Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 12.17.2001BOCC t2ll7ljt PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS REOUEST: Review of the Proposed Grizzley Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility and Recommendation to the Colorado Department of Health and Environment, Water Quality Control Division, per regulations 22, Section 22.4 (2). APPLICANT: ENGINEER: Grizzley Creek Rest Area, CDOT Edward Church P.E., CHURCH & Associates, Inc. I. Description of the Proposll The originalGrizzley Creek wastewater system was installed as an ISDS in 1990, with less than a 2000 gallon per day capacity. This application is coming forward as a result of increased use of the rest area and anticipated future capacity needs. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing system with a Packed-Bed Filter (PBF) treatment system. The PBF system will consist of a septic tank, recirculation tank, geotextile filters, and a disinfection system with surface drainage. The treatment system is to be located north of the access road as indicated on Figure 6 (see attached). The applicant has indicated that the site has single ownership by CDOT. There is no lease, easement, or neighboring property owner agreements necessa.ry for the proposed improvements. The system is to be operated and maintained by a certified wastewater system operator, by CDOT personnel, or through a contract with a wastewater system management company. An operation and maintenance contract is to remain in effect at all times. CDOT has taken on all financial responsibilities for the successful operation and maintenance of the facility. Total project costs for the facility are estimated at $1 12,370 with an estimated $2,500 operating costs per year. II. Issues and Concerns A. Lesal Process: To install a new sewage treatment facility, an applicant is required to submit an Application for Site Approval for Waste Water Treatment Facilities to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). The site application is required to be reviewed by the County Board of Health, Board of County Commissioners and Planning Authority. These entities are given three recommendation options; approval, disapproval and no comment. The recommendation is to address the following question: B. "Are the proposed facilities consistent with the comprehensive plan and any other plans for the area, including the 201 Facility Plan or 208 Water Quality Management Plan, as they affect water quality?" The recommendations made by local governments are considered by the CDPFIE in their approval or denial of the site application. If the CDPHE recommends denial of the proposed site application, it can be appealed to the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission. Garfield County Comprehensive Plan: The PBF treatment facility is located in an area identified as o'Open Space (Federal Lands)" in the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000 - Study Area I, Proposed Land Use Districts Map. It should be noted that this area is outside the boundary of study that tested for floodplain, slope, soil hazards, septic constraints, surficial geology, and other hazards. These issues should be dealt with by the applicant through extensive testing. The following are some relevant Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies: Water and Sewqr Services Goal: To ensure the provision of legal, adequate, dependable, cost effective and environmentally sound sewer and water service for new developments. Objective 7.5: Garfield County will strongly discourage the unnecessary proliferation of private water and sewer systems. Policy 7.1: All development proposals in rural areas without existing central water and/or sewer systems wil1be required to show legal, adequate, dependable and environmentally sound water and sewage disposal facilities can be provided before proj ect approval. Policy 7.4: Where I.S.D.S. is not feasible, Garfield will require a sewage disposal system approved by the State of Colorado. Comment: This application is intended to enable the Gizzley Creek Rest Area to improve its ability to meet existing and future needs. Creating the new facility will ensure the provision of adequate, dependable, and environmentally sound sewer service for CDOT at this location. StaIf finds the proposal consistent with Garfield County's goals, objectives, and policies. Natural Environment Goal: Garfield County will encourage a land use pattern which recognizes the environmental sensitivity of the land, does not overburden the physical capacity of the land, and is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of Garfield CountY. Objective 8.5: Development proposals will be required to address soil constraints III. unique to the proposed site. Policy 8.1: Garfield County shall discourage and reserve the right to deny development in areas identified as having severe environmental constraints such as active landslides, debris flows, unstable flows, bedrock slices, major mudflows, radioactive tailings, slopes over 25 percent, riparian areas and wetlands and projects proposed within the 100 year floodplain. Policv 8.5: The County will discourage development in areas where severe soil constraints cannot be adequately mitigated. Policy 8.7: Garfield County will require development on lands having moderate or minor environmental constraints to mitigate physical problems such as minor rockfalls, 17 to 24 percent slopes, minor mudflows, potential subsidence, high water tables, slow percolation, radioactive soils, and/or corrosive and expansive soits. Comment: The applicants will need to conduct more site specific soils and topographic investigation to address these elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Any approval will need to be based on the completion of appropriate soils analysis demonstrating the site is suitable for the proposed treatment plant. C. Other StaffComments Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment: CDPHE does not review site applications until all of the local entities have made their recommendations. This application is consistent with the State's consolidation policy. CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval of the proposed site application with the following comments: l. The applicants should conduct additional site specific soils tests to determine the environmental sensitivity and appropriate mitigation measures needed for the site. J