Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 CorrespondenceCITY MANAGER Mer,.e,.di ;_n- ..].a.n chat esAwlQ N E Y DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Bob St fer December 17, 1980 806 Cooper Avenue Mr.Ray Baldwin County Planning Director Garfield County Annex 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 re: Glenwood Business Center Special Use Permit Application Dear Ray: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (303)945-5462 Comments made by you and Floyd Diemoz at our meeting Tuesday suggested that the City Planning and Zoning Commission motion of December 10 regarding the above - captioned project is "vague". Re -reading the motion, the language appears to stand on its own except for the clause referencing the "items Mr. Fernandez mentioned be looked at and specified." Let me clarify with regard to those items. The "items" came from a memorandum I prepared for P&Z on December 4. It should have been included in my report to you of December 10. It is now attached. Your will note from reading the memo that it raised numerous questions relating to review procedures. This is because it was written several days before my meeting with you and Davis (December 9). That meeting clarified the special use permit review for me. .DEC 191980; GARFIELD CO. PLANNER Letter- Ray Baldwin Page 2 Nevertheless, the City Planning Commission and my office remain of the opinion that a subdivision or P.U.D.-like review procedure is appropriate for a project of this magnitude. Based on our conversation December 9 and your stated intentions then, I went to Tuesday's meeting expecting there to be an effort to persuade Mr. Diemoz to bring his project under subdivision review. The result of the meeting is a continuation of the special use permit review. In view of that, the City would appreciate a copy of the information and submittal require- ments being made of the Glenwood Partnership on this project. And, as agreed Tuesday, the City will be copied on all submittals made by the Glenwood Partnership. Referring back to the P&Z motion, there is a recommendation that the new county road be four-laned. This comes entirely from the Commission. It can certainly be modified as information becomes available. The City P&Z's next meeting is January 7. The Glenwood Business Center will be reviewed again at that time using information supplied to the City. Respectfully, John M. Fernandez Director of Planning City of Glenwood Springs Enclosure JMF/pks 2 0 w 0 .-i 0 q CO 0CO HI 4-1 UN0 J. 0 0 •0 _VS U 14 H G N 'd N 44 0 0 H '0 (3 c• .....-1 •r 1 P. 0D 0 010 7 44 H 23 2H H P. N H N 0 0 0 _ N U •rl 0 N ri 0 U N 0 N N 0 1 O ij � O U a C N N 0 ..-1 [G UWH •r-1 01 11 r• N0 0 G •HN a•i C C G 0 qO NTN3 rO RI a U O x�•rlH . b CU 0) HaN 0 440 b O 4UAN O u0 L b0.u > U a H O 7 N 11 H N G N ,xNAN P. P. N 1+ N .3-1G UH414 •0 +N1 0 G H 0 N 0 7 0. 4-1 •H T N H 0' H 7 0 77. O•' CI A •H 00 H N 0 U 11 . .0 .-I A 'H ro 11 '0 •d 0 N H +1 +� a !n 11 11 0 N 0 H 0 N N G H 11 N N N 11 H N •H 0 X 0 G •H 'L7 T ••-i 0 N 'd �• 0 11 N 3 G N O H ro N G N N N 3 N U N 0 •rl 00) U 0 0 0) V 0 0 6 G N .0 U O H G H 0 by H b N 0 JHJ n C 0 3 r° -I U N W (00 •rr4 4-'1-4 N 04 A 11 N N 0 H N U U 0 0 33-4rl b H .0 3 N 11 14 00 o 00 .i •0 A H N7 N T .0 0 N O 11 N H N C N n. •0 q •rl = N H • H0 ° C N C w 0 N O U . 14 Nb rN 11 W N •H rom N ,.Z 0 ' H N 11 H N H 11 •H 11 H N ,C G Cil 3-4 7N N C "� • d H C G 44 NN uN 'U •rN N •r44N H O 0 0 W N N o u b H N HN w 11 • G w 03 •r-1 ro d H •H N ,G 'U o• N c. N Ga v 'o N N 7 H•H H 11 11 N p H H 0 0 Hw JJ N U 0 NroH d N 'd T N •ri 11 O CU aO N N ON 3 3 H 00 HG N• tel•T A H N U a r . >7 0 0 N N N 00 0 -N H U T1 G 3 2 wAo•H TAH u+1 P. •r-1N 0. 0 0 N ..-r N 4a H 0 .cu •• ^d 7o bH H x 0 G% •H 0. 00O ed N'O H N NA N ^T N •r1 U N 'd 'd '0 0 0 'd T O o ff c•-• 0 co 0OI 7 C O N T H 0D rN 00 N 0 O X O ' H HI 1 O A 11 0 N •ri O N 04 01 01 01) NO N T N G N N A 41 N A 0 U N C •n (0 . H H G .14 41 0 U T N ri 0 N C aro 11 0 (0 H H N O N H HI n. G w U 01 14 b G O '0 O NG J1 N 11 H N N 0 •H 11 N 'd THA H N 3 circ at 4 N aro H N 0) 41 ,0 00 0 O N T O 0 0(0 G N G 44' i 'd N C •1-1 •--1 11 H 3GvH44 re N 4 CC r-1° NG N •r-1 CO N +1 4r-4 a 60 • v c1 • 0 • 1,� N 3 +- i- 7 a u N G E 1U0 u1HI o ,W i 3-4 •i N H 3 41 H G N H N 0 1v c N , G uHT 00 0oo n ° 0 0 •ri m "4 a 00 v CO a 3 U G 11 0 N ro W •H ,G N N •1T• 0 N 7 A •.1 H C O H 3 U N H 0 N N 11 a' i`• H N N a s 0C.1 0 3 .0 7 1 3 ,a N c +1 7 c• ,G H b 11 b a G N N T N U T N 11 N N a U N H H C 0 N 0 11 it•rl N 11 N N H 11 c0 H U u c• N O N H 7 N v N C .0 > H N 0 N N O H N 04 G A N H 0 0 A N 7 0 A E •rl L H C b 0 N 11 N N ,C N 0 H TJ 0 N44 a 7 T N N •r1 0 CO CO 0• 3 E U 40 a 43-1 N T 5 .1-10.11 H 1.1 N 0 0. U 0 0 11 11 U .0 N '0 N O u H N H N OOH 0 H C00 0 U O N H O O N ro aJ N 0 q •H U 0 NN 11.ri3 07 ON H 0 7 N H N H a N N 3 0 .0 •r-1WN NN N N 11 N Nb N •/-1 WO N 11 H ,CT N d 00 N N as >N T 44 u 0 al M 0 •r1 A 0 0 00 N 11 7 N •1 .3-1 41 N U H '0 > 7 N ('ro w No H 11 N 0 01 H U 0 A N 0 N 0 N a O N N CO N C 0 .00 Q >0).1.1 dN NN W .0 0 4-I 4-I A 1-1 0 0 0 11 0.0 H a 0 •rl A d 43 0. 