HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 08.16.1982l'iWJECT NAH E :
APPLICAN T :
LOCATION :
"!T !\.POSE :
_QUALIFICATION :
ZO,'ING :
WATER :
SE:·!ER :
ACCES S :
COMPREHEN SIVE PLAN :
STAFF COMMENTS :
• P L OJ E CT I:ffO ~iATIO:-.J A;\D S TAFF CO'.-l'l E~T S
Senate Bill 35 Exemption Reques t
Kennet h a nd Opa l Kuhn S r .
4 miles south of Silt on County Roa d
33 1. (Dry Hollow Roa d)
To spl it a 40 acre p a rcel into 3 tracts
of 10, 15 and 15 acres each
Applican t to convey to 10 acres to
daught e r ; app licant has owne d the
property only 9 months , and has no t
evidenced any qualificatio n to app ly
through the Senate Bi ll 35 process for
the 2 -1 5 acre sp lits .
A/R/RD
Applicant proposes to serve all three
tracts from dom es tic wel l #113 06 6 . The
Division of Water Resources has no t
yet responde d to this reques t .
Appl i can t proposes individual sep tic
systems for the parcels
Private easemen t from County Road 33 1
Distric t C (Rur a l Areas with :Mino r
Environmenta l Constraints )
1 . The app l icant has ow n e d this parcel approximate ly 9 months . The y qualify for the
10 ac re sp lit as ap plied for, as they are conveying the tr ac t to a daughter .
However, the appl ic an t does no t appe ar to q ualify for the two add itiona l lot
s plits .
2 . This 4 0 acre parce l is one of many create d in this genera l area wit h o ut benefi t
of any county review . In the past , the Boar d of County Corrnni ssioners has expressed
thei r concern over furthe r sp lits of th ese parcels which did no t receive county
review , specifically , those i n this genera l area and specifical ly, any furthe r
s pl!its attempted through the ex e mptio n proces s . As the Board of County CoI!\Il1issione rs
note d rec e ntly, a review of growt h a s swnptions needs to be made i n this area . The
planning s t af f , the Planning Commission , an d the Board of Coun ty Commissioner s
may wish to r eview this area development scenar io in the near future .
3 . The Boar d sho uld consider the impact to the Si lt Bridge a nd the per lot
assessments ($10 0 0.00 for each n e w p arce l) required by sub dividers in the pas t .
4 . The app l icant n ee ds to address a n access easement for each parcel in the legal
descriptions .of the tracts .
5 . The app l ican t has indicated tha t they wil l serve the proposed parce ls by exis ting
domest ic wel l #11 3066 . If the parcels are approve d, th e applicant needs to
supp ly the following informat ion :
c· 1 ,,-_ . c · ·/ /c_ ' 1 -:?'.
(
-· ' , C. ; r . , --;_ ;.,/ J .· j. / . < J / I ;' / ) ,,/ "/ , • ,..--/ --..... '---"'--r-j c ~ { ·~) -r c~-·~,,,,-~ /'-[ .-1 __,, ,/ _ "'~ C(
/t ! .::.~ -c"--<-/7 // :..c::{ c_:L'_() C:: /~' ~ ·c y·~ ~),/c:-c l'(-,,; _; ( {"',, " /::_
L)// c~_,_:_.-(_ .{_-<_' __ ./!.;::__'Jfa/,r( C/L .f~--/0 V/Lf} G2..---:!_cCA...
/3 ( ( -_ /z:-,__ .hL cc 1 ,,-Lc-5--c <-L ~ ~
~~/-}'.? /r ::::.::::L.-,,-<._:/-%u::_.::__o1