Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application-Permit
Garfield County I NO. 10410 Building & Sanitation Department '-----------' 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 Job Address0?9S t\J. HFQdrJUJ !/?tJi6 :Ybf Nature of Work Building Permit !JI t9-CJ5"d,-o~ -D/S useofBuilding 3/F dr»t>fftnq wjcov.c/ecrt Olb· (/lRa_c/e Owner :SOn mea.ctOW bila~ Contractor fli£tbOU (btii/AWc/td·JJ Amount of Permit $ 31R 2 ·b / SW-IYD - sct42-b 1 Date 4-L~ Clerk j /lfjL~l/.; GARFIELD COUNTY BUll-DING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 gu. Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 jl>ne: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 I Ins.pection Line: 970-384-5003 • {04 f.O · ParceVSchedule No: '2.-1 '\q 0 S L.Ol o s-Permit No: Job Address: ()).. ct<:; 1 Lot No: \$" 2 Owner: Sv "' ~cJ.ow 3 Block No: Subd./ Exemption: 0..,. L.. -~.S . 'u"'-f\A-L&..l.ow <._..~ • ""'~ Ph: Wk Ph: %'lb 'S"1..t..o Lie. No. ·s'6 ·-wo 4 Architect/Engineer: " r G._,w,..r :, A.~>~o c.. Address: .. n 1 J.Je.W Ph: Q-1(:,·1., (.. \ 0 I...LI ~l C..0 V<..,;l 31\c..< Lie. No . :)o$·1 ~"1 5 6 Use of Building: 7 Describe Work: 8 Class of Work: 9 Garage; 10 0 Driveway Permit 11 Valuation of Work.: S 12 Special Conditions: NOTICE Sq. Ft. of Lot: 5L New o Addition o Single Double A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUffiED AND MUST BE I SSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFrER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED TIDS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHOIUTY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTIO Height: .0 \, S I\ o Alteration o Move Carport: '~ · Site Plan ~5 3 792 Zoning: AGREEMENT o Remove 0 + I<Jj.!SO Const. Type: Y-8> Setbacks: 50 1 P!UVI. T ~s~rce~ !0 1 'S!f)fP {.. ISDS No. & Fee: Lt?(>g l;stJe PERMISSION IS HEREJlY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CO:\STRUC T THE STRUCTURE AS. dETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMiTTED TO AND REVI EWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT . . IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND ·LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL >\ND VOID . :· THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATIO:X BE!l\G CARRJED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OFTHS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION . THE REVIEW OF. SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AC C EPT..I.IS CE OF ANY RESPONSIDILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIElD ·coUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR Tlf£SE ITE~I S AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY \VITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. C OMMENTS AH ~ INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfom.003 ~ ?\ (},.{"\ ....j q (!( O (.,e I HE~Mn HlAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): v-=-- ~,.~~··~/5CJ ti)J6(,/J3192,6/ VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applican~1(' ~efi~ Address 3£ :>e) P/iJ-e Date 4 • ¢.6•(!)((, Subdivision .$.t vrJ'V\ ~ ~ 4-\.-. Lot/Block I ? Contractor ~{ ~ ~t. Finished (Livable Area): ~:.,1 ~Jf =Y I~ x:tlf~QE $3o3,La~Z-~ Lower \ L\. cz, ~ Other Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfinished Conversion ofUnfmished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion B V aluatipp _ 7p .,. ,, - Garage: ~ )( \ BOQ _:/PI 1 ~ Valuation ~'-- Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: c 1 crcol6 ~~000 Covered ~\ S 'f... 21 O, Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. 1 ' ' Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the fmish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom Qfthe footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations rna):' be required. A window schedule. A door schedule .. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and profess.ional stamp on the drawing? Properties with s lopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a: structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a s ubdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes X 2 . Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes X 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S .D .S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes "f. · 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes Y 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes "¥" 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 'i 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes X 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes X 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes X 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ?( 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes X .12 . Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? . Yes X. 