Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.01 Application Part 211/24/2003 9:26:09 AM r PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE DRAWING LEGEND PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAMS PIPING DRAWINGS 2501 PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM 4200 TIE-IN 2C LAUNCHER - PIPING PLAN 4201 TIE-IN 24' LAUNCHER - PIPING ELEVATION & DETAILS 4202 VALVE SET y1 4203 VALVE SET j2 4204 16" SIDE VALVE TIE-IN 4205 24" TIE-IN PIPING PLAN 4206 24" TIE-IN PIPING ELEVATION AND DETAILS PIPING DRAWINGS FOR PERMITTING 4600 PIPELINE BLM RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN 4601 PIPELINE 011.1 RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN PIPELINE DRAWINGS 4700 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4701 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4702 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4703 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4704 PIPEUNE P1 AN AND PROFILE 4705 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4706 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4707 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4708 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4709 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4710 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4711 PIPELINE PLAN ANO PROFILE 4712 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4713 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 4714 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE PIPELINE ORAWING5 4730 PARACHUTE CREEK CROSSING AREA B1 4731 BORE pl UNCASED ® CDOT DRIVEWAY 4732 BORE /2 CASED 0I-70 CROSSING 4733 BORE /3 UNCASED 0 PAVED ACCESS ROAD 4740 EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING - AREAS jl @ p55 CATHODIC PROTECDON DRAWINGS 6000 CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATIONS 6001 CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATIONS CIVIL /STRUCI RAI DRAWIN .S 7100 GENERAL NOTES 7101 PIPE SUPPORTS FOUNDATIONS 7201 PIPE SUPPORTS STRUCTURAL STEEL 1145 PIA/MG N. NOT ICEN ECM PREP/AM SY 'MELT n€ 6101 HAWS WC MC .10114.4a (V INC OOJTV eA PAU NOT IIC U50 FP Ain o ne PIPPIY; FUP.WD TO Mel ONES PIArf 1.111.00 bir D PIt0210) 1/1110‘ L. REFERENCE DRAWINGS N0. REVISIONS Ht 0x0 mw OME BY MOT \ Wow Ss 0n5/01 A NEMER {s 0/00/01 0T0000 S n EWER roN0 ONE A °.L RRCESS 0 ISSVED FOR REFERENCE .£5 .ES RN 11/25/03 N0Nql ENCANA PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC MOS (KM ux lJ00 w -mi NILE PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE DRAWING LEGEND GARFIELD & MESA COUNTY, COLORADO . PEN WONG MOM VAS 03013DRAWING LEGEND NONE /A\ CAD FILE:DRAWING LE END 2003 9:24:26 AM PARAC HU FE TO DE 8 EQUE PIPELINE\2501.dwg.dwg, 11 42 A6 A5 A3 A2 A0 39 38 32 36 35 N 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 16 12 16 15 14 15 12 10 8 6 5 L TO LOGAN WASH TREAT/NG FACILITY 0-2000 490 INSULATNt GASKET KIT 5v O4 By FUTURE CONTRACTOR 10.yf B60A SEE NOM /2 4 Ot31 P6080 0-2000 PSIG r\ INSULATING 00.9(E2 411 20]0 PSG wwLAllvG 089000 411 5P Os 60AF TEST LOOP �COI 860AF CINKING 01864140CAP I/4- GR /4 GR 1E086DAP GR TEDBG AG TEE -VALVE SET 11 TEE BLANKING e SP BLANKING CAP CAP 80A COUPON CONNECT. BBOA ORCHARD MESA NORTH (FUTURE CONNECTION) ORCHARD uE5A SOUTH (FUNRE CONNECTION) 1/ N80A RECEIVER 24' 28/28' CONTAINMENT 800 860 GRATED TEE GR TED 1EE AG 80 GRATED 1E£ BG AG GR TE0 TEE 2C EEO D 060AF VALVE SET I3 BO AG FROM OREA, DIME PIPELINE `l BY CON ACTOR 5015TN0 FOR CLIENT APPROVAL O APPROVAL O APPROVED A5 NOTED - REVISE AND PROMO O ROME AND RESUBMIT O 400 APPROVED O SEE LETTER O TRANSMITTAL BY DATE NOTES 1. ALL PIPING COMPONENTS 10 BE 600f 8811110. 2. CONNECTION FOR EMERGENCY FUEL ON PONER GAS. 3. IT 15 ENCANA5 RE5PCN5BNtt TO VERIFY NAT ALL 593511740 EOHPIIENI, 5351545. INTO PPEUNES MAT ARE CONNECTED TO ME NEW PLPEL0E A5 SHOWN ON TOSE ORAI6NCS. HAVE 0VER PRESSURE PROTECT/9N FOR NE MARMU18 ALLOWABLE OPERATING PRESSURE (4AM). nit ORO.O NA& pier MOO PAVOLO MP RAHN AS O N MOWED Fr PROZtr IO▪ U MOM SMUT 10 PC14‘t SOO ON IC WOO 701. Oa COP ORONO 9.11/ PROXOCIDELOHNT LK REFERENCE DRAWINGS V0 REVISIONS 01 C*D VW 0870 80 DAR 01AM1 0400460 YL .116 RN 9/15/03 8/I1/03 51R.1C1 BURR 48040 n ISSUED FOR CLIENT APPROVAL ,E5 RN RH OM1. PROCESS 1/25/Os WEPT ENCANA,M TITLE PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC 1.6 MlailD Mt. ST 00 idi 4ORNO `04 u -000L PP,,.POI :41 [ 3... PIN PROS KAMER 03013 A %2501 atm DowNG woe. NONE n CAD FILE 2501 11/20/03 A, l6 45 44 93 42 40 39 36 32 35 35 3A 5 3l 21 30 29 154 22 26 25 N 23 22 21 20 19 B 12 16 5 1 3 12 11 1G 9 8 6 5 2003 9:22:13 AM °ARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE\4200.dwg.dwg, 11/ L r en Mac KM NOT RP OtlflOWPT PO Ulf PT WI RE PON MAD N RILE OU:Ot SCIJIY It RX MO MAOW M110 MM N 0110 FORM 01 11.115.0) Mt 01M1 MATIIRPOJT °0*0 C410, 11-.000 REFERENCE DRAWINGS X-60 B BOK 10 .500 8.41 _ _ _ c.24: %RIIXE 10 LOLAY WA41 NFAmG EAWrc FW. TRANSITION PIECE SEE DWG. 4201 FOR BILL OF MATERIAL BY CDN1RACTOR EXISIMG X-60 .625 WI. GREAT DV NOTES: 1. ALL BELOW GRADE PIPING TO BE PROTECTED WADI APPROPRIATE COALING MATERIALS COMING TO EXTEND 10 V ABOVE GRADE. 2. ABOVE GROUND PIPE. VALVES AND f1111NG5 TO. BE CLEANED AND LIVEN ONE COAL OF PRIMER FOLLOWED BY TWO COATS OF DESERT IAN ENAMEL NO REVISIONS . B1 PATE B1 DAZE 4205 PIPING ELEVATION AND DETAILS PRAM' SS 9/15/01 4700 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 0¢am MEM 40 9/10/01 10/26/05 6rs1A 0,14. ISSUED FOR PERMITTING .E5 AB RN 11/25/03 ENCANA PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE ROAN CLIFF 24" TIE-IN PIPING PLAN PDI 00 CO 0LLP, MM PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PIOUS TRES LLC FAL 0044 IR -0;_ PP POOL WISP 03013 PO POURIG kVA], 4200 [UPI RAMC !MEM wle CAD FILE:4200 11/20/03 ?003 9:23:33 AM r GRADE BY CONTRACT 00 EASING TAPER BORE 10 .500 WNL _ L 10 W TO OGAN 10 LOGAN WASH MAINS FAOUfY X-60 Y -5W nIg ;j, ilk 3' S1i. 3.-A. SECTION GRADE NEI. 011 WDh 2 24' 2 24' 3 4 24 24' 114101111. DLSV611EE 3R WELD ELL 0.625 WALL, MSS 59-25 WPHY-60, vI'-0' TAN. EACH END RANGE CLASS ANSI 600) RN -RF .625 WT. BORE A-694 F-60 CASXET 600/ RF 1/8 MIK. REXITALLIC TYPE CG. 304 55 AI PI.EZ N1.10s 1 2/8'x ISLO. 5 SND BOLT ASM A-193 GR. 92 W/2 HEAVY HEX NUR ASTM A-194 GR. 2H T.O. WIW.WS PIG 901V W/ MREAD-0-RING NIPPLE MOD./ 04-7228-00-21-51 A 10 24' B 10' PIPE .625 WALL API 5L X-60 ERN (BARE) PIPE .625 WALL API 51. X-60 ERIE (FUS/ON BONDED) NOTES: I. ALL BELOW GRADE PIPING TO BE PROTECTED WITH APPROPRIATE COADNO MATERIALS. CDA1IN0 TO EXTEND TO 6' ABOVE GRADE. 2. ABOVE GROUND PIPE. VALVES AND 0T1NG5 TO BE CLEANED AND OVEN ONE COAT OF PRIMER F010WE0 8Y TWO COATS OF DESERT TAN ENAMEL MOOR NOI 0 WE 001 No0 141 IlN itroftl iKEN Per. r 1110.126 IRE a Pmaim1140 001 044 NOTNE 4.00 10 ANY tart 060 PROCCEMCD TO 110 PMMKNOW DC CO0SSED 04/1111 %1V 1p YL REFERENCE DRAWINGS NO REVISIONS BY OA9 APV DATE BA DATE 2501 PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM 4200 PIPING PLAN n ERASE 0[o0D 4700 PWEUNE PLAN AND PROFILE n M6« 7101 PIPE SUPPORTS AND THRUST BLOCK DETAILS .01 AB B/11/03 6A2/03 10/x6/83 A PMD ISSUED FOR PERMITING AB RH 11/25/03 1110 PROCESS OAR ENCANA TM 0111E PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE 11E -IN 24" PIPING SECTIONS PDI PnadEcr DEVELOPMEWr INDUSIA/E9 LLC t otapS Alt RE W ProtWW;, R0; ®1 0100 M 108 X00 N PFl MMu 03013 .W N,„E 4201 tkt AS NOTED 7,7 CAD FILE:4201 11/20/03 r c 24 RPELNIE 10 LOGAN 1REAIIXG FAOUTY CHAIN LW FENCE S-0. 61 AIELY 40'061 LEND BY 10' NIDE MM 1ONE 06 3'-0' WE PERSONNEL GATE MDI PANIC HARDWARE (SEE 6.0.1. 511). E5-2030) BLANKING CAP EPb 24 FID' 10'x 1/4'0x3 LG. 1/4' 1/4' 10' o' 1 I/i 0LG. 10'' 10' O' r 1 7/6'x13' LG. BLANKING Inc 3 4' 3/4 oI/2 A 20' 24' B 17 10' 20 24' x 0.im[Ilp 5'. 3R WELD ELL. 0.625 WALL. 6455 SP -75 WPHY-60, WI' -0' SAN. EACH END T.D. MLUAMS P15 -51G IV W/11.1READ-O-RING NIPPLE MW./ 04-2776-0021-51 NEW RED. RE 24 .625 WALL/10' .500 WAIL M55 5P-75 WPHY-60 (GRATED W FELD) DIRE00LE1 60001 A-105 PIPE NIPPLE 580 A-106 CR. B (I.B.E.) (COLE VALVE. 6000/ NPT (N80A) PLUG HEX HEAD. SOLID STEEL A-105 RANGE CLASS ANSI 6001 YM -60 .500 WL. BORE ASTM 1-105 CASKET 6001 RE 1/8' 1HK. ELEXISALLIC 119E C6. 304 55 ND BOLTS ASW -A-193. GR. 07 W/2 HEAVY HEX NU15 ASTM -A-194 GR. 25 51 600/ R.E. PLUG VALVE C5. 510. TRW, GEAR OPERATOR FE,FE (P6OAG) WELD TEE .500 WALL ASTM A-234 04. NPB MS/ 6001 YALE 60 500 VERTICAL BLANKING CAP M1M BLEEDING PWC 1HRE00LE1 60001 A-105 PE 6416PLL 5160 A -I06 GR. B (06E) BALI. VALVE 8001 TIIREADED (080A) PLUG HEX HEAD, SOLID STEEL A -I05 FLANGE CLASS ANSI 6001 NH -00 .625 W0 BONE A-694 E-60 05KES 6001 RF I/O' MK. FLEXITALLIC TWE CO, 304 55 STUD BOLTS ASW -A-193. GR. 07 W/2 HEAVY HEN NUTS ASTM -A-194 GR 25 H9 600166 B.G. TRUNNION BALI VA FULL P0IT C5. SIO. TRIM ./GEM OPERATOR p00AF) NOT U5E0 NOT USED IHREUGLEI 60001 A-105 INSTRUMENT NEEDLE VALVE 60001 ACCO M0A-VSS-46 x/V6V1S-4 (PIA) PLUG HEX HEAD. SOLID STEEL A -I05 PIPE 0.625 WALL API 51 K-60 ERW (FUSION BONDED) PIPE 0.500 WALL A -I06 GR. 0 5ML5. (BARE) PIPE 0.625 WALL API 51. X-60 ERW (BARE) 24%10' RED TEE (GRATED) (SEE P,D1. 510. 02-4938) (66.2) 0000 0 TAPER 606E 10 W WALL ADE 1 CII GI CI 011 0-60 625 WE ACCEP MOLE MAIM TAPER BARE 10 .500 WNL _ _ _ 24' PIPELINE FROM GREAT MIX PIPELINE FOUNDATION NOT (SEE DWG. 7101) (119. 2 PLACES) TRANSITION PIECE 4•-2Y• ELEVATION TRANSDGI PIECE 0-60 500 WT. NOTES: I. ALL 80104 GRADE PIPING 10 BE PROTECTED 611H APPROPRIATE COATING MATERIALS. 0001140 TO EXTEND TO 6' ABOVE GRADE. 2. ABOVE GROUND PIPE. VALVES AND FI7DN05 10 BE CLEANED AND GIVEN ONE COAT OF PRIMER FOLLOWED BY 1003 COATS OF DESERT TAN ENAMEL. Pm Nam IMS PPM 11 ▪ AC NON MED IP RC PRE NOD< spun Pt MANN ern NANTLANNE main. immtO M AN IMP MOCK MO MAI NOT BC !JAM WI ANY 0/N:14 PyRPOr CR PANDND PD MN MK, Man MAW! AN REFERENCE DRAWINGS NO REL1SIONS BY 0460 PAPP PAPE 60 DATE 2501 4702 PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM PIPELINE PLAN AND PRORLE A PRANK (NECKED 7101 PIPE SUPPORTS ANO THRUST BLOCK FOUNDATION DETAILS as P/11/12 AB 9/12/03 6001 A A s1R0c1 (LLc1. PAID NSTR. 0 10/26/03 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING .55 AB RH 11/25,03 9WL PRo0ss WENT ENC ANA W 1111-0 PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE VALVE SET //1 PIPING ELEVATION PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC 11 4 • my.. ME. : m 21 Pti,1'Ili6-MN 03013 PP ORApP•P MASER 4202 MOO PRANK nANDOt 3/8"=1'-0" (Al CAO FILEH202 11/18/03 10:32:27 AM r DETAIL SCALE: 3/0' • N-06 (LOOKING EAST) CXMI LWK FENCE APPROXIMATELY 50' LONG BY 10' MOE MM 0488 3'-0' NOE PERSONNEL GATE M1H PANIC HARDWARE (SEE P0.1. 510. (5-2030) BLANKING CAP BORE 10 .500 WAIL AN NG CAP N. CM1 REVD 520 4 24' N 98006P1101 45', 3R WELD ELL 0.625 WALL, 1155 SP -75 WPHT-60, AI -0' TAN. EACH ENO ACMPIAM2.1.X89 7 2 2 24',(10' 4 2 10.0 1/4' 5 2 1/4 ,.3' LG. 1.0. WILLIAMS. PIG -9G IV W/THREAD-O-RING NIPPLE MOD./ 04-7776-0021-51 9019 Rm. IEE xi .625 WALL/10' .500 WALL 455 5P-25 MMY-60 (CRATED 118 FIELD) -PIPE 60001 A -I05 PIPE NIPPLE 580 A-106 GR. 6 (T.B.E.) 6 2 1/4' NEEDLE VALVE 60006 NP1 (N80A) 1/4' PLUG HEX HEAD, SOLID STEEL. A-105 8 FLANGE CLASS A1451 600/ WN -111 .500 VT BORE 45198 A-105 9 10' 10 64 1 1/4'x9" LG. GASKET 600/ RP 1/8' INK. FLEXITALLIC TYPE CG, 304 55 5180 B0115 45111-A-193. GR. 97 W/2 HEAVY HEX NUTS A51M-A-194 CR. 2H 11 2 10 12 2 AN5 620/ R.P. PLUG VALVE C5. 510. TRIM, GEAR OPERATOR PERF[ (P6040) WELD TEE .500 WALL 45111 A-234 CR. WPB 13 2 10' ANSI 600j TALE RG. 500 VER11CAL BLANKING CAP 11111.1 BLEEDING PLUG 14 10', I' 15 1'00.3' LO. THREPOLET 6000E 4-105 PIPE NIPPLE 5160 A-106 CN. B 1.8.E 16 B ALL VALVE 8006 HIRE 12 PLUG HEX HEAD. SOLID STEEL A-105 18 19 20 21 4 96 2 24' 1 7/9113' 10. RANGE CLASS ANSI 6006 WN -RF .625 WL BORE A-694 8-60 GASKET 6006 RF 1/8' LHK. 116911ALLIC 100E CG. 304 55 S TUD BOLTS 45198-A-193. G4. 02 W/2 HEAVY HEX NU15 A51H-A-194 GR. 28 24' 22 AN9 600j 68 R0. TRUNNION BALL VA 1138 PMT C.5. 51D. MN ./GEAR OPERATOR (66011) NOT USED 23 N01 U5E0 24 10-,, 3/48 1HRED0LE1 60001 8-105 25 3/41I/2' 26 1/2' INSTRUMENT NEEDLE VALVE 60001 AGM MFA -655-46 9/V6VIS-4 (PIA) PLUG HEX HEAD. SOLID STEEL A-105 27 2e,, 16' 28 16' WELD REO. TEE 24' .625 WALL/16' .500 WALL M55 SP -75 WRIT -60 (GRATED IN FLANGE CLASS A149 6001 WN -RP .500 002. BORE A-694 E-60 FIELD) 29 30 31 2 16' 16' 16' GASKET 6001 RF. 1/8' 1HK PLEM0ALLIC TYPE CG. 304 5S KIND FLANGE ANSI 6001 R8. A-698 8-60 32 40 11/2'00 I/2'LC ANSI 6001 PLUG VALVE RI, C5. 51D. 113I1A GEAR OPERATED (P6080) 5180 BC41 A5118 A-193 GR. B2 W/ 2 HEAVY HEX NUTS A5114 A-194 GR. 24 A B 20 20 24' PIPE 0.625 WALL API 51 X-60 ERW (FUSION 60140(0) 10' 0 20 24' PPE 0.500 WALL A-106 CR. 8 51115. (BARE) RPE 0.625 WALL API 51 X- 0 ERW (BARE) '224110' REO. TEE (OIA110) -. OOO 8 IT9.x )DJ. 510. 000-400 0mm 0000 0 con0 Y ,/,.00o 24' ® � 2i CD O M O©00 O 6114- ® Q 011.181 XE CEG0.p 24-.16' Danz (WA110) (SEE POI. 510. 01-4935 2-2A. TAPER BOR 10.500 1-6o �P- 24' PPEUHE 10 IMAN WADI - - 1RG8NG TACILITY A X-90 101851 BLOCK '1 SEE DWG. 7101 1RAN90CN PIECE V FOUNDATION N0.1 (SEE DWG 7101) (116. 2 PLACES) X-60 ra %G.1 S-911 7'-2x• 4' -II);' 4'-IIY ELEVATION (LOOKING NORM TRANSI6011 PIECE NOTES: 24- PWEUNE X-60 500 W1. 1. ALL BELOW GRADE PIPING TO BE PROTECTED WITH APPROPRIATE COMM MATERIALS. C0APN0 TO EXTEND TO 6- ABOVE GRADE. 2. ABOVE GROUND PIPE, VALVES AND F11111805 TO BE CLEANED AND 01401 ONE GOAT 0P PRIMER FOLLOWED BY TWO COAL'S OF DESERT TAN ENAMEL. Ms Dump{ HAS NOT MN niessm puT PAD. los len10,00 vo at Mt lac lw curio musty Di wit Er ME CEPProxix.I. touilimma Er IPE rAcwr P.A.101K MD Fen mr ono pans( nanp0, ID air Ditipt flaw *man /IC orspepto CORM REFERENCE DRAWINGS 140 REVISIONS BY 0480 6Pw DATE BY DATE 2501 PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM DRAW. JES 9/20/03 4707 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 04[0450 7101 PIPE SUPPORTS A140 THRUST 91001< FOUNDATION DETAILS AA PECK 011801 AB 40 9/16/03 18/26/03 PIPING ENCANA 1111E PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE VALVE SET #2 PIPING ELEVATION M51R. 155UE0 FDR PERMITTING .E5 AB RH 11/25/03 PROCESS 03061 PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC IuI.ID ONCN 0 _Nn. go pap P6-118 ORANN6 'wow 03013 4203 0181 ANL (Nap vmpc Nue, 3/8"=1'-0". n CAC 8110:4203 11/18/03 9:26:23 AM PA'.ACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE\4204.dwg, 12/5/''" r 34' 2 7); CA 4_241RPEU E FRONT VIEW (LOOTING SOUDEA51) THRUST BLOCK 'A SEE DWG. 7101 CHNN *140 FENCE APPRDXWAIELY 101 03NG BY 1D11112/0 WIN ONE 3'-O- VIDE PERSONNEL GATE WM PANIC HARDWARE (SEE PAL SN. E5-7030) 01) SIZE 2464 16' 2 16' YAILFN DESPOMN MELD REO. TEE 24- 0.625 WALL / 16" .500 WALL M55 SP -75 NPHY-60 (GRATED 90' LR. ELL .500 WALL MSS SP -75 WPHY-60 0.PIM[ 9Nx4S IN FIELD) 3 16' RANGE CLASS 6001 MN -RF .500 W1. BORE A5110 A-694 F-60 5 40 1 1/21410 I /VC C 6 16' CASKET 600/ RF 1/6 INK. FLEXILALLIC TOE CC. 304 55 . 5N0 BOLT A5IM A-193 GN. B7 W/ 2 HEAVY HEX NUTS AST* A-194 GR. 24 RANGE CLASS 600/ RF. BLIND A5111 A-694 F-60 ANSI 6007 RP. PLUG VALVE C5. 510. TRIM GEAR OPERATED (P6OAO) A 16' PIPE .500 WALL API 5L X-60 ERW (BARE) 14 :16' RED. TEE(CRAIEO) (SEE P.D.I. 510. DB4938) �I§ SIDE VIEW ILGMWG NORTHEAST) THRUST BLOCK 'A' SEE DWG. 7101 NOTES: 1. ALL BROW GRADE PIPING To BE PROTECTED WITH APPROPRIATE C0A TWO MATERIALS. COA ENG 10 EXTEND 00 6 ABOVE GRADE. 2. ABOVE GROUND PIPE. VALVES AND FITRNGS 10 BE CLEANED AND OVEN ONE COAT 00 PRIMER FOLLOWED BY TWO COATS 00 DESERT LAN ENAMEL. P utianco tan nue tus • n< ace ButEnd ThE • a00, sciun,. Contra NB, tommuma et 11. noun, sumo .4 IC um Root ramo, riiipos,BBT SE Bac. Faa m:IVO 0' mow IXIRwwl wa. Mr REFERENCE DRAWINGS NO REVISIONS BY 10Po 0A2 BY DAIS 2501 HOLD PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE A OR ATM XS 9/i0/03 C0[aEO MLOI Bm11c0 AB MD 9/n/03 90/30/03 ELECT A ENCANA 011E PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE 16" SIDEVALVE TIE-IN PIPING ELEVATION NL 155UE0 FOR PERMITTING ES AO RH 11/25/03 P0OCESS Xi PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC -/a0 TM(II0R M,-9023 Pot BBL liwBBB 03013 LD1 1010 Arm Po mow 4witl 4204 moo BBB CAD FILE: 4204 10/26/03 L r Sit NOTES: E-1041' 3'-54' 9' 0 11' 6' ERECEIVER 3 FOR SUPPORT DEIM (SEE PD.I. 510. 92-7359) (FOUNDATION TYPE 3) (FTP. 2) 4aPPORT - 28'.24 ECC. REO. PIPE CLAMP (SEE P.D.I. SID. D2-4383) (TIP. 5) 1. All BELOW GRADE PIPING 10 BE PROTECTED MIH APPRORRIAIE COATING MATERIALS. CDATNG TO EXTEND TO 6' ABOVE 0VA0E 2. ABOVE GROUND PIPE. VALVES AND BL1NG5 TO BE CLEANED AN0 GIVEN ONE COAT OF PRIMER FOLLOWED BY TWO COATS OF DESERT TAN ENAMEL FOR SUPPORT DEIµ (SEE P.D.I. 500. 112-7359) (Fg*NAIIo4 TYPE If SEE DWG. 4206 FOR BILL OF MATERIAL 24• GRATED TEE (SEE P.D.I. 51D. DZ -4930) 1E51 LOOP - SEE OEFAIL 11 (THIS DRAWING) ROLL FITTINGS AND A0,9350 SUPPORT ELEVATION TO COMPENSATE FOR ELEVATION CHANGES oho I 94.1! fi � O ® 1 FI ADGEt LTJ 54 FOUNDATION NO. 1 _ oOtt (SEE DWG. 7101) cm FOUNDATION 010. 2 (SEE DRG. 7101)- ya- PLAN ENDED SP INSULATING At 7 03 — CASKET _ —E_ 4— £ SUPPORT _ _ _ t 2. BALL VALVE w/BLINO - _ _ (5R DRG. 7201) 0090 ® 9Erl m®m0 ® '/9 GINASKET ,�IIi/� ® KITSKET ffrimpla IMI 0090 , ° f iti1 L J (TRANSITION PIECE) R-60 .625 WT. /. TAPER BOH! 10 .500 WALL SIDE VIEW L DETAI D'ET: L . FRONT VIEW R-60 .500 W1. Pt ]_PIPELINE FROM GREAT 90010E PWEUNE FOR SUPPORT USE CP -1 AND 850 (SEE P.O.I. 510'5. 02-434D AND 0I-4369) mw+MuTPH OOP HAI . PROMO m ▪ ITE OSP IN ME OM MOM MEV PI PCOMI NO MellOomM 0, AADOPN HAWED M Ma ROM MC pOIL ▪ IA 111088 VSEDMO W"'0 EOM• = !MCP COODO 888 1T w UR REFERENCE DRAWINGS NO REVISIONS 81 MOD DATE 87 DATE 4206 PIPING ELEVATION AND DETAILS 4214 PIPEUNE PLAN AND PRCFIIE AWN 040018 7101 PIPE SUPPORTS AND 171B051 BLOCK DETAILS n E01 15 08 8/30/03 3/37/03 013001. u0 30/0/03 ELECT A n P.010 *MO. OWL ISSUED FOR PERMITTING 3E5 AB RH 11/75/03 PROCESS WENT ENCANA 1M PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE 24' RECEIVER PIPING PLAN PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUS7Ries LLC -+COR[P W 101` 8" •oc 11011/011 8-•a MAewRwo. 0MTOT Tama 03013 4205 MOP PRO MAW POO MOW POOP 3/611=1'-O" CAD FILE:4205 10/28/03 L r �GEIYEfl PIG 510. 24''00' RED. TEE(GRATED) (SEE P.D.I. SID. 02-4938) 24' GRATED TEE (SEE P.0.1. S1D. DZ -4938) 9d 0-2000 ASIC IMIZICILQI!IrI CO 0 1 1-6' FOR SUPPORT DETAIL SEE P.0.1. 511 ne m3/•' 0 24 �3/4 _ 0 ASTM �' 600/ ADE FDUNDARON N0. 1 J (SEE DWG. 7101) BLANKING d _epos eg 000 w�© a A. 11 445 GRADE 0 t / 1-60 2000 P510 OF 0 3/4' • 3/4 - O SECTION SONE 3/6' 28' DETAIL DETAIL (1RAN911544 PIECE) TAPER BORE TO .500 WALL X-60 50 WT. 74' PIPELINE _ roe me 011 6009 010 81TeN msournow 24' 2 2100' 24' 5 28':24' 2 3/4', 3'LG. NE10 ELL 0.625 WALL M55 5P-75 WPHY-60, •Y-0' TAN. EACH END tD. WILLIAMS P10- SIG IV w/1HREAD-O-RING NIPPLE MOD 104-7778-0021-51 MELD REO. TEE 24' .625 8.41/10 .500 WALL MSS 58-75 114117-60 (GRATED IN NEW) WELD TEE .625 WALL M55 5P-75 WPHY-60 tGRAIEO IN FIELD) ECCENTRIC MELD REDUCER 28' 750 WALL/24 .625 WALL 8055 5P-]5 WPHY-60 PIPE NIPPLE 5169 A-106 GR. B (100) a 41 3/4' THREE/01E1 600E A-105 24': 3/4' IHREDOLET 600/ A-105 9 10 28-x 3/i IHRE00E1 600/ A-105 2 26'x 1' IHREDDLE1 600/ A-105 11 2 3/4' TEE 6000/ SCREWED A51M A-105 12 3 24': 4 WELDOE0. 510., A-105 13 ME100ET, S10.. A -I05 14 5 3/4"x1/2' 15 16 3 2 INSTRUMENT NEEDLE VALVE 600/ AGM MEA -V55-46 w/V6515-4 (PIA) PIPE NIPPLE 5160 A-106 CR. B (Inc.).. 17 ANSI 600 PLUG VALVE 51D. TRIM REGULAR PATTERN !WE (080A) PLUG HEX HEAD, SOLID STEEL A-105 18 24'o 2' WEIBOLE1 580 A-105 19 2' 20 2 16 ELFNCE CLASS ANSI 60/ MN -R0 590 BORE ASTM A-105 GASKET 50/ RF 1/8146. FLEXITALLIC TYPE CC. 30455 5/8'4 4 I/2'lG. 22 5100 BLOTS ASPM A-193 08.67 W/ 2 HEAVY HEX NUTS A51M A-194 CR. 251 FLANGE CLASS A451 600 NN -00 540 BORE ASTM A-105 23 24 25 48 7/816' GASKET 60/ RE 1/8' 46. REXISALLIC TYPE CG. 304 SS STUD BOLTS 45111-A-193. CR. B] W/2 HEAVY HEX NUTS A519 -A-194 CR. 24 RANGE CLASS ANSI 600 WN -60 .500 WL BORE A5111 A-105 26 27 32 10 1 1/4"e9' 1G. GASKET 60/ RF 1/8` 4K. REXI1ALLIC TWE CO, 304 5S STUD BOLTS ASIM-A-193. GH. 137 15/2 HEAVY HEX NUTS ASTM -A-194 GR. 2N 28 29 30 ANSI 600/ YALE FIG. 500 VERTICAL BLANKING CAP W14 BLEEDING PLUG BLIND FLANGE GLASS 60/ A511A A-105 ANSI 604 RF. BALL VALVE,REC PORT C5. (806097) BLIND FLANGE CLASS ANSI 600 A-694 0-60 24' 32 5 24' 33 24' 34 120 1 7/8,13' LG 35 37 10' 38 i4 1/2' FLANGE CLASS ANSI 600 WN -151 .625 WE A-694 F-60 GASKET 60/ RF 1/8' 46. 010511ALLIC TYPE CG, 304 55 STUD BOLTS A514 -A-193. GR. W W/2 HEAVY HEX NUTS ASTM -A-194 W. 2H PRESSURE GAUGE 1/2' MNPT 0-2000 P51 RANGE GLYCERIN FILLED 4 1/2' DIAL ANSI 60/ R.F. PLUG VALVE C5. STD. TRIM, LEVER OPERATOR FE:FE (860AG) ANSI 60/ R.F. PLUG VALVE C5. STD. TRIM, GEAR OPERATOR 0E2E0 (860AG) 4RE00ET 600) A-105 39 1/Ya 3'LG. 40 24' 24' 42 2 PIPE NIPPLE 5160 A-106 (IBE) ANS 60/ RF 51.0. TRUNNION BAI1 VA ML P01, C 5. 510. 124 W/ACNAIC4 (6604!) XV -1 ANSI 60/ R.F. PLUG VALVE C5. STD. TRIM, GEAR 00064/00 FE:FE (P6040) INSULATING GASKET SET 60/ ANSI ONE PIECE SLEEVE ANO WASHER 43 44 1/2 PLUG HEX MEAD 5011D STEEL A-105 INSULATING CASKET SET 60/ ANSI ME PIECE SLEEVE AND WASHER 45 RAIN CAP 46 47 NW P51 PECO WICK OPENING ENO CLOSURE FOR 00RCNTAL VESSELS 90' 16 ELL. 510., BUTT WELD, 45100 A-234 GR YRB 48 1/2' 49 BALL VALVE 800E THREADED (9804) 4ED0E1 600) A-106 50 52 BALL VALVE BOD/ THREADED (660A) PLUG HEX HEAD 50 -ID STEEL A-105 53 C ANSI 60/ R6 BALI VALE REG PORT (86040) A 40 PIPE 5160. A-106 GR. B 5ML5 10E:POE B C PIPE 510.. A510 A-106 GR. B SML5 (BARE) NOT USED D 25 ] 10 PIPE 0.625 WALL. API 5L X-60 ERW (BARE) PIPE 0.750 WALL API 51 X-65 ERW (BARE) PIPE 0.625 WALL APIA X-60 ERW (005014 BONDED) NOTES, 1. ALL BELOW GRADE PIPING 10 DE PROTECTED W4 APPROPRIATE COADNG MATERIALS. COATING ID EXTEND 10 6' ABOVE GRADE. ABOVE GROUND PNE, VALVES ANO FITTINGS TO BE CLEANED AND OVEN ONE COAT CF PRIMER FOLLOWED BY TWO COATS OF DESERT 1ANENAMEL. M5 DRAW. HAI MDT MTh MAIM MPT RATIO KM Ian 11117/4173 .0 PROEM Dr111.0,011 110 JAZ NY II{ gni NIKO II IN DIPS 1.1110I 50=911111E5400 .1100 1111.1.0.411Z Pr 11( 100SIT JIMCV bt 11111 ROM MO PALL MOT DC VSED ICA MN 0.1E. Bs:vow rued 70 Ott 0.01 NWT 111111OUT untwe wenn CORM IRMO' MCI.0.1.011 MO LIG REFERENCE DRAWINGS 2501 PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM REVISIONS 60 0409 6896 0410 B : DRAWN 4205 PIPING PLAN 7101 PIPE SUPPORTS AND 4R05T BLOCK DETAILS 7102 PIPE 50000015 A n A JE5 0.10 6/26/03 CHECKED 4004 AH 9/27/03 111Nc1 . D 10/26/03 ELECT w65 915105 ISSUED FOR PERMI11INc JCS AB RH 11/25/03 0541 P80CE55 0.561 ENCANA 4 TIRE PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE 24" RECEIVER PIPING ELEVATION AND DETAILS PD! PROJECT DEVELOPMENT /ADUS77I/ES LLC Kµ990610.800° [-6 614.4.50.. a 080 14.50 03013 4206 3/8"=1'-0" CAD FILE:4206 10/28/03 0 q% 4 w 0 0 a 0 o m SCALE (Set S/me) "<58.9124.40-E - 2610.35' (Meas.) CNuron/Tesace NW1/4 NW I/4 O'e'mn/T•+^sv SW 1/4 NW 1/4 set stme� 1 RIGHT-OF-WAY LENGTHS - U.S.A. (B.L.M.) PIPE LENGTH U.S.A. (B.L.M.) - SECTION 12 PIPE LENGTH U.S.A. (B.L.M.) - SECTION 11 PIPE LENGTH U.S.A. (B.L.M.) - SECTION 10 PIPE LENGTH U.S.A. (B.L.M.) - SECTION 5 PIPE LENGTH U.S.A. (B.L.M.) - SECTION 6 PIPE LENGTH U.S.A. (B.L.M.) - SECTION 31 = 4,269.70' = 5,079.25' = 4,449.83' = 5,565.34' = 1,935.10' = 3,359.45' TOTAL PIPE LENGTH ACROSS U.S.A. (B.L.M.) = 24,658.67' 1/4 Comer (Rent) 70 5890443E - 2610.47' (Meos) LEGEND = SECTION CORNERS FOUND P.I. = POINT OF INTERSECTION P.O.S.L. = POINT ON SECTION LINE P.D.P.L. = POINT ON PROPERTY LINE R/W = RIGHT-OF-WAY o = RIGHT-OF-WAY LIMIT STAKE —x— = FENCE PROPERTY LINE Section cans ;T 0 11 (Taal Alum. Cry, LS 19395) 58926'30"W - 2606.01' (Meas.) 2 1/4 Comer %r (2000 Aum. C. L5 19598) (2007 Alum. C. LS 19595) 58926'40"W - 260598' (Meas.) NOTES: 1. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY 'TRI SATE LAID SURVEYING. INC.' 2.CMIRACTOt SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE EOR THE LOCATION OF AL1 UNDERGROUND UTLITES PRIOR To EXCAVATION OR BORING. 3 PIPELINE SHALL HAVE A MIMMUM COVER OF 4-0' FROM TOP OF RPE PIPELINE LOCATION: SECTIONS 10, 11, 12, TBS, R97W, 6th P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2605.46' (Measured) 559'1101"W (Basis of Bearings) 7/4 Cans: 12 (2001 Alum. Cry, 45 19598) O Q^ 11.5.44(13.1.11.)O CO NC AY 1/4 NW 1/4 O co cy co ke co 8 U.S.A. (8.611) SE I/4 NW 1/4 CORNER RE NONE: P.O.P.t. 659+04.04 bears S4J57'29E 1849.91' from the Northwest Corner of Section 10, TBS. R9714; 617, P.M. Section COMM 196+: (set Stone a Rehm) Section Line 588'3059"W - 2605.84' (Meas.) 414 Centerline of Proposed Pipeline Sec. 10 1 U.S.A. (81.11.) NW 1/4 NC Ip '9 U.S.A. (8.111.) NC 1/4 Ne 1/4 y 3'R W O O U.S.A. (8.1.11.) 5E 1/4 NC 7/4 2 41. U.S.A. (8.LY.) sw1/4 me 0/4 2001 Almon. Cop' 45 19595) n g 1/I comer -tea (Roy) Is 588:7059170 - 260584' (Meas.) 1 • `• • cP U.S.A (8 LY.) NW I/4 5701/4 75' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY Section Line 75' WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY 1 CORNER 77E N016. P.O. P. L. 510+7 .35 boors N742476-91 1076.69' from he East 1/4 Corner of Section 12, 785 R9711; 6th P.M (Being o 2000 Alum. Cop, LS 19598). 1/16 Section Line 10117 Section comer. !✓ (1996 Alum. Cap L5235n) • • • CORNER 116 N07E' P.O.P.L. 557+67.39 bears se 1/4 we I/4 58904'21 "W 369.43' from the East 1/4 Corner of Section 11, 785 R970; 6th P.M. U.S.A. (8d7) Sec 11 U.S.A. (8.1.11) U.S.A. (8.1.11.) NE I/4 570 8/4 NW 1/4 5F 1/4 585'56'13"W - 2632.72 (Meas.) Skinrur NE 1/4 SE 1/4 1 U.S.A. (8.1.11.) SW 1/4 NW 1/4 8 A 181.78' US.A. SC 1/4 NW 1/4 b7/4 Section Line 4� U.S.A (8.1.11.) Sw1/4 Ai 1/4 Sec. 12 1 16 Section Line CORNER RE NOTE: P.O.P.L. 568+01.29 bears 573'4908"W 1371.26' from the 133 East 1/4 Corner of Section 11, o (85, R979K 6th P.M. h s„,,„cans !Mg (1996 Alum. Cap) 1/4 Comer 14 (1996 Alum Cap LS 23817) Section Line c 8 11 Cents 1/4 Comer actor 12 (1566 Alum. Cry) COO 1 58556'0S"W - 1615.19' (Meas.) 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN me .r.ml v¢ a 116 town REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS N0. REVISIONS DUO 4616 B7 RAZE 4601 PIPELINE RIOIT-CF-WAY PLAN OESDOPn1N GUMMY A n 819114 MIXED ME 10/6/03 10/6/03 A A MPH° 465m. ENCANA TRE PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN BLM PROPERTY-GARFIELD COUNTY,COLORADO PDI N MEI m en 6w.w O.1 OVA. 03013 4600 WIG IOW ISSUED FOR PERMIT -1M is RH ,rx6 I0/7/03 POINT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC �,,,L.Pro fro M °o' °_" AS NOTED Mrm CAD RIE 4600 10/)/W •Al. WADE iCALL 3- a 0 O O w z _J W 0 a 0 C3 W 03 LLJ 0 0 L.1 7 U Q U r 31 LM) NE ,,4 sE 1/4 Of PROPOSED sr Ti4 ESp61.INE +36.01lin87 (AITA 'co.3fm9 PP•0 on Line 1/4 SKt"-. Lne CORNERAnggSC, End 5T: from 3168.13 T8 section 6' pears N199. �er5 0( e Noft 6thPM. Rii,97W LEGEND - SECTION CORNERS FOUND P.I. - PONT OF NT:RSEC11Pi 6.0.51 - PONT pl SECTION UNE P.0.PA_ - P007 00 PROPERTY LK RM - moN7-0E-WAY RIOT -OP -PAY UNIT Si4%E —.- - FENCE s PROPERTY 1666 PIPELINE LOCATION: SECTIONS 5. 6. TOS, R97W. 61h P.M. AND SECTION 31, T7S. R97W. 6th P.M. CARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO NOTES, I. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY -1R1 STATE LAND SURVFtlNG. ING R. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO EICAVADO OR BORING. 3. PIPELINE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COYER 0f 4.-0. FROM TOP Of PIPE. Lot Section Line Lot 2 6 Sec on ,Sec. Lot vi s°FNP+ comer (set sl 589.04'40E SCALE 261 0 (Meas.) u come Section Line ;1 s1yIJ b 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN 1/4 Corns' — (RA>) 0.11.104 NM NIT OEM 6411.4 woluau..M n 1 6 -MIM ¢ c AFM; 000 n:o`x`�'PI1�:. Belo 'b.°I0006Rx1 REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS NO. REVISIONS BY OKI FSPR 0410 04 TATE 4600 PIPELINE RIGHT -Or -WAY PLAN ITEM DESCRIPTOR GRAYM NEMO A 0E01 10/6/03 10/7/03 ELECT. (16x0 ENCANA NM. 16.1 A 10100 Plc VC .0 w�O;0000 JW5 10/7/03 cuEN1 PROJECT DEYELOPMDVT PIOL(9TRIE6 LLC Da. o6'1K;, 4v, U CAD FILE: 4601 10/7/03 OTIC PDI AA ISSUED FOR PERMITTING RN moan TRE PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE PIPELINE RICHT—OF—WAY PLAN BLM PROPERTY—GARFIELD COUNTY,COLORADO 03013 4601 WENT MUSK AS NOTED /A\ 20:25 AM \ RAC HUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE \4700.dwg, 12/4/20( CAD FILE:4700 12/3/03 j NOTES' P.I. +2«97.69 / IA y, SU 00411 4 INC.. 1. SURVEY *NO ALIGNMENT BY OH OLESTAE( 0 THE 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE ma THE LOCATION Of 2C 45' .31T ELI J/IO .11 4411111/4.. h ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR i0 EXCAVATION OR BORING. / 3 'T 6P 2 \ / Ts TOP or PIPE. 3. PIPELINE SHALL HAW A MINIMUM 003(0 O 4-0' (531 (,a, .o f / , A\8 ¢ I- \ .0 e 4 / 4 t.fOV CATHODIC TEST STATION DETAILS / • $� R% LryCnO Read h P ^ G (SEE DRAM0NGS 6000 Pc 6001) i ) 1 : 4 el7 rock Rood i w/ / /'{�:, e.„,,, u/ peep, j /: - -IT \ $ 8 ptra«ePrl_/_.,, i . / p ea o oo e 6ma \eev 4. 8 r: xORITw,AL . `h,RLAL •/ P.I. 50«C6.2J /•X 8 s 8 i 8 E 8 :LATE \\• • ' $ j N• 4.5' JR RL RCWiREO $ n fM, R ^ \ S i/tib �\ �� y, �.��. \ CLL &WS Of 11.01.4170V5 . $ \� P'v:rvye f/ fl. IflflIOGAM,1110N 21'ItY JR REWIRED E' t.ty a w V 4.F \\ a flewlm, e. eased on me NLS / 0• Y \♦ BNld.n>, AttPY1{ Waled of (a,. J e. . R a, x p , ,, JD2s'I]63'N✓10 end(m9, /mw'AJIY y� / \ Q ,N 0' ar/ 'ie r \ G Q \`^ '• a CROSSING Y STA. 9«22 �, wn (x027 eJ) m. MAW md..ar.., ./ \ Ietr Benchmark tr 3uxo: ad Q• C, PARACHUTE TNG REEK 4 y� $ ° j St =sy `S1[y(`'i - BAN'S 0' &ARMY NOM <I" a O� / i't's 0 STA. 16+7I 4 j £} OVERHEAD T N\\ ea,tr ./ ee>e9, /e rn, xvin me ,/ m. Nw ,A'.(y O QY 0j •G� `� / 4 Section I2, MSryv U$ , O + / �/9.wen CM Pk kA, (SEE CRANING ` 0]30 FOR DETAILS r— ♦ $ E' CROSSING e STA. 16« t --aw • a g ` 8 E` SF h e�� Paid ti P / `� 1 Q' B / h TF E�� UMW we meeNb Q ap,•Y QR, / ♦ 8 •G ,tante A e�,lw.. eI TSRX.R7 el 260645: 45: N. , \ efl OVERHEAD gao`e. 8 op LEGEND oC� CATHODIC PROTEC110N TEST STATION TYPE 1 <t-%'4,/ 40 " P P 0040 SNA 110+66 • w� F °8 8 2ti Existing Reed 0 P.I. s PONT Of H1055000 . 6 O STA 52.00 �N of Pa.v (ins nee 1 Np B/w- Awl-R-wAr ap (SEE NOTE Rt) Vo* ,\ $\ = Eg,.Pq� — DRAINAGE. 4 w — e qQ e; 3 "w,\$ Pence `w , a,$ �♦ / Oa8, \`0'�t6'r ate+ al.! ^f . .0000001 un[ Qv Y• F E W aQ ;S. a (, / S,OFi� r0 p°6. / `i Q�\ $ V\ Q" 00 F� C/ B B / OVERHEAD CNOSSINGO STA ]«65 " \I wx\el h� / • CV @ JO OQeV �L¢OA. 4 �\ 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN / Qq4' ♦ 6YWNxLLYifNY040 Z O 4•; STA&Yrow7-"-w"' /1 7/ 1 1 _ .�\♦ —..\ .��ry 1 Xe i Bern Slli 000 .000 /M \2 0..4 awe m...m / � 2 � 4:1,1) yyO i / /B• oreal ' Come. Bryn Section 2 h4 s) N 4o-m9 Rana , 5.400' 1"., ^ e "2 & n ` a 5 8 ° _ Pliipal wAo'n Precans(ruenm, Ground [ snNL 8 n $; •,.; .€ er R ' 8 5.200' • Al Proposed Pipeline wWNO at-TATM \ n -�_ C L i TT L; •.j ,Y Precon0lrucl/an Ground i p�C� Ar Proposed Ppelne w i it. e�3 \ 5.200' 24" DIA. PIPELINE PROFILE TR OE PIPE 5.000 SVl[ NCM7p11/1 - 1' s 200'-U 20'0 PP[ (N01 1 SCALE ' 60+00 50 00 ' 24 -..1' T.o BO 5, - Ea CO ..n 52 _ Se x� CO _ ..., 278 _ ar nn nh "" •6,C ., 27x, "„ :'a .l" `d a,., oa :, "r a. w " 27 .. "" ;,8 " ,,., - $" w SS ax 72 ..� .n +. - •-• .,n n" RE r" 2 w" �" r, .." 5.000' 50 00 40 00 45 N 44 W 42 00 40 W J6 00 36 CO 34 00 22 W s0 00 2e 00 26 O] 24 W 22 W 70 00 15 00 15 W I4 00 12 00 10400 B W 0+W .«W 2400 0 00 211 1M[ 970 (501) 0000 1440 PSL RANI Panne - 70001 [00170 010921204420 MIML O O VIDE O 11-1 LIE L451WL 4RWN0 2160 I 24' 1 Oi -BITE/t!' '~'} OE P00 41 1101 Pl[S4e6 PPE 0010 .704.:9 11cIA41 1�1 1f'�1EPS,1'°'S1� 2 (SNL NOR 11) I1 2L., DN70 NUJ nil 0y015 U 0 LL _ ag 020014[ 0.01. NIO.[LI 5 0002 0e0. 11712 los 54ot. REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS N0. REVISIONS By cwm .0+0 RAIL By 0000 DILLE naroco onsox uetniw[u� 3`01 PIPING AND INSTRUMENT DID 0.'ECWPnOI COMEDY ONAMI As 15,2>ro2 ENCANA 00.4.01.111 PC Lc rov IT 114C CIAPil HMCO. Mt 2730 soicw PARACHUTE CREEK [ROSSMG AREA Nu 1 A 24.0.0 1.300' KT. LRM PPE AN Y X-66 (MON Op0E0 6.027' J� MOOD Bp to/n,°] 11.1 PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE bat CI Er FE osonwpoos. 6000 CATHODIC PROBLEM 1E50 STATEN DETAILS Kt 5001 CATHODIC PROTECTION HST STATION-DETAILS $1P1N' PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE NIKO Pi IN Mt 10XX Al. news( Funs A n. BIDINGenv GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO onnsto snot MIR. comma a morn axawlxt PC. us AISSVED FOR CONSTRUCTION 15 RN RN Out...Bs Latium bone PDI � _ 03013 " A 4700 uNc A.IssuE0 RA PERMITTING .Es RN RH 11/25/03 Lunt R. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC 0 ;,R„°P,I,M,-___, °`P11pO'' ""a" °'1"' °"'1"= "'aa" A$ NOTED CAD FILE:4700 12/3/03 Cir 0 N CN r O N L J Z Til 0 a LJ D W LJ O 0 E}) S U GAD 0)1E000 12/3/03 3007.E.1.77- - 26711$ (Moot) Section Lim i GA a SI \ _ 11 1) % cap) a. II LI _ Dr JP 9' paard i' IBM 8' 1\n 03400 I cnwR RE 11011: AI CI •5 /% cane:"( ') OP" AArm, Dm) P.I. 66.59.31 24 45 30 (01 r 1 Y4t ynr.OY am 5473 \'M NIReI ITw/ Comer a/ Section 72. \ 9491 1 F PI. 64+0549 2C (5'9( RL 11[0006 I \C10.4f (A \1A leA 8 8 ux..�,\\ g e 2 �. y ani. 5].}ays LL REWIRED• g \4'627 x a 1 S • . y g FF I. M 6'001,' C, CORNER Z ` y Benet' D. t y \ •� eek j' CULVERT CR05)450 EPHEMAREA ERAL 02040400E 0 514 64+50 (SEE PERMITTING DNC. V Ip) a flo0 rvW / \0p 5, Wall. ----".1.1.- - 1. 04311]04:. e.a, 0+4000'0+'[ )O}»B' Few V 28+00 I ' L° O r 8 Ma 9871 I% Lan.- I EaIRt 11 I CATHODIC PROTECTION i .., .._..___.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ CULVERT CROSSING EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE MEA p TEST STATION TYPE 1 ®$Tq. 1p6+]1L (SEE NOTE 4S. / � /w c.Wa.w < /'� 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN oi' � XmIiWIIy k ISflIK/1 SCALE gOry \ R 1� . O t O STA IOSMI (SEE PERMI111NG - SCM[; --- I' • N]'-0' e0s .[' / LEGEND CV / Dr,G. 42(0) Ep R. \ tiP03•I Bu /7303.03 04,.f // / , ICROSSING L. 40373x22 .E R/W-SYCiIM RIGHT -OE -WAY 1 / `?4'3��! \ e 8 e, 8 e O.ryD. _ c _ 0 Y V/ 7. o 8 5\, , 8 8 o\ - 1 or..,r n \ e._._ n y ._. rocs 1' e). , 8� 8 8 8 8 Ltl PwaR DRAINA�N( 8 D / _ LRn IwE _.,s,:.�Y. 4'07�• _ _ _ _ ,O, BNB lne - •• _ /1 /I6 see' !' ./ NOTE:. \:t;;i0: c^1°73 ATION msPMYY RA .r_dm P+lNW TRACTOR BE SIBLE OR DIE OF -0.1('0*(u E n AREA e1151, ]97f'I147 REQUIRED 3. PIPELINE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF a'-0• FROM Y• 0071 N •• y R ^0+n' /} 0 SIA, 99193 (SEE PERMITTING 0 IOW 83) 74 m! (mP IMW])»' 00* 0,47 83) Pe AA", M dewlm el 9 This BnWno75 a SI)10: TOP M PIPE. 4. FOR [444+004[ )ESI STATION DETAILS Ae 878 0 (w/wet Tran PASS. x RARER, E09; BB D°R-e SBb oe 6.4d g ^ w !mm P.4 P.1. le DMC. 4]40)6001) BA525 p 3'40+403 x011: (SCF 01140+04[5 6000 & so m Pem9. p., pee/ by PV R.P<'I OeM' Znl V "Ink". 11C I Asim PS s40. W Oleo P008 Ine.e le.luee In .Ao.n (7 0 ore net SlelAnM .136 0 0 P.OPL f09e04. r0+ Rmoed Oe 3ery. PV9ne , e .iB.e, l0+ WOE Rg1,-W-Rby N (/( 1 B/e6 ./ pmn7e R Mff 8749 80 ./ Ibe NN Ik% a/Srelb ). IBR R9M' (/b P.Y. 0+,l, ea oWa P.tl/m129 SABO. le is 3891/bl'N 0 mnvd ay, .xe a/�%OS 116' �+, M11 0 50 y. 5,200• y1 yy i- 7 n �q1 _ l ^ O e' Y 5, '_ vC< ° ' n S R N.{ NEM ROIM Ron P.01Lba87.601e P.(.bONMbn bone on plmelm woindualnrxby Projelanal �jy� Bean BORA., [IC for 'M Penance 1 i.0 C, 04 5,E) P91111076110'. ° e C i It ° -. n y € w 1 g C" 1 Precmrlru<lion Ground "' GROUND (LFV1n0V- n C F G 5.200' Pieconslruclion Ground g AI Proposed 14' Pipeline " c . y y ^' Al Proposed P4' Ppeline + e 5.x00' 24" DIA. PIPELINE PROFILE .......• 5.000• iN Cl P0E ]fi tw.e.l 24 0,1 mI scN[ Numm+m H ___ IIVL I• _ 1' app._ aW_p• . M' L,.larl _ 01 _ TO SGu( _ ., .273 F. :, - so .0 .01+ ux n n sR x52 .0 QR nn ^X5 .,2 ^ .., 21 .2., o., 1:1 „ .4d rn 75,.2 6 111 2 7311 :.„ 5000' 120+0 "sew 116 W 114+07 117 00 110400 100400 106400 ICH W 102 CO 100.00 96 00 05 00 w OB 92 00 90+00 M 00 06 00 64 M 62 00 60+00 70 00 76100 )4 W 72 00 70400 68 CO 66 CO 64 00 62 00 60+00 71440 a Ng rz Not) P00 00003 P715970 - DEm11AGlq 0000+ 008(0 000081 a04 O O ILI B I.N Ca1gLIE4 (051168 GROUND 2160 RN. PSC o 0 n o X 0 1151 PROM PR 0010 N "'-14t+� - (SU 44010 W F ' /4) \ y p U O Z O O cr O u. DRAINS .5 NOT CON, REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS N0TS REVISIONS BY 040 APPA DATE 0Y OAK 7111 rase. NI RATNER WS xsol PIPING MO) INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM DEM DESCRIPTION707745 0044+7300 pond) AS N/11/o] ENC ey• PIE �w""xA NYM (740 EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE AREA CROSSINGS A NOD •,SW IYI. ERN PPE 015. x -6p (BVD1 Win 6.067 A CHECKED 844 11/u/m TM PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE lini 4o xiL r x cc Mx.m.xc 6000 CATHODIC PROTECTOR TEST STATION DOMLS NECK N. a nic 6001 CAINCO1 PROTECTOR 1054 514004 0[10405 /V STRUC1 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE ONES PuRPOSC cot 111.910 /� P cr,filt PIPING GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO OMR. 6901 0+.L ox,Bw L u< ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION S5 RH RH I ONO. .Nc.......60.soL< PD1.II °01° �03013M1 ft 1 : lermsni ISSUED PCR PERMIIPN0 ,ES Rn RH 11/25/03 pSil 0+t. 5S coon PROJECT DEVELOPM N L'A °;1 °°°-°' 0 E T INDUSTR/ES LLC - „A„4,��, 0.8 ^04 0303). y"2 wu"° Kw. AS NOTED 0 /V GAD 0)1E000 12/3/03 .28:26 AM RACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE\4702.dwg, 12/4/201 / aae\ Nty \\ CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION TYPE 1 0 STA. /'/ <P / \ e... \ \\ iYO6 $ 90]ROEu 160+00 (SEE NOTE /4) ./// ...P\♦ v°Y0.i1. 11 )991.]9 le fr� 2P flCCNR[0 D _ ♦\ \ P,6P.L 50999.36 the Rap°sed ja \ Pwaanule 1° Oe Beene POnne ler. drnn me LOOT rNe N Rgs•ilhil 4 CULVERT CROSSING ♦ CULVERT CROSSNG EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA `7 EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE \\ EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE P P.I. 1]Hs295 - $ EPN[MERAL DRAINAGE AREA \ AREA /B O STA Is4aeo #7 STA.1 y D O STAG IA'L9+97'6 \\ CROSSING 120+11 24' 24' 45' 3R CLL REWIRED 6 ! - —_ /B 5( STA. 16HBs \ (SEE PCRNN040 DWG. 4740) ( SEE PER�MITTTING DWG. 4740) (SEE PERMIiiING DWG. 4]40) \ `�' (SEE PERMITTING il D (SEE PERa10)G N DWG. 4740) G. ///'/ F/ _ =�4\ osed anon � Pend.Ndy v +@l ±/ 7$;,Z7 0 STA. P 8 �8—�8\9 / ♦ rc • �e s I V i 5x99. 8 8 8 em 8 \<, _Ci FORHL NE N191.ns 6 \ eCl—� CONT. 87q 180f00� lP P II A R _ _ d \ Fw CO n \ SEE DWG ' _\ _ 4103 ful.erl \ ! �caAno 0000 / nlxelle N Intl Band "a \ D a CUrtrl � ti If AIL o..e-E m.•cP -�L°2 / / e SIA �30 /..., O\ T(0M( 140463 _ NIx:mN m min Band \ D / ,..x16•.6 D I LN le e / 0,1 - ne °vd y BASS P' [I[x1MW5 (0,0 (•clan. [inn P.OSL arm\\ d.J O Oen,„,, ve b., ar one n5Y 30060 la P.I. SOJ. JL.9 an band SS 'iP; Bn[rmvx saaml IxpIW at lot v, ym°rin CbleeN nan pro,,,, V P �^In9 // J9Svze5'Nym WO 101, IWwv>)r e096s Rnpel D. m1 ! _ d, / "k Werl 40 Hf me MAW M Raman al &tit ole /v m. . temee \ � 4 0910: Been 8000.. meet 0100 ve Ween \ \\..0 ,[ / eY% LEGEND Y/' BASS (Y P[MNLT NO2 Brian and e. 01 SI°l100 D Y°/ P"° /cddd° P.I. • P0017 Er MERYC1ILX `j/ B°e9 a/ owns+ tr Ine ft.., Ine e/ Ine „ \ .D pq I/I al Scum L T84 R9lN, 81n GM"NM 24" / i RM- 111011-01-VAT DIA. PIPELINE PLAN EL•ELETA MO ry ,llWm en 0000 PWl/mn9 5°1x,1• \ qb. / 16/11T1(1003 le Ma 5191/101'00 a meevea \Pin \ t. 0000 al 20646: \1e \ \y.•\mow \'',5 NOTES, r _. _ ORNIMAGI nine MPOWERfl LM ROILTIAL A VERTICAL SCALE PROP ERIT UNE \ I. SURVEY MD ALIGNMENT BY '101 STATE LANG SURVEYING, MG•. UNLESS N01E0 OTHERWISE. 2. CONTRACTOR SMALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 136E LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND U111111E5 PRIOR i0 EXCAVAnIXI OR BORING. 3. PIPELINE SHALL MAV[ A MINIMUM COVER G[ 4'-0' FROM TOP 0E PIPE. 4. FOR CATHODIC TEST STATION DETAILS (SEE DRAMNGS 6000 ex 6001) frI 9 • R• 5 30C 1 TALH SE, P • a ( 00000 (FvI1.n011 4 ' g, *07* '•300' B. rc d2 - o Y°IO ue Prerontr.Lrlim (Joan e u 2 � Al Picppsed b• PiPel"n ^e 01. Rm. POSL J6. B>6d 1. Ps .36..69Je a eased m nrx m 5 n000 a/ 0001 nw imp ° VIMIS InMeows R 8 Pwe R 5,100' �— g e 2 G R lItCine - • a u•r ICP or RPE 24'6 AK (x01 ID SCALE 24" DIA. __ PIPELINE PROFILE 1900 - sCLLE MOR:C11I0. +0*0 - f 200-D µ 1 • ]W 0 9oD' I 1n " .E n nn nn nn n., r nn nn nn _ nn PI • nn en nr °e 6n nn :.:, `a n;1 •,,, „;,, :.: n Ern , _• _ og S: «m 'oR PaR a: Rs A. _ R .1„ , 8R _ 8 nn �A AS de .§R pa RR R�, 1U $,� RR SR $R - RS 8 p 160+00 1)a OD 1]6100 174900 172700 1)6+00 163+00 166+00 16410 002*00 160+00 Ise 00 156 00 IN 00 150 00 650+60 140 00 146+00 144 00 142 W 140x00 IY 00 034 W IN M 132.00 IMOD I2arm 126 00 124+00 022+0 120 00 24'6 LINE 961 (NW.) - x YKP 0440 820 0(901 P00591# 5 0090.1 FACTOR m '09d OWED EOAINL „n 2100 68. PS6 1[n M[0AN[ 0. yfIr,_ 4-1 ti PFII _ TaIa i IO' .10' .gx O O . 4• EU mt D IO EYsnxL ORpMO PPE DATA �Z•w N CYC 1roR `*I1 111 [• IQ 1- I 0 OI U $ R IO 0; 0 .6 00'-0' •a1 0.625 0-60 PIPE a .0 5' I O n ILL ma MAINK REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS NO REVISIONS 6e DIR0 0800 DATE 6. DA rt IDLE NM 0•01 NIG 2501 %%0G MGR ITER IIESIA1011M COANnrr f\ p1AM xs 11n/OS ENCANA t,e 0.11iINIA/CO IN II( 1110 0+1 [PRIMERµ OR MCA CR055MGS 09 4400 A 24'0 D • .bJ• W.I. ERR W[ IA % 2-W IOXN B}IDEO 5,964 ORE ED Rx 11/10/0 m PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE Tuttor 6000 BUN CA,4COG PR0IEC11p11[SI TAOEINLS 6 OD 74• •.625. 001. ERM PR 4 5 0-60, F09CN 606[0 50 t\ 140-1` cc TH. CEIRIRLICIPT, WON.% STRYCI PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE NAMED IN Nit Tau BMX 6001 CA30 C 60011011P1 1[5T STA 11p1 0(IAAS n 900[0. awl ROI PC 16E0 res, No AnnNc GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO wait, R PROW °Lx`nn'p1 K. LC /B\ 155000 0064 CON51AUC110N t5 RN RH m0[6S PDI1 6,p6., lx,1i60-011311° 4702 e/A�155UED FOR PERMITTING ,E5 RH RH 60/25/03 a12M1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC `,"Pr',,'�°,_s• 80 nos °AXI"1 Fne`" ^6"'m""A ""'L" A$ NOTED CAD PM1E:4702 12/4/03 8:24:32 AM Sa, \\re .yd, / e. rr4 /.� 9447 /_�' // \\fir f/ wB EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA \� / f \�'. a 4. •f-i.r'b 0o 2^v 24 CA /19\ O STA. 354+] (EE PERMIT NG DWG. DWG. 4]40 •CROSSING • EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE AREA 018 O STA. 344+9044. / \ / 4 �. / �•�G� 'wSy / e _ AD31 SEE DWG. 47401NG • • • 45 / `\\ / I-Lu 18 8 g S a �. EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE /'E ^`Dz g CO us I Fs. F e o CROSSING AREA 17 O STA. 020+2 4 0 0 N' ''47'X• 'l 0.m `! n r 9'7R w.5A05' bah Mr q s $ JO I p \ 5 ; q 8 8 `\ cwlgan Of ny nq / ar+H• ayr_er.wr / x 4 (SEE PERMIT NC DWG. 4740 5 F sa.mwn cane of sw� la �,. \\ xlm¢onlu a Icxncu scut • Co 3LLi ^ a / 558 8 8 \ 8 / d R/ 8 8(>'6 \\\N4- CAMODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION TYPE I • \' IT ^ _ 8 \ • OS \\• 8 J. O STA. 350+00 (SEE NOTE 14) • \\\ FORE N 8 8 8\\\ 9-ai Nw+-ave n \ 8lox rr4. .u9.6i • CtNM1'EI/IK NO2: \(" \\ / GM.sI I Nm 159.99.Ae•m -1,- f•• / II ImN X 40+0343710 If}e'' hen ma / r I/' . me ar serve, 13 / B°0 a (Reap e M Nana Fa) \ 4 / sP SP F' 6.3 / 4f 0 2 s. I �p r ' NOTES: \`\\ ` / 3 CQ• yo V a. eSb, /1 pA0 I. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY •1Rl STATE LAND SURVEYING. INC.', \\ Ir/ •Hp fbr _ UNLESS NOTED OMERM59.• 5f/ ra• 'P'a� 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE 900 114E LOCATION OF ` l Ie I� / / ALL UNDERGROUND Ur1LIRES PR10R TO EXCAVATOR OR 008140.• / 91 a. / • 3. PIPEUNE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 4'-0- FROM/ A b / TOP OF PIPE. / / 4. FOR CAMODIC TEST STATION DETAILS• • / / (SEE DRAWINGS 6000 & 6001) \\.O / NOTE. F BANS. OF EZIVI / rnrwtr., nr„ Ran i •.2220` 2.6 barssu s ort based on Me o lat. it/ / 4, 36157.60 la Al 2,0,40 pe band / J1275''l65' Nora. ',Jelin, g9 S0,+4 y5 / y !m [O)aad Nan Gaaapn \\\ 9 4zam.,by Pm/ \\ 24" DIA, PIPELINE PLAN *it (nAo 00)00. NAwma..,l.e, of S S,' LEGEND d lmO'...q.v...1 UP NNW.. xAtE: ___ I•. 2p]'_D' m;,S eCAR4sI1Ja: [� P teths xe.a, e,e r. car ser / e • Bosh Fptln e. These fear r. Mon / alas [e B(Aag.+1402 V 0 /P.I. PORI or enursEenoe PM; -• MGMr-O -WAY PC Anrt i \\ Bosh2 // s"+''&935 n/w 500 vane 1404 ^ 4, / ELEVATION wN 5.400' Fn. 0.0.4.1. 1174PS.79 la / •4 ldw non 0000 Pow'fmap bald/M1 EA / _ - RMCC �� 4.44.1. x,*s.Lm me Propos.' / Antnetio n la One m111,0.w a,nw,r.e 9 / - MNxAG[ / /apyl 400',. n dlnF a r/ \ /inane• of 260SW:COO g NO2 5,200 jF8{ ry ry I PII�[ [IEVA le NI 50.1058.18 i, yy FASTING ¢ mom DRUM Q Grecm#rvcM» 0. M,q w FRlmm0.alm by Reject 0,,e, cent ,✓rn l[ i Al..'s, C 2 ran Wk.*. 0icmn 5,300' 5.000 __---_-111%I-_--I-------I--_-II-�-_-----I_-_----_--I-----II---------_--_ a s o 050 Al Proposed PgNne n ti eau. PleOht R 5.000' flI fl I„ 24" DIA PIPELINE PROFILE 4.BOo' xuE: FoRigncAui__ s6 .DD sm.GD 555.00 SSA.W ssz.ao 4,e0D 30 sm.lro 300.00 344.03 342 00 >w.GD sm+Lo 5364.00 334 00 33 4.0r) sSD.Do ne.DD s26.00 sz«Do 32 DO sm.aD sew 314 DO 31 00 »D.Do SmNOD 3LeADO sa..Do xz.oD 300 00 22e Lx[ 921 Nou.) WI 1430 096 EC901 PRESSURE Mpx FACTOR 1x2 FUSON SOWED MATTE V I �' n WCI , 1• W, 1 1 POSTING MOM 2160 ION P94 O o p 3 RSI M154M PPE DAM \I^p w W'u�xy pyo, I w ~I" Y1f'+"- S (SEE NO N) N 2. D 4 sfi 0' PI DOM 2-60 PIPE1 I� A I IW O MIS NM KDI w"u REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS . 0 REVISIONS ST 00(0 APPD DATE e. DATE 'TRE nava 2501 vp'HC AND 1x5TNMExr MIAMI ITER DESLAWn51 aM'nrc O4AFN A'0 N/I4/05 4x40 EPAEufgµ �NNACE AREA CROSSINGS A z4•ao . i9• nr LRw ME M x 0-60, il9q &HLm 5.9N' p[C([D RN Nn1/w ENCANA. PARACHUTE en/ moo< Rex, Renner 6000 CAMIXMC PRO1001ON RST STATION DUNES II 21'00. • .625' wL 089 RPE AA 5L 0-60 NMN 0042(0 56' XLCN IN TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE �N rim 6001 cnmaolc PROTECTOR RST 500004 DETAILS 00001 ELECT. PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE °"°"n""�vs, on :';xIA"4M" PIPING GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Nm"w,fi61"me,,,,„,.„,p^a ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION £5 RH RX w _ PDI `"6"m• �'a+4ao AM 0403013rocu 00 w 5 ... MIMED FOR PERMNTNG i5 RH RH 11/25/03 PRO CESS CUNT iu . (,WI ae x11 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC 00110504 x,000, 470a. ace eve.... AS NOTED 1 ",' .,:=,,,. CAO nlc 4705 12/4/03 8:05:42 AM /4/0] eF(ytivl, Jp Cost Barre Iv/h[ `/ `• f. / SI 4. CATHODIC PROTECTION ` 'r r/ �� '' '/+ "�% �'� S r'l cp Bf TEST STAl10N TYPE I 0 STA. 403+00• (SEE NOTE ,y4) / / / EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA 021 O STA 766+86 EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA /20 0 STA.365+59 / / / / 1 <swgex o; q rv(7 Pyo-o (SEE PERMIiONG DWG. 4740) (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4740) T O; ^30.8 0 8 B 8 8 8 8 8 `�8 8 8 B i 8 18 8 8 8 8 '' .— 4 8N 'o✓ " R " " 8 B 8 8 B\ mw xy 8 8 i / Iz� �r—• i 0 / ms njn 6 00 l 6- / QQ, EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA wr // IO. se, / CORNEA FIE NOW / *Ca LLD • qq 22 O STA 397+16 (SEE PERMIiTNG DWG. 4740) i AL J➢/a6A]/ ar+r N / P tr / 'Pe n� / x,nr}JY 2.109.0' from m, P / / �p o/s..rx, .lA Ce C i �� INP //mli°3801. sy / —W 1.2n L; / v / W Sy ‘-e / ttNMx le NOM17) Ce N. N P. J50.99.19 bean Yy / Na0'eFJ]T 1192.64' Fen Mt / Mgt Ido conn a/ x,vMm J3 aes '' ,/ / no 4, / Ml o7. m➢leo *00 SO rrm, aaxL non P.oe. (. 40.97.29 to ,➢ �8sj / Ma`6' 60 lo Ft 50!4506 an Desq P.0.P.L x09.➢Ala la, Rgo,q / / NOTES: \`` ..: o;m. mtomq from ao.AN PmmAutt le Be B.we Ppeet eN�"nPk,1 ,s,, mr /q, welch me 0001 / // 1. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY 'MI STAR LAND SURVEYING, INC.'. Most, ,. c ,v- IA. eek.„„. Pian„ gy,1_o/_I,el / nSe UNLESS NOTED DTHERMSE. Bost, PgNi.•, me,e rgrv., m No.n V C / I e,. Old cm not 50000. / 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ME LOCATION OF • 90 1,2' / ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVAIION OR BORING. BA95 4,p BE HC5 x02 BARS OF EZE➢Anays / " 0- i ].PIPELINE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 9'_0• FROM•\• ,m o/ Deargr 4 the poem a e/ me NW BClervotions ay 60.1.1 en mNmmA "'PM] Nm1vIN el lP! TOP C6 PIPE. \• //4J Seclil 1, lbx Mea _ m hen pMr/ Posithe p 50011. a J➢]5Yr63 Meth m/ Em9 1001141117' `/ 47 4. FOR CATHODIC TEST STATION DEIFIES m.Pllon to ear 5.9971 'N v,,,A++q x381 0x40 AM Ge NAro el ✓°vIM or e / (SEE DRAW NGS 6000 k 6001) ,Imr, a 260146: this B°ntlmo+ v 512.10:: / \ \ / ` \• / / //LEGEND / / e/ I. - ipxl M INTERSECTION / Ste^+ / 8/W- R1011-4F-WAY a• °" • / 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN ,04,,,•. i S 5,400' Coloratlo Rizer 4i / _ 00440+ • '' �l \ ® —..—. 8000845 UNE / HORIZONTAL Y'MOM SCALE P. R F 5.900' 5,700' 8. eA Precanstvct,on Ground 63 1 {@ NiiP E A�°Iw° CACN2 ELLv1/S.T 0 R Th p, At Proposed Pq elmr me 00x5 nen P.a Sa. Jsreea0 m 0 \ P[HEOaYne{e' OeNimmbnlelm ea,tnes /M d p_ A uc me Miens m„ 8 BmF Pp."' @ 40 1 C 5,000 100 M NPF ___ _ __. _ 5.000' ere PIPE 24' DIA PIPELINE PROFILE ------ — 4,800' 0x]12 m scN[ SCAIF: xCR12Wru Kfln[4 --- f - I - ]N' X40' ' 0' 420+00 R8 Sn 416400 a "n .�2 416 G8 00 88 82 o% R se RR gR 86 Oe .,., 88 SR e... - 9� e.n -•e 0 �,� eO n" 8,� ee .,n �_ RR - Fs r8 Fn „"„ 4,P ns os e•R ;,;, __ e8 __ 8s n S8 88 Ro RR $R A8 oR .." v RR 4,a` n" 'K 22 RS nn '8 88 RE 28 2R RY RR " ^^ 0 4,800' CO4144412+00 410 DO 400+00 466+03 404+00 ,02+0 4Ma00 300400 796407 394400 392.M 190+0 38840 264+00 384400 992400 360400 278+0 276+00 3744,00 67x00 172+30 X8400 M6 W 4. M4.0 M240 360+00 24° TWE 9S ANA/ YAW 1440 P90 0E906 640035E - 00906 FACTOR PAN BOOM W"1N0 ON I 2060 YM, P90 et IQ3, 0 ! Le N I SOI I EYsnxc 680x0 Q �e IE51 PRESSURE PE wu P x02 (SEE ) I 1 f' N y \ .r OI PE 01 IO OI I6 L O 1 u4s AAA. ws Poor mo, REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS NO REVISIONS 8 4,«0 F+D IM 6. DA2 n L 7501 PIPw6ANO00954+110ACAAN IRC DEVERIP11M CU MY/\ OR .Ym ,A9 HM/0 n>tF AAA A •I 4740 EPxDIE RAL p2NHAa Al1FA (ADs9xCs A N OG. 2.500' 141. pW Pff lA Y 1-fi0. MS M IMO 6.013' 4,0400 RN 11/17/01 ENC ANA nr PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE K.,. rtw0 q 6000 CAIIAFIC PRO 011 1 RST Sall 300M5 /L ' \ YECx PIPELINE mo Av .an so 6004 CA WC PRO CR 851 5140TH DFINl5 mxr EIECr. PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 9441DM 94 MED TM MY ODER 4.04 04 4144•94:0 MT 1394m MG non nA PIM GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO OPRES94 anew Pram Cr nWc, onaoa A 6+006 n w LA ED FOR egislNuenON Fs RN Rx u0 1,. PD1 - AAA,.mot ;,::, Am n 03013 MAW R w4706 ./A\ ISSUED FOR RERMMTIN0 ss Rx RN 1/25/03 Pnn ROMS a291 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC 1 :,°Pjleje4^m0 Ytm 4,`"1 w..rla °'°" °"'^°'",,.," AS NOTED h: /4/0] ''ARACHUIE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE\4707.dwg, 12/4/ CAD FILE:4707 12/4/03 ,Zea /r Icy ''''''.'44. .par m. ` / S/ \ P 6'r _ tv x'•,1, / f t� C "' �;,4 °•� t dP EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING 420/3921 et '•si 4 i 4.9. V LP PC 'V (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4]40) %p�p6 O P / �'a' ' 51k 45bW4 /• ,..'SN -.45k/ \ P. Oaa3135 14 45X30 RI 6' 'Gam. / " n EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING 421+10 4 Q, t'6 �x� x�x EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA /28 / �' 3 / .'. Wy''a�. (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4740 4ti•/' _ _ .c000 • / �pOP 0 STA 463+23 (SEE PERMITTING pWG. 4740 / / EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSINGAREA 927 EPHEMERAL DRAINAGEit26. CROSSING AREA 4, / %� / I m / nm"'s,Ia mama\\ _g_� �x�_ (SEE PERMITTING 526 9D Q / P.1. .)6.6289 / Ryn_e/-Z �l n x `�—z DWG. 4740 g (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4740 / / 8 I0o g 24' 45' 36 EL. P 8 o z x—n x x _ KOZO 8 6 R�—n \� 8 8 /' 2 $\ �. 6 • i i 8 8 8 8 v I mm / ' • COMM IM m727 I'`.a / ,-, m-rgi • •› Mt 463.0534 nm 05nw277 / .�°^^ �rwn L'�1 10225. Can l6a Lest 0/4 ` / BA95 O'(1[YI IKWS / o•- TIN Comer a/'Srcl" !1 !R3 MAK / Deminas aur Ms& m Ina 005 6M P.M (benD a ]MI Alm / x A'01L' / BmNmvs Kral/ located N [al. Cm/' / 3P ]5I}6S'Atrin MO' lm. IC6W']>n' D / wn oon 00 ma N5ro 66 mane' al / This Boman.* b a/uD' `• 84515 o'er G, NOM 7, EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE y CROSSING AREA 2$ S STA 434011 (SEE PERMITTING OWG. 4)40j P.I. .I}6r/0.556awi / / 593MI%IY 154255' nem / fry` . wmnN e/ s na. 5 Po} 0 0 / m / ryM I, / Gr n NOTES: / ease a emDID, b ;MILm. In o,../ In. MW � ` / / ol /3 Maim 12. IBS RDYN. 6M P.Y. Mice / I. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY '1x1 STATE LAND SURVEYING. INC.., / m Ion peM par'Imig saw",ry4 RD 2' / �• UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE./ mo le Der 569v'01Ma measured ryY Than P.¢0BL 11.0 3 l / 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FTHE LOCATION OF / Manor s/ 56010! + { v.¢v,c 5p➢r9AJs am FOR / ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION 00 BORING. / ' Pnw.vla la Da 200 PeNnt / t /a4 arinn Ina (W/ / J. PIPEUNE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER or 4'-0' FROM LEGEND TOP OF PIPE. / vPC 4. FOR CATHODIC TEST STATION p[tAILS / iA et Ppxi 00 m2NYcnd (SEE DRAY4NGS 6000 & 6001) / 0•? '. • xo2. / R/11• Pldl-p-WAc / 1aY e/ AN Glingf •#ram P..SL / tt•E'fl"nd 5301).60 le P.1 50054.8 am basal LENGE O / - P p /rmel;m Lava/ Ren ovary / -- DRAINAGE p o 0 `-z?..,. / Com/ Fd,4ie, BY PnIKl M al nl—..—aPPGP(AIY LNE ea Be,A PyYma masse wan / ,q i 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN V `E`These 5.600' nsOow r. ,near SP4E: - - I. •••_0. j4 Minn and m no/ 51ol;mad / MDTId tLL 4 .[PIIGL SCALE Y H 5,600' B 8 a1 1 a NOM 5.400' 5.200' �?C!"000 a o Preconefrucfion Ground ¢ 9 .g 1 b1 E Ina Prv3• !mm Rail_ 36*37.60 IN 77 wo 50355a35/1 Lasa m mamma, xilN by vroatl Cerel�nl Ba�lria+LC PRaexa PVafi+a. • ( GROUND EIEv/S.1nI0v AI Prep Ned' C T 9 o G G :Ggl s,Dpo' 7 TCP r on 5,000' E 24" DIA. PIPELINE PROFILE NDT To SCALL SCALE: Ndilxd AL -- I • :'EF__R g' n A8r, m gB K 28 - aRR 2 ^ ._30 � a, g _ ^ ' a a..Sa T. .8 a a8 e R2200G0'--v n n 3R._e . _.. co nAR m 418 cc 22 0.9 g ee Ry nil l'„ a a ,$' m 22 ” S:a R4BD.Do 4800' R 0' 4 400 • +00 • 4007 .xx.Do 40400 w .w 44003.Do0440) .6240D wP.oD 45040 456100 454403 452.00 450440 444400 44-6•00 444+00 40400 440.00 36.00 43e.DD 0400 02400 430400 4213403 42640 44400 41240 62040 40 24.4 IME 9S (000..) MOP I440 PBG [f PRESSUREPRESSUREs9 - 000 0901 0004 F W Fact/ MOM 0101 MALpW 0+000 IE5T PRESSUREe. C o 10'4 O 3 I mI e . 24 816' 4' 13 Ensnxc waxD 0 oaL °"T" w4TLIBLI— I`- ale+ F /SCE NOTE N) CO �: U• CC LLa ( • 0 F 0 •L, ID .O •LL I REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS NO. REVISIONS BY 0«D MOD DATE BY DAre onomm e7 maw, 2501 RPING AND INSTRUMENT DIAGRAM ITEM SCRIP ON oumnrrA DRAM JES H/I7/0 ENC TITLE et MC alai NMIal N01 4740 EPxEu6R.0 DRAINAGE AREA c9Dmxcs A Xa6 ..500. T. ER PPE AT x v-sD, lumx ECHO 5.937 Aem. Dump Rx "/v/aa ANA 1M PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE 6000 CAM03:0 p401000000 TEST SEASON DEEMS n MEGA>bA�wUT. me .o.roiota0 6001 5i sTA015 CADMIC 000110604 TIDII 0(1 smuGT PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 9011 NOT a USD FM Ma non no. Ac RECT. GARF ELD COUNTY, COLORADO 04005 pg pm 0550 �R'I V NST. ...on IND. 70 ISSUED 000 CONSTRUCTION 55 RN RH CIVILPDI NMa N,uo nK. 0,........ mp WMw W189 py o TUC ,./A\ ISSUED FOR P[RMIt1ING ,E$ RN RH II/75/03 PRESSRot�IN`swn woo PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC T NI m. cA>'OhvlyaMR twat lvroz071aaml AS NOTED /O\ CAD FILE:4707 12/4/03 ARACHUib 1U UL bEQUE PIPELINE\4708.dwg, 12/4/2( CAO FILE:4708 12/4/03 x M I/r6 5.[(m (nr NLdn� srlIken m IS - - -NE 1 / 4- 0009 Num Lm ES - min) .E I . sklim R Sec' 6I M' N 1/4- L U.S.A. (B. Y.f .¢ I% (b. n NOTES, - 1. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY .TRI STATE LANA SURVEYING. INC.-, § - A1,As 1�^ I O UNLESS OMERM$E NOTED. EOUA POM ,/'e g EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR TRE LOCAIION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UnusES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION W BORING U.S.A.£(B.LKJ V.S.A. AlBack SIOti&92 IIP SA (A CROSSING AREA // 29 i /IF- S( 4./I NM I I ]. PIPCLINF SHALL HAK p MINIMUM COYER p' f-0• FROM / 915 9f SM 1/4 NE 1/4 CI P.I.Mead 511+44.9! 66{' 4C p 'R O STA, aBJ+15 (SDWGE4740NG f c a o9 W ,W 5 W 9 /,8 WSW I50+FOR Cn0+5. TEST SrAnON DETAILS EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE 041'. 'g ,151'x44 3 M . BI4K (SEE DRA'MNGS 6000 8 6DOI eo11 4 EPHEMERAL CROSSING AREA y}} R /r=.Z j EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA 135 Mating DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA /34 O STA, 523+27 O STA 512+59 (SEEPERMITTING S£ 1/4. NE 9/4 ^ L1A°' MI B _9�A $ HE I �i q COo STA. 535+36 (SEE PERMIT NG L (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4740 PA OAP 510966.11 PI MEAD 511.14.95 >✓ c Y _ �O b $, / I W Dwc. 4740 a 1. PO' N EU § A C {F 1 F fQW RG E/ •. MUD/ ITE NOM O U.S.A. (BLN.) or {F < ! Z 8 8 g s s 8 a r n' n = _ N At/PI $ § n 54 24' 45'6 57ELL 9.0 472/6500 bears t4 IS.79.06' bon the /r$ foal wI/I L>ner of R[lim I] 5 6 n � $ RFWMEp SM 1/4 Nx 1/4 4- S i n .• ,Ge.Lir [I or 8 8 .4.^M 1108 $ '6' 5100 VALVE p^I. m. wmy°016 ul io•n-her 4.r C 24' 45' 36 '/ iS j , n 8 nE-N1y 6p G{iA 5 +W} ^r xron-O'-'Or 0Am0I0 940150TON 54. RICO REO •o • YW SII N•4.+• W (( �t.9,l 0+,I R EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA 132 \ Lina e" •amu%w• TEST STATION LYRE I o STA. SOSatO INSTALL NST WTSIDE $ Nd'Io 5' $� Arole NE 4./I SMI I / 21-:1 jZ • SO rm.. sl lid, : 301.42 ro slay a 509011 Int Propos•° P amoln Lit CO STA 509+93 (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4740 Y ti " •{P' EDGE OF CONCRETE PA➢. (SFE x01( P) $cm° 7017.. 119.1(11 N PAP*. De he mr 1 .he.nlai o'01 •3450. nENBrz, -4111111 no I lan P6/ni wiliPrebend cum eKnl-e-Moircwnw re. LL SI'rl'r6r nape nen MtI Lnle 9/4159"6/x114.1112 m.t m"_��EPHEMERAL "v..n DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA 1/r stela. Lint En!r Sec. 12 s.clio./vr�d 0/30 0 STA 499+40 44550061990+5 \ ` ` 2 1�u�xn!9119911, ea9/ (SEE WCE 4740 NG I B.,.4,+. ens boxed ��. BenMg* ARTl4 !925'265' Merin m Me NOS 7 407+6 a let m6( 10900})>T \ l. 000(0 60 ruler 1/ Lmt. N' R' b ELL RLWMFO • NE 9/4 SE 9/4. ort_ L 1/06 snlid• (roe SM 1 4 / Al Ea99QP Enron Age P,9Sc 99.99 (3480 e5} Me 34419 00 ee•el n of 0966 74,,N, Bab Lien, curl EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE I 754060 to P.I. SOJr31N pe Dosed Mix Mahn°* en bmela mra•ed row., t>9m➢. a 51210: LEGEND P.I. 50!956,36 CROSSING AREA y}1 ProeroPded 4,m/to,/ ..1.0,4.111 e.ys n sox cs NOT(. v.L - POINT Cr 1xTEASEcna n O 55A, 503+22 (SEE PERMITTING R R I 4+77 I nee Lie Pc Ine ee+ro Both a ed497 The,...... mete 97177 Be °INN er the Mdu me eel u. me R/9 - RICHT-Or-NAT EL ELEVATOR AG DWG. 4740(Al 1 9 (� 7 on:, !/r a Soarer. 4.•m• Ove Not sl°ImM i. Wen Corn poke von'wlnel of 216046, 2 2S not bis PI( /NAB P°sbmFE 5°INn'te $OD11ror ". nns,ndr - - - PENCE _.__`�N"ALE 24" w Rnu 7 DIA. PIPELINE PLAN 6 6 SSW' 1! f E E PreconsfucnM 9 Ground 9 a .. A 1 a A AI Proposed Pp7/ # 40•000 lmm P.a SC Y.eA60 ro C ,. 50!.5133 Is boxed en 43611°lvr 5.40' Pr A . ., EiE {¢ r 5050 q Praire! B i nPP➢[I[ e o d e c « e § \ „�I§ d ; F'. s an oaww EtLvnnm- Mon SOs89 v �E tor the ,wa„t PNm.e. 8. 5.200'- . 4 $ =n �- 41',,,,,, Ro jc 5.200' TOP OF PPE i4'e PIPE (PDT r 901¢ �- __� 5,000' 5.000' 24" D A. PIPELINE PROFILE 4,800' oli n` SCALE ORIIEN0A1 -- 1' - W -O• 4,800' e' ^ nn do _ _ • nn t.`�^n _ n.^. n 11.11 F«111111^„ n. 99..11 _ 4. ti Rp n nn nn try .•n nn nx "RT 99.11 __ n^ -•., 11+1 C uR £" 2•r, n FN ,de.°• :.:, n:• R' 2•:11 n .',.R .•:• :✓: CM +r_ ^-,a^, - _n •_ __ ^d : « .,.i n: _1f_ __ , n nr :,.E• :nr ^ .:.;• �n E, r, nn n 5050 11'11 n�n ny .11.11 :.-n Fn' __51 �, :1151 5N9CO 530+00 536+00 534900 531900 550+00 526+00 529+0+ 524+00 522+00 510+00 519+00 516+03 514+00 510 W 500+00 506+09 304+01 502+00 500+00 490 00 496+00 49 900 493+00 490+00 488+0 456+90 464+00 469.00 00+0 24TI IIx 9S (MGLI N 7+04'44+ 9360 0[901 97ES9M • 5(104 980000 �N S8}X 1.900 �pE0 041944 vox 901. 694 81PRE59AC r,in al d4. �.6.e a . WI n 0 Iv ti k 5051210`0800+111400 0018 �a i ~4.m" yl�"•'�' LU (SEE ROTE I 00 14) N \ OI O . g4. 11-: 1 ti �O U 12 0 1 Ho ppm REFERENCE ORA GS MATERIALS 340. REVISIONS 9r am APPO wrz 9. 0Arz 1111.6 ul m� „ PIPING AVO IxsniWFNr MAG9Av NEv OF859951 OU OR Am J[3 11/1t/O5 (3408348 L0¢avntpm. as Lia 4740 4740 ECHE ER pIMIACE AREA CR GS A 2LOD...SW' RS ERw NDE MI 1-6q 109DI DED 5,975' ^ aE0(m w« n/17ro5 TM PARACHUTE TO DE SEQUE PIPELINE o-Mm6nnnatcEN t 6000 GA DIC PRO CII W05x15081144 CEPALS A EPL kom 60I CA P802COW 1501 x181100 DEruLs SO MLI, PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE 01369l'+o)Tl+ N s GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO INC 50. 010 _ 11 m PRLI7 6166 rw6Doti Mgw4807' /81‘155/50 FOR CONS1RULnpN RH 901 p 9 60 ^"00 OM PDI 03013 PE. 0686 _ /A�ISSVED FOR PERMITnNG .05 IES RH RH RH 11/25/0! 0 fl0215 OAR 0 7.04 20, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC P -94i, xl..'"w.' :_.. 6 616 tint -ml 1 49.9. O6` 4708 mut AS NOTED CAO FILE:4708 12/4/03 NTV6F rlr NO)S: I r 1+111 Section Corm l / EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE PA 605171.36 Oma S767IYYT7158 79e 19' Pen he 10”I/4 NOTES, BASIS a' ll(VAINYIS 0001 ADmI. 6�, is Imo) SW 1/4 NW !/i GROSSING AREA 136 -1 Coiner el Seats II (9eh9 a 1641 A4nhun Lm 15193➢9 1. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY 'MI STATE LAND SURVEYING, INC T.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION OF fre2llm¢ ore based m lee NCS . 3mWnM' Mo,00LE lxelM of lel. 39730265' Myth and Lens 160740' !Y y ^ 2. SI ,f c O $TA $41 FB6 (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4040) O(t III ZI5 U.S.A. (NT! UNDERGROUND ALL UNDERGROUND ROTTING. MIN PRIOR TO EXCAVATION ONO Te NAK, we a.or. it .0 ,J U.S.A. (B.L K) d 8 ', $ I. s T SW / 1 NM / f • (/ / / 0 01 J. PIPELINE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER Q I'- 60 0-FROA lee Bnem,na tr n350: SE 1/4 NE 1/4 -� R E x 8 W mm .5, TOP OF PIPE. BASS Cr 6164645 NO!(' g q a q n m-4 i „ 4. 000 CATHODIC TEST 51A110N DETAILS (SEE ORAINNCS 6000 & 6001) BSS W O.nn9 tree NW e m O e. Mx An (NIh9 halve¢ Plea P.am. N I/4 of Senor I]. Te; MOW gm PAC 'nth 331Ne, 6O ,e PL 303153,1 ne eaaH l.Fn Fen 211 Poilmh9 6444 oo.. 70 mme,m CtllahM Fm pomea -. +476+Opt, l0 Dm S99)Ibl'W a meowed ^ •f by MY NeKI MMgx,ml ✓vinn of X0546: halal. 0C M lee MAana Pierntt Best POL iN.. lona. Prolong ars Mom MS CPI ape nal Stere, n k1 "v $ n n A 1 ((/♦ F x Gl % g III Section (Fr—Sec. i g 13.10. I'L-C. I pg 'tie' I J 12. 5/ Swlb.lhe Sec .F 11• Dj p. W b I PQnre N4if poo -die \ a U.S.A. (B.LM) { i " • \ ^a 1111] \ 1/I Conn: I (I%6 Macho" CNN I .� �Op•P/ O P. FP O / �� 9~lD�' EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE{ CRO SNn AREA (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4740) S NW I/4 S£ I/4 { R I f4 .� S 1 I I ,i.).6...41, I Y^GGO • a I $ EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE E h°6 N£ 1/4 SW I/4 c e'eg CROSSING AREA pp37 1 LEGEND F5T OQ, / I 8 i (SEETPERMITTII G DWG. 4740) I P.I. - Paxl OF xrzx¢cTrw it6/rI- won -DF -MA. i U.S.A. (B.LN,)pn R O'� SIA p1 NW 1/4 SW 1/f LA1H000 PROTECTION 1 I I [xtt �✓ p^e P.t 5891)28) If 9D' JR [LL REOUWEU TEST SIAIION 100E 1 1 STA 567164 (SEE NOTE /4) a SKINNER N£ !/4 SE 1/I u'$ = = 700 5 6RM[RR DX[ I 8 o Ps 1 ^g. 8A 8 "6 1 $ 2411 DIA. PIPELINE PLAN 5,600' --_ —SW I/4— ' $ S \raw r . $CA{[: ___ 1 1/1.6500° the SE 14— / r. 200'-0' i I/I6 s arM� the i I SW 1/4_ _ _ 5.600' (°^ as R 5.400 a. - ^ R 9A • •R C x a 'j A W c y F" C R ? 0 G ry IW 9N( LLL VA�igi DRDuxo ELYWIM k ; g • m, wen. rmn PAS!. J6.eR60 m RA 503154b IS OOM el hlmmalyn nM,rm, l<C In. PR+n 6 BmW PNhe a yl ee di...ono fe { . .E S . e 5,400' —1 7 " e c Preco„1rNeNo, Ground B M t AI Proposed Pgedne • a 1 R R 8� - 53W' )Ca OF APE I4'1 IP[ - (HOT 0 WALL 5.000 5,000' 24" DIA. PIPELINE PROFILE 562L1: HCRIICHIu ___ 1 L„WRII[H 1 - i0_0. I^„NI�-0 4.1300' __ em.+ . e. / a., ' -t" 1� n / n.. o /., 4 R.� „5� .^,a /.-1 ^^ el.,l X: /^,� n . u. ', �� 22 ../4._ 14 a1Nnn ^^ a S r Sp..,' J . a n-^ A^n a' 22 8b nry /1.1 .^�^n ""�^• e.n .xR " .'i'X .^�... el.. ry" 2, r.. •4„.'". ."1^" r„ .^.R „„ ..., rcry e.l stn +^ oe • x n„ n., • nry .0.1 nn r.ry on. el.,l "ry .., 600400 5WPM 596^00 595000 591164 590400 59e1W 536003 664400 56}400 5864 DS 5)5100 576100 5)4^0] 5)} 00 570400 56e.00 55640] 564400 $61.00 %D40D • 555.2 156400 SSL000 552400 SSMOD 618 00 546400 51110D 5,12.00 540 CO 2e. IN[ FII MOLT 0056 I440 P90 LOCH 40(53PE 00504 TM106 IVSXN BPIX0 000T0W 2160 941. PRF 105170555M0 01 Y• I 0 • WI In •o I 0 0055015 GROUND• Pi[ DATA { 21 I 1~ 1 1,- 02 2I (SIE NOTE 74) \ • U' cc LL! 2 O A 1Er O ILL REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS NO REVISIONS e. 01%0 APPD Derz 5Y 0 TE ENCANA 14 �( au PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1501 PIPING AND I051RLWEXT 0 AGRAM '100 0(500 104 OIAHnni A dUMI FS 11/1)/0] n40 ((+000R/1 DR./NAGE AREA CROSSINGS A 24.05,50' 0c ERR PPE IA x 460. NSW &TDFO 6.036' 0+0 LO R'1 "/'e/o] Lcm 6000 CAINCOC P00110104 1E51 S10700 UEiM5 /\ CLRan 621 cAlHaoc PRorzcnav nsl s%nw DEIAaz /\ CIC _ vnxc . wy once m mmMb1lpsl. e'O 040 mslx .. e..wo Ic PD! D"� hot Iwl tx-5125 w1 Dsn 03013 Pw a .OR A 4709^ ^.4441 Livi I ISSUED 706 CONSTRUCTION 15 RH RH w PH OCE CLAW Mw wne[e °^I' 5.01•00..... AS NOTED p .AISSVED FOR PERMITTING ss RH RH N/26/0 et °S PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC „'e'ah' n1.=.� CAD FILL 470912/4/03 53:29 AM RACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE \471O.dwg, 12/4/200 \ , 13$1" A 7{T\s L 5' / / NOTES, BARS OF 01(6000005 le NONOM • '\ 19696) , 5 i 0 1 ' /A 6 Sal1. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY 'TRI STATE LAND S1RVE11NG, INC.' (hnlwu or• talo m /o. nos - AA [ih/np !a/res lien P,0.ie §q N Ax"' w % / 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPWSIBIE FOR INE LOCATION OF BmNnat NllPS((L (xola 3 ; r (e( 33457.60 00 P., 50215100 se based 392342.65• Nm3 one lona oso42vr 03 a,o Se. aere:'.d Fen o-e.xp. QC' West NOD BJ) Ilse NAM b •Presto• e/ moped 6y Reed OeMymnl San✓' e rni, enwnaA is slxrp: N‘0440,44 .. 104 0‘• iwl w SIN.. (B yµ� I O PI. 632+66.37 Z4 REQUIRED Ll p\ 1 EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING T 631+12.141 ("(.h ALL VHDERGF OU UTILITIES P0100 10 EXCAVATION OR BORING. / J. TIP or 1PALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 4'-0' FROM / TOP or PIP[. Heave OP ere net SleOga U 5 A' H6 6A95 d-m'AAwGs NOM HT1 \ 4 PERMITTINGEPHEMERAL DWG. 4]40) DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA #40 OR CATHODIC TEST STATIONDETAILS (SEE DRAWINGS 6000 & 6001) ‘ SeC \ 8 h el OeriNa h Mt PM The et 10• NW >j e/ SPY." 02, AK Rnm PA NM .nit \ 0 S g :/ / 0 STA. 625+48 (SEE PERMIT]rvC Dwc. a]4D 1\ § PAN bon 0010 Pesilknirp SNOW �• rvlimc le hear 58970326'4 o mearvne \ *00sn606.02001451 K 5'3 '211 \ `d 8 4 ` 4 N\ ` e / /8 8'1007 n / n D 5.'' 41111 G\\ \ f /4 / �eN 8 I 5' CORNER V( NOM P650[O 4 c' .srOS:p t / [� t/A I. \ { a (6 f -_ ; / ...3 14 PA 505974.!6 two,. NOW IT / \ cnlan. er 4cpo.ro 00.03• ann 3. @.r 0/ conn e/ \ / 8 49.9. 0444-./-n/ A§ �. 530003 II. \ Inr \ ` EOUA RON: `6$ / / ^I iP \ a B 8 : 6.000. •1 \ U51/A P. Bock 649+98.69 / P.I. Ahead 650+16) g` d 8 2 1 6 \� \ 8 i \\ H // / EPHEMERALDRAINAGE = A.` \ 11 8 • '\ it d /•e"'b 9. / b"� AGLAREA 9B (SEE PERMITTING D G. 4]40) y 2 a d �n \ , 8 �; ec. \ I- 4 n ` / 8 8 8 � ¢ S a \ C• ROSSINGLAREAR 44E 0 STA. 651+23 / �,, / / \ 55 1 A 6 \ CROSSINCLAREAINp39 0 STA 614+49 n $ ? \ 8 `IN�0 `t /0 P \ (SEE PERMITTING DWG, 4740 - 8 CATHODIC TEST PROTECTION \ (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4]40 'v' g O' 8 4. / L aa[ $ yM \ ae'a` / / $ 1/A STATION 0 STA, (SEE 640+57 NOTE itPE 1 54) / n INNZ \ IV'[e 04. Op E{ OS.A. 4H�D e e' /4 43144 / 3231 \ 6 / 4 QO.8 8 8\ / / Q 0 W I-a�y..�^ e 8 \ A/ / 1S EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA /'43 O STA. 646+74 . (S DWEE G. 40040 NG IOLII QS �2�` \ \ on, U O 1/l 6, T,7 /A.4 \\ ( i'596) A. 85* f/A /k& 1Y � 1/4 JY „Tr, =0' 4/ ¢O' �N 1� \ ¢�I /\ P.I. 656+36.66 24'REWIRED 45' 3R LL y. VSA IB 1( \ �� `* \ SeC LEGEND 4LLi / / \ 561/ 24" DIA PIPELINE PLAN PAM: POINT INTERSECTION 0 / swD / __ '0 e 49 r . 200'-a \ RBLs / wT4e��/A \ LLLv4nw IT'l / (,'Rn' ( 1"' �\ CORNER IN MI(. _ _ u & VERTICAL fir*[ DRa / / SX NI 6564!0.88 1712.15' ban el Seerm 10 (83.00 6eni SJT45.50'W UN Pelf 0/4 even a RMB) \ a Nom . Ila LNL 5,600' 6 ? 4? 06{)Dir R g { ' ,, 1 1 8 Atecmposed P Woe A/ Proposed Pip line 8 . - `� ^ T. profs I' rem SOS. 00.6160 s P.l 03.,3+30 33 eme.,x1amenn 7e. ne,erri e> aIw Taxea,.r (0 I • e '6 p i. 1 x S,6W wWxp RFae5.1�P`41 _ L y n n4 Bmn $24" 5.400•---- ��I�`n�iiiiiiiiiiiiii DIA. PIPELINE PROFI PROFILE111111 ...._ a Ha 200-V5.200 n x: x33 . ....:; n ; -. 660400 655 00 656 00 651400 652400 64600 64640 644.0 642.40 640+00 638403 636400 634400 632400 630.00 626 00 626+00 624400 622+00 62040 610400 6(6400 614+00 612+W 6104-00 606400 606+00 604400 60403 600100 24'4 LM 9S (00601 nK+1440 PSC ttXY PM(SM - IX9T' FACTOR 000004 63000 004144 2160 681 PSW 46194054.3 P. • 3I IV O: W [%'51004 LPWMO O y^ 3nwu UJ yI W (500 NOTE 11) ly IllI- O. Ii O Ui•cc U LLT I2cc • O An itamao au 01 Kti$ Amino en AmE4 044 CT intt Kea Slat DI �uw0 '1 ::w 346 600OMR IR ST mato aeuOr", w. 46c REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS N0. REVISIONS DY 000 APR DATE 64 DATE ENCANA 100 TITLE PARACHUTE TO DE SEGUE PIPELINE PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 2501 PANG MV MSTRUME01 DIAGRAM ITEM DESORPTION WAN111Y ^ ORM 16 I1/I6/0] 04(30 80 n/IB/m 4740 EPx06(691 ORuxA¢AnEA 00055005 A 24'04- 5w' 160 CRw Px.w SL x -6q 00504 BONDED 6.042' /� "c0L 6000 0+1NWIC 600rzc1KK11[Sl su11GN 001Ms smucT 6001 OHMIC 60010011GN rzs SIAlx2l DETAILS n Max PDI x.a..W..% 0- 1600 �N 06:60. IND 0a_xv 03013 Ap ., A 00 4710 N avg. �ISSUEO TOR CCHSTRUCTION .15 RH RH P,660 0 1 w3+ u °""' wawa "'^e" AS NOTED D ISSUED POR PERMITTING ..CS RH RH 11/25/03 [01(x0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC 1",,,1,'.;47,-.1,a'00,n„ CAD PDC 4710 12/4/03 0:01:32 AM 8492 Of ELWARWS Ossetian, ue bend on In. /FS Bm emo. NRPSEIL locator of Lot J975426W Norle and long 1604}27r sent (NAD 81). Me NA10 88 .Nn)a' or Inn B6Nmet b 51210: 8.493 Of WMYN65 N01[' \ Bo+'', 0. 00609, he m. NoO le, of m. MW I/ �f Woke 12 RPM RPCO PY..w4A r n ben Opted 0000/tn9 SoM6(. m,motiv: to 6.a S807I0 W. mw,wa4 oytmo. 0/ 260216: • • 8 8 8 M' Cnirn9 ea sem !row 0..014 M♦ti160 to P.L WPM a. &Nei �.bmorm Mto:.d from O'o.Np P,6 uc4f"roa 664+0, 0N.m,. Boon PpNws,, m... stun: m mom wm Once 6 m not5termq • \ Irb'. /5 LEGEND P.I. . P061 OF MIE 100104 AM • mat -OP -647 R - ELEYAIIOI 3 sec• A Sea 10 ee 5,200 Omer lie Holt EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA .447 O STA. 718+20 (SEDWG. 4740 NG Pi 720♦61.58 beers 6254109'/ Cowerlerrom 4, 1/4 / / / 8 8 THODIC PR01EC11DN TEST. STATION TYPE 1 0 57A. 693+00 (SEE NOTE /4) 06 d) 6 e4 EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA ■46 0 STA. 698+75 (SEEDWG. 4740)NC 8 IA \ 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN NOTES 1. 511RVEY AN0 ALIGNMENT BY '1R1 STATE LAND 506005100. INC 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 16+0 LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND U1LITES PRIOR TO EXCAVATON OR 606640. 3. PIPELINE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 41-0' FROM 1O OF PIPE. 4. FOR CATHODIC TEST STATION DETAILS (SEE ORARNC5 6000 & 6001) EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA ,E 45 0 STA.668+74 (SEE PRMITIJNG DWG. 4740) 8 g 8 Se/ Pre 1r6 / LTi • 9� 8100 ♦ 0 =gym 1mw ' O' / / I*' / o / Ing / 8 F 3 PiIXMO ELEY,nM 1 Preconswclicn Geond Al Proposed Piper e 1 S 24' DIA. P PEL NE PROFILE • • 720400 400 co 71 00 710 Oa 08+00 CO 704 00 703 00 700 OD 69 DO 9 00 GM CO eaa 00 664+00 692+00 600+00 670+00 76+00 67 OD 6 00 7 +00 64 400 660+00 664+00 062422) 0400 ISAOP 1440 PRO UDE SZE 1110112 DEs01 PRESSURE 071 14 I cc 1 Pa How AO BOOED T160 ioni. ig I CC LI - mom TEST PRESSLIn PPE 110.10 1,10 ORAWC 14•5 0101 HIM PACS. WI 6611011 PIM tr INC a•04111.41:0 NC MC Malin lablIDOIRCE CV 1,6 MOW+ NANO 01 The Mil MOS NC (MCI PURPOSE NIT OtP4A osn 11111.00 TOW CC+0.061010 REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS NO. REVISIONS es 010 CATE BY DATE 2501 PINK AND INSTRUMENT DIACRAM COMPTON .07 11/19/03 4740 EPHEMERAL ORMNACE AREA CROVINICS API 7-60. FIBORBORDED 6.0311 6000 CATHOOIC PROTECTION TEST STAIION DETAILS 6001 CATHODIC Pli0100111:14 TEST STKRON DETAILS PM 01/19/03 ENCANA 6. nTLE PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO CIOL PDI LAVEIVCO. 0.9•00 6070 03013 4 711 AISSUEI) FOR PERMITTING 1.14 MI) .116-000 WENT in/ DIJOStIl 0 NAHA AS NOTED 7.7 /6\ ,55000 FOR consntucnon XS RH loCCESS Piet OM 116•113 LCAD FILE: 4711 WA/ 3 i 0:06:44 AM I NOTES: BAssmaErnncws �s.aeM Sane( JJ .21 U.S.A.(II LIE) 1. SURVEY ANO ALIGNMENT BY STATE LAND SURVEYING, INC.' eronl:+n+ yr Seerd w MI lets BmwneAxIXPY4 fantod of Nal ls.e slm.l Tr 36' //I NM //I ¢ AI C [iAPNC9 IIC X02 ONl 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 040 LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR BORING. 3. PIPELINE SI II HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 4'-0• FROM Oor PIPE. 4. FOR CA11100IC0 TEST STATION DETAILS J9i5''4245'POOP !, mO tong IW9h2A' W+r MAD 04 In° HAW Se emotion We emthe,N a SaJO'. 07 NOM 9495 Or &ARAMS NOM +� v./, IOµ J&05 Sean 2 0/4 9'F e, IIJ1 JJ'f5.+' I I/I O L./ y a ly)J Cann a S°e/m 5 (Ben •V er. • Ge+, Coo /`PQ4/ I y Wile U.S.A (B.LM.) (SEE DflAMHGS 6000 & 6001) C+Til^9 M1alurr+ /mm P.0$L Boers o/ e: u Mr Nvf6 61e o/ I6° NW J6+0/.60 to MI 50J.SIb ox band )m/r a seats IJ. A$ n9M. 616 P.Y. °6.N. y Salgado hat µ Oy P0.' MOM pMtPmeel+ edser,oliem le µa 56971tne a measured ac m. F1e nnvn+Pimm Bonn 0'Yn°. Mose Frahm m thorn ealmn Of 2605K: Neem e m not sm(mN _ ,� / /Y ., 1 O0,.' 1 8 ffi R 2 - R (i i ; 40,;P (( ; / I 8 C xN1 A, HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL SCALE 1 RR aw+•��7 8 / . EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA 351 00 STA. 757+00 (5E0 PERMITTING DWG. 4740) 1 F '` S 8 AI t Came 514 ( opei0es nal 1 6 S'ec. CC "5- 10 Lay {{ 1 a {F EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE 6.,"...y\\ '0 8666 rna \�\ 6 666 8 8 8 8 8 \ 8 8 a a I/ . s.aem m. CROSSING AREA p49 O SIA. 126+1 2 I M n' 6 g • ^ 8 8 8• e a 8 a • R n [ R x TI4� R: e „ ^8 ^ 8 (SEE PERMITTING DWG. Q4p -Sec. 4—. 4 •� n . - . -- 8 / B. \�8 n .. ^\ 8 1 1 EPHEMERAL DRAIN/AGE Vv. NMI-eI-nF t U.S.A.(B.LYI a ysl CROSSING CAMODIO PROTECTION TEST STATION LIVE 1 d R. ^ I . 1 � 1 8 tt NE 4/I SII 2/I R i OAP./ Are (SEE PERMITTING DWG. 4740) 1 U.S.A. (ELM)E®STA. Al+30 \Ton n,... 0 8 / 1 N£ r/4 S£ I/4 (SEE NOTE /4) B, 0 MI r/4 SE 1/I 1 n CAPM+onreraco - /'1�v 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN NM I/4 SII /4 EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA 348 o STA. 724+3 ( 8 tiPQ ^d/y 1 gQ bvl SCAB: --_ 1 260-0 DWGE 47I60))NG �0S, seta. vmm !`I9 LEGEND G'�'O� ls.' srm4 \ P` + POINT Or IxTERYC 404 coo+a et P is I /aPO 1 R R • RCVAIpN X,o P.A non", 6m my. 42IT 4 — • FENCE 25?44' nern Om 5w 100' I CManvNTexoco FENEAOC Comm a/SmrwrA 5,800' --• —..-- DROPflin LNE N£ I/4 SM I/4 5.600' 5.600' A Tr • {3. yg 8 d j _ R^ 8 5p 6 5.600' 5.4(10' CR A g RC ^ 8 Rc ' Rc I0 Pw(°'E(3,`,i.r.; e CAWxp RFvn 6092 1. _ a ,r 87 P,c Precaosr,cu6n Ground We A! Proposed Pipeline a \ ao �c n 'o e 1." x g: y $ mm `2 1"y kc IE 5.400' _ - - - - - /CP PPE 24" DIA. PIPELINE PROFILE 5,200' 24 , PIPE (NOT 10CIIF 5 50310: HORIZONTAL - - 1T • 203'-0 VERPCN - - 1' • 201•_U' 5,200' m ^ em $a as �Rcz em " ^ m a5 as m a a , as �: . as %F a m ah - YA ma n 9a as as a^ n^ • ., mm _ as og lex S^q le ^q^ m$ YB lea ^ m. „" ^^ xR „ ni 8 ax „ lea ma ma as ^^ "A as as e8 " as as 760400 776+03 776+60 774+00 772+00 770+00 706+00 766+60 744+00 762+00 760 W 700+00 706+0* 754+00 752+00 7.50400 740 00 746+00 744 00 742 00 140+60 736400 734+03 734400 732+00 720+60 724+00 726000 714+00 722400 720400 24', VI( SIZE KO YNA I440 P50 R9p PRAMS - 00101 FACTOR /11901I 600E0 COMM 2160 MN. PSC TEST PRISM 02 V' 01 3 oe 1°3 1.111 Epsnxc c6Wxp a Q W PPE DATA LU y N My �Illil �e 1 (SEE NOM 94) \ i UI IO cc LLT Er • °LL Onacruottec. ac ra or PUPA° MUT moo NE 114E 13.041.011) X 114tN, laMNIDIMa IT DIE AMITY 9011.10t IC IPLID ro, or OM IIMOSE Na 0.0i Oath'A rwa'm¢mpR..0'Ms REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS Ivo REVISIONS 6. ONO ,PPD 0,10 6. 6+16 ENC ANA TM memo. MC. se °"m gen PDI um.�vp•u-H]) FNOJECT OFVELOPA3ENT INDI1STfllES LLC nwy.''°',1 meso PARACHUTE GARFIELD X03013 TI1LE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE COUNTY, COLORADO mA . .-.., 4712 2501 WOG MD INSTRUMENT 04:932 1106 CESCIAPPM WANIItt DRAM Nµ9/0J 474o EPHEMERAL MANAGE MEA CROSSINGS A 24'oD...soo• w.1. wed Pa Aril-ao, Rlvox eon9Eo 6.017' /tr RH 11/16/05 C 6000WO GMWIC PROMO -MI 1[51 S1AlIGN DETAILS^ :Hoer.PIPELINE 6001 CATHOLICPROMOTION 205051AOEN DETALs pip," NNm L �ISSl1E0 FOR CWSIRU[TGN JES RH RH PRO? pp1 y"1C ""' A$ NOTED p ISSUED FDR PERMITTING XS RH RH 11/25/03 euENT - CAD RLE: 4702 12/4/ 3 CAD FILL 471312/4/03 \ M P.I. 836+9548 24' 45' 3R ELL BAST OF (I(VIBLWS / V \ O=\ `0 V 994. 4. ' 5 \ REWIRED 8 4 447. B4./..'+ o1 NKPS(({ lw°A/d el lvl. J933'aI65'xwm env IMpID.)T LEGEND M / , x ? < C)( e Mal (NAp elf IM M' p al tlaglrin °/ p,l. PW11 L( XIERSLCnCx ' \ Cy -{\ RS Qr 8 Mb BntAne. v 5I210: �l-1 V S \ S' \\ D'. 8195 [Y B(APMGS NOM A RTW, -Li -WAY ) / \V ' •`\ \ J yA S / \ RR. X0.4 / % e'I LILv1nMilik V If \ l)\ S Bmv s/bwnpa a the xv/n 0...., mi NY P O.Pl •• PpNI W PROPERTY WEnIY UNE /'I \ \ N xp `� / /+a of Soapy IA Mt ROTC filo P.m .md, t B P.D.SL • PON, CM SECTION LNE \ 0`0.l� �' e R , /an non ams Paul 10,n9 SOW* /- • 1EM<L / J4 \ DY. % `�� / mr.rolens le beer 589,118 a mnamd y A `J -,_ D b / __�__ / JiNmn wxOSae: \ \,� _..�•pp0PRT 101E M n CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION TYPE 1 0STA. 780+50 (SEE NOTE H) '•0 • , 97.4 PO 6'. y=( QO\• (�� DU • P01101 POLE / \ i� 4+V wr \ Oj rr Cl . 00000 UNE 1101x007/1® 44. \ -! / MOM \ \\ 8/ `\ `�� p' / P.I. ]81+]8.05 2/' 45' 3R ELL REWIRED 8 Nm a JS Ns . • 0. AP (aiali,9l eluna l m P.e SL QI \ \ \, ^\ 1 \ J6.01.60 M ;m°'a o3.e ire, we Ma 9 •v) \5 EauAnoN I , �\ \ ha rinn Ont IAa Wiens o, maa 9• '� V perywed by R'Ncl Da../A^Tnl ��i� \y\5 \\ \ / PP nee !Am helnaa shown / B7. M. a ars n°I SlekbeJ ix \ \ / ` \ 4 \] P.I. Beck > IVJ9 l5 ) i \G 'D,a P./. Ahead 90s5I.0 , V� I J \� \ \ / / 0o bl. C "Yt y Z, V \ \ ;\ PaaYYV \ // 0 \ �~ e I \ < 5 \ \ /Y \ I \ / \\'24 \ \ \ UNDERGROUND PIPELINE CROSSING AND CATHODIC PROTECTION i5T STATION TYPE 4 O STA. 019+69 (SEE NOTE H) .11 i' \i At) Ilii` /_ 'y\ rwe4.5•24.4„, `\ V Y 4 / {f' \\ l`r 0 �aJ \ \42 2, -J / \ r_� (1 ( \' \P >i" \ S DI [v el \ 00.4�/ (� `♦ J. A `\\ \\ ', fit`tP 1 \ Y \ \ / \ �) x / \ \ \ , a m i�� s l + \ \ \ �A / tl4r \ Do \ v `\ 1 P.1. 791+39.15 P.I. 790+5205 24' 45' 3R ELL REQUIRED \ �, I/ 5 \ a g / , '• / . S'4 \\ \ 8 RWwMa P+w .'• ee S 8� / / �i \ \I 5 \‘'' \ J4! / \ \ J' ` /g I -•o -.e9 8 �bj YYY $ t � / / ,moo ��` \ ,�{G itF `� �\ 1 \ / \ \ G°,�0° 'r \ __gat._ dd. y�/ \ Ja' •')\ EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING 799+8652 (SEE PERMITTING •\/ J� )' qE� £� a}' 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN e \ �) \•EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE `6/ DWG. 4740) GA scM£: __. (• 1000' r -J�4\ \ \ �/ \ _ �\ b -.J \ / \ \ CROSSING AREA 553 ® STA 802+85 (SDWOERMIp)NG b/ .0+ ] 010040 511011 GRIMMELEN0TTmKSN r, Y Preconsbucfrcn Ground 1 AI Proposed Pipeline N 1 {y G NOTES: 1. SURVEY AND AUGNMENI BY -TRI STATE LAND SURVEYING, INC' 2. CONTRACTOR SNALL BE RESPONSIBLE 104 001 L0CA110N OF All UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR BORING. 3. PIPELINE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF 4'-O' FROM .TOP OF PIPE. 4. FOR 041X0010 TEST STATION DETAILS/ 5.400 boe (SEE DRAWINGS 6000 & 6001) 5 ' p w; 8' ° e 5,400' TOP OF PIPE / --- as ,aaa a� , (.'a ME p8 8a (NOT p so i)/ ° c 0 Q c ^ 5,200' _ -� I{ 6 G __ -,� 24"DIA. PIPELINE PROFILE ��_ 5,200' 5,000' Io SONE HCM][N1AL I Xp-0 _ -/� _ do 3 m 5.000' m a 000+00 1gg- nx o ee n, .1 �' I. . RnS n .. w n.Pl w ^S e ff+' nE ^ n e P. a n :s :� �n d Y: n ..., _ , - . w W�, .�.� en Gh �R Ro ., n .6 e ^ R^ nn '^ en nn Hry ..., wry ..7 nn .,a SW ., ryry „ .'�R en ., w n., .,. �e 22 - 22 __ ne ^ .e n • ��qp ^^ r� aw . P A^ nn :ti It x �a __ 050+00 000.00 11+.00 032+00 noon 67 W 026+00 024+00 622+00 620+0 Ole 00 010.03 014 W 013.00 010.00 000.00 006.00 004+00 002.0 I 000.00 796+W 796+00 04 00 792.00 760.03 705+00 704.00 70..03 762.0 780400 40 WT sr (No.) VAMP .00+90 0E9p PAE545Q - 0(904160104 094 MD& 0053.00 S n a.04 di DI w l 1 x160 uq. PSC ea 13 (50 GROUND ¢51415441E PFE 041.4 h y 0EE040244) IIIR I \O • CCI LL • � IW ~ _ to2U' U • • ILL MUM( HA 5 MI ecocO REFERENCE DRAWINGS MATERIALS NMS REVISIONS 6Y CHM AR0 BATE 00 OAK TILL w Ram MS 2601 v9Wc AND Xs11MI[Nr DIAGRAM ITU/ 6(SCfiPn WARM /\ DRAIN .Es 11/19/0ENCANA orcwowon ro. at ...HE •• wr WWI NAMED SI nc 4740 EPHEMERAL DRrawer .UNAGE AREA 02059N C5 A 24'05 ' ILL . a .YA[RN PIPES )A S( x- 5, W, TUSAN WINDED 6,151' WEWLB RN 11/19/03 100 PARACHUTE TO DE BEOVE PIPELINE Nu •Dm lair .1 RESSItt PO M °Crw 6000 CAMGxN MAMA TEST SLAn0i OUAs A 11E04. oCo AM 6001 0.1050090 PR00100Oi 105151AnoN OE1415 /\ EAntoci PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE nOoMMoO x:.`,><w,'e„sM A IPNB GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO __l MOM .10000 1 /\ NCR 100“ _ MC. Mai IC.. 803013 aENO n�ea us � ISSUEO 102 CONSTRUCTION ,E5 RH qH 511 KO PDI "a 0 00360p°°a'° w 47)3 SAC: IVENSVI A /\ 1ssuED FOR PERMITTING DS RH RX ups/m PROCESS DANT uu lye s4vsu PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC I , 71,,t.,.. o4'I P'0a 'nnm xxvP AS NOTED //�\ / V\ CAD FILL 471312/4/03 10:23:41 AM P 6 NOTES, 1. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY '101 STATE LAND SURVEYING, INC.' 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND 05111111E5 PRIOR TO EXCAVATION 00 BORING. .1. PIPELINE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 00YER OF 4'-0' FROM TOP OF PIPE. 4.FOR C4M00I0 TEST STATION DETAILS (SEE DRAWINGS 6000 & 6001) IV15 CLOW 1,4“01 MIN PON PREPARED PP PMECT 1�57morirm WP0M 11.119/MCC CP ht flan! NAACO Di TM ElCCP 0011101 IC 03P) rot An dW...6000400 IUPPP 10.5 NI 11154006 2501 REFERENCE DRAWINGS 8.195 E6 (156.400/1 mn(om v. bend .. m. NCS 8mNmo180CPRLL lxvl.6 el Lel. J975'4165' 8M ol8lm( 108,4'11)7' Nal MAO 63) 70. NAV 86 &null,, el this BmNmof i. 51250: 8..95 OP 0649815 8000 G6 63 Liz Bona e/6.03,0 4 ln. Plain Now et the NW T / 10/4 0/ 55.tier 12. 006 P9M 6th 8.44. I W'q is Rion Ran 0068 800rurir9 5.5141614Cd / Nanreli50 le em 559718.1'08 a Reason, Tj 2.0.60. x/ 260140: ABR:5C.---------.4-484 �\ AN (ai.l09 8.4. 50 4rem58. 14.1256 .648660 le Rt 502458.59 or bad iF. a. Ivternolion mmfr.6 Aar DrosiNd P.ryePP 0, PP Relgm eiel O..n( kevBosh 14041,4 L(C b M. flavor R..ae Be.A 14/6530 Riese rmxna are Moan Maroon mlm RR Saline Pt LEGEND • PC017 Of (108610IxrtgsEE9Kx R/0 . MC041-a-486,7' [L • EIEVAPp P.O.P.L • 0PONT007 ON PROPERTY UK P.O.r.L • Polxr ON 1MCI' LME e PENCE DRAMACL 8 -. • PO0ER POLL_0 _00.00 IME NWRCNIAI N WRIIC4L 0041E 100 004ACR Jr 80M ('4 Sle 86548122 eq. �nl 5o Ixl553 Iron EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA f55 / /6 STA. 555+90 (SEEDWGE 474D NG 110010 AWND PIPELINE CROSSING AND CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION 1190 4 O STA. 045.71 (SEE NOTE 54) E e a 1 8 04/ S/ P.I. 645436.01 24' 90' 3R E.L REWIRED PHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING AREA ;654 0 STA. 642+9S (SEEDWG. PERMITTING 4740 /6ml.bnp e/nroe.d moo...-- a ( 8 1 t AE 1p0 en.1 a �; /" t A 1 s/z� hO„NM $ / / /,� / ...:1'..- n� _3 a B • / ..,tr ed'... B.D.DD / f1 y - 0 //eE' / i ,\\ ://.5�a,m'.r F AGDNTEBEE NG 113 6 \ 1/4_ Fealty Bounty Let, s7'mt / / --;-•CORNER IR 10010 81 6649048 ben /41570.0UT 265856' nen Trott Comer 5 e/ Bxl 57 e/ 5dlioi JI. ‘r / r / 'g // �eC 6. NS 5,200 5.000 PmndryASA MOUND EIEE911M P ecenslrvcticn Ground' A Prop sed Ppe/Ne 1 / / 24" DIA. PIPELINE PLAN 062482. 064.00 062400 060.08 056400 24" D A. PIPELINE PROFILE WALE : E4(0M Al -- I . 200.-0• 2 2 DP E6 Mw( el 601 NOT 70 SCALE 00 0414.00 044400 644400 62400 5,400' 5.200' 22 840.03 000' 0440 PDC WE Sr NW) DLval 06566, (SEE 0401E 54 D0SNN5 GROUND N904 BANDED 2160 50. PLD •n v 13 0 ' .N lz 00 Ic 2 0E904 LACIW COMM 1650 PRESSURE MT DATA PIPING AVD 5451NUMENT OAMIAN MATERIALS DE5011P100 N0. REVISIONS BY CORD MPD DAR BY DAR 4740 6000 EPHEMERA ORAMAGT IRE* 00050445 CATHODIC PROTECTION 115T 536,1104 GUARS NC. D.. .503' F.L qN PPE 471 5[ 7-60. R/904 BONED MANN 011070 6001 W1H001C PROTECTION RST STATION DETAILS x5 n/24/03 11/24/02 6001 0101107 A ELECT. 0/000 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION AISSUE0 FOR PERMITTING JCS x5 RH RH RH RH U/25/03 IASIR. PL PROCESS ENCANA TM WILE PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE CARFIELD COUNTY. COLORADO WENT PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC P I. O OP. as -NN P0 PROP NNW( 03013 PP DRAMOIP MIME! 4 040T°PAW. *MAI AS NOTED /V\ CAD FILE:4714 12/4/03 CHUTE TD. DE 0 (7) CONCRETE WEIGHTS (SEE SECTION A). SPACING 15' FEET MAX.1.u u u 0 kl + u �' dc' OU a n U m y n h h i 0. m^eye 0 0 + 0 (V CORNER AE NOTE: Begin Sta. 0+00 bears 47720852"W 2552.49' from the East 1/4 Corner of Section 2 (Being o 1960 Bross Cap) BA515 OF ELEVATIONS Elevations are based on the NCS Benchmark KOEPSELL Located at Lot. 3925.42.65" North and Lang. 10804'2777" West (NAD 83). The NAM 88 elevation of this Benchmark is 51230: BASIS OF BEARINGS NOIE: Basis of bearings is the North Line o/ the NW 1/4 of Section 12, T8S, R970; 61h P.M which is taken from Global Positioning Satellite observations to bear 589.11.01"W a measured distance of 260546: PARACHUTE [REE Ret STRESS DEAD Wet Soil Sample Dry Sod Sample Top Bonk (1 WO' Tap Bonk High Water Line Bankl/ne ~▪ % Parachute Creek Bonkline� High Water Line o S E%151150 GROUND/CXANNEL -IEW:BONS SHALL NOT BE LEERED A5 A RESULT OF PIPELINE coNsiBUCRp! (TYPICAL) 16#36 Fence 164-04 Plan View tr., xort 569 REE STRESS x60 4� g - REFER TO NJOHMERI WETS FOR ROE 920 MO CDAMf.J CREEK CROSSING DETAIL SCALE: NONE mrs. EnAwN0 rue *al KEN /MAKI) OUT !Aka HAS 000.0,101111.1) Ut re* UX kr CoLVNAKD IK 550 toot mMN504, a IA i1a1 ma):.1(50ew THE a a IR 0.E &DPI 9)11 'SOWslum NM VSED 191 ANI Oka An05( Col MKS. W. 0001 PAM [Sakai) MINN CPSDIT ED -1 REFERENCE DRAWINGS PARACHUTE CREEK HIGH WATER LINE EL. 5186.0' SECTION SONE: XT.0. Preconstruction Crude of Pipeline 5,200' '19 El = 5166.0 EXISTING GROUND ELEVAR 70P OF PIPE ELEVATORS 5,200' Proposed 24' Pipeline Not To Scale) (O , •. ,. a v m m O O 01 V LO 1O o- M ID N N I() N N 17+50 17+00 16+50 Pipetine Centerline Profile PRL -0451 BOLTED CONCRETE NOWT •MINIMUM *EIGHT s 6000 POUNDS. •00400115 SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT A 1150 L05/ 04. (1.(MIN.)) 0 UR0ZE *110 0150 TYPE 11 08 NCEMENT. •50BMI1 CONCRETE NEIW1 DRAWNGS 00 ENGINEER FOR RENEW. ROCK SAD1I FABRIC RECORD) FEWER PPE 6 [0..015 0E104T5 O 16+00 Latitude & Longitude Dolum: Horizontal: NAD 27 Vertical: NAM BB U.S. Survey Peel UNA Coordinate ()alum: Horizontal: HAD 83 USM Zone 13, V.5. Survey Peel. Vertical NAM 88 U.S. Survey Peel. Creek Crossing Coordinates Creek North Lotiludo Wen Longitude U101 North U7M Ebel 510. 16+71 39' 27' 52.08" 10B' 04' 3V3- 14,346,547,0 772,175.7 NOTES. 1. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY -RI STALE LAND SURVEYING INC 2 PIPELINE NSINEATIXI UNDER THE WRIER CR05950 91µL BE HORIZONTAL 3. THE USE K FABRICATED BEN05, PROVIDED BY COMPANY. 10 MER COVER 0.(0.501 ENI5. %TALL BE SPECIFIED BY THE ALIGNMENT BRAMN0S. REE STRESS BEN0NC 917711 BE ASSUMED Al 00044105 WHERE N0 BENDS ME 5PEORE0. 4. AT OPEN CUT CRG551NGS, APPRP00 0P -RAP OR 5A40 CEMENT BAGS SHALL BE 70NDE0 AND INSTALLED FROM 147E HIGH BANK WAN TO THE LOW WATER UNE 04 DRY 800 LEVEL FORA IENCIN OF AT LEAST TWENTY (20) IEEE ALONG EACH BANK. 5 CONCRETE 01191(1 AND ROCK 9ME10 FURNISHED ANO INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR A5 910444 ON CON519)0004 pUMNGS 6. SUBMIT CONCRETE WEIGHT DRAMNG5 10 ENGINEER FCC RENEW. 7. SEE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ED -I FOR 805940 LOCATION. NO RENSIONS Dem DATE ee DATE 4700 TCPWRAOIIIC MAP PIPELINE PLANE AND PROFILE 00.1X01 JE5 10/9/03 04[0(0 A n 50/0/03 E. 515UCT 71704 ISR. n RENS[D ISSUED FDR PERMITTING ISSUED (0R PERMITTING JE5 JWS RH 1/6/04 7000490 .CS MO RH /25/03 CLIENT E N C ANA TM 111LE PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE PARACHUTE CREEK WETLANDS DELINEATION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC ru. IO eis-v0( PO 141.11401 03013 PO Caw. FWD. 9730 POO Maki, NONE CAD FILE:4730 1/6/04 r -J� 4_ 2± PIPELIg i0 OE gar DE Lt PLANT SCALE: NONE N� J THIS DWG. 71_. �ll1,LF - - - _ — _ _ __ fE ]C PIPELINE FRW ROAN CIE" COMPRESSOR STATION X-60 f X-60 of X-60 z-60 SECTION SCALE: NONE REFERENCE DRAWINGS MP !PAPP. HAS Kt MN POW.ISWED RADA AS 4703 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE D ENUIPIC41 11E COS VII 111 NC WOO ruirtO Ivir POI lied SOLLY • RESPECT HAWED N MI! OLOCX NO P▪ IT OOP! POPP WINOLIT OPPERPOO 1100 /TN mow CP NO REVISIONS 6Y WAD OPD DATE 6Y DM \ °PAM AW n/13/03 3 CHEMED .E5 WSEN sRucT ELECT. PIPING NSR DML w0¢SS ISSUED FEM PERMIT11N6 ASR JES RX 11/45/0 O.IEX7 ENCANATN TOLE PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE BORE j/1 UNCASED ® CDOT DRIVEWAY PLAN & SECTION PD! PROJECT DEVELOPMENT IAD USTRIES LLC 12314 w BAY WO Ayr- Sit KR IM �o ronwoo 7. 1. AS NOTED A CAD FILE:4731 11/18/03 ARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE \4732.dwg, CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION TYPE 2 AT STA. 185+20 (SEE DRAWINGS 6000 & 6001) 24" PIPELINE T DE BEOUE Nis mums me HOT au. PVIKKED OJI LOCI PM KIN POOPMED In KOKO Onnapani so. lit ftO sr rst MOO KOKO PI la Or ibut ,b. w CT UMMMOOK MUTT PK 1 Pisa NOT K PaP FP Off KKR KIVOSt OP FKIYIKID AN, oncn PARTY WSW, 1K 4703 7 2 0 0� is V0 30" STD WT. CASING PIPE (SEE PDI STD. DZ -4914 FOR INFORMATION) PLAN SCALE NONE 0 n w w TEST STA CASING VENT 4" (TYP. 2) (SEE PDI STD. DZ -4915) (ROUTE VENT TO SAFE LOCATION) PIPELINE MARKER (TYP. 2) (SEE PDI STD. 0Z-4940) CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION TYPE 2 AT STA. 181+20 (SEE DRAWINGS 6000 @ 6001) THIS DWG. 4' DIA. VENT CASING INSULATORINV (SEE PDI STD. 0Z-4916) (42 REQUIRED) Al a Oz Zs 4.0 REFERENCE DRAWINGS PIPELINE PLAN ANO PROFILE NO REVISIONS BY IP00 CASING LENGTH SECTION SCALE NONE n ISSUED FOR PERMITTING 050 JE0 BT ASB ss CIE 11/13/01 ENCANA TM 24'J'IPELINE FROM FROM ROAN CLIFF COMPRESSOR STA. CASING SEAL (TYP. 2) (SEE P01 STD. DZ -4914) TITLE PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE BORE #2 CASED @ 1-70 CROSSING GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PDI on.* mac MR camas PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC ;-,L° 7^,w,_„ KOJ PO 03013NI A KINK 4732 awl' PAP. motet NONE n CAD FILE:1732 11/18/03 PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE\4733.dwg, 11/24/ P PLAN .44101 2C PIPELINE t0 DE Bf01 of 7\ 20,-O' J THIS DWG. _ _ _ - fE _24' PIPELINE EROM R0AN GUST IT COMPRE550R STA➢IX! SECTION SCALE: NONE REFERENCE DRAWINGS NO REVISIONS 01 040 4>P0 DAZE 9. 04¢ 4705 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE A OSAAN AID 11/13/02 DIEIXN n 4(01. .ES 51NYC1 ELECT. PRIMO 7,A\ ISSUED FOR PERMlTRNC A59 JES OW 1/25/03 P40z50 CLIENT ENCANAN 1111E PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE BORE Q3 UNCASED @ PAVED ACCESS ROAD PLAN & SECTION PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMEATOJDUSTRIES LLC Fu PRI w-rm POE PEW. VWOC11 03013 PO 09A/Ixt WISER 4733 0401 PRO, SCALL AS NOTED /A\ CAD FILE:4733 11/19/03 10:06:39 AM °ARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE \4740.dwg, 11/24/ BASIS 0° BEAR/NGS Non - Boni o/ 6erngs i3 0e West /he o/ the 5W 1/4 or Seclion O. 76S R9411 618 P.! which is token front a Global Positioning Soldlile cesn,oliu, Io bear NBIDSITK 3 I e t t ! ! +c E t a I: I t ! t` t i i t i iI t A R 8 x R ! RQB 0 Proposed 24' Pipeline :Ming INN WA, F7o+44 ebb / /e SW rii 0.ccmelrvclo, Rowe Al PApand 24' ARRA. 20+00 18+00 18+00 TYPICAL EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING SCALE: 1'- 100'-0' LEGEND P .1. - POINT or INI045EC11011 R/W= RIGHT-OF-WAY ▪ m FENCE Pipeline Ephemeral Drainage Crossing Coordinates Crossing Crossing Description .......---- North Lolitude -_ 3..200 UTM North UTM Eost 1 Drainage 16+71 39' 27' 52.08" 108' 04' 31.73" 14,346,547.0 772,175.7 2 Culvert 5.100 39' 27' 18.08" 108' 03' 57.73" 14,343,016.3 774,724.8 3 Culvert 20+00 18+00 18+00 TYPICAL EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSING SCALE: 1'- 100'-0' LEGEND P .1. - POINT or INI045EC11011 R/W= RIGHT-OF-WAY ▪ m FENCE Pipeline Ephemeral Drainage Crossing Coordinates Crossing Crossing Description Drainage STA. Coord. North Lolitude West Longitude UTM North UTM Eost 1 Drainage 16+71 39' 27' 52.08" 108' 04' 31.73" 14,346,547.0 772,175.7 2 Culvert 64+50 39' 27' 18.08" 108' 03' 57.73" 14,343,016.3 774,724.8 3 Culvert 99+98 39' 26' 49.08" 108' 03' 46,73" 14,340,053.1 775,487.7 4 Culvert 105+41 39' 26' 43.08" 108' 03' 46.73" 14,339,446.0 775,467,1 5 Oroinage 120+11 39' 26' 29.08" 108' 03' 46.73" 14.338,029.7 775,418.9 6 Drainage 129+97 39' 26' 22.08" 108' 03' 54.73" 14,337,342.9 774,767.3 7 Droinoge 148+91 39' 26' 07.08" 108' 04' 10.73" 14,335,868.1 773,460.4 8 Culvert 154+80 39' 26' 03.08" 108' 04' 15.73" 14,335,476.8 773,054.4 9 Culvert 164+86 39' 25' 55.08" 108' 04' 22.73" 14,334,686.1 772,477.6 10 Drainoge 196+21 39' 25' 34.08" 108' 04' 35.73" 14,332.596.4 771.385.2 11 Droinoge 204+92 39' 25' 27.08" 108' 04' 41.73" 14,331,904.3 770,890.2 12 Drainoge 230+67 39' 25' 06.08' 108' 05' 00.73" 14,329,830.7 769,326.7 13 Drainage 242+41 39' 24' 56.08" 108' 05' 08.73" 14,328,840.5 768,664.3 14 Drainage 261+87 39' 24' 41.08" 108' 05' 23.72" 14,327.363.3 767.435.2 15 Droinage 272+86 39' 24' 33.08" 108' 05' 33.72" 14,326,580.9 766,622.6 16 Drainage 295+56 39' 24' 20.08" 108' 05' 56.72" 14,325,327.7 764,772.4 17 Drainoge 320+21 39' 24' 06.08" 108' 06' 22.72" 14,323,981.5 762,683.0 18 Drainage 344+90 39' 23' 52.08" 108' 06' 48.72" 14,322,635.6 760,593.3 19 Drainage 354+71 39' 23' 47.08" 108' 06' 58.72" 14,322,156.8 759.790.9 20 Drainoge 365+59 39' 23' 41.08" 108' 07' 10.72" 14.321,582.4 758,828.0 21 Drainoge 366+86 39' 23' 40.08" 108' 07' 11.72" 14,321,484.0 758,746.0 22 Droinage 397+16 39' 23' 23.08" 108' 07' 43.72" 14,319,851.1 756,174.4 23 Drainage 420+79 39' 23' 10.08" 108' 08' 08.72" 14,318,604.1 754,166.1 24 Droinoge 421+10 39' 23' 10.08" 108' 08' 08.72" 14,318,604.1 754,166.1 25 Droinage 434+11 39' 23' 02.08" 108' 08' 22.72" 14,317,833.0 753,038.8 26 Drainage 442+15 39' 22 58.08" 108' 08' 30.72" 14,317,450.2 752,396.6 27 Drainage 449+40 39' 22' 54.08" 108' 08' 38.72" 14,317,067.4 751,754,4 28 Droinoge 463+23 39' 22' 46.08" 108' 08' 52.72" 14,316,296.4 750,627.0 29 Droinoge 483+15 39' 22' 38.08" 108' 09' 15.71" 14,315,550.1 748,792.9 30 Drainage 499+40 39' 22' 31.08" 108' 09' 33.71" 14,314,891.4 747,354.7 31 Droinoge 503+22 39' 22' 29.08" 108' 09' 37.71" 14,314,700.0 747,033.6 32 Droinage 509+93 39' 22' 33.08" 108' 09' 43.71" 14,315,121.2 746.576.6 33 Drainage 512+59 39' 22' 34.03" 108' 09' 45.86" 14.315,223.3 746,411.2 34 Droinoge 523+27 39' 22' 33.79" 108' 09' 59.39" 14,315,236.2 745,348.0 35 Droinoge 535+36 39' 22' 32.24" 108' 10' 14.65" 14,315,121.5 744,144.3 36 Droinage 541+86 39' 22' 31.40" 108' 10' 22.84" 14,315,059.2 743,498.2 37 Droinoge 560+14 39' 22' 26.62" 108' 10' 44.70" 14,314,636.0 741,764.7 38 Droinoge 599+51 39' 22' 23.81" 108' 11' 28.46" 14,314,473.0 738,318.6 39 Droinage 614+49 39' 22' 32.10" 108' 11' 44.02" 14,315,355.0 737,126.5 40 Drainoge 625+48 39' 22' 39.16" 108' 11' 54.27" 14.316,097.8 736,346.9 41 Droinoge 631+12 39' 22' 41.97" 108' 12' 00.27" 14,316,398.8 735,885.9 42 Droinoge 639+98 39' 22' 40.08" 108' 12' 10.71" 14,316,236.7 735,059.4 43 Droinage 646+74 39' 22' 39.08" 108' 12' 19.71" 14,316,160.6 734,349.2 44 Drainage 651+23 39' 22' 39.74" 108' 12' 24.41" 14,316,240.5 733,982.5 45 Droinoge 668+72 39' 22' 43.51" 108' 12' 45.04" 14,316,679.5 732,376.3 46 Droinoge 698+75 39' 22' 57.96" 108' 13' 17.60" 14,318.232.7 729,871.2 47 Drainage 718+20 39' 23' 11.71" 108' 13' 34.56" 14,319,671.4 728,589.4 48 Drainage 724+38 39' 23' 14.23" 108' 13' 41.58" 14,319,946.0 728,047.4 49 Drainoge 726+12 39' 23' 14.67" 108'13' 43.73" 14,319,996.6 727,880.2 50 Droinage 750+53 39' 23' 16.74" 108' 14' 14.40" 14,320,292.3 725,479.9 51 Drainoge 757+00 39' 23' 16.56" 108' 14' 22.63" 14,320,297.3 724,833.1 52 Droinoge 799+86 39' 23' 32.34" 108' 15' 10.81" 14,322,030.0 721,108.3 53 Drainoge 802+85 39' 23' 34.75" 108' 15' 13.00" 14.322,280.0 720,945.2 54 Drainage 842+98 39' 24' 10.54" 108' 15' 21.26" 14,325,924.4 720,427.5 55 Droinoge 855+98 39' 24' 03.66" 108' 15' 31.50" 14,325,257.3 719,598.6 SEE DRAWING ED -1 FOR LOCATION OF PIPELINE EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE CROSSINGS Lati ude Sr longitude Datum: Horizontal: NAD 27 Verticol: NAVD 88, U.S. Survey Feet. UTM Coordinate Datum: Horizontal: NAD 83 UTM Zone 13, U.S. Survey Feet. Vertical: NAVD 88, U.S. Survey Feel. FM (AMMO MAS NOT OEM Ma. .11401 K IM /POMO tor PROMO N Y THE WENT WA. IN THE MU KW( SOLELY X rut "IMMTD,Ma Er C{ • PICYt IISED MC MY OTHEA PURPOSE OZ I MO mx SEM REFERENCE DRAWINGS NO REVISIONS eY A%O PATE ei DATE 4700-4714 PIPELINE PLAN AND PROFILE ORA/NAGE LOCATOY MAP IMPAN LP II/13/03 0211(10 Moa .IES ,I/a/01 ELECT. ',RHO 10 ISSUED /DR PERMn1ND IP PRME5S I1/25/0 WENT ENC ANA 1M NOTE; I. SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT BY 'IRI 51471. INC.' TITLE PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE EPHEMERAL DRAINAGE AREA CROSSINGS PIPELINE PLAN & PROFILE PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC / mom PC 400 Mae (33 t.66-1123 ,u Int,. -,ma 001 PRO1 03013 Tab. eamw 4740 WW1 riw pi uliceR CUEWT 119.144 YWCA aai AS NOTED CAD FILE: 4740 11/18/03 r Pressure-lreoled erode est Pail Tnkw k Rnsw Model 13 lest Heed Cold Ytllaw See lar Wring Diagram B -Line Model BH52SH Cbennd w/ Medd 6201631/2PLID Ppe Clomps r PVC Conduit - Bevel bottom opening to prevent wire insulation *mune 2-/10 HMW -PE Copper Mres Notes: Wire Connection 1plcol. See Pwachule la De Beget PipNne Mow sulfeienl dock in lest stalin ries Io Bodgtmg and settling TYPE 1 TEST STATION NTS Stondord Pressure-lreoled e2e Past ode tinker k Rosa Madel D iesl Neod - 4Cd YSIo See OS Ice Meng Diagram B -Line Model 652EH Chanel e/ Model B201631/2PllD Pipe Damps 3' PVC Conduit - Bevel bottom opening to prevent .r e insulation danoge' e-/10 11141V -PE Copper Byes Rood Casing Mre Connection Tyke. See ;g}r 24-n Parachute to Oe Beque Pipeline P1esa50-hooted ode 404 Posl My Steel EnCana pipeline offer Inco the Parachute to De 6egne 24 -inch Pptlne B're CmsocIi n Typical. See U1 Holes: Nolen: Allow sufficient Mack in les' station wires Io' backfilling one, settling Allow sulk Mount Test Stator of 'mcerine or casing vent it nimble TYPE 2 TEST STATION Nis Cased Crossing ALL CATHODIC PROTECTION DESIGNS, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, DOCUMENTS, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HERIN, ARE THE PROPERTIES OF TOTAL CORROSION SOLUTIONS, INC. AND ARE NOT TO BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF TOTAL CORROSION SOLUTIONS 3' Tnkw & Ras& Model 13 Test Head Calor Veto. Seem or Van Diogrom B -Loin Model 852511 Chonnd r/ Model 8201631/2PLID Pipe Clomps 3' PVC Condull - Beset bottom opening to prevent wire oAotioi (anope 1=j10 105w -PE Coppor Was 21-0 Pm to De kept Pipeline ack in lest slat ekes Iw bsrkrding 054 settling TYPE 3 TEST STATION xis Inter—Compony Crossing Pressure-lreoled 454 Peel ode Any Steel foreign pipeline Mire Conned 15,¢051. See 01 Note& Team & Rasor Model 13 lest Heol Cdp Yellow Nein/r�'\Ice wring Oiogron 8 -line Model 05351 D,onnel r/ Model 0201631/2P110 Pipe Chomps 3. PVC Conduit - Beoe bottom opening to proent win Cation dwnoge e-/10 11111Y -PC Capper Wires 24-n P Ole to De Hague Pipeline Mow sufficient slack in lest potion vires lot boROling and selling TYPE 4 TEST STATION Nis Foreign PL Crossing PauSK5 551001 501 KIK SISIKKO Os Matt" OCKLCIIKNI LK /5I VII ST MC WIN' HustO IHC *AD KC FADJIY KKK, M KAPOK FCC K 0°555..KaIOKES5CD (Sala DI 105 L REFERENCE DRAWINGS v0 REVISIONS Be nasO 0512 Be 6001 CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION DETAILS 0555,1 0100050 5601. 103 105 015501 ELECT. PINK n ISSUED POR CONSTRUCTION /A\ ISSUE° TOR CLIENT APPROVAL JCS 055 RH ENCANA TM PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE 24" PIPELINE CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATIONS PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC KIM Na tt )oa' 'k P. PM. NIKKI 03013 Kt ORA 6000 5,55/0501 ruir,m CM, ry.1601 NONE CAD PILE: 6000 12/4/03 29:37 AM r between welds IIDAWC Stranded Cpooer Wire e/ HMW --PE Insulation. Two Wires Required per Cosh Structure. Color Coding Varies - See lest Station Deals. llnmile Weld Cop w/ Primer Brush Weld keo Lal Sled Ppdne Notes ell Connection Copper stn« required Ip (hermit< eeld'ng of 410 and smeller eve. Consult welder mcnuloclure la recommended welds. Use R gran weld corlridge. Cool completed thermile weld with Ropslm Moody«. 11 weld cop and 747 Prime, per monulodarers nstruclions. PIPELINE WIRE CONNECTION NTS Notes: lamnole Subject Pipeline lest Wires in lamins 3 ami 6 Inslan Anr-Spin'Gaskel poor to mgmtng test head to conduit D1 Follow Monuloclurers Instructions. for lest Neal Insldlotion. Fill out 15 nameclim Piot end stoll n terminal cow. INCLUDE ENGINEERING STATION ON LABEL. TYPE 1 TS TERMINATIONS N15 Notes: Terminate Both Casing Woes in ierminol 4 Imminole Subject Ppelere lest Was in Terminals 3 and 6 1,51611 MfrSpin Ea6el pry to mounting lest head to conduit Use 31I 35 lope Colored Red to Mork Cosing Wires. Fdloe Mmulaclwns Instructions Iv lest Head Msldlalan. Fill act 1S connection aryl ond nslol n Inmind cow. INCLUDE ENGINEERING STATION ON LABEL TYPE 2 TS TERMINATIONS N15 le,mnole Nm -Subject EnCanaPpeline lest Won in le,mnvs 2 and 5 Tamnsle SvkjM Ppel'ne lel Wires iI lammds 3 owl !midi Anti -Spin Gasket prior 10 ma,nl g test heod to eond,lt Terminate Foreign Pipeline Teat Wires n lermnols 1 and 5 Terminate Subject Pipeline Test Wets n lermnols 3 awd 6 Inadl Anti -Spin Gasket prop to 600101419 lest head to conduit Notes: Use 3M 35 lope Wiped Green to Mork Foreign Pipeline lest Wires. Follow Mmulocluraa Instructions for lest Heal Installation. F1I out 15 connection than ond install in termitic! cow. INCLUDE ENGINEERING STARON 04 LABEL D3 NIS TYPE4TSTERMINATIONS DS Nolen Use 314 35 lope Colored Blue to Mark Nan -Subject En Cono Wires. Follow Manolocwras Instructions lo, lest Need InoIoIotlan. III out T5 connection chart and nsldl in Iamnd cow. INCLUDE ENGINEERING 51A11DN 01 LABEL. D2 TYPE 3 TS TERMINATIONS D4 615 ALL CATHODIC PROTECTION DESIGNS, DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, DOCUMENTS, AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HERIN, ARE THE PROPERTIES OF TOTAL CORROSION SOLUTIONS, INC. AND ARE NOT TO BE USED IN WHOLE OR IN PART FOR ANY OTHER PROJECT WITHOUT THE WRITTENAUTHORIZ477ON OF TOTAL CORROSION SOLUTIONS STATI NUMBEF CROSSING DESCRIPliaN 1E57 5100N TYPE 52+00 EDGE OF ROAD TYPE 1 106+72 EDGE OF ROAD TWE 1 160+00 ALONG HIGHWAY 6 TYPE I 181+20 U.S. 1-70 CASING TYPE 2 185+20 U.S. 1-70 CASING TYPE 2 246+00 EDGE OF ROAD TYPE 1 298+00 ALONG HIGHWAY 6 TYPE 1 350+00 ALONG HIGHWAY 6 TYPE 1 403+00 ALONG HIGHWAY 6 TYPE 1 505+10 1-70 VIADUCT CROSSING TYPE 1 587+00 ALONG ROAD TYPE 1 640+57 FENCE LINE TWE 1 693+00 ALONG ROAD TYPE 1 731+30 ALONG ROAD TYPE 1 780+50 ALONG ROAD TYPE 1 819+89 CANYON GAS PIPELINE CROSSING TYPE 4 845+71 TRANSCOLORADO PIPELINE CROSSING TYPE 4 INS Dn.. MS 001601 PALI11/10 1.1114111103 O 111111114611 err D CW101101,1110 110 701 US( MT DC 0101 MO PI NC OF 110 00•00111011..1/01.001 MD 1.011TAMOE ty mu 00011 10.0 II 11C 1111E 901.1110111C Kg MT 011(5 POMO./ DR 11000 10 :moom. *00105 po '3 6,00 ti trx REFERENCE DRAVANGS NO REVISIONS BY 0410 AP00 DAIL BY DAIS 6000 CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATION DEIA(LS A DRAM lc< 0/52/03 000060 A A N E« 1(0 5130070 Can A A FNN0 n em 155UE0 FOR CONSTRUCTION JCS RN RH 1050E0 ro3 WENT APPROVAO JES JCS OW PROPE55 '06 11/25/03 0(01 f I<I,,W�O�newr<— wrrr<rlr� W�..- ENCANA IM mQ PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE 24" PIPELINE CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST STATIONS PDI PRO✓ECTAEYELOPMSWTJWDOSTRJES LLC haa0 0 05500 •K-.110 01.400 .30 1o,/ Oa 00000.000 Ft Wim Intoe 03013 Peg DRAWING SABI. 6001 CLENI PP. 11•10,1 NONE /V\ CAD FILL6001 12/4/03 9:09:00 AM "ARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE\7100.dwg, 11/25 r HARDENED 511. WASHER HEAVY HEX NUT (TW,) HARDENED SR. WASHER HEAVY HEX NUT (111.) NI 011184 CL SED€ F 1�1 BRIBE N51N1Nc E0FYEx1 J § H a D ! - 'SOKV%Mso( ' - BM 10C MORA AER( (DIEM) 1R1 oc.. I. G . OA (MIN) I pA I I !!: Iii 1- ISI cIB► LIBI TYPE "RB" " TYPE "RBS" ANCHOR BOLT SCHEDULE MARK TYPE QTY, ASTM MAYL. SPEC. FOR A.B. DIA. L T D E ASTM MAT'L. SPEC. FOR STL. NUTS ANCHOR BOLT COATING 3/4 R515 RB 4 A-36 3/4" 15" 4" - - A-563 GRADE A GALVANIZED GENERAL NOTES 1. DETAILS, 0114f190141, AND NOTES ON ME DESIGN DRAWNGS TME PRECEDENCE OVER THOSE IN 194E GENERAL NOTES AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 2, PWS (1) OR MINUS (-) DIMENSIONS INDICATED AFTER MENDER 512E5 IN A PLAN NEW ARE FROM ME TLP OF STEEL ELEVATION NOTED FOR THE PLAN. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO -CENTERLINES OF COLUMNS AND BEAMS. TOP SURFACES OF TOP RANGES 01 BEAMS, BACKS OF CHANNELS. AND ANGLES, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. BRACING WORK POINTS ARE ON CENTERLINES OF BEAM OR COLUMN UNLESS NOTED. 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM MAT MERE ARE NO UNDERGROUND INTERFERENCES 18101 10 FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, - 5, WE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS MD CONDITIONS Al 114E SITE AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN 111E ACTUAL 50NDID0145 AND !REFORMAT/0N SHOWN 04 THE °RATINGS BEFORE PROCEEDING MTH THE WORK. 6, IME 50N1RA5104 SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT HIS WORK 140 HE SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES. 5E0UENCE, AND PROCEDURES, 7. SAW WT AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING PAVEMENTS A5 REQUIRED FOR FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, REPLACE PAVEMENT WIN EQUAL MATERIAL AFTER FOUNDATION 15 COMPLETED. FOR HEAVILY TRAVELED CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, DOWELS SHALL BE INSTALLED INTO EXI511140 SAW CUT CONCRETE PER AO 330. - ANCHOR BOLT NOTES 1. ANCHOR SHALL BE BUNDLED MD INDIVIDUALLY TAGGED WITH ME MARK NUMBER. 2. ANCHOR BOLTS SHALL BE PRONGED WITH CER111150 MATERIAL TEST REPORTS. 3. ALL THREADS SHALL BE UNC -2 4. WHERE GALVANIZING 15 SPECIFIED, GALVANIZE ALL BOLTS. NUTS, AND WASHERS A5 PER AVM A-153, TAP NUTS OVERSIZE TO PRDNDE CLASS 2 FIT WTH ZINC BUILDUP, GALVANIZED 133.15 AND NUTS SHALL BE SHIPPED IN THE SAME 5041*NER. 5. ANCHOR BOLTS FCR ALL EQUIPMENT AND ALL COLUMNS SHALL BE SET BY TEMPLATE 6. FILL ALL ANCHOR BOLT SLEEVES WITH N0N-511148 GROUT AFTER EQUIPMENT 15 SET, 7. WASHERS SHALL CONFORM TO ARRA F436 TYPE I. DESIGN NOTES I. DEAD LOADS 101AL DEAD wEIGHT OF STRUCTURE, EQUIPMENT, INSULATION, AND OPERATING LOADS. 1. UVE LOADS PLATFORMS 50 P5F STAIRS _IOCLESE__- 3. WND LOADS 00055 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CWEjlQC1 BASIC WRIT 51550Pb IMPORTANCE FACTOR 1.0 _ 4. SEISMIC LOADS 00415 _199] UBC_ SEISMIC ZONE T IMPORTANCE FACTOR SOIL PROFILE TWE ___so _--_ NEAR SOURCE FACTOR No N,A. NEAR SOURCE FACTOR Nr _ 5, SOILS 'WESTWARDS REPORT USE UBC TABLE 18-1-4 ALLOW, SOIL BEARING • 1500 P5F CONCRETE NOTES I. CONCRETE SHALL BE DESIGNED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 'BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE', ACI 318, LATEST 501110N, UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, OSHA 8(001*TION5 AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE STATE ANO LOCAL REGULATIONS. 2. CEMENT SHALL BE *511A 0150, T1PE 0 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. CALCIUM CHLORIDE MAY NOT BE ADDED. 3. MIN1MUM CONCRETE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE Fc -3000 P51 At 28 DAYS. 4, AIR ENTRAINING ADMIXTURES SHALL BE U5E0 TO ENIRNN 4 TO 6 PERCENT OF NR BY VOLUME IN CONCRETE EXPOSED TO FREEZING AND THAWING, CONCRETE SLUMP SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 INCHES FOR PIERS OR 3 INCHES FOR CAISSONS AND FOOTINGS. 5. ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A 3/4' CHAMFER, UNLESS N01E0 OTHERWISE. 6. INTERIOR SLABS SHALL BE STEEL TROWELED ID A 5M001H HARD FINISH. ALL WALKS AND EXTERIOR SLABS SHALL BE BROOM FINISHED AFTER STEEL TROWELING, UNLESS NOTED. 7. REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE DETAILED. FABRICATED AND PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITOR OF 'ACI DETAILING MANUAL'. 8, ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE CONFORM 10 ASTM A615, GRADE 60, U.N.D. 9, ALL WELDED MRE FABRIC (PLAIN) SHALL CONFORM 10 AM A165. 10. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL NOT BE WELDED. II. BEFORE PLACING ANY CONCRETE. ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE CHECKED TO DETERMINE 111AT REINFORCING BARS, ANCHOR BOLTS, EMBEDDED STEEL PIPING, CONDUIT, ELECTRICAL GROUNDING CABLE AND ALL OTHER EMBEDDED ITEMS ARE PROPERLY INSTALLED, 12. FOR CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE, THE MINIMUM or CONCRETE PROTECTIVE COVERING OF REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE A5 FOLLOWS: (a.) UNFORMED STRUCTURE 194 CONTACT MIH GROUND (0.) FORMED STRUCTURE IN CONTACT MATH GROUND OR EXPOSED To WEATHER: /6 OARS OR LARGER 2• 95 BARS OR SMALLER 5 1/2' CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO WEATHER OR IN CONTACT 14711 GROUND: BEAMS, ORDERS & COLUMNS 1 1/Y AMS lc WALLS /11 BARS OR SMALLER 3/4' 13. GROUT FOR BASE PLATES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE: (a.) NON SHRINK GROUT - MAS1ERROW 926 GROUT BY MDT PROTECTOR AND REPAIR, DR EQUAL (b.) EPDXY GROUT - MASIERFLOW MP CRYPT BY MB? PROTECTION AND REPAIR, OR EQUAL. 14. ALL FWNBAB0N5 SHALL BE PLACED 01 UNDISTURBED FIRM WBGRADE SOIL MY SOFT OR LOOSE FOUNDATION SVBG1ADE SOIL SHALL BE OVEREX5AVAIED AND REMOVED. OVEREXCAVAIEO AREAS SHALL BE FILLED WTI LEAN CONCRETE OR INSPECTED STRUCTURAL BAG5FILL COMPACTED TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM PERCENTAGES AS DETERMINED BY A5111 0-1557 (10415950 PROCTOR 1E51). BUILDINGS MD EQUIPMENT 950 TRENCH MO WALL BACKFILL 905 FLOOR SLABS 955 MOISTURE CONTENT OF FILL SHOULD 6E KEPT Al 425 OF OPTIM044 15. SEE ENGINEERING STANDARD ES -7110 FOR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: (o.) CONCRETE 1E51 CYLINDERS ARE REWIRED. (8.) STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES L FABRICATION ANO ERECTION DE STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO 194E LATEST EDITION OF ME N55 SPECIFICATIONS. STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN PER AI5C A50 914 EN110N. 2. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO 114E FOLLOWING ASTM STANDARDS (UNLESS NOTED): 4.)ROLLED SHAPES, RECTANGULAR AND ROUND BARS, PLATE A36 B.) 51RUCNRAL PIPE A53, RUDE B OR EQUAL A106. GRADE 8 C.) STRUCTURAL TUBING A500, GRACE B OR EQUAL 0.) CHECKERED 5500R PLATE A786 E.) BOLTS A5 NOTED ON DRAWMOS 3, MELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED 8Y CERTIFIED WELDERS IN ACCORDANCE WMTH ME LATEST EDITION OF 194E AWS WELDING CODE. D?l, USING 170XX ELEC1R00(5 FCR MANUAL SHIELDED METAL ARC WELDING AND CLASS 57X-EXXX SERIES ELECTRODES FOR SUBMERGED ARC WELDING. 4. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE PAINTED IN ACCORDANCE 14191 STANDARD E5-7410 PAINTING-5E1E0110N, APPLICATION AND INSPECTION, ABBREVIATION INDEX 0.B. ANCHOR BOLTS D.C. BOLT CIRCLE D.S. BOTH SIDES 001. 001104* BRKT. BRACKET CANT, CAN11LEVER O TO C CENTER TO CENTER CENTERLINE CNKb. CHECKERED Cl. CLEARANCE COL. COLUMN CGNx. CONNECTION CONST. CONSTRUCTION 00115 5041440005 COMP. COORDINATE CORR, CORRUGATED DET DEVIL DING. DIAGONAL DIA. OR • DIAMETER DIM. DINERS/ON DWG, DRAWING (E EACH FACE EL ELEVATION (HEIGHT) ELEV. ELEVATION (NEW) ENLR. ENGINEER E0. EQUAL OR EQUALLY EQUIP. EQUIPMENT EXIST. EXISTING F.S. FAR SIDE FON. FOUNDATION FIN. FINISH RL RANGE RR. ROOK FT. FOOT OR FEET FRMO. FRAMING GA. GAGE OR GAVLE 4T10. GRATING HR. HANDRAIL 4.1.ES. HIGH PONT FINISHED SURFACE K NIP (1000 Ws) K.B. KNEE BRACE IL.X. LONG LEG HORIZONTAL L.L.V. LONG LEG VERTICAL MACH. MACHINE MAX. MAXIMUM MIN. MINIMUM 94,5. NEM SIDE O.C. ON CENTER OPNG. OPENING DPP. OPPOSITE PLC5. PLACES 845, PIPE SUPPORT R PLATE PLATT. PLATFORM RAD. OR R RADIUS REE 8(5(111105 1(00. REWIRED R1SER SECT. 5EC110N R. STEEL 51155. STIFFENER 51RUCT STRUCTURAL 50P7. SUPPORT SYM. 545ME1RIC44 TRK. THICKNESS i.0. TOP OF T.O.C. TOP 05 CONCRETE 1,0.0. TOP OF GRATING 1.O.PLATF. TOP OF PLATFORM 1.0.5. IOP CF STEEL TREAD 1YP. TYPICAL U.N.D. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE W.P. WORK POINT 1.45 Punic HAS NOT 1.5511 .251.94CO NM 1.5 105.5 PIMP." 11122a1 rf DC 215111 NYCO el THE E. INC OONSIMCBCD5 621•155/4 MO 11•2102551 CC WC 1/21JTI IMAM 11 115 121 ClOCA 490 MTT 119888* OR 111121 AN• 01,L2 Phut litINO212211312 ocenni 2120dN REFERENCE DRAWINGS NO REVISIONS BY CIM0 041E 0Y 0.1E Maw .55 9/12/03 CHEMED A A NEC 5muc1 110 9/15/03 EIEC 911255 94518. 0111 PROCESS 1550E0 FOR OIENT APPROVAL .E5 MD RH 11/25/03 0.2415 ENCANA TU TITLE PARACHUTE TO DE BEOUE PIPELINE GENERAL NOTES, CONCRETE NOTES STEEL NOTES & STANDARD DETAILS PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT /NDU$TA/ES LLC 1252 w ISMS AN. 52 400 03013 [LW P12 HOOP p 1.00 NONE CAD TILE:7100 11/19/03 10:40:26 AM r 9' PLAN PLAN PIPE 24'R PIPE 11 GRADE 111®111 111151111 ■■■m■■■i _ t:1 1 11=-111: IT, (30)5401 (16)5A01 5 ACH WAY 0 SPACE BOTT. 8 EACH WAY 0 E0. SPACE TOP I/4' NEOPRENE PAD (2)4001 DES SECTIONCl) FOUNDATION No. 1 (REF. 060. 4202.4203.4205.4206) FOUNDATION No. 2 (REF. DWG. 4205) SECTION - SECTION - CENTER OROS, BLOCK ON PIPE CENTER LINE MO PIPE JOINT AS SHOWN 01 REF. DWGS. PLAN SECTION - THRUST BLOCK "A" (RIF. DWG. 42034204) (814/02 4 E.W. NTT. REINFORCNO SCHEDULE (ALL DIMENSIONS ARE OUT TO OUT) LCNGM MEA A 120E 6 119E C SAI TYPE 0 TYPE E MARK NO.. IYyE 512E OUT LENGTH 0114E 510145 B REMARKS 5401 230 4 5601 60 0n. 008 5 FTC'S Ott. FOR 5 FTO S 5602 20 9 OW F04 5 F0C'5 4001 20 D 4 1/2' 4002 25 D 012. 008 5 FIG'S 011 FOR 5 STO S 4401 10 A 071. FOR 1 0005 460' 6 B 6' OIY FOR 1 FTC'S 4003 5 0 4 1/2' Ott 004 1 FINS 4402 16 A Oft FOR 2 FM'S NOTES: 1. FOR GENERAL NOTES AND STANDARD DETAILS, SEC 08461140 2100 Ml a Tit.'.wi SASMEER PROTHRED IT MULCTTENTZLOTITENT TO Lit TM USTIOU MOT SOSO At WSWHUTNTIENNICE ITS MOODNAPADT TT( MU wow Aro!IOU PUH,OHE OT FLARMS•TO TOSTIT OTTO( roar, 611•30LOTRESSCD IDIPROSUI OCNIOTHSTMI Pa tic REFERENCE DRAWINGS VO REVISIONS 9Y 4196 DATE DATE 4202 PIPING ELEVATION DRANK 2S 0/10/03 4203 PIPING ELEVATION A 0#CKED 4204 PIPING ELEVATION 4205 4206 PIPING PLAN PIPING ELEVATION ME04 MD 0/I5/D5 51ROC1 11501. PANG A 1551E0 F01 CLIENT APPROVAL {S M0 RN 11/25/0' 0.06 ENCANA TM PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE PIPE SUPPORTS AND THRUST BLOCK DETAIL FOUNDATIONS PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC 4WHO 00.19 03013 7101 SCHITZt AS NOTED 7 CAD FILE; 7101 11/19/03 L r 1'-5 1 1/4 wA 151REA000 RDD, CENTERED ON RANGE. 111111 HEAVY HEX NUT (HELD 00 BEAR) Alims' RATE 3/8 511FRNER ELEVATION 86715 MS -1 3/4"=1'-0 (1 REQ'0) SECTION / E NOTES: I. 007 GENERAL NOTES AND STANDARD DETAIL5, SEE DRAWING 7100 2. ISOLATE. PIPE FROM SUPPORT MM APPROVED FIBERGLASS SHIELD. REFERENCE DRAWINGS NO REVISIONS BY 0«0 BY 001E 4205 PIPING PLAN DRAM 5/12/03 01000[0 0/15/05 H[a MUST BLESS PIPING MSR. DYIL A ISSUED FOR CLIENT APPROVAL iS 10 RH 11/25/03 PROCESS NEN! ENCANA 111 PARACHUTE TO DE BEQUE PIPELINE PIPE SUPPORTS STRUCTURAL STEEL PDI PROJECT DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIES LLC mem 13091x1 -vv FP PAW Wale 03013 7201 cuin FRU Man 50+0 Esipws1Pv.ea AS NOTED /A\ GAD FILE: 7201 11/19/03 CORDILLERAN February 20, 2004 Mr. Tom Bargsten Natural Resources Specialist U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management 2815 H Road Grand Junction, CO 81506-1781 826 21 '/z Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 T: 970.263.7800 F: 970.263.7456 Re: EnCana Gathering Services Parachute to DeBeque 24 -Inch Pipeline Environmental Assessment Final Draft Dear Mr. Bargsten, Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. is pleased to submit along with this letter, three copies of the Final Draft EnCana Gathering Services (USA), Inc. Parachute to DeBeque 24 -Inch Pipeline Environmental Assessment (EA) for your review. I have also followed up this submission with an electronic copy via your email. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns at (970) 263-7800 or kimkaalna,cordcomp. com. Sincerely, Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. Kimberly Kaal, C.P.G. Project Geologist cc: File EG03141 Jimmy Smith, Wagon Wheel Consulting Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. Grath Junction, CO • Denver, CO • Casper, WY • Laramie, WY• Lander, WY Environmental Consulting Engineers and Scientists U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Grand Junction Field Office Grand Junction, CO 81506 FINAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RECORD NUMBER: CO -13o -2004 -o16 -EA CASEFILE/PROJECT NUMBER: COC -67267 APPLICANT: EnCana Gathering Services (USA), Inc. U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Grand Junction Field Office Grand Junction, CO 81506 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RECORD NUMBER: CO -130 -2004 -016 -EA CASEFILE/PROJECT NUMBER: COC -67267 PROJECT NAME: EnCana Gathering Services USA, Inc. Parachute to DeBeque 24 - inch Pipeline and CO2 Amine Treatment Facility PLANNING UNIT: Grand Junction and Glenwood Springs Field Offices LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BLM Land T7S, R97W: Section 31 T8S, R97W: Sections 5, 6, 10, 11 and 12 Private and Other Land T7S, R96W: Sections 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 26, 27, 28, 32 and 33 T7S, R97W: Section 31 T8S, R96W: Sections 5 and 6 T8S, R97W: Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 All in Garfield County, Colorado, 6th Principal Meridian APPLICANT: EnCana Gathering Services USA, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Acronyms and Abbreviations 3 Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives 4 Proposed Action 4 Alternatives Considered But Not Carried Forward for Analysis 6 No Action Alternative 6 Alternatives Considered But Not Carried Forward 6 Need For The Action 7 Plan Conformance Review 7 Standards for Public Land Health 8 Affected Environment/Environmental Consequences/Mitigation Measures 9 Critical Elements 10 Air Quality 10 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern 11 Cultural Resources 11 Environmental Justice 13 Farmlands, Prime and Unique 14 Floodplains 14 Invasive, Non -Native Species 14 Native American Religious Concerns 15 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive Species 15 Wastes, Hazardous or Solid 19 Water Quality, Surface and Ground 20 Wetlands & Riparian Zones 21 Wilderness Areas and Wild and Scenic Rivers 21 Non -Critical Elements 21 Soils 21 Vegetation 23 Wildlife 24 Other Non -Critical Elements 25 Paleontology 26 Noise 27 Livestock Grazing 28 Realty Authorizations 28 Recreation 29 Socioeconomic 29 Transportation 30 Visual Resources 30 Cumulative Impacts Summary 32 Persons/Agencies Consulted 33 List of References 35 Finding of No Significant Impact 37 Decision Record 37 Stipulations 38 2 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS BLM- Bureau of Land Management BMP- Best Management Practice CDOT- Colorado Department of Transportation CDOW- Colorado Department of Wildlife CDPHE- Colorado Division of Public Health and Environment CFR- Code of Federal Regulations CIG- Colorado Interstate Gas COGCC- Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission DOT- Department of Transportation EA- Environmental Assessment EIS- Environmental Impact Statement EPA- Environmental Protection Agency ESA- Endangered Species Act FLPMA- Federal Land Policy Management Act GSFO- Glenwood Springs Field Office GSRA- Glenwood Springs Resource Area I-70- Interstate 70 MLA- Mineral Leasing Act mmscfld- million standard cubic feet per day msl- mean sea level NEPA- National Environmental Policy Act NRHP- National Register of Historical Places OD- Outside Diameter POD- Plan of Development psi- pounds per square inch PUP- Pesticide Use Proposal RMP- Resource Management Plan ROW- Right -of -Way SPCC- Spill Prevention Countermeasure Plan UP- Union Pacific USC- United States Code USDI- United States Department of the Interior DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES: Background/Introduction: EnCana Gathering Services USA, Inc (EnCana) has applied to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for a right-of-way (ROW) grant under Section 28 of the Mineral Leasing Act (MLA) of 1920, as amended (30 USC 185), to authorize the construction and maintenance of a 24 -inch diameter buried natural gas pipeline on approximately 4.7 miles of BLM-administered public land northwest of DeBeque, Colorado. The project length is approximately 16.4 miles, of which 4.21 miles are located on private lands, 7.38 miles are located on Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Interstate 70 (I-70) right- of-way, and 4.79 miles are located on BLM administered land. The BLM land occurs within areas administered by the Grand Junction Field Office and by the Glenwood Springs Field Office. The proposed construction width of the ROW on BLM land is 75 feet, involving a maximum of 38 acres of potential disturbance. The permanent ROW on BLM-administered land would be reduced to 30 feet after reclamation. Environmental Assessment (EA) CO-GJFO-02-16-EA, Case File COC -65940, was completed in June of 2002 for the Williams Production RMT 20 -inch pipeline. The EnCana pipeline alignment analyzed in this EA is parallel to and partially within the Williams pipeline ROW for approximately 9 miles of the ROW, with the exception of the segment between I-70 and Logan Wash, and a small segment on the eastern end of the pipeline on the American Soda and Ivo Lindauer private property. The Proposed Action would provide an outlet for natural gas produced in the Piceance Basin through an interconnect with the TransColorado natural gas transmission line. TransColorado carries gas for delivery to markets in the Midwest, Southwest, and California. The pipeline would carry approximately 200 million standard cubic feet per day (mmscf/d) of natural gas at start up, with a total capacity of approximately 400 mmscf/d. Proposed Action EnCana proposes to construct a 24 -inch gas -gathering pipeline from the Roan Cliffs Compressor Facility located two miles north of Parachute, Colorado, to a connection point with the TransColorado Natural Gas Pipeline located near Logan Wash, approximately four miles north of the Town of DeBeque, Colorado. In addition to construction of the pipeline, a 400 -million standard cubic feet per day (mmscf/d) gas processing facility is proposed for treating CO2 to condition the gas to meet TransColorado pipeline transmission specifications. The CO2 amine treating facility would be located on private property owned by Chevron/Texaco adjacent to the termination point of the proposed 24 -inch pipeline in Section 31, T7S, R97W, and would occupy approximately 22 acres of land (see Figure 1). 4 The proposed 24 -inch pipeline would connect at its eastern end with EnCana's existing 24 -inch Great Divide pipeline (Rifle to Parachute) at the Williams Roan Cliffs compressor station located just north of Parachute. A CO2 amine gas treatment facility for gas delivered by the proposed pipeline would also be constructed on approximately 22 acres of Chevron/Texaco private property located in Section 31, T7S, and R97W, near Logan Wash. A second and parallel pipeline would be constructed between the treating facility and the TransColorado tie in point (also in Section 31, T7S R97W), to deliver the treated gas to TransColorado. Additionally, two 5 -acre staging areas are proposed on BLM land, one in Section 5, T8S, R97W and the other in Section 12, T8S, R97W (see Figure 1). Anticipated pipeline construction time frame is approximately 6 weeks. The amine plant construction time frame is approximately 4 to 5 months, beginning concurrently with pipeline construction. Pipeline Specifications: The natural gas pipeline would be constructed of 24 -inch outside diameter (OD) schedule -65, 0.500 wall epoxy fusion bond coated pipe. Road bores (not on BLM- administered land) would utilize 24 -inch OD schedule -65, 0.625 wall coated pipe encased inside 30 -inch OD, 0.375 wall bare casing. Construction of the pipeline would meet American Petroleum Institute 1104, American Society of Mechanical Engineers B31.8, and Department of Transportation (DOT) specifications. The pipeline would have induced current cathodic protection and would be hydrotested to meet DOT (Class II) standards to achieve a Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure of at least 1,440 pounds per square inch (psi). Sizing of the proposed pipeline was engineered to accommodate potential gas production from the Orchard Unit North and South Fields. Approximately 476,108 gallons (1.5 acre feet) of water would be required for hydrostatic testing on the pipeline [see Plan of Development (POD)]. Hydrostatic testing for the pipeline would require approximately 476;108 gallons of water, or 1.5 acre feet or the entire pipeline and would be tested in 3 sections. The majority of the water used for hydrostatic testing would come from water produced by EnCana's gas wells. After hydrostatic testing is complete the water would be captured, filtered and cleaned and stored in portable frac tanks staged at the end of each section within the ROW boundaries. The water would finally be trucked to EnCana's permitted evaporation ponds and/or used for drilling fluids. No surface discharges of test water would occur. Hydrostatic testing procedures and conditions for discharge of the water are delineated in the POD. CO, Amine Treatment Facility: EnCana would also construct a 400 mmscf/d, 800-gpm amine gas treatment facility for removing CO2 from gas delivered through its 24 -inch pipeline. The facility would be constructed on approximately 22 acres of private land leased from Chevron/Texaco. The 5 land lies on the east side of, and adjacent to, Garfield County Road 44. The site would be fenced for security, and would be unmanned. Communication and remote monitoring devices would be installed to allow off-site control of facility operations from the EnCana office in Rifle, Colorado. Construction of the proposed facility is anticipated to take approximately 4 to 5 months, beginning concurrently with that of the pipeline. The facility would be constructed to also enable potential expansion for treatment of additional gas volumes. These volumes would result from future development of other existing and potential gas producing fields such as the Orchard Unit North and South fields, and the Roan Creek and Gasaway fields. Initial throughput volumes of the treatment facility are estimated to be 250 mmsefld, and could go up to 500 mmscf/d depending on the future gas field development. A POD for the Proposed Action and for the CO2 amine treating facility has been prepared, and will become part of the ROW grant and stipulations attached to the grant. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT NOT CARRIED FORWARD FOR ANALYSIS: No Action Alternative: Under this alternative, the ROW application for use of BLM-administered public land would be denied. However, the pipeline could be routed to avoid BLM land, and therefore could be constructed without BLM involvement or impact to BLM land. If this were to occur, the pipeline would deviate in Section 6, T8S and R96W from the route of the Proposed Action. That portion of the ROW would then be highly visible to I-70 eastbound traffic; a condition, which CDOT has stated, is unacceptable to them. The pipeline ROW would cross the Union Pacific tracks in two locations, and cross the Colorado River in two locations, impacting riparian resources and wetlands. The pipeline would pass through or adjacent to 15 private residences of the Bass Lake Subdivision. And cause potential impacts to Bass Lake. Pipeline construction would also cross several paved county roads, and cross under I-70. This route would require approximately 6.3 additional miles of pipeline to be constructed and approximate 57 additional acres of disturbance. Selection of the No Action alternative would result in substantially greater costs and environmental impacts than those of the Proposed Action. Therefore, the No Action Alternative is not further considered in this EA. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT NOT CARRIED FORWARD: An Alternative was considered that would construct the proposed 24 -inch pipeline parallel to and partially within, the existing Williams Production 20 -inch pipeline ROW and TransColorado transmission pipeline ROWs for its entire route. This alternative encounters the following concerns: 1) there is inadequate space for an additional pipeline through the rock bore adjacent to the east side of I-70 (located in sections 12 and 13, T8 S, R97W), and 2) insufficient space available in the utility corridor through the town of 6 DeBeque due to existing utilities and the presence of the Union Pacific (UP) Railroad. This alternative was not further considered. Another alternative would include transporting all of the EnCana natural gas production through the existing Williams 20 -inch pipeline. This pipeline is rated to carry approximately 400 mmscf/d of natural gas. Williams' current production is approximately 150 mmscf/d and is increasing on a daily basis as new wells are drilled and put online, leaving less than 250 mmscf/d of available capacity. EnCana's current production from the Rifle field is approximately 270 mmscf/d, and EnCana's production projections will increase to 500 mmscf/d over the next two years. The projected EnCana natural gas production is greater than the total capacity of' Williams's 20 -inch pipeline. Other options for marketing EnCana's gas could also include utilizing the Colorado Interstate Gas (CIG) and Questar pipelines. EnCana gas production would be gathered from the Mamm Creek and Hunter Mesa areas, and transported through EnCana's Hunter Mesa and Great Divide pipelines to the CIG, Questar and Williams's pipelines. However, there is insufficient available capacity in all three pipelines to carry EnCana's projected volumes of gas. Currently, natural gas production from EnCana's wells in the Rifle area is gathered, conditioned, and delivered to transmission pipeline connections near Rifle and Parachute. EnCana recently negotiated a short-term contract with Williams Production RMT for the transportation of 130 mmscf/d of gas in the existing 20 -inch Williams pipeline, from Parachute to the TransColorado Pipeline near DeBeque, Colorado. Four other major transportation pipelines currently move gas from the area. The Questar and Northwest pipelines are at maximum capacity, and the CIG pipeline will be at capacity by the end of the year. Given EnCana's current development plans, infrastructure, and the decreasing capacity of existing pipelines, the ability to transport natural gas production from this part of the Piceance Basin will face severe restriction by the end of this year. Therefore, this alternative was not carried forward. NEED FOR THE ACTION: The proposed action is in response to an application made to BLM for a ROW for the subject pipeline. The pipeline would collect existing as well as future natural gas production developed in the Rifle and Parachute Colorado area. PLAN CONFORMANCE REVIEW: The Proposed Action is subject to and has been reviewed for conformance with the following plans (43 CFR 1610.5, BLM 1617.3): Name of Plan: Grand Junction Resource Management Plan (RMP) Date Approved: January 1987 The Proposed Action is in conformance with these plans [43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1610.5, BLM 1617.31 7 Decision Number/Page: SO -3, page 2-3; WR -8, page 2-4 Decision Language: SO -3: Analyze proposed surface -disturbing projects to determine suitability of soils to support such projects. WR -8: maintain or improve water quality on public land in the resource area by incorporating site- specific mitigation or improvement measures into other resource program projects that have potential to affect water quality. Glenwood Springs RMP Date Approved: January 1984 (Revised 1988) The proposed action is in conformance with these plans (43 CFR 1610.5, BLM 1617.3). Decision Number/Page: Pages 40 and 41, Transportation Management and Utility and Communication Facility Management of the Glenwood Springs Resource Area RMP. Decision Language: The Proposed Action has been reviewed for conformance with this plan . (43 CFR 1610.5, BLM 1617.3). The Proposed Action is in conformance with the management decisions for Transportation and Communication Facility Management. "Designate 443,993 acres (78 percent) of public land suitable for consideration..." On private lands, this project is subject to County regulations. In Garfield County, Special Use and Conditional Use permits are required for the amine plant and pipeline. Public meetings will be held by the County Board of Commissioners to discuss the project. EnCana and BLM are working cooperatively with the County to share information, address local concerns, and inform the public. STANDARDS FOR PUBLIC LAND HEALTH On February 12, 1997, the Colorado Standards for Public Land Health became effective for all public lands in Colorado. The standards apply to five categories of resource values: (1) upland soils, (2) riparian systems, (3) plant and animal communities, (4) threatened and endangered species, and BLM sensitive species and (5) water quality. Standards describe conditions needed to sustain public land health and relate to all uses of the public lands. At this time, the lands involved in the Proposed Action and alternatives have not had a formal Land Health Assessment completed. The assessment for the subject lands in the Grand Junction Field Office is scheduled for summer 2004 (BLM-1, personal communication 2004), and for lands in the Glenwood Springs Field Office, the assessment is scheduled for spring 2004 (BLM-2, personal communication 2004). Assessments will be performed on a landscape, or watershed basis. Since the assessments are not yet complete, a complete evaluation of impacts of the Proposed Action cannot be provided at this time. However, a general analysis of expected impacts (findings) for each the five categories are included the Affected Environment/ Consequences/ Mitigation Measures sections, which follow. 8 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES/1vIITIGATION MEASURES: The BLM-administered land in the project area is located in rolling to steep hills and gently sloping mesa tops and terraces. Shadscale, greasewood, rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, alkali sacaton, and other grasses and forbs are the predominant vegetation. Exposure of Wasatch shale and sandstone are in the area. Members of the Wasatch and Green River formations make up the Roan Cliffs that lie just to the north. The pipeline would be constructed from I-70 at an elevation of 5,160 feet mean sea level (ms1) north of Parachute and would terminate at the CO2 amine treating facility in Logan Wash at an elevation of 5,240 feet msl. Since approximately 9 miles of the Proposed Action route is planned to occupy the same ROW as the Williams 20 -inch pipeline, much of the analysis performed and documented in the Williams EA is applicable and therefore, is used/referenced in this EA. Standards For Land Health Findings The Colorado Land Health Standards categories include more than one resource element in some cases. Therefore, findings for each standard are addressed here rather than under individual resource element sections. Standard #1 Finding: During the construction phase, minor increases in soil erosion may be expected. The proposed project is not expected to result in long-term impacts that would degrade the existing upland soil conditions in the project area. Stipulations attached to project approval documents and mitigation measures included in the Plan of Development are expected to minimize negative impacts and the potential of the landscape is not expected to decrease (see Soils, Vegetation and Stipulations sections). Standard #2 Finding: No riparian zones are present on the I-70 to Logan Wash portions of the alignment. All other portions are addressed in EA CO-GJFO-02-16-EA. The project would not degrade these resources. Standard #3 Finding: The proposed project is not expected to result in impacts that would negatively affect the existing plant and animal communities along the pipeline alignment. Vegetative cover from areas of construction would be removed, and the risk of proliferation of invasive, non-native species would increase. Stipulations attached to project approval documents, and mitigation measures included in the Plan of Development are expected to minimize negative impacts and the potential of the landscape should not be affected (see Vegetation; Invasive, Non-native Species; Wildlife, and Stipulations sections). Standard #4 Finding: The proposed project is not expected to result in impacts to ESA - listed species. The alignment has been selected to avoid Uinta Basin hookless cactus individuals identified during field surveys. Construction of the proposed project may 9 result in loss of individual sensitive plants or migratory birds, but no long-term affects to populations of these species are anticipated (see Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive Species; and Stipulations sections). Successful application of the proposed reclamation measures would minimize negative impacts and habitats are expected to be maintained. Standard #5 Finding: The proposed project is not anticipated to adversely impact water quality. The alignment has been selected to specifically avoid perennial water bodies, and will only cross one, Parachute Creek. The pipeline crosses 54 ephemeral water bodies, which are at great distance from the perennial Colorado River. Proposed reclamation and sedimentation measures would minimize negative impacts to water quality. Note: Unless specifically stated otherwise, most of the analysis impact studies were conducted primarily on BLM-administered lands only, with the exception of the threatened and endangered species survey, cultural survey, drainage crossing permitting, and soils which were also analyzed on State, public and private lands. CRITICAL ELEMENTS AIR QUALITY Affected Environment: The proposed natural gas CO2 amine treating facility would be located on private land in Logan Wash, where air quality standards are primarily administered and enforced by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). Although air quality impacts associated with operation of the amine plant are expected to be insignificant, the type and quantity of emissions from the amine plant would be provided to CDPHE as required under the Colorado air regulations. CDPHE can inspect the amine plant at any time to assess compliance; if CDPHE inspections find the amine plant to be out of compliance, appropriate measures would be taken to bring the unit into compliance. CDPHE can require the amine plant to be shutdown and levy fines if the unit is found to be out of compliance. Other air quality impacts associated with the Proposed Action would result from the short-term production of particulate dust and vehicle exhaust emissions during construction of the pipeline. These impacts would be localized to the construction area and associated roads during the construction and reclamation phases of the project. Public access to these areas would be restricted during pipeline construction, which would mitigate the public's exposure to particulate dust. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: The Proposed Action would not result in significant or long-term impacts to air quality. Potential impacts on air quality from pipeline construction would mostly occur during construction and reclamation of the pipeline and during construction of the CO2 amine treating facility. The duration of these activities and their associated impacts is expected to be 4 months or less. 10 Air quality impacts associated with the project are mitigated by 1) the short duration (i.e., less than four months) of construction, 2) immediate reclamation of the disturbed areas, and 3) minimizing vehicular travel to the project site through use of a shuttle vehicle. Dust suppression measures such as watering the ROW and limiting earth moving activities during high wind conditions would be implemented to further mitigate air quality impacts. Dust control measures and procedures are detailed in the POD and in the contractor construction package. Contract environmental inspectors would monitor adherence to the dust control mitigation measures. AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN Affected Environment: The project area contains no areas of critical environmental concern. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: No impacts would occur and no mitigation measures are proposed. CULTURAL RESOURCES Affected Environment: Pursuant to the following, a cultural resource inventory of federally managed lands and actions permitted by a federal agency must be undertaken prior to the agency considering the proposed surface disturbing actions - Historic Sites Act of 1935 (PI 74-292), National Historic Preservation Act, 1966 (P1 95-515), as amended (PL 102-575), National Environmental Policy Act 1969 (PL 91-190), Executive Order 11593, 1971 (16USC 470), Archaeological and Historic Data Preservation Act, 1974 (PL 93-291), American Indian Religious Freedom Act, 1978 (PL 95-341) and Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act 1990 (PL 101-601). The Proposed Action pipeline route and CO2 amine treating facility was inventoried at a Class III level (100%) to determine whether cultural resources were present, and if present, the affect the Proposed Action would have on those resources. Uncompahgre Archaeological Consultants conducted a Class I literature search and review of the entire proposed pipeline route; and a Class III field examination of a segment of the proposed pipeline route that crosses BLM-administered public land, and American Soda and other private property north of Parachute. The on -the -ground inventory area consisted of a 150 -foot corridor centered on the flagged centerline. The inventory also included areas of previous disturbance such as existing pipeline ROWs and highway ROW. In addition three areas of block inventory were conducted. Two of the areas proposed for staging areas, and one block area was on the western terminus of the pipeline at the proposed location of the CO2 amine treating facility. Three segments of the pipeline on BLM managed lands were re-routed to avoid cultural resources or mitigate visual effects. These segments were inventoried at the same level and intensity as described above, with negative results. A total of 196 acres were inventoried at a Class III level. 11 A Class I literature review of the records at the Grand Junction and Glenwood Springs Field Offices, BLM and the Historical Society's Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation was conducted for the entire pipeline corridor, with an approximate one - mile study area centered on the proposed route. The file search revealed that previous cultural resource inventories had been conducted in and around the proposed route. The BLM-administered public land had been inventoried for a pipeline, a portion of which the current proposed route parallels. The most notable previously recorded sites are 5GF959 (described below) and 5GF110. The Sisyphus Shelter was determined to be eligible to the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP), but was excavated and destroyed by construction of I-70. A total of three prehistoric archaeological sites, ten prehistoric isolated fords and five Modern Features were recorded. Five locations were observed with cultural remains that appeared to be less than 50 years old. The sites and isolated finds were observed to be in areas where the surface has been eroded, indicating that there is a high potential for undiscovered subsurface sites. The three prehistoric archaeological sites -5GF959, 3183 and 3184 are field evaluated as eligible to the NRNP. The original pipeline route was moved to avoid affecting 5GF959, 3183 and 3184. Therefore, the Proposed Action would not affect the site. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Mitigation measures to avoid impacts to archaeological sites include pipeline reroute. The pipeline was relocated in two locations to avoid impacting archaeological sites 5GF959, 3183 and 3184. Although the route was moved to avoid affecting 5GF959, the proposed pipeline corridor lies adjacent to the northeast comer of the site. The soils in this area appear to be at least 50 cm deep and sandy. A monitor during pipeline construction is recommended because subsurface cultural resources may be present and undiscovered. In addition, an education/discovery stipulation would be added to the ROW grant to stress the importance of this matter to EnCana's employees and subcontractors. All persons who are associated with the project must be informed that if anyone is found disturbing historic, archaeological or scientific resources, including collecting artifacts, the person or persons could be subject to prosecution. Pursuant to 43CFR10.4(g), the BLM authorized officer must be notified, by telephone, with written confirmation, immediately upon the discovery of human remains, funerary items, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony. Further, pursuant to 43CFR10.4 (c) and (d), activities must cease in the vicinity of the discovery and the discovery must be protected for 30 days or until notified to proceed by the authorized officer. If, in connection with operations under this contract, EnCana and its contractors, subcontractors, or employees of any of them, discovers, encounters or becomes aware of any objects or sites of cultural or paleontological value or scientific interest such as historic or prehistoric ruins, graves or grave markers, fossils, or artifacts, the proponent shall immediately suspend all operations in the vicinity of the cultural or paleontological 12 resource and shall notify the BLM authorized officer of the findings (16 U.S.C. 470h-3, 36 CFR 800.112). Operations may resume at the discovery site upon receipt of written instructions and authorization by the authorized officer. Approval to proceed will be based upon evaluation of the resource. Evaluation shall be by a qualified professional selected by the authorized officer from a federal agency insofar as practicable. When not practicable, the holder shall bear the cost of the services of a non-federal professional. Within five working days the authorized officer will inform the holder as to: • Whether the materials appear eligible for the NRHP; • The mitigation measures the holder will likely have to undertake before the site can be used (assuming in situ preservation is not necessary); and, • A time frame for the authorized officer to complete an expedited review under 36 CFR 800.11, or any agreements in lieu thereof, to confirm through the State Historic Preservation Officer that the findings of the authorized officer are correct and the mitigation is appropriate. The proponent may relocate activities to avoid the expense of mitigation and/or the delays associated with this process, as long as the new area has been appropriately cleared of resources and' the exposed materials are recorded and stabilized. Otherwise, the proponent will be responsible for mitigation costs. The authorized officer will provide technical and procedural guidelines for the conduct of mitigation. Upon verification from the authorized officer that the required mitigation has been completed, the proponent would then be allowed to resume construction. Antiquities, historic, prehistoric ruins, paleontological or objects of scientific interest that are outside of the authorization boundaries but directly associated with the impacted resource would also be included in this evaluation and/or mitigation. Antiquities, historic, prehistoric ruins, paleontological or objects of scientific interest, identified or unidentified, that are outside of the authorization and not associated with the resource within the authorization would also be protected. Impacts that occur to such resources that are related to the authorization activities would be mitigated at the proponent's cost including the cost of consultation with Native American groups. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Affected Environment: The requirements for environmental justice review during an environmental analysis were established by Executive Order 12898 (February 11, 1994). That order declared that each Federal agency is to identify "disproportionately high and adverse human health or environment effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low income populations." Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: The Proposed Action would produce no high and adverse human health or environmental effects and would therefore have no 13 disproportionately high and adverse human health or environment effects on minority and low-income populations. FARMLANDS, PRIME AND UNIQUE Affected Environment: There are no prime and unique farmlands affected by this proposal. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: No impacts would occur and no mitigation measures are proposed. FLOODPLAINS Affected Environment: The eastern end of the proposed pipeline route lies within the floodplain of Parachute Creek in Section 2, T7S and R96W. Parachute Creek is a perennial stream and contains a narrow, rocky, incised channel. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: the Army Corps of Engineers through the Nationwide 12 permitting process would mitigate and develop design features for the pipeline's stream crossing at Parachute Creek. In general, during pipeline construction, the flow of the river would be diverted, but would not hamper passage of fish and wildlife. After construction of the pipeline is complete in this area, the stream and riparian resources would be returned to their original character to the extent possible and riprap would be placed to maintain the integrity and stability of the channel. Regarding oil and gas operations in general, a US Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Instruction Memorandum CO -932, dated March 10, 2000, states that "as part of the extended biological opinion, BLM is no longer required to track or report depletions associated with oil and gas drilling activities in the upper Colorado River Basin. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have agreed with BLM's position that oil and gas drilling activities on BLM lands in the upper basin contribute substantially more non - tributary water than they deplete." Furthermore, the water required for hydrostatic testing of this 24 -inch pipeline would require approximately 1.5 acre feet of water, which is under the 100 acre feet depletion limit where a formal U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service consultation is required. INVASIVE, NON-NATIVE SPECIES Affected Environment: A survey of the portion of the alignment between I-70 and Logan wash for invasive, non-native species was conducted during the sensitive plant species survey. All portions of the alignment have cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum) present, sometimes as a major component of the vegetation. In addition to cheatgrass, an occasional weedy Cirsum was noted. Small patches of invasive, non-native species, including weedy Cirsium spp. and Knapweed (Centaurea spp.), are present on BLM and private lands at the extreme western end of the proposed route located in Logan Wash. 14 Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Soil disturbance related to the proposed project could result in proliferation of invasive, non-native plant species and degradation of wildlife habitat and native plant associations. To mitigate such impacts, the proponent would be required to reseed all disturbed sites with a BLM-approved mix at the earliest appropriate time following construction, and to implement a reclamation and weed monitoring/control program. If reclamation efforts were found to be unacceptable, proponent would be required to implement corrective actions. The proponent would be responsible for submitting a suitable Pesticide Use Proposal (PUP) and implementation of timely weed control. In addition, the proponent would be required to pressure wash all construction heavy equipment prior to entry onto the project lands, and to use certified seed and mulch (straw bales). See the Stipulations section for details of mitigation measures. NATIVE AMERICAN RELIGIOUS CONCERNS Affected Environment: The Class III cultural resources inventory (GJFO CRIR 14504- 01) resulted in the recordation of two eligible properties and a reevaluation of a tbird property. All three sites are prehistoric and of unknown cultural affiliation. In addition, there is no known evidence that suggests that the project area holds special significance for Native Americans. Letters requesting comment from any interested parties were sent to the current chairs of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation. No responses have been received. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: None THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE SPECIES Endangered Species Act (ESA) Listed Species Affected Environment: A review of the USFWS list of endangered species and consultation with BLM biologists indicated that the following species may occur in the general project area and should be addressed in this EA. 15 Federally Listed Species ESA Status Fish Razorback Sucker Xyraunchen texanus Endangered Colorado pikeminnow Ptychocheilus lucius Endangered Humpback chub Gila cypha Endangered Bonytail Gila elegans Endangered Birds Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened Mexican spotted owl Strix occidentalis lucida Endangered Mammals Black -footed ferret Mustela nigripes Endangered Plants Uinta Basin hookless cactus Sclerocactus glaucus Threatened Federally -listed fish species: There is no habitat for these species along the pipeline. However, removal of water from the Colorado River or its tributaries, e.g., for pipeline testing, could impact these species. All necessary hydrostatic testing water will be obtained as a by-product of EnCana's oil and gas drilling activities. After hydrostatic testing, the water will not be discharged into a drainage but will be used in oil and gas drilling activities. BLM has determined that activities associated with oil and gas drilling contribute more non -tributary water than they delete (BLM Instruction Memorandum CO -2000-19, March 10, 2000). Accordingly, the hydrostatic water is not a reportable depletion and the depletion could be presumed to have no net impact on the endangered fishes of the Colorado River. Bald eagle: According to the Colorado Division of Wildlife (CDOW), there are no active bald eagle nests or winter roosts in the vicinity of the pipeline. Parachute Creek at the pipeline crossing does lie within a designated winter use area. No seasonal restrictions are considered necessary to protect winter use areas. Mexican spotted owl: Habitat for this species consists of large, steep canyons with exposed cliffs and dense old-growth mixed forest of Douglas fir, white fir, and ponderosa pine, and canyons in pinyon juniper woodlands with small and widely scattered patches of old Douglas fir (Andrews and Righter 1992). This habitat is not found in the project area. Black -footed ferret: This animal's range was once coextensive with that of various species of prairie dog (Cynomys spp.), upon which the ferret is entirely dependent for food and shelter (Armstrong 1972). There is no habitat for this species along the pipeline alignment as the nearest prairie dog colony is located west of DeBeque. Uinta Basin hookless cactus: A survey of the project area (WestWater, 2004) located 3 individuals of this species. Two of these were not within the proposed alignment, and the 16 alignment has been revised to avoid the third plant. The revised alignment is at least 200 feet from the identified individuals. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Because habitat for all the listed species but the Uinta Basin hookless cactus is not present along the proposed route and because the individual cactus would be avoided, the proposed project is not expected to have any effects on any ESA listed species. ESA Candidates Affected Environment: The site of the proposed project may include potential habitat for 3 candidate species: Gmnison sage grouse, yellow -billed cuckoo and DeBeque phacelia (Phacelia submutica). While the project area includes potential habitat for Gunnison sage grouse — sagebrush - dominated shrublands - the shrublands along the alignment do not include characteristics of known Gunnison sage grouse use areas (distance to water, density of shrub cover, etc.) and no leks or observations of use of the area by this bird are of record. The proposed alignment includes no habitat suitable for yellow -billed cuckoo. DeBeque phacelia is discussed below in the Sensitive Species section since surveys for this plant were performed in conjunction with sensitive plants. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Because suitable habitat is not found along the alignment, the proposed project is expected to have no impact on ESA Candidate birds. DeBeque phacelia is discussed in the Sensitive Species section below. Sensitive Species Species discussed in this section include Birds of Conservation Concern (or Migratory Birds), BLM recognized sensitive species, and the candidate for listing DeBeque phacelia. Birds of Conservation Concern Affected Environment: The US Fish and Wildlife Service (2002) has compiled a list of bird species of conservation concern. Species included on the list for the Southern Rockies and Colorado Plateau are presented below; those with an asterisk (*) are or were known to occur, as migrants, breeders, or non -breeding summer residents in the general vicinity of the project area according to the Colorado Division of Wildlife and the Colorado Field Ornithologists (Kingery 1988) and. For those species marked with a double asterisk (**), suitable nesting habitat (pinyon juniper woodland, or semi -desert shrubland) exists along pipeline route (Andrews and Righter 1992). This list has been reviewed and revised by BLM GJFO Wildlife Biologist, Ron Lambeth based on long- term observations in the general vicinity of the project. 17 Two species on the list, the Gunnison sage grouse and the yellow -billed cuckoo, are also federal candidate species for protection under the ESA (see above). The peregrine falcon was recently delisted. Northern harrier* Swainson's hawk* Ferruginous hawk** Golden eagle* Peregrine falcon* Prairie falcon* Gunnison sage grouse** Snowy plover Mountain plover Solitary sandpiper* Marbled godwit* Wilson's phalarope* Yellow -billed cuckoo* Flammulated owl Burrowing owl * Short -eared owl Black swift Lewis' woodpecker Williamson's sapsucker** Pinyon jay** Bendire's thrasher Crissal thrasher Sprague's pipit Gray vireo** Virginia's warbler* Black -throated gray warbler** Grace's warbler Sage sparrow** Chestnut -collared longspur Circus cyaneus Buteo swainsoni Buteo regalis Aquila chrysaetos Falco peregrinus Falco mexicanus Centrocercus minimus Charadrius alexandrinus Charadrius montanus Tringa solitaria Limosa fedoa Phalaropus tricolor Coccyzus americanus Otus flammeolus Athene cunicularia Asio flammeus Cypseloides niger Melanerpes lewis Sphyrapicus thyroides Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus Toxostoma bendirei Toxostoma dorsale Anthus spragueii Vireo vicinior Vermivora virginiae Dendroica nigrescens Dendroica graciae Amphispiza belli Calcarius ornatus Of course, not all the above species are likely to be encountered along the pipeline route due to a lack of suitable habitat. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Construction of the pipeline could result in accidental loss of individual birds, particularly ground nesting species, if construction occurs during the breeding/nesting season (March through June), though the likelihood of such an occurrence are low. There is limited potential for accidental loss of individuals. The project is expected to result in no intentional take of individuals. 18 BLM Sensitive Species Affected Environment: Based on consultation with BLM biologists, three BLM sensitive plant species; Naturita milkvetch (Astragalus naturitensis), DeBeque milkvetch (A. debequaeus) and adobe thistle (Cirsium perplexans), and the ESA candidate DeBeque phacelia were identified as possibly being present in the pipeline alignment. A survey of the alignment (WestWater 2004) did not locate any Naturita millcvetch, DeBeque milkvetch, or DeBeque phacelia. However, since the survey was performed in the latter part of the growing season, and the area has been subject to ongoing drought conditions, the lack of these species at the time of survey does not necessarily indicate they are not present. A re -survey of the alignment in late May or April of 2004 will be performed. The survey did locate numerous adobe thistle individuals, and considered the species to be locally common. A total of approximately 423 individuals could be removed from an estimated population of more than 2400 plants within 300 feet of the pipeline alignment. Additional individuals were observed outside of the surveyed area so the total population in the area is likely to be much greater. Adobe thistle plants were found on grey or reddish colored, vertisolic soils, often in association with the annual tansey mustard, (Descurainia pinnata) and widely spaced shadscale (Atriplex confertifolia) shrubs. The report also documented the occurrence of recently established plants on disturbed sites along the pipeline alignment. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: A spring 2004 re -survey will help to determine if the milkvetches or phacelia are present on the proposed alignment. If no individuals are found, the project is unlikely to have any impact on these species. If individuals are found, a pipeline re-route may be necessary to avoid plant groups. Based on the numbers of adobe thistle individuals found within 300 feet of the proposed alignment, the loss of 423 individuals would result in the loss of approximately 18% of the population in this limited area. It is likely that loss of 423 adobe thistle individuals would amount to less than 10 percent of the local population, as many other plants are present outside the surveyed area. The loss of 423 individuals is unlikely to lead to a trend toward ESA listing of this species. Based on observations of this plant becoming established on recently disturbed sites in the project area (WestWater 2004), it is likely that plants will naturally re-establish. In order to mitigate impacts to this species, a specific stipulation requiring monitoring of adobe thistle establishment, and planting of hand collected seed if sufficient establishment is not achieved would be added to project approval documents (see Stipulations section). WASTES, HAZARDOUS OR SOLID Affected Environment: The potential concerns associated with hazardous and solid wastes would be improper disposal of solid wastes, improper use of hazardous materials, or the disposal of hazardous wastes. Standard ROW terms and stipulations require adherence to applicable state and federal laws, which would include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 19 Compensation, and Liability Act, and Federal Land Policy Management Act (FLPMA) which prohibits the disposal of solid (or hazardous) wastes on Public lands. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: A project of this size would require the storage and use of larger quantities of hazardous materials (fuels, for example). Accordingly, if the project were approved, prior to the beginning of construction activities, EnCana would comply with their Spill Prevention and Countermeasure Plan (SPCC) in the POD. This plan outlines measures for the safe transportation, storage, and use of hazardous materials. It also outlines steps the contractor(s) would take to respond to spills or other accidents involving hazardous materials. This plan has been developed and the information is included in the POD. The SPCC and POD would be approved by the BLM before construction is allowed to proceed. WATER QUALITY, SURFACE AND GROUND Affected Environment: The proposed project area lies within the Colorado River Basin, and crosses perennial Parachute Creek, as well as many ephemeral streams. Parachute Creek flow is seasonal, with the greatest flow volumes during spring snowmelt runoff and base flow conditions in fall and winter. Occasional flood events do occur from exceptional storm precipitation. Irrigation withdrawal and return structures have greatly modified flow conditions in the crossing area of Parachute Creek. Sediment load rates are highly variable, with increased rates during heavy runoff events and periods. Sediment loads of 2000 mg/1 are common during snowmelt, but can range as high as 95,000 mg/1 during storm events. The proposed pipeline alignment crosses 54 ephemeral water bodies. No water quality data are available for the many ephemeral stream channels within the study area. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: The primary potential water quality impact on BLM-administered lands would be from sediment availability increases during construction. Trenching operations remove vegetative cover and disturb soils along the pipeline route and access roads. Storm water flow during construction could increase sedimentary loading of affected drainage channels. The naturally high erodibility of local soils would likely be increased only slightly above background levels by project construction. Proper use of sediment barriers such as silt fences and straw bales can mitigate much of the sediment transport to the Colorado River. Potential increased sediment load and consequential need for sediment control measures would continue from the construction phase until reestablishment of preconstruction ground cover, probably one or two growing seasons. The EnCana 24 -inch pipeline does not discharge to any watershed, nor require any water for operation therefore, the greatest environmental consequence from operation and maintenance of the pipeline to water resources would be from sedimentation. Sedimentation can occur as a result of erosion of the ROW/disturbed areas. Sedimentation occurs, in general, from water/precipitation flowing over unreclaimed and unvegetated areas, which transports sediment within the watershed. The disturbance and sedimentation effects from the pipeline ROW would be mitigated by implementation of 20 the storm water management plan in the POD, which incorporates BMPs and other mitigation measures to control sedimentation. WETLANDS & RIPARIAN ZONES Affected Environment: The proposed pipeline will cross Parachute Creek, and associated fringe wetland on private lands located in SE 1/4 Section 2, T7S, and R96W. No wetlands or riparian zones would be crossed in the new alignment section between I-70 and Logan Wash. An Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit # 12 has been obtained by Wagon Wheel Consulting for the one wetland crossing on Parachute Creek, and 54 dry wash crossings. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: The fringe wetland and Parachute Creek crossing would be restored in conformance with Army Corps of Engineers standards. Short-term impacts related to construction disturbance would occur. No long-term impacts are expected. WILDERNESS AREAS AND WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS Affected Environment: This project should not affect any Wilderness Areas or Wild and Scenic Rivers, as no such areas exist within or near the project area. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: No impacts would occur and no mitigation measures are proposed. NON-CRITICAL ELEMENTS SOILS Affected Environment: (Soils discussed in this section are on the BLM-administered portion of the project.) Soils are derived primarily from geologic materials of the sandstone and shale members of the Wasatch and Green River formations, and in aeolian materials from other geologic sources. Approximately two-thirds of this section of the proposed route would entail construction on deep to very deep, well -drained soils; the remaining third would cross soils or land types with inclusions of bedrock, or shallow soils overlying bedrock at depths of less than 20 inches. Soil textures on the majority of the route generally have a higher clay content resulting from the Wasatch Shale influence. The water erosion potential is high to very high for all soils. Soil Map Units, including a brief description of their components and their approximate percentage of the route, are as follows: Barx loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes: deep, well -drained soils on dissected plateaus; loam and clay loam textures; approximately 11 percent of the route. 21 Panitchen loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes: deep, well -drained, stratified valley and low terrace alluvium; loam, gravelly loam, and gravelly clay loam textures; approximately 1.5 percent of the route. Torriorthents, warm -Rock outcrop, 35 to 90 percent slopes: steep, mainly south -facing sideslopes of hills, ridges, and canyon sides; shallow to deep soils with up to 40 percent exposed sandstone and shale bedrock, including scattered areas having a stony or flaggy surface; channery loam texture is typical; approximately 5 percent of the route. Dominguez clay loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes: deep, well -drained, soils on alluvial fans and toe slopes, with clay loam to clay textures; approximately 25 percent of the route. Biedsaw-Sunup gravelly loams, 10 to 40 percent slopes: on ridge sideslopes; deep (45 percent of the mapping unit) to shallow (25 percent of the mapping unit) soils with gravelly loam surface textures. Biedsaw soils have clay loam to silty clay loam subsoil textures; Sunup soils have a gravelly loam texture overlying sandstone bedrock at I1 inches. Soils are well -drained; approximately 19 percent of the route. Bunkwater very fine sandy loam, 1 to 8 percent slopes: deep, well -drained soils on structural benches; subsoil textures are clay loam and silty clay loam. This soil mapping unit makes up approximately 21 percent of the route. Travessilla-Rock outcrop complex, 10 to 35 percent slopes: up to 40 percent sandstone bedrock outcrop; shallow soil with fine sandy loam texture, on dissected mesas; approximately 10 percent of the route. Happle very channery sandy loam, 3 to 12 percent slopes: deep, well -drained soils on alluvial fans; channery sandy loam to extremely channery coarse sandy loam textures; approximately 7.5 percent of the route. Barx loam (# 3), deep, well drained, alkaline, 0 to 15 percent slope alluvium derived from sandstone and shale in approximately 7 percent of the DeBeque study area and approximately 13 percent of the Parachute study area. Arvada loam, (# 3), deep, well drained, alkaline alluvium derived from sandstone and shale with 6 to 20 percent slopes in approximately 33 percent of the Parachute study area. Torriorthents-Camborthids rock outcrop complex, (# 66), exposed sandstone and shale bedrock, loose stone, and shallow to deep stony basaltic alluvium on steep slopes in approximately 17 percent of the Parachute study area. Nihill Channery loam (# 47), deep, well drained, 6 to 25 percent sloped to hilly alluvial fan and valley slope loam in approximately 23 percent of the Parachute study area. Heldt clay loam (# 30), deep, well drained, the 6 to 12 percent sloped to rolling alluvial fan and valley slope loam in approximately 10 percent of the Parachute study area 22 Soil Survey maps and detailed descriptions of the soils (Debeque-Plateau Soil Survey) are available at both the Grand Junction offices of the Bureau of Land Management and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. BLM Colorado Standards and Guidelines, Standard 1, Upland Soils: Successful reclamation would, in the long-term, help return the disturbed soils to acceptable soil health, thereby meeting Standard 1. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Pipeline construction would remove surface cover and disturb soils, thus potentially increasing soil erosion, and reducing soil health and productivity. Segregation of topsoil material and replacement of spoil in its respective original position (last out, first in) would assist in the reestablishment of soil health and productivity. Standard erosion control practices must be implemented, and reseeding of the disturbed areas done in the fall, after October 15t. These stipulations must be included in the POD, which will be a part of the ROW grant. VEGETATION Affected Environment: Sparsely scattered plants and up to 100% bare ground characterize the vegetation of the project area between I-70 and Logan Wash. Based on GIS data provided by BLM, vegetation through which the proposed route passes can be categorized into the 5 vegetation types shown in the following table. Dominant species of each type are also shown, as is the area of each vegetation type that would be disturbed by the project. Vegetation Type Dominant Species Amount of Land Disturbed by Project (Acres) Pipeline Staging Areas* Grass mixtures of cheatgrass, galleta grass, sand dropseed, alkali sacaton, and bottlebrush squirreltail. 10 0 Sage big sagebrush 9.1 5 Juniper/Pinyon sparsely scattered Utah juniper and infrequent pinyon pine. 6.6 0 Semi -desert shrub mixtures of greasewood, four -wing saltbush, shadscale, and rabbitbrush 12.4 25 Bare/ Disturbed Mostly unvegetated 1.6 0 eludes site of proposed amine plant. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Existing vegetation in construction areas will be removed (see previous table), and the risk of proliferation of invasive, non-native species, would increase (see Invasive, Non-native Species section). Application of Stipulations attached to approval documents (see Stipulations section) and mitigation measures included in the project Plan of Development are expected to result in adequate establishment of herbaceous vegetation and shrubs within approximately 3 growing 23 seasons of reclamation. The following seed mix of certified seed will be applied to all disturbed areas of BLM. Species Common Name Paloma Indian ricegrass Luna pubescent wheatgrass Viva galleta grass Rincon Fourwing Saltbrush Shadscale Bottlebrush squirreltail Application Rate Pounds/Acre PLS 3 2.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 TOTAL 11.5 Drill seed after October 15 and before soil is frozen, covering seed 1/2 to % inch deep. Where seed cannot be drilled, broadcast application shall be used at twice the recommended application rate. The proponent would be required to implement a reclamation and weed monitoring/control program. If reclamation efforts were found to be unacceptable, proponent would be required to implement corrective actions. The proponent would be responsible for submitting a suitable Pesticide Use Proposal (PUP) and implementation of timely weed control. In addition, the proponent would be required to pressure wash all construction heavy equipment prior to entry onto the project lands, and to use certified seed and mulch (hay bales). See Stipulations section for details of mitigation measures. WILDLIFE Raptors Affected Environment: Raptors (hawks, eagles, falcons, vultures, owls) may be found along the pipeline. Some, such as American kestrel, red-tailed hawk, great homed owl, and screech owl, probably nest in the immediate vicinity. Others, such as golden eagle, turkey vulture, peregrine falcon, and prairie falcon, which could nest on the nearby Roan Cliffs, may forage in the woodlands and shrub lands through which the pipeline will pass. Many other species may be found there during migration and winter. No formal raptor nest site surveys were conducted; however, an informal nest search was carried out simultaneously with the plant search. No nests were found. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Since very little nesting or foraging habitat, relative to the amount now available, would be disturbed by construction and operation of the pipeline, no impacts are expected. Soil disturbance could result in proliferation of non-native, invasive plant species and degradation of habitat. The proponent would be required to reseed all disturbed sites with a BLM approved mix following construction and to implement a weed monitoring and control program to mitigate such impacts (see Vegetation and Invasive, Non-native Species sections). 24 Big Game Mammals Affected Environment: The pipeline route passes through winter range for both deer and elk. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Construction during the winter season could result in inordinate stress on deer and elk, and loss of herd viability. Timing limitations (December 1 through May 1) on pipeline construction would be imposed to mitigate impacts. With this limitation, it is unlikely that the project would result in long-term impacts to deer and elk. Soil disturbance could result in proliferation of non-native, invasive plant species and degradation of upland foraging habitat. The proponent would be required to reseed all disturbed sites with a BLM approved mix following construction and to implement a weed monitoring and control program to mitigate such impacts (see Vegetation and Invasive, Non-native Species, and Stipulations sections). Other Wildlife Species Affected Environment: A large number of wildlife species occurs in the vicinity, including mountain lion; medium-sized carnivores such as coyote, red fox, gray fox, badger, bobcat, and ringtail; smaller carnivores such as long-tailed weasel and spotted and striped skunks; and an array of herbivores from mice and voles to ground squirrels, cottontails, and jackrabbits. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: Some habitat alteration will result from construction of the pipeline and it is possible a few individuals could be killed. However, no long-term adverse impacts are expected. Soil disturbance could result in proliferation of non-native, invasive plant species and degradation of wildlife habitat. The proponent would be required to reseed all disturbed sites with a BLM approved mix following construction and to implement a weed monitoring and control program to mitigate such impacts (see Vegetation and Invasive, Non-native Species, and Stipulations sections). OTHER NON-CRITICAL ELEMENTS: For the following elements, those brought forward for analysis will be formatted as shown above. 25 Non -Critical Element NA or Not Present Applicable or Present, No Impact Applicable & Present and Brought Forward for Analysis Access X Cadastral Survey X Fire X Forest Management X Geology and Minerals X Hydrology/Water Rights X Law Enforcement X Paleontology X Noise X Range Management X Realty Authorizations X Recreation X Socio -Economics X Transportation X Visual Resources X PALEONTOLOGY Affected Environment: Uncompahgre Paleo Consultants surveyed the paleontological resources along the Pipeline ROW from I-70 to Logan Wash. This survey was performed in compliance with NEPA of' 1969 (NEPA P.L. 91-190; 31 Stat. 852, 42 U.S.C. 44321- 4327) and FLPMA of 1976 (P.L. 94-579; Stat. 2743, U.S.C. 1701-1782). This survey sought to locate, identify, and evaluate paleontological resources along the pipeline ROW for identification and potential protection. The proposed pipeline route overlies the Shire Member of the lower Eocene Wasatch Formation (approximately 55 million years old). The Shire Member contains alluvial plain sediments with a few channel sands and marginal lacustrine deposits with woody coal. Facies along the pipeline route include variegated red, purple, tan, and white mudstones with fluvial sandstone and siltstone interbedding. Despite several good outcrops within the study boundaries, no fossils were found. Other studies performed in or around the proposed EnCana pipeline ROW have reported no fossil localities. The route seems to follow an interval of less smectitic (swelling) mudstones than typically seen stratigraphically higher in the section of Wasatch. The upper portion of the Shire member in the DeBeque area is more carbonate -rich and bears better -developed paleosols that seem to preferentially preserve fossils. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: No impacts are anticipated to occur based on the lack of paleontological findings during the field survey. However, in the event a paleontological resource is found, the finding would be immediately reported to the BLM authorized officer. The operator would suspend all operations in the immediate area of such discovery until written authorization to proceed is issued by the authorized officer. An evaluation of the discovery would be made by the authorized officer to determine 26 appropriate actions to prevent the loss of significant resources or scientific values. The operator would be responsible for the cost of evaluation and the authorized officer would make any decision as to proper mitigation measures after consulting with the operator. NOISE Affected Environment: During construction of the facilities as described in the Proposed Action it is anticipated that periods of both intermittent and continuous noise would impact the areas immediately surrounding the construction activities. According to the DOT, Federal Highway Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), noise levels (measured at a distance of 50 feet) for modem construction equipment typically peak in the range of 75 to 90 dB(A). The proposed CO2 plant would be a source of constant noise once operational, as pumps and bumers at the facility would operate continuously. The amine reflux pumps at the planned site are anticipated to produce the highest noise levels and for the longest period of time. Measurements made of typical electrically -driven amine reflux pumps by a consultant, Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. have indicated noise levels up to 94 dB(A) immediately adjacent to the pumps. BLM regulations or planning do not establish a standard for noise level. The EPA has set a standard that a 24-hour exposure of 70 dB(A) or greater would damage human hearing. The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) has standards for oil and gas operations outlined in COGCC Rule 802 NoiseAbatement. The construction activities and subsequent maintenance and operation activities associated with the Proposed Action would be required to meet the following maximum permissible noise levels: Zone Residential Commercial Light Industrial Industrial 7:00 a.m. to next 7:00 p.m. 55 dB(A) 60 dB(A) 70 dB(A) 80 dB(A) 7:00 p.m. to next 7:00 a.m. 50 dB(A) 55 dB(A) 65 dB(A) 75 dB(A) The facilities planned under the Proposed Action do not fall within any of these zones, but the COGCC states, "Any operation involving pipeline or gas facility installation or maintenance...is subject to the maximum permissible noise levels for industrial zones." The COGCC rule also provides guidance for the measurement of sound levels from oil and gas operations, including measurement of sound levels at a distance of 25 -feet from the property line of the facility radiating the noise. In the absence of a BLM standard, the COGCC rule provides an industry -standard basis for analysis. Environmental Consequences: Impacts from pipeline construction noise would be short term (6 weeks). It is estimated that noise levels at residences near the planned pipeline path would be minimal during construction activities, as the nearest occupied residence to the pipeline is approximately 1,500 feet away. In any event, members of the general 27 public would not be allowed access to the facilities described in the Proposed Action either during construction or facility operation, and would not, therefore be in proximity to noise -generating equipment. Impacts from the CO2 amine treating facility would be more long term. Sound intensity levels decrease as distance from the noise source increases, therefore it is anticipated that noise levels at the facility boundary of the proposed amine plant would be much lower than the COGCC permissible levels. The closest residence to the proposed CO2 amine treating facility is 11/2 mile away, and the noise generated from the CO2 amine treating facility would not be audible at the closest permanent residence. LIVESTOCK GRAZING Affected Environment: No BLM grazing allotments are affected by the proposed action in the Parachute Creek or I-70 portions of the pipeline. In the westernmost portion of the route, the proposed pipeline crosses four grazing allotments, all of which are in the Grand Junction Resource Area except 6730, which is in the Glenwood Springs Resource Area. Cattle use all allotments in the spring or early summer. Grazing Allotments Along the Proposed Pipeline Route: Allotment Allotment Name Season of Use Type of Use 6702 Berry Homestead 5/1-5/31 Cattle 6730 County Line 5/1-5/31 Cattle 6733 Logan Gulch 5/5-6/18 Cattle 6752 West Logan Wash 4/1-4/21 Cattle Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: The construction of the pipeline could adversely affect livestock grazing if fences that are crossed are not properly repaired or if gates are not left as they are found while an allotment is in use. Impacts due to fence damage could be avoided by following BLM instructions as to repair or reconstruction of fences; impacts on livestock movement could be avoided by requiring construction crews to leave gates as they find them. Furthermore, unattended open trenches would be held to a minimum if livestock are present during construction. REALTY AUTHORIZATIONS The following are the realty authorizations for the Proposed Action. C-01872, CDOT highway COC -30678, CDOT highway COC -29686, Telephone line COC -65940, Natural gas pipeline, Williams C -0123147A, Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company compressor site COC -62362, Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company pipeline C -31840C, Canyon Gas Resources pipeline C-38537, Qwest telephone line 28 C-19671, Qwest telephone line C-29686, Qwest telephone line COC -62338, Grand Valley Power powerline COC -60501, Grand Valley Power powerline C-23027, Glenwood Springs Holding access road COC -50845, Occidental Oil Shale access road C-36737, Shell Oil Co. access road COC -63695, Petroleum Development Corp. access road COC -66163, JELCO G V Inc. access road COC -58104, Carl E. Gungoll Exploration Inc. access road C-35181, Teton Energy Co Inc access road C-13643, Getty Oil Co water reservoir and pipeline C-35204, Parachute Pipeline Co natural gas pipeline C-30678, CDOT I-70 Highway C-01872, CDOT highway improvement RECREATION Affected Environment: Little or no recreation activity takes place on the sections of the proposed pipeline up Parachute Creek and in the I-70 corridor. Most of the area is closed to public recreational use because it is private property or because it is the CDOT right- of-way for U.S. Highway 6. Some recreational use likely occurs on BLM and private lands in the westernmost section of the proposed right-of-way. In general, the recreation opportunity experience there would be described as "semi -primitive motorized." All BLM lands in the area are designated as "Open" to motorized and mechanized use. This means traffic is not restricted to approved roads and trails. However, as a practical matter, general recreation use is constrained because physical and/or legal access is limited from both the Highway 6 side and the Roan Creek side. In all probability, the recreation use that does occur is largely limited to late -season big game hunting. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: The impact of the proposed pipeline on recreation use would be negligible. The greatest potential for impact would be construction of a pipeline right-of-way that improves physical access to portions of the westernmost section of the proposed route and allows its use as a primitive road. Adherence to the stipulated mitigation requiring placement of excavated vegetation and rock along the reclaimed right-of-way would discourage such a development, minimizing the risk of this impact occurring. SOCIOECONOMICS Affected Environment: The proposed pipeline and gas treatment plant would be constructed entirely in Garfield County but construction resources would also be drawn from, and impacts could be felt in, Mesa County. Garfield County had a 2002 population of 47,441 and Mesa a 2002 population of 122,463. The communities most likely to be affected directly are DeBeque in Mesa County, population 471, and Parachute in Garfield County, population 1,297 (Colorado Demography Section, Department of Local Affairs, 29 2003). Because of the history of oil and gas and other mineral development in Mesa and Garfield Counties, the local economy has a large and diverse group of contractors that deal with construction associated with mineral development like pipelines and gas plants. Thus, much of the workforce that would be used in construction of the proposed action could come from local sources. Even if much of the workforce were to come from outside the project area, the local economy has a large supply of temporary housing that would accommodate workers from outside the area. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: During the construction phase of the pipeline project, around 150 workers would be expected on a daily basis, for a period of up to four months. Eighty to 100 workers would be required for the construction phase of the gas plant on a daily basis for as much as five months. Even if construction of the two project components were to occur simultaneously, the 250 or so workers in total would not have an adverse impact on housing in the local area since the workers would be local residents or could easily be accommodated by local temporary housing. Motels, restaurants, grocery stores, gas stations, vehicle and equipment repair shops may all experience additional activity. This would be considered a low but beneficial impact of the Proposed Action. TRANSPORTATION Affected Environment: Construction of the proposed pipeline could affect traffic along Highway 6 as construction vehicles move on and around the advancing pipeline. Management of construction traffic, delays and slowing of local traffic and traffic signage and safety would be governed by a permit from CDOT. Construction of the proposed gas treatment plant could affect traffic on the Roan Creek Road (Mesa County Road W.50, Garfield County Road 204 and Mesa County Road 45.00) during the five months required for construction, especially if plant construction overlaps the time during which the westernmost section of pipeline is constructed. The road has an average daily traffic of 337 trips (Road and Bridge Department, Garfield County, 2004). Round trips by vehicles transporting 80 to 250 workers, by construction vehicles and by service and supply vehicles could mean some days would have double the average traffic. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: The overall impact of the pipeline construction on traffic is expected to be low. Although construction of the gas plant could as much as double traffic up the Roan Creek Road, the impact would only be considered moderate because baseline use is so low. The impact would be mitigated by any requirements made by Mesa or Garfield Counties to manage traffic along the Roan Creek Road. VISUAL RESOURCES Affected Environment: The visual quality of the landscape the pipeline route passes through varies from the east end to the west end of the alignment. The 2.2 miles of 30 proposed pipeline located up the Parachute Creek drainage would be constructed in a landscape that is urban in character. The area includes the Town of Parachute and a number of substantial landscape modifications. Much of the area surrounding the town is semi -industrial in character with a railroad, a potassium processing plant, several gas treatment and compressing facilities and various other industrial and business structures. The 7.4 miles of proposed pipeline running westward from Parachute to the crossing under I-70 would be placed parallel to the recently constructed Williams Pipeline in the CDOT right-of-way for U.S. Highway 6. This area is a major transportation and utility corridor and the landscape has been modified by the construction of Highway 6, I-70, a railroad, a powerline, a telephone line, numerous fences and the Williams Pipeline immediately adjacent to Highway 6. According to the BLM Visual Resource Management (VRM) classification system, this area is designated as VRM Class III. Class III areas have moderate landscape variety and a few outstanding features. The management goal for these areas is to partially retain their landscape character. The visual impact of management activities may be evident but should not dominate the landscape. The 6.5 miles of proposed pipeline from the point where the pipeline leaves the CDOT right-of-way to its termination in Logan Wash, including two five -acre staging areas, would be constructed in a landscape that has been somewhat altered by grazing and oil and gas development. Fences, stock ponds, and some corrals are located along the proposed right-of-way as well as several partially reclaimed oil and gas drill pads with their production equipment. Several roads have been constructed in the vicinity of the pipeline. The last mile of the pipeline would be located adjacent to the TransColorado Pipeline. The landscape in this westernmost portion of the pipeline route is classified as VRM II for the about the first two miles from I-70 and then as VRM IV for the remainder of the pipeline's length (in the Grand Junction Resource Area). Class II areas have high scenic quality with a great degree of landscape variety. The management goal for such areas is to retain their landscape character. Activities in these areas should have low visual impact and should not attract attention. Class IV areas have lower scenic quality and limited landscape variety. The management goal is to allow modification of the landscape character as needed. Landscape modifications may be evident and the resulting visual contrast may be moderate to high. Environmental Consequences/Mitigation: The visual impact of construction in the Parachute Creek area would be negligible because of the substantial alteration that has already occurred there. While visibility of the proposed pipeline route in the I-70 corridor is relatively high given traffic flows along I-70 and Highway 6, the visual contrast created by the pipeline's construction would be negligible since it would be largely indistinguishable from the contrast already created by the Williams Pipeline. This impact is in accord with the corridor's VRM Class III designation which aims to retain landscape character and to permit activities that do not dominate the landscape. 31 Upon completion of construction and reclamation in the western portion of the proposed route, the pipeline would represent a moderate contrast with existing landscape character due to its width, its linear character and the altered composition of the vegetation along the right-of-way. Such a contrast is in accord with the VRM Class IV designation in the GJRA but fails the VRM Class II standard in the other part of this section. VRM II would require a low contrast that is not really evident. However, the moderate visual contrast is mitigated by the low visibility of the landscape features as the pipeline would be located below the Roan Cliffs in an area that has limited human use. The only area with high visibility is the first 300 yards west of the crossing under I-70 where travelers on the interstate would see the pipeline route. The potential visibility of the proposed pipeline at this point has, however, been largely mitigated. The proponent moved the pipeline alignment slightly to the south at BLM's request. This change places the alignment in the shoulder of an existing road and across a hillside where few trees would be removed. Overall, the visual impact of this westernmost section of the pipeline would be low. The visual impact of the gas processing plant would be moderate. This structure, located on private property in Logan Wash along the Roan Creek Road, would be built in an area that is largely rural, farming and grazing land with only limited visible evidence of industrial development. The gas plant would be a moderate modification of the landscape character in an area of moderate visibility. Such an impact is within the standard of the area's Class IV designation which anticipates modifications that are evident and may even dominate the landscape. Should the proponent choose to paint this facility on private land in the colors designated for facilities on BLM lands (See Stipulations), the visual impact would be somewhat reduced. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS SUMMARY Cumulative impacts are impacts on the environment which result when the incremental effects of the proposal being considered are added to the effects of other past, present and reasonably foreseeable actions that have occurred or could occur in the same area. The impact of an action might in itself be negligible or low but, when considered in the light of other past and future actions; it could be seen as contributing to a cumulative impact that is greater. The Parachute Creek and I-70 areas that the pipeline alignment would pass through have seen extensive development by the mineral extraction, transportation and utility sectors. Oil and gas drilling activities, railroad and highway construction and use, pipeline, power line and communication facilities have all contributed to extensive modification of a number of environmental elements. As such, any of the impacts generated by the proposed action would contribute little to the net cumulative impact in these areas. In the western section of the pipeline alignment, past activities have been limited to grazing and recreation use, some oil and gas drilling and the recent construction of the TransColorado natural gas pipeline. There is potential for more oil and gas drilling in the 32 immediate area and in the adjacent Roan Creek drainage. More pipelines could also be built in association with that development. Most of the individual impacts cited in this EA were described as negligible or low and largely minimized by mitigation activities. However, they could be contributory to the gradual modification of some elements of the environment. In particular, the visual quality and the presence of invasive species in the area and the extended socioeconomic environment. The visual impact of the proposed pipeline is described as low to moderate. However, when combined with the visual impact of the TransColorado pipeline, the previous drilling in the area and future oil and gas development, the potential exists for the visual character of the area changing if its rural character is modified by the addition of many industrial features. The threat of non-native, invasive species exists with this project as it does with most surface -disturbing projects and it can be largely mitigated. However, the cumulative effect of some non-native, invasive species gaining a foothold in a number of projects may result in a more serious issue. While only a single pipeline, the proposed action is part of a larger network of pipelines and facilities which enable the transport of natural gas from production fields to homes and businesses in other parts of the country. As such, it has a larger contributory effect on the extended socioeconomic environment than the local expenditures it represents. PERSONS / AGENCIES CONSULTED: USDI Bureau of Land Management: Dave Lehmann, Supervisory Natural Resource Specialist Tom Bargsten, Team Leader, Natural Resources Specialist Cheryl Harrison, Archaeologist Mike Berry, Archaeologist David Smith, Natural Resource Specialist Steven Hall, Public Affairs Specialist Vaughn Hackett, Realty Specialist Kay Hopkins, Recreation Planner Wayne Bankert, Petroleum Engineer Carla Scheck, Ecologist Ron Lambeth, Wildlife Biologist Dave Trappett, Natural Resources Specialist Jim Scheidt, Natural Resources Specialist Alan Kraus, Natural Resources Specialist Harley Metz, Natural Resources Specialist Tom Fresques, Wildlife Biologist Other Preparers: Jimmy Smith, Wagon Wheel Consulting Cody Smith, Wagon Wheel Consulting Kim Kaal, Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. Dion Plsek, Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. 33 Joe Miller, Cordilleran Compliance Services, Inc. Mike Klish, WestWater Engineering Steve Moore, WestWater Engineering Lonnie Renner, WestWater Engineering Michael Piontkowski, Uncompahgre Archaeological Consultants Rodney Sheetz, Uncompahgre Paleo Consultants Jeff Reale, EnCana Oil and Gas USA, Inc. Trevor Bors, EnCana Oil and Gas USA, Inc. Persons/Agencies Consulted: Mike Verketis, Colorado Department of Transportation Mark Gilfillan, US Army Corps. Of Engineers Mark Bean, Garfield County Tresi Houpt, Garfield County Doug Dennison, Garfield County John Martin, Garfield County Larry McCowen, Garfield County 34 LIST OF REFERENCES Armstrong, D. 1972. Distribution of Mammals in Colorado. University of Kansas Printing Service, Lawrence. 414pp Hail, W.J., Jr., and Smith, M.A., 1997. Geological map of the southern part of the Piceance Creek Basin, northwestern Colorado. Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map, I-2529. Andrews, R., and R. Righter. 1992. Colorado Birds. Denver Museum of Natural History. 442pp. Armstrong, H.J. and Kihm, A.J., 1980. Fossil Vertebrates of the Grand Junction Area, Grand River Institute, Grand Junction, Colorado. [An evaluation of the fossil vertebrate resources of the Glade Park and Mount Garfield Planning Areas, Grand Junction District of the Bureau of Land Management, Westem Colorado. GRI/PRI Report No. 8050], 212 pp. Hammerson, G. 1986. Amphibians and Reptiles in Colorado. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver. 131pp. Johnson, R.C. and May, F., 1978. Preliminary stratigraphic studies of the upper part of the Mesa Verde Group, the Wasatch Formation, and the lower part of the Green River Formation, DeBeque area,__Colorado, including environments of deposition and investigation of palynomorph assemblages. Miscellaneous Field Studies Map. Kingery, H. (ed.). 1988. Colorado Bird Distribution Latilong Study. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver. 81pp. U.S.D.A, 2003. U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Resources Conservation Service- Official Soil Descriptions. <http://soils.usda.gov/. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Birds of Conservation Concern 2002. Division of Migratory Bird Management, Arlington, VA. 99pp. WestWater Engineering. 2004. TESS Survey Report, EnCana Parachute to Logan Wash. Report submitted to BLM Grand Junction Field Office. 35 INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW: Name Title Area of Responsibility 36 I FONSI CO- -2004-00 EA The environmental assessment and analyzing the environmental effects of the proposed action have been reviewed. The approved mitigation measures result in a Finding of No Significant Impact on the human environment. Therefore, an environmental impact statement is not necessary to further analyze the environmental effects of the proposed action. RATIONALE: DECISION RECORD DECISION: It is my decision to RATIONALE: MITIGATION MEASURES: COMPLIANCE/MONITORING: NAME OF PREPARER: NAME OF ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR: DATE: SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL: DATE SIGNED: APPENDICES: ATTACHMENTS: 37 , Field Manager STIPULATIONS 1. The holder shall request a pre -construction conference with the Authorized Officer at least two days prior to the start of construction. The contact person is Tom Bargsten at the Grand Junction Field Office, phone (970) 244-3030. 2. The centerline of the right-of-way and the exterior limits shall be clearly flagged prior to any construction activity. 3. The alignment shall be re -surveyed during late May or April for presence of DeBeque phacelia, DeBeque milkvetch, Naturita millcvetch, and Uinta Basin hookless cactus prior to initiation of construction. If plant groups are found, alignment re-routing may be required. 4. Construction activities shall be conducted so as not to disturb more than the minimum area needed for construction of the buried pipeline. 5. All disturbed areas shall be contoured to blend with the natural topography. 6. All soil erosion associated with construction of the pipeline and facilities must be stabilized to a condition at least equal to that present before disturbance. 7. The following seed mix of certified seed will be applied to all disturbed areas of BLM. Species Application Rate Common Name Pounds/Acre PLS Paloma Indian ricegrass 3 Luna pubescent wheatgrass 2.5 Viva galleta grass 2.5 Rincon Fourwing Saltbrush 1.5 Shadscale 1.5 Bottlebrush squirreltail 1.0 TOTAL 11.5 Drill seed after October 15 and before soil is frozen, covering seed %z to ' inch deep. Where seed cannot be drilled, broadcast application shall be used at twice the recommended application rate. 8. Only certified seed and mulch (straw bales) shall be used. 9. All construction heavy equipment shall be pressure washed prior to entry on project lands to remove potential noxious weed seeds. 38 10. Proponent shall provide an annual reclamation monitoring report to document the condition of reclaimed disturbed areas. The report shall be submitted to the BLM AO by June 1 of each year for a period of up to three years. The report shall document the condition of vegetation on reclaimed areas including: projected aerial cover of desirable species, cover of invasive, non-native species (see Standard Stipulation 3. below), and erosion condition. If disturbed areas are determined by the BLM AO to be successfully reclaimed prior to the end of the 3 year period, proponent can request that monitoring be halted. If the reclaimed areas fail to provide at least 80% of vegetative cover present on undisturbed areas after 3 years, or demonstrate accelerated erosion at any time, the proponent shall reseed all disturbed areas and provide erosion control measures. 11. Adobe Thistle Stipulation — For a period of at least 3 growing seasons following pipeline construction the applicant will perform an annual monitoring examination of adobe thistle re-establishment and submit a report of findings by November 1 of each year. The examination will document the numbers and condition of abode thistle plants present within the area disturbed during construction. If at least 100 individuals have become established within 3 years, substantial evidence of re-establishment will have been achieved, and no further action will be required. If fewer than 100 individuals are present, the applicant will collect mature seed from nearby adobe thistle plants and distribute seed within disturbed plant group areas to encourage re-establishment. The proponent will continue monitoring and seeding efforts until at least 100 individuals are re- established in the plant group areas. 12. Trash shall be confined in a covered container while the project is in progress. Upon completion, all trash, flagging, laths, etc. shall be removed and hauled to an authorized disposal site. No burning of trash, trees, brush or any other material shall be allowed. 13. Proponent shall paint all above ground facilities on BLM lands, except those specifically exempted by safety regulations, in either Carlsbad Canyon, Juniper Green or other colors as directed by the BLM Authorized Officer. Use of such colors for facilities located on private lands is encouraged. 14. Thirty days prior to termination of the right-of-way, the holder shall contact the authorized officer to arrange a joint inspection of the right-of-way to formulate an acceptable termination and reclamation plan. This plan shall include, but is not limited to, removal of facilities, recontouring, stabilizing, or seeding. The authorized officer must approve the plan in writing prior to the holder's commencement of any abandonment activities. 15. It is the holder's responsibility to coordinate with all other rights-of-way holders to make sure that any conflicts are resolved. Other right-of-way holders include, but are not limited to, Qwest, CDOT, Public Service Company, Union Pacific RR, Grand Valley Power, and TransColorado Pipeline. 39 16. Applicant/Lessee shall comply with all County resolutions and regulations and permit requirements. 17. All stipulations and requirements included in the POD, as approved by the BLM Authorized Officer, will be adhered to. In the event of a conflict between measures included in the POD, and those defined here, measures contained in this document shall prevail. Any variation must receive prior approval from the BLM Authorized Officer. 18. Some of the vegetation and rock excavated during construction should be set aside and then placed on the reclaimed disturbance in such a way as to discourage unimpeded travel along the pipeline route. The objective is to eliminate development of a new, unplanned motorized route in the area. STANDARD STIPULATIONS 1. Any cultural and/or paleontological resource (historic or prehistoric site or object) discovered by the holder, or any person working on his behalf, on public or Federal land shall be immediately reported to the authorized officer. Holder shall suspend all operations in the immediate area of such discovery until written authorization to proceed is issued by the authorized officer. An evaluation of the discovery will be made by the authorized officer to determine appropriate actions to prevent the loss of significant cultural or scientific values. The holder will be responsible for the cost of evaluation and any decision as to proper mitigation measures will be made by the authorized officer after consulting with the holder. 2. Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.4(g) the holder of this authorization must notify the authorized officer, by telephone, with written confinnation, immediately upon the discovery of human remains, funerary items, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony. Further, pursuant to 43 CFR 10.4(c) and (d), you must stop activities in the vicinity of the discovery and protect it for 30 days or until notified to proceed by the authorized officer. 3. The Grant holder shall monitor the right-of-way for the presence of weeds which are included on the County noxious weed list. After consulting with the authorized officer, the holder shall control weed infestations which have resulted from the holder's construction, operation, maintenance, or use of the right-of-way. If chemical control is necessary, use of pesticides shall comply with the applicable Federal and State laws. Pesticides shall be used only in accordance with their registered uses and within limitations imposed by the Secretary of the Interior. Prior to the use of pesticides, the holder shall obtain from the authorized officer written approval of a Pesticide Use Proposal (PUP) showing the type and quantity of material to be used, the pest(s) to be controlled, method of application, location of storage and disposal of containers, and any other information deemed necessary 40 by the authorized officer. Emergency use of pesticides shall be approved in writing by the authorized officer prior to such use. 4. The holder shall comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations existing or hereafter enacted or promulgated. In any event, the holder shall comply with the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, as amended (15 U.S.C. 2601 et m.) with regard to any toxic substances that are used, generated by or stored on the right-of-way or on facilities authorized under this right-of-way grant (see 40 CFR, Part 702-799 and especially, provisions on polychlorinated biphenyls, 40 CFR 761.1-761.193). Additionally, any release of toxic substances (leaks, spills, etc.) in excess of the reportable quantity established by 40 CFR, Part 117 shall be reported as required by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, Section 102b. A copy of any report required or requested by any Federal agency or State government as a result of a reportable release or spill of any toxic substances shall be furnished to the authorized officer concurrent with the filing of the reports to the involved Federal agency or State government. 5. The holder shall comply with applicable State standards for public health and safety, environmental protection and siting, construction, operation and maintenance, if these State standards are more stringent than Federal standards for similar projects. 41 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT FORM (Shall be submitted with application) GARFIELD COUNTY (hereinafter COUNTY) and Project Development Ind. LLC for EnCana Gathering (hereinafter APPLICANT). agree as follows: Services (U.S.A.) Inc. 1. APPLICANT has submitted to COUNTY an application for Special Use Permit Re: Hunter Mesa Gathering Pipeline (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that Garfield County Resolution No. 98-09, as amended, establishes a fee schedule for each type of subdivision or land use review applications, and the guidelines for the administration of the fee structure. 3. APPLICANT and COUNTY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT agrees to make payment of the Base Fee, established for the PROTECT, and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT. APPLICANT agrees to make additional payments upon notification by the COUNTY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. 4. The Base Fee shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board of County Commissioners for the consideration of an application or additional COUNTY staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial Base Fee, APPLICANT shall pay additional billings to COUNTY to reimburse the COUNTY for the processing of the PROTECT mentioned above. APPLICANT acknowledges that all billing shall be paid prior to the final consideration by the COUNTY of any land use permit, zoning amendment; or subdivision plan. APPLICANT fgna e Date: 0 7A 3 Jimmy W. Smith Print Name .rlaLling Address: 12596 W. Bayaud Ave. Suite 400 Lakewood, 00 80228 Parachute to De Beque Proposed Pipeline Description A PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IN SECTIONS 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 26, 27, 28, 33, AND 3: ALL IN T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. ALSO, IN SECTIONS 5 AND 6, BOTH BEING IN T8S, R96W, 6TH. P.M. ALSO, IN SECTIONS 12, 11, 10, 9, 4, 5 AND 6, ALL IN T8S, R97W 6TH P.M. ALSO, IN SECTION 31, T7S, R97W, 6TH P.M. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SE 1/4 NW 1/4 OF SECTION 2, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S60°25'22"W 3056.67' FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 2 (BEING / 1912 BRASS CAP), THENCE S25°59'40"W 188.59'; THENCE SO4°09'56"E 1677.11'; THENCE S30°07'53"E 1621.71'; THENCE S13°21'52"E 200.11' TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE 1 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S89°4736"E 41.66' FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 11 (BEING A 1982 CAP); THENCE S13°21'52"E 0.09; THENCE S06°33'31"E 285.21'; THENCE S31°23'39"E 324.88; THEN( S67°04'25"E 325.91'; THENCE N88°33'23"E 382.63'; THENCE S60°46'02"E 382.68'; THENCE S59°08'23"E 97.63' TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 12, T7S, R96V 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S00°27'31 "E 910.31' FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SMD SECTION 12 (BEING A REBAR); THENCE S59°08'23"E 235.66'; THENCE S34°46'42"E 346.98'; THENCE S14°15'11"E 336.31'; THENCE S19°48'14"W 230.41'; THENCE 513°25'12"W 223.41'; THENCE S17°1123"E 186.01; THENCE S03°24'49"W 68.86; THENCE S16°1925"E 165.09'; THENCE S29°30'59"E 62.00'; THENCE S43°15'41"E 364.03'; THENCE S78°17'11 "E 169.09; THEN S71°23'16"E 91.77; THENCE S72°57'07"E 351.80; THENCE S01°44'53"E 243.39; THENCE S00°17'01"W 499.86'; THENCE S02°03'19"E 353.08'; THENCE S02°42'22"W 130.50'; THENCE S00°12'48"E 1119.41'; THENCE S07°13'38"E 64.94'; THENCE S00°23'33"E 2.15' TO A POINT ON T NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 SECTION 13, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S89°28'49"W 26.46' FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NW 1/4 NW 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION (BEING A BRASS CAP, LS 18480); THENCE S00°23'33"E 1127.55'; THENCE S36°48'18"W 281.48': THENCE S39°30'07"W 1777.15'; THENCE S45°38'41 "W 20.34' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE C THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S00°23'18"E 53.29' FROM TH) EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14 (BEING A 1982 BRASS CAP); THENCE S45°38'41"W 161.25'; THENCE S40°20'24"W 517.51'; THENCE S43°36'06"W 749.58'; THENCE S36°50'51 "W 777.35'; THENCE S20°36'13"W 151.13'; THENCE S31°10'14"W 91.70; THENCE S55°02'09"W 329.57; THENCE S69°50'40"W 273.83'; THENCE S73°26'10"W 192.27; THENCE S59°35'35"W 149.40'; THENCE 543°5328"W 219.07'; THENCE S02°22'26"E 6.40' TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S86°38'14"E 166.09' FROM THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SMD SECTION 23 (BEING A 1920 BRASS CAP); THENCE S02°22'26"E 92.37; THENCE S10°22'42"E 103.71'; THENCE S42°39'36"E 722.62'; THENCE S39°39'13"E 86.25'; THENCE S34°44'50"W 772.31'; THENCE S37°37'18"W 429.65'; THENCE S35°42'28"W 792.40'; THENCE S29°21'50"W 125.76; THENCE S46°56'13"W 55.57; THENCE S35°00'14"W 519.00'; THENCE S35°49'57"W 452.46'; THENCE S35°08'07"W 1233.29'; THENCE S34°54'21 "W 677.48'; THENCE S35°34'39"W 844.85' TO A POINT IN LOT 3 OF SECTION 26, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S03°43'18"E 309.28' FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SA1 SECTION 26 (BEING A 1920 BRASS CAP); THENCE 548°04'51"W 98.00' TO A POINT IN THE NE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 27, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S08°02'25"W 377.81' FROM TH NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE S34°50'24"W 1160.11'; THENCE S38°33'48"W 1147.75'; THENCE S51°18'54"W 1036.24'; THENCE S55°49'53"W 920.04; THENCE S55°3825"W 2570.28' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28, T7S, R96 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS NOl °44'11 "W 533.70' FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 28 (BEING A 1982 ALUMINUM CAP); THENCE S55°38'25"W 370.46'; THENCE S55°43'55"W 4132.32' TO A POINT IN THE SE 1/4 NW 1/4 OF SECTION 33, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N60°34'32"E 1792.84' FROM THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33 (BEING A 1982 ALUMINUM CAP); THENCE S55°47'05"W 1887.68' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 32, T7S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S00°11'15 "E 180.67' FROP THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE S55°47'05"W 512.74'; THENCE S55°31'25"W 863.01'; THENCE S55°47'29"W 3120.77' TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T8S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S89°05'19"W 1059.43' FROM THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 (BEING A 1982 ALUMINUM CAP); THENCE S55°47'29"W 326.57'; THENCE S55°37'51"W 1581.01' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE 1` 1/4 OF SECTION 6, T8S, R96W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S01 °32'20"E 1050.99' FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6 (BEING A 1920 BRASS CAP); THENCE S55°37'51 1090.74' THENCE S62°35'10"W 231.91'; THENCE S51°58'39"W 309.95; THENCE S54°26'51"W 483.88'; THENCE S60°47'33"W 603.12; THENCE S66°16'10"W 520.09; THENCE S34°03'03"W 9827'; THENCE S63°10'41"W 333.37'; THENCE N85°25'55"W 153.51'; THENCE S66°37'54"W 289.94'; THENCE S66°39'35"W 918.79'; THENCE S63°20'28"W 426.65' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS NO1 °38'09"W 175.92 FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12 (BEING A 2001 ALUMINUM CAP); THEN S63°20'28"W 149.39'; THENCE N83°49'58"W 66.77'; THENCE S56°35'00"W 490.44'; THENCE N84°14'57"W 83.22'; THENCE N40°30'52"W 469.69; THENCE N31°20'05"W 157.63'; THENCE N86°42'26"W 742.25'; THENCE S82°46'49"W 3453.88' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE 1' 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N00°14'38"E 181.78' FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SMD SECTION 11 (BEING A 1966 ALUMINUM CAP); THENCE S82°46'49"W 133.56; THENCE S54°16'05"W 621.31'; THENCE S74°51'17"W 1058.77; THENCE S57°24'45"W 1048.52'; THENCE S85°21'42"W 769.64'; THENCE N45°46'08"W 1601.49'; THENCE N62°33'36"W 741.50'; THENCE N59°01'53"W 138.35' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 10, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N00°54'08"E 513.44' FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10 (BEING A 2001 ALUMINUM CAP, LS 19598); THENCE N59°01'53"W 582.04'; THENCE N35°35'26"W 639.34; THENCE N65°13'07"W 590.78'; THENCE S69°43'25"W 1008.18'; THENCE N85°52'21 "W 298.12'; THENCE N80°33'38"W 426.01; THENCE S75°34'35"W 612.14'; THENCE N65°10'42"W 1694.14' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE 1' 1/4 OF SECTION 9, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS S01°00'33"W 731.89' FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9 (BEING A SET STONE); THENCE N65°10'42"W 1743.45' TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 4, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M WHICH BEARS S89°59'44"E 1052.40' FROM THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 (BEING A SET STONE); THENCE N65°10'42"W 247.12'; THENCE N36°15'00"W 146927'; THEN( N49°54'44"W 1276.70'; THENCE N75°08'04"W 1532.23'; THENCE S88°43'33"W 74.33' TO A POIN ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N00°34'07"E 2432.18' FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 (BEING A SET STONE); THENCE 588°43'33"W 3262.81'; THENCE N61 °58'02"W 153.57'; THENCE N48°12'21 "W 1385.54'; THENCE N84°57'17"W 661.10'; THENCE N53°26'30"W 108.25'; THENCE N55°44'15"W 81.16' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 6, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N00°00'28"W 943.20' FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6 (BEIN 1977 BRASS CAP); THENCE N55°44'15"W 509.60'; THENCE N34°53'37"W 1119.55'; THENCE N06°15'36"W 305.95' TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T7S, S97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N89°25'58"W 1094.82' FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6 (BEING A 1977 BRASS CAP); THENCE N06°15'36"W 30.06'; THENCE N12°16'15"E 150.77'; THENCE N33°19'38"E 283.42; THENCE NO3°50'46"E 475.46'; THENCE N07°39'43"E 758.02'; THENCE N08°14'33"W 821.19; THENCE N49°51'31"W 840.53'; THENCE S45°02'21 "W 475.23'; THENCE S29°37'38"W 1228.43'; THENCE S36°30'07"W 368.58' TO A POINT IN TRACT 57 OF SAID SECTION 31 WHICH BEARS S55°39'13"W 87.38' FROM TRACT CORNER OF SAID TRACT 57 (BEING A BRASS CAP). BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE NORTH LINE OF T1 NW 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH IS TAKEN FROM GLOBAL POSITIONING SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS TO BEAR S89°11'01 "W A MEASURED DISTANCE 2605.46' (THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12 BEING 2001 ALUM. CAPS, LS 19598). Parachute to De Benue Pipeline Description — U.S.A. (B.L.M.) A PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY LOCATED IN THE EAST 1/2 EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 31, T7S, R97V 6TH P.M. ALSO, IN SECTION 5, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M ALSO, IN LOTS 8 & 9 OF SECTION 6, T8! R97W, 6TH P.M. ALSO, IN THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 10, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. ALSO, IN SECTION 11, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. ALSO, IN SOUTH 1/2 NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 12, TBS, R97' 6TH P.M. THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE GRANTOR'S PROPERTY LINE BEING THE NORTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF I-70 AND LOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, T8S, R97' 6TH P.M. WHICH POINT BEARS N74°55'36"W 1082.12' FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12 (BEING A 2000 ALUM. CAP, LS 19598), THENCE N31 °20'05"W 75.56'; THENCE N86°42'26"W 742.25'; THENCE S82°46'49"W 3453.88' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE l 1/4 OF SECTION 11, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N00°14'38"E 181.78' FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 11 (BEING A 1966 ALUM. CAP); THENCE S82°46'49"W 133.57': THENCE S54°16'05"W 292.76' TO A POINT ON THE GRANTOR'S PROPERTY LINE BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 NE 1/4 OF SMD SECTION 11 WHICH POINT BEARS S89°04'21"W 369.43' FROM THE SMD EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11. ALSO, BEGINNING AT A POINT THE GRANTOR'S PROPERTY LINE BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE NW 1/4 SE 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 11 WHICH POINT BEARS S73°49'08"W 1371.26' FROM THE SAID EAST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 11, THENCE S74°51'17"W 353.42'; THENCE S57°24'45"W 1048.52'; THENCE S85°21'42"W 769.64'; THENCE N45°46'08"W 1601.49'; THENCE N62°33'36"W 741.50'; THENCE N59°01'53"W 138.35' TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 10, T8S, R97 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N00°54'08"E 513.44' FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTIOI• 10 (BEING A 2001 ALUM. CAP, LS 19598); THENCE N59°01'53"W 582.04'; THENCE N35°3526"1 639.34; THENCE N65°13'07"W 590.78'; THENCE S69°43'25"W 1008.18'; THENCE N85°52'21"W 298.12'; THENCE N80°33'38"W 426.01'; THENCE S75°34'35"W 612.14'; THENCE N65°10'42"W 265.16' TO A POINT ON THE GRANTOR'S PROPERTY LINE BEING THE WEST LINE OF THE SI 1/4 NW 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 10 WHICH POINT BEARS S43°57'29"E 1849.91' FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10 (BEING A SET STONE). ALSO, BEGINNING AT POINT ON THE GRANTOR'S PROPERTY LINE BEING THE EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 5, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH POINT BEARS N00°34'07"E 2432.18' FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5 (BEING A SET STONE), THENCE S88°43'33"W 3262.82'; THENCE N61°58'02"W 153.57'; THENCE N48°12'21"W 1385.54'; THENCE N84°57'17"Vv- 661.10'; THENCE N53°26'30"W 108.25'; THENCE N55°44'15"W 81.16' TO A POINT ON THE EAS' LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 6, T8S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N00°00'28"W 943.20' FROM THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6 (BEING A 1977 BRASS CAP); THENCE N55°44'15"W 509.60'; THENCE N34°53'37"W 1119.55'; THENCE N06°15'36"W 305.95' TO A POIN ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 31, T7S, R97W, 6TH P.M. WHICH BEARS N89°25'58"W 1094.83' FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 6 (BEING A 1977 BRASS CAP); THENCE N06°15'36"W 30.06'; THENCE N12°16'15"E 150.77; THENCE N33°19'38'. 283.42; THENCE NO3°50'46"E 475.46; THENCE N07°39'43"E 758.02; THENCE N08°14'33"W 821.19'; THENCE N49°51'31 "W 840.53'; S45°02'21 "W 475.14'; THENCE S29°37'38"W 1228.43'; THENCE S36°30'07"W 306.82' TO A POINT IN THE TRACT LINE BETWEEN TRACT CORNER 5 AND 6 OF TRACT 57 OF SAID SECTION 31 WHICH BEARS N89°26'57"W 35.41' FROM SAID TRACT CORNER 5 OF TRACT 57 (BEING A BRASS CAP). BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE NORTJ LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 12 WHICH IS TAKEN FROM GLOBAL POSITIONING SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS TO BEAR S89°11'01"W A MEASURED DISTANCE OF 2605.46' (TI NORTH 1/4 CORNER AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12 BEING 2001 ALL CAPS, LS 19598). Sorted by Parcel No. Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:32-6-95 DESC: 6/42 MIN INT SEC:32: E2SW,SE SECT,TWN,RNG:33-6-95 DESC: SEC 33: SESE, PART OF N2S2 SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL DESC: LOTS 1(39.25),2(38.5),3(39.5) (210.55) SECT,TWN,RNG:34-6-95 DESC: SEC 34: SWSW, PART OF NWSW SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL, DESC: PART OF E2SW, WTLY OF COTTONWOOD CREEK & SLY OF DESC: WILLCOX CANAL (85.29) SECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-95 DESC: SEC3: PART OF LOT 1 WSLY OF COTTONWOOD CK (21.16) SECT,TWN,RNG:4-7-95 DESC: SEC 4: LOT 1 (4.75) SECT,TWN,RNG:5-7-95 DESC: SEC 5: LOTS1(34.3),2(40),3(40),4(34.4),5(2 2.9) SECT,TWN,RNG:6-7-95 DESC: SEC 6:LOTS1(40),2(40),3(40),7(39.4),SEN W,S2NE SECT,TWN,RNG:7-7-95 DESC: SEC 7: 30/100AC IN LOT 4, LYING NW OF RAILROAD DESC: R -O -W AND SOUTHERLY OF SAMPSON TRACT SECT,TWN,RNG:1-7-96 DESC: SECTION 1: SESW SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: SEC 12: 8AC IN NENW WEST OF CTY RD, 25.88AC IN DESC: NENW NORTH &/OR NE OF CTY RD, S2N2 LESS i47.62AC DESC: DESCRIBED IN BK26P468 & EXCEPT 2AC CONVEYED/POPPLE SECT,TWN,RNG:14-7 96 DESC: SECTION 14: SWSE SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: SEC 23: SECT,TWN,RNG:32-6-95 DESC: 6/42% MINERAL INTEREST SEC:32: E2SW,SE SECT,TWN,RNG:33-6- 95 DESC: SEC 33: SESE,PART OF N2S2 SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL, DESC: LOTS 1(39.25),2(38.5),3(39.5) (210.55) SECT,TWN,RNG:34-6-95 DESC: SEC 34: SWSW,PART OF NWSW SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL, DESC: PART OF E2SW, WTLY OF COTTONWOOD CREEK & SLY OF DESC: WILLCOX CANAL (85.29) SECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-95 DESC: SEC 3: PART OF LOT 1 WSLY OF COTTONWOOD CK(21.16) SECT,TWN,RNG:4-7-95 DESC: SEC 4: LOT 1 (4.75) SECT,TWN,RNG:5-7-95 DESC: SEC 5: LOTS1(34.3),2(40),3(40),4(34.4),5(2 2.9) SECT,TWN,RNG:6-7-95 DESC: SEC 6:LOTS1(40),2(40),3(40),7(39.4),SEN W,S2NE SECT,TWN,RNG:7-7-95 DESC: SEC 7: 30/100AC IN LOT 4, LYING NW OF RAILROAD DESC: R -O -W AND SOUTHERLY OF SAMPSON TRACT SECT,TWN,RNG:1-7-96 DESC: SECTION 1: SESW SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: SEC 12: 8AC IN NENW WEST OF CTY RD, 25.88AC IN DESC: NENW NORTH &/OR NE OF CTY RD, S2N2 LESS 47.62 AC DESC: DESCRIBED IN BK26P468 & EXCEPT 2AC CONVEYED/POPPLE SECT,TWN,RNG:14-7-96 DESC: SECTION 14: SWSE SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: SEC 23: LOT2(37.5),E2NW,W2SW,SWNW Owner Info Harriet Giem ATTN: Helen Marchand 4807 State Highway 9 Canon City, CO 81212-9754 804609107000 Don Lawrence Living Trust PO Box 1141 Boise City, OK 73933-1141 Assessor's Parcel 0 0 0 0 W 0CO 0 co h, MineralOwners(MailMerge 1)inPipelinePathFINAL 12.12.2003 N co 0 co a) coa Sorted by Parcel No. Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:32-6-95 DESC: 6/42 MINERAL INTEREST SEC:32: E2SW,SE SECT,TWN,RNG:33-6-95 DESC: SEC 33: SESE,PART OF N2S2 SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL DESC: LOTS 1(39.25),2(38.5),3(39.5) (210.55) SECT,TWN,RNG:34-6-95 DESC: SEC 34: SWSW,PART OF NWSW SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL DESC: PART OF E2SW, WTLY OF COTTONWOOD CREEK & SLY OF DESC: WILLCOX CANAL (85.29) SECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-95 DESC: SEC 3: PART OF LOT 1 WSLY OF COTTONWOOD CK(21.16) SECT,TWN,RNG:4-7-95 DESC: SEC 4: LOT 1 (4.75) SECT,TWN,RNG:5-7-95 DESC: SEC 5: LOTS1(34.3),2(40),3(40),4(34.4),5(2 2.9) SECT,TWN,RNG:6-7-95 DESC: SEC 6:LOTS1(40),2(40),3(40),7(39.4),SEN W.,SENE SECT,TWN,RNG:7-7-95 DESC: SEC 7: 30/100AC IN LOT 4, LYING NW OF RAILROAD DESC: R -O -W AND SOUTHERLY OF SAMPSON TRACT SECT,TWN,RNG:1-7-96 DESC: SECTION 1: SESW SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: SEC 12: 8AC IN NENW WEST OF CTY RD, 25.88AC IN DESC: NENW NORTH &/OR NE OF CTY RD, S2N2 LESS 47.62 AC DESC: DESCRIBED IN BK26P468 & EXCEPT 2AC CONVEYED/POPPLE SECT,TWN,RNG:14-7-96 .DESC: SECTION 14: SWSE SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: SEC 23: LOT2(37 5) F7NW W2SW SWNW du46U9307000 Connie M. Luther SECT,TWN,RNG:32-6-95 DESC: 6/42% MINERAL INTEREST SEC:32: E2SW,SE SECT,TWN,RNG:33-6- Wilber E. Giem 95 DESC: SEC 33: SESE,PART OF N2S2 SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL, DESC: LOTS Carol L. Seal 1(39.25),2(38.5),3(39.5) (210.55) SECT,TWN,RNG:34-6-95 DESC: SEC 34: SWSW, PART OF. NWSW Douglas W. Geim SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL, DESC: PART OF E2SW, WTLY OF COTTONWOOD CREEK & SLY OF DESC: Clara M. Hamby WILLCOX CANAL (85.29) SECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-95 DESC: SEC 3: PART OF LOT 1 WSLY OF Eugene W. Giem COTTONWOOD CK (21.16) SECT,TWN,RNG:4-7-95 DESC: SEC 4: LOT 1 (4.75) SECT,TWN,RNG:5-7- 1050 Josie Belle 95 DESC: SEC 5: LOTS1 (34.3),2(40),3(40),4(34.4),5(22.9) SECT,TWN,RNG:6-7-95 DESC: SEC Canon City, CO 6:LOTS1(40),2(40),3(40),7(39.4),SEN W,S2NE SECT,TWN,RNG:7-7-95 DESC: SEC 7: 30/100AC IN LOT 81612 4, LYING NW OF RAILROAD DESC: R -O -W AND SOUTHERLY OF SAMPSON TRACT SECT,TWN,RNG:1-7-96 DESC: SECTION 1: SESW SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: SEC 12: 8AC IN NENW WEST OF CTY RD, 25.88AC IN DESC: NENW NORTH WOR NE OF CTY RD, S2N2 LESS 47.62 AC DESC: DESCRIBED IN BK26P468 & EXCEPT 2AC CONVEYED/POPPLE SECT,TWN,RNG:14-7-96 DESC: SECTION 14: SWSE SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: SEC23: LOT2(37.5),E2NW,W2SW,SWNW Owner Info Charlotte Ann Lawrence Living Trust PO Box 1141 Boise City, OK 73933-1141 Assessor's Parcel 0 O 0 O N 0)0 O t 0 00 h, MineralOwners(MailMerge 1)inPipelinePathFINAL 12.12.2003 2 0 N O 0 N 0) N D Cl O o N O U o 0 C i N r O UO y O 9 N < -0 m N O. 0 a Sorted by Parcel No. Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:32-6-95 DESC: 6/42 MINERAL INTEREST SEC:32: E2SW,SE SECT,TWN,RNG:33-6-95 DESC: SEC 33: SESE,PART OF N2S2 SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL DESC: LOTS 1(39.25),2(38.5),3(39.5) (210.55) SECT,TWN,RNG:34-6-95 DESC: SEC 34: SWSW, PART OF NWSW SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL, DESC: PART OF E2SW, WTLY OF COTTONWOOD CREEK & SLY OF DESC: WILLCOX CANAL (85.29) SECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-95 DESC: SEC 3: PART OF LOT 1 WSLY OF COTTONWOOD CK (21.16) SECT,TWN,RNG:4-7-95 DESC: SEC 4: LOT 1 (4.75) SECT,TWN,RNG:5-7-95 DESC: SEC 5: LOTS1(34.3),2(40),3(40),4(34.4),5(2 2.9) SECT,TWN,RNG:6-7-95 DESC: SEC 6: LOTS 1(40),2(40),3(40),7(39.4),SENW, S2NE SECT,TWN,RNG:7-7-95 DESC: SEC.7: 30/100 AC IN LOT 4, LYING NW OF RAILROAD DESC: R -O -W AND SOUTHERLY OF SAMPSON TRACT SECT,TWN,RNG:1- 7-96 DESC: SECTION 1: SESW SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: SEC 12: BAC IN NENW WEST OF CTY RD, 25.88AC IN DESC: NENW NORTH &/OR NE OF CTY RD, S2N2 LESS 47.62 AC DESC: DESCRIBED IIN BK26P468 & EXCEPT 2AC CONVEYED/POPPLE SECT,TWN,RNG:14-7-96 DESC: SECTION 14: 'SWSE SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: SEC 23: LOT2 (37.5). E2NW W2SW SWNW RK'0722 PG'0799 rsu4tiuy50/000 Laura Nash SECT,TWN,RNG:32-6-95 DESC: 6/42% MINERAL INTEREST SEC:32: E2SW,SE SECT,TWN,RNG:33-6- 1224 Harrison Avenue 95 DESC: SEC 33: SESE, PART OF N2S2 SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL, DESC: LOTS Canon City, CO 1(39.25),2(38.5),3(39.5) (210.55) SECT,TWN,RNG:34-6-95 DESC: SEC 34: SWSW, PART OF NWSW 81212-3518 SLY OF WILLCOX CANAL, DESC: PART OF E2SW, WTLY OF COTTONWOOD CREEK & SLY OF DESC: WILLCOX CANAL (85.29) SECT,TWN,RNG:3-7-95 DESC: SEC 3: PART OF LOT 1 WSLY OF COTTONWOOD CK (21.16) SECT,TWN,RNG:4-7-95 DESC: SEC 4: LOT 1 (4.75) SECT,TWN,RNG:5-7- 95 DESC: SEC 5: LOTS 1 (34.3),2(40),3(40),4(34.4),5(22.9) SECT,TWN,RNG:6-7-95 DESC: SEC 6: LOTS 1(40),2(40),3(40),7(39.4),SENW,S2NE SECT,TWN,RNG:7-7-95 DESC: SEC 7: 30/100AC IN LOT 4, LYING NW OF RAILROAD DESC: R -O -W AND SOUTHERLY OF SAMPSON TRACT SECT,TWN,RNG:1-7-96 DESC: SECTION 1: SESW SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: SEC 12: 8AC IN NENW WEST OF CTY RD, 25.88 AC IN DESC: NENW NORTH &/OR NE OF CTY RD, S2N2 LESS 47.62AC DESC: DESCRIBED IN BK26P468 & EXCEPT 2AC CONVEYED/POPPLE SECT,TWN,RNG:14-7 96 DESC: SECTION 14: SWSE SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: SEC 23: LOT 2 (37.5), E2NW,W2SW, Owner Info Freda Webb 3063 S. Sherreilwood Street Canon City, CO 81212-9385 Assessor's Parcel 0 0 r O i O V 0 h, MineralOwners(MailMerge t )in PipelinePathFINAL 12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM co a co coN m u c Q CO ▪ g o 0 c E co J —y 0 O 2 O E c y 2 • L O ` ) m • R 0 M 0 O O o a 0 C i N • 0 T- O N O U -0 CO N .c a CD 0' CO a D Sorted by Parcel No. Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:27-7-96 DESC: THAT PART OF SWSW LYING S. OF D.R.G.W. RR. ROW SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 DESC: THAT PART OF SESE LYING S. OF D.R.G.W. ROW SECT,TWN,RNG:32-7-96 DESC: ALL THAT PART OF E1/2 LYING SLY OF 1-70 EXCEPT ANY DESC: PART OF U.S. 6 & 24 & D.R.G.W.. RR. SECT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 DESC: LOTS 1(NET 22.60AC), 2(NET (27.09AC) LYING N. OF DESC: THE C/L OF THE CO. RIVER, LOTS 3(28.80AC), 4 DESC: (2.50AC), 9(35.70AC), ALSO THE NWNE LYING NELY OF DESC: HWY 6 & 24, THE NW & NWSW, ALSO THAT PART OF THE DESC: N1/2NE LYING SELY OF D.R.G.W. RR. EXCEPT THAT TR. DESC: DESC. IN 590/643. EXCEPT 35.40AC OF ST HWY 6 & 24 DESC: ROW & D.R.G.W. ROW TRAVERSING SEC. 33. ALSO A TR DESC: OF MEANDER LAND LYING SLY OF LOT 1 SEC. 33 & NLY DESC: OF THE C/L OF THE CO. RIVER. ALSO A TR OF MEANDER DESC: LAND LYING SELY OF LOTS 3,4,9 SEC. 33 AND NLY OF DESC: THE C/L OF THE CO. RIVER. BK:0936 PG:0727 SURFACE: 2409-324-00-111 SECT,TWN,RNG:2-7-96 DESC: 1/10 INT. OIL, GAS & MIN. RTS. DESC: SWNW, PT OF SENW & LOTS 3 & 4 BK:0219 PG:0109 BK:0446 PG:0048 BK:0957 PG:0773 BK:0957 PG:0774 BK:1039 PG:0988 SECT,TWN,RNG:2-7-96 DESC: 1/10 INT. OIL, GAS & MIN. RTS DESC: SWNW, PT OF SENW, & LOTS 3 & 4. BK:0219 PG:0109 BK:0446 PG:0048 BK:0957 PG:0773 BK:0957 PG:0774 SECT,TWN,RNG:2-7-96 DESC: 1/10 INT OIL, GAS & MIN. RTS. DESC: SWNW, PT OF SENW & LOTS 3 & 4. 6 (0219 PG:0109 BK:0446 PG:0048 BK:0957 PG:0773 BK:0957 PG:0774 ouvb1UM) iuuu Lily Womack SECT,TWN,RNG:2-7-96 DESC: 1/10 INT OIL, GAS & MIN. RTS. DESC: SWNW, PT OF SENW & LOTS 3 1358 Buckthorne Way & 4. BK:0219 PG:0109 BK:0446 PG:0048 BK:0957 PG:0773 BK:6957 PG:0774 San Jose, CA 95129-3758 .2 d c 3 0 Anvil Points Properties, Ltd. c/o Joseph Scott 333 S. Allison Parkway Lakewood, CO 80226 Wayne Payton Alberta Payton 702 Gardner Lane Parachute, CO 81635 Dale Payton PO Box 305 Meeker, CO 81641-0305 Warren Payton PO Box 255 De Beque, CO 81630-0255 Assessor's Parcel co• O O r O O V O co o o o t CO O O o 0 O o 10 CO ON O O O o i W W c h, MineralOwners(MailMerge 1)in PipelinePathFINAL 12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM Landowners Generally Listed from West to East Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:2-7-96 DESC: A TR IN SECS 34 & 35 OF T 6 S RGE 96 W & SECS 1-3 OF T 7 S RGE 96 W CONT 998.98 AC. EXCEPT THE ROW FOR CO RD 215 AS DESC IN 657/419, 658/762,702/411-435,714/01-13. EXCEPT A TR OF LAND CONT. 45.28 AC. AS DESC IN BK 1187 PG 176. BK:1130 PG:972 RECPT:545908 BK:1130 PG:971 RECPT:545908 BK:1130 PG:970 RECPT:545908 BK:1130 PG:969 RECPT:545908 BK:0641 PG:0759 BK:0640 PG:0131 BK:0630 PG:0883 BK:0377 PG:0106 BK:0355 PG:0266 BK:0326 PG:0220 BK:0275 PG:0001 BK:0268 PG:0119 BK:0134 PG:0098 BK:1351 PG:551 RECPT:602574 BK:1351 PG:548 RECPT:602573 BK:1333 PG:754 RECPT:598256 BK:1209 PG:429 RECPT:569904 BK:1209 PG:419 RECPT:569903 BK:1203 PG:391 RECPT:568109 BK:1203 PG:381 RECPT:568108 BK:1187 PG:176 RECPT:563403 BK:1129 PG:50 RECPT:545331 BK:0846 PG:0952 BK:0682 PG:0294 PRE:R260370 PRE:R260092 AND/THRU:T TO:R260054 PRE:R260337 AND/THRU:& TO:R260345 SECT,TWN,RNG:11-7-96 DESC: A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SW4SW4 OF SEC. 1, SE4SE4 OF SEC. 2, NE4NE4 OF SEC.11, AND NW4NW4 OF SEC. 12 BK:1130 PG:972 RECPT:545908 BK:1130 PG:971 RECPT:545908 BK:1130 PG:970 RECPT:545908 BK:1130 PG:969 RECPT:545908 BK:0592 PG:0054 BK:0493 PG:0347 BK:0483 PG:0493 81(0217 PG:0246 BK:0204 PG:0263 BK:0199 PG:0220 BK:1387 PG:332 RECPT:610872 BK:1259 PG:359 RECPT:582276 BK:1231 PG:632 RECPT:576016 BK:0778 PG:0041 BK:0696 PG:0853 PRE:R260352 ANO/THRU:A TO:R260086 PRE:R260151 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: A TR OF LAND IN THE SE4OF SEC. 1, NE4 OF SEC. 11, AND THE NW4 OF SEC. 12 BK:483 PG:493 BK:217 PG:246 BK:204 PG:263 BK:199 PG:220 BK:0493 PG:0347 BK:1259 PG:359 RECPT:582276 BK:0778 PG:0041 BK:0696 PG:0853 BK:0592 PG:0054 PRE:R260151 AND/THRU:A TO:R260086 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: ALL THAT PT OF THE SENW4 LYING S OF CENTER OF DESC: PARACHUTE CREEK. AKA LOT 1 RADER ANNEX. 81(.0601 PG:0626 BK:1107 PG:0620 PRE:R460056 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: TR IN W2SW, WATER TANK SITE BK:0632 PG:0180 PRE:R260111 SECT,TWN,RNG:11-7-96 DESC: A PARCEL IN SEC 11 & 12: DESC: AKA: PARCEL A PEAKVIEW MOUNTAIN RANCH BK:0974 PG:0539 BK:0619 PG:0189 BK:0601 PG:0655 BK:0601 PG:0626 BK:0583 PG:0159 BK:0558 PG:0258 BK:0558 PG:0258 BK:0553 PG:0055 BK:0469 PG:0309 BK:0467 PG:0196 BK:0466 PG:0545 BK:0464 PG:0450 BK:0462 PG:0154 BK:0384 PG:0286 BK:0269 PG:0456 BK:0238 PG:0081 BK:0233 PG:0102 BK:1301 PG:817 RECPT:591642 BK:1255 PG:99 RECPT:581413 BK:1232 PG:770 RECPT:576354 BK:0911 PG:0049 PRE:R480122 AND/THRU:& TO:R460082 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: A PARCEL IN SEC 11 & 12 DESC: AKA: PARCEL B PEAKVIEW MOUNTAIN RANCH BK:0974 PG:0539 BK:0619 PG:0189 BK:0601 PG:0626 BK:0583 PG:0159 BK:0558 PG:0258 BK:0553 PG:0055 BK:0469 PG:0309 BK:0467 PG:0196 BK:0466 PG:0545 61(0464 PG:0450 BK:0462 PG:0154 BK:0384 PG:0286 BK:0269 PG:0456 BK:0238 PG:0081 BK:0233 PG:0102 BK:1312 PG:471 RECPT:593818 BK:1301 PG:817 RECPT:591642 BK:1255 PG:99 RECPT:581413 BK:1232 PG:770 RECPT:576354 BK:1231 PG:637 RECPT:576017 BK:1075 PG:0001 PRE:R480122 AND/THRU:& TO:R460082 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 DESC: A PARCEL IN SEC 12, AKA: PARC PEAKVIEW MTN RANCH BK:0974 PG:0539 BK:0619 PG:0189 BK:0601 PG:0655 BK:0601 PG:0626 BK:0583 PG:0159 BK:0558 PG:0258 BK:0553[might be 558] PG:0055 BK:0469 PG:0309 BK:0467 PG:0196 BK:0466 PG:0545 BK:0464 PG:0450 BK:0462 PG:0154 BK:0384 PG:0286 BK:0269 PG:0456 BK0238 PG:0081 BK0233 PG:0102 BK:1301 PG:817 RECPT:591642 BK:1255 PG:99 RECPT:581413 BK:1232 PG:770 RECPT:576354 BK:1231 PG:637 RECPT:576017 BK:1074 PG:0999 PRE:R480122 AND/THRU:& TO:R460082 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:1 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0785 PG:0543 BK:0836 PG:0228 BK:0845 PG:0685 61:0868 PG:0048 BK.0908 PG:0583 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 Owner Mailing Address American Soda, L.L.P. !ATTN: Ed Cooley 2717 CR 215 Parachute, CO 81635-9712 Sarah Del Orona Howard Orona 929 County Road 215 Parachute, CO 81635 Ivo Lindauer Betty Jo Lindauer 0269 Lodge Pole Circle Parachute, CO 81635 Hayden Rader PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Town of Parachute PO Box 100 Parachute, CO 81635-0100 Robert R. Boruch Arlene D. Boruch 8491 Highway 6 & 24 Parachute, CO 81635 Robert R. Boruch Arlene D. Boruch 8491 Highway 6 & 24 Parachute, CO 81635 Robert R. Boruch Arlene D. Boruch 8491 Highway 6 & 24 Parachute, CO 81635 Hayden Rader PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Assessor's Parcel to e O N N 0) 0 a N 240911100153 240912200009 240912200007 240912300006 240911400141 m 0 0 0 en N 0 0 a N 240912300009 240912302001 LoganWash,Route&200'AdjOwners(MailMerge1)FINAL12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM 0 N O N a Landowners Generally Listed from West to East Assessors Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:2 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0785 PG:0540 BK0836 PG:0228 BK:0845 PG:0685 BK:0868 PG:0048 BK:0908 PG:0583 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:3 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0785 PG:0538 BK:0836 PG:0228 8K:0845 PG:0685 BK:0868 PG:0048 BK:0908 PG:0583 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:3 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0785 PG:0538 BK:0836 PG:0228 BK:0845 PG:0685 BK:0868 PG:0048 BK:0908 PG:0583 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:5 BK:0586 PG:0217 8K:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0785 PG:0534 BK:0836 PG:0228 BK:0845 PG:0685 8K:0868 PG:0048 BK:0908 PG:0583 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 I SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:7 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0843 PG:0746 !BK:0851 PG:0301 81:0850 PG:0784 BK:0850 PG:0805 BK:0916 PG:0883 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:9 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0843 PG:0746 BK:0850 PG:0809 BK:0851 PG:0301 BK:0850 PG:0784 BK:0916 PG:0883 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:10 61:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 8K:0843 PG:0746 8K:0850 PG:0811 13K:0851 PG:0301 BK:0850 PG:0784 BK:0916 PG:0883 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:11 BK:1206 PG:293 RECPT:569123 BK:0938 PG:0003 BK:0868 PG:0542 BK:0843 PG:0148 BK:0812 PG:0755 61:0678 PG:0358 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0586 PG:0217 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. ELK:3 LOT:12 81:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0812 PG:0755 61:0843 PG:0148 BK:0868 PG:0542 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:13 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0812 PG:0755 81:0843 PG:0148 BK:0868 PG:0542 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 -..- • •. ro ipelago, Inc. SEUT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:14 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 61(0678 PG:0358 81:0812 PG:0755 928 Minter Ave. BK:0843 PG:0148 61:0868 PG:0542 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:& TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3735 Owner Mailing Address Hayden Rader PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Hayden Rader PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Hayden Rader PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Hayden Rader PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 HCM, Ltd, PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 HCM, Ltd. PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 HCM, Ltd, PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Archipelago, Inc. 928 Minter Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3735 Archipelago, Inc. 928 Minter Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3735 Achipelago, Inc. 928 Minter Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3735 A h' Assessor's Parcel 4 0 N V n 0 V CI 0 N 0O N m o N a 0 N N m 0 N N 0 N O N N m 00 N r 0 N O N a, °' N o 0 N O N N 0 00 N O N 0 0 N N N — 0 0o O N 0 N N N 0) N O O N N °' a N f N c C C n LoganWash,Route&200'AdjOwners(MailMerge1)FINAL12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM Landowners Generally Listed from West to East Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:15 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0812 PG:0755 BK:0843 PG:0148 BK:0868 PG:0542 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:B TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:17 BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0843 PG:0746 BK:0850 PG:0784 BK:0850 PG:0785 BK0916 PG:0883 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:B TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:B TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. BLK:3 LOT:18 BK0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0843 PG:0746 BK:0850 PG:0784 BK:0850 PG:0785 BK:0916 PG:0883 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:B TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:B TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-96 SUB:PARACHUTE PARK P.U.D. LOT:0 DESC: OPEN SPACE BK:0586 PG:0217 BK:0586 PG:0220 BK:0678 PG:0358 BK:0942 PG:0951 PRE:R370025 AND/THRU:B TO:R370150 PRE:R370272 AND/THRU:& TO:R370333 SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: ATR IN LOT 3. AKA LOT 1 FISCHER # 1 EXEMPTION. BK:0560 PG:0030 BK:0560 PG:0032 BK:0698 PG:0115 BK:1049 PG:0548 BK:1222 PG:964 BK:0952 PG:0222 PRE:R260355 SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: ATR IN LOT 3. AKA LOT 2 FISCHER # 1 EXEMPTION. 8K:0952 PG:0222 BK:0898 PG:0115 BK:0560 PG:0032 BK:0560 PG:0030 BK:1266 PG:61 RECPT:583753 BK:0986 PG:0662 PRE:R260355 SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: ATR IN LOT 3. AKA LOT 3 FISCHER # 1 EXEMPTION. BK:0952 PG:0222 BK:0898 PG:0115 BK:0560 PG:0032 BK:0560 PG:0030 BK:1243 PG:847 RECPT:578902 BK:1039 PG:0990 BK:0986 PG:0660 PRE:R260355 SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: E2E2NWNW EXC. 1.094 AC. FOR 1-70 ROW (596-394) BK:1345 PG:756 RECPT:601221 BK:0778 PG:0041 BK:0550 PG:0295 BK:0500 PG:0478 BK:0466 PG:0492 BK:0374 PG:0348' APRIL 5, 1990. PRE:R260300 240913200005 Sidney R. Lindauer SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: NWNW BK:0607 PG:0468 BK:0572 PG:0293 BK:0571 PG:0339 BK:0466 PG:0492 BK:0267 PG:0360 BK:1008 PG:0598 Trustee of The Sidney and Ruth Lindauer BK:0631 PG:0267 BK:0623 PG:0394 BK:0600 PG:0484 BK:0571 PG:0334 BK:0570 PG:0379 460027-LINDAUER, SYDNEY R.1/5 460026-LINDAUER, IVO Family Trust E. 2/5460076- LINDAUER, MICHAEL 1/10460077- CARLSON, JANELL 1/10460028-MCLENNAN, LYNDA K 1/5; and 0933 CR 215 SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: NWNW BK:0607 PG:0468 BK:0572 PG:0293 BK:0571 PG:0339 BK:0466 PG:0492 BK:0267 PG:0360 BK:1101 PG:0771 Parachute, CO 81635 BK:1008 PG:0598 BK:0631 PG:0267 BK:0623 PG:0394 BK:0600 PG:0484 BK:0571 PG:0334 BK:0570 PG:0379 460026-LINDAUER, IVO E 2/5 460027- LINDAUER, SIDNEY 1/5 460028-MCLENNAN, LYNDA K 1/5 460076-LINDAUER, MICHAEL 1/10 460077- CARLSON, JANELL 1/10 Owner Mailing Address Archipelago, Inc. 928 Minter Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3735 'NOM, Ltd. PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 HCM, Ltd. PO Box 686 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Town of Parachute PO Box 100 Parachute, CO 81635-0100 'Efrain Martinez 'Stephanie R. Martinez 8469 Highway 6824 Parachute, CO 81635 Christopher Sandoval Amanda Sandoval PO Box 73 8469 Highway 6824 Parachute, CO 81635 Patrick M. James Kimberly J. James 207 W. Carson Circle Parachute, CO 81635 Sidney R. Landauer, Trustee The Sidney and Ruth Lindauer Family Trust PO Box 626 Parachute, CO 81635 Assessor's Parcel 240912302015 N 0 N 0 N 0 0 N 0 N N p 0 N 0 N in N N n 0 N N N N N O 0 NN 0 N 0 0 LoganWash,Route8200'AdjOwners(MailMerget )FINAL12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM 0 a 0 a Landowners Generally Listed from West to East Assessor's Legal Railroad Right of Way near 1-70 and Highway 6&24 Rights -of -Way 0 0 (9 a 0 0 o_ 0 m SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: NWNW BK:0607 PG:0468 BK:0572 PG:0293 BK:0571 PG:0339 BK:0466 PG:0492 BK:0267 PG:0360 BK:1101 PG:771 RECPT:536509 BK:1008 PG:0595 BK:0778 PG:0041 BK:0631 PG:0267 BK:0623 PG:0394 BK:0600 PG:0484 BK:0571 PG:0334 BK:0570 PG:0379 460027- LINDAUER, SIDNEY 1/5, 460028-MCLENNAN, LYNDA K 1/5, 460076-LINDAUER, MICHAEL 1/10, 460077-CARLSON, JANELL 1/10 BK:1008 PG:0598 SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: NWNW BK:0607 PG:0468 8K:0572 PG:0293 BK:0571 PG:0339 BK:0466 PG:0492 BK:0267 PG:0360 BK:1101 PG:0771 BK:1008 PG:0598 BK:0631 PG:0267 BK:0623 PG:0394 BK:0600 PG:0484 BK:0571 PG:0334 BK:0570 PG:0379 460026-LINDAUER, IVO E 2/5 460027- LINDAUER, SIDNEY 1/5 460028-MCLENNAN, LYNDA K 1/5 460076-LINDAUER, MICHAEL 1/10460077- CARLSON, JANELL 1/10 II -70 and Highway 6&24 Rights -of -Way SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: NWNW BK:0607 PG:0468 BK:0572 PG:0293 BK:0571 PG:0339 BK:0466 PG:0492 BK:0267 PG:0360 BK:1008 PG:0598 BK:0631 PG:0267 BK:0623 PG:0394 BK:0600 PG:0484 BK:0571 PG:0334 8K:0570 PG:0379 460027-LINDAUER, SYDNEY R.1/5 460026-LINDAUER, IVO E.2/5460076- LINDAUER, MICHAEL 1/10460077- CARLSON, JANELL 1/10460028-MCLENNAN, LYNDA K 1/5 SECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-96 DESC: LOT 4 BK:0381 PG:0133 8K:0551 PG:0713 BK:0794 PG:0497 BK:0811 PG:0933 PRE:R260301 SECT,TWN,RNG:14-7-96 DESC: 61/2 SE EXC. 3.54 AC. FOR 1-70 ROW (632-253) BK:1298 PG:645 RECPT:590948 BK:0811 PG:0933 BK:0794 PG:0497 BK:0551 PG:0713 BK:0381 PG:0133 PRE:R260163 AND/THRU:B TO:R260057 PRE:R260058 cei nZa4Uuueo Mary Anne Bosely SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: SEC 14 SWSE (35.5A) LYING NWLY OF 1-70 SEC 23 DESC: ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF LOT 2 NENW, S1/2NW & PO Box 26 NWSW DESC: CONT. 95A LYING NWLY OF 1-70 EXCEPT 12.66 AC. DESC: FOR 1-70 ROW BK:0374 PG:0457 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0598 PG:0508 Woody Creek, CO BK:0926 PG:0990 BK:0926 PG:0992 BK:1000 PG:0249 PRE:R260142 81656-0026 Owner Malting Address Union Pacific Railroad Company 1700 Farnam St., FI 10 Omaha, Nebraska 68102-2002 Janell Carlson 704 Casswall Street Napa, CA 94558-5900 Ivo E. Lindauer 2/5 1832 23rd Avenue Lane Greeley, CO 80631 Michael Lmdauer 1/10 118 Harvest Drive Vacaville, CA 95687-7219 Sidney Lmdauer 1/5 PO Box 626 Parachute, CO 81635 !CDOT Mike Verketis Traffic Department ROW Unit 222 S. 6th Street, Room 100 Grand Junction, CO 81501 Lynda K. McLennan 1/5 aka Lynda K. McLennon PO Box 62 Gunnison, CO 81230-0062 Puckett Land Company 5460 5. Quebec Street Suite 250 Greenwood Village, CO 80111-1917 Puckett Lana Company 5460 S. Quebec Street Suite 250 Greenwood Village, CO 80111-1917 Assessor's Parcel 9oo0o7s: tane7. O O O N co o N 0 O 0 N N .- 0 N N 0 0 N n 0 0 N N 0 N 0 0 N N 0 0 0 0 N N 0 O a i 0 0 N < LoganWash,Route&200'AdjOwners(MailMergel )FINAL12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM m m a U N c a n ;etin n s. ? a N c, L o p 0 ocu a a c c u M m c n rn o o Q !-U 02m. r d LdN mtv L N C o 0 N A 8 a w Landowners Generally Listed from West to East Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: THAT PT OF SENW & W1/2SW CONT. 79A LYING SELY OF DESC: 1-70 SEC. 22 THAT PT OF SESE (21.63A) LYING SELY DESC: OF 1-70 SEC. 27 ALL THAT OF NENE, W1/2NE 8 LOT 1 DESC: CONT 65A LYING SELY OF 1-70 TOTAL 165.63A LESS HWY DESC: R.R. ROW 22.96A 61:0374 PG:0457 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0598 PG:0508 BK:0926 PG:0990 BK:0926 PG:0992 BK:1000 PG:0247 BK:1000 PG:0249 PRE:R260142 SECT,TWN,RNG:23-7-96 DESC: A PORTION OF LOT 2, ALSO DESC AS PROPOSED HWY DESC: PARCEL #816-B8 1-70-1(45) SEC 8 BK:0374 PG:0457 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0598 PG:0508 BK:0651 PG:0181 PRE:R260299 SECT,TWN RNG:23-7-96 DESC: TR OF LAND IN NE1/4 CONT. 5.0 ACRES. EXCEPT 3.16 DESC: AC. DESC. IN 699/444 FOR HWY. ROW. BK:0595 PG:0072 81:0601 PG:0410 BK:0699 PG:0444 61(0772 PG:0974 BK:0839 PG:0920 BK:0839 PG:0922 8K:0999 PG:0732 DESC: A TR IN LOTS 3, 6, E2SW SEC. 23 & LOTS 2 & 3 DESC: SEC. 26 CONT. 148.73 AC. ALSO A TR. OF MEANDER DESC: LAND IN SWNE CONT. 1.44 AC. ALSO A TR OF MEANDER DESC: LAND IN E2 SEC. 23 & N2 SEC. 26 CONT. 33.4 AC. DESC: TOTAL 183.63 AC. LIESS HWY & RR ROW 28 AC M/L DESC: NET TOTAL 155.63 AC. BK:0446 PG:0309 BK:0556 PG:0848 BK:0580 PG:0798 BK:0580 PG:0793 81:0624 PG:0058 BK:0765 PG:0870 BK:0918 PG:0597 BK:0918 PG:0601 BK:0954 PG:0602 SECT,TWN,RNG:27-7-96 DESC: ATR IN LOT 1 & SWNE 61:0577 PG:0192 BK:1046 PG:0633 BK:0925 PG:0895 SECT,TWN,RNG:27-7-96 DESC: A TR IN THE SWNE BK:0567 PG:0502 BK:0566 PG:0124 BK:0883 PG:0569 SECT,TN,RNG:27-7-96 DESC: A TR IN THE SWNE BK:0566 PG:0124 BK:0567 PG:0503 BK:0664 PG:0742 BK:0664 PG:0744 BK:0672 PG:0913 BK:0761 W SECT,TWN,RNG:27-7-96 BK:0727 PG:0255 BK:0790 PG:0036 BK:0954 PG:0412 PRE:R460020 PRE:R460021 AND/THRU:B TO:R460022 -rwuct suuwa Janet A. Smallwood SECT,TWN,RNG:27-7-96 DESC: TR OF LAND CONT 23.53AC & A TR CONT BAC BK:0567 PG:0499 BK:0567 PG:0500 BK:0567 PG:0501 BK:0692 Joan E. Wright PG:0718 BK:0790 PG:0036 BK:0954 PG:0412 Joseph P. Casteel 2630 EI Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Owner Mailing Address Mary Anne Bosely PO Box 26 Woody Creek, CO 81656-0026 Gaon Corp. PO Box 53 Houston, TX 77001-0053 Mary Anne Bosely PO Box 26 Woody Creek, CO 81656-0026 Mary Anne Bosely PO Box 26 Woody Creek, CO 81656-0026 mime T. Bell 5509 Highway 6824 ,Parachute, CO 81635-9737 Eugene Verkerk Alice Kay Verkerk 5509 Highway 6824 Parachute, CO 81635-9737 Scott Ziegler PO Box 2467 Vail, CO 81658-2467 Janet A. Smallwood Joan E. Wright Joseph P. Casteel 2630 El Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Assessor's Parcel D o N P N 90LOO Lc7.RneZ n.m 0 N 0) V 0 0 N N 0) N n 0 N a N b 0 N m co N ^ 0 0 N N a C 0 c 0 C N C N 0 a 0 N Logan Wash,Route&200'AdjOwners(MailMergel )FINAL12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM u c W n '0 O 040aa : c 0 0 R 0 O o0cc'q 0 m c O J00 O 2v. p ✓ b LiI N (0 0 ` c muq A C q 2 0 A 2, c a 0, w Peg 08 u 0C et p 0 N O < W W Q MD Landowners Generally Listed from West to East Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:34-7-96 DESC: TR IN SEC 27,33,34 BK:0801 PG:0367 BK:0457 PG:0482 BK:1341 PG:609 RECPT:600143 BK:1230 PG:23 RECPT:575674 BK:1230 PG:21 RECPT:575673 BK:0912 PG:0791 BK:0849 PG:0512 BK:0814 PG:0150 BK:0809 PG:0426 BK:0740 PG:0307 BK:0734 PG:0946 BK:0714 PG:0201 BK:0701 PG:0548 BK:0664 PG:0146 BK:0664 PG:0144 *RONALD E & MARIE E 20/PER, GRAND JUNCTION ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES PENSION PLAN- WILLIAM R. PATTERSON PRE:R260084 SECT,TWN,RNG:27-7-96 DESC: A TR IN THE SWSW. BK:0936 PG:0727 BK:0952 PG:0221 BK:0602 PG:0964 BK:0590 PG:0957 BK:0590 PG:0643 BK:0487 PG:0528 BK:0487 PG:0559 PRE:R260394 SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:5 LOT:4-21 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:5 LOT:1,2,3 LOT:22,23 DESC: & 24 SECT,TWN,RNG:27-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:4 LOT:1-12 vv. Hazel M. Dee SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:6 LOT:12 BK:0539 PG:0783 BK:0549 PG:0776 BK:0647 PG:0260 ATTN: Sandra Bowers 903 N. Shannon Circle Mesa, AZ 85205 240928407007 Barbara Charles SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:6 LOT:11 BK:1252 PG:580 RECPT:580899 BK:1252 PG:581 RECPT:580900 BK:1170 PG:299 RECPT:558440 Marilyn Ann Hayes BK:1170 PG:298 RECPT:558439 643 Highview Road Clifton. CO 81520 240928407010 Robert Earl Gregory SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:6 LOT:9 LOT:10 BK:0521 PG:0730 Charlotte Louise Gregory 254 E. Lynwood Street Grand Junction, CO 81503-3801 240928407011 Garfield Oil, Land & Dev„ Inc. SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:6 LOT:3-8 & LOT:17-23 BK:0521 PG:0730 c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 El Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Owner Mailing Address Grand Junction Orthopedic Associates Pension Plan William R. Patterson 60%; Rodney C. Power 201/0; Ronald E. Tipping and Marie E. Tipping 20% 668 26 Road Grand Junction, CO 81506 John E. Strong PO Box 264 Carbondale, CO 81623-0264 Gartield Od, Land & Dev., Inc. c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 El Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Dewey I. Dutton, Jr. 12145 W. Applewood Knolls Drive Lakewood, CO .80215-7200 a ieltl Od, Land & Dev., Inc. c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 El Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 0 0 0 p d0 y V W NP n d0 H Q O p N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 N 0 00 0 O P 0 N P N 0 m n N 0 N 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM Loga n Wash, Route&200'AdjOwners(MailMergel)FINAL12.12.2003 Page 7 of 9 c• w N c a Z.S Cal @ N 49 7 p q c C N L O 6 O Z3ad y u c q N N [ F98.1 0 0,▪ 0 9 O Y d N EY u= L c N 2'40: 0 A 0 c a w E 08 O Eco i N N O 20 QL' co `o O o a O. D ed from West to East Landowners Generally Li Assessors Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:6 LOT:2 BK:1365 PG:121 RECPT:605871 BK:1202 PG:2 RECPT:567695 BK:1178 PG:688 RECPT:561187 BK:0967 PG:0293 81:0632 PG:0856 SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:6 LOT:1 BK:0485 PG:0266 SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:3 LOT:12 SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:3 LOT:5-10 W 0 0 0 0- 0 - CO m SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:7 LOT:11,12 SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:7 LOT:10 61:0374 PG:0351 BK:1036 PG:0861 BK:1079 PG:0652 SECT,TWN,RNG:28-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:7 LOT:5-9 & LOT:16-18 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:7 LOT:20 - LOT:21 SECT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:7 LOT:3 LOT:4 BK:0485 PG:0325 BK:1329 PG:941 RECPT:597484 0 m 0 0 0 0. a m 0 Y m m N o O 0- 0 a 0. NN oO a 0 Y Y m m el o 0 co 0 a 0 0. m N 0 N 0 o Y CO CO 1. F H O J 0 J co to Y Y J CO J m Di m D D CO GO CO CO o 0 Q Q x x U' U' 2 1 CO N cc w w W J J Q N CC O 0 m(7 > >a m o m Ol m m0 1; ri Y ro co m N N d 02 $ Z 0 O: cc?, fl - 1 -.2 1-0 0 U U W U WY 000 Owner Mailing Address Frank L. Soderberg Mary K. Stecklin 1106 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO :81601 'Thomas Lester Hendrick ;Harry O. Hendrick 11200 Riverside Drive I Reno, NV '89503 Garfield Oil, Land & Dev., Inc. :c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 El Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Charles E. Boyer Darlene M. Boyer 6086 W. Arizona Avenue Lakewood, CO 80232-5707 Garfield Oil, Land & Dev., Inc. c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 El Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Kenneth Allan Gardner 1113 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Garfield Oil, Land & Dev., Inc. c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 EI Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Kenneth Allan Gardner 1113 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Garfield Oil, Land & Dev., Inc. o'o Casteel, C.P. 2630 El Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Becki S. Latham 6106 Fullerton Avenue Cleveland, OH 44105 Assessor's Parcel 240928407006 240928407005 240928410001 N 240928410003 240928410004 240928406013 240928406012 240928406011 240933106010 0 o0 O coN 0 N Logan Wash,Route&200'Adjowners(MailMergel)FINAL12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM 0 CO0)COCO CO CL Landowners Generally Listed from West to East Assessor's Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:7 LOT:1 SECT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:7 LOT:2 LOT:24 BK:0529 PG:0733 BK:0451 PG:0210 BK:1378 PG:467 RECPT:609050 BK:1378 PG:466 RECPT:609050 SECT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:2 LOT:1-12 SECT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:8 LOT:12,13 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:8 LOT:11 BK:1233 PG:318 RECPT:576464 TAX SALE CERT: 19970013 TAX YR: 1996 SEUT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:8 LOT:1 - LOT:10 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. LOT:15 - LOT:24 ic..0 a field Oil, Land 8 Dev., Inc. SECT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 SUB:TRAVELERS HIGHLANDS SUB. BLK:1 LOT:1-12 c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 EI Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 240933100002 John E. Strong SECT,TWN,RNG:33-7-96 DESC: A TR IN THE NENW & NENE. BK:0590 PG:0643 BK:0590 PG:0957 BK:0318 PG:0195 BK:0317 PG:0276 PRE:R260394 PO Box 264 Carbondale, CO 81623-0264 240932400138 Specialty Restaurants Corp. 80% SECT,TWN,RNG:32-7-96 DESC: A TR IN THE E1/2 SEC 32 8 THE W1/2 8 NWNE SEC 33. BK:0952 PG:0221 BK:0936 PG:0727 BK:0602 PG:0964 Stockton Restaurant Corp. 20% BK:0590 PG:0957 BK:0590 PG:0643 BK:0487 PG:0559 BK:0487 PG:0528 BK:1226 PG:687 RECPT:574814 BK:1226 PG:677 RECPT:574813 61(:1226 8191 East Kaiser Blvd. PG:676 RECPT:574812 BK:1134 PG:698-701 RECPT:547162 BK:0985 PG:0091 PRE:R260394 Anaheim, CA 92608-2214 Owner Mailing Address Garnela Oil, Land 8 Dev., Inc. c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 EI Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Naomi M. Ashcraft Betty Jane Bennett 10745 W. Berry Drive Littleton, CO 80127 Garfieltl un, Land E. Dev., Inc. c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 EI Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Gadieltl Oct, Land 8 uev., Inc. c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 EI Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 .Garfield Oil, Land 8 Dev., Inc. c/o Casteel, C.P. 2630 EI Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 Gad'I ie tl Oil, Lantl 8 Dev., Inc. Go Casteel, C.P. 2630 EI Corona Drive Grand Junction, CO 81501-6895 G rt Assessors Parcel 240933106009 D D _ n n °' i V N " 0D 0 0 O ' m M ° N PO t7 0 O M N) N N 0 O M eaC °' N C C 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM LoganWash,Route8200'AdjOwners(MailMerge1)FINAL12.12.2003 Landowners Generally Listed from West to East Assessors Legal SECT,TWN,RNG:6-8-96 DESC: A TR IN SEC 6 IN THE NELY COR. ALSO A TR IN SEC 5 DESC: & SEC 32 7-96. EXCEPT A TR CONT. 37 AC AS DESC IN DESC: 1055/655. BK:0940 PG:0225 BK:0935 PG:0130 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0378 PG:0428 BK:0374 PG:0457 8K:1226 PG:692 RECPT:574815 BK:1186 PG:45 RECPT:563090 BK:0982 PG:0631 PRE:R260295 AND/THRU:& TO:R260378 SECT,TWN,RNG:6-8-96 DESC: A TR IN SEC 6 IN THE NELY COR. ALSO A TR IN SEC 5 DESC: & SEC 32 7-96. EXCEPT A TR CONT. 37 AC AS DESC IN DESC: 1055/655. BK:0940 PG:0225 BK0935 PG:0130 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0378 PG:0428 BK:0374 PG:0457 BK:1226 PG:692 RECPT:574815 BK:1186 PG:45 RECPT:563090 BK:0982 PG:0631 PRE:R260295 ANDTTHRU:& TO:R260378 SECT,TWN,RNG:6-8-96 DESC: A PCL CONT. 37 AC WITHIN A PT OF SEC. 6. 8K:0940 PG:0225 BK:0935 PG:0130 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0378 PG:0428 BK:0374 PG:0457 BK:1337 PG:501 RECPT:599110 BK:1055 PG:0655 BK:0982 PG:0631 PRE:R260402 SECT,TWN,RNG:31-7-96 DESC: SEC 31 LOT 2 (22.80AC), SESW, S1/2SE (NET 66.28AC) DESC: LYING NWIy OF 1-70. SEC 32 SENW. & ALL THAT PART DESC: OF NESW & SWSW LYING Nly OF 1-70. 8-96 SEC 6 LOT 2 DESC: (NET 6.19AC), LOT 3 (NET 35.30AC), LOT 4 (23.06AC) DESC: LOT 5 (NET 16.82AC), SENW (NET 4.50AC) ALL LYING DESC: NWIy OF 1-70. BK:0940 PG:0243 BK:0940 PG:0225 BK:0935 PG:0130 BK:0734 PG:0107 BK:0728 PG:0019 BK:0700 PG:0007 8K:0671 PG:0804 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0374 PG:0457 BK:0370 PG:0282 BK:0378 PG:0428 BK:0982 PG:0631 'PRE:R260294 AND/THRU:B TO:R260379 SECT,TWN,RNG:10-8-97 DESC: SEC. 1: LOTS 1(39.73), 4(39.61), S1/2NW, 51/2 SEC. 2: LOTS 1(39.59), 2(39.67), 3(39.73), 4(39.81), S1/2N1/2, 51/2 SEC. 3: LOTS 1(39.86), 2(39.92), 3(39.96), 4(40.02), S1/2N1/2, N1/2SW,SESW, SE SEC. 4: LOTS 1(39.99), 2(39.87), 3(39.77), SENW, S1/2NE, N1/2SE, SWSW SEC. 5: LOTS 2(39.37), 3(39.23), 4(39.07), SWNE, S1/2NW, 51/2 SEC. 6: LOTS 1(39.12), 2(39.38), S1/2NE, N1/2SE, SESE SEC. 8: ALL SEC. 9: W1/2NW, S1/2 SEC. 10: NE, E1/2NW, S1/2 SEC. 11: N1/2, SW, W1/2SE SEC. 12: N1/2, N1/25E SEC. 14: PT. OF N1/2NWNE & N1/2N1/2NW LYING IN GARFIELD COUNTY(60.0) SEC. 15: PT. OF N1/2N1/2 LYING IN GARFIELD COUNTY (80.0) SEC. 16: PT. OF N1/2N1/2 LYING IN GARFIELD COUNTY (80.0) SEC. 17: PT. OF N1/2N1/2 LYING IN GARFIELD COUNTY (80.0) TOTAL: 5773.70AC. SECT,TWN,RNG:12-8-97 DESC: NESW, E2NWSW, NESWSW & N2SESW EXCEPT 6.50 FOR 1-70 BK:0940 PG:0225 BK:0935 PG:0130 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0374 PG:0456 BK:0954 PG:0589 BK:1021 PG:0474 BK:1190 PG:413 PRE:R290421 SECT,TWN,RNG:11-8-97 DESC: E2SE. SEC 12:W2W2SW. SEC. 13:W2NWNW. SEC 14:NENE. BK:0940 PG:0225 BK:0935 PG:0130 BK:0439 PG:0489 BK:0374 PG:0456 BK:0943 PG:0482 PRE:R290421 PRE:R290606 Z445043uuuu2 Getty Oil Vendor#1471 SECT,TWN,RNG:4-8-97 DESC: SEC. 32-7-97 N1/2NE, SWNE, NW, NESW LOTS 4,5,6 SEC DESC: 33 N1/2NW LOT 3 SEC. 3-8-97 SWSW SEC. 4 LOT 4 ChevronTexaco Shale Oil Company SWNW DESC: N1/2SW, SESW, S1/2SE SEC. 5 LOT 1 SENE SEC. 9 NE, DESC: E1/2NW SEC. 10 W1/2NW 61:0700 PG:0007 BK:0728 PG:0019 ATTN: J.T. (Tom) Schmid, Jr. P.E. 81(0734 PG:0107 Manager - Shale Oil Development W 241336200017 11111 S. Wilcrest Drive SECT,TWN,RNG:24-7-98 DESC: S2SW, SWSE SECT,TWN,RNG:25-7-98 DESC: NWNE, NW, E2SW, SWSE SECT,TN,RNG:36-7-98 DESC: Houston, TX 77099 NE,NENW,NESENW,N2SE,SESE,N2NESWSE SECT,TWN,RNG:31-7-97 DESC: TR 57 (153.14) 61:0734 PG:0107 BK:0726 PG:0019 BK:0700 PG:0007 BK:0671 PG:0804 SEVERED MINERALS IN SECS. 24825: 8029-003-07-000 PRE:R290075 Owner Mailing Address Specialty Restaurants Corp. 80% Stockton Restaurant Corp. 20% 8191 East Kaiser Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92808-2214 Specialty Restaurants Corp. 80% Stockton Restaurant Corp. 20% 8191 East Kaiser Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92808-2214 Catherine A. Cera Robert Ohara 251 Russey #6 Parachute, CO 81635 Steven Keinath PO Box 5628 ,Minneapolis, MN 55440-5628 BLM Glenwood Springs Resource Area 50629 US Highway 6824 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 C. R. Commercial Properties, Inc. Ted V. Clark, Registered Agent (C.P.A.) 320 South Main Street (PO Box 930) Palisade, CO 81526-0930 David D. Skinner Amy L. Skinner 16706 Hwy 82 Carbondale, CO 81623 0 L d ° N U y N a Q 244706400057 244706100056 244706200069 I) 0 T o N L4SOOLOL9beZ N o N N n N O 0 " N N Logan Wash,Route8200'AdjOwners(MailMerge1)FINAL12.12.2003 12/15/2003: 5:04 PM 1 IIIIII IEll IIIIII 11111 11111 31111 IIIII III IIIII IIII 1111 642516 12/08/2003 03,200W45:ell‘ M gLSDDRF 1 of 20 R 101.00 D 0.00GRRF1ELD COUNTY co Y1[1'EL NE RIGHT -OF -WAV. GRAND For and in consideration of the sumof Ten Dollars ($10,00) andoihervaluabbe considerations: •the receipt and sufficiency of Which is hereby acknowledged, Sidney R Lindauer, Trustee: of the Sidney and Ruth Lindauer Family Trust, P;0: Box 626, parachute, CO 51635, of the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, GRANTOR, grantsand conveysto EtCana Gathering Services (USA) Inc.,95017th Street, Suite 2600, Denver, Colorado S0202, GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, an easement, right•of--way._ and the right to survey and re-survey,locate, lay, maintain„inspect, resize, replace, operate, andremove one or more pipelines and such drips, valves, fittings, and other below- ground equipment and: below -ground appurtenances, as may beneeesaagy (tnoinstallation of above- ground facilities or equipment hallowed under this: agreement). for the operation, over, through, upon, under andacross the landsnowowned by Grantor located in the following described area (the Site)' in Garfield County; Colorado, to -wit: Township 7 -South. Range 96 West of the -6th :P.M:: Section 13: F%2E/2NW/411W/4 The centerline of a proposed pipeline route is shown by, Exhibit `A", attached and incorporated into this instrument by this reference. The pipeline easement centerline shall run from the northeast comer of the )1 W/4NW/4 of said Section 13, southerly 1060 feet and parallel to (not to exceed:26.46feet to the West) along Grantor's easterly property line. The rights inherentherein shall be based: upon and. adjusted to the "as built" line of any actual pipeline construction... Grantee may submit for recording an "as -built” survey for any such location and construction.. THE PARTIES: FURTHER AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I, Grantoras the owner in fee ofthe lands described herein. 2. Grantee agrees that any pipeline shall be installed at a minimum depthof sixty inches (60) below the surface of the ground. The pipeline shall be no lager than twenty-four inches (24") in diameter. Any pipeline right-of-way granted shall be five feet (5') on either side ofthe Centerline of the "as -built" line, except that during any eonshuctionactivities onthe epipeline, .Grantor, for the consideration stated above, hereby also grants unto the Grantee the temporary right to access a right -of --way thirty-five (35) feet wide, such width starting:pn the east. line-ef Grantor's property and extending Suet) width along the pipeline route. Provided, however, that the temporary easement above described shall not be utilized to repairor maintain the pipeline after it is initially constructed and placed in the ground,: if the use of the temporary easement conflict in any way with structures,: buildings or other on-going: uses on surface.. Of Grantor's land. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any road over said easementshall not be considered to be an on- going use restricting such ten)porary easement. A proposed pipeline route is describedin Exhibit "A", attached and incorporated into this agreement by tbis reference. 3 Grantee agrees -that during construction of said pipeline, livestock crossings will be provided. where necessary. Further, all fences which must be severed, pr removed: for installation and maintenance will be reinforced prior to severing, adjacent to where the cut is made, to prevent damage to the fence line. Temporary gatesto preclude the escape of Grantor's livestock shall be installed where necessary. All fences cut prremoved shall be restored in as good a condition as. existed prior to installation of the pipeline. ,2Lri4 e N i MINERAL LAND SERVICES P.O. Box 1223 Glenwood Spriogs, CO 81602 1111111 IIIII1111111111111111111111IIIII 11111111 11111111 642516 12/D8/2003 03: 20P 01545 P120 M RLSDORF 4 of 20. 8.101.00 P-0,00 GARFIELD `.COUNTY ,co ACICNOWLEDQEMENTS. State .pfColorado ). County of Garfield` ) ss. On this day of / t/O 1./L Stip 2003, before me personally appeared Sidney R, Lindauer, Trustee of the Sidney and Ruth Lindaubr Family Trust, known to me and who executed the foregoing wstrument,;and who acknowledged to me tb'at he executed tbesame as his free and voluntary act and dded for the uses andpurposes therein set forth. WITNESS my hand andofficial seal' CITY AND COUNTYOFRbENVER STATE -OF COLORADO 1 ss, Address. f j1 . ux Z A A.niii. !J Xfekiloi co 11Cd• z Notary Public Before me, on this. 3 CZ 41 day of DE( at/ RM 2003 the foregoing instrument was executed by. Jesse G. Wood known to me to bp the du1yauthorized Team Leader — South Rockies:. of EnCana Gathering Systems (USA) Inc., Grantee, and acknowledged said execution to be the signer's free and voluntary act and deed on behalf of said Grantee, for the used and purposes thereinset -fotth. •:;�dand official seal. Page 4 of 8 Address: 9?$12 /MST OV 11E11 I I I I 1111111111111111 t i 11111111 11111 11111111 642516 12/08/2003 03:20P 81545 P121 11 ALSDORF 5 of 20 .R 101..00 D 0.00GARFIELD`COUNTY CO Addendum One. to PIPELINE RIGHT:OF-WAY GRANT Rem Sidney R.Lindauer, Trustee of the Sidney and Ruth ,LindauerFamily Trust to Entana Gathering Services (USA) Inc. The parties above -referenced further agree as follows: A, Notwithstanding anything is said Pipeline Right -of -Way Grant to th contrary; Grantee shall: A(1). Install extra -thick (.300") wall, epoxy -fusion coated pipe, with minimum design specifications of one thousand pounds per square inch (1,000 psi) of pressure capacity. A(2). The top of said pipeline shall be buried no less than five feet (5') from the surface grade. A(3). Install its pipeline parallel to tbe existing Williams Production RMT Company line, ten feet (10') from said Williams line._hOwever, deviation shall be allowed for reasons of safety, legal and regulatdryrequirements,, and practical considerations regarding soil, topography and other existing characteristics of the site. A(4). Grantee shall not exceedthe existing fifty foot (50') working easement previously granted to Williams Production EMT Company per instrument recorded in Book 1345, Page 756 of the Garfield County, Colorado, records.. A(5),: After Grantee performs .any :maintenance, repair or replacement of its pipe, Grantee shall restore any surface disturbed thereby to its condition immediately preceding such disturbance, as near as may be possible and as quickly as is reasonably possible, A(6). Grantor understands and agrees that Grantee has no control over Williams Production RMT Company but Grantee agrees to make good faith efforts to coordinate its work with Williams as Williams fulfills its obligations to Grantor. In any case, Grantee will perform its own -obligations fully; A(7), Should Grantee widen the existing Williams right-of-way, it shall coordinate with Williams as Williams fulfills its obligation to create a road over said ling; Road over said pipeline must extend fee( (5') westerlyand be parallel to the centerline of this Pipeline Right -of -Way Grant, Grantee shall match said Williams roadway when created, so that said increased: width, if any; is matched by the same kind and quality of roadbed as created by Williams; Page 5:of 8 11E11 11111 11111 1 1 1 t h 11111 III 113 1111111 642516 12/05/2003 03 20P B1545 P122 II ALSDORF 6 of 20 R 101 00 D 0 00 GARFIELD, COUNTY CO B. Grantee further agrees to do the following work, even though said items are unrelated to pipelineconstruction purposes: B(1). To the extentreasbnab)ypossible given the quantity and quality of fill materials available on the pipeline -route site described herein, Grantee shall cause such materials to be moved from other portions of the site; with the intent to reduce Me existing "dip" orconcavity in grade that the surface now shows running from north to south near and along the existing Williams right-of-way. To the extent possible under. site Conditions, Grantee will make a good faith and reasonable attempt to create a more constant slope and grade along such surface, as it runs from north to south. B(2). There are approximately seven rock and brush piles approximately twelve feet in flat surface diameter presently existing on the referenced lands, ]eft by Williams after its pipeline installation. Grantor shalluse its equipment to shake up and separate the rock from the brush. Grantor shall then separate out the very large rock from the small and medium size rock, 13(3): Grantee shall tae such very large rock to and place it in an existing eroded ravine at the south end of the referenced lands, separate from and west of the proposed pipeline route, leading toward the frontage road. At its sole option, Grantee shall also be allowed to place other very large rock from other sources and sites in said ravine, so that the resultant surface is, approximately equal to the surface grade existing ten feeteither side of the approximate centerline of said eroded ravine: Granter agrees that Grantee is not guaranteeing any; particular results from anywork on said eroded ravine, including without limitation the elimination: of erosion, but only that itwillhaul to and place in said eroded ravine the very large rock from: Grantor's referenced lands, B(4). Any small and medium rockmixed with soil. (riprap) obtained from the site shall. be handled as follows: B(4.1) First, assuming the property site generates sufficient gUantity of riprap,. Grantee shall haul up to two hundred fifty (250) cubic yards of same to certain property owned by Grantor as an individual located at 0933 County Road, Parachute, Colorado,: for use by him as driveway dirt bank. support Grantor shall provide a single centralized place on said individually -owned property for Grantee's placement of such loads; and Grantor shall be responsible for any further distribution and final placement of such riprap on his individually owned property. B(4.2) Second, remainingriprap, if any, may be usedas road base on the Pipeline site. B(5), :Grantee owns an easement on certain properties northerly of property located at 0933 County Road 215, Parachute, Colorado, owned by Grantor Sidney R. Landauer as an individual and not as trustee;. Grantee bas agreed to remove the compressors on said properties, upon completion of its pipeline running. from West Rifle to said easement site. Should the compressors not be removed upon the completion of said pipeline, Grantee agrees to do whatever is necessary to abate the noise from said northerly properties. so that.. any soundgenerated. by Page 6 of 8 i iiiiii 1 c-111111111 iini ii i ii 'half ' :642516.12/06/2003': 01.20P 8154512123 h ALSDORF 7 of 20 R 101.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY co Grantee's compressorsshall not exceed the level of thirty-nine decibels (39 db) on the dB(A) scale,, and fifty-five decibels (55 db) on the dB(C) scale for the sound frequencies from 20 hz to 20,000 hz„ asmeasured by a type of scientific instrument in good repair, usually and customarily employed in such measurements by experts in acoustical engineering; at any point on the north line of such property at 0933 County Road 215.. B(6). If it shall be necessary to litigate the issue of a breach of this Right -Of -Way Easement and Agreement,: or in any other way to enforce the terms of this easement and agreenient, and if either the Grantor or the Trust, as a third party beneficiary, shall prevail* the Grantor or the Trust shall be entitled to its/their reasonable attorney's fee and any cost of suite occurredduring the prosecution of the action. - 13(7). A waiver, forbearance or other failure to act on an occasion or allegedloecasion of breach by a party shall not be deemed a waiver on any other occasion, or prevent enforcement of the terms of this agreement for any such other breach. 13(8). Reservoirand Culverts: There now exists near the east line :ofthe property, approximately a third of theway from the north line of such property, a small reservoir. Such reservoir lies on or near the proposed pipeline route: Grantee agrees to dig a new reservoir oflike size approximately fifty-five feet (55') northwest of the existing site, and use the, diggings from the new reservoir to fill the now -existing reservoir to the level of its surrounding; surface. $aid new reservoir shall be sixty feet (60') on its north -south axis; twenty feet (20') on its east -west axis, and fifteen feet (l5') at its( deepest point. Grantor asserts rights in the Diamond Ditch, which slopes down from north to south along but outside the east line of Grantor's property; toits connection with Grantor's property on. the east line. At said point of connection, Grantee shall place a culvert to channel the entire flow of said ditch into the new reservoir. at the reservoir's northeastern corner (such culvert to be positioned torun under the roadbed to be placed by Williams Production RMT Company per its separate agreement, with Grantor): Grantee shall place an overflow culvert atthe top of said new reservoir at its southeastern comer, which culvert shalllead back and east to said Diamond Ditch (also to be positioned to run under the roadbed to be placed by Williams Production RMT Company per its separateagreement with Grantor).: After. such actions by Grantee, and absent subsequent direct action of Grantee- which diverts such ditch, Grantor shall be charged with sole responsibility for directing water into said reservoir. Grantor shall indemnify and holdGranteeharmless from any claims of others who may be affected orclaim to be affected by water thus directed, stored and discharged. 13(9). To complete 8(1), 13(2), 13(3), B(4) and B(8) within. sixty (60) days of the completion of Pipeline installation Should weather hindrance the completion date, additional time will be allowed, but not to exceed an additional thirty (30) days. 43(10). In the event that pipeline installation is not completed by May 1,'2004, Grantee will reimburse Grantor in the amount of Twenty -Five: Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) for the loss of spring gazing pasture. Page 7of 8 11111111111 111111 II111 11111111111 11111 III II11111111111 642516 12/08/2003 03 20P 01545 P124 M RLSDORF 8 of 20 R 101.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO B(11). Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary,. Grantor will consider The pipeline project abandoned, and the Pipeline Right -of -Way Grant terminated April 2,2005,if the pipeline installation is not completed by April 1, 2005. Signed for Identification: GRANTOR: Si neyRLindauer,. Trustee of the Sidney and Ruth Lindauer Family Trust. GRANTEE: EnCaoa Gathering. Services (USA) Inc., by: _pite IAA Jesse G. Wood Team Leader — South Rockies Attorney In Fact Page 8 of8 .1111111It'll 111111 lin 1I11111111111111111111111ru1111 692516'12/08/2003 ,03.20P 81545 P125 N RLSDORF 9 of 20 R 101.00 D: 0.00 GRRFIELO COUNTYCQ Exhibit 11A" to iefFELD EIGt1T-OF-WAY GRANT dateii October 27, 2003 between Sidney RLindauer asInistee 4f The Sidney and Ruth Liudauer Family Trust, Grantor and EnCana Gathering Services (USA) Inc., Grantee e4S W +,4 wv/q SAWA Lint Leone, et d J.O.RL"IOHR]9 D. - • • i The Sidney and Rutft Lin4o er Family Trust „3198 NIYt/I. NW 1/6 11308 4161 W 1148* 1/4 &au'Cej. LS 14180) Section 12 Section 13. Cen/et//ne of Picp'osed&».%ie s Para. (lhSL2S t)IC Ai 1 I <' I 1 ✓ /— �f. I CORNER IE NOTE ROSL 1074.51.29 bean S9920491W 2646' from the Northeast comet NW 1/4 MW 1/4 t/Section i 14 r/$ 12961g. 60, RAI Right-of-Woy Length Across The $l4ney Ruth Lindouer- fomlly Trust Property In NW 1/4 NW 1/4 of Section 13 = 1,068. Cot 3 LEGEND and p,1. POINT OF INTERSECTI0N' NC P.L.A. POINT ON PROPERTY LINE DD P.O.S.L.= POINT ON SECTION LINE. 01307159758- yle. ShcY end RatA1gdalr fon* mat —..—_. PROPERTY LINE A PIPELINE RICHT-,GF-WAY LOCATED W THE NW 1/4 NW 1/4 OF 6ECTON 13, 175. R46W 581H P, M. GARFED COUNTY. COLORADO. 111E CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED' AS O4LONS. gANNINC. AT A POINT ON THE 48401/086 NORTH PROPERTY LINE BEING 1548 NORM EINE OF THE NW 1/4 NW /4 Cf SECTION IS 17S 1998W, 6111, P44 NHICH PONT MARS 989'28'49-W 28.46' FRAM 111E NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID NW 1/4 NW 1/4 (BEING A' BRASS CAR LS 184 0) THENCE S0023'a458IPSO 00 TVA PCHNT pH THE GRANTOR'S 90014 PROPERTY UNE1BEING TIE 008148RN' RICHT OF -WAY UNE Cf HIGHWAY -64910 LOCATED N TXE 5480 NW 1/4' MW I/4 OF SECTION 13 WH 811 POINT B AR5 50132'14-W 1090 39'FROM THE SAID NORTHEAST CORNER 08 THE NW 1/4 NWI/4. asps Be'BE RWC915 1111E NORTH. UNE OF 140 NW 1/4' Of ECTON 12,183, 8978, 618 P.M. 'WHICH 45 TAKEN FROM GL BAL P05111011140” SATELLITE OBSERVATIONSS 1'0 BEAR 891101'58A MEASURED DISTANCE OF 260648'' (THE 11901H 1/4. CORNER AND' THE 409140EST CORNER OF SAID (CON 12 BEING 9001 ALUM. "CAPS, LS 99598). I ENCANA GATHERING SERVICES (USA) INC PARACHUTE to DE SEQUA' PIPELINE The Sidney and Ruth Lindauer Family Trust Property located in AV i/4: Kw 1/4 >f Sect4on 18 2MS, R981Y. 4119 ISM Car/Lela County Colorado hay 751-2501 /Tri State Land Surveying, Inc. 160 NORM VERNAL AVE. VERNAL UTAH 84078 SURi£Y£O 8Y•- $Y SCALE; 1'— Zoo' ORA NN on 1.CS IA12. 9-J0-0$ 4111111 itIl 111111 IIIII IIIII 111111 IIIII III IIIIII III IIII 6425110 effi202R08/2003 101.00 D30.00' GARFIELD:20? B1545 25 M COUNTY.CORF Exhibit "R» to I IEELEM0 2ICIIT-OF-WAS' GRANT dated October 27, 2003 between SidneyR .Lindauer, -as Trusteeof The Sidney and Rutb Liudauer Family Trust, Grantor and EnCana Gathering Services (USA) Inc., Grantee Reclamation Plan Exhibit`B-",:Page . 1 of10 111111111011101 Ell 111111101 11111111 I I I I I 11111111 642516 12/08/2003 03 20P B1545 P127 N RL$DORF 11 of 20 R 101.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY ,CD 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1,2 ':Goals & Objectives 1.3 Environmental Training 1.4 Related Plans/ Maps 1.5 Responsibilities 1:5.1 The Company 1.52 The Contractor 1.5.3 The Environmental Inspector 2. Reclamation Process 2;1 Reclamation Activities 2:2 Rock Disposal 2.3 Final. Cleanup 2A Topsoil Restoration 25 Miscellaneous Agricultural Features 2.6 Seedbed -Preparation 2.7 Soil Supplements 2.8 Revegetation: 2.9.1. SpeciesSelectionand Source 2.9.2 Seed Application Rates & Viability 2.9:3 Seeding Methods 84 Procedures. 2.9.3.1 Drill Seeding 2.9.3.2 Broadcast Seeding 2.10 Permanent Erosion Control 2,11 Graiing 3. Noxious' Weed Control 3.1 Weed Control Measures During Construction 3-2 Post -Construction Monitoring and Weed Control. 4. Worker Safety and Spill Reporting 5. Reclamation Scheiule,and Documentation 6. Post -Construction Momtoringand Evaluation 6.1 Revegetationand Erosion Control, 'Monitoring 6.2 'Evaluating Reclamation Success Exhibit "Er,Page 2 of 10 1 IIIIII IIIII IIIIII IIIII VIII! IIIII1 IIIII`III IIIIII III 1111 84416:12/08/2003 03:20P 31540 P128 M RLSOORF 12 of 20 R 101.00 D 0.00 CORR/OLDCOO TY CO 1: )NTRODIJCTION This .Reclamation_ Plan (plan) describes measures to be taken by EnCana Gathering Services (U.S.A.) Inc. (Company) and its construction contractors (Contractor) for topsoil restoration, reseeding, planting, noxious weed control and; reclamation monitoring. 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to describe in text and en drawings the prescribed methods for topsoil replacement, reseeding, planting noxious weed control, and monitoring for reclamation success. This plan is applicable to the construction on right-of-way(ROW) and extra worlcspace locations. 1.2 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The short-term goals of reclamation are to ethanol erosion and sedimentation and to minimize impacts to adjacent land uses, Properly executed .construction practices and optimum scheduling will mitigate short-term impacts. Long term goals include controlling erosion and sedimentation; protecting water resources and soils; limiting the introduction and spread of noxious weeds; and returning disturbed areas to pre-existing condition. Monitoring.. during construction and -post -construction will ensure that these goals are achieved. 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING The Company will conduct environmental 'training :for all project personnel. Training will include topsoil protection measures and methods for controlling the spread of noxious weeds (e.g:, maintaining clean vehicles and equipment). 1.4 RELATED PLANS TMAPS The following documents include additional requirements specifically related to the reclamation of the ROW and ancillaryareas: ♦ Soil Conservation, Sedimentation, and Erosion Control Plan. • Stream Crossing and Wetland Protection Plan • Hazardous Materials Management and Spill Prevention and Countermeasure Plan • Alignment. Sheets 1.5 RESPONSIBILITIES Responsibilities are detailed below: L5.1 The Company The Company will be responsible for ensuring that Me Contractor meets the standards defined in this plan to restore all disturbed areas to pre -construction conditions and to ensure long-term monitoring of restoration success. The Company will take remedial actions as necessary to restore and maintain a stable vegetative cover on the ROW. The Company will provide the Contractor with the appropriate blended seed mixes developed through consultation with agency representatives and landowners. Exhibit 413", Page 3 of 10 11129 1111111111111111111111111111111111112003 03 20P D154511111111111111111 ALSDORF 13 of 20 R'101.00 D 0:00 GARFIELD:,COUNTY CO 1,5.2 The' Contractor The pipeline Contractor will be responsible for post construction re-seeding of the. ROW extraworkspaces, and off-ROW ancillary sites following their constriction activities. Reclamation will be conducted according to this plan as specified for the Contractor. 1.5:3- The Environmental Inspector The Environmental Inspector will have the responsibility to ensure field activities are performed inaccordancewith this reclamation plan by the Contractor and is compliance with all other permits and agreements. The Environmental Inspector will have the authority to makesite-specific field changes in certain reclamation procedures within the guidelines of this plan in consultation with the landowner or BLM. 2. RECLAMATJONPROCESS The following, sections outline the pre -construction planning and sequential steps .for restoring the ROW and extraworkspaces following installation of the pipe and backfilling of the trench. However, one of the most important factorsrelating to successful reclamation takes place during the initial grading of the ROW. Topsoil salvage requirements and methods are discussed in detail in the Soil Conservation, .Sedimentation, and Erosion Control. Plan. 2.1 RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES The Environmental Inspectors with the BLM, Soil Conservation Authority and Landowners will work to determine depth of topsoil, salvage, appropriate seed mixes, and seeding methods. 2.2 ROCK DISPOSAL, "Excess rock" is defined as all rock that cannot be returned to the existing rock profile in the trenchof graded cuts, or is not needed to restore the ROW surface to a condition comparable to That found adjacent to the ROW, This doesnotinclude tailings from boring operations, (NOTE*Absolutely no tailingsfrom the proposed boring areas will be spread or stored on federal land.). Excess rock will be randomly distributed across the ROW, piled or windrowed to create or enhance wildlife habitat, or arranged to block use of the ROW by motor vehicles. If not practical, the Contactor will remove other excess rock from the ROW and haul it to an approved disposal site. The Company will coordinate with landowners or theBLM regarding the methods <if:disposal. 2.3 FINAL CLEANUP Within 30 days afterbackfilling the trench, the Contractor will snake every effort to complete final cleanup andinstallation of permanent.. erosion control structures. If circumstances prevent achieving cleanup within 60 days on federallands, the Company will apply for a variancefrom the ELM. E>0ljbit,"B",page 4 of 10 111111111111II1111 IIIII IIIII liiIII 11111111 1E11 1111111 • 642516 12/08/2003'03 20P 81545 P130`:11 RLSDORF 19 of 20 R 101.00 D 0.00 GRRFIELD -COUNTY CO The ROW and other project -related areas where soil has been disturbed will be restored as close to pre -excavation grades; compaction, and other conditions as possible, unless a specific exemption has been granted by the Landowner or BLM. No solid waste, trash, or vegetative matter will be buried oh the ROW. Final compaction of disturbedareas will be retumed to approximate pre -construction conditions. In cases where.. this is not possible, e.g., steep •slopesor rocky areas where full- ROW width topsoil salvage was not required, compaction will not vary more than 10 percent from adjacent off -ROW conditions. The Company will test soil compaction to a depth of 18 inches, if possible, at regular intervalsusing hand-held penetrometers or equivalent testing equipment and procedures. The Contractor will take remedialaction a3 directed by the Company at all locations where compaction is not within the previously described 10 -percent limit. The Contractor will decompaet excessively compacted areas with a paraplow, "Vibrashank," or other deep tillage implement. In areas where topsoil has been segregated; the subsoil will be decompacted prior to re -spreading the topsoil. In areas with a pre-existing rocky surface material, the Contractor will spread rock over the ROW to maintain a surface appearance similar to that of adjacent undisturbed terrain. Spreading rockon the surface will not be used as a method to dispose of excess rock except as described. in Section 22. Where approved by the landowner or BEM and environmental Inspector, the Contractor will randomly distribute any windrowed shrubs or other remaining vegetation debris over the ROW, However, this must be accomplished by hand or light equipment((e.g, all- terrain vehicles) after seeding of the ROW so the spread material will not interfere with the performance of seeding equipment and to prevent disturbance of the seedbed. 2.4 TOPSOIL RESTORATION- After the trench has been backfilled and the ROW regarded, the. Contractor will redistribute topsoil to the approximate location frons Which it was originally removed. Restored topsoil will be left in a roughened condition to discourage erosion and enhance the quality of the seedbed. Topsoil will not be handled during excessively wet or frozen conditions as determined by the Environmental or Construction Inspector. Topsoil will be redistributed as close to original salvage depths as possible: Salvage methods are discussed in Section 2.2 of the Soil Conservation, Sedimentation, and Erosion Control Plan.: Segregation of subsoil and topsoil will be maintained throughout final cleanup procedures: The Contractor will be responsible for replacement of lost or degraded (mixed) topsoil with topsoilimported from aCompany-approved and weed -free source. Additional erosion control and soil stabilizationwill be required in areas adjacent to or within drainages: See the Soil Conservation, Sedimentation, and Erosion Control Plan and the Stream Crossing and Wetland Protection Planfor additional' information.. Exhibit 13", Page 5 of f I0 111641111111IE 1181 11111 11111 111111 111111/08/2003 03:20P B1545 15 of 20 R 101.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD 1 11111 1111111 OUNTY CO 23 .MISCELLANEOUS AGRICULTURAL FEATURES All irrigation ditches, .drain tiles, cattle guards, fences, and artificial and natural livestock/wildlife water sources will be maintained and repaired to at least '.pre - construction conditions. Temporary measures will be provided, as agreed with the. landowner or BLM, for any of these facilities that are disrupted during the construction or reclamation process. All drain' tiles crossed by the trenchline will be located and restored to the satisfaction of the landowner; Since the exact location or eventhe existence of drainage system may not be known prior to excavation, all drain tiles unearthed during excavation by the Contractor will be reported to the Company in writing. 2.6 SEEDBED PREPARATION The Contractor will scarify, till, or harrow the seedbed to a depth of 3 to 4 inches or as determined by the Environmental Inspector prior to seeding where needed to improve revegetation potential. Those sites where seedbed preparation is not practical (e.g., steep slopes, rocky areas, etc.) will be left with adequate roughness following topsoil placement tocreate micro -environments for seed:, germination and growth, and to reduce the potential for soil movement. 2.7 SOIL. SUPPLEMENTS Generally, fertilizerwill not be used unless requested by the landowner orrecommended by either the Environmental Inspector or a soil conservation authority. At this time, no areas have been identified that require fertilizer. 2.8 REVEGETATION The Contractor will be responsible for _seeding. the ROW and off -ROW ancillary sites using Company -supplied seed mixes, appropriate seeding methods, and approved application rates. The sonling requirements and scheduling of reclamation activities will be determinedin coordination with BLM, Soil Conservation Authority pr the appropriate landowner. 2.8.1 Species Selection and Sources Selection of grass and shrub species for revegetation will be based on pre - construction community composition and soil types as well as. establishment potential, soil stabilizingqualities, commercial availability of regional varieties, post -construction land use objectives, and agency recommendations. Native species will be utilized to the extent possible unless non -natives are specifically requested by a private landowner or land managing agency. Project seed will be purchased from the blended by qualified producers and dealers. Certified weed -free or "blue -tagged" seed will be purchased for use on the project, but this status is only available for those native species with named. varieties. All other seed will be free of primary noxious weeds:. EnCana Gathering Services (U.S.A.) Inc., will submit the seed for independent testing prior to its use. The Contractor will be responsible for providing all seed tags to the Environmental or Construction Inspector at the end of each day. Exhibit "n", Page 6 of 10 111111111111111111_111111111111111111111111_1E1111111111 642516 12/08/2o03 03:20P B1545 P134 11 ALSD 36 of 20'R 101.00 0 0100 GARFIELD COUNTY 00 On Grantor's land, Granteeshall spread, extending from the ten foot easement granted herein, in varying distances westerly to the bottom of the hillsides on Grantor's property, the following seed mix: Pounds Apure live seed (PLS)/Acre Western Wheatgrass (Arriba) 3.0 Crested Wheatgrass (Ephraim) 2,0 Sandberg Blue Grass 2.5 Premium Irrigated Pasture ivfixF 15:0 a. Brome.(smooth) ti. Two types Orchard Grass c; ,Rye. Grass Alfalfa (Ranger) 1.0.00 Total 32.5 lbs PLS/Acre The approximate, seeding area boundaries are shown on Exhibit "C", attached and incorporated into this instrument by this reference. 2.8.2 Seed,ApplicafionRates and Viability Species ratios aix! Pure Live Seed (PLS) application rates will be developed: in: consultation with landowners,: agency specialists, and other regional revegetation consultants. Seeding rates will be determined in PLS pounds per acre and seeds per square foot based on drilled application. rates. Broadcast seeding rates will be twice the drill rat& Seed will be used within 12 :months of testing to assure seed viability.. If additional seeding is required in the year following construction, additional viability testwill be conductedto determine any need for adjustment of application rates. TheContractor will seed wetlands, when necessaryas determined by the Environmental Inspector and BLM. Successful recolonization by wetland species is generally related to effective topsoil salvage methods and sources of seedand. rhizomes in adjacent areas. Streammbanks will be seeded immediately upon completion of finalcleanup as. described in the Stream Crossing and Wetland Protection Plan and independent of other reclamation activities, 2,8.3 Seedinglvlethods and Procedures The Contractor will employ broadcast or drill "seeding as determined in thefield by the. Company. Seedingactivities will be contingent upon weather and soil conditions, and subject to evaluation by the Environmental Inspector,. Seeding'. will not be permitted if there is more than 2 inches of snow on the ground unless approved by the Environmental Inspector and ELM ; field representative. Where approved by the landowner or land managing agency, the Contractor will randomly distribute any windrowed shrubs or other remaining vegetation debris over the ROW by hand or light equipment so as not to disturb the seedbed. 2.8.3A Drill Seeding Exhibit "B", Page 7 of 10 [miii 1111111111!1111 !1111 imii 11111 iii 1//11111111 642516 12/08/2003 03:20P 81545. P133 11 ALSOORF 17 of 20 R 101.00 0.0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO, Drill seeding will be employed wherever soil characteristics and slope allow effective operationofa range driil. Drill seeding will be performed perpendicular to the slope unless otherwise directed by the Environmental Inspector and BLM field representative. The drill will have a seed release mechanism sufficient to allow seedsof various sizes and densities to be planted: at the proper seeding depth_. 2.8.3.2 Broadcast Seeding Broadcast seeding will be employed`itt all areas' where drill seeding cannot be performed. Seed will be applied using manually operated cyclone - bucket spreaders, mechanical spreaders, blowers, or hydroseeders. Seed will be uniformly broadcast over disturbed areas. 'Immediately after broadcasting, the seed will be uniformly raked, chained, harrowed, or cultipacked to incorporate seed to a sufficient seeding depth. If it isnot possible to cover the seed with mechanical methods, the seeding rates will. be doubled 2.9 .PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL. Permanent erosion control methods will be utilized as needed for stabilization of slopes and soils as described in the Soil Conservation, Sedimentation, and Erosion Control Plan. Permanent erosion control measures will be installed- within 30 days after the trench is , backfilled to aid insite stabilization wherever required. 3. NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL Noxious weeds are spread through the dispersal of seeds or the transport of propagative plant: parts. It is therefore important to reduce the sources of seed. andviable plant material prior: to construction disturbance and to prevent its transport or importation during construction. The combination of methods described below will be employed to minimize the potential for expansion of noxious weed populations via the pipeline route. 3.1 Weed Control Measures During Construction The Company will require that all Contractor vehicles and equipment arrive at the work. site clean, to preventthe importation of noxious weeds from a: previous work site: Only after the Environmental Inspector has determined it to be free of soil, debris', or other potential sources of noxious weeds will any piece of equipment be allowed initial transport or access to the ROW. 4. WORKER SAFETY AND SPILL REPORTING All contracted herbicide contractors will obtain and have readily available copies of the appropriate application permits and the. Environmental Protection Agency Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for the herbicides being used. All reasonable precautions will be taken to avoid , spilling herbicides. However; a spill kit will be carred in all herbicide applicator's vehicles to facilitate quick and effective response to a spill; should one occur: Herbicide spills will be Exhibit "W' Page 8 of 10 1111111 11111 111111 11111 11111 111111 11111 111 111111 111 1111 642516 12/08/2003 03 20P B1545. P134 M RLSDORF 18of 20 R 101.00 0 0700 GARFIELD COUNTY CO reported in accordancewith the :requirements described in the project's Hazardous Material Management and Spill Prevention. and Countermeasure Plan. 5. RECLAMATION SCHEDULE AND DOCUMENTATION Reclamation activities will be determined in part by construction: schedules and seasonal climatic conditions. Seeding and planting will be coordinated with otber reclamation activities to occur as soon after seedbed preparationas possible: ,Ideally, theContractor will complete permanent. reclamation activities prior to the end of' the typical fall planting season (September 1st — October 31st). Upon completion of reclamation, the Company's Construction Inspector, Environmental Inspector, and Land Agents, and BLM representatives will perform. a final inspection of the ROW and ancillary facilities to verify that pre -construction commitments have been satisfied. A copy of the post -reclamation "inspection form will be transmitted:' to the Contractor if any deficiencies or a need fqr remedial action is noted 6. POST -CONSTRUCTION MONITORNG AND EVALUATION 6.1 REVEGETATION AND EROSION CONTROL MONITORING During the first growing season following construction and, reclamation, qualified specialists will conduct intensive surveys to assess revegetation success and determine the need for further reclamation. Revegetation Monitoring will include evaluation of the following parameters as compared' to adjacent (off -ROW) vegetation: • percent total herbaceous cover (seeded species plus desirable volunteers), and: ♦ species composition. Where applicable, the following will be evaluated:. • new or :expanded populations of noxious weeds: Areas with poor germination and/or growth will be evaluated to determine, if possible, the cause of the problem. .Reclamation techniques will be modified as .necessary to address any identified problems and appropriate remedial measures will be undertaken. The Contractor will beresponsible for reniethating any problem areas identified by the Company for the first growing season following construction. Thereafter, the Company will be responsible for obtaining a reclamation contractor to perform any necessary work. Erosion control monitoring will be performed inresponse to significant weather events. and/or concurrently with the revegetation monitoring during the first year :following construction. Success criteria for both are discussed in Section 6.2. bit."B",Page 9 of Ip 111111 nisi 11111111111 III imii 1111 III 111111 111 1111 12/08/2003 03.20P B1S45'.. P135 M ALSDORF 10 of 2@ R.101.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Both erosion control and revegetation monitoring willbe conducted routinely throughout the life of the pipeline to evaluate long-term survival 9f reestablished vegetation andthe effectiveness of erosion control measures with specific attention to problem sites. 6.2 EVAUUAT'ING RECLAMATION SUCCESS ;The Company is responsible for the stabilityand revegetafion of all areas disturbed as a result of construction for the life of the pipeline. As discussed in Section 6.1; the Company will :conduct intensive monitoring after thefirst growing, season androutinely thereafter to assess soil stability andrevegetation success. The Contractor will reseed any portion Of the ROW that does not exhibit 50 percent total herbaceous cover (comprised of seeded species plus desirable volunteers) relative to adjacent (off -ROW) vegetation after the first complete growing season. Additional seeding will be completedduring the next seeding season (fall or spring). In the event that first year revegetation is affectedby precipitation amounts significantly below the annual average, the Companymay request deferment of additional seeding activities until the following seeding window. The reclaimed ROW will be considered stable when the surface appears similar to adjacent undisturbed land and the following accelerated erosion indicators do not. exist: • perceptiblesoil movement (exceeding pre -construction conditions). • head cutting. in drainages t flow pattern development resulting in large (greater than 12 _inches in depth) rills o'r gullies ♦ trench subsidence or slumping _. Revegetation will be considered successful when the following criteria are met total herbaceous (seeded species plus desirable volunteers) cover is it least 75 percent of that onadjacent land,: and • species composition comprised of a mixof seeded species and desirable volunteers from adjacent communities. Fxhibit "B", Page 10 of 10 IIi1111II111111111111111ini1111111111111111111111111111111. 20 a# 2v/08/2003, RI@ 00 D.02.00 0? GARFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit "C" to PIPELINE RIGHT-OF-WAY GRANT dated October39 2003 between Sidney R. Lindauer, as Trustee of The Sidneyand Rut lindauer Family Trust, Giantpr end EnCana Gathering Services (USA) Inc., Grantee , nth P.M., Section.13:.EYeE+N WWNW4. 1111111 m1111111111111111111111111111111111m 11111111 .642516. 12/08/2003 03:20P B1545 P119 M. RLSDORP 3 of 20 R 101.00 D 0 00 6RRFIELD COUNTY CO 15. This agreement Shall be binding upon and inure tp the benefit of the parties, and their respective personal representatives, heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall be a covenant running with the lands. Executed by the undersigned in duplicate originals on the dates shown in the acknowledgements; but effective for all purposes asof the: 27th day of October, 2003: GRANTOR: Sidney R. Lindauer, Trustee of the Sidney and Ruth Lindauer Family Trust GRANTEE: EnCaua Gathering Services (USA) Inc., by: Jesse G. Wood Team Leader —South Rockies. Attorney :.In Fact Page 3 of 8: 1 11 1111 1 1111 111111 11111 11111 111111 IIIII 111 1111 1111 642516 12/08/2003.03 20P B1545 P116 11 RLSDORF 2 of 20 'R 101:00 D 0 00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO 4, Grantee shall pay all Incidental expenses incurred in surveying, and recording said easement. Grantee shall furnish Grantor with an accurate "as -built" survey at the completion: of construction. 5. Grantor will not hold Grautee.liable for r damages incurred by Grantor as a result of Grantor's. activities on tbeeasement not compatib'le with the purposes contemplated herein. Grantee agrees to compensate Grantor for extraordinary loss or damages caused by Grantee, its agents or employees to persons, property or livestock; including that of its surface lessee, if any;, 6: Grantee shall, at its sole expense, keep the lands subject to the easement granted herein free and clear of all liens and encumbrances resulting from Grantee's and its agents' activities on the said. lands, and shelf indemnify aitd hold Grantor harmless from and against any andall liens, claims, demands, costs, and expenses, including,; without limitation--attomey's fees and court costs;: in connection witti or arising out of any work done, labor performed or materials furnished. 7. Grantee shall notify Grantor prior to accessing Grantor's: property for the uses allowed unctr this instrument Grantor agrees not tohinder, resist, oppose, obstruct oratherwisedelay the installation and operation of the pipeline. Grantee agrees that Grantor would be irreparably harmed by any delay in said installation and operation. Due to procedures and element$ of the construction -:process outside the control of Grantee; including without limitation the permit process, weather conditions, and critical suppliers of parts, equipment and labor, Grantee'can not guarantee any. particular completion date; nevertheless, Grantee shall pursue all parts of the process within its control with all due diligence and deliberate speed. 9 The rights' granted herein may not be assigned without Grantor's prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 10. EnCana's Reclamation Plan, attached as',Exhibit Ill", andincorporated into this instrument by this reference, shall be fully implemented by Grantor_. 11.. Additional terms are specified: in Addendum One, attachedJereto and made a part of this instrument by this- reference:- 12. This instrument: with its addendum, exhibits and confidential memorandum constitutes the: entire agreement between the parties; and allprior agreements', and understandings; whether written or oral, are merged into them. 13. Grantors agree that they have been fully compensated in advance for anyand all damages whatsoever inherent in the constmctlon of said pipeline: The payment terms are referenced in that certain Confidential Memorandum of Payment Due of even date herewith, referencing this agreement, which shall not berecorded except at the sole option of the Grantee, and the terms said memorandum: shall remain centidentiat between the parties in all respects.. 14.. This agreement shall be executed in duplicate originals, eachparty to retain one. Signatures and acknowledgements may be done separate counterparts without affecting the validity of this agreement: Page 2 of 8 MEMO November 6, 2003 TO: Jimmy Smith FR: Tom K, 970 948-2321 RE: Parachute to De Beque American Soda, L.L.P. Original recorded ROW Agreement Attached please the original recorded instrument. Thanks.