HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff ReportFebruary 11th, 2009
Jimmy Smith, Representative
Wagon Wheel Consulting, Inc.
111 East 3"' Street, Suite 213
RIFLE CO 81650
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING
DEPARTMENT
Subject: Administrative Pipeline Permit Application for ETC Canyon Pipeline
(PDP16808) 'Rulison to Enterprise Pipeline' and Appurtenant Compressor
Station on Holms Mesa
Dear Mr. Smith,
Upon review, the Application was deemed technically complete on December 31, 2008 and
has been reviewed against the submittal requirements required in Resolution 2005 — 53 and
required in Section 9.07 of the Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended. This letter shall
constitute Garfield County's review of the project.
1. Project Overview (General Location and Extent)
This project generally consists of the construction and installation of 10.4 miles of a 24 -
inch buried steel natural gas pipeline, related valve facilities and the construction of a
compressor station which is intended to gather gas from existing natural gas drilling
fields and dry and then boost the gas. The eventual connection on the west is to an
existing 35" Enterprise pipeline interconnect located in Section 2, Township 7S, range
96W. The pipeline will reside entirely in Garfield County.
This application is being processed under the Zoning Resolution of 1978, as Amended.
It is appropriate for a compressor station to be considered 'an appurtenant component to
the pipeline.' In order to properly review the compressor station, Staff has applied
Section 5.03.07 Industrial Operations and 5.03.08 Industrial Performance Standards to
the compressor portion of the application.
The general location and alignment of the gathering line begins at the compressor plant
site on Holms Mesa adjacent to Country Road 301, south of the Rulison interchange of
Interstate -70 (1-70) in the SW 1/4 NE '/4 of Section 6, Township 7S, range 95W. It
proceeds due west, then northward, descending the bench, bores under County Road
309 then turns northwest to the Colorado River. A bore will be performed to allow the
pipeline to cross under the Colorado River, the railroad right-of-way of the Union Pacific
Railroad and 1-70 to Section 25, T6S, R95W, where the pipeline turns to the southwest,
crossing the flat areas north of Interstate -70. The pipeline will parallel existing natural
gas pipelines, turn westward above the Cornell Ditch north of Parachute, then bore
under County Road 215 to its terminus with the Enterprise pipeline interconnect via a
metering device.
108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470
The proposed right-of-way widths vary during construction but result in a 30' permanent
easement once constructed. The pipeline appears to be primarily located in already
disturbed areas significantly reducing the footprint (cuts / fills) on the ground.
11. Surface Ownership
The pipeline crosses numerous private fee lands as well the following easement (listed
west to east): Garfield County Road & Bridge (160 feet) and three rights-of-way (675 feet
of Interstate -70, US 6 & 24 and 100 feet of Union Pacific Railroad). They are located on
the maps, shown by dashed lines and an arrow. A - E, respectively, run west to east: A
and E are Garfield County road crossings, B is I-70, C is the railroad and D is SH 6 & 24.
The following is a list of ownership, from west to east, with the related permissions by
agreement in parentheses. (The numbers correspond to the maps below, depicting
ownership and pipeline corridor, compressor location; the boxes are mean to highlight
ownership and do not reflect the true parcel boundaries.)
1. Solvay Chemicals /American Soda,/LLP (temporary & permanent pipeline
easement)
2. Williams Production RMT (temporary & permanent pipeline easement)
3. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation (temporary & permanent pipeline easement)
4. Puckett Land Company/ Tosco Corporation (temporary & permanent pipeline
easement)
5. Samuel & Teresa Potter ((temporary & permanent pipeline easement,
temporary staging site)
6. Gary Lee Mahaffey ((temporary & permanent pipeline easement)
temporary staging site for directional bore)
7. Diamond Elk, LLC (temporary & permanent pipeline easement)
8. ETC Canyon Pipelines LLC (compressor)
Based on the information provided, the applicant has all of the easements and right-
of-ways necessary to move forward on the project.
FLS,
ETC Rulison-
Enterprise Pipeline:
Western Portion
VfilVAl9
CII
Mtlly3
HVI
lLW
SLCA
F44-
Ll/l
Rl
9 0,
r 5
w w
Pipeline
(red solid line)
..... _ .. MAq�t pL IL1Y rrs _
`i . . �...-...
ttke text_
A
*LW; 441 finMDR
L1 INT
[ill
1 ,.
'JJ 45 Cf40). Ful c0
2
1100
uLni.
H." -AS LII,
WS FM
P4111U4in n tee PMttOS
PATRLFItti IffA PrtSAS
(INI4441.11 FMK 9mCAMCNI
9Al1.LUH7IIA c' C4.
WJ.1 (
3
191711
BAIRCIltllt
VSA
PM'IA.A'S
%,DU( cl
Hl(4_l Ot
UBCR:AC •
FATRLVGT
Fri
2
ETC Rulison —
Enterprise Pipeline:
Eastern Portion
3
WI"
0
YOP.M On. OL .. . [.,I I!
10,014 to
•
1611 ✓m *101 0101
4X001
M1(rYX .r. er Y.IXXfu
an 1110X9
SRM fat
LIP„ 715
wK
I°t,1-
/� rFcl.xu
.V[SA
,4Y,at 11CT) a.t 7op g „a
IlY
'Art XN11.
nX}ni'a IMlgf
WXli.r IPYtr
CA l '-. !.
III. Holms Mesa Compressor Station
The Holms Mesa Compressor Station is located in Box 8 on the map above. The
compressor station will contain up to 3 compressors enclosed within a building. (The
Application states that provisions have been made for 3 additional compressor units of
like size, for future volume expansion.)
A sound analysis in the application demonstrates that the COGCC noise regulations can
be met with the 3 compressor units of this phase. The most affected residence is 2316
feet from the facility. The most affected property line is 1087 feet from the facility.
The processing equipment intended to dry the gas before boosting it and sending it north
and westward to connect to the Enterprise terminus. Collected liquid from the three
compressor units is anticipated to total 400 to 600 barrels (16,800 to 25,200 gallons)
each week. Four to six trucks will be required each week to transport the liquids to an
approved treatment facility. Haul routes shall be designed by Garfield County Road &
Bridge, as well as appropriate permits for those vehicles.
Because the analysis that satisfies the noise attenuation requirements is based on the
initial phase of 3 compressors located inside a building, it is recommended by Staff that
the permit include the initial three (3) compressor units as a permission of this
application, and consider additional units, when needed, as an amendment with proper
review.
IV. Road Cuts / Access /Traffic
The pipeline route will cross and access Garfield County Road 215 and 309. Approved
easement use, access permits and traffic control plans will be required. A temporary
access permit will be required by ETC for access from Garfield County Road 301 to the
staging area on their property, as well. A Garfield County utility permit for road bores and
profiles is also required for the project.
Permits are in place for the crossing permit for underground bore plans with Union
3
Pacific Railroad, and CDOT has issued a utility permit for road bore plan. The Town of
Parachute has issued a watershed permit, and CDOT has issued both a survey permit
and a special use permit (#14005).
The Army Corps of Engineers has approved of the proposed design approach and a
permit to bore is granted (SPK -2008 -501 -CW). A Nationwide General permit NWP) 12 is
granted for the work activity in the course of ephemeral streams amounting to less than
1/10 acre. A permit for the hydrostatic testing of pipelines, etc. (COG -604) has been
issued for the pipeline.
The application contains a Soil Conservation, Sedimentation and Erosion that provides
detail as to how certain areas / stream cuts / Best Management Practices (BMPs) are to
be utilized throughout the project, as well as a Stream Crossing and Wetland Protection
Plan_ A storm water management plan is required by the CDPHE Division of Water
Quality has been prepared. It includes measures to minimize pollutants, erosion,
sedimentation both on and off the right-of-way with detailed BMPs and is associated with
the two (2) storm water discharge permits which cover the sizeable build area:
COR038333 and COR038335. They are valid until June 10, 2010.
The unmanned facility requires a minimum of trips, mostly by pickup trucks. The proposal
to manage the produced water from the 3 initial compressor units is stated to be 4 to 6
tanker trips per week. CR301 is a winding rural road that is not surfaced the entire
distance of the haul route
An alternative management of the produced water generated by the site shall be
considered at the time the compressor station is expanded in any way; Staff
recommends that dust mitigation be incorporated into the operational plan for the site
and the un -surfaced portion of CR301 (if this action is supported by Garfield County
Road & Bridge) as a condition of approval.
V. Staging Areas
For this project, the Applicant proposes five (5) temporary staging areas: three (3) on private
fee parcels (identified in the ownership documentation above), one (1) on their own property,
and one (1) in the Garfield County road right-of-way. Leases and ownership rights are in
place for this use. Access (from these two areas) is directly onto CR 301 and CR 215, and
permits are required from Garfield County Road & Bridge. These locations are intended for
storage of materials and employee shuttle points. It is expected that as the pipeline build
progresses away from these areas, they will be terminated, but their use will terminate no
later than at the end of the project.
VI. Sensitive Species
a. Plants
An extensive Sensitive species study was performed in April of 2008 and revealed that no
TESS plants were observed in the field study, and suitable habitat for several species exists
nearby but outside of the proposed pipeline alignment. No Federal or State -listed species
were noted.
b. Wildlife- Birds
Regarding wildlife, no federally Threatened or Endangered (T & E) species were identified in
the corridor. There were State -listed Threatened, Endangered, Special Concern Species
4
that may occur in the project area that include the American Peregrine Falcon, Townsend's
Big -eared Bat and the Northern Leopard Frog.
Additionally, birds of conservation concern included eight (8) raptor nests within 1/3 mile of
the corridor, two (2) being noted as active nests. Human activity is disruptive to these
species and mitigation should include restricting construction to specific months. There is
Red-tailed hawks have used site RTHA-1 but no species association with the other nests.
The report recommends the nests be re -inventoried by qualified biologists to determine the
associated species to properly mitigate the impact.
The nests are located on the west end of the pipeline project. Because the pipeline
construction period is to start on the west end of the project and work eastward, (the
directional bore is also slated to be done while the Colorado River is at its low point), there is
opportunity to properly mitigate the raptor nesting issue. A seasonal restriction from March
15th to July 15th with a buffer zone of 1/3 mile would mitigate issues for Red Tailed Hawk
nests. Most of the timing limits for raptors begin in March and run through mid-July or
August. Staff has suggested that as a condition of approval an additional inventory be
performed to identify the occupant species of the other active nest site, and use the earliest
timing period found to be justified for the associated species, or March 15th to July 15th if the
other species cannot be identified by a qualified biologist. .
c. Fish
No fish species studies were conducted as part of this survey. The section of the Colorado
River that is to be crossed with a directional bore is in an area considered part of critical
habitat for Federal endangered species Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker. The
report utilized annual electro -shock survey data provided by the Fish & Wildlife Survey
(FWS) to determine whether these species were present in the proposed pipeline alignment
and found that neither species were present. Recommendations for the control of sediment
that might make its way into the river is part of the erosion management plan's directives and
serves to protect these species and the Northern Leopard Frog, as well.
b. Wildlife- Animals
Regarding wildlife, no federally Threatened or Endangered (T & E) species were identified in
the corridor. The area is identified by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) as containing
elk and mule deer 'winter range', 'winter concentration areas' and some 'severe winter
range.' While the wildlife impact assessment states that 'the impact to wildlife as a result of
the pipeline installation and operation is relatively minimal and would not affect the overall
status of populations in the area' it also says that 'the project and its on-going activities will
contribute, however, to the overall cumulative impacts' (including gradual habitat loss,
fragmentation, alteration and displacement through increasing development) and makes
recommendations to mitigate these impacts.
These actions include avoiding construction activities/energy exploration and development
activities in critical times from December 1 to April 30, installing fencing that is
recommended as 'wildlife friendly' by the DOW and requiring construction and service
vehicle drivers to maintain modest speeds to avoid striking wildlife. Staff suggests that these
be made conditions of approval.
VII. Livestock
One of the concerns expressed in comments in a letter from an adjacent owner (Wells -
5
letter attached as an Exhibit) and verbalized on the phone by an adjacent parcel owner
(Backes), is that sudden loud or hissing noises from pipeline and compressor tests
frighten domestic livestock and residents nearby, and increased gaseous discharges
cause concern to residents. Ms. Wells recommended a courtesy notice be given the
affected residents near the test location by direct personal contact via phone, email,
notice posted on the residence in advance of the planned event so that affected
residents may plan accordingly for their livestock's safety and personal comfort.
The Applicant's 'Plan of Development 4.3.9 Livestock Barrier and Other Livestock Issues'
has proposed that Wagon Wheel Consulting meet with affected ranchers to discuss their
concerns. Staff recommends that this be accomplished before construction is initiated so
that suggestions might be incorporated in the operational plan. Staff recommends that be
a condition of approval for Wagon Wheel Consulting meet with affected ranchers to
discuss their concerns.
VIII. Cultural Resources
A Class I Cultural Resource Inventory was performed in April of 2008. No significant
resources were recorded within 100 meters of the proposed pipeline.
Of concern beyond that distance (found 200 feet south of the proposed pipeline) is site
5GF1135. While this site is classified as 'not eligible -officially' in an evaluation for
significance as a cultural resource (regarding eligibility to the National Register of Historic
Places), the site is apparently a EuroAmerican grave, and, as such, is protected under
the CRS Section 1, 24-80-401 as an 'Unmarked Human Grave'.
The recommendation by Grand River Institute archaeological personnel is that 'the
graves location should be verified by an archaeologist, clearly marked and avoided by
any construction.' Staff suggests that it be a condition of approval for the Applicant follow
recommendations for protection of the site 5GF1135.
IX. Referral Comments
Staff referred the Application to the following Agencies / Departments whose comments are
included here for review, and attached to this letter as is required by Resolution 2005 — 53:
A. Grand Valley Fire Protection District: No comments were received.
B. Garfield County Road and Bridge Department: Garfield County Road & Bridge
Department has no objections to this application with the following comments.
■ Permits will issued for CR 215, CR 301 and 309 for the staging areas
and parking of employee personal vehicles.
• All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall
abide by Garfield County's oversize/overweight system. All vehicles
requiring an oversize/overweight permit shall have on fie a letter from
ETC Canyon Pipelines, LLC stating such vehicles can obtain
oversize/overweight permits under their road bond on file with Garfield
County Road & Bridge Department. These must be picked up at the
Road & Bridge Office.
6
C. County Oil & Gas Liaison: No comments were received.
D. County Project Engineer: The comments concurred with County Vegetation
Management on reclamation plans requirements, rates and securities, and had
these additional specific comments:
Holmes Mesa Compressor Station SUP
1. Grading - Proposed Fill and Cut Slopes: Clarification is needed to
adequately review the grading plan and retention pond design.
2. Grading — Drainage Swales: How will runoff be directed from the
compressor platform to the retention basin? No swales directing runoff to the
retention basin are shown on the grading plan.
3. Grading — Vehicle Access: The grading does not show driveways
interconnecting the different platform levels.
4. Retention Basin: What is the volume of the proposed retention
basin? What volume is required to retain the 100 -year storm? How will the
basin empty between rainfall events? What design elements prevent the
failure of the retention basin? Who will maintain and clean the basin?
5. Engineer's wet seal: The grading and drainage plans and report
needs to have the wet seal of the professional engineer. A scanned or
photocopied seal is not sufficient.
E. County Vegetation Management: Found the submitted weed management plan is
acceptable, and specific comments follow.
■ Staff requests that the applicant treat all inventoried noxious weeds in
the project area prior to construction activities if possible. At the
minimum, the noxious weed trees, tamarisk and Russian olive should be
treated this winter. They can be treated this winter by utilizing the cut -
stump method with a herbicide application. We recommend that the
applicant do this and forward treatment records to this office:
Garfield County Vegetation Management
POB 426, Rifle CO 81650
• It is critical that the applicant implement a weed management program prior
to reseeding. There are areas indicated that have heavy infestations of
biennial thistles (Scotch). These areas will need to be treated in May or
June and again in late August or early September. The area of concern
is UTM Easting 12S 755648 and UTM Northing 4373305. Other
species found in other locations should also be addressed, however
particular attention should be paid to the aforementioned area.
• There should be about a six-week window between the last herbicide
treatment and the initial reseeding.
• The disturbance area is for the compressor station is 9 acres. The long term
revegetation security has been $4000 per acre. This totals $36,000. This
7
figure only accounts for revegetation and not any earthwork, recontouring,
or structure removal costs.
• Staff would like to have a meeting with the applicant on-site in Mayor June to
assess the weed situation. We would expect to see the tamarisk and
Russian olive trees treated by that time.
Revegetation Plan: The revegetation plan is acceptable.
• All seed tags must be saved and made available to the Vegetation
Management Department for verification.
Reveqetation Security
• Pipeline: The applicant has quantified the area of disturbance on private land
has 89 acres (Jimmy Smith, January 14, 2009). We recommend a $2500
per acre security for disturbances on private land. This would come to
$222, 500.
• Compressor: The area of disturbance for the compressor station is 9 acres.
The long term revegetation security has been $4000 per acre. This totals
$36, 000. This figure only accounts for revegetation and not any earthwork,
recontouring, or structure removal costs.
• The security shall be held by Garfield County until vegetation has been
successfully reestablished according to the Reclamation Standards in the
Garfield County Weed Management Plan. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact the County, upon successful revegetation
establishment, to request an inspection for security release consideration.
F. Town of Parachute: No comments were received, although a water discharge
permit was issued by their Planning Department.
X. Citizen Comments
Comments in the form of telephone conversations at the Rifle Airport Office of the Planning
Department and a letter sent by Marian Wells have been incorporated in the appropriate
portions of this report. Marian Wells' letter states: 'I request the compressor station be
reviewed with full public hearings, separate from the pipeline. Further study needs to be
conducted on noise, water and wildlife before any consideration of the plan.'
XI. SUMMARY OF REVIEW
The 10.4 mile pipeline corridor will be primarily located within an existing pipeline
easement or immediately adjacent to them and will not result in any significant new cuts /
land disturbance and has met all the zoning requirements for this pipeline.
Therefore, upon substantive review of the documents submitted against the required
standards and criteria in Section 9.07.06, Staff has made a determination of Approval with
Conditions for the "ETC Rulison to Enterprise and Compressor Station"
The specific conditions include the following:
1. Any equipment used in construction or operation of a pipeline must comply with the
Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Rules and Regulations, Section
802, Noise Abatement. Additionally, all power sources used in pipeline operations
shall have electric motors or muffled internal combustion engines.
8
2. Pipeline operations shall be located in a manner to minimize their visual impact and
disturbance of the land surface. Facilities shall be painted in a uniform, non -
contrasting, non -reflective color, to blend with the adjacent landscape. Right-of-way
shall be located in existing disturbed areas unless safety or visual concerns or other
adverse surface impacts clearly dictate otherwise.
3. The use of the staging areas and transporting employees to the work area by multi -
passenger vehicles is a benefit to all users of County Road 215, County Road
301and other roads that will be used by this application both by reducing traffic and
impacts to the road system.
4. All vehicles working within Garfield County Rights -of -Way will be licensed and
registered in the State of Colorado. All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for
the pipeline construction will abide by Garfield County Road & Bridge Departments
oversize/overweight regulations. All vehicles requiring an oversize%verweight permit
will send a letter showing proof that they can operate undera known bond holder on
file with Garfield County Road & Bridge Department before a permit will be issued.
5. Traffic control plans shall be submitted to Road & Bridge to meet their
requirements.
6. Before construction can be initiated on the compressor site, the Applicant shall
provide clarification needed to adequately review the grading plan, retention pond
design, on-site vehicle circulation, etc. listed in the County Project Engineers referral
comments.
7. The Applicant shall provide the County with a digital alignment of the pipeline once
constructed in a format readable to the County Geographic Information System
(GIS) analyst.
8. Air contaminant emissions shall be in compliance with the applicable permit and
control provisions of the Colorado Air Quality Control Program, Title 25, Resolution
7, C.R.S.
9. All operations shall comply with all applicable Federal and State Public Health and
Environment, Noise, and Air and Water Quality Control standards, and so that
ground vibration inherently and recurrently generated is not perceptible, without
instruments, at any point of any boundary line of the property on which the use is
located.
10. All lighting on site shall be directed downward and inward onto the compressor site
itself.
11. The Applicant shall not store any heavy equipment or pipe supplies on this site.
12. Loading and unloading of vehicles shall be conducted on private property and may
not be conducted on any public right-of-way.
13. In no case shall an operator engage in activities which adversely affect Federal or
State threatened and endangered species.
9
14. The Applicant and the project construction plan shall adhere to a seasonal restriction
that results from an additional inventory by a qualified biologist of nest site RTHA-2,
or if no occupation is found or determination of species made by a qualified
biologist, the seasonal restriction shall be from March 15th to July 15t with a buffer
zone of 1/3 mile for Red Tailed Hawk nests, and as identified in the wildlife report.
15. Actions to mitigate adverse wildlife impacts shall be taken that include:
a. avoiding construction activities/energy exploration and development
activities in critical times from December 1 to April 30 for elk and mule
deer,
b. following the `wildlife friendly' fencing recommendation by DOW,
c. requiring construction and service vehicle drivers to maintain modest
speeds to avoid striking wildlife,
d. preventing sediment from entering the Colorado River especially in
estuary locations that might be used as production pools forendangered
Pike Minnows and Razorback Suckers, during both the bore operations
and installation of the pipeline,
e. keeping construction areas free of waste and food debris that would
serve to attract bears, coyotes and other animals.
16. To satisfy CRS 24-80-401 (1) preservation requirements, the grave location
identified in the Cultural Resources Survey as site 5GF1135 shall be verified by an
archaeologist, clearly marked and avoided by any construction.
17. Wagon Wheel Consulting, Inc. shall meet with affected parcel owners to discuss
their concerns before construction is initiated so that suggestions might be
incorporated in the operational plan.
18. Should an abandoned pipeline be removed, it will be subject to the original
revegetation and weed management requirements in the original application.
19. Changes to this permit shall be made through the Amendment process.
20. The Applicant shall satisfy the comments from the County Vegetation Director as
follows:
■ Staff requests that the applicant treat all inventoried noxious weeds in the
project area prior to construction activities if possible. At the minimum,
the noxious weed trees, tamarisk and Russian olive should be treated
this winter. They can be treated this winter by utilizing the cut -stump
method with a herbicide application. We recommend that the applicant
do this and forward treatment records to this office:
Garfield County Vegetation Management
POB 426, Rifle CO 81650
• It is critical that the applicant implement a weed management program prior
to reseeding. There are areas indicated that have heavy infestations of
biennial thistles (Scotch). These areas will need to be treated in May or
June and again in late August or early September. The area of concern
is UTM Easting 12S 755648 and UTM Northing 4373305. Other
species found in other locations should also be addressed, however
10
particular attention should be paid to the aforementioned area.
• There should be about a six-week window between the last herbicide
treatment and the initial reseeding.
• The disturbance area is for the compressor station is 9 acres. The long term
revegetation security has been $4000 per acre. This totals $36,000. This
figure only accounts for revegetation and not any earthwork, recontouring,
or structure removal costs.
• Staff would like to have a meeting with the applicant on-site in May or June to
assess the weed situation. We would expect to see the tamarisk and
Russian olive trees treated by that time.
Revegetation Plan: The revegetation plan is acceptable.
• All seed tags must be saved and made available to the Vegetation
Management Department for verification.
Revegetation Security
• Pipeline: The applicant has quantified the area of disturbance on private land
has 89 acres (Jimmy Smith, January 14, 2009). We recommend a $2500
per acre security for disturbances on private land. This would come to
$222,500.
• Compressor: The area of disturbance for the compressor station is 9 acres.
The long term revegetation security has been $4000 per acre. This totals
$36, 000. This figure only accounts for revegetation and not any earthwork,
recontouring, or structure removal costs.
• The security shall be held by Garfield County until vegetation has been
successfully reestablished according to the Reclamation Standards in the
Garfield County Weed Management Plan. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact the County, upon successful revegetation
establishment, to request an inspection for security release consideration.
This determination has been sent to the Board of County Commissioners to determine if
they wish to call up the matter. Staff will let you know if this matter is called up by February
25, 2009. (Note, the permit cannot issue and no work can be commenced until all conditions
have been met.)
Do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Dustin Dunbar, AICP
970.625.5903
Cc: Fred Jarman
11
Exhibits (2/11/09) Administrative Permit (PDP 16808)
ETC Canyon Pipelines,LLC
RULISON-ENTERPRISE PIPELINE AND APPURTENTANT COMPRESSOR STATION —
HOLMS MESA
Exhibit
Letter
(A ton
Exhibit
A
Referral: Garfield County Road and Bridge Dept email
B
Referral: Garfield County Planning Project Engineer email
C
Referral: Garfield County Vegetation Management Department email
D
Referral: Comment letter (Citizen) - Marian Wells, 6691 CR309, Parachute
E
Addendum: Metering information draft (engineered drawings to follow)
F
Dusty Dunbar
From: Dusty Dunbar
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:48 AM
To: Jake Mall
Subject: confirming ETC Rulison comments.
Jake -
As always, your insight on the road issues has been extremely helpful, and I appreciate your update. I
have not changed any of the conditions that you have seen as a part of the report. This is a copy of
the comments you stated...just wanted to pass it along to confirm it. I hope I am able to go out to
see these road and river bores being done...very interesting...certainly not BORING around here-
haha. Thanks again for your extra effort.
Dusty
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Garfield County Road and Bridge Department: Garfield County Road & Bridge Department has no
objections to this application with the following comments.
• All necessary permits will issued for CR 215, CR 301 and CR 309 for the staging areas,
parking of employee personal vehicles, and access.
•
All vehicles hauling equipment and materials for this application shall abide by Garfield
County's oversize/overweight system. All vehicles requiring an oversize/overweight permit
shall have on file a letter from ETC Canyon Pipelines, LLC stating such vehicles can
obtain oversize/overweight permits under their road bond on file with Garfield County
Road & Bridge Department. These must be picked up at the Road & Bridge Office.
Ms.Dustin Dunbar Acp.mm
Senior Planner
Garfield County, mom.
Phone (970) 625-5903 FAX 625-5939
2/11/2009
To: Files
From: John Niewoehner.
Date: December 30, 2008
n
EXHIBIT
RE: ETC Canyon Pipeline LLC: (1) Rulison to Enterprise Pipeline Development Plan and
(2) Holmes Mesa Compressor Station
Rulison to Enterprise Pipeline Development Plan
1.
2.
3.
Directional Boring Under the River and Highway: The Enserca engineering
drawing AL -08 shows a single boring under the both the highway and river.
However, on Enserca drawing EX -01 there are two borings - - one boring under
the highway and a second boring under the river. Which is correct?
Reclamation Plan: Steve Anthony needs to review the submitted reclamation
plan. The County has a one-page document that lists the requirements of the
reclamation plan.
Financial Security for Reclamation: In order to calculate the amount of the
financial security, we need to determine the area that will be disturbed by the
pipeline. Roughly this area is the ROW width multiplied by the pipeline length
[i.e. 60' ROW x (53000' pipeline — 3200' boring) = 66 acres]. Typically, the
financial security required for pipeline projects is $2,500 per acre.
Holmes Mesa Compressor Station SUP
1. Grading - Proposed Fill and Cut Slopes: The grading plan created by River City
Consultants shows 3:1 slopes and does not show the retention basin. The
grading plan created by Rodney Burrows shows 2:1 slopes. Which plan is
correct? The County may require 3:1 slopes since vegetation cannot be readily
re-established on 2:1 slopes.
2. Grading — Drainage Swales: How will runoff be directed from the compressor
platform to the retention basin? No swales directing runoff to the retention basin
are shown on the grading plan.
3. Grading — Vehicle Access: The grading does not show driveways
interconnecting the different platform levels.
4. Retention Basin: What is the volume of the proposed retention basin? What
volume is required to retain the 100 -year storm? How will the basin empty
between rainfall events? What design elements prevent the failure of the
retention basin? Who will maintain and clean the basin?
4. Reclamation Plan: Steve Anthony needs to review the submitted reclamation
plan.
5. Financial Security for Reclamation: We need two reclamation bonds for the
compressor station. The first bond is for re -vegetating the cut and fill slopes
created during the construction of the compressor platform. The second bond is
for the re -grading and re -vegetation of the compressor site when the compressor
station is abandoned. This second Tong -term bond should not have an
expiration date and its dollar amount should take into account inflation.
6. Engineer's wet seal: The grading and drainage plans and report needs to have
the wet seal of the professional engineer. A scanned or photocopied seal is not
sufficient.
Page 1 of 1
Dusty Dunbar
From: John Niewoehner
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:59 AM
To: Dusty Dunbar
Subject: ETC Pipeline and Compressor Stn - Financial Guarantee
Dusty - -
I reviewed the materials provided. My only concern is that the County obtains a sufficient cost estimate to guarantee the
eventual reclamation of the compressor site.
• I talked with Steve Anthony this morning. He was out last week and hadn't looked at the ETC compressor station
and pipeline plans yet.
• Short-term Financial Security_ Steve will request $2,500/acre for the pipeline. Getting the pipeline re -vegetation is
his priority. (He told me that the County just paid $3,000/acre for re -vegetation so the requested $2,500 security is
certainly not too high.)
• Long-term Financial Security: They need to provide a cost estimate to reclaim the site after the compressor
station is abandoned. This includes re -grading and re -vegetating the site. They can provide the County with cost
estimate using current costs. We will apply an appropriate interest rate to the expected life expectancy of the
compressor station.
John
2/11/2009
MEMORANDUM
To: Dusty Dunbar
From: Steve Anthony
Re: ETC Rulison to Enterprise Pipeline and Compressor Station
Date: January 14, 2009
Thanks for the opportunity to comment on this permit.
My comments are as follows:
Noxious Weeds
Weed Management
The weed management plan is acceptable.
It is recommended that the applicant initiate weed management activities prior to the start of
construction if possible. At the minimum, the noxious weed trees, tamarisk and Russian olive
should be treated this winter. They can be treated this winter by utilizing the cut -stump method
with a herbicide application. We recommend that the applicant do this and forward treatment
records to this office.
It is critical that the applicant implement a weed management program prior to reseeding. There
are areas indicated that have heavy infestations of biennial thistles (Scotch). These areas will
need to be treated in May or June and again in late August or early September. The area of
concern is UTM Fasting 12S 755648 and UTM Northing 4373305. Other species found in other
locations should also be addressed, however particular attention should be paid to the
aforementioned area.
There should be about a six-week window between the last herbicide treatment and the initial
reseeding.
Staff would like to have a meeting with the applicant on-site in May or June to assess the weed
situation. We would expect to see the tamarisk and Russian olive trees treated by that time.
Revegetation
Revegetation Plan
The revegetation plan is acceptable.
All seed tags must be saved and made available to the Vegetation Management Department for
verification.
Revegetation Security
• Pipeline
The applicant has quantified the area of disturbance on private land has 89 acres (Jimmy
Smith, January 14, 2009). We recommend a $2500 per acre security for disturbances
on private land. This would come to $222,500.
• Compressor
The area of disturbance for the compressor station is 9 acres. The long teen revegetation
security has been $4000 per acre. This totals $36,000. This figure only accounts for
revegetation and not any earthwork, recontouring, or structure removal costs.
The security shall be held by Garfield County until vegetation has been successfully reestablished
according to the Reclamation Standards in the Garfield County Weed Management Plan. It is the
responsibility of the applicant to contact the County, upon successful revegetation establishment,
to request an inspection for security release consideration.
6691 County Road 309
Parachute, Colorado 81635
3 Feb 09
Ms. Dustin Dunbar, Planner
Garfield County
0375 County Road 352, Building 2060
Rifle, Colorado 81650
Dear Ms. Dunbar,
EXHIBIT
This letter details my concerns and response to the Rulison to Enterprise Pipeline and Compressor Station
Development Plan. While a single plan, it covers two very different development issues. While a pipeline
has short-term effects and minimal long-term impacts, a compressor station is a major item with major long-
term effects to my community. It is inappropriate to combine these two items under only an administrative
review. The compressor station merits open public review with questions and answers since it represents a major
change in zoning and use for years to come. The shortened time frame for review, minimal notice, and lack of
public hearings (thereby limiting public comment) of an administrative review is woefully inadequate for a
commercial facility permanently and adversely changing the area. Agricultural Rural Residential use does not
match with 24-7, noisy, industrial impacts for generations to come.
Currently there are no posted notices of this plan on public thoroughfares it crosses as required in the
process. Notice only went by mail to those within 350' of the proposed development rather than the larger
area of landowners actually affected by this development.
