORE APR PATE Maw EngFl. srhg, Inc. 12201 E. Arepdhos 941.C10 CenkmlaL CO 80112 (303) 7924911 298 of 317 TYPICAL STREAM 1 DRAINAGE BANK TOPOGRAPHY DETAIL SCALE: NONE DWC. NUMBER: SID—PIPL—SOO2E 3/1/2012 REV: C €6i.ORAi: O 811 Call 811before g.aw. 11.1,[ 01.l.0111 WA111 • I SILT FENCE (A5 REQ'D) TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) TOPSOIL STRAW BALE DIK SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) HARD PLUG HIGH WATER MARK STRAW BALE DIKE TEMPORARY USE AREA AS NEEDED FOR SOIL STORAGE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEETS) SILT FENCE (AS REQ'D) TOPSOIL EARTH FILL RAMP ROSSING PIPE UP TO BRIDGE AS REQUIRED -W -1-1. NOTE 7 11111111111111111111111111111111111111 CONSTRUCTION ROW (NOTE 4) 50' MIN. STREAM MANAGEMENT ZONE EQUIPMENT BRIDGE: 40' STEEL RAILROAD FLAT CAR OR EQUIVALENT (TEMPORARY) STRAW BALE DIKE HARD PLUG STRAW BALE DIKE SILT FENCE EARTH RAMP EQUIPMENT BRIDGE munnInummunnInnumn NOTES 5' MIN. CROSSING PIPE (SEE ALIGNMENT SHEET FOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT) 1. DEPTH OF COVER IS MEASURED FROM BOTTOM OF STREAM BED TO TOP OF CARRIER PIPE. 2. TOPSOIL AND SUB SOIL TO BE STORED SEPERATELY TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF TOPSOIL. EXCAVATED MATERIAL MUST NOT BE STOCKPILED WITHIN 20 FT. OF WATERBODY. 3. STREAM MANAGEMENT ZONE SHALL EXTEND 50' MIN. BEYOND HIGH WATER MARK OR 50' BEYOND ADJACENT, MARKED WETLAND LIMIT. 4. FOOTAGES ARE BASED ON ROW. ADJUSTMENT WILL BE MADE FOR DIFFERENT ROW WIDTH. 5. RESTORE THE STREAMBED AND BANKS TO APPROXIMATE PRE—CONSTRUCTION CONTOURS, BUT NOT TO EXCEED 2' HORIZONTAL TO 1' VERTICAL. 6. FLUMES ARE TO BE SET WITH 10% OF THEIR DIAMETER BELOW STREAMBED LEVEL WHERE SOIL CONDITIONS PERMIT (OTHERWISE © STREAM GRADE & SLOPE). 7. ENSURE THAT THE DAMS & VEHICLE CROSSING ARE LOCATED FAR ENOUGH APART TO ALLOW FOR EXCAVATION. 8. PIPE TO BE STRUNG & WELDED FOR READY INSTALLATION PRIOR TO WATER BODY TRENCHING. REFERENCE DRAWINGS REVISIONS Enterprise Product' Partners L.P. ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. REVISED DIMENSIONS RMS 12/5/11 ZBB 12/5/11 ZBB 12/5/11 A ISSUED FOR REVIEW RMS 9/20/11 ZRB 9/2D/11 ZBB 9/20/11 DWG. NO. WestWater Enaineerin DESCRIPTION NO. DESCRIPTION 299 of 317 9Y DATE CH K DATE APP DATE ni1a o.raEll raowl sr ROONEY wertat:Rma 1220111 Ampa1na Rued. 610 Calc adv 80112 (309) 792-5911 TYPICAL DRAWNG TYPICAL STREAM CROSSING DRY CHANNEL TYPE CROSSING WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II SCALE: NO SCALE DWG. NUMBER: STD-pH:O3 3/1/2012 REv:B TOPSOIL STORAGE FIELD BERM (AS REVD) (NOTE 3) PERMANENT R—O—W FIELD DETERMINE FIELD DETERMINE SPOIL PILE (NOTE 3) w,e rWrlar6below. a Nall 811 Were you dig, 0441 $T*KFS OF 6,4, ww.wMusainkes.org Bcn I 5r - 141 MULTIPLE EXISTING PIPELINES (LOCATION VARIES) \� \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ ti N \ \ N. N. N. N. \ \\ \ \ \1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\>'—--- TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION R—O—W z iO NOTES: 1. DITCH CENTERLINE WILL BE SURVEYED AND RECORDED FOR BLM RECORDS. 2. THE TOP 6" OF TOPSOIL WILL BE REMOVED AND CONSERVED DURING EXCAVATION AND RE -USED AS COVER ON DISTURBED AREAS TO FACILITATE RE -GROWTH OF VEGETATION. 3. TOPSOIL AND SPOIL STORAGE SHALL BE LOCATED IN UPLAND AREAS, OUTSIDE OF WETLANDS. TOPSOIL AND SPOIL MAY BE STORED ON LANDSCAPE FABRIC INSIDE WETLAND AREAS. 4. EQUIPMENT MATS SHALL BE USED IN ALL WETLAND AREAS TO MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE. REFERENCE DETAIL 1 THIS DRAWING (NOTE 4) 000 111 111 DITCH AND CONSTRUCTION ROW ELEVATION SCALE: N.T.S. DETAIL 1 SCALE: N.T.S. PADDING OR SANDBAGS (NOTE 4) ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL STORAGE FIELD BERM (AS REQ'D) (NOTE 3) REFERENCE DRAWINGS REVISIONS Enterprise Products Partners L,P. ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L. A ISSUED FOR REVIEW RM 9/20/11 ZBB 9/20/11 ZBB 9/20/11 OWO. NO. 1 VVcSt1AVVdtei CIigiiieeiitl9 DESCRIPTION NO- DESCRIP00N 300of317 By DATE CHK DATE APP DATE THIS DRAWING PREPARED BY: ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C-10 Centennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 TYPICAL DRAWING TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION DITCH DETAIL WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II SCALE: AS NOTED DWG. NUMBER: STD-PIPL-9005 3/1/2012 REV:A RondyM Wed, 09/21/11 9:56 AM 150' 250' STORAGE FOR BULK BENTONITE AND AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT r L DRILLING FLUID SYSTEM AND TANK MAY BE MOVED TO FIT AVAILABLE SPACE 20' (MIN.) CONTAINMENT BERM ENTRY POINT