Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application - Permit
Garfield County I NO . 10388 I Building & Sanitation Department 108 at'' Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 Owner ~Bet GelD~ \{Q)tJ V'f1 Contractor \---\\iCe [bsL,f'Lt( Amount of Permit $ 6:)(;) .. L( 0 Date JC~i~ Cf-Q-0\- Clerks~ ' A SEPARATE ELECTRJCAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. nns PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUC110N Atn'HORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED wrrnLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUC110N OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED TinS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. AI.!. PROVlSIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING T!:DS TYPE OF WORK wn.L BE COMPLETED WlTHlN WHETiiER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AtmiORITY TO VlOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUcriON OR THE PERFORMANCE OF Total Fee; Da fo,3L:.2 '-ICJ OCC Group: -;::I!!..L Const. Type: .3Z'"!3 ISDS No. & Fee: f.GREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANrED TO THE APPUCANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAlLED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMlTI"ED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY wrm ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGUlATIONS ADOPrED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AtrrHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPIL£0 WITH IN THE LCOATION, EREcriON, CONSTRUcriON, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRlBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED. BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTiiER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUU.OING omciAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUlRING THE CORREC110N OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VlOLATION oF'THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF ntiS JURISDIC110N. THE REVIEW OF SUBMnTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONsrrrtJTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSmiLlTIES OR UABurtES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORs, OMlSSIONS OR DISCREPENCtES. THE RESPONSI BllJI"(FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUcriON RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. ? d $ 5CfOD.•~TlHAVELi~~THEAGREEMEHTABoVE_..,,~ P \a.n J; -R~ c:r QQ&; 3'-CJ-.LJ7 ' . ftl~l~·40 C h -t::t=: CF!Cf 010 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; · 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all me and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to w~ere water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and afinal inspectio~ made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any fmal sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS.ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O . WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occup alj.· C}'-!JW~e issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit#-"-*· ~U~~~ .... ~D--:c......r..fr""-- . i~~~y=-TMA- Stgnature Bpapplicationfeb2006 ,• 03.08.07 Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant '-./CJ \A N y Address LJ. o,,"""llNQ A=~ct.. (?J Date 3 -Z$ -c?:J Finished (Livable Area): Main 41.. "2.'-{ X ?'1 l.B o:. Upper '7.. ~3 X 1"1 u Lower 7() z... A /"I t.B :: Other Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfinished Subdivision /t5p61-1 41-JiW ~ I\ 'J / Lot/Block 6 'L Contractor J'vlllo!.E GA5Le 1 1'1s-,3co 3 z 'i~ I S.l._l&.f"\ 5:2 '12..1) '$J Conversion of Unfinished t o Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation '-}15 '1 X I f" ::. ') .., I 'l ~ 'Z t;ICJ Valuation Crawl Space: Val . I '-11) X li ..:. I ~ 2 7) "c.,. uauon I ..JJ Decks/Patios: Covered .~O'f X '}. ~ I qJ 2.'1 h ,D Valuauon Open 2-LJz_ ..-v Valuation ~ '\ 1 '1. ;24 1 o o oc.. } Total Valuation fo3o oo3 ~ ) .. GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be g iven attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design . Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with 1 decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. 2. 3. N~ Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes X Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes X Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes ----- 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes X 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes X -SEFi.. 5reJCT .s. 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes X-Mt:t:H-~~rc.ALV \/E!'Ire.D 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes 'X 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes X-..SU Sr~lXI.S. 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes )(-SEE: SretXr5. 1 0. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? YesX-:5E£ STII!~. 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes Y. -SEE-SlllrK..T.5 12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes )S 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes '1-. No ------- 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes X No. ______ _ 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes X No. _____ _ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes X No _____ _ 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? -:::L. _ -r Yes No X-ne. Mh_fJuF. SA:cs rte. ..l-ee. 