The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication - PermitC'C 30'J +s $ C}81-~·S~ t)t}E 3-~~ Garfield Cou11ty Building & Sallitation Deparhnellt 108 8'" Street, Suite #401 Glellwood Springs, Co . 81601 Office~ 945~8212 Inspection Line~ 384~5003 ; [NO· 1037l---1 Job AddresO:ft6 G L ( p-f v { EtO c+ fO !eCtClrl ute ~ /6 ~.s- Nature of Work Building Pennit i).l j0JJ8 fQYQ),:J Use of Buildin g IV/h('} Wle Ltp I eli (Ltun ~ rorh w /..qu rL\lie &dii® Owner .!)atlet'l.. L~C Contractor G f C1 re \&!J we3 Amount of Permit $ L)l f=t · 3l- tz_q tVlpctC+ Qfett?t 3q .~O roTat~ 466S·j-+ Date 3"-d8~ Cl erk !\ QJJ t~ ~ \,. ~· GARFIELD COUNTY DUILDINO PERMIT APPLI CATION ' 1.0* 8'•. S~t. SGt. 201, Ofaa-d S~ CO 81&01 l'lloDC:t 970-945-11212 I h.: 970441-'J'U /lzaqoec:Uoo. Uu: P~-4-5003 PenZiltNo: 007'l.J aolf OD1'f Parcdf5chedull: No: Jl l/.1 0 7 I ?J I 0 '+0 l. 3 • Job Adc!Rss: it ao 70 / (.../ i .( P~. Co ~/bjS 3 su·bd. 1 Ell ? -L Ph: I . I_ . .. . .-:::· ~ .. , . w --I.__ . ¥-.. ~··-1 --.1 Ph: Sl.J -s-~~> I ~:· 7o,t>')IO 6 7 s+CJass oTWodc: (] d '() 0 Drivewa,y Permit. l l VallWJono!Worlc 12 Special Conditi.oua: N New Slope Doable Ph: ~st ~ott JJ Hdgbt: ~ -Go-d.. ~ "- AiienaUon Addltloo 0 Move Ouport: 0 On·i!lfte Sewage Dfaponl 0 S ite Plan Adjusted Valuations: S o:Remove 0 SlDgle C Double Peiialt Fer:: 'I I A SEPARIITE EtSCt'RICAL PimMIT JS REQU11Urn AND MU81'A ISSU2D BY tilE SI'ATE OF COLORADO. 1BIS PDI01' JllllCIQimli JIUU. AM> VOID UI'WORitORCWII'l'Kuc:noJf AUTBOJUDO 18 NOT C0604ENCED WJt'HI.K 180 DAYS , OR. IF C:ONSIRUCJtON OR WORK IS SUSPEHDED OR ABANDONIIO FQRA PBRIOD OP 180 DAYS AT AHrtiMII: AFl'ER WORKIB COMMENCED. 2 Da· :I I I ! I BEREBI' c:mmrY' mAT liiA.VB IU'AD AND z:&\JIUIED THIS .Ari'UC&t!OII AND .KNOWnu; IlANE 'ID SE'mUBANil CORRECt'. AU. PRovlSIOI'ISOFtAWSGOVERNJliiQ'tHJSTYPEOFWORJ[WIU.BE CQioiPI.I::n:D WI1'IUIJ WU&:nr&k 81'BCIPIED IDlR£IIf OR 11'02'. TD ORANnNO OP APSRMft DOES NOTl!aS8VIID TO GJVEADTSORnT I I I ~car, 'lltBPR09ISZOH8 OF AN\' emma STA'Il!;OR 11RQ (Y}N!ITRUC'ttON OR 'l1tB PSRPORJU.NC£ ---- Setback&: I l . ~~ i PERMISSION 1s HBREBY <;RANtEO TOne APHJCANt' r£ OWNER. CONtftiiCOOKANO/OR THE. AOENt' ottns OOHl'RAct'OR oR OVfflat TO coNSTRUcr' 11 • S'lllUcrtJRBNJ D.Et'AltED ON l'fANS 1\HD tn'BCmCAllONS SUBMnTS:D TO liND RSVIJtWED 8\'TKJ!: B!JU.DINO DEPARTMENT. , ll'f CONSID!tRA1IOK OF 1HE ISSSUAffCE OP nus PEaMrr, 1118 SJOMER. HERESY AQR&t:S 'TO COMPLY wnH AU. BUn.DINC CODES AND LAND . I RSOUIAtlcmS AOOPrED B'l GARPIEW OOUN'N PURSUANt' TO AlmiDRnY 01VBN LN 30..28..201 atS AS AMENpeD. nu;; SOHER t=tnmfER A~ 'rnA j 11if; ABOVE S.UO ORDINAHCES ·AR& Nor JIULLY COMPtt.ED wnH lN '1'HB r..oo)moN, ERJtC1lON. COKSTRUCDON, ~USB OF·tHE-uoVJt DESCR111 STRUcrua;. 'nfE P&:RMIT MAY BE ~I(ED sv NonCE FROM nmcoumY AND TH.U'THDI AND nmu: rr sHALL BSCOME:truu. MD VOlo. 1 niE ISSUAN<% OF A PERMI' BASED UPON ~. SPex:u:JCA1ldftS AND aitum DATA SHALL Not" PREVEm' 1llE: BUILDING omcw. l'ROM TREREAF ~ RBQUIR!NO 1Hii: OORRECTIOI'f 01" eRRORS 1/C SAJD PlANS, SnaF1Co\1IONB AND orH£R DATA 0!1. FROM PRBVEtmNO Butt.niNO OPERA'tlON BE j CARRIED ON THJ~Bl!:UHDER WHBH IN VlOLA.TJON OPTH9 COO& OR Nl'f OI'HER. ORDINANCE OR IU!XlUU\ttON OP 11IJS .JURlstllCTJOM. • 'l'Rit R5:VI&W 011' SUBMrrrED PLANS AND SPECIFICII.TlONSAND INSl'r::crtONS CON011Cn!:D 'III£R£AFI'ER DOSS NOf CONS11l'UTE Nf ACCEPrAJfCE OF 1 RESPONSUIIunES OR UABLmES BY' OARFTELD COtnnY FOR li:RRORS, OWSSIOKS OR DISCR!I'EtlaES. TH& RESPONSIBILITY POR ntESS I:TSWI , : JMI'L£MSHTAtiON DURJNO CONST1WC110N USl'S SPEC:mCIAU.T WITH 'TH1t ARnctttT, DEStGfta, BUILDER. AND OWNER OOMMEm'S ARK UOI'I'l!m G~O~ ' l I I . I ' ! ' ! l TO I5Z OONSERVATJVEAND IN SUP.PORT Oil' THE OWNIRS UfTER&ST. u Vet$ 17B~:;o~~7f;:--.. ---:·-. ···ul ~ a~7B3 1-1~o? , __________ _ ------· --·---·4···---··----···· . ' The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Pcnnaneo.t address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof; a lockable house, complete exterior siding, ex.tmior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabineiS. a siak with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, cotmter tops and finished walls. ready for stove and ~efrigerator. all llCCCSSaJY plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door. 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps mast have handl3ils, guard rails on balconies or d.cclcs over 3011 high COJlStrocted to all me and m.c requiremen1s; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away ftom the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and gnsding may be .made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstmces, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued 'Uiltil all 'the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Read & Bridge Department for driveway installatiou, where applicable; as well as any final sign offby the Fire District, anchor State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OFOCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HA. VE BEEN COMPLETED. •u•CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTH.. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. wn.L BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDmONS ARE MET. I understand and agxee to abide by the above conditions· for occu~~~ the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# *}u.l...'-1~~~1.___ )( ~IL:L --A"'~t x_~L~~1°-1 -- Signature Date BpcontOca004 -------------------------· i I i i ; II I i . I ! . I l I I l t I . I l I . I ! II r I ! j i i ! I --·· VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant~ LL!::. Addre~?@ l,rr VLW CtZ.. Date Z·(o-97 Finished (Livable Area): A-BCD Main 3~)2.... ~ Upper /~-?'B Lower Other Subdivision V M.~ UI'P.a.J LJLLA4-l.. Lot/Block 23 Contractor r rr. I '-~·uce ~IMeS -. -"' .... ,.. ~ Total Square Feet 5090 v 74 '~ ~ 3 80, 121 z.o Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Gara2e: 4S,j / 5' 9y 1080 • I( AD De Crawl Space: Decks/Patios: Valuation Valuation Covered Z &C ~2. 4 Valuation Open Valuation ll.t.o ~ (l. Total Valuation /'f. ~4() 4 g {)0 [q1_0 4 rY_ 2 tJ I z.O o...<..p, D Assessor's Parcel No.d>l./0116 jQ<.J())3 Date 3-:)\3'-+= BUILDING NRIIIT CARD Job Address OOi£ \ll r-t: v {f\.0 c+ fd PCf r l ') u~ . ~/6 3S Owner.!nfiee. LLC Address7E6 uo nevt ect Phone # so we Jt ContractoWCl (fE. Y\~WlC). . Address .'31 \1'.€1' Phone #S~3-SS.)) S71!>.@cks: Fr,qnt Rear ~ LH Zoning tJ mJ~ve q p1t7< ( unH"l{) t'O O'l ~ 1 C!et F(\~~ ~~ Soils Test----------- Footing------------ Weatherproofing ___________ _ Mechanica1--------==---=---- Eiectrical Rough (State) 8 # 3 -tJ I Foundation _________ _ Electrical Finai1State) n · 11 .. o 7 Grout------~~:--~-= Underground Plumbing 5--U:e? !JnL Rough Plumbing '7-Z.S:.t~-7J9rv'. Final#-U·01 /Checklist CQ!!lB._Ieted? Certificate Occupancy # ~: ;9nA-= Framing ~~lo-0'7 l? K. Insulation f' ... M .. 12 71'dci Roofing ~ Drywall ~-q; 'J ~ Gas Piping 7-=t>1Ji??YL J.cf~~Di.. h-~-t:>7~ UTili lOR Addntll No.--------------- Drainage --------------- ~uppor1 l clearance to wood ------- Oecb-atalrs l ralle ------------ Exterior locka -------------- Fiuhlng around d~ & wlndowe _______ _ lnlltctecntene -------------- INTIIIIOII GARAGE Fire walleeperatlon ------------ Service doors-1~" min,----------- CoOt' (20 min,) w/auto cioMr·1~" min. _____ _ Mach. equip. 18" abOve floor ________ _ No opening Into eleeplng anta ________ _ BASEMENT·CRAWL AREA Acc~----------------- lneutetlon -------------- ~~to•-------------- Ventilation ---------------- Date \'55\) t:b i\=D;:tO"i- Septic System *------------ Date------------Final ___________ _ Other ______________ __ NOTES FINAL CHICKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Boller ____________ _ Hot wat•------------ F.A. gaeloll _________ _ F~r«•"---------------- Ciearance ___________ _ Air con . eyatem __________ _ Hot water heater --------- Combuetlon air _________ _ GIS piping, valve1 --------- LPG Onlln ----------- FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combtletlblel _____ _ Termination ol chimney ______ _ Combuellon air _________ _ Hearth (12 " Ot' 20" on aidn) ------ Glasa doors __________ _ Certifted by: _________ _ REMARKS (continue on back ) STAIRWAYS . Headroom (8'8") ----------- Railing a guardrails ---------- ~--~----------- AIM & run ------------ KITCHEN Clearance above grill ________ _ Exhauet lan _______________ _ Broiler exhauet (t hr. ch811 ) ------- BEDROOMS Eg~--------------- Smoke detector -------------- BATHROOMS Exhauetfan ' Shatterproof glau _________ _ OTHER a L INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB :Z4 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issue~~:~ ...... Zoned Area ............................... Permit No .•. [QJ .. t.l ....... . AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. ::'!..e:'!:'!.!.!G{Fcf,'f:=~ .. 1. Owner IJI!/iet{& I,Lt:, CootracCort,ilr'tle 1/tJMI!S ...... Sctb1rks Fmot Sjdc Sjde Rnr This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing B.u~u .. Driveway Foundation ""?\.L. Underground Plumbing 5-Z.,Z.-D1 ~ Insulation $-/ 1-o 7 /8n(__ Roueh Plumbing 1-~5",01 ~ Drywall 8_ .;)_ tf-v1 A}n1 Chimney & Vent ~-10 --o_'\ D-bl Electric Final (by State Inspector) ~12:_.., _ Gas Piping -1-?-.'1 ,t)'l ~ Final //r ']...1-TJ? 1)-M_ ...... Electrie Rough (By State lnspec:tor) 8/!Jr§ Septic Final ~ Framing ~· •c ~ c 1 ~~ v Notes: (To include Roof in plaee and iodows 1od Doors iostaUed). ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING- WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Da•..J .. Ui By (:Jotlri(JII ''"'*' IF PLACED OUTSIDE -COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC ·. 