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes X No ---,-------- 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No <S ----'------- 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes <'K No ------- 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other v erification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes ~ No ____ · _____ __ 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally u sed as · a walking surface; sliding glass doors ; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes ')( No -------- 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes X No ------- 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes ~ No · ------- 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted without it. · Yes X No ___________ _ 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes :X: No Ifno-Explain: ___________ _ 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes C)( ~ 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes X No --------- 4 ' ' 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes ?( No ____ _ 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your . properties zone district? Yes )< No ______ _ 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes f)f No ---------- 2 7. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes ]>t No ________ _ 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes )6 No ____ _ 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes )<. No ______ _ 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in. a $47.00 re-inspection fee? Yes '£ No ____ _ 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes 'j--No _____ __ 32. Are you aware that the Pennit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes } · No ______ _ 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit app lication you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes 2s No ______ _ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? . The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes X No ______ _ 35 . Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the ParceVSchedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes .>( No ---------- 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes ~ No (please check with the building department about this requirement) I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. ~~~ ~nature of'Qwner . Date Phone :· ~'liP · S <."tO (days); _<1....~..1....l..O~· ..::::S~b~lo=----.!:::'Z::....SL-...L) :=:!,~_(evenings) Project Name: __ _,S""-""'v -'-'"'=-· -----'--~---"'=~~o~w::_·_l........,.sc:...:~:.=.:k~5 ____________ _ Project Address :. __ D_'2.=· _q~&:::..__ _ _J/'--)~_o _r ~-· _:__-"-~--=o-..:...:::}:_o:.....:V)_~ __ \) __ ~ '...::::VJL=---· .::,:~:....-\l..~- Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process . Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected.· Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not revi·ewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first . position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding w ith construction. Bpminreq Oct2004 6 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Building ~ineered Foundation hl..J..nriveway Permit __ ~eyed Site Ptan ~.J. ~-.).,._ ~ /septic Permit and Setbacks ·~de/Topography 30% ~ch Residential Plan Review List .4'mum Application Questionnaire ·~i vision Plat Notes //A Fire Department Review __ Valuation Determination/Fees __ Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Condition s __ Application Signed __ Plan Re viewer To Sign Application Parcet/Schedule No. Planning/Zoning / __ Property Line Setb efs' 30ft Stream Se acks Subdivision Plat Notes No. jtJL//0 Assessor's Parcel No))./JQ--eJjZ-02.0/S" Date Lf-jCfO~ BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address C)29'.) IJ· NEC!CtJW !Je. Jttf-Lol 10 Owner :x;n Hmwt(f)W li_~ Address 73¥ matn of 5lbf Phone # 8l6-S220 Contractor Cbetl,;o{J {'(!)ri$ba;1iF;if Address:Y/n?e Phone # -~ Selbacks: . ...Front Rear RH _____ LH _____ Zoning ----- ::;tr dwei!LJI!If tv}COV·CiecK jaM ~Ra~PECTIONS Soils Test----,---------- Footing -fJ.,.., ~ • Foundation b?\{ ~ Grout--------,----=---=---.-:- Underground Plumbing kd3..-o~Jhl( Rough Plumbing CJ-1~ -o 7Bri'\.. Framing S :i_(p • 0 7 lei /l Insulation If· g: 1-o 7 lfh1\; Roofing ~---"?"7"<-r-----::::--r---z<T=.----- Drywall · ff--:_3o~t:;'l J01YC: Gas Piping/i.O:Jf, -() 7_~ NOTES Weatherproofing __________ _ Mechanical ____________ _ Electrical Rough (State) . · Electr~l F.~rjai_JState) .5$ -10 -0 f ?l:3iE_ Final ;o'" !J=OJ /Checklist Completed? jl]}fV( Certificate Occupan9_ # ~U::o:::..' .....!."'-:Z=;:'-:2~~;---n,..----=.-- Date i ~Si ,l m 'tj_)tf. Cf/ Septic System# __________ _ Date ---=---=-~-:;:-;:,--7""t--:---- Fi nai_.L-.7_..-/~9'-·-=tJ:::..__t_?_,/Vh(;'-2.!:~--- Other--------------- (continue on back) INSPECTION Will. NOT IE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO l.f-I'?Jj l . /OLf/CJ Date Issued ........•••.............•... Zoned Area ............•..•............... Permtt No ..•.•.............................. AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. use W diW'IIi¥1tJ rv/cov. tJIN"et oil· ~¥_~'Y e Address or Legal Description on.s-p. HfOC!tJJ)I /)M· .SI~ Owner~~~ H(J(ItltJW h7t:tlfi Contractor O/¥r!IKJII r/l;tJl!IIC/;;) ~ Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing & evtf2vtt t1tM . .J Driveway Foundation ,, \ VI I ~ Underground Plumbingh~l3-<>1 PJJL Insulation 2J • ;;l7-6 ( !&rJ----- Rough Plumbing !) -If.. -01 /9yil Drywall 8-3i:J-CJ7 ~ Chimney & Vent t)-!(r 0 7 /{}r(\ Electric Final (by State Inspector) fYJo-o''J(!. Gas Piping t-lfo -o 7 f01( Final 2-lf~O q J.91rt I Electric Rough (By State Inspector) Septic Final 1-1 cH:J7 ChiV Framin~~"1h.., ,1/A\.,, 9P'b . g -I[,-Notes: (To include Ro~fin plac~1nd~Windows "D7 and Doors instaUed). .om_ ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD D t l(#/().