Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application-Permit
Garfield County No. I 10746 I Building & Sanitation Departm_ent 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office 945-8212 Inspection Line 384;.5003 Job Address: ()53 0 iJ ~ ~.J4wt sJ/ G 8'/6S~ . Locality: C/6-1= cf ~]Uy.kw ~ /&f11-05;;J-6;).-oa8 ~-~~~ Owner: Contractor: Amount of Permit: 3'79~.0( f-!5o,(JD ~ Clerk: 3Cj<(2. 0/ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Sp~ings, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Permit No: /01 'f {o Parcel/Schedule No: 1-1 "~"< os· '> 6 < oc \1' , os:>o · 'f\J"',.~ · K.'tocv i\5,-;""' 1 No: 9 10 Sewage Disposal Valuation of A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN ISO DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A WkPh: o Remove PERIOD 9F 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ___{"· it, I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT .I HAVE READ AND 'EXAMINED THIS 1-::-=~=-~"--'--"'""-t:.£."""'4---l.~""-----.L-!-'-"''-'4 APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL. ~~~~~[:._ _____ T~~~;~-_:_----~ PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PEIRF(lRl\W~CE OF CONSTRUCTION. . AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREJ)Y GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS.dt!:TAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFlCATlONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH iN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE lT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFtER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF'SUBMITIED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF At"'Y RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIElD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. ~ Garfom.003 J I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL)o {? \ Ovf\ C\. \-2-tc -I 2-C'Y'l (~ / \j''\} -:. t cOt-\fb (<ff»E-" 4 1 ·~c) ~~. 7 F: c.%1'# 5 1:rq ~ -ff ;l.t.-31.£3 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A fmal Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all · necessary plumbing; . 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IR.C requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. . · A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VA CATINO PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# /0 1 Sfb . I Signature Bpcont0ct2004 Date tr · ~~~~~ ~p .. ·· · 4' To l1vH~\ ~~ · ~s~ h4tl ~ V ALUATION!FEE DETERtfiNATION . . / . Applicant 3M.'~\ W\<:AJo..:; ts+0vte..5 Address <0$36 ,_Jer-K. fV:-~ou; :Dr. ·Subdivision b1A.v'l \!\teo-& ow 6S.ic.t~ Lot/Block~'-------,-- Contractor Co-.f ;loov. Date _______ .,--..:___ Finished (Livable Area): Main i51(, . Upper 11 o I Lower l'-t 5l. 4-133 X.'l'-f-6~"' 4t 3o'?,1 b5;).~'Y Other . ..f-~4 + 84 1" 12 "% 4 :>7?,,. 7,. '~ = 3t~, ~[ Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfullshed · Conversion of UnfiniShed to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: · Covered Valuation Open· Valuation Total Valuation ]3uilding Permit Fee Plan Review Fee TotalBP&PR 3 3'J. , I {5I) • 4<-f d.actf).css /CfCftf.o{o 319,). . 0 (. ~ {e&;5Z. --·-· .. ,-···== ;4 8, ~oS.eot F~ ~-'· 1-.f;;w ~ ,. '3 '79Z..~I 39410 ,q.s /47. t4 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION ApplicantSUV\ #k:"Jo..:; ts+cJ.e..s Address C0$3 6 ;-) o f-tt... !V-;~ou~> br. . Subdivision 6'1-~.VI (1\le,._Ji ow f3 &ict~s Lot/Block---'>--------- Contractor Co..< ;loo" Date, __________ _ Finished (Livable Area): Main lSI(, Upper jiO I -Jf/33 )\'l~-Cc '?::: 41' 3o 'Z 1 65 ;).t.fy Lower J'-( 5 L, Other Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Uniinished · Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: · Covered Valuation Open· Valuation Total Valuation Building Permit Fee TotalBP&PR 3 ':)(X' /6\)' 4'--/ d.a<tt.css GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS ,, In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a pennit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete infonnation be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, tbis will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this infonnation before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new infonnation may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to detennine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. · 11 A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 1 06.