HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 BOCC Staff Report 5.21.84t
Bocc 5/21/84
PROJECT INFORMA'IlON AND SiAFF COI,IMENTS
REOUEST:
APPLICANT:
LOC ATION:
SITE DATA:
WATER:
SEWER:
ACCESQ:
EXISTING ZONING:
L9{.AqE-u!--4q[lN9:
For a S.B. 35 ExemPtion
John llenrr/ Antonelli
Section 4, T65, R92W; located 1'5
miles nortlturest of Silt
I. RELA TIONSHIP TO THE C
Tire site is 10
proposal is to
into 3 lots oi
and 3 acres.
Existing weIl or inclividual wel l
permits, if aPProved'
E:listing and Prcposeil individual
septic sYstems.
Off CountY Rd. 229
A/R/RD
A/R/RD in all directions
LAN
IETs Urban Area of Influence '
acres in size. The
divide Lhis 10 acres
approximatelY 2, 5
proposes to subclivide the 10
3 acres.
( 1ot
pr ev ious
r egulations
proPosed
larger Iand
ivithin D 1 str ict A;
\*-qu'A
..ij ,ic u.' JL
]i,'t,
',""
OMPREH ENSIVE P
SiThe site s its
II.DESCR IPTION OF THE P ROPOSAL
A. Site D
nor the f
runrring f rom East
South. The ParceI
agr icultural Parcels '
The site currently has one mobile home on the
the parcel. tfrere are two irrigation ditches
to west on tr,""piicer and, two running North to
is flat opeil-";;i;;itural lanci surrounded bv
B
HISTORY
Br_g.lqgt qe:Srletign
acre-Farcet into 3
: The aPPlicant
lots of 2, 5 and
: The site sits
This subdivision*24).
III.MAJOR
within the Antlers Orchard Subdivison
wis pf att.a ancl recorJed in L9l2'
ISSUES AND CONCERNS
I
2.
The proposal was subnitted and reviewed under the
subdivison t"tJIlutioti" of Garf ield County ' These
note that un 6i"*ption would be considered if the
division was irot part of an existing or potential
develoPment Project'
TheproposalsitswibhintheAntlersorchardsubdivision.There
were ZB4 origi;;i 10 acre i"t"""itit"O i' this subdivision i'
tg';2. A numUei-'of these fois have alrea<ly been resubdivided
either tfrrougli "ul,ai'uision or by exemption '
a ) Subdivisions
'"itt-,in the Itginul antlers Orchard Subdivision:
I. Asgard Sui;division
2. zelenka Minor SgBdivision
(See I{aP Page--{l-- -)b) There frur"-["'"n'u-ffi6ei-of lots created through
t}reexernptionproces=u"t,".nlgTTatttlthepresenttime,
which are wirhin rhe ";i;i;;i Antlers orchard subdivision
or in the immediate ui"inilvr 52 exemptiotts creating 79
new lots for a total of !11- lots'
t3'
aI
3 The aPplicants have a do-me-stic well permit' To tlate'
however, the oi'i"i"t of Water Resources-has not responded
as to wheth"'"if i"-p"tqit cin-r'* used to serve three
households unaTil-ii..uaaiti;;"l permits can be obtained'
The County Road Supervisor has inspected the site and
derermined rh;i driveway u""ll"-peimits *outa U" required
for the rwo sourrrerry par";i;-enlering onio county Road 229'4
IV. S UGGESTED FI NDINGS
1
3
v RECOT,l MEN DATION
1 The property proposed f9r 1n exemption
nil.I"i'"rnti;;;i;r, in Garfieltl countv'
That the proposal is potentially a part
ThatthelrearingbeforetileBoardofCountyCommissionerswas
extensive uno-"6*p1ete, ttrat"Iir-p.ttinent' racts' matters and
issues \^rere "r;;;Ia;d incl tnut-iri ittter""t-o-puities were heard
at that hear ing ' arL\
Thatfortheabovestated3ndotherreasons,theproposedzl{**ra9is nor in tir"-ilIo[ interu"t"If-tii*-r'"ol-th' safety' Tgralsr
conven i ence , or der , pr osper ri-y ;;; ;;1r.t ! oi thl. c it i zens of
Gar field CountY '
sits within a PreviouslY
of larger develoPment'
4
DENIAL, based on
oiat.ted subdivisi
roiti, a Potentiall
the fact that the proposal, is within a previously
on antl because of Ltre possiUie impacts associated
y larger a.utioii'"nl uLing create-d through the
exemPtion Process '
IftheBoardmakesthedetermination.thattheimpactscreatedbytheproposal are ;;i-;ignifi"unl','-If,u fottowlng-'"onOitiot'ts should be
impbsea at a minimum:
I.Thata.Ietterbereceivedfrom!h".DivisionofWaterResourcesapprovlng ttre-,,,onou9i"II"-oi.tl,* oomestic well or tlrat new
lndiviauir well permii"-;; iitain"a-io' the two additional lots'
2. That a clriveway access permit be' obtained f rorn the Garf ield
counry noacl an-ct sridgl ;;;;;tment io, the two southern lots'
Pr ior- to f inal aPPr oval '
3.Thataplatofthe.threelotsbe.submittedtotheDepartmentofDevel'opmentinclyrli!9;;t-ioirowinginforination:a.r,"guidescription!^.or_"i"r,-ro[shallbewrittenseparatelyontheplatincruiingtt,eregar-.i*u"'iptionofal},ut"'ii;;; well ind oitcrr easements'
b. All waterline, *Iii ;;; ait"r,*"i""m"nt" be slrowtt on the
Plat 'c. There shall-b9 signatur:.,:l?:k= for the County Surveyor and
.. i[:'lnla"i:rt"]::I i:Ullli:";13*et,on 3ld make rerere'ce
to the Resolution I'lumber apProving tlie exemption'
4. rhat prior to final appr9v3l' 91-0-9'00
($200'00^per 1ot) shal1 be
paid ro the Departm"ii-oi our"fop*"n[ ioi tf't sitrool Impact f ee'
5.thedeedsforthethreeparcels.shallinclude.aportionof,orinterest itt ' trre weli-iol-lacrr ro[-ino-urr wateri ilrt ' well and
ditch easements ' rnlse-ieeds "r'uir-'u! ieviewea- uy the Garf ield
County At.torney pnoi tu f inal approval'
5. A11 conditions must be met within L20 tiays'
aos/Vtltt,
ft? ?fLot-r 'Off^^Ml 0l