The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2.0 DD Staff Report 08.12.11REFERRAL FORM Garfield County Building and PIanning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212/Fax: (970) 384-3470 Date Sent: July 14, 2011 Return Requested: August 5; 2011 File Number/Name(s) Project Name(s) Type of Application(s) MIEA6913 Lloyd Minor Exemption Minor Exemption Staff Planner: Kathy Eastley keastlev@ arfield-county.com Phone: 970-945-8212 Attorney Applicant: Fiona Lloyd and David Pegg Phone: 970-876-0268 Contact Person: Phone: Location: CR 237 north of the Town of Silt, South of Harvey Gap Summary of Request: 10 -acre site currently has single family and an ADU, request to create lot for the ADU The Garfield County Planning Department bas received a land use request as referenced above. Your comments are an important part of the evaluation process. In order to review all appropriate agency comments and incorporate them into the Staff Report, we request your response by Friday- August 5. 2011. GARFIELD COUNTY Office or Division OTHER Number or Detail Road & Bridge X Attorney X Environmental Health X Board of County Commissioners 4 Vegetation Manager X County Surveyor X COLORADO STATE WCAL/F'ED GOVT EN111I S Water Resources / State Engineer X West Divide Water Conservation (Janet Maddock) X Water Conservancy Board X Health Department (CDPHE I X DISTR)CTS/,SERVICES School District RE -2 X Fire District - Burning Mms. X Exhibits —Lloyd Exemption Administrative Review 8/12/2011 Exhibit Letter (A -Z) Exhibit A Mail Receipts B Unified Land Use Code of 2008, as amended C Garfield County Comprehensive Plan 2030 D Application E Staff Memorandum F Email dated July 18, 2011 from Jim Rada, Environmental Health G Email dated July 27, 2011 from Wyatt Keesbery, Road & Bridge H Response from Janet Maddock, West Divide Water Conservation District 1 Email dated August 3, 2011 from Tom Schaffer, CDPHE WQCD J Email dated August 4, 2011 from Steve Anthony, Vegetation Management K Letter dated August 5, 2011 from Orrin Moon, Burning Mountains FPD L Email dated August 4, 2011 from Karlyn Adams, Division of Water Resources Lloyd Minor Exemption Director Determination August 12, 2011 PROJECT INFORMATION REQUEST APPLICANT / OWNER LOCATION SITE DATA WATER/SEWER ACCESS EXISTING ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Exemption from the Definition of Subdivision Fiona Lloyd and David Pegg North of the Town of Silt in SW 1/4 Section 25, Township 5 South Range 92 West of the 6th P.M. ±10 -acres; Parcel No. 2127-253-00-065 Well / Septic CR 237(Harvey Gap Road) Rural Residential Medium 6 to <10 acres per du I PROPOSAL The Applicant is requesting approval of a minor exemption application to allow for the division of a 10 -acre site into two (2) separate parcels. The site currently has existing structures that include a single-family home and an accessory dwelling unit (Resolution 2007-36), this division is intended to create individual lots to allow for separate ownership of each of these units. Both units are currently served by a shared well and shared leach field though each has an individual septic tank. The application states that a new leach field would be constructed on proposed Lot 2 so that each lot would have an independently functioning wastewater system. The existing well would continue to be shared and the use would be administered by a Well -sharing Agreement. This application is reviewed pursuant to the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, Sections 5-202 A. County Exemptions Requiring Platting, Minor (2 Lot) Exemption; 5-406 General County Exemption Criteria; and Article VII, Standards, as contained within. The Applicant has provided information sufficient to determine that this parcel, legally described as Lot 1, Peach Valley Orchard, has existed in its current configuration since 1909 thus meeting the criteria of existence prior to January 1, 1973. II REFERRAL COMMENTS Staff referred the application to the following agencies/County Departments for their review and comment. Comments received are attached as exhibits and incorporated into this 1 report where applicable. 1. Road & Bridge: 2. Environmental Health: 3. Vegetation Management: 4. County Surveyor: 5. Division of Water Resources: 6. Water Conservancy Board: 7. RE -2 School District: 8. Burning Mountain FPD: 9. West Divide Water Conservation District: 10.CDPHE: Lloyd Minor Exemption Director Determination August 12, 2011 Exhibit G Exhibit F Exhibit F No comments received Exhibit L No comments received No comments received Exhibit K Exhibit H Exhibit 1 III RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan 2030 establishes broad uses and densities which will be utilized in land use decisions. Chapter 2, Future Land Use, evaluates how best to accommodate future growth types and densities within the County while retaining diverse needs such as open space and economic development. The Future Land Use Map graphically depicts the anticipated future growth of Garfield County and designates a density range appropriate to specific areas. The Peach Valley Orchard subdivision, 1909, was designated as Residential Medium Density which recommends a range of 6 - acres per dwelling unit to Tess than 10 -acres per EXEMPT1Oii LOS 1 LOS ACRES i y �r An% NES r; M C3 N N c R From proposed exemption plat I 1 `nrlr, Al LIN... 'I �l 1t X2..24 ACRIO ES 2 oSSii o • avwaosao Lry[N rin 0 r "' N 89'2'45' Er 2S6.14'.,(/ MUM 1. REM /'1 67.2!9' 2 Res M (B TO <1DAe1Du) 1 261 dwelling unit. All properties outside of the subdivision are in the Residential Medium High designation (2 to <6 acres per du). The Lloyd Parcel consists of approximately 10 acres which complies with the FLUM, however the approval of an accessory dwelling unit for the site in 2007 caused the property to exceed the 6 to <10 acres per dwelling unit range recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. The Lloyd Minor Exemption Director Determination August 12, 2011 subdivision of the property to allow each unit to be owned separately will not increase the density on the site and the existing non -conformity with the FLUM. The Comprehensive Plan contains additional components which are to be reviewed for consistency, including elements including Housing, Transportation, Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Open Space. The Lloyd Parcel is consistent with many of the recommended goals and policies including agriculture, water and sewer services and preservation of natural resources. IV COUNTY EXEMPTION CRITERIA The following general exemption criteria (Section 5-406) shall apply to all proposed exemptions requiring platting. A. Compliance with Zoning and Use Regulations. The development and use of Exemption Lots comply with the zoning regulations and use restrictions of this Land Use Code and the PUD zone designations, if applicable. 1. The resulting Exemption Lots are not illegal or nonconforming Tots under these Regulations. Any Exemption Lot that is nonconforming shall not increase its degree of nonconformance. 2. The resulting Exemption Lots contain safe, adequate building sites capable of complying with applicable use restrictions, criteria and standards set forth in these Regulations. B. Not within the Purposes of Subdivision Statutes or This Land Use Code. The division of land by the exemption processes, detailed herein, is not within the purposes of the state subdivision statutes, Part 1 of the County Planning and Building Code Act, C.R.S. §30-28-101, et seq., or the subdivision regulations of this Land Use Code. C. Adequate Water Supply. The resulting Exemption Lots have a sufficient legal and physical source of water, in compliance with the requirements of this Land Use Code set forth in Section 7-105 of Article VII, Standards. D. Adequate Water Distribution and Wastewater Disposal System. The resulting Exemption Lots have demonstrated the existence of an adequate water distribution system and wastewater disposal system in compliance the requirements of this Land Use Code set forth in Section 7-106 of Article VII, Standards. E. Adequate Access. The resulting Exemption Lots have legal and adequate access in compliance with the requirements of this Land Use Code set forth in Section 7-108 of Article VII, Standards. F. Hazards. The resulting Exemption Lots do not create hazards identified in Section 7-209 and Section 7-210 of Article VII, or exacerbate existing hazards. G. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan and Intergovernmental Agreements. 3 Lloyd Minor Exemption Director Determination August 12, 2011 The proposed exemption is generally consistent with applicable provisions of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan and any intergovernmental agreements between the County and a municipality that apply to the area where the division of land will occur. The site does not specifically conform to the Future Land Use Map designation of Residential Medium density however the fact that two units currently exist on the site pursuant to land use permits issued by County, and the fact that the site otherwise conforms to components of Future Land Use and Chapter 3, Plan Elements, staff has determined that the exemption proposal is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. H. Exemption Map Requirements. See the specific requirements for Exemption Plats at Section 5-502(C)(6) and (C)(7). The following general criteria also applies: I. Taxes, The Treasurer is required to sign the plat attesting to taxes paid. V ISSUES AND CONCERNS A. Comprehensive Plan — The development request is generally consistent with the goals, policies and actions contained within the Comprehensive, however the site is currently inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map which designates a density range from 6 to <10 acres per dwelling unit. The site currently has a density of 5 acres per dwelling unit