Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8`h Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. or -7 g Job Address 01 1C7 lc LDC uThS Nature of Work C Building Permit �� - ; �� — 12 -- 1 Use of Building V i P Cr\ C 3 lThl l /• �q1Q�QY l_ d I- V �J Owner Tr onh r' l P VYN2S Contractor I'AQ G1 S Amount of Permit $ l L • Lt Date I D - 1 -t-m7: Lc+ 11 b _Lronbri q&_) Clerk GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8., Street. Suite 201, Glenwood Springs. CO 81801 Pthone: 970-945-8212 / Fas: 970-984-9470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Permit No: "1 1 c5zK Job Address: 0 1 r 3 R vet d w 0 Parcel/Schedule No. 2.35 5t 121 " 18- 170 G -S. Co No 1 Lot No: Block No: �70 Tr01"hrld e. 4oacs Subd /Exemption Ptaro* On/ 4- 'Sb c, -7 I - 9 300 De vetpr►ie. WR Ph' 2 Owner: -Ural briic e, Tomes LLC Address 410 /CVO toriCts. G 3 Contractor: l-Iavi5en CAn5+r UC%i041 Ad ress: 5n me r Ph:'14% qg� Lie No 4 Archlte t Engineer: Wooctle Arch'-Eec-Ivrc Address: 9137 Se Rlel love SW. • ph' LO /41 MIeads Rt,nc1, Co 3D3 Llc. No -6e3-7231 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: I / 4 18 Sq. Fi of 3! o Height No of Floors: 4. 11 Use of Building:5 'l • le rrn N1 i y i.iarYle.vM1 P L C�� ,, T J(tI j 7 Describe Work: v V WX Y rr G Alteration i. Remove ❑ Addition 7 Move 9 10 rage' �+ r ❑ Single 2 l- Carport: ❑ Single / Ll Double a Driveway Permit ❑ On -Site Sewage Eke trip Disposal 1 JI/ Stte Plan 11 Valuation of Work: S Adjusted Valuations- S-7 24- !03 0I(0J 12 Special Condiuo r 00-• Irl _ _ _0 ,� - H ^ c °4 / - (1 • 6 ! ,t V C- 0 . �'a'`V�1 '` VhQO.e_]Y1fd U/Fer/Y.f A ISSUED ISSUED THIS AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PERIOD I HEREBY APPLICATION PROVISIONS COMPLETED GRANTING TO VIOLATE LOCAL OF CONSTRUCT1yl a IEEE STATEAL BY THE OF PERMIT BECOMES NU I5 NOT COMMENCED OR WORK OF 180 DAYS AT ANY CERTIFY THAT I AND KNOW THE OF LAWS GOVERNING WITHIN WHETIIE' OF A PERMIT DOE OR CANCEL THE LAW REG tlrri • TING JIL NOTICE REQUIRED AND •ERMIT ISCOLORADO COLORADO L AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ITH WLN 180 DAYS IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED TIME AFTER WORK 15 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED SAME TO BE TRUE AND THIS TYPE OF WORK : -' -IFIED HEREIN OT PRESUME TO GIVE • • OVIS t NS OF ANY OTHER CO ST' iCTION OR THE PERFORMAN / MUST BE OR. IF FOR A COMMENCED THIS CORRECT ALL WILL BE OR NOT THE AUTHORITY STATE OR E • vManu. rA'_� a aI Plan Check Fee.'b 0L r2 _-� J7Y( '�,{44�`_ Permit Fee: / 35Z /6 Issued' / 05 !, Total Fee: Z2. j�J 4 ne /'V Dat P r(t [/fffnnn 42 o k--- GC Group: Const. Type: `._ Zoning. Setbacks: Home: y/n.✓ !l l C� ISDS No. St Fee: . SQZ�U-'dn'41C� ) ``llW ,E ER / i AIJ1L,' t l II —(' C5 ---4,,A eLa r • PL G. DEPT [•.?'r%�.��5-0 APPROVAL DATE APPROVAL/DATE 1� AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30 28 201 CRS AS AMENDED THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION. ERECTION CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCL OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABUTIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES 1E//�RESPONSI BILrTY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICLALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT DESIGN$R B1IILDER. AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST Garfom 003 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT T HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE IUNFIALI lb1 1�S C - o _ fsNaec4 4 C'`'65ribPf5D.61, The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed. a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing: 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl. tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-ahsorhent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; S. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not he issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable: as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State Agencies where applicable A CERTIFICATE OFOCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. anCANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to ide by the above conditions for occupane , use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupanc ,for the dwelling under building permit # �i-%tg All)LL) Signature BpcontOct2004 Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Tol i 90 7 Total Square Feet /9w Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation Sap `( /5 10 11 `- 105 611 Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation Subdivision --1---R3/418,tit. Lot/Block / 70 Contractor 6° f�kivtse t Corns+, )3 z3(0,Z� 9/0S 9c99 25Z3 / 40 3 %to zi GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the epvelope. Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes , 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 9/Q Y 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes /n 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 2/ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces anddofTts? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind Toads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 2 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a froof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make an odel and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase I1 EPA certification? Yes /% No 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No 9" 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes 2/ No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes 2/ No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and speci safety glazing for these areas? Yes /% No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes 0z2 No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes p No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted w hout it. Yes l% No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes 9 2 No If no -Explain: 22. Have two2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes 9 No 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes 9 No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes /7,2 No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes 2, No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes�D _ No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes 9/ No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a 550.00 re -inspection fee? Yes � No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes 7, No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes No 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of' a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department t 6 -8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes t�� No (please check with the building department about is requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? ��Yes I hereby ackn bes, of my ledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the Signature of Owner Phone: 9 c-(� -20 4 y (days); Date t -(09-1o45 (evenings) Project Name: =eon Lrqotc, e 'P (G H h Go( o r ; 4- 7eved op mei. 4-- GUS, CO o/601 Project Address. Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqFeb2005 7 1RONHRIDQE GOLF CLUB AND MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY August 18. 2005 Garfield County Building Department 108 8`h Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Approved Plans at Ironbridge Dear County Representative, The following plans have been reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board of the Ironbridge Property Owners Association for use on Lot 170: Woodley Architectural Group "Ironbridge — Plan 2202" "Bid Set Redlines" dated September 15, 2004 If you have any questions, please call me at (970) 404-1045. Sincerely, Ironbridge Property Owners Association Dirk Gosda Representative 410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLORADO 81601 T (9701947-9800 F (970)928-8865 www Ironbridgeclub com c.etteCh HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc 5020 Courcy Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8160] Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeorech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 170, RIVER BEND WAY IRONBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 101 196-1 AUGUST 25, 2005 PREPARED FOR: IRONBRIDGE HOMES, LLC ATTN: MIKE WOELKE 410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS - 2 - GEOLOGY -2- FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS - 4 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATIONS -4- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 - FLOOR SLABS -6- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE - 7 - LIMITATIONS - 8 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 - LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot 170, River Bend Way, Ironbridge Development, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted as a supplement to our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to L.B. Rose Ranch. LLC dated July 24, 2003. We previously conducted subsurface exploration to evaluate the collapse potential in the non -irrigated debris fan areas within the development, report dated September 10, 1998, Job No. 197 327. An exploratory boring was drilled on the lot to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The specific building on the lot had not been determined at the time of this study. The proposed residence will generally be a 1 or 2 story, wood frame structure about 2,500 to 3,000 square -feet in size. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade and/or structural over a crawlspace. A basement level may be provided. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job No. 101 196-1 Gtech If building loadings. location or grading plans change significantly from those described above. we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The lot is located in the middle, northern part of the development and was vacant at the time of our field exploration. River Bend Way borders the lot to the south as shown on Figure 1. The roadway and underground utility construction to the lot are complete. Minor overlot grading during subdivision development consists of shallow cuts and fills. The ground surface is relatively flat and slopes gently down to the east. Vegetation consists of sparse grass and weeds. GEOLOGY The geologic conditions were described in our previous report conducted for planning and preliminary design of the subdivision development, dated October 29, 1997. Job No. 197 327. The surficial soils on the lot mainly consist of sandy silt and clay debris fan deposits overlying gravel terrace alluvium of the Roaring Fork River. The alluvium is predominantly a clast-supported deposit of rounded gravel, cobbles and boulders up to about 3 feet in size in a silty sand matrix that was encountered at a depth of about 26 feet on the lot. The underlying bedrock consists of the Eagle Valley Evaporite which contains gypsum and is generally associated with scattered sinkhole development in the Roaring Fork River valley. Voids have not been encountered in the bedrock in borings drilled on adjacent lots and the potential for subsidence due to dissolution of the evaporite throughout the service life of the residence, in our opinion, is low. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on August 15, 2005. An exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface Job No. 101 196-1 - 3 - conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound haminer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsoil profile encountered in the boring is shown on Figure 2. The subsoils. below about '/3 foot of topsoil, consist of 25'/2 feet of stiff to very stiff, slightly sandy to sandy clayey silt overlying relatively dense, slightly silty sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders (terrace alluvium) down to the drilled depth of 27 feet. Drilling in the dense terrace alluvium with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on a sample obtained from the boring included natural moisture content and density, and finer than sand size gradation analysis (silt and clay content). Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on a sample of the silt soils. presented on Figure 4, show that the soils have low compressibility potential under existing low moisture content and light loading and have a low to moderate collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The sample showed moderate compressibility when additionally loaded after wetting. Laboratory test results are summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist. Job No 101 196-1 -4 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The upper clayey silt (debris fan) soils typically have low bearing capacity and low to moderate settlement potential under loading when wetted. Foundations that extend down to the dense terrace alluvium would have moderate bearing capacity and low settlement risk. Spread footings placed on the upper natural soils should be feasible for building support with some potential for differential settlement, mainly if the debris fan soils are wetted. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,200 psi Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. Due to the variable settlement potential of the debris fan soils, additional differential movement on the order of 1 to 2 inches could occur, mainly if the debris fan soils are wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. Job No. 101 196-1 -5- 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil, any existing fill and loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the firm natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Job No. 101 196-1 Gettech -6 - Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive latera] pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly. and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on -grade construction. The upper silt soils have variable settlement potential when wetted under load and there could be some post -construction slab movement if the subgrade soils become wet. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 -inch Job No 101 196-1 Gtech -7 - aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. An underdrain should not be provided around shallow foundations (3 feet deep or less) and garage areas. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/4 feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as a 20 mil PVC liner should be placed in a trough shape below the drain gravel and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the building has been completed: Job No. 101 196-1 C titech -8- 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density- in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site, fine grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to prevent wetting of the bearing soils from irrigation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during Job No. 101 196-1 -9 - construction appear different from those described in this report. we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations; and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P. Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLP/ksw Job No 101 196-1 C iter APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 30' 16th FAIRWAY 1 1 LOT 169 BENCH MARK: GROUND AT PROPERTY CORNER; ELEV. = 100.0', ASSUMED. BORING 170 • LOT 170 mmi RIVER BEND WAY 1 LOT 171 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING Figure 1 Depth — Feet - 0 5 - 10 15 20 25 BORING 170 ELEV.= 92' 7 .-o 14/12 12/12 WC=3.6 DD=93 - 200=92 20/12 WC=3.9 DD=97 15/12 13/12 WC -5.4 DD=97 - 200=96 0 _ 5 10 15 20 25 30 30 NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. Depth — Feet 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Figure 2 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy silt with roots, slightly moist, brown. ^J' ® SILT (ML); slightly sandy to sandy, slightly clayey, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, light brown. 14/12 1 NOTES: 1. GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM—GP); slightly silty, sandy, dense, slightly moist, light brown, rounded rock. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 14 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. Depth at which boring caved following drilling. Practical drilling refusal. The exploratory boring was drilled on August 15, 2005 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. The exploratory boring was located approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. The exploratory boring elevation was measured by instrument level and refers to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1. 4, The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 101 196-1 HEP WORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Compression % U a W N 0 Moisture Content = 3.9 percent Dry Density = 97 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clayey Silt From: Boring 170 at 10 Feet Compression upon wetting Cl..................N L I 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 • • 1 0 0 z 0 0 N Z 1-1 D J N gw Z N 2 w U H H} O a w 0 L7 a '~a gwo J co Efit d LL 2 Ce O! 0 Z LU = cn lait J. / V SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE Slightly sandy clayey silt Sandy clayey silt Slightly sandy clayey silt II UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) 7_ ATTERBERG LIMITS LIQUID PLASTIC LIMIT INDEX (%) (%) PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 92 ON 4 c cr o NATURAL DRY DENSITY (P 93 a Ori NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 3.8 3.9 vi 1 SAMPLE LOCATION DEPTH (R) 5 o 0 BORING 170 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant —(-(2esv_�0.4 ew4 Lor (73 Building Engineered Foundation -Driveway Permit c4ttriirt7d Site Plan f, E. Ali -Aseptic Permit and Setbacks `-/Grade/Topography 30% i trach Residential Plan Review List %inimum Application Questionnaire �Iubdivision Plat Notes 1cfeI Fire Department Review `� Valuation Determination/Fees ✓/ked Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker c/ Atfach Conditions lication Signed 2lan Reviewer To Sign Application /Parcel/Schedule No. L140# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. ✓ Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Date //-I-'0r Planning/Zoning 'Property Line Setbacks -i0ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain !/Building Height ‘4,-oning Sign -off ./Road Impact Fees VHOA/DRC Approval frade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS . r. 16.1 uVa y! .1F� V ••)F! )5.,. _t1F %JJ f1 U Y' jp 4 4' aA 41 ) n 2C°C`•)L'4 •9C'.P 't' Lr ¶ '+r ��,¢ .• i, ]Q ni!.1 E . , t 1;),-�,1�. ��tE,s� fE0,� i IJi7 I�!j,�9�)j,'i��`�1,".i, LfE I?! sta � —thai. 'iasis 9 4e`^t A stere° r...l �. 4 ;. 7:.E Y a 33:.xi!i4�u3. TO •) W4Dfrt FROM .J 14.c.IL e FM COVER ATTENTION • M(raAc DATE ID -IL - CCP PROJECT SENT VIA No. OF SETS DESCRIPTION • t PROJECT No. • O'f I LZ Pf $• 947•149s ▪ hut 44trr t t* n.. No. OF PAGES • (Including cover) 3 COMMENTS • Fog, YOVF- VS COPY TO SIGNED • Fitt If accompanying pages are not as noted, please notify us at once 76 Sunset Drive • Unit *4 • Basalt, CO • 61621 • (970) 927-9510 • Fax' (970) 927-0597 • e-mail: aKpe®aopris.net el V VL S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS To : Mike Woelke From: Jack Albright Date : October 11, 2006 Re : Lot 170, Ironbridge FIELD REPORT r;pQO £ulyi� \.32972 le\ '3; viva L 'NC ,• I was on site on September 22, 2006 to observe the condition of the structure after the foundation stabilization and framing repairs had been performed. The framing appeared to be in very good condition with good construction tolerances. I saw no remaining affects of the movement that occurred that would cause concern for the future performance of the structure, if the items below are addressed. Item 1: I observed conditions where the steel girder beams in the main level floor had been raised such that the anchor bolts no longer provided a positive mechanical connection to the foundation wall. See clarification C1.1 for a revised connection at these conditions. Item 2: I also observed conditions where the sill plate has been raised and shimmed with steel shims above the top of wall. The steel shims need to be an equal bearing area to the studs in the wall above and spaced to match the stud spacing. This is especially Important at all built-up column locations. The builder is to verify this shimming requirement and revise as required Please contact me if there are any questions regarding the above information. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this matter. The above represents ow report of events noted and items discussed, and will be relied upon as true and correct by all parties unless notified within 5 working days of receipt. 04122FR1 76 Sunset Drive • Unit #4 • Basalt, CO • 81621 • (970) 927-9510 • Fax: (970) 927-0597 T • d A-7- GIA- is&LO Co.,.NTy 3t1 -39,W COgi 71 tor -rio ?EltrAct4 975r /17111C,14 TC n77 c7LInU 7nnnT?lalln)1T Tb'bT 011117 cn Jac AUG -09-2006 14:44 2•d FFP GEOTECH HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL July 14, 2006 Ironnndge Homes, LLC Atm: Mikc Woelke 4 t(1 1 ronbtidge Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 61601 Herwl'I4'»Mlik C;, ,:k(lilt l:']l, I1i4. 5020 Coun(r f(ullu tic Ulenwuoct Jtc mp.>, Cott :'-1:• Flee 0T'95549.49 Th.. 97O -445.J411 rn,wil. hrg r.@F{w.utecr r , Job No. 101 196.1 Subject: Foundation Settlement, Lot 170, lronbndge Development, County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Ms. Woelke: As requested, we are providing recommendations for compaction grouting below the foundation of the residence at the subject site. We previously conducted a subsoil study for the foundation design at Lot 170 and presented our findings ill a report doted August 25, 2005, Job No. 101 196-1. We met with you and others at the subject site on June 15, 2006 to observe the foundation and c awlspace conditions. We understand that the waterline break occurred on about May 29, 2006 and the water roto to the top of foundation before the leak was detected. Consequently, the foundation soils became wet and settled up to about 4 inches. Compaction grouting is being considered to stabilize the hearing soils. The grouting should extend to the bottom of the silt soils, encountered to a depth of about 26 fret at this lot The grouting should be performed below the entire building perimeter and at interior column pads. Once the soils are grouted, the foundation or building %ming can be Ieveicxi The grouting should be performed by a specialty contractor Familiar with the local soil conditions. We should review the compaction