HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitJob Address
Nature of work
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION
and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8th. Street; Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 9454212
No. 7949
1( 1 #4,' LADL 5/L- 00
Building Penai.t
Use of Building I Y I 0 1) 11 j, ] r
)4../na 57 -
Owner . 1
Contractor 1 [ L Y ar4 n' S
Amount ofPertnitS 15f- . 7 6
-��•r►�� 7 871 -�
SSS -cg
AD`TV j2a° °
/51jr
Date
}
Q/L.
� i•
TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO
PERMIT NO.
79y7
INSPECTION LINE: - (970) 3 84-5003
ARCS SCHEDULE NO. 1 I7%043a2 bk2 j
NOB ADDRESS : I p { �p / 5L ea ,
I
LOT NO, BLOCK Na SUBDNISiONIEh'E?IT1ON
2
erl n
111
AP1M8A6Box 17(1‘, 8 ser 11, Co
PH,
�]//y ��7��j}�J--/J�1 L/ j
'rh` 70Y IP. j � ■ L
3
Llji QU SAM c—L:
AD6 X 4(d00 (d 00 R n A W3
W--6. (ti
' 719- ,5—
.CY) °'
4
1 gH,w.n,:tIENGn�iER
1
}
AMMONS �• r
LW,
ucrm:
5
-Fr.�li o
sghnOFLT 3
, s�lo
NO. OF
6
I
um, oF 1fLV nIIV[f kes Cr I] 1 I r 1 . gt\414 640/�
7DESCLIBE
NOMf
U EC rrs1 a Au livar
8
GA95 OF WORM VADDLlIONj OAL1ERMION WOVE DREWYr
nAAwcR�: �7caE npa?ffiLE CARPORT: .9.11/CLEPAOVZ1A -
17(111
0D INERVAYPERMII Mg ahrEssvasED MIA. Mile) MEE PLN
VALUATION OF WORE: i AD.RT....,.. IIi:1 ,z3 3 be i61)
L
'ECIN. an.n i1Drf9:
NOTICE
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PBAMTT IS REQUIRED AND MUST 8E ISSUED BY THE STATE DF
THIS PERMIT BECOMES SANS. AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT' COMMENCED WITHIN 18O DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR
WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF ISO DAYS AT ANY TIME
AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND
KNOW THE SAME TO RE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRE&}ME TO (1VE
AUTITORSTY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE. PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LOCAL REGULATING CONSTRU ON OR THE PERFOBMANo r OF
COMMr + ,� FO
•
• r y
PLAN CHECAI'F.Ts:
PERMir FEB; p /''} 5
TOTAL FEE. 4 J1 '� DATE PERMIT' ISSUED:
•
OCC: GRO 2: fjCONST: TYPE:
1.4- -3 ,---
ZONING
SETBACKS:
Signature Owner, Gmuutoror authorized ! -,
. HO - a o . v [?
'`f
$`'"�
SI]lf Ti .. FEE:
1 fl V
q j
`7 !i
--(7„r ' 1�
, ' ( _4111W1-67 i 11
B uildmg Dept APP�t 7 m8 Dept. r
a
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS
DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDINGDEPARTMENT,
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY A(REES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY
oARF3ELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CICS AS AME3,1DED. TEE SK ER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY
COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, OONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT' MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM
THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE Ii SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A puma BAUD SON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SH9L1, NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER. REQUIRING THE
CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION DEIING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN
VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTT-ist ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OFTHIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTION'S CONDUCrEI] THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY
RESPONSI]UTIE'` OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE rums AND IMPLEMENTATION
DURINGCONSTRUCTIDN RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCIETECT, DESIGNER, BUIIIIERAND OWNER COMMENTS ARE MENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE. AND IN SUPPORT
OF THE OWNERS 'MEREST.
C �+^o3 I HEREBY ACKNOVaEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. INITIAL)
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. A complete bathroom, with wash. bowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running
water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decksand grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all
the required items are completed and a final inspection made.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE
ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.Q. WI L BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATION
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit #
Signature
bpcont
Date
c/or I
{
j4otezo-ess t e.
