HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationDate:
T
'SPECIAL USE PERMIT
e/ X4-181
Applicant: Fc Address of of Applicant: 2 of \s
Special Use: (',c,„,„,,'r CA \r-
X�.� g31T A
0
q qi-(D155
Legal Description:
11001
Requirements: Requirements:
1. Plans and specifications for proposed use.
2. Letters of approval from utility companies, sewage and water. Road access
and other information deemed necessary.
3. A vicinity map drawn to scale depicting the subject property, location and
use of buildings and structures on adjacent lots.
4. An impact statement on the proposed use (see 5.03.07 - 5.03.09 of Zoning Regs.
5. A copy of Assessor's map showing property; and a listing of all adjoining
property owners and property owners within 200 feet of said property.
Notice containing information described under paragraph 5shall
to ta
be
mailed
to all owners of record of these lots at least 5 days prior
by certified return receipt mail.
6. Notice including the name of the applicant, description of the subject lot,
a description of the proposed special use and the time and place for the
hearing shall be given in the newspaper of general circulation in that
portion of the County at least fifteen (15) days prior to such hearing time.
Applicant shall bear the cost of advertising.
7. A fee of $500.00 shall be charged for each application and shall be sub-
mitted with the application.
This Special Use Permit is in compliance with Sections 5.03 and 9.03 of the
Garfield County Zoning Resolution and as per application.
List all property owners within 200 feet Poffosubject proper
ty lines.
eos
Attach map showing all improvements (present and proposed) and all pertinent
distances and area. Show all improvements on your property and adjoining
property within 200 feet of your boundary.
The above information is correct to the best of my knowlege.
Ot-A-)./' C2.)
Applicant
Proof :of Publication
Mail Receipts
Fee
Special Use Granted
Special Use Denied
Date:
Reason for Denial
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
\^-o W(z\0p - 01:Ns \_)k. 1)1",
1-\COki t%3 ti- N ess
432.4 1.43 2Q . `dew O e,
0 r � 1. v.C���t� �uS Sc`swl -P• 0. -SO Jc ciS
(50
Division of Highways
D O H Form 101
Rev. August. 1980
Copy Distribution:
White , Applicant
Canary , MTCE Section
Pink, MTCE Patrol File
Goldenrod, Inspector
tlit or County Garf
e Highway No 6
field
2
MTCE Section No
MTCE Patrol No
SDOH Permit No
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
PERMIT FOR ACCESS APPROACH
19
B-59
Fredrick R. and Judy A. Ingelhart , (herein called permittee) is granted permission from the State
Department of Highways to construct an access approach on the north side of State Highway 6 , a dis-
tance of 1,000 feet west from milepost 114 also known as
for the purpose of obtaining access to Light tool rental and plumbing shop The access
approach shall be constructed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit, which are the
special conditions and referenced attachments listed below and the general provisions and specifications listed on
the reverse of this page. Court action may be taken or this permit may be suspended, modified or revoked by the
issuing authority in accordance with the State Administrative Procedures Act if the permitted access approach and its
use violate the terms and conditions of this permit.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. The use of advance warning and construction signs, flashers, barricades, and flagmen are required at all times
during access approach construction within State right-of-way in conformance with the MANUAL ON UNIFORM
TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES.
2. The permittee agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the State Department of Highways from any liability
incurred due to negligence by the permittee during the construction, maintenance, and operation of the
permitted access approach.
3. Okay to improve existing access; no design change allowed.
4. Signing shall be in accordance with Uniform Traffic Control Manual.
The permittee shall notify (Name) John Stacy with the Colorado Division of
Highways in (location) Glenwood Springs, CO at (phone) 945-7441
48 hours prior to commencing access approach construction within State Highway right-of-way. A copy of this permit
must be available at the construction site. All construction shall be completed within 30 days from the permit date.
Time extensions may be requested.
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
. CHI :ENGINEER
E.N.
!rte
By
(Sign/re and Ti le) John :ft acy , Highway Foreman
Date
August 26, 1981
SPECIFICATIONS
Section 1, Definition: A driveway approach is understood to be that portion of the highway right-of-way between the pavement edge and the
property line which is designed and used for the interchange of traffic between the roadway pavement and the abutting property.
