Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplicationL'ARFIELL? COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8." Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Permit No: 9/5 i I Parcel/Schedule No: Job Addreq ; � r 1 Lot No: s —Block No: p 3 Z„{ m ubd. / Exepito : �+ I l II t\q 1 S eh li--l-e,�r".. 2 1,1� Owner: i an 7wei , R. 1 .14.c, .3c Address 2 i. 4 3 i, L. d 4th.lte. A..,.4.,...Gv. Ph: 3'c a 93.3 Wk Ph: 3v -43;y-2.04, 3 Contract 003 {nie._ Ir Address: J 3 q f"5' ,,v 4, i t asq(A/ ea. a I..15" Ph: Soo V 4-` 0 • lea - LIc, No. 33 rZ 4 Architect/Engineer: PA. y Me.., pi' ZS.o. .•% Address: re..4L, / Re Alit Ph: - 1070.3 C715-ir301 Lic. No. 5 Sq. Ft. of Buil n : 4136,7 / Z Z , Sq. Ft. of Lot: 2 ` o ?'C, Height: i N 2Cl Cao No. of. Floors: 2. G II* of Buil ng:` ' 4, aidialvAtaa Qj r - ,[ r.. , Li..Tl� �aWork: 7 �_, r :111' Describe Work: { jam- • '14ra.a15 a.. ,S. ,es; VD 8 Class of Work: V New J Alteration o Remove J Addition ::-.1 Move 9 Garage: iQ Single 0 1181. Double Carport: ❑ Single Ll Double 10 ' o Driveway Permit 19. On -Site Sewage Disposal gir Site Plan 11 Valuation of Work' $ �p ySGf ©inti Adjusted V. f 1� 3 �4 12 Special Conditions: }� �f rte/ �(Ip tt'.0/4•4 Mt Lorg • �L I . i •Xiie.,1, /), C.0, T. ' 1 • fit.419rit 4 NOTICE li Plan CheekP ee: �' A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT I5 REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. 3370,90 5/ .00 THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. Total Fee: J Dated Permit Issued: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT, ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BEC OCC Group: Const. Type: COMPLI:;i'ED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRU i t N. Zoning: Setbacks: ,, � •AO .1 0. 1b. 401r,"'GNA Manu. Home: (SDS No. &Fee: 0• 4 1)' D CE �� it -i7 ,Z tom., A APPRPJLVAL/PATE s ' PT. PING. DEFT. APPROVAL/DATE 13 C AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHERAGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE I.COATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER. BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. Garfom.003 1 tykriti{NOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # )15/ ` Signature BpcontOct2004 - 3— c� Date Applicant Address Date ' 1 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Subdivision Gz uu} Lot/Block Contractor 1 2740 l ��q Ioz7 /3Z3 z342 /577 67ny ‘k,.V ! 1, 34:00 x 74 847 8.64 Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation x"70 t D`iP cRe 344 L1/ =`°z7/o1.60 • l i/ y lCgi Si20(z 8 4z �ir,�r3 (0‘) GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANI\ 970-945-8212 ING MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wail studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A yrindoy schedule. A.41.8441 A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a'40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the e velope. Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent propert. , streams or water courses? Yes 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the prope ? Yes i 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 4 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wioads? Yes ;Z 9. Does the plan inc de a building section drawing indicating foundation,. wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 1 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method ofpositive connection of all columns an cams? Yes 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roo ' (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Pha certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No 15. Does the plan includ a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping r s and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilate for all habitable rooms? Yes t No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safet glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of al natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on th an? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdiv' ' n process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an ap : tion for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted out it. Yes No 21. Will this be t only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) mplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes I 23. Do you understa that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20f1.wide and 20ft. long? Yes No 4 24. Have you designed or ad this plan designed while considering building and other construction code uirements? Yes ? No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone d' ? Yes j No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by t arfield County Building Department? Yes i No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application ese changes? Yes r No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes ?-_ No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-51 Yes No 30. Are you aware that re esting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.0 e -inspection fee? Yes No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the b ding? Yes ► No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes ✓ No 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of a ' able inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parce11111111111111ft Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit plication? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes i No 36. Do you know that the local fire di t may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuanc a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes ti I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my abilit 20,01,41r - Signa ure of Owner Date Phone: 3 0 1ks 3 S 00 C (days), "),v .• 2,L11A, (evenings) Project Name: til b1 _ Project Address: kl,t,;r) G, 41L4i1WR Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqFeb2005 7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload: 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 7001 to 8000ft. 75PSF 8001 to 9000ft. 100PSF 9001 to I0000ft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B qtr C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F -days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-Iayment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R -Values: Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. ▪ Floors R -values are R-19. • Basement wall R -values are R-10 below grade, R-19 above grade. ■ Slab perimeter R -value and depth is R- 10/36in. ■ Crawl space wall R -values are R-10 below grade and R-19 above grade If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R-19 insulation. Common ceiling/floor garage to house must have R-19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant 4Date //-/7-05— Building ✓_Engineered Foundation _AM Driveway Permit Surveyed Site Plan N Septic Permit and Setbacks Grad /Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List Minimum Application Questionnaire ✓ Subdivision Plat Notes —Fire Department Review > 740 S -14( Determination/Fees la / Red Line PIans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions Application Signed ✓ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. / 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning .'Property Line Setbacks 4 -Oft Stream Setbacks `Flood Plain 'Building Height ''oning Sign -off v Road Impact Fees i HOA/DRC Approval /Grade/Topography 40% " ping Issues Subdivision Plat Notes Aspect Glen Homeowner's Association Design Review Committee September 30, 2005 Mr. George Hanlon The Equinox Group, LLC 9055 East Mineral Circle Suite 200 Centennial, CO 80112 Re: Aspen Glen Lot D-32/0066 Upland Dear Mr. Hanlon, RECEIVE, OCT 0 4 "- Thank you for the submittal of youre. s for final review by the Aspen Glen Design Review Committee at their September 2005 meeting. Receipt is hereby acknowledged of the CRAF of $2,995.60 and the builder's completion deposit of $10,000. It was a pleasure to meet Paul and 1 look forward to working with him. The DRC does hereby grant final approval of the duplex with the following conditions: 1. Glass for the exterior lights must be opaque. 2. The detail of the submersible pump that was conveyed to you will be used on your property. 3. Please provide a detail of the entryway feature. Greg Mozian represented that it would be a stone column with cap. 4. The landscape plan is hereby approved. 5. It was represented to the DRC that the window clad is Hartford Green and the rock is moss rock. Please be reminded that three inspections need to occur during construction of your home. These will ultimately be your responsibility and bear upon release of the Builder's Completion Deposit. Please contact the DRC Administrator at (970) 963-3362, upon completion of the foundation and dry -in phases of construction and for your fmal on-site review by the DRC. Details of these procedures are contained in the Design Review application packet. Failure to call for any of these inspections will result in $1000 per violation held by the Homeowners Association from the return of your Builder's Completion Deposit. It will be necessary for your builder to arrange reviews in accordance with the DRC's scheduled sessions. PO Box 900 Carbondale, CO 81623 Tel: (970) 963-3362 1 Email:llamont@sopris.net in2,1 Hwy Please keep in mind that a copy of your approved plans is kept on file for periodic review by the Design Review Committee to assure compliance with your approved plans. Any anticipated changes from your approved plans must be submitted to, reviewed by and receive approval from the Design Review Committee prior to making any changes. eslie Lamont, Administrator Aspen Glen Design Review Committee PO Box 400 Carbondale, CO 81623 Tel: (970) 963-3362 2 Email:Ilamont@sopris.net NOV-1772005 16:23 FROM:DURGIN ELECTRIC 9709279449 TO:3843470 P.1'22 DURGIN ELECTRIC, INC. PHONE: 970-927-9339 FAX: 970-927-9449 T° /4744/ COMPANY. FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET DATE: -215 ---- FAX FAX NUMBER 996 -32t/ --eV? TOTAL NO. OFF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: PHONENUMBER SENDER'S REFERENCE NUMBER: YOUR REFERENCE NUMBER: 0 URGENT 0 FOR REVIEW 0 PLEASE COMMENT 0 PLEASE REPLY 0 PLEASE RECYCLE NOTES/COMMENTS r L6 596 100 ELK RUN DRIVE, SUITE 111 BASALT, COLORADO 81621 TO: 3943470 P.2�2 NOV- 1.7-2005 16: 23 FR4I`t:DllR�aI�l�iL�RAItR YAN9Al0tGhtgt�lSb -NA 11. /00 � : E�1'� SWI ?tettti;1 RESISTANCE IIiAgCTQRY �!! E RE$1STANOS DIRECTORY (a#I(RH) Fes!Seeistanne Ratings - ANSI/1.7L 26-Cor+tintted CONT iTAL GYPSUM COMPANY .types CO -C, CC5-5, OP MUM CORP, SUB OP GEORGTA-p cITIOtxR►—.2 a. WES al CYPBUki IN — pe Mn 'V' . GYPSUM, DIY OF LAp1►1tCB CORP-. LG1+C• ,, LGPC-CM. NATIONAL GYPSCO Types PS -C PSW-G PAIICO GYPsdN OP PP DIC G COAST UILDWG PRODUCTS INC�.Type Cor MILK GYPSUM CO —poi RG•C. STANDARD GYk5I L L SG -c IliMPLE-INLAPID POUST nouuers cow? -- TC -C, UM' 7 SIAM GYra1M CO—Types C, DAR Y� PANAMER.1CArNO S A DE `Tepee C, TP -X2, IPC• L Bids and 19lsakete° NAm 2 in. thick mime.] wool inadation, 96 in. keig, at to Is M. widths„ friction fitted between studs In wall cavity. TILSand LLC �e f� FI 5 1'lope attd thea i, as (two ed t per sppiiad joints, strew heads, and nail ads (tun paper ' ,: +fig thea tn. t hat de, embeddedIn t layer of amptrvut Over all latn�. -•" Design No. U136 itposadd to Ant her1ta� Wail sloe only setts! �adng s Re Wish ems$ — 3 AIL Irk ,..t..=.r..r..:r .a-rwmw w.-a-.tr+wr .. ti �nk '.431 X la 0 • iBDTJOw 4.4 `36QARAT1'ON WALL( (Max Nei& - 4410 ?Icor! ittlenzadiate a7bp Well -- 2 in. vaccis shaped with I beg lass famed rrosnivo. 25 WC gale steel, secured With builable ••I+tle,rts aimed 24 in. OC. EtV0 "1r Muds— Saul wombats fraud Nom No. Z7 MSG steel 1 B wed void 24 In. OC evendl deg in. tau width GMeero Baud' -- Two by= of 1 in. thiol: gyp= waitboard liter �tttta� Y+ d lnam 7A in widdt.. eni edges of pole friction itspmd studs, CANADIAN GYPSUM COMPANY SLL OGYPSUM Spe 9LX 1PANAAMU1N 8AD$ CY SLX WALL( (heft os Nonbesxing WeE) Studs -- Nom 2 by 4 hi. max spacing 24 itt. OC. Studs Crass at mkt - height when necessery Tor dp sttsrlmt'ent Mit 9/4 in. !Peatirn between wood f mlte and fife separation wall. Board-- Classified of Unclasetiorl --• Mb 1/1 in. thick, 4 ft VOed otherar vertically, Wallboardattadted to Mtli 4/4 in. long steel drywall rune spaced 8 in, OC. Vertical located ovsz studs. PTp hons.1) Joints ravened with PAM tape and compound Nsii had&-ec ee ed watt ttohtt cont pound. t Aluminum 0.068 in, chick, 2 In, ,vide with end 2-I /44 lee. Clips se with. lope 5 serevm 3/8 in. long La x FOR Ti#R UL MARK OM PRODUCT staYAt cs nlaECTonv Resist/axe Retinge - ANSIJUL 263 (SXVV)-Caniinued 1a " l land Type W mews 1.1/4 3n. long to wood inning GA. ClipOp psi u of Com 6) tprovided rot separation 'PIPS up tam Spun Opt m aux 4f 10 ft OC verticallybetween wood node. 611. Chip placement (ham 6) for mop/ration wall+ up to 44 el*, Space bps is demibed In Item 6A fotupper 24 R. Realetr3ilg'ii area below zr ernes t¢}pe NNW a max l OC venially between Wood and "1-14 Shida, Twin); UL Clareiliestion ?Auk Mello No. t3337 BFbddsh Rating -See haat 2 1.111MtO R 1. Woad Bruch -- Nominal 2 by 4 in. spaced 16 In. on cesitez effectively erose braced at miid height and Sze napped at top MI bottom 2. Gyepara Doerr -- 5/8 in. i1'sid4 4 it wide? app vertically, Wall- board attached to duds and beau6 plates with 1.3/4 int. kali& nate with 0.228 in. diem abaatk and T/16 in. diem here, quad 81n. on G -P GYPMUM CORE SUB OP GEORGIA—PACIFIC CORP --Type DGG (finish rMttrtg 20 rrdnl Type De. 3, Gypsum 8a*rd' •-- e/8 in, hick 4 it wide, appiidd vertically. Wall- board attarhad to etude and bearing trlatert 1.3/4 fn ions iv assn* with 0.12.8 in. dian shard( and 7/16 M. diem lead, .pa d 8 is on cen AMERICAN GYPSUM CO �AGX-7� wain). BEIJING NBWBUILDING LB LTD— D 4 WIC rating 24 mist). CONT1NENPAL CYPERC OMPANY Type 0c3.3 finish rat- . ing 20 nsbij, 'Type CGS -5 Wish sating 20 stem, Type CC6•6 (4n isEmiing 2E► mane TYPe '`i WW1 rating 20 aratti Type COTC-Crilardeii raft ?A adrr?• G.? WSW CORP, SUB am CBORGIA,-PACIFIC CUSP Types 5, 9, 0, Type OGG (finish grating ntM). �a GPl 2 (cribs 24 amMrt . Type GPPS6 JLAG�IB DMie NC—Type Max LAFARGE GyRPL(flagwing 4 LC3 Type (finish�og2LL type � (fn. • rating ), Type t C-CA 22 Type LOPC 6A (rehab rating 34 izshtl Type L C -C1 A. BIAM_GYPSUM 1NDL7S'PitY CO Type VA (Ankh xstin$ 26 4. ?'antra and Nla'+)Iheat;.— Squad or armed with paper tape and Joint ctmtpoond. Pat tapered rounded edge wallboard, � with ith irr tape oin} ctraparrid. *Been thee t a ! sauifit at Mark ROARING FORK WATER & SANITATION DISTRICT APPLICATION FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AND TAP PERMIT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL, DUPLEX AND SPECIAL CLASSIFICATIONS Please complete and return with your tap fee payment of $6900/eqr to the RFWSD. Name of Applicant: ato24=. ✓•e - Applicant Address:__ �41 t.45 -i C7 ,r.Ll;9- Applicant City/State/Zip: e`lz✓/2,c%u?- : ?4 646)/6 Applicant PhonejH), C.a-- 64 -jam+.$ (W)e' (Fad Service Desired: Water ,✓ Sewer ✓ Owner of Property to be Served: Mailing Address for Distrr.ct Billings: �IC 4 T i 1 if l }i G/,'C� 6J7 ' t) Mailing City/State/Zip / (r C) �'// 2 -- Owner Owner Phone:( -I) -5,4114L- (W) S fhb (Fax) .5t -* Lea Description of Property to be Served: ttach copy if nece say) 3Z r/`Inii6- / W6n/ at. rf - BP) V 4_5(..- 14k. rrb 33a� qs, G, F/Ft- i Ga Street Address of Property to beServed: DO 6 -,Vib Subdivision or Development: SPEnI AJ Lot: rip - J2— Structures on Property (if there is more than one structure of the same type or for duplex or triplex units, give separate information for each): Primary Secondary Square Footage: 2-2-- Bedrooms: vBedrooms: ' j - 3 Kitchens: I / Square Ft. of Irrigated Green Space: 7000 7'Tkt— Hot Tub - specify size in gallons Other water uses or structures (e.g. swimming pools, fountains) I, the applicant named above, as lawful owner of the property described above or on behalf of the lawful owner, hereby apply to the Roaring Fork Water & Sanitation District for the privilege of water and/or sewer service pursuant to §7.03 of the District's Rules and Regulations. I certify that the above description of the property to be served, and the structures thereon, is accurate. I understand that I must have the new tap inspected by District representatives and hereby consent to an inspection of the premises at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner for the purposes of approving the tap and verifying the tap fee to be charged. I agree to abide by the Rules and Regulations of the District as set by the Board of Directors and amended from time to time, and to notify the District of any changes in the structures get • =- described in this application. Applicant Date 9�bzzs--- OFFICIAL USE ONLY EQR Value PO Box 1002 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 TEL: (970) 945-2144 • FAX (970) 947-9220 ACCT #1_ RFWSD BILLING: PO Box 326 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 TEL: (970) 876-5008 • FAX (970) 876-2944 Gtech HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth-Pawiak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 01601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeorech.corn SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT D-32, ASPEN GLEN GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 105 786 SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 PREPARED FOR: STOKES/BRAREN/HANLON PARTNERSHIP ATTN: GEORGE HANLON 9055 EAST MINERAL CIRCLE, SUITE 200 CENTENNIAL, COLORADO 80112 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS - 1 - SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS - 4 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 - FLOOR SLABS -6- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE - 7 - LIMITATIONS - 8 - REFERENCE - 9 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed duplex residence to be located on Lot D-32, Aspen Glen, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to George Hanlon dated September 1, 2005. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed duplex will be a single -story wood frame structure over a basement level. The footprint of the proposed building is shown on Figure 1. Ground floors will be slab - on -grade in the garage and basement areas. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 6 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS Lot D-32 is located in the southeastern part of the development. The lot is off of Upland cul-de-sac between the road and the 12th Fairway to the east. The Jot has been disturbed Job No. 105 786 G:OtCh -2 - by past grading for the golf course, including a landscape berm and pond at the rear of the lot. An open ditch flows from the pond west along the south property line. The building area is vacant and covered with grass and weeds and has a gentle slope down to the west. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous studies for the subdivision (Chen -Northern, 1991), several sinkholes were observed scattered throughout the Aspen Glen development, mainly east of the Roaring Fork River. These sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River Valley. The closest mapped sinkhole to Lot D-32 is located about 600 feet to the west and the edge of a broad subsidence area that contains the sinkhole is about 250 feet from the lot. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot D-32 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on September 9, 2005. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight Job No. 105 786 Gtech augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 13/8 inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic Iogs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about % to 1 foot of topsoil or fill overlying stiff sandy silt and clay to depths of 5'/ to 7 feet where dense, slightly silty sandy gravel, cobbles and boulders was encountered. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit at depths of 101/2 to 11 feet. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell - consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample of the upper clay soils, presented on Figure 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The sample showed a minor expansion potential when wetted. The laboratory testing is sununarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist. Job No. 105 786 G ch -4 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The upper silt and clay soils have low bearing capacity with variable settlement potential. These soils are typically known to be compressible under loading when wetted and the expansion potential indicated by the laboratory testing can be neglected in the design. The underlying gravel and cobble soils have moderate bearing capacity and minor settlement potential. The groundwater level in the area is relatively deep and a basement level should be feasible with little risk of groundwater impacts. We assume that the pond to the east and the ditch to the south of the building site are Iined and will have no impact on the development. The lined condition and water management plan should be confirmed with the developer. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Footings that bear entirely on the dense gravel and cobble soils can be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be up to about 1 inch with some potential for differential between silt and clay and gravel bearing areas. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Job No. 105 786 -5 - Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span Iocal anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) All existing fill, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the firm natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at Least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Job No. 105 786 Gelgt+ech -6 - Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.3 for the silt and clay soils and 0.5 for the gravel and cobble soils. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 325 pcf. The ;; coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral toads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on -grade construction. The silt and clay soils have some settlement potential when wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch Job No. 105 786 -7 - aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy .precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a•perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by ark, underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. Where footings bear on the upper silt and clay soils and an underdrain is needed, an impervious membrane such as a 20 mil PVC liner should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. Job No. 105 786 G & ch -8- 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site silt and clay soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation and sprinkler heads should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so. that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the Job No. 105 786 -9 - project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully .Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. SLP/ksw cc: Phil Henderson (via fax: 720-851-8726) Paul Renus (paulrenusna,msn.com) REFERENCE Chen -Northern, 1991, Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, .Garfeld County, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated December 20, 1991, Job No. 4 112 92. Job No. 105 786 Gtech IRRIGATION 1\ DITCH 1 1,1 / 6070 LOT D-31 E- • BORING 2 , I r - / r i LOT D-32 r / L __ '-, PROPOSED// RESIDENCE / / L. l 1 BUILDING ENVELOPE BORING 1 • 6075 � ▪ �1_ ......_ \ 1 - \ • ti ^-....� `\�\ 1 EXISTING POND J APPROXIMATE SCALE 1'° = 40' ( 1 PROPERTY BOUNDARY UPLAND LOT D-33 105 786 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 Elevation - Feet 6075 6070 6065 6060 BORING 1 ELEV. = 6073.5' 10/12 WC=7.3 DD=107 18/12 30/6,10/0 BORING 2 ELEV.= 6072' 10/12 WC=7.3 DD=86 -200=94 25/6,10/0 30/3,10/0 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. 6070 6065 6060_, Elevation - Feet 105 786 H EPWORfH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 LEGEND: r-7 10/12 FILL; silty sand with gravel, loose, brown. TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt, red -brown. SILT AND CLAY (ML -CL); slightly sandy to sandy, stiff, slightly moist, red, porous. GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM -GP); slightly silty, sandy, dense, slightly moist, brown, rounded rock. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2 -inch 1.0. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch 1.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 10 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches, NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on September 9, 2005 with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided, 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used, 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pcf) -200 = Percent passing No, 200 sieve 105 786 HEPWORTH-PAWLAKGEO1 CHH[CAL LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Compression - Expansion 0 2' 3 4 5 Moisture Content = 7.3 percent Dry Density — 96 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Boring 1 at 2 Feet Expansion upon wetting 7 0.1 105 786 N 1.0 HEPWORTH.PAWLAX GEOTECHNICAL 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS 100 Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Job No. 105 786 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (%) NATURAL DRY DENSITY (P� GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE LIQUID LIMIT %) PLASTIC INDEX (%) GRAVEL (%) SAND (%) BORING DEPTH (ftL 1 2 7.3 107 Sandy silty clay 2 2 7.3 86 94 Slightly sandy silt 7 J J HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Job No. 105 786 SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (off) NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED E COMPRESSIVE (PSF) SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE BORING DEPTH (ft) DRY DENSITY (Pcf) GRAVEL (%) SAND (%) LIQUID LIMIT (%) PLASTIC INDEX _ (5) 1 2 7.3 1 107 Sandy silty clay 2 2 7.3 86 94 Slightly sandy silt FIRE • EMS • RESCUE October 4, 2007 Andy Schwaller, Building Official Garfield County Building Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 8i 601 RE: Hanlon Duplex, Aspen Glen Dear Andy, Per the International Fire Code (IFC) Section B 104.2, areas of buildings that are separated by fire walls constructed in accordance with the IBC in may be calculated individually for the purpose of calculating required fire flows. In this case, the building would not require an automatic fire sprinkler system. Please contact me if you have any questions or if I may be of any assistance. Sincerely, Bill Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District 300 Meadowood Drive • Carbondale, CO 81623 • 970-963-2491 Fax 970-963-0569 COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING PERMIT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 0c26 S 89240.-"( Permit No. 97_�a I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: .11,;44,://x--/ You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When corrections have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date oZ?/D 7 20 Building Inspector —7,7,7 phone (970) 945-8212 No. Job Addrss !} Owner �c)1`' ) Contractor �-R� Setbacks: Front T«,'-ea°'`14` RH ie • Assessor's Parcel Ntll/3 026'1-of`U3 Date / //vWe BUILDING PERMIT CARD C ' k/L d}3 0470-e44 -daut Address )1I • ()Ward, 7CiftQ°.° & Phone #303-°43"5°° S Address rum Phone # 'lute) --303"b'7 /'l Re,ius. Soil 'Test Footing / LA Foundation /- Z,-ocr Grout Underground Plumbing HI --- Rough Plumbing / `1 0 C — Framing a- -APO Insulation 3-9-07P,-)70— Roofing Drywall 3-.a7-13)977/ Gas .a7`d)977/Gas Piping /2 ---tom NaTE: E: EXTERIOR Address No, Drainage Decks -support & clearance to wood Decks -stairs & rails Exterior locks Flashing around doors & windows Insect screens INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation V � , Service doors -1%' min. Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -1 Vs" min Mech. equip. 113" above floor No opening Into sleeping area BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access V insulation Headroom/Stairs Ventilation INSPECTIONS NOTES ,ore 19-catl LH Zoning CA pitiii-14 z-) -C"•a:: Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) S/ Electrical Final (State) Finan -.2 C? /Checklist Completed? Certificate Occupancy # 5443 Date q -2.6 -0 -4 - Septic System # Date Final Other A rse_{,; 0-7 — FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL R9OM Boller �/ Hot water F.A. gas/oil Floor drain Clearance Air con. system Hot water heater Combustion air Gas piping, valves LPG Drain FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combustibles Termination of chimney Combustion air Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) Glass doors Certified by: r. REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS • Headroom (6'6") Railing & guardrails Width ��✓✓✓✓// / Rise & run �/ KITCHEN Clearance above grill Exhaust fan V+� Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) �~ BEDROOMS Egress Smoke detector BATHROOMS Exhaust fan Vti/7 Shatterproof glass OTHER INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS �,, 12 THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB i) 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS qv .. qt4 sin BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO tate Issued!` OVA Zoned Area Permit No AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building fn pector an MEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. iddres Legal escnption615 ?canerk setbacks Front ots . C c . - . f Q..,. Side Contractor IN ` r Side Rear rhis-Carel-Mu ,k Pnsted- t tisPlainty-Visible Fro= The Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing /: • sc' 'SV Driveway /A Foundation L- 7,7-o61 rd-- Underground Plumbing /.-/ 3 -0 b Insulation'i`e v b ,,,# Rough Plumbing —1 Q_ p 7 77 Drywall 3 Chimney & Vent "IA -0/ A. . Electric Final (by State Ins At47 Gas Piping J S Final 9��U7 ,c jaerivOL Electric Rough (By Stat epector)sj'i hs Septic Final ii/4, Framing da -,./-19792,2o=2 (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE ForInspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APP OVERDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date k By tptfAA F PLACED O SIDE - CO R frrH CLEAR PLASTIC --t Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. Ci -7 Sa. Job Address Uo6 (1/#4,(4. C0,111.4_ CcHSW,3 Y'C Dia Nature of Work Buildin' Permit 6 . -')elf"-23- 1 )P 3- a• 1 41 Use of Building Owner Contractor Amount of Permit $ 891757 Date Clerk Vi0?9,acivs' C