grouting proposal ;rnor to grouting. If you have any questions or need additional assistance, please let us know Suxxrely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. SLP.ksw cc. S.K. Peightal Engineers — Attn: Jack Albright Parker 303.841.7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silvcrrhorne 970408-1989 3 et( -3,470 OnCOJ.0 T CC P.01/01 TOTAL P.01 "117 C IIflU MITT T vUunv T to •J, T onn7 en elle Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Properly Search I Assessor Subset Query 1 Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Characteristics 1 Tax Information Parcel Detail 1 Value Detail 1 Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail 1 Photographs Tax Area Account Number Parcel Number Mill Levy 090 R041486 r 239512118170 67.519 Owner Name and Mailing Address ALONGE, BRIAN & CRYAN, MICHAEL & GRAY, GARY 2949 HEAVENLY RIDGE THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91362 Legal Description SECT,TWN,RNG:12-7-89 SUB:IRONBRIDGE PUD LOT:170 DESC: PHASE 1 PRE:R006898 BK:1596 PG:871 BK:1565 PG:600 BK:1560 PG:438 BK:1560 PG:431 BK:1057 PG:0745 BK:1028 PG:768 BK:1028 PG:597 BK:1006 PG:743 BK:1783 PG:7 RECPT:694686 BK:1747 PG:1 RECPT:686745 BK:1735 PG:585 RECPT:684292 BK:1735 PG:584 RECPT:684291 BK:I218 PG:738 RECPT:572583 BK:1218 PG:715 RECPT:572582 BK:1217 PG:266 RECPT:572131 BK:1206 PG:852 RECPT:569200 BK:1206 PG:780 RECPT:569199 BK:1206 PG:768 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3 RECPT:569197 BK:1206 PG:734 RECPT:569195 BK:1206 PG:662 RECPT:569194 BK:1206 PG:637 RECPT:569192 BK:1206 PG:629 RECPT:569191 BK:1206 PG:574 RECPT:569190 BK:1063 PG:0578 BK:1063 PG:0571 Location Physical Address: 153 RIVER BEND WAY GLENWOOD SPRINGS Subdivision: IRONBRIDGE PUD Land Acres: 0.353 Land Sq Ft: 15,369 Section Township Range 12 7 89 Property Tax Valuation Information Sale Date: Sale Price: 10/10/2005 229,600 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 0 Tax Year No Building Records Found Tax Information Transaction Type II Amount II Actual Value Assessed Value Land: 79,870 23.160 Improvements: 0 0 Total: r 79,870 23,160 Sale Date: Sale Price: 10/10/2005 229,600 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 0 Tax Year No Building Records Found Tax Information Transaction Type II Amount II Parcel Detail Page 3 of 3 1 2005 Tax Payment: Whole 11 ($1,441.54)1 2005 Tax Amount $1,441.54 2004 Tax Payment: Second Half ($513.12) 2004 Tax Payment: First Half ($513.12) 2004 Tax Amount $1,026.24 Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Garfield County Home Page The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 - 2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS TO FROM DATE PROJECT 111.4i i •> `li•s!!C1!eI1y}v''• i,s-,i•a a�+a)c�•is=}pt�TiF"s S�!c3)tfr)tp!(°r7:i±cg L1YHyiiq(] bit1 L AtY 4'' 5i3GPlAli= L•.:.shtua-nrxt a . • • JM -k. a FAX COVER ATTENTION • hi1i 1D -IL - oG L i IP SENT VIA • Fb $ 147.94% PROJECT No. • 04/2.2- No. •`}1LZ No. OF SETS • No. OF PAGES • 3 (Inducing cover) DESCRIPRON • (44 l-ttPt 1 SOIL COMMENTS • ropYOVK• U s Fi COPY TO • Fite SIGNED If accompanying pages are not as noted, please notify us at once 76 Sunset Drive • Unit #4 • Basalt, CO •61621 • (970) 927-9810 • Fax: (970) 927-0597 • e-mail: alcpsssoptia.net S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS November 17, 2006 Mike Woelke Ironbridge Homes 410 Ironbridge Dr Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (fax: 947-9495) Re: Lot 170 — Post -settlement repairs Dear Mike, I was on site on November 16, 2006. The purpose of this visit was to observe the condition of the structure after the repairs had been made. At the time of my most recent visit, all of the repair work appeared to be complete. The work appeared to be as recommended. The craftsmanship of the repairs appeared to be very good Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this matter. Please contact me with any questions you might have regarding the above information. Sincerely, Jack L Albright, vice president 04122 -Lot 170 LI 76 Sunset Drive • Unit #4 • Basalt, CO • 81621 • (970) 927-9510 • Fax: (970) 927-0597 S K PEIGHTAL ENGINEERS Ltd STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS `,� To : Mike Woelke -SIX From: Jack Albright Date : October 11, 2006 Re : Lot 170, Ironbridge FIELD REPORT /409 RE67S, Oma % t0.. ALa^'i ; i f' { 32972 SIpt,A: 1. • I was on site on September 22, 2006 to observe the condition of the structure after the foundation stabilization and framing repairs had been performed. The framing appeared