and this would not increase or change with the subdivision of the site into two parcels. B. Legal Water — The site (two units) is currently served by a well permit augmented by water purchased from West Divide Water Conservation District. Response from Janet Maddock with the District stated that an active contract covers two (2) dwelling unit as well a 15,000 square feet of irrigation (lawn and garden watering) from a well permitted by #64912-F. C. Physical Water - A 24-hour pump test was performed on April 26, 2011 by Colorado River Engineering and determined to satisfy the demands of the two units. Water quality analysis has also been provided sufficient to determine adequate water quality pursuant to primary drinking water standards. D. Well Sharing Agreement — A well sharing agreement has been submitted and will be finalized prior to Board signature of the plat. E. Permitting/Construction of new leach field — Jim Rada, Environmental Health, has recommended that the subdivision of the property be conditioned upon the 4 Lloyd Minor Exemption Director Determination August 12, 2011 permitting of an 1SDS for Lot 2. Each home has a septic tank, however the two units currently share a leach field — the Applicant has stated that adequate individual facilities will be constructed. Staff recommends a condition of approval to assure that this improvement is completed. F. Plat issues: Amendment to the Exemption Plat is required to comply with ULUR requirements, the following is a comprehensive list of changes that are required: 1. Required plat notes are recommended as a condition of approval. 2. Required certificates for signatures on the plat are recommended as a condition of approval. G. Payment for Fee in -lieu of School Land Dedication and Traffic Impact Fees (zone 14) are required prior to plat signature and recommended as a condition of approval. VI PROPOSED FINDINGS 1. That proper notice was provided to adjacent property owners as required by the Unified Land Use Code of 2008, as amended; 2. That the administrative review was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that adjacent property owners had the ability to be heard regarding this request; 3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed exemption has been determined to be in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County; 4. That the application, upon compliance with conditions of approval, has met the requirements Article V, Division 4 and Article VII of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Code of 2008, as amended. VI STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff finds the proposed Exemption, upon satisfaction of conditions of approval, complies with the Garfield County Unified Land Use Code of 2008, as amended, and therefore recommends that the Director of Building and Planning issue a Determination of Approval with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall include the following text as plat notes on the final exemption plat: a. Control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the property owner. b. No open hearth solid -fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within an exemption. One (1) new solid -fuel burning stove as defined by C.R.S. 25-7- 401, et. seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances. 5 Lloyd Minor Exemption Director Determination August 12, 2011 c. All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amount necessary and that all exterior lighting be directed inward and downward, towards the interior of the subdivision exemption, except that provisions may be made to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries. d. Colorado is a "Right -to -Farm" State pursuant to C.R.S. 35-3-101, et seq. Landowners, residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, sights, sounds and smells of Garfield County's agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in a County with a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. Those with an urban sensitivity may perceive such activities, sights, sounds and smells only as inconvenience, eyesore, noise and odor. However, State law and County policy provide that ranching, farming or other agricultural activities and operations within Garfield County shall not be considered to be nuisances so long as operated in conformance with the law and in a non -negligent manner. Therefore, all must be prepared to encounter noises, odor, lights, mud, dust, smoke chemicals, machinery on public roads, livestock on public roads, storage and disposal of manure, and the application by spraying or otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendments, herbicides, and pesticides, any one or more of which may naturally occur as a part of a legal and non -negligent agricultural operations. e. All owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under State law and County regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences and irrigation ditches, controlling weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control, using property in accordance with zoning, and other aspects of using and maintaining property. Residents and landowners are encouraged to learn about these rights and responsibilities and act as good neighbors and citizens of the County. A good introductory source for such information is 'A Guide to Rural Living & Small Scale Agriculture" put out by the Colorado State University Extension Office in Garfield County. 