Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4.0 Correspondence & ComplianceGARFI E COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DE'}.LOPMENT SPECIAL/C 1 T IONAL USE PERMIT INS_TION FORM Date Inspected_ - - Inspector_ Name of Operation:_ ? f����7 > .• ~' Contact Person: Phone Number:' 3 Address: / ._3/ -- � 7 CO Notes on compliance or non-compliance w/Resolution TJ'3 a_9� and/or Permit #. (Reference comments by condition #) gev/4/" .� � �S 7 i Further Action Required: c_ Lam-_ '1,-� � JdJ f�u�4 110 GARFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEV OPMENT SPECIAL/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INSPECTION FORM Date Inspected Inspector Z� Name of Operation: 11'� G—�iT / 7 /A/e%, Contact Person:_t,���1�'G2c=/ Phone Number: e�42 397 Address: Notes on compliance or non-compliance w/Resolution and/or Permit #. • (Reference comments by condition #) 7Ta ,3( 7iiec Ou!v /✓?7'-/2,2c�Gee—s�t".� L 3 /©° ,tc ,' ' & r�� i",zr /i'T JET' i ' ©i -c7 fin/ c9zk) .t/ z.)/ 7 -7e;) -7C) 'fig 7"72009--/e-c-_----7,0a,:„ LLS ce-=� . /7//lr' GU /ADZ E ' ti• 77 Further Action Required: STATE OF COLORADO Richard D. Lamm, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • • DIVISION OF WILDLIFE r Jack R. Grieb, Director f .t ,. 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 (825-1192) 230 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 J U L 1 5 1982 GARFIELD G BMW July 12, 1982 Terry L. Bowman Garfield County Planning 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Frei and Sons Special Use Permit for an Asphalt Batch Plant Dear Terry: The Division of Wildlife has reviewed the proposed application and believe that the location north of the river is unacceptable for the batch plant. This small area is already very congested with the operator's conveyor, weigh station, machinery, and gravel stockpiles. Much of the vegetation that previously existed has been removed and the river has been encroached upon already as no setback has been observed by the operator. The small size of the area also makes it questionable for the location of any sediment pond which may be necessary to prevent contamination of the river. For these reasons it is our position that an asphalt batch plant not be placed on the north side of the river. With the exception of the traffic problem, the south side of the river appears to be more acceptable. If, however, this permit is approved the following conditions are recommended regardless of location: 1. A minimum 100' undisturbed greenbelt should be maintained between the operation and the river. If located on the south it should be as far from the river as possible. 2. Vegetative screening should be done to reduce visual impact for adjacent land owners and for wildlife cover. This should be accomplished prior to plant operation. 3. Plant equipment should be painted to blend with the surrounding landscape. 4. Hours of operation should be restricted to reduce disturbance to people and wildlife. The Division of Wildlife appreciates the opportunity to comment on this project. Sincerely, MRG:ch MATR'TN Ab lALbU&W Monr�e5ieise�xecutrol�aerd WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Donald Fernandez, Chairman James Smith, Vice Chairman • Richard Divelbiss, Secretary • Jean K. Tool, Member • James C. Kennedy, Member Michael Higbee, Member • Sam Caudill, Member • Wilbur Redden, Member >>'2e_f' Qe-Qi E_? /.Z.62 Michael R. Grode 72 e'0 Wildlife Biologist • IP • •••. • • , 0.0 • ' ' '" • )3,t1 A -4141-T3:4 - COLORADOc),EP45\es.A..11,:,! • V-4./..te:r‘VT- f * Alr Poffutroh . /87 Is • 7 :;=••••: 1-007-6;, NO PERMIT NO. 4e.4 - • - , - •-• : -4"0 - • • ,--••• • "'" • - DATE 'SSD ISSUED 4'`PETER iudixT SONS(9 •t, )-7•'•••••••; •,_ . • LOCATED.A.S.N, FOLLOVVStAKsezt. 4,;' . '54; •• • ^-1":,,;:` • " '27 of Colorado.t • ,variOas'atta Innen - THE, SOURCE TG WHIcH-ThIS PERMIT APPLIES 1 DESCRIBED AND tit areis, throughout, the' State. -4"/eft'-: - _ "41.;k> = ' . • - - " --, " . - - •:-•,' -•-•, -r.f-t7= • ,--,,, -, _ - ,- - ,- - -_ = - -- 4,;`,.„- " -,--...-4.- - ---1-=--- - , -i . - - -- --., .-, -1-g ,;. THE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT OR 'ACTIVITY SUBJECT- T�THIS PERM- IT 'INCLUDE'S THE .. , — .. , ' - "410,7_ • • • - Doefng HodeT 400' drtia- dr e It; piant ''' ' • • •• ' - :-2,„.,,-. •- .'i-, ,','-:'.• ,'-','"-fr...:-.*y=4?,'" ' -: - ',"- . ' ,•.' . ' .. "1,-:- -,:* IC . '-,V4"..1'.,,,A4... 1.:;-.4-:*.:.-eL;44.3S2.,-;:i'..:143:1-,,;0*,-,:4V4:•,,,-:!..,‘ ":„ ,,,:i(4.f.tt -0.;.1.t .z.„.7.- I., - I, , ., _ ,•., - : : ,:„. f.:_,. .-',.7:.-- .., -::: ..,..; = .. ,-s.-i,, r , , _ ._....., ..,,, '.:•--- ---' - .-:4,?,'--',''''-*#f,„i1,4 "s4M-IVt ,5, !* -0';'-*A..-- "?:'-- -":"--,!--/,-- ';-. ''' '' ,',:j!' 4.,!•#.,..', 4;,--e, -.:.'S .., , l'.. $ - - • - +•• •• : r , ., ' . ,f-,-- --. ,?--,01,-flf.7.,',1',.%t fi.i,r-2, • ,..,.;,..{,-.-. .;;;-.:4v.k.LX.,•,-,C,,,-.*,.....-:,:",„:--'. - .. .,':: „i.-,!-•:, --7':,_;_,-7-- 't.Irr'W,*;..7,',1,-"-*47:i::"''-'7===[-,1:"!-,.-"",." i" -44F.'4- -.`irt.--,,.**-;r!_-_ ,!- =, -- 4... THIS PERMIT IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO' ALL RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE : COLORADO AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION. AND THE COLORADO AIR QUALITX ,.i.-1.4.471.1. CONTROL ACT C.R.S:'_:1971 (26-7-1(fl' et - -:):;, TC) THOSE GENERAL TERMS AND --_,-,f7._:.:::. CONDITIONS BET- FORTI-e014:THE REVERSE SIDE Of THIS; DOCUMENT',ANWTHEri;z ,,:,'..;.'-.--_t„„H-..':,.':•- FOLLOWING SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITION,.,- :„,:;,,:,,,4`..,5,;..,,,--....„.7j71.:---15,:::'r,-444;-:1;41:ii::- '-7:‘;'.;Y,....,:.:-..::.:::::-..)7-1'.4L 7- --,o-T-4-';',.. •,,"•-:-•• 't .--Y-i -5,;,'.'t :-. ..,,,,.,,.", ..,,•:,..., : , ?, .i... _z,.!--..t5„,.:-4'"":x•f- -,,..'f,...%i:!_:.--z,, __,;•t c 1..,-,-"i-.- .1.i.c'.a.,,,,It...,,--i. te7H,--•',.Tr_-:,--,,,,:‘,,t;14,-,.., __:. . :„., •,,*. ;=,,i .-- ..--:".',:-.; ..‘-:.:, -'7"-"'47-,!,'",,,-5P.r.f?_-„,-*. ,:i.:1-:.:=014, fr_V=..*,?•„toes,q, .! '-' '-' ' .- • -,4 ,...: - ,,,..., . -, --i''.7,-,."-- ...,_ ..-A-7.-F ,, --....6.--«- rif,,' 1-':',, - 4 ' I'''-:'.0pOltif,'-•stie,11.-,:not-excee4 ,.,-, ,..,- • -1::::-: ,I,':-::,,:::-.;' r_''..- :,-.,:: :.-',:', ,..::, •-.•':-,:-':'•,-0,1;-.::!.'",i--:' , , ,,, ,• .. .:1.-,-0,,,,,- , '•-• Partitulate emissions' SW :4'nOt,exc Oiffcis:pet4dry....stan •-,-, foo.t ...flue gasz-,41v,,i. '- le .;4!', .. .t'..., raspha - • . • FOLLOWING- 7 •• " • . . t ar dry scrubber. . , s •-• - • 7-- - • ‘--- - - Fugitive- dust esissi *setting doe*, or- -• OCatt ,104.1 tMty(3�j- da theope • - PETER KIEWIT SONS' CO. Emission Permit C-13,146 Initial Approval Page, Two .. a ;:: .. - ., CONDITIONS (continued): 5. Only. virgin aggregate is to be used. No recycled material can be. used at this facility unless a special permit.is requested and received from the Division. •- . .This permit number (C-13,146) shall be stenciled on the equipment for identification purposes. i By: Gary D. McCutchen, P.E. Engineering Unit Leader Stationary Sources Section. Air Pollution Control Division • • • • cx TOWN of SILT P.O. Box 174 Silt, Colorado 81652 303 876-2353 July 1, 1982 Terry Bowman, Planner Garfield County Planning Dept. Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Terry: Once again I wish to express the Town's gratitude for making us cognizant of the recent Frei and Sons' industrial proposal (batch plant) near Silt. Historically, Silt has opposed the majority of heavy industrial uses near it's fringes, while many of the gravel pit requests granted through Garfield County's due process have impacted Silt enormously. Jim Ragsdale, the planning consultant hired by Silt to develop Silt's Comprehensive Plan, has made provisions within Silt's area of influence for light industrial uses; example, Insul-Shutter, preferably through developed industrial park design review process. As you're probably aware, recently Silt had asked Garfield County to require Corn Construction, in the event their pit was approved, to front sufficient money for a traffic study to be undertaken by Silt on a payback basis. In reviewing Frei's application, I didn't see this concern addressed. The residents of Silt have signed countless petitions against gravel pit operations in the past and I feel any expansion of related extractive operations would once again be vociferously objected to. The Town of Silt further hopes that the precedent set in denying A.P.C.'s extractive operations request will be maintained. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input. Sincerely, ,i(t.2„Vf Mike Wikoff Planner on of Highways OH Form 101 Rev. August, 1981 • State Highwa/MP I-70 Frontage Local Jurisdiction Garfield County MTCE Section/Patrol 0312- 5 DOH Permit No -'8—O 2 - S Z.-00 Z t3 Required Permit Fee: $79 An $75.00 paid Ck. 6799 2/11/82 STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS PERMIT FOR ACCESS The property owner, Albert Frei & Sons. Inca -St. of Col herein called permittee) is granted permission to construct an access approach on the South side of State Highway 1_70 roc�tag�distance of approx. 3,432 feet East from milepost 98 also known as , for the purpose of obtaining access to t: and and grave 1 1nading ripe rationThe access approach shall be constructed, maintained and used in accordance with the State Highway Access Code, the terms and conditions of this permit, site requirements noted below, and listed attachments. This permit may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access approach and its use violate any of the terms and conditions of this permit or the State Highway Access Code. The use of advance warning and construction signs, flashers, barricades and flagmen are required at all times during access approach construction within State right-of-way in conformance with the -MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, Part VL The Department of Highways and its duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action or damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit. SITE REQUIREMENTS 1. Okay to install 2-35' driveways as shown on attached plan. 2. 2-35 ft. appraoch. 2-36" C.M.P. required under approach. The right-of-way fence will be braced before the opening is made. The approach will be paved from the edge of the oil mat to the right-of-way line with at least 2-1/2" of A.C. type asphalt material. The construction area will be cleared of all debris and rock when the installation has been completed. The construction signing will conform to the Uniform Traffic Control Manual, Section VI, Par. 6A-1 thru 6B-4. Remove 48' of W -type guardrail at each entrance and install safety ends. Highway Department will pick up guardrail and posts after removal. Depeouounutblemm xsiltitirOIRAXIMMIZatatta By(X SA44''04444 4•4'4:'44044-17, ° e4fr#V+ • t. t 4'• C' t CS: %% At' +3$4.644# .444 dr4IPA►♦ STATE OF COLORADO, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS . HAASE, CHIEF ENGINEER Date »i.. //i PL Title `•1 '`O��`�ii'�sl`ai�'i ilri ? ?4V4.1.P4'v4 i11N'1. V '$ ,Pt' Mizitttamattltratbtfitifikk MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY By(X) Date Title Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained herein. A copy of this permit must be available at the construction site. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from initiation. The permitted access approach shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to being used. The permittee shall notify Tnhn ctary with the Colorado Department of Highways in Glenwood Springs at 945-7441 , at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way. The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted access. Permittee(X) �>' 'elLe 7--A Date S-:\7 I THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNTIL STAMPED AND NUMBERED BY A DULY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS. PY DISTRIBUTION White,-MTCE Section • White, Applicant Canary, Local Jurisdiction Pink, MTCE Patrol File Canary, Inspector Pink, Traffic Eng. Goldenrod, Staff MTCE • • EI)viroI)n)eI)t, Iqc. LARRY E. O` BRIAN PRESIDENT 9989 WEST 60TH AVENUE ARVADA, COLORADO 80004 303- 423- 7297 June 25, i98 at/4" Mr. Paul Mannino, Planner %.4640 y�< Garfield County Planning Dept. Co. 2014 Blake Ave. 104444 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Mannino: As per our conversation in your office on monday June 21, 1982 I have contacted Mr. Al Frei to determine what amount of output tonnage might be expected from a typical asphalt plant. Mr. Frei advises that the typical plant that might be located on the property from time to time would probably vary in output from 50 to 200 tons per hour. If there are any other questions or if further clarification is needed please call. We mailed certified, return receipt requested, letters to all of the property owners within 200 feet of our property lines today. As soon as the return receipts are received we will forward them to you. Likewise the proof of publication from the Glenwood Post. Sin erely your , Lar r,E. O'Brian J ,SL( f ��p/CJ/c.7 /A...42'� L-4/ E lite l�'o o.� •�E--�� ✓T/ov �z srs � Fwd o� l o.��iv, yav,