The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-PermitNOTES: GENERAL: 1) ALL CONSTRUCTION PER CODE IBC-2000 REQUIREMENTS. 2) DESIGN LOADS: ROOF LIVE LOAD (SNOW): 30 PSF ROOF DEAD LOAD: 10 PSF MEZZANINE LIVE LOAD: 50 PSF I\1NO SPEED: 90 MPH, EXPOSURE B, IMPORTANCE 1.0 SEISMIC DESIGN COEFFICIENT (Fo *Ss )=.5 4, (SS = .38, S1 = .84) IMPORTANCE = 1.0, SITE CLASS D, DESIGN CATEGORY B. CONCRETE 1) MIN . 28 DAY CONCRETE STRENGTH = 3500 PSI (MIN 5-1/2 SACK MIX) SULFATE RESISTANT WITH 6% AIR ENTRAINMENT. FIBER REINFORCE W/1 BAG/YO FIBERMESH REINFORCEMENT. 2) MIN COVER ON REBAR AT SLABS IS 1 1/2", OTHER LOCATIONS I\1HERE CONCRETE IS CAST AGAINST EARTH COVER IS 3" 3) MIN. COVER OTHER LOCATIONS 1 1/2" 4) PROVIDE TOOLED OR SAW CUT JOINTS AS SHOWN TO MIN IMIZE RANDOM CRACKING IN EXPOSED SLAB. REBAR 1) ALL REBAR IS GRADE 60 2) LAP #4 BARS 16" MINIMUM, #5 BARS 24" MIN. SOIL TESTING 1) DESIGN BASED UPON GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY CTL THOMPSON DATED JULY 19, 2007. SPEC IFIC 1) DRAWINGS BASED ON DRAI\1NGS BY NUCOR DATED 10-31-07. 2) STRUCTURAL DESIGN ABOVE FLOOR BY STEEL BUILDING MANUFACTURER. SEE BULOING MANUFACTURER ORAI\1NGS FOR ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT AT COLUMN LOCATIONS. 3) ANCHOR BOLTS TO BE TEMPLA TEO AND TIED IN PLACE PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. BUILDING DEPT. NOTE: . STRUCTURE WAS STARTED FOR GENERAL STEEL BUILD ING (FOOTINGS POURED). NUCOR BUILDING NOW TO BE USED SO THIS FOUNDATION WAS PREPARED. A ®- • 0 c ' 0 aJ D E • 0 I 0 (\) • 0 I 0 C\J • 0 I 0 C\J • 0 I 0 C\J 1 2 3 0 ® ~ 7 8 175'-0' 25'-0* 25'-0' 25'-o-20'-0* I 20'-0' I 20 '-0' 20'-0' 20'-0' 1 I I A A I I i® @ : @ : c @ : @ : @ : ~ I 3'-0'x3:::o:---t -._ ___ -i-------~------+T-r----.._-------r--~--___ l ____ -t --r--~.JJ---~-----+----f---;-----j-----i --r----r--;·-o·x3·-o· 1 ;=, L-I 7'-9'x7'-9' '-I 7'-9'x7'-9' L.. I 7'-9'x7'-9' I L.. I 7'-9'x7 '-9' L 7'-9'x7'-9' i L I 7'-9'x7'-9' I '-I 7 '-9'x7 '-9' I I I I I I I I i I J : ! :e i i i I i i I i i i I I I 12'-6' 25',-0' I I 25'-0 ' 22'-6 ' 20'-0' 20',-0' 20 '-0' 20 '-0' ' 10'-0' : 9 I I 1 I -1 1 I I I I I 'i I 1. ~ ~;-.-~~:::;~-~;·;··----------~-----------------------··r-···-----------------______ T ________ ----------------------:-------------------------------------------------------·-·r·-----------------------------------------------r··----------------------------------------··r -·· ------------··r ------------------·-·r··--------------+------------------r -----------J-------3. --0. X ;-.-~~r B -~~I J i ph ----~ ---- ---- ------+ -------TT ----------- ---,-- -- - ------r - ---- - ---~-------,-- ----,------------, --- - ---L 1 -® ® "1 • I I I I I I I I I I ,_f_J : ~ I i : I : I I ! I I I : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -~~:· . -~ _ t . L~ _ . 1 __ _ t .. · ·:..... _____ L _ L ___ ~---· ........................ [.......... -+---+-___ j_j ..1 ............ ~. ~ ' I ' I I I 6' SLAB 'WI #4 @ 18' D.C. I I I I I I I I I ON 4' CHAIRS I 3'-0'x3'-0' I OVER MIN 6' GRAVEL f • 3'-0'x3'-0' -(@BB}t;j,H~-1ph ----~~ ------: -------+ -------r-i---------------:------t ------:----------:------~-----:-----+ ------j-----1----Lt -@ i I ! I I i ! l ! ! I I i ! I i c ---:----,--------------------.,..~ ----------------------r---------------------------r---------------®#J------------------------------------------------r·---------------------------------------T --------------------------------------r----------------~----------· ----r---· ---------------_------------r --------------t----· -,~:j ~ : I : I : : : : : 'I : I : I : I ' ? I . I I I I . I . - ' I I I I I .. l · o· 3' a· I ;, 't 1 I I I 1 J -x -~ , , I · 3'-0'x3'-0 -rs}td:H~JJ:lh --____ , _____ ___;_ ______ -+ ______ _LL _____________ __;_ _________ ___;_ ______ L __ --~·-_· __ -+----____ : ______ 1 ______ ~ _________ qq,rr=JL~-®I,!B!>_ ® I I I I : I I I I I ! I I ·+-----------------------·-j--~ -----------------------------------------------------j--··---------···-----------1-------------------·--·-·---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------·----------------------------------------------t-------------------------·----",---------------------------------------------------------------+ i I. I 4 i i i i I i : i i I I' ? I I I I ,I I I I DIMS TYP . I I l "' 7'-'9'x7'-9' I I 7'-9'x7'-9' I 7'-9'x7'-9' II I 7'-9'x7'-s· 1 I -7'-9'x7'-9" I 7'-9'x7 ''-9' I ! s~. 7~A~~ I I I ' ~ -I 1 ----i -I l-13 '~:~?.:::.o.:_ __ l _._ ___ r--_..J__ _ ____ L _______ .Ll r-------c·-o· _ --~-___ j ______ l _____ I---1--_j __ +----J..I' ___ --L----~----__ J.._ r-~ -r---~)=-*1 -+-DIMs TYP . ! 1 ! 1 1 I I 1 i 1 IJ1 ru @ 3x3 PADS I '---'-1 -f-J -------~ ' C\J !® c A A A A A A 3'-10~'1 3'-10~' FOUNDATION PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 '-6' 1441.:1 '-8' L I 16' o.c. ,. 4'-6' 4 '-6' AROIJND ANCHOR BOLTS 6 ' NON COHESIVE F"ILL cl• GRAVEL RECOMENDED> "' 6' SLAB 'WITH f4 I 18' (A, 'WAY csn ON 4' CHAIRS> 6' NON COHESIVE F"ILL (J/4' \.lASHED GR,WEL RECOMENDED> 6 ' SLAB SA'W CUT OR TODLE.D JOINT ® JOINT REJAIL L t DIA .. ($££ NUCOR A.B. PLAN> t-A307 #!NCHOR BOLT IC 2 '-0' 'WI ,. HOOK AND ,, THREAD • ;>ROJEC:T ANCHOR BOLT 'T' PEiil: NWCCR " y © ANCHOR! BOLJ RETAI L •• (4> I" BARS (£) SECTION ATTHICKENER SLAB @FOOTING DETAIL AT COLUMNS ®FOOTiNG REJAIL AT COLUMNS ©TYPICAL SLAB EDGE RETAIL - SHEET TITLE: FO UNDATION PLAN SHEET 1 OF 1 z 0 F u :::J ~ VJ z 0 u 0/J f- ::;; 0:: w Cl 0:: 0 "- CXJ 0 I Garfield County No. Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office 945-8212 Inspection Line 384-5003 Job Address: Hwy 6fl4, Rifle Locality: 2177-111-00-359 --------------------~-----------------------------'11/\ ~t~'\c!tl('t l'\C6 office I aHtiHterumee facility Use of Building: Owner: Rocky Mountain hotshot & Transportation Inc frl Co ~""\ lol;":!'l ( OW'-f~'1 Contractor: _____________ ...:::-P!:h~itP=:/~oH~g~h~ai~n~C~o~ft:!!St;:!H~1g~ft~t !!lfl~s-~---~--------- Amount of Permit: $7,106.96 -----'-----Date: septic $50.00 Total $7,156.96 Clerk: __ J t_tt___.t[..;._l ()_r __ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8"" Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970~945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 /Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 · Permit No: \ ())--:S 1) . Parcel/Schedule No:~\"]'1-\\1-~-'3S"") ! Job Ad<J;.ess: rtw'1. (, -\-)_ c.j f'J ;f'-<::. l C,., . (7 \ L p., ... ~ d. I (, ... ~ .... s,.'ob.Ms \ -~ F><~l'IM>\\\\"t'-''~" \~ C..\) -\ '-.o "'" ~"'\\."'\.,:,"' \~T.s'N.\ l.l\(, 9 Garage: Q 11 Valuation of Work:$ CJ Single Double lit On-Site Sewage Disposal TillS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AU'THORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHLN 180 DAYS,·OR, IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AITER WORK IS COMMENCED. Height: \ l'-g \\ o Remove Carport: Q Single Ll Double 1jC Site Plan Adjusted Valuation~ 1 ;).:) , Permit Fee: '2 )"" t.; 3&'7 l HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLlCATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECI'. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS 1YPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL TilE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR OCC Group: :Jf5{_ 13-5-1 Const. Type: Zoning: Setbacks: LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE H-ebld;-...~N~S~~:~:~~~~~;;,N~~ \,._:~.J\~~-(\\_~~:\\i__.,J,J !;)_~~~c\')~[/_~ Manu. Home: ~;G{A\[O>F~~:f<.CJQ .J1.c 1:~ -csJ~ ~7 yr ~ F'f. P!:::l_G. DEFT. f ·;I§~~.~ee~~~~ c;;,..,.;.: ,",., .:~ c r ¥AL/DATE APPROVAL/DATE u AGREEMENT PERMISSION lS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER 1D CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE !SSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH AIL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN LN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNERFURIHERAGRE~S ~ 1HAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITI-I IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OFTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKE!) BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHAI~L BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENfTI-IE BtnLDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEl.NG CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN V10LATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF Ul:IS JURISDICTION. THE REV1EW OF SUBMIITED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSI BIL11Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH TI-lE ARTICTECT, DE..'SIGNER. BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS LNTEREST. a '11 d-6-~ S"~c7a~q'cJ:-"11'-~tlf.-\~~-·"'~~~''1 ~ lJ~$1-· '2-S(J$SO f/Sf~ The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. 9. If you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, proof of the tap fees have been paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to issuance of a C.O. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# _____ _ Signature Bpapplicationoctober2006 Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Du bch S Address 4-~ i,\-'l 'I (l.,J:j., Date \i-'1\. . <><1 Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Basement: Total Square Feet Valuation Unfinished Ltooo /0 ooc Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space: Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation 7:Js f Subdivision Lot/Block Contractor ~1._,\ \iG\."'-~ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this vJill result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building constniction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to scale. I Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check with the Building Department. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IBC, IPC, IMC and IFGC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings, setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes''{. 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the location of the l.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design. Yes '/. No Not necessary for this project __ _ 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road accessing the property? Yes~ 4. Is the l.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? 2 Yes X' No Not necessary for this project. __ _ 5. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifYing them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawings only", "For permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes.< No__ Not necessary for this project. __ _ 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes_K_ No Not necessary for this project __ 7. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Yes _X_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for project_}(_ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this projectk_ 10. Do the plans include design loads as required under the IBC or IRC for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes 2L_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 11. Do the plans include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC? Yes~ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 12. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes X_ No Not necessary for this project __ 13. Is the wind speed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes_){_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 14. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes~ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 15. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes_:x_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 3 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Check applicable zone district for building height maximum) Yes)(_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or Phase II EPA certification? Yes No Not necessary for this project](_ Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IBC or IRC? Yes__ No__ Not necessary for this projec~ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IBC oriRC? Yes Not necessary for this projectL No Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes _X_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specifY safety glazing for these areas? Yes _X_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanical systems planned for installation in this building? YesL No Not necessary for this project __ _ Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the IBC Chapter 3) Yes _X_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ _ Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? Yes:J,._ No__ Not necessary for this project __ Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes_lc,_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 4 26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes _X_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and access to the building are handicapped accessible? Yes -X.-No Not necessary for this project __ 28. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yesx_ No __ 29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? · Yes _X_ No__ Not necessary for this project __ 30. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes_k_ No __ 31. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For corner lots see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbacks. Yes)( No __ 32. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the implementation of these changes? Yes_}(_ No __ 33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or "Road Impact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes-X-No __ 34. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes.2{_ No __ 35. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Codes? YesL No __ 5 36. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between 7:30a.m. and 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. '{ ~ S X 3 7. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yesx_ No __ _ 38. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes)( No ______ __ 39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes)( No. ______ __ 40. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the Parcell Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of the building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes X No ______ _ 41. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes X No (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes')\ 43. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? State Law requires any commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons as per Section 1004 of the IBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. Yes ')<· No Not Necessary for this project _______ __ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my ability. 6 Project Name: {(., ~'-\ ~~\M,\~\,.. \~\-\).,.~ -;I:I"\t: ProjectAddressr"'-"<.J\>\ rl., \::,r\'~"' J""~S'i\ ,1~ C><~~~"' \<-t, ~ h\ ~ Note: If you answered "No" on any of these questions you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review. B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in proceeding with construction. *If you answered "No" to this question the circumstances described in the question could result in a "Stop Work Order" being issued or a "Certificate of Occupancy" not being issued. Bpcomm October 2006 7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant CJ ,,Joo, ';) Date_ ...... &",_---""1 !..o...:-~01_,__ __ Building LEngineered Foundation _LDriveway Permit GDor ~Surveyed Site Plan J.L...:_Septic Permit and Setbacks b:.-~ ~ Grade!fopography 30% If-' \0 Attach Residential Plan Review List _LMinimum Application Questionnaire ~Subdivision Plat Notes --\,.L.__Fire Department Review /Valuation Determination/Fees _J_Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~Attach Conditions V Application Signed t./ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application dParcei!Schedule No. ~ 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. 1/ Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: J'anning/Zoning _/_p P1roperty Line Setbacks ~ S<=m Sclbock; ~ Plain __ Building Height ~oning Sign-off ~ r"' ~,., ~IPS ~Impact Fees ?,:Rc Approval __ Grade!fopography 40% ~ning Issues ~ivision Plat Notes Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT August 30, 2007 To whom it may concern, Garfield County has a building permit ready to be issued for William & Donna Dubois for Parcel #2 within the Green Subdivision Exemption for an office/maintenance facility. The fees involvedfor this permit are: Building Permit Fee: $4307.25 Plan Check Fee: $2799.71 Septic System Fee: $50.00 Total Fees= $7156.96 A prepayment of the Plan Check Fee was paid on 7/24/07 in the amount of $2799.71 leaving a balance due of $4357.25. Please make your check payable to the Garfield County Treasurer. If you have any questions please feel free to contact our office at 970-945-8212. Sincerely, " ~-~ Cathi Edinger ~ Planning Technician 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 08/16/2007 08:42PM Jul ~4 U'/ UH:lHa Denise & Philip Vaughan 970-625-4522 William n. Dubois Sr. and Donna M. Dubois 0405 Mid Valley Drive. July 24, 2007 Mr. Andy Schwaller Chief Building Official OarticJd County, Colorado J OX X{11 Slree1~ 4111 floor Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Mr. Schwaller, New Co$tlc, CO 81641 l'h. 970-~76-2324 We are the prope1ty ownen:; l)l'(iadi~:ld (\)\lfJty ~~8~::-:;~::or p<in:l:1JuJrnber 7177~ 111-00-.159, also known !IS Parcel 2 uftho Grwn Subdivision Exemption Rille, CO. Via this letter we authorize Phil Vaughan C()n:;;t.ruct.i<n1 Management, lnc. to art"'ly f<W and receive the necesfiBry huil,line, li.Hd s~:pti.~~ systr.:-:m pmmils for t,:uu~trm.:tion ur t!u: Rocky Mountain Hotshot, Inc. building on this property. RECEIVED AUG 1 6 2007 . _________ _(:WIFIELD!.XltiNIY BUILDING & f'LANNING p. 1 p.2 JeffKehr From: Sent: To: Subject: Darren Adams [dadams@Jvec.net] Wednesday, March 05,2008 3:14PM Jeff Kehr Rocky Mountain Hot Shot Foundation Concerning the project at 28730 Hwy. 6&50, Rifle, CO and our drawings dated 1-31-08: 1) A minimum of (4) L shaped #4 bars shown in detail A and B may be used (Drawings show these bars at 16" O.C. 2) Bottom #5 Bars in perimeter beam may run above the top of the spread footings and continue at that elevation. Darren Adams, P.E. Lower Valley Engineering and Consulting Inc. Ph. (970) 243-8778 Fax (970) 243-8499 1 AU9 oif'oa 06:22p Scott L. Maxwell 970-314-7067 THUNDER MOUNTAIN TESTING ••• 2973 F. Road • Grand Junction, CO 81504 (970) 256-9965/ Cell (970) 210-70081 FAX (970) 314-7067 Huddleston-Berry Engineering & Testing, LLC 640 Whit Avenue, Unit B Grand Junction, CO 81501 A TIN: Mr. Jason Collard RE: Rocky Mountain Hot Shot 28730 Hwy 6 & 24 Rifle, CO Dear Mr. Collard, May27, 2008 Pennit #10758 As requested, structural steel special inspection was conducted per the me 2003 Edition -Chapter 17: Structural Tests and Special Inspection and Garfield County requirements. I arrived on site at 2:00PM. I met with Mr. Jim Cochran with Alco Building Company, Inc. in Grand Junction, Colorado to review project specifications and requirements. The steel bwlding fubric&or is Nucor Bw1ding Systems in Brigham City, UT. Nucor Building Systems is an AISC Approved Fabricator, therefore; no shop inspection is required per 1704.2 of Chapter f7 of the me. The steel erector on site is Ultimate Steel Erection in Rexburg, ID. Visual inspection was conducted at the RoofFraruing Plan level on the%" & 1 II..'' ASTM A325 High Strength beam to beam and beam to column bolted connections. Project bolt tension requirements indicate "snug tight'' as referenced on Sheet Cl of I: Notes and Specifications, Item 2 on approved jobsite drawings provided by Nucor Building Systems: Prqject No U08L0035A dated 2128/08. As a minimum, 10% of all connections, but not less than two bolts per connection were inspected for proper bolt tension requirements. Inspection was conducted at grid line A - E & I -9. Bolted connections inspected were observed to be in compliance and adequately tensioned to a snug tight condition .. p.2 Lower Valley Engineering and Consulting, Inc. 569 South Westgate Drive, Suite 2 Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 Ph (970) 243-8778 Fax (970) 243-8499 David Mead Garfield County Building Department Fax: 970-384-3470 7-22-08 RECEIVED 1),\JG 0 4: '2.00\\ GARFIELD COIJNn' BUILDING & pLANNING Re: Foundation inspections for Rocky Mountain Hot Shot, 28730 Highway 6&50, Garfield County, Colorado Building Department: Reviewing our records on the above referenced project, we have found where we approved a deviation from our drawings at the slab/footing connection allowing the perimeter reinforcing to pass above the footings instead of being placed inside the footings. I believe this was the issue that was questioned when the slab inspection was originally done by inspectors from your department. Our records also indicate that we visited the site while they were in the process of setting steel for one of slab pours. As it was not complete, we could not verify all ofthe steel was placed so we have interviewed representatives from ALCO Building Company and have revisited the site to inspect the slab and perform nondestructive tests on the finished slab. Finally, we reviewed the slab design and considered the capacity of the concrete if it were cast without reinforcing. Based on all of the above, I am confident that the slab at the above referenced project is structurally adequate and capable of supporting the loads required by the building codes currently adopted in Garfield County. Please contact me if you have any questions related to this project. Signed, Darren R. Adams, P.E. President Lower Valley Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Dave Mead From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: David, Jason Clark uaclark@riflefiredept.org] Friday, May 22, 2009 1 :03 PM Dave Mead 'Kevin Whelan'; Andy Schwaller; firecrackerflirt@gmail.com Rocky Mountain Hotshot Transp. Building The Rifie Fire Protection District recommends a Certificate of Occupancy for the Rocky Mountain Hotshot Transp. Building located at Hwy 6 & 24. We have completed the Final Acceptance Test of the Private Water Supply System and the Fire Alarm System at the location. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Jason Clark Fire Inspector Rifle Fire Protection District Office:970-625-1243 Mobile: 970-379-0303 1 ~ -- 1":01 ll me•• 1 OF TRANSPORTATION I COOT Permit No. 307107 STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS~P;E~R~M~IT~~~~~r;;;;;;;;;~~~~;A~~·;; n~= $100.00 I 3/ 02 /10-7A""' Hayes Local Jurisdiction The Permittee(s); William H. Dubois POBox650 New Castle, CO 81647 970-984-2500 Applicant: Sopris Engineering LLC 502 Main Sl Suite A3 Carbondale, CO 81623 970-704-0311 xl2 Ref No.: is hereby granted permission to have an access to lhe state highway at the location noted below. The access shall be CQnstructed, maintained and used in accordance with Utis permit. induding the State Highway Access Code and any attachments, terms, conditions and eJChibits. This pennil may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the penniHed access and its use violate any parts of ltris permit The issuing authority, the Department and rhelr duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any aclion for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of the oonnft. Location: 1688 feet west of Peterson Lane Access to Provide Service to: (Land Use COO.:) II 0 -General Light Industrial Other terms and conditions: MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL (Size or Count) 20 Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority. By (x) Dale TiUe (Units) DHV Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from Initiation. The permitted access shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the perm~ prior to being used. The pennittee shall notify ---· D'Wayne Gaym~..!!._ ___ with the Colorado-Department of Transportation, telephone nbr. (970) 947-9361 at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way. The ~~signing a~ permittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted access and have full authority to accept ')'• pem ;t a and con,_dltions. . {;)rmlti'iJJY/~71?:./ ~ 7 --_ IDalek/ _5-Q 7 This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Copy Distribution: Requi~: 1.RegtOO 2.Appllcant 3.Staff Access Section Make copies_as nece~ for. Previous edhlons are obso~ may not be used local Authority Inspector D'Wayne Gaymon COOT Fonn #101 8/98 MTCEPatrol Traff~eEngineer J()..-2 Alen Hayes From: Philip Vaughan [pvcm@hughes.net] Sent: Thursday, Decer.1ber 06, 2007 12:Go PM To: Cathi Edinger Cc: 'Tiff<:ny Wood' Subject: Rocky Mountain Hotshot, Inc.-Building Permit Cathy, As per our conversation this morning, please change the general contractor information for this project from Phil Vaughan Construction Management, Inc. to: Alco Building Company (970) 242-1423 2526 F iOi Grand Junction, CO 8i505-550i Sincerely, Phil Vaughan Phil Vaughan Construction Management, Inc. 1038 County Road 323 Rifle, CO 81650 970-625-5350 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -i3UILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ;?g 7 3o 1/ W lf? / ~'-/ Permit No. /!J 1~8 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 4 You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ,J ....-/; 20 t) 1/ Building Inspector /lJtit.h ~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARF;ELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at -U-d£V--<Z~w"""'--__,/i_:__:_w__;_q~b .::r___.J CJ-=--tf_.____ Permit No.r_,_/ 0'-"'-'--7_,8',_,8«------------ ~Call for'Re-lnspection D $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ft;.--'J-1 ~ _ 20 QL Building Inspector _ _,_,( ... ~""~v:k=·JA[!,_1M&L-+->~""~""'="'---------- Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at cJ'31.6z::. 1/P.Jtj t-/af Permit No. I 075'8 ----~~---------------------------- I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ~a-f ~reos ;p.:; whef'e. ~~~/'If t.l!jJ/;7~ lrO'Wl 7/ei~t:t(/ Ji Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction{s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date .!5-/CJ-. . 20 . 6"7 Building Inspector ~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 N \.V'T<-> o 0. __ ~~~---------Assessor's Parcel No. 0'1\tt-l\~'-"-' <,.).; .. rl ,,,.,. Date I H9'"'0 -:=t- {}~1"'!f0 BUILDING PERMIT CARD Job Address \-\\.>J'{ G t d-'-t f_l.£te -l-l0-1<-\-h eope.\a.--J OwnerRS)d'-ltv\\.V\ ~\)\~'n.oT')s\m'l\~'f9fttii[{I)O.ddress(t<J'S'fNS1~~\\t:'} br-'N'W;~ #b}~-~~j :,::::'~ ~:~t jt~J';,Jc('::~~" Ad:~.2'5;<1,f 1° ~H C:: 'iil(!::: :f 76~~ Offl<Le {VV\Q\V\\~11\(,f;-'Rlo\\1\{ INSPECTIONS~0 -'II 1 ?<> INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS TIUS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 2~ HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued •.. lt\:::.\~23::-... Zoned Area ............................... Permit No ... .\.Q}'?,(. .......... .. AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of tl!e above described structure, the permit may then be revpked by notice from the County Building Insp.ector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULl/AND VOID. -Use l(t Q\M aN\<'.U'Kf Address or Legal Description'-,---4C:\IJ~_u_.lld--'Q."-~-'-2f..;~;,-----;--:-~-c..-,------- Owner ~C't ~~ Yv\iVi \\ebcl ~ \lQ VlS\?~~actor\?'f\\L lt\>\'g \llcAM Setbacks Front Side Side Re;tr Tbis Card Must Be Posted So It is Piah,IiY Visible From The Street Until Fina1 inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing l-1 ~-0 }.~ Driveway Foundation o\( ?N_ 4'1"" ' ... OPA p. ~ /)'tV Underground Plumb'ing ·}J.-· 0 (f ,A:wv _Insulation W(£>/.fd ll!dJ , <0/<. .GM.. ' Rough Plumbing '7-·3-Df( f\>M Drywall /tJ7if,(IN<. cJr/ieyt::-;> (9i( 7-Z</--t: ~ Chimney & Vent 'J.-.'?P·DB. Lin'\ Electric lFiiDia! (by State Inspector) !)_.'/!.~~-} !; '' Gas Piping "1-'%0-o'6A rm Final£-.::2;1. .c:q ~ Electric RoUigh (By Stole l~speclo•·)p~ Septi~ Final <f-~0 ·l>"f /3_-a £ti · Framing 7-/C'-o fl.&:'~~ '----Notes:'/-:!1-c:P,J~~t ~~· oi<)J/~ (To include Roof in place and Windows 7-z.h·<i!?J /f.f"Asr-P/5<.-"1"9i~ "i%; 1 1 and Doors installed). ?;,Nrq,i;K!aJ;;sr J!Jfcj-1-e: ~.&) ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING- WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THJIS CARD -- ... I I I ! ! -r {. ~- Date \\-\(1-()f. By~ IF PLACED OUTSIDE -COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC Phil Vaughan Phil Vaughan Construction Management, Inc. 1038 County Road 323 Rifle, CO 81650 July 24, 20071 RE: Stormwater Management and Drainage Report and Drainage Design for a Rocky Mountain Hotshot Building, Parcel 2, Green Subdivision, Rifle, Colorado SE Job No. 27063.01 Dear Mr. Vaughan: Pursuant to your request, this letter/report presents our findings in regard to the drainage design for the above referenced site. Our design is in accordance with the Garfield County, Design and Construction Standards. We have reviewed the information forwarded to us including the proposed building dimensions and location, formulated a drainage design and created a drainage plan drawing as a part of our scope of work. Conclusions Based on our findings we believe that the design and installation of a drainage system is feasible in accordance with the regulations of the Garfield County. We recommend that two small retention ponds be installed to accept drainage from a series of roof drain pipes and a system of surface swales to attenuate storm water flows from the proposed developed portion of the site. The design is based on the storm water runoff from the drainage sub-basin area within the limits of the proposed site development area. The runoff volume is retained on site and is recovered by percolation into the ground or flows to the historic runoff destination. Our design is outlined below and delineated on the attached site plan. Existing Site Conditions The site contains approximately 13.69 +/-acres of total land area. All offsite runoff entering the site will be directed to either one of the two retention ponds or flow to historic locations. Proposed Site Conditions Our proposed plan involves the collection, retention and infiltration of storm water runoff from the developed site improvement drainage basins that comprises an area of approximately 3.23 +/-acres. This basin includes all the disturbed areas. The areas are the same in post development as in pre development condition. The storm water facilities are designed to handle the runoff from the proposed improvement drainage sub basin. The proposed improvements will include the construction of one main facility attached to office buildings. The primary quantity of storm water runoff will be generated from the roof and will be collected by new roof gutters, drains and downspouts and routed via swales to storm water retention/infiltration ponds. The storm water management facilities will be installed within the pervious area in the southern portion of the lso2 Main Street • Suite A3 o Carbondale, CO 81623 o (970) 704-0311 o Fax (970) 704-03131 SOPRIS ENGINEERING • llC civil consultants Phil Vaughan SE Job No. 27063.0 I July 24, 2007 Page2 property. Two small retention ponds will be installed in these locations to retain and infiltrate the design storm water volume. It is noted that due to the underlying sandy clays and clayey sands consistent in the area, that storm water should percolate into the soils at a moderate to slow rate. Drainage Plan The drainage plan provided serves as the base for the drainage plan for the proposed site development. The plan delineates locations for installation of drainage collection and conveyance systems and storm water facilities. The new facilities include the installation of drainage swales, roof drain collection pipes, routed to the retention ponds/infiltration galleries installed at the surface. The following information details the technical criteria utilized in design of the proposed system. Drainage Design Criteria The drainage design hydrology is based on the runoff from the impervious roof area, paved surfaces and surrounding pervious gravel surfaces within the improvement area sub basin on the site. The drywell storm water facility is designed to hold the difference in the pre and post development runoff volume from the 25-year storm event. The retention design is based on the application of the TR-55 method for the design storm event utilizing the rainfall intensity on the time of concentration. The post development runoff offsite will not exceed the pre-development runoff since the system is designed to retain the storm water runoff from the design storm. It is noted that the storm water runoff will immediately begin to infiltrate into the soil as it is conveyed to the drywell structure allowing for very rapid recovery. Due to these conditions the calculated storage volume is considered to be very conservative. Drainage Sub-Basin Sub-Basin 1 Pre-Development surface area Basin SF ABC 0 lmpv-roof 0 Open Space 140,698 Total 140,698 Curve Number area ac 0.00 0.00 3.23 3.23 area curve % number 0 89 0 96 100 86 100 CN=86 Retention Ponds I Infiltration Design Post-Development surface area area area rational Basin SF ac % coefficient ABC 84,289 1.94 60 89 lmpv-roof 13,983 0.32 10 96 Open Space 42,410 0.97 30 86 Total 140,698 3.23 100 Curve Number CN=89 The retention ponds are designed with regard to the efficient collection of storm water from the sub-basin. The smaller pond will be installed east of the proposed drive approximately 150 feet north of the south property line. The pond will have a top of pond elevation of 5376 feet with a surface area of330 square feet. The total depth will be 2 feet with side slopes of 5 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical for a total volume of 255 ft2 • The larger pond will be installed west of the proposed drive approximately 200 feet north of the south property line. The pond will have a top of pond elevation of 5375 feet with a surface area of 1740 Phil Vaughan SE Job No. 27063.01 July 24, 2007 Page 3 square feet. The total depth will be 1 foot with side slopes of 5 feet horizontal to one foot vertical for a total volume of255 ft2 . All proposed swales will terminate at the retention ponds. Conveyance/Infiltration Trench and Drywell Volume Install: Pond Storage Volume= Volume of Surface Swales Total Retention Storage Volume= General Notes 1,530 250 1,671 Our design and recommendations are based upon data supplied to us by others. If subsurface or site conditions are found to be different from those described in this report, we should be notified to evaluate the effect it may have on the proposed drainage system. If the Garfield County request changes or modifications to this design, we should be contacted to evaluate the effect on the proposed drainage system. During excavation of the storm water retention facilities, the engineer shall be notified in order to perform an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions at the facility location. These observations are required to confirm assumptions utilized in the design and recommend modifications if necessary. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC fROS!ON CON'IROt /lOTtS: ALL OORK P£RFOi?Mto SHA!t 8£ IN ACCOROANCt \liTH IHt GARFI£W COUNTY INTiiRIM D£5/GN AND CONSTRUCIJON STANOARO$, 2. CONTRACTOR TO U111.1ZE: "BtST MANAGEM£}1f PRACI!US TO CONIROt. £ROSION AND SED/MfNTA J!ON CURING CONSrRUCTIQN. ORA/NAG£ Tl) OFF $11£ AR£A$ $HAIL 8£ PR£\If.:NT£0. 3. IH£ CON'IRACTOR SHM.L M~INTAIN 5£DWI;NT AND EROSION PROrF:CT/011 THROUCkOUT fH£ CON$'/RUCM/1 OP£RAI!ON. SILT F£1/CE$ OR OTH£R NECESSAAY tRO$/ON PROrtCnON SHML Rf:IJAI/1 IN Pl.AC£ UllllL ALL fJISTUR8£D AR£A$ HA\1£ 8££11 R£V£C£TAT£1), 4. PROPOS£0 F!.OW PATHS SHOUW 8£ COII$TIIUCTr0 AS SH0\\1>1 ON PlAN$, YARD INLET EROSION & SILT PROTECTION DETAIL ->->-> I \ I ( N.T.S. ) ,/ ..-)->->->->->-->. I I I I \ I I I I I I MAl F I PROPOS£0 ASPHALT SAWCUT SI':CllON LEGEND £)(!STING CO STAT£ HYff 6 PROPOSW CONCRETe PROPOStO GRAVE!.. SECTION ~ PRO!'OSEO SlOPE GRAOE ¢:=:: DRAINAGE PAT!l -SF---EROSION CONTROL FENCE ->->->-PROPOS<:O f~OW UN~ _....-\000..--..__ PIIOPOSEO !0' CONTOURS PROPOS£0 2' CONTOURS \000..--..__ EXISTING 10' CONlOIJRS EXISTING 2' CONTOURS EROSION CONTROl BAlES Parcel Detail Page I of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information 1'\~~e§§QI/Irca&l!n';rPropertYSPan::h I Assessor_s_llRsPLQl!cn I Assessor Sales _S_e_arPh ~lerk&Re>:Qn!erRcccptiQnScarch Parcel Detail I V all!c_Petail Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial. Im_provement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 021 II R210915 II 2111111oo359 II 45.694 I Owner Name and Mailing Address !ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT & TRANSPORTATION, I INC. 1810 COUNTY ROAD 223 I IRIFLE, co 81650 I Legal Description lsECT,TWN,RNG:ll-6-93 DESC: A TR IN I ITHE SENE SEC 11. PRE:R21 0864 I IBK:0884 PG:0898 BK:0884 PG:0894 I IBK:0878 PG:0964 BK:0363 PG:0189 I BK:0351 PG:0459 BK:0290 PG:0430 RECPT:735149 RECPT:735148 RECPT:735147 BK:0942 PG:0326 Location I Physical Address: llsiLT I I Subdivision: I I Land Acres: 1113.69 I I Land Sq Ft: 110 I Section II Township II Range I II II http://www .garcoact.comlassessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=2177111 00359 11/19/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 II 11 II 6 II 93 II Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: 18,73011 5,4301 I Improvements: 0 11 ol I Total: 18,73011 5,4301 Sale Date: 1110110/2007 · Sale Price: 111,225,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number of Commllnd lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I I 2006 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($251.76)1 I 2006 II Tax Amount II $251.761 I 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($252.76)1 I 2005 II Tax Amount II $252.761 I 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($283.28)1 I 2004 II Tax Amount II $283.281 I 2003 II Tax Payment: Whole ($314.20)1 I 2003 Tax Amount $314.201 2002 Tax Payment: Whole ($298.40)1 2002 Tax Amount $298.401 2001 Tax Payment: Whole ($304.80)1 2001 Tax Amount $304.801 2000 Tax Payment: Whole ($321.88)1 2000 Tax Amount I $321.881 1999 Tax Payment: Second Half II ($161.36)1 1999 Tax Payment: First Half II ($161.36)1 II II http://www .garcoact.corn!assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=217711100359 11119/2007 Parcel Detail II 1999 II Tax Amount II $322.7211 IQpofPage .A.s.s.e.s.sor..D.atahas.e ... .S.Garch.Op!ions I Ire\!Sl.!rerJ).ataha.se.SearchQptions Clerk & Rec.order Database Sem:ch Options Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 · 2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good_}'urns Software. http://www .garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2177111 00359 11119/2007 \, T CTLITHOMPSON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PARCEL 2, GREEN SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION HIGHWAYS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared For: PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1038 County Road 323 Rifle, CO 81650 Attention: Mr. Phil Vaughan Project No. GS05019-125 234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7 411 July 19, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS SITE CONDITIONS PLANNED CONSTRUCTION SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SITE EARTHWORK Excavations Ground Water Sub-Excavation Fill and Backfill FOUNDATIONS FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLAB-ON-GRADE .. BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION SURFACE DRAINAGE PAVEMENTS LIMITATIONS FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2-SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURES 3 THROUGH 5 -SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS APPENDIX A-PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. G$05019-125 S:\GS05019.000\125\2. Reports\GS05019125 R1.doc 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 7 8 8 11 SCOPE This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the Rocky Mountain Hotshot facility proposed on Parcel 2, Green Subdivision Exemption on Highway 6 in Garfield County, Colorado. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site and provide design-level geotechnical recommendations for the proposed construction. Our report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory pits and recommendations for design and construction of foundations, floor systems, pavement sections and details influenced by subsoil conditions. A summary of conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsoils encountered in our exploratory pits generally consisted of about 1 foot of "topsoil" over nil to 5 feet of sandy clay underlain by clayey sand to the total explored depth of 14 feet. Free ground water was measured at depths of about 8 to 10 feet in our exploratory pits. 2. In our opinion, footing foundations are appropriate for the building. The soils at this site become softer with increasing depth due to the presence of ground water. We recommend constructing footings no deeper than 2 feet below existing grades. This will require placement offill to attain frost protection grades. Design and construction criteria for footings are presented in the report. 3. We recommend that interior floor slabs be supported on an at least 2- foot thickness of densely compacted, structural fill to enhance performance. The bottom 1.5 feet of structural fill can consist of COOT Class 3 material and the top 0.5 feet should consist of a CDOT Class 6 aggregate base course. A geotextile separator fabric and/or stabilization of the subgrade with larger rock {8 to 12 inch diameter) shoved into the subgrade may be necessary if soft or wet areas are encountered. Additional discussion is in the report. 4. Pavement design includes 4-inches offull-depth asphalt in automobile parking areas and 6-inches of Portland cement concrete in areas of heavy truck traffic and the Highway 6 access. An aggregate base PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. GS05019·125 S:\GS05019.000\12512. Reports\GS05019125 R1.doc 1 course section with a geotextile separator should be provided. Design thicknesses and construction criteria for pavements are in the report. 5. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water off of pavements and away from the building . . SITE CONDITIONS The Rocky Mountain Hotshot facility is proposed on Parcel 2 of the Green Subdivision Exemption in Garfield County, Colorado. The parcel is about 13.7 acres located between Highway 6 and Green Lane. Copeland Concrete and a residence are east of the parcel. Rural land is to the west, north, and south. An irrigation ditch or drainage channel crosses a portion of the site near the western property boundary. A small irrigation ditch flows westward near the northern property boundary. The lot is primarily flat with a slight slope down to the west with the exception of steeper slopes near the drainage channel and adjacent to Highway 6. Vegetation on the lot consists \, primarily of grasses. PLANNED CONSTRUCTION We were provided structural plans by General Steel Corporation dated February 16, 2007. We understand the building will be a steel-frame building. The main level floor is planned as a slab-on-grade. No below-grade areas are planned. The interior of the building will be utilized for maintenance of trucks. Anticipated loads on the slabs-on-grade will be an 80 kip tractor trailer. Maximum column loads are 55 kips. The structural engineer anticipates a 7 foot by 7 foot footing. An individual sewage disposal system will be constructed south of the building. heavy truck traffic is anticipated. If construction plans will differ significantly from the descriptions above, we should be informed so that we can adjust our recommendations and design criteria, if necessary. PHIL VAUGHAN C.ONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. GS05019-125 S:\GS05019.000\125\2. Reports\GS05019125 R1.doc 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions in the area ofthe planned building were investigated by excavating five exploratory pits (TP-1 through TP-5) with a backhoe at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Exploratory excavation operations were directed by our field/laboratory manager who logged the soils encountered in the pits and obtained samples for testing in our laboratory. Samples obtained in the field were returned to our laboratory where field classifications were checked and typical samples selected for testing. Graphic logs of subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits are shown on Figure 2. Subsoils encountered in our exploratory pits generally consisted of about 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil" over nil to 5 feet of sandy clay underlain by clayey sand to the total explored depth of 14 feet. Free ground water was measured at depths of8 to 10 feet in our exploratory pits. The pits were backfilled immediately after e~ploratory excavation operations were completed. Samples of the soils from our pits were returned to our laboratory for testing. One sample of the clayey sand exhibited an unconfined compressive strength of 2,400 psf, corresponding to a cohesion of 1,200 psf. A sample of the sandy clay exhibited a liquid limit of 35 percent, a plasticity index of 21 percent and contained 84 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). Three samples of the clay or sand selected for one-dimensional swell-consolidation testing exhibited nil to 0.1 percent swell when wetted under an applied load of 1,000 psf. The samples compressed 1.1 to 2.1 percent when the load was increased to 3,000 psf. Laboratory test results are summarized on Table I. PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. G$05019~125 S:\GS05019.000\125\2. Reports\GS05019 125 R1.doc 3 SITE EARTHWORK Excavations We anticipate excavations for foundations and utilities at this site can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. The clayey sand may classify as Type C soils and the natural clay soil will likely classify as a Type B soil based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 5 feet should be no steeper than 1.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type C soils and 1 to 1 in Type B soils. Contractors should identify soils exposed in excavations and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. Ground Water Free ground water was encountered in our exploratory pits at the site at approximate depths of 8 to 10 feet below existing ground surface. Based on the anticipated construction, excavations will not likely penetrate the free ground water table. We recommend sloping excavation floors to gravity discharges or temporary sumps where water can be removed by pumping. Sub-Excavation Our subsurface investigation indicates that soft, wet soils are present at depths below approximately 3 feet below existing ground surface. We recommend that excavations at the site not exceed 2 feet measured from the existing ground surface. To enhance performance, we recommend that interior floor slabs be supported on an at least 2-foot thickness of densely compacted, structural fill. Structural fill to replace the sub-excavated soils should consist of a 1.5 foot thickness of COOT Class 3 material below a 0.5 foot thickness of an AASHTO Class 6 aggregate base course or similar soil. Structural fill should be moisture-treated to PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. GS05019~125 S:\GS05019.000\125\2. Reports\GS05019 125 R1.doc 4 within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 100 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Vibratory compactors should not be used on this site. Areas of wet or soft soils may require a geosynthetic separator or a geogrid to achieve the desired compaction of structural fill. The actual thickness of fill lift that can be properly compacted will depend on the type of compaction equipment. Our representative should observe placement and check compaction and moisture content of the structural fill. Fill and Backfill Fill may be placed to attain grades. Properly compacted backfill adjacent to foundation walls and in utility trenches is important to reduce subsequent settlement of backfill soils and infiltration of surface water. Fill and backfill soils should consist of the on-site soils, free of rocks larger than 3 inches in diameter, organic matter and debris. Fill and backfill should be placed in thin lifts, moisture-conditioned to within 2 pllrcent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Density and moisture content of backfill should be checked by a representative of our firm during construction FOUNDATIONS Our subsurface information indicates that natural sand and clay are present at anticipated foundation elevations. In our opinion, footing foundations are appropriate for the building. The soils at this site become softer and wetter with increasing depth. We recommend a maximum excavation depth of 2 feet between the existing ground surface and the soft, wet soils. Operating construction equipment on or attempting to compact soft and wet soils at this site will likely result in pumping and soil disturbance. To prevent disturbance of soils we recommend constructing footings at depths of between 1 and 2 feet below existing grades. This elevation should be below the organic topsoil and above the soft, wet soils. Backfill will need to be placed to PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. G$05019-125 S:IGSOS019,000\125\2. Reports\GS05019 125 R1.doc 5 attain frost protection depths. Recommended design and construction criteria for footing foundations are presented below. \, 1. Footing foundations should be supported by the natural sand and clay. 2. 3. 4. 5. Soil loosened during the forming process should be removed or recompacted. Footings should be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 1,200 psf. To resist lateral loads, a coefficient offriction of 0.3 can be used for friction between the footings and the natural soils. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 20 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of 36 inches by 36 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by the structural engineer. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least 36 inches below finished exterior grades. The Garfield County building department should be consulted regarding required frost protection depth. FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS-ON-GRADE We understand that interior floor slabs wm be subject to heavy loads resulting from tractor-trailer maintenance activities. We recommend that interior floor slabs be supported on an at least 2-foot thickness of densely compacted, structural fill to enhance performance. The bottom 1.5 feet of structural fill can consist of a COOT Class 3 material and the top 0.5 feet should consist of a COOT Class 6 aggregate base course. We recommend, using a modulus of subgrade reaction, ks, of 150 pounds per cubic inch for design of slabs-on-grade on the structural fill section described above. Placement of a geotextile separator fabric and/or stabilization of the subgrade with larger rock (8 to 12 inch diameter) shoved into the soft soils may be necessary to PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. G$05019~125 S:\GS05019.000\12512. Reports\GS05019125 R1.doc 6 allow proper placement of the structural fill if soft or wet areas are encountered. Vibratory compactors should be avoided as they may draw ground water up through the soils and cause pumping. Recommendations for sub-excavation and structural fill placement in the Sub-Excavation section should be followed. The following precautions are recommended for slab-on-grade construction at this site. \, 1. Slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested before the slab is constructed. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slab with sleeves and be constructed with flexible connections to slab supported appliances. 3. Exterior concrete flatwork should be isolated from the building. These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent units. Movements of these slabs should not be transmitted to the building foundation. 4. Frequent control joints should be provided to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION We understand that no below-grade areas will be constructed in the building. If below-grade areas will be constructed, we should be informed so that we can provide geotechnical input. Recommendations for lateral earth pressures and subsurface drains will be required. PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. GS05019~125 S:\GS05019.000\12512. Reports\G$05019125 R1.doc 7 SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floor slabs and concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the construction is completed: \, 1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the building in all directions. We recommend providing a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet around the building, where possible. In no case should the slope be less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet. · 2. Backfill adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be placed and compacted as described in the Fill and Backfill section. 3. The building should be provided with roof gutters and downspouts. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge points. 4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to mm1m1ze irrigation. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass or other landscaping requiring comparatively large amounts of irrigation should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation. 5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the building. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. PAVEMENTS The pavement design is based on the AASHTO design method. We used an Estimated Daily Load Application (EDLA) of 10. The clay soils generally classified as AASHTO Group A-2-6. We estimated an R-value of10 due to the soft and wet subsoils PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. GS05019·125 S:\GSOS019.000\125\2. Raports\GSOS019 125 R1.doc 8 on the site. Based on our calculations, we recommend the following minimum pavement sections. pavement Classification Automobile Parking Heavy Truck Traffic Fuii~Depth .. Asphalt 4" not recommended · Portland' cerrient Concrete · 5" 6" Our experience indicates problems with asphalt pavements can occur in areas where heavy trucks drive and turn at low speeds. In areas of concentrated loading and turning movements by heavy trucks we recommend Portland cement concrete pavement placed directly on prepared subgrade. We recommend 6-inch or thicker Portland cement concrete pads be constructed at areas where trucks will stop or turn. " The concrete pads should be large enough to accommodate the entire truck. We recommend sub-excavation, moisture-treatment and recompaction to a depth of at least 12 inches below pavements. The top 6 inches of material below pavements should consist of a COOT Class 6 aggregate base course. A geotextile separator should be placed below the aggregate base course. We have included construction guidelines for flexible and rigid pavements in Appendix A. If the anticipated traffic loads are considerably different than those assumed, we should be informed so that we can review our recommendations. The design of a pavement system is as much a function of the quality of the paving materials and construction as the support characteristics of the subgrade. The quality of each construction material is reflected by the strength coefficient used in the flexible pavement design calculations. If the pavement system is constructed of inferior material, then the life and serviceability of the pavement will be substantially reduced. PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. GS05019-125 S!IGS05019.000\125\2. Reports\GS05019125 R1.doc 9 Design of asphaltic concrete assumes a strength coefficient of 0.40. Asphaltic concrete should be relatively impermeable to moisture and designed with crushed aggregates that have a minimum of 80 percent of the aggregate retained on the No.4 sieve. Routine maintenance, such as sealing and repair of cracks and overlays at 5 to 7 -year intervals, are necessary to achieve long-term performance of an asphalt system. We recommend application of a rejuvenating sealant such as fog seal after the first year. Deferring maintenance usually results in accelerated deterioration leading to higher future maintenance costs. Our rigid pavement design is based on a modulus of rupture of 650 psi for Portland cement concrete. We recommend concrete contain a minimum of 610 pounds of cement per cubic yard and between 5 and 7 percent entrained air. A mix design should be prepared for this project using the aggregate and cement that will be used during construction. Control joints should separate concrete pavements into panels as recommended by ACI. No de-"1cing salts should be used on paving concrete for at'teast one year after placement. A primary cause of early pavement deterioration is water infiltration into the pavement system. The addition of moisture usually results in softening of base course and subgrade and the eventual failure of the pavement. We recommend drainage be designed for rapid removal of surface runoff from pavement surfaces. Curb and gutter should be backfilled and the backfill compacted to reduce ponding adjacent to pavements. Final grading should be carefully controlled so that design cross-slope is maintained and low spots in the subgrade which could trap water are eliminated. Portland cement concrete drainage pans with subsurface drains should be considered in areas where water will be flowing across pavement surfaces. Seals should be provided between curb and pavement and at all joints to reduce moisture infiltration. PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. G$05019*125 S:\GS05019,000112512. Reports\GS05019125 R1.doc 10 LIMITATIONS Our exploratory pits were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions below potential areas of additions and improvements. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our pits will occur. We should observe completed foundation excavations to verify that soils are suitable for support of the footings as designed. We should observe and test placement of structural fill. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, please call. en.:~ THOMPSON, INC. Craig A. Bur Project Mana ( 5 copies sent) PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. GS05019~125 S:IGS05019.000\12512. Reports\GS05019125 R1.doc 11 SCALE: 1'= 100' :::Oa>> -o., :=(>Ia. "' -• tiJ n no> \, oc. :::1 oo-<G'l ~ ~ a> :::OCD 010:::1 00 c.. 1>,) 1>,) ~ Anthony W. &: Darcy 756 County Road 2:0 Rifle, CO B 1650 ~ I ~~ IL II 1.~ lv I,;: I I i U lv lc :L I c 1 1 lv 1-II lv II lv I, 9, .~~ Pd)~ I':>Qo ~ 'i) w~~ ~ <::! \~\P ~ \~ ~ • ;o II Ia IV ~ \<6 ~ ~ (.'> . 1' \0' II Ia IV I• II IV lc II IV :\ I~ I ~) I ---->- . ~ \~ <9~ ,~ \ \ I -)-) I I ------)~> ->->--\ \ \ \ Phil Vaughn Construction Management Rocky Mountain Hotshot, Garfield Coun~ Project No. GS05019-125 \ \ \ \ \ \ Approximate Locations of Exploratory Pits Fig. 1 ---i~--- SCALE: 1"= 100' ::OOl)> -o., ~(H.Q. Ill -. .. C') C')O)> oc. :::r oo-<C> -~ 0) ::0111 OIO:::t OC Q. !>.) !>.) - Anthony W. &: Darcy S. Copeland 756 Coun~ Road 221 Rifle, CO 81650 Phil Vaughn Construction Management Rocky Mountaln Hotshot, Ga.rfleld County Project No. 0505019-125 ---->-- Copeland Concrete, Inc. 28803 Highway 6 Rifle, CO 81650 Parcel 2, Green Subd.' Exemption 13.69 Acres TP-5 • \, PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE PARKING AREA \ \ \ \ \ ISDS FIELD \ \ \ \ PROPOSED WELL rLOCATION -->->->->--\ Richard N. Casey PO Box 1815 Rifle, CO 81650 \ \ \ Approximate Locations of Exploratory Pits Fig. 1 .. • .... .E .c -Q. • Q 0 5 10 15 \, LEGEND: P.'??l li::.ZI TP-1 TP-2 v v Sandy clay "topsoil". Clay, sandy, medium stiff to stiff, moist to very moist, brown. (CL) Sand, clayey, loose to medium dense, very moist to wet, brown. (SC) Indicates hand drive sample. Indicates bulk sample. TP-3 v v TP-4 TP-5 0 5 v v 10 15 Indicates free ground water level measured on the day of excavation. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated with a backhoe on June 26, 2007. Pits were backfilled Immediately after excavation operations were completed. 2. Locations of exploratory pits shown on Flgure 1 are approximate. 3. These exploratory pits are subject to the explanations, limitations and conclusions as contained In this report. SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Project No. GS05019-125 T 0 • '2. ::r :; ;at • - Flg. 2 z 0 iii tn ~ a. :;; 0 () 5~--~------------------------------------~~----~ • • • • • • • • •• • • • • •• 4 I· ··········•···· ••···· • • ···•··•· · ········ ················ ·············' ... ·······'············· ····•··· • ' • : : •• ~ •· • ,. • ' TC ~ : ! .............•• , ..., . . . .. , •.. ··········· . ··• • . . .• .• !·············· .....• • ••··•··· ' ...•.. ...... ·········•·····•·· ···············"·· ok~·················•·······'········'·'·········•···H···············•···················'···'···••··'····•··············. •····· • ; 'i··•'···•·H .............. : ............• •••·•····•·H -1 1··············'·'''\··i • . ... • •• •·········· ... •········ • •• • . ... .. •··· \,-2 •. ............•............• \."\·' •.•.••• ···················•······ ·•· ..•..•.• ····•····· •. ..........••.. -3 1-············•··········•······•·\···\ •· •·•···•·'--·........... '··········'······ ' ; ' ' ' :; ....................•.... : ..... ; .. '·' : .. , H • \ . -4 • • ' ... \ -5 !················ , ......• ··• •• ···' \r' ••········· ·+·········•·····•·····•····.-··<··•··•··············· •·········•·············•···· ·•··· -6 I········· +·········•• ' , • •\ •·················+······•·· +······•··· ' ·!·' ;; ................. •· ·······•····· • ···•·····•·····•······H -? •··········· •• • ,, .~ K=~:;::1,~'"f~N.,•. ····c···o····N--J .. s'_~~ .... ·.J·r··· ; • • • :: 1····· .. ·.· .. · .. ···• •...... ····························'···· • •.• • .•.• • ...................... \ ........ y· ·•·· ····'··············'···· : ....... •....•.... ..... J -10 ._______;___;___;_ ...... •~ • _ ___.__;..._;_.__;___;_.. _ __;,_____;___;_~· • 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) From TP-1 AT 4 F_..::E=-:ET __ ------- NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 96 PCF 21.5 % Swell Consolidation Test Result~ z 0 Cii z ~ X w ;!. z 0 ~ 0:: Q. :a; 8 ·~ · -rrrrr ?~~.~~~.~ .. ~.--~.-~ •. ~.~ .• ~.-~~ ... ~.~.~ .. 6 I ....... ....... I ........... •....•.. •······ ......... . . • ......... ,...... , ........... ··' , ..... . • • u : .... · .. •. . • I 5 I············································· ....•...• • •...... • I '· .· • .• .. ·······•············ f I • 4 I ....... ; ... ;. .• , ,· c •··············•····· .; ............ • .... ! .. ! ...•.•....... 3 I·· ········ ··········· ...; ...... ; •.... ; ... ;. ; ;.; • ················ ······· •············' .;;.;. ···••···· 2 1 ........... ' ··········'········'······'·· ... '······'························· ........ •........... . ; . ' ; ·•····· ······· •····· .. ... . . ... ····• ,• .. ... ··I ••• • • • • : • ·21········· !·········'··········~\· c ... c .... ccc ................... c ........ +·····'···'' '··'···•·····················'·······: : .... c ..... c .... c ...• I ·3 I········· • ··•··· .•. \ !\ •...•..•..•................... •.. . .• . ...•..• .•..•....•..•..•.. ............•...... ·•· ................ . • 'I········· •.......... ,.,,,\,·'··················•·······' ~i6~i)N6t~·coN ·····''''·''<~ 4 .,,.. ..... <:YD'\N""'' •, . ,._,..,,;·,;::; ;;~·,T v,;;,~:·c 11/~'r"·'" . vV"0 < "" < ·5 I··········· .•. / ~NC VVt::.l I lfj{.j • • • . ....... ;. • ; .. c. ... c.c •.................... ; ; • ·~ .•.....•. ·6 1 ..............•...........•......... •.. • . ·····"'-... ·•······· ......••.. , ········•··········· .......... ·•···· ·i • ~··· . .• . • . • '1· • . •·········· • • • ·? I····················· •• •• • • : I • I • • I •· i•· •.. ·················'· ........ • • • ' .sL---~----~~~~--------~--------~------~~ 0.1 Sample of ClAY, SANDY (CL) From TP-2 AT 3 FEET PROJECT NO. GS05019-125 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE-KSF NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 100 102 PCF 20.9 % Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. 4 z 0 iii z ~ X w <ft. z 0 ~ w 0:: a. ::;;; 8 5 ....... . 2 •...... ·············:' ········ • • • • • • • • • : . . ... -3 •..............•.... . .•.......•......• \.y, ... ; ....•..•. ··•·····················•············•·······•······•····•··· •····· ; ..•..... • • • \ 41········· •........ ; ••• ·\~····················•·········' • ••+•••···············•··········•····•·······•····• ,,,, ...... •....... • ...•. ··········•·-"•···························· .......•. . •.• + ••• .. • ~NO •v , ._,~EN. .JIE TO WI:: I TINC -6 I· ···············' ····· ••. • '• .;.;•=·~"'-··· ~~··'.l' • ••· ' ' ·••: ;............................. ·•······ -7 I··..................... • ; ....•.....•••.. •...... ........ y .•..••.•..•••...... ••• , !. i • I -8 '--__;__...;._,;_..;.._;,_;_~__;___.:.,._,;__ ··~""-'-· . _...;..__;. ·.;__·__;__·;,..,;...,.;.J. 0.1 Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC) From TP-5 AT 3 FEET PROJECT NO. GS05019-125 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 100 104 PCF 18.3 % Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. 5 PROJECT NO. GS05019-125 TABLE I ... SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS NATURAL ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED SOLUBLE PASSING TEST DEPTH NATURAL DRY SWELL* LIQUID PLASTICITY COMPRESSIVE SULFATES NO. 200 SOIL CLASSIFICATION PIT MOISTURE DENSITY LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH SIEVE (FEET) (%) (PCF) (%) (%) (%) (PSF) (%) (%) TP-1 4 21.5 96 0.1 CLAY, SANDY (CL) TP-1 10-11 15.0 38 SAND, CLAYEY (SC) TP-2 3 20.9 102 0.1 CLAY, SANDY (CL) TP-3 4 15.7 112 2,400 SAND, CLAYEY (SC) TP-3 13-14 26.0 62 CLAY, SANDY (CL) TP-4 2 17.2 98 35 21 84 CLAY, SANDY (CL) TP-5 3 18.3 104 0.0 SAND, CLAYEY (SC) *Note: Swell due to wetting under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Negative values indicate consolidation. Page 1 of 1 APPENDIX A PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS \, PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. GS05019~125 S:IGS05019.000\125\2. Reports\G$05019125 R1.doc FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Experience has shown that construction methods can have a significant effect on the life and serviceability of a pavement system. We recommend the proposed pavement be constructed in the following manner: \, 1. Natural soils should be stripped of organic matter, scarified, moisture treated, and compacted. We recommend sub-excavation, moisture- treated and recompaction of the subgrade soils to a depth of at least 12-inches below pavements as described in the report. A geotextile separator and aggregate base course section should be provided. Moisture treatment and compaction recommendations also apply where additional fill is necessary. 2. Utility trenches and all subsequently placed fill should be properly compacted and tested prior to paving. As a minimum, fill should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698, AASHTO T 99). 3. Asphaltic concrete should be hot plant-mixed material compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum Marshall density. The temperature at laydown time should be near 275 degrees F. The maximum compacted lift should be 3.0 inches and joints should be staggered. 4. The subgrade preparation and the placement and compaction of all pavement material should be observed and tested. Compaction criteria should be met prior to the placement of the next paving lift. PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT A-1 PROJECT NO. GS05019~125 S:IGS05019,000\125\2. Reports\G$05019125 R1.doc RIGID PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Rigid pavement sections are not as sensitive to subgrade support character- istics as flexible pavement. Due to the strength of the concrete, wheel loads from traffic are distributed over a large area and the resulting subgrade stresses are relatively low. The critical factors affecting the performance of a rigid pavement are the strength and quality of the concrete, and the uniformity of the subgrade. We recommend subgrade preparation and construction of the rigid pavement section be completed in accordance with the following recommendations: \, 1. Subgrade soils should be stripped of organic matter, scarified, moisture treated, and compacted. We recommend the sub-excavation, moisture-treated and recompaction of the subgrade soils to a depth of at least 12-inches below pavements as described in the report. A geotextile separator and aggregate base course section should be provided. Moisture treatment and compaction recommendations also apply where additional fill is necessary. 2. The resulting subgrade should be checked for uniformity and all soft or yielding materials should be replaced prior to paving. Concrete should not be placed on soft, spongy, frozen, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade. 3. The subgrade should be kept moist prior to paving 4. Curing procedures should protect the concrete against moisture loss, rapid temperature change, freezing, and mechanical injury for at least 3 days after placement. Traffic should not be allowed on the pavement for at least one week. 5. A white, liquid membrane curing compound applied as specified by the manufacture should be used within 24 hours of placement. 6. Construction joints, including longitudinal joints and transverse joints, should be formed during construction or should be sawed shortly after the concrete has begun to set, but prior to uncontrolled cracking. All joints should be sealed. 7. Construction control and inspection should be carried out during the subgrade preparation and paving procedures. Concrete should be carefully monitored for quality control. The design section is based upon a 20-year Period. To avoid problems associated with scaling and to continue the strength gain, we recommend deicing salts not be used for the first year after placement. PHIL VAUGHAN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PROJECT NO. G$05019-125 S:IGS05019.000\125\2. Reports\GS05019125 R1.doc A-2 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION ROCKY MOUNTAIN HOTSHOT PARCEL 2, GREEN SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION HIGHWAYS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO CTL I THOMPSON