The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 Application1 .. I .I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • BURNING ROCK SUBDIVISION BATTLEMENT MESA INC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFDRMATIDN TD THE PRELIMINARY PLAN APRIL 9 1 1982 PREPARED av: CONSUL TING ENG INEERS 2777 CROSSROADS BLVD ., SU IT E D-2 GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 815 01 ( 303 ) 245-0627 1 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BATILE~NT MESA INC. 7 43 Horizon Court PO. Box 308 Grand Junction. Colorado 81502 April 8, 1982 Mr. Dennis Stranger County Planner Garfield County Planning Dept. 2014 Blake Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO. 81601 RE: Preliminary Plan for Burning Rock Subdivision Dear Mr. Stranger: Please accept this proposal for the preliminary plan of the Burning Rock Subdivision, which is to be developed as a golf course, golf course clubhouse, convention center, and visitors center. You will find attached a check for $255.87 to cover the filing fees. We are including the boundaries and topographic plans along with the drainage, grading, and utility plans. You will also find the supplementary information booklet that includes the subdivision summary form. These plans are being submitted to you by our consulting engineers, Gingery Associates, Inc. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Very truly yours, BATTLEMENT MESA, INC~ lf!s~~ Planning and Design Coordinator KS/de I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SUDIVISION SUMMARY FORM Type ot Subdivision Garfield County Date}\pril !I, 1!182 Request for Exemption.__ __ _ Preliminary Plan xxxx Suodivision Name: Burning Rock Subdivision Location or Subdivision: Final Plat Filing 'lU'JNSfIIP ~ ~E .9..51'.i SEC. 5.6.7,8.18 Owner (s) NAME _Ba_t_t_l .... emen_ .... t .......... M ... e_sa~· _.I_n...,,c ..... _________ _ AIDRESS P.O. Box 308. Grand Junction. m. 81502 Suodivider (s) NAME _B,..a .... tt_l ... eroen ............... t ..... M .... e_sa._..~I-n....,c ...... ..__ ________ _ AIDRESS P.O. Box 308. Grand Junction. m. 81502 Designer NAME Gingery Associates, Inc. AIDRESS 2777 Crossroads Blyd. Grd. Jct. Cl) 81501 Type or Subdivision Nt.mlber of Dwelling Units ( ) Single Family----- ( ) Apartmdlts ( ) Conaanimums ( ) Mobile Hane (x) Conmercial N/A ( ) IneilStrial N/A Street Walkways Dedicated School Sites Reserved School Sites Dedicated Park Sites Reserved Park Sites Private Open Areas Ea~ts(Incl. utility R.O.W) other (specify) Public, Semiplbl1c, Recreational Total Area (Acres) 10.78 % of Total Area 5.2% 0.47 0,3% 194,58 94,5% 205.83 100,0% Est.Linated Water Requirements 34,900 Gallons/day. (avg.) Proposed Water Source sballow well field on Colorado River Est.Linated Sewage Disposal Requirement 15,800 Gallons/day. (avg.) Proposed Means of Sewage Disposal central trea0nent plant A~dON: Plarming Conmission Reoomnendation AI;provcu ( ) Disawroval ( ) Remarks Date , 19_. Board of County Comnissioners AI;provc:LL ( ) Disawroval ( ) Remarks Date , 19_. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AOOITIONAL INFORMATION F'RELIMINARY PLAN BURN!Ri ROCK SUBDIVISION 1 . SutxUvisioo name: Burning Rock Subdivision 2. Owner: Battlement Mesa, Inc, P.O. Box 308 Grand Junction, ro 81502 There are no mortgages on the property. Plat prepared by: Gingery Associates, Inc. 2777 Crossroad5 Blvd. Suite D-2 Grand Junction, CX> 81501 3. Owners or: adjoining land are shown on Preliminary Plan. 4. Lana use St.mmary: Neighborhooe1 Conmercial Business Conmercial COlmlon Open Space unlic, Semi-Public, and Recreational 'lOTAL AREA 2.45 Acres 8.33 Acres 0.47 Acres 194.58 Acres 205.83 Acres 5. Proposed utility, drainage and maintenance easements will be dedicated to Garfield County. 6. A description ot the proposed covenants will be sutmitted with f inaJ. plat. 7. This sutrlivisioo will be in compliance with the Zoning Resolution which designates Lots 1,2,3, and 5 as a Public, Semiµiblic and Recreational, and Lot 4 as Neighborhood Coomercial, and Lot 6 as Business Ccllmercia.l. .. 8. Parking requirements will be acXlressed with the ag:>lication for building permit. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 9. Physical information about the subdivision is included in reports ana mai;:s sutmitted with the Battlement Mesa Plarmed Unit Developnent plan. A general geological report, soils map and tables, a vegetation map, a letter from the Colorado Division of Wildlife and a radiological report have been sutmitted to Garfield County. 10. A drainage study report is included in this booklet. 11 . suwlemental utility information for the site is shown on the Preluninary Plan. The water system and the sanitary sewer will be privately owned and financed by Battlement Mesa Inc. Master Plans of the water and sanitary sewer systems in the Battlement Mesa P.U.D . have been sutmitted to the County. Information regarding tne qualicy, quantity, and dependability of the water system, including an augmentation plan, has been suhnitted. 12. The proposed electrical power and natural gas lines are shown on tne Preluninary Plan. I I I I DRAINAGE STUDY I I BURNINi ROa< SUBDIVISION I APRIL, 1982 I I PREPARED FOR BATl'LEMENT ME.5A, INC. I I PREPARED BY GI~Y ASSOCIATES, INC. 2777 ~ BLVD. SUITE D-2 I GRAND JUNCTION , 00. 81501 I JOO N:>. 1631.23Y I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DRAINAGE SI'UDY BURNilli ROCK SUBDIVISION I. BATl'L™ENT Mt:SA The Battlement Mesa Develop:nent project area is located soutneast ot Parachute, Colorado on a plateau situated easterly of the Colorado River. The project area is skirted by the Colorado River on the west, Battlement Creek on the east and Dry Gulch on the south. Monmnent Gulch flows through the area near the south end. The entire site is drained by numerous small, indefinite drainageways across the majority of the plateau area. Gingery Associates, Inc. completed a Battlement Mesa Storm Drainage Analysis study in March, 1975. Turner, Collie, and Braden reviewed the 1974 study and updated it to reflect recent rainta.Ll data. Where awlicable, the information generated in those reports has been used in this study. Burm.ug Rock Subdivision is situated in Battlement Mesa as shown on the Vicinity Map on the Preliminary Plan. The topography of the area surrounding this subdivisi on is shown in Figure 1 of this report. The site stretches along the western euge of the Battlement Mesa Plateau and the existing topography generally slopes to the Northwest at a 4% to 7% slope. This sUbdivision is split into two major sections by North Battlement Parkway. The southerly section consists of lots 2,3,4 ,S, and 6. Lot 2 is crossed by several drainageways tnat converge on the western edge of the site to fonn two major drainage channels. These drainage channels drain runoff f rarn various subdivisions upstream and they have the capacity of carrying the 100 year storm runoff. Lots 3,4,5 ad 6 are located adjacent to a drainage channel a.long North Battlement Parkway. Runoff from this area pre sently flows into this channel and also partially onto Lot 2 into existing drainageways. Lot 1, the section of the subdivision north of Battlement Parkway, is crossed by several drainageways which drain from sur rounding developed areas to the Colorado River . These drainageways have the capacity of carrying the 100 year storm runoff. I ·. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I e III. DRAINPGE CCNSIUt:RATIONS The proposed golf course developnent plan for Lot 1 and 2 is not expect:ed to change existing drainage patterns or increase rtmoff quantities. The major drainageways that cross the subdivision and intercept storm rtmoff have the capability of carrying the 100 year storm rtmoff. The deve.Lopnent of lots 3,4,5, and 6 will increase the quantity of rtmoff from the site. HCMever, downstream drainage channels and structures have been designed to carry that fl<M. Care should be taken in developnent of the site to direct: any increased rtmoff to the major drainage channel along the south side of Battlement Parkway to avoid increasing the surtace drainage fl<Ming onto Lot 2. 1-· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ., ,,,, / l \ ,. ~' ~· ·-. \ . .: I • • ; I ( J '.~ I ~ • I ( ; r1· . / ' , ,A , __ I , ' "\. •. -- -'~ . 1---------------------·.,, BURNING R QC K SUB DIV I Su,eF,4C'"c 0..e-1/~4'.;~ - VICINITY TOPOGRAPHIC~r F..eo~ -.... AND DRAINAGE PLJV..Y4 Y-c B.4.z,.v5 -/~yR S~~-CVEN0 _ ' \ \ \ -.. 1 <: •II '!: ,, ... .. SU ;)[)J VJ SJ ON ·e _ __PR E_L_J_~·~1 _1 ; '-~y _PLl~J- Cl .e e k Lis t: (~c e scale of map s p age 19. Zoning Reso lu tion ) ~e l _i_rri i n a r y_Pl a t: V r:orth Arr-ow, Scale, Date, Boundary li nes an d dist a n ces v-1it h desc ri pt i o n of tract V" Proper-ty lir1e s, rn·iners adjacen t to tract: _ ~....J fotat ion of easei..c-nt s and setback s v Sti-e et n atr es , bl oc k an d lot nu.mbe ring system --~ Ai-ea of each lot . :_-~Contours e cich 5' int..e i-vals un l es s ap prova l for 10' o n 1/24,00 0 interva ls ~ Co mrw:rn op e n space -_--·ZfV--sites 1-cse ne d for pub lic, p arks, schoo ls e tc. .. Fe e --- .C.cid it i on a 1 I nfo n-.a ti o n·: -· ----~·::ar:-i e of subd ivision (unique ) -~ ::ar.;e a nd c:ddi -es s of c.-;ne ds), rnodgagee s , sub divide r, r;nd fir-m ------prepa ring pla t ,,,.,,.-r:arne s a nd ad di-ess es of ad joi ni no l an d ov in e r-s --~-Tota l acI"2r:i9e of subdivid e d land and acrc:cge of ea c h us e. ----'~ Prnposed t er ms of ded i cat ion of pub lic si tes e tc ... ~ ~~v~d e nce th a t subd ivision c?n;p l i ~s \\1 ~th Zo ninsi Reso lution v 1 o L. a l Sq i.; a re F e e t o f non i-es i o e n t 1 a l r l o o r s pa c e . =---V-Tot al n u111)e r of off stree t pai-king spaces (e xcludin g S.F .) _\~cinity Sketc h i·~ap : -V Sca le l"=l,000' or 1/24,000 if ap proved , .5 mil es in all dir ec t.ions ?h_ys i c a l Info rmatio n: ---- ---- ---- Ge ologica l Informatio n So i l s i n for rr.a ti o n Vege ta t i on \~i 1 d 1 if e ~ad~i_g_~_g __ Dra~e-~_~: · ~G e nera li z e d grading fo r a ll c ut and f ill ~=--=---=C ross-Sect ions for diffic ult grade relati o nsh ips o n i-oa ds an d bu il ding site s -~:)pa-Stre e t prof il e s (sca l e cons i s t e nt with pre li in i nary p l a t) -7 -Dra i nage Study -e xist i ng 1·1cd .e r cou:-ses an d C:>'.pe cte d ti-itutc.ry fl o :s , ------p l us a ll propose d cu l v e rts , br i dges , di'Lch 2 s , ch on 11e l s and 22 se: ... 2 nt s Ut i l i tv Pl a n : /J • ~ • 1J. /f . / A / / ----·~----/(./~ -ts?~ ~/Jz;..L.#~ '.·:a te r S up pl y, source proof of quont ity 2n d qua li t y end evic:'..:::nce of ----c:-.;ne r-s hi p J _ Hi sto ric use 2 n d .Yi e 1 d · V ---J-.1.1 e nab i l i ty of rights to ch an ge in us e. _ proof tha t ·pub lic or priv ate will supp ly ·,;a l e r c.n d 1-.~.2t c.i:-·J u nt ___ Eviclc:nce of potc:b il ity :~a 'L ure of lc:-£c l e:n tity 1 .. ho \·,·in o .. :n sysl c:m and r..:?th o d of f i:lancin g Jn fon ~.ali o n o n e >.i slin g 1-.·a tc::r system (if c c.111r1ecti0n is to b.:·1-:-.r.d e ) J 11d iv idua l \·:ells -proo f of ava il C1b ility of \·:at.e r Pla n of Aug 1;·,2 nt a tio n for Junioi· \·1 e lls • ~Ci~_e_Di_,pos al: j)~ ,/ ~ ~ ~--Ltf_ D·script i o n of system (for centra l syste m) · . T reatmen t -pub lic or priyate facil iti es .ca n an d v.,iill hand le i't Entity whic h ~ill ow n an d operate system.an d method of fin anc ing If conn ec'L.e d t o existing system-informat-lo n-on existin g s y stem If individua l syst em s-perk tests , max i mum groun d water level etc .. results _C_:1de r:_g__c_ounci_ ~.~i ri na : /oe script i o n of the syste m an d ev i dence of utility Com pany agr eeme nt July 2, 1985 Ro be rt A. Fbster • GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Planning & Mark eting Coordinator Battlement Mesa, Inc. P. 0. Box 308 Grand Junction, CO 81502 Dear Mr. Foster: • As you are aware, the Board of County Corrnnissioners has referred the request to extend the approval o f the Preliminar y Plans noted in your May 20, 1985 letter to the Planning Commission for a recorranendation. The reason given for the referral is for the Planning Commission to determine whether or not there has been a change in the purpose for developing Battlement Mesa that might contradict the original subdivision approval. Originally, Battlement Mesa was to be developed to mitigate oil shale industry impacts. It appears that there is a new emphasis now in marketing the area for retirement aged people. With this change in direction, are the basic development philosophies still the same as far as internal circulation and location of corranercial and recreation facilities? Has BMI anticipated the needs of a retirement age community and determined that the present P.U.D. plan meets those needs? Will the present marketing approach be a f fected by a future resurgence of the oil shale industry? 'lhese are some very basic questions that will probably be asked by the Planning Corranission and be a basis for their recorranendation. While this procedure is new to both of us, the present Board of County Commissioners has relied on the Planning Commission for a number of different issues. Your cooperation in this matter will be appreciated. If you have any further questions, please call or write to me, at your convenience. :;;:;~~ Mark L. Bean Planning Director MLB/emh 109 8 TH STRE ET, THIRD F LOOR 9 4 5-82 12 I 625-557 1 G L E N WOOD S PRIN GS. CO LO RADO 8 1601 July 2, 1985 Robert A. Foster • GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Planning & .Marketing Coordinator Battlement IvEsa, Inc. P. O. Box 308 Grand Junction, CO 81502 Dear Mr. Foster: • 'As you are aware, the Board of County Commissioners has referred the request to extend the approval of the Preliminary Plans noted in your May 20, 1985 letter to the Planning CoIIillission for a recorrrnendation. '!he reason given for the referral is for the Planning Conrnission to determine whether or not there has been a change in the purpose for developing Battlement Mesa that might contradict the original subdivision approval. Originally, Battlement tvEsa was to be developed to mitigate oil shale industry impacts. It appears that there is a new emphasis now in marketing the area for retirement aged people. With this change in direction, are the basic developnent philosophies still the same as far as internal circulation and location of commercial and recreation facilities? Has BM! anticipated the needs of a retirement age corrununity and determined that the present P.U.D. plan meets those needs? Will the present marketing approach be affected by a future resurgence of the oil shale industry? 'Ihese are some very basic questions that will probably be asked by the Planning Conmission and be a basis for their recorrmendation. While this procedure is new to both of us, the present Board of County CoIIillissioners has relied on the Planning Commission for a number of different issues. Your cooperation in this matter will be appreciated. If you have any further questions, please cal l or write to me, at your convenience. :;;;~~ Mark L. Bean Planning Director MLB/emh 109 8TH STREET, THIRD FLOOR 945-8212 I 625-5571 GLENWOOD SPRINGS , COLORADO 81601