DRILL PIPE DRILLED PATH CENTERLINE RIG RAMP t----- FLUID SYST. FLUID TANK CONTROL VAN RIVER ACCESS FOR FRESH WATER COLLECTION TYPICAL WORKSPACE LIMITS J TYPICAL ENTRY AREA SITE PLAN SUPPORT EQUIPMENT SILT FENCE GATE TO BE CLOSED WHEN NOT IN USE \ DRILL RIG CONCEPTUAL . PIPE PROFILE LL ) L1( ) I:rl L) L) 811 Knoww.ittbeiow. Gall 811 before redly 0441 MAIMS OF UTAH www.M aMk.s.arg 1 goo,52. al II • . WATER'S EDGE WATER'S EDGE SILT FENCE GATE TO BE CLOSED WHEN NOT IN USE 20' (MIN.) 50' WORKSPACE TO EXTEND THE LENGTH OF DRILLED SEGMENT PLUS 200' 1 CONTAINMENT BERM 5' (MIN.) J. PROFILE 17 11 RIVER ACCESS 71:1 FOR FRESH 1 WATER 11 COLLECTION J L MUD PUMP MUD TANK EXIT POINT PIPE HANDLING EQUIPMENT PREFABRICATED PULL SECTION SUPPORTED ON ROLLER STANDS DRILLED PATH CENTERLINE TYPICAL WORKSPACE LIMITS 200' 7r // // // // // /L--—� 11 11 I1 11 1/ 11 m // // // // J L TYP CAL ROW 200' J TYPICAL EXIT AREA SITE PLAN EXIT HOLE PIPE STRING • ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY R.O.W. MAY BE REQUIRED FOR THE WELDED PIPE STRING DEPENDING ON O THE GEOMETRY OF THE CROSSING NOTES: 1. EQUIPMENT TO BE SUPPORTED ON THE GROUND SURFACE OR TIMBER MATS AS CONDITIONS DICTATE. 2. SILT FENCE AND/OR STRAW BALE BARRIER TO BE USED AS REQUIRED. 3. FOLLOW SITE SPECIFIC PLAN PROVIDED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. REFERENCE DRAWINGS REVISIONS EEnterprise Products Partners L,P. ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. A ISSUED FOR REVIEW RM 9/20/11 ZBB 9/20/11 ZBB 9/20/11 DWG. N0. WestWate' Lrrg6lee' nig DESCRIPTION N0. DESCRIPTION 301 of 317 BY DATE CHK DATE APP DATE THIS DRAWING PREPARED BY: ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C-10 Centennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 TYPICAL DRAWING TYPICAL HDD CROSSING ENTRY AND EXIT SITE PLANS WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II SCALE: NO SCALE DWG. NUMBER: STD-PIPL-9004 3/1/2012 REV:A ----------------- WORKSPACE I POINT OF ECTJ ELEV: 6995.66 LAT: 39•$7A8D64'N LONG: 1D6°66.666116W ------------------- w4 :GO --"x-"----i+ f POIHrpF ENTRY ... •• t ELM!: 71132F lir- LAT: 89•36.96721N tw LONCc 1118'SB.9B97N7W REM TOTAL HORIZONTAL DISTANCE- 3100 FT TOTAL PPE LENGTH = 9114.T FT HDD PROFILE VIEW TL.H17F TRW F VERTICAL :1'. 50' HORIZONTAL: 7~200' NOTES 1. ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE GEOGRAPHIC COORDP1ATE8. HAD63 DATUM. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON USW TOPOGRAPHIC DEM -1D METIER ACCURACY. 2. STATIONING IS BASED ON HORIZONITAL DIST 3. ROOHEY ENGINEERING. INC. AND ENTERPRISE DUCTS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION CF IGH UIILTTIES SHOWN IN PLOT PLAN OR PROFILE. TFE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON ID FURNITIE_CIWITHOLIT LIABILITY DN THE PART ORESULHOMEY TING FROM EEERRORSOROMISSIONSTHEREIN � � �RANY DAMAGES 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSELE FOR LOCATING AIL UTILITIES. B. CONTACT ONE CALL COLORADO AT 611, 3 DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. MATERIAL SUMMARY DESCRIPTION CJLVVdLCI CI 1911 ICCll! 19 QTY. DWG SILTSTON SILTSTONFRLA • NE .. SANDSTONE 1040 Li SEE NOTEPONT ECT ELEV 39354E' CLI+ REFERENCE DRAWINGS DESCRPT10N 9940 99 CLAY SILTSTOI4EICLAYSTONE sAmsToNs 145.6TANGENT LENGTH SILTSTOMCLAYSTONE ^228A' CURVE LENGTH SANDSTONE 120ff RADIUS SILTSTONEJCLAYSTONE z CLAY NNYpp���TpONN�� GRAVEIJCCBBLES SANDSTONE GRAVEUCOBBLE8 CONGLOMERATE a MdWDREWD LAKE phi 33 CLAY m OROUND PROFILE LA10= BpTTOaI 1 IHrERBFOAABCCCOH 1SA/STO SILTSTONECLA TON E INTERBEDDED LAYERS CF SLTSTONE, CLAYSTOIENLMANDSTOLE INIERBODED LAVERS CF SLTSTCNE, CLAYSTONE & SANDSTONE 1729.8' TANGENT LENGTH SAIDAORAIIa 7426' TANGENT LE E PPOINNT OFENTRY ELEV 7t 18.26 ELEV: 7120' CLAY SALWCIAY INTERBEDDED LAYERSCf EILTSra a EIL7$TONE LAYST FE ..-------.<--279Y''RAgcuRVELENGTHU6 16W 1240 7140 7120 :400 7w2 O 9(0 O 920 9940 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 0940 33+00 22+00 31+00 X+00 29+00 26+00 27+00 29+00 25+00 24+00 23+00 22+00 21+00 20+00 19+02 19+00 17+00 16+00 10+00 14+00 13+00 12+00 11+00 10+00 9+00 9+00 1+00 (+00 6+00 4+00 3+00 2+00 1+00 0+00 -1+00 -2+00 NOTES PROFILE VIEW ENGINEERING RECD RD E D C B A REV LPIATED ROW. AODER ADDRIONAL TEMP ADDEDDEOTECH DATA ADDED UTLDYOFORDNTION MODIRED ENTRY I 9127 LOCATIONS FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY EERE IPTLON TL KR NOR NOR NOR BY 11$11 00,78.11 MM 1 -16-tt 02.0611 0-2'1-11 DATE 3D 3D 2B ZS OMAN CHECI® DUCHT PROJECT MOAT. PRC INT2 APP. MECHANICAL PIPING STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL 12C Ei;.ntcrprio PrnJuets Rooney 4 Rad C-10 80772 