Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 Job Address Nature of Work Use of Building Owner �� ! Contractor 4114-4` r Amount of Permit $ 3T q, l r NO CI 1 79 Building Permit tBC.2,L.cR..P a cco h - ($3 ^ b 4- a/ o eU Date Clerk GARFIELD COUNTY OARFIEID TELEPHONE: (970) 9454212 • P�'NeD���lb k/90 3 l D BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION COUN'IYGIENWOOD SYRING9)1 COLORADO (/) INSPECTION Imo: (970) 945-' PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. PERMIT NO. RIB ADDRESS: 3-6 5 IR' T Ya C. C 4 a. R 14 .B b 11 L1-' /ii c oA-j' Y N. tir fl rata. CO TA 3 1 LOT NO. /0 BLOCK9SUBDIVISION/EXEMPTION p NO. /I)0NNMGv7 cgcCKVI0b9R2 S aft `7'eF Tan.0eR Mm, 1 /1J DW mo ATS mos) PA J. 4ca0TLI Co, d 14 c' '�BS� ao%L ,� 2%6 71 7 0 -r-0,4'0 3 n c _ CopS?Rweefi.r "a)7 9 e -,e Sea PAglieNVYCLCo Troc"fs'7+JP) IZ'NCt 4 A.eur@CT2NmaR 0 Ni N e o AIM= A: LIVIA 5 ,l.r.®.IRLDINO 3 / g 9 .pFT.OLOT 1, /o 0 9 5 liar, / MIapna 11 6 ®aIOU C re 14.5 J DQJy 7 A% ) r,9 /e. fir A M) )1 dhuu� vast.w`�►o� 75 °e""°a /v e LA) corvs rax c.rj e .v' e a.aoV. g 01."est CY aARgra DALT[.AIIDl MOVE coxour 9 QUALM yitie .5F,°m° °°°s.TRiPPie. r aeons 10 jog e.AaD Acs110 >WmKAN 6_06-D— m lrea ywan V47 //lYo0l -°O min: ormvon 4 y 0,a annITIEDVALICIATIMS 4 / 354. 5-1— eBoaLamna �h1. _ _ .0 eSl ,`,'faa...a"- its --4 �' AL1fl 15b6"---"4 votat M 0131t. q gore- oK�,PO&� 1 NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. PIAN CHECK FEE: 1197. 2 2 lSins ' 75 THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 110 DAYS. OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 110 DAYS AI ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. Taw- FEE:DATE PERMIT ISSUED: 30 : .17 ! ! 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMTh1ED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNINGTFIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WFETFIFR SPECIFIED HEREIN OR. NOT. THE GRANIT4G OF A PERI DOe3 NOT PRESUME TO GIVE OCC: GROUP: CONST: TYPE: .-gOUP: v , AUTHORITY TO VIOLA ...• 'IR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR r PFORMANCE OF LOCAL -. ,• REr/I p. .`, ER CO. LIf//AI--.A011000 e / n (Agr ZONING: SETBACKS: $'.. 1 T+'/ ar aalhanmd seat h.vuy 'e.d and el L'. HOME: 'SOS NO. & FEE: _ Flaws Dept. Approval/Dim AGREEMENT PERMISSION 15 HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND/OR rim AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE Aa DET ABED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPART E.NT. IN CONSIDERATION OF TEE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER HEREBY ACRFFS TO COMPLY WITH. ALL GUIDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ATIONS ADOPTED Bl GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.21.211 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGJER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOLTED BY NOTICE FRO., THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEA HAFTBR REQUBIIJG 1111 CORRECTION OF ERRORS N SAID FLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTJIFR DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER MIEN I VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDNANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFTCAI1ONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF AN) IUT]ES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. TTM RESPONSIBILITY FOR MESH ITEMS AND IdPLEMENTAIIO' CONSEKXATIVE AND IN SUPFOR? RESPONSIBILITIES OR DURINGCONSTRUCTION OF TIM OWNE71,5IN GLSarmao3 .STS SPECIFICALLY WTnI THE ARCHITECT. DESIGNER GUIDER AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO T. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND TIM AGREEMENT ABOVE (ARTIAL1 r r ► `1`� # U�tt.9 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant 'Tj easel. em Address 50 l c..nt4C LT Date 1- $- f co Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other 6 Total Square Feet 3o/4 F 74 Valuation Basement: Unfinished 170 4- 4l Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 912 + ID Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation /20 x Open Valuation Subdivision 3agT OVA /Mom( stet" Creek Lot/Block ItApt $ec Contractor fonder C064 a25, og S, 50)-- (o?7P RD, 4140 Total Valuation 257, 5s/, 5? 9702859631 Battlement Mesa Metro Battlement Mesa Metro District 01.03 30 p m 07-13-2006 1 /1 CONSOLIDATED METROPOLITAN DISTRICT 199'I41NIARISIK TR II I. / I -O. DON 6116 / HATI'LEM -NT iNII SA, co 81636 FACSIM!L5E15i1TRA��I SSM;ISSION Date: 07/13/06 TO: David Mead COMPANY: Garfield County Building & Planning FAX NUMBER: 384-3470 FROM: Amie Arneson FAX NUMBER: 970-285-9631 MESSAGE All tap fees have been paid and Water & Sewer Service is approved for 50 Sumac Court. Thanks, Anile TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 1 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This fax communication is intended only for the above-named recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, please call (970)285-9050 as soon as possible. It is unlawful to disclose, in any manner, such confidential information to anyone other than the person to whom it is directed. 2603 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within th, e/nvelope. Yes j/ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks sacki dgapply. Yes / 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjace f ernes), streams or water courses? Yes /{� 2 . 4. • Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property Yes 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes // 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and t e clearrances requiredletween wo,Qd an4 earth? Yes b4SQMcvv) IN) 7N 4/.0O�VS 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces andso s? Faa/e vevvT3 `fGcNYSNwd N5 SOFl (/L Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor Toads and wipd loads? Yes �/ 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rajefs or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and Yes 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed gra a to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flit ryef� (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and mod d Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No 3 14. . Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No A/ L ✓v e 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleepin rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and venylation for all habitable rooms? Yes �/ No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify s ety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated o plan? Yes 1/ No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants?/ Yes I/ No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted w out it. Yes No 21. Will this be the nly residential structure on the parcel? Yes No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) co pplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 2011wide and 20fi. long? Yes No 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructioy'code requirements? Yes V No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zo district? Yes No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by e Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicati of these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building per n•f? Yes I/ No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in ty084-5003. Yes t/ No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $5 0 re -inspection fee? Yes No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspectionrp for to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy oft building? Yes No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IR Yes 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department 625-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time f applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the ParcelSt Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building pe t application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes l7 No 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to bmit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No l(please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior tgeissuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes !/ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature of Owner Date Phone: (days); (evenings) Project Name: Project Address: Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal issuance of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge epartment at 625-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes V No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a buildinP er mit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 1/ No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the b t of • y ability. S. a.. e 9ti®'os f Owner Date Phone: 9) 4, 7) 70 (days); 2-r C ?d).4 (evenings) Project Name: M, c G D 4 Project Address: / S Ll ill C O t4)CT/ 64 )71-e rye "7✓h tf % 60. Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 04/2003 =,vrex 19 BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION & CHECKLIST (for New Home Construction projects) COPY Homeowner: Te F p / e N D e i( Home Mailing Address: ) 1 1 F+1 C W T 1l av e !v O y1 r A ,Q A c /1 1 T e Co, X-' '. 3 i_ Home Phone: q 70 a A 5 7 p/ do Work Phone (ifdesired): 9'70 �I 7 17 D Project Address: S O S U ✓n Lot: 10 Block: 7 Subdivision:,. .3.evu % c tic N4 y 6 Production Home Plan Name (ifapplicable): Homebuilder: TO ,N ye Q G QJV C 7 R u C T) a Business Mailing Address: )) d 4 C. e , 10 8' 1 ' p , A c. l/ i[ Ta.1 CP,. 8/1:3( Business Phone: ? 76 ('c `79 g / Fax (if desired): $4 A, e Submittal Date: 2I) 0-eOcEstimatedStart Date: /C-peC Estimated Completion Date: f mtj y 66 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: Two Copies each of items 1, 2 & 4 need to be submitted. (Check -off items attached to the Application. Fill in spaces as indicated.) ✓ 1. Site Plan Drawing (1" = 10' or 1" = 20' scale) with the following information shown: ✓ Lot, Block & Subdivision name. ✓� Street Address of Project. Building Setback Lines (also fill-in the shortest distance between property line to the exterior wall closest to that property line). Please be aware that all Building Setback Lines are taken from your Property Line Pins!! Your Property Line is NOT the Curb Line!! Dwelling Unit Garage Front Setback: c% 8' Left Side Setback: g Right Side Setback: 9.9 ' / Rear Setback: 3 F. 1- !/ Utility Easements. NA 55' Clear Site -Line at Intersection Comer Lots. V. Site Grading Elevations & Drainage. !✓ First (main) Floor Height in relation to top of street curb at front -center of lot. 'eU i Driveways (including width of driveway), Walkways, Patios, etc. fog c., Outbuildings. Page 2 of 6 2. Architectural Drawings (1/4" = 1' or 1/8" = 1' scale) with the following information shown. V 3. Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions �pTRv 9/.'o,c LAIiv Attb First Floor Finished Living Area: Second Floor Finished Living Area: Lower Floor Finished Living Area: Total Finished Living Area: Total Unfinished Living Area: Garage Area: (fill-in the following square foot areas). • /yn sit tT, 57 (o square feet 5-4 0 square feet 39 D square feet o) t} square feet /70 square feet 9 square feet Building Elevations Plans indicating doors, windows, exterior materials, building height,. roof pitch , etc. (fill-in maximum height below). A Pot Con., 1 rid ✓"e C Maximum building height to highest ridge line or building structural projection feet above top of street curb at front -center of your lot. Engineered (stamped) Foundation Plan. Outbuildings indicating dimensions, elevations and overall height to ridge line. Exterior Materials (fill-in the selections below): Roofing Material: ASP 44/7- Color: ✓CAe,A IA' e4 Primary Siding Material: I// ,,v y % Accent Siding Material: 7 B f) Trim Material: T B .D Masonry Material: 8 Stucco Materials: % (8,0 Front Door Material: S 7e'�/ Garage Door Material: S7tt) COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE Page 3 of 6 Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: Color: COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE % P . • 4. Landscape/Irrigation Plans with the following information: Planting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated lawn, tree placement, shrub beds, ground cover, etc.). Plant Material listing by species of trees, shrubs and grasses. Groundcover Material with weed control barrier. Fences. Other Landscape Improvements (decks, site lighting, flag poles, etc.). 5. Variance Request (if applicable) Give details below: 6. Residential Construction Monetary Deposit: I/We hereby acknowledge and understand that our failure to complete Home Construction, Improvement Projects or Landscaping Construction within the time constraints noted in Conditions 2. & 3. On Page 6 of this Application will result in a Notice and Opportunity for a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors. If I/We are found in violation of these Conditions at the Hearing it will result in a fine to the Owner of not less than 5500.00 per month for each full month in excess of the allotted completion time frame. I/We hereby acknowledge that Home Construction or Improvement Projects or Landscape Construction features which are built in non-conformance with this full application, including the Conditions of Approval noted on Page 6 of 6 herein, I/We will be cited by the BMSA/AC in written citation form at the time of discovery. In extenuating circumstances a Variance may be requested from the BMSA/AC, provided such Variance request item is within the purview and approval jurisdiction of the BMSA/AC. If a Variance is not granted by the BMSA/AC and if the Non -Conforming Items are not corrected within 60 days after the date of written citation, I/We will be served Notice of a Hearing before the BMSA Board of Directors, and if I/We are found in violation of these Non -Conforming Items at the Hearing I/We will be fined a minimum of 5500.00 per Non -Conforming Item. Notwithstanding the foregoing, I/We acknowledge that the BMSA Board of Directors and/or Architectural Committee may pursue any legal remedy available in the event of a non-compliance. Page 4 of 6 AS PER THE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS,PLEASE INDICATE THE FOLLOWING POINTS ON THE PLOT PLAN AND BELOW: ELEVATIONS AT EACH CORNER OF THE LOT. LOCATION 1. /CRoNT ce,v7CQ or cine$ 2.R►NT flvN7 oFGoY, 3.Ler%T F'jtavY of LaT 4.teptRcfl of G#T 5.R19NrRen R o 4-17- 6.--THE oT 6.--THE HIGH POINT OF THE LOT. 7. --THE LOW POINT OF THE LOT. 8. --HEIGHT OF GARAGE FLOOR. ELEVATION ( FEET ) 0' -f-1,'oLo'of c-utS *1,00' of cuts of cuRe f 8,2<i .01= caX9 ReAK cen.Ti1.+R;9/r7 CoRWG,( L.e f r SRO N7 +-e• FRPM cemit koF DRe,v� 9. --DIGHT OF HOUSE MAIN FLOOR L i v I N 34(Loo m - +I FRd .h c C ft -7a J 10. --HEIGHT OF ROOF ABOVE FOUNDATION. ( MAXIMUM--- 35 FEET ) 11. --HEIGHT OF ROOF ABOVE CENTER OF THE MID CURB. ( MAXIMUM--- 29 FEET ) 12. --DRAINAGE FLOW LINES ON THE PLOT PLAN. 13. --ROOF PITCHES. 1. 6 % 2. 3.- 4. 15. --SQUARE FEET OF LIVING SPACE. -f �9 of cuRB 3019 oFclAW9 c Failure to pay fines levied as determined at the Hearing may also result in a Lien being placed on your Property or litigation Process initiated by the BMSA Board of Directors to secure conformance with this full Application and its respective Conditions Of ApprovaL I/We understand that Architectural Committee approval does not constitute approval of the local building department, drainage design or structural soundness, nor does it constitute assurance that the plans comply with all applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and laws. I/We further acknowledge that any subsequent field changes which I/We may desire to the Home Construction or Improvement Projects of this original Application Submittal and the original Conditions of Approval issued by the BMSA/AC will require an additional Revised Application Submittal on our behalf, and that I/We will not proceed with any subsequent field changes until a Revised Conditions of Approval have been issued to us by the BMSA/AC. Owner's Signatures)7,1==Z:: Owner's PrintedNames: J e -Pc 1 ovk.c e r Date: /d • 20 •- 0 C Date: Page 5 of 6 This portion of the Application Form is to be completed by the Architectural Committee (not the Applicant). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL or DISAPPROVAL 1. No sitework or building construction may proceed on any Lot (including no preliminary site clearing, grubbing, grade alteration, storing of material, foundation excavation, extension of underground utilities, etc.) until the Project has received a Project approval from the Architectural Committee and has been issued a Building Permit (as required by Garfield County for new home or Renovation projects). 2. All general building and site improvements construction for any Project shall be completed and shall have issued a Certificate of Occupancy from the Garfield County Building Department no later than one (1) year after the issuance date of this Architectural Committee Approval. 3. The complete landscaping and revegetation of the improved Lot, to specifically include the front side and rear yard areas, shall be completed no later than six (6) months from the date of the Certificate of Occupancy. 4. If the selection of colors and /or landscaping plans are not included with this application they must be submitted for approval before any action is taken to install the missing items. 5. 6. Completion Date Required By, Archttectui 44 7. 67,itT CiA.el • s eak4--1( • (714- 341 Application A royal (initials of Arc By: Application Apprved� for nstruction sub. ct to the above conditions: By Chairman: /J.�.cP Date: Application Denied (Initials of Architectural Committee Members): By: Application Denied for reason(s) stated above: By Chairman: Date: Page 6 of 6 RECEIPT ACCOUNT PAYMENT BAL. DUE ( //�� k �- t to ncr�' /1,. 4 l ' 'DOLLARS OFOR QFOR RENy I J �I LC i.[ -C.O ✓ I pC 7 ' 7cry I 'nnC C l /I RECEIVED FRO DATE to /94/05- No. 33761 IFROM TO is s PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant f pFL Date r' 5 -CC' Building ,/ngineered Foundation X/ADriveway Permit -Surveyed Site Plan Ail/Septic Permit and Setbacks Grade/Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List J /7Minimum Application Questionnaire Subdivision Plat Notes ,<2,1 Fire Department Review ✓Valuation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions PlApplication Signed ,/Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. JO 4.40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning VProperty Line Setbacks ✓30ft Stream Setbacks YFlood Plain iilding Height "� ZZoDoing Sign -off !/Road Impact Fees ✓ HOA/DRC Approval /Grade/Topography 40% /Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes GRAD JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECIENICAL ENGINEERS - GEOLOGISTS 1441 Nioror Sr. Grand .function. CO 81505 January 23, 2006 TEL: (970) 242-5968 FAX (970) 242-1561 Tonder Construction 1104 County Road 308 Parachute, CO 81635 Re: Perimeter Drain Requirement, 50 Sumac Ct_, Battlement Mesa, CO Gentlemen: At the request of Mr. Tonder, we have reviewed our records and observations at the above referenced site. It is our opinion that a perimeter foundation drain will not be required for this structure, provided all recommendations which will be contained within our report of open excavation observation for this site which pertain to site surface drainage, grading and soil compaction of backfill are closely followed. These recommendations and requirements are summarized in the notes on the foundation design prepared by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore for the site. It has been our experience in the Battlement Mesa area that if proper site drainage, control of roof runoff and foundation backfill compaction is accomplished for each site that subsurface moisture has not been a problem, even in most cases of fiull basement construction. We must emphasize that these recommendations and requirements are very similar to those contained within the international building cold and the older uniform building code. Our experience in semi -arid to arid climates has been that foundation perimeter drains can create as many problems as are solved. In areas such as Battlement Mesa, we only recommend foundation perimeter drains when specific problems are anticipated, which cannot be mitigated by site grading, roof runoff control and foundation backfill compaction. It is believed that all pertinent points have been addressed. If any further questions arise regarding this project or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office at any time. Respectfully Submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. by: Edward M. Moms ' E Principal Engineer GJLD Job No.920t2-GJ GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL AI, ENGINEERS - GEOLOGISTS 1441 Motor St. Grand Junctigin. GO S 1505 March 6, 2006 Tonder Construction 1104 C.R. 308 Parachute, CO 81635 Re: Garfield County Building Permit #92012 for 50 Sumac Ct., Battlement Mesa, CO Gentlemen: TEL: (970) 242-M96ri FAX. (97()242-1561 Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have examined the foundation footing forms at the above referenced site on 1-31-2006 . Our examination was based on foundation engineering drawings previously completed by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, Inc. for this site. All footings were the correct width and depth as per our foundation design. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have observed the foundation reinforcing steel at the above referenced site on 1-31-2006 and 2-09-2006. Proper placement and quantity of steel reinforcing bars were found at the time of our observation. Therefore, it is our conclusion that the woric done is in conformance with our previous recommendations for this site. We hope this letter has provided you with the information required. If questions arise or further information is needed, please feel free to contact Grand Junction Lincoln-DeVore at any time. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, INC. by: Edward M. Morris PE Principal Engineer GJLD Job #92012- GJ GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. (.EOTE(IINICAL ENGINEERS nEnLOGISTS 1441 Motor St. Grand Junction, CO 515115 March 6, 2006 Tonder Construction 1104 C.R. 308 Parachute, CO 81635 Re: Open Excavation Observation, 50 Sumac Ct., Battlement Mesa, CO TEL: (970) 2424%968 FAX (7711) 242-1561 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a foundation excavation evaluation at the above referenced site on 1-25-2006. The purpose of this observation and evaluation was to determine the type and condition of the soils on the site and to relate their engineering characteristics to foundation reactions of the proposed structure. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundation, but is not a foundation design and may not be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Soil Classification: The soils on this site consist of an alluvial debris -fan deposit which is quite thick and extremely stratified. This debris fan originates on the middle and upper slopes of Battlement Mesa to the east southeast, along the Battlement Creek and Monument Gulch Drainages. The stratification within this debris fan feature ranges from silt, sandy silt and silty clay in the finer portions and gravely silty clays to silty gravel, cobbles and boulders in the coarser portions. Many strata of the finer -grained soils are of low to very low density and exhibit compressible and metastable (collapsible) properties. The soils at foundation level on this site visually classified as of silts and low plastic silts of moderate to moderately high compressive properties. This upper soil is believed to be in excess of 30 feet thick below the foundation excavation. The allowable bearing capacities of the upper soils on this site, after wetting and compaction, are 1600 psf maximum and 150 psf minimum. In-place soil density tests of the reworked subgrade soils were taken within the building excavation on 1- 25-2006. These four in-place soil density tests indicate the wetted, reworked soils have a dry density ranging from 100 to 108 pounds per cubic foot. Densities of this magnitude indicate these reworked soils, in near proximity to the footings, do not possess moderate compressible or possible collapsible properties. No soft areas were indicated by the final density tests taken on 1-25-2006 nor were soft areas observed by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on that date. Unless specifically noted, this site observation, any associated testing and the reworking/compaction of the soils at foundation level, addresses only the soils within 1 to 2 feet below the bottom of the building foundation excavation. It is possible that soil conditions which may affect the performance of this foundation system are present below the depth of soil compaction by the contractor and the testing performed by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore. The grading and drainage recommendations are considered very important for the long term stability of this foundation system and the structure. Man-made Fill: The subgrade soils within the upper 8 to 14 inches of the building excavation were wetted, reworked and compacted by the contractor to obtain the soil densities reported above. Soils within the original foundation excavation appear to be native to the site. r Tonder Construction Open Excavation Observation, 50 Sumac Ct., Battlement Mesa, CO March 6, 2006 Page 2 Soil Moisture Conditions: The subgrade soils at foundation level within the original excavation were believed to be dry to damp, based upon site conditions and our experience in this area. No free water was noted in the excavation. Some moisture was added to the soils in the excavation by the contractor in order to obtain proper compaction. Foundation Type Recommended: A properly designed shallow foundation system of the standard continuous spread footing and stemwall type, based upon the recommendations provided in this report has been prepared by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, a copy of that design has been previously provided to the contractor/client The foundation system must be constructed in strict compliance with our plans and specifications, with no alterations or deviations allowed unless prior approval is first obtained from this office. Voids Beneath Foundation Walls: Voids are not required for this foundation design. Reinforcing: The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect. Floor Slabs: Non -Structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content +2%). Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2%, and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharged a minimum 10 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a `dry well discharge' be used on this site, unless specifically sited by a Geotechnical Engineer. Planters, if any, should be so con- structed that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. Tonder Construction ' Open Excavation Observation, 50 Sumac Ct., Battlement Mesa, CO March 6, 2006 Page 3 The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping and valves be installed no Tess than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water does not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited, so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not limited to: • Metering the Irrigation water. * Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit on-site water usage. * Encourage efficient landscaping practices. * Enforcing reasonable limits on the size of high water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building or foundation. • Incorporating `xeriscaping' landscaping and irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any Crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the Foundation Design Engineer or the Geotechnical Engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Provided all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain (see attached drain sketch) would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development. Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM 11557. The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum content +2%) Cement Type: Type II, Type I-II or Type II -V cement is recommended for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type 11, Typel-II or Type II -V cement under any circumstances. r Tonder Constriction Open Excavation Observation, 50 Sumac Ct., Battlement Mesa, CO March 6, 2006 Page 4 Remarks: We recommend that the bottom of all foundation components rest a minimum of 1-1/2 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. The frost step is 3 feet. Senate Bill 13 (CRS 6-6.5-101) Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foundation soils which do not possess a "significant potential for expansion". We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project, and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of 3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction or the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, INC Edward M. Morris PE Principal Engineer GILD Job # 92012 -GJ CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE INCE THE WIDTH OF THE ORIGINAL EXCAVATION LIMIT ( VARIES — MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM BUILDING ) ROOF DOWNSPOUT SOIL PREPARED 5" to B' DEEP TO LANDSCAPE. USE 'LOW WATER USE' TWE PLANTS and/or 'XERISCAPING' TECHNIQUES WITHIN THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPING 1T THE NATIVE SOILS BELOW THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO BE REWORKED ! COMPACTED FOR A MINMIUM OF 12 INCHES PVC DRAINAGE PIPE LLW for LANDSCAPING SOIL BACKFILL COMPACTED TO MINIMIZE�� + WATER SEEPAGE TO \ THE FOUNDADOIV SOILS H to — EXCAVATION UNIT L----__ .' .14,: �;• - J PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4' dia. PVC /.•: r INSTALLED as per GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER v SPECIFICATIONS — AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'LOW WATER' & PERIMETER DRAIN CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ORIGINAL EXCAVATION LIMIT ( VARIES — MINIMUM OF 5 FEET FROM BUILDING ) ROOF DOWNSPOUT SOL PREPARED 6' to C DEEP 70 LANDSCAPE. USE 'LOW WATER USE' TYPE PLANTS and/or 'XERISCAPING' TECHNIQUES WITHIN THE 'CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE'. GROUND SLOPE ACROSS LANDSCAPING DRAIN PIPE THE NATIVE SOILS BELOW THE CRITICAL DRAINAGE ZONE' TO BE REWORKED & COMPACTED FOR A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES EXCAVATION LIMIT 1 LANDSCAPE FABRIC BENEATH GRAVEL/MULCH COVER I +++ COMPACTED TO MINIMIZESOIL BACKFILL \ WATER SEEPAGE TO PC FOUNDATION SOILS H1-1 s PERIPHERAL DRAIN and 4' db. PVC >a.. INSTALLED as per GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SPECIFICATIONS — AS REQUIRED • DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' & PERIMETER DRAIN or GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN—DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS—GEOLOGISTS EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT OF SCALE [IDI M• NONE 9-16-2005 D—DRAIN1 No rmq Assessor's Parcel No ago 2-13-0-010 Date y -70 G -St PERMIT CARD Job Addresses • Owner C� f Contractor i aka . C;^ c11/6 3s o (o oeppk/giIia&(le5 Address/ft ` (ON/ed-it' Yhone 111k5 -dove Address I Io4 e23O8 1 -Aet%1 Phone k5- bra/ Setbacks: FrontnrRear RH LH Zoning 9Fow tiA,„,, o:,‘,.. INSPECTIONS 1c�r"k` Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) s' /- 6 &O. Electrical Final (State) -/2-D6 Final 4-(3-DbalYehecklisjfarpp d? Certificate Occupancy # 7/ Date CO'43-OCis Septic Systerp #- Date Final Soils Test k Footingn'"1 /tam_ Foundation Grout Underground Plumbing a -lb -04) $- Rough Plumbing r-3/- 6 Framing C -3/-o Insulation 6-2-o6 ar.,� Rooting Drywall 6- 9-o6 .91/A - Gas Piping rs- 3/-O6 Othe NOTES U LTERIOR Address No. D rainage Decks -support & clearance to wood OeclaFetairs & rails Exterior locks Flashing around doors & windows Insect screens INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doom -13/4" min Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -13/4" min Mech. equip. 18" above floor No opening into sleeping area B ASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access Insulation Headroom/Stews Ventilation FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Boiler Hol water FA gsTN stoll 1 alts .44 r Floor dram i Clearance Air con. system fr ��r n1 Hol water heater �f " 51) Combustion air Gas piping, valves LPG Dram FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combustibles Termination Of chimney Combustion air Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) Glass doors Al Certified by: M' 4 g' REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS Headroom (6'6") Rolling & guardrails Width Rise 8 run KITCHEN Clearance above gull17 Exhaust fan / Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) BEDROOMS Egress Smoke detector BATHROOMS Exhaust fan Shatterproof glass OTHER i BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.. .... j 4 Zoned Area Permit Not))) 9 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which ti, 's permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully cceaphed with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above :tscribed structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and V� IMMEDIATE Y BECOME NULL AN VOID. 1 Use Sli: ID . 1� cots Alt Addresso Leg Description o f `+ 1 Asia ' 4 C. 0 4 wners10 Or +s.��� Contractor tonuru Cast Setbacks Front Side SideRear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 0 Driveway e bvki IV Foundation i.i\ s 1-7) - 0 Underground Plumbing 2 - 1 L _ ok 1 Insulation - _Z -o is -siva Rough Plumbing 5.9)1..vt; , Drywall 6-'f- OG opiz. Chimney & Vent p , tAk E lei.- 2 nal - Iib Gas Piping ic -pb A Final 7 -L3 -o a / tb r Septic Final If in ming of !hilitA ciao► .31b Notes: <„ include ' o. iti-PlabesAB Win ows ,nd Donn installed). SI ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BF NSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR 1 XTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. Sas e(� R r 14 THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE w 513 �O6 APPROVED Date I 1 t By Ce IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVE WITH CLEAR PLASTIC