HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplicationGarfield County jNO.I0352um
.... ....j
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8 th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003
Job AddresslLBO C K 3d£ ~~ '6 ( b c::; 0
v
Building Permit ~1k )'[J 5 -3 Sy -00 -I g?
UseofBuildin2 ~1M~ u:o( r ~~J'--
Owner \, ~"G ) p~ E
Contractor ~./
Nature of Work
Amount ofPennit $ 2,(91)9. YJ
1150,6D
Date ~~/%;{01)7
"""",
3 {~9, Cfi Clerk "--'-...--'V\,.h/v·~l
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
Pennlt No: --Ji---"""-''''-="
12 Special Conditions: ~ ~ Jb<.J.AUC"-'-¥'4'
avv ~ J.;J'-e-U.,
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR. IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED TI-IIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW TIiE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL
PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS 1YPE OF WORK WILL BE
COMPLETED WITHIN WHETI-IER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE
GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORl1Y
TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL lliE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTIIn,Ee', R'<FST(\F""TE!p',,;O~R:E
WeAL LAW REGULATING OR THE n
Ph:
Ph:
Height:
Carport:
o Site Plan
Adjusted Valuations:
AGREEMENT
Lie. No.
No. of Floors: ~
o
,32,
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CON~TOR OR O\VNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARI'MENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, TIlE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH AI~L BUILDING CODES AND LAND
USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORfIY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES
THAT IF THE ABOVE SAlD ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITI1 IN THE LCOATION, ERECfrON, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUN1Y AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME
NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL
FROM TIlEREAFTER REQUIRlNG THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAlD PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING
BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLA'TlON OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF
THIS .JURISDICTION. THE REVlEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LlABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUN1Y FOR ERRORS, ,OMISSIONS OR DiSCREPENCIES, THE RESPONSI
BILl1Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WIlli THE ARTICTECT. DESIGNER. BUILDER.
AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. ::jp
-p ~ J' HEi;r;~rO~HATI '~VEREADAN~\;rq3~5~REEff~~tf 1109~3( (cr( ~ I
'$ \ \ 30 ·olp U\:t:t'L'Z-z..:z-
(
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets; a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all mc and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUpy OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(e.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A e.O. W.ILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dWelling under building permit # [ 0 J 5J--
Signature
Bpapplicationfeb2006
Date
7 7
V ALUATIONIFEE DETERMINATION
Applh:ant gL.U~
Address ·tt.(;)
Date Z-bb-§1T
Finished (Livable Area)~)
Main 117'1
Upper
Lower
Other
Basement:
~ 1/70
-:z'f-z4
Total Square Feet 3 J 4 'F
Valuation
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Garage:
Crawl Space:
DeckslPatios:
Valuation
Valuation ~ ~ t g
144Jf) ) l8
Valuation
Covered
Valuation
Open / J .. ___
Valuation ~/('"
Total Valuation
Subdivision
Lot/Block
Contractor it
0W(l\:~-~
2.' ~, 3Ce4· 3'2.,
Z3?j H:e7. Be
':659 §Q3.3L
24~, ~44 .32,
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan
and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result
in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans
to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
1
\ ,
I
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P .R. wind
speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE
Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft.
of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a
subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's
signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a
building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of
the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes ../
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks do apply.
Yes IV"
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the LS.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent properties), streams or water courses?
Yes \I •
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
Yes ,/
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcin~steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes._-,,~ __ _
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes SlQb 12JY'\ %'\~&(.,
7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces and soffits? m d (), \ i:J \t\ \ d \ ;, ~ g, e-s· C c8' Z))' ()... Do V~ I D D 0 .~
~ V u (
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wind loads?
Yes V
9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
Yes J
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing offloor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes / .
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of
all co lunms and beams?
12. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the
top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes -/
13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes NO_Jy(~ ___ __
3
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
complywiththeIRC? Q ~(AS l 'Ni~~\ -9\Ite,p~G.,c..iG u'h1t0
No )/
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes 1\,/
Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes \/ No ______ _
Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes ,/ No ______ _
Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
No _____ _
Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process,!)Ie building plans incompliance with all plat notes and/or
covenants? nO \iG!.C.Jx-6.Q.C\, GO VQ.. tlo-/ rl s
Yes L No _____ _
Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility
to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? The building pe;rmit (lpplication will not
be accepted without it. () () \-lo!Yt Q.., I) o:J ,,1'.-\1' CV52>oc:..\0X\ Dy\
Yes /
Will thi?e the only residential structure on the parcel? r(1 Q..,'l bu..\ \ 6. Ovi\~,Ic,Q.\J'
Yes ~ No If no-Explain: hcu\Q. \(\ -\-Y\.e ..('0IJ,N'0
Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes /'
Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft,
long? J
Yes No ____ _
4
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction code requirements?
