HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitGarfield County
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8`h Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003
Job Address
NO. c. 7.57
Nature of Work Building Permit L`sk- 1 b9 3-rbr
n �J
Use of Building/P nn L..)./ l3 34. ( .cuacp -Cc
Owner - . rc t-mh r YYILS
Contractor
Amount of Permit $aCIit: $S Date 1 an "(,,
2395- I 3 I" /c•-/(09 Clerk
1
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT A PPLI CATI 0 N
108 8"' Street, Suite 201. Glenwood Bprlap. CO 81001
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Pax: 970-3843470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
Permit No: —1 I��
Parcel/Schedule No: 239 s.- 121 '- 18- 169
Job Address: D12q Ri vac- Send, wS
0.y G•. coS/6ei
-` Block No: Subd. / Exemption:
iron bri Joe P�hnwl On; 4-- t edrlopm #-
Address Cl Ph: Wk Ph: N%IQS-e /
410Iron6rtcty ci 9L!1 4B00
Ad ress:
a nit;
Lot No: i ! _I
2 Owner:
iron bridge {4pmes LLC
3 Contractor:
1jcensen Coils -I -roc -11104
Ph: c�4- 4800
Lie. No
4 ArchfteI'glneer: +u�1
wo e- .>;�hI
5 Sq. Ft. of Building: -7-75.
7 7 S
Address:
`1137 6. RkJIyI;Re Bk. a
Sq. Ft of Lot. 15,59
3
MN91ficp ds Rioct„st_Lfi
Height
3
Lie. No
c -683-7231
No. of Floors: 1
6•
7
8
Use of Building: C Ili j lc l am. i I y 4-ia►+ae ow d ,w (Civ,
Describe Work: W /
Pi -aryl wl e
Class of Work: 2 New ❑ Alteration
L.1Addition J Move
rd. get
o Remove
9
10
G�1age: 2- Cc r
❑ Single
Double
Carport:
Driveway Permit
11
Valuation of Work. S
❑ On -Site Sewage
CkempDisposal
11 . --Site Plan
U Single
J Double
o
Adjusted Valuations: 5 /6Z 3uv do
12 OTc d %ibi"lhJ c �f.SQ.� �Q , e--�a, o
e.
NOT1CBi
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO.
71115 PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS. OR IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT ALL
PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE
LIME TO GIVE AUTHORITY
ANY OTHER STATE OR
R THE PERFORMANCE
GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES N
TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PR fl
LOCAL LAW REG - TING CONS
OF CONSTR :•i e"-(2
L,+OFO ER
:No DE.
APPROVAL TE
l1
1
Plan Check Fee:
gee 70
Permit Fee:
/ 3zc /5 -
Total Fee:
2) gC14�5f 79
OCC Group:
Dated Permit Issued:
2934. RS
Const. Type:
Zoning:
Itl/3TCMaim Home:
DAT PFM-
1P,aD
lea
PING. DEPT. "Ay
APPROVAL/DAT
6S
Setbacks -
ISDS No. & Fee:
SO2 /^
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TT/CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF' THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES 70 COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND
USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GNEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES
THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION. ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION. AND USE OF' THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME
NULL AND VOID THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING
BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF
THIS JURISDICTION THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLRI ES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCI ES\ THE RESPONSI
BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT. DESIGNER. BUILDER
AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST.
Garfom.003
1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL!
IoN0C � • ei46o35 = ` 4.t (
4 c9L4—&0 o3 _ '156 , m�
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed. a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing:
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl. tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not he issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE 0FOCCUPANCY WELL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE or OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancyalse and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occup 'cy for the dwelling under building perrnit # >,7•LZ
Signature
BpcontOct2004
Date
lIZ1D`��
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applican tRd>4-
Address
Date //-
Finished (Livable Area):
Main 1775 Y 74 60
Upper
Lower
Other
Total Square Feet
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage:
Crawl Space:
Valuation
Valuation
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open
Valuation
Subdivision—LP-04i ice, "Ilbse 1
Lot/Block /(9?
Contractor
fdctSeti CO rd-,
/ 3:557
444 7�p
/77c F = /s775•
77 Y- 2y
Total Valuation
/s4g
/s8 3oo
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan
and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result
in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans
to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
1
Plans 'must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind
speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE
Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft.
of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a
subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's
signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a
building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of
the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special
setback 5,dp jply.
Yes
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent prope} ies), streams or water courses?
Yes
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
Yes
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and thy clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes
7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces and soffjs?
Yes
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
Toads and wind loads?
Yes
9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
constructigp�
Yes /%
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all columnsand beams?
Yes
12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the
top of a flat roef? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes
13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and del and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes l% No
3
14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the IRC?
Yes No
15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping°oms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes No
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ventil tion for all habitable rooms?