4Jdr-eb~ : {j_Q70-0076 . . Cl,' tfVi~Dc GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-821'2 MINIIvfUM APPLICATION REQUIRE:MENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAI\fiLY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand ~e scope .ofthc work intended Wlder a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete infotmation be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's t:tiscover~d that required information has not been provided by the applican~ this will result Jn the delay of the permit issuance and in proCeeding with building construction. The own~ or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new infOrmation ma.y be reViewed after it has been pro\ided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if yon have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please cooSider using a deslen professional for usistan~ in you.l" design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more thaD ten (10) occupants requires the . plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfessionaL To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to determine compliance ,;th the building, plumbing and mechanical codes) applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 181'x 24'"' and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor pi~ a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roo( including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated ·ptatc:s, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting. house-rap, (which is required)t siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check .with the Building Department. A window schednle. A door schedule. A floor ftaming plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C: and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 me, !PC, IMC and IFGC. Applicants are req~d tG illdicate appropriately and to submit completed checldist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed stiucture, additions or other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan for the plaeement of any portion of a stru.cnn;e within 50 ft. of' a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be · prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building ~velope of a lot shown oo a recorded subdivision plat, shall inc::lude a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the fin-t'lat with the proposed structure located within the enveloPe. Yes . . 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I. S.O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjaceot propcrti.es), streams or water courses? This infoimation must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design . Yes f No Not ne~acy for this project __ _ 3. Are 1he plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or matked identifying them as "Not for construction, for pennit issuance only,, _''Approval drawings only", "For pennit issuance only" or similar language? Yes Y No__ Not necessary for this project. __ _ .2 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. '13. 14. Is the LS .D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed. stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? Yes+ No__ NotnecessBiyforthisproject~- Does the site pl_an. indicate the locatio.n and 'direction of the State, County or private road accessing the property? Yes-'t-- Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the .size, location and spacing of all ' reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes~ No~ Notneccssacyfortbisproject_ If the building is a pro-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered fo~dation plan for this building? Yes-+-No_ Not necessary for this project_ Doth., plans indicate the location and si!e of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes__ No_ Not necessai)' for project_E_ Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation Clpenings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes~ No__ Notnecessaryforthisproject_ Do the plans include design loads as required under the me or IRC for roof snowloa.ds , (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in. Garfield County)? Yes+-No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject __ Do th7lans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC7 Yes No_ Not necessaty for this project_ · . Does the plan include a bw1ding section drawing indicating foundation, wal~ floor, and roof coru~truction? Yes-+-No__ Notnecessaryforthisproject_ Is the wind speed and ex.poSUI'C design included in the plan? Yes--+-No_ Not necessary for this project_ Does th .e building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists: wall studs, cei.J.ingjoists. roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes....s:L_ No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject_ 3 , -.... --. ._, -.... _.. 'ts. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive conney'on of all columns and beams? Yes No_ Not nc:ccssary for this project_ 16. Does the elevation plan iodicatr: the height of the building or proposed addition from tbe undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable _or sbed roof or the to~ of a flat roofl {Check appicable zone district for building height maximum) Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_ 17. · Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace plann.ed for instaiJation inoludin& make and model and Colorado. Phase ll certifications or Phase II EPA certification? Yes_ No__ Not ncc:cssary fur this projec:t__l_ 18. Does the plan luclude a. masomy firq>lace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IBC or IR.C? Yes_ No_ Notnecessaryfurthisproject.1_ 19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requ'ire.ments of the IBC or IRC7 Yes~ No__ Notneressacyforthisproject_ 20. Does 'the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and veatilation for all habitable rooms? Yes+ No_ Notnecessaryforthisproject_ .. 21. Do t!le plans indicate the location of glazing subject to puman impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doozs; glazing adjacent to any surf8ce normally used as a walking surface; sliding gJass doors; fixed g]ass panels; shower doors and tub · enclosures and specuy safety glazfug fur these areas? Yes__:f_ No_ Not~forthisprojec:t_ 22. Do the pl8os include a complete design. fur all mecbanical systems planned for installation io this building? Yes__ No )t' Not necessary for this project. __ 23. Bave a1J areas m the builctiug been accurately identified fur the intended use? (Qc:cupancy as identified in the IBC Chapter 3) Yes~ No__ Not necessary fnr this project. __ 24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and stomge of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Ye$_ No_ Not necessaryfortbisproject.:...l._ 4 .. 25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas · furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on 1he plan? · Yes+ No~ Not necessary for this project __ 26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension ofrestroam facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes_ No_ Notneoessaryforthisproject~ 27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes~ No Not necessary for this project_ . 28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes-r--No_ 29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes-L. No_ Not necessary for this project __ 30. Docs the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes_t__ No __ 31. Do your plans comply with aU zoning rulr:s and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 .in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbacks. Yes T No __ 32. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are requ1red .m:i2r to the implementation of these changes? Yes_\_ No_ 33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "PlanReview'1 fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Pennit" fee as well as any "Septic System'' or "'Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pjck up your building pennit? Yes~ No_ 34. he you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required Wlder the IBC including approval on a :final inspection ·Drior to rece.iving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes¥-No __ s 35. Aie you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project .must comply with tbyniform Codes? Yes No_ 36. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following busin~ day? Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m. aud .3!30 p.m. Mooday thruugh Friday. Inspections are to be caUed in to 384-5003. 37. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not -accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes~ No~--- 38. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a builcljng permit you are required to sbow proof of a driveway access permit or, obtain a statement from the Garfie.ld County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes .¥ No ___ _ 39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Co1orado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to per.fonn installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes f No. ___ _ 40. A:Ie you aware. that on the front of the building perm.it application you will .need to £ill in the ParceY Schedule Number for the Jot you are applying for this penntt on prior to submittal of the building pennit application'? Your attention m this is appreciated. Yes 'r No __ _ 41. Do you lmow $at the local fire district may require you to ·submit plans for their review of fire safecy issues? Yes y No (Please check with the building department abour this requirement) 42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the . property prior to issuance of a building peunit that you will be! required to obtain a grading ~nnit? Yes 'f 43. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? S.tate Law requires any commercial project with occupancy of more tban 10 persons as per Sec~ on 1004 of the IBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. Yes '( No NotNecessacyforthisproject ____ --: 6 I hereb acknowledge that I have read, UDderstaod, and ~wered these questions to of my ability. Signature Phone: Zlf~-<[521... (days); ________ (evenings) Project Name: U fl, (/;~ l;; /~ h.a~ ProjectAddtess: 0070-0076 CJ.f V;~Q- Note: r Date If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Officia1 prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the pemrlt are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" 9n any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official' that the infonnation is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please ex~ the following: · . , · · A. The application may be plac:cd behind more recent applicatiOns for building permits in the review process aud not revjewed until required-information has been provided and the app~cation rotates again to first positi,on for revjew, B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in proceeding with construction. *If you answered ·~o" to this question the circumstances descnoed. in the question could result in a ••Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. Bpcomm Apri12006 1 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST App licani:Jac=fe c LLC Building ~ngineered Foundation ..iJJJloriveway Permit _Lsw-vcyecl. Site Plan 'P ·iS' ttvw U Mseptic Permit and Setbacks ~ade!Topography 30% ~ach Residential Plan Review List 4mum Application Questionnaire ~division Plat Notes ~Fire Department Review ~tion Determination/Fees ~ine Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~a.ch Conditions /A li · s· d __ pp cation tgne ~Reviewer To Sign Application __ ParceVSchedule No. ~now!~ Letter-Manf. Hms. ~lL.~ GENERAL NOTES: Dateer2-7-d 7 _----~--'HOA/DRC Approval Subdivision Plat Notes -- 89/84/2883 . 21:36 9782439487 PAGE 82 .. . ·. , ... ~ ... . ~ ... . ... . BAT'ILEMENT MESA SERVICE .ASSOCIATION ARC.mT.EcrtJRAL COMMITI:El£ APPLICATION SUBMl'ITAL FORM (For New Home Co~ctios) INSTRUCTIONS: . . This AppJicatio.o & OieclcHst fs to be used for aD project submittals to the Battlement Mesa Service .Associa:tion Archftcctural Committee (BMSA/AC). This foim is intended to BSBist in ensuriDg that the application submittal . is complete.. This will help provide a quicker, more thorough review process. · .. It is ~ed that each Applbnt tboroughl;y review tho r~ of tbe cauenf ArchitedunJ Smp<kr#s. the Algcnded apdRgt!ted .J29Sl!tatlon ofcgv.euptt (igcJudiDg Rgsobrtion!) and thereco.tded Ffru.i PJSt ibr th~ir respective ~mood prior to prcparioS a &UbmittaL . . . . . . .AppliGSDts preparing a submittal should compare the mmrmation they are about to suboUt w.irh tm requiremeals ·ofthis:tbrmand "check otr each required item on the ibmL If~itcmis not cbecked, theApplica:tio.nsubmittal is not.complete and should not be submitted. Incomplete .Applications will :oot be processed and wiD be~ .to the App&mp.. In addition to the checklist. ApplicaDts should :JiD in aU of the places on the Application FoiiD wbeJ:e iufiJJ:mation is requested. ~Architectural COmmittee will usetbis fufD.rmationio. evaluating your .AppOOatiou. Iimfonnation is requested but is not appJic:ablc to your specffi.c piOjeet submittal, write 'W A"' iti tbB $J*:e pm~ If some tequired ioformalion is yet to be detN u•i•ll'd (su.cJl. 8$ extcior paiDt colors youmq not)lave yet solec;ted)· write ":r.BD" in the appropdated space prov.ide<L You will then bo required to make a fOllo-w-up submittal With these , ~om at.a Jatc:r date bYt bc.te~ iDstaDation in the hom:. · DO NOT fill in any info.tmation in tb! "Conditions fOr A9Provar section of this lbrm. This portion of the :fbm is for Arcbitectoral Committ= use ODiy. When .ali .AWlication 1s c:oq>tete, p~t:asc man or~ it to t11e .mUowiogaddrcss: B~Mca.Servicc~ .Architectural Committee AppJicaWm 73-G S~Drivc P.O. Box 6006 Battle,mentMesa, ColoradO 81636 I i I I l The An:hitedunll Commltteem.eet81lrrfee.onthJ;yon-tJio ~~ apd3tlt Wedpesl1ay. andAppUea$DS.tk"e.due . I -oue w~ p,rlor-to t~ SCh~ MeDCblg.Datea for P,Dor review byC_C)mJidft'• m_.J;en. PI~~ : ! Jane Cbapnv;n at (970) 285-9740 to confirm tbe ~.sdledalt;d meeJins date orto.1:equest furtber ~i%ol;\tiOJL · ' . . --··---·---·~ 08/B4/2BB3 21:3& 91B24384B7 PAGE 83 • 2 • t .. • ... · .. · ..... ....... .. . . BAT.I'LEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOOAnON· ARC,...,111rrrrr1''1:'EcroRAL COMMI'ITEE APPLICATION & CIIECKLIST (for New Jlo~e Colldrucdon projects) · Submit1a1Date: Bstimated StartDate! EstimatedCamplctionDate: ·__...______ ----------~----- SUBMriTA.L REQUJREMENTS: Two Copie$ ~eh ofltaos 1, 2 & 4 need to b'e mbmitt~. · (Check-o1f.itcms at.tachedto thc.AppHcation. FiG in apac.enss·indicated.) . . __ f?~ · · 1.· ~ftc· Plan Drawing (l"""' 10" or l" • 20' ~) ~-~ foRowiD,g iDfo.rmat.ion shoWn:. Lot, Block~ Subdivision I~BD;~C. · S!Rc:t Ackhus ofProjcct. . Building Setback Lmes (also .fill-in the -'4oxtest dl~ between pr9perty Jine fo the exterior wall closest to that ptOjJerty Hne). Please ~ .11ware that .alllJu,ildiDg-Setbac:k Liqcs are taken from your Property Line Y.msll Your Property IJne fs 'NOT tbe Curb Line!! · From Setback: Left S.ide Setback! Rigbt. Side Setback: Rear Setbaek: ·· .. Page2of 6 . ·. ------·-·-.. ·--· --·-----·--··-·-· -·-. 88/B4/2BB3 21:36 9782438487 PM£ 84 .. .. •" I • ' .. ·. . _/'2. Architc:ctui'alDI1lwings (114" -1' or 118"= 1' scak:)withthefo~wiugiotbnnation.sho'Wll. ~Floor Plan( a) "With overall dimensions (fill-in the 10DoWhJg square fbot ar~). F'JrSt Floor F1uishcd Living Area: Second Floor Fmisbed Living Area: Lower Floor Fmisb:d Liviug Area: Total Finished LMog Aiea: Total Unfinished Livmg Area: Oarage Area: f . . square ttct · "~· ----~:&= ----~feet v lS).OX' ~;feet . ~----~efeet X----~ft:et / Buil~ Ele'Yatiom ~laos fudica~ ~ windo~ exterior materials, banding b.eig1Jt, roof pitch, root:mountecl evctP,Orativ~ coolers, etc. (fill.in maximum hciiht below) • . Maximum building height to highest ridge line or btiilding structural projection ----!cct above top ofStreot curb at :froDt-cr:Dtm' of your lot · · · . / ~ (stmupcc.9 Foundation Pian. · ·. . . . ~ OutbuBdiDgs iDdicatiog dime~ons. el.ns and oveiBllhcdght to ridge lice. Color: 'v/e,.~ \/OoJ Color: f},"t Color: ~;h ~3. Exledor Matcriab (~-in the sclcct.lo~ belo~): . ~ RoofiogMateiial: 30 ~ ... tt~ ~~t ~ Primarys~~ea:.t: A .. e,.ica" u::;( .. ~ J\GCC:Dt~.idiqMatcCal: A.....,iHt~t Drr. ... ~-TrinlMatcdal: A~~"· P,.,_ Tr•"f · . -~ ~Diy~:-. _R_i"'--:'"-a..-~ __ k ___ _ --AJffr--. StuccoMatedal•. IJ lA . Color:· ColDt:. Color: t,Vh~ Ak"t-Nf ts.l fA · ,c. Stcc.l ColOr: \v11;.J.t ~ . St~l CoJor: ~{~ COtOR SAMPLE· COLOR. s.M!PLB COLOR SAMPLE OOLORSAMPLB COLORS4MPLE . P:age3 of 6 .. ... . . .8818412863 21:36 9782438487 PAGE 05 . . -· . . _ __./._ . 4. ~nP.laDSwiththefollowingmmiDJation: ~ Plantiog Plan (indicate &TeaS of irrigated Ia~ tree ,P~ .shrub beds, ground cover, -/ etc.). . . . V Plant Material listing by sped.,s oftn;cs, sbn.tbs and gras&C8. . iZ . Grouo.dco\'CJ' Matcrlal with weed control baaicr. ' ~Fcmces. ~ Other Landooape Improvements {decJcs. site lfgbting. i1ag po~ etc.). · ~ s. v~ Request ('If applicable) Giw details· below: 'r · I/Wo heccby acknowledge ad-IQld~d that o~rfailueto c:ompl.toBome Const:zudion1 Improvetn~t . . r.roJ'ects or Lmadseap.iug Construction witbln the time 4!o~t$ noted In COllditJoas 1 & 3. On Page .6· of this Appli~on ·wlll n:sult in a Notice and Opportunity for a Hearing bef~rit -the: ~MBA Bo_ard_ of · .f).lrecton. HJJWe an foand ~ 'Vf~tiQn «d'the5e Conditions irt tbe lieariag it lrilln.iildf·in a fble te-.~· . . ... Owner of not leu tho ssoo~oo · per month for eadl Ml month in exa!$5 of-the a~~ ~mpletiOJI ·tlm." -~e. . . . . '. . J/We Aereby. aebowledge tluttBo~tt Co~sb'uctioJl or lmpl:OvoBWltP.-ojeds or La.Ddlcapa Consfirucdoil. · featnre;S W:hich. are. built iu uon .. cctllfo~ce wfth· thu full' applicatfqn, in~d~J:.; t\)e Conditl9lll of .Mwrovaln~ted ~D Page 6 of 6_her.du,. JJW-e will be cited by the,DMSA/AC itt~~·60n.fol'Dl .~~thc · · tiiia~ of &cov~. .ijl atenuatlbg d.rcn~biaces a VariaJ!c• iilay .be requested.-~-the BMSMACr p.rovidecl,mdl. V~ce reqaest H~·.is ~hiu the-punriew· ~d spprovaJ·J.urisdi~:.t--of1be BMSAI~C. • ·l;f a· Variai~A:e is na.t-~D~ byt~-.~A/AC alid·.iftbe Na~ol:1for.mlng,ltemJi~r4!'·~o~ ~~~liln . ~ _:60·_da_ :p·dlertJ:Ic date ~f'Written .cifa~on,~cwfl be seJ;Vcd.No4c:·_c ~f aJI~g )t~~ t~c ·lJttfSA ll~.d-, . . of-l>itec:tons; aiid ifJJWe aro f~au~ iu•la~P:Q of tbes~ Nou-(:pJifbtmJne lt..,. at tJt•,B.__rJ:Dg 1/W-G~WW~ .· .'le· An-~4-• mfa:lmu1D {t(. SSOO.OO· p~~fJ:qf~Conformbig .it... ·Nonritbabiu~.-e ·fo~~lilrt: Jhi;e . ~ ·: .:: ··-.a~o:w~edp~~e BMsA Board~~D-andlor Melil~ Co~ee-ma,J. puiwe any leg#l ,, . . · teJJtedy. availab~ lJl tlie .event of a ndD'-c».p1ia:Dce. . . . . ... .. ' Psge4of 6 . . 08/84/2893 .21: 3~ . 9?92438487 ~ ~. . .-·- : : .... · " • • + • •• • +,I" • ... • • • ~ .• . ... . ~ ~ ·· ·. · . . AS PER TBE A:RCBJl:EcrimAL STANDARDs,PLEAB.E INDICATE '1'llE · · ·.r~LLO~G ~-~INTS -oN ~~LOTPLAN AND BELOW:. . . .. .. . . . .. . . . ... . . : · -~~TIONSATEAcHCORNEROF -llJBLO'i.: .. . . ·LO¢ATION. :1. ELBVAllON ( Fmrr i • I • 2. . .. .. ~ .. . . . • 3 . . . ~ . .. . · .. .. . •. 4 . .· s. . .• .. 6.-THB HIGHPOINT OF llmLOT. 7 • .:..nm LOWPOlNT OF TBH LOT. 8.-HBIGHT OF GARAGE FLOOR . .. 9.--HBIGHT OF HQUSE MAlN 'FL(>OR... - ·. .-- . 10-HBiGRl' OF ROOF ABOVE :fot:JNJ).AltON. -· (MAXIMUM-3S FBBT) . . 11.-HBiGBT OF ROOF ABOVE. CENrim. --·. OF.T.HEMZD CURB. . . . · ·c~-22FBBTl . . ·l2~--DR.AiNAGEFLOWLlNBS ON. '11m PLOT PLAN. . . 13.-ROOF PITCHES~:-:--1.----. . .. . . 2..----~ 3 •. --- 4 .. --~ .. . . . l5~-8QUARBl'EBT OF LIVING SPA~: ... · .. ; . -··------ .. .. •. ·. · . . . . P~GE 86 . .. .. .. . . .. . ' l . I . . ... •< . . ae/e412eea 21:36 9782438487 PAGE. 87 ~ . . . . . . .,. . . li'ailurt to pay Jines levied as determined at the -Bearing may also res.Ut m a, Lien bein~ placed Oil yG P:avpeU:y or litlptioll ·Pro~ lnit.iated by the BMSA &ard o!Directo.rs to secure conformance with t fall Application aad its respective Co:ndiuons Of Approval ·. I .. 1/WeUDdentand thatA.rddtectu.ndCummitteeappro;Yaldom.JW>tcoDatmrteapp~~oftheloc:albufidi dq)arfm.BJJt, ckaiaage desip-or lfl"uctunl soUDda.e.s, :nor does it constitute asa~ce that the phi compJ3 'With· an appliaable eodes. regat.tious, ordinances and ~ J/We fiuther admcmledge that any Siibsequc~t tic:ld dl:anges whick J!We may desbe ·~:o:. ~.; BoJ CoiiSbtuclioo or ~rove.tdmt Projects oftlds origlru~l.Applicadoll· SJ~~mJetal ~d the origJual~GDdlfio _ of' Appl'OYal isau~·by the llMBit.IAC lfUlteq~ au additional ~ed App&Citicui.-Sabmif:tal on o behalf,. aud tflat I/Wc. will Dot p.wceed· witlt au:, sldlseqneut :tldd ehaages uum :a ~ed CoadfdQ):lS Approvalbve been Issued OJ 1U by tlle BMSAIAC. · ~IW' -T"l •p I .. p f ~ t -I ~ dO ~ • OYI>lv& £~..,fowt. ~ ~L: . Ow~1s Pf't"wl )10¥\,~..__. ·~)t-=-....(_e_ePe_e lf-b(f_~~ ~-.. ___ .......:D~uii~e. :JC~. _j¥::....:...iv-_~ ' 1 98/84/2883 21:36 9782438487 PAGE 88 I • • 0 ••• ~ ' .. ~ .. '... • • I -. -• 'l1lf:l portion of the Application. Form b to be completed by the · Architec:tura.l Committee (not the AppDcm.t) • . CONDIT1QNS OP APPROVAL or DISAPPROVAL . 1. No sitework or building construction may proceed on any Lot (mclwtiog uo ~site c.~eari~Jc, grubbing, gradealte:ratio~ storing of.m.ateriaJ. mundation examrtion,. extension ofUDdergroUDd ~ etc.) until the Project has received a Project approw1 :fi:o.m the Architcctuml Committee and has been issued aBuilding .Pmnit {~required by Oarfidd County for nt:W home ar .Raoowtion proj~). 2. Allgcnenl buildiog 8Dd site improvPJDNn' co~nibr anyP.roject shall be completed imd sbaJlllaie issued a Certificate of~oy .from the Garfield County Buildiug Dcpaitiiletlt JlP later t1laD ppe Ul . Dar after the issueDce date of this Arnbitenl Connuitts:e AiJlpnnal. ··3. . The complete 1and.scapiDg andrevegetatbnofthc:.improved Lot, to spccificalb' iD,alude the Bm. Jikiaml 1m yard areas; shall be completed no Jau.r than six (6) momm fiwl the date of the Ccrdficate of Occup_ancy~ . . . 4~ . If 'the ~n of.col~ IDd /or landscaping plans are not inc~ with this· application they must be? submitted far approval bclbn: ~action js. tabn to~ the misSing items. s. ~-,. 1. : ~ppB<.ti~:trroVd(lnllla}s of~ Committee Members): .lly: ~ -. . . 7'-"A-----.-- ·.-. · App~~ A.p·ib~1u~t4» G.e above ceudfti&Jis: . Y.., · , r_ t}/_. · ·. Byqi~u-7 ~ ~ . _Date:_lJ_~ __ ~_v __ _ . . . .. . . . . Ap~oD Dcmcd {lniiia~ pf.Atchit~ CoJtVilittee MC1ilbers): . .Qr. _·_....,......_ ~.Denied fOr reuon(t}atated ab~e:· ·Bo CJUt.irman•. . . . .. ,J . -----~~~-----------------------------~:--~-----------.. Pagc6of 6· I I ! IIOIK 011/04101 -,. _ zrt SITE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN -CIWto lido Units 0070,0072,0074, & 0076 -~u: -GRACE HOMES~ Valley VIew VIllage -~ 11 m rn ~ .g ~ ~ ,... m :s· lb ~ ffi -~/01 -, ... :~~ SITE LAYOUT & GRADING PLAN -Clute ...,. Units 0070, 0072, 0074, & 0076 -,.. ai5Wion GRACE HOMES -Valley VIew VIllage .,.. 1101-oa:l GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS · GEOLOGISTS 1441 ~lotor St. Gmnd Junction, CO Hl505 Grace Homes 786 Valley Court Orand Junction, CO 81505 June 22, 2006 Re: Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Job f/92355-GJ Valley View Village, Phases C and D, Battlement Mesa, CO Gentlemen : T EL: (970) 24:!-89611 FA.'\: (970) 242·1561 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel completed a limited geotechnical exploratory program at the above-referenced site. Ten shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity of the proposed buildings, as shown on the attached sketch. These exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of3 feet to 10 feet. These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on May 10, 2006. The purpose ofthesc pits was to detennine the types and character of the in-place overlot grading fill placed on the site to the date of our exploration and the types and character of the underlying subgrade soils, particularly the potential expansive characteristics, and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. The slope stability of the embankment fill overlooking the stormwater detention pond was modeled to confum that the building setbacks are adequate. This particular site was the subject of two previous geotechnical studies conducted prior to initial subdivision development. The principal report is a preliminary geotechnical study, "Proposed Roan Cliff Village Development, Parcels 2-5 and 2-6, Battlement Mesa, Garfield County, CO," prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc ., Job #102 526, dated September 16,2002. A second geotechnical report was prepared by Yeh & Associates, "Test Pit Obscavations, Lots 1-7,38 and 39, Battlement Mesa, Phase ll, Garfield County, CO," Project #24-116, dated Juoe 1, 2005. The Hepworth-Pawlak report provided the principal geotechnical parameters for the design and construction of this subdivision. The Hepworth-Pawlak report identified some areas of low expansive clays and one moderately expansive clay. These expansive clays, combined with the proposed structural fill on the site, presented some limitations on the construction and ultimate performance of individual residential construction. The Yeh & Associates report was a very limited study. It appears that five explomtion pits were excavated to a total depth of approximately 6 feel Bulk samples were obtained, and basic soils classification and moisture determinations were made. This report did not detennine in-place dry density of the soils, nor were relatively undisturbed samples taken for swelVconsolidation testing, so very little additional information is provided that can be utilized for predicting residential foundation perfonnance. L ·· Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 2 The following laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples to determine their relative engineering properties. ASTM D-2487 Soil Classification ASTM D-3080 Direct Shear Strength, Cd ASTM D-2937 In-Place Soil Density ASTM D-2216 Moisture Content of Soil FHA Swell by PVC Meter(ShelbyTube Samples) Tests were performed in accordance with test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials or other accepted standards. The results of our laboratory tests arc included in this report. The in-place soil density, moisture content. and the standard penetration test values are presented on the attached exploration pit logs. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundations within this subdivision but it is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. An additional study was conducted on the slope located at the north end of the development overlooking the storm water detention pond. The purpose of this additional study is to provide a factor of safety for the nssumed developed conditions regarding slope stability and placement of the building foundations at the top of the slope. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Excavation Obseryation: Graod Junction Lincoln DeY ore personnel should be contacted to observe the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed and prior to placing forms or concrete. The pwpose of this is to observe the type and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation. If the soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits, or if they appear to be unstable, additional recommendations may be required prior to construction of the foundations. Soil Classification: During our field exploration of the existing man-made fills and upper 2 to 3 feet of the native soil, three soil types were identified. These soils are all quite similar, being fmc-grained, oflow to vcty low plasticity, and derived from the same geologic source. These in-ploce materials have been naturally reworked due to alluvial activity and wind activity. Soil Type No. I is a slightly sandy lean clay. Soil Type No. II is a somewhat sandier lean clay with some strata being a sandy silty clay. Soil Type No. m is a low plastic, slightly sandy silt The actual characteristics ofthese soils are described on the attached soil analysis and summary sheets. The principal concern of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore was the presence of low expansive strata. A number of tests were made on relatively undisturbed samples obtained using thin-walled shelby tubes and tested in an FHA PVC meter. This method allows a rather quick test to be performed and can be reasonably correlated back to the test methods utilizing the consolidation test apparatus. Based upon our testing of these soils, the possibility of minor amounts of soil expansion being encountered is relatively low; however, the potential appears to exist in both the native and man-made fill soils. Based upon our testing. it would be reasonable to expect between 0.7% and 2.1% sweU under conditions of relatively low swcharge pressure. The corresponding swell pressures range from 236 psfto 645 psf. These particular values may only slightly affect a properly designed and proportioned footing and I i [ I I I ! I i I I l I ! r I • I l I I I ~ Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration. Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 3 stemwall foundation but would affect more noticeable distortion or movement of a thickened edge slab (monolithic-type) foundation system. Man-made Fill: Portions of this site contain newly placed man-made fill, ranging from only a few inches to as much as J 2 I /2 feet measured in test pit # 1 at the northeast comer of the site at the top of the bank overlooking the stormwater retention pond. It is our understanding that more fiJI has been placed over portions of this site since our exploration pits. The site grading map plan, which Lincoln DeVore utilized during some of our soil density testing of utility trench backfiJI, indicates that up to 13 feet of fill can be expected. It is not known if this man-made fill bas been placed under controlled moisture and compactive effort conditions during this subdivision grading. This office does not have any records regarding the placement of the fill and is nol able to verifY the overall condition of fill. Based upon our exploration pits, the majority of the till appears to have been placed in manner that would produce percent compaction results in the range of90 to 1 000/o of the standard proctor (ASTM D-698). Tile native soils typically contain strata with percent compaction significantly less than 90%, with many of these native strata exhibiting slight to moderately severe collapsible properties. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has not been provided with any geotechnical reports or specifications for site improvement, which provide guidelines and requirements for structural fiJI. It is not known what actual requirements are in effect for this fiiJ which is expected to support buildings, slabs and subdivision improvements. Based upon our experience in this area, it is common to have structural fill placed during site grading at a minimum of95% of the soiJ's maximum standard proctor density (ASTM D-698). It is normally required that the fill be placed at a moisture content ranging from -2% to +2% of the optimum moisture content (ASTM D-698). Some modification of these specifications are possible, particularly when dealing with potentially expansive soils. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore typically recommends that the soils be compacted to n minimum of 90% of the soil's modified proctor dsy density (ASTM 0..1 557). The requirements for the moisture content nre usually± 2% of tho optimum moisture, but in the case of slightly expansive soils, the preferred moisture range would probably increase. Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation on this site. In general, the man-made fills and the very upper portion of the native soils were in a slightly damp condition, with the native soils usually being somewhat drier. There exists a distinct possibility of perched water tables developing in the native nlluvia!/debris fan soils which are present across this entire site. There is also the possibility of a perched water table developing in the compacted man-made fills. This perched water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due to the presence of lawns, landscaping and roof runoff. I ! ' I I I I i~ ! l ' I I T I I i ' I 1 : Grace Homes Limited Subsurfuce Soils Exploration, VaUey View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 4 While it is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of our exploration the actual construction progress would not bo affected by any free flowing waters, it is very possible that after development is initiated and for several years later, a troublesome perched water condition may develop on individual lots that will provide some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract. Therefore, it is recommended that the future presence of perched water tables be considered in the design and construction of all proposed residential structures. Prevention of perched water tables, and minimizing the effects of any developed perched waters around residential buildings, is usually accomplished by prudent site grading, good control of roof runoff, and very good compaction practices regarding backfill against structures, backfill of utility trenches, and extra compaction effort in the areas between structures, particularly in narrow side yards that tend to have slow to very slow swface drainage. In the experience of Grand Junction Lincoln De Yore, good attention to site grading, drainage, and particularly compaction of all backfills is more effective than the installation of shallow perimeter drains around foundations. In some instances, particularly in the side yards between two structures, a shallow drain may be required Foundation T)l)e Recommended: The foundation recommendations contained in the Hepworth- Pawlak geotechnical report provide general design infonnation for a standard continuous spread footing and stem wall-type foundation system . The preliminary allowable bearing pressure for this foundation system was given as I,SOO psfto 3,000 ps£ Further note was made that if expansive clays are encountered in the building areas, removal or redesign may be required. The recommendations are general in nalure as is typical with a preliminary geotechnical study. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore has significmtt experience in the Battlement Mesa area, and on a preliminary basis, provides the following recommendations for lightweight single and attached residential foundation systems. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore Foundation Recommendatiops: Assuming that some amount of differential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foundation system, possibly underlain by up to 18 inches of structural fill (may be native, reworked soils) and placed in accordance with the recommendations contained within this report, may be utilized . The foundation would consist of continuous spread footings beneatb all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concenlratcd load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of 1,500 psf maximum and 500 psf minimum. Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage. and inspection are considered extremely important and must be followed . Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within ± 200 psf at all points . Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 1 SO psf less than tho average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing wiJJ depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single story, slab on grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on tho basis of dead load plus one-half live load for up to three stories. I I I I I I I I ! l l t I I i i j ·. · · Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22. 2006 Page 5 If the potential effects of frost heaving are either mitigated or discounted, and if the design of the upper structure is such that loads can be balanced reasonably well, and if minor amounts of differential settlement can be tolerated, a floating structural slab or raft type of foundation could be used on this site. If the slab is to be a floating structural slab (similar in appearance to the "monolithic" slab), the slab should be underlain by a minimum of 2 feet of noo.expan.sive and non frost-susceptible fill. placed in accordance with recommendations contained in this report. Such a slab would require heavy reinforcing to resist differential bending. This structural slab, using the granular structural fill as part of the foundation system. could be designed osswning the top of the structural fi]) bas a modulus of subgrade reaction ofk = 220 pci. If large concentrated loads are located in the interior of this fil~ or if minor construction problems are encountered in the placement of the fill, the use of gcosynthetic fabric or geogrid as part of the fill construction would significantly improve the perfonnance of the fiiJ and foundation system. It is possible to design either the floating structural slab or the raft type of slab either as a solid or ribbed slab, but in either case a rimwaJI must be used for confinement Any such slab must be specifically designed for the anticipated loading. Such a foundation system will settle to some degree as the softer, underlying soils consolidate, but differential movement is held to a minimum. Because the soils may settle in varying amounts, some minor cracking and heave arc possible unless the slabs are specificaUy designed with the movement in mind. Structural FiiVSoil Improvement For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system, a structural fill may be required to replace any upper metastable soils, low expansive soils, or to provide a non frost heave-susceptible subgrade. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fill beneath concrete slabs on grade. Any existing metastable soil, expansive soil, or frost susceptible soil beneath slabs should be removed to a minimum depth up to 1-1/2 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation and at least 2 feet below the bottom slab elevation for a thickened edge structural slab. The excavation/fill width is to extend at least 16 inches from the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad in contact with the fill. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended that the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to ensure that on adequate overexcavation depth has indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man-made fill. At the specific direction of the geotechnical engineer, water soak the overexcavated portion of the site for at least 1 day prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The purpose of this wetting or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgradc soils and to allow proper subgrade. This wetting or soaking must be controlled and must not be allowed to adversely affect nearby structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgrade soils are to be mechanically compacted to a minimum of86% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) for a depth of at least 6 inches. Once this examination has been completed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained, non-expansive, non free-draining, man-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the properly prepared sub grade soils. Non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. The upper 6 to 12 inches (minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (-3/4 inch and GMIGW) or a gravelly sand (-3/4 inch and SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the I I , I I I I I j l I I ! ! r I I I I I I l i L ! I I l I I i • , i I .. Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soi1s Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 6 overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of90% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture content± 2%). Very low expansive to non-expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill if specifically approved by the geotechnical engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be placed as structural fiJI in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction . These soils must not be over- compacted but compacted wet ofthe soirs "optimum" moisture content These soils should be placed at a minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92% of the soil's maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D- 1 557). These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being wet of the optimum moisture content. These soils must be placed at optimum moisture content or up to 4% over optimwn moisture content. The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting. or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confum the quality of tho compacted fill produc4 it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum2-foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill, at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the C<Jilection of water in the soils and fill beneath the structure. Reinfcm:jng: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 10 feet. Where the foundation stemwalls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 55 pcf would be appropriate for the native and the man·made fill soils. Floor Slabs: Non-5tructural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from ali structural portions of this building and alJowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible sluinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any toan·mnde fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of9001o of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM 0.1 557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum moisture· content± 2% ). Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that_ the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from tbe building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend ' 1 I I 1 I I j I I i i I ! r l I I I f ; i I l I I l I ·. Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration. VaJiey View VHJage, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 7 on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2% and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least S feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharge a minimum of 10 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a "dry well discharge'; be used on this site unless specifically sited by a geotechnical engineer. Plaoterst if anyt should be constructed so that moisture is not alJowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping, and valves be installed no less than S feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water docs not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not be limited to: Metering the irrigation water. • Sizing the irrigation distn"bution service piping to limit onsite water usage. • Encourage efficient landscaping practices. • Enforcing reasonable limits on tho size ofhigh water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building or foundation. • Incorporating "xeriscaping11 landscaping and irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If fubJre moisture problems develop or are anticipat~ the foundation design engineer or the geoteclmical engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Provided that all recommendations fowtd herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading, and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished bnsemcnts, however, the usc of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development Backfill; To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557). The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking. jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below j i I i I I l r I I l I I I I t ! I i t I I I r ! I t I I t ! i ! I l t l I •. Grace Homes Limited Subswface SoiJs Explomtion, Valley View ViUage, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 8 foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of90% of its maximum modified proctor dry density {ASTM 1)..1557). These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually proctor optimum content± 2%). Cement IYPe: TypeD, Type I-~ or TypeD-V cement is recommended for all concrete in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type~ Type 1-D, or TypeD-V cement under any circumslances. Remarks: We recommend that the bottoms of all foundation components rest a minimum of 3 feet below fmished gmde or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on ftozen soils. Slope Stability Analvsis: Slope stability calculations were performed on the existing embankments overlooking the stormwater detention pond. The stability analysis addresses the individual slope and the "global" condition of the entire embankment. The soils were subjected to wetting due to lawn irrigation and frequent use of the storm water detention pond. Saturation of the lawn areas and the slope toe at the detention pond were modeled using the SEEP/W module. The analysis was performed using the PC software SLOPEIW module within GeoStudio 2004, Version 6.19, Geo-Siope International L TO, Calgwy, Alberta, Canada. The analysis utilized the Limit Equilibrium Theory for the factor of safety, incorporating the following four methods. Fellenius or Ordinary Method == Bishop Simplified Method • Janbu Simplified Method = Morgenstem-Price Method = Moment Equilibrium Moment Equilibrium Force Equilibrium Moment and Force Equilibrium The Morgeostem-Price Method, incorporating both Moment and Force Equilibrium Theory is generally considered to be the more "accurate" of the four methods. The Fellenius or Ordinary, Bishop Simplified, and the Janbu Simplified Methods arc commonly utilized in older slope stability software and are included for comparative purposes. No seismic coefficient was assumed in these calculations. Several models were assumed for the existing embankments. The critical model assumed that lawn irrigation would be excessive, causing seepage on the upper slope and complete saturation of the slope toe area. Based on slope stability calculations, the constructed fill slope is reasonably stable. The analysis indicated that the embankments have a suffacient factor of safety, equal to or greater than 1.5. The majority of low factors of safety indicate that the steeper slopes arc "sloughing .. under the conditions of nearly saturated embankment fill. I t I I I I I i I I I t I I I I f I I f l I I r r I 1 I l I f J ·. Grace Homes Limited Subsurface Soils Exploration, Valley View Village, Phases C and D June 22, 2006 Page 9 Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibiJity that the necessruy steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The fmdings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly. the fmdings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subjectto review and should not be relied upon after a period of3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and oro based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions nrc encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental reconunendations can be provided, if appropriate. · Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, INC. ~~~~ r;; Edward M . .Moms, P .E. Principal Engineer GJLD Job# 92355-GJ I l I I I I I f i I i I I I I I ! I ; CRincAL DRAJHAG£ ZOH~ TliiCE' 'IH£ liiDJH ~ 'IH£ OIIJ(11NAl. O'CAVAliCW UIDT (VAIIIES -lti!NIUtJAI OF 5 FaT FROM lltltDIHO) $OIL ltlll'AMJJ ...... IIU1' lO I.UICISI:AI'£. US( \D" Mlllt UK' 'lll'l: PUNJS .,~ ~ l'I'CNI'.a/0 IIIJ)/114 1111' 'clill'ICAI. 11/fAIHAt:E tCIIC'. R(J(!I' DOIWSPWT"'"" DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION nwa 1H£ IIIOJH OF !HE ORIGNAL DCAVAJ7CW IJ.IIIT ( VARIES -I.IIN/JIIAI OF IJ FrET FROU SUitDWt: ) INSTALL DRAIN AS REQUIRED BY ~NG1N£ER. SEE N01tS fOR DETAILS. - • FILL TO EXTEND BENEA m ALL FOUNDA T1DN D.EMENTS. SEe NOTES GEDTEXTILE r ABRIC such ns Contech C-180 or Mlrnf'l 500-X AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE I LANDSCAPING CONCEPT I 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, Inc. GEO'l'ECBHICAL 2NCINEERS-OEOLOOJS'l'S EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / NONE IDI LANDSCAPING CONCEPT DA'Ii: 9-16-2005 "'' O-DRAIN2 l l I r I . PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing GRAND JUNCTION LINCOlN -DeVORE, Inc. NO SCALE SITE LOCATION DIAGRAM VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phose C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand JunctJon, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM L ! PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing SKETCH From G.J.L.D. Field Per-Sonnel Notes SLOPE LOCATION DIAGRAM GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN • DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I ; I l ! I i ! r l i ! L i t I l ! l l t ~ ; i i .~. PLAN Adapted From HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING Drawing SKETCH From G.J.L.O. Field Personnel Notes GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. £. rP-t }.1/lc.~ P~~~E Tesr ~r-s-~IO·It. S · HI-t I Hi!PtiMitT/f-PAIIIIAI( T~.,. 8~~Nt~--?·t!J·tn. · NO SCALE PIT LOCATION DIAGRAM I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction. Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM ' j I [ ! l I r l ' I I i ! ! i ! j j ! }: .l i ! I I EXPLORATION PIT NO. 1 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: NORTHEAST CORNER of SITE, LOT 24 WATER (FT.) 5 10 15 TH DEP (FT .) - - - -5 - - - - -10 --- --15 SOIL LOG ~,r.. 1 I I~ r: ~ .- DESCRIPTION % CL LEAN CLAY SJ. SANDY I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE Sf . MOIST MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY 107.2 15.0% STRATIFIED Strata of LOW DENSITY 96.6 15.4% CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANOY S/.MOIST 103.7 10.7% I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE MEDIUM DENSITY Sf. MOIST 15.0% MAN-MADE FILL CL LEAN CLAY SI.SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY I Sl. COMPRESSIBLE Sf. MOIST 13.3% ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE ND NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 12·112' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J . EXPLORATION PIT NO. 2 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: SOUTH PORTION, LOT 24 Torvane DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf % CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY SJ.MOIST l!Q_ 100.5 13.2% 51. COMPRESSIBLE .