This plan fails to answer basic questions. Is there truly a need for a large transmission line? Why must a
compressor station be on ARRD-zoned land? There currently are numerous gathering and transmission lines
servicing the area to the Parachute plant. Where is the proof this project is required? If required, then why
not locate the compressor station in areas where industrial use is already permitted such as near I-70? If
approved, all of Holmes Mesa and surrounding rural areas will be adversely impacted by this industrial use for
generations to come.
The plan does not adequately address the noise issue of a compressor station. A pipeline of that size
with six compressors will generate unacceptable noise levels in this quiet, rural residential area. Modeling is
totally insufficient for review. There is no baseline data for the actual location and the adjacent properties.
While 55 -day and 50 -night limits are set, this is not a city location and is high considering existing area noise.
The plan fails to detail pigging stations and valve locations which can increase the size of the affected area.
The use of water trucks to haul production water from the compressor station demonstrates poor planning
and a lack of consideration on the part of the applicant. A production water line to at least I-70 should be
required to eliminate additional long-term traffic issues on that unpaved, inadequately maintained section of
County Road 301 and other haul routes.
There is a retention pond on the compressor station site that is inadequately detailed. Specific
requirements should be included for long-term use in a watershed boundary, like liners, breach procedures and
cleanup standards. Groundwater fluctuations were not addressed in the plan because of snow at the time of last
year's report. Why didn't they address it before the plan was submitted? With numerous springs in the
development area, more baseline information and monitoring should be required in this water -critical area.
Reclamation is covered only in general terms. This company has yet to meet reclamation terms on its
existing pipelines. They should be required to bring current their existing pipelines reclamation before being
allowed to start this development. Spreading of slash should be disallowed since it creates fire hazard.
Noxious weed requirements need to be strictly enforced with penalty provisions.
Landowner notice should be detailed for environmental accidents, fires and maintenance like pressure
tests and pigging. The plans should include provisions for evacuating livestock as well as residences, with cost
reimbursement provisions to affected persons. Notice needs to be given to the largest area affected.
The plan's wildlife analysis raises many questions. While the short-term affect of the pipeline is
addressed, the greater long-term 24-7 issue of a compressor station are ignored. This area includes critical deer
and elk winter range, along with wild turkey and red-tailed hawk nesting sites. The drilling programs in the
area have already adversely impacted or altered wildlife patterns. The noise issue of the compressor station
must also applies to wildlife and requires analysis. The failure to address the wildlife impacts raises the
question of competence of the purported experts preparing reports as well as the applicant.
The question of compliance is crucial yet remains unanswered by the plan. The county must have the
resources and expertise to review this plan carefully without rushing because of its long-term effect. Inspection
of the requirements applied should be performed by the county or its independent agents at the expense of ETP
Canyon Pipeline. The bonding requirements should be much higher since the plan will be used for the 80+ -year
duration of the compressor station.
I request the compressor station be reviewed with full public hearings, separate from the pipeline.
Further study needs to be conducted on noise, water and wildlife before any consideration of the plan.
Mitigation plans for many issues need to be added to the plan before consideration. It needs to be proven this
compressor station cannot be located elsewhere in an area of compatible use. Because of the long-term effect of
this decision, more time and more information must be given for this critical review.
Sincerely,
(Ms.) Marion J. Wells
33
e
n
c'
e
�y
O 414Q$
N
0)
0
71
2
e
�
o
n
Et O
Jimmy Smith
From: Dusty Dunbar [ddunbar@garfield-county.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 11:47 AM
To: Jimmy Smith
Subject: RE: Rulison to Enterprise Pipeline
Thank you for satisfying the requirements of Condition #17. To my knowledge, the conditions of the permit that have
been satisfied so that construction will begin.
I will look for the item that you said Carl Conner, the archaeologist, will be providing you upon his visit next week, and
the pipeline as-builts when is complete.
Please call me when the bore is being performed as I would like to see that.
Thank you for your efforts.
Dusty
Senior Planner, Garfield County
625-5903
From: Jimmy Smith [mailto:jimmy@wagonwheelconsulting.com]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 11:23 AM
To: Dusty Dunbar
Subject: Rulison to Enterprise Pipeline
In regards to the Rulison to Enterprise Pipeline Administrative Permit (Conditions of Approval). Wagon Wheel
Consulting, Inc. has contacted all affected residence to the best of our ability to inform them of the project status and to
resolve all outstanding concerns. All landowners informed Wagon Wheel that there were no outstanding issues or
concerns with the pipeline and were ok with the construction beginning on the pipeline.
As mentioned before on the phone please submit an email to myself which grants permission for Energy Transfer to
begin construction on the pipeline. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Jimmy W. Smith (Cody Smith: codv@wagonwheelconsulting.com)
Owner/President
Wagon Wheel Consulting, Inc.
111 E. 3rd. St. Ste. 213
Rifle, CO 81650
Office: 970-625-8433
Cell: 303-726-9070
Fax: 970-625-8435
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.3/1975 - Release Date: 02/27/09 07:05:00
1