Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4195~~;- GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SAN ITATION DEPARTMENT 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Coloradof 81601 Phone (970) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY Legal Description of Assessor 's Parcel No. SYSTEM DESIGN ______ Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) ______ Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Required Absorption Area -See Attached Special Setbac k Requirements : ______ Other Number of Bedrooms (or other) ____ _ Permit 4195 Assessor's Parcel No . This does not constitute a building or use permit. Date _____________ Inspector ____________________________ _ FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND A.PPROVAL (as installed) Call for In spection (24 hours notice) Before Covering lnstallat io Septic Tank Access w ithin 8" of s urface ----------''--------------------------- Abs orption Area ----------------------------------------- Absorpti on Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name -------------------------- Adequate c ompliance with County and State reg ulations/requirements. ______________________ _ RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RE C *CONDITIONS: ~ ~. ~ ~ or;;uCTION SITE G'm _ 11 l!t 1 1 ()0 1. All installation must comply w ith all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25 , Arti cle 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. Thi s permit is valid o nly for connection to structures which have fully complied with Cou nty zoning and building requirements. Con- n ection to o r use w ith any dwelling or stru c tures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement o f the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual seWage disposal syst em in a m anner whic h involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine-6 months jn jail or both). White · APPLICANT Ye llow-DEPARTMENT INDIViDUAL SEW AGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION P ERMIT REQUEST FOR {)A. NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( ) REPAIR Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, so il percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4). LOCATION OF PROPOSED FACILITY: Near what City ofTown_J.P..;Hl~\'=f., ____________ Size of Lot \L \ 2...S3a_c \CS Legal Description or Address (, OLA. V\ +J 'J2... 2.b") WASTES TYPE: ~ DWELLIN"G ( ) TRANSIENT USE ( ) COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ( ) NON-DOMESTIC WASTES ( ) OTHER-DESCRIBE ______________________________ ___ BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: c£W\..p\o;,J--e.e \-\ouS, 1\._G\ Number of Bedrooms 2-' Numhe'r ofPersons 2 ---------- (/) Garbage Grinder ( /} Automatic Washer ( 1Dishwasher SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: ( ) WELL ( ) SPRING ( ) STREAM OR CREEK If supplied by Community Water, give name of supplier: C _ ~'\ 0 ~ ~--~\€_. DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: .p(i £t. \9~ ~ \. Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? ~Yf-'e-"'"-'S'--------------­ A site plan is required to be submitted that indicates the following MINIMUM distances: Leach Field to Well: 100 feet Septic Tank to Well: 50 feet Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet Septic System (septic tank & disposal field) to Property Lines: 10 feet YOUR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN. GROUND CONDITIONS: Depth to first Ground Water Table hlD w A:4 {' \f\b...s Ob s e ( \(e d PercentGroundSlope ~ CC\a.. ~\ vt\'-) \-\..cAl-w ~hA._ <1tV\.\-k._ S\o?.e r -S au_~""-ec~ +- 2 TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEW AGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: t><! SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLANT ( ) VAULT ( ) VAULT PRIVY ( ) COMPOSTING TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, POTABLE USE ( ) PIT PRIVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, OTHER USE ( ) CHEMICAL TOILET( ) OTHER-DESCRIBE FINAL DISPOSAL BY: C)() ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT ( ) EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ( ) UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER ( ) ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND ( ) OTHER-DESCRIBE WILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? ~}o PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: (To be completed by Registered Profess ional Engineer, if the Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes___,3 "'-'0"=!..-__ per inch in hole No. 1 Minutes ---=io'-D ____ per inch in hole No. 3 Minutes (a Q per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes\\)A per inch in hole No. r N arne, address and telephone of RPE who made soi l absorption tests: --------~----- Name, address and telephone ofRPE responsible for design of the system: _________ _ Applicant acknowledges that the compl eteness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the i ssuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of m y knowledge and belief and are designed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any fa l sification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted b ased upon said applicati~e ·<>n for perjury as provided by law. ~-. Date -5~ TO YOUR PROPERTY!! . 3 ~tech HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNIC March 20, 2007 Ryan and Elizabeth McKenzie 400 East Fifth Street Rifle, Colorado 81650 Hepwo rth -Paw la k Geo tcc hnic,ll , In c. P. 0 . Drawer I 887 Sll\'e n hnrne, Color.1d,1 80-1 98 Phon e: 970-46R-1989 Job No. 406 0460 Subject: As-Built Evaluation of Individual Sewage Disposal System, 527 County Road 265 , Rifle, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. and Mrs. McKenzie: Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. has observed the installation of the Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) for the two bedroom residence on the project site. The ISDS components observed include : septic tank, sewer pipe, effluent pipe, cleanout, manifold pipes, Infiltrator chambers, inspection ports, distribution box and the locations of all components. We performed our site visit on March 19, 2007. Based on field conditions, minor modifications were made to the layout of the Infiltrator trenches in the ISDS design dated December 6, 2006. The modifications are shown on the ISDS As- Built Plan View, Figure 1. It is our opinion that the modifications to the design will not affect the performance of the system and do es not encroach on any of the Colorado State Board ofHealth's required setbacks. Please feel free to contact us if you ha ve any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. ~A~ Jason A. Deem Project Geologist Reviewed by : Ronald J. Uhle, P .E., C.C.E . As sociate Attachment: cc: Rick Himeisen-Anytime Sewer and Drain Company Garfield County Building and Sanitation Department G le nwoo d S prings 970-945-7 988 • Park er 303-8 41 -7 119 • Co lor ad o S pr ings 7 19-633-5562 APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1 INCH -60 FEET EXISllNG RESIDENCE ~,J CLEANOUT-9 '-. -COPELAND CONCRETE SINGLE 2.__1.r---PIECE, 1,000 GAL., TWO CHAMBER AB.D TO: 25' 135' PROPERTY UNES TANK HOUSE WATER UNES SURFACE WATER DRY DITCHES ¥ruS IRRIGATION DITCH EXISllNG FIElDS CUT BANKS , •. •• 20' ,.. 50' • 25' • 100' • 50' • 20' SEPTIC TANK WITH EFFLUENT FILTER. ldlNJMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCES TANK TO: HOUSE 5' WAD UNES 10' SURFACE WATER 50' DRY DITCHES 10' WELlS 50' PROPERTY UNES 10' '""""'"" • ADD 8 FT. FOR EACH 100 GAl.. / DAY DESIGN FlOW OVER 1.000 GAL I DAY. 4X \IERT. CUT HEIGHT WELlS: UNES ~: aJ 0 c z 0 )> ~I I I I I I '1J ::0 fT1 ..., 0 z .... ~ z fT1 )> Pi ~ ,., "' N "' tn ~ 406 0460 ~tech 527 COUNTY ROAD 265 ISDS AS-BUILT PLAN VIEW FIGURE 1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL G:\,JOBS\Engineering\200G\4000<1BO\IIs·BUiiMOID150 fig1.dwg \ r~;J~ /-Jc:Jo0 ,~j v~~ ~c-c:~JD !1~/J_) ~~u rvu .c:Ja~;_eJ(_j fcyc~ /}I ~:OJ_) I /fd :JA-B'~- ~/-JvD ~u c-~~__g~~ fA/l£U~-?-~ ~ ~~ i~~-f_/}':Fuci:J i~'~t! ~~'--0:0 ~ -ry ~~~/cty - ~¥ ~Wvv '1-'' '--"'-n APPROXIMATE SCALE: t" = too· I I I I I I I I 1 \ PROPERTY I BOUNDARY ~ I I BENCH MARK : GROUND P-1 ~ PIT 2 SURFACE AT CORNER STAKE· • ELEV . = 1 00 .0', ASSUMED . , {~ ([) / / / PROFILE PIT. PROPOSED ,_I.J BUILDING CD N ~ / / / 105 968 ~tech HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTEC HNICAL ~ P-2 • PIT1 P-3 ~ ~ ~ P-5 P-4 RIFLE ANIMAL SHELTER LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES I I I I I I I I a: ~ z :::> 0 Q LU :::> z LU ~ LU z ~ z 0 u... LU a: 0... FIGURE 1 .c 15. Q) 0 0 5 PIT 1 ELEV.=96.6' WC=4.5 DD=94 b~ WC=3.9 DD=107 -200=23 PIT2 ELEV.=102.1' WC=11.8 DD=95 WC=6.1 DD=103 -200=79 PROFILE PIT ELEV.=99.4' 0 5 10 LEGEND: 10 TOPSOIL; silty sand and clay, root zone, soft, moist, brown. ClAY AND SILT (CL-ML); sandy, very stiff to hard, slightly moist, light brown, slightly calcareous and porous. SAND AND ClAY (SC-CL); with shale fragments, stratified, dense/very stiff, slightly moist, light brown to greenish brown. Pit 2 only. SAND (SM); silty, with shale fragments, medium dense to dense, slightly moist, light brown, possible weathered bedrock. GRAVEL (GM); sandy, silty, dense, slightly moist, light brown, rocks consist mainly of shale fragments. Pit 2 only. Weathered Bedrock. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. Practical digging refusal. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on October 31, 2005 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was observed at the time of excavation. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve .c 15. Q) 0 105 968 ~tech LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Moisture Content = 4.5 percent Dry Density = 94 pel Sample of: Sandy Clay and Silt From: Pit 1 at 2 Feet 0 ~ 1 ---......._ * -~ ' r--.. z " 0 I (i'j 2 (/) \ f'\ Compression w a: upon n.. ~ 3 '\ wetting 0 0 \ I i\ I 4 I 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) I Moisture Content = 11.8 percent 1 Dry Density = 95 pel Expansion Sample of: Sandy Clay with Shale Fragments upon '-.... From: Pit 2 at 1 1/2 Feet 0 wetting ~ !-----__ -----" ,J * 1---....._ ~ -1 -.... z ·~ 0 (i'j z <{ 2 n.. I X \ w I ' z 3 0 (i'j \ (/) 1\ w a: 4 n.. ~ 0 I\ 0 5 I \ D 6 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) 105 968 ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 3 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Moisture Content = 6.1 percent Dry Density = 103 pel Sample of: Sandy Clay with Shale Fragments From: Pit 2 at 5 1/2 Feet 1 Expansion ~ upon ........_ ?fl. !'---~ 0 wetting z I' 0 ~ U5 -r--z <( 1 (L X ~ w ' z 2 0 U5 '\ Cf) w !\ I cr: 3 I (L 2 0 u 4 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE ( ksf) 105 968 ~tech SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 1 05 968 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED PIT MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL NO. DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (It) (%) (ocfl (%) (%) (PSFl 1 2 4.5 94 Sandy silt and clay ' 4 1/2 3.9 107 23 Silty sand 2 Ph 11.8 95 Sandy clay with shale fragments 51/2 6.1 103 79 Sandy clay with shale fragments HOLE NO. P-1 P-2 P-3 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) 41 35 30 TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS PAGE 1 of2 LENGTH OF WATER WATER INTERVAL DEPTH AT DEPTH AT (MIN) START OF END OF INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) 15 8% 7 7 6 6 5% 5% 5 5 4% 4% 4 15 6% 6 6 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5 5 4% 15 7 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6% 6 6 5% 5% 5% DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) 1% 1 % 'lz % % % % % % % % % % % % % % JOB NO. 105 968 AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) 30 60 60 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on October 31, 2005. Percolation tests were conducted on November 1, 2005. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. I HOLE NO. P-4 P-5 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) 39 33 TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS PAGE 2 of2 LENGTH OF WATER WATER INTERVAL DEPTH AT DEPTH AT (MIN) START OF END OF INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) 15 9 8 8 7 7 6% 6% 5% 5% 5% 5% 4% 15 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4% 4% 3% 3% 3 DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) 1 1 % % % % 1 1 1 % % % JOB NO. 105 968 AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) 30 23 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on October 31, 2005. Percolation tests were conducted on November 1, 2005. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test.