HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitGARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
10919" street, Bate 404 01e4ree& 8prhp, CO 61601
7:t
97 94849712 / Pm 9703144470 / Inrpeatlan Lae: 970-394-5003
Permit No: Parcel/Schedule No: g393 g 1 0 a o -3
Job Addrese;�
al d a (L Cf(16d,3
1 Lot No: �B[oc
....01..1.
IS
o:
Su . / Exem tical:
__P- .� r ti
de
2
ner: —7-1401,46,01.4.
Ad1drese� ilii
3 i
h:
Ph: 3... r j.
3-5
Ph:
Ph:
3
Contractor:
tD lr•.5 V\tL i
Address:
Ph:
Lic. No.
4
Architect/Engineer
...1014-1, -floti
Address j MAW 4 j S ,T
6 31'4
Ph
-4oy-Q9-S 0
Li No
�'.-S-yb'u
5
Sq. Ft. of BuildingI prj
8q. Ft. of t:
Heigh r
No. of Floors: ry
6
Use of Building:
S144414._ f -i i I2 r S I F (.0ti044 + 5
i-
Qa rl'k c.61.3
0
7
Describe Work:
M E) CO 1--) -02-0 " C1
8
Claes of Work: New U Alteration o Remove
❑ Addition ❑ Move
9
10
e: I0 Single
--(_,1 Double
Carport: ❑ Single
❑ Double
rry �y Permit 0 On -Site Sewage
i'r Disposal
❑ Site Plan
11
Valuation of W . $f/��{(��
G 1_.2J1G+UV
yy�
C.
Plan Check
t t
Adjusted Valuations:
,f-`�o."''�.
Fee:,C�� 3
^ �,
S jSix
/Iy
'ei ./Luz
(j Permit Fee: pW 0�t ,f
�`/(j�
:7 !' ti
12
Special Conditions:
J 0711. ,.,,,.1
oTICE
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST B8
ISSUED BY THIN STATE OF COLORADO.
ISS
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED 1S NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 18O DAYS, OR, IF
CONSTRUCTION SO AT A IS Y TIME AFTER OO ISNCOMM NCE .
PERIOD OF LBO DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THISOC[;
APPLICATION A/ID KNOW THE SAME To in TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL
PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNINO THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
COMPLETED wrn-uN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, THE
GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY
TO VIOLATE OR CMICEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LOCAL, LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE
OF _.:,,La aleN.
!/ i}//ylL4_ ��3- -o (eManu.
. `-
,lliFt
Total Fee:Dated
Ifo 33 .
Permit Issued:
-�p11p:
Const. Type:
J
�J.•�
Zoning:
Setbacks:
Home:
ISDS Na. Ss
Fee:
f1 e
•
to'n
DATE
:Pre DE.. ' PLIIG..EFT.
AMC) /DATE APPROVAL/DATE! 12,10/1
Orn 511 +wr+-e r)
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/0R 7HE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND
USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIEID COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. T18 SIGNER FURTHER AGREES
THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTIUICTION, AND USE' OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE FSRAIT MAY BE REVOKES BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME
NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERM' BASED UPON PANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHAM. NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING
BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF HIS CODS OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF
THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMIPIBD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTEDTHEREAFTBR DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSNiILI2IEs OR LlABLTt1ES BY GARFI ELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI
BTLI1Y FOR TMIESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER,
AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST.
1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE REND AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE [INITIAL):
c�'x..13 01_0-Z.) . D
Pvk
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door,
S. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away frons the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Badge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
**"'CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, se an the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit #
3-od- OCA
Si nature Date
Bpapplicationfeb2006
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant / 4''41 Sati@ Subdivision
Address 077 L) ccLot/Block 1.5 275
Date 1-1 Contractor D —
Qc_C-4 f; V" 2
Finished (Livable Area):
Main 2742
Upper 2 (,5
Lower
Other
6�.
Total Square Feet 5- 7 ' 74
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage:
Valuation
Crawl Space:
Valuation 0/
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open
Valuation
217 11
Total Valuation
3g1i, 35 0 -7
, /Z
5 e29
Applicant
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Building
Engineered Foundation
l,kDriveway Permit
(---Surveyed Site Plan
g,tISeptic Permit and Setbacks
'--/Grade/Topography 30%
Attach Residential Plan Review List
-/Min imum Application Questionnaire
YSubdivision Plat Notes
Fire Department Reviewfq 01/410, ("2-410II
t.„- aluation Determination/Fees
Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
Attach Conditions
p lication Signed
yl P an Reviewer To Sign Application
Parcel/Schedule No.
)(14 -404 Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms.
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zoning
Property Line Setbacks
30ft Stre. Setbacks
Flood Plan
Buildin : Height
Zoni Sign -off
• Impact Fees
A/DRC Approval
rade/Topography 40%
Planning Issues
Subdivision Plat Notes
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan
and ifs discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result
in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten, (10) occupants requires the
plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
1
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top ofthe roof,
including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor j oists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind
speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by
a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the
drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan.
(NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure
within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on
a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's
signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a
building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of
the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes t/
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks do apply.
Yes
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent pjoperties), streams or water courses?
Yes 14If?-
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property>
Yes ii//
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes k/-
6.
✓
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes ✓
7, Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces and soffits?
Yes ‘V-
8.
✓
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wind loads?
Yes ✓
9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
Yes ✓
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor j oists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all columns apd beams?
Yes {/
12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the
top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes t/
13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado Phase I certifications or phase 11 EPA certification?
Yes No
3
14. Does the plan include amasonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the IRC?
Yes No
15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rpoms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the 1RC?
Yes ✓ No
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes s/ No
17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specify s ety glazing for these areas?
Yes No
18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
Yes No
19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes
and/or covenants?