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes X 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes X 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes "i- 2 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ~ 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes '\:' 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes ~ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes X: 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County forroof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes X 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes X I 0. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes )( II. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes )( 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? Yes >( 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes X No . 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes No __ ..L>.~--- 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/resc~e windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes ~ No __________ __ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes '>( No ------- 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as . a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes ';>s No ______ _ 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes )( No _____ __ 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes )( No ______ _ 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to . submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted without it. Yes ;:>( No ______ _ 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes X' No Ifno-Explain: ______ _ 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes X 23. Do you understand thatthe minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes f.-No ____ _ 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes ':>< No _____ _ 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County rel1!ted to your properties zone district? Yes X No ________ _ 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes '< No -------- 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes 'X No _____ _ 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building l?(rmit? Yes No _____ _ 29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes X No _____ _ 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $47.00 re-inspection fee? Yes K No _____ _ 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Cetiificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes r\ No ______ _ 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written auth01ity being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes~ No _____ _ 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Depariment stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes ~ No _____ _ ,, C"•"'i'" 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes X' No ______ _ 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ~ No ________________ _ 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes "< No· (please check with the building department about this requirement) I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. ~ lC~0m.>rt S gnature Owner Date Phone : ___ %.:::l_:_::clo--'· >::_.-_'-_<-_D _________ .( days); __ 9--'-''l'-"D'---S,b=.:b,_· 1_.,,"'s...,1.,.,3'-------(· evenings) Project N ame:_--.:'3=-· .:::.\)::.c'v"=---'-'~-""'"',j,""' '"'owe::.· _ __._(4s"-~='-">~------'-"L'-'o""'~'--, ---=2?=----- Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this infonnation at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. ·Work may not proceed without the issuance of a pem1it. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is l)ecessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreq0ct2004 6 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, It Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload: 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 700 I to 8000ft. 75PSF 8001 to 9000ft. 1 OOPSF 9001 to 1 OOOOft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. · Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-laymen! required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R-Values: • Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. • Floors R-values are R-19. PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant ;;s,."' Mead&?"':;.-Led: '8" / Building __ Engineered Foundation JL};_Driveway Permit /;'urveyed Site Plan 7 -/septic Permit and Setbacks vc;;:e/Topography 30% ~~i&mtW PLm """''w li" _ Min~Application Questionnaire ....4division Plat Notes ti.J.fire_J;partment Review ~on Determination/Fees ~Red ~lans/Stamps/Sticker · ~h Conditions ~woSigned .. -=._Pl~evlewer To S1gn Applwatwn ~eel/Schedule No. ~~owload Letter-Manf. Hrns. _~us GENERAL NOTES: _._Prop Line Setbacks -. __ 30 Stream Setbacks ___ 7 lood Plain --+-'Building Height -+--"Zoning Sign-off -t----'Road Impact Fees -t----'HOA/DRC Approval _,_Grade/Topography 40% -++-Planning Issues -\/--Subdivision Plat Notes 101<3/2006 13:10 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION FAX CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION 734MAINST. SILT. CO 81652 PAGE 01 970-876-5220 FAX 970~876-5221 DATE: {b •d3-0(p TO: QN\d L'\ ~ ATT:.