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes X No _____ _ 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes ~ No _____ _ 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted without it. Yes X No. _____ _ 21. Will this e the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No Ifno-Explain:. ______ _ 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes X 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes X No. ____ _ 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes X No ____ _ 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes X No _____ _ 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes ){ N o ____ _ 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes X No ____ _ 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will co llect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building P.ermit ? Yes X' No ____ _ 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes X No _____ _ 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a ~~50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes X No ------ 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy ofthe building? Yes X No _____ _ 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes X No _____ _ 5 33 . Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes X No _____ _ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes 'X No ______ _ 35 . Are you aware, that on the front of the Build ing Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 'X No ----------------- 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes X No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes X I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. ~t:A~:}y~dMI's 03 .08.01 SignaJllre ot\Vner / ~~~ kE.Nr Date Phone: JO.f-Cf7.So (days); (evenings) Project Name: You Nc':r 'Res:c~e:_Nc.E. Project Address: lor B Z , ~S PEN ~~ S:l\BD.-Li\eHoNM-L£., Co Notes : If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process . Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected . Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first 6 position for review, delay in issuance of the penn it or delay in proceeding with construction. BpminreqFeb2005 7 ~ No. -·' 0 3 oO Assessor's Parcel JSQ3~~~ · · .Date Y-9-0 4- 5( B""LDING PERMIT CARD Job Address w ~ n f L\ L''tl) C) Vtd B ~ I<Cl VlC \f) Eel ~ ('O rOOrrtl tr\< Owner Vm~nr~, .eoot. QPXl.\} Address&Y< I~K'Q) <1WS eh~mb#RJ-!-0\:f:\ contractor 'fo:;Lrq, tv\ 1 te Address \65\lGfDCelcoYQ txz .. c~oh~# ld:i--059+ SJttP,acks: Front Rear Rl:l ___ LJ:i Zoning ''g-¥724 ~ r-<?lOJetltvtQJ ~nc~r.lUJ( sf{lce llil ~~~c~~N:rct::s fu-tt Qetretcte Soils Test:------------=---- ;;Footing .6-= Foundat1onL!L.~ Grout ___________ _ Underground Plumbing ~7~ Rough Plumbing ,.g-:Z.:£A~ Framing LJ., &:o 8"fJJ???: -1 Insulation ~-~<J~?/J?'L Roofing ---;;:::------::-:--::r-------- Drywall 5'"""2=a s-~ Gas Piping 3 =~oa /01V"= ~ 1"~41///¢6~~ ~ o~~ ~~c/ "#attiJJ~~ ?.-to~{~ Weatherproofing __________ _ Mechanical ______ __,_..--________ _ Electrical Rough (State) 3-3;:-OfS j3F Electrical Final (State) 7 ~naltCCrBe,-..oc /Checklist Co~ted?...:..../ __ _ Certificate Occup~ncy ~-L€.~0_'.£1_..;;.......~~....---=---- Date ~s~ /0·2~·ct5 NOTES Septic System # __________ _ Date------------ /~ F4· al Other ~ ~ 'l-Jo-c;;B: ;ezz I (continue on back) COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECT IO N N OT ICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ULJ).~~ Permit No. 1 o3~ g I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 1)---d.eO~~.:z,~ ~~~-~ ,t) ~ ~-~~ cJ( ~: ~~ ~)&dl r-AL-~' You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 2-9 -d"? 20 Buildinglnspector ~~--- Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 ' Job located at Sl~ tJ ~11/-~ fj Permit No. /o3 &ff I have this day inspected this structure and these premises a9,d found the fallqwing corrections needed: t)_!Jd'fk +iY .!rom .JofSf ~~ """>~. -rf~ tl~v~J'~t'n-_ • ~.:;;a::L,;;;~ ~!"-B:;:~ .3) -pJ;O,)(iJ~ ~~ ( /n~e.d-ces re..pf>rf ·OH.... £'1 ~dJ wdltar 0 Call for Re-lnspectlon 0 $50.00 Re-lnspectlon Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for i t:~spection at 970-384-5003. Date :3-:J..'[ 20 QS_ Building Inspector __ .,..,/)1k:~ ......... ~----------- Phone (970) 945-8212 COUtJTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone(970)945-8212 Job located at Permit No. I tJ 3~ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed:· )('can for Re-lnspection Cl $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date j() -/6 -cJ g 20 ------:::=---- Building Inspector -~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 14 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECI10NS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date lssued~:'J..