Yes No
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility
to obtain written permission front the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not
be accepted without it.
Yes '+✓ No
21. Will this be theyonly residential structure on the parcel?
Yes No if no -Explain:
22. Have two(2) S,omplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes L/
23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and
20ft. long?
Yes No
4
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction a requirements?
Yes No
25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone district?
Yes ✓ No
26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes i/ No
27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior
to the application of these changes?
Yes t/ No
28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as
well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your
building pe t?
Yes No
29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to
be called in tit 384-5043.
Yes ✓ No
30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $50.00 re -inspection fee?
Yes t✓ No
31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupancy of a building?
Yes .7 No
32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC?
Yes u7 No
5
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
Yes No
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at time o applicable inspection.
Yes No
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building pe t application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes No
36. Do you know that the local fire distijct may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes ./ No (please check with the
building department about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading
permit?
Yes
1 hereby acknowledge that 1 have read, understand and answered these questions to the
b st of my ability.
. )1. Y�,u�.�' 0
Date
Phone: tf q4-5 Q (days); (evenings)
Project Name: RO S c> Li
Project Address:
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process.
Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected, Work may not proceed without the issuance of a
permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review
the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
6
ROM : THOMSON
.FP 1 :CONVENIENT CUISINE
/ `.- --
FAX NO. : 3032201423 Mar. 20 2006 11:42AM P1
FAX NO. :9709842468 20 2006 09:56AM P2
To: Building & Planning Department
Garfield County, Colorado
From: Alexander & Dorothea Thomson
Date: March 20, 2006
RE: Authorization of Owner's Representative
Lot IS -23; Aspen Glen Subdivision
With this letter, I tmtborize John Muir or Kristin Mule of John Muir' Architects, Inc. to act
on our behalf for Lot ES`23, Aspen Glen Subdivision.
Signed!
Alexander L Thomson / Dorothea D. Thomson
20
Aspen Glen - HOA
Design Review Committee
Final Pian Approval
L
-Administrator
)HNCE/
DIVISIO\
TSJNC
FINAL
OCT/01/2007/MCN 07:46 AM N4CCOG
jt'plyN[II,( OF fQVItRNIVpIVT,5
r-$4A.sf;1 r .4:ey y • rP
iY
7b: Andy Schwaller Garfield County, Building Official
From: Gene Morse, Elevator Inspector
970-468-0295 ext. 108 or elevatarrrnwc.cog.CauS
FAX No, 9704661208
Date: 10/1/2007
Project Name: Tomson Residence #9891
0 Elevator Plan Review
1 Elevator Test and Inspection
P.001/001
oc r 0 200?
UjLD11VC; p..,t�L,N
NN8VG
Location: 0127 Wildflower Ln. Carbondale, Co.
Permit Number: NWCCOG 07-033
Elevator Type: Residential Winding Drum
❑ The plans; have been reviewed and found to conform to all applicable ASME 17.1 and
IBC codes
tik The rated speed of the conveyance meets ASME A17.1 requirements, speed in up
direction 36 FPM, speed in down direction 35 FPM
Ii The Elevator at the above location was inspected and tested on 9/17/2007 and a:
0 TEMPORARY Certificate; has been issued,
FINAL Inspection Certificate; has been issued.
El NO certificate; is being issued.
0 FOR CONSTRUCTION USE ONLY
Comments:
Signature tA.6.-e-t..4.,A.)-P
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments • P0 Box 2308 r Silverthorns • C0 • 80498
970-468-0295 ♦ Fax 970-468-1208 ♦ wvw.nwc,cog.co,us
FUHRMANN ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
December 7, 2006
Ironbridge Homes
410 Ironbridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
ATTN: Mike Woelke
RE: Tendon Stressing Observation
0193 Red Bluff Vista
Lot 193
Ironbridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
PLATTE RIVER PLAZA BLDG.
1205 S. PLATTE RIVER DR., STE 200
DENVER, CO 80223
OFFICE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
Per your request, we visited the subject site on November 8, 2006 to observe the tendon stressing operations for
post -tensioned slab -on -grade design.
The stressing of the tendons were conducted within acceptable tolerances and appeared to be in general
conformance with the construction. At this time, tendon tails may be cut off and the anchor cavities grouted with
a high strength, non -shrink grout. This concludes the construction of the post -tensioned foundation system.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
Ca
Matthew S. Peterson, PTI #1919
MSP:kab
attachments
file
FUHRMANN ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
December 5, 2006
Ironbridge Homes
410 Ironbridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
ATTN: Mike Woe1_ke
RE: Tendon Placement (pre -pour) Inspection
193 Red Bluff Vista
Lot 193
Ironbridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
PLATTE RIVER PLAZA BLDG.
1205 S. PLATTE RIVER OR., STE 200
DENVER, CO 80223
OFFICE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
Per your request, we visited the subject site on October 27, 2006 to observe the tendon placement and interior
trench beams of the post -tensioned slab -on -grade. The dimensions, geometry, and required options have not
been verified at this time. The contractor assumes responsibility for the accuracy of all building dimensions,
locations on lot, foundation elevations, and the slab step layout.
The installation of the tendons and interior stiffened beams appeared to be in general conformance with the
construction plans. We observed the top of grade appeared to be at the correct elevation to maintain the slab
thickness per plan. It is the responsibility of the contractor to verify slab thickness and tendon layout remain as
observed during concrete placement. No other items were observed at this time.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
Matthew S. Peterson, PTI #1919
MSP:kab
attachments
file
FUHRMANN ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
December 7, 2006
Ironbridge Homes
410 Ironbridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
ATTN: Mike Woelke
RE: Certification
0193 Red Bluff Vista
Lot 193
Ironbridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
PLATTE RIVER PLAZA BLDG.
