Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-Permit12/13/2005 14:30 9709499940 Permit Neat_ Job Ad.dross. 05179 i...-cg/'K5Fes,f' ':j, $32,, 04 O 571 1- v-SPUt• _ —v0 Ar,�raczgfz,k1 -_—C c _L2' r1 l.Ot Ido: Block No 1Slab& / Exemption: t i* St G 5.111 it.ei iGkt UL0. 5e— a -- WINTERGREEN HOMES PAGE 02/04 GARFIELD QOUNTY PERMIT AD PLTCAT 10 N 108 8'" 81restr Sults Rut, o140i.woo4 glit Cq $3641 F pun, 97094S-8212 /nom D708F4970-884.-2470f imorectIem Maw 9'P70-714.g02r-�OI, lJ I of r cigDg PAts:C1/94bCduie Na:21S i - At=_Cat 2 owner: A elms& ftilLi cO GesRI CA rr rr .- PQ 1 Sacs AVEnA Co Contractor; Aearew istkozo ArelaECt/trienccr. Cs_C Sq. IL 4f Ballillagr�r UNeOT uttding; �� %1 7 Drar•.rI1i Work: `al tr} Cih.M 11 L 1 +rQ.1_D R Class of Work: Vii. Nr°w 4 L g� Melrosty. 72.41. 1 Th 51-, q. Ft. of Lot: IGi t"r 1'17' Eh; Rib, 94`i.,4J 1?41: height • WkT71: gio•449.41,7. . Lic. Na. Uc, No. No. of Mom 1.0 1jr1vrway Fcrmit l I I VeILIF.,I ork; SM./ 64, 50 12 P 3tpcial Conditions; Single i7 Aitoration a Addition I:1 Movc VouLle [I x)737 c Sewage Site PlAn n RcltloVv :inglc 1)or,Ahlr, 1'IC A FRPA1CAT15 ELECTRICALPRRMTT IS REQUIRE I)AND MUST 113 ISFLED 13Y THE STATS Or• CO,,oIaADO, ti•ir pottirrSEom=NVLI.A.NDVI1DrFWORTI5CaitoWIBTRUCTI N Atr7vomultP :B Non' qc.imt.dsHcco E7t 'mw 164 DAYS. oro, 17 coNsrPUCTI ON OR WGT.K is SUsPENDED f)R AT3AN1a❑NBLI FOR A I'1ER34D OF IRO PAYS AT ANY TIME AC'S S1 WORK IS CONTHIENara. 1 HATErks, cERT1Rv TI9;AT t TIMM MAXI ANP EXAlIITItraP TH11I AppLicivno19 AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE ANDCORREDT. ALL PROviSIONE oP TAWS GOYBRN1N0 THIS TYPE OP WORK VIt1.I. ren COAMPLSTBD'5 lxriiS WJWTH,6R BP$ .DII to =RED! SIR NOT. ME GRANTING OP A. PERMIT DOGS NOT PnItStitAt TO GIVE At3TIEOP.Illt 'Pb VIOLATE O17 CAltetL TItF intoviewel of ANY omen MATE QR IAT, i.AW RROUl,I'yT,IrO rONSTstrriTronORTHE PERrmRMANCE T UCTION. 131D4/ATE 11, • ti pA APPROVAWlDAT$ Adjutdcd V0100,t,iar1 3 Adb`. °.0 &02skz, /14 ifil-c,t-ei C. . an Check Pee; Tota1.FER: 3737. /7 OCC G Zoning: Ptrtnitrec 7z(04. `_- Dated Perrot issued: MAtau, 14 Dm Contd. Type: Setbacks; TSCSSNo.d�1 a Feel � AGREaF,MENT rERMI RSION rs DERE!? GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT A5 OWREII, CONTRACT[)R AMG/OIt THE, AOENT OR THE GONTRAOTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON F1.AN8ANT") SPECFRic-ANIONS SIjI3MITTIED'AD AND RRV'1R WED DY rig B1jlI,RrNO DEPARTMENT, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSIIANCS OF T11Is PERMIT, THE EIrNTER. HEREBY AGRRRS TO COMPLY 1MTFe ALL 13UTLDINO COOlIS AND LAND u$II, I0E1111,ATrONB ADOPTED SY SIARRrlvr,r3 cautery PURSUANT IQ AUTHORITY GIVEN r.N BO 29.2011 CRS AS AMENDED. THF SIGNER RATHER AooRms THAT1r THE Ae0Y5 FATD f)RDINANCEs ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN VTR I.tTtIATION, !?RECTION, CONEITTWorroN, AND tJJFR OF TN1I ANCISZ ❑ESCRIB1>an s'reucTuRc TI I3 pg mu MAY 8s REVO1{SE) TY NOTICE PROM THTi COUTe'TY ma)THAT TFTEN AND TFIERE rT strAI,T,1IrT.COMI NIJL1.AND VOID, "NM IS91JAN41i OF A PsRN1 IMBED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PR111VItNT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MOM THEREAFTER RI;Q,t11R1Nc THE O0RRECTION Or rARORS IN RAIZ) PLANS. apiN.IrIDAT1©N0 AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PRII:VPMTINI:3 i UIt. tNC7 [)Ffi7AT'1DN rxxtra, cArFoltDoleTTHEREUNCERW1-1PNINVIOI.A'I'It)NOFT1ISCODSORANYOTTIANOL 1NANCEORRT1GULATIVNUgT1•As,1iRIsDic'CroN, TMtit R1iIltbpr of supMrrrRr) PLANS AND SPF,CTPIcATrorrs AND INSPEcITIONS CtAtOi,1(STRD 7wrtnEA Mill DO Nar CONSTITUTE. AN A0r:5PTANcl1 OF ANY REsrONSIBILITTES OR 1.IAS3LT71EJ3 13Y QANFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS (Al DIscRERENDIE9, THE Rl}SPONSr81LS'TY FOR THRSF ITEMS AND tMFL6MI NTAT1ON p1IRrNG 00NST1e'.ICTIoN imams aPECSFRGIAET.Y WITH TYLE ART1C_T1.CT, DESIGNER, BuILDFR, ANU OWNRR, G0MM1;NTS ARE 1Ni'BNI7EF TO THE GONSERVA'1'1VP. ANr? IN SuFrOmY [717 TMIF. OWNERS orrtmg 'r, r,;nrrem.0o0 1 rIEREEY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ ANT) uN1,ERETAND Tb1r AC Me ME NT ADM (INITIAL!, -fir ns -4_ z. 12/13/2005 14:30 9709499940 WINTERGREEN HOMES PAGE 03/04 The following items are required by Garfield County ,for a final inspection; 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical, inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, countertops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or deolcs over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7, Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upatt the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL TITS ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY Olt USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C,O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C,O. WILL BB CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY ER GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL AP3OVEE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for ocoupaimr use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # Date Applicant Address Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION €-4i5 VCRrrEL.L -C� Finished (Livable Area): Main /335 Upper /440 Lower / 355 Other Total Square Feet Valuation quo Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 8 2'5 y j g Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation 2 Rz Total Valuation Subdivision i4 i.v" ', Pkae L Lot/Block 21 Contractor w 00-eir S )-74 —30031.83 /4a zo 2,2,0 v- /a1 z 3 z4p/ 440.80 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other pians that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtan a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof frarning pian, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft_ of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes -__1.1 _-- 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the Location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design Toads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the pian include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase ll certifications or phase 11 EPA certification? Yes ---- No 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms andlor basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes X No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes �%. No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the pian check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes___No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes ) No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes No 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. An inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes k No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $47.00 re-inpsection fee? Yes No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes . No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Building Code? Yes sKJ No 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a budding permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes x No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes x No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No I hereby acknowledge that l have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. 1 kT _e_--- 7[a -1 -Ls Signature of Owner Date Phone:_q1 = 49_ -AL2 (days); (evenings) Project Name:r -Z ,2f- UTZ 42-1 Project Address: Notes: 59 . L 1K-SPG0- a (4OQi_111- )11)/4 (- . If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Budding Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. if it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 04/2003 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant -tom pr#- eL4 Date k- 19 ""' Building Engineered Foundation A/ g Driveway Permit -��ed Site Plan 7 Septic Permit and Setbacks ✓Grade/Topography 30% Att ch Residential Plan Review List Minimum Application Questionnaire / Subdivision Plat Notes #4 -Fire Department Review luation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions Agplication Signed P n Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No, k4O# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setb. k 30ft Stream Se racks Flood Plain Buildins eight Zoni : Sign -off R d Impact Fees OA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% PIanning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes 12/13/2005 14:30 9709499940 61- `� sic X70 4 cd —1—K4 tiproiPi".‘ AuL) FAX Number of Pages: F WINTERGREEN HOMES 1 y., PAGE 01/04 DECu }r, 2005 801.14V U°N P4.414f� (including this cover slieet) FAX #: q70 g49 7 940 Comments: Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 Fax # (970) 384-3470 12/13/2005 14:30 9709499940 WINTERGREEN HOMES AeA Wintergreen 4100, PAGE 04/04 memorandum To: From: CC: Date: Re: Via: Andy Schwaller Garfield County Building Department Jeff $panel Terri -Ann Giandomenico (970) 376-2263 12-13-05 Cerise Ranch, Lot #3 and Lot #21 Cerise Ranch Building Permits U5 Mail Wintergreen Homes,LLC 77 Metcalf Road, Box 1530 Avon, Colorado 81620 970/949-4120 Fax: 970/949-9940 Terri -Ann Giandomenico and George Redford have been authorized to deal with ail matters concerning building permits far Cense Ranch LLC and Wintergreen Homes at Cerise Ranch. If you have any questions regarding this authorization you may call me at (970) 949-4120. this document may contain PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIA1+ information intended ONLY for the we of the specific individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized dissemination pr copying of this document or the information Contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document In error. please notify the sender at once by telephone and return the original document to the above address via the US Postal Service. Thank you. 4o! boas jj MIIli.NJ 6 6000000 0' 2C -16E2 0u0u0(14, T. 7 S.-R. 87 W. SEC. 33 cerise ranch design review board memorandum To: Jeff Spanel From: Terri -Ann Ciandomenico (970) 376-2263 CC: File Date: 11-14-05 Re: Cerise Ranch, Lot #21 Via: Fax, US Mail Wintergreen Homes, LLC 77 Metcalf Road, Box 1530 Avon, Colorado 81620 970/949-4120 Fax: 970/949-9940 Thank you for your submittal. We have reviewed the Lot #21 submittal package, drawings, catalog sheets and colors. All have been reviewed and approved. All the same items that have been previously submitted and approved for Lot #16 are reviewed and approved for Lot #21. We have included a stamped "reviewed" set for your files. If further information is required, please feel free to contact me. Terri -Ann (970) 376-2263 This document may contain PRIVILEGED and/dr CONFIDENTIAL information intended ONLY for the use of the specific individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized dissemination or copying of this document or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. if you have received this document in error, please notify the sender al once by telephone and return the original document to the above address via the US Postal Service. Thank you. go FIELD REPORT Date: July 6, 2006 Project: Cerise Ranch Lot 21 Weather: Cloudy Present at Site: Danny (Framing Subcontractor) To: Wintergreen Homes 40801 US Highway 6 S.TE 203 PO Box 1530 Avon, CO 81620-1530 The following was noted: Project: M&N# 6375.A Location: Carbondale, CO • Temp: 70° F at 10:00 A.M. n Monroe & Newe'.I 1. The basement level plywood shear wall on the eastside of the stair can be eliminated along with footing and holdown. 2. The basement colunnl footing that was built eccentric to the colutnrt is being repaired per the direction on Monroe & Newell Engineers, Inc. 3. The main level column at Grid D3 can omit the base plate bolts on the east side. 4. The exterior gable wall sheathing joint is being repaired by adding 2"x6 along top of double wall plates and nailing together at 6" o.c. 5. Prefabricated roof truss blocking at bearing is not yet completed. 6. Entry posts shall be connected to framing above with Simpson Strap. Very truly yours, MONROE AND NEWELL ENGINEERS, INC. ratle g/Cart"o11, P.E. Priyipal Page 1 of 1 Terri -Ann Giandomenico From: Craig Carroll [ccarroll@monroe-newell.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 12:04 PM To: terriann@vail.net; 'Scott Nunnery'; 'Chris Taylor; wghomes@centurytel.net Subject: RE: Cerise Ranch Lot 21 The joist can be omitted. Be sure the columns above are blocked thru the rim space. Craig Carroll P.E. Principal >"r€oE & kVC 3:;#hf i�.`.i:.fi'{.,,;:1•, .:i;1r=kii70'.. i�`2:� Y3�..:f�it`.. From: Terri -Ann Giandomenico [mailto:terriann@vail.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 3:54 PM To: 'Scott Nunnery'; 'Chris Taylor'; 'Craig Carroll'; wghomes@centurytel.net Subject: Cerise Ranch Lot 21 The attached photos are taken on the main level at the kitchen rear wall below the second floor hall bath. The plumbing from the bath above needs to go in that joist bay. We want to put another tji in there but it looks like it might be tight. Can we get away with leaving it out or can we brace the floor above in that bay some other way? Thanks, Terri -Ann 10/23/2006 Gtech HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgearech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 21, CERISE RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 105 742 OCTOBER 11, 2005 PREPARED FOR: CERISE RANCH c/o WINTERGREEN HOMES Attn: JEFF SPANEL P.O. BOX 978 AVON, COLORADO 81620 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS - 1 - SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 - FLOOR SLABS - 6 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM. - 7 - SITE GRADING - 7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE - 8 - LIMITATIONS - 8 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 21, Cerise Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Cerise Ranch dated August 24, 2005. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a 1 to 2 story structure over a basement level and located on the lot as shown on Figure I. The basement floor and attached garage will be slab -on - grade. Grading for the structure will to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 10 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS Lot 21 was vacant at the time of our field exploration. The vegetation on the site consists of native grass and weeds. The elevation difference across the lot is about 18 feet and Job No. 105 742 Gtech -2 - across the building site is about 5 feet. Lot 21 is flat to gently sloping down to the southwest towards the Roaring Fork River which is located about % mile south of the lot. An irrigation ditch located southwest of the building envelope was dry at the time of our study. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL The Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the project area and outcrops on the valley sides north and south of the site. It consists of gray and tan, gypsum and anhydrite with interbedded siltstone, claystone, and dolomite. The gypsum and anhydrite are soluble in fresh water. The siltstone and claystone vary from cemented and hard to non-cemented but firm. The dolomite is cemented and hard. The bedding structure is convoluted because of flow deformation in the plastic gypsum and anhydrite. Joints are commonly present in the siltstone and dolomite. Because of their plasticity, the gypsum and anhydrite are massive and have no joints. Due to the soluble nature of gypsum and anhydrite, subsurface voids and sinkholes are sometimes present in areas underlain by the Eagle Valley Evaporite in western Colorado. Sinkholes were not observed in the field during our study. However, the presence of the Eagle Valley Evaporite beneath the project area indicates that there is a potential for subsurface voids at the project site. It is our opinion that the potential for subsurface voids below the site is low and the site can be developed as proposed with a relatively low risk of future ground subsidence throughout the service life of the project. If additional evaluation of potential subsidence at the project site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on August 31, 2005. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a CME -45B truck -mounted drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Job No. 105 742 Gtech 3 Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about 1 foot of topsoil overlying stratified layers of silty sand, clayey sand, and clay. The sand and clay layers ranged from medium dense to medium stiff in consistency. Relatively dense, slightly silty to silty sandy gravel containing cobbles and probable boulders was encountered beneath the clays at depths of about 17 to 25 feet. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and probable boulders. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density and finer than sand size gradation analysis. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the sandy clay soils, presented on Figure 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. Groundwater was encountered in the borings between depths of about 121/2 feet and 17'/2 feet. The upper soils were slightly moist to moist and wet with depth. Job No. 105 742 Gtech -4 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS The upper soils tend to be hydrocompressive and there is a risk of post -construction settlement if the soils below the building become wetted. The building can be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural soils with some risk of differential settlement and building distress if the bearing soils become wetted. The foundation should consist of heavily reinforced continuous foundation walls that will span and limit the effects of differential settlement. Compacting the bearing soils will help reduce the settlement potential. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. There could be about 1/2 to 1 inch of additional settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. Job No. 105 742 Ge Stech -5- 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site sandy soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site sandy soils. Backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil or oversized rock. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure Job No. 105 742 Gtech -6 - against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.40. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 350 pcf The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on -grade construction. The soils tend to be hydrocompressive, which could result in some slab settlement and distress if the bearing soils become wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free- draining reedraining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site sandy soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. The fill below the garage should be placed early in the construction and before the foundations are built to allow for settlement of the deeper clay soils. Job No. 105 742 Gtech 7 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was encountered below the proposed basement level during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. An impervious membrane such as 30 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SITE GRADING The risk of construction -induced slope instability at the site appears low provided cut and fill depths are limited. We assume the cut depths for the basement level will not exceed one level, about 10 feet. Fills should be limited to about 6 to 8 feet deep. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. Job No. 105 742 Gtech 8 SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Irrigation sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface Job No. 105 742 Hgtech -9 - conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Arthur D. Buck Engineering Geologist Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. ADB/ksw Job No. 105 742 GLVStech APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 30' 6380 LOT 20 6370 BORING 1 LARKSPUR DRIVE i i r 7 LOT 21 BORING 2 " � 1 _________ _________ 6380 LOT 22 r 63'C 105 742 I-1 Hepworth—Powlak Geotechnical LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 A Elevation - Feet BORING 1 ELEV.= 6381' BORING 2 ELEV.= 6376' - 6385 6385 l_ 6380 6375 6370 - 6365 6360 6355 13 - 0 • ▪ ▪ • 18/10,10/0 WC=7.6 DD=109 -200=49 15/12 7/12 r:. WC=23.0 DD=98 ID 6/12 r' '4�CJ )' 5/12 GARAGE LEVEL BASEMENT FLOOR LEVEL 0 13 12/12 ;..� IIII 8/12 r :Y WC=15.5 OD=99 ti w - 7/12 _rj ✓ r ✓ • n 3/12 _' 43/12 D6. Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. 6380 6375 6370 6365 6360 6355 Elevation - Feet 105 742 H Hepworth—Pawlok Geotechnical LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 LEGEND: r Wr. 15/12 0,2 TOPSOIL; organic sand and silt, brown. SAND (SM); very silty, gravelly, medium dense, slightly moist, brown, subangular rock. CLAY (CL); silty, slightly sandy, medium stiff, wet, brown, low to medium plasticity. SAND AND CLAY (SC -CL); stratified, stiff to medium stiff with depth, brown. GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GM); silty, sandy, probable boulders, dense, wet, brown, rounded rock. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch I.D. California liner sample, Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch 1.D. split spoon sample, ASTM 0-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 15 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Free water level in boring and number of days following drilling measurement was taken. Depth at which boring had caved when checked on September 13 , 2005. Indicates slotted PVC pipe installed in boring to depth shown. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on August 31, 2005 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level, 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcf) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 105 742 Hepworth—Pawlak Geotechnfcaf LEGEND AND NOTES • Figure 3 Compression % 0 c 0 .F) w 0. E 0 U 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 Moisture Content = 23.0 percent Dry Density = 98 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 1 at 10 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf 100 Moisture Content = 15.5 Dry Density = 103 Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 2 at 5 Feet percent pcf No movement upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf 100 105 742 H Hepworth—Pawlok Geotechnical SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Job No. 105 742 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (%) NATURAL DRY DENSITY{%) (Pd) GRADATION ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE 1 BORINGS DEPTH (ft) GRAVEL SAND (%) PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE LIQUID LIMIT (%) PLASTIC INDEX (%) 1 2 7.6 109 49 Very silty sand with, gravel 10 23.0 98 Sandy clay 2 5 15.5 103 Sandy clay COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at C1.� 7 6 k'57 ,eic Permit No. I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: v Ad 0A( JJo4- Dn e J Le !e /v f 7 C/jo S Argo./6---0 17,a,-(1SGS" y'jf-eehel" / C_ You are here* notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 2 G Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at C S' 7 9 Permit No. l �' e { fr.& have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: Cc ie 42Z.91 ' el , -Cw0- a - GYa 0"1, You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 7-d � 20 Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 No. 808 Assessor's Parcel No 69311. 33D, -0Y-04 Date 1/6 /)-G BUILDING PERMIT CARD a / Job Addres6595 !C�7 9 -t . C �G AI elz) �( a3 n �o� r �'sr�tA.a.�¢. S4.111. Ownerlta / L?j 5 Xt Address 'P. o .6)-1 153�2uorl ,C06'Phone #9'70-57‘. - � ✓ Address ', Phone #9 /v -9y9 -in 2-t) Contractor Setbacks: Front Rear Ril LH Zoning ECTIONS Soils Test Footing -2� Foundation ZZ -067 %4' Grout Underground Plumbing -3-/ O( 4S, Rough Plumbing q- / gl't5' 97a'z• Framing /0-‘2,43-07/A2.- Insulation JO 30 -476377,:2--- Roofing Drywall B-6, -06" Gas Piping 9-49,t96 74,e7-) ��yNOTES 40:n - c.G 6U4 eLQ, EXTERIOR Address No Drainage Decks -support & clearanc: to woo Decks -stairs & rails Exterior locks Flashing around doors & wind Insect screens INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doors -I his" min. _ Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -13/s" min Mech. equip, 18' above floor_ No opening into sleeping area BASEMENT.CRAWL AREA Access Insulation Headroom/Stairs Ventilation Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) /7.J -ow Electrical Final (State) inal 69,P5-07 /Checklist omjeted? Certificate Occupancy # D65 Date G'"Z`T-0 Septic System # $-QQ Other FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL RO Boiler.__ Hot water t/ M Date Final M1 F.A. gas/oil Floor drain Clearance Air con. system Hot water heater Combustion air (continue on back) STAIRWAYS • Headroom (613") Railing & guardrails Width Rise & run KITCHEN Clearance above grill Exhaust fan Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) Gas piping, valves BEDROOMS LPG Drain Egress FIREPLACE/STOVE Smoke detector ✓ Clearance to combustibles BATHROOMS Termination of chimney Exhaust tan �✓ Combustion air Shatterproof glass Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) OTHER Glass doors Certified by:_ REMARKS • BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued 1, Zoned Area Permit No91V AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the: County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VO D. UseS IF I welvi ou 0. �p � ( 6.4* St Address Legal Owner 1 Descriptii0 CI `_s l .ems Setbacks Front LCContractor Site Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 2—/7..06 1 Driveway 4✓11 . ,. Foundation ,2 -.z-fes 7 ' Underground Plumbing 3.j ao A�.A -Insulation /d"3 p' 't j6 e.�t Rough Plumbing 9- ig Drywall /7_6., pd Imp,. Chimney & Vent /0_26-05¢ 7,6r , S5--z/-07,6r_ Gas Piping ?-,..06.- / B Final 6 T ix� Llcstric t• :t;, - ijicSeptic Final A4./ Framing jp,/3-6',474t (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: r ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. APPROVED Dat ant By IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COV THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE WITH CLEAR PLASTIC Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 Job Address (]5127 t • 9 Nature of Work Use of Buildina Owner Building Permit NO. 9c c Ce,A,6-ey-elz,k Co E16�3 D.1 c. 0/3 Contractor ( 4r -)W` -11.4:t ' C Amount of Permit $ "'') % ! 7 Date (2 f Clerk