~ ...... Zooed Area ............................... Permit No •• J()._~~-~---····· AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the mning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. use ~~ i " I c. ,.... loti-ttre Address or Legal Descnption Va blt/trn ~ ·M ltcfCI <>wuer W":UIIllf, 1/!A/) 16tny Coutas:tor /tll¥e FOS/~tj Sctbub Fmnt Sjdc Sjdc Rear This Card Mwt Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING· WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. TIDS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date lf•9•6/. By f:'}htltt&r-~·/~'!Jb IF PLACED OUTSIDE-COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant '/OWl--? Cq Date 3 -~;, -O'] Building ~Engineered Foundation /Driveway Permit d_Surveyed Site Plan Lseptic Permit and Setbacks LGrade!fopography 30% /Attach Residential Plan Review List L.Minimum Application Questionnaire __ Subdivision Plat Notes '~ 1t1u. ~ IZcv• ~ £ ... ~ 6,1( -tL..-Fire Department Review (:m. r.."""'-- ~ Valuation Determination/Fees L_Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~Attach Conditions / Application Signed LPlan Reviewer To Sign Application ---dParcel/Schedule No. ~ 40# Snow)oad Letter-Man f. Hms. £ Soils Report 3cr:o p~;.;:- GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning __ Property Line Setbac · __ 30ft Stream Setbac s __ Flood Plain ·. John Muir Architects, Inc. Owner Designated Representative Form I, Ro)lert J: Young, do hereby grant John Muir or Alan Augustynowic~, of Jobn . . Muir Architects, permission to represent myself with the Design Review Committee . at Aspen Glen, CarJ>ondnlc and Gadicld County, C9mmunity Development. Department, Glenwood Springs, Colorado for all applications, approvals and 1 submissions for my res~dence on Lot B~2-As~en Glen, Carbondale, Colorado •. ' ~ . I>nte . ' ·. . ' 201 Main Sll'Ce~ Su.ite 1'04, Catbondalc,. Colorado 8162S .r:lton= (970) 704.·9750 Fax: (970) 704·0287 E-1l.1ail: ~ 0 • '· HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL ll\'ruwth·P.t\\"1,,1: Gt,,t ... ·hnt.:;ll, ln .. 5~'X' C.•unn· R<"~a.l ) ).f Glemw~o~.i $rrlnj:.4. C(IJ~,r.lJ<• :'lt:-..'1 f'h••n~: 9il'-9of5 · 79&\ F~:97~9~S-Sof5• email: hM.'t~~hNc•lf(Ch .c~'m SUBSOIL STUDY FORFOUNDATIOND~GN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT B2, ASPEN GLEN DIAMOND A RANCH ROAD GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 106 0946 NOVEMBER 30, 2006 PREPARED FOR: ROBERTANDGENYYOUNG C/0 JOHNMUIRARCBITECfS, INC. ATTN: ALAN AUGUSTYNOWICZ 101 MAIN STREET, SUITE 304 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................ - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... -l - SITE COND1TIONS ....................................................................................................... -2- SUBSIDENCE PO~TIAL ......................................................................................... -2- F1ELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................. -3- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... -3 • DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. -4- FOUNDATIONS ......................................................................................................... -4- FOUNDATION AND RETA1NJNG WAllS ............................................................ -5- FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... -6- UNDERDRAJN SYS'fEM .......................................................................................... -7- srrE GRADING ......................................................................................................... -7 - SURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................. -8- LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... -8- FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 ·LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4-GRADATION TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located on Lot B2, Aspen Glen, Diamond A Ranch Road, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1 . The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Robert & Geny Young c/o John Muir Architects, 1nc. dated November 1, 2006, Proposal No. 133-06. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to detennine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotecbnjcaJ engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered . PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will consist of 1 and 2 stories of wood frame construction over a combination of crawlspace and basement area with an attached garage located on the lot as shown on Figure 1. The lower level will contain a garage/shop area which will have a driveway graded down to it for access. Basement and garage floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 4 to 8 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. lf building loadings~ location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. I 06 0946 -2. SITE CONDITIONS The Jot vvas vacant at the time of our field exploration and is located on the southwest (downhiU) side of Diamond A Ranch Road in the southern pan of the Aspen Glen Subdivision. Previous site grading on the lot consists of shallow cuts and fiiJs performed during the subdivision development. A sewer easement borders the southwest side of the building envelope. The ground surface in the proposed building area is rela1ively flat and moderately sloping down to the southwest at a grade of about 8 percent. There is about 9 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building footprint. The Roaring Fork River is located about 150 feet to the southwest with a current water surface several feet lower in elevation than the building envelope. A steep river escarpment is located between the building envelope and river. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds in the building envelope with brush and cottonwood trees on the escarpment. Gravel and cobbles are visible on the ground surface throughout the building envelope and rounded cobbles and boulders are visible on the steep escarpment. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen Subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits ossociated with Eagle VaiJey Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of locaJized subsidence . During previous explomtion and mapping by Chen-Northern, Jnc. during the subdivision development, sinkholes and broad depression areas were identified at various locations throughout the subdivision. The sinkholes and broad depression areas are believed to be associated with dissolution and warping of the underlying Eagle VaiJcy Evaporite in the Roaring Fork River valley. Job No. I 06 09-t6 -3 · Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area and lhe Jot is located outside of the broad depression areas. No evidence of cavities was encountered in lhe subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively sha11ow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes wiU not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot B2 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 16, 2006. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geoteclmical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 1¥. inch J.D . spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACECONDnnONS Graphic Jogs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about Ylto 1 ~feet of granular fill overlying relatively dense, silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders down to the maximum explored depth of 1 1 feet lob No. I 06 09-16 at Boring 2. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples of the natural granular soils obtained from Boring 1 included narural moisture content and gradation analysis. Results of the gradation analysis performed on small diameter drive samples (minus I VJ inch fraction) are shown on Figure 4 . No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilJing and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsmface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we reconunend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. lbe design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. I) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils and set back at least l S feet from the steep escarpment face should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of3,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement offootings designed and constructed as discussed in this section wiJI be about I inch or less and essentially occur during construction. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Job No. 106 0946 Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation wa1ls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 1 0 . feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining WaJls'• section of this report. 5) AtJ existing fiJI, topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing areas should then be moistened as needed and compacted. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to denect sufficiently to mobilize the fuU active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. AIJ foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walJs and a horizontal backflll surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateml pressure imposed on a foundation wall or Job No. 106 0946 -6 ~ retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in unifonn lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to atleasl95% ofthe maximum standard Proctor density . Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wnU. Some settlement of deep foundation wa] I backfilJ should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could resuh in distress to facilities constructed on the backfilL ll1e lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings wilJ be a combination of the sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.50. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 450 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum . FLOOR SLABS The natural on·site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded sJab- on·grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be sep8I'8ted from all bearing wa1ls and colum~ wjtb expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. "fbe requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended Job No. 106 0946 -7- slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage . This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No . 200 sieve. AU fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soiJs devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can devclop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition . We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the waJI backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material . The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. lbe drain gravel backfill should be at least 1 Y1 feet deep. SITE GRADING The risk of construction-induced slope instability at the site appears Jow provided the building is located above the steep escarpment as shown on Figure I and cut and fill depths are limited. We assume the cut depths for the basement level will not exceed one level, about I 0 feet . Fills should be limited to about 8 to J 0 feet deep and not be placed Job No. I 06 0946 -8 - near the top of the steep escarpment. Embankment fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximwn standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 95% of the ma.'Cimum standard Proctor density. The fill should be benched into slopes that exceed 20% grade. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to I vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at aJI times aJ\er the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backflJl should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in aJJ directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 1 0 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site fmer grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generalJy accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or impJied. Tile conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations Joh No. I 06 09-16 -9- indicated on Figure l. the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include detennining the presence , prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted . Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report. we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client fo r design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interprellltions by others of our infom1ation. As the project evolves; we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our reconunendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fiJ) by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC . Trevor L. Knell, P .E. Reviewed by: ~. Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. TLK/vad Job No. J06 0946 108 0946 I L&dl ..r-' -\ ....... --\.-- \ EXISTING HOUSE \ --\...-- LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 1 1015 1010 m 1005 • z 0 fi ~ 1000 w 995 990 106 0946 BORING 1 ELEV.=10W BORING2 ELEV .• 1 002' 1M2 181t2 28112 Note: Explanation ofsvmbols Is dtown on Figure 3. ~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS HEPWORTH-PAWlAK EOTECHNICAl.. 1015 1010 1005 m I ~ 1000 ~ w 995 990 FIGURE 2 ·~----------------------------------------------------------------~ LEGEND: FILL; silty to clayey sand and gravel with cobbles, firm, slightly moist to moist, brown to reddish brown. GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GP-GM); sandy, silty, with boulders, medltm dense to dense, slightly moist to moist, brown. Drive sample; standard penetratlon test {SPl), 1 3/Binch 1.0. spHt spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. 48112 Drive sample blow count; Indicates that 48 blows of 140 pound hammer faRing 30 Inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 12lnches. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on November 16, 2006 with 4-lnch diameter continuous fffght power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by Interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by Instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree lmptled by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the appraxknate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered In the borings at the time of driUing. Aucluation In water level may occur with time. 1. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on the No.4 sieve -200 "" Percent passing No. 200 slave 106 0946 ~ H£PWORTKPAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 3 IU« flft 411o1K ·--,_ ·-lloiK otBII -lCD ,. •» ,,. .. •• .. " ,., :r , , , D_ lCD 10 10 10 10 &0 10 10 lCD • .1m .-... -... .., •• ·'· ~ -1.11 Ul .... u tU .. ,.. lU ul" liD DIAMETER a= PARTIClES IN MUJMETERS I ~ I~ I -. la.~a QAYTO$L.T 1M I I -... ~ Gravel 54% Sand 32 " Silt and Clay 14 " Uquldllmlt " Plasticity Index " Sample of: Silty Sandy Gravel From: Boring 1 at 2 and 5 Feet, Combined -t-IP_. --._ 1060946 ~ GRADATION TEST RESULTS RGURE 4 HEPWORTHPAW\.AK GEOTE,.......,.. ... , Page I of2 t. Andy Schwaller From: Andy Schwaller Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 10:28 AM To: 'JYoungUAL 1 @aol.com' Cc: Fred Jarman Subject: RE: CO request Jim, An option available to you is to provide for a reclamation bond in the form of a letter of credit or cash based on the estimated cost to repair the damage to the river and green belt. Once this is in place we could complete the inspections and issue a C.O. Regards, Andy From: JYoungUAL1@aol.com [mailto:JYoungUALl@aol.com] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 4:15PM To: Andy Schwaller Subject: CO request August I5, 2008 James Young P.O. Box 2052 Glenwood Springs, CO 8I602 Andy Schwaller Garfield County Building and Planning I 08 gth Street Glenwood Springs, CO 8I60I Dear Andy, I have enclosed a copy of my letter to Christopher Chappelle explaining the steps I have taken to correct the zoning violation on my property at 0309 County Road I67. As I stated in that letter I feel I have done everything I can to this point to correct this violation. Per our earlier conversations I feel I have more than shown a good faith effort to correct this violation. I assure you it will be my top priority until completely corrected to the County's satisfaction. I am writing to request that you allow me to reschedule the final inspection for a certificate of occupancy on my residence at 0309 County Road I67. I would appreciate hearing from you as soon as possible on this matter. 8/I8/2008 Page2of2 . . Sincerely , James Ymmg looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in your budget? R.e.ad. review~ on AQJ,. A\!.1~. 8/18/2008 April4, 2008 Mike Easley Light Hill Construction 534 Diamond A Ranch Road Carbondale, CO 81623 • ~ ~·~~~q ... ftlll_.g• .. by Weyerhaeuser Subject: 515 DIAMOND A RANCH ROAD lf{,IUU11UU<I: Our Strategic Sales Representative, R. D. Leellng, asked me to review a cut T J~ joist used In the referenced construction. The conditions are shown on the enclosed sheet that was prepared by Mr. Leellng. The joist Is acceptable wHhout repair. Please Jet us know tf there are any questions on this. Sincerely, Enclosure cc: R. D. Leeling Midwest Division .. 9115 E. 90"' Avenue• Handel'80n, CO 80640 ... Phone 303.nD.6262• Fax 303.n0.6324 8 11 :44• Apr 03 0 oW::.. 252-1885 970-p .2 ilevel.com 1-888-iLeveiS (~·4P .... ) KAUP ENGINEERING INC. Garfield County Building Department 1 08 gtb Street Suite 40 1 Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 I RE : Field welds and beam reinforcement YOUNG RESIDENCE Dear Matt: 1129 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970)945-9Ei13, fax (970)945-9633 April2, 2008 In regards to the field welding on the Young Residence, there were instances where field adjustments were required and it was to be expected that the steel workers would have to field weld boots in adjusted locations. The chimney steel required field welding due to sequencing and hearth changes in the great room . The large beam with multiple web openings, required design reinforcement and can be seen in attached sketch SSK4.2. Please call with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Ryan Ne lson II" (VI F) 1/4 9/e ~x 9 1/::2 · STEEL PLA e· 4 " (VIF) (VI F ) NOTE: 9/e" PLATE REINFORC-EMENT TO BE FULLY Y'IELDED @ ENDS BEYOND Y'IEB OPENINIS . RE INFORC.EMENT IDENTIC.AL ON OPPOSITE SIDE OF BEAM . VERIFY END DISTANC.E BEYOND Y'IEB OPENINCS JIIIITH ENCSINEER IF II" EXTENSION IS NOT POSSIBLE. e" .2 " . ::2 " e " 4 " e " (VI F) VIF!VI (VI F) (V IF ) (VI F ) 114 " F ITTED STIFF PLATES TYP UNO " .::: - ... ·. YOUNIS RESIDENC.E KEI 4-.2-0e I SSK4 . .2 II" (V IF ) Bm_c:.o l1 ~ '<t Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessorffreasurer ProP-erty Search I As sessQr Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Rec o rd er K~cepjion Sem:c.b Basic Building Characteri~ti c~ I T~_I.Df011]latjqp, Parcel Detail I Value Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail L and Detail I PhotograP-hs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 083 II R830025 II 239320302002 II 67.214 I Owner Name and Mailing Address jYOUNG, J ROBERT LLC I jctO ALPINE BANK I jPO BOX 10000 I jGLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 I Legal Description jSECf,TWN,RNG:29-7-88 SUB:ASPEN GLEN IFLG 1 LOT:B-2 PRE:R111395 BK:0918 IPG:0408 BK:0904 PG:0724 BK:0846 jPG :0615 BK:0835 PG:0305 BK:0779 IPG :0484BK:0703 PG:0121 BK:l769 IPG:715 RECPT:691741 BK:1769 PG:712 IRECPT:691740 BK:0952 PG:O 168 IBK:0921 PG:0661 BK:0921 PG:0661 Location Physical 1515 W DIAMOND A RANCH RD. CARBONDALE~ Address: I Subdivision: IIASPEN GLEN FLO 1 I I Land Acres: IJI .299 I I II I http ://www.garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=R830025 3/9/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 I Land Sq Ft: llo I Section II Township II Range I I 29 II 7 II 88 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I Land: II 55o,oooll 159,5001 Improvements: II oil ol Total: II 55o,oooll 159,5001 Sale Date: jj21112006 Sale Price: jj700,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number of Commllnd lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year Transaction Type Amount I 2006 Tax Payment: First Half ($5,360.32)1 2006 Tax Amount $10,720.641 2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($10,764.34)1 2005 Tax Amount $10,764.341 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($11,436.16)1 2004 Tax Amount $11,436.161 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($9,718.98)1 2003 Tax Amount $9,718.981 2002 Interest Payment ($109.35)1 2002 Interest Charge $109.351 2002 Tax Payment: Second Half II ($5,467.44)1 2002 Tax Payment: First Half II ($5,467.44)1 2002 Tax Amount II $10,934.881 2001 Tax Payment: Whole II ($10,991.50)1 .. http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountN umber=R830025 3/9/2007 • t Parcel Detail 2001 Tax Amount $10,991.501 2000 Tax Payment: Whole ($10,031.98)1 2000 Tax Amount $10,031.981 1999 Tax Payment: Whole ($1 0, 148.40)1 1999 Tax Amount t $10, 148.401 Top of Page Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Search OP-tions Clerk & Recorder Databalie Search OP-tions Garfield County Home Page Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Oood Turns Software. http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp? Accoun tN umber=R830025 3/9/2007