rf1 ENTERPRISE RPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. PROPOSED IUD MdWDREWS LAKE LOCA11CN WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II GARFIELD CouNTY, COLORADO WALE 1•3 OGLE IDRA9rING 017EPPPL9001 IREN E e 5 ,Yr oon TOTAL HORIZONTAL DISTANCE = 2298FT TOTAL PIPE LENGTH —342 FT NOTES 1. ALLS �N$HAR�H DOMSE(g�0PR0AOP{APIICDEM-IIDMtiEER 3A CU 2 STATIONING IS BASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. ]. ROONEY ENGINEERFI INC. AM ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE HF0L OCAATTpNSOF FORE ECMO IS SHOWN WIPLOT TT WITHOUT PLAN LIABILITY ON PROFILE THE OF ROOMY ENGIN_OFSUL FROGMREERgpRpO G IIPS CR AND E3EPR�ODUCTS, FOR ANY DAMAGES ONE C I COLORADLEO AT 91L , 3 VMS PRICK. g DIGGING. MATERIAL SUMMARY REFERENCE DRAWINGS REM DESCRIPTION QTY. DWG DESCRPT10N EIROSSZIEIEGIENO NOTES ENGINEERING RECD RD DRAWN CUENT PROJECT MOUT. EEntcrprisc Pwducls ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERE, L.P. PRpC[a$ A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY TL 11-03.11 UM REV RESCRIP111:81 BY DATE APP. NECHAHIC,AL PIPING STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL Iac IfCorgennint � os Road 2 44U PROPOSED NOD PULLBACK COLULBIPE SPRINGS LOCATION OPTIDN 3 WESTERN IDIPANSION PROJECT PHASE II GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO RCMP 1O OGLE I WHIM 0176/4.P4,GG8E TREY: R CJLWCLLCI CI 1911 ICCI IIID '7520 -100-275..210-0®-100-475-77 r'w1-40Yd77-300.490.700-!75-210-!a-i00-170-100-RO-10! -72 -00 -00 STA 8+00 • 144aa��=CC14 4 EEEE333EEEEEFE t±± =1J CCtt±± 1 1zt4 1 1 1=4t1* T=:=�=FF==T EII333FEEEII ▪ -` rt1- ===TCC========1== _144t:=" =1=1 4q=FFFT7?aq=1=F HE33JLEE`EEEIEH333EE • J -t ... 1. ".— a 44Ca==I1= 4==1 FT=4q=1=F EEEEIE33EEE • •�=tttt±±d=1=C •RR=E1=F=4R�=1=F EE33EEEEg EE33EEE 1====CCtt2Ctt�=1=C U PIPE HEV.7077' EIIE333�EEEEEEE 3EEEEEIE33EEE t±±±=tttt±±±tt 1333=--EIEH=TTE3 T7?R-1-F EEEIEE33EEE =Cttt±CGCG=I=C =�=1=z2== =1= : UPIPE a v-7177 mt -100-57}.90-395-270-472-170-49!-400-372-90-39'-100-17'2-400-297-700-0A-120-Im-0m -A -00 -03 0 2 20 75 110 175 171 STA 4+00 ==SS=LJ—LL=LZS==L 1 1 LLL=SILL=—i=L - 1-771:44q-1-AFF=17rt44gq=F F= 4?qq-I 33 EEEEE T33EIEEEEEIIE _=E f: d =C'ttt - d -1=C. -. tl 171777.. ._...� 77 J3 EEEE i± 'Q RPE HEV -TWA' _:F Nif :1 i -OOY575-710-592-0O -4x-PD-113-400.-2-,-39'1-100-97Y27o-222-100-1A-120-I15-1W -73 -00 -25 0 a 20 A 110 112 170 STA 2+00 7TTT77=7F77TT77=F777T77=1=F' EIIE333;EEEEIIIE33-EEEEI?F3E'EE. Ctt±±t. ttttLi± • �^"�RPE EOrRY-Tdo@ - r�-tT= 1=rr rrr rt= -i- j r T-rt2=—I=r 7200 -*0-575-:112.515-51/o-4T.1-110-4LF4W 7D-5fl--ZT-2!F] 5-210 m-1•.5.-100-100 -15 -01 -25 0 25 50 75 110 125 120 STA. 0+00 7300 as am } 7300 EE111333-EEEEIIE33EEEEIIE33EF 'rr*=t4==5C44=44 4 1 1=1=4 :EEIEE333-EEEEEEHEE3- �_zt=_ :i=t±±===Cttz±tt±=-- f=ttttt=t+=±tf =t .tt±±=-L th t±±±ate±�=CCt:f U PIPE HEY • 7487• -000-95-510-!23-000-471-420-W'-91r110-2/5-.700-776-230-g7-000-0IS-131-171-010 -75 -50 -25 2 75 22 77 100 122 170 STA 14+00 rrT 4 1=Fr7r7T?a77rrFTT=®a--- EEEIE333EEEEFt13EEEEEFI7 �-- E=LI -1 =L EFEHH=-FEEE =EEEETHHAA=F tttt1t1�==t dd-ttttltdd=t ?-FF==?T = F7TE a�-E EEEEE333EEEEEI1a333=EEErT;l-=1-1 tt-1-1- tLLt±la�t�=C1=t II PIPE HEY • 1445' niliMiladMINNINNINI -000-170-110-7®-200-471-460-121-000-095..960-32-211-!95..920-7®-000-170-110-171-110 -75 -15 -96 2 21 20 x 110 116 111 STA 12+00 :::=i===a===CCtt=CaCC==C '_r :EEI11333-EEEEIIE333EEL. r -ter_ .t±±±=ttt±±��±�-< tt±±==t =FFT?q=F ><-_IEE333-EEE HEE3EEEEEIEET ±±=���=C t=±2222=CCtt±=±. rt FET?q.E =FF=T?=7 _17 -T-777--�^.+-1-174-1-7--77?-f^—r—r77-._ 11:7 PIPE ELEY•MOW 7110 app 7110 -527-373-310-323-101-473-.00-613-421-373-E0-215-321-273-11.00-120002-400 173 130 123 100 72 20 } 22 20 x 10 2 4 0 123 170 STA 0 Et±± thJ ± ±±tt1±E�3 1=L LJ ±LEJ J LLtCCa�==CCLtC7Laa=Mttia �± F=�444=F1=44_ -1- t-tt±± 1= ttt±± d r4 ±ate=•= mrr 40. =CC a�==r FTTT---=FFFTTT - 7=FFFTT??=F FEEL, IEEEEFF 3EEEEEEEIEE33EE Et±±_ 1 ELbt '=iaJ=Cttt± di =1= _ 4= ?qFFF ?=1q=_ 1=CCt1 2==1=rTT2=�==-=rr•' •rpt=- 7110 am-675-550-525-000-f1o-451-425AGESM-550-525-351 7M-220-225-200 1M 151 125 100 -75 -!D -S7 0 15 '.0 T! 100 12s 114 V PIPE I3 -E5' .1 70' STA 5+00 }ICC CROSS SFCTIONR VIFW 370602p 700 T701 =FFFE =1EE333EEEE - YYm R=EF rr� ▪ PIPE aur -772 7600 760 7720 7710 7" 7750 7740 7740 7110 7700 x17E0 1 MOO 7170 7040 X170 -530 -0E --472-X110 270- 7" -500 -!70 -f0 -291-1W-171-110-1!0-110-76 -22 -21 0 10 10 STA. 25+18 FTT77f-EFF==FF=??? fft�=l=tLttie . 