The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-PermitGarfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. 915.sto Job Address in 5 (_)1_0(1 Nature of Work Building Permit 10-15 3 rcb r I Use of BuildingE/Pr)n1xj-P lacts2. Owner 3f r �Urtr4)yy\D_ Contractor COviS11--, Amount of Permit $ D O' 3 ! Date / » I 3 rC S -(--CI-b)z'.? Tf) GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICAT! ON 108 8'" Street. Suite 201. Glenwood Springs. CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax 970.383470 / Inspection Lina: 970-9844-8003 Permit No: q55lo 4 � ( 1IV Parcel/Schedule No: 1 121 " 18- !3 AGREEMENT PERMISSION I5 HEREBY GRANTED TO TIIE APPLICANT AS ER CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT QI CONSIDE=RATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMTS, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES ID COMPLY mI ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHOR] Y GIVEN LN 30 28.201 CRS AS AMENDED THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION. AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSITTITE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABIIIIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DLSCREPENCIES THE RESPONSI BATTY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT. DESIGNER BUILDER. AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST Garfom.003 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE [INITIALI. 6(f /°5 •80)•c16 , Q Q- 4f ?5Lg�i /(/O t0Jt0 -#5-a55 Job Address: / v 0065 W:1 d Rosa Pr1 Gle�,w A r( 5 61V 16 . 1 Lot Na:Block No' , SuW, Exem tion: i 3 Ir-onbr"(ds�° �cn eot Uri ;4-- Ivve1oeMe--,4` 2 Owner: 1rrortrki'ccw, rrie's LLC. 'Address Li 1D IreriLPi�cir± Cks _ 5 -j -r IL I- c tj00 Wk Ph: 3 Contractor J" 1-1avisen Dohs -I -roc -4c i Address: ✓` a.ri� Ph: cici-y-gee° Lie. No 4 Architect/Engineer: WOoe-ykrill 4ec4-i rc, j Address: ` 137 S.11icj60«e BIsni. tzo h: Lic. No. N;ykkl s Rkvc� LC 3V3--6 , 3 - 72S j Sq. Ft. of Buildmg: y I 1 1 go S. Ft. of Lot: +� I 1 9 ci Height: No. of Floors: 2 6 Use of Building: C•1 P ' r ^��.L J i ill le_F.A rvi i l V -! ►fie- 51 udvie, ()I `Nv' ' " 7 b 4 y Describe Work tc{� / �f'G. rti 1(' OY' r o Class of Work. 31' New 1 Alteration ,. Remove 3 Addition 3 Move 9 G ge:❑ Singe 2CC% I/` DoubleJ Carport: ❑ Single Double /n-Site 10 o Drweway Permit 1� ❑ OSewage C k eil p -1'" Disposal B' Sire Plan 11 r Valuation of Work- $ Adjusted Valuations- $ ay 1 Special 0 e - ,12-4-41-1 c) 0„--0A.L-IL-cl-A-LA-4-eres--4yoce- /2-4-4:01 6 14-4;"5"19 644Pid-ct' -0 • 105-35. *z A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL ISSUED BY THE STATE THIS PERMIT BECOMES AUTHORIZED I5 NOT CONSTRUCTTOIk OR WORK PERIOD OF 180 DAYS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT APPLICATION AND KNOW PROVISIONS OF LAWS COMPLETED WD IN . GRANTING I A PE - • 7D VIOLATE t ' CANC ' LOCAL LA+ 'Ia ULA OF CON `4 • • �� NOTICE PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE OF COLORADO NULL AND VOID IFWORIIORCONSI•RUCTION COMMENCED WCLHLN 180 DAYS. OR, IF IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK I5 COMMENCED. I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE • y ER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE DO. 5 NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY THE ' • O VISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR I.. CI STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE 0 6 Plan Check Feeg Permit Fee: /+<'Q 5-J . T2211, 3%+ -:Dated � 33 7- 37 Permit Issued: OCC ro p: Const. Type: J...4 L. Zoning: Setbacks: g !'h ►R l `.'e' ISDS No. & Fee:,�rj 74 1 (Al,i -n h,i B .' s 3. S+ D F" APPRO .A.' TE APPROVAL/ELLTE AGREEMENT PERMISSION I5 HEREBY GRANTED TO TIIE APPLICANT AS ER CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT QI CONSIDE=RATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMTS, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES ID COMPLY mI ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHOR] Y GIVEN LN 30 28.201 CRS AS AMENDED THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION ERECTION. CONSTRUCTION. AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSITTITE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABIIIIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DLSCREPENCIES THE RESPONSI BATTY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT. DESIGNER BUILDER. AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST Garfom.003 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE [INITIALI. 6(f /°5 •80)•c16 , Q Q- 4f ?5Lg�i /(/O t0Jt0 -#5-a55 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. AU steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; S. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, anchor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OFOCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED_ OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupant use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occ cy for the dwelling under building permit # C s5�1111 Signature BpcontOct2004 Date 124d cr VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant �iLm,e. urL Subdivision_V:04bOdpi 9114 Address 0065 V.1; se Dr. Lot/Block L,04 (53 Date [,, ( 33 o S Contractor + Finished (Livable Area): Main /0t0 Upper 907 f?,2j Lower Other Total Square Feet Lm e » 7) Valuation Basement: b Ar 7 Unfinished ...iv 1 I. 41 Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 5.1 ig Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation 2A 00 4413,48:3-1+ 2041, /0$ 51 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the ope. Yes ' 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks ply. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent p perties), streams or water courses? Yes 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes t? 5. Do plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforci1 in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and ces required between wood and earth? Yes 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and • loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construe ' Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, ro Yes or joists or trusses? 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all col •�� beams? Yes 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top ofof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make •del and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes ` No 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleg rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes ,/%17 No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light an. ventilation for alI habitable rooms? Yes i 40P No 7. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specsafety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated the plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes t 2 No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be acct'y ithout it. Yes l No 21. Will this be only residential structure on the parcel? Yes 22. Have two Yes No If no -Explain: complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes No 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructi code requirements? Yes (771 No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zon district? Yes No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your buildinit? Yes /`� No 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in tt 384-5003. Yes r41/ No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result s . ' 0.00 re -inspection fee? Yes /, No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupanc o the building? Yes >> No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the I' Yes No 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at ti i e of applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a buildi t application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No 36. Do you know that the local fire ' ' : t may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes .�%� No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes _ I hereby a best my dge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the Signature of Owner Date Phone: 9 L(s-)-D q y (days); ire -to-(S (evenings) Project Name: I" n+ C e- Roj4 5 LZ C Project Address: ' r t' GS %tJ co sF/ G o f 0065 )(a 5 r. [,f- r53 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application 6 may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminregFeb2005 7 Abb.. 1RONBRIDGE GOLF CLUB AND MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY April 27, 2005 Garfield County Building Department 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Approved Plans at Ironbridge Dear County Representative, The following plans have been reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board of the Ironbridge Property Owners Association for use on Lot 153: Woodley Architectural Group "Ironbridge — Plan 2202" "Bid Set Redlines" dated September 15, 2004 If you have any questions, please call me at (970) 404-1045. Sincerely, Ironbridge Property Owners Association Dirk Gosda Representative 410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS COLORADO 81601 T (970) 947.9800 F (970) 928-8865 www Ironbndgec]ub com gin.Ar:I,r+r N)Ii.r ,{forret Cowie (AdMilJtani ( 01111111 RestclenCer HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL -T ,1 v,a1 'J t:1[N. nL11=a! '-• �.iillP- Rkcod i J ICl�lS "i. 5a 1DTLIl i'� ..� fICtT 1 I �� 1 (1 )'. Fu: u7C-L)4 5- ,4 Crn iI I)rc,tlr-lhlii,ci rtz1-1 C' X17' SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT 153, WILD ROSE DRIVE IRONBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 101 196-1 MARCH 4, 2005 • f PREPARED FOR: IRONBRIDGE HOMES, LLC ATTN: MIKE WOELKE 410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - I - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS - _ GEOLOGY FIELD EXPLORATION SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS. _ DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATIONS - 4 - FOUNDATION AND RETAKING WALLS........ .......... .......... . FLOOR SLABS UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE - 8 - LIMITATIONS • FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 2 - LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS 8 4 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be Located on Lot 153, Wild Rose Drive, Ironbridge Development, Garfield County, Colorado, The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted as a supplement to our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to L.B Rose Ranch. LLC dated July 24, 2003 We previously conducted subsurface exploration to evaluate tite collapse potential on the non -irrigated debris fan areas within the development. report dated September 10, 1998. Job No 197 27, and conducted an evaluation of subsidence potentia] on Lot 153, report dated Februar) 25, 2005, Job No. 105 115-1. An exploratory boring was drilled on the lot to obtain information on the subsuiface conditions Samples c,l the subsoils obtained durin2 tyle field e;,pl,or7tion were teed in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing 4 were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The specific building on the lot had not been determined at the time of this study. The proposed residence will generally be a 1 or 2 story, wood frame structure between about 2,500 and 3,000 square -feet in size. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade and/or structural over a crawlspace. A basement leve] may be provided. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Job No. 101 196-1 G Beech -- - If buildin{tz loadings_ location or Grading plans change significantly from those described above. we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The lot is located in the central. uphill part of the development and was vacant at the time of ouT field exploration. Wild Rose Drive borders the lot Lo the southeast as shotitin on Figure 1 The roadway and underground utility construction to the lot are complete Minor overlot grading during subdivision development consists of shallow cuts and fills on the lot. The ground surface is relatively flat and slopes gently down to the east Up to a feu inches of snow covered the lot at the time of our field exploration GEOLOGY' The geologic conditions 'ere described in our previous report conducted for planing and preliminary design of the subdivision development, dated October 29, 1997, Job No 197 327. The surficial soils on the,lot mainly consist of sandy silt and clay debris fan depgsits overlying terrace gravel alluvium of the Roaring Fork River. The alluvium is predominantly a clast-supported deposit of rounded gravel, cobbles and boulders up to 3 feet in size in a silty sand matrix that extended to a depth of 45 feet on the lot. The underlying bedrock consists of the Eagle Valley Evaporite which contains gypsum and is generally associated with scattered sinkhole development in the Roaring Fork River valley. Voids were not encountered in the bedrock to the drilled depth of 77 feet and the potential for subsidence due to dissolution of the evaporite throughout the service life of the residence, in our opinion, is low. Our previous report dated February 25, 2005 should be referenced for the complete findings of the subsidence potential evaluation. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on February 21, 2005. An exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the Job No 101 196-1 C cStech subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous fli<aht augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical. Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches This test is similar to the standard penetration test uescribed by AS T lvi '\-lethod D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetratir' resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, FiEure 2. The samp!es were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsoil profile encountered in the boring is shown on Fi2ure 2. The si1bsolls, below about 1'/ feet of fll, consist of20 feet of stifa slichtly sandy to sandy silt and clay overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders (terrace alluvium) down to the drilled depth of 23 feet. Drilling in the terrace alluvium with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the boring included natural moisture content, density and percent finer than No. 200 sieve (silt and clay fraction) gradation analyses. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample, presented on Figure 4, indicate low compressibility under existing low moisture and Tight loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under a constant load) when wetted. The sample showed moderate compressibility with increased loading after wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist. Job No 101 196-1 Gtech 4 FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The upper silt and clay (debris fan) soils typically have low bearing capacity and ]ow to moderate settlement potential. Foundations which extend down to the dense ten -ace alluvium would have moderate bearing capacity and low settlement risk. Spread footings placed on the upper debris fan soils should be suitable for support of Ii2tht. loaded structures with some settlement risk. mainly if the bearing soils become wetted. The settlement potential and risk of distress can be reduced by supporting the building on stiffened slab (mat) foundation, or ground improvements. such as removal and replacement of the native soils compacted to a: least 95% of standard Proctor densi'- at a moisture content at to 2% o above optimum. We expect the Around modifications would be limited to the upper 5 to 10 feet. If a mat foundation or ground improti ements are proposed. we shoulLl he contacted. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural subsoils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,200 psf. Based on experience. we expect initial settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be up to about 1 inch. Due to the variable settlement potential of the debris fan soils, additional differential movement of about I inch could occur if the bearing soils become wetted. .lob No. 101 196-1 -5- 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. i Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies sucli as by assuming an unsupported length of at least l? feet. Foundation walls acting. as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section ofrhis report. 5) The existing fill, ani topsoil and loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the firm natural soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then he moistened and compacted. 5; A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site fine-grained soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the building and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at Least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site fine-grained soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures .such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and Ink Tin 1111 IQ1_I �-�r 1tP —h • -6- equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wail or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in U11;1)1111 lifts 2 1d compacted to at lean X0°0 of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum Backfill in pat ernent and walkv,ay areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor densit\. Care should be taken not to overcompact the back -fill or use la; Lie equipment near the v, all. since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings \hill be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance,to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab - on -grade construction. The debris fan soils are typically compressible when wetted under load and there could be some post -construction slab settlement and distress if the Job No 101 196-1 GLcPtecrh -7- subgrade soils become wet. To reduce the effects of some differentia] movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining grave] should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate draiilaie. This material shoLii d c.oi-ts st of rnii_ _!S aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 slue and less than 2'Y passim, the No 200 sieve. A11 fill materials for support at -floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95O of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it Is been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during limes of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. An underdrain should not be provided around shallow foundations (3 feet deep or less) and garage areas. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 1'/2 feet deep. An impervious membrane such as Job No. 101 196-1 c- tech -8- 20 nii] PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at al] limes after the building has `)een coi;tp,leled: ]) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the inaxirnum standard Proctor densit.\• pavement and slab areas and to at ]east 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3 + The ground surface sun-ounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from we foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first _10 feet in unpa),ed areas and a minimum lope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site, fine-grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are Job No. 10] 196-1 Gectech -9 - based upon the data obtained from the explorator; boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure I. the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area Ou services do not include determining the presence. prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC. then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratori boring and variations ill the subsurface conditions may not become evident until exca. ation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report. we should be notified se that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the protect evolves. we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations.. and_ to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional.analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GE • ICAL, INC. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, SLP/ksw Job No. 101 196-1 GLgTtech LOT 152 4 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 20' COMMON AREA LOT 153 • BORING 153 a L WILD ROSE DRIVE HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 0 BORING 1 (105 115-1) 1 1 1 I 1 I I LOT 154 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING i Figure 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 1 BORING 153 LOT 153 8/12 WC=3.9 DDA90 -200=88 11/12 WC= 4.4 DD= 12/12 20/T2 wC=B.3 DD -700 - 200=95 NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. 0 5 10 15 20 25 m 0. 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Figure 2 LEGEND: FILL; silty sandy gravel and cobbles. SILT AND CLAY (ML—CL); slightly sandy to sandy, stiff, slightly moist, light brown, slightly calcareous, friable. GRAVEL, COBBLES, AND BOULDERS (GM—GP); slightly silty, sandy, dense, slightly moist, brown, rounded rock. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch F.D. California finer sample. —7 v 8/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 8 blows o o 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. TPractical drillina-efusel NOTES: 1, The exploratory boring was drilled on February 21, 2005 with a 4—inch diameter continuous `light power auger. 2, The exploratory boring location was measured approximately by Pacing from features shown on the site pion provided. 3. Tne exploratory boring e,eva`ron was not measured and the log c' expiorato,ry boring i.; drown to dept`. 4. The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring I?g represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6, No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content () DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure Compression 0 1 3 4 5 6 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 Moisture Content = 4 4 percent Dry Density = 97 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clayey Silt From: Boring 153 at 10 Feet U 1 Compression upon wetting L , I _ _ 0.1 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 101 196-1 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 Job No. 10,1 196-1 U � Z J C!7 LL! CZ Z L() = w y. 0 V ri • LUO _1 m ¢� a - u_ ± 0 0 <• Z z w = 1') Sandy clayey silt 1 W i Z Ln Ln LL W Z 0. W Z p Ln U z a r 2 z ¢ Li" g SAMPLE LOCATION L7 Z 0 CD c 00 N r - 1 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant Tnc44,1t.4,1G.ik Date %•ZI •d`S- Building Planning/Zoning Engineered Foundation Property Line Setbacks A/4 Dri eway Permit $. 30ft Stream Setbacks Setsuoyed Site Plan D.fir X14(Flood Plain A/, 4.Septic Permit and Setbacks wilding Height ade/ Topography 30% ✓Zoning Sign -off ttach Residential Plan Review List it tRoad Impact Fees Minimum Application Questionnaire c../4 A/DRC Approval Subdivision Plat Notes %.---Grade/Topography 40% M Fire Psepartment Review ation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker C/Attach Conditions A lication Signed Pl Reviewer To Sign Application ParcellSchedule No. 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: 1 Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes No. ct 551, Assessor's Parcel No (9593-13A-- i* - 1 L-53 Date 7- cps' Job Address � Ca � -Dr. CARDL /53 Owner t CO -1 111' ,, Address y) 1t v C r( O1,� one #941-9 141-9 l. .0 Contractor .C\ i°3`"� Address C-5-1):1._. e ks: Front &n Ler-) s Tesof"rIcq e Footing 7—Zo-oS'7E Foundation 7-4q-0_5--W--- Grout -4q-oyt EGrout Underground Plumbing Rough Plumbin Framing- %S o Insulation L• Zz Tr Roofing Drywall 1 2.-2- -p Gas Piping /1-3-Q Phone # Rear RH LH Zoning e_c_A/.? / INSPECTIONS LAI C) Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) Electrical Final (State) FinaIl V(if tCheckli Com leted� Certificate Occupa cy # CM Date a� ' - O CZ Septic System # Date Final Other NOTES R,a4,4440(6" (i( oa 0 ,-c+#s) 11 cws (continue on back) INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO i Date Issued15 Zoned Area Permit No g5w(s=to Issued? AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all Taws and regulations related to the arming, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use S/t'ti uii4 , Address or Legal Descriptio Owae,E. 0 '4-co4,pol) Contractor This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing - -Raglill. Foundation illa �P-_' Driveway —�� ..l1aa Underground Plumbing _zf- , , /J Insulation -2' -c9 i3O Rough Plumbing _72 ,, S 1ii=11 Drywall 1. - ..,:,i i=Win Chimney & Vent Electric Final (by State Inspector :�i �� Gas Piping f _ - p Final 2_ az-06, f Electric Rough (By State Inspector)/ rsz Septic Final Framing - /,S,o)- , (To include • ootin place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THOS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Daiel IF PLACED OUTSIDE C VER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC LO T i