HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationHP-OzFeb-O4-OZ O7 : OrlA
g*.fr"/d 9"/*"t ha*at fi* #o -e
= -'G
'.,'E
: .E;
=."1
gl .&fi*,A'''il*aa"t tr"/"a't*'l*t
9o *-,e 8"l/rr,,,tt' .?L'f"-' tun't+"l
tO: The Garfield County Planning Conrmisaion
FBOH: Lennard Eckhardt. Superjntendent
REr Acguisltlon of a site f,or Anpther Secondary Buildlng
DATE 'aprLI 3Or I993
PrrreuarlL to c.R.E - 2?-32-724, r-'*.":tiryil? I"I':l Hl"]1"::r:l"n::"13.::;f;;';"3?,3";'3ii"l'T,H: iii-fE -i ^i$i-;::"*:i;';:,:::-t;,,:H:gli;i*i:''.E'.!xi,?E:l'ii!.:il?:i-?i::ri:lr"::i':I,1Ji;ril'**:i;"lil":"".uan offer to acquire a Bite for E'r'uurrqrLr -*""--E-ia-ip|ro"-imltety thre€
by ur. and utt..iilnlta-ii"ig norEh of Hishwav 6 '
*i.I** east of silt'
To help you betster understand nhy thie eite wae selectedr I a'm providlng you
irre roirlwing inforilletion'
In October of 1981, the Board of,Education appointed a ELte cvaluatioa
comnrittee, The committee was mad€ up ef orr"--iep"Jl"'[*ii"t froro each director
dietrict_tirreep..ion"atlargJ]Ii*-**.ondaryteaeher,twoadminietrators
and one Fer'€n ,rII'ItI'c"""i]-ir".nins offiee' .i"-"ia"i Eo evaluate the
siree the €orunitteE establighed it"'^i"ir"'-i"'g-=til;tiit +) environmenEal
aepects;b)ro.iii"',-_"ico*,e"iiul-iityvilfr.""iIy-,"ningid)'eizeandsn-ape; e1 a,,arr.iiiiiiy,-'ri,iriiliil-'a"iirauiri:I;"":l..tui|::3tl:t{;";T'::;"";iniiitv;--Li
-'ti"n"portatieni j I ?p:I"::
irrformarion pro,ri.ded by_t!? "i:! evai,r.[ion *o*oiti** ttt conJunction wlth HCE
Archireets, the i."rJlt Di-rectori''t-tr,it tirne-i.ir."a-tr'te eittt an6 ulti-urate-
rv selected whar r,ras then k rgr*l iI ;;.-ilgtr- aitll'--it ie the opinron of the
dietricr rhat the cr6erLs ar,"t ]ini"It*g-att" seiection of thie eite rn the
;;i;-;isrtci"= is equarrv selevartt todav
your positlue consldEration sf the craig proPerty being approved a'g a ftrture
school siEe wouiii-ft gt*atly appresiated'
Pleaes leE rne know If there Is addielonal infornration t'h*t would be of assls-
tance.
LElmb
enclogures:1. Iocetion maP
t, ::#:F";[ilg":r_];31]rffi;'i:Eli3:d in eonrracr ro purchaee e*e
Feb-O4-OZ 07:()5A
VARE
P-()5
lo
lE
o). (.*
,r''leos
. -\-? = i/ gloo :--l*d il o,:h=s--\\
i!- lr*!' Iii [i==ri i*qIll i\ io^,
{e
{j"
(i\Ji
\\-
J.
LIAvc
6u
it
$
ll
)t
ll
tt
h
It
'
.'.a
/'Q
HINDs
'fi
lltl\
,
--651e*
"Br{
r --:==
t==
I
I
r')raEv
L/r?(;1:Hi
/rc), fi','/ '.', f,;'.
(i','(,.1i=,."trll
,',*l(1,\i'.li
di i,#:i{,,
t
t
I
I
\
,l,!
zlt
'Jtti
'i.
ti;.'ir.l,tl
ri It, !
t ,/_. : /.1 ',t(-
Feb-O4-OZ 07:OEA
ADDITIONAL PROVISIOilS
Purchaser's performance under thls contract is expressly coiltin-
gent upon accomplisfurent of each of the following by August 15,
1993:
(A) To be obtained by Purchaser, at Purchaser'5 expense:
( 1) Sati.sfactory consultaEion with the Garfield county
flanninil Commission for evaluation of the tchool site conforrnance
wlLh the CountY General Plan.
(2) Septic system permit for treatment systelB on the
property for secondary school use'
(3) permaneilt easement or }icense of not less than 20 years
tor sewage effluent from septiC Systen on the property, southerly
to the Colorado River
( 4 ) Permit for a water well and completion of ? test well-
provldtng adequate potahle water for secondary achool use'
(5) Access perml-t for Hlghway 6 & 24 to the property for
=e.onda.y school use- Purchaser agrees that' a condition reguir- -lng consiruction of acceleration/deceleratisn }arres or other road
imfrovements shall not constitute denia]. of an access permit'
(B) To be obtained by Sel1er, at Sel1er's expensel
(I) ReLease of right of surface entry by any mineral
Ieaseholder of any portion of the property.
(?) Irrevocable wrltten commitment to partially release the
subject property fron anY encumbrance affecting that property
upon payment to the eneumbrance holder(s) of an amount not
exceeding the net proceeds of sale'
(3) Upon failure to satisfy any of these contingencies
prior to August 15, 1993, Purchaser may elect to treat thls
iontract as-terml-nated, in which case aII earnest money shall be
returned to Purchaser-
P. 03
Feb-O4-OZ O7:OEA P.Ort
E:OITBTT 'lA'
rrA parcel of land situate inSection 1, Torrnship E South. RangeHeridian which is uore partieularlyas followsl
the E 7/2 of the sE 7/4 of92 Hest of the 6th Principal
described by Estes and bounds
Beginning at the point of intersection with the northerlyright-of*way of Etate Highway 6 & 24 and the East Line of saidsection l. (the Range line), whence the witness corner to theSoutheast corner of said Sectl-on I bears South 00-42r00,' East451.35 feet, said uritness corner belng an iron post with abrass cap affixed properly rnarked and set by the Garfield
County Surveyor, and Located near the Southerly rlght-of-Hayof Interstate 70 and being South 0O'42.OOn East lO0.bO teet ofthe true lrcsition of said Southeast corner of Section l,thence along the Hortherly right*of-way of State Highway6 & z4 and alsa along side an existing fence South 77'O4,OgilHest 1290.34 feet; thence leaving said right-of-!{ay and alonga line parallel vith a fence running Hortherly aha located
60.OO feet l,Iesterly (very nearly) Horth O0'4etO0tr West 1528.00feeti thence East 1261.13 feet, to a point that lntersects theEast line of said Section 1; thence along said East line andalso along side an existing fence South 00"42'00( East 1?3?.18feet to the point of beginnlng. Said parcel of land contains40 acres more or Iess.h
Feb-O4-OZ O7rQ7A P. Lo
GARFIELD COUNW
REGUIITORY OFFICES AND PERSONNEL
May 14, 1993
konard Eckhart, Superintendent
GarfielC School District No. RE-Z
839 Whiteriver Avenue
Rifle, CO 81650
RE: Arqulrition of a Secondary School Site
Silt - New C;rstle
Dear Mr. Eckhart:
Please consider this letter to be verihcation that the Board of klucation o[ Garfield Schoo]
District RE -2 consultcd with the Garfield Counly Planning Corrml,i*^ion rcgarding the
acquisiliort of a secouiJary rchool site on Highway 6 &.24, between Silt ancl New Castle. This
corrsultation w&s done pursuant to C.R.S. 22-12-124.
At their regular meeting on May 12, 1993, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed
school site a-nC rcqucsted that the following comments be passad onto the Board ofEducatiorr:
The paroel lies within District C, Rural Areas/Minor Environrnental
Constraints;
Thc property is zoned A/R/RD, which requires a conditional use permit for
sc'hools. When the District is set ort their plans lor a school dcsign, application
for a conditioml use permit should be made to the Board, if the regulations still
rcquire the permit;
One of the stipulal,ions lor the purcham of the property is that a scptic system
permit be acquired prior to tlll5/93. There artr.Bome diffrculties in this
rcquircment. A septic system has to be dcsigned hasetl on projected flows ol
effluent. Garfield Coun ty can o nly issue an individual sewage system (ISDS) for
a sy$tem that ha.r a design capacity of 2,000 gallons per day (Spd) or less. A-uy
system larget than that must go through the site application approval proce$s
with theColorado Department of Heallh, WaterQuality Control Division. This
process can take up to 180 days from the tiate of application to a dccision.
Des'lgn capacity lor a public school with a caleterir, gym and showers is based
t.
2.
3.
1O98TH STREET,SUITE3OS 94+B?1216?sl55I1128F7972 . GLENWOODSPRINGS, COLORADO 8T601
Feb-O4-OZ O7;O7A
Mr. Leonard Eckhart, Superintendent
May 14, 1993
Page 2
on 25 gpd/pupil x 1.5. Basetl on this calculatiort, if the school will have more
than 54 pupils and teachers, a site application will be requi.ted. If a sewage
system is pl:nLuul at this site, it would he logical to design this system to
accommodate additional rlevelopment that will occur in the ilr€il. Thi.s systeur
would ned to be controlled by a special district with the authority to run a
public sewage treatment facility.
Any water system that provides water fqr 25 people or nrore, has to meet
Colorado Department of Heal th, Drinking Water Standanls. This may require
treatment of the walet beyond that notmally required for residential use. Them
are also additional requirements fortesting and Lhe subnrittal ofthose results on
al least a quartedy basis to the State.
ln the L'over lettcr, a number: of criteria are identified to evaluate the proposed
Iocations lor a new secondary school. One of thc criteria identified is "utilitia.;
avaiJability'. Thi$ site has rro utilitics available that are adequate for a public
school, without substantial costs up front to the District. The construction ofl
a strwage treatment facility will decrease the amount of usable artra for school
facilities. Substarntial reliarrce Lt being placed on the Boarrl's cvaluation of the
vflriour- sites considered. It woutd seern more logical to locate a school facility
in an area with sommunity water and sewer availablc.
If you have any additional questions or conceffis, leel flree to call or write to the Planning
Departrnent.
P. 11
4.
5-
$incerely,-{n,"l4i.**-
Mark L. Bean, Director
Regulatory 0ffices and Personnel
MLBisa