~· ------ FAX: 321-Q "-( 'l Q PH;.·_------- PAGE£G+\L} COMMEN'IS: 10/23/2006 13:10 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION Too876522l ~tech H.oJ~\\'qlth· PA~' )nl' ()~•.ltk'rhnKill, )lit SOlO Counr.'r RcMJ 1~4 Gltn'-'·IJod Sprmn .. , Cd1'HI(i1' 8iMI ~~.,.,, 970-945 79$8 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAl fo>: 9)U.041-8414 t:?!ll\\tl. hp(!en®hpg~tl!ech Ci'>m SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED RESIDENCE LOl' 8, SUN MEADOW ESTATES 0530 NORTH MEADOW DRIVE GARFIELD COUN'fY, COLORADO JOBNO.lOS363 OCTOBER 19, l006 PREPARED FOR: CARlBOU CONSTRUCTION ATTN: FRED COOKE 734 MAIN STREET SILT, COLORADO 81652 PAGE 02 F'.2'15 Parker 30.3-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverrl)<)rm~ 970-468-1989 10/23/2006 13:10 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 03 ._;.._~· ,_ .• r~!!Jv.!o lGO!~i:;:l From•HF'~GEOTECH 971394584::>4 To:8765<:!21 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................ • .1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... -l - SITE COND!T.lONS ....................................................................................................... -2- FJELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................. -2- SUBSURFACE CONDITJONS ...................................................................................... -2- DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. - 3 · FOUNDATIONS ................................................................. , ....................................... -3- F.LOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... • 4- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ...................................................................................... , ... -5- SURFACE DRAINAGE .............................................................. , .............................. · 5- PROFILE BORING ........................................................................................................ • 6- LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... -6- FIGURE J -LOCA T!ON OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORJNGS .FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 • SW.ELL-CONSOLTDA TION TEST RESUUS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABOROATRY TEST RESULTS 10/23/2005 13:10 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 04 971il9458454 To:S755221 P'VRPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This repo.rt presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at Lot 8, Sun Meadow Estates, 0530North Meadow Drive, Oar.fleld County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Caribou Construction dated May 3, 2005. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Inc., previously performed a preliminary geotechnical study for Sun Meadow Estates {formerly Mamms View) and presented otor findings in a report, dated March 28, 2000, Job No. l 00 169. A field exploration program consisting of one exploratory boring in the building area and one profile ooring in the septic disposal area was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditio.ns. Samples ofthe subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering cha:racieristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analy7..ed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations ba~ed on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION · The proposed residence will be one and two story wood frame constroction above· a full • basement with an attached garage. Basement and garage floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading forth~ strocture is aSsumed to be relatively minor with C1!1 depths between about . 2 to 9 feet. W~ assume relatively light foundation .loadings, typical of the proposed type of constnJCtion•. Jfbuilding loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Jobl-lo. lOS 363 10/23/2006 13:10 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 05 U~l-c~-~~~b 1~:22 crom:HP-GEOTECH 9709458454 To:8765221 -2- SJTE CONDITIONS Lot 8 is located on the west side of North Meadow Drive and was vacant at the time of our field visit. The building area is located in the central eastern part of the lot. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. The grottnd surface in the building area is relatively flat with a gentle slope d<;>wn to the southwest at a grade of about 3 to 4 percent. An irrigation ditch is located along the western property line and below the building area. FIELD EXPLORATION The field el<ploration for the project was conducted on October J 0, 2006. One exploratQry b\lring was drilled in the building area and a protlle boring was drilled in the sept.ic disposal area at the locations shown on Figure l to evaluate the subsurface mnditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a track-mounted CME.-45 drill rig. The borings were logged by a representatjve of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch J.D. sp<>on sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. 'This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by AS1M Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned tl> our .laboratory for review by the pr(\ject engineer and testing, SUBSURFACECONDnnONS Graphic logs ofthe subsurface conditions encountered at the site arc shown Oll Figure 2. The subsoils at Bming I, below about V. foot of topsoil, consist o{sandy to very sandy clay down to thp depth explored of25 feet . .Laboratory testing performed ~n samples obtained from Boring 1 included natural .. ' ' moisture contelit and density, finer than sand si?.e gradation and Atterberg limits. Results . ' . of swell-consoJidatloo testing performed on relatively undisturbed ·drive samples of the Joi> No, iOSJ63 10/23/2006 13:10 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 06 u.._, . .:~··c>l:l~5 12:22 rrom:r!P-GF.DTECH 9711l9458'1S4 To:876S21:1 -3- clay soils, presented on Figure 4, indicate low compressibility under conditions of light loading and existing moisture conditions with a low to high swell potential when wetted. The laboratory testing is summari~ed in Tab.le I. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS rOUNDAT.lONS The clay soils are expansive when wetted and could heave lightly loaded Jbotings and slabs-on-grade. The settlement/heave potential should be further evaluated .at the time of construction. Considering the subsmfac~> conditions encountered in the exploratory borings .• the nature of the proposed construction and the soils typical of the area, the building can be designed with spread footings bearing on the natural soils. lfthe soils ex:posed at bearing level are expansive, subexcavation and placement with non-expansive structural fill or designing the footings for a minimum dead load could be needed. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed oo the undisturbed natural soils with low to no exp8l1sion potential should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of l ,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or Jess. There could be some additional differential movement iftbe bearing soils · ' . . become wetted: 2) The footings sh~uld hllve a minimum' width of 16 in~hes for continu'ous Vtalls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) E:xterior footin11s and footings beneath unheated areas should be pro;,ided ,',Jth adequate soil cover above their beari.ng elevation for frost protection. i . . Job No. lOS 363 ~lacement offo~Jndations at least 36 inches below el\:terior grade is typically used in thi$ area.: 10/23/2006 13:10 9708765221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 07 UCT-23·2~06 12:22 From:HP-GEOTECH 9709458454 To: 876521"1 -4- 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining strucn1res should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure correspollding to an equivalent .fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf 5) The topsoil and any .loose or disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down 10 the undisturbed natural soils. The exposed soils should be evaluated for expansion potential. If they show moderate to high ex.pans.ion potential, at least 3 feet of non-expansive structural flll, such as road base, compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density should be provided below footing areas. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FLOOR SLABS The natural clay soils are expansive and there could be some heave of stabs-on-grade. Non-expansive structural fill could be needed below slabs to help reduce the heave potential. ·To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. F.loor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer offTee-draining gravel should be placed beneath ·basement !eve,! slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should cdnsist of minus 4 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No.4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill rnateriali for support of floor slabs should be compacted to bt lea:n 95% of: maximum standard Proctor de;1sity at a moisture content near optimum. Required fiJI .Should consist of granular soils devoid of vegetation and topsoil. .lob No. 105 363 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 08 10/23/2006 13:10 9708765221 •;c.•-.o.s-0:1<106 i2:23 From:HF'·GEDTECH 971119459454 To:8765221 . 5. UNDER.DRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched gro·undwater can develop during times ofhcavy precip.itation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below•grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. Where drains are installed, they should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert levd with free"draining granula.r material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least l foot below lowest adjacent fmish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet, dry well or sump and pump. Free-d.rainlng granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel backfill shc:mld be at least J Y, feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The :fol.lowing drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the .residence has been completed: l) 2) 3) Job No. I 05'363 Inundation of the foundation excavations and undcrslab areas should be avoided during construction. Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimuni moisture and Cjlmpacted to at:least 95% 6fthe maximum standard' Proctor density in . . . p~vement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the rr;aximum standard l'j-octor density in landscape areas. ~e ground surfucli! surrou~ding the exterior of th~ b~ilding should be . • ' ; ., t ' ' sloped to drain away from !he foundation in all direciions. We ~commend a minimum sJ~pe· pf(\ inches in the first :ttHeet in unpaved i '. . . : ·. . ~. /23/2006 13"10 9708765221 10 ,~ .... ..~ ~..,e:l!lLOO ~.;:~.;$ From~HP-GEOTECH CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 09 9709458454 P.9'15 ·6· areas and a minimum slope of3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill s.hould be capped with abOL112 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and dra·ins should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regula.r heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. PROFU..E .BORING A profile boring was drilled in the proposed septic disposal area at the location shown on Figu.re 1. The subsoils encoulltered, below about ! /2 foot of topsoil. consisted of sandy clay to I 0 feet overlying clayey sand to the bottom hole depth of .1 S feet. The log of the profile boring is shown on Figure 2. Tile sand .layer is apparently not coutinuous through the building area. No free water was observed in the boring at the time of drilling and tbe subsoils were slightly moist. LIMITATIONS Tbls study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon tbe data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on F.\gure l, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining tbe presence, prevention of possib.iHty of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in tile future. !£the client is toncerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of _practice should be ~onsulted. Out Hndings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface . ' ; l . fOnditions identi:fied at the exploratory borings and variarions in the subsurface ~ondit\ons may mot become evident until e><cavat.ion is performed. If conditions Joh No. rOH63 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 10 970S45845'! 1".10-'15 . 7. encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive usc by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to veritY that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifica.tions to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation or excavations and :foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer, Respectfully Submitted, HEP:?~i ·PAWLAK GEOTECijNlCAL, INC. ~if~ ~ Reviewed by: LEE/vad 10/23/2006 13:10 9708765221 L''-' "~-'-""'"'" 1c:"1 F'rom:HP·GEDTECH 5220 \ \ \ ~ \ 1\ . \ I I I I ,/ r / 5220 ......... LOT9 t"~ -;,_.. --~ . . ~~ APPROXIMATE SCALE 1'1 ~501 / / CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 11 97fil9458454 To•8765221 \ \ '-\ \ '-\ \ '\ \ \ '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ I I I \ \ \ I l I I I / I / ,/ I ,/ I ,/ I / / I I PROFILE / BORING I • I / / LOT8 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 10/23/2005 13:10 9708755221 u~~-~~·c~~ >~:~4 From:HP-~EDTECH 0 5 10 ii 1.1. ' t "' 0 15 20 25 LOTS BORING 1 ELEV. ~ 5225' 80112 wc~M DD~113 BOIS WC"7.5 OI:Jc122 -200~75 LL~28 Pt~1a il0/5 27/12 WCe7A oo~tl!1 ·200~51 Ll-22 PIPIII9 50112 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION 971<194SS4S'l lOTB PROFILE BORING ELEV. ~ 5223' 36/ll.3G/:l 30/M5/5 40/SM/2 To:S7652!!1 Note; explanation Of sy,mbols iS Sh()wn on Figure 3. 105363 • · LOGS OF .. ExPLORATORY BORINGS PAGE 12 F'.12115 0 5 10 'a! u. ' ~ ., 0 15 20 25 Figure 2 10/23/2005 13:10 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION OCT-23-2006 12:24 F•om:HP-GEOTECH 9709'158454 To:8765221 LEGEND: ~ TOPSOIL: organic sandy silt aod clay, firm, moist, brown. 0 ClAY (CL): sandy to very sandy. very stiff, slightly moist, brOWn. low plasticity. m SAND (SO); clayey, snghtly gravelly, madium dense, slightly moist, light brown. p Rela!lvaly undisturbed drive sample: 2·inoh I. D. California liner sample. 60112 Drive sample blow counl; indicates that 60 blows of a 14() pound hammer falling 30 Inches were required to driVe the California sampler 12 inches. NOTES: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on October 10. 2008 with 4·inch diameter continuous flight power auger. PAGE 13 P.13115 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the aile plan provided. · 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between oontours shown on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degrea implied bY the method used. 5. The linea between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boUndaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in tho borings at the time of drilling. Fluctuation In water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) DO "' Dry Density (pel) ·200 ~ Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL ~ Liquid Limit (%) PI = Plasticity Index (%) 105 363 LEGEND ANi:l'NOTES .·. 10/23/2005 13:10 9708755221 CARIBOU CONSTRUCTION PAGE 14 U'H:!3•21alil6 L~:24 From:HP-GE:CJTECH 970945845'1 To:8765221 P.14'15 Moisture Content = 6.4 percent Dry Densily ~ 113 pel Sample of: Sanoy Clay *' From: Boring 1 at 4 Feel, Lot 8 "' 1 0 ·u; "' .. ~ 0 [1..., ' ~ ~ "' 0 ~ . ., 'I i! \ c.. E \ 8 z Expansion upon 3 wetting 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 7.5 perce nt Dry Density = 122 pcf 5 Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 1 at 9 Feet, Lot a 4 "-.., " 3 ., 1\ 2 ~~ Expansion upon "' wetlhm ' j 1 0 i\ c \ .!2 "' ., i 1 c c;) ·, 0.1 1.0 ; 10 .. 100 APPLIED PAE!SSURE • ksl -~ ·~·-.. 1os ci363 SWELL-tbNSOLIDAl'ION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HltP'Wartn1<PAW K Gi:O'JUiC..Jc""' HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAl, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. lOS 0363 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPlE lOCATIOI'I NA11lRAI. NATIJRAl GRADATION PERIE'IT ATIERB<RG UMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY GRA'Iel SAND PASSING UQ!JIO PUSTIC OlMPRESSIVE SOil OR OORJNG O£PTH COtiTEI'IT O!:NSITY NO. 200 UMIT INDEX SIRENGlH BEURDCK 1Y!'t (%} {%) SlEIIE (fti (%) {ocfl (%} f%} IP5f}_ 1 4 6.4 113 Sandy Clay .. I Sandy Clay 9 7.5 122 75 28 16 14 7.4 l21 51 22 9 Very Sandy Clay \I) ""· "' .. & . ; ~ 0 J> ~ ;u H . tJj 0 c ! 0 0 z (i] -l ;u -f c 0 0 ! .. .. ~ -l H 0 z ru ' ru ~ ZOO/ZOO~ Caribou Construction, Inc. 11854 Bradburn Blvd. August 20, 2008 Garfield County 108 s•hst., Suite401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Jenna Thompson Westminster, CO 80031 (303) 469·2476 f(303) 469-2467 RE: 530 N. Meadows, Silt CO, (Lot 8) Jenna, Per yoU!" request, I am writing a brief letter stating the changes made to lot 8 as recently submitted to you. Please review the new prints for the following revisions ..... 1. The Living room is extend by 4'. 2. An entry vestibule is added. If you any further questions, please call. Sincerely, Greg Hardy Pmchasing -Caribou Const. Cell: 303-495-4987 XVd zz:£1 OHM SOOZ/06/SO Andy Schwaller From: Carole Cooke [cjcooke@rof.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:07 PM To: Andy Schwaller Cc: fcooke@rof.net Subject: Building permit renewal request Garfield County Planning Department Andy Schwaller, Please consider this request to renew our building permit# 107 46 for Lot 8 0530 N. Meadow Drive in Sun Meadow Estates. Page 1 of 1 We are working diligently to obtain construction financing for this building and will appreciate at least a 6 month extension. Please contact us at this email with your decision. Thank you, Fred. Cooke, Caribou Construction, PO Box 598, Silt, CO 81652 970-379-7696 Or c.cwole c.ooR.e 970-379-9944 2/12/2009 10/17/2006 Andy Schwaller Chief Building Official, Garfield County 1 08 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: PROJECT: Single Family Home INTERNAL PERMIT #: #2046 ADDRESS: 0530 North Meadow Drive S..tl't" f~lr1roel\,;j ~ Dear Mr. Schwaller: ~·, J.\ -rLI1-~~tv ~~'w1tvJ & 90/.;,~ c::=.:::::.::--.....,.