Yes No
17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes nNo
18. Is the locationatof all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
Yes 9/ No
19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenants?
Yes n // No
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to
obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not
be accept ll wyjhout it.
Yes /7/ No
21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes i%// No If no -Explain:
22.
Yes 9/
I -lave two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft.
long?
Yes L/// No
4
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes No
25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone district?
Yes 7 / No
26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes 7, No
27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to
the application of these changes?
Yes No
28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at
the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well
as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building
permit?
Yes No
29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be
called in to 384-5003.
Yes /J No
30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $50.00 re -inspection fee?
Yes CO No
31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupancy of the building?
Yes n0 No
32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC?
Yes � No
5
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at 625-8601.
7f
Yes
No
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at time of applicable inspection.
Yes No
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes n �% No
36. Do you know that the local fire distric may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the
building department about this equirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading
permit?
Yes
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
best o
W,3/s.
Signature of Owner Date
Phone: q 4 S* 2 0 H 4 (days);
4011-104 5 (evenings)
Project Name: =t o&fl3RloGC ?LA's/Nth ()u,T Devetpp, e,Vr
o (di Ri der Seta COoM
Project Address. j &kJ S. C -O aIGol
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays
in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If
it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the
application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
6
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
BpminreqFeb2005
7
IRON RIDGE
GOLF CLUB AND MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY
August 18, 2005
Garfield County Building Department
108 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Approved Plans at Ironbridge
Dear County Representative,
The following plans have been reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review
Board of the Ironbridge Property Owners Association for use on Lot 169:
Woodley Architectural Group
"Ironbridge — Plan 1101"
"Bid Set Redlines" dated September 15, 2004
If you have any questions, please call me at (970) 404-1045.
Sincerely,
Ironbridge Property Owners Association
i
/life
Dirk Gosda
Representative
410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLORADO 81601
T (970) 947-9800 F (970) 978-8865 www Ironbndgeclub com
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant i ?.Alipm
Lir 1 69
Building
c/Engineered Foundation
/l/e%itDriveway Permit
`Surveyed Site Plan
, LA Septic Permit and Setbacks
vGrade/Topography 30%
Attach Residential Plan Review List
Minimum Application Questionnaire
.---Subdivision Plat Notes
thFire Department Review
Valuation Determination/Fees
Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
✓ Attach Conditions
Application Signed
�
✓Pl�an Reviewer To Sign Application
`�Parcel/Schedule No.
40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms.
Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
Date HI'
C6—
Planning/Zoning
Property Line Setbacks
' 30ft Stream Setbacks
Flood Plain
✓ Gilding Height
l�Zoning Sign -off
t4oad Impact Fees
V HOA/DRC Approval
L4rade/Topography 40%
4/Plan ng Issues
Subdivision Plat Notes
CetTECiI
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970.945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
email: hpgeo®hpgeotech.com
SUBSOIL STUDY
FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 169, RIVER BEND WAY
IRONBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 101 196-1
AUGUST 26, 2005
PREPARED FOR:
IRONBRIDGE HOMES, LLC
ATTN: MIKE WOELKE
410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 -
SITE CONDITIONS - 2 -
GEOLOGY -2-
FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 -
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 -
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS - 4 -
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 -
FOUNDATIONS - -4-
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 -
FLOOR SLABS -6-
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 7 -
SURFACE DRAINAGE - 7 -
LIMITATIONS - 8 -
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING
FIGURE 2 - LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located
on Lot 169 River Bend Way, Ironbridge Development, Garfield County, Colorado. The
project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop
recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted as a supplement to
our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to L.B. Rose Ranch, LLC dated July
24, 2003. We previously conducted subsurface exploration to evaluate the collapse
potential in the non -irrigated debris fan areas within the development, report dated
September 10, 1998, Job No. 197 327.
An exploratory boring was drilled on the lot to obtain information on the subsurface
conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in
the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other
engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing
were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable
pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained
during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other
geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the
subsurface conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The specific building on the lot had not been determined at the time of this study. The
proposed residence will generally be a 1 or 2 story, wood frame structure about 2,500 to
3,000 square -feet in size. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade and/or structural over a
crawlspace. A basement level may be provided. Grading for the structure is assumed to
be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light
foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction.
Job No. 101 196-1
-2 -
If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report.
SITE CONDITIONS
The lot is located in the middle, northern part of the development and was vacant at the
time of our field exploration. River Bend Way borders the lot to the south as shown on
Figure I. The roadway and underground utility construction to the lot are complete.
Minor overlot grading during subdivision development consists of shallow cuts and fills.
The ground surface is relatively flat and slopes gently down to the east. Vegetation
consists of sparse grass and weeds.
GEOLOGY
The geologic conditions were described in our previous report conducted for planning and
preliminary design of the subdivision development, dated October 29, 1997, Job No. 197
327. The surficial soils on the lot mainly consist of sandy silt and clay debris fan deposits
overlying gravel terrace alluvium of the Roaring Fork River. The alluvium is
predominantly a clast-supported deposit of rounded gravel, cobbles and boulders up to
about 3 feet in size in a silty sand matrix that was encountered at a depth of about 34 feet
on the lot.
The underlying bedrock consists of the Eagle Valley Evaporite which contains gypsum
and is generally associated with scattered sinkhole development in the Roaring Fork
River valley. Voids have not been encountered in the bedrock in borings drilled on
adjacent lots and the potential for subsidence due to dissolution of the evaporite
throughout the service life of the residence, in our opinion, is low.
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on August 15, 2005. An exploratory
boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface
Job No. 101 196-1
GlEtech
-3-
' conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight augers
powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The boring was logged by a
representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch LD. spoon sampler. The sampler was
driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30
inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method
D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or
consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration
resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples
were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
A graphic log of the subsoil profile encountered in the boring is shown on Figure 2. The
subsoils, below about 'A foot of topsoil, consist of 33'/ feet of stiff to very stiff, slightly
sandy to sandy clayey silt overlying relatively dense, slightly silty sandy gravel and
cobbles with boulders (terrace alluvium) down to the drilled depth of 35 feet. Drilling in
the dense terrace alluvium with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and
boulders.
Laboratory testing performed on a sample obtained from the boring included natural
moisture content and density, and finer than sand size gradation analysis (silt and clay
content). Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on a sample of the silt soils,
presented on Figure 4, show that the soils have low compressibility potential under
existing low moisture content and light loading and have a moderate collapse potential
(settlement under constant load) when wetted. The sample showed relatively high
compressibility when additionally loaded after wetting. Laboratory test results are
summarized in Table 1.
No free water was encountered in the boring at the time drilling and the subsoils were
slightly moist.
Job No. 101 196-1
G leStecfn
-4 -
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
The upper clayey silt (debris fan) soils typically have low bearing capacity and low to
moderate settlement potential under loading when wetted. Foundations that extend down
to the dense terrace alluvium would have moderate bearing capacity and low settlement
risk. Spread footings placed on the upper natural soils should be feasible for building
support with some potential for differential settlement, mainly if the debris fan soils are
wetted.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the
nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread
footings bearing on the natural subsoils.
The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread
footing foundation system.
1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for
an allowable bearing pressure of 1,200 psf. Based on experience, we
expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed
in this section will be about 1 inch or less. Due to the variable settlement
potential of the debris fan soils, additional differential movement on the
order of 1 to 2 inches could occur, mainly if the debris fan soils are wetted.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
Job No. 101 196-1 ctect'I
standard Proctor density at a moisture COHWIIL ileal upwi,uiu. LWall-W. .11 r,... W.
walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment
near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some
settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is
placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill.
The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the
sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be
calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted
backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit
weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended
above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the
design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case
of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads
-6 -
Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and
walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment
near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some
settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is
placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill.
The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the
sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be
calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted
backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit
weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended
above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the
design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case
of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads
should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a
moisture content near optimum.
FLOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -
on -grade construction. The upper silt soils have variable settlement potential when
wetted under load and there could be some post -construction slab movement if the
subgrade soils become wet. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor
slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which
allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce
damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended
slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath
basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 -inch
Job No. 101 196-1
- 7 -
. aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No.
200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can
consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our
experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy
precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched
condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace
and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an
underdrain system. An underdrain should not be provided around shallow foundations (3
feet deep or less) and garage areas.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish
grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as a
20 mil PVC liner should be placed in a trough shape below the drain gravel and attached
to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the building has been completed:
Job No. 101 196-1 Gtech
-8-
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas.
Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-
site, fine grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at
least 10 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use
of xeriscape to prevent wetting of the bearing soils from irrigation.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated
on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our
services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or
other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is
concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be
consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during
Job No. 101 196-1
-9-
• construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so
that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E
Reviewed by:
Daniel E. Hardin, P.E.
SLP/ksw
Job No. 101196-1
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1"=30'
LOT 168
T
BENCH MARK: GROUND AT PROPERTY
CORNER; ELEV. = 100.0', ASSUMED.
16th FAIRWAY
LOT 169
BORING 169
•
RIVER BEND WAY
1
LOT 170
101 196-1
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Figure 1
Depth — Feet
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
BORING 169
ELEV.= 95.2'
16/12
10/12
WCr4.6
DD -93
14/12
WC -3.1
DD -106
-200-89
14/12
/
/
/ 17/12
34/12
W0414.9
DD•110
-200-94
NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Depth — Feet
101 196-1
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
Figure 2
LEGEND:
® TOPSOIL; sandy silt with roots, brown.
7
SILT (ML); slightly sandy to sandy, slightly clayey, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, light brown.
GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM—GP); slightly silty, sandy, dense, slightly moist, brown,
rounded rock.
Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. Colifomia liner sample.
16 12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 16 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were
required to drive the California sampler 12 inches.
Depth at which boring caved following drilling.
NOTES:
1. The exploratory boring was drilled on August 15, 2005 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power
auger.
2. The exploratory boring was located approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan
provided.
3. The exploratory boring elevation was measured by instrument level and refers to the Bench Mark shown
on Figure 1.
4. The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered accurate only to the degree implied
by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries
between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may
occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC Water Content ( % )
DD = Dry Density ( pcf )
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
101 196-1
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LEGEND AND NOTES
Figure 3
Moisture Content = 4.6 percent
Dry Density = 93 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Clayey Silt
From Boring 169 at 5 Feet
11
Compression
upon
wetting
III
C
41
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
101 196-1
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Figure 4
Job No. 101 196-1
f/Y
Z J
QJ N
V
w • O• O
<uJo
co m
a •LL
= O
re
o r
W =
S Lo
107
SOIL OR
BEDROCK TYPE
Sandy clayey silt
Sandy clayey silt
Slightly sandy silt and clay 11
L2
$
sio
V g F
?$,
waZ
a
ie
0
a
oX
NATURAL
DRY
DENSITY
III
93
8
o
w F
ZiV
::
3.1
0,
I SAMPLE LOCATION
g v
0
tn
10
O
to
0
z
s
o'
\o
No 1-1 `)
Assessor's Parcel No.3 ' I a1-12 - 1(oat
Date 1 --]-OS
BUILDING PERMIT CARD
Job Address CM 1 act +.-1-\1 t e>I" i- s�
Owner ijrfmt) br1 AI •'
Contractor
Address 4tp
lL Tro �l
0.
• •
as
r, br'
Phone #
Phone #
Address .Mnn
l Pe F rn • RH LH
•
Soils Test
Footing /2-73-QJ7W-
Foundation /-s--c,%
Grout
Underground Plumbinc
Rough PlumbinggiM-
Framing S /-0
Insulation
-
Insulation lo-L-D(ori
Roofing
Drywall /02 -9-86177(
Gas Piping 5-(4-dts
EXTERIOR
Address No.
Drainage
pecks -support 8 clearance to 721, /�
Decks -stairs & rails
Extenor locks
Flashing around doors 5 windows
Insect screens
INTERIOR
GARAGE
Fire wall separation
Service doors -1% min
Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -1;V min
Mach equip 1S" above floor
No opening into sleeping area
BASEMENT•CF)AWL AREA
Access �/
Insulation
Headroom/Stairs/
Ventilation
V
NSPECTIONS
Zoning
Weatherproofing
Mechanical
Electrical Rough (State)
Electrical Final (State) 7 "is- t QF
Final € /-06 /Checklis omleted? 17
Certificate Occupa ny #
Date 2S' ( - DCo
Septic System #
Date
Final
Other
NOTES
FINAL CHECKLIST
MECHANICAL ROOM
Baler
Hot water
F A. geslod ra�sic.
Floor drain
Clearance
Air con system
Hot water neater /as
Combustion air lit4.1.LLL
Gas piping valves GG
LPG Drain
FIREPLACE/STOVE
Clearance to combustibles
Termination of chimney
Combustion air
Hearth (12" or 20" on sided
Glass doors
Certified by -
REMARKS
(continue on back)
STAIRWAYS
Headroom (S'8")
Railing I: guardrails
Width
Rise & run
KITCHEN
Clearance above grill
Exhaust tan
Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase)
BEDROOMS
Egress
Smoke detector
BATHROOMS
Exhaust tan
Shatterproof glass
OTHER
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
ia_GARAELD COUNTY, COLORADO C
Date Issued 11111111111 Zoned Area Permit No 9157
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zonin, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Usellairein CSphY ate. ` 4.cay. pct
Address or Legal Description Mail ellOtlr . ` ! /�S
o ner= a3 w Scontraetor 14a.a%as [ Ate_
Sethacks Front Side Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visibe From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
,/
Footing i 2 - a7_05776
Driveway
Foundation /-5-06 77f
Underground Plumbing
Insulation (r_ 2..-06 si
Rough Plumbing S_IL-o6T14
Drywall 6,—.7 -06,01 -
Chimney & Vents_f G _8,4
Electric Final (by nspector)77476‘. AS
Gas Piping S _(&,_B
Final ,_06 ,
Electric Rough (By State Inspector)
Septic Final
Framing 5—/6j-0,
(To include Roof in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
Notes:
9,
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
Dates By
rr
IF PLACED OUTSIDE = COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC