HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitMEMO
RE: Cancellation BLRE-9-09-1279/6124 Addition @ 160 River Glen, Aspen Glen Club Villas
On November 18, 2010, I contacted owner David Hoperaft who informed me the property has been sold,
therefore cancelling the project. Mr. Hoperaft gave verbal permission to close the file and dispose of the
plans.
David Bartholomew, Plans Examiner
Garfield County Building & Planning
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8'h Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
wv ww7v. gavel d -c o un ty. cog
1
Parcel No: (this information is available at the assessors office 970-945-9134)
'7---' 1 q1 o4 e>6 e..
Job Address: (if an address has not been assigned, please pro ° e ,Er, wy or Street Name & City) or and legal description
Cao R-lv EAL G r. -F IJ te Co 8/i0A3
2
3
Lot No: Block No: Subdi Exemption:
t!(~4-) 6 VILI S fi1L- 5 k5Pix1 6c -E")
4
Owner: (property 13 wner)
DAwrE k--IIL.t_ KOPtLF,
Mailing Address:
kpa 12 -iv 6,c..E,3 6141 l t,133z1
Ph:
£Z4 ? C 41
Alt Ph,
5
Contractor:
Lt X1 1�L..4L,
Mailing Address:
(46e bd.
Pl.
yTT70v41
Alt Ph:
6
Architect / Engineer:_
< kr, -.hr.) AR,Cft1 i �L1 v&
Mailing Address: /
re, 6dk lO31 CaLEhIu`,do�
Ph: a 4,1 1 6 5_
c/70
Alt Ph:
7
Sq. Ft. of Building:
At, 2 , 4r b / tib
Sq, Ft. or Acres of Lot:
, 54-z. -e
s -
Height:
2.4" - t.pr�r, MAI.)
No. of Floors:
Z.
8
Use of Building:n IXici •
..e.) , J F M t 4y R- E 5 t b I�..�i t -E
9
Describe Work:\\ L 1 fAf y
l b t A N 1 � f- X t c P I. 4, 1'x`'.5 t, to+ ..4-) 4-- E. — �iILQQ,4A. t .er ,
10
r .
Class of Work: T ( '�, f - Al p„1i , I - ` cf.
❑ New o Alteration Addition 1 " ';'"`"`
11
Garage:
Attached o Detached
Septic:
o ISDS Community
12
Driveway Permit: 1 t /ilk
/.r
Owners valuation of Work: $ 5 q CP
O
Authorih.
This application for a Building Permit must be signed by
letter of authority, signed by the Owner. must be provided
A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal
/
NOTICE -
the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized anent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate
with this Application.
and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Depanment.
Electrical Permit. (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another pemtit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or
Discharge Penna.
authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180
CERTI FICATION
contained above is true and correct. h understand that the Building Department accepts the Application. along with the plans
based upon my certification as to accuracy.
a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on
and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal. state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building
Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County. if the location,
are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law.
described above. to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the
if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or faciltiy(ies) if such is in violation
work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors. omissions
compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without
THE NOTICE & CERTIFFICATION ABOVE:-
.- - r�
1--.-F 1 - , .70 9
Le al Access.
Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required: (I) Stale
County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater
Vivid Permit. A Building Permit becotnes null and void if the work
I hereby certify
and specifications
Assuming
the submittals
In consideration
Code, ISDS
construction
1 hereby grant
Building Official
of Count^
Review of
or discrepancies.
limitation
HEREB
days after commencement.
that I have read this Application and that the information
and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals),
completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application,
reviewed by the Building Department
of the issuance of the Building Pentair. I agree that I
regulations and applicable land use regulations (County
or use of the structure(s) and facility(ies), described above,
permission to the Building Department to enter the property,
from. (1) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals.
Regulations) or any other applicable lave.
this Application, including submittals. and inspections of the
As the Owner. !acknowledge that responsibility for
my architect designer. engineer and/ or builder.
' NOWLED a- ^ - t • D AND UNDERSTAND
OWNERS SIG' ' ' E DATE
STAFF USE ONLY
Special Conditions:
° f '` ,, c f. Ce -4-e - FDP4 - G e a.3
Adjusted Valuation:
72010:
Plan Check Fee:
.6.1&-.66r
Permit Fee:
.76 i
Manu home Fee:
Mise Fees:
ISDS Fee:
P(�
To al Fees:
6 7.64'
t
Fe es
Pa'
Iici
Due:
8/4,1'5-
BP NoIssue Date:
&Balance
ISDS No & Issued Date:
—12 9
PiA-
Setbacks;
OCC Group:
ltf&
Const Type:
IF&
Zo sing:
l' cern
BL DEPT:
P NG DEPT:
AP ROYAL" DATE
APPROVAL DATE
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection:
I) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector.
2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the
structure and where readily visible from access road.
3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows
installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all
necessary plumbing.
4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running
water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door.
5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks
over 3.0" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails.
6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building;
7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of
Occupancy may be issued conditionally.
8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED.
OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED.
OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN
ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES
UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a
C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit.
Bapplicationdeccnnbcr2007
DATE
Building Plan Review
Description of Work: Single family addition to existing residence.
Bin #: C-4
Location Address:
CARBONDALE, CO
General Information
Contacts
Case Manager: Ken Smith
Plan Case Number: BLDG -9-09-6124
Parcel: 239319104006
Application Date: 09/23/2009
Owner: David & Jill Hoperaft
Applicant: David & Jill Hoperal3
Applicant Phone: 321-624-2647
Email: dhoperoft@instantsof
Building
Engineered Foundation
Driveway Permit
Surveyed Site Plan
Septic Permit and Setbacks
Grade/Topography 30%
Attach Residential Plan Review List
Minimum Application Questionnare
Subdivision Plat Notes
Fire Department Review
Valuation Determination/Fees
Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
Attach Conditions
Application Signed
Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
Parcel/Schedule No.
40# Snowload Letter - Manu. Homes
Soils Report
Planning/Zoning
Property Line Setbacks
30ft Stream Setbacks
Flood Plain
Building height
Toning Sign -off
Road Impact Fees
HOAIDRC Approval
Grade/Topography 40%
Planning Issues
Subdivision Plat
General Comments:
eArlform
L6V`dC�
a ('R'1
Ots-Alx 16.a)
4 72 x 74.66
N411831t(
2l .a?
3$e)
or4 MAO_ 6W4 4
Thursday, September 24, 2009
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and
it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the
delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall
be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line
for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been
provided to the Building Department.
TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE
SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project
and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design
professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your
project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a
Colorado Registered Design Professional.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing
and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during
design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at
time of application for a permit. ,
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least I8"x24" and drawn
to scale.
1
PIans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks,
balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and
original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed,
wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your
plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2003 IRC, and 2006 IECC.
I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to
the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor
and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of
30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the
placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously
surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor
and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be
built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a
copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located
within the envelope.
Yes Y..
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility
easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the
property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do
apply.
Yes )(
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal
System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent
144 properties), streams or water courses?
Yes
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the
property?
Yes
2
5. Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and/ or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this
property?
Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No k - AVAT
6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof
of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your
right to use a private easementlright of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept.
of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any
combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for
other agencies
Yes
7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel
in accordance with the 1RC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes y
8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the
clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes )C No
9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and
soffits?
Yes X No
I0. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum
of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind
loads?
Yes
11. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
Yes k
12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists,
roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes
13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all
columns and beams?
Yes
14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the
undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top
of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet)
Yes
15. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make
and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase 11 EPA certification?
Yes No
16. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply
with the IRC?
Yes No
17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from
sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes
18. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and
ventilation for all habitable rooms?
Yes k
19. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing
immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking
surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety
glazing for these areas?
Yes )C No
20. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on
the plan?
A Yes
21. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the
subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants?
Yes x
22. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to
obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting
an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without
it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in
revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans
have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either
revocation or substantial modification of the plans.
Yes
23. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes k No If no -Explain:
24. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes
4
25. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long?
N/A. Yes
26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code
requirements?
Yes
27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties
zone district?
Yes )`
28. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection
by the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes
29. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the
application of these changes?
Yes
30. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the
time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any
"Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit?
Yes
31. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the
requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be
made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in
to 384- 093.
Yes ) No
32. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a
$50.00 i e -inspection fee?
Yes A
33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including
approval4on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the
building?`
Yes X
5
34. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being
given for
an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC?
Yes
35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and
Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the
work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of
applicable inspection.
Yes x
36. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the
Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a
building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes
37. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety
issues?
Yes }` (please check with the building department about this requirement)
38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior
to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit?
Yes i<
39 . Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap
fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of
Wh a Certificate of Occupancy?
Yes
40. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that
the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such
a letter.
Yes
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of
Z 3 XPi Zoc7
Signature of Owner
Date
Phone: R-ia 3-7 (days); (evenings)
6
Project Name: Pe—P--d1= l 2-G-6 Alst t {io,3
Project Address: t 6L1/3 67[1,3 U{ D
Notes:
If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not
proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional
information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the
adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the
review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates
again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with
construction.
bpminregsfMar2009
7
08/05/2509 088:58 8774E47329
August 5th 2009
To whom it may concern
INSTANT SOFTWARE PAGE 01/01
David & Jill Hoperoft
160 River Glen Road
Carbondale, CO 81623
Please accept this document as confirmation that Brad Jordan is authorized to
represent us with respect to our proposed application on our Aspen Glen
property.
David B Hoperoft
• J,4.
o,AR�
PUBLIC :o
▪ // iimiiErt\ko
5/201200
Jill Hoperoft
Sheet
AR3.1
Scale
Date 10-2-09
A Custom Residence Addinon/Remodel for:
Dave & Jill Hoperoft
Lot 6, Filing i, A.G. Subdivision
Garfield County, Colorado
OItDAN ARCHITECTURE, INC.
410 20th Street, Suite 204, P.O. Box 1031, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
Phase: 970, 947.1837 Fax 970.9-47.0425 jutdanarchitect@sopdsatet
ARTICLE 111
ZONING
3-301 GENERAL RESTRICTIONS
E. Row House: For purposes of setback calculations, only those row houses
which do not share a common wall with an adjacent row house need observe the
required side yard setback for the district, provided that building code
requirements for this type of structure are observed; (Reso 2009-53)
F. Partially Developed Frontages: On a vacant lot bordered on two (2)
sides by previously constructed buildings which do not meet the required front
yard setback for the district, the required front yard setback for the vacant lot
shall be established as the averaged front yard setback of the two (2) adjacent
buildings; where a vacant lot is bordered on only one (1) side by a previously
constructed building which does not meet the required front yard setback for the
district, the required front yard setback for the vacant lot shall be established as
the averaged front yard setback of the adjacent building and the minimum front
yard setback for the district; (Reso 2009-53)
G. Projections: every part of a required hall be unobstructed from
ground level to the sky except for projections o architecturalfewer-e as follows:
cornices, sills and ornamental features -- twelve (12) inches; roof eaves - eighteen
(18) inches; uncovered porches, slabs and patios, walks, steps, fences, hedges
and walls - no restriction; fire escapes and individual balconies not used as
passageways may project eighteen (18) inches into any required side yard or
four (4) feet into any required front or rear yard; (Reso 2009-53)
H. Accessory Building in Required Rear Yard: An accessory building may
be located in a required rear yard provided that not more than forty percent
(40%) of the rear yard area is covered. Such building shall observe a seven and
one-half (7 1/2) foot setback from the rear lot line when there is not an adjacent
alley. An adjacent alley shall observe a ten (10) foot setback from lot line; (Reso
2009-53)
(d)
[. Accessory S#ructt i i Eti
following Section (K), "A
applies to the Rural RL (G-
fence,
Gfence, hedge or wall may
installation shall exceed e G` :t ,.
yard, nor shall any such st - EAv 5 ti`E
front yard. (Reso 2009-53)
-f c-z+o,i,} 3 - 3Q/
' "_'`-'"'``moi- required side yard or rear
:xcept as provided in the
icultural Property", which
, and DWC zone districts),
yard provided that no such
AtLcsan E it in height in any required
} J. Accessory Structures — Agricultural Property: a fence, hedge, or wall
may be located in any required yard of the Rural, RL (Gentle Slopes / Valley
Floor), and DWC zone districts provided that no such installation shall exceed
eight (8) feet in height and shall meet sight triangulation standards. A taller fence
may be approved by the Board of County Commissioners by obtaining a Limited
GARFIELD COUNTY UNIFIED LAND USE RESOLUTION OF 2008, AS AMENDED 3-15
C-46 ACI 530-02/ASCE 5-02/TMS 402-02
6.2.2.3.1.3 If anchored veneer with a
backing of cold -formed steel framing exceeds the height
above the noncombustible foundation given in Table
6.2.2.3.1, the weight of the veneer shall be supported by
noncombustible construction for each story above the
height limit given in Table 6.2.2.3.1.
Table 6.2.2.3.1- Height limit from foundation
Height at plate, ft (m)
Height at gable, ft (m)
30 (9.14)
38 (11.58)
6.2.2.3.1.4 When anchored veneer is
used as an interior finish on wood framing, it shall have a
weight of 40 lb/ft2 (1915 Pa) or less and be installed m
conformance with the provisions of this Chapter. �.
6.2.2.3.1.5 Exterior masonry veneer
having an installed weight of 40 psf (195 kg/m2) or less
and height of no more than 12 ft (3.7 m) are permitted to
be supported on wood construction when installed in
compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. A
vertical movement joint in the masonry veneer shall be
used to isolate the veneer supported by wood
construction from that supported by the foundation.
Masonry shall be designed and constructed so that
masorn-y is not in direct contact with wood. The
horizontally spanning element supporting the masonry
veneer shall be designed so that deflection due to dead
plus live loads does not exceed 1/600 nor 0.3 in. (7.6
mm).
6.2.2.3.2 When anchored veneer is
supported by floor construction, the floor shall be
designed to limit deflection as required in Section 1.10.1.
6.2.2.3.3 Provide noncombustible lin-
tels or supports attached to noncombustible framing over
all openings where the anchored veneer is not self-
pporting. The deflection of such lintels or supports
hall conform to the requirements of Section 1.10.1.
6.2.2.4ason tM-urrits shall be
at least 25/8 M. (66.7 mm) in actual thickness.
6.2.2.5 Anchor requirements
6.2.2.5.1 Corrugated sheet metal anchors
6.2.2.5.1.1 Corrugated sheet metal
anchors shall be at least 7/8 in. (22 mm) wide, have a base
metal thickness of at least 0.03 in. (0.8 mm), and shall
have corrugations with a wavelength of 0.3 to 0.5 in. (7.6
to 12.7 mm) and an amplitude of 0.06 to 0.10 in. (1.5 to
2.5 num).
6.2.2.5.1.2 Corrugated sheet metal
anchors shall be placed as follows:
(a) With solid units, embed anchors in the mortar joint
and extend into the veneer a minimum of 11/2 in..
(38.1 nun), with at least 5/8 in. (15.9 mm) mortar
cover to the outside face.
(b) With hollow units, embed anchors in mortar or grout
and extend into the veneer a minimum of 11/2 in.
(38.1 mm), with at least 5/8 in. (15.9 mm) mortar or
grout cover to the outside face.
6.2.2.5.2 Sheet metal anchors
6.2.2.5.2.1 Sheet metal anchors shall
be at least 74 in. (22.2 mm) wide, have a base metal
thickness of at least 0.06 in. (1.5 mm) and shall:
(a) have corrugations as given in Section 6.2.2.5.1.1, or
(b) be bent, notched, or punched to provide equivalent
performance in pull-out or push -through.
6.2.2.5.2.2 Sheet metal anchors shall
be placed as follows:
(a) With solid units, embed anchors in the mortar joint
and extend into the veneer a minimum of 11/2 in.
(38.1 mm), with at least 5/8 in. (15.9 mm) mortar
cover to the outside face.
(b) With hollow units, embed anchors in mortar or grout
and extend into the veneer a minimum of 11/2 in.
(38.1 mm), with at least 5/8 in. (15.9 nun) mortar or
grout cover to the outside face.
6.2.2.5.3 Wire anchors
6.2.2.5.3.1 Wire anchors shall be at
least wire size W1.7 (MW11) and have ends bent to form
an extension from the bend at least 2 in. (50.8 mm) long.
6.2.2.5.3.2 Wire anchors shall be
placed as follows:
(a) With solid units, embed anchors in the mortar joint
and extend into the veneer a minimum of 11/2 in.
(38.1 mm), with at least 5/8 in. (15.9 mm) mortar
cover to the outside face.
(b) With hollow units, embed anchors in mortar or grout
and extend into the veneer a minimum of 11/2 in.
(38.1 mm), with at least 5/8 in. (15.9 mm) mortar or
grout cover to the outside face.
6.2.2.5.4 Joint reinforcement
6.2.2.5.4.1 Ladder -type or tab -type
joint reinforcement is permitted. Cross wires used to
anchor masonry veneer shall be at least wire size W1.7
(MW11) and shall be spaced at a maximum of 16 in.
(406 mm) on center. Cross wires shall be welded to
longitudinal wires, which shall be at least wire size W1.7
6.2.2.5.4.2 Embed longitudinal wires
of joint reinforcement in the mortar joint with at least 5/8
in. (15.9 mm) mortar cover on each side.
6.2.2.5.5 Adjustable anchors
6.2.2.5.5.1 Sheet metal and wire
components of adjustable anchors shall conform to the
requirements of Section 6.2.2.5.1, 6.2.2.5.2, or 6.2.2.5.3.
Adjustable anchors with joint reinforcement shall also
meet the requirements of Section 6.2.2.5.4.
6.2.2.5.5.2 Maximum
between connecting parts of the tie shall be
311 X71 + l'2 i4Vv&I'
clearance
'/t6 in. (1.6
WALL CONSTRUCTION
TABLE R603.6(5)
HEADER TO KING STUD CONNECTION REQUIREMENTSa,b,c,d
HEADER SPAN
(feet)
BASIC WIND SPEED (mph), EXPOSURE
85 A/B or Seismic Design
Categories A, B, C and D
85 C or less than 110 A/B
Less than 110 C
4'
4 -No. 8 screws
4 -No. 8 screws
6 -No. 8 screws
> 4' to 8'
4 -No. 8 screws
4 -No. 8 screws
8 -No. 8 screws
>_8' to 12'
4 -No 8 screws
6 -No. 8 screws
10 -No. 8 screws
> 12' to 16'
4 -No. 8 screws
8 -No. 8 screws
12 -No. 8 screws
For SI: 1 inch - 25.4 mm, 1 foot = 304.8 mm, 1 mile per hour -1.609 km/h, 1 pound - 0 454 kg.
a. All screw sizes shown are minimum.
b. For headers located on the first floor of a two-story building, the total number of screws may be reduced by two screws, but the total number of screws shall be no
Tess than four.
c. For roof slopes of 6:12 or greater, the required number of screws may be reduced by half, but the total number of screws shall be no less than four.
d. Screws can be replaced by a up -lift connector which has a capacity of the number of screws multiplied by 164 pounds (e.g., 12 -No. 8 screws can be replaced by an
up -lift connector whose capacity exceeds 12 by 164 pounds = 1,968 pounds).
R603.7 Structural sheathing. In areas where the basic wind
speed is less than 110 miles per hour (177 km/h), wood structur-
al sheathing panels shall be installed on all exterior walls of
buildings in accordance with this section. Wood structural
sheathing panels shall consist of minimum 7/16 -inch (11.1 mm)
thick oriented strand board or 15/32 -inch (11.9 mm) thick ply-
wood and shall be installed on all exterior wall surfaces in ac-
cordance with Section R603.7.1 and Figure R603.3. The mini-
mum length of full height sheathing on exterior walls shall be
determined in accordance with Table R603.7, but shall not be
less than 20 percent of the braced wall length in any case. The
minimum percentage of full height sheathing in Table R603.7
shall include only those sheathed wall sections, uninterrupted
by openings, which are a minimum of 48 inches (1120 mm)
wide. The minimum percentage of full -height structural
sheathing shall be multiplied by 1.10 for 9 -foot -high (2743
mm) walls and multiplied by 1.20 for 10 -foot -high (3048 mm)
walls. In addition, structural sheathing shall:
1. Be installed with the long dimension parallel to the stud
framing and shall cover the full vertical height of studs,
from the bottom of the bottom track to the top of the top
track of each story.
2. Be applied to each end (corners) of each of the exterior
walls with a minimum 48 -inch -wide (1220 mm) panel.
R603.7.1 Structural sheathing fastening. All edges and in-
terior areas of wood, structural sheathing panels shall be fas-
tened to a framing member and tracks in accordance with
Table R603.3.2(1).
R603.7.2 Hold-down requirements. The percent of struc-
tural sheathing, required in Table R603.7, is permitted to be
multiplied by 0.6 where a hold down anchor with a capacity
of 4,300 pounds (1952.2 kg) is provided at each end of exte-
rior walls. A single hold-down anchor is permitted to be
installed at wall corners.
SECTION R604
WOOD STRUCTURAL PANELS
R604.1 Identification and grade. Wood structural panels
shall conform to DOC PS 1 or DOC PS 2. All panels shall be
identified by a grade mark or certificate of inspection issued by
an approved agency.
R604.2 Allowable spans. The maximum allowable spans for
wood structural panel wall sheathing shall not exceed the val-
ues set forth in Table R602.3(3).
R604.3 Installation. Wood structural panel wall sheathing
shall be attached to framing in accordance with Table
R602.3(1). Wood structural panels marked Exposure 1 orExte-
rior are considered water-repellent sheathing under the code.
SECTION R605
PARTICLEBOARD
R605.1Identification and grade. Particleboard shall conform
to ANSI A208.1 and shall be so identified by a grade mark or
certificate of inspection issued by an approved agency. Parti-
cleboard shall comply with the grades specified in Table
R602.3(4).
SECTION R606
GENERAL MASONRY CONSTRUCTION
R606.1 General. Masonry construction shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the provisions of this section or
in accordance with the provisions of ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS
402.
R606.1.1 Professional registration not required. When
the empirical design provisions of ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS
402 Chapter 5 or the provisions of this section are used to de-
sign masonry, project drawings, typical details and specifi-
cations are not required to bear the seal of the architect or en-
gineer responsible for design, unless otherwise required by
the state law of the jurisdiction having authority.
152 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE®
-5-
4) Continuous foundation walls should he reinforced top and bottom to spa
local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12
feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining strictures, if any, should also be
designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent
fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for predominantly granular soils as
back -fill.
5) Structural fill placed below the footing bearing level should consist of a
suitable granular material, such as pit run, compacted to at least 100% of
the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near
optimum. The fill should extend out from the footing edges a horizontal
distance greater than or equal to the depth of fill below the footing, but at
least 3 feet. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be prepared by
removing the vegetation, topsoil and clayey soils, adjusting the moisture
content to near optimum. and compacting to at least 95% of the maximum
standard Proctor density.
A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe and evaluate
the fill placement and compaction for compliance with the design
recommendations, and observe all footing excavations prior to concrete
placement to evaluate bearing conditions.
FLOOR SLABS
Compacted structural fill and the natural granular soils below the topsoil and clayey soils
are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of
some differential movement, non-structural floor slabs should be separated from all
bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical
movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage
cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be
established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum
4 -inch layer of sand and gravel should be placed beneath interior slabs for subgrade
Job No. 105 135
C --A tech
ILEJordan Architecture Incl
30 September 2009
Building & Planning Department
Garfield County, Colorado
Re: Hoperoft Addition
Attn: John and Ken,
Amendment to the Drawings -
The following changes have been made to comply with the Flood Plain Development
Submission. The revised sheet A2.2 illustrates the boulder wall has been moved out of
the flood plain and into the flood fringe. Upon this change; door #5 and the walkway on
the original plans and elevations will be removed. These changes shall be carried out
throughout the set of drawings, even though a complete revised set has not been
submitted.
Respectfully,
Brad JordareZ:
Principal Architect
410 20th Street, Suite 204 + P 0. Box 1031 a Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 • Phone: 970-9471837 + Fax: 970-947-0425
October 2, 2009
Mr. Brad Jordan
Jordan Architecture, Inc.
PO Box 1031
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: Floodplain Development Permit for Hoperoft House Addition, Aspen Glen,
Permit No. FDPA-9-09-6123
Dear Mr. Jordan,
We have reviewed the Floodplain Development Permit application and found the
application to be complete and compliant with the Garfield County Unified Land
Use Resolution of 2008.
Please find attached the Floodplain Development Permit for the Hoperoft House
Addition. Please note the conditions of approval attached to the permit, As you
are aware, a building permit will need to be obtained prior to the start of any
construction,
Feel free to call County Planning Engineer John Niewoehner or myself if you
have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Fred A, Jarman, CP, Director
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
(970) 945-8212
Attachment: Administrative Permit with Conditions of Approval
108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 •Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470
LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT
to
David and Jill Hoperoft.
for
Hoperoft House Addition Floodplain Development
(County Project No. FDPA-9-09-6123)
Parcel No. 2393-191-04-006
In accordance with and pursuant to Sections 3-401, 4-203, 4-503 and 7-701 of the Garfield
County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, the Director of the Building and
Planning Department hereby authorizes, by this Administrative Floodplain Development
Permit, the following activity:
In accordance with the plans submitted by Jordan
Architects on September 30, 2009, this permit allows the
construction of a 31 foot by 41 foot residential house
addition in the flood fringe of Roaring Fork River.
The house is located on Lot 6, Filing 5 within the Aspen
Glen Subdivision. The physical address of the house is
160 River Glen Road, Carbondale.
This Administrative Permit is issued subject to the conditions set forth. in Exhibit A (attached
hereto), and shall be valid only during compliance with such conditions and other applicable
provisions of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of2008, the Building Code,
and other regulations of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado.
BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT;
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
/15 eXy
Frecl A. Jarman, CP Date
Building & Planning Department, Director
EXHIBIT A
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT — Hoperoft
House Addition; Aspen Glen Subdivision, Lot 6 Filing 5
Owner: David and Jill Hoperoft
1. No $rade changes can occur or obstructions placed in the floodway identified
on the site plans.
2. In accordance with Section 7-203 of the County Land Use Resolution of 2008,
no land disturbance can occur within 35 -feet of ordinary high water line of the
stream. Prior to construction, -a silt fence must be placed along this 35 -foot
buffer line to .prevent sediment from entering the stream buffer and to also
remind equipment operators that they can not enter the buffer zone.
3. All representations made in the application shall be considered conditions of
approval, unless modified by this Exhibit A.
4. No alterations of the floodplain may be made other than the specific
improvements noted in the application.
5. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be designed (or
modified) and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral
movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads,
including the effects of buoyancy.
6. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by
methods and practices that minimize flood damage.
111111111111111111IIIII1111111111!Illi III 111111111 III!
678137 07/14/2005 0122P 51706 P321 M RL$DORF'
1 of 1 R 11.00 D 0.00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO
(,72j37
7Pia-i:Aspe4G/ 5
/.0-1-• A neiencied
Qer rcuymy Poarinersif
1,t1).
iN.e43 6MAt. r6 —Flieuxi
GarCieki Cc:A.014y
mak; 1.- Irl- X005
Fe -e,: II��
--xjraWer: 14 A
77,77772A T-Te7vor.ch-F,2:.vialz.
Fi 970-.945--79a3
SUBSOIL STUDY
FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 6, R1YERGLEN, ASPEN GLEN
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 195 135
FEBRUARY 16, 2005
PREPARED FOR:
JORDAN ARCHITECTURE
ATTN: KURT REYNA
410 201 STREET, SUITE 204
P.O. BOX 1031
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 31602
Parke. 303.341-7119 Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 0 Si? vertHorne 970-468-1.989
TABLE OF .OINTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - I -
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
ONSmRUrION
- 1 -
SITE CONDITIONS - 2 -
SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL - 2 -
FIELD EXPLORATION - 3 -
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 -
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 -
FOIJNDATIONS - 4 FLOOR SLABS -5-
SURFACE DRAINAGE - 6 -
LIMITATIONS - 6 -
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 5 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE AND 'SCOPE E u a i�`i {.iD 1
This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located
on Lot 6, iverglen, Aspen Glen, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown
on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recorrlrnendations for the
foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for
geotechnical engineering services to Jordan Architecture dated January 25, 2005.
A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain
information on the subsurface conditions, Samples of the subsoils obtained during the
field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification,
compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field
exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for
foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation.
This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions,
design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the
proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed residence will be a two story, wood frame structure with an attached garage
located on the lot as shown on Figure 1. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade. Grading
will involve filling the site to raise the structure to above the flood plain level shown on
Figure 1. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of
construction.
If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report.
Job No. 105 135
15Stech
-2 -
5177 CCONn1T :ON
The lot is located at the north end of the Riverg'len cul -de -sae and was vacant at the time
of our fiela exploration. The Roaring For'krRiver borders the site to the northeast. Fill
froiil roadway construction is _'located at the south side of the lot and the building area is
1
roughly 6 feet lower in elevation 1 anu1ac.
, the c- e-SThe building en elo Je is located on
a relatively flat topographic bench about 4 to 5 feet in elevation above the Roaring Fork
River and the site slopes gently down towards the river. Vegetation consists of grass with
scattered bvlliflw trees. Several rounded cobbles were visible on the ground surface.
SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL
Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen
development. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone
and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility
that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie
portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause
sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. During previous
geotechnical investigations for the subdivision development, several sinkholes were
observed scattered throughout mainly areas east of the Roaring Fork River. These
sinkholes appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of
the Roaring Fork River valley.
Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of
cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings
were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of
the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not
develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 6 throughout the service life of the
proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be aware of the
potential sinkhole risk. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below
the site is desired, we should be contacted.
Job No. 105 135
G -13 -tech
A ELI. EXPLORATION
Then
field exploration for the project was conducted on January 26, 200 3. wo
exaloratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate th
subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 -inch diameter continuous flight
augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. Hand -slotted, 11/4 -inch diameter
PVC pipe =las installed in Boring 2 down to the depth shown on Figure 2 for groundwater
level monitoring. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak
Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The
samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound
hammer -falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described
by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the
relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken
and the .penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings,
Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer
and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2.
The subsoils generally consist of between 1/2 to 1 foot of topsoil overlying relatively
dense, silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders (alluvium) down to the maximum
explored depth of 101/4 feet at Boring 1. A silty sand and clay layer, approximately 21/4
feet thick, was encountered between the topsoil and gravel at Boring 2. Drilling in the
dense gravel alluvium with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders
and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit.
Job No 105 135
Gtech
-4 -
Laboratory testing performed cm sampies obtained -iron the borings -included !mural
moisture content, density and gradation analyses, _esults o f swell -consolidation testing
performed on a relatively undisturbed drive sample of silty sandy clay, presented on
Figure 4, indicate re,latively high compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting.
��. of l t; 1. ,... S i"r, __�_ i 7 inch Results gradation analyses performed en a small diameter drive sample (minus 1%2 i.ncn
fraction) of the coarse granular subsoils are shown on Figure 5. The laboratory tAsling is
summarized in Table 1.
Free water was encountered in the borings at depths of 5 to 51/2 feet below the ground
surface. The subsoils above the groundwater level were moist to very moist.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the
nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread
footings bearing on the natural granular soils or compacted structural fill.
The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread
footing foundation system,
1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils or compacted
structural fill should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of
2,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed
and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less..
2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
Job No. 105 135
-5-
[
4) Continuous foundation walls should he -reinforced. 1 -A7410 -m to spa_:
local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12
feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures, if an should also y, _ lso be
designed to resist a lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent
fluid unit weigh of at least 45 pc;T forpre(iorninanQy granular soils as
rTl
5) Structural fill placed below the footing bearing level should consist of a
suitable granular _material, such as pit run, compacted to at least 100% of
the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near
optimum. The fill should extend out from the footing edges a horizontal
distance greater than or equal to the depth of fill below the footing, but at
least 3 feet. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be prepared by
removing the vegetation, topsoil and clayey soils, adjusting the moisture
content to near optimum and compacting to at least 95% of the maximum
standard Proctor density.
n; A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe and evaluate
the fill placement and compaction for compliance witli the design
recommendations, and observe all footing excavations prior to concrete
placement to evaluate bearing conditions.
FLOOR SLABS
Compacted structural fill and the natural granular soils below the topsoil and clayey soils
are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To reduce the effects of
some differential movement, non-structural floor slabs should be separated from all
bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical
movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage clue to shrinkage
cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be
established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum
4 -inch layer of sand and gravel should be placed beneath interior slabs for subgrade
Job No. 105 135
C -Gtech
_6_
swoon. ,. ,
This material should consist tle r�7ni��¢ � i:zrh aanrc+c�t �=�k-, _]+ 7„ t. 'noi
- - - - --_.--- '� x�u.i� v iu
retained on the No, 4 sieve and less than 12% nassi= g the No. 200 sieve.
Ali flll materials for support of 1001 slabs should be#cornpacted to at least O5°/ of
d
maximum standard Froctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required till
should. consist of granular soils devoid of vegetatioa, topsoil and oversized rock.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab caeas and to at least 90%
of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions, We
recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations
indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area.
Job No. 105 135
C t h
-7 -
Our s r ,'i ,s tiff �s li.ci' de yle erm�s�in the pre1 .., ., nt - - ossi _ _ c _ _
_. _.-- - --'_,__.., i,. ..� _vLliivii v.i'�J�iJ �'i�ti3,Y of ��11 X21! u.f'
other ;bioin!.2,ieal contaminants (ivlOBC` developing in til;,.. fi'n-Te, ;-FTh ri r,rit is
concerned about MOBC, then a professional inthis s� cial field of practices should
_ i- " ai�v iia t6 be
consulted. Our findings include in erpolstion and extrapolation si,bsurface.
conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface
conditions may not become evirl,_„ 4 µ t f t: . performed.
t it
iii; ' •:i, excavation is y:,riliiitlCCi. 11 conditions
encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we
should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
P_especthally Submitted,
HEP 4;i OR T H -1 AWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
•
Trevor L. Knell, P.E.
Reviewed by:
��jj„..•*,-s ,'fib a,1, _:^
J] ''
µ�rh
Steven L. Pawla`c, P.E . 2 ”, , ;
a 3-,,,:,,
y i
�1 J' �'� �� da' Y v!'
TLKJksw `_' ,}, �; R
aAV , -van„ : o m w '�`g-
Job No. 105 135
f f
1
LOT 5
7.150
BORING 1 '.,
LOT6
BORING 2
_ r �_
/ i'�
/ g j
/' / iIj
it ----
------"-1,---
w, t\✓_,/ — : \
_
• — \ / / > l
— i \ f
N
APPROXIMATE SCALE:
/" _ 40' (i'
LOT 7
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
105 135
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1
0
0
6000
5995
5990
5935
BORING 1
ELEV.= 5999'
37/12
33/12
+4=49
-200=8
10/0
BORING 2
ELEV.= 5999'
2
0
DD -36
NJC35.3
--200=58
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3.
6000
5995
5990
5985
Elevation — Feet
105 135
HEP WORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
Figure 2
LEGEND:
V'✓� TvE' JvL; silty ay, organic, rn.
W�
•I
37/12
SAND AND CLAY (SC—CL); Silty, stratified, loose/soft, moist tc very moist, brown_ Boring 2 only.
GRAVEL AND COBBLES (GP—GaiVi); with boulders, sandy, slightly silty to silty, .medium dense to dense.
moist to wet below groundwater level, brown, round to subround rocks.
Relativelyundisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample.
Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586.
Drive sample blow count; indicates that 37 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were
required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches.
0,2 Depth of free water measured in the boring and number of days following drilling measurement was
taken.
NOTES:
indicates hand—slotted, 1 1/2—inch diameter PVC pipe installed in the boring to the depth shown.
Depth at which Borina 1 had caved when measured on January 28, 2005.
Practical drilling refusal on a boulder.
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on January 26, 2005 with 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger.
2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site
plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan
provided and checked by instrument level.
4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied
by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries
between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. Water level readings shown on the logs were made
Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content (7 )
DD = Dry Density ( pcf )
+4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
at
the
Ume
and
under the conditions indicated.
105 135
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LEGEND AND NOTES
Figure 3
i
Compression
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.1
105 135
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
100
Figure 4
Dry f}�n.,ity = 85 pof
Sample of: Sandy Sifty Clay
From: Boring 2 at i Feet
No moiernent
upon wetting
1
0.1
105 135
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
100
Figure 4
PERCENT RETAINED
10
20
30
50
90
70
00
90
100
H;'DRC1.1E1E,R Ai,1:1LY3iS
SIE4E ANo1L7;Is
E '
24 HR. 7 H
'".IN. x5 MG!. 5C.11!. 19!41.N.
TIME READINGS
1 MIN.
9200
U.S. STANDARD SERIES
4100 #501- 4130
910
C. -LEAP SQUARE OPENINGS
94 3/B" 3/4` 1 1/2' 5"5" 6' 100
mumismomMidillii
IIr+rrrriw.�NIMIM
lrlliiiirlr�-i--
�IMIIIIIIIIIMMINE 111111
�m�—MEMINII Zw1 11111 �1— .=�rrraINNIr l
rra� im MMMIR I_ rr�
YrrrlM 1/1111 lrsw — lll�a� w1 01mm—aa�
11 a•a�i111aA�EI��A —M--- —aa -
--—MiMi/MIMINIIIYawiiw�ilwli--
IIL--- —i-- _Fi arillllw 1
iNIIMIXIMMII
�� — rlairaaiwilIMIEMIEMINNINIMMIINIMMIIMOMIFININ = -r
-�I*- wll �rll iiiiiiiiiiM.Miiiii i a��rnl i�iiii ni
iaamin - mIormows wrEa�
mmilimommil
— ---
-illlillwll--M— � III�rwl�illwl——EI'--�EMOM--
-Ia melwilimilm . —� wwwwai��
iimwriiii
�_
ilillgimmwmisimmillit
mMIIIIIIMIIM MIINII -1u=. MM
— IIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIMEmilimomplINENEI
i—----i—wla—
aaa-ywllllwllllllwlaa�wwwwla��——aaw/a—aaawwaaa�a�a
is �--- — — a>l
mi —fir —i---
----�NEEME
---
-iri�--i —ri II. TaIIIllliiail�Ii—Moliaa�
i lllin li i—MIIII—erlpiilla llliilllw��
la rl M IIIIIArIIa SAI IIII��—
aaar—I—IwA—eaMIwIwMliawwEa menuii awllaaaww aaawwl
—iwlmotio ' i���M��A11�11���1Ft+11�_a�
im
IMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIESINIIIIIIIIMPFAMINNIIMMINMEIMM
ftimm
awwwwwwllimiln
wwwwwar-- a�a�
.�w�i.-li�I�1�
� � limn moi
—=— r i ai
MaliilmiliIIIMIMMA
i�a�i——ilii ate
aMm
�i—MillillW�— 'AM IPOOMER IaN��aaawwwaAAllw�Iil�a—ww
—>✓mmui m_IIw __MNM I_•a��s Ommm—a��aywlMNw-
immump wll>owwwwwlw•a�wa--wwllrrl>tl--wlwir wo—rlr
______ 11w_alMn1wwr�--iwil —____ llMIIIIIMIIMINIIIIIIIIIIIIMMi�
=1=11111—wwwwwwwwAi—� Er� Il IIII �� 11111 �M�
-- .... rr w1�I� ii——Iwrwar
--wl�I— :YIII�ai1 A�1111�11AAR�A_ar11�>•wlwllrrlw11 1AImA
mow I � ww =IF-AlawEINN m=1•I1w• I1IIIMiii riiii1M
ill' la—= 111 i 1—i�>wllIl—rte=� :u1
IiiIIIIMI �lww— >—l�1Millwwaw IMMamww—�llMMI1lrrr.NEIN
—lwAwlMM II I IIIal�wiwwwiirrlllwliiai—iME=IMMINIeMice wwl)�
IMIIIMMIMM
wwwww�i w--- -- wIIIIN
ri_�rwr _ IIrlwlwrllsmonemm rai
eiMANlaiMliw WllAiA—IIwA•�—�_.111lMill
E----- �liftli llrwtlllllw1 MIIIIIw1MNIMi-I� IINI111lllllrwllwl
�II.1�---ate—1w1111wIIIIIII■g11�1� IUMM1IRA1� MNIM=M11.1 w1wa11�1111I1�t111111 11
MOWN mmOilimEIMMIIIMINIIIMIIIIIIIIIIMPIMMMII•MMIMMIIMMINIMMImmoiman
1wt���IMM
�wll—ate IwMi aw�iwwl�irra—
�� iw lM—lirlriiiyr�ami
.001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150
.300 .600
1.16 236 4.75 9.512.5 19.0 37.5
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS
76.2 152 203
127
CLAY TO SILT
SAND
CRAWL
FINE
MEDIUM [COARSE
FINE
COARSE
COBBLES
GRAVEL 49
LIQUID LIMIT
SAND 43%
SILT AND CLAY $
PLASTICITY INDEX
SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sand and Gravel FROM: Boring 1 at 6 Feet
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
90
B0
70
60
50
30
20
10
0
PERCENT PASSING
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Job Nc., 11:5 135
SAMPLE LOCATION
NATURAL
NATURAL
GRADATION
PERCENT
ATTERBERG LIMITS
UNCONFINED
, .— _..—......___........„............______;
SOIL
rYPE
BORING
NO.
DEPTH
(ft)
MOISTURE
CONTENT
(To )
DRY
DENSITY
(pct)
GRAVEL
SAND
PASSING
NO. 200
SIEVE
LIQUID
LIMIT
PLASTIC
INDEX
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
PSF)
1
6
49
43
8
....-___
Slightly silty sand and
gravel
2
1
33.3
86
Sandy silty ,lay
')v,
35.3
86
58
Very sandy sili:y clay ..,.
•
•
•
•
Jordan Architecture
30 September 2009
Building & Planning Department
Garfield County, Colorado
Re: Hoperoft Addition
Attn: John and Ken,
Amendment to the Drawings -
The following changes have been made to comply with the Flood Plain Development
Submission. The revised sheet A2.2 illustrates the boulder wall has been moved out of
the flood plain and into the flood fringe. Upon this change; door #5 and the walkway on
the original plans and elevations will be removed. These changes shall be carried out
throughout the set of drawings, even though a complete revised set has not been
submitted.
Respectfully,
Principal Architect
410 20th Street, Suite 204 • P O. Box 1031 • Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 • Phone: 970-947-1837 • Fax: 970-947-0425
OPEN SPACE
N
a,etz.
sr
F ti A
N
N
YOLF COURSE PARCEL 10 4�'Qti�
.'1l'
66 ,..- Stiff' l N v,
,15', ,oIf Z N
11O�R5� ,a 4C f z
G aG� / �5
05 V 7 09' 0 96
7,p7o of z .Z g
o LOT 4
0.506 AC. +-
N
N
N
LOT 0
0.542 AC. +-
J 63 b\
of
/ LOT 7
0.508
AC. +057 brer
-
7,
toz
1
30.00
LOT.3
0.511 AC. +-
86,7
3;„
73.68'
1
199.55'
56715'15"W
_to/
LOT 9
0.508 AC. +-
�RCLUB
Q TRACT B
VIL
LINE 1
DIRECTION L
DISTANCE
L 1
561'35'56"E
27.00'
L2
N85'00 07'W
22.65'
L3
N13'08'05 'W
4.91'
L4
N1626'01 "W
24.50'
L5
N5126 55 "W
64.06'
L6
N22'13 "57"E
42.69'
L7
N31-08'317-
24.23'
L8
N51'26'551,1
62.68'
L9
N33'18.51 E
45.38 `
110
N71'59 56'W
72.76'
111
546'16'28"E
70.84'
112
531'08'31W
13.38'
L15
552-55'46W
114.36'
L 14
541'00'56'W
111.64'
L15
N38'0723 "W
7183'
116
541'00'56U
96.09'
117
548'59'04"E
6314 `
118
N33'18'51'1-
98.00'
119
A148'12'5214/
76.28'
L20
N35' 10'53 "W
91.37'
L21
N74'55'551-
82.61'
L22
N75'19 58 "W
52.73'
L23
552'55'46"W
114.38'
L24
N4322 00 "W
19.13'
L25
N00'00 00 E
63.37'
L26
N43-22 '00"W
22.01'
L27
58.5'15'19 E
75.65'
Legend and Notes:
0 indicates set monument, /5 rebar and Yellow Plastic
Cap (YPC), L.S. 15710.
- Bearings are based on a bearing of S 00'01'46" W on the line between
BLM brass caps found at the NW corner and W1/4 corner of Section 20.
- Date of survey Apr. 1998.
NUM-
BER
REVISION
CURVE
RADIUS
163.50'
LENGTH
66.24'
TANGENT
33.58'
CHORD
65.79'
BEARING L
N40'00 26 E
Cl
C2
136.50'
11.72'
587'
11.72'
549'09'10W
C3
136.50'
98.95'
51.76'
96.80'
NO737'59 "E
C4
343.50'
78.53'
39.44'
78.36'
506:35'06"E
r
C5
343.50'
25.45'
12.73'
2544'
502'05'12"W
C6
34150'
59.13'
29.64'
59.06'
509'08'26U
07
24.75'
22.72'
12.23'
21.93'
N12'13'44'W
08
46.00'
21,37'
10.88'
21.18'
S25'13'201-
25'1320EC9
C9
46.00'
68.63'
42.51'
62.44'
530449'33'W
C10
46.00'
27.26'
14.04'
26.86'
N892728"W
C11
46.00'
62.21'
36.91'
5757'
N33'44 31 'W
012
46.00'
26.45'
13,59'
26.07'
N21'2730 -E
C13
46.00'
30.35'
1575'
29.80'
N56'49'19 E
014
24.75'
27.15'
1512'
25.81'
544'18'12"W
C15
316.50'
79.72'
40.07'
79.51'
505'39'58"W
016
2500'
41.87'
27.74'
3714'
549-51'28"E
C17
313.50'
147.45'
75.11'
146.09'
N84'01 '32'W
C18
286.50'
142.55'
72.78'
141.09'
N82'55'15'W
C19
25.00'
41.88'
2776'
3716'
5.34'51'42W
020
163.50'
71.48'
36.32'
70.92'
N00'36'54 "W
C21
165.50'
47.04'
25.68'
46.88'
N20'0930 "E
C22
76.00'
52.08'
27 11 '
51.07
.542:33 0714/
C23
345.50'
124.62'
63.00'
123.93'
N86-10'21 "W
024
286.50'
63.53'
31.90'
63.40'
S0554'18"W
025
76.00'
30.43'
15.42'
50.22'
N61-47'45 E
Legend and Notes:
0 indicates set monument, /5 rebar and Yellow Plastic
Cap (YPC), L.S. 15710.
- Bearings are based on a bearing of S 00'01'46" W on the line between
BLM brass caps found at the NW corner and W1/4 corner of Section 20.
- Date of survey Apr. 1998.
NUM-
BER
REVISION
Parcel Detail Page 1 of 4
Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer
Parcel Detail Information
Assessor/Treasurer Property Search j Assessor Subset Query 1 Assessor Sales Search
Clerk & Recorder Reception Search
Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information
Parcel Detail ( Value Detail 1 Sales Detail 1 Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Land Detail 1 Photographs 1 Mill Levy Revenues Detail
Tax Area
Account Number
Parcel Number
2008 Mill Levy
082
R820133
239319104006
64.673
Owner Name and Mailing Address
HOPCROFT, DAVID BARRY & JILL HILDA
160 RIVER GLEN
CARBONDALE, CO 81623
Assessor's Parcel Description
(Not to be used as a legal description)
SECT,TWN,RNG:19-7-88 SUB:ASPEN GLEN
CLUB VILLAS FLG 5 LOT:6
PRE:R820125 BK:0966 PG:0686 BK:0925
PG:0345 BK:0918 PG:0408 BK:0904
PG:0724 BK:0887 PG:0824 BK:0849
PG:0695 BK:0846 PG:0615 BK:0835
PG:0364 BK:0835 PG:0305 BK:0831
PG:0544 BK:0818 PG:0326 13K:0799
PG:0484 BK:0703 PG:0121 BK:1864
PG:0435 RECPT:711290 BK:1864
PG: 043 4 RECPT:711289 BK:1864
............. .
PG:0433 RECPT:711288 BK:1150 PG:610
RECPT:552145 BK:1053 PG:0701
BK:0921 PG:0661
http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNunnber-239319104006 10/8/2009
Parcel Detail Page 2 of 4
Location
2009 Property Tax Valuation Information
Physical Address:
CARBONDALE 1
Land:
Subdivision:
ASPEN GLEN CLUB VILLAS
FLG 5
1,948,850
Land Acres:
0.542
214,830
Land Sq Ft: 0
Section
SINGLE FAM.RES-
Township
Range
19
7
88
2009 Property Tax Valuation Information
Additional Value Detail
Most Recent Sale
Sale Date:
Sale Price:
11/15/2006
2,850,000
Additional Sales Detail
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
Buildings:
Number of Comm/Ind
Buildings:
1
0
Actual Value
Assessed Value
Land:
750,000' 59,700
Improvements:
1,948,850
155,130
Total: 2,698,850
214,830
Additional Value Detail
Most Recent Sale
Sale Date:
Sale Price:
11/15/2006
2,850,000
Additional Sales Detail
Basic Building Characteristics
Number of Residential
Buildings:
Number of Comm/Ind
Buildings:
1
0
http:/Iwww.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239319104006 10/8/2009
Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics
2 STORY:
2,120
1 STORY:
296
FIN. 1 STORY OVER
GARAGE:
832
TOTAL HEATED AREA:
5,368
ABSTRACT CODE:
SINGLE FAM.RES-
http:/Iwww.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239319104006 10/8/2009
Parcel Detail Page 3 of 4
IIIMPROVEMTS
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE:
EXTERIOR WALL:
EXTERIOR WALL:
EXTERIOR WALL:
ROOF COVER:
ROOF STRUCTURE:
INTERIOR WALL:
INTERIOR WALL:
FLOOR:
FLOOR:
FLOOR:
HEATING FUEL:
HEATING TYPE:
STORIES:
BATHS:
ROOMS:
UNITS:
BEDROOMS:
YEAR BUILT:
1-STRYB SM
STONE VEN
WOOD LAP
FR STUCCO
SLATE
RIDGE FRME
DRYWALL
DECORATIVE
HARDWOOD
HARD TILE
CARPET
GAS
FORCED AIR
STORIES 2.0
5
10
4
2006
Additional Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail
Tax Information
Tax Year
Transaction Type
Amount
2008
Tax Payment: Whole
($13,260.56)
2008
Tax Amount
$13,260.56
2007
Tax Payment: Whole
($13,322.68)
2007
Tax Amount
$13,322.68
2006
Tax Payment: Whole
($3,745.72)
2006
Tax Amount
$3,745.72
2005
1 Tax Payment: Second Half
($3,930.62)
2005
Tax Payment: First Half
($3,930.62)
2005
Tax Amount
$7,861.24
2004
1 Tax Payment: Second Half
($4,504.69)
2004
Tax Payment: First Half
($4,504.69)
2004
Tax Amount
$9,009.38
2003
Tax Payment: Second Half
($3,832.86)
http://www.garcoact.comlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239319104006 10/8/2009
Parcel Detail Page 4 of 4
2003 I
2003
2002
2002
2002
2001
2001
2001
2000
2000
2000
1999
1999
1999
Tax Payment: First Half 11 ($3,832.86)
Tax Amount
Tax Payment: Second Half
Tax Payment: First Half
Tax Amount
Tax Payment: Second Half
Tax Payment: First Half
Tax Amount
Tax Payment: Second Half
Tax Payment: First Half
Tax Amount
Tax Payment: Second Half
Tax Payment: First Half
Tax Amount
Mill Levy Revenues Detail
$7,665.72
($4,100.72)
($4,100.72)
$8,201.44
($3,939.63)
($3,939.63)
$7,879.26
($4,363.28)
($4,363.28)
$8,726.56
($4,216.32)
($4,216.32)
$8,432.64
Top of Page
Assessor Database Search Options 1 Treasurer Database Search Options
Clerk & Recorder Database Search Options
Garfield County Home Page
The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain
accurate data. However, Good Tums Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices
are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained.
Copyright 0 2005 - 2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved.
Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software.
http:/lwww.garcoact.comlassessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber239319104006 10/8/2009
Flood Fringe
r'N
/
NN. /
/ N
VN *a l N
\ ' .db N. ‘,)
\may
C,>
ss,
ca>0„
`\
N„/
//
Found Re6 with
Yellow Plastc Cap
\L.SS 15710
Lot
Flood Way Line
„.„
-ePo
2,2
Found Rebar with
Yellow Plastic Cap
L.S 15710
Nge
Op
•••--74,*
Hood Way Line
(according to Saki.)
Zot '
6/0 sq. jet ,L,_
o.5i.e acres,
//1
44344/i)4,4 /4,6'
/tft
A
ding EnveloNO-
pe
Gen Approval
,/
7
>/
ffua?a'inrg Envelop
iet
e/ 44 /
41>
N.
.6
100 Year Flood Plain
Eleveatior 6002
According to FEMA Map
,Lot
Building Envelope
ding En veelop
Glen App
700
p
4)4
//
NN.
Curve .? abte
s,,
Sewer Service
Found Rebar with
Yellow Plastic Cap
L:S 15710
Elev. 6006.38
CURbE
LENG7H
RADIUS UDISrANCE
BEARING
DELTA
08
27.26
46.00 26.86
N89'27'22'141
3357'12"
flood Fringe
100 Year Flood Plain
Elevation 6003
According to FEMA Map
Water Shutoff Valve
Found no.5 Rebar
Arnended
Lot 6, F(ncii Piae Aspen C1en, Filing No. 6
County a, f Carfetr State 0/ Colorado
"lois peat was created to amend the Building envelope of said Zoe 8.
Found Rebar with
Yellow Plastic Cap
L.S. 15710
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 o 10 20 10 a0
Legend and Note,:
(ni FEU)
1 inch_ 20 ft.
-- o indicates found monument as described
-- Bearings are based upon two rebars with yellow plastic caps L.$.#15710
found at the southwesterly comer and westerly angle point both of subject Lot 6,
also being angle points on the easterly line of Lot 5,
using a bearing of S1626'01 "E between the two described monuments.
- This survey does not represent a title search by this
surveeyor to detedrrnhne ownership or to discover
easements or other encumbrances of record and
no tide commitment was provided at the time of this survey.
- This property is subject to apparent easements for
existing +utHltles
�- This property is subject to easements, rights of way and/ or requirements
as noted or shown on the Final Plat of Aspen Den Filing No. 5
— Flood plain information was taken from Perna Map Panel No. 080205 1855 B
revised January 03, 1986.
— The sole purpose of this amended plat Is to modify the building envelope
to the configuration shown and dimensioned on this plot.
Surveyor's Certificate
I, Jeffrey Allen Tuttle, do hereby certify that I am a Professional
Land Surveyor licensed under the law of the State of Colorado, that this
plat is a true, correct and complete plat of Amended Plat Lot 6;
Final Plat Aspen Glen, fling No. 5 as laid out, platted, dedicated and shown
hereof?, that such plat was made by me from an accurate survey of said
property by me, and under my supervision and correctly shows the
location and dimensions of the boundary and easements of sari
subdivision as the same are staked upon the ground /n compliance with
applicable regulations governing the;bailvision of` land and hither
certify that this plat complies with38 3. 3-209
IN Vf7NESS WHEREOF 1 hove set m '�, this day'
s
of
(1, ra. R * �E
Je ' 12111,t4‘
•T ` Y3638
41* tANC
CER77FICA TI0N OF
DEDICATION AND OWNERSH/P
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that The Reiuna Family Partners L.P.
being sole owners in fee simple of all of that real property described as.
Lot 6, Final Plat Aspen Gen, Filing No. 5 A Resubdivision of Rlr rfront Club Villas Tract 4
2nd Amended Plat Golf Clubhouse Parcel, Garfield County, Colorado recorded May 28, 1998
as Reception No. 52549Z containing 0.542 acres more of less.
That said Owner has caused the said real property to be laid
out and surveyed as Amended Play Lot 6; Fina Plat Aspen Glen, Filing No. 5
o subdivision of a part of Garfield County, Colorado.
The aforesaid owner does hereby restate and rededicate all dedications made of
any portions of the subject property to the purposes and for the beneficiaries
as set forth in the Certification of Dedication and Qwnersh* contained upon
Final Plat Aspen Glen, F71b g No: 5, A Resubdivision of Rim -tont Club Villas Tract A,
2nd Amended Plat Golf Clubhouse Parcel, Garfield County, Colorado recorded May 28, 1998
as Reception No. 525497.
1N WITNESS WHEREOF said Owners have caused their names to be
hereunto subscribed this day of , A.D.
2005
By
Representative
Brad Jordan
STATE OF COLORADO )
))ss
COUNTY OF
The foregoing document was acknowledged before me this
day of 2005, by Brad Jordan.
H TNESS my hand and official sea/.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Board of County Commissioners' Certificate:
This Amended Plat approved by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield
County Colorado, this day of ,A.D. 2005,
for filing with the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County and for
conveyance to the County of the public dedications shown hereon;
subject to the provision that approval in no way obligates Garfield
County for the f hancing or constructing of improvements on lords,
public highwoyy or easements dedicated to the public except as
specifically agreed to by the Board of County Commissioners and
father that said approval shall in no way obligate Garfield County
for the construction, repair or maintenance of public highways.
BOARD Cr COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Chairman
Witness my hand and seal of the County of Garfield.
.
Attest:
County Clerk
County Surveyor's Certificate
Approved for Content and Form only and not the accuracy of surveys,
calculations or drafting. Pursuant to C.R. S., 1973, 38-51-101 and 102
(revised)
By.
Garfield County Surveyor
Clerk and Recorder's Certificate:
This plat was hied for record In the Office of the Clerk and
Recorder of Garfield County Colorado, at o'clock amu, this
day of , 2004 in Book ,, at Page , Reception
No.
Clerk & Recorder
By:
Deputy
Notice.
According to Colorado law,. you must commence
any legal action based upon any defect in
this survey within three years after you
discoren such defect. In no event may
legal action tithed upon any defect in�7Q�
this survey be commenced more than ten years
from the date of the certification shown
hereon,
eimilimemompairmimw
.I ['.77.1. l� S1 RF �l ZN
727 Blake Avenue
% CiWGC3C1� , '�7C7CIC�i9� �JlCJI'iC]�C
_%08 �-iq¢�--��%.[
jeffOtss-us. com
SERVICE'S
t�l� �
,/
fJ
.LI
1/
i! Clen
yy�� rye
! ! +ri I
,ry
C.lf
,�+�
V
,
V
�frye
.lam +�
/"�'% ry�
/ �i (T +U f Gj
/r� �%r�
.L G G Cr
/�%�jf€est
.t ■ [J.any
■
OF 1
Drawn by: �T'
Dote: a6'/Q3�/C5