Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 01.15.1996• • BOCC 1-15-96 PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS R EQU EST: An exemption from the definition of subdivision. APPLICANT: Ernest Frywald LOCATION: A tract of land located in a portions of Section 1, T7S R89W and Section 7, T7S R88W of the 6th PM; located approximately 5 miles south of Glenwood Springs off of SH 82. SITE DATA: 10.3 acres WATER: Well SEWER: ISDS ACCESS: Proposed new driveway off of Hwy. 82 EXISTING/ADJACENT ZONING: Commercial/ Limited I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The site is located in District D - Rural Areas/ Moderate Environmental Constraints as designated on the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. II_ DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL A. Site Description: The site is located in an area with existing commercial and residential uses. The property has the Summit House (Coltons) furniture store, associated storage buildings, and two mobile homes. The area is relatively flat, draining gentlely toward the railroad, which forms the western boundary. A vicinity map is shown on page _. B. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to split the 10.3 acre parcel into four (4) parcels of approximately 2.2, 2.1,2.1, and 3.9 acres in size. One of the 2.1 acre sites would have the existing furniture store, the 2.2 acre site would have the storage buildings and mobile homes, and the remaining two lots would be vacant. An on site well supplies the existing uses and a new well is proposed to serve the new lots. All existing and proposed lots would utilize individual sewage disposal systems. A sketch plan of the proposed exemption is attached to staff report, and a cover letter from Ron Liston is attached on pages _ • • III_ MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCI RNA A. Subdivision Regulations Section 8.52 of the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations state that "No more than a total of four (4) lots, parcels, Interests or dwelling units will be created from any parcel, as that parcel was described in the records of the Garfield County clerk and Recorder's Office on January 1, 1973, and is not a part ofa recorded subdivision; however, any parcel to be divided by exemption that is split by a public right-of-way (State or Federal highway, County road or railroad) or natural feature, preventing joint use ofthe proposed tracts, and the division occurs along the public right -of way ornatural feature, such parcels thereby created may, in the discretion of the Board, not be considered to have been created by exemption with regard to the four (4) lot, parcel, interest or dwelling unit limitation otherwise applicable; A deed submitted with the application describes the parent parcel on December 28, 1965 (Book 372, Page 175, Reception No. 232928). Therefore the tract of land qualifies for a request of up to four (4) parcels to be created through the exemption process. B. Zoning. The proposed exemption parcel exceed the required 7500 sq. ft. minimum lot size for the C/L Zone District. Each lot meets the two (2) acre minimum required for a lot with individual wells and individual sewage disposal systems. The proposed lot with the storage buildings and mobile homes has been reduced in size due to some conflicts with the railroad right-of-way, that has resulted in some of the buildings now being on the railroad right-of-way. One of the buildings has a lease, two other buildings have no easement or lease. There is no verification of the length of the lease to determine if the conflict with the setbacks can be resolved with a variance. The lack of easement or other legal agreement for the other buildings,creates the same conflict the setback requirements and needs to be resolved before the Board approves any split of land. Some kind of correspondence from the railroad recognizing the encroachment of the buildings on their right-of-way needs to be received prior to any approval. C. Legal Access. The parent parcel is accessed from two access points off of Highway 82. The proposed new lots would use a new access point adjacent to the southern most access and expand it to a sixty (60) foot wide easement, with a cul-de-sac with a 60' radius. No new State Department of Transportation driveway permit has been included with the application. The application states that the applicant does not know what type of uses would be on the property, as a result the State would have difficulty issuing a permit. While this may be true, staff believes that the State will be indicate whether or not a new permit can be issued for expanded uses on the property. No approval should be given to the application, until it can be demonstrated that there is or can be a legal access to all of the lots and the proposed driveway will be approved by CDOT. D. Water and Sewer. The applicant intends to serve the new parcels with a commercial well, augmented with water by the Basalt Water Conservancy District. The current well permit supplies the existing uses, but no copy has been submitted with the application, so it is not possible to assess what, if any limitations there are to the use of the well. It is not clear whether or not a contract will be approved by the conservancy district or whether the contract • • land that was created by this exemption reserves the right to use the proposed central water supply." "The shared well system approved for this exemption requires a minimum 1000 gallon water tank be installed at each lot. This shall be done at time of building permit application at the expense of the building permit applicant." The applicant is proposing to serve each parcel with a new or existing ISDS. The application indicates that there are existing systems on the lot, with no indication of the locations or the capacities. It is not possible to determine if the existing systems are capable of meeting the needs of the proposed lots. Soil conditions on the site does not preclude the use of individual leach fields on the site. It should also be noted that ISDS can only be used for domestic waste and any plat approved should have a plat note to that effect. State and Local Health Standards. No State or Local health standards are applicable to the application, with the exception of Colorado Department of Health ISDS setback standards, which should be verified by an engineer. F. Drainage. No intermittent of perennial streams are located on the property, and it does not appear that easements are necessary. G. Fire Protection. The applicant has proposed to meet the same requirements made of the Evergreen Commercial Center developers in their agreement with the Carbondale Fire Protection District. That agreement was to pay the impact fees established by the District. These fees should be paid prior to the signing of any plat of resolution. H. Easements. Any required easements (drainage, access, utilities, etc..) will be required to be shown on the exemption plat. IV. SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. That proper posting and public notice was provided as required for the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. That the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that not all of the pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted at that meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed exemption is not in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. V. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends a Continuance of the meeting on the application to a date certain, to allow the applicant time to provide additional information regarding the wells, water rights, ISDS locations and capacities, a highway access permit, verification from the railroad that the buildings encroaching on the ROW can continue to encroach indefinitely. 595/ I1' • l'. sr7s CPS=' have�`=:: J . \ :1 • 6000 C0 ' 101. \ oo: \^ m\ • 0• WG \ ` 47l \I 1 I s- na 11 111 6 67 S) 1112++ 0 ? IV I • 69f X11.,, Il y\ II 11 32 .959 • VICINITY MAP 6700.4 Pi" tihe z (Yeller -6s o • • November 27, 1995 Mark Bean Garfield County Planner 108 81.h Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81(101 Ue: Fyrwald Subdivision Exemption Application Dear Mark: land design partnership Al.Lached herewith are the application forms, plans, supplemental information and application tees as required for an application for exemption from subdivision procedures. This information is submitted on behalf of the owner and Petitioner, Ernie Fyrwald. Herewith is a copy of a Gleed transferring the property to the previous owner (Colton ) and the deed from Colton to Fyrwald and partners. This provides evidence that the property has not been divided since prior to 1973 and thus qualifies for consideration as as exemption from normal subdivision regulations. EX -STING SITE The lieu plus acre parcel is located on Ilwy. 82 five miles south of Glenwood Springs. It is the site of the Summit ]louse (formerly (o11ons) furniture story: and is zoned Commercial/Limited. The. attached Sketch Plait shows all the existing structures on the site including two large warehouses, the furniture store, a small warehouse and three mobile homes. Access is provided by two driveways from Hwy 82, one al. the north end of the property and one near the middle of the highway frontage. Access to the site is available to south hound Hwy 82 traffic only. The southerly half of the site is open field. An on-site well (see Sketch Plan) serves all existing uses on the site. Wastewater disposal is handled by multiple septic Lank and leachl'ielcl systems. The Sketch Plan shows that some of the existing structures extend into Lire railroad right-of-way. TIhis apparently is the result of some confusion over property boundaries in the past.. Note the old properly line and also an easement on the railroad right-of-way as depicted on the Sketch Plan. IL is possible that some time is the future the railroad could call for the removal of these structures form railroad property. P.O. Box 517 • Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 918 Cooper Avenue (303) 945-2246 • Fax (303) 945-4066 • • Mark ligan I l/24/ th gage 2 Adjacent uses include Sop►•is restautrant to the south, agricultural fields to the southwest (Unocal ranch) , railroad to the west, residential to the north and Hwy 82 to the east. Various commercial and residential taus (furniture store, truck rental, warehousing, mobile hones) currently occupy the structures on the site. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION The Sketch Plan shows the creation of four lots ranging from just over two acres to nearly four acres. All existing structures are included within lots one and two with the furniture store isolated on lot one. initial access to all lots will be through the existing central driveway via easements as shown on the Sketch Plan. Upon identification of the future uses of logs three and four, an access permit will be processed with the Department of Transportation for the relocation of the existing central drive to the common boundary between lots one and two. At that time, the cul. -de -sac shown and any required highway impr•ovemenis will be constructed. Prior to the identification of the future uses, it would he difficult to accurately process an access permit. Domestic water wi 11 he provided by a new commercial well. Application is being made to the Basalt Water Conservancy 1)is1.r•ic1: for a water rights contract for the new well. The s i Le is located very close Lo the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District Sub Station. Based on the request; of the I)istr•ict of other commercial subdivisions in the same vicinity, the Petitioner proposes to pay Lo the Fire District a fee comparable 10 that paid by other developments in the area. It is understood this fee will be used to construct a water storage facility at the fire station site. Wastewater wi 1 I Ire treated by on site septic tanks and leachfields. These will be designed by a registered engineer in accordance with Colorado Department.. of Health Standards. This requirement will be noted on the exemption plat. Putur•e uses of the lots will be specifically limited by the amount of effluent they generate. Mary uses will not be possible on the property because their wastewater discharge would he greater than can be accommodated by on-site disposal systems as regulated by the Department or Health. s • Mark Bean 11/24/95 page :1 Please contact me if you have any questions or require any additional information. Sincerely, Ronald 1i. Liston mow