44 dN 0 0 11 11 •r1 7 N G N •rl ,G O 1 N 0 N 0 7 N'o T'd .G T C •rl N O •rl > N > N N 0 N 11 .CP 00(0 •H •ri A 0 11 H N •H]a N N 11 J H N 'd O .0•ri t4 .0 11 N .G N 44 t1 !` N 00 11 H 3 N ,C N H- a1 b 0. 11 O N 11 .0 0 H a r%I H 11 7 P. N N 'd U O G 3 CO a U U N A N CO O N co 00 N •d H N 7 I N u O H ro G u •ri 0 .0 a 11 N 7 O 7 N O N H co t1 N ,C •r1 N G •34 ,C O G .0 N .0 N 4-1 0 H U S • a '0 a ro ro H N '0 a •r1 W ,G a •HN 7 3 H ,.0 N 3 +1 3 •r1 3 00 3 'd 11 N N O •H N 0) 4.1 >•d 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0) ,C H 0 H H W H 0 H P4 N N • 11 CO N 0 d N 0 .H .G w 00 '0Hror H.1U 0a H• 01 N x0• • •33-1H H G H 0 00 0 0 40 0444,0 ,1 N0 N '1N uN N N .H N0 N N G 1 aG aN r H N , a 4 1 0X •u ' �:f�• �. cy O 33" "�N O O W' N O • •ri H N W N '0 H N 0 0 14 - H0 /Q uo C ro0.u o, I 00 +r',i 44 0O '0 ( -;121 X al N° N • G 000 4 N •r°i c00 'tl 11 U H N N N 00.+1 ° H0 NN 1O W50 H 0 0 3', 0 0)00 N 0 01 0 0 U N,_7 T 14 H 00 N W N H ro 0 CO • 0 0 •�-I '1H1 (0 '0 0 C 100 •(01 O r+ p 4-4 13 - 0 H 0 N A 44 H ro N a a N • u 0 0 O 4-4 q;N 3 Id ro O N 4 H ro,C•rl 4-1 iU N • t1 > H 0 H N w 0 ,NC 01 4-1 T7 N 0 7 O U ',NC . ro N 444 `y 0 T ro (14 H • °u N H • p A• N G N 00 0 4-1 O N 14 014•• 'r1 01 O 0 1-4 0 HI HI N H H r° -I W 0 h N H N N 1°1 0 N 0) 111 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 H H HI 44 N ,`l. •r1 0 N N > N N H 7 N . 44 U (0 0 4 >°, N 14 0 1 H N N G •rl N 14 Z u 0.a 6 m 0 A 0 11 L d 0 N 0 JTY MA GER Meredith FAinn 945-7616 CITY ATTORNEY Charles Willman DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Bob Standerfer 945-6481 December 10, 1980 806 Cooper Avenue Mr. Ray Baldwin County Planning Director Garfield County Annex 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Ray: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (303) 945-5462 The Glenwood Springs Planning Commission has reviewed the special use permit application submitted by the Glenwood Partnership for the Glenwood Business Center. The Commission unanimously adopted the attached motion concerning the application. It expresses concerns similar to those I raised with you and Davis at our meeting Tuesday. The basic fault in the application is its lack of information. I will be pleased to attend a meeting with you and Mr. Diemoz concerning informational and procedural requirements of the application. In the meantime, the City will be reviewing the water supply situation relative to this major project. Thanks for your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, John Fernaikdez Director of Planning City of Glenwood Springs Enclosure JMF/pks "qMTN' DEC 511980 1 MOTION APPROVED BY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 10, 1980 1169-80 - Consider a referral from the County Planning Office - The Glenwood Partnership is seeking a Special Use Permit from Garfield County for permission to establish a 16.4 acre, 230,000 square foot mixed-use business center. The Glenwood Business Center would be located southwest of the Donegan/Mel-Ray Road intersection in West Glenwood, adjacent to and north of the proposed shopping center to be developed by Ainbinder & Associates. Motion on 1169-80: Commissioner Reed moved, seconded by Commissioner Law, that item 1169-80 come in under subdivision regulations; that a joint county and city site review be arranged; that that the county and city jointly communicate and cooperate on the whole project; that all the items Mr. Fernandez mentioned be looked at and specified; that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the new county road be at least four lanes; that the county be made totally aware of the water problem and that this problem be resolved prior to any action; that the county check with the City engineer to determine if there is adequate water; that the water appurtenant to the land shall be deeded to the City. AYES: Gates, Kaufman, Law, Reed, Gamba. Zemlock NAYES: None ABSTAIN: None The Motion was carried. Ainbinder Bramalea Executive Offices Ainbinder Bramalea Shopping Centres 5850 San Fe cue. Sr'e 500 Houston Texas 77057 713)978-7800 March 23, 1981 Mr. Ray Baldwin Garfield County Planning Director 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado Re: GSP 703 Dear Mr. Baldwin: ,} D 5-qi N.. at.— it7 , APR 2 1981 GARFIELD CO. PLANNER Reference is hereby made to your Public Notice of a hearing on April 6, 1981 in connection with the zoning request of The Glenwood Partnership. Such notice encouraged adjoining landlowners to transmit their opinions to you by letter if they could not personally appear at the meeting. Our Construction and Design Department has reviewed the plans of The Glenwood Partnership in connection with the land described in your Public Notice. Without exception, every engineer and architect in the department commented that the design reflected a good deal of conscientious effort on the part of the landlowner to use its land in a way that would minimize interference with surrounding land. Thus, The Ainbinder Company and Bramalea Limited both wholeheartedly endorse the zoning request of The Glenwood Partnership. Very truly yours, AINBINDER/BRAMALEA SHOPPING CENTRES By: AJJ/gjs cc: Mr. Dale Ligon Mr. Floyd Diemoz 318 20th Street Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Aaron Johnsto ,/ -- 4 Amei General Cou el Walter D. Dorman 0449 130 Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Mr. Ray Baldwin Garfield County Planning Department 2014 Blake Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Baldwin: Reference is made to your notice concerning the Glenwood Partnership's application for a commercial Park in West Glenwood. As adjacent land owners, we have no objection to the proposed commercial park. However, we would like to see the building and parking lot set -back from 130 Road increased to allow for landscaping and screening. It is a radical land use change to go from residential on one side of a street to commercial on the other. We feel that it is imperative to plant a vegetation barrier along the south side of 130 Road to buffer between existing homes and the proposed commercial park. This would seem to entail a set -back of at least 25 feet. or MAR 1 0 1981 GRIWIELU CO. PLANNER February 5, 1981 Garfield County Commissioners Garfield County Court House Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 RE: Revised Glenwood Business Center Submittal Dear County Commissioners: Enclosed is a revision of our original Glenwood Business Center submittal dated November 24, 1980. The revisions are on pages 6B, 9, 12 and 13, and are as follows: PAGE 6B. The revision adds this page describing uses excluded from the project. PAGE 9. The original submittal shows a site plan illustrating 65% office and 35% non -office space. The revision uses the same site plan to illustrate 50% office and 50% non -office space. The site plan is illustrative only with the final ratio of office to non -office space depending upon future market demand (see page 7). PAGE 12. The original assumed a parking formula of 1 space per 300 sq.ft. of office space in a pure office building. The revision assumes 1 parking space per 200 sq.ft. of office area and 1 space per 1000 sq.ft. of warehouse type area. PAGE 13. Northern Property Line Setback: The original was not clear as to setbacks. The revision states that setback require» ments will be met. Southern Property Line Setback: The original assumed this property line as a rear yard requiring a 7.5 ft. set back. The revision determines the southern property line as a side yard requiring 10 ft. setback. All buildings will meet this requirement. Building Heights: The original indicated that the County maximum building height of 25 ft. would be exceeded by 3 feet. The revisions states that the 25 ft. requirement would be met. The 25 ft. stipulated in the code excludes parapet walls and noninhabitable building appurtenances ( see Garfield County Zoing Code, page 63). Our building height estimates in some conditions included parapet walls and mechanical spaces on the roof. Thank you Floyd 19iemoz your consideration. Glenwood Partnership November 24, 1980 (Revised 2/9/81) Garfield County Commissioners Garfield County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Dear County Commissioners: RE: FRAMEWORK PLAN Glenwood Parnership is pleased to present a unique develop- ment proposal for 16.4 acres of West Glenwood commercial land. Our intent is to build one of the finest business complexes in the area. The development will be retained under one ownership, and will be designed and managed to serve local business needing quality office, showroom, light assembly, warehouse, service facilities and general business space. We would like to complete construction of Phase 1 (2.6 acres) of the Glenwood Business Center in the summer of 1981. Full development of all 16.4 acres will depend upon future market demand and could take 5 to 10 years to realize. When fully developed, the Center will contain approximately 230,000 square feet of business space and 2 or 3 dwelling units for maintenance and security personel. Thank you for considering our project. We look forward to working with you. Very truly yours, Floyd Diemoz Glenwood Partnership 318 20th Street P.O. Box 326 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 (303) 945-6712 BUSINESSES EXCLUDED. The Glenwood Business Center will exclude the following uses listed in the limited commercial code: Animal clinics and shelters; boarding and rooming houses; hotel, motel, lodge; Church, community building; day nursery and school; auditorium; public building for administration; fraternal lodge; art gallery; museum; library; Hospital; clinic; nursing or convalescent home; Wholesale and retail establishment selling mobile homes, feed and feed lots; Bank; barber shop; beauty shop; laundromat; drycleaning; mortuary; reading room; private club; theater and indoor recreation; Repair and service of automobiles; vehicular rental; Mobile home; parking lot or garage as principal use of the lot; Automotive service station or washing facility; camper park; mobile home park; Drive-in establishment where the customer receives goods or services while occupying a vehicle; water impoundments. 