=:: Colorado Inspection Agency has completed a review of the following documents: 1. Plans: • 7 -Architectural Sheets • 4 -Structural Sheets • 2 -Electrical Sheets These documents were reviewed only for their conformance to the provisions of the 2003 International Residential. Colorado Inspection Agency finds the documents submitted to be complete for construction and ready for issuance of the building permit. Please see attached conditions of approval. John Plano Plans Examiner Colorado Inspection Agency Colorado Inspection Agency 1286 Chambers Ave, Eagle CO 81631 P: 970.328.1790 F: 970.328.1791 Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Ass~~sw/TrG4§nf~LPropertySs;gn::h I i\$$essocS~ubsetQ\!9n I Asses$QI Sales Se4n;h Cl~rl<: ~ R~>:PrderRe<::eptionSeilJeh .Parcel Det<li.l I Yalue DemjJ I Sales Detail I Residentjal/ComJnercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I o2o II R041233 II 217905202008 II 45.408 I Owner Name and Mailing Address . !suN MEADOW ESTATES, LCC I 1734 MAIN STREET I !SILT, CO 81652 I Legal Description ISECT,TWN,RNG:5-6-92 SUB:SUN MEADOW I !ESTATES LOT:8 PRE:R005381 BK:549 I IPG:615 BK:372 PG:115 BK:360 PG:441 I IBK:334 PG:415 BK:217 PG:476 BK:214 I IPG:201 BK:213 PG:596 BK:207 PG:315 jBK:180 PG:491 BK:1571 PG:651 \BK: 1186 PG:328 BK: 1175 PG:878 jBK: 1159 PG:829 BK: 1150 PG:774 \BK:1150 PG:511 BK:0565 PG:0163 \BK:0549 PG:0615 BK:1610 PG:430 \RECPT:657177 BK:1571 PG:803 \RECPT:648969 BK:1571 PG:801 jRECPT:648968 BK:1571 PG:799 \RECPT:648967 BK:1571 PG:797 \RECPT:648966 BK:1571 PG:749 I IRECPT:648965 BK:1571 PG:746 I http://www. garcoact. com! assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce1Number=217 905202008 2/21/2007 Parcel Detail IRECPT:648963 BK:1571 PG:744 I IRECPT:648962 BK:1571 PG:701 I IRECPT:648960 BK:1571 PG:686 I IRECPT:648959 BK:1571 PG:655 I IRECPT:648951 BK:1571 PG:653 I IRECPT:648950 BK: 1571 PG:651 I IRECPT:648949 BK:1571 PG:649 I IRECPT:648948 BK: 1571 PG:648 I IRECPT:648947 BK:1571 PG:647 . I IRECPT:648946 BK: 1401 PG:325 I IRECPT:613636 BK:1401 PG:323 I IRECPT:613635 BK:l301 PG:499 I IRECPT:591549 BK:ll99 PG:619-620 I IRECPT:567070 BK:1150 PG:515 I IRECPT:552105 BK:1150 PG:513 I JRECPT:552104 BK: 1150 PG:511 I IRECPT:552103 I Location I Physical Address: llsiLT I I Subdivision: liS UN MEADOW ESTATES I I Land Acres: IJ2.103 I I Land Sq Ft: llo I Section II Township II Range I 5 II 6 II 92 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II I Imerovements: II I Total: II III F======;S:=:a=cle::=Da:=te=i: I . Sale Price: I 87,60011 Oil 87,60011 Basic Building Characteristics http://www. garcoact.cornl assessor /parceL asp ?Parce!N umber=21 7 905 202008 25,4001 0 25,4001 Page 2 of3 2/21/2007 Parcel Detail I I I I I I I I I I Number of Residentiallo Buildings: Number of Comm!Ind lo Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type 2006 II Tax Amount 2005 II Interest Payment 2005 II Interest Charge 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole 2005 II Tax Amount 2004 II Interest Payment 2004 II Interest Charge 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole 2004 II Tax Amount ToPPLPage II Amount I II $1,153.361 II ($40.37)1 II $40.371 II ($1,009.36)1 II $1,009.361 II ($2.17)1 II $2.17\ II ($36.22)1 II $36.22\ Asses;;gr Database Search Q]2tions \ Treasurer Database Se_arch Options Clexk & Rrc:;onter Dat'lba5e SearghQnti.ons s::'rarfi_eld County_Bome Pa_ge Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to wa!Tant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Qoo.tLinmfi.S..oftware. http://www. garcoact.com/ assessor/parcel. asp ?ParcelN umber=217 905 202008 2/21/2007 No. _ _,_/_0 1...:....(..J.._/-'-"='--Assessor's Parcel Ncf?J79-(.)5,}-(),} -~o'i.JI? Date I 1/ q /;J. crt 7 I Setbacks: Front Rear.-----RH, _____ LH _____ Zoning ____ _ '5lf~-~ fJJ(GnJ, Js,_J.o..-~J. '{ c&f, INSPECTIONS Soils Test Sjtr .J--t:J--t'f.J?..__, Weatherproofing ____________ _ Footing·_ U If Mechanical ______________ _ Foundation Electrical Rough (State)---------- Grout Electrical Final (State) _________ _ Underground Plumbing Final /Checklist Completed? ___ _ Rough Plumbing Certificate Occupancy # ---------- Framing Date ----c,..,...,c=-,---------- lnsulation Septic System #_~ZfL-;:-'s'-9~/,__ _______ _ Roofing Date --'-'ll+/-''~¥/--"o~7~------- Drywall -------------Final ____________ _ Gas Piping-----------Other ________________ _ EXTERIOR Address No.-------------- Drainage--------------- Decks~support & clearance to wood ------- Decks-stairs & rails ------------ Exterior locks ----~------- Flashing around doors & windows------- Insect screens------------- INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation------------ Service doors-Hit min.---------- Door (20 min.) w/auto closer~13fe" min. _____ _ Mech. equip. 