HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Feasibility Reportto
ENGINEERING TEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR THE PROPOSED
SOUTH RIFLE METROPOLITAN WATER A}ID SAI{ITATION DISTRICT
- Prepared by
l4eurer, Serafini and Meurer, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
2901 l.Iest 19th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80204
1-
a.;I
i
i.
i
IE:
(*"t
*q#.:
F
t
I.t'
r
t,
'
i
Fq?
lfLrr',:'
[4"Cd
i:- '
FF
I
i
I
t
A. IIURPOSE .,i..:,.
.: ,'.) , ,,'..: . : l, ,,' The purpose of the proposed Water and Sanitation District
is to effect an efficient development and increased degree of beneficial
utilization.of, exi-sting.water resources of rthe State of,'Colorado rrvithin
the Colorado River:Basin,by applying waters: to morp thpn oqrg beneficial
use; and thereby provide.a method of contributing towar{ phe,provisign
,of a domestic vrater supply that shall be necessary to the development
of a eonrnunity,of,suf,ficient,size to assist io the suPport of the
economic development and growth that shall presently,ocgur rin the . . .
vicinity of Rif,le, Colorado. ,. .
t:,. .,,: , r ,_i
.
i:: . : B. NECESSITY i ', ',1
The necessity for such a District berng formed.to suPPort
and serve land developrn'rent in the area has been crqaq,pd b.y the inability
of existing agencies to provide rvat.er,and sanitaryy geryices to..the ..
hereinefter-described,,area that is either presently undpr develoEnen! ,:
or which is proposed;tp be developed. .
;1. ,,.:lj
. .i : The, objeclive,.of this report is to determine the engineering
and economic feasibili-ty, of the proposed initial Water and Sanitation
Distric!.and to provide a dir.ection of its future development rvithin
the limits of :known. condiEious-,and foreseeable economic growths to :i
the-'general ar€a. , ..i. : :
'..:'l ' ,;.,!i .l .r
.,II. ..'WATER: RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO,f}IE ABEA
' ''": ) ' '1 ,'; .;
Ai , COLORADO RIVER.,B[$IN HISTORIC APPORT.IONI'{ENTS
The available water to the Colorado River Basin was aPPor-
Eioned to the Colorado Uppgr,.Rl-ver Basin and to the CoJorado lcwer
River Basin,;by thg t'Co1o.5-4do.'River Compact" which was apppgvgp. by, :,. .
six qf r,the. ggven bas. 1'tapgs ,in 1923, and was later {atifigd !I,a}?'..last. of.t,he (s:e'ien,st€tter, inVolved in said CompacE on Febpuary 1.4, ,L9,,4(+.this Compac.t designated that the physical division poinr on the inain.
stem, of the Colorado River between the two basins woql,d bg, Lee Ferryr-
Arlzona. The.,rplrrpose of the Compact was to apportion rrraters contribu-
tory. to ther Co-lorado. River System between the "Uppert' and "Lower, River
Basins . tt . ; : ',. t:! .. i -,.: .
I
FL:
l,rir
[t-
ir-
t
IE:
t' -.
Ery,rli4-'
jF
t
i
SOUTH RIFLE METROPOLITAI{ WATER AI{D SAI{ITATION DISTRICT
Colorado
treaties,
In making the apportionment, the virgin flows of theRiver system at several points were estabrj.shed and priordeletions and exportations were taken under consideration.
:: r I't was esEimated that under virgin flow conditions, priorto diversion of waters frour the Colorado River system, that the rivertsvirgirilflow produced an average annual yield across the internaEional
boun'dar.y- into Mexico in the amount of L7 ,7201000 acre feet per year.
.: : :,..:,Apr!.orInternationa1Treatybetr+eentheUnitedStateSof,
America eindr'theiiUnited-iMexican,scates apporEioned a direct flow rightout of the Colorado River System to the Ur:ited,'Mexican,states in apamount that was later determined by a treaty of L945 to be 1,500,000acre feet annually, and which further provided that,iAn,.g-d.ditionai amountof 200,000 acre feet per year vrould be apportioned to the United Mexi.canState3l'for thoSe"'yeari' in-which:the United States deter:s.rined that asurplusi'existed.j -These rro,Ji""ai;"; i;,effecr; ,apporrioned ro rhe ) -
United"Sratds 'anid.verage"aniitial: amounti,of 'warer rin.,ihe- €lffioult.rof : r::.::.-, ii:
L6r22O:;'000 acre feet PEr''yeariunder virgin',flow,conditiorls, plus)any , ' :isurplus in an amount above 2OO1000 adre,:.feeE:.per /e€rr...:, ,',j,1.' ...
The choice for the division potti't-.betwedni.the'ttso basinsto be at Lee Ferry, Arizona, was made forreasons that it was thefurtheresL upstream phystcal point of r.concdncfati.on of all drainagesystems on the upper r€achesiof the main stdmrof ,the Colorado.r,River;but which was also' irmnediately below atl,lmaJor stream systems,that :::.drained those areas generally.''considerbd:;contributory to the,upper,,Portion of the Colorado River System. Thus all of Ehose:areas withinthe Colorado River System that have their respective drainages intothe main stem of the Colorado..iRiVer- b'e1sr^/ti4"eCi,Ee.r,-ry ",4f-g.:.dg.f...f_dE_{llasbeing within the Lower Colorado River Basin, and tirose fraving'iheirdrainages above Lee,' f'driy iAie iaef in6dl,as;lUe(itg.iltilhi,d.,ljtheillpier',
Colorado River Basin.
The esEimated virgin flow of the Colorado'*rrrur "a LeeFerry at the time Ehe pacE lras formalLzed on November 24, L922, vrasin lhe -average annuar a^mount of 15,0001000 acre feet per year. TheColorado River Pact apportioned an annual right of 7,500,000 acre feetof water to each of the Upper and Lower Basins for each of their respec-tive beneficial consumptive uses. The pact further providedrthat Ehe
Lor,rer Ba$in would be granted the right to i-ncrease its beneficial ',
cohsumptiver&nnual usE by the amouni of 1,000,000 acre feeL annually.from waters tribuEary to the Colorado River below Lee Ferry. The Pacts,ii
-2-
further that the Upper Basin could not cause Ehe flow of Ehe
River at Lee Ferry to be deleted below an aggregate total
7510001000 acre feet over a perioci of any ten consecutive
Ttre Pact furEher provided that the apportionment of any excess
o
),wacer among the States would be made after OcEober 1, 1963
The Coiorado River Pact did not define the management of
che wacers conEributory to the Colorado River Basin to a sufficient
excenc Eo enable a selection of proposed projects to be made for the. ,.purposes of regulating, utilizing and managing the waters so appor-
lion"a by the F."t. itu "Bouldei Canyon eioject AcEr" as ratiiied by
all;seven of the States that were a party to the Coloradg River Compact
by the year L929, provided the means of determining the most favorable
directioris'of development within each of the respective basins which
would most.effectively achieve the purposes of water management in ,,
accordance with the Colorado. River Compact
1, ,.Actua1 Quantity of Water Upper Basin Would Haye,i, .' Received Under Compact , [ -i
The apportionment of rirater by the t'Colorado River'Compact"
favors the J.gwer,Basin. It r,rould appear that the Compact provides a
on all water produqed by areas tributory to the
all of the r,raters produced from areas tributory -to,
apportioned to the Lower Basin, i.;hich hist.orically
average yield, of 1,200 r 000 acre geeF,,,per )rgar...
. ..t : ..:.,
I, . A fifty:fifty spli!,yould mean that waters would'be
equally apportioned each year on the basis of actual computed virgin
flows and yields from the Upper Basin as measured at Lee Ferry. Thus,
if , che computed virgin f lorv ,from .the Upper Basin, fo-r a givqn year
r,ras to. be 20,000r000 acre fegt,,,e?gh. Basin wguld,bq,apport-i.o5refl,,,..i:
I0,000,000iacre feet for, that yea\; and provide.d,further Ehgt sfrould
the ggmputed virgin. flow from the Upper Basin fog, a given year, bp .
8,000,000 acre feef, each Basin viould be apportioned 4,000,009,acre
feet for that. year ,i:,, l
',j.: -r: , I , , :i1t' i,But,such, is no!.,the case. The Up.per Basin is required to,
deliver not.. less than,;a total aggregate quantity of vrater in the amount
of 75,_000,000. acre fe.et, past Lee Ferry to the Lower Basin in any 10
consei:utive year, peri.od. This would not be of any serious consequence
provided the Upper Basin, could intercept, store,, dng carry over all
exceSSwaEerinthoseyearS,inwhichthecomputredvirginf1owyie1ded
an amount of waEer greater than 15,000,000 acre feet; but under
provlded
Coloradoyield of
ye8rs.
fifcy-fifty split
Upper Basin, af,ter
Che Lower Basin are
has.amounEed to an
-3-
,t.
t
apportionment of the Compact the Upper Basin would only be permittedto place into'storage'a mAxim,r* qrrrrrtity of watet in'anyrone year inthe arnount equal'to:'50% of any quantity in excess'of the,15,000,000racre feett Wi'thout storage to provide carry-over waEer'.for.replace-
ment in'dry' yeers and r+ith the mathematics of "proportionmeht, .t'he
Upper Basints apportionmencs shall be reduceci by the,provision't.hatduring any consecutive ten years, the Upper Basin shall deliver 75,00Cacre feet to th'e Lower Basin plus an apportioned share of all excesses
s an example; wiEh ample storage provided in the UpperA
Basin, based upon the estimated computed,virgin flows at Lee feiiy asdetermined from historical flows pl-us ups,treaoi'deletions; for the y"ur"
L92'3 through L943, the upper Basin would have received.'an, averageyearly'apportionment of 6 ,5201000 acre feet;per year, whereas the LoweBdsin would have received an average yearly apportionmenE of B ,480,000acre feet'Per year'frorir:Upper Basin yields and an adcli.Lional f ;000,000acre feet per year from Lower Basin yields,i Thus, for said period,the apportionment of water within the Colorado River System would havebeen 40.75% to 59.25% in favor of 'the',Lower Basin;' or an amount equalto approximate1y. 2,96.0r-000..^ac.re...fe.et--per:year more'.f-or.the- Lower Basinthan for the Upper Basin. 'This quantity represents about 50% of thetoEa1.'UpperBasin|saPPortionrnent.,'.|.l-,,'].
Presently,' and siince Aprirl,.,1956,' the' division of waterbetween the Upper and Lower River''rBasins has been under an interpre-tation by the States party to the eompact, and iniaccordance with thelanguage of the "colorado River pactr,, Ehe ,'Boulder canyon,project .
Actrrand the "Boulder Canyon Project AdjustmenE Acttt for the pi.por""of filling Lake Powell';behind Gilen Canyon.Dam and with'regaid-to dis-
Persement'of power revenues derived or not derived from Lower Basinl',,projects.' : :
A greaE amount of controversy has thus far resulted betweerthe States involved'as to Ehe lnterpretation 'of the provisions perti-nenr to the appropriation of water between Ehe two basins. Thedifficulty in their inability to arrive at an.interpretation that r.roul<be acceptable to all concerned arises from Ehe enormity,and complexityof the system and projects involved, and also from Ehe fear rtai anystipulation of agreement, statement of,conclusionsr oE,usage of woris,tetms and phrases other than'those used in prior Pactslmaylin),some waydiminibh their own iespective individual Stite's approprtration ofi,. ',water by altering the Physicatr procedures and mechanlsms'utilized in ,effecting'the div'ision', The potential value ,of the,water involved,is,,of 'such enormity because of ics irreplaceable nature, and its,necessityto the economic'growth and developmenE of each', State, that.it causes )
-4-
eaeh-)Stdte ,to,compete for every drop. A comrnon expression.'fhat
Iiberally ancl.'implacably expounded by each of the six inte'rior
under the'terms of Ehe ComPacts.
is
SEates ,,-,
South-
, ,000
is that::Lne Coloiado River represents the last waterhole of the
wesc and of each'ofrthe respective individual States. i
B.UPPER CO!gRADo RLVER BASrN APPORTToNI',IENTS
The Upper Basin includes those parts of the States of
Arizona, Colorador-ner'Mexico, UEah, and Wyoming within and from rshich
waters naturally drain into the Coloracio River System above Lee Ferry,
and also parEs of saicl States located without the drainage'area contri-
butory to: the Coloradg Riverstem rvhich may be benef icially served
by waEers diverted from the System above Lee Ferry
-.--,:. -.i.The .S.tates within the.Upper Basin enE-ered into t*he t'Upper
Colorado River Compact" which was approved by Congress on April 6, L949'
Wifhin said Compact, the further apportionment of the beneficial coo- ;
sumpgiVe'use of-water that had been apportioned to ther,Upper Basin
Uy lfre Colorado River Compact was established for each of the respective
Staces in the Upper Basin. The Scate of Arizona received an arnount of
50,000 acre feet of water annually from the Upper Basin. The State o{,:'
Colorado' r"."iv"a .n .pporcionmerit of 5L,7 5 per cent of :.,the, remain;ing " ,
water available for use each year by the Upper Basin under thei Colorld-o
River Coitrpact, but after the 5O,OO0 acre feet Per annum deducEion hacl ''
been made for Arizona.
l).: ' :
1. Coloradors Actual Quantity of Water Received
:' ' - "' {Jndef ApPortionment
l
' .,:r..' Based upon'the average yearly.quantlty of water that wbuld
have be'en available to'the Upper Basin Stbtes during the previously
computed years of L923 through L947, which was in the amount of
6,SiOr000 acre fcet per year, the SCate of Colorado would have teceiveci
an average yearly apportionmenE in the amount of 3,348rC00 acre feet
per year-foi its apparent 3r855,000 acre foot Per year aPProPriation
t
,11
d .!ir.,'
: :;I.. C: 'i). COLOMDO ' S POTENTIAL . ViATER RESOURCES FROMI
(designaEed
Grand and
within the
Ferry and
WESTERN WATERSHEDS ;.: I
The Upper Basin has been divided into three divisions
as the Green, Grancl, and San Juan. Portions of Che Green,
San Juan Divisions lie within Colorado.
A comparison between the contribuEing water flows from
State of Colorado toward the historic virgin flows at Lee
the apportionment of waters Colorado would have received
E
I1l
t r ti .. , : ) ,,/ t,: ..1. .. i.throughr,the'years L923 to L947:from its appropriations;shalI. !e hcrein
made. Cornputation of the virgin flow at Lee Ferry as compiled within
Ehe ilRegional Direccorfs Report of December, 1950, ,oo Colorado River
storage Project and Participating Projects, upper Colorado River
t
E
E
i
E
I
E
$
G
t
B
$
Tr
*
i
'4
$
rylr
;.is
' r' :'t TOtal,
: Avg. .:, 'Dele
,. . Histori- tions Virgin
. cal Flow From Fl.ow
At Lee Upper At Lee
Ferry Basin Ferry, 1,000 ,,L,000 lroo0
.Acre Ft. Acre Ft. .Acre,.Ft.
(34 yrs. )L'9L4-47 13,670 L,849 15,519
(25 years)Lg23-47, L?,447 ,1,822 L4,269
(42..ye,ars) , :
199$.47,., ',,L4,242 I,7'58 16,000
(52 years), ,, i
r8g6: L947. L4,068 1,550 15,618
(10 years)1931-40 10,171 ,.1,581 LL,852 ,
( 1),
Lower'
Basin
Appor-
t ionment
1,000
f=&
8,299
7 ,884
8,423
8,245
. 7,501
(l)
Upper :Basin ,
Appor-
t ionment
1,000 ,
:
7 ,23L :
6, 395
7,577
7,373
4,351
;: l
ill
i..., (?)
Coloradors
Appor- ,
t ionment
1,000
Acre Ft.
i
3,71,6
3,27 g
3,995
.., 3,790,
. .2,226
(1) Figures fri-fhese 'columns wCfe"'riot' included ir#'-ttie iUorru-srared, RSPgrt. .: , . ,(2) Color4do's .apportionment rsthe +lngg,r,rt of 38.3 ,rrillion
!.i ,[hq,..lJpper ,Basiq, [9 e.ffecr'
a sufficignf : stgrage in ,i:being available, within
from wet yearq ,go dry ,,.
based on
acre feet
carry-over
r ,YC45S.'' .r,j ri..l Il
I i'''11,.'. 'f i.i : - .it ,i,. ,, ,',rn comparison'with the above apporqionments. Eo the stateof Colorado for the indicated periods basei-on virgin flow conditions,'the average annual d.ischargq'of gtre,eps tribu(ory Eo thg,,Colorado RiverSystem above Lec Ferry and which have Eheir rgspqgtive.. dpainage basinswithin the state of ccjrcitditcj"-shilar-be-h6tein"'tabuietdd'. :"'-'-''
I
..( .,
, :1'.[
"'t
\'
i.-6-
. (' r
ler Diainaee ''lt':
" Vairipa' River
White River
tt
Colorado"River.
Point of
Historic Stream
FIow Measurement
Cross Mt. Dam site
at Maybell, Colo.
Irlatson, Utah, just
outside Colorado
Cisco, Utah, .. just .up-
stream from Dolores
RiVer Confluenbe
Gateway, CoLot'ado
Rose, Nernr' Mexico,just outside of Colo.
Bayfield, Colorado
State Line
State Line
Edith, Colorado
Piedra, Colorado
Dolores
San Juan
River
River
Period
of
Record'
;
47 yrs,
30 yrs
33 yrs.
25 yrs'.
,4:';yrs .
36 yrs.
30 yrs.
43 yrs.
51 yrs.
51 yrs.
1, 126.0
5r6.9
'i5i913.0- 664.2
:
,' 87 L'.7
252.'7
6s3 .0
-t
9B
',rB115 i'1
_. 230.2
L0,44L.6
il, 231.0
LL ,67 2 .6
Orr" roric
Est. AnnuaL
Disch. from
Colorado in
100O.:'Ac. Ft.
I
t*mm,
'
---.di
Fr*.<iq,,* "J"
ii"l"#rqt" "[ircd.+].i'':.'
l--*-'- *' ".*r!r
:
:
i
i
E@"i&
, i.
Pine River
Animas River
McElmo, Mawcos,
LaPlato Riveis
Navajo River
Piedra River
I'Historical Flow
maEed Average Yearly Deletions & Exportationithin Colorado (1914-45)
1 Estimateci Average Annual Virgin Flow Out of
lorado
.t
.Thub, Colorado would receive about.';in average of 32.57" of
L,'ater originating in the State from its apportiohments. To receiveutilization of those waters so apporEioned to ther State and to /i'
i-ve a benefit from other water originating in the State butrtioned to other states, beneficial'usbs'for those r*raters must be
loped by municipalities, special ube' districts, and private'iridus-
:.rithin Lhe State so as to realize the value of this natura'Lurce ., --..,-:
Water must be subjected to multiple reuses'to gain the.maxi-effici-ent application of all ruaters. Adequate protectj-on'iof
rsheds, watershed improvements, sufficient capacity of impdundment
storage facilities, improved water transmission facilities.,ahd,:r lvater treaEment facilities must be construcEed and maintained I
irese agencies to place the control and management of these'warers
Ln the State so as to secure and preserve this resource for the
;mic growEh and develop,nrent of the State and -its people.
-7-
i in the computed amount of 211000 cubic feet per minute. The Last
j Chancc Ditchts appropriaEion in the amount of 3,000 cubic feet per
i rnlnuce rcpresented 1/7th of t'he total appropriaEions of that date
'' wtth adJudicated priorities to other diEches having qrior:aPProPriations
ln thc amount of LO1542 cubic feet per minute', The arirount of ,water
appropriated by dccree orrt of waEers flowing in the main stem.of the
Grand Rtvcr as of May 5, 1888, totaled 3,710 cubic, feet per minute. r^:ith
710 cubic feet pcr minute having a prior appropriation date
Historv of Dltch
, 'lthe initial "statement of Claim to Water Right" for the Last
Chance Ditch was filed with the Clerk and Recorder for the County of
Garfield on January 18, 1888. A plat showed the diversion structure for
satd Dicch betng located at a poi-nt on Lhe south bank of the Grand
Rlver In Sectlon 10, T. 6 S., R. 92 rrt. in Garfield County, and further
dellneated the locaEion of the Ditch by a traverse survey line termi-
naftng iri':Section 20, T. 6 S., R. 93 t^/. in Garfi-eLd CounEy. The
orlginal size of the Ditch as constructed was given as being 10 feet
ln wicJch at Ehe bottom, 13 feet in vridth at the high water flow line
r*ri.th rhe Ditch flowing at fulll,capacity, a "L\'foot depth of water with
tlre ditch f lowing fr:ll capacity and with a gradienE of 4 feet per mi'le,
and having a flow capacity of 30.325 cfs or 1,819.5 cfm. Work vras,.,,.J.,
cqmrenced on the DiLch on March 4, IBBT ,-,
The first enlargement of the Ditch was started on April 15, ,
1891, and increased the Ditch to flow capacicy of 42,45 cfs or.2,547
cfrn by increasing its bottom vridth to Lq feet and the high water. line
.
width to L7 feet. Statement of Clai.m Eo additional water rights by
said enlargement \n,as filed with the CounEy Clerk and Recorderrs office
on 'January 22, L892. /, ,,,:
The present condition of the Ditch is such thaL the conditions of
flow and utage restricE the capacity of the ditch to a computed flow
of water equal to about 35 cf,s as measured at thb point of diversion
out of the main stem of the Colorado River
On January 18, 1898, Articles of Incorporation for t'The Loesch
and Crann Ditch Company'u were filed with che County Clerk and Recorder
for Garfield County. Said Ditch Company purchasecl title to the Last
Chance Ditch and atquired sole interest in said Ditch, the Ditch right-
of-ways,itliversion structures and the priority rights to appropriation
of waEer out of the Grand River appurtenant to the Ditch.
The Loesch and Crann Ditch Co. issued 5,000 shares of stock at a
par valuti ot"$10.00 per share at the tirye of incorporation.-.f!: PV-laws of the Corporation allovreil that said'shares of stock should be
sold for the purpose of proportioning the Corporation's interest in the
a)^
-9-
'. I
"-{4C#nl, fitic;i;yJ*{
"i
-1".,-."-r{
I.t
1t
'i' ,-e'l
rl
l
j
r-*{
, t.ra.^.r. -l'* .. 4*I,BJ
.-"'f'iif
,.,4r, rrn d
,--_!
Jp*H
,rffi
a:-1
{
Inrd
-.tr"or("r4---J
't
;
j
.d
,i'-.13d
'i*":d:q
j
i
,*
,dlfr,.',fu{[
'a'..
4uf
water- rights out of the Last Chance Dicch, and that said stock shouldbe sold for the PurPose of applying waEer out of the Ditch onto landsunder the Lasr chanie Ditch, ior-iriigation "ia-J"*"raic,uses.' ii 'Each shAre of stock of sard Company was considerbd as con-veyi-ng'the'righr to the sharehorcrer ro hrro .' ""rri.i;;;-;"t".I.y-"rwater out of'the' Last Chance Ditch necessary to irrijate o"u "ail
,lof land at the established water-to-land ..lio or or-,f-""ui"-robl:pu.,second of flor.i for each 50 acres of land irri.gated. , .'i;-
The company originalry incorporated for a ter,myears, with a provision for reincorporating at the end of
of twenty
each sub-
:;
The index Eo ditch compan:'-es at the County Clerk and iu"or-derts 0ffice did not reveal.r,y "orporation documenE other rhan theinitial Articles of Incorporation, Docurnent No. 4666?. This wouldindicate chat t"l! cglRanr clld not reincorporare afrer i;;=;*;i...io*daEe of January 18, 1918. , ,i r
t of Lasr'Chdnce Ditch
The Physical Ditch and urater rights"appd*tioned thereto werecLaimed by eighE persons, seven of r.,,hich ft.i*"a'artro-iifa;;;;h;inEerest and one individual cla:-ming a one-fifteenth i"a;;;;;;-;; thctime that its appropriation vias acijudicated in 1888. Thus, a one-fifteenth interest in and to the Ditch would have iepresenied a rightto divert a flow of 3.333 cfs out of the Ditch, prori.dud rhe Ditc6rvas flowing 50 cfs of water. ,',.'
These interests were acquired by the Ioesch and Crann Ditchcompany and held by said company as of January 18, lB9B, at whicht:-me the Ditch and water ri-ghts apportioned tirereto \.rere represcngedby 5,000 shares of stock ussed by the Loesch and Crann DiEch Co. Eachshare of stock represencing an undivided i/S,OOOttr-irau.ura in and tothe Ditch rvas to be sold and was to convey a' rigt,; t; call-a sufficientqlantiEy of water necessary to irrigate one acre of land at a rilteof flow of L/50 cubic feet per seconcl.
In Cause Number 1509 in tl'rc District Court of the NinthJudicial District, the Eotal interesr in and ro the r.asr-C-h;;;-ofa"hhlas claimed by twenty-four individual-s or private companies'.- 'T6erej.n,
an equal division of ttre Last Chance DiEch was defined on'the basisthat a share represenre:d a L/:1; tn interesr in and ro afi"':Oil'"f.,1-"ilnan undivided 1/1200th interest in and ro the Ditch being sufficientinterest to utilize that amount of vrater necessary,.o ii.i;;a;-;;;-acre of land. There apparently vrcre 254 shares oi Loor"h ind Crdnn ,| |,
:r
- 10-
Ditch Co. stock that ,wcre sold out of blocks of sEock, reprcsenting
the original fifteenchs' intcrests in thc Last Chance Oitctr. l'Ji-th
an issue of 5,000 shares of stock wiEh.q 9a11..of one cubic feet of
urater out of the Ditch f or each f ifty shares, iE vroul<i have required
100 cfs of vrater to satisfy Lhe 5,000 shares of stock issued unlcss
the Ditch was under one managing authority, such as the Board of
Directors or offieers of the Ditch,Company. Since a civil action rdas
initiaCed betrveen parEies having an interest in the Ditch for pur-
poses of defining what these separate interests were, it ruould appear
that che Ditch Company no longer retained 3rr| rec;ogniz,ablc authority
over the managemenE and proporEioning of:water out of the Last Chance
Ditch, which vzould be the case providcd thc Loesch and Crann Ditch
Co. did not reincorporate at,their corporation expiration date.
Thus, pri.or to being capabfe of evaluating thc water rights
out of the Last Chance Ditch, a legal opinion vrould have to be acquired
concerning the legal status of the conveying of an interest in and to
Ehe Last Chance Ditch by shares of stock in..-!].The !,-o.es_ch and Crann Ditch
Co." In additr.on, a determination vrould have to be made of ch.e
subsequent interests that have been conveyed by partics since the
determination, findings and adjudicafion of interest in said Ditch
in Cause No. 1509 by a legal analysis of the'various terminologies
uEilized in the various instruments formalizing the Eransfer of water
rights since Ehe decreed date'of Cause No. 1509.
the present distribution of interests in the Last Chance Ditch. An
estimate has been made of Ehat interest in the Last Chance Ditch held
by individuals or+ning land within the proposed district as rePresented
by shares oftrThe Loesch and Crann Ditch Co." stock that was indicated
to have been conveyed by the warrenty real estace deeds that \..7ere
examined. Such deeds that were examined indicated an amount of from
848 ro 932'shares.These ehares could reprQsent a toEal interesE
in the'Last Chance Ditch in a percentage amounE varying from zeYo to 1;
i8.07", depending upon the interesE such shares represent in and to
the Last Chancc Ditch
A determination of the interests Ehat the present land
owners rvithin the proposed district hold in said Ditch should be ,nadB
asl'such interesEs could represent a considerable amount of water having
an':excellent prioricy to the appropriation of water out of the,. ''. l
J'Uf'-
ll'ik,, "'
;
F
i-:l'r'{[
-
!*-"
i.
b,i4iq
W
l.
l'- '.,t-
l'''tt
'ilr+
E-f-
{ f,
i
'"
:4\,F
F
i
- l1-
tr
'{i.dtr",
ffi
B. CLARKSON DITC4
;
1. Adiudicated Prioritv
r 1. r-" - -si ^- ^E +l-^ --i nv{ f-rr nfThe Clarkson Dirch has an adjudication of tl're priority.gf
righrs r";i;;;;;-oi r,'acer for irrigation in ldater District No' 45 bv
a decree in the District Court of the Ninth Juclicial District of the
i."."-eid"ro."ao,SitEinginan<jfortheCountyofGarfie1d.
-; ,':.:,' The Clarkson Ditch was Eherein decreed to bc priority Number
L76, r,aving--a ;;;;"" date.of appr?p:l"tion of April-15' L944' in the'
adjudicarion of the priority oi-right. t9- the use of v.'aters aPPropriated
from the streams ip Water nistrict 45. The aPproPri-ation of vraters
o,.ra of Ehc Colorado River to the Clarkson Ditch rvas adjudicaEed in thc
amount of t2 cubic feet of water per minute of time' The date of thc
decree was FebruarY 2, L946.
2. HistorY of Ditch
The initial "sEatcment of clairh to water RiShEsrf to_r t!r:
Clarkson DiEch was filed rviEh the County Clerk and Recorder for Gar-
ficld county on Nove*ber 22, 1887. The,poinE of cliversion was indi-
cated to be- ar a point on the south bank of the Grand River rohence the
Northv:cst corner of the Southeast onc-quarter of Section 16, T' 6 S',
R. 93 W. beared souEh 75"L5r l.Jest a dj-stance of 2,350 feet. Thc stated
capacity of the Ditch as constructecl was in tl-rc amount of I0 cfs wiCh
. it.t"i date that work was commencecl.on,the Ditch on April 15, 1BB4'
The warrenEy deeds examincd: of :ndividuals ov,rning land tvithin
the proposed di-strict indicated'lr total of fivc Persons holding interests
in ana io the Clarkson Ditch and the water rights thcreto. Thc Pro-
portionate amount of interesE in the Ditch was not specified in Ehe
iecorded documents examinecl. The amount of lanc otrTred by the indi-
via,,a1shavinganinterestintheDitch'isapproximate1y65acreS.-
il-;il;-.ra"Uii"t,ed rvater-to-land ratio r,,ithin Water District No. 45 of
i-"i;,ofwaterf1ovlforeach50acresof1andirrigate<i,Ehe1and
area held by said owners would indicate an interest of 1'3 cfs out of
the Ditch, ,hi"h i" an amount of water flow greater than the decrecd
amount gppropfj-aEed to thc Ditch. The Irrigation District office for
Division- i'ive indicaEes an apPoflionmcnt for this Ditch in the- amfynt
of LZ cfs in licu of rhe L2;t*.] FuqEher investigation intb. t,ire d]t-.
ariU"ai"" ;i tf," interests held 'in 'and for this DiEch should also be '
made. This vrater right, although of a later priority clate on the
river, would probably be alvrays callable because of its small amount
of appropriation.
-L2-
C' ' l", -:':: "i-''::'-''" 't t'---"
I . Ad iuclicared P.rioritv ' i: - i
AnexaminationoftheDistrictCourtrecordsforWater
Disrricr Number 45 did not t"r"ur an'adj1dicatio1t,9:-:h" prioriry
a righc by decree for "., uppropriation _6f *"t"r ir"r,water District
No. 45 under the namq or t;-lfe'of the J' F' Pierqc 'Ditgh'
E
[,{:
rb
7
of
2. I{istorv of Di-tch
rd , The initial "sEatemenE of clairn Eo liJater RiBht" for the
J. F. pierce Ditch tuas filed rrith the County Clerk tld'Recorder for
Garfield county or, .l.,fv 3, ig0O' The original 9!ut:9^capacity was
5 cf s, anC ,ori. commencerJ on the Ditch on June 10, f 899 ' The poi'E
of diversion is staced as u"i"f "t a_point on the south bank of thc
Grand River in Section L7, T' 6 S" R' 93 l'J i:I DUgLlL,rt Lt
'
v -''
The present point of cli.version for said Ditch is at a porn!
whence the South one-quarter corner of Section 16 bears SouEh 79"051
East a distance of. 4,071'86 feet
t.
stare of col0rado in civi-l Action No' 4954 in the counEy of Gdrfield'
,inthematEeroftheAdjudication-ofthePriorityofRightsintheUsed ;; ffi";]rr., r".ur oisriict as, haci ordered that all persons claiming
the use of rvater r^rithin l'later District No' 45 but not previously
adjudicared for priorify "i i:": hug unEil septcnber 1, L964, vriEhin
in which ro file any and "if additio.,.i ;t;i*" with t,he Court' -and provided
,.'n, furEher t+ould have untii Novembcr l, Lg64, !o offe-r proof of the
beneficialutilizaEionofwateranc]proofofclaim.
AsimilarCivilAction,No.4gL4,]'wasilitiatedfor.Watcr
District No. ig in vrhich the aate wi-rhin w[ich additional claims v/ere
to be filed rvith the District Court was ti"i"a as belng prior:o-July l'
Lg64. The <iare of receivin; ,;gg!_of claims for both acEions has
An application by Sam W. Anderso,, '"q.,"sting an adjudicaEion
of his priority of right t.;h" "". "t.vrater.s froq'.'ttre Colorado River
in wacer District No. 45 by an aPPropriation of water'to the J' r'
piercc Ditch in Ehe amount of 5 ci", and rvhich is accompanied by a
claim for an actditional use of vrater through the J... F' Pierce Ditch
in Ehe amount of 5 cfs for which an adjuclilatio* of priorrEy of right
has beCn lfequestcd and arc on file l''ith the District Court' Proof 'of'
original claim of 5 cfs and additional "iti* or 5 cfs has been madg'by
EheclaimanttotheCourtforthefullarnountofl0cfs.
,
I
- 13-
D' '-'-"'; ""'-"r'' - "' " '.^. '
1. Sliudicaled .Prigritv :-:. - :- : -
An examination of the DistricE court records for water Dis-
rricr Number 45 did nor. rerl;i ; adjudication of a prrori't-y of-right
by decree : for an appropriation of ,*"Lur in Water District No ' 45
under the name or;t:itle 'of .Iftt f^f ' e.. Skelton Ditch ri'
,,The initial "statement of Claim to Water Right" fol Ehe !J' A'
Skelton Ditch was filed with. the County Clerk and Recorder for Gar-
field.CounEy on Seprembe-r iO-,-igl4. Ti,e original:l.i* sEaEed Ehat
the point of diversion for said Ditch *as one-quarter rnile Northeast
of the Northeast corner "t Lot g in Section 17, T' 6 S" R' 83 W'
and that the Ditch had a constructed capacity i.t the amount of 6 cubic
feet per seconcl v,'ith consa.""ii." "f th; Ditch conmencing on October 15
in 189? (The f"tt digit ,of the numeral designation of the year was
noE legible. ) :
The present poinE of diversion for said Ditch
whence,the south one-quarEer corne,r of Section.16 bears
East a distance of. 407 1.86. feg(
AnapplicaEionunderCivilActionNo.4g54,,LnEheDistrict
courE iq and for the county of.Garfield by one sam w' Anderson request-
ing an acljudication of his priority of .right Eo the use of vraters
from the Colorado River in Wut"t pistrict-No' 4I Uy an apPropriation
of waters to the W. A. Skellon Di-tch'in-the amounE of 6 cfs has been
filed with the court. In .ddiaio.,, a claim to the righE to the uae
of additional water in Ehe amount of 4 cfs by the diversion of waters
from the coloracio R.iver through said Ditch has also been claimed for
appropriation by the claimanE and said applications are on file vrith
til" Oistrict Court, as well as proof of claim'
',;' l::
The status of said claims are the sanle as those previously
indicated concerning the J' F' Pierce Ditch'
-i
is at a Poir-nt
South 79 o05t
E.
right to
in Water
I. Adiudicated Prioritv
The sidehill Ditch has an adjudication of .lu priority of
the use of wasEe and drair,.gl waEer {ot irrigation purplsesl
District No. 45. t
-L4-
, tHr srorurll om.cu
' 1.,r.,'
d.
LC
15
SE-
me Siaehill Ditch uas therein decreed
ber 11988 having a decree daEe of appropriation
ancl the date of decree being December 29, 1913'
acljudicated for appropriation vras not specified
beln designated a waste and drainage Ditch'
to be PrioritY Num-
of April l, 1900,
The quantitY of water
as said Ditch has
I
I
F
i)t
r
I
r
r.
I
F
I
r
F. SI.JMMARY OT DITCHES IN WHICH AN INTEREST MAY BE
AE the time the Last Chance Ditch was adjudicated its apPor-
tionment of 50 cfs, the \,ilater was used to irrigate approximately 1300
acres of land by eight Persons holding an inteiest in the Ditch'
Scven persons nlfa in equal i-nterest in the Ditch vrhile on€ Pcrson
ht-.ld an interest equal to one-half of EhaE held by the other seven'
if,ur, the inEeresE in and Eo saicl Ditch vras divided into fifteenEhs,
wifh those having an equal share rcceiving a 2/L5ths i-nEeresE and the
remaining person receiving a I/158h interest '
The quantity of vrater adjudged and decreed to be sufficient Eo
properly i.rij.,t. fiiCy acres of land in Water District No, 45 has been
"a5,rai""tua to, be an amount of v;ater equal'' to a f 1ol,' of one cubic foot
pei second. This criteria w-ould have allorved Ehe then original owners.
if rn" Last Chance Dicch to utLLizc only 26 cfs of Eheir absoluEe . :,',1i
decree in the antounE of 50 cf s. '. r- ',.
'; Thus, a Ditch company r,/as'"formed under the title of iirho
,
Loesch and crann Ditch co.i'for the purposes of placing additional '
acreage under irrigation to r:tilize the remaining 24 cfs' During
'
Che "*irt..r,"" of uiiO Ditch Company, one share of Loesch and Crann
Oit.t Co. Stock represented a ".rfficient quantity of rvater out of the
t rC lCtr.r"" Ditch Lo irrigaEri one acre of land, with \{ater proportioncd
out of the Difch at a water-to-land ratio of I cfs of flovr per 50
acres of land. Thus, on6 share of stock rePresented a 1/5000th interest
in the'Ditch and also represcnted an aPPropriation of \'/ater out of
Ehe Ditch in the amount of 0.02 cfs per share. The Ditch Company
evidently sold 254 shares of stock for the irrigaCion of L22 acres of
land during its existence. Since the Ditch r,;as origirrally constructed
to carry a capacity of 42,45 cfs of flow, each share of stock at lttaq
time'rrrould,'havc orriy bcen able to receive an apportioncd amount of water
ouE of thci,Ditch,eqlal to 0.00849 cfs per share of stock; whereas,
the quantity of waicr detcrmined necessary for adequatc irrigation was
an amount equal to 0.02 cfs pcr acre. Since thc adjudi-cated wader to
the Ditch rvas in an amount equal to 50 cfs, each share of stock vrould
trarie.been entitled to a flow of 0.01 cfs per qhare. Thus additional
shares of sEock were purchased by the oldllers of che additional L22
acres that was brought under the Ditch so as to obtain a sufficient
quantity of vrater o;t of thc Ditch for adequate irrigation of the new
land.
- 15-
I
r
I
r
EvidentlyduringtheexistenceoftheLoeschandCrann
Ditch Co.-a., inEerest in thc Last Chance Ditch'ras'hetcl bv others
which amounted to a 6.530/lstrr interest i;t;;; bii"h "q"ui''to a-
i".;^.tay;-i1o, o.r. of the Ditch in the appropriatiye iT?Y"t of
2L,76 cfs. This interest r^ras applied ot upptoximately 1099.,u"t"t of
land.
the existence of the Ditch Company, the interest
.estimated to be as follovrs: -'-i '- j: :'i: : r:i:-':Thus, during
in che Ditch has l;e'€n
Minority Interest in
Srna1l Lots and Tracts
Origina'l IncorPorators
Unknorrrn Interests
Total
L22 acres 254
; 1,300 acr€s , 2,600
1.090 acres 2.L46
2,5L2 acres 5,000 shares 100.00 cfs
shares
shares
shares
5.08 cfs
52.00 cfs
42.92 cf s
Prio4 to a Civil Action in Cause No. 1509 and subsequenE to
existence of if,n Ditch Co., the lvlclearn Mercantile Co' and oEhers
acquired a 6.530/I5th interest in the-Ditch froni Ehe original incor-
porators of the Ditch co. After the'Ditch co. no longcr existed, thcre
no longer existed an agency to proPortron the rvater in the Ditch to
holders of sEock in the Loesch and Crann Ditch Co' Thus, a Civil
Acrion.in Cause No. i509 by those lavi1q an intercst in the Last Chance
Ditch was iniEiated for p1ripo"o", of making such a determinaEion of
interest.,
If the Ditch company failed to rei-ncorporate, Ehe assets of
the Company would have been disfributed equally among all its stock-
holders, excepting that the interests of ine minority stockholder vrould
have been suU3ect to consideration by the majority stockholdcrs' Thus'
all of the interest in the Last Chance Ditch, excepting that rePrc--
sented by the 254 shares sold by the Ditch co., must have reverEed
backtotheoriginalincorporatorsandtheoriginalo\dnersofq,he
Ditch or their subsequent irancees. Thenc:, ? 4/r5Eh interesE in the
Last Chance Ditch, represontirrg an aPpropri.ation out of the Ditch
in the amount of i:.rOfq cfs, was acquirld by I'lclearn I'lercantile Co'
for irrigation of 666 acres of land. other land ovTners acquired a
3/15th interest in Ehe Last Chance Ditch for the irrigation gf sonic
430 acres of land
.l
Thus, prior to causc No. j109, the distribution of inte.resE.
in the Last Chancc Ditch was as follows i :
- 16-
.1. 1 ;.
)f
:est
rfs
cfs
cfs
cfs
Io
r-
there
o
hance
,s of
:k-
viould
Thus,
tlr .,i.
the
lo.
I
l.rC
ist
.'
Croup
Ot'iglnal incorPorators
Htnority Iand owners
Hclearn Plercantile Co.
Othor InEeresLs
Tocal
L IL5
Intere s t
In Ditch
Acres
Under
ITTI.
&a.E ioP
1, 300
L22
666
420
i . B0o/r5rh
L.5251 15rh
4.000/15th
2.468ll5th
ii Apport ion.-t4
,
26.000 cfs
5.083 cfs
13. 333 cfs
"'-B:227 -'cf s
Appor-
Tionrnetrt
2J.5'3O cf s
4.485 cf s
13.L62 cf s
B .823 cfs
No. shares
L& C stk.
2, 600
254
L,323
B2'J
Apport ionmenE
Per Share Of
L & C stock'
0.00905 cfs
0.01766 cfs
0.00995 cfs
0.01072 cfs
L5 .7 9 3/ I5th 2 , 508 52.926 cf s 5,000
Ihus, an.over extension of interests in the Ditch anci in the
sppropriaEion of water in excess ,;f adjudicated rights out of the
niich'required,adjusEments to be made. The over extension in the
turount,'ot 2.926'cfs was determined to be equally distr:lbuted among
ghe original incorporators, after an adju'r.;tment rvas made for the land
$rea$ rcpresenEed by the oLher interests.
The result of Cause No. 1509 resulted in these final determinaEions
of inCerest being made as follows:
Crr:tt p
0riginal Incorporators
Hlnority stockholders
ltclcarn Mercantile Co.
Ochers
L7 lL7 ths 50.000 cfs
Based upon the (l) above ciistribution of interest in the Last
Clrance Ditch, (2) the indicatecl acreage, and (3) the shares of srock
lntThe lcesch and Crann Ditch Co.ooas shown as being conveyed to
present owners of land v;ithin the proposed District on the warrenty
real estaEe deeds cxamined on file nith the County Clerk and Recorder,
Bhe estimaEed inEerest held in the Last Chance Ditch by owners of lanci
co be included in the propose<I District would be estimated as follows:
L/L7 Interest
In Ditch
8lL7th interest
L.525/L7rh. int.
4.47 5 /Ll th int .
3.000 /L7ti;. int.
Land now held by Minority Interests
land now held that was l"lclearns
Land now held under 0ther InterLSts
(254 shares:) 4.485 cfs
(370 shares) 'O.0AO cfs
$2A shares) 4.502 cfs
L2.667 cfs
-L7 -
In addition to Ehe Last Chance Ditch, land within the proposed
District has an amount of 0.2 cfs out of the Clarkson Ditch and a
poEencial,,.,of 20 cfs ouE of the J. F. Pierce and w. A' skelton DiEches
"po1*nq.'subj""ttoadjudicatlln'Thege.conrbinedestinratedrights".-.from these Ditches would provi-de a rav/ water supply of 32'867 cfs,
subject,toverificationofpre5entownership.
..t
Ag.ticipated Yields From I']ater Rishts ",',
rheaboveintefestsintheindicatedDitcheswou1c1yie1dthe
following quanEities of \''rater each year:
9rL70 acre ft. P€r::)r.
I45 acre ft. Per Yr '
7 ,240 acre ft. Per Yr.
7 .240 acre ft. Per Yr.
2-1,795 acre ft. Per Yr.
'i '1 *Adjudication Pend'ing
il
{
T
' It vrould be very clesi.r'able for the proposed District to acquire
aIl i;;";;;t,'in r*d to Ehe Last Chance Ditch, Clarkson Ditch, W' A
sr."r.o";ni."r,, J. F. pierce Ditch and Rising syn fi-tch 1: :li:Illr"" l
;;;ibr-*:l-ri.tu may be effected by acquiri-n[: the inEerest in those'- -'
I
Ditches as land under said Ditchei is -annexEd to thc Distric.t as
.
devblop,n'rent' occurq'. . ,.
rv. w4qE4 .REQUTREYFIIIS
A. COtlSUuprrvr-'oEltuluS Or werrn rOn oCntrsrrc useCr
r .l(. )
.. -. ! The .water rcguired Eo sat:Lsfy the <lemands' o{'domes'tic usaSe
shali'tl"iX;" rhar porabte vrarer neces""iy ,to satisfy lhe'combinecl 'i'\
;:Eti l'Jiii=nqr+seL,;ra ,requisemenrs , (z). irrigatrg" !,riip"ia""tiit-:; . ,(5it;;il;.;iii-"u"go, .t,a C+l community, services and vrhichlandscaping' :s to satisfy tirose demancis-i;;;t;; uy tr'" "may be sufficient in arnounts to saErsry t?::: t:"'i::::
prlr""a-!t"r,Or.as of Iiving and customs within a primarily residential"
communily 1n the Rifle area. The consumptive usage of watel' shail be
established by deEermining the quantity of water requi-red to satisfy
;;;;ffirli"-r,""au of a unit of popuralion for the avera8e,duy of leach
*t"Iail";ii"i-ar," clrmatic conditions cxper:i-ence durrqrg a cirought"h'ater
year withr.n the locality of the proposed DisLrict'''. I r-;'
Last. Chance Ditch ,
Clarkson Ditch
*W. A.,, SkeIEon Di-tch
,rJ.r F., Piercc Ditch
12.6b7 cfs
0. 20 cfs
10.0 cfs
, 10,0 cfs
32.857 cf s
-18-
t
Uni't Per Capita Consumption' Per Day for Drought. Year
Household
Month requirements
0cE. 60 GPD/C
Nov. 58
Dec. 59
Jan. 5A
Ireb. 54.
i'larch 54
April 60
IIay 62
June 7,2
.Iuly 7 4
Aug. '84 ,
SepE. ,62
Avg.Daily
Total 63 GPD/C
Residential Cornmercial
Irrigatio$. Usase
Community
Services Including
SLstem Losses
L4 GPD/C
9
5
5.
5,,
5
9
rB
22
22
26
18
49 GPD/C
25
5
:
35
115
r66
r30
160
84
L2 GPDIC
10
L2
oo
L2
l0
L2
19
20
20
20
20
Monthly
AveraEg
135
9I
81
7L
7L
69
rl6
2L4
28O
246
290
L.84
L5463 .5 cPD/C L4.5 cPD/C 13 GPD/C
iE
n-.t:" !b-
Ffim-
EF
r- --
) - ^'r'lnt+rl-mFThe above-determined consumptive usage shall be applied to popula-
tion projections of estimated growth lvithin Lhe area anci land,usageratios co establish total r.rater requiremenLs of ttre"'District.
B.POPUi4TTON PROJECTTONq
, : , ,',. i,. j.
The primary natural resource within the locality which shalldirectly affect the rate of gro'*th and magnitude of developmgnE of both
the general area and proposed District is the L,lydro-carbonq associatedwith the connnonly referred to oil shales" The quantity of vrater Eli3t,shall be necessary to facilitate the extraction of Ehese hydro-carbons
from the organic matter distribuEcd through the mineral matrix of :.
the ore shall not bc evaluatcci nor inciuded as a part of this study;
nor shall the water requiremcnts of other related petro chemical
indusEries be herein considered. The estimated rate of development !of the hydro-carbon industry shall be herein .cvaluated for purposes
of this reporE.,.;
i', 2. PcJetopment of tnc Oil t
The extraction of the hydro-carbons {rom the commonly referrecito Oil Shales, oD a commercia| basis, shall occur at such time as it
becomes profitable to do so and at such time as,.:,a !,eage hotding eom-,
pany takes the initiative and construcEs plant facilities. That l.rhich
may be profitable ro one industry may not nccessarily be profitable to
-19-
:. )-.
F
!r .'r sr'
p"r:1
r.lf,- i\,i
another i-ndustry,. Provided tha6 this 6ource of hydro-carbons is
deterrnined to fr" a profifablc source, thcn the deposits of organic
matf er contained wilhin'the sedimentary depositions of ,t,h9, Picgancc
b.""t FormaEion, to Ehe"'northwe st'bf Riflc, shalI be pevelopco ttti,,,.
i,iatly.in.preference to other deposits'in' Ehe three state"area
because of its earlier mapping, coring and evaluation of deposi-Ls'
existing workablc claims, greater percentagc of knovrn richer deposits
in th. piceancc Basin formltion chan other basins, technical research
and development Programs conciucEed on Piceance Basin deposits at
Rifle, and the general past interest by potcntial produiert il develop-
,]
o.ri ah. ,t"t,r" and probl.n'," involved in thc dcvelopment of the oil
shale indusEry in bolorado. Aftcr btudying much of the Published
*ii"ri"I avaiiable,'it would appca( that at such tinre as sufficienc
cost data on the commercial product'ion of usable hydro-carbon prociucts
;;; arru-.rg"nic matter contained in thc mineral matrix is availablb
in substantial sfatistic foqrn, many of thc problels that have been
fresented as being obstacles'to thc development of the indusLry shall
be readily resolved and growth,of'the iljustry shall bc quitc rapid',:
ra The Need for thc Dcvclo nt 'of the '0i1 Shalc Indust
The relationship between the cons.umPtiqn,,,of-,\ydro:carbon
products within the United StaEes and the sources of- petroleum supplies
necessary to satisfy these and future_ consumptiy,g demands are such
that a need of an alternaEb source of hydro-carbons,' 'sueh as would be
available rro* oir shale, ffiay be necessary by th9 year L967 .
I I , ri
The present methods of recovery "f .liquid f:r:il .crude oir "',
,
from'existing developed formations lying wirhrn the United States
produced "., Ertimatei 8.3 million barrels p"r day in 1960' The dail-y
uqJi".f"". demand of liquid crude oil Eo satiSIy^.h:-Petro- chemical
rlemand of this countiy has been esEiuiated at'10.0 million barrels a
;;t-f;r that same year. Existing proven reserves in 'this country
for thac year that were not utilize( to saEisfy th9 deficit l"d an
""ai*"CJa"."or"rable production in the amounE of 2 million barrels
per day under present methods of recovery. Because of economic
."""o.r", liquid crude oils and petroleum products in the estimated
equivalent amount qf L.7 million barrels per g*y ,ol liquid fossil
crude oil-were-i*pul.;dl to"the t)niL*.i scaies froui forei[n markets for
the year 1960 in order ro satisfy the deficj-t between domestic petroleum
product clemands and'domestic procluctibn of-petroleum products from
domesEic hydro-carbon "o,.rr""u.' Qnder icledl economic conditions and
poticies glrrur.ri"*tin".'o;;;;i;"*-,industry within Ehe United StaEes, Eh9
I .i rr ,: " i ' I
,;
i{
r)
I
I
t
-20-
I
I
;
r
I
I
United States had an estimatecl daily production capacity of petroleum
' producEs. of ''equivalent barrels of liquid fossil crude oil in the
amounE of,10.3 mitlion barrels per day for the year 1960. In January,
1959, t,he United States had a recoverable liquid fossil crude oil
reserve Ln an estimated amount of 37 billion barrels. In January,
1963, the United States had an estimated recoverable liquid fossil
urude oil reserve in the amount of 35 billion barrels. During this
four-year period, 3d estimated total deletion of knovrn recoverable
reserve in the amount of 2 billion barrels was experienced at'an
average deletion of 500 million barrels per year. The estimated'
quantity of equivalent liquid crude oit extracted during this four-
year period from United States reserves vras 12 billion barrels. Thus
the di""overy of new reserves and improuements in recovery techniques
from existing sources accounted for an increase of known recoverable
reserves in ah estimated amount of i0 billion barrels for the same
four-year period. Assuming the same rate of deletion of recovcrable
reserves from existing hydro-carbon sources, thrs countryts liquid
fossil crude oil reserves would be exhausted in about seventy years.
Thus the quantity of equivalent liquid fossil crude oil in reserve is
sufficiently large at this time so as not to'be of an j.mmediate con-
cern of exhausEing these known reserves at the present rate of recovery.
Therefore, present rates of the deletion of dunestic crude reserves
'would not, at this Eime, add impetus to the oil shale industry by an
inunediate concern of Lhe deletion of United SEates reserves..i.:
, "' The inability of the domestic petroleum industry to effectively
lncrease the produccion race of crucie oi1 from cxisting United SEaEes
hydro-carbon sources to satisfy the increasing us'age' ;of hydro-carbon
products within the Unitcd States requires thi'further development of
oEher s6u'rces of hydro-carbon material. These b-d'ditional sources of
.
, l .\
hydro-cdrbons may be developed from either foretgn imports of liquid
fbssil crude oil or provided chrough the development of other sources
of domeitic organic matcrials yielding hydro-carbons, of which oil
shalc could be ollc such source
Presently, foreign imports of hydro-carbon maEerial are being
ufilizecirto satisfy the differeilce betwcen domesEic demand and domes-
cic production. Thc quan{tty of hydro-carbon material, expressed as
tiquid 'fossil crude ol1, ^phaE was irnporte d during the year 1963 to
satisfy,"-domestic dqmdnd' of 11.0 million barrels Per day rvas in thc
amount' cif"Z'','3 million barrels per clay. EsEimaEed addiEional sources
oi tya.o-carbon materiafs to u"tiufy the domestic dcmands of liqui<l'
crude oil by L975 has been placed at 7.2 million barrels per day. The
logisEics of importing,gl*1* quan&ity of liquid hydro-carbon matcrial
Tuy qvgptually result,lr', some ultimate limiting quantity of foreign
imports.
O-
Modern mariire'design of ocean transporting tankers have
capacities of 100,000 barrels of oil with speeds of f8.0 knots. The
. distance from Ciro, Arabia, to San Francisco, California, is approxi-
mately 81325 nautical miles over sea lanes or a distance of 16,650
l!3!T
rfi#
;slt
E-:h#
f.
FF
i
F''.
I
I
{r."
f."''. ,
t{I
F;adr,L,n d{;
FI
Lt
)1
nautical mr,les for'a round riip.- At speeds of ,fS knots, rE would -j*;;;;r;" :g a.is-ai g";.i;; u n,bd"r,'t tanlcer Eo'complete chc round trip'
wirh lciadine and unloading facilities having caPacltiu: of 1-2 till19',
;;ii"il-Iit,3tr per day, ii would rcquire a iorar of 7 davs for toading
:il.::i,Ii'I*".dockfacilities,requiringaminimu-::i:li,":xu
ciays'qo. , tinker to complete a round trip. Thus, -to inrporC l 't
million barrels of oil per day, it would iequire 72 tankers of the '
100,000 barrel capacity docki.,! ua"t day at U.S. ports of call havtng:
peEroleum handling facilities. A tankcr fleet of not less than 3'312'
modern vessels ,o,rla bu required to -maintain an import synn|f .of
foreign crude oi1 of such a magnitrrde. Harbor and pic'r facilities to,
;;;;i; this amount of water trlnsportaEion traffic may also be'a
ili;i"g i...or at both foreign and domestic PorEs'
Nerv maritime'dcsign of gcneral cargo.and tankcr ships having
a Eotal dead weight capacity of 15,000 Eons with normal cruising ran8cs
of 16,000 mile, if,ott have tverall lengths ot' 496 feet, bcam widths at
load warer'line of 73 feet and design,full' load draftt o!-?1:5 feeu'
;;;;";;i;; ;h"r" exists about ,11 u,ts.' harbors. having sufficient chan-
nel depths and bcrths .that 'eould -accommQdate this size of ship' The
iamount of tarikage to sustain a 7 .2 'million barrel per day import of
liquid oil wou1l U" equal to abour 400 rnillion tons of ,cargo Per- year'
i"-igiol-tt.-lr major harbors in the unitcd SEares handled a combined
ao.,rr.gu of 440 million tons of cargo , of which 34% was petroleum and
oetroleum products. Thus, iri addition to foreign imports, anoEher 17l
;iiii;;-toi"-or domestic petrolaum producE tonnagc traffic wourd also'ia:r.,;;Jr;;-';y rhese same porr facilirics. To accommodate this number
;; i;;;;.ru-i" ship traffic, &o estimatecl 'umber of 300 new berth
;;"iii;i"r-*o.rra b; requirei at an estimated cost of $3,000,000 per
;;;;;:-;uq"iri"e .., u*p".,dirurc of $900,000,000 for rvharf facilities
;i;"gi wf,ictt dofs not include harbor and channel improvements'
AlthJrieh Ehe technical developments neicessary to'dcvelop such an
il;d;E';'i.,-'"tipping are presently availabre, the magnitudt- ot -:"qi-
neering, constrr.ti"" and financing to plan the necessary facilitics
both at home and abroad bccome quite exlensive' As presently planncd
.ni".";;;;;.;;-harbor and shipping facilities become more-c9t18es:ed,,
il;";-;;tiri.i"u can demand prlmium prices which wilt result rin the
;;;;-";.f;;;i;" imporEs of liquid ".,.,d. oil to increase' rt would
thus appear conclusive that the domcstic production of hydro-clrbons
ili ;;:;;;r; in quanrity ro mcer rhc incieasing hvdro-caro-on.demands
of the country by the development of the oil shale indusEry'
Present Status of the Oil Shale Indusj
It is quite difficutE'to :lndieate thc
oil shale industty uu those directly involved
its status. It is apparent that 5he mqjor.oil
,: i i
present staEus of the
do noc desire to'define
companies involved are
4.
I
lr
t
I
I
I
t
l
t
I
t
I
I
t
I
t
r
t
I
I
I
noE under commercial production at this time bccausc cxisting condi-
Cions make it more ptofit.bln ior thcm to produce hydro-carbon
prOducfs from existing sources, whcther domestic or foreign, than
to bcgin production fiom the oil shales ' These same comPanies realizc
tliat at somc time in the future thcse conditions t+ill change' For
this reason, Ehey have i{.r=g't€:.Par-E individually'condu-cted sufficient
rcsearch to develop economical methods of extracting the commercial
valuable hydro-catbor,, from the mineral matrix, and they are now in
thc process of attempting to secLlrc as largc of leaaes on these
tJeposits for their inaiviAuat companics as changing conciitions perrnit ''
one important key to a commercral prociucEion of hydro-carbon
producrs.,.tf.o# 9ir..qha.|e -l-s.. i-n thc. ITliIBIrS. gpsrSgi!1,,:,thu maj or oil
comoanic,, h.r6-6"fii1;;t;a' ii'i€ti'{ii6n3'rcsearch'irnclcr iicld conditions
;; ;;;;;it. a"posits , although under presenE methods of mining, the
mining.of, ithc tru could be a major cost in the extraction of thc hydro-
carbons from.the mineral matri>r. This apparent lack of concern by the
major oil companics holding leases toward Ehe mining aspect on a
coirmercial production basii coulcl bc explained by several hypotheses'
One such explanaEion vrould be that cvcn uncier the presenE methods of
mining, the present estimated cost of mining would not make Ehe total
excraction cost of the hydro-carbons noncompeEitive with liquid fo-99i'l
crudc oils eiCher.at PrcSCnf or at some foresceablc future date
Thercfore, tnnf'/Propoi" to clevelop and improve mining techniques as
rhey enrer rhc-'lo*merciar p.rq-9g-"Iigl pl:e:.i!!!!i.:..i] ';i::'!.''.'-Lti"5 er''<'.:"'trt:
p*Jf ri A.sl(Ll lN'tO 'l''t'r') F-u Z^r't/r-' 'rf,A ' 1\"s\ Ar'!' nltY-<!.\ ' j ' - I'
Secondly, Ehey may desire not to Press the import'ance of the
mining operation- and therely invite comPetitot" from the mining indus-
try inEo the petroleum industry until such time as they have fairly'i
,oil secured ifru ore deposits ior their own individual development '
Thirdly, the major oil cornpanies nay not at this timr: really
have a cicsire tt enter.into production of hydro-carbons from this
aource as this could place certain parts of their total industry in :
compcEition rvith other parts. A grcat amount of investmen:t bY Ehese
majtr oil companies has been madc in equipment, plant facilities,
transportation facj.lities ancl production iacilities for the extraction
il ;;;;essing of ctomestic li-qui-cr fossil crude oils. The potential
of the oil shale industry is suf f icicntly large in -magnitude t-har '
provided commercial production of |ydro-carbon products thercfrom
. proved to be consiclerably less Chan the present 9os-E f rom liquid sources '
the question would then te irow to mainta|n liquid fossil crude oil
competiEive to oil shale until sucir time as these invescments in the
liquid crude oil industry could be liquidated' There are many indi-
cations Ehat support "rr"L reasbnlng. The major oil Companies ar:
.pr"r""tIy,placing much interest, in an effort toward,increasing Ehe
percengage of li{uid fossil crude'oil recoverable from existing fielcis
I-
i'-3;
F -t'4rf'
i
F
i
I
::,ir.i*-
&&*r
!T
S'rAY
r*.;
F . i,.Jrr
i r\na'
-23-
:f
by leaching, methods emplpying water f,lporling 1"q steam extraction
methods foi; purposes oi a""t"asing the, e_ost of domestic crude oil '
MuchPro8reSs.hasDqFnmadeintheseefforEs.j
, ., A considerable amount, of maEerial has also. been written
concerping the problems of Ieas.es, compeEitive bidding, royalties, size
of feaseSl depletion rates and taxes relative to the oil shale indus-
try. ,
"The proLl"rns thac they have presented indicate that commercial
production- cannog start unril these problems are favorably resolveci in
i"r,o.r, of oil producers to a point rvhere the industry may be comPetitive'
But, these problems cannot be Pelmanently resolved to a satisfactory
and equitable solution to all concerneci until such time,as realistic
cost d"t, on actual commercial procluction may be ascertained by proPer
public authority. Thus, until such tit,.e as actual production IS ob-
tained on a commercial basis, such statietical inforrnation will not be
available, and the solutj-on to these prcblems shall be stalemated.
Present cost data available from pilot plant stpdies, if applicd,
would result in resolving the problems most favorable Eo produccrs,
i
Th.us Ehe simplest method of solving these problems will be Eo sEart
commercial production :
. : .i
,.:Ac.onSi-derableamountofemphasis.hasbeenpIaceduPon
in situ methods of extraction of hydro-carbon produccs in lieu of
mining operations, esPecially so by the major produceru -tt :"PP?.t! of
r."rorrilg in favor of large icale testing Eo deEermine the, feasibility
of this method on the higher yielding formations. The higher yielding
formatriols '.in1 thc .Piceancc Creek Basin are on public lands which are
being lrithheld from,,being leased until such timc'as adequate informa- ',
tion is available to deEermirre.equitable leasing conditions, royalties,
lease sizes, and dePletion rates.
.presenr activities by the Oit Shale .CorporaEion toward the
completion of a cornmercial operaEton and the investigative Programs,,' 'l
being conduclgci under the Colorado School of Mines Rescarch Foundatlgn,
Inc.l should,,produce the necessary data and informaElon to solve thg'
.
non-technical-probJ.erns confronting the industry and. permit an orderly
development of- the induSt,ry n, irl/o-^, ,'or,,,1,,r,,, .:': /";1''t"-': {)RFsr""r/rt
;;-;#'";;;.;; J)i-.,,1-n1^- ':,1i::11"s'/i/r' ./1s ('"'t"/r442{r:';'tt t?'r 't -'"-'
Those who have been directly acquainted wiEh the industry in
the past have, estimated that after thc j.nltial construction of commcS;
cial prototype facilities has been completed, the., lndustry will deVeloP
to a capabiiity of L,25 rnillion barrels per day production in en :.
approximately 15-year Period.
*.,*:i|.F.- , : ' ):
5. Population Required in SupporE of IndgstrJ
by t'Cameron and Jones, Incorporated:t - ;tLe Colorado l{ater Conservation Board
-24-
i : It has been estimated
in their respective rePorts to
; rhar rhe firsr five ,".r4, commercialarrd"to EhP steFre of colora rpulacion of 2,500 persons, thedevglopmen! will require a supporting p(
i."iha'five years a sl-lpporting-population of 45,000 Persons, and at
tire, end of rS.yurru,;!'h; indulriy will require a suPPorting popula-
cibn of 340,0C0'Persons.
., '' 6' '
'
, ilt:haS been; our experience thaE when a general area has been
.:subjecCed to the most favoraLle conditions of economic growEh, the
pfiysical growth of a comrnunity within that area that becomes necessary
io'"""o**;d";;'rhu iaff"" of--popula:ion resulting from the economic
stimulus to it",t,ot" genera1 "i"" has'some lim'iEing rate'of increase
in its physi'cal growth. The rate o{'growth and the rate of increase
;i;;;;h'of " glrurr'c-ommynity is also a funcEion of the sLze or caPa-
clry of its eiilting facilitils at the time it is subjected to unlimited
au*l"ar of its-pt,yri""f facilities. Development of housing and com-
mercial u.""a-'"i.' dependent upon utilities ind community services' The
;;;^;; ;i'],f, ;-;;;r,ity may expand _its utilities and services is,;;;;";;r,i'[,po"-i;;-;;iitLv,L plan, finance, consrrucr, operare and
[![;;;-;t"-pr.rr,,ed expansiorr. Experience and confidence in manage-
ment must be acquired by those diiectly responsible for the decisions
ne.Qessary to effect exPansion, .and this confidence is gained 9y t
;;;;:;;'li"p ;;;a;;"iIi rhus, :tte'"more experierice the 'iivic leadelrs
of a community t.,ru in these matEers at the time new demands are
ir.paS"a',rpo. tnuir communiEy, the more quictrtly and surely they respond
g;Ipi""iding,-,nsr^I facilities and to- recognizing the 'oyer extension'o'!'i
exiscing facilities.
' The following estimated growth of the proposed district is based
upon the growth patterns .of slmilar districts that have been formed
under similar economic e.onditions with an uncontrolled influx of
populaEion j-nto a general iarea with a deficiency of utilities and
'.:.'''' :
Total No' Equiva-
'. . of TaPs lent
Added Con- PoPu-
TaPs nected lation
stage of const. 40 40 L52
"or,f . . conrpleted ,3 :3 t'r|
7 2 L46 '554
104 250 950
,.1 \ 200 450 1,710
following Page
I[,
I
I
i
Fr: :
ru;l',.
m,,A
iE
r-r.-+';/#&:
F
i'i+s "/
S*.. *
IF'a
t
services:
period qoE@
Wl6i.6lt / 65 Eorma"t ion of
6lLl6519 /Ll0s siart ,of 1st
9 /L165-4166 1st stage' of
4lll66:9lL/66 :
9lLl67 l
,.9lLl6B ,'..
't9,/.L169 . ,
conttd. on
*t-
b+'r:blt**lrr.fd .-'
P+'r':l'q.'l*[,.
/ri
;l-'I t ..,
-25-
o
, . t' ' ,
, : i.; I
Comments
!,. :
*(Estimated Population Neces-'
' sary to'; supPorf industrY,"' 270,000 in year L977 ) r
i '..' .\ r
,.,1 '
Pe.riod
e lLl70
e lLlTL
e ltlT 2' 9l,L17 3,' ' 9/L'174
"e /L17s' 9 /L/7 6',* ''9 lLl77
e /L178..{:i.rir. , g lIl79i ' ,9/L180
9lLl8t
g ftl82"
'9 /L/83'i " '91'r184,,:tgll/95
o
Added,
Taps
300 7 50 2,850
400 1, r5o 4,370
500 1,650 6,270
600 2,250 8,550
447 2,697 ' .' 10,25O
67L 3,368 , L2,8oogzl 4,289 16,300
843 5,L32 19,500
L,026 . 6,158 23,400
L,026 7 ,L84 27 ,300t,079 B ,263 31 ,4oo1,131 9,394 35,700
L,290 10,684 . 40,600
,L;342 L2,026 45,700,L,342 13,368 50,800
L,42L L4,7 89 56, 200
Total No.
,tof Taps
Con-
nected
Acres of land
:, Developed
23
49
83
150
250
383
5s0
750
900
L,L23
1,430'
1 ,710
2,053
2,395
2,7 54
3,131
3,561
4,010
4,456
4,930
Equiva-
lenE
Popu-
lat ibn
ESTIMATED T,IATER REQUIREMENTS AND ACREAGE TO SERVE ABOVE POPUI'ATIONS
i
I
t
' lg-pglaficg'
258
5s4
950
.",",',L'4o .',. ;', ,2r8504,370
,.:i,l : trQ r?70
,,:l'r',8'550'10,250
,-, Lzr g0o
------16,300-,-
L9,500 , :
;:''23'400
..,.,27 r 300
.,, 31,400
1,, 35 r 7oo
,40,600
45 ,7 0O
50, Bo0
56, 200
Acre Foet of
WAter Pdr Year
45
": 96
'T64'295
' 492
753
1,082
L,47 5
1,769
2,209
2,8L2 . .
3,364
.. 4,037
4,710
5,4L1
6,L59
7 ,004
7 ,884
8,7 64
9,696
Maximum
Flow.cfsYear''"
L966
L967
19 68
L969
L970
L97 L
. L972
L97 3
.L97 4
,,,,ig7 5*^T97 6
L977
,1.97B
L97 9
,,1980
i 1981
L982
r98 3
L984
1985
0. r16
0.249
o.427
0.768
1'.'280
L.962
2.8L5
3.839
4.602
5.7 47
7.3L9
8.755
10.507
L2.258
L4.099
L6.O29
L8.229
20. 519
22.809
2s.234
-26-
va' NorE:(1) Per CaP
o
ita
Requirement
Per Year or
Usage. f,or Drouth Year Utilized for-Water
Deterrirination was 56,LLA GallonS' Per capita
' 0.L7252 Acre Feet Pe,r Year'
i_on
ri0
70
/0
-r0
50
00
JO
00
30
00
00
00
00
00
00
c0
.(2)Maximur. F.'low iq BSsed
of 290 Gallon.,Per- DaY
(3) PopulaEion Density 'of
v.FACILITIES TO BE FURNISMD'BY DISTRICT
A. GENERAI
on Averag.' D"ily Flow fot- Peak Month
Per Capi'qa or 0.000449 cfs per Capita'
LL.4 Persons Per Acre '
The facilities."that-.shalt be furnished. by the District shall
include r^,arer ;;;;;;;t ptanr, raw and rreared .i:::^lumning stations,
treaEed viater transmission lines, treated water'storage, individual house
;;;;ia; 16r,r,.".io.,, and meters for existi.ng units, sewer outfall svs-
,.*r, and sewage Ereatment facilities'
The development of these facilities shall be through stages
so as to be capable of progressively satisfying increased demands with
adequaEe s'ervice' but limit
lsome financial 0bligaEion;'i""irities 'within a feasible'dnd unburcier
t,i. i : l ' t, ',.j
, ,r
'
The facilities shall"be sized and situated for the first
sEage of consEruction to ptorio. adequate facillties for the initial
developmqnr o[ ;;;ti;";-"r9. wirhin it" initial'boundaries of the Pro-
.pbsed oistrici. 'certain or-tn"ru iacilities, br'parts thereof , may be
::il;#;liii"."."srrucred under separate phasesr to' diminish initial
capital costs and expanded as increased demands are experienced; while
ocher facilities should be itttt"fled with sufficient caPacity- to be
adequate to serve the requirements'of the ini-tial District'-'ful1y
1. Design Crit6ria 'foi First 'Srage
:
. .. la. Acreage Includec] in Initial District
' . b. Acreage developed in First Stage
. r'c . Numbei ' of Contribut ing Single Family
Dvrelling TaPs' d. Contributing PoPulation "i
e. Average Daily Witer Usage for Peak llonth
f. Peak 6ai1y Water Usage for Peak Month
1r040 acres
3OZ acres
307 caPS
3'1448 persons
1.0 MGD
1.3 MGD
-27 -
o
Raw Water PumPing CaPacitY. ,. : r, :
Water Treatment Plant CaPacifY
Treated ltlater High Service' R:mP Capacity
Trdnsmission Line Capa:city, Main Service
Transmission Line Qqpacity, Main Loops
Per Leg
Treated I'Jater Storage CaPagitY
ServiCe MainS . -. .'. :.. 1.: .- .-,*l--...:-;; .. ..,,:,, .
House Services and Meters
Sanitary Waste Facilities for First S!
'a. Main Outfalf ' 6'"w.r Line i \ :
''' ' b. Laterial'Out'falI Ser,rer Lines' c. Sewage Treatment Facifiqies '
.'.
SECOND STAGE OF CO}ISTRUCTION ;r
The faciliCies'shall'be 'sized and situated for the second
stage of construqtion'to'proride adequate facilities'for the ful1 develoP-
*..ti of all land area within"t'he'initial boundiries 6f the proposeci
DistricE. Facilities construcEed shalf !g. ,such Cq permit and encourage
the annexation of adclitional land aread-.f6 the Dist.rict irr.preparation
of the thiq{ stage of constructiou. The.location of waEer treatment
plant facilities-shall be changed to a point furEher upstream to accom-
mgdate future expansion. "T"rti"ry facilities shal! Qe incorpotated
into sewage treatment plant''f"qilities to provide for'rdcovery iof water
for a secdndary application for inciusErial usag€ within:cf,i9 stage of
constructi'orl' ; :i. | '.' ,,.. :i ,''" , :,
l. :Desien
. gritgria f or gecghd , $I;ig,e
Acreage Developed by the Second Stage
Number of Contribu!ing Siagle, t*irr,
Dr,velling Units '-.r '-- '- - " '
ContributingPopulation , ,.r
Average Daily,Water Usage, for, Peak I'.Ionth
Peak Daily. Water, Usage fq,r, Peak,Month
Average Daily Sewage Flow for Year .
2.['Iat€LFacilities fqE_ Ji-!s!_ Sgggg .,','1,::
.:i t'
a.
b.
.c.
d.
e.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
.CI.
g.
f.
g.
h.
I.2 MGD
1.0 MGD
1,0 MGD
3.5 MGD
1,:6 MGD
1.0 MG
6," I.lD.
3/4" r.D.
5.5 MGE,2.0 MGD
O:.6 MGD
: , ir .
.. i,
1 ,040i aeres
.3,200 taps
12,168 persons
3.5 MGD
4.6 MGD
1.5 MGD
2.3 MGD
.]
E
E
r28-
I
F
t
I
I
t
t
2.l&ter Facilities Add-ed for SecoE{ Stage .-.."....
a. lwater Treatment Plant CaPaciuY :
b. Move Exi-:ting I MGD Plant to 3 MGD Site
c. Raw Water PumPing CaPacitY
d. Move Existing 1.2 MGD Raw Water Pumps 3'5
e.,...Main-,TransmissionLineCapacity
f. Treated Water Storage CaPacirY
Sanitarv l^laste Facilities for Second SEage
a. ExEension of Main Outfall Sewer Line
b. Tertiary Serarage Treatment Plant Capacity
tiilnO STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION
a...].r.'lAcreage.Deve1ope.dbytheThirdStage..
b. Number of Contributing Single Family,:Dwelling Units :
c. Contributing' PoPulation
d. Average Daily Water Usage'for Peak Month
e. Peak Daily Water Usage for P.e-ak Month
t. Average Daily Sewage Flow for Year
g. Peak Daily Servage Flow for Year
2. hlater Facilities Added for Third S.tage
a. Water Treatment Plant Facilities Expansion
b. Raw Water Pumping Facililies Expansion. i
c. Hi.gh Service Pumping Facilities
d. Transmission Line to Nerir Storage
e. Treated \alater Storage -. .:..,.
f. Distribution Transmission Line Per Leg
'. - .. :, - :-,.. -...of Outfall
Servage Plant
.--r.l :.
3.0 MGD
3.5 MGD
MGD Station
10 .0 .MGD
5.0 MG
F'I
h{v:-
S"ri-
3.
D.
5.5 MGD
3.0 MGD
,+l's
E.
W
t!
E--
F:*
ts:Y,
F
{
The facilities sha1l be sized for the Ehird stage of con-
struction to provide adequate facj.litics to expand the boundaries of
the Districr to include all Ehe land under the Last Chance DiEch and
be of sufficient capaci-ty to encourage development of land areas above
sai.d Ditch preParatOry to the fourth'stage of coirstruction'
I'.'Des i CriEeria for Third SL@
a. Extension
b. Tertiary
Sewep Line
Expansion
2,7 54 acres
8,262 taps
3L,396 persons
9. IO MGD
t1 .90 I',IGD
3.92 MGD
7 .06 I"IGD
6.0 I'{GD
6.5,MGD
6.0 MGD
6.0 MGD
10.0 MG
3.5 MGD
r-) -.
fr;!i"
h.&'
WI
lr,-,
t'. I;. --.
.I
!'
I.
!i.
i'
r"
!t
i
h'- .kf,..r-'
!"*
t-
I
3.
-29-
4.0 MGD
it ies
F. FOURTH STAqE OF CONSTRUCTTON
Facilities shall be exPanded
struction to accommodate expans'1o1,'of
Last Chance Ditch;
i-" r
..... .-:..-I.:..:.--. '*'r
for Ehc fourth sEagc of con-
Distrlct boundaries above the
1.Des ign -Q4-t for Fourth -.9!e of Conqtruction
a. Acreage Developed by the Fourth Stage
;: Numbei of contiibuting singre Family
c. Contributing PoPulati-on
d. Avcrage oaiiy Warer Usage for l"-1k l'lonrh
e. Peak Daily wlter Usage for 'Peak llonth
t. Average Oaify Sevrage Flow for Year
;. peat 5ai1y Slroage E1'or'r"fdr'- Year' ''*'' - ' ''
Est.
Unic
. .. OuanciEY
I 16 r.f.
I ea.
2 ea.
- 30-
5,263 acres
:" -I5,790 EaPS
60,000 Persons
17.40 MGD
22. BO I"IGD
7 .50 I"IGD
.',,1.3. 5 I'1GD
7.0 MGD
7 . O I,IGD
EsE.
Item
360 .00
7 50 .00
1,300.00
2.,,' !,later FaSilities iAdded .for Fourtb QtaBe
a. Rhw Warer Rrmping' Station Expanded 6'5 Y9?', . b.. r,l"ter*i;;-;rh;;;'t?1rrr. Facilr-ri"s Expanded '8 .0 MGD I
c. 'High-sJivice zu*ei"g:rncreased '6'0 I'IGD
d. Treatecl Water Storage 15'0 l'IG
---:--- -.-.,..,....-:. ..:'..-
:. g""itrt" i^l"tte Fttl
a. Outfall Sewer Line ExPanded
'" ill Tertiary Sewage Plant Expanlion
', At that point in'Iime 'rlhence Ehe Second stage of construc-
tion ii to be completed, thb fifth stage'of construition should be
planned,withsEages3and4revisedtomeetrateanddirectio'..of
irowttr "'r- ' -r'' ":' " ':
vI. PRELIMTNARY Tsrrl',l4TEP cosr ?r qgNqIFucr'roN
A.Estimated Cost of Watet'Facilicies to be
WATER SYSTEI"I Est.
Unir
Edt
$22.50
7 50 .00
650.00
Item
No.
1.00
l.;i
.10
.20
.30
DescriPt ion
Raw Water PumPing
1.2 I'IGD CaPacitY r
4\ dia. well with
L?t <iia. PumP well
840 GPM Vert. Tur.
Station
cas rng
house
Pump
_:,
WATER SYSTEM con! !i
Descrlptior]
20 HP Motor, Llound Rotor
Variable Speed Control'
ConcreEe Foundatron and' lJell Hcad
..1 Chemical Feed Lines
10t' Discharge PiPing
Valves and FiEtings
Center
Filter, Chem. Feeders, '
Coagulant Control Center,
B.W. Pump, Sec. Floc
Feed System, Filter PiPing,
Valves & Flow ConErollers
ChlorinaEors
Air Compressor & Air
Proces s ing
High Service Pumps, 700
GPI,I Each at 380 ft. T. D. H.
with 75 'HP- Motors
High Service Pump Control
100,000 Gallon PIant Stor-
age Tank
t MG Treated Water Stor-
age Tank
Treated Water Transmission
Lines '|
Line ttAtt, -L2" Dia. with
Valves & Fittings
Loop ttNo. ltt I0tt Dia.
Valves & Fittings
Loop "No. 2" 10" Dia.
Valves & Fittings
Fire Hydrants
House Service Lines
and Meters
Watcr Rights
Est .
-Unit
Cos t
l,:Fr
tr-,,/q"
li;,."le,fi-
Item
No.
. .40
.50
'.60
-*.70' .80
.90
2.00
.10
.20
.30
1.0 MGD WaEer Filtration Plant
Filter Building 24 x 32 L. S.
ElecEri-cal & Motor Control
Est.
Unit
Quant it Y
2 ca.
I ea.
' '1 ea.
L. S.
50 L.F.
L. S.
L. S.
L. S.
L. S.
L. S.
2 ea.
L. S.
L. S.
L. S.
$1,300.00
3 ,400,. oo
120.00
80.00
5. 60
$B ,000.00
12,000 .00
96,000.00
1,200.00
', 450.00
3, 200.00
5,500.00
11,000.00
+s, ooo. oo
5. 50
4. 30
4. 30
385.0 0
1r5.00
2,500.00
Est .
Item
Cos t
2,600.00
3,400 .00
r2c.00
80.00
280.00
360.00
8,000 .00
12,000.00
96,000.00
r ,200 .00
450.00
6 ,40o . 0o
5,500.00
11,00p.00
45,000.00
31,,350.00
7 4 ,B2o .00
36,9,80.00
5, 390 .00
4, 600. 00
15,000.00
t
i
;rq.Ln'
F-SL
I T
F'- -
!' ^.,trltir
w
t.
fddo.,-
i'.*.'. r"FI
Flrr!-i-Ll'i:'
P."''
t"'
'.40
.50
,'. '60
':'70
3.'00
4.00
.5.00
5. 10
.20
.30
6.00
7 .00
8.00
5,700 r. F'.
17,400 L. F.
8,600 L. F.
L4 ea.
40 ea,
6 cfs
-3r-
O --l :.,--,-. ---1.,--:::
l',,*"
t'
l.**sffirhfl,EF
i
I
I
i
I^JATER SYSTEM con
a
trd
Est .
Unit
Quant it v
la',l-i.i
Est..- -
Itcm
Cos t
Esi .
Unit
Cost
Item
No.
9.00
, I Descriptiog
Rrghts of I^/ays and'
Easements z acres li ,oo.oo
First Stage
1 ,000 .00
$:og,94o. oo
21,836.00
10,918.00
$39e,694.00
:
1.00
.r0
.20
TotaI Estimatecl Construction,Cost of
of Water System
Engi-neering & Supervision of Construction Fee - 7%
Legal and Administrative Fee . 3;5%
Total Estimated Cost of FirsE'Stagc Water System
SEI^/ER SYSTEM
Sewer Outfall Lines '.
Line 'rAArr 21"' Dia. Sewe,r, ,
Line 11,800
Liire rrBBrr 10tt Dia. Sewer )
Line 1,100
.30 Line rrCC'r 10t' Dia. Sewer
Llne', .
' .40 Manholes i
2.0O Scwage Lagoons
.10 Excavati-on & Embankments
.20 Parshall Flume & Metering
Dcvice
' .30 Distribution Boxes
,40 Influent Lines
.50 Overf lovrs & Drain Lines
3.'00 krnd Costs 20 acres
.tTotal Estimatecl ConstrucEion Codt of .Sewer System
Engineering & Supcrvision of Construction - L0%
Legal and Administrative Fee - 3.5% r,
Total' Estimated CosE of First :Stage Sewer System: ,
2, 500
18 ea.
29 ,000
L ea.
3 ea.
3',000
r , e.".
L. F.
L,F..
L. F.
cu. yd.
4. B0
i ,1 .2.s0,',
2.50
200 .00
0.35 ,;
$ 56,640.00
2,7 50.00
.; 6, 250 .00
3,600 .00
10,150.00
; 500.00
7 50.00
' 12,000.00, 4,000.00
10,000 .00
2 ..000 .00
$108 , 640.00
10,964.00
3"802.00
$r23, 306.00
500 .00
i 'i 250.00
L. F. 4.00
4,000,;00
500.'00
I
-32-
.,
,t.
. ',:l
:i
I
t
,l
I L. '
:
VII.AI"IORTIZATION SCHEDULE
The individual columns' on each shcet shall be herein
Expenditure Schedule f'I First and, Se3on! :::9:r::ffi;;;;t;":' rhe scht-dule has only been extended
H;il;;'.i.,l"iu"o"a srage of construcrion as ir shall
-- ^^.-F ^S#'#:iiri"lnlu" firsr rwo srages rhar rhe cosr of
The following two sheets 'set fqrth the estimated antici-
paEcd expendit.rt"", oplrating and malnienance costs that would be
incurrecl under the proposed ilethocl of development ' Also shorvn is a
suggested revenuu, ."h"O,rfe-lnaicating Ehe relaf iye rapes and charges
that would be required to ,utiufy thI debt service on borrowed capital
and other financial obligations '
ffi
Lr'.d.ffi
i-
t
explained:
t(
Sheec 1.
Column 1.
Column 2.
Column 3.
Column 5.
Column 6'.
'ti ',:l'ri
I
F-
r..."-",rh{
I.
IF
I
facilities ,pui ,jrulling unit tn"f f be at its' mai<imum'
Thus, the contributing population and capital
expenditures aftet atiaining a population of 12'168
persons has: nort bcen shor.''n' l
Calendar Year of Bonding Period for First Issue
Estimated RaEe of GrowEh of Single Unit
Taps, Connectecl .And In Service At Such
Aclequate.'iFacirl,it ies .Becomc Available'
.l
Contributing iEquivalenE Population -Fpr,single Unit ,pr^re tling Taps Connected''
The'Year of Issuc and the Amoqnt of Issue of Bonds
Necessary to Construct Facilj-ties Proposed for First
and Second Stages'of Construction' These should bc
General Obligaiion Bonds, although they may be retircd
with funds .received from direct rev'cnue '
Debt Service includcs both the yearly Principal and
interest puyr"rra that shall be required for the
amounts issued' in Co,lumn 5 under 25 equal yearly pay-
ments for each bond issue. Avcrage interest rate
for trotal issue \t,as:assurned as 3 '5% of the unpaid
principal, compounded annually' The -principal Pay-
mcnt for the first 3 years tolta Ut deferred until
toward thc end of the first issue payments and thereby
decrease t,he amount, of the obl,igation for the initiral
years when the District shall' have the minimum of
income.
Dwelling
Time As
Number of
i
rf
ii'
l.r, :
I
i
${x.-
lor0il
-I,'
i
I
I
tII
!
7
-33-
t.
l-
,1. o
H+
t'
F
o
..r., ri; l 'i', i |,r.1,..,./,. . '.
Estimated Costs to be Incuiied by'fieatmenr Facili-
ties, Both' lr]ater and Sewage, Including PIanE fumping,
Chemicals, Maintenancer' Improvements and, Salaries.
'.)i
Elecurica'l Energy Costs for High Service fumping of
TreatedWatertoE1cvatedStorageandSystem..
Estimated llaintenance and Repair of Irlater Distsribu-
tion. System, Including Labor and SuperinEEndance.
.t
Estimated CosE of Maintaining, Flushing and Super-
vising Sewer Collection and Outfall Systcms. Inspec-
tion of caps and house lacerials shall be paid -
scparately by cieveloper to County plumbing inspector.
Estimated Cost of, Meter Reading, Billing, Collect:-ng
and Generali Administration.
:.' ').Fixed Overhead, ,such as RenEs, eEc. i .!.
Revenue:Schcdule 'for FirsE and Second Stages of
Construct ion.|:,
Assessed Valuation. The assesscd valuation of lands:.
and, improvcments vrithin::t,he proposed boundaries of
the District are presenEly estimated at $f41,630.00.
The est,irnaited assessed valuation, o'f,:oew single family;
housi-ng units including lot siEes has been assumed
for purposes of this report at an average of $51000
per unit o:,;.t tt,,
Mi1l Levy EsEablf.shed by District to AssisE in
Establishing a Method of Enc,ouraging Development of
District,and Equalizing Cost of FaciLities and
Increased Land Valucs Betrueen EarIy and l-ater Develop-
mcnE. The f irst mill levy of 25 .mitrls may bc lowcred.
by reducing rfr!s5t and second ,debitr service Paymen.by one of 'several techniques.,t ,';:..
Watcr Tap Fee,G $200"100 Pcr Tap After First Two Years.
Firstr two years aE $fOO.00.per tap Eo,encouragc early
facility use.
..i.,
Sewer TapFee of $50.00, for First 2 Ycars and $100.00Per Tap Thereafter. , : r, ..1
Column 7.
,,,.
," ,l l
Column 8."',
I :t i
Column 9.
t.
Co1umn 10.
, .t i r !
': :,
Column 11.
Column LZ.
SheeE 2.
;,w
Column 3.
Column 4.
, i t,,t
',).)
,,i
Columnl5,.
Column 6.
-34-
I
Column
Column 8.
Column 9.
Column
Column 11.
Column L2.
Column f3.
Column L4.
7,
' ri
ost of 30CRevenue from water sales at an average c
per thousand gallons meLered. 'Mlnimum charges and
r"t. schedule to be established later'
Sew;5 servrce chargc of $24.00 p"T yeat per stt'glu ,, ,
fam.ily unic "
construction fund represents those rnonies obtained
from bond sales whrch are not immediately spenE for
-
i""ifiiy-constiuction bc'cause of construction'perrod
and phaie expansion. Monies 1ay be invCstcd in
shori Eerm Goverment bonds and intlcresE earned to
help meet earlY cost".
,
Sinking Fund. 'Tap fees should be deposited in
sinkin[ Fund ar the earliesr possible dare to pro-
vidcfundsforfutureexpansionoffacilities.
Inirial $36,900.00 in fur-rd represents thc amount of
monies the District would receive from a Federal
participation in sahit ary treatment facilities and
outfall servers uPon application by District for such
a granr-in-aid. This iould be reflected by reducing
th; amount of bond issue by this amount, but is
shov,rn here as a credit to the sinking Fund for reasons
that the District must show flnancial ability to con-
strucE facilities prior to being qualified to be
of fered a grant; a'tld funds must be available in Grant
Fund to actuallY receive the aid'
Interest on Monics Invested From construction Fund
From Previous Year.
Interest on l"lonies Invested from sinking Fund From
Previous Year.
Revenues Derived from Taxes collected From Mi1l Levy
Assessment. Prcsent mill levy within County is a
EoEal of 56.58 mills.
Total Revenue Received From A11 Major Conventional
Sources.
10.
t
{
F
;i
,t- JJ-
r
t
I
I
r
I
Column 15.This represcnts defrcits and surpluses expcrienced
between thc Eotal of sheet I and total of sheeE 2.
surpluscs ga. LnEo S:Lnk.ing Fund to earn'interest thel
foll-owing !oa.. Deficirs in revenues'are satisfied
from cash reserves of Sinking Fund''
Thus, under the proposed ratcs of growth, costs-and revenues, thcr
District would be in a sound financial statr:s aft'er a'pproximately
250 tapc \dere connected.
:
Since the monies received and/or expendiEures noteci in the Amorti-
zation Scheclule beconre more or less c.onsEant upon, reaching a
contribuEing population of L2,L6B persons (year 1975), the Schedules
have not been projected for the full 25,year bonding period in this
report, but have been terminated ac the year L97 5. The only columns
that vrould reaL'.Lze a yearly change would .be Columns 10, L2, L4 ..tq
15 of Sheet 2, due to the increase in inLerest on the Sinking Fund.
$
*
H
ffi
m
ils
B
ffi
k
s.
ffi
ffi
s
M
l
ry
n
I
!E
I
ffi
E
ffi
ffi
-36-
rt i
i
l1
.J
onou')oooo()oo<'o)(:\-{.$tr.ltr)trl!ntntnu1 O\ N r{ \:f Cn r{ Cn \O 6 q)
-{ \t C0 \t $ -i v) C) .f, r{ r{alo)o")\ttr)\f5Qcotoorr{r{NNNN
OOo
O
OO
r.n
oo
Oc)
^.l*\
oON
LN
oO.)
cr)
OOOOON\OO<)ON\t@tr).$
r{N
trloooooooooI c'.)a.)ooooooool.f,Cr\\OO\CO.$cr).if Olo
F{e!-f,NO\tr'-F{
F{ F{ rl 6l
fsoS
,(1.reatr $
TBf oJ, {G
Peaq-ra^o3
PaxTJ </>
S.TrcaTToJ -^'arrfftfgH' 'uTtuPv
f so-ralul (^
1- TBdTcurJd <r}
a"TA.IaS lqao
($ uolTT ii^l)
sanssl *
Puog<a
('rec w)
uol ldurnsuo3
-ratPll d1:eotr
uoTleTndod
8ut lnqlrfuo3
Pafcauuoc
sdel
Telo.l
cO
r{
c{
r{
rl
F{
l.J
qJ
OJ.c
CN
d+1i
F4.
I
oor/")c)ooooooI O\r.{r\OOOOOOOI N\OOONOOOOLN
F{ Sl (r, "f) F\ Or C\ Cr)
F{ F{
.(
6Bl ,:rarsds uoTl<+
"
331 -caTTocS
slcl(dl,r dl tualsdg uo'r1.r>
t- El -nqT.rf srq <,>
'#l
ol aJTn-ral;
a "dl qsTtr g
- S Sutduln6 <+
xl
^ 8l sf,so,*
56L f uaurearJ<^
14
C)
H(n
azoo
14tn
rfz
kl(,
t-{
V)
Frq
&
l{
fr{
&
h
kl.l;fa
rdEr
(J
(A
t1&
E{Hazrd
O{Xrd
()OOOOO<)OOOI €NT.)OOOOOOOI tr)CN-{O,-f,C)ONOO
rl c\,lcf)\OO$OO(Y)r\r{ rl F{ N C\J
OOOOO()OOOC)OO\OC\'./..)tnOn
OO
CJ
^rO O r\ il c.t O FF{Nc)\Or{r{C{(n-f,<'
oooOf-s)
O Fl f'-
OOOOOOOOOOI r\\OOOOOOOOOI OOOOC!oO\OLn()OC)O
F{(')tr)O\.iflflCOr\@N cO.$ Ln \O
OOOOOOO-f, \t $ .if -$ rn Lnrn rn rn Ln tf) c) co
r{ r{ '{ -{ .{ -t -f,crl ('1 cf') cq cf) o o
F{ F{
\o
r.r1
ooc{orn (\l
Or{
.J'oLnoo()oooo
aa.$rlt1t*-otrlooooF{ c'l tn ori \O .$ tn CC f.\ @rl C! crl .$ tJ1 \O
.$
(fl
0o\oooc)oC)()r-<>o\o-f,rntr)l.r)trlt^l.r)cNOrl c\ -t l.- 1-^.:^ Y.l
F.l F{ OI N (Y)
tn\Or\@O\OF{Nc.l-$Ln
\O \O \O \O \O f.- f\ f\ r\ I-\ f\Or O\ O\ O\ C Or O\ Or O\ Or cI\
F,l F{ F{ F{ F{ F{ r{ r{ r{ r.l F,l
N
@\or{
N
Fl
c)rnN
O
F{
O
Lr)rn
co
Or\N
\o
OC{OOOOO l'r) rn tr) F-l tn r..N t/) or\ l-- CO cn
F{N.f
-{jrBai\
E=
tdI'*tt
l-
I
I
i
i1":iii:ii-Q=
"{ -t -t tn \O n Cn r{ f'- O r{ -{ -$o) -{ ti1 (n CO .f, CO Ln Ch o') C,1r r _! + _t- ..r_ _i- i.i i i _i- -i_
-i- -l- -i -i.
F{ C) N a) \O N.if f- Ln ct (}\ O\
O cn C Fl ''O *a' r{ r{ N cq (rl a')cq -$ rn r{ r- \.C) rf, (\ r{ @ N C{r-{F{NcY.)-$-t$cica
;o</).E<D
F-i <n-
Ou>.d <n-H</}
lT rTJ aq
-IO
snTdlns
anuaAau
TEf,OJ
r.,1
rl
-,f,
F{
f\ cn Ln O OO @ O c/) \O \O \O \O
Fl F{ C! *i' cO C! F{ r{ r{
\o I r4 \o (o c'-) C) c'1 o\ *$ c! F{.tF.{ OOC{c'1 \OOrlO\ON
F{r{C!NN
-f,..t r r r c)ttt.un lr} c\t
r{
cn
r{
N
F{
r{
r-.i\-i
\O t/) O -t O\ \O F{ F{ N (r\ O -{ Cnc'-) r{i\FlO-So.t€f-Or{No)tn\O€O\
OOO I I OONcOcO r I ooLn r.l F{ N -f
F{
O
r-{
:i?r?::?\T1i
F{ ei \O O @ t- o|.r -J- \t \O \O \OFl r{ N CO tfi rO f\ f.- f\
cacOOrlOtnOO()C)OO
-f, 01 '..o O\ @ cf) Ln -f, F{ .f, -$ $
-lN-f,NO.$r\OOOF.'lF{F{NNN
.sc{.soooooNco tlcnr\OOOOOO.$O I IF{Nco.irtn\o.$Ln
oN@@c/)co@ncoooo
at\ -f, Ln @ CO I.\ O\ tr.l \O f\ c.) @ O
u"l Ln Ln tn tn tr) tn cO N Fl F{rN
dnar IJIII e
anuaAag H </'
punJ j
3u14u-rs f fruo.rg 'lu1 H <'r>
Pun.{ :;'Jf suo.| o (/}' ".C<Dtuo-tJ 'f uI H {/}-
;punJ g:r
8ur>1utS tr #
;
Pun.{ ,3 3'JfSuoO H s)
a3-req3 !.^acT^.ras ; a
JaAoS H <'>
)
saTBS :8f alel\l ts {/)
saal 6 u. a",1, f; g
Jallras
saaJ
deJ
.raf el,1
daal
T TTI^I
uoT SBnTPA
pas sa s sv
. fsg
pafcauuoc
sdBJ,
TBfoI
.rBaI
N
IJ
a)
q)
a
c\
l--
@
\o
j 6\t@oooc)o.ir\oO<r> l I.tr<r> \O\tOOOOOOO\O I IEl<D -.,t N-f,\ocOON@O
-l F{ Fl
tr)
\t
. c!oo(>oooootr)ooo
F{ <.O- <f CO n' \O \O \O \O \O \O O\ O O C).-l (f} r{N\Or{r{\O\OF-{"{(..) OOC)
a !)-
F{ N O') 'J) 0O Fl O) \O \O \O
-{ F{ F{ F.{ F{
co
cC\OOOOOOOI\O(>O
C) \O .S rn (r) rn'r') Ln Lr) Oi O O O
-lC!-Sr.\r.{\ON\ONNN
r{ r{ N (\.1 (r) ct cn
tn \O r\ CO O\ O r{ C\ C.) .$ tf) \O t\\O \O \O \O \O f\ f\ F\ f\ |-\ f\ f\ t\
CIr O\ CI\ O\ O\ O\ O\ Or (}r Cl\ O\ C Oi
F.{ F.l r-.1 F{ F{ F{ F{ r-{ F{ F{ F{ Fl Fl
N
F{
r'r
i+"
Sv
F
:
l-
Lr.
rr
F
i
t
!
lF'.t*-
H
ha.r
I
rl1(J
Ha
azo
CJl.la
(f
H(n&H
fr{
€4o
f&.
kl
FJpa
E]
Oa
kl:)
rI]
r{il
,.
l
F
t.