Yes .\1 No _____ _
25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone district?
Yes vi No, __________ _
26, Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspectionby the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes II No ________ _
27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to
the application of these changes?
Yes J
28, Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as
well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pickup your
building pennit?
Yes \ / No. _______ __
29, Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspectiou in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7 :30 a.m. to 3 :30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be
called in to 384-5003.
Yes \I No __________ _
30, Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $50,00 re-inspection fee?
Yes 1/ No _____ _
31, Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupancy of the building?
Yes V No -----------
32. Are you aware that the Pennit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the IRC?
Yes.J No __________ _
5
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Depattment at 625-8601.
Yes 1/ No ____________ _
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and. hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be
required at time of applicable inspection.
Yes ~ No ____________ __
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel It Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. L 0+ D
Yes 1/ No, _______________ _
36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the
building depattment about this requirement)
37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the
property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading
permit? .,/
Yes __ , __ _
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
~~) best of my ability. . ~ahMM)£,~) {0 I /bl Ub
Signature of Owner J?im Date ~ r~J:0
Phone: g 70 -~DlS -3'5 J GJ (dayS~ ~ di :)fJ rn (evenings)
Proj'" N=, . C{ i 1; C\"hu~.~.0vR)~ .
Project Address: G &):,"*, Id~L ~t81 ~ tL) ) C 810)50
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
infol1nation at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays
in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If
it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the
application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
6
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
BpminreqFeb2005
7
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant Cud. Date 1-Z2..-0 7
Building
*neered Foundation
~waypermit
__ Surveyed Site Plan
/septic Permit and Setbacks
~erroPOgraPhY 30%
~h Residential Plan Review List
~nimum Application Questionnaire
~ion Plat Notes
~ire Department Review
~erminatiOnlFeeS
__ Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~h Conditions
~onSigned
~er To Sign Application
__ Parcel/Schedule No.
J4~Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms.
. Soils Report
GENERAL NOTES:
Planning/Zoning
__ Property Line etbacks
__ 30ft Stream etbacks
raderropography 40%
__ Subdivision Plat Notes
Bill To:
Garfield County
Road and Bridge Department
P.O. Box426
Rifle, CO 81650
Phonec(970)625-8601 Fax-(970)625-8627
Invoice
Driveway Permit Number: GRB06-D-68
Invoice Date: 8/3/2006
Patricia Cline
1361 Dogwood Drive
. Rifle ,CO 81650
$75.00 per Driveway Permit.
Driveway Permit Fee:
Total Due:
Thank You!
$0.00
$0.00
6) In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-w(lY fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall
be surely braced before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence and all posts and wire
removed shall be turned over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Commissioners.
7) No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without
written permission of the Board of County Commissioners.
8) Provisions and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction of the B!)ard of County
Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, and the Specifications, set forth on the attached hereof and
incorporated herein as conditions hereo!' ' . .
9) Final inspection of driveway will be reqnired upon completion and must be approved by person issuing
permit or representative of person issuing permit.
The inspection and sign off must.be done prior to any CO from the Building and Planning
Department being issued, . \;tw \
. IJ{l \;\J '\U
Special Conditions: J ,. ,i(. ".-.J
1. Driveway Width-30ft ,(1 'I ' r. Y ~ )<\\y r.. \. ~"
2. Culvert required? True Size: 15 inch byA6!f "21 [) t i \ i \ II--'~ yi . .\ tY
3. Asphalt or concrete. pad required? False Size of pad: ',\;" ji-\ \0 -r,)"iv
4. Gravel portion required? True Length: 50ft " \ '0 ,
5. Trees, brush and/or fence need to be removed for visibility? False 9' [)--'
~: ~~s::~~~ ~r~~i~~~:~~l Required? False C}v~~~ e v \
8. Work zone signs required? True
In signing this application and upon receiving authorization and permission to install the driveway approach (es)
described herein the Applicant signifies that he has read, understands and accepts the foregoing provisions and conditions
and agrees to construct the driveway(s) in accordance with the accompanying specification plan reviewed and approved
_", by the Board of County Commissioners.
Sigl1edV~Q.·, CR~
Patricia Cline ~\ \) Q, 'II (L fL Q ' . C
Address: (~Co. L ~ ~ t:::t\----' ¥J~)CJa () \ ~.::> ()
TefephoneNtimber: q70-0~ -3S)e,
Permit granted 8/3/2006, subject to the provisions, specifications and conditions stipulated herein,
For Board of County Commissioners' of Garfield County, Colorado:
Representative of Garfield Cou~ty Road arid Bridge Signature
July. 16, 2003
Patricia Cline
1361 Dogwood Drive
Rifle, CO 81650
RE: 40' X 60' BASEPLATE STEEL ARCH
18 GAUGE ARCHES/2 OPEN ENDS
(ENDWALLS TO BE BUILT BY CUSTOMER)
REVISED
PO # S27884 Regency Steel
Dear Customer,
Sunward
Corporation
This is to certify that the above referenced structure is being designed for a roof snow load of 62
psf on the horizontal projection in addition to the dead load. It is also being designed for a wind
velocity of 110 mph, exposure B. These loads are being applied in accordance with the
American Society of Agricultural Engineers and to buildings not loaded with grain. If this Steel
Arch building does not have endwallssupplied by Sunward Corporation, for this certification to
be valid, adequately designed endwalJs have to be built by the customer.
This certification covers the LLIWL you requested. Synward Corporation makes no claims or
representations as to the adequacy of the design loads on the building components you have
ordered. It is your responsibility to contact your city or county building officials to determine if
the specified design loads you requested are adequate for your geographical area. If you are
unfamiliar with the design loads that are required to obtain the necessary building permits, please
contact your building official immediately and verify that the loadings you ordered are correct
and in accordance with your building official's requirements for obtaining the necessary permits.
Sunward Corporation's limited warranty and engineering data are set forth in your PURCHASE
ORDER, LIMITED WARRANTY and MANUFACTURER'S AGREEMENT.
This certification covers parts manufactured and delivered by Sunward Corporation only and
excludes such parts as doors, windows, foundation design and erection of this building.
The undersigned is not the engineer of record for the overall project.
{{.
I ~\\\\\\\IIIIIII"III ~e~, #:~I,)O R£ GI."tII.!//,<
s ~'\... ..000. tJl"...(\ ~ 4-~F<.~ o!tl1A ",0 00 <; ...... ~ _ <::s .~.~. "th.', -eo "" .~ ~~. \". -
i!tlb_<.:>j:f ~:o~
Ra Ad ·k~·"" 23771 "': ;: rna ..... ~ ~_ ~. : 0:::: ::
Registered Pr$'IRAtcr'l.al Engiijt!~ t . ~"«"tf ··h ... ·· ~ $!-
Enclosures rreid,{GiM\a~~~mon Practices
. . l/flIMHU\\\\\\ Llmltea "Warranty
P.O. Box 110· Jamestown, North Dakota 58402-0110· (701) 252-7390
Mrs. Patricia Cline
1361 Dogwood Drive
Rifle, CO 81650
November 22, 2006
Re: Building Permit Application
Dear Mrs. Cline:
Garfield Co
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
This letter is in follow up to our phone conversation earlier this week. I had John Plano
of Colorado Inspection Agency return your plans to the building department for our
review. Your proposed construction is a little different than the standard wood frame
type residential construction, and the building department dealing with you directly may
help speed the process.
The type of construction you are proposing using 2 arched steel buildings attached to a
center wood frame structure adds some complicated aspects to the design requirements.
The mixing of a steel structure and a wood structure requires careful attention to the
connection points of the buildings. Both buildings move normally with changes in
outdoor temperatures, wind, and other physical loads that nature puts on structures.
Unfortunately, the wood acts or reacts very differently than the steel. A rigid connection
between the two would lead to detrimental and very damaging results to the structure as a
whole. Every change in temperature would lead to buckling, fractures and possibly
failure. of the structural integrity of the building. Some sort of expansion joint needs to be
incorporated into the design. An engineer or architect needs to be involved in order to get
this critical detail done correctly.
Basically, the arched steel building is used in more of an industrial, commercial or
agricultural application. When using it as a residential structure, additional requirements
imposed by the building code for live safety, health, insulation, plumbing, mechanical,
light and ventilation are also required. For example, the roof and walls of the steel
building need to be insulated for the living space areas. The county minimums are R-19
for walls and R-30 for roofs. Possibly the insulation requirements can be met with
conventional fiberglass insulation if there are provisions for the venting of moisture out
of the building. Rigid insulation may also be utilized if the foam is protected from heat.
An architect is the best way to determine the methods needed and possibly least
expensive way to achieve the code required building details.
As discussed on the phone, these details and others we do not know about need to be
determined before construction begins. Architects and engineers can be expensive, but
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
they also can save a lot of money and time by getting things correct before the building is
built rather than during construction or after the building shows problems.
Due to your proposed construction and the complexity of many aspects in mixing the two
building types, a design professional is required to provide the needed details for
construction.. The structural drawings including connection points as outlined above,
need to be stamped by an architect or engineer. Additional details to the plans need to be
submitted for insulation, venting, and mechanical code requirements. Please have your
architect or engineer contact us. We will help in any way we can.
Please call with any questions or comments.
Yours truly,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
•
IlUILDIN PERMIT
GARfiELD COUNTY, COLORADO
-<JlGirfi}'? p . N·{tE~' Date Issu~.'l. •. \. •..•.. ¢: ..... ZOll1led Ar~a............................... ermlt 0 ••••••••••••••••••••• ~ ••
. AGREEMENT
Iu consideration oCtile issuance ofthis permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, I~ation; constru~tion and erection of the proposed
structure for wbicb this permit is granted, aud furtber agre~s that if the almve said regulations
are not complied witb in the zoning, and construction of the above
described the then from tbe County Building
Inspector
Setbacks Front Side Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. 8kuch,:uJ\ ?-e . . ~ t -:::l:±:-b 4l 'i? 3 S-·
INSPECTION RECORD
iping
o~~~~··_···~"_· __ ~ __ ~~~
Framing g-5'-0S: ~ +~"7,;<;"""",
(To include Roof in place and Windo s
and Dpors installed). " .
Driveway
ulation~baM\)K ~H 7
t{
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERlNG-
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
HIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
APPROVED ..... ' ...... . ..•.......•.•...........
Dat3! \300 B(r,~AA,~~, kw C c:
. IF PLA~ -COV;~\ITH CLEAR PLASTIC
6 SCHMUESERIGORDON I MEYER
ENGINEERSlsURYEYORS
Attn: Patricia Cline
1280 CR 325
Garfield County, Colorado
Cline Residence
SGM Project # 2007-317.001
Dear Patricia,
July 17, 2008
At your request a representative ofSGM-Inc. conducted an observation of the existing
framing at the above aforementioned address, for the purpose of addressing a correction
notice issued by the Garfield County Building Department. The following is a written
response to the structural aspects of the correction notice.
Correction 1:
Add structural components per plan -LVL missing at East wall
1. The (3) 9 Yz" L VL originally was intended as a header for a pass-thru opening
from the kitchen to the dining room. This header was also receiving two point
loads from floor beams at both sides. A field change was made eliminating the
opening. The point loads are currently being supported by a (5) 2x6 wood column
bearing on the foundation (re: Figure 1 & 2). This field change is structurally
acceptable.
Correction 2:
Get letter from engineer for holes in LVL that are not to manufacturer specs.
2. The LVL in question is a (2) 11 7/8" 3-span floor beam (re: Figure 3) located
above the kitchen and bathrooms 2 and 3. After analysis ofthe beam using a
revised floor loading of 40 psflive and 15 psf dead the beam was found to be
adequate for the loading with the holes at there current locations. Note that the
structural general notes assumed a dead load of 40 psf. The owner needs to be
aware ofa reduced dead load (15 psfmaximum) in this area.
If there are any questions please feel free to contact either of the undersigned.
Sincerely,
Mo Alkhoudairy
Figure 1
COLORADO INSPECTION AGENCY PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
Garfield County has contracted Colorado Inspection Agency to perform the plan review for
this project.
TO:
EMAIL:
FAX#:
Contractor
none
NUMBER OF PAGES:
FROM:
DATE:
CIA BUILDING PERMIT #:
OWNERS NAME:
SITE ADDRESS:
SUBDIVISION:
OCCUPANCY GROUP:
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
NUMBER OF STORIES:
Architect
none
3
John Plano
11/01/06
2164
Cline
Engineer
none
Porcupine Creek Road
none
R-3
VB
The design documents submitted for this project have been reviewed for compliance with the locally
adopted codes and amendments. The following comments must be addressed before a building
permit is issued.
For processing:
Please submit (2) complete sets of revised construction documents containing the requested
information or plan revisions.
Responses such as "will comply with code" are not adequate. Revised drawings must
clearly show code compliance.
Please be sure to include on the resubmittal the engineer's or architect's "wet" stamp, signature,
registration number and date on the cover page of any structural calculations, all structural details
and structural sheets of the plans.
V:\Plan Review\Garfield County\2164 M corrections.DOC
BUILDING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS:
1 Provide all the information required for building permit submittal required by Garfield County. Please
see the attached "Minimum Application Requirements".
2 Provide engineer stamped drawings for the metal building.
3 Provide an engineered stamped footing/foundation plan. (See # 5 on the check list, the IRC does not /
have foundation recommendations for pre-fabricated buildings.)
4 Indicate on the drawings design criteria utilized.
Specify design criteria used in structural design:
Roof live load
Floor live/dead load
Deck live load
Wind Speed/Exposure
5 Change the footing detail to reflect the required 36" frost depth. ~
6 The drawings are indicating BCI 450's and 500's. These are no longer manufactured by Boise. _______ -
Please change the joist. The rafters shown for the roof appear to be over-spanned per the old Boise
span charts.
7 Show on the plans stud size and spacing for all walls.
8 Indicate on the plans header sizes for all the openings.
9 Show on the plan the rise and run of the stairs.
10 Indicate on the plans insulation values for roof systems and exterior walls. /'"
11 Provide detail showing how insulation is to be installed in the steel portion of the building. ~
12 Provide details how the wood framed roof is ventilated. t..J. ~. r.~
13 Indicate on the plans that the laundry in the garage is raised 18" above the garage floorllll
14 Show that the common walls between garage and dwelling is protected with 1/2" gypsum board on __
garage side
15 Specify a 13/8" solid wood door or a rated 20 minute door between garage and dwelling.~
16 Indicate on the plans the type of fireplace that is being installed. ~
17 Indicate on the plans weather protections on the exterior walls. ~
18 Indicate on the plans ice and water shield underlayment for the roof. /./·4.
19 Show on the plans the location of mechanical equipment. ~
20 Show on the plans the beam for the second floor deck.
V:\Plan Review\Garficld County\2164 w corrections.DOC
21 Provide guardrail details.
22 Provide the north elevation drawing.
23 Show a landing at the required exterior exit door. Landings are to be minimum 3' deep for width of
the door. Landings may step down a maximum of 7 3/4" when the door does not swing over the
landing.
Please refer to the cover sheet for information and instructions for resubmitting plans. The recheck of plans
usually occurs within 3-5 working days of plan resubmittal. In order to avoid delays please check all requested
information is included with the resubmitted plans.
Plan Review Comments
John Plano
I.C.C. Plans Examiner
Colorado Inspection Agency
970-328-1790
Fax (970) 328-1791
Please send revised documents to:
Colorado Inspection Agency
1286 Chambers Avenue, #101
P.O. Box 1618
Eagle, CO 81631
V:\Pian Review\Garfield County\2164-corrections.DOC
'7 CTll THOMPSON
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
CLINE RESIDENCE
PARCELD
SECTION 35, T 6 S, R 94 W
COUNTY ROAD 325
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Prepared For:
MS. PATRICIA CLINE
1361 Dogwood Drive
Rifle, CO 81650
Project No. GS04827-120
234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411
September 12,2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
SITE CONDITIONS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
SITE EARTHWORK
Excavation
Structural Fill
Fill and Backfill
FOUNDATION
SLABS-ON-GRADE
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION
SURFACE DRAINAGE
LIMITATIONS
FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
FIGURE 2 -SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
FIGURE 3 -GRADATION TEST RESULTS
MS. P ATRlelA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO, GS04827 ·120
S;\G$04827.000\12012. ReportslGS04827120 R1.doc
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
6
6
7
7
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for
the Cline Residence proposed on Parcel D in Section 35, Township 6 South, Range 94
West in Garfield County, Colorado. We conducted this investigation to evaluate
subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical engineering
recommendations for the proposed construction. Our report was prepared from data
developed during excavation of exploratory pits at the site, laboratory testing,
engineering analysis, and from our experience with similar conditions. This report
includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory pits and
presents geotechnical engineering recommendations for design and construction of
the recommended foundation, floor systems, and details influenced by the subsoils.
If actual building plans will differ significantly from the descriptions contained in the
report, we should be informed so that we can provide geotechnical engineering input
and check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. A summary
of our conclusions is presented below.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits consisted of
nil to 6 inches of clayey sand "topsoil" underlain by gravel, cobbles
and boulders in a sandy clay matrix to the total explored depth of 8 feet
below existing ground surface. Boulders made deeper excavation of
the pits not practical. Free ground water was not observed in the
exploratory pits.
2. In our opinion, the natural soils at this site are suitable for support of
footing foundations. Design and construction criteria for footings are
presented in the report.
3. We judge potential for differential movement will be low for slabs-on-
grade supported by the natural soils at this site. Structural fill required
below slabs should be placed and compacted as recommended in the
report.
4. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of
surface water away from the residence.
MS. PATRICIA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS04827-120
S:\GS04827.000\120\2. Reports\GS04827120 R1.doc
1
SITE CONDITIONS
Parcel D is located in Section 35 of Township 6 South, Range 94 West in
Garfield County, Colorado. The site is accessed from County Road 325, which passes
through the west part of the parcel. Porcupine Creek trends down to the north in the
center of the parcel. Several access roads for natural gas production are on the
property. The residence is proposed at the location shown on Figure 1.
An irrigation ditch trends down to the north about 25 feet east of the building
site. Water was flowing in the ditch at the time of our investigation. A historic
drainage channel passes through the building site. Reportedly, surface grading and
installation of culverts up-gradient of the site have eliminated most water flow in the
channel. The client informed us that a structure located approximately 50 feet
northwest of the planned building site was damaged by a historic debris flow. We
recommend that the risk of debris flow at the site be evaluated by an engineering
geologist
In general, ground surface in the building envelope slopes gently down to the
north at grades of about 2 to 5 percent. Vegetation on the property consisted of sage
brush, juniper, and native plants. Ground surface in the area of the planned building
had been stripped.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We were not provided with building plans for the Cline Residence. We
understand the residence will be a one and two-story, steel-frame building with an
attached garage. Siabs-on-grade are preferred for the main level and garage floors.
Foundation loads are expected to vary between 1,000 and 3,000 pounds per lineal foot
of foundation wall with maximum interior column loads of 30 kips. If construction will
differ significantly from the descriptions above, we should be informed so that we can
provide geotechnical engineering input and adjust our recommendations and design
criteria, if necessary.
MS. PATRICIA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS04827·120
5:\G504627.000\120\2. Reports\G504827120 R1.doc
2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
We investigated subsurface conditions at the site by directing the excavation
of two exploratory pits (TP-1 and TP-2) atthe approximate locations shown on Figure
1. The pits were excavated with a backhoe provided by the client. Exploratory
excavation operations were directed by our project engineer who logged conditions
exposed in the pits and obtained samples of the soils. Graphic logs of the soils
encountered in the exploratory pits are shown on Figure 2.
Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits consisted of about
nil to 6 inches of clayey sand "topsoil" underlain by gravel, cobbles and boulders in a
sandy clay matrix to the maximum explored depth of 8 feet. Boulders made deeper
excavation of the pits not practical. Our observations during excavation indicated the
gravel was dense. Free ground water was not found in our exploratory pits at the
time of excavation. The pits were backfilled immediately after excavation operations
were completed.
Samples of the subsoils obtained from our pits were returned to our laboratory
for testing. A sample of the gravel selected for gradation analysis contained 62
percent gravel and cobbles, 15 percent sand, and 23 percent silt and clay size
particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). The sample had a liquid limit of 28 percent and
a plasticity index of 12 percent. Gradation test results are presented on Figure 3.
SITE EARTHWORK
Excavation
Excavation for the building foundation and utilities can be accomplished using
conventional, heavy-dUty excavation eqUipment. Large bOUlders should be
anticipated. Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and
federal safety regulations. The soils at this site will classify as Type C soils based on
MS. PATRICIA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS04827~120
S:\GS04827.000112012. ReportslGS04821120 R1.doc
3
OSHA standards governing excavations: Temporary slopes deeper than 4 feet should
be no steeper than 1.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type C soils. Contractors should
identify the soils encountered in the excavations and refer to OSHA standards to
determine appropriate slopes.
Free ground water was not found in our exploratory pits. We do not anticipate
excavations for foundations or utilities will penetrate ground water. Water from
precipitation should be removed by sloping the excavations to a gravity outfall or a
temporary sump where water can be removed by pumping.
Structural Fill
A minor thickness of structural fill may be required to attain grades for slabs-
on-grade. Additionally, voids may result below the building from removal of boulders.
Structural fill below the building should consist of an AASHTO Class 6 aggregate
base course or similar soil.
Structural fill should be placed in loose lifts of 10 inches thick or less,
moisture-conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and
compacted to at least 98 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry
density. Moisture content and density of fill and structural fill should be checked by a
representative of our firm during placement.
Fill and Backfill
Proper placement and compaction of fill and backfill adjacent to the building is
important to reduce infiltration of surface water and wetting of foundation soils. Fill
and backfill should consist of the on-site soils free of organics, debris and rocks
larger than 4 inches in diameter. The fill and backfill should be placed in loose lifts of
10 inches thick or less, moisture-treated to within 2 percent of optimum moisture
content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698)
MS. PATRICIA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS04827-120
S:\GS04827.000\120\2. Reports\GS04827120 R1.doc
4
maximum dry density. Moisture content and density of fill and backfill should be
checked during placement.
FOUNDATION
In our opinion, the natural soils at this site are suitable for support of footing
foundations. Voids form removed of boulders should be filled with densely
compacted, structural fill as recommended in the Structural Fill section. The
completed foundation excavation should be observed by a representative of our firm,
prior to placing forms, to confirm that the exposed soils are as anticipated and
suitable for support of the footings as designed. Maximum settlement of footings
designed and constructed as recommended is expected to be about 1 inch with
differential settlement across the building of about % inch. Recommended design
and construction criteria for footings are presented below.
1. Footing foundations should be supported by the undisturbed, natural
soil. Soils loosened during excavation or the forming process for the
footings should be removed or the soils can be re-compacted prior to
placing concrete.
2. Footings supported by the undisturbed natural soils can be designed
for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf.
3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16
inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum
dimensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required,
depending upon foundation loads.
4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and
bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We
recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance
of at least 1 0 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by the structural
engineer.
5. The soils beneath exterior footings should be protected from freezing.
MS. PATRICIA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at
least 36 inches below finished exterior grades for frost protection. The
Garfield County building department should be consulted regarding
required frost protection depth.
5
PROJECT NO. GS04B27~120
S:\GS04827.000\120\2. Reports\GS04827120 R1.doc
SLABS-ON-GRADE
We understand that slabs-on-grade are preferred by the client for the main
level and garage floors. Based on our laboratory test data and our experience, we
judge slab-on-grade construction supported by the natural soils will have low risk of
differential movement and associated damage. Structural fill required below the slabs
should consist of an aggregate base course. Structural fill placed below the floor
slabs should be in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the Structural
Fill section.
We recommend the following precautions for slab-on-grade construction at
this site.
1. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing
members with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the
slabs.
2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the
slabs are constructed. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs
should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with
flexible couplings to slab supported appliances.
3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence ..
These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units.
4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with
American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce
problems associated with shrinkage and curling.
BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION
We understand no below-grade areas are planned in the building. If plans
change to include below-grade areas, we should be informed so that we can provide
geotechnical engineering input Recommendations for below-grade walls and
subsurface drainage will be required.
MS. PATRICIA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS04827*120
S:\GS04827.000\120\2. Reports\GS04827120 R1,doe
6
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floor slabs and
concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed:
1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should
be sloped to drain away from the residence in all directions. We
recommend providing a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet
around the residence in landscaped areas.
2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should be placed as
described in the Fill and Backfill section.
3. The residence should be provided with roof gutters and downspouts.
Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits
of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be
provided at all discharge points.
4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minImIze irrigation.
Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low
moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5
feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of
the foundation and should be directed away from the building.
5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground
surface immediately surrounding the residence. These membranes
tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring.
Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some
evaporation to occur.
LIMITATIONS
Our exploratory pits provide a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface
conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by the pits will
occur. We should observe the completed foundation excavation to confirm that the
soils are as anticipated and are suitable for support of the footings as designed.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care
and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under
MS. PATRICiA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. GS04827·120
S;\GS04827.000\120\2. Repotis\GS04827120 R1.doc
7
similar conditions in the locality of this project. No warranty, express or implied, is
made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or in
the analysis ofthe influence of the subsoil conditions on the design ofthe structure,
please call.
CTL I THOMPSON, INC.
,,,,.
h~<'(:': ....
Craig A. Burger, PiE. ;>:
Project Engineer I:', ....
\,<.' C! 2 iJb
Reviewed bY\;;;;:;~ .. ,:., •.... -/ ,-, .... "
" " .,:,'\':;:~::,:.:::,;'(".,.,
~1) \~,r;:C-.
es D. Kellogg, P.E.
r ject Manager
CAB:JDK:cd
(5 copies sent)
MS. PATRICIA CLINE
CLINE RESIDENCE
PROJECT NO. G504827-120
S;\GS04827.000\120\2. Reports\GS04827120 R1,doc
8
Scale:1" '" 200'
Patricia Cline
~-~
Project No. GS04827-120
c>' o
~
',\
\\ \\ \\
'\,~ y\
\\
Proposed Residence );' \
P-2/ )
P-l WllI!o~s .!joductLq!) Rood _.' I
PARCEL D \
\
PARCEL
:~
• .,l~\,
~, ,
"
£ I
/
I
I
('
! ,
7
Approximate
Locations of
Exploratory
Pits
Fig. 1
LEGEND:
T
TP-1
o
.... 5 ., ., ....
E
.<: ....
Il. .,
0 10
15
Clayey sand "topsoil", organics,
slightly moist, brown.
Gravel, cobbles, boulders,
sandy clay matrix, dense.
slightly moist. tan. (GC)
Indicates bulk sample.
Indicates that boulders made
deeper exploratory excavation
not practical. Symbols above
bottom of pit indicate that
hole location was moved to
excavate pit deeper.
TP-2
o
5 0 .,
"0 .... :r
::J ..., ., ., 10 ....
15
NOTES:
1 . Exploratory pits were excavated
on August 1 6, 2006 with a
backhoe provided by the client.
Pits were backfilled immediately
after excavation operations were
completed.
2. No free ground water was
observed In the exploratory
pits at the time of excavation.
Locations of exploratory pits are
3. approximate.
4. These exploratory pits are
subject to the explanations.
limitations and conclusions as
contained in this report.
SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
Project No. GS04827 -120 Fig. 2
25 HR. 7 HR.
45M!N 15MIN
100
o
.001
60 MIN 19 MIN 4MIN 1 MIN
CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC)
"200
Sample of
From
GRAVEL, CLAYEY (GCl
25 HR. 7 HR.
45 MIN 15 MIN
100
o
.001 0.002
TP-2 AT 4-5 FEET
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
TIME READINGS
60 MIN 19MIN 4M1N 1 MIN
.005 .009 .019 .037 .074
SANDS
FINE MEDIUM
.149 .297 .590 1.19
OA2
·4 318" 1%"
9.52 19.1 36.1
GRAVEL
COARSE FINE COARSE
I
3"
76.2
.y.: ........ . ..
J [
-10n
127 200
152
COBBLES
GRAVEL 62 %
SILT & CLAY 23 %
SAND
LIQUID LIMIT
15 %
28 %
~% PLASTICITY INDEX
SIEVE ANALYSIS
30 @
40 ~ w
" ~ 50 w u
" w
60 "
70
80
90
2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1
DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS
CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC)
Sample of
FINE
SANDS
MEDIUM
From ___________________ _
PROJECT NO. GS04827-120
COARSE FINE
GRAVEL
COARSE
GRAVEL % SAND
COBBLES
SILT & CLA·-Y---% L1QUID~L~IM~IT--%
%
PLASTICITY INDEX _________ %
Gradation
Test Results FIG.3
Parcel Detail Page I of 3
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
A~§GS$Or!IrGf\§\lIGJ:ProPGrtySg<lrGh I A~SSOLS.!lQBGLQueIY I Assessor Sales Se"rcl1
CIGrk_Q{BecQfd~XBeGeP!iQ!LSe"Xcl1
.!3J1Sic Building Cl1araeteristic.s I Tax InfQIlJlation
parcel Detail I yalue Detail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail I Photographs
I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I
I 024 II R005274 II 217535400188 II 44.867 I
Owner Name and Mailing Address
ICLINE, PATRICIAE I
11361 DOGWOOD DRIVE I
IRIFLE, CO 81650 I
Legal Description
ISECT,TWN,RNG:35-6-94 DESC: A PCL IN I
ITIm E2SW & W2SE CONT 40 AC. I
IPRE:R247311 BK:992 PG:309 BK:897 I
IPG:760 BK:548 PG:163 BK:1112 PG:784 I
IBK:I057 PG:632 BK:I036 PG:456 I
IBK: 1825 PG:752 RECPT:703114 BK: 1266 I
IpG: 108 RECPT:583761 BK: 1112 PG:786 I
IRECPT:539762 I
Location
Physical Address: I
Subdivision: I
Land Acres:·1140 I
Land Sq Ft: 110 I
Section II Township II Range I
II II I
http://www.garcoact.comiassessor/parcel.asp?ParceINumber=217 535400 188 2/2312007
Parcel Detail Page 2 of3
II 35 II 6 II 94 II
Property Tax Valuation Information
I II Actual Value II Assessed Value I
I Land: II 70,00011 20,3001
I Improvements: II 011 01
I Total: II 70,00011 20,3001
Sale Date: 117/2112006
Sale Price: 11106,000
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
1
0
1 Buildings:
Number of CommlInd
1
0
1 Buildings:
No Building Records Found
Tax Information
I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I
I 2006 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($455.40)1
I 2006 II Tax Amonnt II $910.801
I 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($915.10)1
I 2005 II Tax Amount II $915.101
I 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($969.94)1
I 2004 II Tax Amount II $969.941
I 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,078.36)1
I 2003 II Tax Amount II $1,078.361
I 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole /I ($1,018.68)1
I 2002 Tax Amount II $1,018.681
I 2001 Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,041.18)1
I 2001 Tax Amount II $1,041.181
I 2000 Tax Payment: Whole II ($987.74)1
I 2000 II Tax Amount /I $987.741
I 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($495.18)1
I 1999 II Tax Amount II . $495.181
http://www .garcoacLcomiassessor/parcel.asp?ParceINumber=217 535400188 2123/2007