Si 1+05 s165a,
FaE
(3A5E-m7u fr (1--/ 1 1-11 GI( .012
A 1 i2 az 6 et 32.,00
occrK 1 604 { rZ - oto
'1G3.t20
ci( .1)
�
S p CO -00
Exhibit "A"
A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SE 1/4 SW 1 OF SECTION 4,
TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST OF THE 5TH P.M. COUNTY
OF GARFIELD, STA ,1'E OF COLORADO, SAID TRACT OF LAND
BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND
BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS:
(BEARINGS AS RECITED IN THIS DESCRIPTION ARE BASED UPON
THE EAST/WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 4 AS BEARING
S.89 DEGREES 43'22"D, MONUMENTATION FOUND IN THE FIELD
AT THE WEST 'A CORNER IS A STANDARD MONUMENT AND
BRASS CAP, PLS 14060 AND AT THE EAST ;/a CORNER IS AN
ORIGINAL STONE MONUMENT.)
BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WINCH THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 4 BEARS N. 45 DEGREES00'02"W, 1864.17 FEET,
SAID WEST 114 CORNER BEING AN IRON PIPE WITH A BRASS CAP,
PLS 14060 AND SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SE1/4SW1/4, THEN
S89DEGREES51'09"E, 934.40 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID SE 114SW II4, THEN DEPARTING SAID NORTHLINE
S.1 ODGREES45'20"W, 208.21 FEET, THEN S 15DEGRRES53' 53"E, 20
00 FEET TO A POINT IN TI -1 1-, CENTERLINE OF GARFIELD COUNTY
ROAD NO.236 AS CALLED FOR IN THAT DOCUMENT RECORDED
IN BOOK 516 AT PAGE 442; THEN S.74 DEGREES06'07"W, 938.31
FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SE1/4SW1/4, THEN N 00 DEGREES09'58"E,483.22 FEET ALONG SAID
WEST LINE TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING.
SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINING 321,510 SQ. FT OR 7.38 ACRES
AS DESCRIBED.
B1
1
mom anior
Ukfele Lane
—
r • — cr •
1-,,,f1 I 1
C
JAN -29-2001 ICON 11:14 Rrl KAN BUILD INC
FAX NO. 17855284795
P. 02
BESTCOPY
STATE OF COLORADO
UIVI$1OP Of HOUSING
Iwo Hart, airectw
t
Jt1L'F L-lsn._ 29 4Oy
impar m n of Local Affairs
R1~: Job #'-993411
Dear Building Official:
The Colorado Division of Rousing, by statute and rule, is
required to conduct oversight insp.ectintvv. of an fa_t4y-
built housing manufactured, sold or offer45d for sal in the
State of Colorado_ The Division, of Housing tomo titer nn
olzi5rsight o. Kan Build and found their quality
control procedures capable of producing Residential Factory-
lairl i t unite .l . '':`•si%1i wiLh the 2.7 J
uniform Building
Code, 1997 Uniform Plumbing Code. 1997 Uniform Mechanical
Code, 1996 National R?-,_trii Code. and Zllow Clad Design data •
for Colorado. .Thezi= giant certification is in affect,
subject to Resolution 31 until June l; 2(O1_
r� certified manufacturer must attach a seal to each l i v; ng
unit 141-Isis their method of informing the local
jurisdiction that the unit was built to the above listed
cndf="Z. The seal
i<+f�+i«sext jcii which is listed below means the
unit has been certified by the Colorado Division of Housing
exnd is authorized to hn rin,l-kA within t e State. The seal
will be located in the kitchen sink cabinet.
INSIGNIA INFORMATION
Mfgr. Certifies Roof Live Load for 100 ?'SF
Mfgr. . Certifies Wind Design Pr ,;-,-, r,f 20
Plan Approval No. 505230
Date 1-10-99
Co tj=icati.on No. Fig 23127
Should you desire any more information pertaining to this
manufacturer, please fere free to contact thi office.
Sincerely,
a2}r M4' CriIlis
5C E gi r�e�-
B',n Oiweiix
Covwme
B,AA kiroci�f
Ewecltive Dire wr
1313 Sherman Street, Room 518, Denver, C ]orado 80203 (308) 866-20.33 FAX (303) 865.4077 Ton (3U3y 866•5301.1
1
Gech
February 8, 2001
Colorado River Development
Attn: Dean Rolzin
P.O. Box 539
Silt, Colorado 81652
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
hpgeo @bpgeatech.com
Job No. 101 136
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed
Residence, 7.38 Acres at Northeast Corner of Ukele Lane (County Road
216) and Harness Lane (County Road 236), South of Antlers Orchard,
West of Silt, Garfield County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. Rolzin:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and
percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study
was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services
to Basalt Construction dated January 26, 2001. The data obtained and our
recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions
encountered are presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a single story wood frame
structure over a walkout basement level/garage located in the area of Pits 1 and 2 shown
on Fig. 1. Ground floor is proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to
range between about 3 to 10 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are
assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The
septic disposal system is proposed to be located about 50 feet to the east-northeast of the
proposed residence.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The site was vacant and covered with a minor amount of snow at the
time of our, field work. The ground surface in the building area has a gentle slope down
to the south. The northern portion of the lot is steeper with slopes to the south. The lot
is vegetated with scattered cottonwoods, sagebrush, grass and weeds.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and one profile pit in the septic
disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are
Colorado River Development Company
February 8, 2001
Page 2
presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 1 to 11/2 feet of topsoil,
consist of stiff clayey sandy silt to the depths excavated of 7 to 8 feet. Results of swell -
consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the clay and silt,
presented on Fig. 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and
light loading. The clay sample showed a minor expansion potential when wetted under
a constant light surcharge. The silt sample showed a moderate to high collapse
potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted and high compressibility upon
increased loading after wetting. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of
excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist.
Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the
exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on
the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,000 psf
can be used for support of the proposed residence provided that the potential for future
settlement of the foundation is understood by the owner. The soils tend to compress
after wetting and there could be some post -construction foundation settlement. The
amount of settlement would depend on the depth and extent of subsurface wetting and
could be 1 to 2 inches or more. Footings should be a minimum width of 20 inches for
continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the
foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing
bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural soils. The exposed subgrade
should be moistened and compacted prior to placing concrete. Exterior footings should
be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection.
Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this
area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local
anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation
walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure
based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The soils are compressible when wetted. To
reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from
all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical
movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage
cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be
established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum
4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to
H -P GE0TECH
Colorado River Development Company
February 8, 2001
Page 3
facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less
than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during OUT exploration,
it has been our experience in the area that. local perched groundwater can develop
during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring
runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such
as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic
pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain
should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent
finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining
granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the
No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of
2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. An impervious
Membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough
shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing
soils.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be.
capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce
surface water infiltration.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
R -P GEOTECH
Colorado River Development Company
February 8, 2001
Page 4
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas. A swale may be needed uphill to direct surface
runoff around the residence.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at
least 10 feet from the building. Consideration should be given to the use
of xeriscape to limit potential wetting due to irrigation.
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on January 31, 2001 to evaluate
the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and
three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes
(nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow
backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in
the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and
consist of about 11/2 feet of topsoil overlying sandy silt with scattered gravel to the pit
depth of 7 feet, The percolation test results are presented in Table II. The percolation
test results indicate an infiltration rate of 12 to 13 minutes per inch with an average of
13 minutes per inch. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the
percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration
septic disposal system.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in
the area. Our fundings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be
notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
H -P GEOTEcH
Colorado River Development Company
February 8, 2001
Page 5
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GE i a �. ;�arxa' L, INC.
Daniel E. Hardin, P.
JZA/ksw
attachments
H -P GEOTECH
COUNTY ROAD 215 (URELE LANE)
t
COUNTY ROAD
R. O. W.
1
1
PIT 1
P1,-1,2
PROFILE PIT
1
P' hA p_3
P_2
1
1
1
r. 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
)---
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1" = 140'
TRACT 43
ANTLERS
ORCHARD
TRACT 44
101 136
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC,
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS ,
AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES
Fig. 1
I- 5
1D
LEGEND:
f-•-1
PIT 1
wC.13.6
DD 100
PIT 2 PROFILE PFT
WC=9.0
DD=93
WC=15.6
DD=88
-200=77
TOPSOIT4 sandy clayey silt, organic, slightly moist, brown.
0
5 1.101101.1
10
SILT (MLS); sandy, clayey layers, stiff, slightly moist,.'light brown,
slightly porous.
2" Diameter hand driven liner sample.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on January 30, 2001 with a Bobcat 337 trackhoe.
2. Locations of -exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from
features on the site plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and logs of exploratory pits
are drawn to depth.
4. The exploratory pit locations'should be considered accurate only to the
degree implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the
approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating.
Fluctuations in'water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( % )
DD = Dry Density ( pcf )
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
101 136
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
Fig. • 2
802
1
0
4 0
1
4
m 2
o 3
0.1 1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf
100
101 136
HEPWORTH-PAWEiAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Fig. 3
Moisture Content = 13.6 percent
Dry Density - 100 pcf
Sample of! Sandy Silty Clay
Fz'oui: Pit 1 at 6 feet
r
----------r---L--Th7:)-'-'-'----'-''%...''.\
---- Expaxzszon
upon
wetting
.
0.1 1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf
100
101 136
HEPWORTH-PAWEiAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Fig. 3
era
0
0
w
a
Moisture Content = 9.0 percen
Dry Density = 93 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt
From: Pit 2 at 2.5 feet
10
11
12
13
0
ompressicfl
upon
11111 1111
wetting
11111 11111101111111111
0.1 1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf
101 136
HE PWORTH— PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL ■ INC .
SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
100
Fig. 4
(
) § /
E
z
SAMPLE LOCATiDN
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE fl
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
JOB NO. 101 136
HOLE N0.
HOLE DEPTH
'INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
{MIN)
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER DEPTH
AT END OF
INTERVAL
,(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN./INCH)
P-1
54
15
Water Added
12%
10%
214
.
13
10%
8%
1%
8%
7'%4
13
11
9'h
1%
96
8%%a
11/4
8%
7
1 A
7
6
1
P-2
49
15
Water Added
Water Added
11%
9Y4
21/4
13
9%
7%
1 Ys
7%
6%
1%
10%4
9%
1%
9'!%
81/4
1%
101
9
1%
9
8
1
P-3
50
15
Water Added
9
6%
2%
12
6%
4%
2
4%
3
1%
8
6%
1 */2
614
5
1.A
6%
5%
11/4
5*
434
11/4
Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on January 30, 2001. The
holes were covered with rigid foam Insulation to protect against freezing overnight. Percolation tests were
conducted on January 31, 2001. The average percolation rates were based on the last two readings of each
test.
FROi'tt & Associates, Inc.
t .
K I TZ & ASSDCIATES.
5012 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
PHONE NO. : Mar. tt 2032 07:34P11 P2
STRUCTURAL CONSUL.i'A IV't'
Phone (970) 945 6305
Fax (970) 945 1093
FAX MEMORANDUM
Date: March 11, 2042
To: Peters Construction, Inc. Fax No.: 963-4899.
Attn: Greg Peters
Re: Cantilevered Balcony: Robin Residence, 101 Harness Lane, Garfield County, Co.
1 have reviewed the cantilevered balcony details provided by Trite -Joist
Corporation and peters Construction, Inc. for the noted project,
As detailed, the 2x8 Cantilevered joists spaced at 24" on center are more than
adequate to support a residential deck live load of 60 PSF.
529 4$10 1'Li1flYJUi;i'i
le] oaf.
DATE: 1/14/02
FROM: TONY ATKINS
Ph: 800-844-8281
Fax: 662-329-4610
TO: Mr. Greg Peters
Re: Balcony Cantilever
Mr. Peters
Concerning the cantilever balcony condition we discussed earlier, where your framer
has attached a 2x8x1O'-O" balcony joist to the side of Trixn.ioist in series spaced 24" on
center. The balcony joist have been cantilevered 3'-O" and have been attached to the side
of the TrimJoist ,flush to the top chord, with glue and 16d nails. The balcony joist are .
uniformly load only, no concentrated loads have been applied to ends of joist.
The above conditions do not adversely effect the performance of the TrimJoist. If we can
be of any further assistance please feel free to call.
Thanks,
Tony Atkins
1.y
0
e
-3--
<=.19
v
11 •
rs
-.i
BUILDINC.i
FIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issued.
:....Zoned Area Permit No 1791
AGREEMENT
In _ deration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws\and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector a d IMMED ATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
/PA sY.
Legal Derr p on • 3
Setbacks Frnt Sidi Side Re
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly .Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSP
Footing 044W ) 7.24 &
Foundation
Underground Plumbi =- =
Rough Plumbing r' � 4 )
Chimney & Vent
Gas Piping 7_.0-c1
C ON RECORD
Insulation i6--1-ar
Drywall lb../ to, Di
$` k-ctric Final (bySete Inspector;
0.41.7 411,
Electric Rough (Sy State Inspee€i
Framing fi"cee 7` 0'cl L\ 2.144
(To include Roof in place and Windows •
and Doors installed).
Final „3-/9-612._
Septic Final Z7• ® l'.5�
c ww Notes: SOW8oSYl - $05 342
0.44( J SI
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE
XTERIOR UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
-
yL�HETHER INTERIOR OR
AP
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
ED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
SeDa By
IF PLACED OU DE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC
THE FOLLOWING
PAGES ARE THE
BEST COPY
AVAILABLE AT
TIME OF SCANNING