3EEi fr t� 1-t 1 rt uRPE aril -7700 -002I7Y920-'97-000-473-120.423--17Y>20-]97-700-!7 -'.7"- 7 -210 -017 -W -125-010-x -70 -07 0 25 20 A 120 IE m STA 24+00 EIIE333EEEE.. 3EEEEFIIE3='T 1=4444��=EFF=��=FF== —r II PIPE REV= nor 7 - 7100 7790 7700 7770 7750 7100 7910 77500 17" 7170 1576 7041 -o72172512516-062415.r oo--7" 71 Jio-Af-AIFV 910714 -9W -174-L-0-146-120-'+5 -60 -25 0 26 oo STA 22+00 IIEHa-EEEF+4 -EET -71: tt Jdth±ttt±t d± =Ctt" —J ?��=FFv. ??3=3=FF= �• T3w ..333=EES. IIE3-.: t -.;._. 1--1--r 13" PIPE HEV. 7618' -0Oo-77Y920-7"-7"-47 --432-1H-0Oo-7 - -)"-9-l7Y970-797-100-0x-120-115-100-x -9 -25 0 35 20 A ILO 104 120 STA 20+00 RBS u'x r L 1=A=CC=S22===1=====2==21=r 7P$ 3 8 a 44441 41=4444a14�=400 r 147i_'- 0 0 7T777=FF==7777 =F==TE77-- 0 3 EIIIE9BEEEEFEI3333EEEEEI - 1 1_tt =1=�Ctttt4 th t44± -- 'l 388 ?_ 4 4._ . 44 � I I 1 _ r 0p 244E EE=-4?=i _4??�=� 3110 f-±_±. 1=i- ` =h±=h 0 3388 ���-�--FrF7?-IFF=lf' 70 0 j '1-1-1--7TT-r^^.-!-r-7--r' PIPE ELEV. 7E7x El gl RI 76q 1510 -002675-5W-!9442-475-410-{R-00F775 26 -502275 -95 -44 -9W -1]I-170-121-110-75 -50 -55 0 21 W 71 122 196 150 STA- 18+00 7T777=7FFT7T77=FF77T___-- - EFI3333EEEEEEIF3EBEEEE-I• -� ±=L-Ctt±±ici=Ltt • =FFF�;c44q�--P i-4-4--Ehtf-_ MI r ==tCtt±Cat=CttttCa� 0 al TSx as 1 rr RPE ELEV. 7 27 Ei ' 7201 WI io7-I5-.350-975-511-475-4 - 12-175 )"-l-0ih-Slo-ffi-alD-1TJ-ED-1:5-100-T5 -12 -22 0 25 50 75 100 125 ro STA 18+00 NOIES 1. 9! HDD DRILL ENTRY a EXIT ELEVATIONS BASED ON SURVEY CALCULATIONS. PROFILED ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON LIGGS TOPOGRAPI IC DBI - 10 METER ACCURACY. 5. 4. SRTTA11ONINNG� Ips MEED�ONIIH0I .075 L DIISRTMCRES. NpT FOR L0 An0NNOF FtlR90N LmLR1 HDWNEIN PLCR PLAN GR PROF�BLE IIN�FOORRMMA11ONN 5H�01 *1 HEREOO�N 15 FpUFRHISHREpD'MTHOUT LNSILRYON TI£ PART ORESI]LTNO Ri0M ERROR OR OMISSIONS TFE IN.WCTS. FORANY DAMRG� 8. CONTRACTOR IE R>=SPONSISLE FOR LOCATINOALL 1JI TO DI.. & CONTACTONE GILL COLORADOAT811, 0 DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGNG ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. DWG DESCRIPTION CHOSIDISaLEGEND NOTES •]:I 3=At DEEO72F71700 --- DRAWS -- --- CHEC1132 -- ---14100:1--- - —I'. =..r.'.Il.':1�-- -�— 11111.``'-- I::l imw1•1-_L r1�1:i��-- ©D- ®1_I.1I.:[e 1�-- EFnIcrpri ie 1)rnducl+ Rooney (3431 UI}� 80 7 '1iSod C -W :111111114f F1V:I;Y1:1:1;7:041! PROPOSED MD COLU&IBNE SPRINGS LOCATION CROSS SECTIONS WESTERN EXPANS10N PROJECT PHASE II GARFIELD COUPRY, COLORADO DISAW7": 097e7fl1.200115 WestWater Engineering 305 of 317 3/1/2012 V a iika44 lit t 1171 dir: 75* •fr 51:16114 A veil TOTAL HORIZONTAL DISTANCE = 1336 FT TOTAL PIPE LENGTH = 1365.1 FT HDD PROFILE VIEW P-SI7F SC.AI F VERTICAL : 1, 100' HORIZONTAL : 1'=100' PIPE ELEV. 7825' Rr1RF I net WP -1 7892' 78655' Lii ,t brown -gray, DSLIDE DEPONT) (09Eoaoff CLAYEY r$ILTb�C[-ML) Nlalans 01 m4emay weathered 79igi Nora tra them CLAIEV L7iraNFniln ,.ne aeaa EL,S7ela wod.. Light 9°y, 7852' 78487 7847.7 7842.2 7859.5' 78.184' 7830.5' 7826. 51751817.. yz 40 Mar Weefg l'E7sTrCaer'.rddn'i8b' ma Imbr ahem garro) ¢' 811710Nt' Weak, 58 , OnMima9x , Brn Ir mdy weak Mw. C naZy. 88y .eak. SW -MW. dtlt GAYSrizNEk 5W -MW. dopy 11 T5051E' 00y4uMNavtt RedWoaiiehh-Gmm.Weak. pYNv sus:0 EE, SW. nSk t,dr1,-brmrn. Weak, da�yyyeeeyyy SLTSTONE don-9L5$k SW. 8100 8050 8000 t- 7950 L POINT OF ENTRY STA. 0+00 7900 I ELEV 7820' 7850 7800 7750 7700 7650 7600 —1+00 0+00 LANDSLIDE AREA EXISTING GROUND PROFILE POINT OF EXIT STA. 13+36 ELEV 7995' 8100 8050 8000 7950 le -BORE : -1 67. H: BORT 6 ELEV: 7824 ' 152.9' TANGENT LENGTH POINT OF CURVE STA. 1+51 II PO11'T OF TANGENT STA.18+15 I 70.2' CURVE LENGTH 1600' RADIUS 1 1 1 1 FLOWLINE OF CREEK PROFILE 7900 7850 __L. 1- -1-----F---- 11 —�1 4 7800 I I 7---�---- fiI 7750 I I I — — — — --- — — — — 7700 I I I - k - 1-- 7650 II 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 pROFII F (EXISTING GROUND ALONG DRILL PATH) y y y I 7600 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 NOTES 1. ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES, NAD83 DATUM. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON USGS TOPOGRAPHIC DEM - 10 METER ACCURACY. 2. STATIONING IS BASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. 3. ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. AND ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATION OF FOREIGN UTILITIES SHOWN IN PLOT PLAN OR PROFILE. THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS FURNISHED WITHOUT LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ROONEY ENGINEERING, INC. AND ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS, FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS THEREIN. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES. 5. CONTACT ONE CALL COLORADO AT 811, 3 DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. MATERIAL SUMMARY REFERENCE DRAWINGS Pl+Wsr�- Tv tP7 6.1i* :rift rIt' 41‘1 e ; _ $ r I 1 [- . J * i s _ OP • . r wf 'Mr CI 41 FLOWLI E OF CREEK• a ti 14r • — —.—e.`.`. OLDER TOE EXISTING PIPELINE \ limp _ - RIGHT-OF-WAY - ars r " O O O ers - C.1. 1. ABANDONED PIPELINE / WEP II SURVEY CENTERLINE ------------ 1 1 1 fir - 1 !.. — 11101 UPPER LIMIT OF SLIDE TERRAIN 1 ee CREEK BANK •. SLUMPING C za. STRAIN GA�yE_----- ---- - -- �• - ARRAY - - - 0 • V 1 1 1 1 1 1-1- 1 I 8. 1 II 1 1 1 Im-a-1-1y I POINT OF ENTRY STA. 0+00 LAT: 39'35.8'N LONG: 108°57.5W ELEV 7820' OLD BLOCK TOP TEST BORE WP -1 ELEV: 7892' LAT: -39°35.724344 LONG: 108°57.48993W 0 Q' W EO T 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i "BCOCRTOP-'IWANDSLIDE UPPER LIMIT '4;,. Y OF SLIDE TERRAIN R • -r SCARP Crek + d Ob• 1 M ----- WAS _ LIMIT OF SLIDE TERRAIN Q + • .1 Ai,o 'M s-- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- i -1 4# 1- 1 I --I 1 -1 1 -IDD DRILLIATH } POINT OF EXIT -- --- ------ O • 11' 46LA6 1 fi 5 ONED PIPELINE / WEP II SURVEY CENTERLINE 475 • STA.. +36 'Vy - - __------------------- --- -- r]r! 7.5034 ' '1 10 - i • r y 5.59392 t - - ✓ f - i r �1 - JI 'F � ONG AiNCsr � • +a. 4, OA b4F. # # -titi ti 0 j) °.' . - I t . 4444 ,, 3 r $ vr t_7 4 • FEIPT AsIVP " a rA a PUL K IGHT O • i • ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. DWG DESCRIPTION ¢ROSSINC, I F1;FNn NOTES ENGINEERING RECORD DRAWN CHECKED ADDED NEW TEMP USAGE AREA KR 11-14-11 MM CLIENT E REVISED DRILL LENGTH & PROFILE TL 11-04.11 MM PROJECT MGMT. D ADDED BORE LOG INFORMATION KR 10-20-11 ZB PROCESS C RECONFIGURED HDD ENTRY & EXIT LOCATIONS KR 10-06-11 ZB MECHANICAL B ADDED UTILITY INFORMATION KR 09-15-11 ZB A REV FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY DESCRIPTION KR 08-05-11 ZB PIPING STRUCTURAL BY DATE App, ELECTRICAL 18C EEntcrprisc ProJueIE Rooney Engineering, Inc. 12201 E. Arapahoe Road, Suite C-10 „IACentennial, Colorado 80112 (303) 792-5911 ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. PROPOSED HDD WOODPILE LOCATION WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO SCALE: NO SCALE I DRAWING: 02757'PIPL-2003 IREV: F Yes ►Y er ngineering 0 t BLM SITLA A j.l A 1 \ N 31. HCO rrr R STA. 5PIPE8.25— TEIPOPARY WORKSPACE FOR PIPELINE PULLBACK (7Sx 1000') 1 }� � 1 l s� X61 1 1 P 1 ` 1 1 \ 1 1 1 , iii 1 '1 1 d6 • 1 # /T\I EM WI.LI M5 GAS PIPELNE } PRCPOSF- PIPELINE— RIGHT-OF-WAY ` 1 1 1.1 '1 \18 \ b■ 8 r \ r \ \ \ AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY: FROM NATIONAL AERNL IMAGERY PROGRAM DOWNLOAD, RESCLLRICN: APPROXIMATELY, 1 PETER TOTAL HORIZONTAL DISTANCE - 831 FT TOTAL PPE LENGTH -534.4 FT HDD PROFILE VIEW D. ZF RCA E VERTICAL: 1ti26• HORIZONTAL: 1'.56 Cal 811 cm 4700 4690 4680 4670 4660 4650 4640 4630 4620 4610 4600 4590 4580 4570 4560 4550 POINT AN6� 907 LAT. 88'11.8014'N EEEV :4530 11M 8 \ 1 1 8 POINT OF ENTRY L�ALT x'71.4191 LONG:1o55 • ELEV 9682 1 TEST SORE INTI ELEV:454? LAT: 99' 11.9069' N LON6c 108' &1818' w _I -DD PORARY PACE 1 A PCN STA U+2F ENT ELEV 485V _6 1 DOMING GROUND PROFILE PROPOSED PIPELINE RIGHT -Cf -WAY INTERSTATE 70 EASTBOUND LAPES 10. LEV: 4147 127.T TANGENT LEN 67.6 4 — IPOINT OF TANGENT STA 7+01 TEST BORE INT -1 CEFTH: 11T 4 - r ELEV. 46621 \ — t NTERBTATE 70 WESTBOUND LANES - 28.6 1 \ \ 514.5' CURVE LENGTH I— 1400 RADIUS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 —PUNT OF CURVE STA. 14i0 ✓ \\ 4700 — 4690 4660 POINT OF EFITRY 41132' 4650 — 4640 4630 — 4620 — 4610 — 4600 — 4590 1=2'7Am:3er LENGTH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 50 0 50 100 PRELIMINARY FOR GEOTECH INVESTIGATION 45701' ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE GEOGRAPHIC CCORDINATES. NADE DATJM. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON SURVEYED FORMING .CATHERIED IN THE FIELD. - 45601: STATIONING IS PASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. ROONEY ENGINEER!. %INC. AND ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS ARE tan RESPCNSIBLE FOR LACATCN OF FOREIGN UTILMES SHOWN IN 2+00 4550 WITHOUT LJANUTY 014 THE PART OF RODPEY ENGINEERING, INC. AND PLOT PLAN CR PROFILE. TIE INFCRMATION SHOWN HEREON IS FURNSHED ENTERPREE PRODUCTS, FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS THEREN. 0+00 4. COMPACTOR IS RESPONSBLE FOR LCGATING ALL ununEs. 5. CONTACT ONE CALL UTAH AT 811. DAYS PRJOR TO DIGGNG. MATEPJAL SUMMARY REFERENCE owdmmas mEm DESCRIPTION DWG DESCRIPTION CROSSINIILEEZip NOTES ID DRAWN MODF1ED CALL LOCATION AND PRORLE REV KR SY 10-12-11 DATE LIM ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, LP. Rooney EIMInc. 12201 E Road Saki C- TO C(386.13)f.05917 00112 PROPOSED POD NEAR NIRE MARKER 221 WESTERN ECPANSION PROJECT PHASE 1 GRAND COUNTY. LTAH MA IAL PHOTOGRAPHY: FROM MAMMAL AERIAL IMAGERYPROCRAM DOWNLOAD, I a70LUIHON: APPROXIMATELY, 1 METER 1 REVIB®TENPORARY WORKSPACE FOR PIPELINE PULLBACK (75' x 10005 alk t 146, • • MLD TEMPORARY %YORK:SPACE BOUNDARY SY BUFFER ZOIE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY MITT BLM 1-70 HDD PULLBACK PLAN VIEW POINT OF OCT STA. 8426 LLOOHGe1 OB'6.1,�p177511W TEST BORE NT -11 ELEV: 46617' LAT'. S8' 11.301W N LONG: 100. 6.1118 W HDD 1'EYEIFORPACE 0200' x 300, 50 PROPOSED PIPELNE RIGHT-OF-WAY t PROPOSED PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY 0 50 100 FEET C::3il'u11 NATES 1. ALL NN ICOORDINATES R ALL LEEVATARE GEOGRAPHIC COCRDINATES. TIONS PRE BASED ON SURVEYED POSITRONS GATFE RED N THE HELD. 2. STATIONING IS BASED ON HORQONTAL DISTANCES. & ROONEY ENGINEERN INC. AM ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS ARE NOT RESPONSBLE FOR TION OF FORBON UIILRIES SHOWN IN PLOT WITHOUTNLIABIBILITYYONE TI-THE EPS OOFF ROONEY SHOWN HEREON 18 FURNISHED ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS, FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING FM ERRORS OR MISSIONS THEREIN. t CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILRTEB. 6. CONTACT ONE CALL UTAH AT 511, 3 DAYS PROs TO DIGGING. MATERIAL SUMMARY REFERENCE DRAWINGS ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. DESCRIPTION CROSSBRIEGEND NOTES ENGINE RING RECORD DRAWN CHECKED CLIENT PROJECT NOWT. EEii .'rhri ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, LP. PROLEBB A FOR REVIEW PURPCGE6 ONLY TL 10-2&11 UM MECHANICAL RANO STRUCTURAL REV DESCRIPTOR BY DATE APP. ELECTRICAL IOC Aida jidle 440 PROPOSED HMA] PULLBACK INTERSTATE 70 CROSSING PEAR MLE RUINER 228 WESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE II GRAND COUNTY, UTAH BONE NO OW EIDRAYTINR 0171:44.14.4901A REY. A CJLVVtlLCI E 1 ILy.II ICCI 11 IIy )UO L) [til=f�i� IJ:•.gni•.:•„��� 1�- I:11 vi1U•� I I:n 1191.- HOLES 1. A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY TL 1441-11 REN cesamPTION BY DATE NM APP. CJL W dtCI CI 1911 !cell! 19 EEnterprise Protivct,s ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, LP. 7 M21, 8O 1• P 4 b}0 1 OEOTEC1SORE LOCATION INTERSTATE 7O SING NEAR MILE MARKER 229 YIESTE.RN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE 1 GRAND COUNTY, UTAH MALL: ND!CALE IDNAWIN]: 01767PR.®61I FICA A SITLA T21 T3 R24ESECTIOI47B PROPOSED WWII PIPELINE 7RACKCO ROAM ION ACCESS CS ICIIONACCESSROAD\ uJ r + q - TD 1Q + O —f SETA. OHOO RUT LAT: 3B'2B.48C27N LONG: 109'1&OOB98'W ELEV 4347' POINT OF ENTRY SA 0.00 LAT'. 88'58.686294! LLON 77.BBiEGW 6 d * TEST BORE RR -1 9111: 4338 LAT:. 2818.5005N LONG: 10997.9824 TEMPORARY WORKSPACE 26' X 200' ^HPOPAm WORKSPACE 25' 7C 138 HDD PLAN & PHOTO VIEWFEET 100 NOTES 1. ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES, NAO83 DAMN. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON SURVEYED POSITIONS GATHERED IN THE FIELD. 2. STATIONNO IS BASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. S RRPOEEBIEE FORK LOOCATTI0ON OND FOREIGN UTU SHHOOWNN 14NOT PLOT PLAN OR PRORLE THE INFORMATION SHOWN HERECpN�JIS FURNISHED EWNTERRRI5 PRRODDLICTS FOR A#D RESHULLTEIENG FROM ERRORS OR OMISSIONS TH3iEJN 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATNOALL UTIUTES. S. CONTACT ONE CALL UTAH AT 511, 5 DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. PRELIMINARY FOR GEOTECH INVESTIGATION TOTAL HORIZONTAL DISTANCE - 640 FT TOTAL PIPE LENGTH = 845.0 FT HDD PROFILE VIEW DAI7C ACI C VERTICAL :1 =25' HDRJzONTAL: 1•40 4-370 4-360 4-350 4-340 4-330 4-320 4310 4300 7+00 6+00 5+00 ELEV: 4252 4+00 3+00 ELEV. 4312' 2+00 1+00 0+00 4376 4366 4356 4346 4336 4326 4310 4300 MATERIAL SUMMARY REFERENCE DRAWINGS REM DESCRIPTION QTY. DW3 DESCRPT1ON EIROSSINGIEEEND NOTES ENGINEERING REDO RD DRAWN CHECI® CLIENT PROJECT MONT. EEnterprise PT4duCT$ ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, LP. 0 ADDED SECTION AOWPERSHP =LOURS TL 1011 29 NECHANIGVL B MODIFED DRLL ENTRY i Elul LOCATIONS KR 10.7&11 ZB A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY laR 10-01-11 EEI REV CESCRIPTIOR RY DATE APP. PIPING STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL 15C Brow 12201 �2Lava �.�r'�� 8aT72 PROPOSED IUD RAILROAD CROSSING NEAR CISCO. UTAH WESTERN E%PAPISION PROJECT PHASE II GRAND COUNTY, UTAH SCALE N0 SCALE I GRAMM 0176/-0PL9016 *cc CJLW dLCI CI 1911 !cell! 19 NOIES 1. ENGINEERING RECORD DRAWN ROUT. E I nterpTISC Prof tet; ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, LP. A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY TL 1441-11 YY REV DEsf/UPTION BY DATE APP. I&C °rt2Roo'}2sldla aao OEOTECN SORE LOCATION RAILROAD CROSSING NEARGISC®. UTAH YIESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE 1 GRAND COUNTY, UTAK DMZ ND 4C1LE DIAAWIND: 01761,P11.216M FCA A CJLVVdtCI CI 1911 !cell! 19 J 1 1 V PRIVATE BLM T 12 S R 26 E SECTION 12 POINT OF ENR / lam UT 9B' IGI5ZN LONG:10r4.40011 W ELEV 8714' �A PIPELINE X40 -INT OF ENTRY. LLAAT47 4 ELEII .6774 PULLBACK CONSTRUCTION CRIGHT-OF-WAY EGSTNG 10" NGL PIPELINE PROPOSED HOD PLAN & PHOTO VIEW 1. 2. 2. 4. 5. PRELIMINARY FOR GEOTECH INVESTIGATION TOTAL HORIZONTAL DISTANCE - BEA FT TOTAL PIPE LENGTH = MOS FT below Ca11811 gooton, HDD PROFILE VIEW NOTES D.RIZF CA F VERTICAL :1"- 28 HORIZONTAL: 1.40' ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES, NAM DATUM AU. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON SURVEYED POSITIONS GATHERED IN THE FIELD. STATIONING 1S BASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. ROONEY PRODUCTS NOT • PONSFLE OR LOCATION FO�(U11LfESSHONN PLAN OR PROFLE THE IEFQRMATNXN SHOWN HE 1S FURNISH • ROUT LIASILIIY ON TIE PARE OF ROONEY ENGINEER .% AND ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS, FOR ANY DAMAGES RESULTING F ED M ERRORS CR THERE]N. ORIS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UITLmBS. CONTACT ONE GALL UTAH AT 611.3 DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. 5780 — POINT OF ENTRY 5760 -- STA 0+00 ELEV 5742' 5740 5720 -- 5700 -- 5680 5660 — 5640 — 5620 —1+00 EXISTING GROUND PROFLEi DEPTH:: • P 0+00 HEV: 884r 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 POINT OF ENTRY STA 8423 ELEV 8714'. 10` ELEV. 8977 6+00 408.T CURVE LENGTH 1409' RADIUS 7+00 S TANGENT LENGTH POINT OF TANGENT STA 7411 8+00 9+00 5780 5770 5760 5750 5740 5730 5720 5710 5700 5690 5680 5670 5660 5650 5640 5630 5620 10+00 WIMP/ SUMMARY REFERENCE DRAWINGS REM DESCRIPTION QTY. DWG DESCRPT1ON CROBBINGIEGEND NOTES ENGINEERING REc0 RD DRAWN CHF -DIED CLIENT PROJECT MOM'. EEnterprise PT4duC1$ EN7T;I.PRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS" LP. PRpC[$B B ADDED OINIERSHP i PULLBACK =LOUTS TL 10.21-11 MM A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY KR 10-15-11 REV DESCRIPTION Hy DATE APP. NECHAHICAL PIPING STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL Iac Rooney i220/ iP'li6�d, 0! 2NE6! ava 80772 PROPOSED FUD EVACUATION CREEK - YP 732.8 DEAR DRAGON. UTAH WESTERN E IPA NSION PROJECT PHASE II UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH WALE NO OGLE I GRAMM 0176/-0PL900! 11000 0 CJLW dLCI CI 1911 !cell! 19 PROPOSED TD' WIDE ACCESS Lk 10 • ' ilk ??It' 4 • 1‘*t '41;1 1 • ALA14 • • 4 AA* r . r +� « ay ' T-aany. Rom, - • ''h 1 • : ■ w • sp„,.I 1 • 44i4i 41011: 4w A 10,40 COSTING ETC PIPELINE E7OBTrIG 1(r NGL PIPELINE 0400-6` PROPOSED WEPII PIPELINE FDD Joy Y 41.1 • PLAN & PHOTO VIEW 1 JuiPoamsitic -7 4,4 MOM 100 0 100 200 FEET ww,...n„xhetow. Ga11811 n.m,. mop. NOTES 1. ALL COORDINATES SHONRI ARE GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATEE, NAM DATUM AU. ELEVATIONS ARE EASED ON SURVEYED POSITIONS GATHERED IN THE FIELD. 2 STATIC/0013 BASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. 3. RFLO�OOFIEOILNOT RE8PPONSFLE OR LOCATION FO( L1ESSHOWNN PLAN CR PROFIE. THE IPFQRMATION SHOWN HE 15 FURNISHED AND ENTERRPRISE RPR DUCTS. FORON TIE S S RESSULTI�NG F IERRORS CR THERON. C ORIS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL ummES. 5. CONTACT ONE GALL UTAH AT 811.3 DAYS PRIOR TO DIGGING. MATERIAL SUNAIYARY REFERENCE DRAWINGS ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY. DWG DESCRPT1ON 1330613MIGIENEND NOTES ENGINEERING RECD RD DRAWN CLIENT PROJECT MOM%. EEn[:r} tI1. Pry+,f,lt•ec ENTERPRISE PRODTICI'S PARTNERS, L.P. PROCC$s A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY TL 11-0&11 MM REV CESCRIPTICN BY DATE APP. N CHANI VL PIPING STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL IDC Rooney WO/ 80112 �N 0! Sidle ava PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD EVACUATION CREEK - YP 733.5 PENT DRAGON. UTAH WESTERN BIPMISION PROJECT PHONE II UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH SCALE NG OGLE I GRAIRINR 4.PIAIMAA IIDDA A CJLVVdLCI CI 1911 !cell! 19 NOTES 1. FNr91NFPRIN(' RD CFAwN c _. `IV SI I EPriicrprisc Products ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, LP. A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY TL 1441-11 NY REV cescRIPTION BY DATE APP. I&C rrgYeta8O 121d1e 4}0 Frarz„, CJLVVdtCI CI 1911 !cell! 19 OEOTECH SORE LOCATION EVAC WT1ON CREEK - GIP 73La NEARORAIION, UTAH :WESTERN ExPNISION PROJECT PHASE 1 NNTAH COUNTY, UTAH !GL!. NOL!1DRAYR1/NO:2 O12a6F PCH A 3/ 7R! T12S R25E, SECTION 24 e- UINT'AH COUNTY, UTAH IL�,. ibt EXIs11N[i 10" NGL PIPE_. ___ __ ___ _FROP PIP_k1E%G______ __— —AIIP TEST BORE TC -1 ELEV: 6680' LOONE 1Or9A71TE L.7Ylf SETA. 0 0 lit 0 ilk 8871' 144 EVACUATION CREEK p p• HDD PLAN 8. PHOTO VIEW 5900 5890 5880 5870 5860 5850 5840 5830 5820 —1+00 I I I I 0+00 NOTES 1. ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE GEOGRAPHICCCCRDINATES, NPDB9 DATUM. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON SURVEYED POSmONB GATHERED IN TIE FELD. 7. STATIOMNG IS BASED CN HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. RODPEY $1HLEI LOCATION OFF FOREIGN PoUTI ILRSE IEESS SFGID♦�II N ARE PLOT PLAN OR PROFILE. TIE INFORMATION SHOVE! I4EREON IS FURNISHED MID EENTTERPPRRISLIABILITY RODDUCCTTHE FORA ANY OFA ENGIREESUULTHG FRINC.RRRORS OR OMISSIONS THERE*. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILRIES. S. CONTACT ONE CALL UTAH AT 811, 9 DAYS PRIOR TO MGM. ITEM MATERIAL SUMMARY DESCRIPTION CJLV V dLC1 119 11 !cell! Ily icnero w r below. 0, Calla t1 =ep QTY. DWG 2+00 REFERENCE DRAWINGS DESCRPT1ON 3+00 4+00 ELEV. 6648 1, 50 111 a N FEET ao ELEV: 8860' BORE TC -1 DEPTH: 5TH 418.8 TANGENT LENGTH I I 1 I I I 5+00 HDD PROFILE VIEW OESoRaCALE VERTICAL : 1'.28 HCRQONTAL: 1W' NOTES 5 u 6+00 I I 1 7+00 ELEV: 6878' ENGINEERING REOD RD B A REV ADDED ONNNERSHIPCALLOUT FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY DERRRIFTICN TL KR BY 1641.11 10-1E11 DATE MM 22 APP. DRAIMN CLIENT PROJECT MOYT. PRCC[8B MECHANICAL PIPING STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL Iac EEnterprise Producll 5900 5890 5880 5870 5860 5850 5840 5830 5820 Roomy WO/ infMorad. Sidbs IF30* 752-6E1/ 100 r wwn.lt wow. Q5 Ca11811 r..,. run v s PRELIMINARY FOR GEOTECH INVESTIGATION TOTAL HORIZONTAL DISTANCE -1100 FT TOTAL PIPE LENGTH . 11803 FT ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, LP. PROPOSED VU EVACUATION CREEK - LP 7223 NEAR DRAGON, UTAH TPEBTERN EKPANSION PROJECT PHASE II UINTAH cOUNTY, UTAH ICL NO OGLE I !WHIM 01761-0PL9007 IRE,. 0 • • • 0•-11 lie it 0411 4144 Ato • ... • • .4 • •„ TI2S R25E_ SECTION 24 w UINTAH COUNTY UTAH • 4• • r• • • 4.4 .0- • % a. • • Illo 0 L' ft •` • • • . • • • • •4. - - • 1 4. • •••;"$.7•• Iqf 410, - �` ..J► PRIVATE • I •rte= •. DUSTING 10• NOL PIPELIPE- -, TEST BORE TC -1— E LAT:007 5BBY1'N LANA 101r3,4257111W 4� --- --� POSm PIPELJNE RIG►TT#"4'YN f J •����• _ p 0 Q Q -- Q —}—� N KO LL7 co f, -�._ 00t Qr .1• • 0 t PPAP°SEU PCINT 'yam 'r STA. pCF ENTRY- Jl LAT: 3••45.4848BIN 34577W kV- r - ELEV SEPT it Ir ;i• • d PROPOSEDWEPII PPELJNE - .,— --.s _ - • ANT ' 8' 406644 STA 11+p0 LONG: f ELEV 88T1'_ . • t 1500' PIPELHE PULLBACK - 4 • • •4• IP • op �.•f j • • • D• • • -• • • •.4* #' • • .44 • • 9 • r., M • ' • I • "� 1► •100 0 100 200 •• 7P . 4 ti • • ►. FEET NOTES 1. ALL COORDINATES SHOWN ARE GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATES, NAM DATUM. ALL ELEVATIONS ARE DAEMON SURVEYED POSITIONS GATHERED IN TIE FELD. P. STAMPING L9 SASED ON HORIZONTAL DISTANCES. 9. RCCIPEY &SALE FORLOOdATNG �ION OFF FOREIGN PoU D ILITSE IEESS SHOWN N ARE PLOT PLAN OR PROFILE. TIE INFORMATION SHONRI IBiEDN IS FURNISHED WITHOUT ENTERPRISE PRODDUCCTUTY ON THE FORA ANY OFA REESUULTHGP111 INC.RR�OO NS OR OMISSIONSTHEREH. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL LTTIUTIEB. 5. CONTACT ONE CALL UTAH AT 817, 3 DAYS PRIOR TO MGM. ro.r.belowL Cgl, • CaIISIIe.I..A eq TOTAL HORQONITAL DISTANCE = 1100 FT TTQTAL PIPE LENGTH -11 .3 FT TAL PIPELINE PULL 1800 FT MATERIAL SUMMARY REFERENCE DRAWINGS REM DESCRIPTION QTY. DWG DESORPT1ON L R0SRING I E1 ND NOTES ENGINEERING RECD RD ORAWN CuEHT PROJECT MOYT. E!1 }erica ProchIt•rc ENTERPRISE PRODUCT'S PARTNERS. LP. PRC INW B ADDED OWNERBHP CALLOW'S TL 10-31-11 NM A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY IR 10,2611 22 REV DESCRI FION BY DATE APP. NECHANP:AL PIPING STRUCTURAL ELECTRICAL I&C Rooney �80112 0911 PROPOSED HDO OIRILLPATH & PULLBACK EVACUATION CREEK - 14.7222 NEAR DRAWN. UTAH WESTERN MAMMON PROJECT PHASE II UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH SCALE ND SCALE I CRAYON@ E70TPPL9007A 1000 0 CJLVVdLCI CI 1911 !cell! 19 NOTES 1. ENGINEERING RECORD IN AAYN II;I- i Entcrprisc Products ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L2. A FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY TL 1441-11 NY REV OESr/tlPT1ON BY DATE APP. I&c a 7 6 Rvsd, SI C -W SO 12 OEOTECH SORE LOCATION EVACUATION CREEK - IP 7242 NEAR DRAGON. UTAH YYESTERN EXPANSION PROJECT PHASE 1 UINTAH COUHrY, UTAH DMZ ND!CALE DRIIWIla 0176APFUa 7l FCA A CJLVVdtCI CI 1911 !cell! 19