HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 BOCC Meeting Minutes - DeniedI
i.
t
., (){ thc Board of County Commissioners, Garfield County' Colo"'SEPTEI\IBER le..l!.....
.- to r|TRI,HER RES)LVED, jf thjs proynsal and resolution is approved bg a najoritg of the electors of
,_tt-1,-'ri"i)7'rt'r-"t-tn" general eLection to be heTd on November 2, 7976, its provisions reTating to
' i"'-"^)irr"r";:;2"7;" tax impsed, the provisions reTating to the disttibution of revenue as set forth
"''.::",:';:;' a")Tin" proposaT and resotution, and the date of termination of the effectiveness cf the
t il IE: aY"r'- -
,-.- fer as set forth in paragraph 5 of this proposaT and resofution, sha71 not,be amended' aTtered
''t-.'ii,iZ2o"Z-.Zir" o, resotution of tbe Board of countg conmissioners of GarfieLd countg, approved bg
'"' "-11"'^7 ,7"2"7{rZr1'tr"d eTectors of Garf ieid ccuntg in the same manrer as the oriqinaT adoption hereof
t:::; \",'j*ti"}-"tor", aft other portions and provisions of this propcsal and reso-lutjon maq be
', l,,,rlr.o'or- r:"t"l"tj"" passed arrd approved bg said Board of countg comnissioners of GarfieTd countg
.,,l.:'ritirrut a vote of the qualified eLectors of GarfieTd Countg'
.... r,r rij]RTHER RESOLVED, that if ang provision of thjs Reso-lution ot th:: appli-catj'on thereof to anq
,-.r.";on or circumstance is heTd invaTid, such invaTiditg sha-l.l ;ut affu'ct cf'her provisions or appTi-
.:_1:ions of this ResoJ.utjon which can be given effect ';,7.i.y1i6v1.r. r-j:e i::r"aii<i provision or appTication'
"..t-i" this endt the provisions of the Resc)-iutior: ar<:4ec1ri'ed ta be severab)'e'
:t,rh,,HEREFORE, BE rI FURTHER RESOLVED, that xhe vaJ-iri question on the countg-wide saies tax proposaT
t:it sh."71 be referred to the quaTified e-lecLc,r-s of tlp Countyt of Garfield at the GeneraT Election
'c'c be heTd on Tuesdag, November 2, l-976' shaLl be:
GARFIELD COUNTY-WTDE ANE PER CENT SALES TAX
,,shell a countg-wide saLes tax in the amount of one (1) per cent be imposed upon the sal-e of tangible
:x,r.sora-l ptopelxg and uwn the furnishing of certain taxabTe servjces putsuant to the tetms of ' and
)rt sccordance with' the proposaT set fotth in Resolution #76-58 of the Board of coantg commissioners
i,t. GarfieTd Countg, as amended'
FOR APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY-WIDE AGAINST APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY-WIDE
oNEPERCENT(7"4)SALEiTAxoNEPERCENT(7%)SALESTAx
lir Ir FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Notice of the ad.option of this coutttg-wide safes tax ptoposal b9 a
ntjoritg of the quaTified eLectors votinq thereci shal-7 be submitted bg the countg cTerk and Recorder
tct the Director of Revenue at -i.east one hundred Xwentg (720) da|s ptiot to 'the effective date of such
r"r.* toq"t?rer with a certified copq of this Reso-lution"'
:1'rs HEREB. DECLARED bq the B)ARD oF couNTY COt'lMrSSroNERS of the countg of GarfieTd that this
,ttttionjs necessarg for the innediate y:reservation of the pubTic peace, heaTth, saffetg and weTfare'
r:trtt it sha77 become effective inmediateTg upon its adoption'
j,Is.sED AND ADoprED bq the B}ARD oF cotJNTy ccMMrssroNERS of the county of Garfield at a reguTat meeting
such Board. this 20th day of Septenber, 7976
rman
Conmi
onet
,t l''I'f,S?i
i: of the Board of County Commissionets
iirtkotn,ski, County planner, and Tom Stuver, attorney, presented a petition for SB-35 exemption near
i lk Crcek Development, for trlary Louise Joitey. rhis is an exchange of land with no third ownership'
\l:rttivi moved that the exemption be granted. Seconded by l''1r. Cerise' Ir{otion carried' Fee of $50 pai
i:itlowski presented a petition for a SB-35 exemption for Llenry and lvlarian Paruszetr'ski for division of
..r.ts into three tracts on tr{ain Elk creek. Mr. witkowski recommentied approval with the condition that
i,uiltl ing permit be issuetl only if the site is outside of the flood plain' lilr' Irlattivi moved that the
,il lon be granted rvith the condition that a flood plain map be a prri of thc Resolution. Seconded by
i.'-'ri sc. li'lotion carried. Fee of $95 pai"d.
' t.rr-kla,d presented a petition for a SB-3S exemption for 6.72 acres of land into two tracts of 2'41
r.-r ,,..elr-oppro*ir.t"ry. This is located near carbon(ia1e. I'lr. !{itkowski recommctrdcd denial due to
iL.nrs lrith access off of two private easencnts and also prior cxemptions have becn denied because of
'.!t)'. l{ater table and septic tank problcms with density were rliscussed. 'Iabled fc'r' an on-site inspec-
'l,rrl.
' I colrrba presented a petition for a SB-.3s exemption for carl and I'largaret l^littwer for the division of
I i.l.l acrc tract into two parcels of 3.5 and i:12 acrcs approximatcly. Ihis is near Rifle on state
,,lr' j2S. Iilr. Iriitk,wski recomnended approval rsith the cbndition that a highwa,"- drivewai',permit be
. '.,i,,t'a,-ina tira"tr.," ,otcntial_ roc.kfall irazard bc pointcd out. Ilr. Irlattivi moved approval subject to
;rr)ovc conciitions. 3econded by lrlr. Cerise. l'{otion carried' Fee of $54 paid'
"', hitilowski presentc<l a petition for a SB-35 exemption for Archie and John Royal for division of 9'76
r.'; into tr{o tracts of s ancl 6.75 acres. Ile recommcnJed approval ' Irlr. Ir'lattivi moved that the exemp-
''t, lr,' ,,r,,rr^! (n^nn,rnrr hr' r\ir Cr.rise. Iritrtion carrjcd. Fec of $OO paid.
6r rrrrLLv
' I llicks, Dr. Boh Sammons, and Jack Zimmercr, rcprcscnting thc.soPl11 lrlcntal Itealtlr Clinic, prcscnted
',,r,1,.,i",ii,,r"=a"ir. $1s,000. l'his is to funil one positi.n in the ilifl" "r"".
'Iabled rrntil Mr' llill
",rlti llr l)rescitt.
i I t"t,1'11,'4 for lunch. Reconvened at 1 :30 p, m.
l,-,l thc Bcard of County Commissioners' Garfield County'
ib
TUESDAY ocroBER 72, 7976
Bo:rrd of County Commissioners met in regular session beginnlng at 10:00 a.m., 0ctobe-r 12, 1976, there
rcsent Chairman Flaven Cerise, Commissioners Lynn Hill and Pete Mattivi, Commissioner Candidate
and Adminis trative Assistant Esther PiPer.
\i rkland reques ted a decision on his SB-35 exenption pet ition. Bob Witkowski, Planner, reviewed the
vi stated that he would have t'o go along with the recommendation of denial by the County ri
and asked for the reasons again. They we re based on the land use pattern in the area
l i or denial s Minutes of the SB-35 exemption request from Redstone Corp. and its denial were read
rc's of 9/15/75.)A discussion fol lowed , after which l''lr. Hi 11 moved that it be tabled until legal
t . -..ray nrornotiolr was discussed. I'lrs. Piper presented a chart showing the estimated rerrenue as re-
. <;tIC5 Lo/\ I---
',:., ::i';, in" 'Colorado Department of Revenue, Siatistics Dept ' Irlrs ' Piper was in-structed to prepare an
i., i"' informatron on th; sales tax issue to be inserted in the newspapers in the county' Two insertions
.-,,'i,;: made in each PaPer'
rr,rr l.cirn, candidate for District Attorney, inforned the conrnissioners that if he were elected District
?:' '' -., l:e wo.ld not ask for any additionai salary above that set by legislature as a minimum' He felt
.'.'rtrc)''.il'rl"o"ra" compensation for the position. He did not want to joi.n in cn lr{r. Tuckerts request
,, ]t,::;.;:;5'lio,oob from the combinei three counties. He stated that he would so inform the Comnis-
.iii r'(ru- --r- the other two counties also. Ir{r. lr{attivi pointed out that in the past, the candidates had
' I i'\ rrr !"- -
.,i.J tlrtt they could live with the budget prepared the p,ior year and then during the year after they
.r-:_-- thev would come with additional requests. llr. Keim stated that "at this time I am not comPet
' i,".tli,'i,ri"l'anii la"r, in the budget - if there are enough investigators or secretaries, "but he can
" ,,i:\
..,,n his salary,,. He further stated that 52 to 35% of iniome for local attorneys must go for overhead'
..,.,.,s t'e District Attorney does not have the expenses of office, secretary, telephone, etc' He felt
,..',,,iiiii"raI morrey was ila g::oss imposition on the taxpayers'r.
.!:s brlance of the neeting was sPent discussing budget'
ii r,.,urrrcd at 3 :30 P 'n'
errt
i,
ii
ll
il
ti
rl
ii
il
II
it
li
l
rrr,st. l*1r. Ilatti
: ,ili)L r. l.1r. Kirkl
i ir.i [opf,
i i,
I i.
,!
:r ;cl could advise them on whether an exemption was required Further discussion fol towed. l'tr. I'lattivi
,.i that the motion of l,'lr. HiIl be rescinded and since this is in a t'greY area",that the SB-35 be denied-,"
,r,,it'd bY lrlr. Hil l . I{otion P assed with l'1r, Cerise voting t'no". Mr.Cerise stat ed his reas.'n because
. hirs rlot the same as the Redstone Corp'request that vras denied He felt that the circumstances were
I thc same and that approval for the exempt ion for I''lr. Kirklr.nd wou ldnot be inconsistent with prior actions:
,. . lir il r-equested that legal counsel be present.- Ir'lr. Cerise explained that Irlr. Hartert was in Colorado
: ilngs and had told him that K.T. Johnson would be avaj.lable
,,,.i llcrnklau presenteu a SB-35 exemption petition to split 80 acres into t:,ree parcels as followst 2 of
,,.i.(.:i jach and c;le of 6g acres. I{r. l{itlowski reviewed the request atid recommendcd apprcval gs there
. !!,n() Problems. Irlr. Ir{attivi moved that the SB-55 exemptron for iVIr. Bernklau l-re grante'1 ' Scconied by
'.; . lti ll. tr{otion carried unanimously. Fee of $56.00 paid. Res. #76-65.
,.r.,r.rrc),Char1es Stoddard presented a request for vacation of an easement for EvelFr C' Eimstad' Mr' Cerise'
..!.ri:rcrl tl1at he had made an on-site inJpection rvith Jim Terry, Road supen'isor, and they recommended
,rirrl fo,r feet beyond the garage only. After discussion, this was tabied until a nerv clescription can be
::.'in ul) and lega1 counsel can approve it.
. Il;rttivi read a public Noti.ce from FCC to UIIF translatol li.censees relative to acceptance of Political
..,.rrising. Irlr. Kopf felt that this cleared him of implication of illegat advertising and asked the
.r:,sioners for an apologv. Irlr. Mattivi statcd that no apology was in order as they had not accused Mr'
,.r of anvthing. It was pointed out that this notice was ient to all translator licensees and was not a
' i r.,. 1 irrrswer to our letter of Septembe't 27 , 1976.
':rottrncd for lunch. Reconvened at I:15 p.m.
' ili I I reported on a meeting in Rifle orr pari-rnutuel horse racing, which .is being considered by the
i r r l]oard.
,i.rrtivi moved that the minutes of the meetings of September 22 anC 23, 1976 be approved. Seconded by
ilill. Nlotion carried unanimously.
rrr., \rrrSCS Johanna Terry and Bctty Woolley discussed their attendance at rneetings. Mr' I{i11 asked rvhat
'' r 'ili:cnrunts were rnade when the;- were gone. lle felt one nurse should bc in the county available to cover'
,, lr:rsn,t hoppened before r,,herc they-nere both gone. Mr' Hill suggested that they trade off and that
' ii,,11l,r b";;i;;i io uoth - tlc opportunity to aitend meetings. M;.-Mattivi felt that they should attend
' 'l ('\'cr mcetinls are necessary to do n gooi ;ob. Ir'lrs. Temy submitted a contract with RSVP' It was
' 1,:J until legal counsel could check it.
r":. Pifer was instructed to send a telegram to President Ford, urging him to sign the payments-in-lieu
r t;rxcs bill.
,lohnsen, Assistant Cognty Attorney, presented a dcposit slip in the anount of $46,391 at the Roaring
rr,,nt iii 'r;;;;;;;-account for thc Ranch at Roaring Fork and KASSCO Realty Corp. I'{r' llill moved that
(.lrrirrnan be authorized to sign for the County on the escrow account. This is in accordance with tl1e
lrvirlcrs agreelncnt. Seconderl by I'lr. Irlattivi. Motion carried unanimously'
ll ll;rlncs, County Auditor, requestcd that thc inventory be put on the computer. Cost should be around
"',tt0 for Pi;;;;;*irs. Aiter rliscrrssion, the commissioners-agreeti to the proposal and asked Mr' Barnes
' Iirtrrc llirrbnra Brorvn, Bookkeeper, proceed on it.
t'ltlt't rlj scusseC unt il 4 :00 p. m.
