HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - Permit' · Garfie/cl County j NO. 9270
Building & Sanitation Department L...-.--------l
108lf1' Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003
' Clerk._......:=..._·-~-___:_~____:::::~--
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO
INSPECTION LINE: (970) 3 84-5003 . · TELEPHO~. (970) 945-8212
... PERMIT NO. __ q~J--_"J_O __ PARCEUSCHEDULENO. R040126
JOB .ADDRESS: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO BUILDING TWO
1 WI' NO. BLOCK NO. StJBDMSIONIEXEMPTION
~---+~*H~PT-PVT~~~~~~~,_----------------------------~------
2 Commercial,LLC ' -1 Grand Av e,GWS,CO 81601 ru. 945-4545 wr;ru: 945-4545
4 ~ton/M c E vo 1928 Pearl S t , Boulder, CO 803 T 303-443-:f5!
5 IQ.rt. GriiUINO 12 J 000 IQ.n.artai'Approx. 4 acres
6
7
8
9
10
THIS PmlMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK Oil CONSTJWCTION
AtTlli01UZED II NM COMMENCED WIIBIN 110 DAY&. OR. IF CONSTlWCTION OR.
WORK IS SUSPENDED OR. ABANDONED FOR. A PE1IJOD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TIME
AFTEII.. WORK IS COMMENCED.
l HEB.EBY CEUlFY 'tHAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED 1'HIS APPUCATlON AND
ICNOW TB£ SAME roBE UDR AND COB..RECr. AlL PROVISIONS OF LAWS
GOVERNING 'IBIS TYPE OF WORK WlLLBE COMPUED WilliWHE'lliE1lSPBCIFJED
HEllEJN OB. Nor. TBE ~F A PEJlMil' DOBS NM PllESTJME TO GIVE
AtlTBDRIIYTO VlOIJ\TE OR ~~~!c:m ~ OIBEILSTATEOll ~CAL LAW lU!GDLATING CON ~N~~~?o OF
/:) -U -o
TO!ALF£2: 4~92.../7
OCC: GllDUP:
MANU. HOME :
.AGlU!EMENI'
lllllaKI\J aries HO.OPI'tOOU 2
DATE PBRMil' l3SlJED :
CONST:TYPE:
:Jf-A.I
SETBACKS:
PEllMDSION IS BPltEBY GRANIED TO THE OWNER, CONJ'RACI'OR.ANDIOR. TB£ AGENT OFTBE CON'IRACJ'OB. OR. OWNER. TO CONS'mUCfTim S'IllUCJURE
DETAJlm)ONPLANSANDSl'ECIFICATIONSSUBMII"l'EDTDANDREV!EWEDBYTBEBUU.DINGDEP.AR.ThmNI'.
lN CONSmERAnON OF THE. ISSUANCE OF nDli l'EIIMII', THE SIGNEll.BEl\EBY AGREES TO COMPLY Wl1:B AlL BtllUliNG CODES AND LAND USE B.EGULAllONS ADOPTED .
GAllFIELD COtJNTY POilSUANI' TO AtJIHORIIY GIVEN IN 30-11.201 ClU AS AMENDED. THE SIGNEB.Ft1R:l'BEJLAGREES mAT U: THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FtlL
COMPLIED Willi INTBE LOCAI'lON, :ERECTION. CONSTJLUCI10N AND US£ OPTBE ABOVE DESCRIBED STlUJC'l'U!E, 'IBE PERMil' MAY THEN BE R.EVOKED BY NOTICE FRt
tmt COUNTY AND'I!fAT'IBEN AND 'llJEBE II' SHAll. BECOME NUILAND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PEJlMII' BAm> UPON PLANS, SPECJFICATIONS AND arm!1t DATA &HALL NOT PllEVENI' TBE BUILOING OFFICIAL FROM TJmREAFIEIL REQUIR.ING T
COR!lECDON OF ER1lOR.S IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFJCAllDNS AND CJl1D!.ll DATA Oil FlU> P.REVENIING BUJlDING OPER.ATION BEING CA1UllED ON TBEREtJNDEll WBEN
VIOLATION OFTBIS CODE OR. J1NY O'IHER. ORDINANCE OR. REGt!L\TION OFTSIS lUIUBDICTION.
TBE liEVlEW OF TBE stJBMinED PLANB AND SPECIFICATIONS AND lNSPECnONS CONDUCIED T8EREAFI'Eil ·DOES NOT CONSTil'U'IE AN ACCEPTANCE OF A
JlBSPONSIBILII'IE! OA IlABILII'II!S BY GARFIELD COUNTY FQII.. ElUl.ORS. OMlSSIONS OR. DISCREPANCJES. TBE ll!.SPONSmJUTY FOB. ~ID!MS AND JMPUMENI'.Al1
001UNGCON&T:a.DCI'10NREmSPECJFICAI.LYWIIliTBEAB!:BilECT,DESIC!NElt.BUIIDER.ANDOWNPll. COMMENTSAREINIENDEDTO . V.ATIVEANDINSUPPO
OFTBE OWNERS .INIEllEST. :
Gmaim.oca3 IBEBEBY.ACXNOWLEDGemATIBAVEJEADANDtJNt1DS!ANDTBEAGREEMENl'AIIOVE.fJNO'W.).. .
p J;!i{~sq1~ ip~~~/bf
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
A~plicantGeu Date b"2a .. ef fP_v~~ fi,'cKS Q.<-Uw~ ~~crA-L 'fM ~L....
J~
Building
~gineered Foundation
~veway Pennit ~
~rveyed Site Plan
JjASeptic Pennit and Setbackc~
/oradeffopography 30%
l::h.tl_Attach Residential Plan Review List
~Minimum Application Questionnaire
..JfLL_ Subdivision Plat Notes
__ Fire Department R~
.-~Valu~tion!Fees
__ded Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
~tach Conditions
-~plication Signed
h lan Reviewer To Sign Application
-h'arcel /Schedule No .
40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms. --
GENERAL NOTES:
(, 0~0 1-2.5. ~Q -.
Planning/Zoning
__ Property Line Setbacks
__ 30ft Stream Setbacks
_Flood Plain
__ Building Height
-·-·· _Zoning Sign-off
__ Road Impact Fees
__ HOA/DRC Approval
_ Gradeffopography 40 %
__ Planning Issues
Subdivision Plat Notes
'e>oO 1 ~.Ol (fll...~' -2oo/b ~ t>~~ --
/~IJ See
jo01 18 0
1 s-11so
t
Garfield Counly -Minimum Applic nlion Required: Conunercinl and Mulli-Fnmily
•r
Garfie/11 (~ot lllt,,, Co/o1~1llo jsearch ..• _ _ _ ____ I (.t.fYt!lfl
HoME , Abt)Ut<iAA~lHbt(IUNtY wW4tvstft\Jtets 'MUNt~ittbVt~~ANt~-o~ .tlU!tMINH~' ·
._. . ·-
County Qeoanmenls » Building & Planning , !:gum 11 I!Y!l!Jfng£~ » Minimum Applicallon Required : Commercial and
Mulli-FamHy
{ N~v iqAtioN
Accounting
1\dmlnlslmllon
Ahpott
Ass essor
Boilrd of Co mmissioners
Building & Planning
~ Boards, t-leetfngs & Agendas
.. FAQ
• Comprehensive Plan of 2000
..... Fmms
..... Bullulng Forms
• Code VIolation Repatt
Form
• Drlvewily Pennft
Application
.. 1505 Appllcallon
,.. 1,\inhmnn Appllcallon
Required : Commercial and
l·lUILHamlly
.. t•linhmu n Appllcallon
Required: r4anufactured
Homes
• l,·llnlmurn Application
Requh ed: Sf Construction
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIRED: COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-3212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF
COMMERCIAL OR MUL TI·FAMIL Y RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS
including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
and
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the worlt Intended under a permit application and expedite the Issuance of a
permit It Is Important that complete Information be provided. Adequate and complete Information will prevent
delays In the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required Information has not been
provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit Issuance and In proceeding with building
construction_ The owner or contractor may be required to provide this Information before the plan 1 evlew may
proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are In line for review may be given attention before the new
Information may be reviewed afler It has been provided to the Building Department.
http ://www . garfield-county. com/home/index.usp? page =690
Page 1 of 7
5/24/200
Garfield County -1\•linimum Application Required: Conunercinl and Mulli-Family
~ Ow ner's Ag1 eemen t l o
Duilll Gnmge
• Sig n Permit
• Planning Forms
., land Use Co d e Updates
• Building Code Fmms
~ Code Enforcement
., Ag1lc ulturnl Buildings
De fin ed
• Recreallon Cabin Derlnetl
• Dem ographics
• Consumer P1·1ce I ndex
• Geographic Information
Services
1> Zoning ami Sullt.livlsion
Regulations
• Proposed Bldg Code
Amendments
Cie ri~ and Recorder
Communlly CoiTec llons
County Engh1eer
GeogratJhlc lnformallon Services
1-iuman Res ources
Information Technology
landfill
011 and Gas liaison
Public Heallh
Public Tltlslee
Roatl and Ill klge
Sheriff
Social Servic es
Treasurer
Vegetation Nanagement
Purchasing
Please review this document to determine If you have enough Information to design your project and provide
adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, It may be helpful to obtain a bool1 titled "Dwelling
Construction Under the Uniform Building Code". This bool< is available to you through this department at our
cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance In your design and a construction
professional for construction of your project.
To provide for a more understandable plan In order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and
mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design.
Plans to be Included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at leasl1B"x 24"" and drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete fooling and foundation plan, elevations all sides with declls, balcony
steps, hand ralls and guard ralls, windows and doors, Including the fin i sh grade line. A section showing In detail,
from the bottom of the footing to the lop of the roof, Including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor
joists, wall studs and spaci ng, Insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which Is required), siding or any approved
building material.
A window schedule. A door schedule.
A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot. up to
7,000 feet in elevation, an BO M.P.U . wlndshear, wind exposure B, wlndload of 15 pounds per square foot and a 36
Inch frost depth.
All sheets to be Identified by number and Indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will
be returned.
All plans submitted must be Incompliance wllh the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC.
Applicants are required to Indicate appropriately and to submit completed checldlst at time of application for a
permit:
1.
2.
Is a site plan Included that Identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings,
setback easements, and ullllly easements showing distances to the property lines from each corner of the
proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional
stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 30% or more on properties must be show on slle plan. NOTE: 106.3 .1
(7 .) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not
wllhln a previously su r veyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licens ed
surveyor and have the surveyors s ignature and professional stamp on the drawing. /\ny str ucture to be
built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivis ion plat, s hall include a copy of lhe
bulldl)( envelope as It Is shown on the rlnal plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope.
Yes
Does the slle plan when applicable Include the location of lhe I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System)
and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject p r oper ly an d adjacent properties), streams or w ater
courses? This Info rmation must be certified by a licensed sur veyor with their signature and professional
stamp on the design. \/
Yes No Not necessary for this project.&..___
http://www. garfield-county .com/home/index.nsp? page=690
Page 2 of7
5/24/200
Garfield County ~ Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi-Family
3. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or
marhed ldenllfylng them as "Not for construction, for permit Issuance only", "Approval drawings
onlyXor permit issuance only" or similar language?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project __ _
4 . Is the !.S .O.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado
Registered Engineer? V
Yes___ No__ Not necessary for this project~
5 . Does the site plan Indicate the localion and dlreclion of the Slate, County or private road accessing
the property7y'
Yes .L::::..._
6. Do the plans Include a foundation plan Indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel
In accordan~th the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design?
Yes No_ Not necessary for this project __
7 . If the building Is a pre-engineered structure, Is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan
for this building? ·v
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project~
B. Do the plans indicate the location and size or ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the
clearances required between wood and earth? V
Yes_ No_ Not necessary for project.A.-
9 . Do the plans Indicate Ute size and location or the ventilation openings for the alllc, roof joist spaces and
so Hi~
YesA.-No_ Not necessary for this project __
10. Do the plans Include design loads as required under the Uniform Building Code for roof snowloads,
{a minimum o[4Jl pounds per square foot In Garrteld County)?
Yes~ No__ Not necessary for this project __
11 . Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the Uniform Building Code
Chapter 16 a')(ables 16A, 168 and ·t6C?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project __
12. Does ~~tan Include a building section drawing Indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction?
Yes_)S,._ No_~-Not necessary for this project __ _
13 .
14.
15.
Is the~ speed and exposure design Included In the plan?
Yes No_ Not necessary for this project __
Does the building section drawing Include slz.e and spacing or floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof
rarteXr Joists or trusses?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project __
Does the building section drawing or other detail Include the method of positive connection of all
hllp://www.garfield-county.cmu/home/index..usp?page=690
Page 3 of 7
5/24/200
Garfield County -Minimum Application Required : Commercial and Multi -Family
columns and ~?rns7
Yes_p_ No_ Not necessary for this project __
16. Does the plan Indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point or the building
or ad~lon measure.d at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours?
Yes No_ Not necessary for this project __
17. Does the plan Include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for Installation including make
and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA V certlncatlon7
Yes__ No_ Not necessary for this project-A-
·10 . Does the plan Include a masonry fireplace Including a fireplace section Indicating design to comply with
the Uniform Building Code Chapter 317 v
Yes____ No_._ Not necessary for this project___.6._
19. Does the plan Include a window schedule or other verification that egresstrescue windows from sleeping
roomgndlor basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project __
20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verlfh::atlon that windows provide natural light am.l
ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes _A_ No__ Not necessary for this project __
21. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human Impact such as glass doors, glazing
immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a wallting su1 face;
sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels ; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for
thes)(eas?
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project_
22. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for Installation in this building?
Yes_)(_ No___ Not necessary for this project_
23. Have all areas In the building been accurately identified for the Intended use? (Occupancy as Identified In
the ~orm Building Code Table 5-A)
Yes No__ Not necessary for this project __ _
24. Does the plan lndh:;ate the quanllty, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be In
use In this building? V
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project-A-
25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water healers Indicated
on the plan? V
Yes__b._ No__ Not necessary for this project __
26. Do the plans Indicate the location and dimension or restroom facilities and If more than four employees and
both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? X
Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_
27. Do the plans Indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible?
http://www .garfield-county .com/home/index.asp?page=690
Poge 4 uf7
5/24/200
Garfield County-Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Mulli -Fnmily
Y~s X No_ Not necessary for this project __
26. Have~ (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the aPI>IIcallon?
Yes~ No_
29. t-lave you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code
requirements~~
Yes--'5:::_ No_ Not necessary for this project __
30. Does the plan accurately Indicate what you Intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by
the ~)teld County Building Department?
Yes No_
31 . Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations In the County related to your zone district? For
cornxots see supplemental section 5.05.03 In the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbaclts.
Yes No_
32. Do you understand that approval for design amlfor construction changes are required prior to the
lrnpl~],ntallon of these changes?
Yes_pL No __
33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the lime of
application and that you will he required to pay the "Perrnll" fee as well as any "Septic System" or "Road
Imp a)<: fees required, at the time you plclt up your building permit?
Yes No ____
34. Are you aware that you are required to call for all Inspections required under the UnHorm Building
Code Including approval on a final Inspection P-flor to receiving a CertUicate of Occupancy and occupancy
of the bulldinQ_? ~
Yes-.&-No __
35. Are you aware that the Permit Applicallon must be signed by the Owner or a w1lllen authority be given for
an AgK and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Codes?
Yes No __
36. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice Is required for all Inspections? Inspections will be made
from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale, In
the afternoon. All inspections must be called in IJy 3:30 p .m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four
(24) hour notice for inspections will delay yout Inspection one ("I) day. Inspections are to be called In to
3o4-soo3. Ye <;.
37. Are you aware that requesting Inspections on work !halls not ready or not accessible will result in a $47 .00
re-lnspectlon fee? Yes~ No ___ _
38 . Are you aware as part of the sul.:unittal for a building permit you are required to show proof of a
driveway access permit f r om the Garlleld County Road & Bridge Detlartment or If applica!Jie the Sle~le
Uighway Department? If a permit Is not necessary, then a letter slating that Information Is required. You
can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 6~60 ·1 or refer to the phone boolt for the Stale Highway
Department phone number If applicable. Yes 2S!_ No N/A ___ _
http :1/www. garfield-county .com/home/index. asp? pnge=690
Pnge5of7
5/24/200·
Garfield County -Minimum Application Required: Commercial and Multi -fnmily
3 9.
40.
41.
Do you understand lhal y ou will be required to hire a Slate of Colorado Licensee! Electrician and Plumber to
perforrQ i9stallalions and hookups? The license number will be required at lime or Inspection.
Yes )( .. No. _______ _
Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit aJJpllcatlon you will neetllo Ullin the Parcel(
Schedule Num!Jer for the Jot you are applying for this permit on prior to sulmtlllal of the building permit
appllc~l9n? Your attention In this Is appreciated.
Yes X No. ___ _
Do you knQ.w )JlBlthe local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safely issues?
Yes X No . (Please check wilh the building department aboulthls requirement)
42 . Are you aware, lhat if you receive your water and/or sewer from an Association, a Oislrlct or Municipality. you
will be required to provide the County with a copy of the Tap Permit (or evidence of an exemption} al the lime
of the building permit application submillal? X -r J:' , 1
Yes No H/A /PI.fS C:.Xl 'S i
43 . If you are within live (5) miles of the City or RiOe or the Town of Parachute, have you c hecl<ed
wllh them concerning water shed protect on zone permit requirements for ISOS and other aclivllies? Yes
-----No N/A -~"'---
~
Note:
If you answered "No" on any of ll1ese questions you may be required to provide this Information at the request or
the Building OUiclal prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays In Issuing the permit are to be expected.
Work may not proceed without the Issuance of the permit.
•tr you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the
Building Official that the Information Is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum
compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following:
A. The application may l>e placed behind more recent applications for building permlls In the review process
and not reviewed until required Information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position
for review.
B. Delay in Issuance of the permit.
C. Delay In proceeding with construction.
http://www.garfield-county.com/home/index .asp?page=690
Pnge 6 of7
5/24/200
COLORADCI :lEPARTMENT bF TRANSPORTATION COOT Permit No.
STATE Hlit'WAY /ESS PERMIT 302043
State Highway No/Mp/Side ri:J~ ~t\Av 082A/003.500/L
Penni t fee\., \/\ ~ Date of transmittal I Reg ion/S ection/P atrol Local Jurisdiction
300.00 05117/2002 03/02/12 Glenwood Springs
The Permittee(s); Applicant; Ref No. 02-092
David Hicks David Hicks
131 7 Grand Ave. Ste 101 Prince Creek Construction
Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 1 1317 Grand Avenue Ste. 101
970 -945-4545 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-945-4345
I~ hereb y granted permission to have an access to the state highwa y at th e location noted below The access shall be constructed, maintained and used in
accordan ce with this penn i!, including the Slate Highwa y Access Code and any attachments, tenns , conditions and exhibits. This permll may be revoked
by the Issuing authority If at an y time the permitted access and its use violate an y parts of this permit The issu ing authority, the Department and thei r duly
appointed agents and emp loyees shall be held harmless against an y action for perso nal injury or prope rty damage sustained by reason of the exercise of
the permit.
Location:
On the north side of SH82, a distance of 2640 feet east from milepost 3, also a distance of 1320 feet west from Roaring Fork
Marketplace.
Access to Provide Service to:
Warehousing (20,700 SF) .••••••••.••. -.................................................................. 17DHV 17.00%
General Office Building (32,100 SF) ............................................................... 58DHV 58.00%
Apartment (22 units) ........................................................................................ 25DHV 25.00%
Combined Access usc not to exceed 100 passenger car cqulvnlentpcak hour volume.
Other terms and conditions:
• See Attached Pages 2 and 3 and Othe r Enclosures for Additional Terms and Conditions.
MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL
Required only when the appropriate !ocal authority retains issuing authority.
By I Date Tille
(x)
Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained
herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from
Initiation. The permitted access shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to
being used.
The permittee shall notify Leslie Stanton with the Colorado Department of Transportation In Glenwood
Sprlng~,Co at 970-384-3360 at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-
way. ~i
The person signing ~s the pe~ ittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted access and have full authority to
accept tift penn~ Its tem and condi!Cons.
Permit ~ _.l l (t . -§:~~ -·-"I Date S::/ r-:r /~ ?--
(x) A (dl ~~~~ ~1.,. ~"";~ot<L
v -
I
This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department.
COLORAD.O DEPARTMENT OF ~NSPORTATION
By~~D~e) (x) . .n 17,0/oD~
Copy Dlsj$f6utlon : Require~( 1.Re ion g
2.Applicant
J.Staff ~e511 Section
~-e copies a( necessary for:
Local Aulhorit Ins ctor y
MTCE Patrol
pe
Traffic Engineer
Title
Access Manager
Pravlous adltlons are obsolete and may not be used
CD T 0 Fo "".-.o1 B/98
SENT BY: RAILTON UCEVOV ARCHITECTS; 303 443 5535 ;
Date:
Project:
To:
Ju ly 1 5, 2004
Glenwood Commercial
Srcvc Hackett, Gartleld c,)unly Euil<.ling
and Planning Depurtment
Fax (970)-384-3470, Ph. (970)-945·8212
JUL-15 -04 5:40PM;
RECEIVED
JUL 1 6 2004
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
PAGE 1/2
RAILTDN•MCEVOY
Frum: Phil McEvoy, Railton McF.voy Architects, Boulder, P.C. " R r. 14 I T E l: I :i
II 0 II 1 n E A
Copy to: Prince: Creek Construction
Enclosure: Red Lined Sitt Plan tn Show Areas of Revision
Discussion :
1. The following clari lications are in response to your memorandum l)f today .
2 . The requirement to provide 200 squan: Ji::cl pc.:r purking space cun be u.chievcd by
assigning 22 .2 feet by 9 feet per car which rounds up tt' 200 square feet per car. There is
1ldequate room on site for I his length of parking space.
3. The requirement to add 4 parking spaces can be met by adding tour spaces that ore shown
on the attached site plan just north ofRuilding Two and adjacent to the fare depnrunenl
turn around.
4. We acknowledge that the building height determination is in compliance with the Land
tJse Regulations.
If you lind additional items that require clarification, please eall me righL away.
..
I !£1H 1' .. $II PIUb. CO IIG.'IIl'
~ 1-tJ 1J:,J ·~ ••J ~h:t~
FUTLJRE TRASH
LOCATION
-~ . "!i~ ~ : - -sssssssss ~SSSS$5''5'5 f ssuw¢i?ivss : f \3 ] sum ;,sssg
-"=DemON,
POND \
--------~--
Glm_Wa:lD ~)t{fY1~A-L-/~ttf (Zet>U~
Pfr1lT7Irt-Site pt,!r?J 7·17 -()~ t4
CITY OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
10 I WEST 8m STREET
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
PHONE: (970) 384-6408 FAX : (970) 928-0980
July 14, 2004
Andy Schwaller
RECEIV ED
JUL 1 5 2004
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
108 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Hicks Water and Sewer Service
Dear Andy:
At the July 1, 2004 City Council meeting, Council approved David Hicks for water and sewer
service from the City for his South Glenwood project.
Should you have any questions or require additional information about this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me. Thank you.
Very Truly Yours,
~ KarlJ.Hn ~
City Attorney
June 30, 2004
To: Andy Schwaller
Garfield County Building Official
From: Ron Biggers
FP A, Glenwood Springs Fire Department
Re: Comments on Glenwood Commercial, Applicant Prince Creek Const.
1. All building to have automatic fire protection systems installed in them . The
systems to be designed and installed to NFP A 13 standards, 3 sets of plans to be
submitted to and approved by Glenwood Springs Fire Department.
2. Hydrant locations; I did not see any hydrants located on the submitted plans.
Two ftre hydrants will be needed to provide fire flow to these buildings. Contact
Glenwood Springs Fire Department, Fire Protection Analyst to discuss locations
for them.
3. All buildings to have a UL listed central station monitored,
anologable/addressable fire alarm system installed in them. System is to be
designed to NFP A 72 standards, 3 sets of plans to be submitted to and approved
by Glenwood Springs Fire Department.
4. Emergency vehicle tum around added at north end of parking strip
between the buildings. It looks like this is possible depending on setback
requirements. Contact Glenwood Springs Fire Department to discuss this item.
5. Knox key box to be installed above each Fire Department Connection, on each
building, 5 to 6 feet above finished grade. Pick up Knox Box application from
Glenwood Springs Fire Department
Contact the Glenwood Springs Fire Department, Fire Protection Analyst to discuss
the above items. Phone 970-384-6433
PCC
September 14 ,2006
Prince Creek
Construction, Inc.
2520 S. Grand Ave ., Suite 210
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-945-4545
970-945-4848 Fax
RE: Glenwood Commercial Permit # 9270
The attached drawing is an illustration of the proposed tenant finish for
Mauldin Plumbing and Heating. The proposed work involves finishing
Units C - F in Building 2 (Level 1) and basically is comprised of the
following :
1. Finishing 2 bathrooms which are roughed-in and will meet
· ADA Standards for handicap access.
2. Completing a drywall finish in Unit 2F, and framing in a
a small office, also in Unit 2F.
3. Installing a 36" vanity w/ sink and wall cabinet in both
Units 2D and 2F.
Prince Creek Construction
Andy,
Dave Mead
From: Andy Schwaller
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:07AM
To: Dave Mead; Matt Provost
Subject: FW: 2550 Hwy 82, Glenwood Commercial
From: Ron L. Biggers [mailto:rbiggers@ci.glenwood-springs.co.us]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 12;58 PM
To: Andy Schwaller
Subject: 2550 Hwy 82, Glenwood Commercial
Andy,
Page I of 1
This is a note to let you know that yesterday 3/29/07 I did a finial inspection on and approved the fire protection
systems that are installed in DG Drywall space A-200 (office) and B-100 (shop).
I also inspected and approved the fire protection systems installed in the Mauldin Brother space in building B.
The fire protection systems in the remaining cores/shells of both buildings at this site are also approved. The
tenant finish work in the Dahl Plumbing spaces in Building B are a few weeks away from a finial inspection date.
If you have questions on these spaces please contact me.
~ 011 ~ '9~· ';iu ?1talt.1haC. tj. S. ';.'D .
970-35'4-6433
';&ze s~ StWC.LWeJ
4/2/2007
Garfield County Building and Planning
108 8th Street Suite 401
Glenwood Springs, CO
970.945.8212
Plan analysis based on
the 2003 International Building Code
Project Number: Date: October 16, 2006
Project Name : Dahl Tenant Finish
Address : Glenwood Commercial
Occupancy: M
Construction: V-B
Contractor:
Architect:
Engineer:
Report By: Andy Schwaller
NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a
complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 2003 IBC.
It is a guide to selected sections of the code.
Report created using Plan Analyst software by IHS Global 800-854-7179
FL NAME OCC MAX FLR AREA ALLOWED RATIO STATUS
1 Sales Room
Total for Floor
M ok
FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS
ELEMENT
Structural Frame
Interior Bearing wall
Interior nonbrg wall
Shaft Enclosure
Floor/Ceiling Assembly
Roof/Ceiling Assembly
Stairs
NOTES:
MATERIAL
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
3414
3414
Interior check only
Interior check only
FOR BUILDING
RATING
ELEMENTS --Table 601
NOTES
0 hour
0 hour
0 hour
1 hour
o hour
0 hour
None
Note 1
1. Fire resistance rating for shafts based on Section 707.4
NOTE: See Section 707.2 for shaft enclosure exceptions.
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
SHAFT REQUIREMENTS:
Page # 2
Openings other than those necessary for the purpose of the shaft
shall not be permitted. --Sec. 707.7.1
Penetrations other than those necessary for the purpose of the shaft
shall not be permitted. --Sec. 707.8.1
Shafts that do not extend to the bottom of the building shall:
1. Be enclosed at the lowest level with the same fire-resistance
rating as the lowest floor but not less than the rating
of the shaft enclosure; or
2. Terminate in a room having a use related to the purpose of the
shaft. The room and openings shall have a fire-resistance
rating at least equal to the shaft enclosure; or
3. Be protected by approved fire dampers installed at the lowest
floor level within the shaft enclosure.
Sec. 707.11
EXIT REQUIREMENTS:
FL NAME NUMB
occ
MIN MIN
EXITS WIDTH
PANIC CORRIDOR DOOR NOTES
HDWR RATING SWING
1 Sales Room
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
FOOTNOTES:
114
114
2
2
17.1
17.1
No
No
N/A
N/A
Out 1
Out
1. Two exits are required from this area since the occupant load exceeds
allowable in Table 1014.1
NOTES FOR EXIT TABLE
Door swing is based on Section 1008.1.2
Occupant load is based on Section 1004 and Table 1004.1.2
Exit width is in inches and based on Section 1005.1 & Table 1005.1
Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components.
Width shown for 1st floor is based on other egress components.
Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways.
For the m~n~mum width of doors, see Section 1008.1.1.
For the minimum width of corridors, see Section 1016.2.
For the minimum width of stairways, see Section 1009.1.
Exits shall be continuous from the point of entry into the exit to
the exit discharge. --Sec. 1003.6
Page # 3
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
EXIT SEPARATION
In areas where 2 exits are required, the m1n1mum separation is 1/3 of
the maximum diagonal of the area or floor measured in a straight line
between exits or exit access doorways.--Sec. 1014.2.1, Exception 2
Multiple means of egress shall be sized such that the loss of any one
means of egress shall not reduce the available capacity by more than
so percent. --Sec . 1005.1
EXIT SIGNS
Exits and exit access doors shall be marked by an approved exit sign.
Signs shall be placed where the exit or the path of egress travel is not
immediately visible. No point to be more than 100 feet from an exit sign.
--Sec. 1011.1
Exception 1: Exit signs are not required in rooms or areas which require
only one exit.
Exception 2: Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are
identifiable as exits need not be signed when approved.
Exit signs shall be internally or externally illuminated.
--Sec. 1011.2
Exit sign shall be illuminated at all times including during loss of
primary power . --Sec . 1011.4 & Sec. 1011.5 .3
BOLT LOCKS :
Manually operated flush bolts and surface bolts are not permitted.
--Sec. 1008.1 .8.4
Exception 2: Where a pair of doors serves a storage or equipment room,
manually operated edge-or surface-mounted bolts are
permitted on the inactive leaf .
LOCKS AND LATCHES:
Egress doors shall be readily openable from the egress side without the
use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. --Sec. 1008.1.8
Locks and latches shall be permitted to prevent operation where any
of the following exists:
Exception 2: The main door or doors in Group B, F, M and S areas are
permitted to be equipped with key operating locking devices
from the egress side provided:
2 .1 The locking device is readily distinguishable as locked.
2.2 A readily visible durable sign is posted on the egress
side stating : THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING
IS OCCUPIED
Exception 3: Where egress doors are used in pairs, automatic flush bolts
shall be permitted to be used, provided the door leaf having
the automatic flush bolts has no doorknob or surface-mounted
hardware.
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
ADDITIONAL DOORS:
Page # 4
Where additional doors are provided for egress purposes, they
shall conform to the requirements in Section 1008.1
LANDINGS AT DOORS:
1 . There shall be a floor or landing on each side of a door .
--Sec. 1008.1.4
2 . Such floor or landing shall be at the same elevation on each
side of the door. --Sec. 1008.1.4
3. The floor or landing shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the
threshold. --Sec. 1009.1 .6
4 . Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway
or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing
serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall
not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required
width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44
inches. --Sec . 1009.1.5
5 . The space between two doors in series shall be 48 inches plus the
width of door swinging into the space. --Sec. 1009.1 .7
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
STAIR REQUIREMENTS:
Stairways:
Page # 5
1. The riser heights shall not be less than 4 inches or greater than 7
inches. The minimum tread depth is 11 inches. --Sec. 1009.3 The
maximum variation is 3/B inch between the largest and the smallest
in a stairway flight. --Sec. 1009.3
2 . The minimum width of a stairway is 36 inches, 44 inches if the
occupant load is greater than 50. --Sec. 1009.1
Also, check exit table above to see if minimum width is greater than
44 inches.
3. Provide a handrail on each side of stairways. --Sec. 1009.11
Handrail height, measured above stair tread nosing, shall be not
less than 34 inches and not more than 38 inches. --Sec. 1009.11.1
Handrails with a circular cross section shall have an outside diameter
of at least 1 1/4 inches and not greater than 2 inches or shall
provide equivalent graspability . --Sec. 1009 .11.3
Handrail-gripping surfaces shall be continuous without interruption
by newel post or other obstructions. --Sec. 1009.11.4
Handrails shall return to a wall, guard or the walking surface or
shall be continuous to the handrail of an adjacent stair flight.
Where handrails are not continuous between flights, the handrails
shall extend horizontally at least 12 inches beyond the top riser
top riser and continue to slope for the depth of one tread beyond
the bottom riser. --Sec. 1009.11.5
4. Open sides of walking surfaces which are located more than 30 inches
above the floor or grade below are required to have a guard.
--Sec. 1012.1
5. The minimum height of guard is 42 inches. --Sec. 1012.2
6. Open guards shall have balusters or ornamental pattern such that
a 4-inches diameter sphere cannot pass through any opening up to a
height of 34 inches. From a height of 34 inches above the adjacent
walking surface to 42 inches above the walking surface, a sphere
8 inches in diameter shall not pass. --Sec. 1012.3
Exception 1. The triangular opening formed at the riser, tread and
guardrail may be 6 inches.
7 . The minimum headroom clearance is 80 inches (6 ft.-B inches.)
measured vertically from a line connecting the edge of the nosing .
Headroom shall be continuous to the point where the line intersects
the landing below . The minimum clearance shall be maintained the full
width of the stairway and landing. --Sec. 1009.2
B. Enclosed usable space under the stairs is required to be protected
by 1-hour fire-resistive construction or the fire-resistance rating
of the stairway enclosure, whichever is greater. --Sec. 1019.1.5
9. A flight of stairs shall not have a vertical rise greater than 12 feet
between floor levels or landings. --Sec. 1009 .6
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address : Glenwood Commercial
Page # 6
2. The openings into the exit enclosure are required to be 1 hour
fire assemblies. --Table 71S.3
Openings into enclosure are limited to those necessary for exit access
to the enclosure from normally occupied spaces and for egress from the
enclosure. --Sec. 1019.1.1
Doors shall be self-closing or automatic closing . --Sec. 71S .3 .7
3. Exit enclosure must discharge directly to the exterior of the building.
--Sec. 1023.1
Exception 1: so percent of the number and capacity may exit through
areas on the level of discharge provided all of the
following are met :
1.1 There is a free and unobstructed way to the exterior that is
readily visible and identifiable form the exit enclosure .
1 .2 The level of exit discharge is separated from areas below by
construction conforming the fire resistance rating for the
enclosure.
Exception 2: SO percent of the number and capacity may exit through
a vestibule provided all of the following are met :
2.1 The area of the vestibule is separated from areas below by
construction conforming the fire resistance rating for the
enclosure.
2.2 The depth from the exterior of the building is not greater than
10 feet and the length is not greater than 30 feet.
2.3 The vestibule is separated from the remainder of the level of exit
discharge by construction providing at least the equivalent of
approved wired glass in steel frames.
2.4 The vestibule is used only for means of egress and exits directly
to the outside.
4 . The walls and soffits within enclosed usable spaces under stairways
shall be protected by 1 hour fire resistant construction. Access to
the enclosed usable space shall not be directly from within the
stair enclosure . --Sec. 1019.1.S
Sec. 1019.S
S. If a stairway continues below the level of exit discharge, an
approved barrier is required at the level . Directional exit signs
shall be provided. --Sec. 1019.1 .6
EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE:
The maximum travel distance in Group M is 2SO feet. --Table 101S.1
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address : Glenwood Commercial
BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY
Page # 7
1. In addition to accessible entrances required by Sections 110S.1.1
through 110S.1 .6, at least SO percent of all public entrances
shall be accessible. --Sec. 110S.1
2 . At least one accessible entrance shall be provided to each tenant,
dwelling unit and sleeping unit in a facility. --Sec . 110S.1.6
3 . Where parking is provided, accessible parking spaces hall be provided
in compliance with Table 1106 .1 --Sec . 1106 .1
4. At least one accessible route shall connect each accessible level .
--Sec. 1104 .4 See exceptions.
S . Accessible routes shall coincide with or be located in the same
area as a general circulation path. Where the circulation path is
interior, the accessible route shall also be interior .
--Sec. 1104 .S
6 . On floors where drinking fountains are provided , at least SO percent,
but not less than one fountain shall be accessible. --Sec. 1109 .5
Where dressing rooms, fitting rooms or locker rooms are provided, at least·
5 percent, but not less than one, of each type in each cluster shall be
accessible . --Sec . 1109.11.1
Where check -out a i sles are provided, accessible check-out aisles shall
be provided in accordcance with Table 1109.12 .2
STANDPIPE AND HOSE SYSTEMS --Sec. 90S
Exception: Class I standpipes a r e allowed in buildings with an automatic
sprinkler system.
A standpipe system is not required .
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
Page # 8
During times that the building is occupied, in lieu of the automatic
activation of alarm notification appliances, the manual fire alarm
system shall be allowed to activate an alarm signal at a constantly
attended location from which evacuation instructions shall be
initiated.
LIGHT AND VENTILATION
1. Every space intended for human occupancy shall be provided with
natural light. The minimum net glazed area shall not be less than
8% of the floor area. --Sec. 1205.1 and 1205.2
Any room is permitted to be considered as a portion of an adjoining
room where one half of the area of the common wall is open and
unobstructed and provided not less than one tenth of the floor area
or 25 square feet, whichever is greater. --Sec. 1205.2.1
Artificial light shall be provided that is adequate to provide an
average illumination of 10 foot candles over the area of the room
at a height of 30 inches above the floor. --Sec. 1205.3
2. Natural ventilation of an occupied space shall be through windows,
doors, louvers or other openings to the outdoors. --Sec. 1203.4
The minimum openable area to the outdoors shall be 4 percent of the
floor area. --Sec. 1203.4.1
Any room is permitted to be considered as a portion of an adjoining
room where unobstructed openings are provided that have an area not
less than 8% of the floor area of the interior room but no less than
25 square feet. --Sec. 1202.3.1.1
When openings are below grade, clear space measured perpendicular to
the opening shall be one and one half times the depth of the opening.
--sec. 1203 .4.1.2
3. Rooms containing bathtubs, showers, spas and similar bathing fixtures
shall be mechanically ventilated. --Sec. 1203.4 .2 .1
CEILING HEIGHTS:
Occupiable spaces, habitable spaces and corridors shall have a ceiling
height of not less than 7 feet 6 inches. Bathrooms, toilet rooms,
kitchens, storage rooms and laundry rooms shall be permitted to have a
ceiling height of not less than 7 feet . --Sec. 1208.2
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
WALL AND CEILING FINISH:
Page # 9
1. Wall and ceiling finish materials are required to comply with
Sec. 803.5 and Table 803.5.
2. Textile wall coverings shall have Class A flame spread index and
shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the criteria in
Section 803.6.1.1 or 803.6 .1.2. --Sec. 803.6.1
3. Carpet and similar textile materials used as a ceiling shall have a
Class A flame spread index and be protected by automatic sprinklers.
--Sec. 803 .6.2
4. Expanded vinyl wall coverings shall comply with the requirements for
textile wall and ceiling materials. --Sec. 803.7
5. Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface
that extends upward onto the walls at least 6 inches.
--Sec. 1210.1
6. Walls within 2 feet of urinals and water closets shall have a smooth,
hard nonabsorbent surface, to a height of 4 feet above the floor.
--Sec. 1210.2
INSULATION NOTES:
1. Insulating materials shall have a flame-spread rating of no more than
25 and a smoke developed index of not more than 450. --Sec. 719.2
(concealed installation) and Sec. 719.3 (exposed installation)
2. Where such materials are installed in concealed spaces, the flame
spread and smoke developed limitations do not apply to facings,
coverings and layers of reflective foil that are installed behind
and in substantial contact with the unexposed surface of the
ceiling, wall or floor finish. --Sec. 719.2.1
Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. --Sec. 2603
ACCESSIBLE FACILITIES:
NOTE: Except as noted, section numbers listed below are from
ICC /ANSI A117.1-1998
WATER FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS:
Accessible units must comp l y with the following:
1. Spout is to be within 36 inches of the floor. --Sec. 602.4
2. Spout arranged for paral lel approach shall be located 3 1/2
inches maximum from the front edge. Units with a forward approach
shall have the spout 15 inches minimum from the vertical support
and 5 inches maximum from the front edge of the unit.
--Sec. 602.5
3. Spouts shall provide a flow of water 4 inches height minimum.
--Sec. 602 .6
Code review for:
Project Id.: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
TOILET FACILITIES:
Page # 10
1. A 60 inch diameter turning space or T-shaped space is required
in the toilet room. --Sec. 603.2.1 and 304.3
Doors shall not swing into the clear floor space for any fixture.
603.2.3 See exception for rooms used for individual use.
2. Water closet shall be mounted adjacent to a side wall or
partition. The distance from the side wall or partition to the
centerline of the water closet shall be 16 to 18 in. Sec. 604.2
3. When the accessible water closet is not in a compartment:
Clearance around the water closet shall be 60 inches minimum,
measured perpendicular to the side wall, and 56 inches minimum,
measured perpendicular to the rear wall. --Sec. 604.3.1
4. When the accessible water closet is in a compartment:
Wheelchair accessible compartments shall be 60 inches wide
minimum measured perpendicular to the side wall, and 56 inches
deep minimum for wall hung water closets and 59 inches deep
for floor mounted water closets, measured perpendicular to the
rear wall. --Sec. 604.8.1.1
Compartment doors shall not swing into the minimum required
compartment area. --Sec. 604.8.1.2
Code review for:
Project Id. : Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
Page # 11
5. Grab bars shall have a circular cross section with a diameter of
1 1/4 inch minimum and 2 inches maximum, or shall provide
equivalent graspability. --Sec. 609.2
The space between the wall and the grab bar shall be 1 1/2 inches.
Sec. 609.3
Grab bars shall be mounted in a horizontal position 33 inches
minimum and 36 inches maximum above the floor. --Sec. 609.4
a. Side wall grab bars are required to start within 12 inches
of the backwall and extend to 54 inches from the back wall.
(The minimum length of the bar is 42 in) --Sec. 604.5.1
b. The rear bar shall be 24 in long minimum, centered on the
water closet. Where space permits, the bar shall be 36 in
long minimum, with the additional length provided on the
transfer side. --Sec. 604.5.2
6. The top of the water closet seats shall be 17 to 19 inches above
the floor. --Sec. 604.4
7. Accessible urinals shall be of the stall type or wall hung with
the rim at 17 inches maximum above the floor. Sec. 605.2
B. Accessible lavatories shall be mounted with the rim 34 inches
maximum above the floor. --Sec. 606.3
9. Sinks shall be 6 1/2 inches deep maximum. --Sec. 606.5
10. Water supply and drain pipes under lavatories shall be
insulated or otherwise treated to protect against contact.
--Sec. 606.6
11. Mirrors shall be mounted with the bottom edge of the reflecting
surface 40 inches maximum above the floor. --Sec. 603.3
Code review for :
Project Id .: Dahl Tenant Finish
Address: Glenwood Commercial
GLAZING REQUIREMENTS
Page # 12
All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety
glazing material. --Sec. 2406.1
Locations: Sec. 2406.3
1 . Glazing in swinging doors except jalousies.
2. Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding patio door assemblies
and panels in sliding and bifold closet door assemblies.
3. Glaz ing in storm doors.
4. Glazing in all unframed swinging doors .
5 . Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas ,
steam rooms, bathtubs and showers . Glazing in any portion of a
building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed
edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface.
6. Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the
nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of
either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the
bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the
walking surface.
Exception: Panels where there is an intervening wall or other
permanent barrier between the door and glazing .
7. Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those
locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets all of the
following conditions:
7.1 Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet .
7 .2 Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor .
7 .3 Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor .
7.4 One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of
the plane of the glazing .
See Exceptions .
8 . Glazing in guards and railings regardless of the area or height
above a walking surface .
9. Glazing in walls and fences enclosing indoor and outdoor swimming
pools, hot tubs and spas where all of the following are present :
9.1 The bottom edges of the glazing on the pool or spa side is
less than 60 inches above the walking surface.
9.2 The glazing is within 60 inches of the water's edge .
10. Glazing adjacent to stairways, landings and ramps within 36 inches
horizontally of a walking surface when the glass is less than 60
inches above the plane of the walking surface.
11. Glazing adjacent to stairways within 60 inches horizontally of the
bottom tread of a stairway in any direction when the exposed glass
is less than 60 inches above the nose of the tread .
See Exceptions.
..., ...
PCC
Prince Creek
Construction, Inc.
2520 S. Grand Ave., Suite 210
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-945-4545
970-945-4848 Fax
To: tll~-r
Phone:
Fax:
cc:
From: Dan Becker
Phone: 970-945-4545; 230-0263
Fax: 970-945-4848
Pages: £:(including cover)
Subject: l N s u t. A -r-r o N t N t<6. FOI(_ &; t..-(}V v.J e> 0 l.)
ClJ ,.n.n-t &t.er,n_ ""L.d:> '-~.
1o .. PAX 87084152408 PBIUlANENT BUILDERS INC 'h-. A1t-: ~~ 0!/27/07 TUE 13:42
,,
QIOOl/004
ftt. J;x 9'15" -4'BYt
...
I .. ;, .
-...,_.---·-~-------....... -----
~;~
..
............... ................. _." •• ••u•A.-u .• t ..
C'NPI,II ,.., .. ~oll~a"""
....... , • .-.... .... .~ .. rt»>
lllll'llllf) lclllm ••'4dlllllll
.lUI R·':lllot-.l'~~llctll Wlllnli
.......... .-... 'ICI1""''.-ul
~w.nm& ·~-'" .... ..,...
hnwlaiiCIII alll!nt.olt\IIUI 11 .. "4' liU
... •iltd ..... " .. ""*1 ..
APrli~.11i11~ l•lu.l.::
8 C'~~nm'll' Bltt.:t.
• \t,.ci~Wy C':.\'11} Hll • l'm:.NHoll~-._., ......
T ILOR D
CHDilOAl f'IODUC'II, IIC.
\ 1D a.n....., Clll
... 8DD-617-1617
.,
02127107 TUE 13:42 FAX 8708452409 PERMANENT BUILDERS INC f4]002/004
I as II
C:..FIII5W 1 li a ~(nklr 111~ .....W 1M IIIC
In Clllllllleldllllll iiUwrial tlllbllllcriun lllld 11:. en.-rl-
ltnll.bermlll IUIIf IIL'llllllic Pft~iell It i• 01 l'll~"'IIOpp.
llelll ,.,.-., L'mlli~inr. L.r ;~mi11CJ>pl;ta min llllll u caua)!'\1
-.aillf, ..... loUJflnnl.
~ I"All 1.11111pnnrnl\. wbm plllp.'ri' IIII4Cx'd IIIII
p111p:llcd hy "'~Ill&. pi\llk\: I J&UTI i~lll
~lft'in: liE iiiJIICIIIlll'l ol ..tlinillf: L~l.
,__ •A n ••
t'CIICoAll Dr i\ liiHIIold M. ON A t.•illllnl m
IIIIIISIII Rw-ialhe filliaf ,-6 L'OII:IIII L11Do~ tnowlft-)
,., hka:l.... ~) •111b. ... hctWr'Cia'lllridi 111111 hiM..
ltlodii-.'Vklin 10111 MIICI.'UIIIbantf IMia; lh! ho~
nnnJc ..1 '*" 11111 nf81111 ~ funller .... en.."-!
'f*C'o """ 11c r.tJN v.iiiiPuc fW''4111lllui1ckf\ Bd'UIIl
scum,.~~~t r-lk•• e:u.il)' .,. fill ale ,,a;aa \"IIYilr.
ftJIII'IIbo.tlfil,llilap:nrdc ~ nt ·~·dnn~
.ucllll'tpip:~o. wi~-.1 cb:tril:ul ~~~~ lte~· ..... , Ill:
lftJWtkd in~~••.-:nlll\'11\ ir ~~r-~~a~. .....
<"nrr.fln jCIIJ • CIITm. llfl'"·"'1-=11iwn11111C'C a. an
ln'llllvliftl nlltri:lllr L'tlmhl~ a llifh 'K' \lllllt' wllh 1~
~ lbilit~ '" mn~~ttrlr r.n -oo::tl ,'flid, ~ lllll'
1111\'lllllfe v.~ clo!:llin{t v.illlllll"!~ ,,llllolnll.1iclll.
lr deDlllo JIIUid \'1!1) dl'lricnli)·.
8c:l:aDc il b.lplllicd uncll:r pn."'lll:. lhc: '••m n~~>.
mpalilr spar:u •ith ca::. c,~ .. ~~~ ".,.. "'.....,.~~~~
"''R li~ ,mna.,lllt 111' I::PS bcliJ-. llw" reallllllilltf
dl'n'tht' hwlhl! e11111~ lirl: t•f IIIII! llliklinp.
MOIII inlpuRautL II i~ L'\J\1'\.U .. ill~ Ill ida ~
tJihcr IINihlliun ei'L'IIIud.
"••c.J;u soo . No&lr aompl~ whltllll ~IMfll
Clllb...lolllllllal\1• ;IIIII ~iiiJ! I J')C)f" f.PI\. ,\51)1
... odw:n.l. Sc!.'IMC 11 Wllllliu. .. puly)l)I'CQCI..
rolyl_,... .. .,.e. or poli)Ut"tlllnr<. h ntrt~ .,;.~
Iff ~C~Jft)• ~ ,, .. .,.. •••
Millin'" tmil ('fC"'~ "' IJCR:"',.,
C Pll'-NII .SW • /.\ t«1imte11 mr~Ut tUifl
pmnpttl ""de-' /ln'.\.'mrr in111 rhr nvtll
('tn'il.\; fHf'f' C'lrm•t 11r intl'ni'UJ/ .\pelt~.
('orc-•Fi/1 J(lr Itt I' ~n IIISICII/t:cl/llltl'rf
110.000 iii.SJtJI/dtltHu cukl !60 /J/1/1011 ;, nt'lt'
('(JIIifiiYIC'titllt.
C'n~Fill StXr is twih· appllnl ;,, IIC'\1' UJJJ
t!rlstbJC rnn#l'flrnnrr. •
1. A wric~· of .'Utlttll llulrs nil'
tlrllltil 1111, tlk' mnrmr.
2. Tht founr fltJW.f lllltllllh
thf' ttlllff' I'Utoil,'1 ttnd u·rh.
3. Hnl"·' rllr fJitltrlltd tHit'r tltt'
M'flllls ,.,.mnJ,.IC'/t·ft)laJ.,~ .. .,_ ~ .... ~~:,.~ . ~.
/ CtJn'-RII.SOO• cmr trl$t• hr.
\ f11ltii}Wd i11111 tr wult nr
; t't111ityfmm tlw 1up tif tlrt.*
••• , llllrt1pfitd ll'ttll.
I ,.
" ..
. ---:-. •,
I
~
,.;
.
OZ/%7/07 TUE 13:4% PAI 97094GZ409 PBRIANBNT BUILDERS INC
C'.,.., jW" IIVS' ~ irulaiM ... J5ll./UJ ,..,ft' /rtf
rl~ ..... -·\lkdilt,m b~UdiU Sftlifllll.
IJr-•a•
Nn·~~~n ~a~.Tht riWIIn i>
llll.-lnthc1111Pf111cd en~~~~ 11rn 1t.: !lAIII·
c:allll' J.w. Ont or I~~ M'lllllafh lli'Cill\0.
Fill~,_ a.a.Ja&i&• j,. dml il i.l)~ly
iiDIIIIIaiiii'ICr .;.II ocaim' 11m bcm ''1111lpktal.
l'hJ\ ullc-.~ lbc' IQIIloCIII ~'lllllllll:tOr U1 ll.'llft \111101Cr11111t·
cd daA llllllntnU., l'UIWolrbrlkll'llllnl:l. :IIIII pnd~~~o1im
tmob.
Whn! •1111~a1iollc 1\11\l' IUn ~unplcled. lolllltd
ur doJo!d. CtR-fUI ,._, .. "pumped lmn ear.:~\ mit}"
~II \INIII bnlt olrilil:d bill• .... mc-1~ jiliN~
.-o&lnd !lie mitt 1r:111 m-.a ~l:U..-Iy r fmmlbc
0nor !MI. 11li:l tna111111 " ICPCIIICil in un.' ell ur unlil
lh: Will ~ filled. . --Cllr.!-Fill !oCIT" ~an~~ p;at u1 ~
l'IIIIICIIIC\illn 111!1 u-~ lnnc-lmn mr~· ~'~~' 1111!-' IIDii
lk'UII~ik ..!dckiiiiJ. h )D.**"~ !!pin and
a;ma !ly 1hr atdri~m\ Iii' \IICII a•llf'lrin ~ Wal·
Man. K-Milt. W'IIII-Dbil:. Sarewly. k~.I'Ubllx.
lllfle.-. Hlnl" TNt«. C"111.'11i1 Clly. u'llloft Ftalll!. .1111!
l.tM>e'• ,.,.,._
II hi~ hftD ......alcd In Jodlnnl,.,.dlllf\.'hto.. pth•>~~•.
tllnb. ~ -lllbmll\L~ flll.ilili~~ u .....
c~FiU sm ~ 111 ia'lllllk\l ~·ca~ OCflll« ...
rllfiiPI"WWC""' lilt nn~>~wc~ ~, _ ..
.. ·
WAl· MART
,. _;
. ... .... \
. -r
~~ llflPIIcdlllllllipi ill \WI~
C'lft-l:"dl !o(., n. llllll\.'1.\ommcndc:d ""' I.'Cilinp ...
1111~ llll!llil:al•-\11&1\1 ... ~ 'o11!11'llt ~llllf'\o"IAA~
Jc.llb su !oiMald II ~ u'CI.IIur l1wllllln.. Un 11111 uw: in
~ .JAlli..':ltinft. Clrundo:tplllllll a-:a,,......
htrrier. \)p lllllll"ir III!UNw IIU!f~ "'1111 OCIIIIUIIned
ll.'ft1PI!IIIIUIDD\Ql~"llll,.)'l:.
• Supcriur l1r: •'liB 111111 ""-'11 potfarot~llo.'\!
• Rlllllll\lltlo ~n llo tR~~•-ed k> ~ buur.. IWI 2 hnon rroll.'ll :f" a!IZ"C'Ml'•ull~~
• ro;.a nt-. "' \ll'l···
•li;rt'r fur !he: cmilmmrnl
li!003/004
r
•
i II l r
I I
I 'i.t 'I'. f i6 .::a
•o ;I
il ·~
Z-;• :0,-1
~~ '11'1'1 tn!l t 11 r ~ r ~ 1 ~ J!!i·.,t: ! .( r ' ~ a t I~ 1i l I . Jfli ~~-s·i'~i (tz-I ="" --=-~ ~-!1 '-'~ ~'HI
I • c:. f · :-!5 .,. ' i:! )C ,_. • "' ~. ,.7 II ;.& I .. I e :n I a~ 'CI If. a ~ . ! =t
~~
~if.
·~= ~ A!:,-[ .~: ~~~ , ~~ P'1> Pn ; ! !;I. 0 ~ i! ?-1!~=-: ~~ i:~ t:~ : ~ -~; J .._ . -I -• - - -' -t'! ~~ [ • -• I c ~r: I ~il. i f i ' Jl! ... ll J~ ~'-'!S 1: : •
' ~~l! li ! F.-i~ = ' a j: i f 'f : 11 ~ i!: ! s: 1 r a-{ t: I te-·~;:e a~: I rtit
) i a i I I !. ~ I r ! . ~~t I
il(lfi !!! rr, Jii Iff I .. ~ I l· t ~ ~= If~ f .... ~~~,j~l"-!5 ill ffl
sf i. ~u ~~ ,-, H fiirl -~, I 1 I A. 5tei ! j I ~ ~ t s,,,
; ! I 1 ~ w·~ff r .. '~ttf
I! ' ' J r, r f £·1-.. ... y ' .... ..,. f~l!i .. :r ~-e
f = .. ~ r J ,~ i i~ ~ ra 1· .r~~ r· ..... ! f ;Iii-rr it -~: t i '' I ~~ ,:1:. ; ' : 1 .... :-1 .. ,
t· II .1.1 !.-4 .... w : .. :n;, ar;r 11 : l -I
J ! s r ~ : ~ :1. • 'if : !i a ~ f 1 .. • il.! 'l
• . i Jtl : ~ t : il'" i • • I • . . . . · . . l i .
• I -f I i'f ;e al ir 1'1 i r I i '-,.. r_ r 1 • a I ~ 1 I ~ i ~ I i ~ ~ '1 tt 18
• ' or ..e " :),.. a , I I r ~ ~ . ~ . r I 111
. . . I . . .
0 'N ......
N ... ...... •o ...
~ ...
Col ,.
Col
~
tD ...
0
tD ...
(II
N ,.
~
I
~
1-1
§ ...
~
61
0
0 ,.
.....
0
0 ,.
FROM : Kurtz & Rssociates, Inc.
KURTZ&
ASSOCIATES, Inc.
STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERS
5012 COUNTY ROAD 154
~NWOOO SPRINGS,
COLORADO 111001
PHONE ( 970) 045-6305
FAX (i70) e4~1~3
COPYTO: -
FAXNO.: -
NUMBER OF PAGES
INCLUDING COVER SHEET:.l_
PHONE NO. : Mar. 02 2007 02:21PM Pl
FAX TRANSMISSIQN
DATE: /)1~~ ·(/~ £~ f
J
FROM: $r.•-r ;c::;. r ~ .
TO: /1-:~"~c.e. C'/"eek' ~~~s.friJGf.._,.,
ATTN: D a.4 1.3e~ !4 ,-
RECENER'SFAXNO.: tf4§ .. 4-84:8
PROJECT: /1/ j c I L;tt11~o" o ll(,#fllr{;,·t:.
/i/..1' ., No. I { Alo. £.
~ iv-l~r s> he IV' tV-<-~ (]> i/1..1~ '~ Ne~. t 1 /tlt>.1!. :
..T 1./lf~~s.h.,./ -(t.f /Ae dk4r w~~ h"-1/~ be~/1
C~A>.frvc-nd ~;/~ .J.if:" ~~/<( ep~ ,P~~u~~ t~/1
~.x 6 ~/i.,;/s @)'-11 ..., .. ~4 ,...,// Aol'/z~,~l bitJt: k:=11J
<? 4// Gl4!e-l e~~~. . 71-L ,P/ycwDa~ ~./£.':; t'S
$ fyle~ ~ ~ tr ~/.~It X/' ct;;(J_ _s.lf?;,.S 5;1~c~d
G? -4--.fQ -S o/1 c~"~r. A-tl ~~ds f i!t,J6i1.J
"/e. sf'Y'kd a :$,·:s. ~~ .. "'.
!A.· s l s ~;f. vt:-£r.f ~c:"'er~Ve ~~!~as £vG-f.;A
~r .a. t5'A'e~ 4/Q./Is..
f U/l~el's£;!/ ~~ tY &'-1 No. :Z .a.. S~o"
~-·de X 7~7" fi-;,,( r~~~·~ A~s ki';? c(.l-t h1~
()/Ill <' f ,t",{e ,·..,.£r,o-.r s-~-r" ev~/k. {A.tz $ovk
Gd:f e ~ ~ r:(e.. ?-~'A ;'!f. .. ~ 4 ~,. 44Mo ~ ~o.;~
ex -Q.r '"~" 4-.J'I. A"" ~-!.·~.., -1 J"/d.. ;lt:JW/1 a.Ac"'r
S ~~~&' Oe.. /~'"-v'/~~ J t:'#A/1'~-f.·".J ~ ~1~~ evJI-~ "
f'.(e CtJRCI'' ~ e</4/( 6Phw. ;:J.IJV.'e:Je A!. /1/.tJ~
&II/J/Itc~p' ~ 4lt. (2) .. 2x ~ sl'vd' . @ ric.. ;1(; ..... ~'''"'~11n'~11111!~ e.d,y~ o.f' 14'~ "'/"Al":J· ~~e .Jef,..-( F /> +;~·j~~\l #
. -: ') . .;
.. ·' . ~ .. : \J ' 0 ~ ~... :~ ~ --~· ~,. ... ";. . . .·~ ~~"...... .C.#o~ '-~~
..
KURTZ & ASSOCIATES. INC. STRUCTVRALCONSVLTANTS
50 12 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
To: Whom it May Concern
MEMORANDUM
Re: Special Masonry Inspections at Buildings No.1 & No.2,
Glenwood Commercial Center: 2550 Highway 82
Glenwood Springs, CO.
Phone (970) 945 6305
Fax (970) 945 1093
November 09, 2006
Our office is the design engineer of record for the noted project. Our office issued
construction documents for both buildings on 05/28/04. The lower level masonry walls
and bond beams were designed utilizing allowable stresses based on "Special Inspection"
of the masonry construction. Our office performed a series of masonry inspections during
the construction of the two buildings to verify the quality of masonry construction was
such as to allow the use of the "Special Inspection" values. A series of masonry test
prisms were constructed on site during construction to verify in place grout, mortar, and
assembled masonry unit strengths .
The masonry subcontractor was Permanent Builders, Inc. Steve Strauss of
Permanent Builders served as masonry foreman of the two buildings. Inspections
performed by our office were coordinated with Mr. Strauss so that we were able to
observe masonry construction at random as well as prior to grouting of the walls . Given
the sizes of the buildings (Building No. 1 measures, in plan, 30'-0" x 188'-0", and
Building No. 2 measures 30' -0" x 200' -0") and the modular layout (The buildings are
based on a recurring 30' -0" by 40' -0" bay), the masonry work proceeded in a staged
manner from bay to bay . Permanent Builders was responsive to all requests by Brian
Kurtz, P. E. of our office relative to the construction process corrections in, and
adjustments to the placement of masonry reinforcement.
It is our professional opinion that the masonry construction for the lower levels of
Building No. I and Building No.2 were peifonned in a professional manner, and that the
masonry construction is of a quality such that the utilization of"Special Inspection" values
is entirely appropriate.
Attached to this memo is a summary of the special inspections performed during
construction by Brian Kurtz, P. E.
KURTZ & ASSOCIATES. INC.
5012 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs , CO 81601
STRUCTURALCONSQLTANTS
Phone (970) 945 6305
Fax (970) 945 1093
GLENWOOD COMMERCIAL: BUILDING No. 1
LOWER LEVEL MASONRY INSPECTIONS
Note : From the west, Bldg No. I is comprised of one 34' -0" wide bay, then three 40' -0"
wide bays, and finally at the east end, one 34 '~0" wide bay . Bays are counted from the
west. A majority of the lower level wall construction occurs along the south wall of the
building, with partial height masonry walls at the east and west ends of the building. Wall
and bond beam notes refer to the south wall unless noted otherwise . The primary bond
beam referred to in the inspection notes is the bond beam above the masonry openings
(See detail A/S6).
04/07/05: Masonry wall construction had commenced in the three westmost bays . I
requested that grout cubes be constructed from the materials being used in Bay No. 3.
04/Il/05: Masonry wall construction had commenced in the two eastmost bays .
Fiberglass isolation joints had been applied to the steel columns embedded in the walls in
the three westmost bays . Bond beams were in place, but not grouted in Bays No 1 & 2.
Horizontal reinforcement in the Bay No . 1 & 2 bond beam was placed as (2)-# 4, not (2)
~ # 5 as specified . I recommended that (1)-# 5, horizontal be added to augment the
existing reinforcement. The# 3 ties were in place in the Bay No . 1 bond beam as
specified . Placement of the ties was just beginning in Bay No. 2. Reinforcement had not
been placed in the Bay No . 2 & 3 bond beams . Vertical wall reinforcement was in place in
Bay No . l & 2 as specified . Formwork for the bond beam in Bay No . 3 was under
construction . Horizontal corner bars were in place at the northwest comer of the building
as specified . Splices in horizontal reinforcement occurred only at the control joints as
specified .
04/12/05 (7 nm): Bond beam reinforcement and vertical and horizontal reinforcement in
Bay No . 1 & 2 was complete , and was in place as specified, with the addition of the
(1)-# 5 horizontal bar in the bond beams . Grouting ofthe lower level wall at Bay No . l
& 2 was scheduled for 11 am . Lower level wall construction and bond beam construction
for the three eastmost bays was nearing completion . Horizontal bond beam reinforcement
for the three eastmost bays was in place as specified, and was continuous between control
joints. The # 3 ties were in place in the bond beams of the three westmost bays as
specified . The# 4 vertical wall reinforcement was in place at 24" on center as specified .
04/13/05: The south, upper level wall . was under construction, to include the placement
of the bond beams . At the main level floor, in Bay No . 1, the clearance between the south
end of the center beam and the masonry wall was not adequate . I recommended that the
masonry units at this location be removed and replaced.
Bldg No. 1 cont'd
04/14/05: The west 'return' wall was fully laid up, but not grouted . Vertical
reinforcement and bond beam reinforcement was as specified, but embed plates for steel
bar joist bearing had not been placed. In Bay No. 6 bond beam construction was
complete, and ready for grouting, with all reinforcement in place as specified. In Bay
No. I, 2 & 3 the wall had been grouted to the top of the bond beam. The three courses
above the bond beam course had been laid up, but not grouted. Dowels from the masonry
wall to the main level slab were in place as specified.
KURTZ & ASSOCIATES. INC.
5012 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
Phone (970) 945 6305
Fax (970) 945 1093
GLENWOOD COMMERCIAL: BUILDING No. 2
LOWER LEVEL MASONRY INSPECTIONS
Note : From the west, Bldg No . 2 is comprised of five 40' -0" wide bays. Bays are
counted from the west. A majority of the lower level wall construction occurs along the
south wall of the building, with partial height masonry walls at the east and west ends of
the building (i .e. masonry extends from the top of the concrete foundation wall to the
upper level floor). Wall and bond beam notes refer to the south wall unless noted
otherwise . The primary bond beam referred to in the inspection notes is the bond beam
above the masonry openings along the south wall (See detail A/S6).
05/13/05: Masonry waU construction had conunenced in all five bays. Vertical
reinforcement was in place at the masonry pilasters . Vertical reinforcement for the
balance of the waJls is to 'stabbed' immediately after the grout is placed . Clean-outs were
installed at the base of the wall at all reinforced ceUs. The masonry crew was preparing to
grout the south wall of all five bays up to the bottom of the primary bond beam .
05/17/05: The first pour (up to the bottom of the primary bond beam) of the south wall
had been grouted. Vertical wall reinforcement was in place as specified . The vertical
reinforcement extended out of the top of the first pour up to the main level floor as
specified . The pilaster elements at this wall were reinforced as previously observed, but
not grouted . The 'return' wall at the east end of the building had been constructed up to
the main level floor . Bond beam reinforcement for the bond beam at the main level floor
was in place as specified, and vertical wall reinforcement was in place as specified. The
vertical reinforcement at this condition extended 24" above the main level floor. Steel
embed plates to support the floor joists had not been set.
05/25/05: Structural steel beams for the main level floor were being placed at the time of
this inspection. The steel beams had been set in Bay No . 1, 2, 3 & 5. Placement of
structural steel was ongoing in Bay No. 4 at the time of my inspection .
05/31/05: Masons were laying block for the upper walls of Building No . 1. One mason
was laying block at the west 'return' wall of Building No.2.
06/02/05 (9 am): Masons were preparing for the grout pour of the lower level walls at
Building No.2. The pour was scheduled for 10:30 am. The pilasters at the south wall
and the south wall itself was to be poured 8 '-0" high up to the 'primary' bond beam .
Vertical reinforcement for the south wall was to be 'stabbed' after the grout was placed .
Bldg No.2 cont'd
06/06/05: Construction of the upper portion of the south wall and the primary bond beam
along the south wall was in progress in all bays. A majority of the mpons were working
on the upper level walls of Bldg No.2 due to a shortage of the 'split face' blocks
necessary to construct the bond beam courses . The primary bond beam plus three
additional courses of block up to the main level was complete in Bay No. 1. All
reinforcement was as specified . In Bays No.2 & 3 the primary bond beam had been
constructed one course high and the (2) -# 5 horizontal reinforcement was in place as
specified.
~ech
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
hpqeo@hpgeotech.com
Report of Masonry Grout Testing
......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 ......................................................................................... ..
Prince Creek Construction Job No: 105 217 Date: 4-7-05
David Hicks
2520 South Grand Avenue, Ste. 210 Sheet: 1 of 1
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Project: Glenwood Commercial Project, Hwy 82, South Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Placement Location: Unit 1, Front Wall, 1st Lift
Type & Size of Specimens: Cast in block cells and a 3" diameter core cut
Supplier: Casey Concrete Mix Design No: -Time Batched : -
Ticket No: -Truck No: -
Field Testing Information:
Time Sampled: 1 :JOpm Slump: -in. Water Added : -
Air Temperature : -0 Sample Temperature: -0
Compressive Stren~ th Testing
Age Days 7 28 28
Date Tested 4-14 5-6 "'~-.. 5-6
Maximum Load (lbs} 14,487 14,238 25,213
Length (in) I 6.0 6.0 6 .0
Diameter (in) 3.00 3.00 3.00
Area (in:.:) 7.07 7.07 7.07
UD Ratio 2.0 2.0 2.0
UD Correction 1.0 1.0 1.0
Compressive Strength 2050 2010** 3570
(psi)
Specified Strength: 2000 psi @ 28 Days
Progress Report: Grout was cast into block by contractor and picked up by HP Geotech 4-11-05.
•• Core had a defect along the side.
·-• • •••·-••-• ,._, ••• ~•u •u •••• ''h"Uo•U •"" •••• -.. ....... ,, ··~·-·•·•.._. .o oooou•t ,, ..... •u •-. .......... _,,. .•• ~_,,.,, .. ._,,..,,,.,~ .. , •• _~, •• ,._,..,,,, • ._, o oo o~o._u •••••••F>•• ... -.o o '"''""'''' •• ,,, .. .,. ..... •• .... ,,,_.. ••• ••·-·•·•·•·• "-••• 0
Copies :
Kurtz & Associates -Brian Kurtz
Casey Concrete-Shawn Vendette
Michael Evans
Field Technician Reviewed By
~tech
HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
h pgeo@hpgeotech.com
Report of Masonry Mortar Testing
•••~••~••oooooooooooOO •OOO I Oo.Oooooo u ooooO hi O ... .ooo.o oo o w ou.ooouuo ... oooo M oooooouo+ooooooooooo,.OniOoOIOOUioO••oo••o•••dono•r n on •oooouooooooooouoooooonuoonoooooou o oo.....,.,. ... ,.,..,. .. ,., •. ,, .. ..,~-..o••o w.......,_...h,...,... ............ ,.._.,_~r ... ooo N ooo•o -...ooo..o
Prince Creek Construction
David Hicks
2520 South Grand Avenue, Ste. 210
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Job No: 105 217 Date: 4-11-05
Sheet: 1 of 1
Project: Glenwood Commercial Project, Hwy 82, South Glenwood Springs, Colorado
•• , ... ,._,,,,,,,,,,,.l"'t••o•••••,..,.,.•ooo oo I I,,_,.,,, .. ,,, .. ,,,,,, OIOIO ... o i OOOio•OO h ooHoouoooooooooo••••••·••h .......... ooooo o oooooo-t ooooouooooooOOihhOII•••U•••I•I t",..••nrrtl orl••trnr t nro•l •"rt•nrnll",..n •l•lt t .,.,.-,, r ••1••1 110 1 o•o..•••"'• ••••
Placement Location: Front Wall, Unit 1, South End, 11th Course
Type & Size of Specimens: 2 x 2 cubes
Supplier: Permanent Bldrs Mix Design No: job mixed Time Batched: not observed
Type: N
Field Testing Information:
Time Sampled: 3:15
Air Temperature: 53° Sample Temperature: 61 o
Compressive Strength Testing
Age Days 7 28 28
Date Tested 4-18 5-9 5-9
Maximum Load (lbs } 9496 12,973 12,915
Length (in) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Width (in) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Area (inz) 4.0 4.0 4.0
Compressive Strength 2374 3240 3230
(psi)
Specified Strength: 1800 psi @ 28 Days
Progress Report: Sampled from tub on scaffolding.
Copies:
Kurtz & Associates -Brian Kurtz
Casey Concrete-Shawn Vendette
Field Technician
Michael Evans
Reviewed By
~
~c!rtech . 5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hegeo@hegeotech.com
Report of Masonry Prism Testing
~oooo••••~•o._o-o ... o oo o ... •uoooouuooooouooooou o••••••o ooooooo 0o4 o o·•~•"••••o oo•u·-."~·••u•u u .. ouo ooo.o .. ooo~n•••n •-• .. ••••oouuouoo ooo•on•o•o•••M h •--·•••uoouuoooo••••••..,ooo uuooooooooouooo•o •••O••U••o ... •wuoooooooooo,.......,.0 ,..,.,._,_.0
Prince Creek Construction Job No : 105 217 Date : 4-12-05
David Hicks
2520 South Grand Avenue, Ste. 210 Sheet 1 of 1
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Project: Glenwood Commons Project, Hwy 82, South Glenwood Springs, Colorado
•·••••• ,_. • oo ,,.,,,,,._,,.,._, .. ,,..u .. oouoooo o oooo·•~••·•-~t-••••o---oo ... ..,, ... ,.._,,.,....,.,,,._.,,_..,_.,,,,,,,,..,.., • .,,.,,.,,., •••••••••••••••••••u .,..., ...... _.o.4 ·•..0•o ••••• .. •••• •••oooo.o•oooooo ooouoo ooo oo o.uoooooooooooooo o• ...... ,..,...,,,,.-.. , .... uo•o•~••t ,,,.,..,.,..,,..,.,
Placement Location: Unit 1, Front Wall
.N ... \.....,.,..,..W<J<t,'~V. .. .._. ....... ,~w.h--'oVolfo'llti!/V•It.''~.,.,.,...v..--.,~Y~"'' ... "'_.,,.., ..... ,..,.,.,..~~ .... -....... _...~~Y""""'-Y.._Y __ ..._.,.,.,. __ 'o._o __ ..,....w.'No'o'A.~A'Y'o-WoWo.,.~Wo""'\'>'
Masonry Contractor: Permanent Builders
Block Supplier: Mayne Block
.•.y~~.•.•.t,•.•/',''f",Yo'lo'<'I""'NII"'..,-,'"""Ni!II'N.IV~NN.-IN...,.,.,""'''N'..,..,..illo'HN ... '"Y"'N.'"HNII',YoY,~/',YIM'I'I'•Yi,_',VIIH<'•'IH~.Y#HHI'Ni'~NNI#"'~'"Y"'"'NH/I,,\I,,'INNI,'II'Nn.•t,I,,.,.,HI'AN~N/>H'~N~o,•, .... H,'""'"'._,,,I ,Wo'•NY_.IWnl'~,•~•.•¥o'I-"UNJ",'J'~~·o
Prism Data: grout filled Bedding: full shell
Nominal Dimensions : 8x8x16 Type of Masonry Unit light weight
.......... , ... ,..,_,,,_,..,.,,.,....,.. ,.,~,..,,.,.,.,., .. ,,._,,., .• , .. ,.,.,.,,,,,..,,..,..,.,,.,, __ , ........ -,... ........ -u.oooo.oa.."'oo.ouooo•o oO"t >ooooo oooooo.•o•"'''_., ... _,.., .... .._ ..... .._.,., .. ,,,._.,,ao oo ooooo ooooo ooo ooo ooooooto o oooooo• ... •""..,'•_.•••••••-•"""''""•-·-.•ooo•-----
Compressive Strength Testing
Age (days) 7 28 28 28 28 28
Date Tested 4-19 5-10 5-10
Capped Height (in) 15.8 16.0 16.05
Length (in) 7.65 7.7 7.7
Width (in) 7.65 7.65 7.7
Gross Area (inz) 58.52 58.91 59.29
Net Area (inz} ·-----
Maximum Load (lbs) 99,720 147,810 112,560
Gross Strength (psi) 1700 2500 1900
Net Strength (psi)
Specified Strength: 1500 psi @ 28 Days
.v,-.._vHIM'-.IA'**_""""""'_"""''""•------~.,_.v.u~I'No.....,-..-.-.......... .._.,.,.,...,...,...,..,.,.,...
Progress Report: Prisms were built 4-11-05 and grouted 4-12-05.
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ,_,_,._,, .........
Copies:
Kurtz & Associates-Brian Kurtz
Michael Evans
Field Technician Reviewed By
~tech
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
Report of Masonry Grout Testing
Prince Creek Construction
David Hicks
2520 South Grand Avenue, Ste. 210
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Job No : 105 217 Date: 6-15-05
Shee t 1 of 1
Project: Glenwood Commercial Project, Hwy 82, South Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Placement Location: Unit 2, Bond Beam
Type & Size of Specimens: Cast in block cells and a 3" diameter core cut
Supplier: Casey Concrete Mix Design No: -Time Batched: -
Ticket No: --Truck No: -
Field Testing Information:
Time Sampled : -Slump: --in. Water Added: -
Air Temperature : --0 Sample Temperature : -0
Compressive Stren~ th Testing
Age Days 7 28 28
Date Tested 6-22 7-13 7-13
Maximum Load (lbs) 22,720 28,962 31,637
Length (i n ) 6.00 6.00 6.00
Diameter (in) 2.98 2.98 2.98 I
Area (in") 6.97 6.97 6.97
UD Ratio 2.01 2.01 2.01
UD Correction 1.0 1.0 1.0
Compressive Strength 3260 4150 4540
(psi)
Specified Strength: 2000 psi @ 28 Days
Progress Report : Grout was cast into block by contractor and picked up by HP Geotech 6-22-05.
Copies :
Kurtz & Associates-Brian Kurtz
Casey Concrete-Shawn Vondette
Michael Evans
Field Technician Reviewed By
WEST SLOPE TESTING & INSPECTION
3177 Glendam Dr
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone: 970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
9-2-05
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
108 8th st., Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RECElVED
SEP 0 6 ZOOS
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING & PLANNING
Page 1 of 1
Please find enclosed copies of special inspection reports to date for
the Glenwood Commercial Center. I guest this project is in the County
jurisdiction & not the City of Glenwood as I originally sent the reports
to them.
Thank You; Doug Young
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 2-15-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center
Address: 2550 Grand Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9269 & 9270
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#!
Page 1 of 1
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Shop
Report: Visually inspected the shop welding at the beams & columns
piece marked 2B 1 (Qty2), 2B2 (Qty 3), 2B3, 2B4 (Qty 2), 2B4A, 2B5,
2B6, 2B7 (Qty 4), 3Bl, 3B2, 3B3 (Qty 3), 3B4 (Qty 3), 3B5 (Qty 3),
3Cl (Qty 2), 3C2 (Qty 3), 3C3 (Qty 5), and 3C4.
A few welds were discovered that needed to be repaired (porosity &
undercut). These welds were repaired and then the welding inspected
above appeared to be as shown on the drawings and appeared to be of
acceptable quality per the requirements of the AWS Dl .l Structural
Welding Code.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 4-18-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9269
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#2
Page 1 ofl
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Visually inspected the field welding at the bar joist support
ledger angles to the embed plates and at the bar joists to the beams &
embeds from grid lines I to 5 2nd floor level building I. Also visually
inspected the high strength bolting at the same area as the welds above.
The welding & high strength bolting inspected above appeared to be in
general conformance with the drawings and appeared to be of acceptable
quality per the requirements of the A WS D 1.1 Structural Welding Code
and the AISC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or
A490 Bolts except as noted below.
1) A few welds needed repaired and the welds at the bottoms completed .
2) There were no embed plates to weld the joists to at three areas above
the center beam pockets.
he steel erector was made aware of these items. ----
Inspectortreehnieian: Douglas E Young <{J~~·~·llll 1 ~-·~ ~n ~~ ~ ·-."~ CJF F
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 8 I 504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 4-26-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9269
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor tbat Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#3
Page I of 1
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Visually inspected the field welding at the bar joists to the
beams & embeds from grid lines 5 to 6 2nd floor level building 1.
Reinspected the welds noted in report #2 item I.
The welding inspected above appeared to be in general conformance
with the drawings and appeared to be of acceptable quality per the
requirements of the A WS D 1.1 Structural Welding Code. Note no
special inspection was performed on the shop welding at the anchor
studs to the embed plates.
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 5-25-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9269
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#4
Page 1 ofl
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Visually inspected the floor deck puddle welds at building
number 1. Also received copies of some additional details from the
structural engineer for some fixes as noted in report number 2 item 2 and
at some other locations.
The welding inspected above appeared to be in general conformance
with the drawings and appeared to be of acceptable quality per the
requirements of the A WS Structural Welding Codes.
'~:4 .
oc1 \\
Inspectorffecbnician: Douglas E Young ~~ ~. c~ .·
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 7-26-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center (Building #2)
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9270
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#5
Page 1 of I
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Received & reviewed copies of some additional details from the
structural engineer for some fixes at varies locations. Visually inspected
the field welding at the bar joists & shims to the beams & embeds grids
4 to 6 and close to grid line 3. Also visually inspected the high strength
bolting at the area above.
The welding & high strength bolting inspected above appeared to be in
general conformance with the drawings and appeared to be of acceptable
quality per the requirements of the A WS D 1.1 Structural Welding Code,
and the AISC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or
A490 Bolts.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young ··
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 7-28-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center (Building #2)
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9270
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#6
Page I ofl
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Visually inspected the deck puddle welds grids 2 thru 6.
Visually inspected the field welding at some beam connections close to
grid 3.
The welding inspected above appeared to be in general conformance
with the drawings and appeared to be of acceptable quality per the
requirements of the A WS Structural Welding Codes except as noted
below.
1) Some additional tube steel shims needed welded in at the joist seat
bearing locations per the engineers detail at grid line 2. These welds will
need to be inspected when completed along with the other remaining bar
joist welds that were not already inspected on 7-26-05.
2 needed welded to embed p a e · -----
3) It appeared that a few anchors were missing or the ledger angle
needed welded to the embed plates at the concrete wall grid line 4.
The steel erector and the contractor were made aware of these items.
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 8-17-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center (Building #2)
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9270
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#?
Page 1 of I
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Visually inspected the deck puddle welds grids I thru 2.
Visually inspected the field welding at the bar joists to the beams, shims,
and embeds grids 1 thru 2.
The welding inspected above appeared to be in general conformance
with the drawings & additional structural details, and appeared to be of
acceptable quality per the requirements of the A WS Structural Welding
Codes.
Note there was some remaining welding to complete, high strength
bolts to tighten, and anchors to install. These items will need to be
inspected when completed before a fmal inspection report can be issued.
Inspectorffechnician: Douglas E Young
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendarn Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 8I504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Final Inspection Report
Date: II-17-06
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center Buildings I & 2
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9269 & 9270
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#9
Page 1 of 1
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Shop & Field
Report: Reinspected the items that needed completed and/or repaired as
noticed on the prior inspection visits.
To the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspections of
the structural welding & high strength bolting as outlined in reports I
thru 9. To the best of my knowledge the structural welding & high
strength bolting inspected as outlined in reports I thru 9 met the quality
requirements of the me, A WS D 1.1 Structural Welding Code, and the
AISC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490
Bolts.
Inspectorffechnician: Douglas E Young ·
I
Prince Creek
PCC
Date: 3/29/05
To: Andy Schwaller
Construction, Inc.
2520 S. Grand Ave., Suite 210
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
970-945-4545
970-945-4848 Fax
Garfield County Building and Sanitation
Department
cc:
Phone: 970-945-8212
Fax: 970-384-3470
From: Fred Cameron
Phone: 970-945-4545
Mobile: 970-230-5352
Fax: 970-945-4848
Pages: 14 (including cover)
Subject: Here is some additional information regarding
masonry special inspection for the Glenwood Commercial
Center, Buildings 1 &2. I have also enclosed the submittals
requested in item #2 of Brian Kurtz's memo. We will be
starting masonry work next week. Please call if you have
any question ~ Wu
1
cJ~
FROM Kurtz & Assoc1ates, Inc. PHONE NO. Mar. 29 2005 05:02AM P2
KlTRTZ & ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAl, CONSUJ,TANTS
SO 12 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
To: Prince Creek Construction
MEMORAL"iDUM
Re . Special Inspection for Masonry Constl·uc:tion
Glenwood Commercial Center: Building No.1 & No.2
2550 Highway 82
Garfield County, CO
Phone (970) 945 6305 _.--
Fax (970) 945 1093
March 29, 2005
Our office is the structural design engineer of record for the noted project. A~;
such, we specified that the lower level masonry construction at the south wall of both
buildings be constructed under the standards of"Special Inspection.'' This requirement
was precipitated by the strength requirements of the masonry bond beams above the
overhead doors . Note that at Building No _ 1. the lower level waH has a gross area of
approximately 2600 sq. ft ., and that at Building No 2, the lower level wall has a gross
area of approximately 3000 sq. ft .
Note that the Structural General Notes for each building specify concrete block
requirements, mortar type, and the required strength for the mortar, grout, and assembled
masonry.
For each building, our office recommends that the Special Inspection program
consist of the following requirements:
1. A qualified masonry inspector shall be present (full time) during the
construction of the lower level, south masonry wall of each building . The
inspector shall observe and record all applicable aspects of the masonry
constroction, to include handling and placement of masonry units, mortar
mixing . grout pumping, and placement of reinforcement..
2 The supplier of the masonry units shalt provide test. reports to verifY that the
masonry units conform to ASTM C90, Type N, lightweight block_
3 At the discretion oftbe masonry inspector , two sets "Prism Tests•t shall be
performed for the lower level wall of each building A set of "'Prism Tests"'
shall include a set of"Grout Prisms", a set of"Mortar Prisms", and a set of
"Ma.iionry Units Prisms, (i e. assembled ma.<\onry units). Each set shall consist
of three prisms. with one prism to be tested for compressive strength at 7 days,
and two prisms to be tested for compressive strength at 28 days.
COMMERCIAL T ESTING LABORATORIES
A D IV I S ION or CTL /THOMPSON , INC
REPORT OF PHVSICAL PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE MASONRV UNITS
IN GENERAl. CONFORMANCE WITH AS"IM C 140 AND C 90
CTLJob No: CT-11618
Date Submitted: October 15,2003
Client: Mayne Block
Gypsum, Colorado
Product: Lightweight CMU Data: November 14, 2003
ASTM Unit Spaclncatfon: ( ASTU C 90 . ...-· ,
Nominal CMU Dlmen51ons: '---Width:-6 .0
Ughtwefghl
ln. HeJght
SUMMARY
CMU Gross Al'ea Compressive Strength •.
CMU Net Area Compressive strength •..•..
eMU Nal Area Compf8ssive Strength ••.•..
Minimum Facashelf Thlcknoss ........... -·· •.
Minllllt-"J1 Web Thickness .......................... .
Equivalent Web Thickness ....................... ..
CMU Net Cross Sectional Anra ................. .
CMU Gross Cross Sectional Area ...... -... ..
CMU Percent Solid ,_ ............... -............... _.
CMU Equivalent Thickness ....................... ..
Variation rrom Slandard Dimensbns ........ .
Absorption .: .................................................. .
Density (Oven Dly Condition) ..................... .
Moisture Contant, (as delivered for tesUng).
Shrinkage. ASTM _.26 (aa tested) ............... .
COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS
ABSOR.P110N ANO DENSITY RESULTS
fi!:j:!j!i®f:.l.jjij;l;fi J:RJifiii - - -,. ~:-:t - -,.. -~ .~! :.: •. ---• -
REQUIRED ... ..
Average: 1900 min
Individual: 1700 min
1.25 min
1 .0~n
2.25mln .....
•••• ·-·-Width: 'f'/~ 0.1261nch
Haight: 'f'/-0.1251och
Length: +/-0.1261nch
18 malt ........ . .....
0 .065%
8 .0 ln. Length 16.0 ln.
ACnJAL
1350 psi
2650 psi
2610 psi
1.29 h .
1 .07 .!1~ -..
2 .81 ln .
60.5 sq. in. •
118.5 sq. ln..
51.0 %
3.87 in.
max 0.021 in.
max 0.023 ln.
max 0.025 ln.
15.1 pet
101.1 pcf
11.3 %of 'total absorption
male 0 .081 %
Statement: Thea a samples meet ASTM C 90 specifications for lightweight. loadbearlng concrete masorlfY units tor
the properties tesied 8Xq)8l far Bnear dr)ting shrinkage, AS1M C 426.
COMMERCIAL TESTING LABORATORIES
lynn
Laboratory ~ger
Certified NCMA Lab Technician
AWF/JLGlawf
#f6.1 4 --
Jeffrey L Groom, P .E.,
Principal
22 LIPAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 8022 3 303 / 825-0777
·---~
This I.Hst report r'fllat.es only to tha tl.t:lrns tasted and ahall not IJo reJlr'CIIluced, except•n full, without wdU.I!'I approv~ of C'.ommcrcial TestinoLBbarator~
Table 1
t '
REPORT OF DRYING SHRINKAGE OF CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS
IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE Wlnl ASTM C 426
CUenl: Mayne Blook
Block ID~ Ughtweight CMU
CTLJab No.: CT-11618
Date Submitted: October 15, 2003
Date: November 14. 2003
l:;:~;~~i;i;f~~~~~f~j~;~~~~;~Ji;t~~;f~ft~~;~:Ir~~iJ~~~mt.~zliti~F======:=~~~~=====:::===r==::::::::===:====:=::=======r=========~~:~:==========
'·.·.·.·--.·.·.·;·.·.·.·.·;·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.············i!i-:.:.:..::~·-·.·t·.··;;tw· .• ···•~i;.;j::·l· ~=-··1 5 75 I 5 555 I 5 64 ·::::::::::::;:::::;:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;::::::::::::=:::=:~~lllJt~: .. ~lUll~:.~.;; • • •
~jj. ~ i : ~ ~~~Z i ! iii! i ~i~f ~!! i]i I il~!!! !l ~ j; I~ if fil i!i !ii~ iii i i ~i~ JJ~~ li iii f iff i i 1f~I f II! J i~! ~i~i ~~ J 1~ !{ i ~ !ilff Jl ~i! if ff! fit it l~i ~ 1 il ~ll ~~ li[ !l~ l~i ! 1 ~ 1! 1; ii l ~ [i l i [:!~if[! !i! i 1I !if i
1 120 BICM;k Weight, lbs. · 5.37 ·. · · 5.18 -5.25
Shrinkage. %1 0.031 I 0.030 I 0.031
2 I 48 I Block Welaht, lbs.l 5.10 I 5.00 • 5.08
Shrinkage, % 0~069 0.062 0.070
3 I 48 I Block Weight, lbs. 5.05 4.87 4.93
Shrinkage, % 0.079 0.073 0.082
4 I .t8 I Block Weight. lbs • 5.05 4.86 4.92
Shrinkage, % 0.082 0.075 0.084
5 • 48 I Block Weight. lbs . 5.04 4.BCi 4.92
Shrinkage,% 0.082 0.077 0.085
SHRINKAGE SUMMARY
\riliiji~il~i~~~~~rj~lli~i~~~~J~l ~~~!I~m!lj~j~lli~~•ml~ii~iiiiif~~~~i~i~i
7 0.082
a . _ .. 1 o.on.
9 I 0.085
Average: I 0.081
22 LIPAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80223 303 I 825-0777
Tt11s test repllrt mlates unly to t.he 1te1T1S l.tlst.ad and sll811 not be reprodul:ad. except m full, without wliLten approvnl of Curnmercial Testtn~J LAhnratol'll.!S
PROJEC.I :
l livision 4 -Masoru y
MORTAR DESIGN MIX
Reference: ASTM C 476 using property Specification except compressive strengtl L
Water:
Cement:
Sand:
Lime:
Mixing:
Potable water, clean and free from deleterious amounts of oil, acids l
alkalies and organic matter.
Portand Cement shall be ASTM C 150, Type I & II
Clean, sharp sand, free from loam, acids, alkalies, soluble salts and
organic matter. Ninety-five percent (95%) shall be retained on a number
1 00 sieve and all shall pass a number 4 sieve.
Well known brand confonning to ASTM Standard Specification and Test
C-207 Type S with all official revisions thereof.
1800 psi mortar shall be Type ·s· of the follmNing proportions:
1 (Part by volume of PorUand Cement)
1 % (Parts by volume of Hydrated Ume)
5 % (Parts sand measured in damp. loose condition)
Use method of measuring materials on job so that specified proportions of mortar
materials can be controlled and accurately maintained as work progresses. Unless
otherwise specified, all proportions are by volume.
For purposes of these specifications, weight, of one cu. ft. of respective materials used
as ingredients in mortar, is considered as the following:
Material
Portland Cement
Sand (dry)
Sand (damp)
Weight per Cubic Foot
94 pounds
80 pounds
85 pounds
., \J 't '/l r. •• t.u u .-d • .... .,. t 10 , .. ,:'r j,,,.t h t .I J• -~t~•· t h ~ .. ,1' I
PROJECT:
Division 4 -Masonry
GROUT FOR UNIT MASONRY-DESIGN MIX
Portland cement: 6-112 sacks per cubic yard
3/8" pea gravel: 20%
concrete sand: 80%
Grout for unit masonry to comply with ASTM C476 UBC Standard 21-19.
Supplied by Redi-Mix trucks from:
La Farge Corporation or
Casey Concrete
Equal
Strength: This mix has been tested to well above 3,000 psi. Compressive strength in
27 days. (Similar tests attached)
C.\My Documents\1'01 Forms\Grout Design Mix wpd
~'F#Ut.Gii I U I It I~~,. f fl ,J h \h ·t I n I._ fl
119!l (JIIIViiS ::.lrt•fli
OCII'/fl, ((I fi()?()IJ
j(l'j (1;7 4'!/11
Mix P6rformance Report
._ ... .._ ..... _ ---
Company Number (or G
location Numberl:
Companv Name: Moumalo Conactc -
Plant: I I · Wnod v Cree~
Ticket Nu111ber:
Job Number:
lndependMI l..Bh 1: H P. Geotcr.
Lab Technician:
Batch DaHl' 10129/99
DatchTime. 11 ;2 7 ~00 AM
Slump (inches): 11.00 )C
Weight fper albic ft.): --Concrete Temp. (11f): 54
twMJ•r StJ«tAth
~ 3 dav.,s 7.JilYJ 14 day.
Strernnta
1:
Strength
2:
Strength
3:
Average:
Comments:
4160
4040
4100
---------··--. -M br IL>· O!}J J
Aoorc:gete SOUtce .
Project Description: Apsen MIJSi c rant
OOT Reference
Number:
Document Author: Ric k Seymour
Cure Type: lab Cuw
Tcu ck Number: ----------8036
•-o~d Volume.s :
-Test lla.te: 10/29/99 -T est 1-•me : 12:4!i :OO PM
Oif I en:nc:c: Od 1h 18m
Air Content (%):
Air Temp. (•F): 35
28 dava 6S davt 90 dAvt
6560
5660
~ARGJi. l Il L II \I•· j ... "''" ··' ''" •••
II !J!) (liMrH !.o hi!;J I
Utll 'lt't, <.0 R02 0 •1
W1 6 1,7 4:170
Mix Performance Roporl
--~------------··-------Company Number lor 6 Mh< 10 : 0 0 ;~3
Location Numbe•t·
Company Name: Mol,nraln Concrete Aggregllte Source : -----· ·
~ ·-----·--1 1 -Woody Creel Project DcscripJiow - -• Api o M u sit : 1 ·'t~u
Tickel Number: -----09008 I 77. DOi helefence ·---· ·--___ .. ____ ·
Number :
Job Number: Oocument Author: fiid:
Sevmovr/Oenver/Us /Con
cretr.-Aggregatc s llalarg
e
Independent lllb 1: H.P. Gcotec Cure Type : Lab Cure
lab Technician· Truclc. Number· 8036
Lm~d Volumes·
Batch Date: 10/29/99 Te5l Date : 10/29/99
Batc h Time: 11 :17:00 AM Test Time: 1Z:15:00 PM
Oilference: Od Oh 48m
SUMp (inches): 10.25 x Air Content(%):
Weight (per cubic ft.l :
Conaete Temp . t•f): 55 AA Temp . t•fJ: 36
Cvtiodor Strenatb
Streng&h
l:
Strength
2:
Strength
1 day ~JI~• 1._Dm 14 dcrtf
4tifi0
4810
28 davt 56 day! 90 day!
6680
6800
3 ; ----------------------------------------------
Average : 4 630 6740
I
Comments:
I .t~ l'l'U H t 'rJ I· II
'"':"•·~ #&•a. I
0/A. 320 I A.OUn DIA J20 Tn Tnl noo D/A J2n osn oouru.t: !;nn: non
Prefabricated Corners and Tees
A complete line ol prctabricatcd corner and Icc sections are available
in all dcsion types and tinishes. II is necessary lo designate corners as
inside or outside when using Trirod or Ooullle side rod design types.
1--36" (91Smm) ~
L:ZS~1T
28"
(710mm)
-···l
Trlrod I
Outside •
Cor11er I
. ·t
Block
1
~36" (915mm)~
zs. I ,(II)T
20"
Trlrod
Inside
Corner
llrick Olock.
1--32" (AIOmm)--j
~
OUR·O WAL Truss amlladm is manulaclumd in accordam:e with
llnilorm Ouillhii!J Code Slandau.l Ufll: 24 I~~ and ASC[/1\Cl !1::10
Hmlllnl!J r.nrlr~ lh~lllllmmenl•; Jrn M~·auu y Sllur.hu r.s
Desc1'i11tion
I allur Type r~; iltlrclahnr:atml n:rnfnrr.enu!nl nsper.iallv ilr:si!JIWil lru
r:nrhcdrnenl lltllm horrzoutalmfu1ar IOIIll!; nl mt!>lulr y. II i•;
manufar.hrm!l in 10 ll.f30!i0mntllcugths I ;uhu lyJu! ww;r st:; nllwu
or more r•arallfll. lougiludmitl rml~ \'/Cicl ·r.otuwr:lr.rl lo fll!tJ l!:lllli r:ul.ll
cross rolls normally spaced 15" t3110rnn•l 0 C lo I arm ill.ldtler
design . for remlorced masonry apphcalions Hi " (400mm) spacin!l is
available on request The cross rods are ch!r:trir:ally hull weldecllo
deformed side rods in a singlr. pl.lllr.
Basic Uses
OUfl ·O·WAL lmlur Type minlo•r:~:uwnl can hr. uscrl 111 auumhe1 nl
atlflhcalions to improve the pcrlormanr.c ol rnasonr\' walls. Some arr:.
• To conlrol shrinkage crar:t<i nn
• To provtd!l prtncipal horizonlalrr:mfuu:r.uwnlut r.u(luu wre!l miiSnury
walls
• To Llond masonry wythes to!Jolhllr 111 r.omposile anrl eavily walls.
• To bond intersecting walls.
• To bond masonry wytltcs logolhr.r rn utullrptc wylhc !)routed
masonry.
Advantages
Tests show lhal continuous rcinlorccmcot improves the pellormance
ol masorvy walls by providing
• Greater elasticity
• Higher ductility
• Beller resistance Ia 1 a in
pcnelration
• Increased horizontal llcxual
strength
Finishes
• More economy
• Crac!( control
• Bull welded s1nglc plane
construction
• High bond with dclormc!l stde
wim s
• oun·O·WAL recommends mill yalvi.lnizm:J 1.10 oz psi3Dgtm )lol
interior applications .·
• OUR·O·Whl recommends ho1 dip galvaniwd (1 50 OZJIS14!J8g/nl;
101 cxtcraor applications.
• Also available in brilc llasic. Class I. Class Ill or slainlcss steel .
• Check local building code lor SJlCCilir.alion or sec Jl3gll2
• OUJl ·O·WAL docs nol recommend epoxy coaling
'1111~11111 i.lfollllt~IK.IIl'lher~ lliUh niOI~IIIIt r.GiliCiliiS KIYIIIIII~I(lofkCI
1 uunr; IIIOIIr:cutei Sl. hoi lfit• y;~v~rurmt •~wnuuerKiert
Dlll ~ l > WAI, 11<11
(
\
"
'tt.tn'' t.'\P I! -.~\Ill : ••!I I. 'fiCI I ·~·~~~ ll ~ wur•. ~.: .. t I ~' H
l't cll.~~~d"' f •(;Uv··,ll .. ul:il! -~' •. \1 ~ \ ~;uqo r olllh~l \
/\ll.ul.lhh: 11 1 III!!JIII,u. lh : ,uul Wulr : ll.lll!J•! fh ".IIJII .. 1111111 I'. d•:·.I IJIII"II !J,, )
11 '.1! Wllll'.l.lllfl ,lll l •,.1:.11 lihl•.l, I'VI. ni.III.II·IIIIIUIIIIIII . li1 J\',1 M ll :';li(
IYfll! I 'V L h!o1l tl Willi .1111111olll1'l l!l h.ndlll ! ,', ulll'•• '• v~l1111 11 ~ li•tl
.n :W i d .rru .n Willi 1\!.IM j)(';Jijl) Coll i Lloll.l! hllllli!UI!',', :,.,., r '1/"L)
TAOI.E 1Ja: SliCAn STREN G Ill
1\.vcri)(je
III!!IIJI,u I'VI. 11/n/1111'
1!uhh11 U/r.-•cm•
Conlrol lo;~d (ll :r She ar
.lolnl n· ol Joinl !Hrcnglh
Typ e (lhs) ~-
Widn nange 22B:l llll 21m) 4 90 tJ 4mPa)
'' -.~-1.; .... ,lt."""'-
Regular 2fi3 Jl1~7_kn) !ii!!!.P ~~al ~-,··· f l · fJ.
1 ;. ~->I '. .. (Uinunl
II"Pitfl•a. t,_-JI No 6 PVC 0/11 21111-1
lluhhcr D/A 2001
'..& ••
., ... ' ,... -1 .; ... :.'.
If• '""'n• .; .. / · ,~r -
...... ,, .. _. '"'
l '4'
·~··lh41'··~
,"~·'~-~ , ........ Nno
--? ·J.J'..
.• '(v • ~r_.JZ'"·.,,· • '.l.·••c..·-·•.. ... ~I...,_ r ...... -·,~·'""""""A.-1>1•-" , I
;-1 -,.. "'),..[__.... '{-j I '
J.• .p&h~~
_, t-'.4·~·~·~ · , r L.. · • • ~ ••.1.·• t,£•1•7' •" ·-I r .!'"1Unwu1 1 Tee I•VC U/A 202U
. ~.-) ·' Oubbcr 0//\21125
,.. U ~"~,z.,... ·--~~~ ~~ No.BPYCO/A20fljl Y"' ~ ~/'' 1 Rubber DfA 2005 -~-·~; .. ,..,,.. , .. A,· ••~• ;_ , ....... -..-~,.e:::::--.:_"j ,-I
', "-'"''"""'1-1 1-. _ ·-·-~tt.,(• t ., •• U !t t51 _,.,;
" ' ... , )--.-7.··-7,/ ·-7/,• ~ ,
,?¥ / ,•:,'/ _/•:;::. / ~ •' U'~I~M~I
'.L .. IGOmMI ~ ~ // ~ ··.. _, .. :: ,··'· .. ~
__ :.£_ ~ ·-.r-1'•1.?-;.--,-""111-1 I ''.1,"1•>-1
~-,--,~ --1.--V -::-.,.. =-~'
t---1\4"1111-1 • -~~ ,.,._1 flo. t2PVCooly
11 'J" llllmo»o ---· · DfA 2007
Rapid* Soft..Joint/Expansion Joint
Keeps mortar __ ., Er[lilnsion Joinr
and other 'I i .
foreign · 1 ~:;-'~ .. ;""::··
matertal andmollaf~ outside i Soii·Jolnl dlllflPngs ool-
horizontal or oljolnl. , • -~ >"'
vertical _:i DIA 2010 _ • DIA 2ots
expansion • I G / Singto Wylho
joints.
Available in a variety of thicknesses with adhesive on one side lor
convenient temporal}' allachmcntto steel shelf angles. 114· {6mm)
thick for soft joint and 3/8. (10mm) thick lor expansion joint. Closed
cell neoprene material conforms to ASTM 01056 class RE41 or 2A 1
compressibility exceeds 50%. OIIICr widths available.
Joint Stabilization Anchors D/A 2200
0/A 2200 has numorous applications In bridging veJiical control
joints. ll can be used to join continuous rows of brick or block,
inlersecling hottow block wythes, or to connecl new to existing wall s.
Fully tested, call lor resulls.
0/A 2 200
I L. •• ,, '·I. ~ •lit. ~I -.••. ;;; <-li II I ........
I ~ •·h ,, ~I I. I' ld; l· '·
l"l,lli.illh· II I I :I:IJIII ,u l •·1.. ,u u l 1/1!1 d 1 1111 1111' d•· ll fll I 1 1 •II I do 1 ll l••l l111 11 .1· Will i ~.l.uul,111 l · ,,:.~, lth u l 1:ul1l w1 1'. l.ulc .1y ,. h lld•:d
I Aill f II ~j lll:/\l l~·ffii ·I-/Gtll l,lllll oiJIIIIII IJI II/\!,IM il
...... w · -·~~-~--~ i'I)IJ O .JAA 1111!, Wtllr .1
1\VCrii!J~ I I I I I
( I I I I . I 111 1111 ! 1!1 loll IIIII:·,•, ul /UI on rn _rlt'll 1•cr f.;h ,·.u
.1111111 II" of ,lc >Uol !oi ii!U CJih \'!lll !ll h ::,lf:il lll oll .l.lolfLI/IJ I '
T\'Jl ' (lh:o) (p~i) \'IIIII N.IM 11.':'/fll l.ulrl
W11~: i'J..u!JI' :?.i;;,l iii.l ;;i,j ·:l·lfi i -1 ;•~1 1',1 1 1.1.11.1, hllll h·llf:·,:, •10" I
01:1~~.1r _ -~?!~ (~_:!_ I!~•} -~:1.1 (I 7oul~•) ! -'Ill" I:)
DUR-0-WAI}'' Masom·y WaH -Top
Stabilizing Ancho.-Pr·odud Oe:-•. e dptio n
Mt!l:ltanitill anchorin{J !lyslelll tlr:srgJwd lo w•;1:;J l;llcrallu,uJo; al the
IO[l olma sonry walls. Jl consists of a steel tlowci J /8" x (i" ( IOmm "
150mm), vcrlir.a lly wclderllo a 12oa (2 7mm) uahl <llliZr.d sttml Jllale
ll1c assmnl..lly is mounted to the unrlcrsitJc ol a hcam nr 11aruu1
slrur.lum via ITICI:hanical anchors or wcldiii!J. Slot ~. iu llw tllal r. 11111vuh:
liclll adjustmenl ollhl! assembly. The dowel. slccv ecl wilh a plasl ir.
tube. is bedded in mortar wilhin I he groove of a sa sh blo ck. The
closed emf sleeve prevenls the dowel from bonding lo the mortm ami
allows lor vertir.al tlellcclion . The product is available hoi diJllll!d
galvanized lor cldcrioe ilJ1Jllir.ations. or, mill galvani7ctllnl inl erin.-w;1U
applicillions.
Advantages
• Resists laleralloads al lhe IOJl ol Masonry Wall s
• Installs Easily
• .1\llows lor live load Vll11 ical dcllcclmn
• Slotled base plate lor accurale inslallalion po silioning
-Concealed within part ilion wall -no exposed hardware
• Available wilh corro sion resistanllinishes
Finishes
D/A 410 (Special Order)-Mill galvanized plate wilh plastic sleeved
dowel , (brlle} 50/Dox .
D/A 411 (Sloet} -Hot Dipped Galvanized Assembly wilh plastic
50/Box.
t !:~\i;! 3,\·:;_::r~~I2'!~·;'T~~~~-f! ')(~: -.?, :;;'r~~
:-. , .. , . . . . I ! .... -· , ,.· . . 1
0/A 411
Di ll! n ·WAl, II,I C . II
300"' is a superior insulation mate rial for usc
in commercial and industrial construction and ha s excel -
lent thermal and acoustic properties. It is a two~compo
nent system consisting of amino-plast resin and a catalyst
foaming agent surfactant.
These two components, when properly mtioed and
propelled by compressed air, produce a foam insulation
having the appearance of shaving cream.
A building
material for use in the filling of cores in concrete mason -
ry blocks, cavity walls and between brick and block.
It sets cold in I 0 to 60 seconds after leaving the hose
nozzle and does not expand any further, so enclosed
spaces may be filled without pressure build -up. Before
setting, the foam flows easily to fill the total cavity,
regardless of its shape or the presence of obstructions
such as pipes , wires and electrical boxes. It may also he
troweled into open areas if desired .
offers proven performance as an
insulating material . It combines a high 'R' value with the
unique ability to completely fill and seal voids, a true
advantage when dealing with masonry construction.
It deadens sound very efficiently.
Because it is applied under pressure, the foam fills
irregular spaces with ease. Core-Fill 500"' does not
settle like vermiculite or EPS beads, thus remaining
effective for the entire life of the building.
Most important, it is cost-competitive with any
other insulation method.
Core-Fill 500'w easily complies with all relevant
codes, standards and testing (DOE, EPA, ASTM
and others). Because it contains no po lystyrenes ,
polyisocyanurate, or polyurethanes, it offers superior
fire safety characteristics. It does not
contain or emit CFC 's or HCFC's.
Core-Fill 500rw is activated on-site and
pumped under pressure into the wall
cavity, pipe chase or interwall space.
Core-Fill 500"' has been installed in over
80,000 installations and $60 billion in ne w
construction.
Core-Fill 500'"' is easily applied in new and
existing construction.
1. 1 .\eries o.J .\l!utl l ho le' an
d rille d illfo the morwr
2. flwfo am .flmv.\' th ro ugh
th e enti re cavity aud web.
3. Holes are patched on ce th e
wall is completely .filled.
Core -Fi/1500 " can also be
pumped into a wall or
cavityfinmtlze top of the
uncapped wall.
In a 1Jf1ical tim , mu• Cl t!lv Cll /1 fill up to X.OUO s quar~:feet of 11'1111 .1pw ·e
with Om·· Fill 500". a spee(//lutclr lug lu:r tlr w r a lte m a ti••e m et/r od\,
CoaE•FILL soo·· MEns OR EXCEEDS
Au. PERTINENT TESrs, CoDES AND STANDARDS.
Test/property Reference
Fi re Safety ASTM E-84
Fire Wall Rating ASTM E-119
Rcc,uircd Pcrfonnance
Flame spread not to exceed 25
Smoke developed of not
more than 450
Minimum -2 hours
07210/TAI
Buyllne 2097
( 'un·-Fill SUO l 'crfonnancc
l•lame .~prcad ()
S muJ..1.. de vel oped ')
Fuel coni rihul ion 0
4 Ius . on I 2'' C M U
4 hrs . on R" C MU
------------------------------------·----------------------------------------------------------------------
Corrosiveness DOE (e) (3)
HUD6.2.8
AI, Cu . Steel -No Perfor.1tions
Loss of mass not to exceed 0 .2g
N o PcrrnrJI ion:;
L cs-; than 0. I g
------------------------------·-----·---------------·------------------------------------------------------
Density DOE (c) (4)
HUD 6.1.4
O.R lh!fl '
2.7 IO :U lh/fl
1
J Dry 0.7 to 0.9 lb/ft
Wet 2.5 to 5.5 lb/ft,
--"·-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Water Absorption DOE (e) (8)
HUD6.2 .2
Not to exceed 15%
No absorption in less than one hour
Aoat ing test 3%
Droplet test I hr. J 5 min.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·----------------
Shrinkage DOE (e)(ll)
HUD6.2.5
Not more than 4 .0% Less th.m I o/r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
•Fiamt: spread values are nat inttnd~d to rejlt!ct hawrdl· p rutllled by this or ant other material under acwaljire conditions.
QluwrY AsSWWICE
Core-Fi11500"' contractors are licensed and approved
by Tailored Chemical Products, Inc . All applicators
are trained and certified in the use of Core-Fill 5<Xr
materials and equipment
For more information or
the name of the certified
installer nearest to you,
call 800-627-1687.
This product is Chwilied by Underwritcn;
Labonllories Inc. as to Surface Burning
Characleristics; Rl9134
When inslllllcd as suggcslcd in the: ENERGY
STAR• tnsulotion Guide, this product can
mvc energy. Coli for the insulation guide
or call 1-888-STAR ·YES.
INSULATION
...
E Manufactured by TAlLO R := D CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
FoAM INSWADON PO Drawer 4186 • Hickory, NC 28603 • 828 322 6512 • Fax 828 322 7688
www.core~fill500.com
Cl All Capyriehtt ,...,....,.... 2001 Tallonod Chemical Product• Inc. . .
I
I
\
\
David Hicks
Prince Creek Construction
1317 Grand Ave.
Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601
December 8, 2004
Re: Project at 2550 Hwy 82-Building 1 and 2 .
Dear David,
Special Inspections as per Chapter 17 of the 97 UBC are required for this project for any
structural welding and also for the masonry from the foundation to the 2"d floor of
Building 2. In conversation with Brian Kurtz, the bond beams above the garage doors on
the lower level are of particular concern.
It is important to get the special inspectors involved early in the process of the
construction. They need to do their inspections as the work progresses rather than once
the work is done. The engineer of record will need to work with the special inspectors on
any structural details or alterations to the plans.
As per Sec. 1 70 1.2 any special inspectors shall be submitted to the building department
for approval prior to construction. Please submit your proposed special inspectors at your
earliest convenience.
Please call if you have any questions. I have a list of possible special inspectors that
work in this area if you do not know of any.
Yours truly,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
cc Brian Kurtz
SENT BV: RAILTON MCEVOV ARCHITECTS; 3034435535; PAGE 1/1
OJ~ r;jt job
l':o ~,;!.Jl GthfW7/0I ~m£,1<~
~.llJ!i!t~ .. .._ lrNoj ~ff/JJA1At~ '17o ;e4-'347D
p,etN~ C~ t-cAJS{
CO~'/ OF BLOb P~ Wf II l'JtutlLY/J65
I I
RAILTDN•McEVOY
i4 II f H I i f r. T S
' I
i
' :..
;
-I
'
__ ,_~+-+-r-~-+-
1---·--+--+-+-+--+--1-----l~-* .
··-+-+-+--.j....-...;i--1-1--··
·-1-+---1--~~~--~-·-
·---
-
n lh.l I t•)l•' ;.• ,._. ·(·~:RIP..J4\; .. ;,;
Ff.:,:"~<An.1U ;"..~RPI\l'l•' r I~ !;tCal
•• r.t :, i h ·.ltJU l U .! t..!1UC !Ul
t J ~lde r :;r ...... 1 :1 , ~u u:.1
!U~! '·1.3 ,\!;:\ ' :,\).o-,;3·!";~'1·~
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 7-26-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center (Building #2)
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9270
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report#5
Page 1 of 1
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Received & reviewed copies of some additional details from the
structural engineer for some ftxes at varies locations. Visually inspected
the field welding at the bar joists & shims to the beams & embeds grids
4 to 6 and close to grid line 3. Also visually inspected the high strength
bolting at the area above.
The welding & high strength bolting inspected above appeared to be in
general conformance with the drawings and appeared to be of acceptable
quality per the requirements of the A WS D 1.1 Structural Welding Code,
and the AISC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or
A490 Bolts.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young
West Slope Testing & Inspection
3177 Glendam Dr.
Grand Junction, CO 81504
Phone:970-434-6988
Cell: 970-260-2844
Daily Inspection Report
Date: 7-28-05
Project: Glenwood Commercial Center (Building #2)
Address: 2550 Hwy 82 Glenwood Springs, CO
Building Permit No.: 9270
General Contractor: Prince Creek Construction
Contractor that Performed Work: B&B Welding
Report #6
Page 1 ofl
Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field
Report: Visually inspected the deck puddle welds grids 2 thru 6.
Visually inspected the field welding at some beam connections close to
grid 3.
The welding inspected above appeared to be in general conformance
with the drawings and appeared to be of acceptable quality per the
requirements of the A WS Structural Welding Codes except as noted
below.
l) Some additional tube steel shims needed welded in at the joist seat
bearing locations per the engineers detail at grid line 2. These welds will
need to be inspected when completed along with the other remaining bar
joist welds that were not already inspected on 7-26-05.
2) Beam needed welded to embed plate at grid B/2.7.
3) It appeared that a few anchors were missing or the ledger angle
needed welded to the embed plates at the concrete wall grid line 4.
The steel erector and the contractor were made aware of these items.
Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young ·
Fred Cameron, Project Manager
Prince Creek Construction
!317 Grand Ave., Suite 101
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
December 17, 2004
Garfield County
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Re: Special Inspections for Glenwood Commercial Center
Dear Fred,
Thank you your letter of December 13,2004. My files show that Western Slope Testing
and Inspection is qualified to do the inspections as proposed for any structural welding.
Check with Kurtz and Associates if they want to do the inspections on the masonry.
Brian Kurtz is the person requesting Special Inspections of the masonry as per Chapter 17
of the 97 UBC. We do not have a problem with Mr. Kurtz doing these inspections if he
is qualified and spends the requisite amount of time on the job to provide either the
continuous or periodic inspections required by the code. I believe Mr. Kurtz also wanted
to see the 2"d floor structural support.
Please call if you have any questions.
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470
DEC I 7 2nn.1
j
Prince Creek' ... liNG I. FLAt..-.m ..;>
G.. . -=1ELD . -PCC
Construction, Inc. ------
December I 3, 2004
Andy Schwaller
Garfield County Building and Sanitation Departmert
I 09 8th Street Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE : Special Inspections for Glenwood Commercial Center
Dear Andy:
1317 Grand Ave , Suite 101
Glenwood Spgs, CO 81601
970 -9454545 Phone
970-9454648 Fax
Prince Creek Construction, Inc is proposing to use the following special inspectors for masonry and steel inspections
on the above referenced project:
Field Welding of Structural Steel Western Slope Testing and Inspection
Visual Inspection of Masonry Kurtz and Associates
Masonry Sample Prisms HP Geotech at the direction of Brain Kurtz
If you have any other questions please feel free to call me at 970.945-4545 or 970·230-5352.
Sincerely,
t=r~/!~=
Fred Cameron, Project Manager
RE . P:~g.c I o f I
Project Number:
Gafield County
Building and Planning
108 8th Street Ste 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado
970-945-8212
Plan analysis based on
the 1997 Uniform Building Code
Project Name: Glenwood Commercial -
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
Date: June 25, 2004
Building Two
Occupancy: B,F1
Construction : V-N
Contractor: Prince Creek
Designer: McEvoy
Engineer: Kurtz
Report By: A. Schwaller
NOTE: The code items listed in this report are not intended to be a
complete listing of all possible code requirements in the 1997 UBC.
It is a guide to selected sections of the code.
=====================================================================
NFPA 13 sprinkler system throughout the building
Sprinkler system used for allowable area increase --Sec. 505.3
DIRECTION BOUNDARY
NORTH Property line
EAST Property line
SOUTH Building
WEST Property line
SEPARATION
AREA INCREASE
200.0 Feet
105.0 Feet
74.0 Feet
FIRE PROTECTION
200.0 Feet
105.0 Feet
36.0 Feet
57.0 Feet
Allowable area increased
--sec . 505.1
57.0 Feet
100.% for open area on 4 sides.
Page # 2
Code review for:
Project Id .: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address : 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
FL NAME occ MAX FLR AREA ALLOWED RATIO STATUS
2 Woodworking Area F1
2 Woodworking Area Fl
2 Woodworking Area Fl
2 Woodworking Area Fl
2 Woodworking Area Fl
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
1 Office B
1 Office B
1 Office B
1 Office B
1 Office B
TOTAL FOR FLOOR
BUILDING TOTAL
--Sec . 504 and Table 5-B
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
1200
1200
1200
1200
1200
6000
1200
1200
1200
1200
1200
6000
12000
48000
48000
48000
48000
48000
48000
48000
48000
48000
48000
48000
48000
64000
The actual height of this building is 29. feet.
EXTERIOR WALL FIRE RATINGS AND OPENING PROTECTION
Table 5-A
NORTH
For
Occupancy
B
F1
EAST
For
Occupancy
B
Fl
SOUTH
For
Occupancy
B
Fl
WEST
For
Occupancy
B
Fl
Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
Bearing
wall
0 hour
0 hour
Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
Non-Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
Non-Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
Non-Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
Non-Bearing
Wall
0 hour
0 hour
Opening
Protection
None
None
Opening
Protection
None
None
Opening
Protection
None
None
Opening
Protection
None
None
Construction
Material
Any
Any
Construction
Material
Any
Any
Construction
Material
J:m.y
Any
Construction
Material
Any
J:m.y
0.03
0.03
0.03
0 .03
0 .03
0.13
0.03
0.03
0.03
0 .03
0.03
0.13
0.19
Parapet
Required
No
No
Parapet
Required
No
No
Parapet
Required
No
No
Parapet
Required
No
No
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
ok
Page # 3
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial -Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS , CO
None No fire prote ction requirements for openings .
3/4 hour Openings are to be protected with 3 /4 hr fire assemblies.
50% of the area of the wall maximum. --Table 5-A,
Footnote 5 & Sec. 503 .2.2
Maximum s i ngle window size is 84 sq .ft . with no dimension
greater than 1 2 feet . --Sec. 713 .8
Not Allowed --Openings are not permitted in this wall.
OTHER BUILDING ELEMENTS
ELEMENT MATERIAL
Table
RATING
0 hr
0 hr
0 hr
6-A
NOTES
Interior Bearing wall
Interior nonbrg wall
Structural Frame
Exterior Struct Frame
Shaft Enclosure
Floor/Ceiling Assembly
Roof/Ceiling Assembly
Stairs
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
0 hr See footnote #1
1 hr
0 hr
0 hr
No ne
NOTE: See Section 711 for shaft enclosure exceptions .
FOOTNOTES:
1) Elements in an exterior wall located where openings are not permitted
or where protection of openings is required, shall be protected
against external fire exposure as required for exterior bearing walls
or the structural frame , whichever is greater. --Table 6 -A, footnote 1
Page # 4
Code review for :
Project Id . : Glenwood Commercial -Building Two
Address : 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
PENETRATIONS OF FIRERESISTIVE ASSEMBLIES
WALLS ASSEMBLIES --Sec. 709.6
Through penetrations:
1) Penetrations shall be installed as tested in the rated assembly.
--Sec. 709.6.2
2) Penetrations shall be protected by an approved penetration
firestop system and shall have an F rating of not less than the
required rating of the wall penetrated. --Sec. 709.6.3
Exception: When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper
pipes or steel conduits and the wall is concrete or
masonry, the annular space shall be permitted to be
grout or mortar. The minimum thickness is the
thickness required to maintain the fire rating. The
maximum size of the penetrating items is equivalent
to a 6-inch diameter and the opening is a maximum of
144 square inches. --Sec. 709.6.1
Membrane penetrations:
The requirements are the same as for through penetrations.
--Sec. 709.7
Exceptions:
1 . Steel electrical outlet boxes that do not exceed 16 square
inches provided that the area of such openings does not exceed
100 square inches for any 100 square feet of wall area.
Boxes on opposite sides of the assembly shall be
separated by a horizontal distance of not less than 24
inches.
2. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates.
Noncombustible penetrating items shall not be connected to
combustible materials on both sides of the membrane unless it can
be confirmed that the fire-resistive integrity of wall is
maintained. --Sec. 709 .7
Page # 5
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
FLOOR/CEILING AND ROOF/CEILING ASSEMBLIES --Sec. 710.2
Through pentrations:
Through penetrations of fire-resistive horizontal assemblies shall
be enclosed in fire-resistive shaft enclosures. --Sec. 710.2.1
Exceptions:
1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper conduits,
pipes, tubes and vents through a single concrete floor, the
annular space shall be permitted to be grout or mortar.
The minimum thickness is the thickness required to maintain
the fire rating. The maximum size of the penetrating items is
equivalent to a 6-inch diameter and the opening is a maximum
of 144 square inches.
2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in
fire-assemblies.
The system shall have an F rating and a T rating of not less than
one hour but not less than the required rating of the floor system.
--Sec. 710.2.3
Exception: Floor penetrations contained and located within the
cavity of a wall do not require a T rating.
Membrane penetrations:
The requirements are the same as for through penetrations.
--Sec . 710.3
Exceptions:
1. When penetrating items are steel, ferrous or copper
conduits, electrical outlet boxes, pipes, tubes and vents
through concrete or masonry and the annular space is
protected by an approved penetration firestop assembly or
protected to prevent the free passage of flame and
products of combustion. Such penetrations shall not
exceed an aggregate area of 100 square inches in any 100
square feet of ceiling area in assemblies without
penetrations.
2. Electrical outlet boxes that have been tested for use in
fire-assemblies.
3. Sprinklers with metal escutcheon plates.
Fire-resistive roofs may have unprotected openings. --Sec. 710.4
Page # 6
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
SMOKE and FIRE DAMPERS--Sec. 713.10 and 713.11
Dampers shall be accessible for inspection and serv1c1ng:
1. Penetrations through area separation walls.
Penetrations through occupancy separations.
2. Penetrations of the fire-resistive construction of horizontal
exit walls or corridors serving as a means of egress.
Exception: Openings for steel ducts penetrating the required
fire-resistive construction of corridors are not
required to have smoke dampers when such ducts
are of not less than 0.019-inch thickness
(26 gage) and have no openings serving the
corridor.
3. Penetrations of shaft enclosures.
Exceptions:
1. Duct penetrations by steel exhaust air subducts
extending vertically upward at least 22 inches above
the top of the opening in a vented shaft where the
airflow is upward.
2. Penetrations of a fire-resistive floor forming the
base of a shaft enclosure may be protected by fire
dampers listed for installation in the horizontal
position.
3. Smoke dampers are not required when shaft is exhaust
only, and is used for continuously operating fans.
4. Penetrations of the ceiling of fire-resistive floor-ceiling
or roof-ceiling assemblies.
Exception: Smoke dampers are not required.
5. Penetrations of an atrium enclosure element.
Exception: Smoke dampers are not required.
6. Penetrations of exterior walls where protection of openings
is required.
Exception: Smoke dampers are not required.
7. Penetrations of areas of refuge.
Exception: Ventilation system designed to supply outside
air during an emergency.
8. Smoke dampers are required in smoke barriers and elevator
lobbies.
Page # 7
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, co
DRAFT STOPS:
If there is combustible construction in the floor/ceiling assembly, draft
stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not
exceed 1 ,000 square feet and so that the horizontal dimension between
stops does not exceed 60 feet. --Sec. 708.3.1.1.3
When sprinklers are installed in the floor/ceiling space attic, the area
may be 3,000 sq.ft. and the greatest horizontal dimension may be 100 feet.
If there is combustible construction in the roof/ceiling assembly, draft
stops shall be installed so that the area of concealed space does not
exceed 3 ,000 square feet and so that the horizontal dimension between
stops does not exceed 60 feet. --Sec. 708.3 .1 .2.2
When sprinklers are installed in the attic , the area may be 9 ,000 sq.ft.
and the greatest horizontal dimension may be 100 feet.
OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS --Table 3-B
B-F1 Ohr
HEATING EQUIPMENT SEPARATION:
FOR B OCCUPANCY:
A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around rooms containing a
boiler or central heating unit greater than 400,000 BTU input.
--Sec. 302.5
FOR F1 OCCUPANCY:
A 1 hr. occupancy separation is required around rooms containing a
boiler or central heating unit greater than 400,000 BTU input .
--Sec. 302.5
ADDITIONAL SEPARATIONS:
A refrigeration machinery room shall be separated from the remainder
of the building as required for an H7 occupancy regardless of area. A
horizontal occupancy separation may be limited to the actual floor
area of the machinery room. Structural supporting elements shall be
protected for the type of construction only. --Sec. 2802
A 1 hour separation is required from an B occupancy. --Table 3-B
FOR F1 OCCUPANCY:
Woodworking areas with a floor area greater than 2,500 sq .ft. must be
separated from other areas by one hour occupancy separation construction.
--Table 3-B , footnote #5
Page # 8
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
EXIT REQUIREMENTS:
FL NAME NUMB MIN MIN PANIC HALLWAY/ DOOR NOTES
OCC EXITS WIDTH HDWR CORRIDOR SWING -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Woodworking Area 6 1 1.2 No N/A N/R
2 Woodworking Area 6 1 1.2 No N/A N/R
2 Woodworking Area 6 1 1.2 No N/A N/R
2 Woodworking Area 6 1 1.2 No N/A N/R
2 Woodworking Area 6 1 1.2 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 30 2 9.0 No N/A N/R 1
1 Office 12 1 2.4 No N/A N/R
1 Office 12 1 2.4 No N/A N/R
1 Office 12 1 2.4 No N/A N/R
1 Office 12 1 2.4 No N/A N/R
1 Office 12 1 2.4 No N/A N/R
TOTAL 60 2 12.0 No N/A Out
In areas where 2 exits are required, the minimum separation is 1/2 of
the maximum diagonal of the area or floor. --Sec. 1004.2.4
When 2 exits are required, exits must be arranged so that it is possible
to go in either direction from any point in a corridor or hallway to a
separate exit, except for dead ends not exceeding 20 feet in length.
--Sec. 1004.2.6
Exit signs are required from all areas where 2 or exits are required.
--Sec. 1003.2.8.2, Exception 2
No point to be more than 100 feet from an exit sign.
Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable
as exits need not be signed when approved. --Sec. 1003.2.8 .2, Exception 1
Door swing is based on Sec. 1003.3.1.5 except as noted.
Occupant load factor is based on Table 10-A.
Number of exits is based on Table 10-A except as noted.
Exit width is in inches and based on Sec. 1003.2.3 and Table 10-B
Exit width is to be divided approximately equally among exits.
--Sec. 1003.2.3.2
Width shown for all areas is based on other egress components .
Width shown for 1st floor is based on other egress components.
Width shown for other floors & basements is based on stairways.
--Table 10-B
For the minimum
For the minimum
For the minimum
For the minimum
width of
width of
width of
width of
doors, see Sec. 1003.3.1.3
hallways, see Sec. 1004.3.3.2
corridors, see Sec. 1004.3.4.2
stairways, see Sec. 1003.3.3.2
Page # 9
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial -Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
FOOTNOTES:
1) The second floor is required to have 2 exits when the occupant load
is 10 or more. --Sec. 1004.2.3.2, Exception 1
FLUSH AND SURFACE BOLTS:
Manually operated edge-or surface-mounted flush bolts and surface
bolts or any other type of device that may be used to close or
restrain the the door other than by operation of the locking device
shall not be used. When automatic flush bolts are used, the door
leaf having the automatic flush bolt shall not have a door knob or
surface-mounted hardware . The unlatching of any leaf shall not
require more than one operation. --Sec. 1003.3.1.8
LOCKS AND LATCHES:
Regardless of the occupant load served, exit doors shall be openable
from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or
effort . --Sec. 1003.3.1.8
Key-locking hardware may be used on the main exit when the main exit
consists of a single door or pair of doors if there is a sign stating
THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. When unlocked,
door(s) must swing without operation of any latching device. --exc.
Page # 10
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial -Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
STAIR NOTES:
Public stairways:
1) The rise of steps shall not be less than 4 inches or greater than 7
inches. The minimum run is 11 inches. The maximum variation is 3/8
inch in a flight of stairs . --Sec. 1003.3.3.3
2) The minimum width of a stairway is 36 inches, 44 inches if the
occupant load is greater than 49. --Sec. 1003.3.3.2
Also see exit table above to see if minimum width is greater than
44 inches .
3) Provide a handrail on both sides of stairway 34 to 38 inches above the
nosing. May be on one side of stairways less than 44 inches wide.
--Sec. 1003.3.3.6, Exception 1
4) Provide a guard rail where drop off is greater than 30 inches.
--Sec. 509.1
5) The minimum height is 42 inches. --Sec. 509.2
6) Open guardrails shall have intermediate rails or ornamental pattern
such that a sphere 4 inches in diameter cannot pass through .
--Sec. 509.3 The triangular opening formed at the riser, tread and
guardrail may be 6 inches . --509.3, Exception 2
7) The minimum headroom is 6 ft.-8 inches. Such clearance shall be
measured vertically from a plane parallel and tangent to the stairway
tread nosing to the soffit above at all points . --Sec. 1003.3.3.4
8) Enclosed usable space under the stairs is required to be protected
as required for 1 hr . fire-resistive construction . --Sec. 1003.3.3.9
RAMP REQUIREMENTS:
1) The minimum width is 44 inches. If a ramp serves an occupant load of
49 or less, it may be 36 inches wide. If the ramp is serving a high
occupant load, check exit table above for required width .
--Sec . 1003.4.2
2) If the ramp is part of the accessible route, the maximum slope is
1:12. All other ramps may have a slope of 1:8 or less .
--Sec. 1003.3.4.3
3) When the slope is greater than 1 :20, landings shall be provided at
the top, bottom and for each 5 feet of rise. Top landings and
intermediate landings shall be at least 5 feet in the direction of
travel . Landings at the bottom of ramps shall be at least 6 feet in
the direction of travel. --Sec. 1003.3 .4.4
4) Handrails shall be per stair requirements. Sec . 1003.3 .4 .5
5) The surface shall be roughened or shall be of slip-resistant
materials. --Sec. 1003 .3 .4.8
Page # 11
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
LANDINGS AT DOORS:
1) A floor or landing shall be provided on each side of doors. When
access for persons with disabilities is required. the floor or landing
shall not be more than 1/2 inch lower than the threshold. When access
is not required, the maximum is 1 inch. --Sec. 1003.3.1.6
2) Landings shall have a width not less than the width of the stairway
or width of the doorway, whichever is the greater. Where a landing
serves an occupant load of 50 or more, doors in any position shall
not reduce the landing dimension to less than one half it required
width. The minimum length in the direction of exit travel is 44 inches.
--Sec. 1003.3.1.7
TRAVEL DISTANCE: (distance to an exit)
The maximum travel distance in this building is 250 feet. --Sec. 1004.2.5.2
Travel distance shall not be limited within an exit enclosure or exit
passageway. --Sec. 1005.2.2
Page # 12
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY:
1) This building including each tenant shall be provided with at least
one entrance which complies with the accessible route provisions of
CABO/ANSI A117.1. At least 50 percent of all entrances shall be
accessible. --Sec. 1103.2.3
2) When more that one exit is required from any accessible space, each
accessible portion of the space shall be served by not less than two
accessible means of egress. --Sec . 1104.1.1
3) When an exit stairway is part of an accessible means of egress, the
stairway shall have a clear width of not less than 48 inches between
the handrails. The stairway shall either incorporate an area of refuge
within an enlarged story-level landing or shall be accessed from
an area of refuge. --Sec. 1104.1.2
The area of refuge shall have direct access to the stairway that serves
it. --Sec. 1104.2.1
4) Each area of refuge shall be sized to accommodate one wheelchair space
not less than 30 inches by 48 inches for each 200 occupants, or
portion thereof. --Sec. 1104.2.3
5) If the area of refuge is not within the stairway, it shall be separated
from the rest of the story by a smoke barrier having at least a one-
hour fire-resistance rating . Smoke barriers shall extend to the roof or
floor deck above. Doors shall be smoke and draft control assemblies
with a rating not less than 20 minutes. --Sec. 1104.2.4
6) Two-way communications are required. --Sec . 1104 .2.5
7) Each area must be identified by a sign stating AREA OF REFUGE and the
international symbol of accessibility. --Sec. 1104.2.7
8) NOTE: Exit stairways in buildings protected throughout by an approved
automatic sprinkler system are NOT required to incorporate an area of
refuge. --Sec. 1104.1.2, Exception 2
ROOFING REQUIREMENTS:
1) The roofing on this building is required to be Class c. --Table 15-A
2) See section 1504 and ICBO research reports for requirements.
AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS:
If there are 100 or more sprinklers, all valves controlling the
water supply and water-flow switches shall be electrically monitored.
Valve monitoring and water-flow alarm and trouble signals shall be
distinctly different and shall be automatically transmitted to an
approved central station, remote station or proprietary monitoring
station . --Sec. 904.3.1
Page # 13
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial -Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
STANDPIPE REQUIREMENTS:
There is no requirement for a standpipe. --Table 9-A
FOOTNOTES:
VENTILATION:
All areas customarily occupied by humans shall be provided with natural
ventilation by means of openable exterior openings with an area of not
less than 1/20 of the total floor area or shall be provided with a
mechanically operated ventilation system. Such system shall be capable
of supplying a minimum of 15 cubic feet per minute of outside air per
occupant. --Sec. 1202.2.1
WALL AND CEILING FINISH :
1) Wall and ceiling finish materials are required to comply with
Sec. 804.1 and Table 8-B.
2) Carpeting on the ceiling is required to have a Class I flame
spre ad rating. --Sec. 8 0 4 .2
3) Textile wall coverings shall have Class I flame spread rating.
and shall be protected by automatic sprinklers or meet the
acceptance criteria of U.B.C. Standard No. 8-2 --Sec. 805
4) Toilet room floors shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface
that extends upward onto the walls at least 5 inches.
--Sec. 807 .1.1
5) Walls within 2 feet of the front and sides of urinals and water
closets shall have a smooth, hard nonabsorbent surface.
--Sec. 807 .1.2
INSULATION NOTES:
1) All insulation material including facings are required to have a
flame-spread rating of 25 or less and a maximum smoke density of 450
unless it is in a concealed space and the facing is in contact with
a wall or ceiling. --Sec. 707.3 exc .2
2) Foam plastic insulations are required to be protected. --Sec. 2602
ACCESSIBLE FACILITIES:
NOTE: Except as noted, section numbers listed below are from
CABO/ANSI A117.1-1992
Page # 14
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
WATER FOUNTAINS AND WATER COOLERS:
At least 50 percent of drinking fountains, but not less than one,
provided on every floor shall be accessible. --UBC Sec. 1105.4.1
Accessible units must comply with the following:
1) Spout is to be within 36 inches of the floor. --Sec. 4.15.2.1
2) Spout arranged for parallel approach shall be located 3 inches
maximum from the front edge. Spouts of cantilevered units with
knee and toe clearances shall be located 15 inches minimum from
the vertical support and 5 inches maximum from the front edge.
--Sec. 4.15.2.2
3) Spouts shall provide a flow of water 4 inches height minimum.
--Sec. 4.15.2.3
4) Operable parts shall be located at or near the front edge of the
unit and shall comply with 4.25.4 --Sec. 4.15.3
5) A cantilevered unit is required to extend 17 inches minimum from
the vertical support. Clear knee space must provide a clear area
of 8 inches in depth at 27 inches high and 11 inches at 9 inches
minimum above the floor. --Sec. 4.15.4.1
6) Forward approach units shall comply with 4.2. Units in alcoves
shall comply with 4.2.4.4. Units not having the necessary knee
and toe clearance or clear space under them shall comply with
4.2.4 and have a clear floor space that allows a person in a
wheelchair to make a parallel approach. --Sec. 4.15.4.2
TOILET FACILITIES:
1) A 60 inch diameter unobstructed turning space is required in
the toilet room. --Sec. 4.16.3, 4.2.3 & Fig. B4.2.3
2) Water closet shall be mounted adjacent to a side wall or
partition. The distance from the side wall or partition to the
centerline of the water closet shall be 18 in. Sec. 4.17.1
3) When the accessible water closet is not in a stall:
The clear floor space shall be 48 in minimum in front
of the water closet and 42 in from the center line of the
water closet on the side not adjacent to the wall.
--Sec. 4.17.2 & Fig. B4.17.2
4) When the accessible water closet is in a stall:
The stall shall be 60 in wide minimum and 56 in deep m~n~mum
for wall hung water closets and 59 in deep minimum for floor
mounted water closets. --Sec. 4.18.3.1
If the door swings into the stall, the required depth shall
be increased by 36 inches minimum. --Sec. 4.18.3.2 &
Fig. B4.18.3.1
Page # 15
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial -Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
5) The bars are to be 33 to 36 inches above the floor and shall
be provided on the rear wall and on the side wall closest to
the water closet. --Sec. 4.24.2.2 & Figs. B4.17.3, B4.17.4
and B4.18.3.1
a) Side grab bar is required to start within 12 inches of the
back wall and extend to 54 inches from the back wall. (The
minimum length of the bar is 42 in) --Sec. 4.17.4.1 &
Figs. B4.17.3 and B4.18.3.1
b) The rear bar shall be 24 in long minimum, centered on the
water closet. Where space permits, the bar shall be 36 in
long minimum, with the additional length provided on the
transfer side. --Sec . 4.17.4.2 & Figs . B4.17.3, B4.17.4
and B4.18.3.1
6) The top of the seat on the water closet is required to be 17
to 19 inches above the floor. --Sec. 4.17.3 & Fig. B4.17.3
7) Accessible urinals shall be of the stall type or wall hung with
the rim at 17 inches maximum above the floor. --Sec. 4.19.2
8) A clear area of 30 X 48 inches minimum is required in fron t
of the urinal. Privacy shields shall not extend beyond the
front edge of the urinal rim, unless they are 30 inches apart
minimum. --Sec. 4.19.3
9) Accessible lavatories shall be mounted with the rim 34 inches
maximum above the floor and a clearance of 29 inches minimum
from the floor to the bottom of the front edge of the apron.
--Sec. 4.20.2.1 & Fig. B4.20.3.1
10) It shall extend 17 inches minimum from the wall . The clear knee
space shall be 8 inches in depth minimum at 27 inches minimum
above the floor and 11 inches in depth minimum at 9 in minimum
above the floor. The dip of the overflow shall be ignored when
checking the clearances . --Sec. 4.20.3.1 & Fig. B4.20.3.1
11) A clear floor space of 30 X 48 inches minimum shall be provided
in front of the lavatory and shall extend 19 inches maximum
under the lavatory. --Sec. 4 .20.3.2 & Fig. B4.20.3.2
12) Water supply and drain pipes under lavatories shall be
insulated or otherwise treated to protect against contact.
--Sec. 4.20.4
13) The bottom of mirror is required to be within 38 inches of
the floor. --Sec . 4.16.6 & Fig. B4.20.3 .1
Page # 16
Code review for:
Project Id.: Glenwood Commercial-Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
GLAZING REQUIREMENTS
All glazing in hazardous locations is required to be of safety
glazing material. --Sec. 2406.3 & 2406.4
Locations:
1) Glazing in ingress and egress doors except jalousies.
2) Glazing in fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies
and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors.
3) Glazing in storm doors.
4) Glazing in all unframed swinging doors.
5) Glazing in doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas,
steam rooms, bathtubs and showers . Glazing in any portion of a
building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed
edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface
and drain inlet.
6) Glazing in fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the
nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of
either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the
bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inche s abov e the
walking surface. ·
7) Glazing in an individual fixed or operable panel, other than those
locations described in items 5 and 6 above, than meets all of the
following conditions:
A. Exposed area of an individual pane greater than 9 square feet.
B. Exposed bottom edge less than 18 inches above the floor.
C. Exposed top edge greater than 36 inches above the floor.
D. One or more walking surfaces within 36 inches horizontally of
the plane of the glazing.
8) Glazing in railings regardless of height above a walking surface.
Included are structural baluster panels and nonstructural in-fill
panels.
9) Glazing in walls and fences used as the barrier for indoor and
outdoor swimming pools and spas when the bottom edges is less than
60 inches above the pool side and the glazing is within 5 feet
of the pool or spa water's edge.
10) Glazing in walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of
then bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge is less
than 60 inches above the walking surface.
Page # 17
Code review for:
Project Id .: Glenwood Commercial -Building Two
Address: 1317 Grand Ave. GWS, CO
ATTIC REQUIREMENTS:
1) Provide an access to all attic areas with a clear height of 30 inches
or more . The minimum size is 22 inches by 30 inches. There must be 30
inches or more clear height above the access. --Sec. 1505.1
2) Provide ventilation in all attic areas. The net free vent area is
to be not less than 1 square foot for each 150 square feet of attic
area . The vent area may be 1/300 if at least 50% of the required
ventilating area is provided by ventilators located in the upper
portion of the attic. The upper ventilators must be at least 3 feet
above the eave or cornice vents . --Sec. 1505.3, Exception 1
The vent area may be 1/300 provided a vapor retarder having a
transmission rate not exceeding 1 perm is installed on the warm side
of the attic insulation. --Sec. 1505.3, Exception 2
3) Where eave or cornice vents are installed, insulation shall not block
the ~e flow of air. A minimum of 1 inch of air space shall be
provided between the insulation and roof sheathing. --Sec. 1505.3
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotedtalcal, lac.
SO:ZO County Road 154
Glenwood Sprlnp, Colorado 81601
Pboae: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-J4S.8454
bpgeo@bpgeotec:b.com
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY
PROPOSED OFFICE/W AREBOUSE DEVEWPMENT
SMITH PROPERTY, mGBW AY 82, SOUTH OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 101175
MARCH 30, 2001
PREPARED FOR:
PRINCE CREEK CONSI'RUCTION
ATI'N: DAVID mcKS
1051 COUNTY ROAD 111
CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
March 30, 2001
Prince Creek Construction
Attn: David Hicks
1051 County Road 111
Carbondale Colorado 81623 Job No. 101 175
Subject: Report Transmittal, Preliminary Geot~hnical Study , Proposed
Office/Warehouse Development , Smith Property, Highway 82, South of
Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado
Dear Mr. Hicks:
As requested, we have conducted a preliminary geoteChnical study for the proposed
. development at the subject site.
Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory pits excavated in the general
building areas consist of medium dense, silty clayey sand and gravel with cobbles and
boulders. The matrix soils are hyd.rocompressive. Groundwater was not encountered in
the pits and the soils were slightly moist to moist.
Development above roughly elevation 5 ,920 feet does not appear feasible based on the
geologic conditions. Spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an
allowable bearing pressure of 1500 psf appear suitable for building support . The
foundations should be heavily rej¢orced and tied together in a box-like fashion to limit
the effects of differential settlement if the bearing soils become wetted .
The report which follows descn'bes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and
presents our recommendations suitable for planning and preliminary design . It is
important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during
constnlction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical
recommendations.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us.
Sincerely,
ORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Rev. by: SLP
DAY/djg
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ..........................•.... 1
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . , • . . . . 1
SITE coNDmoNs .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . • . . . • . . . . . . . 2
FIE.LD .EXPLORA.TION • . • . . • . . . . • • • . • • . • . . . • . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . 3
StJBSURFACE CONDmONS ........••..•..••..••..•.•.•......• 3
PRELIMlNARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
FOUNDATIONS • • . . . . . . . . . • . . . . • . • . . . . . • . . . • . • . • . . . . • • . 4
FLOOR SLAB.S • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • . . • • 4
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM .........•.•...... · ....•........... S
SITE GRADIN'G . . • . • . • . • . • . . • . • . . • . . . • . . . . . • • . . • . • . • • . . S
SURFACE DRAI:N'AGE •.••.••.•••..•••••.•.••.••.. · .• ·• . . • • 6
LOOTATIONS . . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . . . . • . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . • . . . . . 6
REFER.EN CES . . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . • 7
FIGURE 1 .. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS
FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF. EXPLORATORY PITS
FIGURE 3 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
FIGURE 4-SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 5 -SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 6 -GRADATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE I-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
H-P GEOTECH
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical study for a
proposed office/warehouse development to be located on the Smith property, Highway
82, south of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown . .
on Fig. 1. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical
engineering services to Prince Creek ~onstruction, dated February 28, 2001.
A field exploration program consisting of exploratory pits was conducted to
obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained
during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their
classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The
results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop
recommendations for project planning and preliminary design. A review of the
geologic conditions at the site was also done. This report summarizes the data' obtained
during this study and presents our conclusion$ and recommendations based on the
proposed development and subsunace conditions encountered.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development will consist of several office/warehouse buildings
conceptually located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. We assume the buildings will be
two story, wood-frame structures, possibly with partial or full basement levels. Ground
floors will probably be slat.on-grade. The development will be serviced with individual
septic disposal systems.
Once preliminary building and grading have been developed, we sho~d be
contacted to review the plans and perform additional analyses as needed.
H·P GeOTECH
-2-
SITE CONDITIONS
The site consists of about 4 acres located adjacent the southern limits of the City
of Glenwood Springs to the northeast of Highway 82 . The terrain is moderately steep to
steep, southwest facing hillside with slope grades ranging from about 25 to 40% in the
upper eastern part and 10 to 20% in the downhill western part. The elevation of the site
ranges from about 5880 feet to about 6000 feet. The Glenwood Ditch, which is
abandoned, crosses the north~t part of the property (see Fig. 1). The site is occupied
by several existing structures including a residence and a mobile home as shown on Fig.
1. Portions of the site have undergone some previous grading consisting apparent of
sballow cuts and fills . Vegetation consists of grass, weeds, brush and some trees.
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
The Glenwood Springs Metropolitan Area regional geologic hazard study
indicates the site is exposed to debris flow, rockfall and hydrocompressive soil hazards
(Lincoln-Devore, 1978). The Lincoln-Devore report found the debris flow, rockfall and
hydrocompressive soil hazards risk to be severe. Regional mapping of the Glenwood
Springs area by Kirkham and others (1995) indicates the surficial soil deposits are
colluvium and younger debris flow deposits .
The geologic conditions at the site should be considered in the project planning.
We believe the debris flow and rockfall hazard risks in the upper, steeper part of the
site are severe and will probably preclude development in that area. Development
should be feasible in the less steep terrain provided the potential geologic hazards are·
mitigated as needed. Mitigation of the debris flow and rockfall hazards may consist of
berms or deflection structures . Recommendations to limit the hydrocompressive soil
risk are provided in the "Preliminary Design Recommendation" section.
When preliminary building plans have been developed, we should conduct
geologic assessments to develop recommendations for mitigation of the debris flow and
H·P GEOTECH
-3-
rockfall hazards . We expect that the geologic constraints and mitigation will probably
make development above roughly elevation 5,920·feet at the site infeasible.
_FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on March 7, 2001. Seven
exploratory pits were excavated at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the general
subsurface conditions . The pits were dug with a rubber-tired backhoe. The pits were
logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc .
Samples of the subsoils were taken with relatively undisturbed and disturbed ·
sampling methods . Depths at which the samples were taken are shown on the Logs of
Exploratory Pits, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by
the project engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACECONDDcrONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on
Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about ~ to 1 ~ feet of man-placed fill or ~ foot of
organic topsoil overlying medium dense, silty clayey sand and gravel containing cobbles
and small boulders extending to the pit depths of 6 ~ to 8 feet .
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained. from the pits included natural
moisture content and density , gradation analyses and Atterberg limits . Results of swell-
consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on
Fig. 4 and 5 , indicate low compressibility under natural moisture conditions and light
loading with a low collapse potential when wetted under a constant light load . The
samples showed moderate compressibility when loaded after wetting . Results of
gradation analyses performed on disturbed bulk sanwles (minus 5 inch fraction) of the
natural granular soils are shown on Fig. 6. The laboratory testing is summarized in
Table!.
H-P GEOTECH
-4-
No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavation and the
subsoils were slightly moist to moist.
PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the
proposed development, subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory pits, and
our experience in the area. T_he recommendations are suitable for planning and
preliminary design but site specific studies should be conduct~ for the individual
buildings.
FOUNDATIONS
Based on the nature of the proposed construction, lightly loaded spread footings
bearing on the natural subsoils should be suitable for building support . The foundations
should be heavily reinforce<l and constructed in a box-like configuration to limit the
effects of differential settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. Potential sources of
wetting include surface water ponding, excessive irrigation and utility line leaks.
Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils.
We expect the footings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure on the
order of 1500 psf. Existing fill, debris and topsoil encountered in building areas should
be removed to expose the natural soils. Nested boulders and loose matrix soils may
need treatment such as enlarging footings or placing compacted fill or concrete backfill.
Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies and to resist lateral earth
loadings when acting as retaining structures . Below grade areas and retaining walls
should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by use of an underdrain
system. ne footings should have a minimum depth of 36 inches for frost protection.
FLOOR SLABS
Slab-on-grade construction should be feasible for bearing on the natural soils or
compacted structural fill. There could be some post construction slab movement if the
H-P GEOTECH
-5-
subgrade becomes wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor
slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints .
Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. A
minimum 4 inch thick layer of free-draining gravel should underlie basement level slabs
to facilitate drainage.
UNDERDRAlNSYSTEM
Although free water ~as not encountered in the exploratory pits , it has been our
experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy
precipitation or seasonal runoff. An underdrain system should be provided to protect
below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas from wetting and
hydrostatic pressure buildup. The drains should consist of drainpipe surrounded above
the invert level with free-draining granular material . The drain should be placed at each
level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a
minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. An impervious membrane such as 30 mil
PVC should be placed below the drain gravel in a trough shape and attach~ to the
foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils.
SITE GRADING
The risk of construction-induced slope instability at the site should be low
(roughly below elevation 5,920 feet) provided the buildings are located in the less steep,
lower part and cut and fill depths are limited. Cut depths for the building pads and
driveway access should not exceed about 10 feet. Fills should be limited to about
10 feet deep and should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density near optimum moisture content . Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be
carefidly prepared by removing all vegetation, topsoil and existing fill and debris. The
fill should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20% grade . The· on-
site soils excluding oversized rock and topsoil should be suitable for use in embankment
fills .
H-P GEOTECH
-6-
Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to
1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation,· rock riprap or other
means. Oversized rock from embankment fill construction will tend to collect on the
outer face. A protection fence should be provided downslope of the embankment toe to
prevent rockfall into developed property and on Highway 82. This office should review
site grading plans for the project prior to construction .
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The grading plan for the subdivision should consider runoff from steep uphill
slopes through the project and at individual sites. Water should not be allowed to pond
which could impact slope stability and foundations. To limit infiltration into the bearing
soils next to buildings, exterior bacldill should be well compacted and have a positive
slope away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet. Roof downspouts and
drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill and landscape irrigation
should be restricted. The existing Glenwood Ditch is partly filled with debris from
recent flows. The ditch should be cleaned out to provide interim debris flow protection
until the site is developed.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time . We make no warranty
either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this
report are based upon the data obtained from available geologic reports, the exploratory
pits located as shown on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in
the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those described jn this report, we should be
notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
H-P GEOTECH
-7-
This report bas been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning
and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations
by others of our information . As the project evolves, we should provide continued
consultation, conduct additional evaluations and review and monitor the implementation
of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or
modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site
observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by
a representative_ of the geot~bnical engineer.
Respectfully submitted,
. David A. Young P.
Reviewed by:
~-d ,j?~
Steven L. Pawlak 'P. E.
DAY/djg
REFERENCES
Lincoln-DeVore, 1978. Geologic HaztJrds of the Glenwood Springs Metropolitan Area.
Garfield County, Colorado. Colorado Geological Survey Open File Report
78-10.
Kirkham, R.M. and Others, 1995. Geologic Map of the Glenwood Springs
Quadrangle, Garfield County, Colorado. Colorado Geological Survey Open
File Map 95-3.
H-P GEOTECH
5900
\
\
\
5890
\
\
\
\
\
\ ,, \
\
5880
EXISTING
TRAILER
HOME
\
\
~
\
\
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1• = so·
z
, _____ ....... ,
\
\ ,,
)\
PIT 1 5890 •
5880
5920
101 175 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
'
COOCEPTOAL
BUILDING
LOCA'riOOS
(TYPICAL)
Fig. 1
0
~
~
Q)
~
.s:::
JJ
5
g.
r.:l
10
0
~ • Q)
~
.s:::
JJ
5
~
r.:l
10
101 175
PIT 1
ELEV.:S883'
WC•7.4
DD=95
-200:a60
I
I
I ot4a60
I -200 .. 19
-.J
PIT 5
ELEV.:5909'
PIT 2
ELEV.:5881'
WC=8.3
DD=l04
-200·35
LL•22
Pl:l
WC•12.J
DD-106
PIT 6
ELEV.:S893'
I
t
I
I
I _ _.
PIT 3
ELEV.=5902'
I
I
I
-.J
PIT 7
ELEV.:5907'
t
I <t4=76
I ·200=11 _ _,
PIT 4
ELEV.:5885'
WC•l0.9
DDalOJ
-200·52
LL•23
PI•4
WC•l2.0
DD•lOJ
Note: ~lanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3.
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
0
IJ
~ .,
f&4
5 .c:
IJ g.
Q
10
0
.aJ
CD e rz.
5 .c:
JJ
i'
Q
10
Fig.2
LEGEND:
.FILL; manplaced, silty sand and gravel to sandy clayey silt, moist,
dark brown, some trash/debris.
TOPSOIL; organic sandy clayey silt, moist, dark brown.
SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM): with cobbles and small boulders, medium dense,
slightly moist to moist, red-brown, rocks are 'primarily angular
sandstone.
2• Diameter hand driven liner sample.
Disturbed bulk sample.
NOTES:
1. Exploratory pits were excavated on March 7, 2001 with a backhoe.
2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from
features on the site plan provided.
3. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between
contours on the site plan provided.
4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only
to the degree implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the
approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the ttme of excavating.
Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( % )
DO = Dry Density { pcf )
+4 = Percent retained on No • 4 sieve
-200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL = Liquid Limit ( % )
PI = Plasticity Index ( % )
101 175 HEPWORTH -PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 3
Moisture Content = 7.4 percent
Dry Density= 95 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Clayey Sat Matrix
From: Pit 1 at 2.5 Feet
0
Compresslon
upon
1 !t wetting
~ 2 "" j I\ • I 3 L.
Q.
E
8 -4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPUED PRESSURE -ksf
101 175 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL CONSOUDA TION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4
GEOTECHNICAL. INC.
.
Moisture Content • 12.3 percent
Dry Density • 106 pcf
Sample of: Silty Cla,ey . Sand Matrix
From: Pit 2 at 7 Feet
0 --1--1'--~ r-1-
""" ~ 1 -1"--
~ ~'No movement c ~ upon 0 -;; wetting • 2 • '-\ Q.
~ 0 3
)
4
0.1 1.0 10 tOO
APPUEO PRESSURE -ksf
Moisture Content • 12.0 percent
Dry Density • 103 pcf
Sample of: Very Sandy CICJY8Y Silt Matrix
Fram:Pit 4 at 4 Feet
0
)
1 -r--
~
""'
r--. 1"-.,. Compression
~
upon
2 . wettfng
"i • 1\ . • '-Q.
~ 3
1\
4 1\
\
C)
5
0.1 1.0 10 100
APPUED PRESSURE -ksf
101 175 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5
GEOTECHNICAL. INC.
0
UJ z
~ UJ
0::
~ z UJ
CJ
lr
UJ a..
0 w z
~ w
0::
1-z
lJJ
0
f5 a..
c&EAR SIIJNIE Cf'!NNIS
Z4 Hit. 7 Hit
3/4. 1 1/r' :r' re· rr
100
10
20
30
40
•
10
'1'0
10
10
1110
JIDt .tm AilS .001 .D11 M1 .lf14 .1!0 .3110 .1110 1.11 2.31 4.7S
DIAMETER OF PARllCLES IN MIWMETERS
ClAY 10 SLT niE :a:r-~CIIMII!E===-f--....:.,..-'au_,.~~nlao..:CDAIIIlE=r:::=--t1 ~
GRAVEL 60 X SAND 21 SILT AND CLAY 19 %
UQUID UMIT % PLASTICJTY INDEX X
SAMPLE OF: Silty Clayey Sandy Gravel with
Cobbles FROM: Pit 1 at 6 thru 8.5 Feet
111E.,...G5
24HR. 71R
1D
IQ
IQ
2D
10
0
211 •
3D
41
SD
•
711
Ill
Ill
1CID
Jill! JIZZ liLI 152 203 1Z7
DIAMETER OF PAR11Cl£S IN MilliMETERS
GRAVEL 76 X SAND 13 % SILT AND CLAY 11 X
UQUID UMIT
SAMPLE OF: Sftty Clayey Sandy Gravel
Cobbles
PLASTICJTY INDEX
with FROM: Pit 7 ot 4 thru 6 Feet
10
0
101 175 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL. INC. GRAD A llON TEST RESULTS Fig. 6
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE I JOB NO . 101 175
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
a~L~TION I'U.TUIIAL NATUIIA\. GAADATION PEIICUfT ATT1!1111EIIO I.JMJT8 UHCO-ED
Pit DEPTH MOI&TUIIl DRY GilA VEL SAND I'ASSINO UQUID I'I.AiliC COMJIAEISIVE SOIL OR
(fHII CONT£HT DENSITY ,,., ,,., N0.200 UMtT IHDEX Sll'IEHGTH IIEDIIOCit TYPE ,,., IIICII SIEVI! ,,.. . ,.. , ..... ..
1 2% 7.4 95 60 Sandy Clayey Silt Matrix
6-8% 60 21 19 Silty Clayey Sandy
Gravel with Cobbles
2 5 8.3 104 35 22 1 Silty Clayey Sand Matrix
7 12.3 106 Silty Clayey Sand Matrix
4 2 10.9 103 52 23 4 Very Sandy Silt & Clay
Matrix
4 12.0 103 Very Sandy Clayey Silt
Matrix
7 4-6 76 13 11 ·Silty Clayey Sandy
I Gravel With Cobbles
-----
I t ~
David Hicks
Prince Creek Construction
1317 Grand Ave.
Glenwood Springs, CO . 81601
December 8, 2004
Re : Project at 2550 Hwy 82-Building 1 and 2.
Dear David,
I .,
Special Inspections as per Chapter 17 of the 97 UBC are required for this project for any
structural welding and also for the masonry from the foundation to the 2"d floor of
Building 2. In conversation with Brian Kurtz, the bond beams above the garage doors on
the lower level are of particular concern.
It is important to get the special inspectors involved early in the process of the
construction. They need to do their inspections as the work progresses rather than once
the work is done. The engineer of record will need to work with the special inspectors on
any structural details or alterations to the plans .
As per Sec . 1701 .2 any special inspectors shall be submitted to the building department
for approval prior to construction. Please submit your proposed special inspectors at your
earliest convenience.
Please call if you have any questions. I have a list of possible special inspectors that
work in this area if you do not know of any.
Yours truly,
Andrew Schwaller
Building Official
cc Brian Kurtz
.. L
' \ , . Pagel of l
Tim Holliday
From: Andy Schwaller
Sent: Tuesday, December 07,2004 4 :17PM
To: Tim Holliday; Dave Mead; Steve Hackett
Subject: Special inspections Hick Project
With building #2, we are requiring that the project have special inspectors for any high strength bolting and
structural welding. The engineer is requiring that the masonry walls on the south side also be inspected by a
special inspector. Of particular interest is the bond beams above the garage doors on the first level. The
engineer also wants to inspect the shelving system holding up the 2nd floor. Make sure you look at the revised
drawings dated 11-23-04 when doing inspections. A lot of the structural details are complicated . If in doubt.
request the engineer to review.
Andy Schwaller
Building Official, Garfield County
asch ~Jf~r1fJl!J._arfleld·cou nt v.com
970.945.8212
12/8/2004
COUNTY OF G:ARFI~LD ·-BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 7..550 .JL'f 8"2...
Permit No. Cf z.7U ~
I have this day Inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
J. zrf$' ~t=j\ ~ J~ • ~ 'I.L...Lt0U,
~ fl.tAfi..~~ S'~ s-4. !"1:1Cc1l "'~~ Be:
6r..cc.J<W' C~ OJtt. ~ t-JIDI 7¢.NKe
2. c fH.<K. ~.. ~ J &.ol ~~
3. Vf#. H ~<.A-f.. ;:r.~OlLS"
4. :r'~lr}lf ~ !..11> S.h'QU' ~ S~
t..Jfkt ~£(. J:i,;c:v>44.t ,.,.__
W M.{, 'h:r-,.,_-I At.
You are hereby noUiled that the above correction must be Inspected
before covering.
When correction( .. have been made, call for Inspection at 970-384·5003.
• ,te 12-4a·q,. ~ 20 ~ulldlng Inspector l). •I
Phone (970) 945-8212
··c'OUNTI of: GARFIELD -BUILDING PERMIT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th 51., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at ;t25V ~¥ '8".;1.
"' Permit No. 9.;;\ 7o/<?.;t6"?
I have this day Inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
lj~ ~·~~~eo~-~'/~~
t:!'t.;;.% ~~
.i)~~#~~
You are hereby nolllled that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When corrections have been made, call for Inspection at 970..384-5003.
Date 1/-17-ot' 20 ;;:'5-:;;::::;;:....--
Bulldlng Inspector ~
Phone (970) 945-8212
COUNTY OF GARFIELD : BUILDING. PERMIT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th Sl, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone(970)94~212
Job located at ~ HtJt( d2.. i'/12-
Permlt No. ---L:'1~~"..L.20~----------
I have this day Inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
1 /kJ ~ ~ f:ji.J 1/ .
2)M~~~~
~) p~ _cbu/f~;;. ~(,~'J-11~)
1} ~(/ ~~J vn ~~ tJ~zL4
1 /~ I J-Jc6-U:U,· !elk, ~ti.«.. .,t ~
~~~~ 0111d~
>) 111tJ &u ~111 "?t
~)~~~~~~ IYl~~(JJ~ !tl 7J You are hereby notified that the above c:omtellon must be inspected
before covering.
When corrections have been made, call for Inspection at 97o-384-5003 •
Date 10 -I'] 2oa:: /1
Building Inspector AJc...,;-<(2 "7lLJ ~
;.\ Phone (97~ 945,~12 "/ ~) ~1 (..\.,;~""'"\ ..
..
COUNTY OF GARFIELD • BUILDING PERMIT
CORRECTION NOTICE
1 08 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945·8212
Job located at w.t \ ~vt ~
Permit No. q 2-l 0
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises ~o d Jhe foUowln? c~IJectlona needed: '"A.. D. ~ (A ~( IJ4tf_ ~~ ./. ij~ 0"71 ua.-1 ~ . . .
~l ~ wdJ.. -~ ~~ ~uz·~'"r7 vw~l ~~~;r·--~
You are hereby not Ill •d that the above correction must be Inspected
before covering.
n macte, call lot Inspection at 97G-3ll4-5003.
Date c ' <--1.) t U t' I I ~\
·,
COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING PERMIT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at ?w ~ J~·<
Permit No. 9.;l? 0
I have this day inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
J) 18~ ...;. ~ .... ~~ k ~
~
:J.)a..M~Zr ~~~
.:i/lSa tXJ .-u-.c;rzcer_, .tf--~ « ~
~Z-~~-
'1)~~~~~
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be Inspected
before covering.
When corrections have been fll8de , call lot Inspection at 97().384.5003.
STOP WORK OROER • INSI'fCTOR'S POROON
j/.jod I~ ~ z.-Mdes
8"-3/-o.r r!fz1o
DA11! PENIITNO.
,.._,.,-' , ... ~ ( _.,;
'COUNTY OF GARFIELD • BUILDING PERMIT
CORRECTION NOTICE
1 08 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at ¥"<"0 ~ R:l.
Permit No. __.'2f<l~~2..~oO::-_~-----------
I have this day Inspected this structure and these
premises and found the following corrections needed:
1)~;;./6~ ~~--~~
~
-~ ....... --=---
• ' 7 m ti §Ill._ ,-1., __..-... , " l!!!!!£003""'"'7'ZCO *::::S ... ___ _
~"'"" @ 7 :gs;c
You are hereby notJfled that the above correction must be Inspected
before covering.
When corrections have been made, call lor Inspection at 970.314-5003.
Date 7'·/o-a Z 20:-==--
SuJidlng Inspector ~a.,..:;:z:,
Phane(970I94~12
) .. ; ,.
EXTERIOR
Address No. ,V'
Drainage / ~ 1
Oecks·support & clearance to wood/f. ____ _
Decks·stalrs & rails V /
E.tM•< ""''" y----
Fiashing around doors & windows
Insect screens _____ ...:~------
INTERIOR
GARAGE
Mech. equi
Access --~-/---------
Insulation --..:..t------------
Assessor's Parcel No.J_{gs~ .. co-o{,5
Date g /ff='J./t'>'{
FINAL CHECKLIST
MECHANICAL ROOM
Boller ___________ _
HQI wat l!r _~---------)\ F.A. gEIS!oit _ _._~--------
Fioor drain _________ _
Clearance __________ _
Air con . system'---------
1-fQI water heater -..~fX~------
Combustion ai r _{)(..-___ _
Gas piping, valves _______ _
LPG Drain ----------
FIREPLACE /S
REMARKS
;;..
STAIRWAYS v
Headroom (6'6") ---..-------
Railing & guardrails _£1112~------
Width ______ ~Vr..._ _____ _
Rise & run ----lll(f'---------
KITCHEN
Egress ----.,1-\----------
Smoke detector -J~.lt--------
EKhaust tan ----t'-----lo,-------
Shatterproo
OTHER
INSPECTION WILL wOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
14 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECfiONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFI~LD COUNTY, COLORADO
Dale lssoed~.(~.9..1.ned Are•·········--·······-·····-Pennil No..~'J..Q. ... ·-·-·
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector and IMMEDIATE Y BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Us \ t\J .: ~~
Setbac:lss Front Sjde Side Rear
I bis Card Must Be Post~d So It is Plaiuly Visible From Tbe Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing ~· ,
Foundation
Insulation
Drywall
Electric Rough (By State Inspector)
Notes:
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING~
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Phone 384~5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
oa~ej\~oY a~\ b•Cf:
\ IF PLACED OUTSIDE ~VER WJTH CLEAR PLASTIC
' ·\_
3~(3-o7 ;og(3-(lcJCI;5 ~~.,/ ~
3·15'-c--r ;o<;s-Br-/tJC//S -~~"'--\
3-/s-o/ /C/at1 ~~ ~~--~-:P'-c?~
£.L£.Cr. nAJAL VNl"fS /r Jog f tJo4-~e.b 4ft /trJ /tr
~~ 11-16~7 4.U t<l? 4 ~ ~
edt ·~~-~ ff,ot 13F
-------... ·--------·---