18" above floor ________ _ No opening into sleeping area ________ _ BASEMENT-CRAWL AREA Access ______________ _ Insulation -------------- Headroom/Stairs ____________ _ Ventilation-------------- NOTES r--~~ ';Jff.. /tLt: (continue on back) FINAL. CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Boller ____________ _ Hot water __________ _ F.A. gas/oil __________ _ Floor drain __________ _ Clearance __________ _ Air con. system _________ _ Hot water heater --------- Combustion air _________ _ Gas piping, valves ________ _ LPG Drain----------- FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combustibles _____ _ Termination of chimney ______ _ Combustion air _________ _ Hearth (12" or 20" on sides)----- Glass doors __________ _ Certified by:~---------- REMARKS STAIRWAYS. Headroom (6'6") ---------- .Railing & guardrails --------- w;dth __ ~~--------- Rise & run------------ KITCHEN Clearance above grill--------- Exhaust fan------------ Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) ------- BEDROOMS Egress ____________ _ Smoke detector----------- BATHROOMS Exhaust fan------'------ Shatterproof glass _________ _ OTHER Date: September 29, 2009 To: Sun Meadow Estates P.O. Box598 Silt, CO 81652 Dear Permit Holder, Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Please refer to your building permit number 10746 , issued 11/9/2007. A routine review of our open building permits indicates that we have not received a request for an inspection on this permit since Issued Please be advised that building permits expire, per Uniform Building Code, section 106.4.4 or lnemational Code Sections 105.5 "Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commencGd within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the buliding or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work has commenced for a period of 180 days. Before such work can be recommenced, a new permit shall first be obtained to do so, and the fee therefore shall. be one half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided no changes have been made or will be made in the oritinal plans and specifications for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonement has not exceeded one year. In order to renew action or a permit after expiration, the permittee shall pay a new full permit fee." Please contact this office at your very earliest convenience, in writing, to advise us about the status of your permitted work. If you have not responded within thirty (30) days from the receipt of this notice the permit will be closed and a permanent notation will be placed in the property records at the County Clerk & recorders office that indicates that the work permitted per Colorado Revised Statues 30·28-205 & 210, was not inspected, is not approved and the building or area is illegal to occupy and is subject to legal abatement action or other option available by law. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Jim Wilson Building Inspector 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401• Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 r #l5o,on GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 108 Eighth Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Coloradof 81601 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY Owner's Name ~ V\ SYSTEM DESIGN ------Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) ------Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Required Absorption Area w See Attached Special Setback Requirements: Phone (970) 945-8212 ______ Other Number of Bedrooms (or other) ____ _ Permit 4 3 9 1 A~essor's Parcel No. ,x,(171-D5~=l-oJ.~ crog This does not constitute a building or use permit. Date _____________ Inspector ___________________________ __ FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation System Installer _________________________________________ _ Septic Tank Capacity· _____ _:_ ________________________________ __ Septic Ta~k Manufacturer or Trade Name ---------------------------~--- Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface --------------------------------- Absorption Area---------------------------------------- Absorption Area Type and/or Manufacturer or Trade Name Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements Other ________________________________________ ___ Oate ______________ !nspector ___________________________ _ RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE *CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have fully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Conw nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs, alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine-6 months ~n jail or both). White-APPLICANT Yellow-DEPARTMENT