Section 2, Intersection Clearance: At any intersection of a State Highway with another highway, road, or street, where right-of-way has been
acquired to provide sight distance, no driveway approach shall be permitted within the frontage thereof. At any other intersection, a driveway shall
be restricted for a sufficient distance from the intersection to preserve the normal and safe movement of traffic. (It is recommended for rural
residence entrances that a minimum intersection clearance of 50 feet be provided and for rural commercial entrances a minimum of 100 feet be
provided. For similar installations in urban or suburban areas, a minimum of 20 feet for both residence and commercial entrances is
recommended.)
Section 3, Sight Distance: All entrances and exits shall be so located and constructed that vehicles approaching or using them will be able to obtain
adequate sight distance in both directions along the highway in order to maneuver safely and without interfering with highway traffic.
Section 4, Traffic Operations: Driveway locations for ingress and egress must be reasonable from the viewpoint of the traveling public in that no
unusual hazard to pedestrians or motorists shall be created, nor shall the driveway(s) invite or compel vehicular movements in directions or
locations contrary to those for which the highway was designed, neither shall they invite or compel illegal or unsafe traffic movements.
Section 5, Control Devices: No entrance or approach shall be located or constructed so as to interfere with or prevent the proper location or
functioning of any traffic regulating device. The Applicant shall not be permitted to erect any sign or display material, either fixed or movable, on or
extending over any portion of the highway right-of-way.
Section 6, Property Line Offset: All parts of entrances and exits on highway right-of-way, including the radii, shall be confined within the
Applicant's property frontage. Frontage is that portion of the right -if -way lying between the two most distant possible lines drawn perpendicularly
from the centerline of the highway to the applicant's abutting property line.
Section 7, Driveway Width: No commercial driveway shall have a width greater than thirty-five (35) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of
the driveway, except as increased by permissible radii. No noncommercial driveway shall have a width greater than twenty-four (24) feet measured
at right angles to the centerline of the driveway, except as increased by permissible radii.
Section 8, Approach Angle: The axis of an approach to the highway may be at a right angle to the centerline of the highway and of any angle
between ninety (90) degrees and sixty (60) degrees but shall not be less than sixty (60) degrees. Adjustment will be made according to the type of
traffic to be served and other physical conditions.
Section 9, Curb Return Radii: Permissible radii on driveway returns shall be governed by such factors as width of drive and angular placement.
Where the flared edge of an approach controls the turning radius of a vehicle entering a property by a right turn from the adjacent outside traffic
lane of the roadway, the radius of that edge shall be not less than twenty (20) feet where the approach is to be used by passenger cars and single unit
trucks and not less than fifty (50) feet where all types of vehicles may be expected.
Section 10, Area Between Drives: A safety island or buffer zone shall be constructed and maintained between adjoining driveway approaches to a
State Highway. Size and shape of such restricted islands shall be determined according to existing lot frontage, right-of-way depth, and angle of
entry, but a minimum length of ten (10) feet at the property line shall be required for the island separator. Curbs or posts, or other suitable methods
of island designation and protection as approved by the Division, shall be provided to prevent vehicle parking and access in the restricted island
area.
Section 11, Parking: The construction of parking or servicing areas on the highway right-of-way is specifically prohibited. Off -the -road parking
facilities should be provided by commercial establishments for customers' vehicles.
Section 12, Slope of Drive: The grade of entrance and exit shall slope downward and away from the road surface at the same rate as the normal
shoulder slope and for a distance equal to the width of the shoulder but in no case less than ten (10) feet from the pavement edge. Approach grades
are restricted to not more than 10%.
Section 13, Drainage: All driveways and approaches shall be so constructed that they shall not interfere with the drainage system of the street or
highway. The Applicant will be required to provide, at his own expense, drainage structures at entrances and exits which will become an integral
part of the existing drai nage system. The dimensions of all drainage structures must be approved by the Division representative prior to installation.
Section 14, Surfacing: All driveways will be surfaced immediately upon completion, and prior to being used.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
FIRST: The Applicant represents the owner or lessee, and affirms that the driveway approach(es) is to be constructed by him for the bona fide
purpose of securing access to his property and not for the purpose of doing business or servicing vehicles on the highway right-of-way.
SECOND: The Applicant shall furnish all labor and materials, perform all work, and pay all costs in connection with the construction of the
driveway(s) and its appurtenances on the right-of-way. All work shall be completed within 30 days of the permit date.
THIRD; The type of construction shall be as designated and/or approved by the Division of Highways and all materials used shall be of satisfactory
quality and subject to inspection and approval by the Division.