1205 S. PLATTE RIVER DR., STE 200
DENVER, CO 80223
OFFICE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715-9890
As of November 8, 2006 all required construction observations for the Post Tensioned Slab -on -Grade
Foundation System at the subject site have been completed by this office.
From our observations, we have concluded that this foundation has been constructed in accordance with the
approved construction documents and guidelines set forth by the Post Tensioning Institute.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
k -at
Matthew S. Peterson, PTI #1919
FUHRMANN ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
December 5, 2006
Ironbridge Homes
410 Ironbridge Drive
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
ATTN: Mike WoeIke
RE: Trench Beam and Steel Observation including Ufer Rod
193 Red Bluff Vista
Lot 193
Ironbridge Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mike:
PLATTE RIVER PLAZA BLDG.
1205 S. PLATTE RIVER DR, STE 200
DENVER, CO 80223
OFFICE (303) 715-9885
FAX (303) 715.9890
Per your request, we visited the subject site on October 27, 2006 to observe the construction of the trench beams
of the post -tensioned slab -on -grade. The dimensions, geometry, and required options have not been verified at
this time. The contractor assumes responsibility for the accuracy of all building dimensions, locations on lot,
foundation elevations, and the slab step layout.
The trench beam depth, width, and required steel placement appeared to be in general conformance with
approved construction documents. Also, we observed the required 1 -inch polystyrene foam (extruded) insulation
was placed in the trenches at the exterior of the building footprint per plan and is temporarily to the trench wall_
We also observed that an Ufer rod was placed at the time of the wall steel installation. No other items were
observed at this time.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC
/f( (76-
Matthew S. Peterson, PTI #1919
MSP: kab
Attachments
file
APfit 23, 2oo
QY
nbr
lcnwvQ
Attn: David'
Subject:
01.6
$044 ,,0 13 div
Iranbridgc ..6i4uni
Garfseld G'ounLy : Ct
Dear i?aVii
IIEA PA BLOQ.
1206 s PSA' PifS/E0�R , S 2oa
,
OE cO eta
9F14sEs h. s
FAX .7IS .,.
012ve;
vs is '10Vista
fu f to 02921cdtBit
Red Buff Vista; 54 Rtiser Bast Wily;;
y4 05 O Ri r 1� f1d ay; 0574 River
0670 River Bend Way; 0547 River Bend WaY;
O6l9 River Bend ayi 06 3 R•iver Rend Way, 0661 River fiend Way, .0691.- River
•Way; 0739 R verRend Way'
e d I .41,..,_,._ the1clty itis ctor is requesting, sii ol��tian of ilio honz rntat
e ie svbjec sitea 11 �s our understand•ing that horizontal ii sulation has been placed.`
a Sgt Tens�bited Slab on Gx foundatioba designed by this of ce do
till for t o Norio ?til installation }der thc•Eate national
h'Fr ezinglndexc at the proposed slab laxation. i00 ycar
•ihodp4byNOAA
•
xnsuirttion s not required for die above.
d c1 ilus• dation
Neale Cal if you taVe arty c cons.
Su r*
u r uann ngiut
Q14, rhRS Mitt's tQe
gC OLY. ci
.4310a404
April 23, 2007
e
Ott rid
ive.
Attu;. David Ockcrs
Subject: Fast Tensioned
oaf
•:tits Girade Certi fi t
cation Let
nod-e + omtnt
e .0 u
105 LPLAITS V
PAX'i int ioay
Per theeqnal! we i+eeeion Apili 23,007, we,unn�taiid that tbo city inspector is reciuesting a:
cover letter approvita tet et d letters t�eived in, this office pertaining to the Post Tensioned
B •
ub o, tide obse trans <for. ' h.. lot at the a ve subdivision #t is our IWtent that tho.st m.
i etatiett tetter` ed forea `iot, pptov all •ofthe rer t� e 6 tlu o<t ce�w..
:F. o' stamp tette otr, rho ` ii Jt � Observation e udi Jfe sd, Tcnd f
18 ent`L �� tion 1it ilii ervation.
Please earl if you
Sincerely',
Fuhrmafln
n
11eerw.g5ery es,.
Matthew S Pete
Itevielved'b
•
MSF
cc: 'file
Q'-FYTERS'€4 ittes\IRVt,4,figc .0ridso !T$fa Ci sr tyanL�'iii .s
rtta- a r- nab lv: 1J h -N LIEU I EU -1
Geepi14.
HEPWORTH-1'AWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
Hepworth. Pawl al< Geotecl!i. ;l, Inc.
507(7 Centro y Raid 154
Glenwood Spring,:, [:olori:,i,: Iii601
Phone; 470-147-7988
Rax: 970.945.8454
trttrai imccathpgeotech,c.); c ,
SUBSOIL STUDY
FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT IS -23, INDIAN SUMMER AT ASPEN GLEN
WILDFLOWER
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 106 0045
JANUARY 31, 2006
PREPARED FOR:
SANDY AND DOTTIE THOMSON
clo JOHN MUIR ARCRTECTS, INC.
ATTN: KRISTEN MULE
201 MAIN STREET, STE. 304
CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623
Parker .30.3.841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989
P.02/21
rcb-u r-CbClb H -V ULU I tLH
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION .. - ] -
SITE CONDITIONS - 2 -
SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL 2 -
FIELD EXPLORATION.. ,.- 3 -
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 -
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS 4 -
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 4 -
.FOUNDATIONS - 4 -
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 -
FLOOR SLABS -7-
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 7 -
SITE GRADING - S -
SURFACE DRAINAGE - & -
LLMITATIONS - 9 -
REFERENCES -11-
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PTI`
FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND NT
FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURES 4 and 5 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 6 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
P.03/21
rtts-e r-�abb i4; 15 H -P GEOTECH
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located
on Lot IS -23, Indian Summer at Aspen Glen, Wildflower, Garfield County, Colorado.
The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop
recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance
with aur proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Sandy and Dottie Thomson
dated November 21, 2005. Chen -Northern, Inc. previously conducted a preliminary
geotechnical engineering study for development of Aspen Glen and a geotechnical
engineering study for preliminary plat design (Chen -Northern, 199.1 and 1993).
A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings and pit was conducted to
obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during
the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification,
compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the .field
exploration and Iaboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for
foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building fbt ndation.
This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions,
desip recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the
proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed residence will be a two story split level structure with the lower Level being
a walkout basement/garage. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade. A boulder wail about 7
feet ;n height will be constructed to the south of the residence. Grading for the structure
is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 12 feet. We assume
relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction.
ifbu.ilding loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in. to is report.
Joh Na. 106 0045
P.04/21
rtrt-b f-b0b 14:15 H—P GEOTECH
-2-
SITE CONDITIONS
The lot was vacant and covered with up to about 3 feet of snow at the time of our field
exploration. There appears to be some fill on the lot from overlot grading as part of fhe
subdivision development. The ground surface on the northern portion of the lot is
relatively flat with a moderate to strong slope down to the west-northwest. There is a
steep hillside to the south with slopes of about 60%. There is about 12 feet of elevation
difference across the proposed building footprint and 44 feet across the lot. Vegetation
consists of a large old scruboak tree at the southwest side of the building area and grass
and weeds. There is sagebrush, grass and weeds on the steep hillside.
SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL
Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen
development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained
sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a
possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with. the Eagle Valley Evaporite
underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause
sinkholes to develop and can produce areas ofloealized subsidence. During previous
studies in the area by Chen Northern, several broad subsidence areas and smaller size
sinkholes were observed scattered throughout the Aspen GIen development. These
sinkholes were primarily located onthe cast side of the Roaring Fork River and appear
similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork
River valley. ,
SinithoIes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of
cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings
and pit were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present
knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that
sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot IS -23 throughout
the service life Of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner
Joh No. 106 0045
P.05/21
rmu—F7 (—�V_4'Jb 141;1. H—H GEOTECH
-3-
should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation
of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted.
FIELD EXPLORATION
The. field exploration for the project was initially conducted on November 30, 2005. Two
exploratory borings were drilled at the Iocations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the
subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight
augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. An exploratory pit ins
excavated on February 2, 2006 to further evaluate the subsoil conditions. The borings
and pit were logged by a representative of l-Iepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Sarnpies of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The
samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound
hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described
by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values arc an indication of the
relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken
and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings and
Pit, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project
engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on, Figure 2.
The subsoils were variable between the boring locations. The subsoils encountered in
Boring 1 consist of about 3 feet of sandy silty clay with gravel and cobble fill and 3 feet
of stiff to very stiff, sandy silty clay overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel with
cobbles and possible boulders. In Boring 2 and Pit 1, the subsoils consist of about 2 feet
of fill and 5 feet of stiff to very stiff, sandy silty clay overlying relatively dense, silty
sandy gravel with cobbles. Soft to medium stiff, sandy to very sandy silty clay was
encountered beneath the gravels at depths of 91/2 to 10 feet. Dense gravel and cobbles
Job No. 106 0045
GEtech
P.06/21
rtb-er-dbbb 14;]5 H -P GEOTECH
-4-
was encountered beneath the clay in Boring 2 at a depth of 17 feet, Drilling refusal was
encountered in the upper gravels in Boring 2 at a depth of $'/a feet.
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural
moisture content, density and gradation analyses. Results of swell-c:onsolid.at . n testing
per'ormed an relatively undisturbed drive samples of the clay soils, presented on Figures
4 and 5, generally indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions ofloading
and wetting. The sample from Boring 1 at 5 feet showed a minor expansion potential
when wetted under a constant light surcharge. The sample from Boring 2 at 3 feet
showed a minor collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The
sample from Boring 2 at 5 feet showed a low to moderate expansion potential when
wetted. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a small diameter drive sample
(minus 1'A inch fraction) of the coarse granular subsoils are shown nn Figure f. The
laboratory testing is summarized in Table I.
Free water was encountered at a depth of 17 feet in Boring 2 at the time of drilling. The
other boring and pit were dry. The subsoils were slightly moist to very moist with depth.
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
The clay soils appear to have variable settlement/heave potential under loading and when
wetted. Due to the variability of the subsoils encountered in each of the borings, we
should observe the excavation to further evaluate the bearing conditions and the
settlement/heave potential at the time of construction_
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and pit and
the nature of the proposed construction, we rceomrnend the building be founded with
spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils.
Joh No. 1 OG 0045 Gperbech
P.07/21
1-Ee—e7-2006 14:16 H --P GEOTECH
5
The .design and construction criteria presented below should be observed fora spread
footing foundation system.
1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for
an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Based on experience, we
expect settlement/heave of footings designed and constructed as discussed
in this section will be about 1 inch or less. There could be some additional
movement if the bearing soils become wetted.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should he provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span
local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12
feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should aim.) he
designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation
and Retaining Walls" section of this report.
5) A11 existing fill, topsoil, loose or disturbed soils and expansive clays
should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the
firm natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be
moistened and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, we should be
contacted for further evaluation.
6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing
excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions.
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be
expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral
earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf
Job No. 106 0045
C fh
P. 08/21
FEB -07-2006 14:16 H—P GEOTECH
-6-
P.09/21
fc r backfill consisting of the on-site clay soils and at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of
on-site or imported granular materials. Cantilevered retaining structures whi ch arc
separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full
active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure 'computed
on ihe basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of
the or. -site clay soils and at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site or imported
granular materials. Backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil or oversized rock.
A1_l foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and
surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and
equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the
walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward
sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or
retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure
buildup behind walls.
Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and
walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment
near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some
settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is
placed correctly, and could resultin distress to facilities constructed on the backfill.
The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the
sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be
calci:lated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure Of compacted
backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit
weight of 350 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended
above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety Should be included in the
design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly. in the case
JobN i. 1 06 0045
FEB -07-2006 14:16
H—P GEOTECH
-7-
of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist latera] loads
should be a nonexpansive granular materia] compacted to at least 95% of the maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum.
FLOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, arc suitable to support lightly loaded slab -
on -grade construction. The clay soils have variable settlement/heave potential which
should be further evaluated at the time of construction. To reduce the effects of some
differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and
columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab
control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The ,
requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the
designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of fee -
draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This
material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4
sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optiniurn. Required fill can
consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
Although free water was encountered well below the expected excavation depth, it has
been our experience in the area and where clay soils are present that local perched
groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen
gl-nund during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend :below -grade
construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from
wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
Job No. 106 0045
P. 10/21
EES -07--2006 14:16 H -P GEOTECH
-8-
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish
grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draininie granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 1V2 feet deep.
SITE GRADING
The risk of construction -induced slope instability at the site appears low provided cut and
fill depths are limited. We assume the cut depths for the basement level will not exceed
one level, about 10 to 12 feet Fills should be limited to about 8 to 10 feet deep,
especially at the uphill side of the residence where the slope steepens. Embankment fills
should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor densitynear
optunum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should he carefully
prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 90% of the
maxiunnm standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into the portions of the
hillside exceeding 20% grade.
Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horiiontal to 1 vertical or
flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. The risk of slope
instability will be increased if seepage is encountered in cuts and flatter slopes may be
necessary. If seepage is encountered in permanent cuts, an investigation should be
conducted to determine if the seepage will adversely affect the cut stability_ This office
should review site grading plans for the project prior to construction.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Tb.e following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
Soh No. 106 0045
Gtech
P.11/21
1-tru-07-20@6 14: 16 H—P GEOTECH
-9-
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optirnum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in teved areas.
Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the (N -
site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
5) Inigation sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy
irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least 5 feet from foundation
walls.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report arc
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings and pit Located as indicated on
Figaro 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services
do .not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other
biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned
about. MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should he consulted.
Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions
identified at the exploratory borings and pit and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during
Joh n. 106 0045
P.12/21
f-h.b-07-2006 14:17 H—P GEOTECH
-10-
cdnstruction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so
that re-evaluation of the recornmenda.tions may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
arc not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. .As the
protect evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
. Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOT �.:;,, � , INC.
Jordy. Z. Adamson, Jr.
Reviewed by:
Steven L. PawJak, P.E.
JZA/l sw
cc: Ernest Kollar Engineers, Inc. — Attn: Ernie Kollar
Joh No. I06 0045
P.13/21
FEB -07-2006 14:17 H—P GEOTECH
-11-
REFERENCES
Chen -Northern, Inc., 1991, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study. Proposed
Aspen Glen Developnnent, Garfield County, Colorado, prepared for Asp'cn Glen
Company, dated December 20, 1991, Job No. 4 112 92.
Chen -Northern, Inc., 1993, Geotechnical Engineering Study for Preliminary Plug Design,
Aspen Glen Development, Garfield County, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen
Company, dated May 28, 1993, Job No. 4 112 92.
Job 106 0045
Gtech
P.14/21
rtrt-e (-1?bb 14:1'r H -P GEOTECH
APPROXIMATE SCALE
' 1' X30`
70
f
• LOT IS -23
BORING 1
•
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
1
1
BORING j D•
/PFT1
1
70
LOT IS -22
KEPwo fl+PAWLAK GO=Ch3MCA1-
1
1
80
1
1
1
1
1
1
f
}
1
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
AND PIT
P.15/21
100
LOT GV -3
100
Figure 1
rtts-e r-eJbb 14: 1'r H -F' GEDTECH
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
106 0045
BORING 1
ELEV.= 79'
38/12
15/12
WC=8.5
DD=115
13/12
50/6
WC=3.8
+4=44
-200=27
16/3,10/0
BORING 2
ELEV.= 72'
22/12
WC=6.0
DD=109
12/12
wC=11.2
DD -111
4/12
5/12
46/12
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3.
I E WORTFFPAwLAKGNOrTBCHurCAL
PIT 1
ELEV.= 72'
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS.AND
PITS
P. 16/21
80
75
70 ...MY
65
6O
55
50
Elevation - Feet
Figure 2
1-1J-17 (-dbbb 14:1Y
H—P GEOTECH
P.17/21
LEGEND:
—7
M
38/12
—3,
FILL; sandy silty clay with gravel and cobbles, firm, slightly moist, brown.
CLAY (CL); silty, sandy, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist. brown,
CLAY (CL -SC); sandy to very sandy, medium stiff to soft, very moist, reddish brown.
GRAVEL (GM); silty, sandy, with cobbles and possible boulders, medium dense to dense, slightiy'moist, brown.
GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM -GP); silty, sandy, dense, wet, reddish brown, subrounded rock.
Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample.
Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT}, 1 318 inch 1.0. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586.
Drive sarnpje blow count; indicates that 38 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were
required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches.
Free water level in boring at time of drilling.
Depth at which boring had caved when checked on December 5 , 2005.
fPractical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of log, indicated that multiple attempts were made to
advance the boring.
NOTES;
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 30, 2005 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. The
exploratory pit was excavated on February 2, 2006 with a Case 580 Super L backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory borings and pit were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan
provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory borings and pit were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan
provided and checked by instrument level.
4. The exploratory boring and pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by
the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring and pit logs represent the approximate boundaries
between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in
water level mayoccur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results;
WC = Water Content (%)
DD = Dry Density (pcf)
+4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
106 0045
H
HEPWORTH,PAW[JJC GEm CMMcu.
LEGEND AND NOTES
Figure
rtz--e r-eeb 14: 1'f H -H UE01 ECH
Compression - Expansion °,b
Compression %
1
0
1
2
0
1
2
$
4
5
Moisture Content = 6.5
Dry Density 115
Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay
From: Boring 1 at 5 Feet
0.1
Expansion
upon
wetting
P.18/21
percent
pct
T •1-
1
1.0
0
APPUED PRESSURE - ksf
100
0.1
106 0045
r
Moisture Content _ 5,0
Dry Density = 109
Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay
From: Boring 2 at 3 Feet
Compression
upon
wetting
percent
poi
4
1.0 10
APPUED PRESSURE - ksf
]iEPWOfT .PAWLAKGROT CHDUCAL
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
100
t-tb-e r-2bbb 14:17 H—P GEQTECH
Compression - Expansion %
P.19/21
Moisture Content = 11.2
Dry Density 111
Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay
From: Boring 2 at 5 Feet
percent
pot
Expansion
upon
wetting
T
01
106 0045
1.0
10
APPUED PRFSSURE • ksf
100
SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
HEPWOR1H AWLA GCOTECHN!CwL _ !
1 -L8 -0'(-201b 14:18
*E► 1R
H—P GEOTECH
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME HEADINGS
24 0 45 MIN.10 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. 4200 4100 450 430 X116 #B
SIEVE ANALYSIS
U.S. STANDARD SERFS
10
20
P.20/21
CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS
318" 3/4' 1 1/0 3" s' 6" B' 100
lMwr..AMM...r_....��a ..lar....,.1....MMENI......Nla�r—�,...�
MNIINOW
=mom* 1.,••01.11d• YMMOIMIN MMII MMMM MM.MM•i l.MMINEli MMMMA dapppod
.MmIIw ....11MMpl.mlwr.mon... ...n.,..=..mm wrMMI/IMi1.r..rrnigNammor
owini a �IiMM.M1.•r.i•r4MMIMMMwr=mMMINMEIwIIMi1milaMMMill m/NEYlUlMEMMI.w/`r#Il o
MMwM.Mmm.miI.MMMMiMMu. MM/MNMM=r N MMOL AM iNrr`u.I i •• w+ra.l.M. IartwILYiMri
90
rr+wimpimr•.+ilim Mrrmiliii IMr• imIl rI=.rm mels mr.r.11illwwliPr IIMNII r.ry!rNoir
wMNIMMMI..wM.IMlMMMM. Ywww.��M�M id■II wr iJIIMM INIMO� M IONIiwrft.
�M iMI• MrMM�M MYO MM.I..M1MM.uwu.M
wYN IMIIMiMMMlENNWrMMMIIMI IP= MMM
lMM M.MwMMi�I MMi.MM lMMMw•MMM.l�I.if.l�M�Mw
MaIMINIMEMONIMIIII mONINNOBRIIIIMMmimimMFMN���MYMMM.MMMMI MMMi� .iii IIMMMMI� w•w�.
MMMMw.lMN.Y.II MMMYlMMl MMM• I.MMMMMiMMMw/WI!
Iww!.www�
•wl/..IMI=EI Egno >�
wwsmwww�w imer•m.• 1 ..IN ir �w'
www..w��� im
matEm
mwIM
wwwi..w...w__w...wwru..mo..w iima l=1=t..mi...rwwwwwly.u. II IMw.yEg.......m
MMIIwIIMNIMMMwIIIIIMMI IMmli .. rrwEMME MIMIl rmMWwwwp.rA111111 . Iws♦ww.0
lMr...MCMI.rM.MMMrM...MUM�M INEMMMMM.MMIIIMIMMM IMIN ll.iiMMnilMM II..r .Mmod
MwMliftewwlml•Mp a/MNO..YMMINM MamM=INEMIllir...wlNI.r,MMIN mMillyig
q,..111011MMMM^ir.M.`MiiMiIIiM MMM...r.. .......wrAMIMmi MI.MM.•IIII•W 1rm..
...,,.I.w im w....I..I..IwII..imim iiwlwiwwsmiw...u...i.�Illini rww.�..Mw
.EMIIRO .
MMMi���lMSA♦M
MMi.I.w..��w
.,.. r
w..w.I.^.�.n.w...
.1.1111 ..wwG�..,..
,w1..w.r.w.11l�iMMMil. Ol Miw.,r MAIM rwr.wMINIMMMMEMmWMIIMW =Nwwl..wll.Y.MIONip
MMM.w..�M.....^wwwl llM.MMMiIIIMI MMM.M..MM�w. ...... . .......M/IMII M II INIIMM�..r.....
a.. ..r.ri �.w•i.uwrrwr
. MIlyille_w
r.> - r
.w.wl+rI.
..wwu�rwMEMMI mow
30 w.Iw.MmaNIM ..IWOM=1............�.. .... aN.... .�.Iwwrw..wullrgsminwm..rw...
MMM+�...I.,.M�.wII....rwl�.r���..��r+...��...�.r..�w,.�rwwl...wl■
.�II.ww1.�wmblww�rr..=••1 r+�II� !/�++r �..rw•ww�r..wrww�a•I.w wl.www�M•.MrMMY.�M.�.! MMMT! M�M.MiMi.A!!�E=7:!:
.�.w.1..t.wl.llIw�Iw�.w�/w�..wr.�w.ww.r���wwl... rwr...�R..w.wlM�1�.....wl.^�wwwww.wr..w..�,rII wwl..���w..wM+IMwwINMa= .lu..VIII.�.wwalw..�w.w�ul>•IrI....Iu.wa w.lw.r/w��MMwlwluwrw�wluu�MI..I.Iu.MMMMMIMr..,�.M ILMI MMIMMMM�i1/M.MMI♦!ll.M�k0 w.Iw.r,ww.a.. r.w�Y...rwwwwsll.iwIMIMM• •MMMON,A.m �a� lIMEMS I..1r.l~11UNIII�w....r.wwww�+��r.w..+��wr•+w.Iw,www.r•Yrwwr...w.r��..w.�w..rM+w�.Ir...!w.I+++wwwr+..r+.r.Irw.r. 60
..... .•n....Ir.•^1.rI..rl +l�..�. ..i.••i=11a,RI+. iPNI.��i...MI.MMM MMiwlw...rrriMMMIIMMI IMM.I...MMI�MMMwYM1..wl
iiMI ulw.r+rMNI.ww....wwI.Iwtl MINie .wwwMwlwr��rt MIM
M , ,mil. .MM.mlMMmailMrM.lMMMi./MMMi MMONEMONNM .i
lMMINEMMIMM/NOMEMMINMW uuMMIM MMM.MMMMi MMM041. ♦Mw.MIMluMM1.1.1 .MMi
.wIIMMMMMMMM�MMMUMMM MMM„IMMMw..ri /MMi Mi am...I.�...uwlww.Im�I�.uIIIIwwww.w.+mwmo .I�M.M•. .r.wwa.......wo... rwwrr.
I.Nau
»IiMMilworm=— ...•.r MMMIw M1MM. .M.�MMNEMMMMMwMNInil. MSI
......q...M. MM.!MM.AM!lmi• MMMI...MMMMYMMMMMMi11 11.»111# nift
IuulwwA.liw
fwf.n..+lw���
aIIM INII Mil i1a_�
.wl
�IRWIIMMRI mim ww.we
MMI•.I.MwM 0iI1M WIi M.Mi
l.i w..SMmIl MS,■M�MMMMM IMM I MMWI I...MM iM.�MMMIMMMMM M. mom
l MI1= MMS=M.MMM•Mi==.PM==WillomilWidMinigIla..�IIiIM.MM Mp MMMM
40
...MrM.....aMMM MwM•ri.. ..wMMw.r.Mi MMMIrlMM. wIM.• W.M.. Mmn
..1•••10 .Mi!! miumila IMM. Im.MMMMMmilln `al,mm .MiE SIM m..0.0=mor.MMMIMl.r._
iipol MM wMw. .MMMMw inMIrwIMIMMImal••,i1 MMiMIMMM! •1=•=1
Mager ...rMNatM....rye.nN�—mml IwMM��^.m. IMMWM*Im.M ..w,,.,
=M•... MM.MMMl.W.uM J MM^
1.M1.M^w MM A.'wwMlMiM..mml lr gmr,MMwi MMM --1 i. —MMM,r MM..r MMMM! MMy..I.Yi
�IA��.M•MMIIMMMwI.MMMw. �j MM.m.A M•M��r•MMMi 11.. MMM�YrMA! Min. MMi
�R//INM��wr�r.l...11.1r_I.YfMM�..�r.ri� 30
MMr. .■ ^rA MMII.+.ISMwry..w MM.M.�..tlm wwwk. i�soMMiIi MsMM�MMI..
MMMr■w'i iMM,1100. r..MMM.../l MM—r_—MMMMM w.MMAir IMMY�l wM�I1
rONIMMI .MM.MM lnil �w men E=IMr.Yn+=—I.. MIN=N MMMwYmimil MMIIIMPAIN. Mew
munliiMilipm liplirowilmodMIIIIIINONNOmeMOMMMEnwwrtMMmMMMi—r�r�MwM.l.�MMMM.wMi11w..■.■
MMMMNiMMM w�MMMM MMwr■!M.� MMMM. WIM. _MI• MMMT-- M .—
I.I.M.i� �»I. .M.Mi+..�MMMi Yell iMMMIMMMi MMwIWitessiRillMER.. MMi
iiimirminiaalkirlin MMMT MMwI- M
.—.MMI..M—!!MMMMI.MM/rM.Mi MMMMMMM !M•M�—MMM—iimimM
✓ MM..I.�IMme'
VJ 11..I�.MrM�MM..�AMMMM.IFr�M�1.. ..�IMMMw.. ..AMw1i.M1�MMMMM 1, MMMT IwMYMIilINOMIMMM CaV
MM MMM.11rI�wMIMIIIIIM.= w=
1..MIN..wMMMMMI Mon .r.l...r. Mon _MMria .MMiftMMWOMMUNI MI AiMAMMMi� r.—
M=
.MwmgMMMiplOMi— Imei �1..�MMMMMM—I110AMOi'MMI MM.ft. ...gw
MYMMM.M�—MM•11.MMMiEn MMrM.— MMM.�M----— agoi n
_w _ __-YMw.M�MM.Mw—M�AONIMMMMMi 5 1.. MMMMMM.MrMIM
90 !MM/ MMM.M.MMlMrMM.^�M..�I.wM.MMM.....MMi�...�rrMirlA rM.F.�r.I 10
>!.Mw../f—M^r!MI.�r--MM P.r•ommIr M.Af1w Ommwm. .AM_i.•OMMI.M g1. M
MWYINENE
I.IrNM
/00 IMM.—MMme!
M IMMM
M
.MwMM MMTM.r.� �.ilwl I..MA .M
.M.
MMMT wMMw•MM. mum
MM�!
MINIIIIINOM=1MMMTM.MMMMMM.l—....�!w�M.— emp iMr.wwM.MMi
. MM. MMilMwM.M�MM.ir�y---ice MMMMu .MM,.M.I..
.m... 10 w•r.M-MMMM.—MMMw.—MMrl1MMMi—MMMMM MMr_rAMMMi�IM Y.IM{tIMi
Yi+.0gl.—r•.M..MMMMMIM� IwiM.MMM.M—MMM 1.�.M--M—.MM rr•M�... ....MMi
100 �.wI.M.MRmmM/.M� .N. MMM.ME.N.i. !/!• timmM.M..�M..IM.MMM•.Y4iwMw MM..w1.M.rIM•MMMIM.MMA 0
.001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 300 .600 1.19 236 4.75 9,5 19.0 07.5 ::%0.2 152 203
12.5 127
80
70
50
60
70
50
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MIWMETERS
CLAYTO NI T
AKE
smo
ORAvEL
MEDIUM I CC14R5E
F.Fw� 1 C: ARV.
GRAVEL 44 %
LIQUID LLMIT %
SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel
108 0045
Hepworth-Pcwlpk Geotechn1ca1
CODDLES
SAND 29 % SILT AND C!AY 27 %
PLASTICITY INDEX
FROM:Boring 1 3t 15 Feet
GRADATION TEST RESULTS
ERCENT PASSI r
Figure 6
TZ'd 4101
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Job No. 106 0045
SAMPLE LOCATION
NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION
PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED
BORING C E H
(ft)
- MOISTURE DRY GitAVEL .l SAND PASSING LIQUID
I
NO. 2D0 LIMIT
CONTENT DENSITY I (%)(o`o)
iSIEVE
1 ( ) (P�) 1 (%
PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE1
INDEX STRENGTH
(%) (PSF)
SOIL OR
BEDROCK TYPE
1
5 6.5
115
—1 Sandy Silty Clay
15 3.8
44
29
27
Silty Sandy Gravel
2
3 6.0
109
Sandy Silty Clay
5 11.2
111
1
Sandy Silty Clay
3
1
9002-20-ESd
H0010D9 d -W
Job Address D l a c
Owner il►& £► . L% r., A
Contractor tJL)---f'\Q S'1
Assessor's Parcel NOit _/ cH caa- £ 3
`t
Date —12 LL
BUILDII1O PER T ARD S'-- - �3
1 6 i- ibk_s__IF L._ i6t'40-n (2--Q-D-1,--
dress` 4-.1 tab Sc`hone #`tern:5—(0�
SJcks: Front
or\ CSP w1
Soils Test S
Footing ii) - Z-06'
Foundationt 'j .
Grout
Underground Plumbing
Rough Plumbing .?—./.;%9.01"2,
Framing .g -5.-c,
Insulation 4 'c 744r Septic System # 0144—
Roofing
14,-Roofing Date
Drywall y 6-07 /4 /c7G7 Final —
Gas Piping
Address Phone #
ear RH LH Zoning
INSPECTIONS
Weatherproofing
Mechanical
Electrical Rough (State) VElectrical Final (State)
Final 7--/7-07 /Checklist Com let d7
Certificate Occupancy # 1
Date
4)00 del ottortd/J
e.pg
EXTERIOR
Address No.
Drainage
Decks -support & clearance o wood
Decks -stairs & rails
Exterior locks
Flashing around doors & wlndgws
u
Insect screens
INTERIOR
GARAGE
Fire wall separation
Service doors -13,4" min.
1/
Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -13,4" min.
Mech. equip. 18" above floor
No opening into sleeping area
BASEMENT -CRAWL, AREA
Access ✓ i
NOTES
Other
FINAL CHECKLIST
MECHANICAL ROOM
Boiler
Hot water
F.A. gas/oil
Floor drain
Clearance
Air con. system
Hot water heater .2
Combustion air
Gas piping, valves BEDROOMS
LPG Drain Egress
FIREPLACE/STOVE Smoke detector
Clearance to combustibles BATHROOMS
Termination of chimney Exhaust fan
(continue on back)
STAIRWAYS
Headroom (8'8")
Railing & guardrails ,,
Width v
Rise & run
KITCHEN
Clearance above grill
Exhaust fan
Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) —
Combustion air Shatterproof glass
Hearth (12" or 20" on sides} OTHER
Glass doors
Certified by
Insulation v
HeadroomlStairs t�
Ventilation t/ REMARKS
Iow
NSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issued..i'L?d Zoned Area Permit No 9811
AGREEMENT
Iti consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Use5/P on 0 : / i C*p
tiglIkr.
Address or Legal Descriptio a 'd eek/�
Owne
Setbacks
Front Side Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
5s2
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing D -2,-,p (y
Driveway
i✓/rf
Foundation 42- iZ -067-1—
Underground Plumbing 7-,,g..ps - .
Insulation --2- Q 7 , S
Rough Plumbing 3/�,U7z
Dtywally G_07 `. ;o,zt....,
Chimney & Vent 3 ��,v fi07
Electric Final (by Stat : . cta 7/( y.
Gas Piping 3�/� .07 �_
Final 7/07 5yA.-Zi
Electric Rough (Hy State 1
.awl
Septic Final Nag e
4
Framing .3-07r7 -
(To include Roof in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
Notes e ,y
��1
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Date'/�•n` By
IF PLACED OUTSID - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
Garfield County
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003
Job Address (D1 fl L i 41 bCALL_
Nature of Work Building Permit Lam[
Use of Building) fr Cep a,347 [ .rt f aS
Owner (-1 tQY`L61:
Contractor rjV f i -ice
Amount of Permit $ .`(e Date t
NO.
`j 891
0393-71‘7,/-- O,.5 Clerk
f—