Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application-Permit
Garfield County No. l!o--:r-o-G Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office 945-8212 Inspection Line 384-5003 3'8() I c_;?_ ZJ3 Job Address: Locality: 2411-082-00-011 Use of Building: Main compressor I Auxiliary I Generator Building Owner: Savage Limited Partnership( owner), TransColorado Gas (lease) Contractor: Ritter Construction Inc Amount of Permit: $4,125.25 _ ___:::..::..::.:==-- No. --'-1 o=-qoc--'--'=-____ _ Soils Test---------- Foundation _ __,_,~~--F.----- Footing ~ ~~~~~ground Pl~nf_R ____ _ Rough Plumbing --"'c='=~----- Framing ___ -j.b._,~,L-,.+,~--- Insulation ----V-U-<-~_~___:__::_• --- Roofing _____ ~+----- Drywall ------f'X.--r~H/Jlli1;>Yfi'l"i" Gas Piping -----'L...l..L/ L-f=-<_u_1 '1_._-_ NOTES Date: Clerk: ---------'J=--->-t U"'-'---3{1-'-"'1 o__::_fL_ Assessor's Parcel No. dY!b t -()'C J. -{)\)--C)\ I Date I (')-?v~-61- Weatherproofing _________ _ Mechanical ___________ _ Electrical Rough (State) _______ _ Electrical Final (Statel------,.-~~ Final !/). IJ5:' I 0 /Checklist Completed? ~n..!.>:1g __ Certificate g~~u pancy #'5o-· -+\·Kf?J.-'5""1~:..<u'9e"---- Septic System # __,\,.,_) ~\J£-1,'-------- Date -----------Final __________ _ Other ------------- (continue on back) GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8"" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 I FM: 970-384-3470 /Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Permit No: Parcel/Schedule No: J<;/1 0'/?fJ.. 00 0/L -Job Address: Southwest Quarter of SectionS, Twp. 7 South Rge.97 West compressor station 0 $4.2 million Adjusted Valuations: S A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. TI-llS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ! HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS 1YPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL TH;;EOPNRf!Or'IFii!Si.IcO:lNj(S)jiOF ANY OTHER STATE OR v OR THE PERFORMANCE Dated Permit Issued: Const. ISDS No. & Fee: AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DE'JAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITI'ED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDJNG DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF 1'HlS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDJNG CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH JN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, 1'HE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE PROM THE COUNTY Al'lD THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER Wl·IEN IN VIOLATION OFTHS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITI'ED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR UABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSJ BILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIAI.LY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. f'T'tAI.I· ~ \(\v~ (~E;:;;;)HAVEREA~b~~!~EAGREEBP~~~~ \1"-<-•\Cl ("0-\-\0 ~'P'~1G~;:V\Qec.0 Ck:'80Lt~q $,\~~D.1-IJ p; $ ~'BE,Y. s:s The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. 9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# \ \)i-eE,-IOto=f-10':\0Y> Signature Bpapplicationoctober2006 q-/2--0'7 Date VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date -':S::'a"'va"'g':'e~L::::a:::n=d/""T:;.:r;:an:::s:..;C::;o::::l::.o.;......_;_,.-.,---'--Subdivision ,.:C"'o:;,:n::;n-cC:::,r;ee;k.;...... _ _;.....,..__;__.....,_;__.;._LotlBlock -'l"'0'-'/2::2:..:12::::0::::0.;..7_;_;_;_..;,__.;......_;.:_.;......_Contractor Sec.5 Finished (Livable Areal: Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Covered Open Valuation Type of Construction: Occupancy: u,.., 4<h5~ <1L Valuation F-1 F-1 F-1 Total Valuation Ritter Const. sf sf sf sf X $74.68 0 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 sf X $18.00 sf X $9.00 sf X sf X Commercial 6000 sf X 790 sf X 2448 sf X sf X sf X sf X $24.00 $12.00 $39.88 "' $39.88 -<: $39.88 ~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d.:S 'l ;1.. lfll . o"\l ' . -~i 1 5os. ;.c <fll t. d. f.,. ~If 368,411.44 368,411.44 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to scale. 1 Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check with the Building Department. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IBC, !PC, IMC and IFGC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes X 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes No Not necessary for this project X 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road accessing the property? Yes__){_ 4. Is the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? 2 Yes __ _ No Not necessary for this project X 5. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes X No__ Not necessary for this project. __ _ 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes_)(_ No Not necessary for this project __ 7. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Yes_l(__ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces ana the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for projectL 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project___x_ I 0. Do the plans include design loads as required under the IBC or IRC for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes_)(_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ II. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_K_ 12. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes _x_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 13. Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes _,lL_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 14. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes_L No__ Not necessary for this project __ 15. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes_lL_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 3 16. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district for building height maximum) Yes No l( Not necessary for this project ----£Me +\E'I(ItT t-.tJ't> 'Q..;;ov: '5L.oP&. 'S-..ols.)tJ 17. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA certification? Yes No Not necessary for this project_)(_ 18. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IBC or IRC? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_j(_ 19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IBC or!RC? Yes No Not necessary for this project_'l<_ 20. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project_2(,_ 21. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project~ 22. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building? Yes__ No Not necessary for this project '6, 23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the IBC Chapter 3) Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project )( 24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes__ No_&_ Not necessary for this project __ 25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes _J,_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 4 26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this project -X- 27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes__ No Not necessary for this project -X- 28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes_$._ No __ 29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes_j(_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 30. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes__lL_ No __ 31. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For corner lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbacks. Yes X No __ _ 32. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the implementation of these changes? Yes_)(_ No __ 33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? YesL No __ 34. 35. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes_K_ No __ Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comp:k with the Uniform Codes? Yes No 5 (i 36. Are you aware that you must call iu for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m. and 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. 3 7. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes_){_ No ___ _ 38. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes X No. ___ _ 39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes )( No ___ _ 40. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcel/ Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of the building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes )( No __ _ 41. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes X No (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes )( ' 43. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? State Law requires any commercial project with occupancy of more than 1 0 persons as per Section 1004 of the IBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. Yes No Not Necessary for this project _ ___,X_,_ __ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my ability. 6 9-/2-07 Signature Date Phone:3o3-'114-7793(days); 3J3-201-21 'iS'( (evenings) Project Address: Note: If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review. B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in proceeding with construction. *If you answered "No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. Bpcomm October 2006 7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant. __ '6.,tL-J.h/'-"-_,!3::!'\::.q,<:.e ___ _ f Building /Engineered Foundation Date. _ _c\._,6,_-_,t~ct,_· c_-oe:o,71---- Planning/Zoning .......-1>roperty Line Setbacks LDriveway Permit Gl.. '" h '7-(tt~k ---t_L3oft Stream Setbacks .}«J> ").L-t / ~Surveyed Site Plan f;rc.u4-s-o ' --i,.L_Flood Plain f/DO .,_ ~'5 _,/ ~Septic Permit and Setbacks -LLBuilding Height Jll_Gradeffopography 30% ~Zoning Sign-off aAttach Residential Plan Review List ~ Minimum Application Questionnaire 4subdivision Plat ~otes ~Fire Department Review _Lv aluation Determination/Fees _LRed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker -J'4l_Attach Conditions LApplication Signed ~Ian Reviewer To Sign Application _0arcel/Schedule No. Stir--L..~ --J04,_ 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. _J_ Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: ~Road Impact Fees J:!.k_HOA/DRC Approval _Loradeffopography 40% LP!anning Issues 4Subdivision Plat Notes Andy Schwaller From: Francis Marcotte [FMarcotte@myrgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:12 PM To: Andy Schwaller Cc: Claudia_Leal@kindermorgan.com Subject: Kinder Morgan Conn Creek Station Andy Just to follow up on our conversation regarding the permit for the compressor station at Conn Page 1 of 1 Creek. Cyrus Tuchscher, the inspector for the State has a note in the permit file that the seal-offs were the only thing left to inspect before closing the permit. I spoke to our Foreman that was on the compressor site and he said Cyrus did come out after they were poured and was going to go back to the office and close out the permit. It apparently didn't get done. Our foreman on the Rifle Water Project was going to talk to Cyrus and see what wants to do about it. If Cyrus needs to go back out to the site then I will have to arrange a time to get in from KM. He may recall the final inspection and go back to the office and correct his comment. Either way I will send you the final on it when I get it. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to reply or call me at my direct line (303-853-7618). Respectfully Francis Marcotte Operations Manager 8/6/2009 Chris Chappelle From: Andy Schwaller Sent: To: Monday, August 31, 2009 3:02 PM Leal, Claudia Cc: Chris Chappelle Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan Conn Creek Station Claudia, I got the same e-mail and am waiting for the electric final. These permits date back to Oct 07. I spoke with Richard Jones on 5-1-09. He assured me prompt response. I got the foundation report early in June 09 and have been waiting for the framing special inspections and final electrical since. These building should not be occupied and my next recourse is to turn it over to our legal department which will generate a summons before a district judge. If we do not have the required material prior to September 15, we will start this legal process. Regards, Andy Schwaller · From: Leal, Claudia [mailto:Ciaudia_George@kindermorgan.com] Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 2:32 PM To: Andy Schwaller Cc: 'Francis Marcotte' Subject: RE: Kinder Morgan Conn Creek Station Andy, Below is the email I received in early August. Did you receive this email? Are you just waiting to the final inspection notice? Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Claudia Leal Kinder Morgan 303-914-4626 From: Francis Marcotte [mailto:FMarcotte@myrgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 3:12PM To: aschwaller@garfield-county .com Cc: Leal, Claudia Subject: Kinder Morgan Conn Creek Station 1 Andy Just to follow up on our conversation regarding the permit for the compressor station at Conn Creek. Cyrus Tuchscher, the inspector for the State has a note in the permit file that the seal-offs were the only thing left to inspect before closing the permit. I spoke to our Foreman that was on the compressor site and he said Cyrus did come out after they were poured and was going to go back to the office and close out the permit It apparently didn't get done. Our foreman on the Rifle Water Project was going to talk to Cyrus and see what wants to do about it. If Cyrus needs to go back out to the site then I will have to arrange a time to get in from KM. He may recall the final inspection and go back to the office and correct his comment. Either way I will send you the final on it when I get it. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to reply or call me at my direct line (303-853-7618). Respectfully Francis Marcotte Operations Manager ____ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4385 (20090831) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ____ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4386 (20090901) The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com 2 KINDE~MORGAN May 27,2009 Garfield County Building and Planning Department 1 08 8'h Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Andy Schwaller RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2009 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PlANNING Re: Conn Creek Compressor Station Building Foundation Review Dear Mr. Schwaller: I have reviewed the Kinder Morgan inspector reports and construction pictures to determine if the foundations were constructed in accordance to the foundation drawings for the Auxiliary Building, Generator Building, Compressor Building, Compressors, and Generators for the Conn Creek Compressor Station. The foundations for the referenced structures were installed between June 4, 2007 and August 2, 2007. I was on-site on May 21, 2009 to observe the existing foundations of the referenced structures. The Compressor Blocks, Compressor Building footings and stem wall, Generator Building footings and stem wall, Generator Block foundations, and Auxiliary Building footings had been formed, and reinforcing steel installed based on observations of construction pictures and inspector reports. However, the size of the footings, foundation bearing soils conditions, and reinforcing lengths and sizes could not be verified. The piers for the Compressor Blocks and Auxiliary Building stem walls were referenced to be installed in the inspector reports however there were no pictures or reports showing or referencing the foundation sizes, steel reinforcement size and placement, and foundation soil conditions. The on-site visit consisted of observing the concrete of the above grade sections of the foundations. The concrete for the above grade stem walls for the Compressor Building and Auxiliary Building had a couple of areas with cosmetic defects apparently caused by the removal of the forms. The overall structural integrity of the foundation at these areas remained intact. For all the existing foundations visually observed there were no indications of any settling and the concrete appeared to be properly placed and structurally sound. Based on the review of the inspector reports and construction pictures, the Compressor Building, Compressors, Generator Building, Generator, and Auxiliary Building foundations were installed. The on-site Kinder Morgan inspectors verified these foundations were installed in general compliance with the "Issued for Construction" Conn Creek Compressor Station Foundation Drawings. Sincerely, KNAPP & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATIORNEYSATLAW 1775 SHERMAN STREET. 31ST FLoOR DENVER, COLORADO 80203-4323 Timothy J. Knapp Knapp_and_associates @yahoo.com Mr. Don DeFord Garfield County Attorney Garfield County 108 8th Street, Suite 219 Glenwood Springs, Colorado. 81601 Re: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC Land Use Permit Dear Mr. DeFord: 303-996-8616 (telephone) 720-898-9608 (facsimile) April 23, 2007 Following up on our conversation this letter will confirm that upon review of Rockies Express Pipeline's (REX) proposed project through Garfield County the County has determined that the REX project will be regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and therefore the project is exempt from any land use permits pursuant to Section 2.02.431 of the County Zoning Resolution. Thus, the County will not require REX to obtain a land use permit from Garfield County to construct its natural gas pipeline in Garfield County. Should my understanding of our conversation be incorrect please contact me immediately since construction will commence in late May or early June of this year. Respectfully, Timothy J. Knapp WEST SLOPE TESTING & INSPECTION LLC 3-2-10 3177 Glendam Dr Grand Junction, CO 81504 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Garfield County Building Inspection Dept. l 08 81h St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Page 1 of 1 MAH 0 4 20iO Please find enclosed special inspection reports including final reports for Conn Creek Compressor Station. Thank You; Doug Young KINDER~· MORGAN TRANSCOLORADO GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY Mr. Andy Schwaller Garfield County Building Department 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Dear Mr. Schwaller: February 26, 2010 Re: Conn Creek Compressor Station Building Permits #1 0706, 1 0707 & 10708 Garfield County, Colorado Pursuant to our previous communications and the recent communication between our attorney, Ruth Moore, and the Assistant Garfield County Attorney, Cassie Coleman, enclosed please find the following: Final Inspection Reports dated February 24, 2010 (including reports dated February 17, 2010) covering the special inspection of high strength bolting at three (3) buildings constructed at the Conn Creek Compressor Station located in Garfield County, Colorado. Final Inspection Report by the Colorado State Electrical Board dated October 5, 2009 covering acceptance of the electrical installation at the Conn Creek Compressor Station in Garfield County, Colorado. Also enclosed as requested is our check# 86760 in the amount of $2,500.15 as full payment for renewal of permits# 10706, 10707 and 10708. It is our understanding that TransColorado is now in compliance with all applicable Garfield County requirements and has cured or removed any violations. We hereby request your confirmation of the same and request that the final inspection by the county be scheduled at your earliest opportunity. If you have any questions regarding the above please contact the undersigned at 303/914-4626. Thank you. Sincerely, TRANSCOLORADO GAS TmSMISSION COMPANY LLC UJ~c-~ Claudia E. Leal Project Manager P. 0. Box 281304, Lakewood, Colorado 80228-8304 303/989-1740 lu~pec:uuu .Kepun COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD INSPECTION REPORT I CORRECTION NOTICE Date Received: 05-0CT-09 Contractor/HomeOwner: Address: Type of Inspection: Action: Comments or Corrections: Permit Number: 675571 STURGEON ELEC CO INC 7000 CONN CREEK RD Final Accepted rage 1 or 1 1) 500.8(E) Conduit and fittings shall be made wrenchtight 2) 11 0.22 Permanent identification of each disconnect required. This marking to be of sufficient durability to withstand the environment (panels in control room) 3) Ground Stairs 4) Replace LFMC in two locations where it has pulled away from fitting 5) Installer on site making corrections (Christina Ziegler) Inspectors Name: Cyrus Tuchscher Phone Number: 970-625-5085 Date: 05-0CT -09 COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES 1580 Logan St. Suite 550 Denver, Colorado 80203-1941 Phone: (303) 894-2985 https://www .dora.state. co. us/pls/rea]/Ep _Web _Inspection_ GUl.Process_Page 12/14/2009 West Slope Testing & Inspection LLC 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Date: 1-20-10 Client: Kinder Morgan Inspection Report Report#l Page 1 of 1 Project: Conn Creek Compressor Station Main Compressor Building Address: Garfield County, CO Building Permit No.: 10706 Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report: Started visual inspection & testing of the high strength bolting for proper tightness at the main frame column, rafter, and pipe strut connections. However after testing bolts for proper tightness at four connections the inspection was discontinued, as loose or under tighten bolts were discovered at all of the four connections inspected/tested. It would be recommended that the building erector or another contractor go back thru and tighten or verify bolt tightness on all of the A325 high strength bolted connections. Note there did not appear to be any special bolt tightening requirements on the building manufactures plans, but bolts would need to be tightened to a minimum of snug tight as per AISC requirements. High strength bolting would need to be reinspected after bolts were properly tightened. Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young JAN 2 8 2010 GAF<Fif::LU COUI\!TY BUILDiNG & PLANNiNG West Slope Testing & Inspection LLC 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Date: 1-20-10 Client: Kinder Morgan Inspection Report Project: Conn Creek Compressor Station Generator Building Address: Garfield County, CO Building Permit No.: 10708 Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report#! Page 1 of 1 Report: Started visual inspection & testing of the high strength bolting for proper tightness at the main frame colunm, rafter, and crane beam connections. However after testing bolts for proper tightness at four connections the inspection was discontinued, as two loose bolts were discovered that could be turned by hand, and there was not a tall enough ladder available to reach the rafter peak connections. It would be recommended that the building erector or another contractor go back thru and tighten or verity bolt tightness on all of the A325 high strength bolted connections. Note there did not appear to be any special bolt tightening requirements on the building manufactures plans, but bolts would need to be tightened to a minimum of snug tight as per AISC requirements. High strength bolting would need to be reinspected after bolts were properly tightened. JAN 2 S Z01D G~HF!F'LU COUNTY Bl)\L6lN-(; & PU\NN~NG West Slope Testing & Inspection LLC 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Phone:970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Final Inspection Report Date: 2-24-10 Client: Kinder Morgan Page 1 of 1 Project: Conn Creek Compressor Station Main Compressor Building Address: Garfield County, CO Building Permit No.: 10706 Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report: Reinspected the high strength bolting at the angle bracing connections, as noted in the last report. The high strength bolting reinspected as outlined above now appeared to be in significant conformance with the building manufactures plans, and appeared to meet the quality requirements of the AISC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts. To the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspectionlreinspection of the high strength bolting as outlined in reports 1 thru 3. Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young West Slope Testing & Inspection LLC 3177 Glendam Dr. ---.: .. :.J ('~OUI\l'TY C1UiUJ!1· •··. :.~~. PL..t\Hi'-JlNG Report#2 Grand Junction, CO 81504 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 Page 1 of 1 Inspection Report Date: 2-17-10 Client: Kinder Morgan Project: Conn Creek Compressor Station Main Compressor Building Address: Garfield County, CO Building Permit No.: 10706 Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report: Visually inspected/reinspected the high strength bolting at the main frame, end wall frame, portal frame, and angle bracing connections. Also randomly tested some of the high strength bolting for proper tightness. The high strength bolting inspected & tested as outlined above appeared to be in significant conformance with the building manufactures plans, and appeared to meet the quality requirements of the AlSC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts except as noted below. 1) Noticed the center bolts were missing at the roof level angle bracing. Also some bolts still needed tightened at one angle bracing connection rooflevel West end. The onsite personnel with Kinder Morgan were made aware of these bolts, and they would need to be reinspected before a final report can be issued. Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young West Slope Testing & Inspection LLC 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 MAR () 4 20iD Final Inspection Report Date: 2-17-10 Client: Kinder Morgan Project: .Conn Creek Compressor Station Generator Building Address: Garfield County, CO Building Permit No.: I 0708 Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report#2 Page 1 of 1 Report: Visually inspected/reinspected the high strength bolting at the main frame, end wall frame, and portal frame column & rafter connections. Also randomly tested some of the high strength bolting for proper tightness. The high strength bolting inspected & tested as outlined above appeared to be in significant conformance with the building manufactures plans, and appeared to meet the quality requirements of the AISC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts. To the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspection/reinspection of the high strength bolting as outlined above. West Slope Testing & Inspection LLC 3177 Glendam Dr. Grand Junction, CO 81504 Phone: 970-434-6988 Cell: 970-260-2844 MAR 0 4 2010 Final Inspection Report Date: 2-17-10 Client: Kinder Morgan Project: Conn Creek Compressor Station Auxialary Building Address: Garfield County, CO Building Permit No.: 10707 Inspection of shop fabrication or field work at job site: Field Report#l Page 1 of 1 Report: Visually inspected/reinspected most of the high strength bolting at the main frame, end wall frame, and portal frame column & rafter connections. Also randomly tested some of the high strength bolting for proper tightness. The high strength bolting inspected & tested as outlined above appeared to be in significant conformance with the building manufactures plans, and appeared to meet the quality requirements of the AISC Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts. To the best of my knowledge this completes the special inspection/reinspection of the high strength bolting as outlined above. Inspector/Technician: Douglas E Young 1111 Ml'l. P'ltr,M,HIL~!.~Lrll(,~f.i'f\,'lo!ll. ~·~·~ IIIII Reception#: 724880 . 06!05/2007 04:20:41 PM B: 1934 P: 0223 Jean Alberico 1 of 7 Reo Fee:$36.00 Doc Fee:0,00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT GRANT TO TRANSCOLORADO GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY KNOW ALLMENBYTHESEPRESENTS: That Savage Limited Partnership, ("Grantor"), for itself, its successors, or assigns, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, do hereby grant, convey and confirm unto, TRANSCOLORADO GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, whose address is P. 0. Box 281304, Lakewood, CO 80228-8304, its successors and assigns (collectively, "Grantee"), an Exclusive Easement for the installation, construction, maintenance, alteration, repair, replacement, reconstruction, operation, upgrade, and removal of a natural gas compressor station, including, but not limited to, buildings, guardrails, fences, and both underground and aboveground gas pipelines (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Gas Equipment'~, on a tract ofland being 6.098 acres situated in tbe SW/4 of Section 5, Township 7 South, Range 97 West, of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Garfield and State of Colorado, as further described aod shown on the attached Exhibit "A". This Exdusive Easement Grant is subject to a recorded Letter Agreement executed on the i:tt. day of Z>upc , 2007 by and between Grantor and Grantee. Grantee, at all times, shall have the right of access by the pipeline route, the access road shall be improved with a gravel surface, the road will parallel the pipeline to the Exclusive Easement described above for all pwposes and uses described herein, including the right to survey, inspect and test its Gas Equipment. Grantee shall have exclusive possession of only that area of land actually fenced in, not to exceed the described 6.098 acres. This Exclusive Easement and rights hereby granted are exclusive within the fenced area (except as noted below) and are subject to any and all other existing easements, exceptions, reservations, encumbrances, rights-of-way, variances and/or agreements physically either of record or evidenced on Grantor's premises, and are granted without any warranty of title, express or implied, by Grantor. If a third party desires to cross said easement paralleling existing pipelines, they may do so with prior approval from Grantee. Such approval will not be unreasonably withheld. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said Exclusive Easement unto Grantee for an initial term of 20 years with an option to renew for two additional 20 year terms. It is understood that thls grant of an Exclusive Easement does not constitute a conveyance of the land described herein or of the minerals therein and thereunder but grants only the rights provided above. Grantee's Gas Equipment shall be designed, constructed, tested, and operated in accordance with applicable safety rules and regulations published by federal and/or state regulatory agencies having jurisdiction. If no such government safety rules apply, then applicable industry standards and practices shall be complied with. Upon WJUest from Grantor or the owner of any of the land crossed by or situated within five hundred feet (500~ of said Gas Equipment, Grantee will provide written certification that the Gas Equipment was so designed, constructed, and tested and is being so maintained and operated. 1111 WP'l. ~~~.HH .~r.to~l,r+N,t-rl~~ ~~~ .1~~~·~ IIIII Receptionij: 724880 06/05/2007 04:20:41 PM 8: 1934 P: 0224 Jean Alberico 2 of 7 Rae Fea:$36.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Grantor: Grantee: Savage Limited Partnership 5953 CR320 Rifle, CO 81650 TransColorado Gas Transmission Company P.O. Box 281304 Lakewood, CO 80228-8304 Attention: Land and Right-of-Way Dept. Or Physical Address: 370 Van Gordon Street Lakewood, CO 80228-8304 Attention: Land and Right-of-Way Dept. In the event that Grantee shall fail to perform any of the terms, conditions, or covenants herein or pay the specific considerations when due, and such default shall exist for thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice of such default to Grantee from Grantor, then Grantee shall be deemed to have breached this agreement and the Grantor shall be entitled to pursue any and all remedies allowed or permitted by law. Except as otherwise agreed in writing, no waiver by Grantor of any breach by the Grantee of any of its obligations, or covenants hereunder shall be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent or continued breaeb of the same of any other covenant, agreement or obligation, nor shall any forbearance by Grantor to seek a remedy for any breach by the Grantee be deemed a waiver by Grantor of its right or remedies with respect to such breach. Grantee shall not be liable, however, for claims of normal damages to the Property, caused by Grantee's enjoyment and/or exercise of its rights contained in the Exclusive Easement Grant, and in no event shall Grantee be liable for consequential or punitive damages. Grantor is not the owner of the entire surface estate. Savage Limited Partnership 1, a Colorado limited partnership shall act as surface owner representative. Joan L. Savage, c/o Savage LP, Daniel W. Strooek, c/o Savage LP and Sue van de Bovenkamp, c/o Savage LP (each, a "surface owner" and together, "Surface Owners'), and Surface Owners do hereby agree to designate Savage LP as their Surface Owners Representative. Further, Grantor has a Surface Use Agreement with OXY USA. OXY USA has agreed that Grantee's exclusive use of the described 6.098 acres is acceptable and does not constitute a significant impediment to its uses The covenants and conditions herein contained and all of the provisions of this Letter Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their respective heirs, representatives, successors or assigns. No change of Grantor's ownership in the Property shall enlarge the obligations or diminish the rights of Grantee, and furthermore, no such change in ownership in the Property shall be binding on Grantee until thirty (30) days after Grantee has been furnished with the original or a certified copy of the recorded instrument or instrmnents necessary to evidence such change in ownership. Without further consideration, Grantor and Grantee agree to execute such further documents and take such further actions as may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the pnrpose of this Letter Agreement. This Letter Agreement and the Exclusive Easement Grant contain the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto, and supersede all prior agreements and understandings, P"!''" J efS 1111 Wlr\"'~~~HlL~Ua.l!,~l+l(n-fll:l'ltil ~~~~·~·y IIIII Recept!onH: 724880 06/05/2007 04:20:41 PM B: 1934 P: 0225 Jean Alberico 3 of 7 Rae Fee:$36.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Grantee shall take full responsibility tor protecting its facilities from flood and from any water 'that originates in the irrigation ditch that crosses the land used by Grantee. Grantors retain the full right of access to the existing irrigation ditch for use and maintenance and other ranching purposes. Grantee Hereby assumes all liability for and agrees to pay for all damages, including enviromnental damages, and all losses resulting from such injuries and damages arising out of and directly attributable to Grantee's, its agents or assigns use of the Grantor's property, and agrees to indemnify Grantor and save Grantor harmless from any and all claims, demands, and causes of action for damage to property or injury to or death of persons or for environmental damage, including any claims arising under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and other applicable federal and state environmental laws, which may in any way result from, the Grantee's actions except to the extent that such claims, demands, or causes of action result from Grantor's negligence or willful misconduct In the event of release of contamination on Grantor's lands from Grantee's pipeline or from the Gas Equipment used by or for the benefit of Grantee, reganlless of the cause or circumstances of such release, Grantee shall immediately notify Grantors of such release. Grantee agrees to remove such cootamination and to restore the su:r:fuce of the land as nearly as is practicable to the condition in which it existed prior to such release. In case of the permanent abandomnent of this Exclusive Easement by Grantee, Grantee shall remove all above ground Gas Equipment, restore the surface of the land as nearly as is practicable to the condition in which it existed prior to the installation and constrnetion of the Gas Equipment, and file in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado real property records a release instrument releasing all rights in said Exclusive Easement to Grantor. Grantee shall provide a survey plat to Grantors showing Grantors property lines and the lands and fucilities proposed by Grantee. After constrnetion, Grantee shall provide to Grantors, a surveyed as-built plat of the facilities and access road. The rights granted herein shall not be assigned by Grantee without the prior written consent of Grantors., Any purported assignment made without the prior written consent of Grantor is void The rights granted herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, succesaors, assigns, and legal representatives. The obligations undertaken by Grantee hereunder shall be deemed covenants running with the land. This instnnnent may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same force and legal effect as if all executions were of one single instrument IN W11NESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set its hand this 5' day of ~~ , 2007. GRANTOR: GRANTEE: SAVAGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP TRANSCOLORADO GAS ~~COMPANY 1< ~· V\ ot *--'" m {>I" 00--'1'1 A.~L\: 't-\<A)r('1 G olll:eV', Lo..h~Ll:sep+. 1 D· ~ox: c)_.~ 13o4 lo1.eu.)oocL C'.o <:c oJ;x~-S3o~ I 1111 ~~i,~,H/I,~,,~L~~~~~~Ialh:~~~ IIIII Reception~: 724880 0q/~5/2007 04:20:41 PM B: 1934 P: 0226 Jean Alberico 4 of 7 Rec Fe&:$36.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATEOFCOLORADO ) ) ss COUNTY OF GJ>,-£ PI c:LP ) On this 1(, r-M day of Jv.. fW, , 2007 before me, a notary public, in and for said count} and state, personally came the above:Jl!uned 0 o CVV\ l, :5:,~Q_ > personally known to me to be the same person who executed the foregoing instr t and who has acknowledged the executton of the same as representative on behalf of, and as the free act and deed of said Partnership IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my notary seal the day and year last above written. My Commission Expires A :y ~ \ \ 1 'Zo \ I Notary Public /t J cJu.-, )JJYJJ STATEOFCOLORADO ) ) ss COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) On thisiffiay of _ ,.JO!J7 b¢~e me, a notary public, in and for said,counf.¥,-and state, personally came e a e-named,~&/1~ ~/'!"'~~1.8rA'~,Y ___ ofTRANSC LORADO GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, personally known to me to be the same person who executed the foregoing instrument and who has acknowledged the execution of the same as representative on behalf of, and as the free act and deed of said corporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my notary seal the day and year last above written. CHARLES H. JOHNS JR. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 31112ill1 My Commission Expires ~~001/ / N Public EXHIBIT"A" TRANSCOLORADO PROPOSED SITE A TRACT OF LAND, LYING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 97 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 5, A FOUND GLO BRASS CAP; THENCE NORTH 25°46' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2454.0 FEET MORE OR LESS, THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S 82°25' W A DISTANCE OF 575.0 FEET; THENCE N 07"35' W A DISTANCE OF 500.0 FEET; THENCE N 82"25' E A DISTANCE OF 500.0 FEET; THENCE S 07°35' E A DISTANCE OF 186.3 FEET; THENCE S 21"09' E A DISTANCE OF 138.6 FEET; THENCE N 82°25' E A DisTANCE OF 42.5 FEET; THENCE S 07°35' E A DISTANCE OF 179.0 FEET, TO THE POINT 0~ BEGINNING: BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS UTM ZONE 13 (NAD83) GRID NORTH TIED TO THIS SURVEY BY COMMON GPS METHODS. CONTAINING 265625 SQUARE FEET OR 6.098 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FOR AND ON THE BEHALF OF TransColorado Gas Transmission Company KINDER MORGAN, INC. CALVIN HEINLY COLORADO PLS 23501 'F:\Civi!JD Projects\! 0600500· TmnsColorado\PDF _PLA TS\1 (){i00500-eonn-erk_BDY.doc Last printed 4/612007 10:25 PM Lllslsaved by Calvin Heinly ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' Reception~: 724880 I 06/05/2007 04:20:41 PM 8: 1934 P: 0228 Jean Alberico 6 of 7 Rec Ft~e:$36.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT"B" . PROPOSED SITE SECTION 05, T07S, R97W, 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CONTAINING 6.098 ACRES MORE OR LESS "·~ ! j i SW1/4 I'( :---L-(t CREEK ! SECTION 05, T07S, R97W j 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN EXISTING : GARFIELD COUNTY 1\ \! 'ffiANSCOLORAOO ) COLORADO PIPEliNE , ~ i f----~--------~----------!---------------------- \ f<o --i , :f.XISTlNG N (\ ! PRPOSED -1RACK " PR~tm~ ! -TRANSCOLORDO • CONN CREEK ~ . ' SITE < ~% ! \ .\i ~ D ' ~ f ~\ i&oy~~ASS CAP IJ.BD~ QUARTER CORNER ,\ l~ECTION 5, T7S, R97W, 6TH PM -f- StM ( '?J\ /~ ~ .• ~ . B \ o-~,-·-§ /}' ""' I -, "'"' , ... _ .......... .... . ...... • F I ~-l ~......... ..... ....... ,.., .. ........ ..... -~ ...... TR 'OLOR I'\ DO , .... , SIT A I -"":::" ...,...., ..,..,._ ~~··:' I'' u v I .......... .--r'-'>.-..... -·· -::I ,I ~ ... --..... " "l· ~-' r::·i -~ ~J ~J _::·:-"l:-::::t: __ :~-: -~ 7 VICINITY MAP VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE COOODINATES AND 5EARINGS SHD\\'N HEREON ARE Vl\.1 ZONE 13, NAD 6J DISTANCES St!O\\N HEREOO ARE GRIP VISTANCES. SCALE 1"=1000' El£VA110NS SHO\\W HEREON ARE NOVO R8. PRo.ECT COORP!NAID ANC ElEVA liONS ~RE EST.IJlUSH£0 8'1' OPS 08Sf:RVATIONS, USING 0 1000 20 1 00FEEl OPUS TECHIIIOO£S IN ACCORDANCE \1\iH NATIONAL CEOOETIC SUR'Ic!Y SPI:OflCATIONS. BASIS Of 8EARmG: \ln.l ZON£ 13 (NAOBJ) GRID NORTH TIED TO lliiS SURVEY USING GPS METHODS. Ull.! ZONE 13 (NAOBJ) 11-IIS DRAWING IS fOR 1Nf"ORMA110NA\. PURPOSES ONLY ANO IS TO US SURVEY FEET DE;PICT lliE LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON AND IS NOT NAD SJ INTENDED TO REPRESENT A MONUMENTEO LAND SURVEY. Jffi'AAWS¥: KINDER,...ORGAt! TRANSCOLORADO ck CONN CREEK SEC. 05, T07S, R97W, 6th P.M. SCALE OAlt REV. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1'.,1000' 4{'26/2006 D SHEET 2 OF 2 Alliance Engineering W.O. I DRA'M'l CHK. OR. xxxxx C. HEINlY C. HEINlY fiLE ~~600500·CONN·CRK_BDY II WO<><IC•wpComp<ll)" coo JOO I PROJECT ENGR. PROJECl MGR. 10600500 A OIAZ K. HACKMAN "'M>t I 1111 Wlli. N.~l'lr/,HIL~I .~! .~1-r\Ciiil: l~ii.lr+~:~·~ IIIII ReceptlonH! 724880 0S/0S/2007 04:20:41 PM S: 1934 P: 0229 Jean Albarlc:o 7 ,of 7 Reo Fae:$36.00 Doc Fae:0.00 GARFIELD COUNT\' CO \ I SCALE 1"=100' 100 200 ff:El UTU ZONE 13 (NAOBl) US SUR'I!Y FEET NAO 83 Alliance Engineering /o.Wood()roo;>~y ,.., .... EXHIBIT "8 .. PROPOSED SITE SECTION 05, T07S, R97W, 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CONTAINING 6.098 ACRES MORE OR LESS N 82'25' £ soo.o' - EXISTING TRANSCOLORADO PIPELINE SW1/4 SECTION 05, T07S, R97W 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN GARFIELD COUNTY COLORADO EXISTING RMNG PIPELINE 265624.9 SQ. FT. 6.098 ACRES N 82'25' E 42.5 lll TIE FROM THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF )_j~ SECTION 5 IS N 25'46' W 2454.0' ::j <.0 o. I'- TRI!.IirLOifDO SIT I'I'W\ JL VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE / COOI<DINII!ES AND SEAR!IIGS S!lO'IItl llEREOO ARE U'O.I ZOOE \3, NAO 113. DISTANct:S SHOIIW HER!:W ARE CillO O!STNlCES. E\£'/ATIONS SHO'IItl NER€00 A.RE llGVD 88. PRo..ECT COOIIOJN"n;s AND E!.EVATIOOS ~\ERE ESTA8USHEO SY CPS 08SERVA'Il0NS, USING CPUS TEWNIQIJES Ill ACCOROANO:: 'MTH NATION.'.!. GEOOEllC SUR'<tY SP€0ACATIONS. SASS OF SEARING: UT!.I ZONE 1.'1 (N.I.OB3) GlliO NOOll'l 11£0 TO nilS SUR\IEY USIN\> CPS YtTHOOS. nilS DRA'MNG IS FOR INFORMA110NAL PURPOSE"S ONlY AND IS TO DEPICT THE LEGA\.. DESCRIPTION SHO""" HEREON AND IS NOT INTf:NOEO TO REPRESENT A MONUMENT£0 LAND SUR~Y. TRANSCOLORADO CONN CREEK SEC. 05, T07S, R97W, 6th P.M. SCALE1 , __ 100, OA11' 0 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ~~~~~MW~,/~26~fi~~~-h~~~~ SHEET10F2 REV. W.O. I DRAI'II'l CHK. DR. coo . .X>J 1 PRO~CT ENGR. PROJ:C1 MGR. m£ ~~600500·CONN-CRK_BDY \0600500 A. D!AZ K. HACKMAN 'fXIXX C. HEINLY C. HEINLY I Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information t\$§eS$or/Ir~<!S1,1HeTPioP~rtyS~<m,;h I Assessor Subset Q!!ITy I Asse~.soLSales Search C:lexk ~ R~Gord~rR~GsmtionSe<~r~:h Basic Building Characteristics. I Jax Information Parcel Detail I Value Det<~il I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Det<~il Land Detail I Photo_graphs J TaxArea JJ Account Number JJ Parcel Number JJ Mill Levy J I o29 II R290460 II 241108200011 II 28.203 I Owner Name and Mailing Address JsA V AGE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I JATTN: JOHN SAVAGE J5953 COUNTY ROAD 320 JRIFLE, CO 81650 Legal Description jSECT,TWN,RNG:8-7-97 DESC: SEC 5-TR I j38(159.99A) SEC 8&9 TR 39(19.64A) I jTR 40 DESC: (160A) TR 41(40A) TR I 42(120A) SEC 17-TR 48(160A) DESC: SEC 18&19-TR49(160A) * STROOCK, jDANIEL W. 10%; ERPF, SUE STUART I jMORTIMORE & BOVENKAMP, VANDE 3.025% I PRE:R290133 BK:0307 PG:0479 BK:1934 PG:223 RECPT:724880 BK: 1927 PG:411 jRECPT:723469 BK:1637 PG:811 I RECPT:663103 BK:1586 PG:805 RECPT:651929 BK:0989 PG:0646 li'l3K:o905 PG:0248 BK:0785 PG:0346 jBK:0748 PG:0347 BK:0748 PG:0335 I jBK:0682 PG:0484 BK:0659 PG:0580 I http://www .garcoact.comlassessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2411 08200011 10/5/2007 Parcel Detail Location I Physical Address: IITWN 7 RGE 97 SEC 5,8,9-I I Subdivision: j I Land Acres: 11819.63 I I Land Sq Ft: jlo I Section II Township II Range I I 8 II 7 II 97 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 27,42011 7,9501 I Improvements: II oil 0 I Total: II 27,420/1 7,950/ IJ=I =======Sa=le~D~a=te~: I J Sale Price: / Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential !o I Buildings: Number of Commllnd !o I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I I 2006 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($244.24)1 I 2006 II Tax Amount II $244.241 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($311.24)1 2005 II Tax Amount II $311.241 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($345.78)1 2004 II Tax Amount II $345.78/ 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($422.68)1 2003 II Tax Amount II $422.681 II http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=241108200011 Page 2 of3 10/5/2007 Parcel Detail Page 3 of 3 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($434.20)1 2002 II Tax Amount II $434.201 2001 Tax Payment: Whole ($430.50)1 2001 Tax Amount $430.501 I 2000 Tax Payment: Whole ($537.08)1 I 2000 Tax Amount $537.081 I 1999 I Tax Payment: Whole ($665.38)1 I 1999 II Tax .Amount II $665.381 TopofP<!gQ Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Se~_<;;h..Q.ptions (:Jerk & Recorder D.ambase Search Op.tions The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Tums Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Qood Turns Softwa.m. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2411 08200011 10/5/2007