to be in very good condition with good construction tolerances. I saw no remaining affects of the movement that occurred that would cause concern for the future performance of the structure, if the items below are addressed. Item I; I observed conditions where the steel girder beams in the main level floor had been raised such that the anchor bolts no longer provided a positive mechanical connection to the foundation wall. See clarification C1.1 for a revised connection at these conditions. item 2; 1 also observed conditions where the sill plate has been raised and shimmed with steel shires above the top of wall. The steel shims need to be an equal bearing arca to the studs in the wall above and spaced to match the stud spacing. This is especially important at all built-up column locations. The builder is to verify this shimming requirement and revise as required Please contact me if there are any questions regarding the above information. Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this matter. The above represents our report of events noted and items discussed and will be relied upon as true and correct by all parties unless notified within 5 working days of receipt. 04122FR1 76 Sunset Drive • Unit #4 • Basalt, CO • 81621 • (970) 927.9510 • Fax: (970) 927-0597 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING PERMIT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at C/5-3 u Permit No. J7S-EC I have this day inspected thi ; structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: Sdizete osa irs-e(sci_or _ o9 a-75- .aZa = 3� 4.i/t- -te i)22zed 71eitt.en - - You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When corrections have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date //-/3-06 20 Building Inspector '%%:xrJ��eY_ Phone (970) 945-8212 No. l I ti( Job Address Owner l ran hr r a e t Assessor's Parcel No a3G�) / /9 -4rt BUILDING PERMIT CILRD Date ir9-7-0C %f /70 . / 1t1 Contractor l I ` ,� Scks: Front �Rear Sit -tern CS --.43 n [ soils CeJvr• ���pppr Footing /-Z30&714-- Foundation -4-0L7 Grout Underground Plumbyipg Rough Plumbing .J H Framing 41 Insulation q 27-06 ThrA Roofing Drywall /0-6-C611.e�, Gas Piping 1j-�'7'° ntr al ei, r.agal,a*eitr x1.140,4 # U ewes« 440e.,‘, 7-oO r Address4l� d50 -Phone #947 Address Phone # RH LH Zoning EXTERIOR Address No Drainage Decks -support & clearance to wood Decks -stairs 8 rails Exterior locks Flashing around doors 8 windows Insect screens INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doors -13 min Door 120 min I wiauto closer -11/2 min Mach equip 16' above floor No opening into sleeping area 1.7 BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access Insulation Headroom/Stairs Ventilation ECTIONS Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) Electrical Final (State) /F2-0611111fl8iC 440 Finalfi-af06 /Checklist Completed? ✓ Certificate Occupancy # 'Dc -17 0 Date / I - Z2= pia Septic System # Date Final Other NOTES FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Baler Hot water F A gas/oil Floor dram Clearance Air con system Hot water heater Combustion air Gas piping. valves LPG Dram FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combustibles Termination of chimney Compost= air I✓ Hearth (12 ' or 20' on sides) r/ Glass doors Certified by REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS Heacroom (6'6' 1 I� Railing & guardrails C Width Rise 8 run /.✓ KITCHEN Clearance above grill Exhaust tan Bruner exhaust (1 hr cnese) BEDROOMS Egress 17 / Smoke detector BATHROOMS Exhaust fan Shatterproof glass ✓ OTHER INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ��8 Date Issued..l11 ..7,A .2 .Zoned Area Permit No 975/ AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use .S/h pr1 CWII��W k• i 3404 -cat/ .t.b `Q Address or Legal Descriptiooyl V til V�R"� Y Owartrekiorl Setbacks Front Side Contractor alji Side Rear e . This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing / -z 3 -0`741_ Driveway Foundation J- t -00 77A --- Underground Plumbing Insulation 9-.27-06 Ala Rough Plumbing j/n/o6 --py,262Diu /0-6-06 Chimney & Vent Electric Final (by Stat or) , fit, lot ff:S>d Gas Piping s/o/ 6 'moi Final be.7,2k0692,2 Electric Rough (By State Iospector)�1�e. ) Septic Final Framing l( (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doom installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR 011 EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD �.Orr r70 Date 12/7/01,1 By IF PLACED OUTS!. HE = COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC