The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication - Permitl' J:_. ;;J.J J. I ~ $ ~ZR~ lt.tlO ~ -:18 -+ Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108ll' Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Lille-384-5003 Contractor Gmce J1(!)WJC:S Amount of Permit $ L )i..{"f6· 3 '1-- ecJ tn~c-\-Q~tq .1 ~ .;;;o To tctL ? -L((bS-S~1- Date 3c1o-+ Clerk JT C.~ fLQ)( I NO. 10370 I ----\ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION · lOS r•.stzont, Slll.t.. '201, Olctl.-d Spdllp. co ll'Dl ftlaaa 9'1o.94UZ12 I h.: 97'0-311-TO /lAqo.c:Uaa. LIAr. 970-384-SOCI3 001t 0C)1Y, Parcd(Bchcdulc:No:Jt l /.10 713 10'f0 1.3 1 2 :.J ... s 6 Use of SuildiAc: 7 Oesc:ribe Work: a CIU$ or Wade: 11 Valu.adoo of Worlc $ 12 Special Conditio.aa: N C& A 8£PARATE EtECt'IUCAL l'BRMIT IS REQUIRBD AND J.IUB1' B11 ISSUED BY TilE STI\U: OP' COLORADO. 'JSISPEIWlTIIIICOiall KUU. AM> VOID lli'WORICOR~ AUTBORIZED JS 1'101' COMMENCED W1THUf 180 DAYS, Oil. IF CONSTRUC1lON OR WORK IS SUSPENDED ORABANOON£0 FORA PattOO OP 180 DAYS AT ANrUIB AFTER WORICIS COMMKHCEO. I DEaS8r cattPY' 'l'RAT J IIA'VB a£AJ) AND lCZAiollln3J nus .APPUCATJOIIANDKNOWTHt:BANETDBE'lRUBANOCORJIECI'.AU. PRoviSIONS OF tAWS GOVERNU«11'ftiS TYPE OF WORI[ WIU. BE C!OKI'LEn:lt WI1'BDI' Wdln'BI!ik 8PBCIPIED DRBUr ORKOT. '11m GRNII1NOOP'Al'ZRMD'DOESN01'ms&UJDTO~ADTSOJU1"1' ~TOijVl~O~LAT;·;=~="QIISJ'ROVISK)lf8 OF' 11NY 0111Ba:9TA1E OR _Q :11NO NlNSTRUCTIOlf OR THE PSRPOR14ANCE fJt:L-<-t:J.. • Co ~I b 3 s Q Al&enaUon AddJtiOQ 0 Move Permit Fee: J ·I I l .J 1 I I I . II i ! I 47. ~4~ /8?-~ I l I ~~ II PERMISSION IS HER&:8Y QRAHni:O TO 'tle API'UCANt ttl> OWNER. COHTRACOORAND/OR ntl!: .AOE:Nl' OP11E OON'l'IL\Cl'OR Olt OWJtER TO CONS'nWCT ' stllUcnJR8 Ml DErAJJ.ED ON 1'1.\NS MID SP£CIF1CATION3 stiBMm'EDTO AND REVIEWED BY TK!: B\IILDINO .OitPARTMI!:NT. 1 lit CONSIDERATION oF rne: ISSSUAlfCE or THJS PERMrT, rna SIGNER. HEIIEBY AORSES m ooMrl.v wrrH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND 1 I 11 REOUIATIOftS ADOPTED BY QMfJELD COUNtY PURSUANt' TO At/tHORnY GIVZH.LN 30..28.201 CRS AS AM£1(1)!0. UlE SOMER FURttiER AORI!:ES ntA l 'ni£ ABOVE IWO ORDflfANE:E:s ·ARE Nor P\lt.LY.COMPJLED wtrH fit '1HB a:WmoN, ERI!C110N, CONSTIWCnoN, ~ USS OF lH£.-'ABOW DESCRII l . STflUcnJR£, '11fE PB:RMIT MAY BE R£VOI(EO BY' N011Cit FROM niS COUNTY AND THAT THat AND t"fQRUU: Jt' SIIALL BECOME NUU. AND VOlO. ; j Tfm ISSt1ANCE Of' A PERMT BAS£0 UPON PUNS, Sf!CU1CAUOMS .AND oitmR DATA SHA1.L Not" PREVEm' 1ll& Buw:nrfO OmCW. FROM 'IREREAF' j j RBIQUJRmO THB CORRI!C'nON OP ERRORS lit SAID PI.VIS, SPBOSJCo\TlONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PRBVENJ1lf0 BUILJ)INO OPE:RA'tlOH B£ ; c.\RRIED ON TffEIIEUHD£R WHEN ll'f VIOLATION 01' 'I1IS CODB OR ANr OTHER ORDII'fANCB OR IU!XlutJI.TION OP: THIS JUIUSDlCTION. • ----------------·----------..... ----------------------------------·-----· ·--··, \ ·' ·The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where teadily visible from access road; 3 . A finished roo~ a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets. a sink with hot&: cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls. ready for stove and reftigerator. all 11ecessnry plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, witb washbowl, tub or shower. toilet stool. hot and cold running water, DOn-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; S. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or dcclcs over 30,. high consiJUcted to alliBC and IR.C IeeJ.uirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions tD the outside steps, decks and gxading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i .e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy wtll not be issued until all the requ.in:d items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspectioo sign off by the Garfield Count}" Road & Bridge Department for driveway insta.Uation,. where applicable; as well as any final sign offby the Fire District. 8!1Cbor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL~ niB .ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. *•**CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTn.. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWEILING WIIHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CON~IDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDmONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions-for OCCil~C:.o-YFA the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling Wider building permit # ~f0~> _J.Ioo-'-~ ..... +_..-..~ )_ X d:IL -:.. AY4j X_' [1---f-!51°-7 -- Signature Date Bpcont0ct2004 -----------------·· ----- -------·~---... --. ·-··-----~ I l i I I I ! I I ! I t I I I . I I I l ! l ; I I I I I I ll II l i ! i I I I I i ' I : --~ VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant~~ L Lr.F-Addre~~?@ •Fft'l&-? Ctt.. Date 2 -(a-97 J. Finished (Livable Area): A-i3c.D Main J~ )2.. bt-<._ Upper /"-'S'B Lower Other Subdivision U ~~ Ut~ UtLL~~l.. Lot/Block 23 Contractor<; (c.A ce f..{.c tMeS -.. -"" . ·~, ... ~ T a1 .l ' V 3 clQ/ /2} t.O ot· Square Feet 5090 v 7~ c :: o Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garaee: AD [}(. Crawl Soace: Decks/Patios: Valuation Covered Z &C \-.2. 4 Valuation Open Valuation tu..o '4-(L Total Valuation COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945~212 Job located at -~tl:J;:;......!,..7....:;;2-;;...._...,L/_-=·t;~(!):::..........:.7-l-:/:___ ____ _ Permit No. / o.3 ?o / It:? 3 1/.. I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ;Pe.. clo /;,;.e S~jJj?l~f /.?sJtth.;1 /tJI ?-b-¥ .1tP/t?5 tau:/er -1~,65 You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ~ ~ /7 20 67 Building Inspector ---Ld4~~~.=~q:' -~::.......;...___;~::::::..;..:~---- Phone (970) 945-8212 No.JQ"j)Q Assessor's Parcel No. ~LJ011o }OlJo?\2 Date 3-/fD-3=: BUILDINMERMIT CARD -JobAddressOO~ Cltfl' UlfW c± _FQc\rlu\5 -("516~) owner "nfJ/11 . LLC . Address:Jib Drl1ktj c-\. contractor{fffl((". !j,(')yY)f5 Address 3'"1 \1!/V" '? Soils Test------------ Footing------------- Foundation~------------ Grout----------~~-~--- Underground Plumbing -;,-tz --tJ 7 ..f)r?l: Rough Plumbing ~1·;;;;: I .pi\ A~:. b Framing _1l' 11> -CY:"l SS I~ Insulation fl-_;g 7 J9'M = Roofing __ -;;1111'__,.,~--=-~_.,..---- 0rywall ~ ~-o 1 f;if!i -;;;zgit!iii~EZ-z~, = IIXTIIIIOR Addrna No.------------ ~am~=:~~---------------- Decke-aupport I cle•ance to wood Oecks-atalrt & ralls ------- Exterior locks Flashing eround-:-:do_ora __ &_wt_n_do_ws _______ _ Insect ICteenl INTIIIIOII GARAGE ------- Fire waH separation Service doon·l~" mln-:-.----------- Door (20 min.) w/auto closer·l~" min. Mach. equip. 18" above floor ----- No opening Into sleeping area BASEMENT·CRAWL AREA-------- Aceesa lnaulallo::n:---------------- Headroom/Stalrs Ventilation ----------- Weatherproofing------------- Mechanlca\ _____ __,,....-------- Electrical Rough (State) __..::S~-:~~a~,L-~7:..-...---- Eiectrical Final (State) Jl· 14 • o 7 FinatfL· ll~o? /Checklist Completed? ifWl : Certificate Occup_.:::Y I ~~ ...... m'J.«...,•?:Jt~C-.=--.-----Oate~Ofd~g:of = Septic System # __;-=:~----------- Date _..s:::.::::::::=-------- Finall_-=::::===--------- Other------------------- NOTES FINAL CHICKLIIT MECHANICAL ROOM Soller Hot wa:::t __ er ________ _ F.A. gaaton, ________ _ Floor ckaln Clearanct ----------- Air con. syattm Hot water heate,_r _______ _ Combustion air Gas piping, valve--,------- LPG Drain FIREPLAC.:EI:-:S-:-T-O_V_E _____ _ Clearance to combuallblaa ----- Termination of chimney, _____ _ Combustion alt ------- Hearth (t2" or 20" on sldaa) Glasa doors ----- Certified by: ________ _ REMARKS (continue on back) STAIRWAYS . Headroom (8'8") Railing & guardra-Ils ________ _ Width Rise &.-run--.J..---------- KITCHEN Clearance abova grill _______ _ Exhaust fan ~-------- Brolltr exhaust (t hr. chase) BEDROOMS ------- Egresa Smoke-:d:-:et-ac-:-to_r ________ _ BATHROOMS Exhaust f•"-----~---- Shatterproof glssa ________ _ OTHER INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date lssue~.U:?. •••• Zoned Area ••••..••.•••••••••••••••••••••• Permit No •• t.P.J..l-.Q ....... . AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all taws and regulatio~ related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which tbis permit is granted, and further agrees tbat if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit then be revoked notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY ua:.·'-v.L••a:. Sctbec:b Fmnt Sjdc Side Rear Tbis Card Must Be Posted So U is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Finallnspec:tioa. INSPECTION RECORD Footing h~A:#~A Driveway Foundation , v ~ Underground Plumbing 5 -1-2.-· 01 /011t Insulation 'f· U · 0 '1 ~ Rough Plum bing · J _ '3 J ~b!J tfh( Drywall ?> · 'J. if · ol A-m Chimney & Vent f · to ~l\--h~ Electric Final (by State J.uspec:lorl ~~'Ji:? 7 Gas Piping 1 ~ )J . o1 a.~~ Final //-U-o 7 ,.9-W\ .Electric: Rough (By State laspector)'i~ Septic Final f1...A- Framing &-· )0 ..-crt. 9-'::L ._ Notes: (To iac:lude Roor in place and Windows and Doon instaUed). ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING- WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Da~~By~~ IF PLACED OUTSIDE-covd W;;H~LEAR PLASTIC ~ ·. 4dJrebS: Q2_70-00?6 1 Cl,. (fl!;~D. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-821'2 I\flN1MUM APPLICATION REQUIRE:MENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand fh:e scope.ofthe work intended Wlder a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan aod it'$ discover~d that required information bas not been provided by the applicant, this will result jn the delay of the permit issuance and in .ProCeeding with building construction. The own~ or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new infurmation may be reViewed after it has been pro\ided to the: Building Department. Please review this document' to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please conSider using a design professional for assistance in yollr design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the . plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professlona.L To provide for a more understandable plan and in order tD dc:tennme compliance '-'ith the building, plumbing aod mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the followins checklist prior to and dwing design . Plans to be included for a Btdlding Permit must be on draft paper at least 18''x 24'"' and drawn to scale. 1 --.·-·-- Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, baJcony mps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish gr.ade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the root; including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting. house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required Check .with the Building Department A window schec:hxle. A door schedule. A floor ftaming p~ a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C= and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 me, IPC, IMC and IFOC. Applica.ats are req~d to iD.dicate appropriately and to submit completed cheeklist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed strocturc, additions or other buildings, setback: easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 10ti.2) Any site plan 'for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previousJy swveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signatuTe and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building ~velope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the. building envblope as it is shown oo the fin-t'lat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes . 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properti.cs), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a liceru~ed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes ·'( No Notne~forthisproject __ _ 3. Are 'the plans submitted for application review ~nstruction drawlags and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for pennit issuance only"l-"Approval drawings onlt', "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes T No_ Notneccssazyforthisproject~-- .2 ' - 4. Is the !.S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? Yes+ No__ Not necessary for this project. __ S . Does the site plan indicate the location arui'direction of the State, County or private road accessing the property? Yes-+-- 6. Do the plans include a fowulation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all " reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes~ No_· _ Not nc:cessazy for this project_ 7. If the building is a pre-engineered stntctw'e, is there a stamped, signed engineered foup.dation plan for this building? Yes-+-No_ Not necessary for this project __ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes_ No_ Notnecessacy forproject....l::_ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of tbe ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes4-No__ Not necessary for this project_ 1 0. · Do the plans include design loads as required under the me or IRC for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot irt Garfield ComJty)? Yt:S---t-No_ Not necessacy for this project __ .. 11. 12. "13. 14. Do thj'lans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or lRC? Yea No_ Not necessaty fur this project_ · . Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes-+-No__ Not necessary for this project_ Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes+-No_ Notnecessaryfortbisproject_ Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists: wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes~ No_ Not necessaty fur this project __ 3 'IS. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive conneyon of all columns and beams? Yes No_ Not necessary for this project_ 16. Does the elevationplen Dticare the heigbl ofthe building or poposed addition from tbe uDdisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or sbed roof or the 1Dp of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district fur building height maximum) Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_ 17. · Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace pJann.ed for installation includiog make and model and Colorado. Phase ll eertifications or Phase II EPA certification? Yes_ No_ Not ~cessary fur this project_l_ 18. Does the plan include a masomy fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IBC or IRC? Yes__ No_ NotnecesS8Iyfurtbisproject1._ 19. Docs the plan include a window schedule or other ~cation that egress/rescue windows ftom sleeping rooms and/or 1:Jasements comply with the reqUirements of the IBC or IRC? Yes_2:_ No__ Not neressacy for this project_ 20. Does 1he plan include a window schedule or other veri:fiad:ion that windows provide natural light ami ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes+ No__ Not necessmy for this project_ 21. Do ~ plans indicate the location of glazing subject to ~uman impact SU(;h as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glaziog adjacent to my surfiJce normally used as a waJidDg surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub · enclosures and specifY safety glazmg fur these areas? Yes_:f_ No_· _ Not necessary for this project_ 22. Do the p1sos include a complete design. fur all mechanical systems planned for installation in this btdldini? Yes__ No 'f Not necessary for this project. __ 23. Have all areas in the buildiDg been accurately identified for the intended use? (Qccupancy as identified in the IBC Chapter 3) Yes~ No__ Not necessary fur this project. __ 24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials tbat may be in use in this building? Yes_ No_ Not necessary for this projecQ_ 4 25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? · Y es_,'L.... No~ Not necessary fur this project __ ~6. Do the plans indicate the location and dimeosion. of restroom facilities and if more than · four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes_ No_ Notneoessaryforthisproject1 27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes~ No Not necessary for this project_ 28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes-+-No __ 29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes-L. No__ Not necessary for this project __ 30. Docs the plan aCCU{ately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Bui1ding Department? Yes,.L_ No __ 31. Do your plans oomply With all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbaclcs . Yes T No. __ 32. Do you understan.d that approval for design and/or construction changes arc required l!li2r to the implemc:ntation of these changes? Yes_I_ No_ 33 . Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review .. fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System'' or "Road hnpact'' fees required, at the time you pick up your building pennit? Yes~ No_ 34. lue you aware that you arc required to call for all inspections required under the IBC including approval on a :final inspection .orior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? . Yes.:{!--No __ s 35. Are you aware tbat the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with tbtyniform Codes? Yes No __ 36. Are you aware that you must c.all in for an inspection by 3;30 tbe business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m-aud 3:30p.m. MOOday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. 37. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not ·accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes-¥-No, __ _ .38. Are you aware that prior to is!>uance of a buildjng permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or:, obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601 . Yes .¥' No. ___ _ 39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Co1orado Licensed Elc:c:trician and Plumber to perfonn installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes T No. ___ _ 40. Are you aware. that o.n the front of the building pem:Ut application you wilJ .need to fill in the Parcell Schedule Number for tbe Jot you axe applying for this penn it on prior to submittal of the building pennit application? Your attentjon in this is appreciated. Yes 'r: No __ _ 41. Do you know ¢at the local fire clistrict may require you to ·submit plans for their review of fire safety issues'? Y cs y No (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 42. Do you understand that if you arc planning on dojng any excavating or grading to the . property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading ~tmit? Yes 'f 43. Did an Architect sea! the plans for your commercial project? S.tate Law requires any commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons as per Se~on 1004 of the IBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. Yes '( No Not Necessary for this project----...., 6 I hereb acknowledge that I have read, understand, and ~wered these questions to t of my ability. Signatw-e Date . Phone: 2lf6'-<j5'2Z. (days); (evenings) Project Name: tk fl, l/;e...-lt,lf~ ~ ProjectAddtess: 0070-0076 Cl:.f lt'ie....-Llf· Note : If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the pemtit are to be ~pected. Work may not proceed without the. issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project., 9D any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official' that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: · . · · A The application may be pJaccd behind more recent applicatiOns for building permits in the review process aod not reviewed until required information has been provided and the appljcation rotates again to first positi.on for revjew. B . Delay Jn issuance of the permit. C Delay in proceeding wlth construction. *If you answered ''No'' to this question the circumstances descn'bed in the question could result in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. · Bpcomm April2006 7 ·. PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Ap plicant.J4C:fec LL,C Building ~ngineered Foundation .Jl..!.Driveway Permit _01:lf'.zcyed. Site Plan '[.). [S' ttvwu .6fiLseptic Permit and Setbacks ~aderfopography 30% ~ach Residential Plan Review List . ~mum Application Questionnaire ~division Plat Notes -.iJ.:AFire Department Review ~tion Determination/Fees ~Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker 4ttach Conditions ~lication Signed ~Reviewer To Sign Application __ ParceUSchedule No . ~now!~ Letter-Manf Hms. (;)lL. ~ GENERAL NOTES: DateeJ2. z... d 7 _ _,_.HOAIDRC Approval Subdivision Plat Notes -- .. . ~ '!o. . . '• 88/04/2BB3 . 21:36 9702438487 • .; I BA.TI'LEMENT MESA SERVICE.ASSOClA1ION ARCHITEc:rtmAL CO:MMlTl'EJt.APPLICATION SUBMI'ITAL FORM {For New Home CollSI;nld:foa) INSTRUCTIONS: PAGE 82 This AppHcatio.o & CheclcHst is to be used for all project submittals to the Battlement Mesa Service Association Architectural Committee (BMSA/ AC). This foiDJ. is mtended to assist in ensuriDg tbat the apptication submittal . is complete. This will help P~. a quicker, more thoroughrmcw process. · . . . . It IS teeammeJJded that each Applicant tboroughfy rmew tho r~ of tile cttuenf ,Arcldtedunl Stan~ the·Ameuded:aJJdRC!Itde4 D9SJ8ratfon o[Cir~evpn CigeludiugR.c:ctoJqtions) and tbereco.r:ded FJMiPJa't mr th~ir respective ~mood prior to pcparing a submittaL . . . Applicants preparing a submittal should compare the iofDrmation they are about to subnUt with th= requircmeBls of this 1Dnu and "chec:k off' each required item on the 1bnn. IfiUJl' item is not cbecka\ the Application submittal is not corqplcte and should JlOt he submitted. Incomplete AppJicatianswDI not be processed BDd wiD he.xeturDed .tothcApp~ ln addition to the checldist. Applicants should :fill in all of the places on the Application Follil wbete iafbrmaiion .isre~ed.. The Atchitectuial COmmittee will use this mmzmationin evaluating your Application. IimfoDll8tion is requested but~ not applk:able to your specific p;tOjeet submittaJ. wrlie 'WI A.,. ui ~ $J)8Ce pmVided If some teq1liMd i:afbllDation is ~t to be det«J nti•m (sacJJ. 8$ emaior paiot colors you .may .DOtbave yet~· write '7BD~' in. the appropdated space provided.. You wDl then be required to make a fOJlo.w-vp submittal With tbcsc ' ~om at_a..latcr &!t~ but bc.tit~ iDstallatio.n in the home. ·DO NOT fill in any iofu.tmarioniu the "Conditions fur ApProvar section of this bm. 'Ibis portion ofthe :tbnn is for An:bitector:al Committee use only. Whe.n.mi AJWli~;ation is c:omplelt; pkase man: or~ .it to the mlfowiog address: Batt:ler.D=t M~Scrvicc ~n Architcctutal Con1111ittee A.pplicatim1 73-G S~Drivc P.O. Box6006 Battkm.e.at~ ColoradO 81636. I . The.An:hitcchmll CommJtteemeetstwtee.-ontlalyon·UIO 1" gd3"' Wedngday, mdAppllca~DS.~dile : I · . oJte.w~ prior-to t~e Sehed"izkd ~Data for P,riorreriew byCdl!Uidttee. m_.J;ers~ Pl~-. : 1 . Jane Cbapnvm at (970) 285-9740 t9 confinn the next .sdledul~l meetfns date orto.1:equest ~ bttQ~aa.. 1 t . • I l ... Page 1 of 6 I ;. ----------··------·-· •, . QS/04/2063 21:36 9702438467 PAGE 93 . .. (' .. ·' ... BA'ITLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION' ARC_.:ni ....... l'rP.I>EcruRAL COMMITI'EE APPLICATION &.CJm~ (for New HoJne Condrucdon projects) Submit1alDate:. ____ EstimatedStartDate: _____ EstimatedCoJ:tplctionDate: ___ _ · . SUBMnTAL.REQUIREMENTS: Two Copi~ arsih of Items 1, 2 & 4 need to be submitted.. . . (Cb.cck-o1f.items attached·to theAppHcation. F.iii in spac:es a -indicated.) · . . __ V"'"~ . · 1.· Site Planl:Jrawing (1" =-1 0'" or 1•.., 20' ~) ~ ~ tollow.iiJg iDformation sboWu=. Lot, Block~ Subdivision lJBIQC. • Stleet Address o!Project. . Building Setba~ Lines (also .fill-in the oS4oxtest dishuwe ~= pr9perty llile to the exterior wall closest to that ptoperty line). Pletie ~ Jllfal'e that all Bu,ildiJlg SetPack LU.cs are taken ftom .your Property Line Y.UUU Your Property Lme fs 'NOT tbe Curb Lfnel! · · · TlwsJ'ing Unit From Setbact: Left Sjd.e Setback: Right Side Setback: Rear Setbac1c I ? ·: util;tty kvments. . • 1 ~ . s.s• Clear Site-~ atlotarseotion Comer Lots • .' . ~ Site ·Gradhig EteWtiaris ~~e. · · · · . . . f2:: . 'First (m.iill).l'Jooi·~efgbt-fu reh#ion to t9.p of~ curb.at ~-cemer oflot~. -~~~-· .. nmew•rmc~widthofdrivewily)~ \V~Pa~o~-~-. -:--....... v--.... · . ._ Outbuildings. . • . . . . . ··. ·· .. Page2of 6. • . .. _.. ·--__ .. --- ... ea/B412BB3 21:36 97B24384B7 PAGE 04 .. . . . , •' ' . ·~: ' .. ~Floor Plan(s) with overall dimensions (1lll-m the 1bDoWfug square fuot ~). . . F'.nt Floor Fimshed Livq An:a: Second Floor Fmisbed Living .Area: Lower Flool' FJJJisW Liviog Ar~ Total Finlsbed LMng Aiea: Total Unfinisbcd Liviog Area! t .. w ~eM · .. ~---~~ ~"":""'::":-~feet V SzOX' ~;teet . ___ .... square ~et x ___ ~feet B .. :tA:..-E1 tio" P''--.;,.vt• ~ ... __ --~-....... • ~-1.. 1-.."Lot:..-l..:nl.f. U&IWoU5 eva ns .~ ~~.s ~.l't W1.UI,N'M. ~erJOl' ~, "~ ~, roofpitcb, roo:f:.m.ounted eva.P,orativ~ coolcss, etc. (:6ll .. in maximum height below). Maximum buildiog height to highest ridge line or bailding structural projection . !cct above top ofStreet curb at :from-center of~ lo~ · · ~ ~ (statopec9FoundationPlan. · · ~Outbuildings iDdica:tiog dimensions. ekmmons and ownll hajgbt to ridge line. COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLB COLOR SAMPLE €0LQR SAMPLE ·COLOR. SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE . Pag~;3 of 6 . . . ' OBIB4F2883 21:36 9782438487 PAGE 85 .· . . -~/.-. 4. Lan~nP.lsns with the following infuDJJation: --/. Plantiog Plan (indicate areas of irrigated Ia~ tree yla.cem~.shrub beds, ground CtWert "' ~ etc.). • · . V Plaut Matt:ria1 Jistiog by speci"' ofcn:es, shtubs and grasses. . iZ . Groundco~ Matcrlal with weed contzol bmier. · ~Fauces. ~ other laudseape Improvemmxts (decks, site lighting, iJag poles, etc.). · ~ s. v~ Request (if applicable) Give details: below: ·~ 6. Residential CoDStru~Monetmy Deposit: • r · J/Wo hereby admowledge and·~U~dcn~d that o~rfailu.roto campl.teBomoCoDSf:n!diOJl,lmprovem~nt . . ~j'ects or Lmadscapjug Constru~ lritb&t the time co~ts noted Jn C~Qftfous :A & 3. On P&J& ~6· of this Appli~OD ·mn ~ult in a Notice and Opportunity .for a He:uin£ befC:»~·fhe· J!l'dSA Bo.ard.. of .nlrec:tor.r. · HJ/We 81'0 fOUDd hl Vfala&.n of th~e Conditiom at the Rearing it lrill =~ m a .fiJie t.-:ffa:e Owner of not )es~ than ssoo~oo·per month for each fill1 month iu ex~:e~S of the all9tted, ~mpJedOJl ·uDle Jrame. . ·. . . J/We ~ereJ,y. .neknowledge thutHo•at Co~sttU.:tioJl or Impmvo~tPl"'j.ecb or La.udscapi Construction. · · ~eatnm w:hich. sft:. built in uon .. c:Qnfo~ce with· thu Mr aJWJieatiCJn, ~din.-~" Conditl~u qf ~rpvaln9ted ou Page 6 'of 6 _.her.ciJa,. iiW•lriU be cited by-the:BMSAIAC iil ~C;ii--~tfo~.foma .~t:Qlc ·tiiD~ of discrova:y. Jn menuaCJ.Dg; cinmmtanc:es a V~e• i;Jay .be requested ~ the BMSM,A~,. provideclmch V~ce ~quest it~-is trit.liiu thcr purriew and .apP.rovai'Jurisdi~•·~f1be BMSAI~. 1 J;fa VariU.Ce b ·ncrt·J:DDt4Kl IJ.Tti.!•~A/ACalidifthe No~o~or.miDg)teolSta~·~o~ ~~-~-. j .. :&O·dia:ys ·after~e date f!llfritton -c:ita~oo,.IlWewDlbe sc~~Notfc~ ~f allearing ~~ tltc »~A; n~-1 .. · :9fbitec:torzs;. ~d -ill/We~ f~udm ~ha~p~tof'tbes~No-'·€oafoimln.e It.,_ at tli,•.-B•dng~~·-:!i~Jl: j :·ttl· P.n~4-a mbd~mn .f1! $500.00-per:t:fj:q-ftCCJJifonning _It... ·Notmtfqtan~.fJle ·(o~oiilg;: 'J.I'W;i:. 1 ·:·\. ··-.Bcb~~edp ·~t~e BrdsA Board-~~r:t-andlor ~~Cominltfee-iDaJ. ~eanyl_egsil ·· .. ·. nbleqy·avaUab~ fD tlie .~CDt of .a non-c()mplbmc~ Page4of 6 . . es/~/2883 21:3~ ~ .. . :. .. · ·. •' . . .. . .. .. .. .. 9?82438487 : . . • .t • • • ~ • • . . ·. .. . .. . . . . . , . . . AS PER TBE A:JtCBIT.ECTURAL STANDARDStf'LEAS.E INDICATE THE .. . .• . .... . . . . . .. . . . . ·.FOLLOWING POJNrS.ON THE PLOT PLAN AND BELOW: . · . . . ·· ...... : . · a.EV"ATIONS AT EAcH CORNER OF ·TBB LO-f. ~ . . ··LOCATION. • t • • •1. ... 2. : . ... . . . . ' 3 . . .... 4. .. s. . .. . · . . . . . - . : . ~.. . ·. . . .. . . .. . 6.~nm HIGH POINT OF niB LOT • . . . . 7 • .:...nm LOW.POlNT OF T.BH LOT. B.-HEIGHT OF GARAGB FLOOR. 9.··HEIGBT OF HQUSE MAIN'FL(>OR. · ·. . -- . lQrHElGBT O.F ROOF ABOVE FoUNPAltON. - (MAXIMUM-35 F.BBT) 11.-HEIGHI' OF ROOF AJ!OVE CBNi"ER. o.F ·T.BB MID CURB. . . . . . · ·(~-~F.imTl ·l2;.-DB.AlNAGE FLOWUNBS ON'lliB PLOT PLAN. 13.-ROOF .PITCHBS·.:-:--1 •. ----. .. . .. .. . . • • • I .. 2 •. --- 3.--- 4 .. --..,.....,. : JS;-SQUARB:FEBT OF LIVJNG SPA~ . . . . .. . . ·. .. · . ~. : . P~ e& . . .. . . .. . ~ ·· . . . . I . .. .. i l . I . ! ~---------------------·-------------------------- BS/B4/2BB3 21;36 . . .. . . , . 9782438497 PAGE 97 :Failure to pay fines levied M detcrmioed at the -Bearing may also res.Ut m a Lien beiq" placed Oil YG :rroperty or litfgadon ·Pro~ hlitiated b)' the BMSA Board ofDirecto.rs t(J 3ecu.re couformancewlih t: mD Application aod its respective Cond~ODS Of Approval ·. -.. l!Wc-ander.ttand that.Architectu.ralCvmmittet~ap~al-doaD()tcoDstmrteapp~~ ofthc:lomlbuHdi d~artmeut, ciJ:ainage deeqpt or structural so:unda.ess, nor does it constitute asa~c:e ~ 'Ole phi coJDPJY mtb:aD appiiaable eoiles, regQbdions, onlinancessnd ~ J/We fiuthar admowledge that any subsepent tidd change. whid.t _I!We m;aty deslie ··to: ~e BoJ -Commudioo ar ~rovemmt Projects arfhfB o~·Applicatio~-SJt~mfrtai:.,.the o.riglual~andttio . of' .Appl'VYal issued· by tile :PMSA!AC WU1. teqqire aa addftiOJial ~ed A.ppJiCiiiou:·submittal 011 o behalfj, and tJiat-I/Wc will JJot p.\'OCeed wit.& arq sldJseqneot :tidd ~C3 utt1fl a~ CoaidldGllS Appl'OV&lllave berm Issued to 1U by the BMSAJAC. · · ..... .-1""' ........ '. -· • ..... --- Ow-..,3 £ ~ ... t..t.! ~::::-: -·0'-'~t..,..'s Pr,'hW No~~~..__·~ x....;;;.___t_e_e ~-e~lfu;;J-' e -~ ~ ___ _____.:_lA..:_uii..:.....:e :k~--~.o/!_)~_· ~ '• .. ·E4ddtr~ .Pri~tt~ JJ~~•?.i' .•.r ' .. ·~·?·-~+ ~·: __ ~. ,:_: .-:: ~··_ ·,.-.~;·!.t~ -· < ------ 88/84/2883 21:36 9782438407 . ... .. ... .... ~ ... . . :. :t~+ • • I • ~ portlon of the Application Form b to be completed b)" the · Architeetural Committee (not the Applicmt). CONPmoNs OP APPRQV 4L or DJSAfPROV AL PAGE 88 .. .. 1. No siteworlc or buDding construction may proceed on su.y Lot fmclwHog oo ~site cJoariu3, grubbing, gradealteratio~ storiQg of material mundation ex~ extension oftmderground utilities, etc.) until the Ptojeat hu :roc:eivcd a Project approw1 :B:om the Architectural Committee and has becl1 issued a Building P.cmdt (~required by Oamdd County for new home or Ranovation P"',jccm). 2. All genera] btrllding and site .impronmmns coJ1SttUc;tian1br any Ploject shall be completed ~ shaBllave issued a Ccrtibte ofOccup&aoy ftom the Garfield Couaty Buildiug Depactmcwt uo later thaD ge (1} :uat after the issusnce date oftbb ~ Cowmjtts:e A;Jmoml · ··3. The complete~ and.~nofthc·.improvedLot, to specificalb'in.cludethemmta.§ikam:l 1m yard areas; shall be compJeted no later than m (6) J110l1lbs 1imn tht: date of the c~ of Occup;mcy. . . . 4. . If the ~n ofco1~ aud /or laudscapiDg plans stc :oot inc~ with this application they must ~ submitted for approval bemn: ~action is. tabu to~ tbe miSsing items. 5. 6. . I 1. ! ' . : . Applloati~roval(.IJJhil!}sof~Committcc Mem~): .:By; .~ ~ . . .,~ . ·. ··-~~~A~-tb~ctiOJu~t~-&eaboveeellditioU:. f --~-tJ(, · .'! .~-.?~~ _n.tel ______ _ .. Ap~on DemccJ {ll\ffi~ o.f.Axchitcctmal Conutittee Members): . .t,ir. _---.,.--- ~~.Demed fOrmu~o(•) stated ab~e: .,tCJYtitmsn•. _· -...;.._~-'-------------~:-----~----~----- Pagc6of 6 SITE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN Units 0070, 0072, 0074, & 0076 1-=---~:::=-t GRACE HOMES -Valley View VIllage - MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING. INC. Clwlo,.-c..,,..,...,.DNII• at'" o,..... ._..,. •• a..,......,......co.,., fi'~IIIPI.M&_...,........._, ••~ SITE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN Units 0070,0072, 0074, & 0076 ~-=--~~ GRACE HOMES-Valley VIew VIllage . • GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc . GEOTECHNICAL F..NOINEERS • GEOLOGISTS 1441 ~lotor St. Grnn d Junction. CO IHSOS Grace Homes 786 Valley Court Grand Junction, CO 81505 June 22, 2006 Re ; Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job 1192355-GJ Valley View Vj))age, Phases C and D, Battlement Mesa, CO Gentlemen: TE L.: (970) 242·B96H FA.'t: (9 70) 242·l561 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a limited geotechnical exploratory program nt the above-referenced site. Ten shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity of the proposed buildings, as shown on the attached sketch. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of3 feet to 10 feet These exploration pits were Jogged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln De Yore on May 10, 2006. The purpose of these pits was to detennine the types and character of the in-place overlot grading fill placed on the site to the date of our exploration and the types and character of the underlying subgrade soils, particularly the potential expansive characteristics, and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. The slope stability of the embankment fill overlooking the stormwater detention pond was modeled to confumthat the building setbacks are adequate . This particular site was the subject of two previous geotechnical studies conducted prior to initial subdivision development The principal report is a preliminary geotechnical study, "Proposed Roan Cliff Village Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, CO," prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc., Job #102 526, dated September 16,2002. A second geotechnical report was prepared by Yeh & Associates, "Test Pit Observations, Lots 1-7.38 and 39. Battlement Mesa, Phase ll, Garfield County, CO," Project #24-116, dated June I, 2005 . The Hepworth -Pawlak report provided the principal geotechnical parameters for the design and construction of this subdivision. The Hepworth-Pawlak report identified some areas of low expansive clays and one moderately expansive clay. These expansive clays, combined with the proposed structural fill on the site, presented some limitations on the construction and ultimate performance of individual residential construction. The Yeh & Associates report was a veJY limited study. It appears that five exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of approximately 6 feet Bulk samples were obtained, and basic soils classification and moisture determinations were made. This report did not determine in-place dry dens ity of the soils, nor were relatively undisturbed samples taken for sweiVconsolidation testing. so very little additional information is provided that can be utilized for predicting residential foundation performance. J I 1 J I f Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 2 The following laboratory tests were perfonned on representative soil samples to detennine their relative engineering properties. ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification ASTM D-3080 Direct Shear Strength, Cd ASTM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil FHA Swell by PVC Meter (Shelby Tube Samples) Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratory tests are included in this report. The in-place soil density, moisture content, and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration pit logs. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundations within this subdivision but it is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. An additional study was conducted on the slope located at the north end of the development overlooking the stonnwatcr detention pond. The purpose of this additional study is to provide a factor of safety for the assumed developed conditions regarding slope stability and pJacement of the building foundations at the top of the slope. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Excavation Observation: Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel should be contacted to observe the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed and prior to placing forms or concrete. The purpose of this is to observe the type and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation. If the soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or if they appear to be unstable, additional recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations. Soil Classification: During our field exploration of the existing man-made fills and upper 2 to 3 feet of the native soil, three soil types were identified. These soils arc all quite similar, being fine-grained, ofJow to VCI)' low plasticity, and derived fiom the same geologic source. These in-place materials have been naturally reworked due to alluvial activity and wind activity. Soil Type No. I is a slightly sandy lean clay. Soil Type No. II is a somewhat sandier Jean clay with some strata being a sandy silty clay. Soil Type No. m is a low plastic, slightly sandy silt. 1be actual characteristics of these soils are described on the attached soil analysis and summary sheets. The principal concern of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore was the presence of low expansive strata. A number of tests were made on relatively undisturbed samples obtained using thin-walled shelby tubes and tested in an FHA PVC meter. This method allows a rather quick test to be perfonned and can be reasonably correlated back to the test methods utilizing the consolidation test apparatus. Based upon our testing of these soils, the possibility of minor amounts of soil expansion being encountered is relatively low; however, the potential appears to exist in both the native and man-made fill soils. Based upon our testing, it would be reasonable to expect between 0.7% and 2.1% swell under conditioos of relatively low surcharge pressure. The corresponding swell pressures range fiom 286 psfto 645 psf. These particular values may only slightly affect a properly designed and proportioned footing and i i I I I I i I I r·- 1 • I j i l I l ~ Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration. Valley View Village. Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 3 stem wall foundation but would affect more noticeable distortion or movement of a thickened edge slab (monolithic-type) foundation system. Man-made Fill: Portions of this site contain newly placed man-made fill, ranging from only a few inches to as much as J 2 1/2 feet measured in lest pit # J at the northeast corner of the site at the top of the bank overlooking the stormwatcr retention pond. It is our understanding that more fill has been placed over portions of this site since our exploration pits. The site grading map plan, which Lincoln DeVore utilized during some of our soil density testing of utility trench backfi11, indicates that up to t 3 feet of fill can be expected. It is not known if this man-made fill bas been placed under controlled moisture and compactive effort conditions during this subdivision grading. This office does not have any records regarding the placement of the fill and is not able to verifY the overall condition of fill. Based upon our exploration pits, the majority of the fill appears to have been placed in manner that wouJd produce percent compaction results in the range of90 to 1 000/o of the standard proctor (ASTM D-698). The native soils typically contain strata with percent compaction significantly less than 90%, with many of these native strata exhibiting slight to moderately severe collapsible properties. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has not been provided with any geotechnical reports or specifications for site improvement, which provide guidelines and requirements for structural fill. It is not known what actual requirements are in effect for this fill which is expected to support buildings, slabs and subdivision improvements. Based upon our experience in this area, it is common to have structural fLII placed during site grading at a minimum of 95% of the soil's maximwn standard proctor density (ASTM D-698). It is nonnally required that the fill be ploced at a moisture content ranging from -2% to +2% of the optimum moisture content (ASTM D-698). Some modification of these specifications arc possible, particularly when dealing with potentially expansive soils. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore typically recommends that the soils be compacted to a minimum of90% of the soil's modified proctor dry density (ASTM I).. J 557). The requirements for the moisture content are usually± 2% of the optimum moisture, but in the case of slightly expansive soils, the preferred moisture range would probably increase. Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation on this site. In general, the man-made fills and the very upper portion of the native soils were in a slightly damp condition, with the native soils usually being somewhat drier. There exists a distinct possibility of percbcd water tables developing in the native alluviaVdebris fan soils which are present across this entire site. There is also the possibility of a perched water table developing in the compacted man-made tills. This perched water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due to the presence of lawns, landscaping and roof runoff. I I i-· I i I ' j T I i i ( l l GmceHomes Limited Subsurface Soils Explorution, VaUey View Village, Phases C and D June 22,2006 Page 4 While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of our exploration the actual construction progress would not be affected by any free flowing waters, it is very possible that after development is initiated and for several years later, a troublesome perched water condition may develop on individual lots that will provide some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract Therefore, it is recommended that the future presence of perched water tables be considered in the design and construction of all proposed residential structures. Prevention of perched water tables, and minimizing the effects of any developed perched waters around residential buildings, is usually accomplished by prudent site grading. good control of roof runoff, and very good compaction practices regarding backfill against structures, backfill of utility trenches, and extra compaction effort in the areas between structures, particularly in narrow side yards that tend to have slow to very slow surface drainage. In tJ1e experience of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore, good aUention to site grading, drainage, and particularly compaction of all backfills is more effective than the installation of shallow perimeter drains around foundations. In some instances, particularly in the side yards between two structures, a shallow drain may be required. Foundation Type Recommended: The foundation recommendations contained in the Hepworth- Pawlak geotechnical report provide general design information for a standard continuous spread footing and stem wall-type foundation system . The preliminary allowable bearing pressure for this foundation system was given as 1,500 psfto 3,000 psf. Further note was made that if expansive clays are encountered in the building areas, removal or redesign may be required. The recommendations are general in nature as is typical with a preliminary geotechnical study. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has significant experience in the Battlement Mesa area, and on a preliminary basis, provides the following recommendations for lightweight single and attached residential fowulation systems. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore Foundation Recommendations: Assuming that some amount of differential movement can be tolemted, then a conventional shallow foundation system, possibly underlain by up to 18 inches of structural fill (may be native, reworked soils) and placed in accordance with the recommendations contained within this report, may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of l,SOO psf maximum and 500 psf minimum. Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within ± 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 150 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single story, slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus one-half live load for up to three stories. I ' ! ! t I i I I I • ! I t I ; l f Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C 8Jld D June 22, 2006 Page 5 If the potential effects of frost heaving are either mitigated or discounted, and if the design of the upper structure is such that loads can be balanced reasonably wei~ and if minor amounts of differential settlement C8Jl be tolerated, a floating structural slab or raft type of foundation could be used on this site. If the slab is to be a floating structural slab (similar in appearance to the "monolithic" slab), the slab should be underlain by u minimum of 2 feet of non-expansive and non frost~susceptiblc fill , placed in accordance w ith recommendations contained in this report. Such a slab would require heavy reinforcing to resist differential bending. This structural slab, using the granular structural fill as part of the foundation system, could be designed assuming the top of the structural fill bas a modulus of subgrade reaction ofk ~ 220 pci. If large concentrated loads are located in the interior of this fill, or if minor construction problems are encountered in the placement of the fill, the use of geosynthetic fabric or geogrid as part of the fiJI construction would significantly improve the performance of the fill and foundation system. It is possible to design either the floating structural slab or the raft type of slab either as a solid or ribbed slab, but in either case a rimwall must be used for confinement. Any such slab must be specifically designed for the anticipated loading. Such a foundation system will settle to some degree as the softer, underlying soils consolidate, but differential movement is held to a minimum. Because the soils may sett1e in varying amounts, some minor cracking and heave are possible unless the slabs are specifically designed with the movement in mind. Structuml Fill/Soil Improvement: For usc in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a structural fill may be required to replace any upper metastable soils, low expansive soils, or to provide n non frost heave-susceptible sub grade. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath concrete slabs on grade. Any existing metastable soil, expiUlSive soil, or frost susceptible soil beneath slabs should be removed to a minimum depth up to 1-112 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation and at least 2 feet below the bottom slab elevation for a thickened edge structural slab. The excavation/fill width is to ex/end at least 16 inches from the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to ensure that an adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man-made fill. At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, water soak the overexcavated portion of the site for at least 1 day prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The purpose of this wetting or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgrade soils and to allow proper subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgrade soils arc to be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 86% of the soiJ•s maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) for a depth of at least 6 inches. Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse~grained, non-expansive, non free-draining, man-made structural fiJI be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared subgrade soils . Non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and GM/GW) or a gravelly sand (-3/4 inch and SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the I I [ I I l I ! l ! i I I I I I I I i j l i L ! t I I r I l ! t I ; I i I ... Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 6 overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557) must be maintained during the soil placement These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture content± 2%). Very low expWJsive to non-expWJsive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be placed as structural fill in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. These soils must not be over- compacted but compacted wet of the soil's "optimum" moisture content. These soils should be placed at a minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D- 1 557). These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being wet of the optimum moisture content. These soils must be placed at optimwn moislwe content or up to 4% over optimwn moisture content. The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking. jetting. or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To con finn the quality of tho compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2·foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill, at the base ofthe fil~ in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill beneath the structure. Reinforcing: All foundation stem walls should be designed as .. grade beams" capable of spanning at least 10 feet. Where the foundation stemwalls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing wilJ not be necessary. However~ in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such ver:tical reinforcing. an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pcfwould be appropriate for the native and the man-made fill soils. Floor Slabs: Non-structural floor slabs on grade. if any. should be positively separated from ali structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximwn slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1 557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimwn moisture·content±2%). Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent tJte pending of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend I 1 I i I l I I I I r ! I i l I j j I I J l I I Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 7 on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2% and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of l 0 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry weH discharge't be used on this site unless specifically sited by a geotechnical engineer. Planterst if anyt should be conslructed so that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly ns possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend tl1at water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this sitet we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping, and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water docs not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not be limited to: Metering the irrigation water. • Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit onsite water usage. • Encourage efficient landscaping practices. • Enforcing reasonable limits on the size ofhigh water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building or foundation. • Incorporating "xeriscaping" landscaping ilnd irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retnin/tmp excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipatedt the foundation design engineer or the geotechnical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Provided that all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished basements, however, the use of 11 perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development. Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0-1557). The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below I J i 1 I j i I I I I t I I i l ! ' i I I I f ! I t i i I I I r ! l 1 1 i I I I t l ·. Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 8 foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density {ASTM D-1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2% ). Cement Ivoe: Type n, Typo I-ll, or TypeD-V cement is recommended for all concrete in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a TypeD, Type I-ll, or Typo U-V cement under any circumstances. Remarks: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a rrunimum of 3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. S looe Stabi1itv Analvsis: Slope stability calculations were performed on the existing embankments overlooking the stormwater detention pond. The stability analysis addresses the individual slope and the "global" condition of the entire embankment The soils were subjected to wetting due to lawn irrigation and frequent use of the storm water detention pond. Saturation of the lawn areas and the slope toe at the detention pond were modeled using the SEEP/W module . The analysis was performed using the PC software SLOPFJW module within GeoStudio 2004, Version 6.19, Geo-Siope International LTD, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. The analysis utilized the Limit Equilibrium Theory for the factor of safety, incorporating the following four methods. Fellenius or Ordinary Method • Bishop Simplified Method = Janbu Simplified Method = Morgenstem-Price Method = Moment Equilibrium Moment Equilibrium Force Equilibrium Moment and Force Equilibrium The Morgenstem-Price Method, incorporating both Moment and Force Equilibrium Theory is generally considered to be the more "accurate" of the four methods. The FelJenius or Ordinary, Bishop Simplified, and the Janbu Simplified Methods arc commonly utilized in older slope stability software and are included for comparative purposes. No seismic coefficient was assumed in these calculations. Several models were assumed for the existing embankments. The critical model assumed that lawn irrigation would be excessive, causing seepage on the upper slope and complete saturation of the slope toe area. Based on slope stability calculations, the constructed fill slope is reasonably stable. The analysis indicated that the embankments have a suffic ient factor of safety, equal to or greater than 1.5. The majority of low factors of safety indicate that the steeper slopes are •sloughing" under the conditions of nearly saturated embankment fill. I I ! I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I I t L I ! l j I I I l J .. Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 9 Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The fmdings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, chWJges in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or tbe works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. · Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, INC. ~ ~"7---~· ·~·-?-?-~~ ~ Edward M. ~;rif,P£. Principal Engineer GJLD Job# 92355-GJ I I j I l I l i ! I I I I ! I I I I i I L I l I f l I CRI71CAL DRAINAGE: ZONE TliiCf" lHE IIIDTH OF 7Hf: ORJQNAL 0'1:.4VAliCH IJWT (VMloES -NWU/UM QF 5 nET nHJII l!l.fiD,WQ) .sot. lfiEI'AADJ e• te a· t1tf:1J m 1AMlSI:AI'C. ~ \o" !MIDI liSt' ~ l'tAim ....VV ~W lCCIItiOU£S WITHIN THr 'CIII~ tlRAINAC£ zatt'. ROOT DOIIIISPDIIT~ II 7H£ HAll~ !G'I.S BnDW II£ I ~ I 'CRincAL DRAIHACC 20N£' 'II) II£ I @ I A UIMIIUII OF 1:1 INQ-ICS \ Rtii'CifltDJ • CCWI'AC!m FOR \ I ! I , n n soo. BACICIJU. ~ I FlU 1HICKHE:SSU _ UF71..1. tHICKNESS I STRUCTURAL FILL COIII'ACI!D 71J 11/NIJI/N I ....... 0 • 0 • 0 • • • • .. ./ FlLL TO EX.,.,.ND B""NE.ATH 1'147!R !£UI'AGC m · ,. . . , • • •. . . r . • •• • • o , ,;... c., THC FaJMJATIOH SOILS \ 0:;. :.-: ,;:":;. :.-:,;::~to":~;. ALL FOUNDATION ELEMENTS. \ •• .. • ........ .. •• • ........... •• • ... ~.. SEE N07£S ~ \ .............. rift •••••• "" ....... . ~ \ .................. . oc:AVAI!CW Ulllr-o--:=4---,~· ~·;; r J; r .i ; !' ;; r;; ~c GEDTEXTILE F' ABRic ~ \ 0 0 0 •..!... .... 0 0 0 •• 0 0 • 0 0 ••t• / h C ... h C 180 INSTALL DRAJN ... • '~~·:t·r .a;t~t-:rr_; · ·. · sue ns on .ec - AS REWIRED BY ENGINEER or Mlrafl 500-X S££ NOTES FOR OETioiLS. ·--AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION l"tiiCC 1H£ IIIDTH aF 'IHE ORIGINAL uc.iVA170N UIIIT ( VARI£5 -IIINIUIJU OF ' FEET FJlOU IJIJIDIN!: ) FILL TO EXTEND BENCA TH ALL FOUNDATION ELEMeNTS. SEE NOTES GEOTEXTILE: FABRIC such as Contech C-180 or-Mlro.f'l 500-X AS RECUIRED DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION a GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE. Inc. Ci!OTi!CJOOC.lL 2NODIDS-DEOLCQIS'l'S EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / NONE 1.01 LANDSCAPING CONCEPT DAtE: 9-16-2005 ,.., D-DRAIN2 l i I ~ ! l I ; I l PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. NO SCALE SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I I 1 I I I I I I I r ' i I l 1 I ; I l PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Pei'Sonnel Notes SLOPE LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM ; f I ! I I l t l 1 i ~ l t j ' i I I ! I I I O~EN Si'ACE PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Personnel Notes GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. L rP-t j.INCIJ'U-1 PE'VP~~ iesr 11r M ~-10·11. S · Hf-1 c Ht:PfiMitTit • PAwJAI( rHr u~~N6--,.,~,.g,. . NO SCALE PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM ' VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM j I I I j i I j I I l ·I r I l I I l ! I I I EXPlORATION PIT NO. 1 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT lOCATION & ELEV.: NORTHEAST CORNER of SITE, lOT 24 WATER (FT.} 10 15 TH OEP (FT .) -- - -5 -- ---10 --- --15 SOIL LOG ~~ 1 I~ I I ~ ~ -· DESCRIPTION % CL LEAN CLAY SI .SANDY I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE Sl. MOIST MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY ST 107.2 15.0% STRATIFIED NO Strata of LOW DENSITY 5 96.6 15.4% CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANOY Sl. MOIST ST 103.7 10.7% I 51. COMPRESSIBLE MEDIUM DENSITY Sl . MOIST Bulk 15 .0% MAN-MADE FILL 10 CL LEAN CLAY SI .SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE SI.MOIST Bulk 13.3% ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUClEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 12-1/2" NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: SOUTH PORTION, LOT 24 TOfVIM DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION IPsf pcf % CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY SJ. MOIST NO 100.5 13.2% Sl. COMPRESSIBLE .§!__ 105.3 10.4% ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 104.8 10.2% MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP Nil ML SANDY SILT Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA LOW DENSITY 5 97.1 13.6% ST 86 .8 16.5% STRATIFIED -- 10 -ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENS ITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE- 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRAND JUNCTION UNCOLN .. DeVORE, Inc. GRACE HOMES lac. Grand Junction, Colorado Date ·6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM l. 1 ' j i • l j TH DEP (FT .) -• SOIL LOG r l -, - -5 _a t I - ---10 --- --15 H DEPT (FT .) -- I SOIL LOG I I I E EXPLORATION PIT NO. 3 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Pro~~ertv Lin• LOT 2S & 26 Torv-DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION ,psf pcf % CUT AREA for SITE GRADING DRY ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY No-88 .3 10.1% Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA DRY sr-6.20/m STRATIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY -s-100.4 9.6% NO -- ----w --ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE -NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE~ 15 Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Lin. LOT 1:1 & 28 ToM Ill DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION IPsf j)_Cf % CUT AREA for SITE GRADING Sl. DAMP ML SANOY SILT -· '! Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Strata of LOW DENSITY MOISTl!Q__ 89.1 19.5% ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY~ 84.1 9.0% .-5 --- - -10 -- - - -15 STRATIFIED ___§, MOISTURE ACCUMULATION ABOVE 3' - ---=jQ ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE- 15 Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·1 0-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION UNCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand JunctJon, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Gmnd Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM Date 6--17-2006 2 f I I i i l I 1 i I r-----------------------------------------------------~3 I EXPLORATION PIT NO. 5 SHEAR SOIL TH '· DEP SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT14 & 15 Torvana DENSITY WATER (FT .) LOG DESCRIPTION ipsf pcf % V1 ~ CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY l!Q_ 110.3 11 .2% - -- -5 -----10 --- - -15 TH DEP (FT SOIL .) OG -'"' -· ' -I '~ .-• I 5 --~ ' -· '!! --10 -----15 DRY ST 106.8 6 .9% ML SANOY SILT LOW DENSITY -(II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ~ 89.1 12.7% STRATIFIED _____§. - - ~ ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pi t Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water Curing Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. I EXPLORATION PIT NO. 6 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORTH PORTION, LOT 23 Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION !psf f)cf % ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY "NO Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA SI .DAMP 89.6 18.1% ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 15.6% MEDIUM DENSITY-5 STRATIFIED Strata of LOW DENSITY ML SANDY SILT DRY NQ... 92.2 8 .1% IIJ COLLAPSIBLE STRATA MEDIUM DENSITY ST 96.6 4 .6% 10 ---ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE I t NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 8' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2008 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand Junction, Colgrado Job No . Drawn 91355-GJ EMM Date 6-17-2006 l I I I I 1 l I ! I 1 l ! i l l t- 1 l l i l I ' TH OEP (FT .) _I - SOIL LOG I I l I EXPt.ORAnoN PIT NO. 7 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: PrC~~~C~rti_ Line LOT 22 & 23 DESCRIPTION CUT AREA for SITE GRADING ML SANOY SILT Ill COLU\PSIBLE STRATA SHEAR SOIL Torv•n• DENSITY WATER lpsf pcf % NO 92.2 9.4% -I I ~ ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 81 .1 13.4% -5 5 --- - -10 --- - -15 H .) DEPT (FT SOIL LOG -~ ---5 -----10 -----15 51 . EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 4' 645 psf@2.1%Swell 93.2 6 .0% 107.5 6.9% - --w. ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE _ NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During ObservaUon: 5·10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley ConstrucUon, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 8 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: Pl'(l~erty Una LOT 20 & 21 Torv•n• DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf % MAN·MADE FILL - ! CL LEAN CLAY Sl. SANOY MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP Ji!?-95.8 15.2% II 51 . EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 2' 286 psf@ 0.7% Swell ST 106.3 13.2% ~ Sttata of LOW DENSITY NO 89.3 11.5% ML SANOY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY 5 99.2 4.7% Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ST -ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS , Qa/Qdf - 10 ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley ConstrucUon, G.J. LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES lac. Graod Juoctioo, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM j i I ~ I i j I I ! ~ { i t ~----------------~l 5 I TH DEP (FT .) - --.-5 -- ---10 --- - -15 DEPTH (FT .) SOIL LOG ~~ M \,I!"' ~I ~! v-/! SOIL LOG EXPLORATION PIT NO. 9 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & I!LfV.: Pro~~ Line LOT 18 & 19 Torv11ne DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pef % MAN-MADE FILL ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY 51. DAMP II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ~ 87.6 14.9% ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf DRY~ 90.7 11.0% CL-Ml SILTY CLAY LOW DENSITY 5 lla 51. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 5' 62 psf@ 0.3% SweU DRY NO 94.5 10.1~o MEDIUM DENSITY _§I_ 89.6 4 .1% Strata of LOW DENSITY 97.0 6.1% - 10 -ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE- 15 Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10·2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Con•tructlon, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 10 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 18 & 17 Torv11ne DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION lpsf pcf % -~ MAN·MADE FILL !:!Q_ 110.3 14.4% ~ CL LEAN CLAY MEDIUM DENSITY 51 . DAMP -COMPRESSIBLE Strata of LOW DENSITY NO 19.6% I 87.5 -ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf .§I_ 109.0 7 .8% -5 -- ---10 -----15 ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY ____2 II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA _jQ ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 3·1/2' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM l I I I I I I I I i I i I ' ! ~-· l l l Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: (Typical} Geologic Origin : ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Testby: LRS 10 0 g 0 60 70 t:n!IO c ·~ 50 a.. ~ .. o ~ 0. 30 20 10 0 - - Natural Water Content (w): 10.7% In-Place Density (pcf): 103.7 COBBLE to GRAVEL .. . . Pit No.: 1 Depth: 5' Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated SAND SILT to ClAY ·~ Effective slze mm Cu Cc Plastic Limit (PL) 18 Liquid Limit (LL) 30 Plasticity Index (PI) 12 Skempton's Activity ~ Shrinkage Limit (SL) .. Shrinkage Ratio \ DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res . Shear Angle : deg • Tan Shear: 125 75 50 37.5 25 1j. 12.5 9.5 ... ]~ 2 0.85 OA25 0.15 O .p~ 0.02 0.005 Cohesion. psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 112" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 Particle Grain 'Size {mm) (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 125 75 50 37.5 Maximum 25 ~iz~~~~QW~g 19 Bli! Sam12f~r 12.5 2-1/2" 9.5 4 .75 2 0 .85 0.425 100 0.15 99 0.075 94.2 0.02 42 0.005 30 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Gra nd Junction, Colorado ASTM Method: D-§28 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf Optimum Moisture ! HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell Displacement 300 psi: psf Expansion. @ 300 psi : sf Remolded Sample ALLOWABLE BEARING (nat): psf by Consolidometer Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compression (gu): psf COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf CONSOUDAnON: @ psf SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABIUTY: K (20 C): Remolded em/see ~ SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Dat e Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM j i" i • 1 ! J ! j I } I t j Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) 51. Sandy Sample No.: I (fypk:al) 2 Geoloaic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test b:l: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 7.8% Pit No.: 10 Depth: 2' In-Place Density (pcf): 109.0 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTtoCLAY 100 r"" ~ ~ Effective size mm 9D "' Cu Cc 8D 70 Plastic Limit (PL} 19 Liquid Limit (LL) 35 CJ) 60 Plasticity Index (PI) 16 c: Skempton's Activity OA ·~50 Shrinkage Limit (SL) a.. ~ Shrinkage Ratio -B <lO -\~ ..... Cl) a.. 30 20 -DIRECT SHEAR: co Peak Res. to Shear Angle : deg. Tan Shear: 0 !& 12.5 9:5 ·~ 2 0.85 0.425 0 .15 O.WJ, 0.02 0 .005 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 Particle Grain lze {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method : ~98A D 4718 • 0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-112" 37.5 M~ximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 §izeAIIQwed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell 3/4" 19 By: §imQier Displacement 300 psi: psf 112" 12.5 2·112'' Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer #4 4 .75 Standard Penetration (SPT): pst by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (gu): ESf #20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 97 CONSOUDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 94 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0.075 85 .3 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm 0.02 44 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 34 K (20 C): Remolded ~ .Ln£f SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D a Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) St. Sandy Sample No.: II (Typical) Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test by: LRS 100 90 80 70 0)60 c: ·u; 1Q 50 a_ ~ 40 ~ Q) a. 30 20 fO 0 - Natural Water Content (w): 13.2% Pit No .: 8 Depth: 2' In-Place Density (pcf): 106.3 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTtoClAY mm ....., ~~ Effective size Cu 1\ Cc " Plastic Limit (PL) ~ 1\ Liquid limit (ll) 29 Plasticity Index (PI) ! \ Skempton's Activity ~ Shrinkage Limit (Sl) ~-Shrinkage Ratio -\ DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 125 75 50 37.5 25 1a., 12.5 9,5 4.]~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 O.W«, 0.02 o 005 F'article Grain 'Size {mm} Cohesion: psf Sieve (mm) % Passing 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 112" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 125 75 50 37.5 Mii!~imY!!J 25 SjzeA!Iowed 19 Bl! §S!m~l!llr 12.5 2-112" 9.5 4.75 2 100 0.85 99 0.425 98 0.15 94 0.075 73.2 0.02 44 0.005 32 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-Oo/o Rock Correction Max. Dry Density : pcf pet Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 0.7% Swell Displacement 300 psi: 286 psf Expansion @ 300 psi: sf Remolded Sample ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Conso/idometer Standard Penetration (SPn: psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compression (qu): psf COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf CONSOUDATION: @ psf CONSOUDATION: @ psf SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABILITY: K (20 C): Remolded ~ @U&f SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM 3 ! I I I r i I L I ! I I I f i ' I : I f 1 Soil Sample: SILTY CLAY (CL-ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II a (Typical) Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 4.1% Boring Neola.: 9 Depth: S' In-Place Density (pcf): 89.6 Soil SpecifiC Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SANU ~ILTIOClAY 0 ~ "' Effective size Cu "~ Cc ~l Plastic Limit (PL) 22 - 1\ Liquid Limit (LL) D Plasticity Index (PI) § \ Skempton's Activity 2:1 ' Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio 10 90 80 70 mm -~ I 20 -DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: dag. Tan Shear: 0 125 75 50 37 .5 25 VI!. 125 9.5 4.]~ 2 085 0.425 0.15 0 .~ 0.02 0.005 Cohesron: psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-112" 1" 3/4" 112" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 P"article Grain 'Size {mm} (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 100 99 95 87 75.4 40 28 Maximum Size Allowed By Sampler 2-1/2" GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi : Expansion @ 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARING (net}: Standard Penetration (SPT): sf FHA Soli Swell: 0.3% Swell g psf Remolded Sample psf by Consolldometer psf by Penetrometer Unconfmed Compression'"'"'(..;;&;qu;.<.);_: ---__.L;;.;.._ __ _ psf COLLAPSE~ Wettlng: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf SULFATESALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABILITY: K (20 C): Remolded ~ @......Qg SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM 5 i I I i I I l I I j ! I l l-- 1 I • i J I I I Soil Sample: LOW PLASTIC SILT (ML) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: Ill (Typical) Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS , Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 6.0% Pit No.: 7 Depth: 3' In-Place Density (pcf): 93.2 Soil S~c Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTioClAY 100 r"""t ~ Effective size mm 90 ~ Cu Cc 80 70 Plastic Limit (PL} ~ Liquid Umit (LL) 22 0160-Plasticity Index (PI) 1 c: Skempton's Activity 0.1 ·~ 50 Shrinkage Limit (SL) Q.. Shrinkage Ratio ... c: <40 ~ ~ Q) a. 30 • " 20 DIRECT SHEAR: co Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 ~4 12.5 9.5 4.~ 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0 UM, 0.02 0.005 Particle Grain fze {mm} Sieve {mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718 • 0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 Siz!;!AIIQwed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 2.1% Swell 314" 19 By Sampler Displacement 300 psi: 645 psf 1/2" 12.5 2 -1/2" Expansion @ 300 psi: _£Sf Remolded Sar!Wie 3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (gu): ~sf #20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0.075 86.6 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm 0.02 36 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 22 K (20 C): Remolded ~ .@...._Qg SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. J Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM .. I I I I ! ; I I l I 1 I I I t ! I I l I I I l I • ( t ~ I J t I I I i 1 l • j FEET· View Is to West BASIC PROBLEM SLOPE OVERLOOKING TilE STORM WATER DETENTION POND, SEEP\W ANAL YSlS VAU.EY VlEW Sub. BAm.EMENT MESA, CO. FILLED SLOPE 0\ll:RLDOJ<JNG STORM DETEN'TlON POND 92355 Slllbllze trrlgal.<l.pz 8127120011 SEEP Tnnsllnl 2D o w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ FEET· View Is loWest SEEP\W ANALYSIS The Site has been developed, the Yard areas are Landscaped and I-lEA VIL Y IRRIGATED. Standing Water is in Front Yard and Seepage is occwring on Slope leading to the Pond. The Storm Water Detention Pond is heavily used, due to Stonn Runoff and Irrigation Rwtoff. The soils beneath the Pond and at the Toe ofthe Slope are SATURATED in about 20 feet into the TOE. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE. Int. CEO'll:CIIHICAL EHGDIEllRS· GEOLOGISTS Figure I VALLEY VIEW Vll..LAGE Phase C & D GJLD f# 923SS·GJ, June 28, 2006 l i I 1 I I i ! I I ' I l ~ I FEET-View is to Weal • . . . . . . • . . . . . • • ••• ,j,z,. • • • • • • • • . . . SLOPE\ W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety ofl. (F.S. = 1.023) is shown. We recommend the Pond Sides be well compacted, to prevent this modeled deep penetration of water into the SJope Toe. V~\nEW-8Al"T\DjEHfME&\CO, F1UED SLOPE IMliii.OOICI>IO lrnJRU DETEtmON POND n:w -· lnflltltd Qopt.gtr G/%1/211011 SI..CPE ........ IIIII'P,... 2D • • • • • • • • • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m M m ~ * ~ m ~ ~ ~ * m ~ * a m ~ m ~ FEET· V.ew ls Ia West SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1.5 (F.S. = 1.494) is shown . The computed failure surface is more than 40 feet from the structure and foundation. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, In~ GEOTECitNICAL DIGINEEIIS· COOLOCISI'S Figure II VALLEY VIEW Vll.LAGE Phase C &; D GILD II 923,S·G1, June 28, 2006 I I L I I f r I J ! . 1 I Parcel Detail Page 1 of2 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assesso rffreasur~r_ErQI~ert~a rc t} I Assessor Subset Q ue ry I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder ReceP.tion Search Basic B u ilding Characteristics I Tax Informati on Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Comm erc ial ImP-ro vement Detail Land Detail I Photograp hs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 080 ll R043096 II 240718104023 II 39.826 I Owner Name and Mailing Address IDARTERLLC I j786 VALLEY COURT I IGRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 I Legal Description jSECT,TWN,RNG:18-7-95 SUB:VALLEY IVIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C & D ILOT:23 PRE:R040986 BK:586 PG:524 jBK:0615 PG:0487 BK:1831 PG:941 IRECPT:704369 BK:1812 PG:167 jRECPT:700392 BK: 1807 PG:663 jRECPT:699425 BK: 1767 PG:909 jRECPT:691345 BK: 1767 PG:899 jRECPT:691343 BK:1767 PG:887 jRECPT:691342 BK:1756 PG:427 jRECPT:688665 BK: 1756 PG:422 jRECPT:688664 BK: 1754 PG:986 jRECPT:688326 BK:l546 PG:979 jRECPT:643048 BK:1546 PG:964 IRECPT:643045 BK:l546 PG:954 jRECPT:643041 BK:l546 PG:946 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2407181 04023 2n12001 Parcel Detail IRECPT:643039 BK:l518 PG:822 IRECPT:636574 BK:0748 PG:0893 IBK:0642 PG:0065 BK:0641 PG:0278 Location I Physical Address: 1Jt8 CLIFF VIEW CIR PARACHUTEj l Subdivision: I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C&D Land Acres: 111.117 Land Sq Ft: jjo Section II Township II Range 18 II 7 II 95 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Land: II Improvements: II Total: II 1~1 =====S=al=e =Da=te===l: I . . Sale Price: I 64,68011 oil 64,68011 Assessed Value I 18,7601 ol 18,7601 http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023 Page 2 of2 2/7/2007