(>1 B {:: .r.ft{H/0. a e . "I ' Y.c'~"",L'-· -'--- IF PLACED OUTSIDE-COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC IVJay 'd1 07 08:21a Harry Garner GA,l Garner Associates, Inc. 4181 County Road 311 New Castle, CO 61647 (970) 876-2210 FAX 676-2209 Garner _harry@msn .com FIELD REPORT #01 PROJECT: SUN MEADOW ESTATES, LOTS 15 JOB NUMBER: 0608 DATE: 05-18-07, 8:00AM WEATHER: Mild and sunny 9708762209 p.1 The following observations were made at the job site on the date and time listed above. No observations regarding job safety or construction means and methods were made. Job safety and construction means and methods are the sole responsibility of the General Contractor. No observations were made regarding the soils. 1. The spread footing forms and reinforcing steel were in place. The reinforcing steel appeared to be spaced and sized in accordance with the construction documents. The third bar in the footings is required only in footings over 24" wide. The additional steel in the other footings is acceptable. 2. The laps in the horizontal steel appeared to be the proper length. 3. The clearance between the forms and the reinforcing steel appeared to be the proper distance 4. The spot footings for the hold-back walls and the spot footings in the center of the basement were in place and the reinforcing mats were ready to place. 5. Verbal approval to pour the foundation concrete was given to Sherry at Caribou Construction. END OF FIELD REPORT #01 Harry Garner Garner Associates, Inc. Jun 04 07 11 :09a Harry Garner GA,I Garner Associates, Inc. 4181 County Road 311 New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 676-221 0 FAX 876-2209 Gamer_ harry@msn .com FIELD REPORT #02 PROJECT: SUN MEADOW ESTATES, LOTS 15 JOB NUMBER: 0608 DATE: 05-29-07, 7:00AM WEATHER: PartlyCioudy and mild 9708762209 p.1 The following observations were made at the job site on the date and time listed above. No observations regarding job safety or construction means and methods were made. Job safety and construction means and methods are the sole responsibility of the General Contractor. No observations were made regarding the soils. 1. The stem wall forms and reinforcing steel were in place except for the eastern end of the garage. The reinforcing steel appeared to be spaced and sized in accordance with the construction documents. 2. The clearance between the forms and the reinforcing steel appeared to be the proper distance 3. The stem walls are approved for concrete placement. The Contractor should verify that the reinforcing steel is in place at the eastern end of the garage prior to concrete pouring. END OF FIELD REPORT #02 Harry Garner Garner Associates, Inc. Jun 21 07 12:50p Reyes Sarmiento 9703720641 &re1wn ~n5ine.e.rin5, Uc.. June 21, 2007 Mr. Fred Cooke Caribou Construction 734 Main St. Silt, CO 81652 Struc.turM J.n1inuri'"'11f In$pution$ Re: Lot 15, Sun Meadows Estates Crown Engineering, llc. Project No. 02-01-01-02 Dear Mr. Cooke: p.2 As requested we have visually observed the welding of the steel column cap plates to the bottom flanges of the steel beams used in the basement of the above referenced residence on June 18, 2007. It is our opinion that the welds are in substantial conformance with the specifications shown on the foundation detail plan by Crown Engineering, lie. job number 02-01-01-01, dated January 18, 2007. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 691-4239. Maio Offire 524 Sto~.;cr Strcet Fort Collin!>, Colorado 80524 Phone: (970) 498-9537 Cello (970) 691-4239 e-mail reyess£5@msn.com TYPICAL FLOOR: FINISH FLOORING OVER 3/4" T&G OSB OVER BCI JOIST OR EQUAL WI R-30 FIBERGLASS BATT INSULATION. 1 3/4" RIM BOARD AND 2X6 PRESSURE TREATED PLATE W/10" ANCHOR SOL TS @ 6'-0" MAX (MIN 2 PER WALL). ~ T.O. SUB FLOOR 100'-0" 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT 4" CONC SLAB W/ #3 REBAR@ 24" O.C. EA WAY OVER 4" OF FREE DRAINING GRAVEL AS RECOMMENDED BY THE SOILS REPORT REVISED GARAGE/ CD~~~~~~-DE TAlL SUN MEADOW ESTATES • LOT 04 00284 NORTH MEADOW DRIVE 0607 10-30-06 REVISED 05-07-07 GA,I 0.\JU'IER. ASSOO.A 'rES, INCORPORATED ~M"DI'L-.m."TNO ~Carner Registere4 ~hitt:ct • -llil O:nunyRo!~:Ull N~wCII.!Ilc,COIIIl'i47 97M76-Z210 I' AX 970JS76-2209 £.nWI: glVIICT_Iwq@m.m.Q~m • 10/20/2005 15:21 9708755221 CARIBOU CONS TRUCT I ON 734 Main Street Silt, Colo. 81.652 FAX: 970-876--5221 PAGE 01 -------------~H; 970 -876-52,...,20..__ _____ _ FAX transmittal • • • Pages: CC: D Urgent D For Reviaw 0 Please COmment ... 0 Please RepCy o Plea Recycle Notes : RE CE IVED OCT 2 ~ 2006 GARFIELD COUNT Y BUILDI NG & PIJ\NN ING . ,. " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • 10/20/2006 16:21 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION 9709458454 To:8765221 <:~tech l·ll;'jl~h~tl'h f'l.l\1 l;lk ( ;t'•ll~l.hl'll\.:11. In£ 5l12Ll C\Hmr.v Ru:,,IJ14 Ulcm1n1d Spun/.!$, C \l)nr.HI,, ~1(1(,1] rhMI' 1170 ~)~ ~ Nl:l8 HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL F.l.\ 97~) 94).Joj454 t·:ni.:JI! hp~l''JII'!lht'\tt'lllr~ll t1•rn SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOT lS, SUN MEADOW ESTATES 0295 NORTH MEADOW DRIVE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. lOS 363 OCTOBER 19, 2006 PREPARED FOR: CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION ATTN1 FRED COOKE 734 MAIN STREET SILT, COLORADO 81652 PAGE 02 P.1114 10/20/2005 . 