§!___ 105.3 10.4% AUUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 104.8 10.2% -ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY SI.DAMP NO Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA LOW DENSITY 5 97.1 13.6% ST 86.8 16.5% STRATIFIED -- 10 ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE _ NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE~ 15 Pit Total Dtpth: 4' NO Free Water During Ob1ervation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRAND JUNCTION UNCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. GRACE HOMES Inc. Grand Junctioa, Colorado Date 6-17-1006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I I ! J I ' I I ; ! j i' l I 2 -. EXPLORAnON PIT NO. 3 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 25 & 28 Torvane DeNSITY WATER (FT.) LOG DESCRIPTION psf pet % • , CUT AREA for SITE GRADING DRY -• ALLUVIAL/DEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf -. ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY l!Q_ 88 .3 10.1% -~ COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Ill DRY ST 6.2% .-I I STRATIFIED MEDIUM DENSITY 5 s_. 100.4 9.6% -l!Q_ ---- 10-10 -----ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE -NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15-15 Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PrT NO. 4 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PrT lOCATION & ElEV.: Property Line LOT %7 & 28 Torvane DENSITY WATeR (FT.) LOG DESCRIPTION psf pcf % I I I CUT AREA for SITE GRADING 51. DAMP I -- I ML SANDY SILT MOISTND -I _, a! Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA Strata of LOW DENSITY 89.1 19.5% ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS , Qa/Qdf DRY~ 84.1 9.0% I 5-I STRATIFIED 5 I -i -MOISTURE ACCUMULATION ABOVE 3' -i --l --i i 10-10 I I -1 I -! --ST SHELBY TUBE DENSilY/MOISTURE j -) NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE ! 15-15 ' Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 ' i I Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mounlaln Valley Construction, G.J. 4 ~ j LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION i ~ • t ' VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D a Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Ioc. Date UNCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6.17-1006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. I Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM .. .. I ~--------------------------------------------------------------~3 I I TH .) DEP (FT SOIL LOG EXPLORATION PIT NO. 5 PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property UnelOT 14 & 15 DESCRIPTION SHEAR SOIL Torvane DENSITY WATER lpsf _pcf_ % ~/ ~ CL MAN-MADE FILL MEDIUM DENSITY l:!!L_ 110.3 11.2% - '1. ·l - - .-5 -----10 --- - -15 TH DEP (FT SOIL .) OG _, I"' -· ' DRY ST 106.8 6 .9% ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY -Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ~ 89.1 12.7% STRATIFIED ~ - __1Q ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 3' NO Free Water Curing Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATIONPIT NO. 6 SHCAR SOIL PIT LOCAnON & ELEV.: NORTH PORTION, LOT 23 Torvane DENSITY WATeR DESCRIPTION psf PCf % ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY - '~ Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA SI.DAMP NO 89.8 18.1% -t ALLWIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 15.6% -.. 5 • I --~ I -I '!: --10 -----15 MEDIUM DENSITY-5 STRATIFIED -Strata of LOW DENSITY ML SANDY SILT DRY Ni)" 922 8.1% Ill COLlAPSIBLE STRATA MEDIUM DENSITY ST 96.6 4.6% 10 ---ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE- 15 Pit Total Depth: 8' NO free Water During ObservaUon: 5·10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlemeot Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Graod Juoctioo, Colgrado Job No. Drawn 91355-GJ EMM Date 6-17-1006 I J 1 j I ' l i j l TH DEP (FT .) _I - SOIL LOG I I ' I EXPLORAnoN PIT NO. 7 PIT LOCATION & EI.EV.: Property Une LOT 22 & 23 DESCRIPTION CUT AREA for SITE GRADING ML SANDY SILT Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA SHEAR SOIL Toi'Van• DENSITY WATER psf pcf % NO 92.2 9.4% - I IE ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 81.1 13.4% -5 5 --- - -10 --- - -15 DEPTH SOIL (FT.) 5 10 15 Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 4' 645 psf@ 2.1% SweU 93.2 6 .0o/o 107.5 6 .9% - 10. ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE- 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5·10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Pro Une LOT 20 & 21 WATER DESCRIPTION % MAN-MADE FILL CL LEAN CLAY Sl. SANDY MEDIUM DENSITY SI.DAMP NO 95.8 15.2% II Sl. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 2' 286 p&f@ 0.7% SWell 106.3 13.2% Strata of LOW DENSITY 89.3 11.5% ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSilY DRY 99.2 4.7% Ill COLLAPSIBLE STRATA ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 4' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES In~ Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM Date 6·17-2006 I i r i I i I J I i I r I I ! l j I i f •. ~----------------~1 5 I EXPlORATION PIT NO. 9 SHEAR SOIL DEPTH SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 18 & 19 Torvene DENSITY WATER (~.) ~LOrG~r-----------~~--~D-E~S~C~RI_P~TI=O~N------------------~~P~t&f __ ~P~Icf~-+~%~~ " ~~ MAN-MADE FILL -." " ML SANDY SILT LOW DENSITY -' "-1 1J COLLAPSIBLE STRATA . = 1'-I ~ ~ ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf 5_~~/! CL-Ml SILTYCLAY LOWDENSITY _ Jla SJ. EXPANSIVE STRATA@ 5' 62 psf@ 0.3% Swell -SI.DAMP NO 87.6 14.9% DRY ST 90.7 11 .0% ~ DRY !:!Q__ 94.5 10.1','o MEDIUM DENSITY ST 89.6 4.1% -Strata of LOW DENSITY 97.0 6 .1% - 10--- -ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE -NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE~ 15-15 ~--~~--~----~--~--------~~--~------~~--~~~--~~~~--~ Pit Total Depth: 5' NO Free Water Durmg Observation: 5-10-2006 TH DEP (FT .) ----5 --- - -10 - - -- -15 SOIL LOG ~ ! Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. EXPLORATION PIT NO. 10 SHEAR SOIL PIT LOCATION & ELEV.: Property Line LOT 18 & 17 Torvant DENSITY WATER DESCRIPTION psf pcf % MAN-MADE FILL .!iQ_ 110.3 14.4% CL LEAN CLAY MEDIUM DENSITY Sl. DAMP I COMPRESSIBLE Slrata of LOW DENSITY ~ 87.5 19.6% ALLUVIAUOEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf ST 109.0 7 .8% ML SANDY SILT MEDIUM DENSITY DRY 5 II COLLAPSIBLE STRATA - 10 ST SHELBY TUBE DENSITY/MOISTURE NO NUCLEAR DENSITOMETER DENSITY/MOISTURE 15 Pit Total Depth: 3·1/2' NO Free Water During Observation: 5-10-2006 Pit Excavated By: Tracked Excavator, Mountain Valley Construction, G.J. LOG OF SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. GRACE HOMES loc. Grand Junction, Colorado Date 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM I l f I l l I I [ I ·I I ! r I ! i Soil Sampl e: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: I (Typical) Geologic Oria in: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test b~: LRS Natural Water Content (w}: 10.70.4 Pit No.: 1 Depth: 5' In-Place Density (pcf): 103.7 Soil S_pecific Gravit~ (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEl SAND SILT to CLAY 100 "" Effective size mm 90 Cu Cc 80 70 -Plastic Limit (PL) 18 Uquid Limit (LL} 30 0)60 Plasticity Index (PI} :1a c: Skempton's Activity 0.3 ·u; :Qso Shrinkage Limit {SL) ll. Shrinkage Ratio -• ffi <40 ~ ~ (I) ll. 30 20 -DIRECT SHEAR: co Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg . Tan Shear: 0 :!& 12.5 9.5 4~ 2 0.85 0.42 5 0.15 0 .~ 0.02 0.005 Cohesion : psf 125 75 50 37 .5 25 Particle Grain ize {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5 " 125 ASTM Method: D-§9!! A D 4718-0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pet 2 " 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell: 1" 25 ~~~Allowed 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell 3/4" 19 lib! Sam12l~r Displacement 300 psi : psf 1/2" 12.5 2-112" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 AllOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolldometer #4 4 .75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 Unconfined Compression (qu): esf #20 0.85 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psr #40 0.425 100 CONSOLIDATION : @ psf #100 0.15 99 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0.075 94 .2 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm 0.02 42 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 30 K (20 C): Remolded emf sec @....N SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. I Drawn Grand Junction, Colorado 9235S..GJ EMM 1 I I I : I I I I I I I I i I i I I I I I I ! I I I i l • j I i i i I j i l j r i l Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY (CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: I (Typical} Geologic Origin : MAN-MADE FlU From Alluvial Debris Fan Soils Test b~: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 7.8% Pit No.: 10 Depth: 2' In-Place Density (pet): 109.0 Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): Estimated COB8LE to GRAVEL SANO SILT to CLAY 100 ~ ~ ~ Effective size mm 90 Cu ' Cc 80 70 Plastic Um it (PL) 19 \ Liquid Limit (LL) 35 CJ60 Plasticity Index (PI) 16 c: Skempton's Activity OA ·u; m so Shrinkage Limit (SL) a.. Shrinkage Rallo -~ ai 40 -" ~ G) a.. 30 20 -DIRECT SHEAR: CD Pcok Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 ~ 12.5 9:5 ·~ 2 o.as o.425 o.1s o.~ o.o2 o.oos Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 Particle Grain ize {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-691 A D 4718 • 0% Rock Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf 2'' 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 M§!ximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 §l~eAIISM~ 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Swell 3/4" 19 all! Sam12lgr Displacement 300 psi : psf 1/2" 12.5 2-112" Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression (gu): ~f #20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 97 CONSOUDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 94 CONSOUOATION: @ psf #200 0.075 85.3 SULFATE SALTS: .ss ppm 0.02 44 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 34 K (20 C): Remolded ~ ~ SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa_!_ Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. J Drawn Grand JuncUon, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM 2 I .. Soil Sample: LEAN CLAY {CL) Sl. Sandy Sample No.: II (Typical) Geologic Origin: MAN-MADE FILL From Alluvial Debris Fan Solis Test by: LRS 100 80 70 C) 60 c 'ii5 fG so 0.. ~ 40 CD a. 30 20 10 0 . Natural Water Content (w): 13.2% Pit No.: B Depth: 2' In-Place Density (pe0: 106.3 Soil Specific Gravltv (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL SAND SILTtoCLAY mm .._, ~l Effective size Cu 1\ Cc '~ Plastic Limit (PL) ~ i\ liquid Limit (LL) 29 Plasticity Index {PI) ! \ Skempton's Activity 2.2 1 Shrinkage Umit (SL) ~ Shrinkage Ratio -\~ DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. Shear Angle: deg . Tan Shear: 125 75 so 37 .5 25 w~ 12.s e.s 4ZP 2 o.a5 o.425 o.1s o.~J£ o.o2 o.oo5 F'article Grain 'Size {mm} Cohesion: psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 112" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 (mm) 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 %Passing 100 99 98 94 73.2 44 32 Maximum SjzeA!Iowed By Samc!er ~ GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN -DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-O~o Roa:k Correction Max. Dry Density : per per Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soli Swell: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: .Q:lli Swelt Displacement 300 psi: lli psf Expansion @ 300 psi: sf Remolded Sample ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): psf by Consolidometer Standard Penetration (SPn: psf by Penetrometer Unconfrned Compression~(.;,.qu;;;z.)'-: ___ -..~;;ps:;;.f ___ _ COLLAPSE@ Wetting: @ psf CONSOUDATION: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf SULFATE SALTS: ~ppm PERMEABILITY: K (20 C): Remolded SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa, Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6·17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355·GJ EMM 3 I I I r I l I I i I ' ! I ' ! ! I L 1 I i ! I i I ' Soil Sample: SIL TV CLAY (CL·ML) 51. Sandy Sample No.: II a (Typical) Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS, Qa/Qdf Test by: LRS Natural Water Content (w): 4.1% Boring Nc4o.: 9 Depth: 6' In-Place Density (pcf): 89.6 Soil SpecifiC Gravity (Gs): Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEL ::IAIIIU ;)ILl IOI.OU\T 0 ~ ~ Effective size 0 "~ Cu Cc ,, Plastic Limit (PL) 22 ll -i\ liquid Limit (LL) n Plasticity Index (PI) § _\ Skempton's Activity gJ_ ' Shrinkage limit (Sl) Shrinkage Rat io 10 9 eo 70 mm ' I 20 -DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res. 10 Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: 0 125 75 50 37.5 25 -w. 12.5 9.5 4.]' 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0 .~ 0.02 0.005 Cohesron : psf Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 314" 112" 3/8" #4 #10 #20 #40 #100 #200 ?'article Grain 'Size {mm} {mm) % Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4 .75 2 0 .85 0.425 0 .15 0.075 0 .02 0.005 100 99 95 87 75.4 40 28 Maximum Size Allowed By Samoler z:m:: GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN M DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado ASTM Method: D-698 A D 4718-0% Rock Correction Max. Dry Density : pcf pcf Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi : Expansion @ 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARING (net}: Standard Penetration (SPT): sf FHA Soli Swell: 0.3% Swell ~ psf Remolded Sample psf by ConsoJidometer psf by Penetrometer Unconfined Compression~(.;:J;qu::L)·=--· ___ ..,L::..:.._ __ _ psf COLLAPSE @Welting: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf CONSOLIDATION: @ psf SULFATESALTS: ~ ppm PERMEABILITY: K (20 C): Remolded ~ @_R£f SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesa Colorado GRACE HOMES Inc. Date Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Job No. Drawn 92355-GJ EMM 5 i I I 1 I I I ~ I t-- 1 i l I j I j l I Soli Sample: LOW PLASTIC SILT (ML) SL Sandy Sample No.: Ill (Typle.l) Geologic Origin : ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS 1 Qa/Qdf Test bl LRS Natural Water Content (w): 6.0% Pit No.: 7 Depth: 3' In-Place Density (PCf): 93.2 Soil Specific Gravity (GsJ : Estimated COBBLE to GRAVEl SAND SILTIOClAY 100 r-. ~ Effective size mm 90 ~ Cu Cc 80 70 Plastic Limit (PL) E Liquid Limit (LL) 22 en SO · Plasticity Index (PI) ~ ·~ Skempton's Act ivity 0.1 :a !50 Shrinkage Umlt (SL) Q. Shrinkage Ratio ..... ai <40 ~ ~ Q) D.. 30 . ~ 20 DIRECT SHEAR: CD Peak Res . 10 -Shear Angle: de g. Tan Shear: 0 Cohesion: psf 125 75 50 37.5 25 1j4 12.5 9.5 <C.« 2 0.85 0.<425 0,15 O.PJa, 0.02 0.005 Particle Grain lze {mm} Sieve (mm) %Passing MOISTURE I DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: 5" 125 ASTM Method: D-§9~A D 4718-0% Roe.k Correction 3" 75 Max. Dry Density : pet pcf 2" 50 Optimum Moisture : 1-1/2" 37.5 Maximum HVEEM-CARMANY: FHA Soil Swell: 1" 25 Sg!;!AI~~ 'R' Value @ 300 psi: 2.1% Swell 3/4" 19 all: ~amoler Displacement 300 psi: 645psf 112" 12.5 2:1!'2: Expansion @ 300 psi: psf Remolded Sample 3/8" 9.5 ALLOWABLE BEARJNG (net): psf by Consolidometer #4 4.75 Standard Penetration (SPT): psf by Penetrometer #10 2 100 Unconfined Compression {gu): ESf #20 0.85 98 COLLAPSE @Wetting: @ psf #40 0.425 97 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #100 0.15 95 CONSOLIDATION: @ psf #200 0.075 86.6 SULFATE SALTS: ~ ppm 0.02 36 PERMEABILITY: 0.005 22 K (20 C): Remolded ~ @_p,g SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE, Phase C & D Battlement Mesl!t_ Colorado GRAND JUNCTION GRACE HOMES Inc. Date LINCOLN ~DeVORE, Inc. Grand Junction, Colorado 6-17-2006 Geotechnical Consultants Job No. /Drawn Grand JuncUon, Colorado 92355-GJ EMM .. I i i j I J I I i I j i I f I I ! I I ' ! ' I I I ! t ! ! l l ; l . i r FEET · View Is lo West BASIC PROBLEM SLOPE OVERLOOKING TilE STORM WATER DETENTION POND, SEEP\W ANALYSIS VALI.EYVIEW Sub. BATTlEMENT MESA. CO. FILLED SLOP!! OVERLOOKING STORM DETl:NTlON POND 923l!S Slilblllt lnfgaled .gsZ 11127/20011 SEEP T,_nsilnl 20 o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ oo m ~ oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ FEET ·View Is lo West SEEP\W ANALYSIS The Site has been developed, the Yard areas are Landscaped and I-IDA VII.. Y IRRlGATED. Standing Water is in Front Yard and Seepage is occUlTing on Slope leading to the Pond. The Storm Water Detention Pond is heavily used, due to Storm Runoff and Irrigation Rwtoff. The soils beneath the Pond and at the Toe of the Slope are SATURATED in about 20 feet into the TOE. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, lac. GEon;cuNICAL EHGIHE.Ii:IIS -GEOLOGISJS Fjgure I V AILEY VIEW VILLAGE Phase C & D GJLD I# 92355-GJ, June 28, 2006 : l I i i t ! l V.AU.EY VIEW Sd. IIATl\DIEHT lot~ CO. FUED lii..OPE OVEAI.OOIUNG BTOIIMDEll:NTIOII POND tln55 lllolllllolmglfed 81ape.ru 11121112008 SlaPE .. ...,.._ :10 • • . . . . • SLOPE\ W ANAL YSJS The previous SEEP\ W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1. (F.S. = 1.023) is shown. We recommend the Pond Sides be well compacted, to prevent this modeled deep penetration of water into the SJope Toe. FEET · View Is to West SLOPE\W ANALYSIS The previous SEEP\ W analysis was utilized for the soil moisture parameters and the most extensive failure at or near a Factor of Safety of 1.5 (F .S. = 1.494) is shown . The computed failure surface is more than 40 feet from the structure and foundation . GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN De VOllE, Inc. CEOTJ:CIINIC.U. ENCIHEEIIS • CEOLOCISJS Figure II VALLEY VIEW VU..LAGE Phose C & D GILD II 923,S·G1, June 28, 2006 I I l I I I I I J I i l I I J l ; . Parcel Detail Page 1 of 2 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information A sse ss orffreasurc r_~rQJ~e_ny_5_garch I Assessor Subset Q ue ry I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Recemion Search Basic Buildin g C haracteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 080 II R043096 II 240718104023 II 39.826 I Owner Name and Mailing Address IDARTERLLC I j786 VALLEY COURT I IGRAND JUNCTION, CO 81505 I Legal Description ISECT,TWN,RNG:18-7-95 SUB:VALLEY jVIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C & D jLOT:23 PRE:R040986 BK:586 PG:524 IBK:0615 PG:0487 BK:1831 PG:941 jRECPT:704369 BK:1812 PG:167 jRECPT:700392 BK: 1807 PG:663 jRECPT:699425 BK: 1767 PG:909 jRECPT:691345 BK:1767 PG:899 jRECPT:691343 BK:1767 PG:887 jRECPT:691342 BK:l756 PG:427 jRECPT:688665 BK: 1756 PG:422 jRECPT:688664 BK: 1754 PG:986 l jRECPT:688326 BK:1546 PG:979 jRECPT:643048 BK:l546 PG:964 jRECPT:643045 BK: 1546 PG:954 jRECPT:643041 BK:1546 PG:946 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelN umber=2407181 04023 2n12007 Parcel Detail IRECPT:643039 BK:1518 PG:822 jRECPT:636574 BK:0748 PG:0893 IBK:0642 PG:0065 BK:0641 PG:0278 Location I Physical Address: jjt8 CLIFF VIEW CIR PARACHUTEj I Subdivision: I VALLEY VIEW VILLAGE SUB PHASES C&D Land Acres: Jlt.l17 I Land Sq Ft: Jlo I Section II Township II Range I 18 II 7 II 95 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Land: II Improvements: II Total: II 1~1 =====S=a=le =Da=te9: I __ Sale Price: J 64,68ojj ojj 64,68ojj Assessed Value I 18,7601 oj 18,7601 http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=2407181 04023 Page 2 of2 2/7/2007