FOURTH: The traveling public shall be protected during the installation with proper warning signs and signals and the Division of Highways and its
duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the
exercise of the permit
FIFTH: The Applicant shall assume responsibility for the removal or clearance of snow, ice or sleet upon any portion of the driveway approach(es)
even though deposited on the driveway(s) in the course of the Divisions' snow removal operations.
SIXTH: In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall be securely braced before
the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence, and all posts and wire removed shall be turned over to the District representative of
the Division of Highways.
SEVENTH: No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(S) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without the written permission of
the Division of Highways.
EIGHT: On those highways along which access rights
only to the service roads and not to the main traveled
NINTH: Provisions and specifications outlined herein
highways within the corporate limits of cities, cities and
the local governing body.
are restricted or for which service roads have been constructed, driveways shall connect
highways.
shall apply on all highways under the jurisdiction of the Division of Highways, except on
counties, and incorporated towns. Division regulations shall be subject to concurrence by
West Glenwood Springs Water District
c/o Ronald W. Johnson, Attorney
P. 0. Box 983
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Garfield County Board of County
Commissioners
P. 0. Box 640
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Re: Supply of Water
Fred Inglehart Property
Gentlemen:
The purpose of this letter is to advise you that the
West Glenwood Springs Water District encompasses the pro-
perty which is the subject of the above -referenced matter,
located at 50633 U.S. Highway 6 & 24, Glenwood Springs,
Colorado, Garfield County; and that the West Glenwood Springs
Water District is obligated to supply water for said property,
and will supply water to said property, within the limitations
of its ability at the time of request for tap onto the water
lines of West Glenwood Springs Water District, subject to
certain limitations the District has in regard to excess water
from the City of Glenwood Springs.
Should you have any further questions with reference to
this matter, please feel free to contact me.
Very truly yours,
Robert Berg, \sident
West Glenwood Springs Water District
RB:vp
West Glenwood Springs Sanitation District
P. 0. Box 866
Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
August 26, 1981
Fred Ingelhart
2301 154 Rd
Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Dear Sir:
We have received your request for sewer service availability by the West
Glenwood Springs Sanitation District.
At this time, the West Glenwood Springs Sanitation District is able to
provide sewer service for properties within the district boundaries.
Our current tap fee is $1,000.00 per unit.
Sincerely,
C
Lee Enewold
West Glenwood Springs
Sanitation District
Board President
LE/dg
-r -o D V.SES
OG'F\c E. c - c_c") �c.�k D� �v.S� NEsS oQr'EssAON
w\ MAte-SC&E IAN O 52_erc .. t. 'vSrpaysvicm.1
1NC\vs.� �J SAS Oar' O Ec o p S ,
A??` "Aw3c.E
ANO VE v,\CAAA Ae(Z ler.r71 (NA. 14 T 4 AQOVJAit E
c-\13 'tin.1 -1 , b.A.\a.14 CA 4N"464
TF Q: "s , F� , C+ " 5%k??‘1
Prkt O p‘ aw vAn;Cos s
-s.4..\4►`A,s\.. w.1 4J
\Nc\VAZ44el iM.kr A -u o Sie4 Ac...` &Ir-ovs...so}�utrk A*40
v �•:, c,,,. L4 ry - F cv:. P v...c,.a } v ��: c..,.\ <zE.a Q Sr c-..) tca
44%3 D 12.02„4?,,.r
p 4% $RT `etasc-L- 1 S '`.o "f- "-$\iic *-c'''` . " 1
c��►; N �\-�-.4 G\a a .3 1,
• •
GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1982
ADDENDUM:
Decision on Inglehart Commercial Park Special Use Permit
Although the applicant has requested a change in his proposal to omit access
to the Storm King Trailer Park, there remains a concern that indeed a more
adequate access is needed. The Board has all authority to condition approval
of the commercial park on the provision of this access as proposed, in addition
to the nine conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. One further
condition that would be appropriate:
That all proposals of the applicant be considered conditions of approval
unless stated otherwise.
• •
Mr & Mrs Fred R. Ingelhart
2307 154 Road
Glenwood Springs, Colo. 81601
January 13, 1982
Terry Bowman
Garfield County Planning Commission
2014 Blake
Glenwood Springs, Colo. 81601
Dear Ms. Bowman:
At the present time, we have decided not to extend a road easement
through subject property into Storm King Mobile Home Park.
Sincerely,
V
Fre( R. Ingelhart
1{e, �n-,h•d at • L..
THIS 11EEu. mud,
'tit
:rl
IH 79 . between ktiti`, � , 1V
th.