68 Market Demand BUILD OUT TIME. Since Glenwood Partnership plans to own the entire project and will be selective about the types of tenants it serves, the total potential market will be reduced (see restrictive controls). The project build out time, therefore, could be 5 to 10 years. With a lengthy build out time, the exact composition of the market is not known. We estimate that somewhere between 30% and 80% of all leasable space will be office space, with the remainder being non -office usages. THE FRAMEWORK PLAN. The framework plan on the following page has been designed to allow phased development and to accomodate either a high or low office ratio in the future. THE SITE PLAN. The Site Plan on page 9 illustrates the Center with roughly 50% office space. The appearance, character, and func- tion of the Center would remain essentially the same regardless of the future office ratios. PHASE 1. Phase 1 development will coincide with the construction of the adjacent Shopping Center which is scheduled to begin in the spring of 1981. The Phase 1 Schematic Plan on page 11 presents a building with 45% office use and 55% non -office use. While the use, size, and configuration is our best guess of Glenwood Business needs, we will have a better picture once we contact potential users. For this reason, we plan to advertize the center immediately so that better market information can be incorporated into the first building design. 7 County Road 130 ■• •• MI .. •■ 50 100 150 GLENWOOD BUSINESS CENTER SITE PLAN SHOWING 50% OFFICE 9 USE COMMENTS Site Coverage SITE PLAN SHOWING 50% OFFICE PHASE 1 PRELIMINARY PLAN Total Land Area 16.4 Acres Minus 0.6 Acres for County Road ROW -- 15.8 Acres to be developed. 15.8 Acres 688,800 sq.ft. 2.6 Acres 116,200 sq.ft. Building Area 231,100 sq.ft. (34% coverage) 30,800 sq.ft. (27% coverage) Paved Roads, Parking & Service Courtyards (No. of Parking Spaces) County Code requires 1 parking space per 200 sq.ft. of office space, excluding warehouse areas. The parking formula used for the illustrative site plan is 1 space per 200 sq.ft. of office and 1 space per 1000 sq.ft. of warehouse type space. See parking note below. 338,100 sq.ft. (49% coverage) ( 711 spaces) 64,600 sq.ft. (56% coverage) (90 spaces) Sidewalks All sidewalks are 5.5 feet wide. 21,800 sq.ft. (3% coverage) 2,800 sq.ft. (2% coverage) Landscaping Within the Final Property Line The Complex will be handsomely land- scaped and maintained. Phase l however will have a higher coverage ratio. 97,800 sq.ft. (14% coverage) 18,000 sq.ft. (15% coverage) Landscaping Between the These areas will be landscaped and 30,000 sq.ft. Property Line and the maintained. (+4% coverage) County Roads. 3,400 sq.ft. (+3% coverage) Other Residential Uses are allowed by right in the Commercial Code 2 to 3 dwelling units for the manager, caretaker & security no dwelling units in Phase 1 PARKING NOTE: The parking formula we have adopted is being successfully used for office/ warehouse type buildings throughout California, Oregon and Colorado. For pure office buildings, many communities are finding that the ratio of 1 space per 200 sq.ft. of office floor area can result in excessive parking. In the future, this imbalance may become more pronounced as increased car pooling and gasoline prices reduce single passenger auto use. While the illustrative site plan shown in this report more than meets existing code requirements, our intent will be to monitor parking trends so that future phases do not result in excessive parking areas. 12 Setbacks and Heights ITEM COMMERCIAL CODE FRAMEWORK PLAN PHASE 1 SCHEMATIC PLAN Northern Property Line Setback (County Road 130) Front yard:set back--25ft. Buildings will not front onto from lot line or 50 ft. from County Road 130 and will meet road centerline, whichever setback requirements. is greater. Not applicable Western Property Line Setback (New County Road) Front yard: set back--25ft. Buildings will be set back from lot line or 50 ft. from roughly 70 ft. from the road centerline, whichever property line. is greater. Building is 93 ft. from the property line. Eastern Property Line Setback Rear Yard: set back --7.5 ft. Buildings would be set back Not applicable at least 7.5 ft. Southern Property Line Setback Side Yard: set back--10.0ft. Buildings would be set back Building to be 25 ft. to 30 at least 10.Oft. ft. from line. Building Heights 25 feet to the top of a flat One story: approx. 17 feet One story: approx. 17 feet roof, excluding parapet walls Two story: approx. 25 feet and noninhabitable building appurtenances. 13 L.P. ZANCANELLA, Chief VIC ROSA, Asst.Chief MARTIN ZEMLOCK, Captain JACK MITCHELL, Secy. Treas. MIKE FATTOR, Lieut. Glenwood Springs Fire Department Member of Colorado State Firemen's Association Box 2043 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Garfield County Planning and Zonning Ref: Glenwood Business Center : The Following are a list of Fire Dept. Coments on this project. 1. Fire Plugs should be instaled before const is allowed to start. 2. Internal Driveways are to narrow through parking areas to manuevor fire equipment. 3. No plan for snow storage or snow removal are shown and these areas could be a problem for the fire department in the winter time. 4. Some of the fire plug locations need shifted to better serve buildings. 5. Square footage of buildings is large enough to require them to sprinkler systems. 6. This size project will have a large impact on the fire Dist. and we will be looking at more equipment to serve these large commercial developments with. Both with equipment and sta. locations. So maybe the P&Z should consider this in approving this plan, and similar large developments. 7. All fire plugs should be of the type that have the large pumper 0 outlet on them and open counter clock wise to match all existing hydrants on the Dept. DIEMOZ CONSTRUCTION P. 0. Box 326 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (303) 945.6712 JOB SHEET NO. OF CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCALE DATE DATE C1141 2 i9/ /;C:7,17( ) e(d )01(S) /ci 1721C') /74 4-; <],33 L 0 c AL) 00(C/2 «jF-) s, -7e(/ /11 c. 17c) ::Thil)Pc Oft n Huct. ,)/( / / 1Li( 11CLC: t? I n S17 :)1(./ Li 11 1SL e f/ '-1// .1-1)6 O.' - C 2, LCo/Xs 1-)7y) / . 11(2/ "ix) lard tit /1". -1-74 fit) DivisLs /4L212±capy)y 1,1i5/9/)s ('6cc &yfd» (lc 6-'61 dc (tpcc c f (ss covey -61e p I Cie I +Art CY re ct._ CUICrik S17 -2H) 7,:.7)?, tr.: JCL / Lel Yld6Z pctc . iS r t-TaL tmq, F30, fitY Lt. e ) 'a lied, Ile r. Z.67) pi/712C PL../9-4/2 11Jct EIiecktdp 16.;.(A) (cirtd -112,24 ne/ed J22L Lndcccpiici F/ i --(1q cc)6., (1724c -SI an(A64,1)nc1 bi4 h/1 //at 116 /-!s p(65crit 130tIcittr. 9 (06:0)2 .3(-Lid-/-fi -He ,-7.31.v.t. H big:G.- /471/4, //C/7 DIEMOZ CONSTRUCTION P. 0. Box 326 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 (303) 945.6712 JOB SHEET NO OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE '- �l) 2A‘ 1(./(S (S' SCALE • 1rettS C:ti'^�I �?.0)Z , Ili at t,. 1,,,e1:30. I')(.1 -- ept t(114 rd 4/1 Z /.c. C�(.- I:: T-'--t-).-2y- (_kc. yLL.(,,t.-1 Li),T_, .-L,) C/c; cl d?.'/ </ /7-) '1-'6: -?=c f :5C t 06062 t if, 120 71/7/47 E. uiREP, 6e rbi-16 r O V t Oe S Int rtttThfkii C pe41 PC c cs P6peo x..'.s venae f 5 &' Letoci c1 11(2.6 14 Lcincisc4-7�.;(1, Vit Loog g073&f.7L' G F CU11Q, G ec;%L. r CSD Fr i 'eons 'c�r�c� u �z e ` c, c i) S /At1 26:, c� uot)-1- 6.• - c_� , /cry. (c venci_.)-4,Z 4 / IV Jr Q �' t Vj / - / :6 / ' " ei.) rte/ cege Az, e C;c� lcu(c pay((", oc.1 i , EC?u I reOV/ftd J rc2 TILL, ►a ictuh c ---- L.LI/1 ut ) Ove --'r .-ua L Lar k S(7c _r ed. `��>C�l� 6Ct.1.4 ci/J �(?i1Z-f ' ��b-_ fIY�1 -,c'r''ec_) ``t z /7 /7z e. • 67 )-(-?e . -r/ie �� � �,�/ h 0.5 /2 t lc, I:- you (l�c�( CY�Q . 7�"�L' . Ll��.rC_.5��� i�c"--{ ti MEMO •T0: PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS FROM: Davis Farrar GLENWOOD BUSINESS CENTER COMMERCIAL PARK SPECIAL USE PERMIT Concerns: 1. The project is directly tied to Ainbinders Shopping Center being developed ie: 1) On site drainage is to be handled with Ainbinders storm drains, 2) The new County Road is necessary for the project and has to be constructed, 3) Utility lines installed on Ainbinders project will serve this project. 2. The uses in the park will be limited to a maximum of 3 residential uses, commercial establishments, wholesale and retail establishments, personal services establishments, general services establishments, offices, and community buildings. 3. There shall be a maximum of 9 buildings on the site for the above uses. 4. All improvements required to service each phase of the project must be completed before a certificate of occupancy will be issued for that phase. The improvements installation will be subject to review by the building inspection department and the planning department. The improvements on the site shall include: necessary roads, water lines, sewer lines, fire pro- tection, parking, landscaping, storm drainage, utilities, and any other improvements necessary for the function of any particular phase. 5. Some provision must be made along the Westerly and Northerly perimeters of the site to provide for safe pedestrian conveyance along those portions of the site ie: sidewalks or easements that may or niay not include bike - paths. 6. The new County Road proposed on the Westerly boundary of the site from the Ainbinder property boundary to County Road 130 must be constructed and completed, at the developers cost, before a certificate of occupancy will be issued for any building on the site. 806 Cooper Avenue February 6, 1981 Mr. Davis Farrar County Planning Director 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Davis: js COMMUNITY DEVELOP! DEPART NT (303) 945-5462 The City Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and discussed the proposed Glenwood Business Center. At its meeting Wednesday night, February 4, the Commission approved the enclosed motion urging the County to attach certain technical and procedural conditions to any special use permit issued on the project. The motion references certain staff recommendations. These are included in the memorandum from the planning office, also dated February 4, 1981 The City appreciates the opportunity for joint site review. A representative from the City will attend the County P&Z meeting Monday night. Sin erely yo rs, ....J. John M. Fernandez Director of Planning City of Glenwood Springs Enclosures JMF/pks /f69-80 - Consider the proposed Glenwood Business Center for the purpose of making recommendations to the Garfield County Planning Commission in its consideration of the special use permit requested for an office warehouse complex. Motion by Planning and Zoning Commission, February 4, 1981. Commissioner Gamba moved, seconded by Commissioner Durrett,to recommend that should the Ainbinder Shopping Center not go, the permit for the Glenwood Business Center be dissolved; regarding water, a special use permit not be issued until the City Council issues a certificate to the effect that all points of agreement in the contract between West Glenw•••. and the City have been met and , is available; that in the event that is satisfied, installation be to the specifications of the City of Glenwoo ufficient tion be made of ufficient right- L_of-way)to widen County oad 130 to provide for and cause to e constructed as a part of this project a bike and pedestrian way along Donegan Road; that all staff_co is he_fo11pwed regardin ±-landscapin .wate fire.. "Protection etc.; that any permit that is issue e valid for up to one year and that only the first phase be given a permit and that the first phase be what can be expected to be completed within one year. AYES: GAMBA, DURRETT, KAUFMAN, AND LAW NAYES: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE The motion was carried. Planning Couuuission Planning Office )4 v (0 4-1 4-1 NU E co 0 O U O) U u N o bO o •r1 C, •rO4 0 t:4 o UH 0 (24 f>~ February 4, bO v • •r0 44 H CO 14 r� c• a - 14 ON CO 0 T rov14 cri co U 0 C u M u wh acro H u C v v v 0 10 •H 4JQ0O) U CO CO A 0 ro rIu )m - m 0) Ca 6'o u 4ON 0 0 0 3 C ra ro a) r-1 rl u0,0 CO 1.0 0) r4 v v 0 v 1a a'd ro)4 n v r-• v 3 4 a g u v ro 4) 4-) $4 v cn ater/Waste Water co u m 14 ro M r• N C 0 my co aa)) •r-4 v H ro N N uro 0 v •.a re •rl i H O • -I .n r1 Rf •rI U) JJ oct a co v Sa c• v v rob 0O u •(034) Ca 4-1 8 0) CU '0 (/) •r-1 0 CO 0 14r4 N r4 0 m 3 CO 3 u 0) bo•rI 4) 0 .•0 u co 3 14 X,c 0 vw- 0 C mo (p3 N M 3 0) 1) 0 r1 N m roco co a0i u •r40 •r1 rI H a 0 • (13 0 4-) co v •rI 4.) Q) a _-) 4a 4J r 4 •4 o0 71w Responsibility unknown. should be for -00) v o rola 14 Oro a ore ro 3 al a) v 9 0 A U) o re CO I—I � 0 •ri H �m 4-) 3 v 444) 4) o v •r4 • '0 m 0 •`a ba r v ca rc). .O P: O N N a) u) b 0 CN4-) roO o rr4 1cn 04 ro 0 cd co 00 co 0 P � 0 $4 4 •O 144 0))4 al 0 ro u o c0 ra H •r1 a v u co 040 H"0 v v rI 4-J o 4) 104 cn 0 'd N SCJ co ,O 0 co 0 0 4)) 04 Oro° o o ro 0 a 0 '0 0A o u 0 0 0 k 14 C w N 0014 440) 40-70 v• 0 0 $ 14 t. O + .0 � i CO H E• 1:1 O •a•rI C •4J-1 04-1 r4 4J u •C 4J 0 U N T $4 O 'd O 14 u44 14 a) ra 3 9 .,4 C 4J •r4 rI N 1) al T O ., C 14 O'er G 3 >w 3 0 <,A ancnw a. ro O w 00 co H Va CO td 7 3 v aC 0 u •rI NC cal 4a u ra 0) • 4-1 3 4 m ) ri 4-,C 00 0 N hat the u u ro OD ca H (014 ca a) O v v CO u 4a .Oro w H 'd N .0 O,ro3 0 (0 00 WM 0 0 co 0 r4 rn C 0 C u u 14 cr oo04 CO a) 4J a) 4J x JJ —4 v v N 0•r4 14 4 co ,C 3 r--) meco a) raa'iv1P>4 v4 0 u -4 N .0 4J C 0 C CO uro N 8•r u4 Hut aal O)4aa)ico a) 0 c Q • 14 0 • r I 3°000 c°0J ('jE 0 CO •ra 4-) A .0 0 0 - �bO • Cro4-)a) 0co0)4 vo°bov 10+r`41ro c0 0) r4 m P. P.1-) 3 P) _ N u'J, 000)r4 7, .4-1H (Q 4-) 0 1J ,1] 1J 73 g0 )4N0ra 0 v •rl r) .r) m rl w 0lOiu 0av40m u rl N M �f V) 10 CO Police Chief 4J 0 0 0. rt v 0 0 - re a)H D,a) co 0E -0 14rO 4-1 w .1-1 10 • 1Ird-I �ro ro 0 bO 0 0 v op u co o U C 14 0 4J 1.I v •r1 (Q •r3 •d 0.4 v 0 0).r. A •rr1 ro N co •ri 0 .n F ro 0 01-1 0 0 a4CO a) ) 0 a 0O i • 4- v u,CA coil 0.3344.0 N bON H a)0acna 00•0 0 • bO•x •H N L1-1 44-1 0 0 4) N ° 10 4-1 H •H Pa C. 0 'd I CO u N C •SOD -0 0 cu •0 O N O O roOOQH Prna) aa))a)14ua 0,0CA. Na00014 • r4 .0 N J-1 a 4a ) 44 r-4 •rr4a) ra C u •.a H 0 O a) S4 .0 re o..0 •N 0 0 ra •n a.CbO,AO •r cn 4 u am'0 v 0 bop v O v 0-H1-100000 OrI �N bO�° 4°' 0 O.J G� 4) •r1 4J C (U u (i) a) Q) 0 4a 34 CO40 1100 y,COO u$4O CO RI ° 0•r-Iro O) ° w 0 L 0. 4 a) (1)0)'d004a)R3 Hro'oC N 044 c0 4-) ,C .0 0 •H C) 0 Cvwu ua.uvmola D 4-) 144 4-)-) bbl) 0) ,C C0 N 4-) N 4a b xuro°o0 14u•r4 (1) I-4 4$4 acro CO $4 0,O 0•.a 0 0 1 al0 44-0 . y 0 Lk 0(0 co 4) a) •r4 a) 0 v •H 0 0 ro �pxtEcn u.o u 14 01-14-1r O and O 'U •rCI N -IN N cd Hu14uar4Ha)a3u6b4OCO v u a) N 0 O Oro N N .01401-.0 140)$414 0040 H 0 CO a34J Oro c0 a c0 v H 4) v u r1 r ri td) a) HI on •H0 03 r1 m CO ..0 ra C i a 0 •rl a) 0 A'd N - I u a) CO a r v v w u s+ •r1 ca ca •I 0w 0 1-1 0 '0 CO Eavo 4J um N Os) 0 F4 w a) ra 0) G 0 •r4 v •r1 .x w a) 34 N D? -+N •r-1 CU .1-30 •ri +J r -I N .0 a) q A 4 H OD E •C A rl 4-1 O 0 tp rl H H w m ,. ra ..-1 •ri 0m0 .3"3 4 b LH A .1-4 H y H 3 0 r -I. E J-1 CO •J 0 OD0 ,C..0 N t H)4 •r1 0H a) a) m a•� u A W ra1 a) ca • ri • a�u3u cU3 000•r1 CU •v 00 ba 0 co QD vv v s+ mH a cd • .1-1 O Ow a) 1J 0 O • co-' uCII 0 •0 W ;0-4 u v v+-Jw a ca•.C)4G a)a) oo J.) ,C U O N $ H ra HH •rt N O o @u W cow ,c ro 14 a) • • .4)0 a) 04,-, 0,0014-1-0a) 0w�a) •r0 v a • i0Oro 0 �ua •rl P N Cl? )4 W m 0 O w •rl a) 0 al ro ra 0-0 .c N 0 0 0 ••-i - ai H 4 O U t 0 U) 4 T) Page 1 February 19, 1981 MEMO TO: PLANNING COMNIISSION MEMBERS FROM: Davis Farrar GLEN4WD BUSINESS CENTER 1. Maintainence of the waterlines within the property boundaries will be the responsibility of the project owner. Control valves will be installed at the property boundaries where water lines inside the project comnect to public water lines. All public water used on the project will be metered with secondary metering installed to meter water used for irriga- tion of landscaping. 2. a) The location(s) of fire hydrant(s) necessary to service each phase of the project shall be subject to review by the Fire Department for compliance with codes, prior to the issuance of any building permits. Fire hydrants and necessary waterlines to serve the hydrants shall be in place and functioning for each phase at the time the foundation walls reach ground level and at the time of final foundation inspection by the County Building Department. b) Fire protection, where required, within buildings shall be subject to review and recommendation, as per. code, by the fire department prior to the issuance of a building permit. c) Turn radi necessary for access, in critical areas,by firetrucks that will serve the project will be subject to review and recomendation by the fire department prior to issuance of building permits. d) Uses in buildings that require special fire protection consideration or special construction shall be designated prior to the issuance of a building permit and subject to review, as designated by code, by the Building Department, Planning Department and Fire Department. These uses shall be those designated in the U.B.C. as "hazard" (H) uses. e) Areas for snow storage shall be designated prior to the issuance of building permits and subject to review for compliance with code by the Building Department, Planning Department, and Fire Department. 3. The project owner shall confer with the County Sheriff's Department for advice on security matters prior to the installation of security lighting and landscaping. 4. No building permits shall be issued for any phase until: 1. There are sufficient water taps available to serve that phase for all of its water requirements frau a public system. 2. Or proof that a private water system will adequately serve all of the water needs of the project. 5. a. A 5 foot sidewalk shall be installed along the Westerly end of the property in the New County Road ROW before a certificate of occupancy will be issued for the first phase. The construction of the sidewalk shall be at the expense of the developer. b. A 5 foot sidewalk will be constructed along the Northerly portion of the property boundary at such time that pedestrian traffic along County Road #130 warrants. This sidewalk may be along the Northerly or Southerly ROW of County Road #130 to be determined by the County Road and Bridge Supervisor and subject to his review. The costs of such construction shall Page 2 GLENWOOD BUSINESS CENTER be carried in fair shares by the developer and property owners adjoining the sidewalk. A reimbursement agreement may be drawn which includes future developers impacting the sidewalk to contribute their cost share of construction of the sidewalk. 6. The project, as proposed, is directly tied to the Ainbinder Shopping Center ie: a. On site drainage is to be handled through Ainbinders storm drains. b. The New County Road is necessary for the project and has to be constructed. c. Utility lines installed on Ainbinders project will serve the Glenwood Business Center. In the event the Ainbinder project is not constructed, the Glenwood Business Center must stand on its own. 7. All on-site and off-site improvements required to service each phase of the project must be completed before a certificate of occupancy will be issued forthat phase. The improvements will be subject to review by the Building Department, Planning Department, and the Fire Department for compliance with code and conditions of the special use permit. The improvements shall include: Necessary roads, water lines, sewer lines, fire hydrants, parking, landscaping, storm drainage, utilities, sidewalks, and any other improvements necessary for the function of any particular phase. 8. The New County Road proposed 'on the Westerly boundary of the site frau Highway 6 and 24 to County Raod 4130, must be constructed before any certificate of occupancy will be issued for the project. 9. Landscaping will be completed for each phase of the project as proposed in the application and in compliance with the requirements of the zone district. 10. The uses in the park will be limited to a maximum of 3 residential uses, Co rcial establishments, wholesale and retail establishments, personal services establishments, general services establishments, offices, and community buildings. Page 1 March 3, 1981 MEMO TO: PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS FROM: Davis Farrar GLENWOOD BUSINESS CENTER 1. Maintainence of the waterlines within the property boundaries will be the responsibility of the Project owner. Control valves will be installed at the property boundaries where water lines inside the project connect to public water lines. All public water used on the project will be metered with secondary metering installed to meter water used for irriga- tion of landscaping, unless otherwise agreed to by the West Glen Water District. 2. a) The location(s) of fire hydrant(s) necessary to service each phase of the project shall be subject to review by the Glenwood Springs Fire Department for compliance with codes, prior to the issuance of any building permits. Fire hydrants and necessary waterlines to serve the hydrants shall be in place and functioning for each phase at the time the foundation walls reach ground level and at the time of final foundation inspection by the County Building Department. b) Fire protection, where required, within buildings, shall be subject to review and recomendation, as per code, by the Rural Fire District department, prior to the issuance of a building permit. c) Turn radii necessary for access in critical areas, by firetrucks that will serve the project will be provided. d) Uses in buildings that require special fire protection consideration or special construction shall be designated prior to the issuance of a building permit and subject to review, as designated by code, by the Building Department, Planning Department and Fire Department. These uses shall be thosed designated in the U.B.C. as "hazard" or (H) uses. e) Areas for snow storage shall be designated prior to the issuance of building permits and subject to review for compliance with code by the Building Department, Planning Department, and Fire Department. 3. The project owner shall confer with the County Sheriff's Department for advice on security matters prior to the installation of security lighting and landscaping. 4. No building permits shall be issued for any phase until: 1. There are sufficient water taps available to serve that phase for all of its water requirements from a public system. 2. Or proof that a private water system will adequately serve all of the water needs of the project. 5. a) A 5 foot sidewalk shall be installed along the Westerly end of the property in the New County Road ROW before a certificate of occupancy will be issued for the first phase. The construction of the sidewalk shall be at the expense of the developer. b) The owner of the property will be expected to contribute to the finan- cing of a sidewalk along County Road 130, when it is deemed necessary by the County. Page 2 GLENWOOD BUSINESS CENTER 6. The project, as proposed, is directly tied to the Ainbinder Shoppina Center ie: a. On site drainage is to be handled through Ainbinders storm drains. b. The New County Road is necessary for the project and has to be contructed. c. Utility lines installed on Ainbinders project will serve the Glenwood Business Center. In the event the Ainbinder project is not constructed, the Glenwood Business Center must stand on its own. 7. All on-site and off-site improvements required to service each phase of the project must be completed before a certificate of occupancy will be issued for that phase. The improvements will be subject to review by the Building Department, Planning Department, and the Fire Department for compliance with code and conditions of the special use permit. The improvements shall include: Necessary roads, water lines, sewer lines, fire hydrants, parking, landscaping, storm drainage, utilities, sidewalks, and any other improvements necessary for the function of any particular phase. 8. The New County Road proposed on the Westerly boundary of the site from Highway 6 and 24 to County Road #130, must be constructed to County specifications, before any certificate of occupancy will be issued for the project. 9. Landscaping will be a minimum of 12% for the entire project. 10. The uses in the for the purpose establishments, establishments, buildings. park will be limited to a maximum of 3 residential uses, of management, security, and maintainence for Commercial wholesale and retail establishments, personal services general services establishments, offices, and community 11. The maximum number of buildings on the site will he W. GARFIELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SPECIAL/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INSPECTION FORM Date Inspected �p-,D..,/-6%.E3 Inspectorc=i) a c —__ Name of Operation: 4 rJ4 n' 2v,OO a /-/c,-es �c a.odD,t'9n ele a41-1A4-€49fl1fll'7LtF/tv104112- Contact Person: /=Loyfl .0/6-7-A7107-- Phone 7/c mQ2_ Phone Number: Address: Q2/ c 7y L—.112.1r>i= Notes on compliance or non-compliance w/Resolution #5)/-/x-/ and/or Permit #. wco (Reference comments by condition #) 47o C'/t/- S/ re!,/0 C...."1-77.0 tO.< Cm-c//J/ 7-762-40 ---S GO /0 ca-c>ern Z c ?-/ "--2 Co AAt/ . F ,c= e_e n-nt e:mac.» c'cz / /We e�oe'E „-nrcCtirC) pc -72-42-9.2-7 .74/5.oez Tits- //A. -206.7--71,//z2/ r� c= ��-c= /9c 7-/ C�r9-T�ZO Ce>h`-, i /9- dz.),�- /3cr/c-40/4_,�('s) .--/u- ec/It sr-rr_ttc Further Action Required: