Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondenceAndy Schwaller From: Andy Schwaller Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 8:09 AM To: 'Angela Kincade' Cc: Abbey Pascoe; ajulrych@gmail.com Subject: RE: Grading Permit Garfield county It does appear the new driveway is off of the ROW. As long as there is communication regarding the utilities, I feel save issuing the grading permit. Thanks everyone for their input. Andy From: Angela Kincade Imailto:akincade@rfta.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 5:12 PM To: Andy Schwaller Cc: Abbey Pascoe; Angela Kincade; ajulrych@gmail.com Subject: RE: Grading Permit Garfield county Andy - just spoke with Mr. Ulrych and he verified that he will NOT be grading a driveway and access road in the RFTA Railroad Corridor. That his driveway and access road will be adjacent to his parcel and adjacent to the RFTA Railroad Corridor but not located in the RFTA Railroad corridor. His electric utility pull and road crossing to access his parcel will be the only encroachments into the RFTA Railroad Corridor. I've copied him in on this response so that he can clarify further if necessary. Thank you, Angela M. Kincade Assistant Director, Project Management & Facilities Operations Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (RFTA) (970) 384-4982 — Office (970) 384-4870 — Fax Office Hours -Monday through Friday, 9am to 5pm From: Angela Kincade Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:53 PM To: 'aschwaller@garfield-county.com' Cc: Abbey Pascoe (apascoe@rfta.com); 'Angela Kincade' Subject: RE: Grading Permit Garfield county Andy - Abbey Pascoe forwarded me your email and I wanted to get back to you regarding the license and the utilities for Mr. Ulrych's license. 1 Mr. Ulrych has a license to use an existing crossing of the Railroad Corridor but not for the construction of a new access road inside of the Railroad Corridor. It is my understanding that he will be upgrading an existing access road located adjacent to his parcel and located outside of the RFTA Railroad Corridor. I've left Mr. Ulrych a message to call me back on this so we can make sure we are on the same page. As far as the utilities, Mr. Ulrych has provided me with a rough sketch of his plan for tying into the Holy Cross electric pole and I will be getting back to him on Tuesday of next week to discuss further. Mr. Ulrych is required to do a utility locate prior to any work being completed in the Railroad Corridor , it is a condition of his license agreement and this includes any grading of the Railroad Crossing. Thank you for the head's up and I will get back to you as soon as I hear from Mr. Ulrych. Thank you, Angela M. Kincade Assistant Director, Project Management & Facilities Operations Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (RFTA) (970) 384-4982 — Office (970) 384-4870 — Fax Office Hours -Monday through Friday, 9am to Spm From: Andy Schwaller (mailto::aschwaller garfweld-countv.comj Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 4:12 PM To: Abbey Pascoe Cc: ajulrych(@gmail.com Subject: Grading Permit Garfield county Abbey, Thanks for sending the Access License for Andre Ulrych. Mr. Ulrych has applied for a grading permit to construct his driveway to his future home. It appears the utilities for his home are also located on the railroad ROW from an existing power pole. I do not see that utilities are part of the Access License but the source for his electricity is the existing pole. Utilities are exempt from our grading permit, so we can issue the permit just for construction of the driveway. I will put a condition on the permit to contact RFTA regarding any utility extensions into the ROW. It appears there are existing fiber optic cables (Item 7 of License Agreement) somewhere in the ROW. Please call if you have any comments or questions. Regards, Andy Schwaller Building Official Garfield County The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent 2 responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. 3