Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application - Permit
Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601- Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Project Address Parcel No. Subdivision '~~ifutt.t-io. EU.RE~9~1o~:1774 Pef(llltr'rl'~: Rf!sid.e'11tl~l·l3qildiH9 · <:' · .. Work C!assificatiolv' NeW ·•• · ;P~rillirs,tatu~:Actlve Issue Date: 10/6/2010 Expires: 04/04/2011 Section Township Range 50 Juniper LANE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 239308205036 PINYON MESA PUD, FLG 1 Owner Information Address Phone Cell Geral Phinney 55 Summer CT Parachute CO 81635 285-9012 Contractor(s) Phone Primary Contractor Don Schoon Constructin INC (970)319·4229 Proposed Construction I Details Single family dwelling on unfinished basement, crawl space, covered and uncovered patios, and a attached garage. FEES DUE FEES PAID No Valuation: Total Sq Feet: $ 236,116.40 4294 Fee Amount lnv Total Paytype Am! Paid Am! Due Plan Check Fee Residential Building Fee Road Impact Fee Total: Wednesday, October 6, 201 0 $1,144.62 $1,760.95 $933.07 $3,838.64 lnv # BLRE-9-10-20550 $ 3,838.64 Check# 2506 Check# 2508 $1,137.34 $2,701.30 $0.00 Required Inspections: Fo""'P"t;o""'" • 1 (888}868-5306 Inspection IVR See Permit Record Building Department Copy 2 GARFI ELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION I 08 81h Street, Suite 40 I , Glenwood Springs, Co 8 160 I Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 888-868-5306 www.garlic ld-cou nly.com Parcel No: (thi s information is avai lable at th e assessors office 970-945-9 134) ')... .1 " J CJ g.-() s 6 3 f;, 2 , . rovide Cr, Hwy or Street Name & C ity) or and legal description I 3 4 5 6 7 8 U se of Building: 9 Describe Work: 10 C lass of Work: o Alteration o Addition II Garage: Septic: o ISDS 12 Driveway Permit: Own e rs valuation of W ork: NOTICE Al!!h.!!!i!x· This applicat ion for a Buildin g Penn it must be signed by th e Owner of th e property, desc ribed above, or an au th orized agent. If the signature be low is not that of the Owner, a separate teller of aut hority, signed by the Owne r, mu st be provided with this Appli ca tion. Lega l Access. A Building Permit can not be issued without proof of lega l and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by th e Building De partm ent. Other Permits . Multipl e se pa ra te penn its may be required: (I) State Elec tri ca l Permit, (2) Co unty ISDS Penn it , (3) anoth er permit requ ired for use on the property id entified above , e.g. State or Co unt y Hi ghway/ Road Acce ss or a State Wastewater Disc har ge Permit. Vo id Permit. A 13uilding Permit becomes nu ll and void if the work authorized is not co mmenc ed within 180 days of the date of iss uance and if work is suspended or aband oned for a period of 180 days afier commence ment . C ERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read thi s Appli cation and that th e inform ation contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Buildin g Departmen t accepts the Applicat ion, along with the plans and specification s and other data subm itted by me or on my behalf(subm iuals), based upon my cert ifi catio n as to accuracy . Assum ing completeness of the submillals and approva l of th is App li ca tion, a Build ing Penn i! wi ll be iss ued gran ting permission to me, as Owner, to const ruct the s!ructure(s) and fac il iti es detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Bui lding Depart ment. In consid eration of th e issuance of th e Buildin g Penn it , I agree that I and my agent s wi ll co mply with provi sio ns of any federal, s tate or local law regulating th e work and th e Garfie ld County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations {County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that th e Bu il ding Permi t may be suspended or revoked, upo n not ice from th e County, if th e location, construction or use of the structure(s) and facili ty(ies), described above, are not in compl iance wi th Coun ty Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permi ssion to th e Buildi ng Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Buildin g Penni! does not prevent the Bui ldi ng Official from : (I) requiring the correc tion of erro rs in the subm iuals, if any, discovered afte r issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the stru cture{s) or faci lity(ies) if suc h is in violation of County Regul ation(s) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submitt als, and in spec tions of the work by the Building Department do not co nstit ute an accept ance of responsibi li ty or liability by th e County o f errors, om issions or di sc repancies. As the Owner, I acknow ledge that responsibi li ty for co mpli ance with federa l, state and loca l law s and Coun ty Regu lations rest with me an d my auth orized age nts, including wi thout limit ation my arc hit ec t designer, engineer and/ or builder. I HEREBY ACKN?WLEDGE HAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAN D TH E NOTICE& CE RT IFICATION ABOVE : I I ~ . ~ti DATE STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions : Adjusted Valuation: P l an C h eck Fee: Permit Fee: Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: 5UICll{ • I 0 2-361 /lb . L/D I Ill'!. 62-1760 .95 Qj3.01- IS DS Fee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due : BP No & Is sue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date : -~83 Br b <I ll~1·"34 Z1 70/. 30 -\11-4 COMM Setbacks: O CCGroup: C ons t Type: ..:J1:_ p~Tt ~Z~/{) R-3 •. 13 BL~ 1~0VA~~~ DA;.r.;~ PL~: 1.~ROV~::~ Building Plan Review Description of Work: single family dwelling on unfinished basement and crawl space with < Bin#: Location Address: 50 Juniper LANE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO Case Manager: David Bartholomew Plan Case Number: BLDG-9-10-6603 Parcel:239308205036 Application Date: 09/28/20 I 0 Building / Engineered Foundation f'Jj t1' Driveway Permit / Surveyed Site Plan IJ/It Septic Permit and Setbacks / Grade/Topography 30% / Attach Residential Plan Review List / / Minimum Application Questlonnare Subdivision Plat Notes / Fire Department Review / Valuation Determination/Fees 7 Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker / Attach Conditions / Application Signed / Plan Reviewer To Sign Application 7 Parcel/Schedule No. #jA 40# Snowload Letter -Manu. Homes / Soils Report Cont acts Owner: Geral Phinney Applicant: Geral Phinney Applicant Phone: 285-9012 Email: Planning/Zoning / Property Line Setbacks / 30ft Stream Setbacks / Flood Plain / Building height v Zoning Sign-off / Road Impact Fees ~ HOAIDRC Approval v Grade/Topography 40% v Planning Issues / Subdivision Plat General Comments: VA~,I-*11# /1>t~tt-fe~ f?ev,uvfee 236 ~ 116 . <;o J7b6.9~ I I 1./ l/. 6 Z-- f?d.Ji,..tp~r ~~-~/ ,fMf. ~/tJ ~ 3~ 7~. 6¥ I I 3 7~ J'l :z/ 76/.30 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ....;G:;..;e~ra;;;.;.ld;;;...;;..;Ph;.;.;i.;.;;nn;.;.;e~y-...,...--~...,...-..,....----Subdivision ...::5...::.0...::.Ju.:.::n.:.:.iP~:.;e:;;.r..=La:.::n::..:e:..!.., -=G::..:Ie::..:n:..;.;w:...::o...::.od;;....;:;.Sp~;.;r.:.:.in.:.gt::..s __ Lot/Block 10/5/20 10 Contractor ~~~~----------- Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Co nversion of Unfini shed to Fin ished Total Valuation Ga rage/Storage (wood framed) Carport: Total Valuation Craw l Space Tot a l Valuation Decks! Patios/Porches Covered Open Total Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Va luation 1650 sq.ft 380 sq.ft sq.ft sq.ft X $74.68 2030 sq.ft 1440 sq .ft X $41.00 sq.ft X $33.68 824 sq.ft X $18.00 sq.ft X $12 .00 80 sq .ft X $9.00 340 sq.ft X $24.00 147 sq .ft X $12.00 Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Pinyon Mesa Lot36 Don Schoon Construction 151,600.40 59,040.00 14,832.00 720.00 9,924.00 0.00 236,116.40 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: I) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. 'j· jC-/a DATE Bapplicationdecember2007 13L~E-q -10-{77 '1 Cmtlfrhon s oP PeYm,+ • Sec. plM-\. Jrtbtc .. l,.WJtV' ts ¥ butld.tK-q /l.t:ttu.trc...~-e.vvh . ' P~otL-~ ~s+tz.u.c.hm, ·Ctn-s >'-'"l t Frr< .Pnt .. rct ~ .J>e.ttJ4.$tbl.e... s p JtC.-e.. flktu. f r't. wt-tlll-k • • F 1 KA' l Ft fe .1?1 sht-lct AppflJf'l' A \ J_e.t}er lUtfc.tlf-t.ol .{::< C.O. • elec..kt&A I fDW'fk ,..,_ ~tppiU'vk I ~lfUtYeol. -'..-FJU-Wlf.-.J;Jsp~chern . " fitut I e/€c...ftt.tc..tl trppllDVA-( I .s JZequ ,reel ().:,J.,. C. b . o Ope11. l.!ole.. ~oils 12epoYt ~uired telL ~ct-.. 4 rl!fsreohtrn . 'zoo r~f. ptle_ Copy ~ftf/~(__/d~~L ~~ ~ K./..£/1/?-?<A.~---t:A.~ A ~-; ( ~( ~ ~~~~AC--4/ .I ' ~~ ~~·~ c;? ~ ~~~~~/~a·-~~( ~-~~;?~c~. &~ /34~-;r P7 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and 1 original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2009 IRC, and 2009 IECC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. f Yes 'f,. S-' h J .' "· r;"""' jJ f ttl-I ~ Y'- ' 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 3-301 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes X 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes )( 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 'f. 5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and/ or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No _ __.X'-'------ 2 6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other agencies Yes X 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes X 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes )( No ____ _ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? X Yes No ________ __ 10. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? X Yes ___ '-'------ II. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 'J.. • 12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes '/-.. 13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 'lv 14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes A 15. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes '/.. No _____ _ 3 16. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes. __________ No __ ~~------ 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes 'f.< 18. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes i. 19. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing fo!Jhese areas? Yes ~ No ____________ __ 20. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes 'h. 21. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes X 22. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes __ _A ______ _ 23. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes No Ifno-Explain: _______ __ 24. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes X 25. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes ~ 4 26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes X 27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes __ _.,._ __ _ 28. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a fmal inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes X 29. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes X 30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes X 31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 888-8_6~-5306. Yes ~ No _____ _ 32. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes._--A.----- 33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes X 34. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes X. 5 35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes_----"'-"------- 36. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 1{ 37. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes X (please check with the building department about this requirement) 38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes Y., 39. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes X 40. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. Yes I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. ~d~ Phone: Of /0 -J I '1, 1./ ')., 1.. Cf (days); Project Name: J/.. ; n n ~ ,Y /(. ._ S. Date _ __,S"-"'a-'-__...._-<.:.." ______ ( evenings) Project Address: _ __,S'--cL.L>_...:T"--"'u_,_nw..'-"'(l'-'""-,.--'-/"'-.f~.'"'-'1 IL---'L"'-"a.."'"n'-'--"L~---------- 6 PINYON Aug ust 05 , 20 I 0 Ga rfi e ld Co un ty Buildin g Dep t. Att n: Mr. A nd y Sc hwa ll er I 08 Eig hth Street Suite401 G le nw ood Spr in gs, CO 8160 I RE: Design Review Release for Buildin g Permit Dear Mr. Schwall er, Page 1 of 1 MESA The Pin yo n Mesa Design Revi ew Co mmittee has revi ewed the p lans and is hereby iss uin g appro va l for th e r elease of a Buildin g Permit(s) up on yo ur sa ti sfacti on of plan s submitted for the followin g lot(s): Lot: 36, Filing 1 Owner: Ger a ld & C harlene Phinney Upon yo ur re view and app ro val of submitted plan s and issua nce of Bui ldin g Perm it , the appl ic ant is auth or ized to proceed wit h construction at th e ir own risk. Final approva l in wr itin g from th e Design Rev ie w Co nm1itte e will be necessa ry before requesti ng fina l in spec tion and issua nce of a Ce11ificate of Occupancy from Garfie ld Co unt y. Pl ease fe el free to co nt act us should you have an y qu est ions. Sin cere ly, ·nyo n Mesa-Des ign Review Co mmitt ee http://sz0032.ev .mail.comcast.net/service/home/-/Phinney%20Approval%20Letter%20(05... 