HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 08.08.19831
BOCC - 8/8/83
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
REQUEST: Senate Bill 35 Exemption
APPLICANT: Mumbert and Laurine Cerise
LOCATION: Section 29 and 33, Township 7
South, Range 87 West of the 6th
Principal Meridian. Located
aproximately 1 1/2 miles east of
Catherine's Store on the north side
of Highway 82.
SITE DATA:
SEWAGE:
WATER:
The site is approximately 333 acres
in size.
Proposed individual septic disposal
system
Proposed well
ACCESS: Onto Highway 82
ZONING: A/R/RD
ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD in all directions
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The site falls within Districts C and D - Rural Areas with Moderate and
Minor Environmental Constraints. The site is within one mile of
Carbondale's Urban Area of Influence, thus, the Comprehensive Plan states
taht this should be a transition zone between urban and rural areas with
no greater than one (1) dwelling unit per 2 acres.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
A. Site Description: The site is basically flat in nature with a
covering of sage and trees. There also appears to be several irrigation
ditches on the property. The property fronts the north side of Highway
82.
B. Project Description: The applicants propose to divide a 333 acre
parcel into one 5 acre parcel and one 328 acre parcel. The applicants
wish to deed the 5 acre parcel to their son and daughter-in-law so that
they may build a homne for themselves on the property.
III. MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS:
A. Reviewing Agency Comment:
1. The Division of Water Resources sent a letter dated July 27, 1983
stating that they can issue an individual in house use only well
permit for the 5 acre parcel. They additionally recommended that
sufficient irrigation rights be deeded with the 5 acres to meet
the projected needs for outside water use.
B. Staff Comments:
1. The applicants must obtain an access permit from the Department
of Highways to access onto Highway 82.
2. The deed to the five (5) acre parcel should contain access and
maintenance easements for the ditches so that the ditch users
will be able to maintain the ditches.
IV. FINDINGS:
1. That the proposed request is in order with Resolution No. 80-65,
governing Senate Bill 35 exemption requests.
2. The proposal is in order with the acreage requirements for the A/R/RD
zone district.
3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed zoning is in
the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order,
prosperity, and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County.
BOCC - 8/8/83
* V. RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the Senate Bill 35 Exemption request with the following
conditions:
.. The applicants must obtain and submit to the Planning Division an
.? access permit from the State Department of Highways prior to final
\4.\ approval of the Senate Bill 35 Exemption. ci'-C a'.l{ (v1G-. (.�5& ri"�n--_I
2. The applicant must obtain and submit to the Planning Division a well
permit for the 5 acre parcel prior to final approval of the Senate
Bill 35 Exemption.
3. That a new legal description for the 5 acre parcel must be submitted
to the Planning Division prior to final approval of the Senate Bill 35
Exemption. This legal description must include access and maintenance
easements for the ditches on the parcel. These easements shall also
be reflected in the deed transferring the property to the applicants
son and daughter-in-law.
I(
All above conditions must be met within 120 days after conditional
approval of the Board of County Commissioners. /'Y1k,a be ori
Dee 69,1153
-2-
Apphci rn..( st
print. • 5\1
Or erz!.,-.1.3:.?'
1
COLORADO DIVIS!ON OF kVATER RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203
PEW,1!T .APPLICATION FORM
'..VATE!
tr. L
PE--iFiT TO ALL A. l'UMP •
REPLACE;VEN i
Orvi‘zi;
COGRT CASE NO.
RECEEt
SEPp-iY)`13
-
(1) APPL !CAN T • ..iddress
t5
STREET usocci___
CITYC.Actlo ond al a B\22
(state)
TELEPHONE NO ac -9(.03 - 3S 7' -L
(2) LOCATION OF PROPOSED WELL
GRAdcL
L.L.) •.3?
.7...
k/I
N •
elf
pOStid 'tI :11.!;)Th f
Aquifer ground v,ater is to be obtained from:
Owner's well designation
GROUND WATER TO BE USED FOR:
(X) HOUSEHOLD USE ONLY - no irrigation (0)
( ) DOMESTIC (1) ( INDUSTRIAL (5)
LIVES FOCK (2) 1 TION (6,
(4) ; ((3
[OH OFF )CE UE ONLY: DO NO i WR((E N THi..1 COLUMN
Receipt No. 3 9 1 `i/
Dist.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause
no material injury to existing water rights. The
issuance of the, permit does not assure the applicant
that no injury will occur to another vested water
right or preclude another owner of a vested water
right from se,4,ing relief in a civil court action.
a 71:;::::1!;•NT TO C.Z!-,
S 7.7E,;".
i1t-T!)1,
• . ,;;;
;;;iNGLE ;
ci.11:;il: THE HO,'‘,I•SE AN!'
THE FiETET:N r::!*;:; FRGY,T ETEC,;' TEE 'iVE'LL
MUST RE THRP, WASIF WVIT.R
SYSTEM OF THE N'',.`;N - EVAi‘GRATViETY
WATER IS RETURNED TO THE SAME STREAM SYSTEM IN
WHICH Ti -IE WELL IS LOCATED.
THIS WELL MUST BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING
TO THE REVISED AND AMENDED RULES AND
REGULATIONS APPROVED BY THE STATE BOARD
OF EXAMINERS FOR WATER WELL. AND PUMP
INSTALLATION cONTRACTORS., .., • •-
- ,
OTHER APPLICATION APPROVED
DET11 1:HE USE 0.1‘..1
(4) DRILLE
2 653
":.a1.1P,E11
SEP Inc-)
6
SE?
1? i9ds
RICHARD D. LAMM
Governor
890H
r
\/876
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
1313 Sherman Street -Room 818
Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581
July 27, 1983
Ms. Cynthia M. Houben
Garfield County Planning Department
2014 Blake Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Dear Ms. Houben:
ro
64 k
Re: Cerise Exemption
Section 32, T7S, R87W
JERIS A. DANIELSON
State Engineer
l Jd3
We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to separate five acres
from 328.9 acres. Apparently a spring is the source of water on what would
become the larger tract. The applicants seek a well for the proposed building
site.
This office could make a household use only well permit available for the
five -acre site provided tracts of less than 35 acres have not been exempted
from the larger tract since 1972. If this provision is met, we can recommend
approval. Since a household use only well is the only type we can make avail-
able, we recommend sufficient irrigation rights be deeded with the five acres
to meet projected needs for outside water use.
We consider proposals such as this as a one-time exemption of a tract
less than 35 acres. The availability of a well on the larger tract would not
be affected since it remains greater than 35 acres.
HDS/KCK:ma
cc: Lee Enewold, Div. Eng.
Ralph Stallman
Sincerely,
11). Simpsdn, P.E.
Assistant State Engineer