15:21 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 03 OCT~20-2006 16:10 From:HP-GEOTECH 97e9~S454 To:S765221 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................... -I · PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... -1 • SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... • 2- FJELD EXPLORATION ................................... , ............................................................. • 2 • SUBSURFACE CONDJTJONS ...................................................................................... -2 • DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. -3- FOUNDATIONS .......................................................................................................... 3- FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... -4- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ........................................................................................... S • SURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................. • 5- PROFILE BORINO ........................................................................................................ -6- LIMIT AT.lONS ............................................................................................................... • 6 • FIGURE I· LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORJNGS FIGURE 2 ·LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 • LEGEND AND NOTES F'IOURE 4 • SWELI,-CONSOLJDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I-SUMMARY OF LABOROATRY TEST RESULTS 10/20/2006 . 16:21 9708765221 DCT.-20-2fl05 15:10 From:HP-GEOTECH CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION To:8755221 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY PAGE 04 P.3t14 This report presents the results of a subsoil study lor a proposed residence to be located at Lot 15, Sun Mcadow Estates, 0295 North Meadow Drive, GarAcld County, Colorado. The project site is shown on figure I. The purpose ofthe study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Caribo11 Construction dated May 3, 2005. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnicallnc., previously performed a preliminary geotechnical study for Sun Meadow Estates (formerly Mamms View) and presented our findings, in a report, dated March 28,2000, Job No. 100 169. A field exploration program consisting of one exploratory boring in the building area and one profile bo.ring in the septic disposal area was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their c)assitlcation, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results ofthe field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained durlng this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be one a.nd two story wood J'fame construction above a full basement with an attached garage. Tile basement and garage floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about ~to 9 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed t.ype of construction. If building loadi~gs,location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we shoulq be qotified to re-evaluate th~ recommendations contaioe.d,in this repon, ;- Job No. !OH~J 10/20/2005 15:21 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 05 OCT-20-2006 16:10 From: HP-GEClTECH 9709458454 To:8765221 -2- SITE CONDITIONS Lot 15 is located on the north side ofNorth Meadow Drive and was vacant at the time of our field visit. The lot is bordered to the west and east by drainage easements. The building area is located in the central part of the lot. Vegetation consi•ts of gross and weeds. The ground surface in the building area is relatively flat with a gentle slope down to the southwest at a grade of about 3 to 4 percent. FIELD EXnORATION The field exph;>ration for the project was conducted on October 1 0, 2006. One oxploratory boring was drilled in the building area and a profile boring was dri11ed in the septic disposal area at the locations shown on Figure l to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a track-mounted CMF:-45 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Ocotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch I. D. spoon sampler. 1be sampler was driven .into the subsoils at various depths with blnws fi'om a 140 pound hammer falling 30 · inches, This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values arc an inpication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the prqject engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs or'the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils at Boring I , below about I> foot of topsoil, consist of sandy clay down. to 20 .feet overlying si)ty to clayey sand and gravel with scattered sandy silt layers to the depth explored of 25 f~et. 10/20/2005 15:21 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 05 OCT-20-20El5 i6:10 From:HP·GEOTECH 97~9458'154 To:8765221 -3- Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from Boring 1 included natural moisture content and density and finer than sand si:r~ gradation. Results of swell- consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the clay soils, presented on Figure 4, indicate low compressibility under conditions of light loading and e)Cisting moisture conditions with a low to moderate swell potential when wetted. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time o:f drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist with depth. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS The clay soils are expansive when wetted m1d could heave lightly loaded footings and slabs-on-grade. The settlement/heave potential should be further evaluated at the time of construction. Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings, the nature of the proposed construction and the soils typical of the area, the building can he designed with spread footings bearing on the natural soils, If the soils exposed at bearing level are expansive, subexcavation and placement with non-expansive structural fill or designing the footings for a minimum dead load could be needed. The design and construction cr;iteria presented below should be observed for a spread . . footing foundatipn system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural soils with low to no expansion potential should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of I ,500 psf. Based on experience. we expect gettlement of footings designeq and constructed as discussed in this section will be about I inch or less. ·n,ere could be some additional differential movement if the bearing soils ; I ·, : • become wened, 2) The footings shou.ld have a minimum width of .16 inches for continuous . . willls e,nd 2 feet 'ror isolated pads. . ' ... ~ •,' .-:~ ·, Job No. I 0~ 363 10/20/2006 16: 21 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 07 OCT-20-2006 16:11 From:HP-GEOTECH 9709458454 To:9765221 . 4. 3') Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement offoundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local !U'IOmalies such as by assuming •n unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining str\lctures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf. 5) The topsoil and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natmal soils. The exposed soils should be evaluated for expansion potential. lfthey show moderate t.o high expansion potential, at least J feet of non-expansive structural fill, such as road base, compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density should be provided below footing areas. 6) A repre~entative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FLOOR SLABS The narural clay soils are expansive and there could be some heave of slabs-on-grade. Non-expansive structural fill could be needed below slab~ to help r~:duce the heave potential. To reduce the effect$ of some differential movement, tlo?r slabs should be $eparated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints· which allow ; . ' . ' unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should b~ used to reduce . . ' . (lamage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements fo.r joint spacing and slab . ' ~einforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended • I • slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer offree.draining gravel should b~ placed beneath ' . basement level slabs to facilitate drainage.' This material should consist of minus 2 inch ' ' ; \ ~ggregate with at' least SO% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less thru) 2% passing the\ No. ioo sieve;.' · . . ., ' . ' Job No. lOS 363 10/20/2006 . 16:21 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 08 OCT-20-2006 16:11 From:HP-GEOTECH 9709458454 To:9765221 P,7/l4 All till materials for ~upport of.Aoor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill should consist of granular soils devoid of vegetation and topsoil. i.JNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered d\tring our exploration, it has been our experience in the area tl1at local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement area~. be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. Where drains are installed, they should consist of drainpipe placed in tl1e bottom of the wall backfill SUlTOunded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet, dry well or sump and pump. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a max.imum size of2 inches. l11e drain gravel backfill should be at least I Y, feet deep. SURFACE DRAfNAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at a!! times after the residence has been completed: . ' J) limndation oft.lie foundation excavations and under~lab areas should be avoided during ponstruction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at' least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and stab areas a.qd to at least 90% of the II]•ximum standard Proctor density in landscap~ ~re~~ .. . ' . -. . J Job No. I 05363 10/20/2006 16:21 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 09 OCT-20-2006 l.61 H From:HP-GEOTECH 971<19458454 To:B765221 -6. 3) The ground surface suJTounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of3 inches in the firstJO feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on· site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at lea~t 5 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xcriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation . . PROFILE BORING A profile boring was drilled in lhe proposed septic disposal area at the location shown on Figure I. The subsoils enco~ntered, below about l/2 foot oftopsoil, consisted ofsandy clay to the bottom hole depth of 15 feet. The log of the profile boring is shown on Figure 2. No free water was observed at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist .to moist with depth. LIMlTATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical• ·engineering pri~ciples and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either .express o.r impli~. The conclusions and recommendations $ubmitted in this report are ; based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig~re I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. . . . pur services do pot include determining the presence, prevention o~ possibility of mold or pther biological pontaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is boncerned abom:MOBC, then~ professional in this special field of practice should be !:onsuJted,· Our findings include inlerpolationa~d extrapolation ofth~t'~u~~urface . ~onditi~1:~ identi:fied ·at the exploratory bo1in~'f~~ variatiqoi in the s~b.S,,j~ace . .... -' . , ....... . . . . ~ . 10/20/2005 15: 21 9708755221 OCT-20-2006 16:12 From:HP-GEOTECH CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION 9709458454 To•8765221 -7. PAGE 10 P. 9'14 conditions may not become evident until excavation is perfonned. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of struct.ural 1'i ll by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Louis E. Eller ;Reviewed by: ~Ieven L. Paw 1.-EE/ksw lob No. lOS 36! 10/20/2006 .16:21 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION OCT'20c2006 f6t 1!! From:HP-GEOTECH 9709459454 To:8765221 5536 --..... ..... ..... 5534 \ \ \ \ \ \ 5540 -..... ' ' \ \ ' \ \ • PROFILE BORING \ ' ,, 5542 .... -.., ............ ............... LOT15 BORING 1 • PROPOSED RESIDENCE ' ' ' ' ' .......... ' ----..._ ' ' ' ..... --......... ..... ..... .... .... APPROXIMATE SCALE 111 = AO' -........ -- -.... --5540 :-............ ........ _ ..... " 55:l6 ' ~ ~---· .. ' ----.....;..;......;...,----·---------'---~--... ........... NORTH MEADOW DRIVE .~ .. ', -~' . PAGE 11 105 0363 ·wcA· Figure 1 10/20/2006 ,16:21 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION OCT•2El-2006 16: 12 From: HP-GEDTECH 971219458454 To: 8765221 0 5 10 1l u. ' ~ ill 15 20 25 1' 363 LOT15 BORING 1 ELEV."' 8137' 17M WC=4.4 DDe110 ·200=50 30112 wc~a.2 00,124 ?.S/12 WC=14.0 00=117 ·200~90 40/6,?.0/2 6015 LOT15 PROFILE BORING ELEV. ~ 8135' 55/12 40/1?. 30/12 Note: Explanation of symbols is shc,wn on Figure 3. I . .. . . ' . ~ .. LOG~. PAGE 12 P.11114 0 5 10 ll u:. ' .c a 15 ~ 20 25 10/20/2005 . 15:21 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 13 OC"f·20·e0~5 16:13, From:HP-GEDTECI-I 97~9458454 To:B765221 P.li:Vl4 LEGEND: ~ TOPSOIL: organic sandy silt and clay, firm, moist. brown. D CLAY {CL): vary sandy to slightly s~ndy, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moistvAth depth, lighl brown. ~ SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM): silty to clayey, scattered sandy silt layers, medium dense, moisl, brown. p Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-lnch I. D. California liner sample. Drive sample blow count: indioates that 27 blows of a t 40 pound hammer falling 30 inches were 27/12 required to drive the California sampler t2 inches. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on October tO, 2006 \lAth 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Loeatlons of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing frorn features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained toy interpolation between contours shown on the slta plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the botings et the time of drilling, Fluctuation In waler level may occur with time. 7, Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DD = Dry DeMity (pc~ -200 .. Percent passing No. 200 sieve , 10S 363, ... . :· . 10/20/2005 15:21 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 14 ocY-20c2006 i6:13 From:HP-GEOTECH 9709458454 To•8765221 Moisture Content a 4.4 percent Dry Density~ 110 pof Sample of: Very Sendy Clay ';/1. From: Baring 1 at 4 Feet, Lot 15 c: 1 c -~ Q. .n 0 ' t--. c: 0 j"-..., 'UI 1 "\.. "' e ~ I', "-$ 2 Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE-ksf Moisture Content ~ 8.2 percent Dry Density ~ 124 pel Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 1 at 9 Feet. lol15 2 'II ! 1 p......_ ~ ~ I' 0 " ~ I' ·~ I 1 Expanslc 0 upon ~ 2 wetting ' • ,., .. • ,'\ , • . " 9-1 -1.0 ,., 10 ·, ... ·· .. 100 .. ·: . ·~ : ' AF>PLfED , i , _ tr_l:it= -ksf '· : . .--· :>. -.:-, '! ··. ...:_ _ SWI=I I .·. _;;:, ;;:. •~ • .:.;;., '•c . i c:\1: fit H ... 105_ OOt!~ \I,IUN · Figure 4 .. ·: . HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 0 ,_. 0 "' --. ~ ' "' -~ "' ~ TABlE 1 Job No. 105 0363 ' "' ru "' SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS "' "' "' "' "' SAMPlE lOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT AITERBERG UMITS UNCONFJNED ···~ . 0 •• -••••• MOIS11iRE DRY GRAVEL PASSING UQUID PlASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOJLOR SAND BORING DE Pill CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 UMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE .. (It) (%) (ocfl 1%1 (%) (1'51') .. I 4 4.4 110 50 Very Sandy Clay .9 .. .. .8.2 .124 Very S!IIldy Clay . 14 14.0 117 90 Slightly Sandy Clay ~ ,_. "' "' ~-"' ... ,_. ., , 0 3 "' :.: --.J -u "' ' co li! --.J "' 0 (Jl ... "' m 0 "' I ,_. . - ' i . '-" -J "" .. "' ... "' OJ .. . -... VI 0 ' ... ... D "' H OJ ' 0 c -0 ' 0 z (J) :··. I . I -· . '· i -1 -< 0 "' c OJ 0 -J -< ... H . ._ ..• "' 0 ru z ru .. -~ ' .\ .. ,,. I I -. -- :0 '0 -D ... GJ ' 01 ,_. _,. ,_. (Jl Aug 10 09 05:12p Jami Lynn Sho1t 970 876 2875 Inspection Report J e (1 fl,tz, -~Ui ltelllgrf£-(M:1~io Lf 1 a COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD INSPECTION REPORT I CORRECTION NOTICE Date Received: 10-AUG-09 Contractor/HomeOwner: Address: Type of Inspection: Action: Comments or Corrections: Permit Number: 670096 CALIBER ELECTRIC 0295 N MEADOW DR Final Accepted 1) 210.8(A)(7) Laundry, utility, and wet bar sinks require outlets installed within 6' of edge of sink to be GFCI protected (no exception for appliance) 2) Installer on site making corrections 3) No building permit card available 4) Electric final OK Inspectors Name: Cyrus Tuchscher Phone Number: 970-625-5085 Date: 1 0-AUG-09 COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGFNCIFS 1580 Logan St. Suite 550 Denver. Colorado 80203-1941 Phone: [303) 894-2985 p.1 httvs:/ /www.dora.state.co. us/pls/reailEp_ WebJnspection .GUI.Process . Page 8/1112009 Parcel Detail Page I of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessm[freasl1rer PropcrtyScnrch I Assessor Subset Qll<;;I)' I A!is<;;ssPI5aks .. S.~m""h Clerk&Rec;orderEec:eption .. Senrch Basic Building_ Characteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I TaxArea II I o2o II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I R041240 II 217905202015 II 45.408 I Owner Name and Mailing Address !sUN MEADOW ESTATES, LCC I 1734 MAIN STREET I !siLT, co 81652 I Legal Description ISECT,TWN,RNG:S-6-92 SUB:SUN MEADOW !ESTATES LOT:l5 PRE:R005381 BK:549 IPG:615 BK:372 PG:115 BK:360 PG:441 IBK:334 PG:415 BK:217 PG:476 BK:214 IPG:201 BK:213 PG:596 BK:207 PG:315 IBK:180PG:491 BK:1571 PG:651 IBK:ll86 PG:328 BK: 1175 PG:878 IBK: 1159 PG:829 BK: 1150 PG:774 IBK:ll50 PG:511 BK:0565 PG:Ol63 I IBK:0549 PG:0615 BK: 1610 PG:430 I IRECPT:657177 BK:l571 PG:803 I IRECPT:648969 BK:l571 PG:801 I IRECPT:648968 BK:1571 PG:799 I IRECPT:648967 BK: 1571 PG:797 I IRECPT:648966 BK:l571 PG:749 I IRECPT:648965 BK:l571 PG:746 I http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelNumber=2179052020 15 2/21/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 ' ' IRECPT:648963 BK:I57I PG:744 IRECPT:648962 BK:I57I PG:739 IRECPT:64896I BK:I57I PG:70I IRECPT:648960 BK: I 57 I PG:686 IRECPT:648959 BK:I57I PG:655 IRECPT:648951 BK:I571 PG:653 IRECPT:648950 BK: 1571 PG:651 I IRECPT:648949 BK:l571 PG:649 IRECPT:648948 BK:l571 PG:648 IRECPT:648947 BK:I57I PG:647 IRECPT:648946 BK:I40I PG:325 IRECPT:613636 BK:l401 PG:323 IRECPT:613635 BK: 130 I PG:499 IRECPT:591549 BK:ll99 PG:619-620 IRECPT:567070 BK:I I 50 PG:5I5 IRECPT:552105 BK:ll50 PG:513 IRECPT:552104 BK:I !50 PG:511 IRECPT:552103 Location Physical Address: IISIL T I Subdivision: llsUN MEADOW ESTATES I Land Acres: 112.007 I Land Sq Ft: llo Section II Township II Range I 5 II 6 II 92 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 87,6ooll 25,4001 I Improvements: II oil 0 I Total: II 87,6ooll 25,4ool II Sale Date: I Sale Price: I Basic Building Characteristics http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=2 I 7905202015 2/2I/2007 Parct;l Detail Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number of Comm/Ind lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I 2006 II Tax Amount II $1,153.361 2005 I Interest Payment ($40.37)1 2005 Interest Charge $40.371 2005 Tax Payment: Whole ($1,009.36)1 2005 Tax Amount $1,009.361 2004 I Interest Payment ($2.17)1 2004 Interest Charge $2.171 2004 Tax Payment: Whole ($36.22)1 2004 Tax Amount $36.221 TopoLP1.1ge Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Garfield Countv Home Page Page 3 of 3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good..Twn_sS.9ft\\'ill:.t<- http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=2179052020 15 2/2112007 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT Permit 6P-/OL(LO 4309 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado! 81601 Phone (970) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY Owner's Name pn fYifOr:ltJW bslQJCi Present Address fJLJ Jna/11 i5-/. '5iij= Assessor's Parcel No. 2111t2'S Z..o2ol s- This does not constitute a building or use permit. Phone3f6-S 2 2D Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No-«j"'. LJ-'JC}--1--'()"'·"':);"2,.-_,0C""'V:.::::::..!f'-',.L)-____________________ _ SYSTEM DESIGN ---'"l_0_0"'-'0=--Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) ______ Other -~1_'-\_, ___ Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) ~lK ~ lA jlZSf!Ft'e-1~ 56 Sfoc z's F 0 "-' Required Absorption Area-See Attached -(" ·) 'ii"' ~t;fi (ll ~ ~ '-vi d<-Fa""'--, 2. so'! ~ i'J B~O ~ ~IA.tCl fbiL-l (55j Special Setback Requirements: Date __ l.\_,_-_'&-'_,__'1,_-_o:::._l\_,_ ___ Inspector --~&l"'_oi-UJ-h-\.,U"=":::_------------- FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before -Covering Installation System lnstaller_~"--'-'"-'"'-"(1,"-~----------------------------------- S,eptic Tank Capacity·_,U.'t:LbL----------:--c.-----~----,--~--------'----- Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name _.o.;a«4"'1/A'<g~a>V"~"'-/:7'~'-'/"------------------------- Adeq~ate compliance with-County and State regulations/requirements~------------------ Other _________ ~------~-----------,~-----.---------.-------------------------------- Date_____,_] __._,-lq-"--'0-'--7 __ Inspector _.,lli\J~·.._t--"-'-""'YM.d"""'l _____ _ RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE •CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revi~ed 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connect"1on to structures which have fully complied w~· County zoning and building requirements. Coh· nect~on to or u_se with any_ dwelling or structures not approved by the Buil?ing an Zoning_office shall automatically be a ~iolation or a requirement o1 the perm1t and cause for both legal action and revocation oft e perm1t. 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an indiv'1dua1 se-wage disposal syste, in a mannerwhich involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or snRr:iflr::Mi("ll"l<> ,..,...n+oin.orl ;,.., +h~ ~~-"--.. '---• .. ·· -· - INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM APPLICATION OWNER CSurc Jv\~v-l 2 ... ~\-c.., ADDRESS 'l:>'j Mr..x. .. :f\ ~l,q""t ~,\l-PHONE %1b S~2.W CONTRACTOR Cc.-,. \. ~"' L6r-...~\-cv dr .c,,...... ADDRESS I::, L.\ M&t;,. .. ·~ ~(e..J.. ';.\ !-PHONE '/s'll., SZ. LO PERMIT REQUEST FOR N NEW INSTALLATION ( ) ALTERATION ( )REPAIR Attach separate sheets or report showing entire area with respect to surrounding areas, topography of area, habitable building, location of potable water wells, soil percolation test holes, soil profiles in test holes (See page 4). Near what City of Town Size of Lot J... Ob1 /l.C... --~~u_ ____________________ _ Legal Description or Address )-11_ S' 1\J ~ow ~\. '1.\~ (i) f?\ioS <.. WASTES TYPE: (')() DWELLING ( ) TRANSIENT USE ( ) COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL ( ) NON-DOMESTIC WASTES ( ) OTHER-DESCRIBE ______________ _ BUILDING OR SERVICE TYPE: Z:,,"'~L 6""~'\j tv w .:..o""s./r-cqc.l--o...,. Number of Bedrooms ---------'7::,=--------------Number of Persons \~ '\) ()9 Garbage Grinder ( /9. Automatic Washer ( )<) Dishwasher · SOURCE AND TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY: (;<)WELL ( ) SPRING If supplied by Community Water, give name of supplier: '2:,.,.1\. k .. .e ... J .. <)v) ( ) STREAM OR CREEK c.~.,\<,& \+o .A DISTANCE TO NEAREST COMMUNITY SEWER SYSTEM: __ l~\___,_;v...'-'-'-';\""'.t.S~----- Was an effort made to connect to the Community System? ---~Jv~_u__ _______________ _ A site plan is required to be submitted that indicates the following MINIMUM distances: Leach Field to Well: 100 feet Septic Tank to Well: 50 feet Leach Field to Irrigation Ditches, Stream or Water Course: 50 feet Septic System (septic tank & disposal field) to Property Lines: 10 feet YOUR INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PER.l\11T WILL NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT A SITE PLAN. GROUND CONDITIONS: Depth to first Ground Water Table ___ __s;~="---"'b>.~<D'-'.~\""'<;'--...:::'....::'-:.>;'f~Oc..."'ll-.:..._ _____________ _ Percent Ground Slope ______________________________ _ TYPE OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PROPOSED: ()<() SEPTIC TANK ( ) AERATION PLA.l\fT ( ) VAULT ( ) VAULT PRIVY ( ) COMPOSTING TOILET ( ) RECYCLING, POTABLE USE ( ) PITPRJVY ( ) INCINERATION TOILET ( RECYCLING, OTHER USE ( ) CHEMICAL TOILET( ) OTHER-DESCRIBE FINAL DISPOSAL BY: ()<) ABSORPTION TRENCH, BED OR PIT ( ) EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ( ) UNDERGROUND DISPERSAL ( ) SAND FILTER ( ) ABOVE GROUND DISPERSAL ( ) WASTEWATER POND ( ) OTHER-DESCRIBE \VILL EFFLUENT BE DISCHARGED DIRECTLY INTO WATERS OF THE STATE? A )a PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS: (To be completed by Registered Professional Engineer, if the Engineer does the Percolation Test) Minutes ____ -"er inch in hole No. 1 Minutes ______ per inch in hole No.3 Minutes per inch in hole No. 2 Minutes er inch in hole No. Name, address and telephone ofRPE who made soil absorption tests:-------------- Name, address and telephone ofRPE responsible for desigo of the system:----------- Applicant acknowledges that the completeness of the application is conditional upon such further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the local health department to be made and furnished by the applicant or by the local health department for purposed of the evaluation of the application; and the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and regulations made, information and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are or will be represented to be true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and are desigoed to be relied on by the local department of health in evaluating the same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for perjury as provided by law. Sign,fc(('Lt ACQ 9-fC 02JU h7 Date ___ q-=+/ ly/'-'o"--"'(0'----- PLE.A;g-RAw AN ACCURATE MAP TO YOUR PROPERTY!!