2. The Applicant shall amend the proposed exemption plat to include the following: a. Add a vicinity map; b. Add the following certificates (attached): i. Certificate of Taxes Paid; ii. Board of County Commissioners Certificate; iii. County Surveyor Certificate. c. The following easements must be added to the plat: i. Electric, for the overhead power line; ii. Access easement for the common driveway; iii. Water line distribution easement. 3. A well -sharing declaration must be submitted which addresses all easements and costs associated with operation and maintenance of the system as well as identifying the person responsible for paying costs and how assessment will be made for those costs. 6 Lloyd Minor Exemption Director Determination August 12, 2011 4. A driveway sharing agreement shall be submitted that is deemed acceptable by the County Attorney's office. 5. Prior to Board signature of the plat the Applicant shall obtain an ISDS permit for Exemption Lot 2 for the construction of a leach field. The permit shall stipulate a timeframe for completion of the system. 6. The property is located in the RE -2 School District therefore the Applicant shall be required to pay $200 for the creation of an additional lot. This fee shall be paid at or prior to the Board of County Commissioners signing the exemption plat. 7. The property is located in Zone 14 of the Traffic Impact Fee area and therefore is required to pay fees based upon the traffic generated by one additional single family lot. This fee shall be paid at or prior to the Board of County Commissioners signing the exemption plat. 8. The Applicant shall maintain its contract with the WDWCD #SM060921JNT(a) and ensure that all annual payments required therein are timely paid to WDWCD. 9. That prior to scheduling the plat for Board of County Commissioner signature, the applicant shall submit a mylar with signed certificates by all entities except the Board of County Commissioners, Clerk & Recorder and County Surveyor. Recording fees will be due and payable at that time as well. 10. Within 90 days of this determination the Exemption Plat shall be signed by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners and recorded in the office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. The Plat shall meet the minimum CRS standards for land survey plats, as required by Colorado state law, and approved by the County Surveyor. 7 From: To: Subject: Date: Jim Rada Kathy A. Eastley; MIEA6913 Lloyd Minor Exemption Monday, July 18, 2011 10:21:37 AM EXHIBIT Hi Kathy, I offer the following comments on that referenced application: 1. The well sharing agreement should be signed and notarized as a condition of approval. 2. The ISDS for Lot 2 should be installed as a condition of approval. I agree with Colorado River Engineering as to the need for additional water treatment on the potable water supply, however, as a private water system, there is no state regulatory requirements to do so. Thank you for the opportunity to review this application. Jilll Rada Environmental Health Manager Garfield County Public Health 195 W. 14th Street Rifle, CO 81G5O Phone - 970-B25-52GO x8113 Fax - 97D-625-8304 Cell - 97D -3I9-1579 jrada jgarfield-county,com www.garfield-county.com From: Wyatt Keesbery To: Kathy A. Eastley; Subject: Lloyd Minor Exemption C.R. 237 Date: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:12:44 AM Kathy, After reviewing the Lloyd Minor exemption, for an ADU on a 10 acre site, the Road and Bridge has no problem with them proceeding as planned. Thanks, wyatt REFERRAL 1:01,04 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suits 401; Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 946-8212/pax: (9970}384-3470 Date Sent: Italy 14. 2011 Return Requested: August 5. 2011 EXHIBIT File NumberlName(s) Project Name(s) 1 Type of Appli MIEA6913 Lloyd Minor Exemption Minor Exemption Staff Planner: Kathy Eastley keastle).' garfeld-countv.com Phone: 970-945-8212 X Applicant: Fiona Lloyd and David Pegg Phone: 970-876-0268 Contact Person: Phone: Location: CR 237 north of the Town of Silt, South of Harvey Gap Summary of Request: 10 -acre site currently has sin. lc famil and an AI)U. re nest to create lot for the AIX: Environmental Health Fbe Garfield County Planning Department has received a land use request as referenced above. Your comments are an important part of the evaluation process. In order to review all appropriate agency comments and incorporate them into the Staff Report, we request your response by Friday August S. 2011. GARFIELD COUNTY J Office or Drnsion OTHER Numt r or Detail Road & Bridge )ti Attorney X Environmental Health , Board of County Commissioners 4 Vegetation Manager 3! County Surveyor X COLORADO STATE 1OCAI/FEl) GOVT EN111 EES Water Resources !Sum Engineer X West Divide Water Conservation (Janet Maddock) 1,-, t C\ k. f (v c X VI Ca/ 1 CU 1---1G1 { t) ! a 't V3.i Water Conservancy Board x Health Department (CDPHE t Health X :�- Lt l �1 el I_ & - `L ...).. T'e'l C C)'1, ‘,k rCJ_C_.'C` o_' C. >''. _ j -O `1 a 1 SCJ (b" ; Ca loft r1Ct , 1 - _- 1 L : 4-irvc cy.. ut L. Y• DISTRICTS/SERVICES C ; �, — -_.- lel i t' \ �j-rr t -i VI l \- fir"Y9}, -- ----k_____42—.1. lC(r~c } G - _.• School District RE -2 X 1 Fire District - Humin¢ Mins- x From: Schaffer, Tom To: Kathy A. Eastley; Subject: MIEA6913 Lloyd Minor Exemption Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 3:31:59 PM Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment has no comments regarding this project. Tom Schaffer, P.E. West Slope Regional Field Unit Engineering Section Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 222 S 6th Street, RM 232 Grand .function CO 81501 970-248-7152 (w) 970-248-7198 (0 tom.schaffer@state.co.us EXHIBIT 1 From: Steve Anthony To: Kathy A. Eastley; Subject: Lloyd Minor Exemption Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:55:10 AM Hi Kathy I have no comments on this one. Thanks Steve Steve Anthony Garfield County Vegetation Manager 0298 CR 333A Rifle CO 81650 Office: 970-625-8601 Fax: 970-625-8627 Email: santhonyngarfield-county.com Burning Mountains Fire Protection District burningnIntsfpd@ansii.com rnsn.com Kathy Eastley Garfield County Building Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 EXHIBIT Reference: Lloyd Minor Exemption, File Number MIEA6913 Kathy: August 5, 2011. This letter is to advise you that I have reviewed the Lloyd Minor Exemption located at 1491 A, County Road 237. I have no requirements or requests for this exemption to take place. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, Orrin D. Moon, Fire Marshal President, Karen Maddalone-Cochran Secretary, Kevin Erpestad Director, John Moore Jr, Fire Chief, Brit C. Mci.in 1111111. Vice PresidentlTreasurer, im oor ets 1111111111 Director, Megan Richards Station 61 Administration PO Box 2 t 611 Main Street Silt, CO 81652 (970) 876-5738 Fax (970) 876-2774 Station 62 731 West Main Street New Castle, CO 81647 (970)984-3412 Station 63 5255 CR 335 New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 984-3323 Station 64 775 Castle Valley Blvd New Castle, CO 81647 (970) 984-3157 From: Adams, Karlyn To: Kathy A. Eastley; cc: Martellaro, Alan; Rubin, Edward; Subject: Lloyd Minor Exemption Comments from DWR Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 4:26:53 PM Kathy, We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to divide, by exemption, a 10+ acre parcel into two lots: Lot 1 will be 8.06 acres and Lot 2 will be 2.24 acres. The applicant proposes to supply both lots with an existing well operating under well permit no. 64912-F. Individual Sewage Disposal Systems will be used on each lot. This office will be evaluating this application consistent with SEO Policy 11-1. Permit no. 64912-F was issued on October 3, 2006 for the Thomas Well. This well is to operate pursuant to a contract with West Divide Water Conservancy District and their Silt Mesa Substitute Water Supply Plan or a court approved plan for augmentation. The uses of this well are limited to ordinary household uses inside one single family dwelling and one accessory dwelling unit, the irrigation of not more than 15,000 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of four head domestic animals. This permit is valid. The applicant proposes to utilize a well sharing agreement between the two parcels. The well uses described in the agreement should not expand beyond those allowed by the existing permit; any such agreement would not supersede the limitations of the permit. Currently, the well sharing agreement indicates that 15,000 square feet of landscape watering will be allowed on Parcel One on odd days of the month and another 15,000 square feet of landscape watering will be allowed on Parcel Two on even days of the month. This proposal would expand the irrigation amount to 30,000 square feet. At no point should the applicant be watering more than 15,000 square feet of home gardens and lawns total. This office requests that the well sharing agreement be amended to read 7,500 square feet of lawn and garden irrigation be allowed per lot, or some variation there to that adds to no more than 15,000 square feet in total. Once this amendment is complete, this office has no objections to the above referenced proposal so long as the applicant continues to operate within the bound of their well permit and their contract with West Divide. Please contact me at this office if you have any questions. Sincerely, Karlyn Adams Water Resource Engineer Colorado Division of Water Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Suite 818 Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-3581 office (303)866-3589 fax , Garfield County July 12, 2011 Fiona Lloyd 1491 CR 237 Silt, CO 81652 Fiona@juniperridgeranch.us RE: Lloyd Minor Exemption Dear Fiona: BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Building and Planning Department has reviewed the submittal documentation for the above referenced exemption application and determined the information to be technically complete. A determination of technical completeness is not an approval of the application but a determination that the information submitted is sufficient to commence the review process. The Minor Exemption process is Administrative, meaning that here is no public hearing required but that a decision of approval, approval with condition, or denial will be determined by the Director of Building & Planning. A date for the Director Determination has been set for August 12, 2011 when a decision will be issued. It will be your responsibility, as the Applicant, to complete the required notice to adjacent properties within 200' of the boundary of Lot 1, Peach Valley Orchard, required to be sent at least 15 calendar days prior to the Director's date of decision. Attached is the notice you will send certified mail, return receipt requested, to those adjacent properties. Prior to the Director's date of decision the County must receive the proof of mailing and receipt. A draft notice form is attached, please verify the content and make any necessary changes as it is the Applicant's responsibility to assure form and content of the notice is correct. I am including an outline of the process from this point: 1. The Director Determination is set for August 12, 2011; 2. A referral form is attached which lists the agencies that will review the information. I will keep you informed as we receive comments related to the application. I will need 15 additional copies of the application material to send out — please provide these to our office prior to the end of business on Thursday July 14th; 3. Notice must be mailed by July 27, 2011 to meet the time criteria; 4. You will provide the proof of mailing and return receipts prior to August 11th 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 siGlenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 5. On August 12th the Director will render a Decision to approve, approve with conditions or deny the application; 6. The Board of County Commissioners will be provided notice of the Director decision. The Board has 10 days to review the application and make a request for a public hearing; 7. If the time period expires without a request for hearing, the plat mylar may be submitted for Board signature and recording. Please let me know if you have any questions on this process or your responsibilities in the process. Kathy Ea Attachment Cc: File 2 ENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: JotihV c i'usly C8 C4- 231 2. Article Number (Transfer from service Labe° COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signature X nt dressee B. Received by (Printed Name) .II of D livery C f"- /VZ) J' j1 D. Is delivery address different fro em 1? Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. Service Type Certified Mail /Registered 0 insured Mail 0 Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 7011 1150 0000 8912 0336 'S Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: La YIN cry\ c C a) 2 102595-02-M-1540 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY B.iecelved by (Printed Name) D. SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or an the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: _Ju -v) >~1t �L4t -� c.' t, g -o cm'cmr 816c2- COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signature X /1- B. eceived by (Printed Name) ❑ Agent Addressee C. Date of Delivery D. Is delivery address different from itern 1'? 0 Yes if YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 3. Service Type AgCertified Mail Registered 0 Insured Mail ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7011 1150 0000 8912 0312 PS Form 3811, February 2004 ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee C. ate IIDa?teir Delivery Is delivery address different from item 1? ('Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 335 CR ,_56) 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 3. Service Type ❑ Certified Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Insured Mail ❑ Express Mail C Return Receipt for Merchandise 0 C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 7011 1150 0000 8912 0084 PS Form 3811, February 2004 - Domestic Retum Receipt SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the Card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: k 1214 3�1 i1 Co 8►bft 0 Yes 102-M-1540 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A Signature X / ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee C'e o D livery /a°I/ D.�ls delivery dre5`s different from item 1? 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No 3. Service Type ❑ Certified Mali 0 Registered 0 Insured Mail 0 Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) 0 Yes 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) 7011 1150 0000 8912 0329 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595.02-M-1540 Domestic Return Receipt SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. • Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: q�tCAA-4- Ccw&4.0 ?ickcr- 1 46 1 CA-L.2_31 c-0 81 -6s --L 102595-02-M-1540 COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY A. Signature x 13. Received by (Printed Name) ❑ Agent ❑ Addressee C. •.teofpelivery 7,2!(1 D. Is delivery address different from item 11 0 Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: 0 No 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label 3. Service Type r�'�rtifled Mail Registered 0 Insured Mall ❑ Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 7011 1150 0000 8912 0091 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Retum Receipt 102595-02-M-154 U (13bbUbW -UUS8 07/18/2011 (970)876-2250 11:01:38 AM Sales Receipt Product Sale Unit Final Description City Price Price SILT CO 81652 Zone -0 First -Class Letter 0.50 oz. Expected Delivery: Tue 07/19/11 Return Root (Green $2.30 Card) Certified $2.85 Label #: 70111150000089120084 Customer Postage -$0.44 Subtotal: $5.15 $0,44 Issue PVI: SILT CO 81652 Zone -0 First -Class Letter 0.50 oz. Expected Delivery: Tue 07/19/11 Return Rcpt (Green Card) Certified Label #: Issue PVI: $5.15 $0.44 $2.30 $2.85 70111150000089120091 SILT CO 81852 Zone -0 First -Class letter 0.50 oz. Expected rielivery:: Tue 07/19/11 Return R_ f (Green $2.30 Card) Certified $2.85 Label #: 70111150000089120312 Customer Postage -$0.44 Subtotal: $5.15 $5.59 $0.44 Issue PVI: SILT CO 8165.2 Zone -0 First -Class Letter 0.50 oz. Expected beiivery: Tue 07/19/11 Return Rcpt (Green i2.30 Card) Certified $2.85 Label #: 70111150000089120329 Cuscomer Postage $0.44 Subtotal: $L.15 $5.15 $5.15 $0.44 Issue PVI: SILT CO 81652 Zone -0 First -Class Letter 0.50 oz. Expected Delivery: Tue 07/19/11 Return Rcpt (Green $2.30 Card) Certified $2.85 Label #: 70111150000089120336 Customer Postage -$0.44 Subtotal: $5.15 $0.44 Issue PVI: SILT CO 81652 Zone -0 First -Class Letter 0.50 oz. Expected Delivery: Tue 07/19/11 Return Rcpt (Green $2.30 Card) Certified $2.85 Label 4: 70111150000089120343 Customer Postage -$0.44 Subtotal: $5.15 $5.15 $0.44 Issue PVI: OCEANSIDE CA 92054 Zone -5 Media Mail 10.90 oz. Issue PVI: BEDFORD TX 76021 Zone -5 Media Mail 7.80 oz. Issue PVI: Total: Paid by: VISA Account #: Approval #: Transaction 4: 23903033942 $5.15 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $36.16 $36.16 XXXXXXXXXXXX2288 040359 250 ru a D' 8912 0343 w N Q�-. O04^1._ •+{c0 �Or�irs cci- = �(0 0.-w q N Vl j q • V LILd[1L] U.S. Postai ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAIL,. RECEIPT Provided)(Domestic Mali Only; No Insurance For delivery information visit our website at www eusp . o e Clr8102 postage Certified Fee 02. Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) r -▪ R ra a a 1ti Restricted De1R ulre e (Endorsement Here Total Postage & Fees 07/18/2011 Sent ro ---------- ------------ S`treet, Ap or PO Box No. ----------------'--- Ci y Statt-e, ZiF+d - PS Form 3800, August 2006 i -R Er D n] r -R Lr - LinD D ra rR ra r-1 nt To bh'ee4 Apt. No.; or PO Box No. City. State, Z1P+4 See Reverse forinstructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.44 $2.85 $2,30 $0.00 $5,59 059L- 'ti fi 020 " iPOSVr&rk 1. Here 07/18/2011 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions rR ra D m m n] U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comr Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $0.44 $2.85 $2.30 $0.00 $5.59 0591 02 Postmark tete 07/18/2011 Sent To Street, Apt. No.; or PO Box No, City, State, Z7P+4 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usPs•cam8 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt D (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee D (Endorsement Required) ra Total Postage & Fees rR 0591 02 a a Q 1ti Sent To Postmark ®re 07/18/2011-- a 7/18/201Y - -aFtreet, Apt. No.; or PO Box No. City. State, ZIP+4 See Reverse for Instruction U.S. Postai ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comu ru rR rn D ru 1150 0000 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Feo (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 0591 02 4 erk Po re 07/18/2011 Sent To Street, Apt. No.; or PO Box No. City, State, 2IP+4 PS Form 3600,. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 07/18 Sent To S4reet Apt. No.; or PO Box No. City, State, ZIP+4 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions