Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application-Permit
Garfield County ~.-1 N_o_._w_48_6 ___ __j Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 JobAddress lUt i(CJ tv .l{q c.p CO:c3" \S:S ( RC'{{; \0 Nature of Work . Building Permit a)~~ 1-~()C) .. o.D Use of Buildingult§ia ~ NJ-UJitiqt:rstwo~~ ~UtU'lS Owner b:n (fiVID{ (2)~ , k QAt& ContractorR$-~Q>J:l lt!--,. Amount of Permit $ ]: 1 "2b ' i.bb Date (ify-ot-- clerk < ~ttLt\cr . v - Permit No: I Job Address: \J 'E ';" 1 Lot No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8'" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ·'"'/ht"($~945-8212 I Fw" 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line' 970-384-5003 \~ Parcel/Schedule No: 21 ;),)-'1... 1-;)-o U lJ';~~u-t<•-' >,15S, 1<.'\bW Block No: Subd. I Exemption: ··- --- 2 Owner: I::.V\Cu..;, M q. c__. WSfl.) Address "2-; \1 (.:~ c...\ s-Ph: no -?.'b>-•6<>~--~lS. h>. u~ ~-':=-! (~ 'i'l61.) 3 Contractor: Address: "?o ~"'~ zs-\ Ph: '11,-:.3 q-'i ·K7 Lie. No.3:J3 -4::3-1<,-"S" \~\>!or .\.. vi"\ \i'icS""~ ~ 4 Architect/Engineer: l{t.~ + ks ~ott~-td. Address: \10 n(J ~11\.:> ~.-...1 Ph: o;JD··~i"i-\$"'00 Lie. No. bl.!.--'-"'"·\ >e'~ ~~ >,(o 1ibo\ 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: -;-;~ 5~-~\. Sq. Ft. of Lot: Height: i~( No. of Floors: l'-'0 1 '1.\0l .... ' I 6 Use of Building: 1-(6.1\ 'i>p ;:;.r~t~-~!i~ ~ P •Vqo1 \-S lr or A," oh'\.,'s:;,,, \ ~'"'~ "".).. ~" .\.,_".). w~\-v 7 Describe Work: \)\ . {Jh-c,A.5 ~'\,tftJ 1>~1 u; ... :>, ·~ \. CD"'\-'"''-J-d. f"'L <.L II\~ " 8 Class of Work: )X New 0 Alteration o Remove 0 Addition 0 Move -·-0 9 Garage: Single Carport: 0 Single 0 Double 0 Double --10 Driveway Permit 0 On-Site Sewage 0 }( Site Plan Disposal 11 Valuation of Work: $ !>o,ooo. ~ Adjusted Valuations::ff d---'6 '?33,.,3lf 12 Special Conditions: NOTICE Plan Check Fee: Permit Fee: b A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ?-~ot;'l ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. 431 T THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOJD IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued: AUTHORIZED IS NOT OOMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF '712 72 CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS OCC Group: Const. Type: -- APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL F-t ...:Il_8_ PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS 'TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE Zoning: Setbacks: GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. s-- ----1--:;pA,::;r:-~f.\'u....:,Hk '3[1) (2.CJ~') '7 Manu. Home: ISDS No. & Fee: ~FOWNER 2 J DAT:~A }/ ;% b:.__S~So ·ell ~ /c";;a~ =~:-)~/; I 1:J) ATE APPROVAL/DATE ·-· --------- AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUC1'URE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSJDERA110N OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND !,AND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUN1Y PURSUANT TO AUTHORIW GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER PURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUN1Y AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFPICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OP THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITIED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR L!ABL!TJES BY GARFIELD COUN1Y FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSJ BILI1Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPEC!FICJALLY WITH THE ART!CTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND JN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT! HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL)~.!.:~--~:::._ __ _ Gl\k. d. l.f;) '-( q 0 '-$ /O b d • ( c;· .3 I d. c_,; '0 7 ~ \\\ \) l ~:-:-~ ~ [r ~t--~~ -4'--v-cl ~ J, Jlf9, ~ 7 - ~ "'-'-(:f-£~ The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. 9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupa]~fl~~the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # ~)'""\. · Signature Bpapplicationoctober2006 ., Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant £&cft?V q Address A:-o.3 GOO Date 5/30 --cJ'] Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper ~ ;:233 Lower ~ LJ90 Other Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfinished Subdivision Lot!Biock Contractor (2;T T-+Jiut '72-~ X 3'1 6'-8' :1--¥ ?3-:7. 3<-f ) Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Gara£e: Valuation Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a petmit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in yonr design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check with the Building Department. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IBC, IPC, IMC and IFGC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes X 1 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes No Not necessary for this project ~XA-- 3. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes )( No__ Not necessary for this project __ _ 4. Is the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a 2 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. II. 12. 13. 14. 15. Colorado Registered Engineer? Yes No__ Not necessmy for this project '/., Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road accessing the property? Yes_y;j_ Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes No Not necessary for this project_i__ If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Yes_:t,_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for project_y.._ Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this projectl Do the plans include design loads as required under the IBC or IRC for roof snow i-ds, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes No__ Not necessmy for this project __ Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_:i_ Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes_}:;,_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes~ No__ Not necessary for this project __ Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes Y.. No__ Not necessary for this project __ Doe~uilding section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? V Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_Ll_ 3 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district for building height maximum) Yes_:']9_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA certification? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_?:<::_ Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IBC or IRC? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_2(_ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IBC oriRC? Yes __ No Not necessary for this project_L Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? .J Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_'A.._ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_X_ Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building? Yes__ No Not necessary for this project X Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the IBC Chapter 3) \1 Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_"--"-- Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project___L Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? 4 Yes __ No Not necessary for this project _X_ 26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_L_ 27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes__ No Not necessary for this project X 28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the appli)(ion? Yes No 29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_i_ 30. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes::j,_ No __ 31. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For comer lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbacks. Yes X No __ 32. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required J.!.tl!!!;,_l<;~ the implementation of these changes? Yes_],_ No 3 3. Do you understand that the Building Depmtment will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes.;£--No __ 34. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes_)(_ No __ 35. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must 5 comply with the Uniform Codes? Yes.](_ No __ 36. Are you aware that you must call iu for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m. and 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. 37. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes~ No ___ _ 38. Are you aware that prior to issuance ofa building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes j( No. ___ _ 39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes X No ____ _ 40. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcel/ Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of the building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes X No __ _ 41. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes X No (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes j( 6 I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature Phone: '110-2-g~-2 {,(, 7 (days); '2>o·:,.. 'i :n-"1 J 4 s-(evenings) Project Name: A o-, s-") (, c~R Project Address: \0 E 1/-1 \..) € '1'-1 o \-~'-'-\: ~., 3,\ S S., \<. "''bW Note: 3/IS")zoo·7 Date If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review. B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in proceeding with construction. *If you answered "No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. Bpcomm Feb2005 7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant £& e-~. Building /Engineered Foundation , ~Driveway Permit [i;x,s~ -t,L_surveyed Site Plan '}_k, oco ;f-c;,(</L ~Septic Permit and Setbacks 4 Gradeffopography 30% ~Attach Residential Plan Review List .J.LMinimum Application Questionnaire *Subdivision Plat Notes ;v'/)._ Fire Department Review ~Valuation Determination/Fees dRed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker t4&:-Attach Conditions ~Application Signed JLrlan Reviewer To Sign Application LParcel/Schedule No. ~0# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms, ~ Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/ ing __ Buildi g Height Zoni " Si<>n-off --Co"' __ Roa Impact Fees __ HO RC Approval __ Gr· deffopography 40% Subdivision Plat Notes No. lN:\6b ,_ Assessor's Parcel No. ¢fj$-~}3-()C){)\S Date CQU-e>J-. BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address lvc 'fq < l0 1 /y ~'Sec "3 1 TS~ 1 RQE; \>J Owner 'fhCaro Chlt ()OS Address ~"t\\-n~\S ptr\3'~ Phone # »& ~ +- Contractor R S" 1"6\ltor Address\b< ~'S \ 've<:J\.0. o~V\(J, Phone #L\"S<s-3$3~L\qSi- ~backs: Front Rear RH LH Zoning ____ _ ~tO'fOc:.te ~ Y\Cil:OJ:ul C\Cf'.) ~ p_:roouc~ W;i~fcr16'~r>\'dn<:ttRN'\ Soils Test----------- Footing------------ Foundation, __________ _ Grout ______ ~----- Underground Plumbing _____ _ Rough Plumbing --------Framing, ___________ _ Insulation-----------Roofing ___________ _ Drywall ------------ Gas Piping---------- NOTES Weatherproofing __________ _ Mechanical ____________ _ Electrical Rough (State)--------- Electrical Final State)'------..,Ll.~ FinaiS.--'J. ~ /Checklist .(Omgleted?_l?'~~= Certificate Occupancy# ...J.:~~~~~~--4-::.,__ Date //-(o vO+ Septic System # __________ _ Date-----------Final __________ _ Other--------------- (continue on back) I~ Y eh and Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers & Scientists November 7, 2007 Mr. Kyle Vanderberg Mays Construction Specialties, Inc. 2399 River Road P.O. Box 4229 Grand Junction, Colorado 81502 Project No .. 27-090B Subject: Review of Micropile Foundation Construction, CDP Sites A-03 and F-09, Encana Oil & Gas, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Vanderberg, Yeh and Associates prepared plans for a micropile foundation for the CDP sites A-03 and F-09 in Garfield County, Colorado (Project No. 27-090, dated May 15, 2007). Mays Construction Specialties conducted two micropile verification tests on sacrificial micropiles and two proof tests on production micropiles on June 25 and 26, 2007. The verification tests were conducted to 200% of design load, and the proof tests were conducted to 150% of design load. The total measured deflection was less than 0.5 inches for all tests. The test results are attached. The results suggested that the test piles were designed and installed to meet the project loads. If you have questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerely, YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ·>;:.¥7 ~:r~".:y .. , //··· " .. · >-'"' --::'c'"C:"'r· : .. ·.f./ y-·-···-/ C~_..-C.>"" -'"'" . ~' Richard D. Johnson, P.E. Senior Geotechnical Engineer 5700 East Evans Avenue, Denver, CO 80222 170 Mel Ray Road, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 570 Turner Drive, SuiteD, Durango, CO 81303 ,L ·. 0 0 2008 VERIFICATION MICRO PILE "Test Data Log" Mays Construction Specialties, Inc. P.O. BOX 4229, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502 (970) 245-0834, fax (970) 254-8957 Project Name : EnCana Oil & Gas, Inc. -CDP Sites Pile Location: CDP Site F-09 Project Address: Garfield Cnty (Roan Plateau), CDP Sites F-09 & A-03 Lb (ft), ____ ft "V" -Verification (non- Micro Pile No.: .I!P'"'od"'u"'"""·u,n)c_ __ _ Lu (ft), ______ _ Test Date' 612612007 illtimate Adhesion: _:c3o:5 ________ _ Inspector I Engr.: Not on site Design Adhesion: 17 5 Bit size·~ Test Typ" (XX) Verification: --"'XX"-'---Bar Size: R32N Bar Area: 0.61 in2 Pile Lcngth:....3ft1f Installed 6/18/2007 MCSI Job No ' Hold Time or Until Stable (VIS) VIS VIS 10 Min. 10Min. 10Min. 10Min. *1 min. *2 Min. *3 Min. *5 Min. *6Min. *10 Min. *20 Min. *30 Min. ••o Min ><O '· • 10 Min. 10Min. VIS VIS VIS VIS VIS VIS VIS Pro.iect Engineer Testing Equip.: Ultimote: ____ _ Bar Mfg. Williams Form Engrg. Proof: Dwain Cook & #210861 MCS1 Supmr · Darrell McChlskey .. Load Ratio (psi/kip) Test Design Load (kips)· Load Movement (in.) Load Load Pressure Dial Dial Absolute Increments Increments Gauge Gauge 1 Gauge2 Disp. (% of design) (Kips) (psi) inches inches ~ J-.00 0.0000 25.0% 6.25 Approx. 500 0.000 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.024 75.0% 18.75 1750 O.Q75 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.133 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.192 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.257 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.258 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.260 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.266 ~ ~ 3450 No Reading ~ ~ 3450 No Reading 175.0% 43.75 3950 0.330 200.0% 50.00 4500 0.462 175.0% 43.75 3950 0.457 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.425 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.380 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.330 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.281 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.237 25.0% 6.25 500* 0.221 0.0% 0 0.1980 Grade: 75 Bonded:~ Un-Bonded:_tflf 25 (200%-50 Okips) - Comments Average Notes & Disp. Information Value t T oa.d TOO LOW Alignment Load-' 0'-Gauge "'.Stm:U:: *"'nish Cr. en~ MAX TEST Start to Dnlo.ad.Nan Yeh & Associates, Inc.-Richard Johnson, P.E. Lo•s taken bv enoineer (YIN)' NO I Ram:_Sl_Ton (# or Letter)_21lli5..2:R_, Guagc (#or Letter):_ll3.fl:B_, Pump (Letter):_]):' 0*10 OOOpsi Calibration of testing equipment by: Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. Performed: 11113106 Per ASTM E-4-99 S~ NOJ:ES: Bedrock was at approx. 10'-12' below grade on this micro pile installed 10'+ into bedrock. This micro pile is located adjacent to the Generator Building. * See Plans with pile locations Page 1 of 1 MCSI-Test Log Project Name : Project Address: Test Date: VERIFICATION MICRO PILE "Test Data Log" Mays Construction Specialties, Inc. P.O. BOX 4229, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502 (970) 245-0834, fax (970) 254-8957 EnCana Oil & Gas, Inc. -CDP Sites Pile Location: CDP Site A-03 Lb (ft): ____ ft "V" ~Verification (non- Micro Pile No.: -"P':::""::"::::'"::'nn::c) ___ _ Lu (ft): ______ _ Garfield Cnty (Roan Plateau), CDP Sites F-09 & A-03 6/26/2007 Ultimate Adhesion: ::,3::,5 ________ _ Inspector I Engr.: Not on site Design Adhesion: 17 5 Bit size·~ Test Type: (XX) Verification: __ _,X"'X_o_ __ Bar Size: _,_R"'3""2N"----- Installed I Ultimate: ------Bar Mfg. Williams Form Engrg. " _ _::6:::12.::11.::20:::0:..7 _.J_-,-,--=-Pr"o"'of": ______ Dwain Cook & MCS1 Job No #210861 MCSI Suprvsr · Darrell McClaskey Load Ratio (psi/kip) Test Design Load (kips)• Load Movement (in.) Hold Time or Load Load Pressure Dial Dial Absolute Until Stable Increments Increments Gauge Gauge 1 Gauge 2 Disp. (U/S) (% of design) (Klos) (psi) inches inches IJIS ~ !.00 ().0000 U/8 25.0% 6.25 Approx. 500 0.0000 10Min. 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.007 10 Min. 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.031 10 Min. 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.060 10 Min. 125.0% 3!.25 2850 0.098 *1 min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.148 *2 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.154 *3 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.154 *5 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.154 *6 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.161 *lOMin. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.161 *20 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.161 *30Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.164 *SO Mia -;p.5() 3450 No Readin~ *"" Ml, -;p.5() 3450 No Reading 10 Min. 175.0% 43.75 3950 0.180 10 Min. 200.0% 50.00 4500 0.245 U/S 175.0% 43.75 3950 0.230 U/S 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.207 U/S 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.177 UIS 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.152 U/S 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.115 U/S 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.040 U/S 25.0% 6.25 500* 0.040 0.0% 0.010 Bar Area: 0.61 in2 Pile Length:_3D.1f Grade: 75 Bonded:~ Un-Bonded:_ltlf 25 (200'!1 -so Okips) ,_ Comments Average Notes & Disp. Information Value t Load TOO LOW Ali2Jllllent Load -' 0'-Gauge :':..S.!l!li.Cr.eeo Test *Finish CreeD T•-'1 moved r~ht to 175% loading MAX TEST Sbrrt ro llnlaa.d.Nail Project Engineer Yeh & Associates, Inc. -Richard Johnson, P .E. Logs taken by enW!teer (YIN): NO I Testing Equip.: Ram:_s.Q_Ton (# or Letter).2ID3:5.2::IL Guage (#or Letter):_.12J.!l:Ji_, Pump (Letter): 'P' 0-10 OOOpsi Calibration of testing equipment by: Geoteehnical Engineering Group, Inc. Perfonned: 11/13/06 Per ASTM E-4-J!9..SP!l<>. l'illiE& Bedrock was at auvrox. 10'-12' below &ade on this micro pile, installed 10' + into bedrock. This micro pile is located aqjacent to the Vessel Supports (VS-1) Sliding End. * See Plans with pile locations Page 1 of 1 MCSI-Test Log MICRO PILE "Proof-Test Data Log" Mays Construction Specialties, Inc. P.O. BOX 4229, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502 (970) 245.{)834, fax (970) 254-8957 Project Name : EnCana Oil & Gas, Inc. -CDP Sites Pile Location: CDP Site A-03 :Micro Pile No.: npu w Production Pile #22 Project Address: Garfield Cnty (Roan Plateau), CDP Sites F-09 & A-03 Lb (ft): ____ ft Lu (ft): ------- Ultimate Adhesion: -"3;:5 __________ _ Design Adhesion: 17 5 Bit size·~ Test Date: 612512007 Hn!low Rar Bar Size: -"R3=2N"--- Bar Mfg. Williams Form Engrg. Bar Area: 0.61 in2 Pile Length:..20'lf Grade: 75 Bonded:_2j)jf _,T_,es,t-==="'---, Verification: _____ _ Ultimate: ____ _ 6/22/2007 Proof: XX (production piles) Load Ratio (psi/kip) Un-Bonded:_.!l'lf MCSI Job No #210828 MCSI Suprvsr · Darrell McClaskey .. Test Design Load (kips)• (1 50%=37 50kips) Load Movement {in.) Comments Hold Time or Load Load Pressure Dial Dial Absolute Average Notes & Until Stable Increments Increments Gauge Gauge 1 Gauge2 Disp. Disp. Information (VIS) (% of design) (Kips) (psi) inches inches Value IJIS ~ ;1..00 0.0000 AH :nt..Lo.ad IQQ I .ow VIS 25.0% 6.25 Approx. 500 0.0000 Alienment Load-' 01 -Gauee VIS 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.012 VIS 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.031 VIS 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.070 VIS 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.106 *1 min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.155 ** .":..S.Illr1 f'r~n To<t *2 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.155 ** *3Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.162 ** 5 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.162 ** 6Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.165 ** 10 Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.172 0.0171! *Finish Creen...I.e,st VIS 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.162 StarU~ J Jnlruul Naj] VIS 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.148 VIS 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.126 UIS 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.095 UIS 25.0% 6.25 500* 0.045 0.0% 0.00 0.004 Pro· ect Eneineer Yeh & Associates Inc.-Richard Johnson, P.E. Lo~s taken by engineer (YIN): NO I Testing Equip.: Ram:_5.Q_ Ton (jl or Letter)~_. Guage (#or Letter):_123D.::R_, Pump (Letter): 'D' 0-10 OOQpsi Calibration of testing equipment by: Gootecbnical Engine€ring Group, Inc. Performed: 11113106 Per ASTM F.A-99 SJll'<S, l'IDTES.; Bedrock was at a2)!rox. 7'-8 1 below &!:ade on this micro E:ile, 10 1+ into bedrock. This micro pile is located on the outside corner of the Generator Building. * See Plans with pile locations Page 1 of 1 MCSI-Test log MICRO PILE "Proof-Test Data Log" Mays Construction Specialties, Inc. P.O. BOX 4229, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81502 (970) 245-0834, fax (970) 254-8957 Project Name : EnCana Oil & Gas, Inc. -CDP Sites Pile Location: CDP Site F-09 Project Address: Garfield Cnty (Roan Plateau), CDP Sites F-09 & A-03 Lb (ft): ____ ft Micro Pile No.: "P"-Production Pile #3 Lu (It): ______ _ Test Date: 6/25/2007 Ultimate Adhesion: 35 -=------- Design Adhesion: 17 5 Bit size:~ Hollo.lr..B.ar Bar Size: .oR3=2Nc:._ __ Bar Mfg. Williams Form Engrg. Bar Area: 0.61 in2 Pile Lcngth:_JSjf Grade: 75 Bonded:_3.5.1f ~T'-'es"'t~===-, Verification: _____ _ UltimaJe: _____ _ 6/19/2007 Proof: XX (production piles) Load Ratio (psi/kip) Un-Bonded:_fijf MCSI JobNo #210828 MCSI Suprvsr • Darrell McClaskey .. Test Design Load (kips)· (1 50%-37 50kips) - Load Movement {in.) Comments Hold Time or Load Load Pressure Dial Dial Absolute Average Notes & Until Stable Increments In(~ements Gauge Gauge 1 Gauge2 Disp. Disp. Information (U/S) (% of design) Kips) (psi) inches inches Value lJ#> 2()..()!{{, ;bOO 0.0000 : Load TOO LOW U/S 25.0% 6.25 Approx. 500 0.000 Alignment Load-' 0'-Gaue:e U/S 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.019 U/S 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.041 U/S 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.070 U/S 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.115 *1 min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.142 ** * Start Creeu Test *2Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.144 ** *3Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.147 ** 5Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.150 ** 6Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.151 ** 10Min. 150.0% 37.50 3450 0.152 0.01711 ~Cl:oen.Test U/S 125.0% 31.25 2850 0.149 Start h~ !Inload Nail U/S 100.0% 25.00 2350 0.138 U/S 75.0% 18.75 1750 0.115 U/S 50.0% 12.50 1250 0.089 U/S 25.0% 6.25 500* 0.079 0.0% 0.00 0.068 Project Engineer Yeh & Associates, Inc.-Richard Johnson, P.E. Logs taken by engineer (YIN): NO I Testing Equip.: Ram: _5.Q_ Ton (#or Letter)~_. Guage (#or Letter):_WM_, Pump (Letter): 'D' 0-10 OOOpsi Calibration of testing equipment by: Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. Performed: 11/13/06 F_er_AS~_9.9.S=- NOTES.: Bedrock was at auorox. 21'-22 1 below grade on this micro oile 10'+ into bedrock. This production micro pile is located at the outside VS-3 pile location. * See Plans with pile locations Page 1 of 1 MCSI-Test log COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD 1580 Logan Street, Suite 550 Denver, CO 80203-1941 PERMIT#: 633531 Permit Holder: BRAD HASLEM, INC. P 0 BOX 1848 VERNAL 84078 Inspection Report Date Inspected: 03/18/2008 Phone: (435) 789-5252 Fax: (435) 789-7782 Email: branden@bhi-ut.com Site Owner: Status: A 03 Pad Parachute, Garfield County, 81635 Encana Oil and Gas Phone: Accepted Inspection type: Final NEW COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL NEW Partial lnspection:N Trim Permit:N Inspector: Cyrus Tuchscher 970-625-5085 Corrections: 1) Corrections all addressed and repairs made 2) Electrical Final OK Comments: 4/2/2008 Page 1 Garfield County Building Permit# 10486 A03596 CDP Geotechnical Investigation COP Sites F-09 and A-03 Garfield County, Colorado Project No. 27·068 April 20, 2007 Prepared for: Mr. Preston Nelson Encana Oil and Gas (USA), Inc. 2717 County Road 215 Parachute, Colorado 81635 Prepared by: Yeh and Associates, Inc. 0170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-384-1500 Fax: 970-384-1501 COP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE ...................................................................................... 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ........................................................................... 1 SITE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................. 1 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............................................................................. 2 SITE DEVELOPMENT ......................................................................................... 3 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 3 SURFACE DRAINAGE ........................................................................................ 4 LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................... 4 COP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for design and construction of the two new COP facilities for Encana Oil and Gas in Garfield County, Colorado. The site locations are presented on Sheet ACM-1. The subsurface investigation was conducted to provide recommendations for foundation design and construction of a gas facility at two sites. The site investigations consisted of reconnaissance and drilling of exploratory borings to investigate subsurface conditions. The exploratory drilling was observed by a representative of Yeh and Associates. Samples obtained during the field exploration were examined by the project personnel and representative samples were subjected to laboratory testing to determine the engineering characteristics of materials encountered. Based on our investigation, Yeh and Associates completed an engineering analysis of the subsurface conditions. This report summarizes our field investigation, the results of our analysis, and our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed construction, site reconnaissance, subsurface investigation and results of the laboratory testing. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand the proposed construction will consist of several structures related to natural gas production. Plans indicate an approximately 100 by 1 00-foot pad will be constructed at each of the COP sites. Grading plans provided indicated fills up to 15 feet and cuts up to 7 feet are planned at the sites (Figures 1 and 2). Pad elevations are planned at about 7602 to 7604 feet for the F-09 site and at about 8316 to 8318 feet for the A-03 site. The proposed structures will include generator buildings, liquid buildings, gas skids, gas vessels and associated piping. The structures will likely be supported on prefabricated steel foundations supported by concrete pad foundations or micropiles. SITE CONDITIONS The site is located about 25 miles southwest of Rio Blanco, Colorado {Sheet ACM-1). The A-03 site is located on a southeast trending ridge. The site was covered with sage and brush and was relatively flat with grades of less than 5 percent. The F-09 site is located near the base of the West Fork of Parachute Creek. An existing road was located through the central portion of the site. The remaining portions of the site was covered with sage and sloped from the south down to the north at grades of 15 to 20 percent. 1 COP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling two exploratory borings at each of the sites. The approximate locations of the exploratory borings are presented on Figures 1 and 2. Test holes TH-1 and TH-2 were drilled at the F-09 site and test holes TH-3 and TH-4 were drilled at the A-03 site. All test holes were advanced using a CME 55 track mounted drill rig with 4-inch continuous flight auger to pre-determined depths where a modified California sampler was used to record blow counts and obtain samples. To perform the modified California penetration resistance tests, a 2.0-inch inside diameter sampler was seated at the bottom of the bore hole, then driven up to 12 inches with blows of an standard hammer weighing 140 pounds and falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows (Blow Count) required to drive the sampler 12 inches or a fraction thereof, constitutes the N-value. The N-value, when properly evaluated, is an index of the consistency or relative density of the material tested. Bulk samples were also obtained from boring TH-2. The results are shown on Figures 3 and 4. The subsoils encountered in the borings consisted of clay and sand over sandstone and interbedded sandstone/claystone bedrock. The clay was medium stiff to stiff. The clayey sand was medium dense to very dense. The bedrock was weathered to very hard. Cemented sandstone was encountered in several borings and ranged in thickness from 1 to 4 feet. A single clay sample tested had 53 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). Atterberg limit test results indicated the clay had a liquid limit of 42 percent and a plasticity index of 19 percent. Sand and sandstone bedrock samples tested had 9 to 44 percent fines. The laboratory test results are summarized in the Summary of Laboratory Test Results table. Groundwater was not encountered during this investigation. The clay and sand was moist to very moist. Variations in groundwater conditions may occur seasonally. The magnitude of the variation will be largely dependent upon the amount of spring snowmelt, duration and intensity of precipitation, local landscape irrigation practices, site grading changes, and the surface and subsurface drainage characteristics of the surrounding area. Perched water tables may be present, but were not encountered in these borings. 2 CDP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068 SITE DEVELOPMENT We understand fills of up to 15 feet and cuts of up to 7 feet are planned to reach pad elevation. Areas to receive fill should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils and debris. The on-site soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches can be used in fills. Fill should be placed in thin, loose lifts of 8 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to 0 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698). Granular soils should be placed at a moisture content within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. Placement and compaction of fill should be observed and tested by a representative of a geotechnical engineer. Based on the soils encountered during our investigation, we recommend permanent cut and fill slopes less than 20 feet in height be constructed at a slope of 2H:1V or flatter. For slopes greater than 20 feet in height, we recommend the slope be constructed at a slope of 3H:1V or flatter. Cut and fill slopes can be adversely affected by groundwater or surface runoff. If groundwater is encountered within cut slopes, we should be contacted to evaluate stability and provide additional recommendations, if necessary. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the subsoils encountered in the test holes and our laboratory test results, we anticipate foundation soils would consist of clay, sand or sandstone bedrock or properly compacted fill. For the F-09 site, we believe there is a risk of differential settlement due to the transition from cut to more than 10 feet of fill. To reduce the risk of facility damage due to differential settlement, we recommend structures be supported on a deep foundation such as drilled piers or micropiles installed to the natural soils or bedrock. As an alternative, the facilities could be detailed to allow for movement and releveling of structures placed on deep fills relative to structures placed on cut areas. If a deep foundation alternative is selected, we can provide additional recommendations and/or a foundation design. construction criteria for pad foundations are presented below. 3 Recommended design and COP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068 1. Foundations should be constructed on undisturbed, natural soils. Loose, disturbed soils encountered at foundation level should be removed and replaced with compacted fill or the foundation should be extended to undisturbed soils. 2. Footing foundations should be designed for a maximum allowable soil pressure of 2,000 psf. The design pressure may be increased by 1/3 or as allowed by local code when considering total loads that include wind or seismic conditions. 3. Continuous footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundation pads for isolated columns should have a minimum dimension of 20 inches. 4. Resistance to sliding at the bottom of the footing can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.30. Passive pressure against the side of the footing can also be considered for the sliding resistance if it is properly compacted. Passive pressure can be estimated based on an equivalent fluid density of 250 pcf for a level backfill. 5. The soils below exterior footings or exterior edges of slabs should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at least 42 inches below finished exterior grade or as required by local municipal code. 6. All foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of a geotechnical engineer prior to placement of concrete. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is crucial to the performance of foundations and flatwork. We recommend the ground surface surrounding structures be sloped to drain away. We recommend a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 10 feet for gravel areas and a minimum slope of 0.5 percent for paved areas. Backfill around foundations should be moisture conditioned and compacted as recommended in the SITE DEVELOPMENT section. LIMITATIONS The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon our data obtained from the test holes at the indicated locations, field observations, laboratory testing, our understanding of the proposed construction and other information discussed in this report. It is possible that subsurface conditions may vary between or beyond the points explored. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until construction. If variations appear, we should be contacted immediately so we can review our report in light of the variations and provide supplemental recommendations as necessary. We should also review the report if the scope of the proposed construction, including the proposed loads, finished 4 CDP Sites F-09 and A-03 Project No. 27-068 elevations or structure locations, change from those described in this report. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Yeh and Associates reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in writing. Respectfully Submitted, YEH AND ASSOCIATES, I ~~~ Richard D. Johnson, P.; Senior Geotechnical Eri 5 fi.OW U.•t -4' fi.O: PIP[ IU>W UN[ I<OJ>I'~ ~ ~· sm;J._ UQW) Ul<~ -Slttl. PlPI:. (>l~ AS ~00\11 CAS UH( • Slt[L f'IPI:. (>l""~l!:ll 1o.S S><01111 t;<J$nNC U!l{: &v fllDCI< VAl.vt SCALE' 1' Project No. 27-068 SE1/4 NW1/4, SECTION 9, T 5 S, R 96 W, 6th P.M. -- 40 = 40' -----· ·------------7· 580 ""'"' -·-------~---~~ ~ ' Legend: . _.-7590~------------ HYDROS££0 SEDIMENT TRAP 6" S70N£ · ____ 7600------- T~-1 1ndicates Approximate Test Hole Location NOTE: Base drawing provided by Wasatch Surveying Approximate Locations of Exploratory Borings (F-09 Site) Figure 1 NE114 NE1/4, SECTION 3, T 5 S, R 96 W, 6th P.M. --······ PROPOSED ACCESS ';· i f; 40 SCALE' 1 H = 40' Project No. 27-068 ~,,,oo••'''M'•oo,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ······ .. . ~ Legend: .. .. .. ' .. i r' .. .. ··. ·. ··. ··. ··. _,----SE1?/ME'~ T TRA' STONE (, ','· T~-31ndicates Approximate Test Hole Location NOTE: Base drawing provided by Wasach SuNeying Approximate Locations of Exploratory Borings (A-03 Site) Figure2 ~ ~ iii § " z g :g_ (]) Cl TH-1 F-09 COP SUe Elevation: 7589.0 ft il TH-2 F-09 CDP Site Elevation: 7609.0 ft ?9!9 .. ?P!? .. ?91? .. ?9!? .. ?9!? .. TH-3 A-03 COP Site Elevation: 8316.0 ft ,, TH-4 A...()3CDPSite Elevation: 8318.0ft 0 ! ~iL---------------------------------------------------------------------~----------------------------------------------------------------------1 "I~ § l' j iO YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS CDP Sites F09 & A03 ;l_~~~~~~--------------------------------------------------------_j~P~r~o~je~c:t~N~u~m~b~e~r:~2~7-~0~6~8--------------------------------------------~F~ig~u~re~3~~ I , jyEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Project: CDP Sites F09 & A03 • -GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Project Number: 27-068 Legend for Symbols Used on Borehole Logs Sample Types D • Modified California Sampler. The symbol 16/12 indicates that 16 blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches was used to drive 2~inch J.D. sampler 12 inches . Split Spoon Sampler. The symbol15/12 indicates that 15 blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches was used to drive 1.5~inch I.D. sampler 12 inches. ~ Bulk sample was obtained from auger cuttings at the depths indicated. Soil Lithology 6J Topsoil ~ CLAY, silty to sandy, moist to very moist, medium stiff to stiff, brown, dark brown (CL). ~ SAND, clayey, moist to very moist, medium dense to very dense, brown, dark brown (SC). Bedrock Lithology ~ WEATHERED SANDSTONE AND INTERBEDDED SANDSTONE/SHALE, slightly moist, ~ medium hard, brown, tan, gray. D SANDSTONE, slightly moist hard to very hard, brown, tan, gray. § INTERBEDDED CLAYSTONE (SHALE) I SANDSTONE, slightly moist, hard to hard, brown, §gray. Fiaure 4 ·~ YEH & ASSOCIATES, INC Summary of Laboratory Test Results Project No· 27-068 Project Name· CDP Sites F09 and A03 Sample Location Moisture Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Water Unconf. Test Depth Sample Content Dry Density Gravel Sand Fines Soluble Comp. Soil Description (pcf) >#4 <#200 LL PL PI Sulfate Strength Hole (It) Type (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (psf) TH-1 4 CA 17.4 53 42 23 19 Clay, sandy (CL) 9 CA 20.5 87 44 Sand, clayey (SC) TH-2 9-14 Bulk 10.3 14 69 17 0.030 Sandstone Bedrock TH-3 4 CA 18.8 91 10 Sandstone Bedrock TH-4 4 CA 11.1 110 12 0.031 Sandstone Bedrock 14 CA 22.2 9 Sandstone Bedrock CA -Indicates modified Cahforma sample Bulk-Indicates bulk sample from auger cuttings Page 1 of 1 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 5 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor!Treasurer Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor SijJs;.t;_8earch Cieri<; &: RecorderReceptimlSei\n:b Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Infou:nation Pm:ceLRet<lil I Y<lllJeDet<lil S<tles_Ret<lil I Res!dentia!/Comm9rd<l1lmpmYementDetilll ).,.,and Detail I Photograpl!~ I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I o26 II R460005 II 213527300015 II 36.682 I Owner Name and Mailing Address IENCANA OIL & GAS (USA) INC. I I c/O LOGAN & FIRMINE I 13615 S. HURON STREET, SUITE 200 I jENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 I Legal Description lsECT,TWN,RNG:27-5-96 DESC: SEC 2 I ILOT 4(NET 27.16A) ALSO A TR IN SEC I j2&11 DESC: CONT 341.07A SEC 3 S2NE, I ls2NW, S2 LOT 1(40.82A) DESC: I I2(40.69A) 3(40.57A) 4(40.44A) SEC 4 I js2NE, S2NW, DESC: S2, LOT 1(40.33A) I I2(40.21A) 3(40.11A) 4(39.99A) DESC: I lsEC 5 S2NE, S2NW, S2 LOT 1(39.80A) I I2(39.52A) DESC: 3(39.24A) 4(38.96A) I jSEC'S 8,9,10 ALL SEC 14 W2NE, DESC: I INW, S2 SEC 15 W2NE, NENE, NW, S2 I lsEC 16 ALL SEC DESC: 17 E2 SEC'S I 121,22,23,24 ALL SEC 25 TR I I37(107.06A) DESC: LOTS 1(37.84A) I I2(37.42A) 6(6.55A) 7(11.27A) N2NE, I IDESC: W2, SWSE SEC'S 26,27,28 ALL I http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=213 5273000 15 5/30/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 5 !sEC 33 N2NE, NENW, DESC: E2NWNW SEC I j34 NE, N2NW, SENW SEC 35 N2 SEC 36 I IN2, DESC: & PT OF THE SE(NET I I116.68A) EXCEPT APT ALONG DESC: I jTHE C/L OF PARA. CRK. TO POB CONT I I43.32A SEC 15-DESC: 5-95 APT OF I !SEC 15 CONT 467.62A SEC 16 ALL THAT I IDESC: PT LYING s OF SOUTHERN MOST I !MAHOGANY MARKER CONT DESC: 386A SEC I 117 S2S2, THAT PT OF THE N2S2 LYING I Is oF DEsc: THE souTHERN MosT I jMAHOGANY MARKER CONT 41A SEC DESC: I 119 E2, LOTS 1(40A) 2(40A) 3(21.41A) I I4(21.42A) 5 DESC: (40A) 6(40A) I I7(40A) 8(40A) 9(21.44A) 10(21.45A) IDESC: 11(40A) 12(40A) SEC.'S 120,21,22,27,28,29 ALL SEC DESC: 30 IE2 LOTS 1(40A) 2(40A) 3(21.49A) J4(18.78A) 6( DESC: 40A) 7(40A) I I8(40A) 9(40A) 10(14.95A) 13(18.21A) I IDESC: 14(40A) 15(40A) TR 37(12.93A) I !sEC 31-5-95 NE LOT DESC: 1(40A) I I2(40A) 3(21.79A) 4(21.93A) 5(40A) I I6(40A) DESC: 7(40A) 8(40A) I I9(22.07A) 10(22.21A) 11(40A) I J12(40A) DESC: SE SEC'S 32,33,34 ALL I !sEC 1-6-96 LOT 3(43.51A) DESC: I I4(43.4JA) 5(43.31A) 6(43.21A) I J7(40A) 8(40A) 9(40A) DESC: 10(40A) I I11(40A) 12(40A) 13(40A) 14(40A) SEC I 12 SW, DESC: SE, LOT 1(43.12A) I I2(43.05A) 3(42.97A) 4(42.90A) DESC: I j5(40A) 6(40A) 7(40A) 8(40A) 9(40A) I I10(40A) 11(40A) DESC: 12(40A) SEC 3 I IE2SW, SE LOT 1(42.81A) 2(42.72A) I IDESC: 3(42.63A) 4(20.87A) 5(19.63A) I I6(40A) 7(40A) 8(40A) DESC: 9(40A) I I10(40A) 11(40A) 12(19.65A) I I13(19.67A) 14( DESC: 19.69A) SEC 4 I http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp ?Pat-ce!N umber=2135273000 15 5/30/2007 Parcel Detail Page 3 of 5 jLOT 3(52.68A) 4(54.26A) 6(42.70A) IDESC: 7(39.50A) 8(39.57A) 9(40.27A) I10(41.11A) 12(41. DESC: 53A) Location I Physical Address: liMINE & RETORT AREA PARACHUTE! Subdivision: Land Acrtf;: 26441.91 J . Land Sq Ft: u I Section II Township II Range I I 27 II 5 II 96 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II· 442,73011 128,3901 I Improvements: II 714,64011 207,2501 I Total: II 1,157,37011 335,6401 . Sale Date: 116/11/2004 Sale Price: 1126,445,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Commllnd 8 Buildings: Commerciai!Industrial Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics I TOTAL HEATED AREA: 115,120 I ABSTRACT CODE: IIREFINING/PETROLEUM ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: !!oFFICE EXTERIOR WALL: !!PREFAB MTL ROOF COVER: !!PREFAB-MET ROOF STRUCTURE: IIPREFAB-MET INTERIOR WALL: !!DRYWALL I INTERIOR WALL: IIA VG PANEL I FLOOR: llcARPET I http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel. asp ?Parce!N umber=213 52 7 3000 15 5/30/2007 Parcel Detail I FLOOR: llsHT VINYL I I HEATING FUEL: IlGAS I I HEATING TYPE: IIFORCED AIR I I STORIES: llsTORIES 1.0 I I BATHS: 12 I ROOMS: II I UNITS: II I BEDROOMS: I 0 I YEAR BUILT: III982 I Tax Information I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I I 2006 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($I8,236.08)1 I 2006 II Tax Amount II $I8,236.081 I 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($I8,272.88)1 I 2005 II Tax Amount II $I8,272.881 I 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole I ($6,840.I4)1 I 2004 II Tax Amount $6,840.I41 I 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole ($7 ,556.98)1 I 2003 II Tax Amount I $7,556.981 I 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($7,265.32)1 I 2002 II Tax Amount II $7,265.321 I 200I II Tax Payment: Whole II ($7,749.94)j I 200I Tax Amount II $7,749.941 I 2000 Tax Payment: Whole II ($II,463.96)1 I 2000 Tax Amount II $II,463.961 I I999 Tax Payment: Whole II ($8,8I5.74)1 I I999 Tax Amount II $8,8I5.741 Top ofP~ Ai>~gs_mL.Patabase Search_Qpt_jpns I IIeflsmeLDatabase_S.ew-.£!LQv1ions Clerk & RecPnl.erDfltal:mse Sew-chQp!iPns G4rfield County ]{Q!Jl~.J:'ll~ Page 4 of 5 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices http://www. garcoact. com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?ParcelN umber=2I3 5 27 3000 15 5/30/2007 Parcel Detail are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns_Software. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=213527300015 Page 5 of5 5/30/2007