8/7/2010 Jim Wilson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Jim, Bill Gavette [gavette@carbondalefire.org] Thursday, July 28, 2011 3:50PM Jim Wilson Andy Schwaller Phinney Residence -Pinion Mesa Subdivision I completed an inspection today of the defensible space at the Phinney Residence and it is acceptable. Please contact me if you have any questions. Bill Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District www.carbondalefire.org 970-963-2491 FIRE· EMS· RESCUE !lr.MIJ<Vtl <£: ~~~©©O~"il'ln JobCode(Jl-Mcjl &'!w.tay~Dm !2-0(p-2ot0 CONSULTING E/-.I<;JNHRS SubJect &11:<6 Chocked Shoet_i_ 01 / (z)-~> co ..sT. \oP~ [boT I < 'l'o·lo t " ~ 4 6 4- < 2><'10 FULl HEI(lHI -----f DwL #.f.x ~~u ~ 12.'1 o.c . . ( AL{e:tt.JA~ WOo!<:) c 4)-~ 5 ~otJT '< Permit Card POST ON SITE Garfield County Permit NO. BLRE-9-1 {!)-~ 77 4 Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Su ite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: (970}945-8212 Permit Type: Residentiah Building Work Classification: New Fax: (970)384-3470 Issue Date: 10/6/2010 Ex pires: 04/0 4/2 011 AGREEME NT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to compl y with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, l ocation; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully compl ied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Reside nt ia l Bu il din g Owner's Name : Geral Phin ~ Job Address: 50 Juniper~ NE GLE NWO 0 SPRINGS, CO Con tracto r (s ) Phone Don Sc hoon Constructin INC (970) 319-4 229 Inspection Scheduling Co d e Inspection ·" IVR Pr imary Contractor No Comments Footers j/-.t.}-10 Gtt7 w /f P.~~ '105 t 6 At?. +-t~;:',z;<_ Foundation Walls / 110 Framing 115 Drywall -:1;20 Final . '125 ' '· Mi se 136 Ins u l ation ' ~60 Grout 1,75 ' M echani cal 405 1--· UG Plumbing 605 Rough Plumbing 610 Gas ·620 Pa rc el#:2 393 08 205036 Owner's Phone: 285-9012 Total Square Feet: 4294 Work Description: S in gle family dwelling on unfinished basement, crawl space, covered and uncovered patios, and a attached garage. Pass Date. / • -.£.-(,, 1/-S:::./ c t:?w 3:1~-11 It' ........., 4--.fB-/1 Vu..l 7-t ~--// I/ V:ft/. 1-5-"'7/ ( . l ;..;_-/£/¥/< 9?c.l s-Z'l-z/L ,.,-c;;? ?c./ 3 ~z'?-// ' ) I' r t f \ ' (t_, /< _f (_,( /.J ! f;</// * ( trP'C.-/C '.Y ~l {cV '-~?lf \1' l \0 j: . €L.L F ..J dt-o '-.1·~~1, /3t!Jt£)/E,e5 C/?RT /SSti~Y ' 1 b'!iiti. D ~ t..,... A dbiTIONAL IN SPECTI ONS MAY BE REQU I RED POSr'rH1 S11N C ON SP ICUO US PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCT ION IS STARTED For In specti ons C a ll : 1 -888-868-5306 C /l ~ . tuA 2 t_ -;-/{ 1ttl.5 ,r, Y C''/(1{ c-o L ~ L L I 2-Tc?;; ~-;--~/ ( ~ FL ?I ;-t:.. f'if?f(s Us'UJZ C>/C. -s7/2c. %.ec;,r12 f/l(lf.f%Ac.;t '3 -f?-;; I~ /('/[ /(e£ C![, 7== v ~-.,l U , 1= -/ S -:// 7 &?< J , AUG 3 0 ZOOo Grand Junction District 222 S. 6th. st., Rm.#416 Grand Junction, CO 81501 (970) 248-7325 August 28, 2006 % b £/;/;;(; J)oof~; & Fred Jarman Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 RE: Pinyon Mesa Subdivision Mr. Jarman rrr-joo'( - 1-ttJ-~o~J I have reviewed the preliminary plan application for the Pinyon Mesa Subdivision. There was no wildfire hazard map or review included in the application; therefore I met with Mr. Kjell V anghagen at the property on August 23rd, 2006. I also spoke with Bill Gavette, Deputy Chief for Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District about his concerns for wildfire hazard for the property. I have the following comments regarding wildfire hazard on this proposal. The primary vegetation is juniper and pinyon trees, and sagebrush. The combination of v:-~tative species poses a signification wildfire hazard to parts of the proposed subdivision. The lots at the highest fire risk are: lots 17-20 and lots 36-48. These are located in the northeast section of the proposed subdivision and include pinyon and juniper trees on a slope that is greater than 10 percent. Any homes built on these lots need to have defensible space which is an area around a structure where fuels and vegetation are treated, cleared or reduced to slow the spread of wildfire towards the structure. Also, homes should be built using firewise materials that are fire-resistive (Class C or better ratin~. The next area of increased wildfire risk is located on either side of the ravine, the lots surrounding this area are lots 66-72 and lots 59-65. The vegetation in the ravine is comprised of dense, mature pinyon and juniper trees. Trees and understory shrubs should be thinned and the removal ofladder fuels and dead material should be completed before any homesites are built on. The final area of higher wildfire risk is the lots surrounding a small knoll where pinyon and juniper trees are growing. The lots are 49- 54 and 1-5. The size of the trees and the increased slope make this portion of the property prone to higher wildfire hazards and should be treated as lots 17-20 and 36-48. I believe the best methods to reduce wildfire hazard on this property would be to thin the pinyon and juniper trees to Colorado State Forest Service standards along the edges of the property and in the ravine. Also enforcing defensible space standards around all permanent structures, and encourage or require the use of firewise building materials (firewise Construction, Design and Materials, 2000) would decrease the potential for a severe wildfire event. Written standards for defensible space management zones published by the Colorado State Forest Service can be found in the recent revision of publication 6.302, Creating Wildfire Deftnsible Zones. ' From: schoon438 @comcast.net Subject: Fwd: Phinney Exemption Letter Date: July 28, 2010 9:22:50 PM MDT To: "Phinney, Gerald & Charlene" <cphinney@q .com> Cc: "Phinney, Sue" <sue@hemasource .net> rf7 1 Attachment , 151 KB ( Save • ) The attachment is the Exemption letter for the driveway. Don will include a copy of this letter when he submits the building permit application to Garfield County Bldg Dept. Just keeping you in the loop. You do not need to print unless you just want to. This letter will be included in the Owner Manual I Binder that you will receive from us after you get the Cert of Occupancy . Kindest regards, Susan Schoon schoon438@comcast. net 970-319-5688 -----Forwarded Message----- From: "Christi Bullock" <cbullock@garfield-county.com> To: schoon438@comcast.net Cc: "Jena Thompson" <jthompson@garfield-county.com> Sent: Wednesday , July 28 , 2010 11 :33 :07 AM Subject: Phinney Exemption Letter Mr. Schoon, Attached please find the Exemption letter for the Phinney Property. I have also forwarded this letter to the Building and Planning Dept. Thank You. Christi Bullock Garfield County Road and Bridge Administrative Assistant II P.O. Box 426 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone : (970) 625-8601 Fax: (970) 625-8627 -----Origi nal Me ssa ge ----- ) F rom : Christi [mailto :cbullock@garfield -county.com] Sent: Wednesday , July 28 , 2010 11 :17 AM ) To: Christi Bullock Subject: This E-mail was se nt f rom "RNPF5A967" (Aficio MP C4000). Scan Date : 07.28.2010 11:16:47 ( -0600 ) Gar_field County July 28, 20 I 0 Don Schoon Via e-mail@ Schoon438@comcast.net Re: Lot 32, Pinio n Mesa Owner: Gerald Phim1ey To Whom It May Concern: Road & Bridge Department This letter is to inform you that the above referenced Property and owner is exe mpted from need ing a Driv eway Permit from Garfie ld County Road & Brid ge. The point of access for the driveway does not connect to a Garfield County Road . If you hav e any qu est ion s, or ne ed anyth ing further, please let us know. Sincerely, vf'ltltJ/[ ·l /Ju_t/ 0(~ . , Llli'IStl UUIIOCI< Administrative Assistant II Garfield County Road & Bridge Cc: Building & Planning File 0298 County Road 333A; P.O. Box 426 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: 970·625·0601 Fax: 970·625·0627 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at Lot 36, Pinyon Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Gerald and Charlene Phinney dated October 29, 2007. We previously performed preliminary geotechnical engineering studies for the subdivision development and presented our findings in reports dated November 11, 2005 and April 10, 2006, Job No. 105 652. A field exploration program consisting of an exploratory boring was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Building plans for the residence had not been developed at the time of our study. In general, the proposed residence will be a one story structure located in the middle of the building envelope. Ground floor will likely be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 5 feet. Part of the building could be below the surrounding uphill lot grade. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. Jfbuilding loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. I 07 0812 l -2- SITE CONDITIONS The subdivision is located on a relatively flat topographic bench above the Roaring Fork River valley and below Spring Valley. Vegetation has been removed from the site apparently during the subdivision development. The ground surface is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the southwest. A scree field ofbasalt cobbles and boulders is visible on the hillside to the north and Eagle Valley Evaporite is exposed in County Road 114 cuts above the site. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Pinyon Mesa Subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the subdivision but geologically young .sinkholes are locally present in the evaporite region between Glenwood Springs and Carbondale and we are aware of three sinkhole collapses in this region during the past two years. Based on our current understanding of the evaporite sinkhole process, all areas in western Colorado, including the project site, where evaporite is shallow have the potential for sinkhole development. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 36 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 1, 2007. One exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight Job No. 107 0822 -3- augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I. D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site is shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of sandy silt and clay with scattered gravel overlying medium dense, silty sand and gravel at a depth of about 23 feet below the existing ground surface. The soils are alluvial deposits that are expected to be 40 feet or more in depth overlying Eagle Valley Evaporite. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the boring included natural moisture content, density and percent finer than No. 200 sieve gradation analyses. Results of swell-consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figure 4, generally indicate low to moderate compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The sample from a depth of2 feet showed a low collapse potential when wetted and a sample from a depth of I 0 feet showed a low expansion potential when wetted. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The subsoils encountered ·on the lot generally consist of sandy silt and clay and are typically compressible when wetted under load. Lightly loaded spread footings can be Job No. 107 0822 -4 - us ed fo r s upport o f th e proposed r es id en ce provid ed th at so me ri sk o f settleme nt is a ccep t able to th e owner. A heavily r e inforced m at foundati o n w o uld h e lp to make the structure more ri g id and better able to res is t differenti a l s ettle ment. Co mpacting the b earing s oils to a depth of at le ast 3 to 4 feet below s hallow fo otings would help to reduce the settlement ri sk. Another alt ernative is a deep fo undation s ystem that extends the bearing level down to dense, rela tiv e ly incompressible granular so ils or bedrock. If the dee p found ation a lternative is s elected, r elative ly d e ep explo ration will be needed to provide additional reconunendations . DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Co ns id erin g the subsurface conditio ns encount ered in the explorat ory b oring and the n ature of the pro posed cons truction, we recommend the building be founded w ith spr ead footings or a m at b earing on the natural soils. The d es ign and co nstruction crit eria present ed b elow sho uld b e observed fo r a spr ead footing foundation s y st em I) Fo otings or a mat placed o n the undis turbed n atural so il s s h o uld be designed for an all owable bearing pressure of 1,200 psf B ased o n exp eri ence, w e exp ect initial settlem ent o f footin gs d es igne d and co nstructed as di scu ssed in this s ection will be ab out 1 inch or less . T h er e could be a ddition a l differential found atio n settlem ent o n the ord er o f 1 to 2 in ches or more dep end ing o n the d epth o f any sub surface w e ttin g. Precautions sho uld b e tak en to prevent post-co ns tru ct ion w e tting o f the b earin g soils . 2) T h e footings s ho uld h ave a minimum w idt h of20 inches for cont inu o us walls and 2 feet fo r iso lat ed p ad s. 3) T he m at ed ges, ex t erio r fo o tings and footings beneath unheat ed areas s ho uld be provid ed w ith aq equate soil co ve r ab ove their b earing ele v ation for fr ost pro t ect ion.· P lacement of foundations at least 36 inches below Job No. 1 07 0822 - 5 - ext erior grade is typically used in this area. Shallow frost protection can consist of rigid foam insulation in the shallow mat found at ion condition. 4) Fo und ations should b e des igned to be rigid with "box like" co n figu ratio n and iso lat e d fo o tings sho uld be avo ided . Continuous foundation walls should be heavily reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies ·such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) Topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to undisturbed natural soils. The exposed soils in footing areas s hould then be moi stened and compacted . Additionally, removed and replaced soils below footing bearing level should be compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. 6) A represent at i ve o f the geotechnical eng in eer s hould observe all foo ting excavati ons prior t o concr et e pl acem ent to eva lu at e bearing co nd itions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Fo undation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a s li ght amount of deflection shou ld be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis o f an equ ival ent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soil s. Cantilevered r etaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to defl ect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure co ndition s hould be des igned for a lat eral earth p r essure computed on th e bas is of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for backfill co n s isting of th e on-site soils . All foundation and retaining structures should be d esigned for appropriate hydro static a nd surcharge pressures s uch as adj acent footings , traffic, construction mat erials and equipment. The pressures r eco mmended abo ve assume drained cond it ion s behind the Job No. 1 07 0822 -6- walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% ofthe maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance ofthe footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure · against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded shib- on-grade construction. There is a risk of slab settlement and distress if the bearing soils become wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints shopld be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab Job No. 107 0822 ~tech -7- reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site granular soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least I Y, feet deep. An impervious membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SURF ACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been Cbmpleted: Job No. 107 0822 -8- 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) . Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use ofxeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory boring drilled at the location indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include detennining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOB C) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface .conditions identified at the exploratory boring and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during Job No. I 07 0822 I -9- construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verifY that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. . /1 ,.,--------.·;/ ~~-->-< ----~ '""::-''' .. / -· -~-/'"" -----;/· -c::e::->· -•-''~~- ·V"'Louis E. Eller Reviewed by: LEE/vad Job No. 107 0822 -- DRAINAGE EASEMENT ;;:> ~-----------------------G ~ (~ APPROXIMATE SCALE I I 1" = 20' I LOT36 I ,------------, I I I I I I I w I z :5 I __j I BORING 1 :! I I • a: I w Q_ I z I I :::J I I I --, I I I I I I I L ____________ __l -- BENCH MARK: RIM OF MANHOLE; CLIFFROSE LANE ELEV. = 100.0', ASSUMED. ~ 107 0822 ~ LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORING Figure 1 HcO"worth-Powlok Geotechnical 0 5 10 a; .'!' D. "' 0 15 20 25 107 0822 BORING 1 ELEV.= 106.8' 11/12 WC~7.0 00~102 17/12 20/12 wc~11.1 00~100 26/12 31/12 WC=16.1 00=102 -200=88 NOTE: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ~ LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING He worth-Powlok Geotechnical 0 5 10 a; " lL ' .c ii " 15 0 20 25 Figure 2 LEGEND: J SILT AND CLAY (ML-CL); slightly sandy to sandy, scattered gravel, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moist, brown. ~ SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM); silty, scattered cobbles, medium dense, moist, brown. p Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 20 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were 20/12 required to drive the California sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on November 1, 2007 with a 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. The exploratory boring location was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided: 3. The exploratory boring elevation was measured by instrument level and refers to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1. 4. The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. •_aboratory Testing Results: VVC = Water Content(%) DO = Dry Density (pet) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 107 0822 c$&tech H_~pworth-Powlok Geotochnlcol LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 I 0 5 10 I 15 I al u. 20 -'-Q) 0 25 30 I I 35 40 105 652 BORING 1 BORING2 18/12 WC=5.1 00=95 32/12 25/6 WC=5.6 00=110 50/6 WC=7.3 00=112 -200=91 50/4 50/1 BOTTOM OF BORING AT 48 FEET 40/12 40/12 WC=7.8 00=115 50/6 50/6 50/3 WC=7.7 00=118 -200=66 50/2 SQ/4 BORING3 23/12 WC=6.0 00=107 27/12 WC=6.0 00=123 -200=70 Ll=24 PI=S 50/6 50/3 50/1 50/3 80RING4 12/12 WC=7.0 00=100 30/12 WC=6.9 00=102 -200=94 LL=33 P\=15 25/12 36/12 45/12 WC=8.6 00=121 BORING 5 ' 16/12 10 WC=S.B 00=113 19/12 15 25 60/12 35 BOTTOM OF BORING A159.5 FEET Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 4. 05 Q) lL J:: u Q) a LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 3 .I LEGEND: . I ~ TOPSOIL; sandy silt, root zone, brown. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I [2 D ~ ~ I p ~ 18/12 SILT (ML); slightly sandy to sandy, clayey zones. stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, light brown. slightly calcareous. CLAY (CL); slightly sandy to sandy, silty, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist, light brown to brown, low plasticity, slightly calcareous. SILT AND SAND (ML-SM); scattered gravel to gravelly, very stiff to hard, slightly moist, light brown, subangular basalt rock, slightly calcareous. SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM); silty, sandy, scattered cobbles, sandy silt layers, medium dense, slightly moist, brown, subangular basalt rock. SILTSTONE/SANDSTONE BEDROCK; some gypsum, very hard, dry, grey. Eagle Valley Evaporite. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch I. D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPD. 1 3/8 inch J.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 18 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. T Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of log indicates multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled between October 6 and 14, 2005 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were not measured and the logs of exploratory borings are dravm to depth. 4. The exploratory boring locations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry Density (pel) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL = Uquid Um~ (%) PI = Plasticlly Index (%) ~~-1-0-5-65-2--~-.. -(;-~-~-~~-~~-~~-~-_-ci __ ) __ -.. -.r-------L-E_G_E_N_D __ A_N_D_N_O_T_E_S ________ ~F-ig-u-re---4~ I