FBEDRICK R. I\(; : iAR1 a,'.
whose 1rga1 adds. -•s s 2307 )- 'a •
-
r..
t.mber
� . 1 5,`;5 "E 7(K)
SIM i WVINIUT117 m
of to
WIT\ESSETll,that ti+r ., 144W
Ten Dollars and other v•t/ua ic
es tt a r•ct•:pt wnrtt,>f •
t„ the card fart,f the `ir
here • r , . ,• i ter est$ do
grant. bargain. $; •'.,nf�••sed and aekuow•led�.,t
$ed. lonvey and ..,',: ,„ and assigns foie%er.
•� • a,,, , ..f lanai. $ituatr.
not in tenancy- to e.•nvnun but In ),•i ' '• r ar • .
l ing and bring ::, • he
. • - i:c+rf ie1'1 ;,,. �t:r.e o,, ,; ,r .,•ii . t,•vJit
Apa rcel of land situate in Section +1, ;,•am`.'si h Ss ut':, F:ange `9 '..est of the
6th Principal Meridian, being more 1:arLicuiari: desc riht•d as follows:
Beginning at the southwest corner of S_•ction :<^.asti;, South, Range 89
.l Thence S. '7`. i'if'" 1",h6 feet to the
West of the 6th Principal . eridian, -�
northerly rigat of way line of Interstate /0; thenc, a1oeg ,rig northerly right
of way line the following courses: N. 74357'30" :t; thence 13.60
feet along the arc of a 1482.40 foot radius non tang•at tor'•, to the right which
ars, subtends a chord bearing N. 75°13'37" E. 13.60 fet_t o the true point of
beginning: Thence 114.60 feet along the arc of a 1,482.40 foot radius curve to
'
the right whose arc subtends a chord bearing 7'," 42' 17" SL.
a Cis 3�•stance of
114.57 feet; thence S. 10°05'00" E. 10.00 feet; thence N.
feet to the westerly boundary of a parcel of land described in Reception No.
203932 in Book 314 at Page 218 of the records of the Clerk and Reorder of
Garfield County, Colorado; thence N. 01306'00" W. 203.8: feet alonz t•aid westerly
boundary line, thence S. 88°11'41" W. 147.37 feet; thence S. til°26'38" F. 298./1'
feet to the true point of beginning, containing .966 acres more or less.
Subject to easements and rights of way f public record or s'*.elate ani in
use.
Subject, also, to the lien of adeed c` trust recordedfApril 2,securing one
in
Book 508 at Page 802 as Reception No. 84941,
promissory note in the original. principal Gum of $106.500.00, payable to
Leonard E. Rippy and William G. rinpv. which promissory note the b•.intors
herein shall pay as the same becomes due and payable and, i• anv even..;rartcrs
shall pay said note in full on or before the date that the grt.n•.efs 7..V
in full the promissory note which they have given to grantors thi ',te
to secure the balance of the purchases price of the pr'hper-y here.t cenvev".,
and secured by a deed of trust to be r:crded tt,:s date.
also known as street and number
(vacant land)
T(K.ETRER with all and singular the heteditaments and appurt, stances th.•reur to belonging. ,r in anywise apper-
taining. and the reversion and reversions. remainder and remainders. r1nt . issues and profits thereof; alai all the
estate. right, title, interest. ••laim and demand whatsoever of the said partes ,•f the first part, eft i.er to iaW or equity,
of, in and to the above bargain^d premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances
Na. 7h$. N.%HH%%11111E1-- 1.J $t 1eeanr• Hi:.a6 oiP.+
.3t lor
I• v'rE j Ol
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and desctieed. S with the
tiappurtenances, ,tnto hem the said
parties ofthe tt second part. their heirs and assigns forever. And the said part part,
} cov..nant. grant. bargain and agree to and with the
se•l VeS, teas, executors, and administrators. do
said parties of the se •ond part. their heirs and assigns, that at the Um‘ -'of the ensealing and delivery of these presents.
they are well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good. sure. perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate
of inheritance in law. in fee simple. and ha ve good right, full power and lawful authority to grant. bargain. sell and
coney the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants.
bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessment s and incumbrances of what e‘ er kird or nature sawyer,
except taxes for the year 1979, due and payable in 1980, which shall be
prorated to date of closing between the parties hereto and shall be paid
by the respective parties on or before April 30, 1980; and, except
the lien of the deed of trust recorded in Book 508 at Page 802 hereinabove
referred to,
and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable
and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully
part ies of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND F
INN ITNES. WHEREOF, the said part ieS of the fit
sea;i S the day- and year first above written.
Signed. Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of
S [ATE t)P C01.0I1A1'
County of Denver
V The fui•HjAinp}.instrument was rchnuw'edged before met itis
:.D0 -?4 by' . D )QALD A. CALDWELL.
�.
-) s7 Jnmusaon expires
'`�, r
possession of the s:ti i parties of the second part, their heir:
claming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, the said
OREVF:R DEFEND
-t part has ve
hereunto set their hand S and
t./
Rtri ,T) .TF. Ftja� Ip /
(tlJ
L �_ 7fi
L jSEA►.j
:`' DONAtD A. CALII MU.
{
17th
day of
'SEAL]
September
19 . Witness my hand and official seal.
\..ten {'•1•i.�
STATE OF COLORADO )
DENVER ) ss.
COt;N'I 'C F . GXAr ea=
.�•� , 1' ie foregoing instrument was acknowledged before
Se•.epe}.,:~1N79, by ROSS D. JEFFERY.
commission expires:
WITi$ESS my hand and official seal.
STATE: )I• u1.0RADO
i
•
r' z
Y
>: 1 , E
me this lath_day of
NOTARY PUBLIC
7.
VL
z
5
•
October 22, 1981
Terry L. Bowman
Assistant Planner
Garfield County
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
•
RE: Ingelhart Commercial Park, Special Use Permit
Dear Terry:
I have coordinated a City review of the referenced project,
scheduled for final review by your Planning Commission on
October 26, 1981. Time did not permit a review by the
City P&Z however I was able to discuss the project and
review the plans with the City's police and fire chiefs
and the superintendent of water/wastewater.
Water
The current installation of the 8" inch main solves what
could have been a major problem. The proposed fire hydrant
will have to be flushed periodically by City crews since
it will be at the end of the line. Provisions should be
made for draining the considerable water released during
flushing. Release directly to Mitchell Creek may be appro-
priate. While the new line will end at the northerly
property line of the referenced project, the City recommends
that an easement be obtained at this time for the future
extension of the line to the south. It is reasonable to
expect that with development of properties to the west of
the shopping center, a looping of the 8" main to Hwy. 6&24
will be desirable. A minimum 15 foot easement is recommended.
Fire Protection
The Fire Chief will be sending his comments under a separate
cover. In his conservation with me, he recommends that,
Page 2
• •
based on the size of the proposed building and the variety of
permitted uses therein, a fire hydrant be located on site.
He also recommends that the County P&Z, within its powers,
require the applicant to provide a new fire plug at the
northerly end of Storm King Trailer Park. The Fire Chief
also recommends that the proposed site plan be made a part
of and attached to the special use permit since the required
improvements are site specific; should those site plans change,
further review is requested.
Site Plan
The proposed site plan is acceptable. However, the City
recommends strongly against using the easterly parking
area as a new accessway to the trailer park. Routing
through traffic from a relatively dense residential area
through what should become a busy, business-related parking
lot would inevitably lead to unnecessary accidents and
congestion. Additionally, if the parking lot were maintained,
it would tend to supplant the existing, deteriorated and
narrow drive as the primary access to Storm King. Children
would then tend to use the new drive as their walking access
to Hwy. 6&24. This would be a very dangerous situation.
Hwy. 6&24 Access
Please be aware that the Highway Department Access Permit
contained in Ingelhart's packet is predicated on the
existing uses (essentially, an empty lot). John Stacy at
CDH told me that any change of use (proposed building) will
require a new review. Stacy indicated that the plumbing/
equipment rental shops may not in themselves require re -design
of the access but that using the parking area as a driveway
to Storm King probably would.
Suggestion
A new or improved access to Storm King is certainly desirable.
One alternative to consider would be to set the building back
far enough from the westerly property line to allow an access
between the Inglehart and BLM buildings. No parking or
Page 3
• •
delivery vehicles would be permitted on this drive. This
would require moving one or more trailers in the park but
this might be acceptable if the only alternatives are the status
quo or the proposal at hand. If the existing proposal is
accepted, parking will have to be strictly controlled and
a fire lane maintained on the east side of the building.
Sincerely yours,
I '"l
John M. Fernandez
Director of Planning
City of Glenwood Springs
806 Cooper Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Co 81601-3495
cc: Garfield County Planning Commissioners.
Enclosure
JMF/pks
\
,
• \ - l)
SPOOLSo E=11 1
11,-- -----i- .
, ---_____-\
11
11 —1
11 1
ii II° ----r' 1
11 Li 1
1 0 iZo. ' ' Yt. ) -t-
\
\ II \
\
,,,,),-- 0 11
1\ u\,.._1 1
\ I
,,CD>)
0 \
\ CI --
-1
0 11
--, —
/ I ...,
1 ',---) • r J -,_-'
( I TRAILER i,
1\ ILc o u R 1- c( i ii )
\e) • k ::-,'
i. I 1' \ 11 1
•
-r--7_-_----:-.;=-:-J
1 1 1_1 • ) r
1l___—,/ c --,----.)
1 'L'
1 _____.) l_i1
)/ L- r -- --
• - • - - - - - ) il
C), i
(I
- ' -
u
....-, 7 _Fir'l
./11 /IV * •
PARKING
•
k_ •
I I
0 0
000
A' pro,'s.. tocci:„-rtte,
YV02,1/4,3 " (‘.)4r
•-
PARKING
//
//
X -IP
• •
•
- 70
LLL
SEWAGE
x TREATMENT
_ _s FACILITY
IrJas1+14,40 ti,ott.,otw4
x —
%O.
GARFIELD COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
•
PLANNING / ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH / BUILDING: 945-8212
March 30, 1984
Fred Inglehardt
2307 154 Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: A Commercial Park approved by Resolution #82-28.
Dear Mr. Inglehardt:
As a result of an on-site inspection by the Garfield County Department of
Development, the following violation(s) of the conditions of approval
contained in Resolution No. 82-28, were noted:
Condition #4 states that only two uses are allowed in the Commercial Park.
In addition, we would like to review the remaining conditions of approval
with you to verify compliance. (See attached Resolution)
i
Please contact the Department of Development/Planning Division at 2014li
Blake Ave., Glenwood Springs, or 945-8212 or 625-3321,
by 4/25/84 , to initiate a discussion on possible resolution of
the above noted violation(s).
If you choose not to respond to this letter by the date noted, the
Department of Development will turn all information over to the Garfieldsl
County Attorney for legal action. Your cooperation in this matter will be
appreciated.
Sincerely,
Cynthia M. Houben
Planner
CMH
�!, L Vii. CJz` 2 of r Co -f 3 c. � iJ „
l. ✓ U
� _ gl 44 . u,e� access ��..��
s dS 41/" 14407141,w
100 8TH STREET it** O. BOX 640
r�� ,� ./ GLENVLOQD
•
GARFIELD COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING / ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH / BUILDING: 945-8212
May 17, 1984
Fred Inglehardt
2307 154 Road
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear Mr. Inglehardt:
Thank you for responding to our letter of March 30, 1984 concerning the
conditions of your Resolution of Approval for the commercial park. Since
our phone conversation of 4/2/84, I have discussed the conditions of
approval with our County Attorney. It has been determined that you are in
compliance with your conditions of approval. Please note, however, that
when condition #8 is satisfied, the other conditions regarding the access
to Storm King Trailer Park must also be met at that time.
If you have any questions regarding the conditions of approval in the
above noted resolution, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
Cynthia M. Houben
Planner
CMH/emh
100 8TH STREET
P.O. BOX 640 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81602
L. P. ZANCANELLA, Chief
VIC ROSA, Asst. Chief
MARTIN ZEMLOCK, Captain
•
•
JACK MITCHELL, Secy. Treas.
MIKE FATTOR, Lieut.
JAMES MASON, Lieut.
Glenwood Springs Fire Department
Member of Colorado State Firemen's Association
Box 2043
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602
Garfield County Planning Department
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Colorado - 81601
413
RE: Ingelhart Commercial Park Special -Use Permit
Dear Terry:
In reviewing your revised site plan for this Use Permit,
Item #5 states that a fire hydrant be located on the site.
If this condition is met, the Fire Department will be satisfied
with this project.
Thank you,
L. P. Zancanella, Fire Chief
L. P. ZANCANELLA, Chief
VIC ROSA, Asst. Chief
MARTIN ZEMLOCK, Captain
•
f
•
JACK MITCHELL, Secy. Treas.
MIKE FATTOR, Lieut.
JAMES MASON, Lieut.
Glenwood Springs Fire Department
Member of Colorado State Firemen's Association
Box 2043
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602
Garfield County Planning Department
2014 Blake Ave.
Glenwood Springs Colo.
RE: Fred Ingelhart Special use
Water line needs extended to this property and a fire hydrant installed on
this site.
Parking on site needs designed to give fire dept. a fire lane along side and
rear of building.
If water line is being extended through Mr. Inelharts trailer Court
to get to this site consideration needs given for a added fire plug in
the Storm King Trailer Ct.
.P. Zancanella
t Cr
•
November 16, 1981
Terry L. Bowman
Assistant Planner
Garfield County
Planning Department
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Ingelhart Commercial Park, Special Use Permit
Dear Terry:
•
-444co
Enclosed please find a motion by the City Planning Commission regarding
the referenced project. The PW's concerns echo those of staff: to fully
separate the trailer park access from access to the proposed building. The
revised site plan improves the separation but still allows competition
among vehicles travelling to different destinations. Furthermore, the wide
access road will invite parking, further cluttering the situation. If the
proposed access remains, it may be preferable in this instance to reduce
its width to 20-24 feet to discourage parking.
One redesign discussed at P8s9, is to move the building as far east as
possible, to reduce the Storm King driveway width, and to create a rear
access drive on the west side of the building.
One personal comment: I would urge the County to ensure that a landscaped
buffer be placed between the parking area and the frontage road. The City
requires a four foot strip on all new construction. The lack of such
separations is what renders the frontage road/Mel-Ray Road intersection so
dangerous.
I would appreciate if you would convey these comments to the Board of
County Commissioners for the public hearing on this item next Monday. I
believe the fire chief will submit his comments under separate cover.
Sincerely yours,
M
John M. Fernandez
Director of Planning
City of Glenwood Springs
806 Cooper Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Enclosure
JMF/pks
tio-rio4
REGULAR MEETING
PLANNING AND ZONI
NOVEMBER 11, 1981
PAGE 2
OMMISSION
•
4. #60-81 - Consider a special use permit for property
located at 50633 Highway 6&24 in West Glenwood. The
applicant proposes two commercial uses in one building
on a 0.97 acre parcel. (County Referral)
Applicant: Fred Inglehart.
Mr. Fernandez recounted the City staff's previous review of
the proposal which was done for the Garfield County Planning
and Zoning Commission's hearing of October 26, 1981. Mr.
Fernandez referred to the County Planner's letter of October
27, 1981 which conveyed the County Planning and Zoning Commission's
motion of approval. Mr. Fernandez said the County responded
to most of the City's concerns which was encouraging. Any
new City comments Mr. Fernandez said, would be conveyed to the
County Commissioners for their public hearing on Ingelhart's
proposal on November 23.
Mr. Fernandez displayed Mr. Ingelhart's site plan and said that
while it is much improved, there remains the problem that
access to Storm King Trailer Park and the commercial building
parking lot are one and the same. Commissioner Gamba, Kaufman,
and Viehe concurred in this criticism, saying the driveway is
so wide it will invite parking which would further aggravate
the situation. It was the consensus of the Commission that
the trailer park access and commercial building access need to
be separated.
Commissioner Gamba said there is room on-site for a 20 foot
driveway on the east (which would also permit additional parking
lot area) while leaving plenty of room on the west side for
access. Alternatively, he said a mirror image of the design
would work, leaving the trailer park access on the east, moving
the building to the east and putting the parking lot and drive
on the west side on the building.
The Commissioners wondered why Mr. Inglehart was sticking
with the trailer park access on the east side. Possible
reasons were cited including joint use of the proposed water
easement, better solar exposure for snow removal, and better
alignment with trailer park improvements.
After lengthy discussion and consideration of alternative
re -designs,
Chairman Law moved, seconded by Commissioner
Durrett, that incorporated in a letter to the
County planning staff that the Planning and Zoning
Commission strongly recommends that access to the
trailer park be separate from access to the
parking area for the business in order to
provide safe access, and that the driveway be
24 feet wide with no parking on it, and that
there be a fire plug on site.
Discussion ensued regarding provisions for pedestrian access
to and from the trailer park. It was the consensus of the
•
e
REGULAR MEETAk
PLANNING ANDNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 11, 1981
PAGE 3
•
Commission that improvements are necessary and that they
can be provided within an amended site plan. Commissioner
Gamba wondered if this existing access might be restricted
to pedestrian use when a new access is created to the east.
Chairman Law amended his motion and Commissioner
Durrett amended his second to also recommend
that there be established a separate pedestrian
right-of-way to Storm King Trailer Park.
Ayes: Gamba, Durrett, Viehe, Law, Gilmer and
Kaufman
None.
None.
Nayes:
Abstain:
The motion was carried.
F
Phase of Comprehensive Planning Project:
A. Implementation Report: Annexation.
B. Implementation Report: Land Use.
C. Implementation Report: Major S- eets.
of Potential Changes to Zoning 0 dinance.
6. Discussio
(Agenda Item 5 and 6 were discussed tog= her)
Mr. Fernandez n.ted that the first pha e of the comprehensive
planning project s now complete wit omives' submission of
the Llree "impleme ration reports". Komives, Mr. Fernandez
said, has satisfact• ily completed is contract with the
City.
Mr. Fernandez summarized ec
saying that one purpose o t
was to bring the annexation
was happening. He said tha
had taken the issue as far as
to the City Council that .nne
pursued. He said the p. icy
en City actions on annexation,
h: comprehensive planning project
sue 'co a head. He said this
aff and the planning consultants
ey can and were recommending
xat •n of West Glenwood be
quest on now lies with Council.
Mr. Fernandez said th Komives reco nded that three key
tools be used to imp ement the City's 'opted Land Use Plan
and Goals and Obje ives: capital impro,- ents programming
(C.I.P.), annexat'•n policy, and changes implementing
regulations (pririly zoning). Mr. Fernan•-z said that a
C.I.P. was just getting underway and would in olve the
Planning Comm sion. In regards to implementi regulations,
Mr. Fernande said some recommended changes invo ved re -zonings
(North Glen •od, the downtown with adjacent resid tial areas,
South Gran• Avenue), and some involved amending the one
district egulations. Mr. Fernandez suggested that e
"re-wri s" be done first so as to maintain momentum i the
planni • process. Mr. Fernandez proposed that the Comma sion
discu the following: the building height definition: m- imum
heig, limits in the C/2 zone and throughout the City; home
1
• •
On October 26, 1981, the Garfield County Planning Commission
recommended approval of the Ingelhart Commercial Park Special
Use Permit with the following conditions:
1. That the allowable uses shall be as follows:
A. Office for conduct of business or profession
B. Wholesale and retail establishments including sale of
drygoods; furniture; appliances; automotive and vehicular
equipment; hardware; clothing; building materials; feed;
garden suuply; and plant materials.
C. General service establishment including repair of appliance;
shop for blacksmith; cabinetry; glazing; machining; printing;
publishing; plumbing; sheet metal.
2. That only two uses shall be allowable under this permit.
3. All outside storage areas shall be fenced.
4. That the applicant provide a 15' easement for extension of the
water line south through the property to Highway 6 & 24.
5. That a fire hydrant be located on the site.
6. That an access easement for the Storm King Trailer Park be
conveyed to the park; and that at such time as this access is
developed, the access shall meet county road specifications.
7. That the site plan be realigned to separate the required parking
from the proposed access serving the Storm King Trailer Park;
Landscaping,islands, etc., to indicate and maintain this separation
shall be used.
8. That the Planning Department receive a copy of the State Highway
permit for expanded uses (commercial park, and access for the
trailer park) on the property.
Lo •
That the revised site plan be sent to the City of Glenwood Springs
Fire Department and Planning Department for any additional comments.
1 rn-Pe-n eri. 5 rotes I r) ,\N V-4(9
he.,a 1r)arcc-1- 016M- J
11-A bc re e.iled wG ed
c -H2_0 `75,
_ &Ic-L
c;e-but�d trk
ter-
E, t- (n- r s 'S S t 'l t t'S .
i � �� �t � ^ �= �� preT,6_,--Licty
- Luhe-=� i iy\7‘rri o '(-c:
n
, I-
dcce c - )
decon 1-1 E 9:3o
;"Yl
• •
GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
January 18, 1982
ADDENDUM:
Decision on Inglehart Commercial Park Special Use Permit
Although the applicant has requested a change in his proposal to omit access
to the Storm King Trailer Park, there remains a concern that indeed a more
adequate access is needed. The Board has all authority to condition approval
of the commercial park on the provision of this access as proposed in addition
to the nine conditions recommended by the Planning Commission.urther
conditio5 that would be appropriate:
1A. That all proposals of the applicant be considered conditions of approval
unless stated, otherwise.
at:o -Thai e dpil�ca
` i
cY1
[ e s em. be r c -c 5?:::) l A. W►
n
cr I cD r\ c_COY cThri5
��k,