Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - PermitGarfield County ._I N_o_. _1_05_04 ___ ---' Building & Sanitation Department 108 8111 Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office-945-8212 Inspection Line-384-5003 JobAddress~1:~ rP0C)f \~ i \ \S K} "Slbh Nature of Work Building Permit a n-q -0 \} -QQ ~C) l ~ UseofBuilding7SJF (?}\6£\llirq ~u~(')~ tCDU f?CITIO'S [Dtt QOrc:t(\tj owner :SlOl 22¥1 1 GCip;'( t R:l\fY) Contractor fut( 8CJ V1SOQ Amoun!J:!U'ermit $ »-99 1-Q + "S('pttG -) 0() - e Z)04 i .q.::}- Date 6-\ "5-oi- cJerk.-+-d""'. ~=--(Q=l...u=o_,__r __ _ ·_ INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS _\ <--~~----------------------------------.---~ ·-, (\ :;.. BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued.~J:S..i?.! .... Zoned Area ............................... Permit No . ..\.Q~Q.~ ........... . AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure (or which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIA TEL)( J,!ECOME NULL AND VOID. ·' Contractor '{Y)et Setbacks, Front Sjde Sjde Rear Tbis Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visi~le From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 1-l~·o7tfJP_ tJRJ t:k' Driveway Foundation 13/·o7 j5k._ -rz.."'-- Underground Plumbing '8-fif-rf{ ~K Insulation 11-p 111 ~. Rough Plumbing lf-1 -<YJ II w.. Drywall :_)-£!.{ -'11 Kr (\" Chimney & Vent VJ -). -'D 7 /(hr,.. Elettric Final (by State Inspector) ;l./J,Jf5-f7 1 Gas Piping -V1f-1.{)7Rrr---Final ;t.-/1-~f) /{;n'- Electric Rough (By Sta" ~p Septic Finai,St/ WlMH t-//-7-PT Framing -'),;._~tq -~ Notes: (To include_,/ofm place and Windows and Doon installed). ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call J8~-5()()J 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs. Colorado APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date ~~-01--By tSJA-6 IF PLACED UTSIDE -COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC GAR F I ELD COUNTY BU ILDI NG PERMI T APPL ICAT ION 108 8'" Street, Suite 401 , Gle nwood Springs , CO 816 01 Phone: 9 7 0-945-8212 I Fu:: 970-384-3470 I Inspec tion Line: 970-384-5003 Pe rm it No: }Q'3J ~\ Pa rcel/Sch ed ule No ~ Yl-9 -0n-Da-o \ ~ 2 3 4 5 G 7 0 9 Gar age : ¢ 10 11 12 Sp ecial Con ditions : NOTICE 0 S ingle Do u b le On-S ite Sewage Disposal Carport: ~ Site Plan Adj usted Va luation t P lan C h eck Fee: Pe rm it Fee: 0 Si n g le ::J Doubl e A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERM IT IS REQUIRED AND M UST B E I SSUE D BY THE STA TE OF COLORADO. I /Jfrl o~ / 8' / L f5" THIS PERMIT BECOM ES NULL AN D V OID IF \VORl< OR CONSTRUCTION A UTHORJZED IS NOT COMM ENCED WJTHLN I 80 D AYS, OR. IF CONSTRUCTI ON OR WORK IS SUSPEN DED OR ABAN DONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORJ< I S COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED T HIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAM E TO BE TRUE AN D CORRECT. ALL PROVI SIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THI S TYPE OF \VORl< WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFI ED HEREI N OR NOT. T HE GRANTING Or A PERM IT DOES NOT PR ESUM E: T O GIVE A lJJ'HORITI' TO VIOLATE OR CAN CEL THE PROVISI ONS OF ANY OTHE R SfATE OR WCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTI ON OR THE PERFORMANCE OFCON~U~ Can s t. Type: Zo nin g : S etbacks: Ho m e : AGREEMENT PE RMISSION I S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT A S OWNER. CONTRACTO R AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRA R OR OWNE R TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE A S DETAI LED ON PLANS AN D S PECIFIC ATI ONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEW ED BY T HE BUILDING DEPART MENT. IN CONSIDERATI ON OF T HE ISSSUANCE O F T HIS PE RM I T. TH E SIGNER. HE:REBY AGREES TO COM PLY WITH ALL BUILDI NG CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTI' PURSUANT TO AlJJ'HORITY <)IVEN LN 30.28.20 I CRS AS AMENDED. THE: SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WJ1li 1N THE LCOATION. ERECTION. CON~UCTION. AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE. THE PERMIT MAY BE: REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS. SPEC I F1CATIONS AN D OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILD ING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERHORS I N SAI D PLANS. SPECIFI CATI ONS AND OT HER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUI LDING OPERATION BEING CARRJ ED ON T HEREUNDER WH EN I N V I OLAT I ON OF T HS CODE O R ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURJSDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBM ITTED PLA!\IS AND SPECIFI CATI ONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF M'Y RESPONSIBILITIE:S OR LlABLITIES BY GARFI ELD COUNTI' FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI B OU1Y FOR THESE OlEMS AND OMO'O.EMENTATION DURONG CONSffiUCTION RESIS SPECWOCOALLY OmH THE AimcrEcr 1/iiJNER. BUOLOER. AND OWNER. COMM ENTS ~NTEN DED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND I N SUPP ORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. I H ERE!Jf A CKNOWLEDGE T HAT I HAVE READ AND UN DERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE IP'TIAL): J) . tttJ<>. ~~ 6l d-)/1!1 cA ~ tq ~q ~l'tt~ \V'-.B d-,<'A 1-· 03 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1.-A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. 9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupan£<~¥nd the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# !U~_l--'j 9JttAJ J~ _,.vv-v .'{-] _ 0 7 Signature Bpapplicationoctober2006 Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant S Lt v0:\ Address 0 k 72 C,.d & "'\\:;. ed Date ·s-~o -u1 Finished (Livable Area): Main I "33 ~ Up per Lower J33~ Other S ubdivis ion C..ecVtrt_ H-~\'\~ Lot/Block \ "Z. Contracto r t'\'\el.. -t\G4\Scn. Basement: Total Square Feet Valu ation 2bb~ X7Lfi.f'" 11 rr :2Ljj-J, r Gara!le: Unfi ni shed Co nve rsion of Unfini shed to Fini shed Plan Check Fee for Conversio n Va luati on ,0'8'8" ,X ( (' -Val uati on _. Crawl Space: Va lu at ion Decks/Patios: Covered Va lu at ion Open I) be( A Va lu ation I L ;:; Total Va lu ation ;}.U tfc Lf?~l ?.cf I GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. I Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure( s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes 7 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please referto Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks "'apply. Yes. ___ _ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes ·v 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing 2 the property? Yes i./ 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Dep~t at 625-8601. Y es-'H.r"L::..I-L.._ __ _ 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes V 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes (';/ 1'1- 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes, _ __.c_ __ _ 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? 10. II. 12. 13. Yes_--+':__ __ _ Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof . constructi?n J. Yes __ -"'v ___ _ Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ,/ Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes. __ v ____ _ Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes V 3 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 2 1. 22. 23 . D oes the pla n in clude any stove or zer o clear ance fire place p l a nn ed for installation i ncludin g mak e and m odel and Col orado Phase IT cer ti fi catio n s o r phase IT EPA cet1ificatio n ? Yes No v-- D oes th e pla n include a masonry fi re place including a fire place secti on i ndicati ng d esig n to com ply with the IRC? 1 ~ Yes N o __ ~~~-------- Does th e plan include a windo w sche dule o r o ther v erificati on tha t egress/r escue w indows fro m sleeping rooms and/or b asem ents comply w ith the r equirements of t he IRC? Yes v N o ____________ __ D oes the plan include a w in dow sch ed ul e o r o ther veri fication that w in dows provide n atural li g ht and vejtila tio n f o r a ll h abi tabl e rooms? Y es ~ No ____________ __ Do the plans indicate the l ocati o n of g lazing s ubj ect to human i mpact such as gl ass doors, g lazing imme diatel y adj acent t o s uc h d oors; g lazing adjacent to any surface normally u sed as a w alking surfa ce; sliding g lass d oors; fi xed g lass panel s ; shower d oor s a n d tu b e n closures a nd specify safety glazing fo r th ese ar eas? Y es !L No ____________ _ Is the locati o n of all n atural and li q uid petro l eum gas f u rnaces, bo i ler s a n d water h eaters indicated o n the p l an ? · Yes V No __________ __ D o you u nd ersta nd that i f you ar e buil d in g o n a parcel of l a nd cr eated by the exemption process o r the s u bdivisio n process, are b uil d ing pl an s in compliance with all pl at notes an d/or cov e n ants?/ Yes ~ No ____________ _ D o yo u under s ta nd that i f you belong to a Hom eowners Association (HOA), i t is your r es po nsibility to obt a in w ritte n permission fro m the association, i f requi red by that associatio n , prior to submitting an a pplication for a building permit? The b uild i ng permit a p p licat ion will be accept ed w itho ut it , b u t yo u run the ri sk of t he HOA bringi ng actio n t o enfo r ce t h e coven ants, which can r esult i n revocati o n of permit i ssued. Add iti on a ll y, your P l a n Review fee is not refundab le i f the pl ans have been r eviewed by the Bui l d in g D epartment prior to a ny acti on by the H OA that requires either revocation o r substanti cy mod ificati on of th e plans. Yes v' No ____________ __ Will thi s be the only residential structure o n the parcel ? Yes V No lfno -Explai n : ____________ __ H ave two (2) com p le te sets of cons tructio n d r awings been submitted w i th the application ? 4 Yes,_~./ ___ _ 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? / Yes V No ________ _ 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes 1/ No. ____ _ 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zonp district? Yes Ll No, ___________ _ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection bJ the Garfield County Building Depattment? Yes V No _________ _ 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicagon of these changes? Yes V No. _________ _ 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit?, J Yes V No. _________ _ 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in tp 384-5003. Yes !L_ No. _________ _ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $~0.00 re-inspection fee? Yes !L No. _____ _ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes V No. ___________ _ 5 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? I Yes lL No. ______ _ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes No ______ _ 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a buildins; permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ~ No ________ _ 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) ~-- 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? V Yes_..:._ __ 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance oJ..a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes ---'V'------ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. ,9}ctfi. ~,:e:±t L----r-0 -c J Signatu of Owner Date Phone: Cj ¥" l.j -0 } 0 "2.--(days); _ __L5;¢!/'-'~""'':.;{i:;;_ _____ ( evenings) Project Name: 5 L-171/ 1£11/ ![l,_ f.?<; ic/~ /J U£ Project Address: QC, 7 J.-,. [ JEd«Vc-/h!l > RJ2 6 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreq November2006 7 PLAN REVIE"' CHECKLIST Applicant S I ftV h. Date c) ... 3 0 ... 0 '1 Building ~ngineered Fo undation . J Dri vewa y Pe rmi t ~X~ _Lsurveyed Site Plan -bLSeptic Permit and Setbacks b-.~ ~Gradeff o pography 30% ----tbtt ach Res id ential Pl an Review Li st -tL'Minimum Application Questionnaire J bdivision Plat Note s l!./fL,_Fire Department Rev iew ~aluation Determinati on/Fees .lL._R ed Line Pl ans/Stamps/S ti cker ~Attach Condition s V Appli cation Signed ·0 1an Reviewer T o Sign App li cati on ~Parcel/Sch edu l e No. _i/&40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms. l/Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: ubdivision Plat Note s GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado! 81601 Phone (970) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY 1\.) I ((1 ;s. \ ~ Owner's Name · Slaven, Gary & Pam Present Address ~j :J. ?:n V)\K\ 'f)('fi)e. Permit 4324 Assessor's Parcel No. ~\}q ·()\ \-08 -<:Jt(h This does not constitute a building or use permit. QH o""'"<::>}., Phone 0 \-;:) System LocationC'f,J-d-C'EC:).O r \~ILL~ 'f<1 . s:lut- Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. _av.:lL\'-~-'-~-'---'0"'--'\'-~---()=-~=---a--"-''-'~'-'d'-~.:_ ______________ _ SYSTEM DESIGN _____ Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) ______ Other _____ Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) ____ _ Required Absorption Area-See Attached Special Setback Requirements: Date ________________ lnspector __________________________ ___ FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System lnstaller ___________________ ----;:--------------------- Septic Tank CapacitY--------------....,,--LLJLf-+-· -11--fr---------------- Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name '91: ~ Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface ------------------------------- Absorption Area---------------------------------------- Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name------------------------- Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements Other-----,--~--~------------------------------------------~------~----~--------- /l-1 ~oJ lnspecto;£JJ9~ f&.bl!rc~c:O· CJJAJ\I Date RETAIN WITH RECEIPT R~COifoSATCONSTRUCTION SITE •CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article tO C.R.S. t973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con· nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine-6 months in jail or both). · White· APPLICANT Yellow· DEPARTMENT Ma~ 24 07 09:05a Mel Hanson c"BOUNDARIES ~-"~ ... · .. ·UNLIMITED INC. ·. · . ~ . ; . Civil & consultiq·Engineers Ap rtl 11 ,. 2006 Bill Pugh '187 Blackhawk Drive NewCastle, CO ,81647 9709840757 . ·-. . :· .. ' . . . . p. 1 Re: Culvert at the driveway of l_L}t 12-Cedar Hills Subd~i;ion, G~rfield County, Colorado BUl Project: {:16002.04 (Pugh} · · · Bill: As. reques~. l.l:lave. assessedthe site conditiOns at Lot 12-CedarHiUs Subdivfslim to .· determine the c!llyert C<'lpacity requiremEmtsforthe drive~ay crossihg. ·After visiting the site and reviewing the supplied house plans. I have concluded that you should install a · 20 lF 12"0 GMP culvert with 18" of cover to conveytlie stormwaterditchflows Which . may accumulate in the ditch: Based on two culvert anaiyses, a 12"0 CMP should be . capable of conveying approximatelyA.!j,CFSof stormwater; This isgreatertnan the calculated 0.4-;: CFS which could be produced by a 100•yr storm event over the existing . ,,. __ _ '':.:':._ -:- .·: __ -.:-;- ._-,. 6000 SF upstream drainage basin. If you have any,questions.or need additional ·· · · ·· ' information, please feel free to contact me at945-5252 · · Sincerely, DertcJ. Walter.P. Project Manager · . 823 Slake Avanue • Suite ~02 Glenwood ·Springs i 'colorado B.1.601 • Ph; .970.945.5252 · Fax; S70.384.283:;3 Ma~ 24 0;7 09:psa Mel Hanson . _.-; Pugh culvert 1()0-yr Runoff 06002..04 4/11/06 TR..:s.s Tabular HydrtiWaP~ Method · Input summ;..ry _ •. Descd ption •• -.•• ; • .. , •... , •. ; ; • .-, . Pugh~colvert _ _ · · · -- Rainfall Distribution ; .. ' •. ; .••• _Type ':n·- Ia/P Interpolation ..•.. _,., .. , .-:,.; .. on . . . . . Total Area . ; . ,-.-... .-........ ; .. • >-6000.00 ft2 ·· Pe~k Time .•.. : •.. • ... , ; •· ..•.. :. ; . • 'iLio hrs _Peak Flow , ._ .......... ,; ... ":; .-c·. :• 0.47 cfs Given.Input Da;a, 9709840757 -------~---------..;.· ... _..;.-... ----------.,-.:... ____ -,.;...--·---:----... _-_,_ __ .._ ..:::-_ _:_-':'" -·...: __ _ suba~ea · Area ·eN -•· -Tc. --Tt . . .Rai nfa 11 _ Description (ft2) (hrs) Chrs) (in) · .;.. -------.... _ ... _____ _:,;:_. __ --~-----:--.-.-------_ _... __ ..,. __ -:... _:; ____ :.._·_...: _,;..._.;..:~:.....,.:..:... _::_...,; culvertBasin· '6000 --:··gs· o:10 . O.OQ .·tAo p.2 -·-, Ma~ 24 0? 09:06a Mel Hanson Pugh Culvert . ··_.. . . Lot 12-Cedar Hi 11 s subdi vision · 06002.04 .4/11/06 culvert-calculator 9?09840?5? All. calculator out~u~ sho~ld b~ ver·(hed pd~r to .. de~tgn use .-E~t.e.red --ilata =· 1 ·• ·-: -~·:_ .. :: : ••• -~ \-· .-- .. ~~;g;,. 'bf' B~~~;i~':: :::: :; :::;·::: .· i~r:cular __ .SolVing. for .. ;., ...... ; ._ ... ·; .· ... ; •. -• Headwater -· · · . . ~~::re ~~~~~r: : : : : : ... : : : : : : : : : : : ~ •---•-. ---.. --• --•. -----·--_ .-• • .. Chart Description , •.•. ··•.; ••.• ; .. ·; •. CORRUGATED ~IETAL PIPE -CULVERT Scale Description ••••••••••. : .. ;,. PIPE;; PROJECTING FROM 'F'ILL - Overtopping .:; •. ; ........ -. •-·; ... _. . off: · · · ·-· · · .;~~~r~~;~-~-::::: :·:: ::::~:: ::::::--;ug~gcfs Roadway Elevation . , , •..••. ; • : ..• -• 3-.oooo ft · ·rnlet Elevadon .•..••.. ; •.•.••• , .. o:sooo ft: ·outlet Elevation ................... •o.oooo ft ··· Diameter-..... ; ....... : ••.••.•.. , 12.000\} in· Length , .. -.•.... ; ._, ...... , . .: .. , . ,. ·zo.oooo ft Entrance Los~. . • ; .. .-. : ... ; •• ,_ ._, .. .o ;·oooo Tail.wirter ... · ...... · ... , . , . , : .: ... ·. .. · 0. 5000 ft . . . . ComP'u1:et! R-e~-ults;- -Headwater ••.•.•....• .: ..•••.•.. ; .. 2.9245.ft ·rnlet control 1 . . -·· . .. 0.0250 ft/ft. . . ~e1~~hy'::: :;: :::::::::::::::::: .· 5..8569 .fps Messages:_-_ .· •·--.. ·_-· _ ·· · . rnlet heil.d>:. ou_tl_et head. .. computing In let contra T headwa_ter .: . · Solvi_ng Inlet Equation .26. · . •• c · · solving In let Equation 28. · · ·· ·· · Headwater:_ 2.9245 ft · p.3 Ma~ 24 07 09:p7a I ... · I I I l I I I • I I I I • • I Mel Hanson 9709840757 ·CHART .5 _to;o_oo e·,ooo--: EXAMPLE 6,000.' ~,coo· ··-o-~ ;;fi ~nt.tu!~-(!.O ·;.,.,;·.; .. .-ci~-n-ct~_. · · .!!!"' .. •w D '11..-t) "' ·~·a tli .... --. -:RJ" ••• ... <3r·-'2':.2 . ••• T~-~-~~ ~li_l~ {21 o.r t~)-JHOjiCI tuu~'i:o111~11; I!O~::•c-c:TI -_(1!-~'i_~-" Ul.li-IIUI1Qttf iiiC:1iC111iJ.Jill$. JtiiNhiQf'l 0 trad o: ae.ciH~ t~r ruuu. a• · lli~~t•ot..i-11:·-. · -. ' · 1.0 •• .7 HEADWATER DEPTH F:OR .. C. M; PIPE CULVERTS WITfi.INLET CONTRO) ''• , I p.4 :-:--_ .. -:--~~~-~-r~~. -_:,.;.-~ Ma~ 23 07 Ol:20p fr71 Mel Hanson X a-r;;; c:_ G&btech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL June 23, 2004 Lamie Chase 1834 Grand A venue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 9709840757 Hepwotth~PawLul.: Oeott!chnicnl, lnc. 5020 Coutlty Ra:Jd 154 O!t:nwoocl Sprh,g;;, Colorpdo 8160) Phone: 970-Y45-7~t!S F<1x: IJ70-945-8:t54 email: hp{!co@hppecnedl.com .Tab No.I 04 206 SuQject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design aud Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, Lot 12, Cedar Hills Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Ms. Chase: As n'guesled, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. pe•·formed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated March 16, 2004. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed constmction and subsmface conditions encotmtered are presented in this report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazard impacts on the site are beyond the scope of this study. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story woad frame structure over a walkout basement level located on the site as shown on Fi gme 1. The attached garage and basement floors are proposed to be slab-on-grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 3 to 1 0 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construcl:iou are assumed to be relatively light and typical oftbe proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system will likely be located about 7 0 feet downhill to the northwest of the proposed residence. If building conditions or foUlldation loaclings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the reemnmendatious presented in tlus report. Site Conditions: Tile site was vacant at the time of our field exploration. The ground surface in the building area is moderately steep down to the west at grades up to about 28%. Tile terrain becomes very sleep down to the west and nortl1 ofthe building area tbeu flattens in tbe septic disposal area. A small pad had been cut 2 to 3 feet deep in the building area. Several small ephemeral drainages are ]coated on the steeper slopes. Vegetation cousisls of pinon and juuiper trees, sagebrusb, grass and weeds. Scattered cobbles and boulders are exposed on tl1e ground surface. Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthome 970-468-1989 Ma~ 23 07 0~:2!p Mel Hanson 9709840757 -2- Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and one profile pit in the septic disposul area at the approximate locations showJl on Figure 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Figure 2. The subsoils encountered, below up to about Y:, foot of topsoil, generally consist. of fragments of claystone in a sandy silty clay matrix. Results of swell- consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the clay matrix, presented on Figw·e 3, indicate low compressibility under existing moistlu·e conditions and light loading and a low expansion potential when wetted. The sample showed moderate compressibility upon increased loading after wetting. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of the gravels (minus 3 :inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Figure 4. Tbe laboratory test results [lfe summarized in Table I. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Consideting the subsoil conditions encom1tered ju the explorator)' pits and the nauue of tbe proposed construction, we recoDllllend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing; pressure of 2,5 00 psf for support of the proposed residence. The clay matdx tends to be ex:pansive after welting and there could be some post-construction foundation movement if the bearing soils become wetted. The rock content of the soils should help limit the risk of movement. The settlement/heave potential of the subgTade should be evaluated at the time of construction. Footings should be a mininmm width. of 16 i11ches for continuolls walls and 2 feet for colulll11s. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level e>-.1:ended down to the undisturbed natural soils. Voids created by boulder removal should be backfilled with compacted granular soils or with concrete. E:h.ierior footings shmtld be provided with adequate cover above their .bearh1g elevations for frost protection. Placement offootings at least 36 inches below the cll.ierior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assmning an tmsupportecllenb>th of at lea~t 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining stmctures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for the on-site soil as backfill. A sliding coefficient of 0.45 and a passive earth pressure of 350 pcf equivalent lluid unit weight can be used to resist lateral earth loading on t11e fotmdalion. I~loor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to Stlpporllightly loaclecl slab-on-grade constmction. The clay mauix tends to have an expansion potential which could resull in some slab heave and distress if the bearing soils become welted. To JabNo.I0420G ~tech p.2 Ma~ 23 07 0!:21p Mel Hanson 9709840757 -3 - reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be sepamted from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow umestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints shouLd be used to redllce dan1age due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intemled slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 li1ch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. Ail fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near opilinum. Required fill can consist of the ou-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Undel'drnin System: Although free water was not encormtered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area tllat local perched groundwater can develop during tin1es of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen grolllld during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildllp by an Ullderdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill SW1'0l1!lded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the uuderdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least l 'h feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during ·construction and maintained at all times after the residence bas been completed: 1) Inl1!ldation of the fatmdation excavations and underslab areas shouid be avoided during construction. Drying could increase the expansion potential of tl1e clay matrix. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to ncar optilmunmoistlu·e and compacted to at least 95% of the maxinnuu stnndard Proctor density in pavement ood slab Ell'eas and lo at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free-draining wall baclcftll should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. JobNo.l0420G ~Ch p.3 Ma~ 23 07 01:22p Mel Hanson 9709840757 -4· 3j The ground surface surrOLmding the e"1erior oftbe building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimu111 slope of 12 inches lll the first 10 feet .in unpaved areas and a minimmu slope of 3 u1ches in the fLrsl I 0 feet in pavement and walkway areas. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Irrigation sprinlder heads ru1d landscaping which reguil'es regular heavy iJTigation, such as sod, should be located alleasl5 feet from foundatiou walls. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on June 8,2004to evaluate tile feasibility of an infiltration septic dis]Josal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Figure l. The test holes (nomimu 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at U1e bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked v.~th water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Figme 2 and consist of about 3 y,_ feet of claystone fragments in a sandy silty clay malTix overlying weatl1ered to hard sandstone bedrock: The bedrock could be a displaced block The percolation test results are presented in Table 2. The percolation test results indicate an infiltration rate between 40 and 180 minutes per inch with an average of 93 minutes per inch. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered, pmticularly the shallow bedrock, and the percolation lest results, we recommend that a civil engineer desig11 ibe septic cllsposal system. Additional percolation tests m1d pro:Ble pit could be needed to fmther evaluate the subsurface conditions_ Limitations: Tlus study has been conducted in accordance wi.tb generally accepted geotec!mical engineering principles m1d practices in ti:ris area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. T11e conclusions and recommendations submitted iu this report are based upon th.e data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the . locations il1dicated on Figure 1, ti1e proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services donal iucludc dctennining the presence, prevention ot possibilit~y of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. Iftbe client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in U1is special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include itllerpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions ideulified at tbe exploratory pits and variations i11 tbe subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered dtning construction appenr different from those described in·tlus repor~ we shm1lcl be nolifLeu at once so re-evaluation of ti1e recommendations may be made . .lobNo,I04 206 p.4 Ma~ 23 07 Ol:22p Mel Hanson 9709840757 -5- This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our clieut for design ptuposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review md monitor the implementation of our reconunendations, and to verify tlmt the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Signiftcant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We reconm1eud on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical eng1neer. If you bave any questions or if we may be of fi.u·ther assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC . .Tardy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. .TZA/ksw attachments Figme 1 -Location of Exploratory Pits aiJd Percolation Test Holes Figure 2-Logs of Exploratory Pits Figure 3-Swell Consolidation Test Results Figure 4-Gradation Test Results Table 1 -Sumiuary of Laboratory Test Resu Its Table 2-Percolation Test Results cc: The Drawing Board-Atbl: Rob Classen Ka.up Engineering-Attn: Dale Kaup .1ohNo.J04205 ~tech p.5 Ma~ 23 0? 01:22p Mel Hanson z ') APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 100' 104 206 LOT 15 PROPOSED RESIDENCE ' ' BUILDING ENVELOPE LOT 11 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 9?09840?5? LOT 14 p 1 .6. PROFILE .PIT -- .6. p 2 5700 PROPERTY 5710 BOUNDARY 5720 - LOT 12 LOCATION Of EXPLORATORY PITS AND PERGOLA 110N TEST HOLES p.G LOT 13 I I Figure 1 Ma~ 23 07 01:23p 0 5 10 LEGEND; Mel Hanson PIT 1 ELEV.= 5728' -, I WC=B.O DD-119 -200=94 : +4=53 1 -2.00..,39 1 LL=32 -Pl .. 14 9709840757 PIT 2 PROFILE PIT ELEV.= 5714' TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, scattered gravel, organics, firm, slightly moist, brawn. p.7 0 5 10 CLAYSTONE FRAGMENTS (GC); from gravel to boulder size In a sandy silty clay matrix, medium dense to dense~ slightly moist, grayish brown. SANDSTONE BEDROCK; weathered and medium hard to hard, dry, light yellowish brown, Wasatch Fonmation, possible displaced block. ~ 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. r-: Disturbed bulk sample. ~-" T Practical backhoe refusal. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on June 07, 2004 with o Kabelco 35SR backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by taping from features shown on the site pion provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. Logs ore drown to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree Implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materiels shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation In water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) OD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve 104 206 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL = Liquid Limit ( % ) PI = Plasticity Index ( % ) LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 2 Ma~ 23 07 01:23p Mel Hanson 9709840757 p.a Moisture Content ~ 8.0 percent Dry Density. = 119 pel Sample of: Slightly Sandy Silty Clay Matrix From: Pit 1 at 1.5 Feet 2 ~ <= p-...., 0 ;;; 1 <= """-,. 0 ~ ~ ~ w I 0 ''\ <= Expansion 0 upon I\ ;;; wetting " " 1 ~ I\ a. E 0 "' 2 3 4' 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPUED PRESSURE -ksf 104 206 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 3 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Ma~ 23 07 01:24p Mel Hanson 9709840757 24 Hll 7 HR o <lfi Wltl 15 .OH. !!OMIH. 1NN. o!-t.IIN. 1 t.I!H. 1160 flOC! f'O 130 1111 fB 10 ,. 50 .. .. 100 104 206 .001 .1]02 ..OOS ,0111! .OlD .1137 .07~ ,\50 .J00 .1300 \,1S :Z.36 <f.75 B,5t2-tS \V,D 'S/.5 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MIWMEllERS D.AY 10 SILT I GRAVEL 53 % SAND 8 LIQUID LIMIT 32 % SAMPLE OF: Slightly Sandy Clayey Grovel HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. FINE COI\&E 9AHD lroiRSE I um1uu SILT AND CLAY 39 % PLASTICITY INDEX 14 % FROM: Pit 1 at 5 to 8 Feet GRADATION 1EST RESULTS p.9 00 .. 10 00 ,. lO 10 • 76.2 \52 203 177 I OOB9L!S Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PAWlAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.. TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF lABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURI\l NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERSERG UMITS t-10!STURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING UQUID PLASTIC PIT DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 UMIT INDEX (0/ll) (%) SIEVE (It) [%)~ (pQ}_ (%) (%) 1 1 Vz 8.0 119 94 I II 5-8 53 8 39 32 14 II Job No. 104 205 UNCONANED COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR STRENGTii BEDROCK lYPE (PSFJ Slightly sandy silty clay matrix Slightly sandy clayey gravel I I I 3: .. (( "' w a ..J a ~ "' ... ... 3: "' ~ I .. :J .. 0 :J "' ..J a "' Cll ... a ..J Ul ..J ... ~ a Ma~ 23 07 0~:24p HOLE NO. P-1 P-2 P-3 Mel Hanson 9709840757 HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) 33 37 40 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 2 PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS LENGTH OF WATER WATER INTERVAL DEPTH AT DEPTH AT (MIN) SfARTOF END OF INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) 15 81/z 81/4 sv. 81/4 sv. BY. BY. BY. BY. 8 15 9 B'l4 B'l'• 8'1> 8Vz 8'14 8'14 B B 7% 7'1• 7'12 15 9'h B3/4 8% 81/2 BVz BY. BY. 7'1• 7% 7% 7% 7 p. II JOB NO. 104 2.06 DROPIN AVERAGE WATER PERCOLATION LEVEL RATE (INCHES) (MIN./INCH) 1/4 0 y. 0 y, 180 1/4 '14 'I• 1/4 '14 v. 60 '14 '14 % % % % 40 Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug·in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on June 7, 2004. Percolation tests were conducted on June 8; 2004. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings of each test. No. ~Q:plj Assessor's Parcel No.O'l' I -, \.J 1 1 ';-" ~ '-' •. (i'\ Date G-(~-<J1 BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address Cf>1~ GtlGr \)1\\S fd fCtttcw \i,l\\s ~~tJ:b~ -::>1L+ owner SlOL'l?D 1 0Cf1?,~ R-f\:}W) Addressbl,.>S· FD,~r \11!?.1'!£ p~;n~~Q&'-I-0"30d, ContractorWL \'\('! V\'SO D Address3'S~ [-bOJ 'PvlV'c'I"J rll C ~hb';e # 3lQ-»JKb S~tbacks: Front! Reljr RH LH Zoning ___ _ S!f" au.e\li~ W0p(-f) l cou t:611.Q3 fo.Ms~@.ci'~ Soils Test .--:-=-=--"7T-==-"C7:=--- Footing 2-IJ."t77J'7/~?-~~&g Q/C Foundation 1-'31-o 1 -~~ Grout ______ ~~ Underground Plumbing Jt-1"1_,;-IUlit Rough Plu~bing 11-~k-D? RB/C Frammg .1.!-'2.. -o 2 ~ Insulation IF6-o 1 Roofing · Drywall i ( -l<f -or f1k11_ Gas Piping fi-'1--f>7Xfu\O ' £nfermtJunltVt 11 en ~f!- NOTES Weatherproofing, ____________ _ Mechanicai _____ -.,.-.,-,,--,,--==-=---- Eiectrical Rough (State) l/-1· D "1 SF Electrical inal (State) 7.-!1-oB '!'f.= Final -$ /Checklist Completed?_.<.:~z:L.= Certificate Occu1~p~a~n~c~::,e~~~~~J:::=== Date_ Septic System #?~1"';.~--------­ Date _wrc*-'S!;'---~-,..,---'---­ Finarl_j'L::...I-=-~.!_Af-..k:.~l4.l;&...___ Other _____________________ ~------- rJ~1_w.r ~~ (continue on back) 6$-5/..lrf ¥ Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/TregstlrerPropertySe<~rch I Asse,S..s.m Subset Query I Assesso.r_S.llJ"s .. Se!!rch (:l_erk: .. & Rec:or<ler Rec~ption Semch I3asicl3tl)lding C::hamcleris.ti.c .. s I T<IxJDformation Parce!_Detail I Value Detail I Sales_ Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I TaxArea II I o85 II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I R850012 II 217901108012 II 44.581 I Owner Name and Mailing Address !sLAVEN, GARY L. & PAMELA H. I 123 S. PAINTED HORSE CIRCLE I !NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 I Legal Description lsECT,TWN,RNG: 1-6-92 SUB:CEDAR HILLS I !RANCH LOT:12 PRE:R150234 AND/THRU:& I ITO:R150235 BK:0983 PG:0077 BK:0980 I IPG:0274 BK:0974 PG:0357 BK:0936 I IPG:0524 BK:0833 PG:0386 BK:0458 I IPG:0128 BK:0393 PG:0510 BK:0369 I IPG:0463 BK:0362 PG:0582 BK:0357 I IPG:0591 BK:0205 PG:0004 BK:1861 IPG:540 RECPT:710714 BK:1756 PG:707 IRECPT:688730 BK:1208 PG:826 IRECPT:569762 BK: 1117 PG:OOO! IBK:1101 PG:0809 BK:1050 PG:0602 IBK:1050 PG:0601 BK:0998 PG:0006 IBK:0936 PG:0532 Location http://www. garcoact.com/assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNumber=R8500 12 5/7/2007 Parcel Detail I I I I Physical Address: [[672 CEDAR HILLS RD SILT I Subdivision: IICEDAR HILLS RANCH I Land Acres: [[3.303 I Land Sq Ft: lfo Section II Township II Range I I ll 6 II 92 I Property Tax Valuation Information I. Actual Value II Assessed Value I Land: 150,ooofl 43,500[ Improvements: II 61[ of Total: 150,ooofl 43,500[ Sale Date: [1~9/,;;6/,;;2;;00;;:6========ll Sale Price: [[190,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number of Comm!Ind 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type Amount I 2006 II Tax Payment: First Half ($872.68)[ 2006 II Tax Amount $1,745.36[ 2005 II Interest Payment ($52.40)[ 2005 II Interest Charge $52.40[ 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole ($1,746.56)[ 2005 II Tax Amount $1,746.56[ 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole ($1,768.68)[ 2004 II Tax Amount $1,768.68[ 2003 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($984.41)[ 2003 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($984.41)[ 2003 II Tax Amount II $1,968.82[ http:l/www. garcoact.com/ assessor/Parcel.asp? AccountNumber=R8 500 12 Page 2 of3 517/2007 Parcel Detail 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,660.88)1 2002 II Tax Amount II $1,660.881 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole ($1,652.22)1 2001 II Tax Amount $1,652.221 2000 II Interest Payment ($43.69)1 2000 II Interest Charge $43.691 2000 II Tax Payment: Whole ($1,456.18)1 2000 II Tax Amount $1,456.181 1999 II Tax Payment: Whole ($1 ,449 .26)1 1999 II Tax Amount $1,449.261 TopofPage Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Search Qptions Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options Garficlct .. C:ounty.Home .. Pagt: Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/Parcel. asp? AccountNumber=R8500 12 5/7/2007 COUNTY OF GARFIELD-BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at Olo 12-~ ~~~ .!?t£ . Permit No. /t' .5[) Lj I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: J {Uc//'6?65 #= / /1-UL ~ . h ~ jl~ ~ otJd-4 ~ ·~.&·A~~~~ ;) tj~'-' . ~~:~;--~-to ~ ~:;:~~~ ~ . ~ You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date g ... /;;l . 20 08 ..., Building Inspector ~ ~ - Phone (970) 945-8212