The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication-PermitProject Address 4618 CR 113 CARBONDALE, CO Owner Information Steve Keohane Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 - Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Parcel No. ertrtttNO. BLRE -7-10-16 Type: Residential Buld>In Work Classification:New ?etmrt Status Active Subdivision Issue bate: 1/26/2011 Section Expires: 07/25/2011 Township Range 239311400020 Address Phone Cell 4618 County Road 113 Carbondale CO 81623 Contractor(s) Phone Primary Contractor OWNER Yes Proposed Construction / Details Detached garage FEES DUE Fee Amount Penalty Fee $181.25 Plan Check Fee $117.81 Residential Building Fee $181.25 Total: $480.31 Valuation: Total Sq Feet: FEES PAID $ 9,504.00 528 Inv Total Paytype Amt Paid Amt Due Inv # BLRE-7-10-20367 $ 480.31 Check # 7742 Credit Card $117.81 $362.50 $ 0.00 Required Inspections: For Inspections call : 1(888)868-5306 nspectlon !VR See Permit Record Building Department Copy Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-82121 Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 888-868-5306 teha.Lar IteId-ch,¢thtt .uh,III 1 Parcel No: (this informati available at the assessors office 970-945-9134) Z,.3 ' c 4 4i Ole) 0z0 2 -1 Job Address: (if an address has not been assigned, please provide Cr, Hwy or Street Name & Cily) or and legal description5EJG, t I rtt A(es1 : i. -,Alvi E EJ3 '1C. 18 CA -77" L tZT) CP-��u_fa -t jr! ‘1'�-5o_ cry 3 Lot No:` I� Block No: t, i ,, SubdJ Exemption: /WA tl' 4 Owner: (property owner)/ + kentl /OF Vilguia1 TOKA) 5. Mailing Address: 4e. tgCm—rut_ ca �' p Ph: 440 -?Js--z9 Alt Ir !� . Sd�,S�cetl 5 Contractor. 1 L4 Mailing Address: Ph: Alt Ph: i Architect / Engineer: Mailing Address: Ph: Alt Ph: 7 Sq. Ft. of Building: 5- 3 Sq. Ft or Acres of Lot:. Height: r z r , e. No. of Floats: 1 8 Use of Building: C-�PkR,F. 9 Describe Work: T! c _ �� 11-"P' 5 i}i — j l 8447 Q 4-7-D O 1 L L7f ,s-%( c.s i �ZIa S > 10 Class of Work_ Te.‘„, ❑ Alteration i) Addition I i Garage:� trached tYDetaehed Septic: D ISDS D Community 12 Driveway Permit: Owners valuation of Work: $ Z /O Authority. This application Lor a Building Permit must be signed by NOTICE the Owner oldie property, described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate with this Application. and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspection by the Building Department. Electrical Permit (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or Discharge Permit. is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 CER11M1CATION contained above is true and correct. 1 understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans based upon my certification as to accuracy. a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield Couuty Building [ acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. described above, to inspect the work I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions compliance with federal, state and local laws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without L HE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided Leve[ Access. A Building Permit eaumoL be issued withoutproof of legal Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required (1) State County Highway/Road Access or a State Wastewater Void Permit A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized days after commencement T hereby certify that 1 have read this Application and that the information and specifications and other data submitted by she or on my behalf (submittals), Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, the submittals reviewed by the Building Department In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, T agree that T and Code, €SDS regulation- and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). construction or use of the structure(s) and faeility(ies), described above, 1 hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, Building Official from: (1) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law, Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the or discrepancies. As the Owner, t acknowledge that responsibility for limitation my architect designer, engineer aud/ udder. I HEREBY A sWI.EDGE THAT READ AND UNDERSTAND Ar owNE `* SIGNATURE DATE STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: 9 5-01-1, 00 Plan Check Fee: t178I Permit Fee: i81.z5- Manu home Fee: Misc Fees. / /-'6 e ig1.z5 ISDS Fee: Total Fees: y480.3 / Fees Paid: Balance Due: .562,50 BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: it (043 -- Setbacks: OCC Group: Const Type:_ Zoning: BLDG DEPT: /-2 f'/ PLNG DEPT: - *-tA.-✓ /AS-- A APP APP OVAL DATE AP ROYAL DATE VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant John & Wewer Keohane Subdivision N/A Address 4618 Cattle Creek Rd. Carbondale Lot/Block N/A Date 1/25/20I1 Contractor Owner Finished (Livable Area): Main sq.ft Upper sq.ft Lower sq.ft Other sq.ft X S74.68 Total Square Feet 0 sq.ft Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage/Storage (wood framed) Carport: Total Valuation Crawl Space Total Valleatinn sq.ft X $41.00 sq.ft X $33.68 528 sq.ft X $18.00 salt X $12.00 Sq.ft X $9.00 Decks/ Patios/Porches k_:overed sq.tt X $24.00 Open sq.ft X 512.00 Total Valnaticn Type of Construction: Occupancy: Vatnaticn l +►liiitl l' 41 X sf X si X st X sf X sf X 0.00 0.00 9.504.00 0.00 0.00 000 'Total Valuation 9,504.00 Building Plan Review Description of Work: Garage, work w/o permit. Bin #: Location Address: 004618 113 COUNTY RD CARBONDALE, CO General Information Contacts 4, Case Manager: David Bartholomew Plan Case Number: BLDG -7-10-6511 Parcel: 239311400020 Application Date: 07/16/2010 Owner: Steve Keohane Applicant: Steve Keohane Applicant Phone: Email: Building Engineered Foundation Driveway Permit Surveyed Site Plan � 4 Septic Permit and Setbacks Grade/Topography 30% Attach Residential Plan Review List /f N/4 Minimum Application Questionnare Subdivision Plat Notes Fire Department Review Valuation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions Application Signed Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ParceIISchedule No. f 40# Snowload Letter - Manu. Homes Soils Report _ Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks / Flood Plain Building height Zoning Sign -off oad impact Fees HOAIDRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat General Comments: V44 M mixed fee tee/4 At 7,74r L - A44,4/4 S -O 91. Co /B 4/W ‘71,670. 3/ I The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so thatwater slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit, ERS SIGNATURE DATE B applicationdecember2007 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and s discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and 1 original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,00() feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be in compliance with the 2009 IRC, and 2009 IECC. 1 is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final platshall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes �/ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 3-301 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent 1 grope s), streams or water courses? Yes 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? � Yes 5, Have you provided any RESOLUTIONS and/ or LAND USE PERMIT(S) associated with this property? Yes if Yes please provide a COPY. No 2 J 6. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other agencies Yes 74/k 7. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes t/ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood ar►1 earth? Yes No v 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes No 10. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes ,/ 11. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? tz- Yes 12. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or .oists or trusses? Yes n 13. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and, beams? Yes 14. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and cave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roo (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes V 15. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No , Z 16. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC'? Yes N 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the 1RC? Yes %# 18. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilatiofor all habitable rooms? Yes 11/. 19. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes No +/ 20, Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Nf� Yes 21. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes A11. 22. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes i� Irffi 23. Will this be the only res}dential structure on the parcel? Yes If no -Explain: 24. Have two (2)complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes �/ 25. Do you undersond that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes f 4 26. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes / 27. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes 28. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfie1 County Building Department? Yes ' 29. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes E/ 30, Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes 31, Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 888-S68-5 Yes No 32. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re -ins ion fee? Yes 33. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes 1/ 34. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an gent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes 5 35. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection Yes ✓ 36. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 37. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes f (please check with the building department about this requirement) 38. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes �/ 39. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate occupancy? Yes 40. If you anticipate obtaining a water tap from the City of Rifle, please provide a letter indicating that the City will provide water service. No building permit application will be accepted without such a letter. / Yes ✓ 1 hereby acknowle i ge that 1 have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of Phone: ci 1-0 9_4 3-1Zq (days); Project Name: C1 MAA (iL Date -7129 (evenings) Project Address: 8 C'. t,rr C 1 t_ A- d+ C 6 Property Address 004618 Street Direction NIA Street 113 COUNTY Street Suffix RD Vicinity CARBONDALE Business Name NIA Subdivision Name N/A Block N/A Lot N/A Condo Name N/A Condo Unit N!A Dwelling Units 1.00 Acres 2.55 Land Sq Ft N/A Owner Owner KEOHANE, WEWER & JOHN STEPHEN Care of 1 NIA Care of 2 N/A Owner Address 4618 COUNTY ROAD 113 Owner City CARBONDALE Owner State CO Owner ZIP 81623-8853 Assessor Parcel Number 239311400020 Tax District 11 Tax Exempt Entity PRIVATE OWNERSHIP City or County Unincorporated Garfield County Zoning Description Rural Land Use 1 SINGLE FAM.RES-IMPROVEMTS Land Use 2 SINGLE FAM.RES.-LAND Land Use 3 N!A Land Use 4 N/A Land Use 5 NIA Reception No N/A Book 0834 Page 0503 Legal Description Section: 11 Township: 7 Range: 88 TR IN EII2SE DONT 2.55A Section N/A Township N/A Range N/A August 19, 2010 John Stephen and Wewer Koehane 4618 CR 113 Carbondale, Co. 81623 Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Certified Return Receipt NOTICE OF VIOLATION - ZONING /BUILDING CODE Dear Property Owner: The Garfield County Building and Zoning Code Enforcement Officer has reason to believe a possible violation may exist on your property located at 4618 CR 113 (Cattle Creek Road). The Code Compliance Officer observed new construction without a permit on the property. This new construction also appears to be within the thirty-five (35) foot buffer for water bodies. The Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008 as amended does not allow this activity without a building permit or a variance from the buffer setbacks. Based on my observations the construction activity on your property appears to be in violation of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008 as amended. You are hereby given notice, pursuant to Article XII of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008 as amended, that you must completely correct the violations or cease and desist from continuing the violations within ten. (10) days of the date you receive this notice. Under Article XII of the Garfield County Land Use Resolution of 2008 as amended, your failure to correct or cease the violations on your property may result in one or more of the following enforcement actions being taken against you: 1. Revocation of any building permits issued for improvements of the subject property; 2. Denial of additional land use approvals or building or other development applications pertaining to the subject property; 3. Suspension of any land use approvals for the subject property; 4. Withdrawal of any development permits that are being violated; 5. Forfeiture of any vested property rights; 6. Criminal enforcement; 7. County court civil penalties; and 8. Civil lawsuit. You have the right to appeal this Notice of Violation, pursuant to the provisions of the Garfield County Land Use Resolution of 2008 as amended. Pursuant to Garfield County's Land Use Resolution of 2008 as amended, Article XII, the county may pursue any of the available enforcement procedures and penalties in connection with this violation. U:1140V Leteers\I(enhan E- Oj/pRiJdS(90J 61 lo. Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax:: (970) 384-3470 Garfield County Building and Zoning regulations, Enforcement Protocol and permit application forms are available at www.garfield-county.com in the `Building and Planning "directory. if you have any questions regarding what actions are required to achieve compliance, or you wish to report compliance action taken, please contact this office in writing at the address below or by E-mail Rcarmoney@garfield-county.com Respectfully, ale r C Code Enforcement Officer Garfield County Administration Building 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 cc: Andy Schwaller, Chief Building Official (via email) Kathy Eastley, Planner (via email) David Bartholomew, Plans Examiner (via email) file U:1NOV Letters1CCeohanelNOV 8-19-10.Doc David Bartholomew From: David Bartholomew Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:39 AM To: Steve Keohane Cc: Andy Schwaller; Fred Jarman; Kathy A. Eastley Subject: RE: old building and setbacks Attachments: image001.jpg Hi John, In response to your setback questions; your property is located in the RURAL zone district, FRONT yard setbacks are 50' from arterial streets and 25' from local streets. SIDE yard setback is 10' or 1/2 of building height, whichever is greater. REAR yard setback is 25'. FYI, the current zoning regulations can be viewed at www.garfleld-countv.com click on COUNTY DEPARTMENTS, Building and Planning, New Land Use Regulations, then select Article 191, Zoning for setback info. Please feel free to contact me with any building/structure related inquiries and Kathy Eastley for any planning/variance inquiries. Thank you for your immediate response to gain compliance of your building/zoning project. Regards, David From: Steve Keohane [maiito:skeohane®wildblue.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 8:42 AM To: David Bartholomew Subject: old building and setbacks Dear David, I did find some photos of the old building, and attached them to this email. I thought I read somewhere that the minimum setback from property lines for building is 30', but I can't find it again, nor any specific reference. I am trying to deteiiuuine if anywhere else is available to build on, and it does not look like it between the 35' setback and a 30' property line setback as shown here: i z Building south of the house isn't possible because I don't want to shade the house nor the solar panels. To argue for a site slightly to the west of the present site would involve hauling in a lot of fill and retaining walls would be needed. What I'm asking is the actual property line setback 30'? Thank you, John Keohane David Bartholomew From: Sent: To; Subject: Hi David, Steve Keohane [skeohane@wildblue.netj Friday, August 20, 2010 5:32 PM David Bartholomew Re: Garage I have no further questions, thank you. Regards, John On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:19 AM, David Bartholomew<dbartholomew@garfield-county.com> wrote: John, I'ni not certain of the code enforcement procedures, but feel free to contact Gale Cannoney with any questions. As a building permit is involved, Gale forwarded a copy to keep me informed. For specific questions/concerns, please contact: David BarthoIornew, Building. Kathy Eastley, Planning. Gale Cartnoney, Code Enforcement. Do you have any further questions regarding my response to your building inquiry? Regards, David From: Steve Keohane [maiito:skeohane@a wildblue.net] Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 9:54 AM To: David Bartholomew Subject: Re: Garage Hi David, I just received a certified letter from Gale Camoney dated 8/19/2010, which you received a copy of by email. Is this an official statement of my stop work order of 7/15/2010? No construction has occurred since then. If this is not strictly a formality, what is it? Regards, John On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:57 AM, David Bartholomew <dbartholomew@garfield-county.com> wrote: Hi John, As we cannot okay any further construction until all permitting is approved, we will allow you to secure the walls to protect the structure. Securing the walls must be done by bracing and shoring without any sheathing applied. If you choose to take down the walls, a demo permit will NOT be required. Thanks for keeping me updated with the status of your application. Regards, David From: Steve Keohane [mailto:skeohane!,wildblue.net] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:21 PM To: David Bartholomew Subject: Garage Hi David, Since it will now be after the October 25th BOA meeting that 1 might start building on my garage again, I was wondering if I can brace it or even get the trusses and roof sheathing on. If I can't do that, I am wondering how much of the 2 walls I will have to tear down. If I have to demolish what is now up, do I need a Demolition Permit to do that? Thank you, John Keohane David Bartholomew From: David Bartholomew Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 4:25 PM To: Kathy A. Eastley; Tom Veljic Cc: Andy Schwaller; Gale Carmoney Subject: RE: nonconforming structure change Thanks, Yes, that's what I'm thinking too. From: Kathy A. Eastley Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:54 PM To: David Bartholomew; Tom Veljic Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: RE: nonconforming structure change Tom is out today and I'm not sure what his schedule will be tomorrow. I may have a few minutes. I'm sure you are aware that increasing the non -conformity is not permitted so if hewants to proceed he has the ability to apply for a variance (which must be permitted prior to issuance of a building permit). Kathy Eastley, ATCP Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, #401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 ext. 1580 Fax: 970-384-3470 keast ley@garf i eld-county.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. From: David Bartholomew Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:13 PM To: Kathy A. Eastley; Tom Veljic Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: nonconforming structure change Hi all, I have a meeting scheduled tomorrow at 9:00 am with John Keohane regarding a garage replacement in the 35 ft. waterbodies setback. (4618 Cattle Creek Rd. Carbondale) John was issued a stop work order for not having a building permit. He made permit application, and plan review suggests the structure has been changed/enlarged along with grade changes and retaining walls near the creek. Would one of you (or both) be available to sit in and provide him information regarding the appropriate permit review process/application? It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, David 1 David Bartholomew From: Gale Carmoney Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 4:00 PM To: David Bartholomew Subject: RE: nonconforming structure change Dave Thanks for including me. I would like to attend. 1 want to see how this is handled. Gale D. Carmoney Bldg & Planning Dept. Garfield County 970-945-8212 From: David Bartholomew Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:17 PM To: Gale Carmoney Subject: FW: nonconforming structure change Hi Gale, Sorry, I should have copied you on this. Please attend if you can to discuss compliance. Thanks, David From: David Bartholomew Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:13 PM To: Kathy A. Eastley; Tom Veljic Cc: Andy Schwaller Subject: nonconforming structure change Hi all, I have a meeting scheduled tomorrow at 9:00 am with John Keohane regarding a garage replacement in the 35 ft. waterbodies setback. (4618 Cattle Creek Rd. Carbondale) John was issued a stop work order for not having a building permit. He made permit application, and plan review suggests the structure has been changed/enlarged along with grade changes and retaining walls near the creek. Would one of you {or both) be available to sit in and provide him information regarding the appropriate permit review process/application? It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, David David Bartholomew seamellek From: David Bartholomew Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 2:48 PM To: Kathy A. Eastley; Gale Carmoney Cc: Andy Schwalrer; Fred Jarman Subject: RE: Non -conformity All, I called and spoke to Mrs. Keohane and informed her they need to set up a pre application meeting for a variance. Someone should be hearing from then soon as they want to move on this. Thanks, David From: Kathy A. Eastley Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 10:59 AM To: David Bartholomew; Gale Carmoney Subject: FW: Non -conformity Well, well, well. A legal non -conforming structure may be replaced only in the event that damage occurs by causes outside the control of the owner. As you can see from the section quoted by Fred below, the intentional removal ofthe a legal non -conforming structure terminates any rights. The guy will have to apply for a variance and make his case. Hopefully he can demonstrate that a legal non -conforming structure existed and where on the site. Have him contact a planner to set up a pre -application conference. Kathy Eastley, AICP Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, #401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 ext. 1580 Fax: 970-384-3470 keastley@garfield-county.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. From: Fred Jarman Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 10:51 AM To: Kathy A. Eastley Subject: RE: Non -conformity Huh...your sentence does not make sense to me. It was found that the replacement structure is larger, however the increased size of the structure does not increase the pre-existing non -conformities. Section 10-105(B): Structure Intentionally Damaged or Destroyed. The right to continue a nonconforming land use terminates immediately when the structure containing that land use is damaged or destroyed by an intentional act of the property or structure owner or their agent. i From: Kathy A. Eastfey Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:32 AM To: Fred Jarman Cc: Gale Carmoney; David Bartholomew Subject: Non -conformity David and Gale are dealing with a gentlemen up Cattle Creek who removed a pre-existing non -conforming structure (stream setback and front setback issues) and was issued a stop work order on construction of the replacement structure. It was found that the replacement structure is larger, however the increased size of the structure does not increase the pre-existing non -conformities. The potential problem is that the owner built a retaining wall to stabilize the replacement structure and the retaining wall(s) is within the 35' stream setback. §7-203 A.2. and 3. Lists the structures permitted and prohibited within that setback. Would a variance be required? Kathy Eastley, AICP Senior Planner Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, #401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone. 970-945-8212 ext. 1580 Fax: 970-384-3470 keastley@garfield-county.com Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. 2 6 SCHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER GLENWOOD SPRINGS E N G I NEERS ;SURVEYORS September 28, 2010 Dave Bartholomew Plans Examiner Garfield County Building and Planning 108 8th Street, #401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Keohane Garage Foundation SGM Project No. 2010-396.001 Dear Mr. Bartholomew: 1 1 8 WEST SIXTH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 8I 601 970,945.1 004 970.945.5948 Fax This letter presents the results of my engineering analysis performed for Steve Keohane for his property located at 4618 Cattle Creek Rd. Mr. Keohane was issued a stop work order on July 15, 2010 for an accessory building being built without a permit. On July 27th, 2010 Mr. Keohane met with you and Ms. Eastley for a Pre -Application Conference. The Pre -Application Conference Summary indicates that Mr. Keohane must obtain a building permit for the accessory building and engineering approval of the constructed slab -on -grade foundation. Mr. Keohane provided SGM with sketches of the slab -on -grade foundation based on input from his contractor - these are shown in Figures 1 and 2 on the following page. The calculated bearing pressure under the thickened edge of the slab is approximately 850 psf using the following loads: Roof Dead Load = 15 psf x 13.5' = 203 lb/ft Roof Live Load (snow) = 40 psf x 13.5' = 540 lb/ft Wall Dead Load = 10 psf x 8.0' = 80 Ib/ft Tributary width for roof loads = 1/2 x 24' + 1.5' overhang = 13.5' Assumed wall height = 8.0' Based on these loads, the calculated bearing pressure of 850 psf is Tess than a typical, conservative design value of 1000-1500 psf. Therefore, the slab -on -grade foundation should be considered adequate to support the anticipated structural Toads. To our knowledge, a geotechnical investigation was not performed prior to construction and we did not observe the bearing soils before the slab concrete was poured. Additionally, we understand that frost protection measures such as rigid insulation below the slab were not provided. Therefore, the potential exists for future movement due to frost heave, swelling soils and settlement of unconsolidated fill material. These movements could affect the performance of the building, but would likely not compromise the structural integrity of the building unless the movements result in failure of the foundation. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. Sincerely, Michael Fowler, PE SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. ASPEN GUNNISON GRAND .JUNCTION MEEKER 1 01 FOUNDERS PLACE, UNIT 1 02 1 03 WEST TOMICHI AVE, 573 WEST CRETE CIRCLE 320 THIRD STREET PO Sox 2155 SUITE A BUILDING 1 , SUITE 205 MEEKER, CO 81641 ASPEN, CO 81 6 1 1 GUNNISON, CO GRAND JUNCTION, CO 8 1505 970.876.5180 970,925.6727 970.641.5355 970.245.2571 970.878.4181 FAX 970.925.4157 FAX 970.641 .5358 FAX 970,245,2671 Fax 18" 1 /2"rebar 24" o. c. 4" PVC drain 5" slab 4-0" 1.5" gravel compacted earth under gravel Figure 1 - Typical Section 24' Top down rebar layout 1/2" rebar Figure 2 - Plan View 2 Owner's Name: Steve Keohane Job Address: 4518 CR 113 CARBONDALE, CO Owner's Phone: Total Square Feet: 528 Permit Card Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone; (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 POST ON SITE PermrtNO. B3LRE-7-10-1643 Permit Type: Residential Building Work Classification: New Issue Date: 1126/2011 Expires: 07/25/2011 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Residential Building Parcel #:239311400020 Contractor(s) OWNER Phone Primary Contractor Yes Inspection Scheduling Code Work Description Detached garage Inspection IVR Comments Pass Date Footers 105 Foundation Walls 110 Framing 115 Afe 41 6qW. 47 aif% 9rAti Drywall 126 77"C �AM� ' /r !tel 1! V�E DD `ice et•a2.. Final Assep_125 Misc 136 Insulation 160 Grout 175 Mechanical 405 UG Plumbing 605 Rough Plumbing 610 Gas 620 low ADDITIONAL INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED POST THIS IN CONSPICUOUS PLACE WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS STARTED For Inspections Call: 1-888-868-5306 !/ N Se'e p/.rw ,444&4& rvit u jc 1 ei tztref fr . -cy�fr -a' «5,m • e1ec SctcA I 43)44 47',' A� 4-cq u// d 4' Cee/ , i/ rs/ec APPRCNED SURTECT TO NOTED EXCEPTIONS & I NSP EC'TIONS GARFIELD COUNTY —Dat _ // Ey COP — NO INSFEcTION WITHOUT THESE PLANS ON SITE Pgge of M CO W J Ca • • m �c.r) 2CD 0 c a2, UOi}eLLIJO UI MaN — >1330 3111VD 0 1 ria 12-14" 1/2"rebar 24" o.c. 5" slab 1/2°rebar in footing 4" PVC drain /z7/y) 4-6" 1.5" gravel compacted earth under gravel tZ YDS cci /L c gET" . er-A C QTS 8 K c>. �qa uMop do± N RJ Grade Fill f i =i ,I `�' t•-- B' below top of slab —= T 24' 0 1 2 3 4 — feet 4" PVC drain r ► Grade 4-6" 1,5" gravel cornpacted earth under gravel FIII hand -stacked stone wall Looking North Creek Level 6' below top of slab 8' below top of slab r Grade 2") -,- \,-- -----;-'N . ) , Looking East 0 1 2 3 4 feet Retaining Wall 4-5' X 2.5-3boulders with packed sandy/gravel fiI bottom row set in scooped - out earth Creek Level tzefii,o;es ektepneer glOsipepi 4pp/ox41,4 11 -5 + -7-c) - 1(C #1 1.4 c sir 7-'b .c. T J am{— '& C.a Ct` n Roof: One course bituthene, remainder covered in tyvek Pro -Panel H metal roof screwed to 5/8" OSB sheathing Sheathing retained 1" each side of peak, capped with a vented roof cap 4/12 pitch 18" overhang �zn Continuous vented soffit on both 22' walls 10 Mid -truss 9O finish opening V 2 X 12 1 -leader 204" r 2 X 8 finish around door _N.- opening, ropening, protrudes 1.5" from 2 X 6 frame F $41 IOC! hvtd r ytcc 0g5 peY aHmfur-►?') gefutre pweet M4'e9J!'b4,9� 204" finish opening 288" 16 108" 39 i5' "411-- Lookouts—P.- 18" ookouts—r 18" Overharg PRE-ENGINEERED RF TRUSSES HAVE ENGINEERING FOR INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAME INSPECTION #'i619 414 Seew/d -SSC Aff.,rr.41'e%' 74.5 54ed d r widltjS 2 X 6 Studs: 16' O.C. Trusses 24' O.C. 5/8" OSB Roof Sheathing 112" OSB Wall Sheathing 264" 2 X 8 Meader 39.5" X 81.5" R,O. 39. 5 —Lockouts-1°' 108„ y TRUSFAB, INC. 6181 ROAD 335 NEW CASTLE, CO 81647 (970) 984-2336 Fax: (970) 984-3533 -- To: VALLEY LUMBER (RIFLE) 2495 RAILROAD AVE: P.O. BOX 1579 , BASALT 81621 RIFLE, CO 81650 Reaction Job Number: 5914 Page: 1 Date: 07/13/10 08:08:05 Project: JERKUNICA Block No: Model: Lot No: Contact: Site: Office: Deliver To: Account No: VR Designer: / Salesperson: TROY H. KELLEY Q P.O. Number: 139154 Name: Phone: Fax: Fax: ( ) - P. DOUG WILLIAMS (970) 625-9663 (970) 625-9233 Qty: Truss Id: Span: Truss Type: Slope Reactions: _,-. b10 A 75 Ibs. each 24-00-00 2 X 4/ 2 X 4 FINK 4.00 • Joint 0 Joint F 1929.05 1929.05 -220.01 -220.01 a _ 2 A-GAB 71 Ibs. each 24_00_00 2 X 4/2 X 4 2 X 4 DROP4.00 Joint A Joint K Join! L Joint M Joint N 459.10 459.10 1121,06 537.56 727.47 -20.34 -20.34 -105.76 -50.71 -71.25 M iTe POWER TO F& FDRM.,.. Re: 5914 JERKUNICA MiTek Industries, Inc. 7777 Greenback Lane Suite 109 Citrus Heights, CA, 95610 Telephone 9161676-1900 Fax 916/676-1909 The truss drawing(s) referenced below have been prepared by MiTek Industries, Inc. under my direct supervision based on the parameters provided by Trusfab, Inc.. Pages or sheets covered by this seal: R31907330 thru R31907331 My license renewal date for the state of Colorado is June 30, 2012. July 13,2010 Tingey, Palmer The seal on these drawings indicate acceptance of professional engineering responsibility solely for the truss components shown. The suitability and use of this component for any particular building is the responsibility of the building designer, per ANSI/TPI-2002 Chapter 2. Job 5914 Truss Trus5Fab, New Castle, CO 81047 -141-0 1-6-0 6-4-14 0-4-14 Truss Type COMMON 12-0-0 Sre = Qty 0 PI 11-7-2 5-7-2 JERKIJNICA R31907330 Jab Reference (aplicnall 7.230 S Apr 22 2010 MiTek Industries, Inc. Tue Jul 13 07:17:45 2010 age 1 24-0-0 a4-14 254w 1 1-6-0 Scale 1:446 6-3-4 8-3-4 15-6-12 24-0-0 7-5-8 8-3-4 Plate Offsets (X.Y1: [6:0-0-3.Edgel. [F:0-0-3.Edaej LOADING (psf) TCLL 40,0 (Roof Snow=40.0) TCDL 10.0 6CLL 0,0 BQDL 10.0 SPACING 2-0-0 Plates Increase 1.00 Lumber Increase 1.00 Rep Stress Iner YES Code IRC2003ITPI2002 CSI TC 0.75 BC 0.61 WB 0.92. (Matrix) DEFL in (10c) Udefi Ltd Vert(LL) -0,18 H -J >999 360 Vert(TL) -0.36 B -J >775 180 Horz(TL) 0.09 F nla n/a Wind(LL) 0.07 H -J >999 240 PLATES GRIP MT20 1691123 Weight: 76 lb FT = 20% LUMBER TOP CHORD 2 X 4 SPF 2100F 1.8E BOT CHORD 2 X 4 SPF 2100F 1.8E WEBS 2 X 4 WW Slud REACTIONS (Iblslze) B=159005-8 (min. 0-2-7), F=159010-5-8 (min. 0-2-7) Max Harz B=43(LC 8) Max UpIif1B=-220(LC 9), F—220(LC 9) Max Grav8=1929(LC 2), F=1929(LC 3) FORCES (Ib) - Max. Comp./Max. Ten. - All forces 250 (Ib) or less except when shown, TOP CHORD B -C=-36521352, C-0=-29531310, 0-E=-29531310, E -F=-3652!352 BOT CHORD B -J=-26113311, I -J=-135/2080, H -I=-135/2080, F -H=-261!3311 WEBS C -J=-9591147, D -J=-3911192, D -H=-39/1192, E -H=-959/147 BRACING TOP CHORD BOT CHORD Structural wood sheathing directly applied or 3-0-1 oc purlins. Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. MiTek recommends that Slabitizers and required cross bracing be installed during truss erection, in accordance with Stabilizer Installation guide. NOTES 1) Wind: ASCE 7-02; 90mph; TCDL=5,0psf; BCDL=5.0psf; h= 25ft; 0=45f1; L=24ft; eave=4H; Cat. II; Exp C; enclosed; MWFRS (all heights); cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed; Lumber DOL=1.33 plate grip DOL=1.33 2) TCLL: ASCE 7-02; Pf=40.0 psf (flat roof snow); Category II; Exp C; Fully Exp.; C1=1-1 3) Unbalanced snow loads have been considered for !his design. 4) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof five load of 16.0 psf or 2.00 times flat roof load of 40.0 psf on overhangs non -concurrent with other live loads, 5) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nanconcurrent with any other live loads. 6) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 lb uplift at joint(s) except (jt=1b) B=220, F.220, 7) This truss is designed In accordance with the 2003 International Residential Code sections 8502-11.1 and R802.10.2 and referenced standard ANSI/TPI 1. LOAD CASE(S) Standard July 13,2010 WARNING • Verify design parameters and READ MOMS ON' MIS AND INCLUDED 06FEKRRFE6ENC/3FAG E8AI-74?3 ren. IO20811RFORE USE. Design valid for use only wllh !Mak connectors. This design Is based only upon parameters shown, and is for an individual building component. Applicdbl9ly of design porornenters and proper Incorporation of companenl is responsibility el bulkfing designer - nol Iruss designer. Bracing shown is for lateral support of Individual web members only. Additional temporary bracing lo Insure stability during construction is the responsibiliily of the rector. Addtlional permanent bracing of the overall structure 5 the respansibiliiy of the building designer. For general guidonee regarding fabrication, qur5ly control storage, delivery, wee lion and bracing, consult ANSE/TP11 duality Criteria. 088-89 and BCSI Building Component Safety Ietorreollon available Irom Truss !"late Institute- 281 N. Lee Streel. Suite 312. Alexandria, VA 22314, 7777 Greenback Lena, Suite 109 Citrus Heights, CA, 98010 Job Truss Truss Type Qty Ply JERKUNICA -' R31907331 5914 A•GAB 2 X 4 DROP 2 Job Reference (optional) TrussFab, New Castle, C0 81647 7 1 12.0-0 7.230 s Apr 22 2010 MiTek Industries, Inc. Tue Jul 13 07:17:47 2010 Page 1 24-0-0 12-0-0 4.6 = 12-0-0 3.15 a 1'394 3110 1' S I.S+4 11 1.5.4 11 P o N 1 5.4 11 4.0.4 II 54= 1.5m4 II 1.5.4 II 24-0-0 F1 4.sea II l 1.5.a II 1.10 24.0.0 Plate Offsets(X.Y1: IP:0-3.0.0-3-01 LOADING (psf) TCLL 40.0 (Roof Snow=40.0) TCDL 10.0 BCLL 0.0 CDL 10.0 SPACING 4-0-0 Plates Increase 1.00 Lumber Increase 1.00 Rep Stress Inc( NO Code IRC20031TP12002 CSl TC 0.45 BC 0.25 WB 0.29 (Matrix) DEFL in (lac) lidefl Lid Vert(LL) nla - nla 999 Vert(TL) rlfa - n/a 999 Horz(TL) 0.00 K nfa esti PLATES GRIP MT20 1691123 Weight: 72 Ib FT = 20% LUMBER TOP CHORD 2 X 4 SPF 2100F 1.8E BOT CHORD 2 X 4 SPF 2100F 1.8E OTHERS 2 X 4 WW Stud REACTIONS All bearings 24-0-0. (Ib) - Max HorzA=-89(LC 7) Max Uplift Alt uplift 100 Ib or less al joinl(s) A, K, Q, R, S, 0, N, M except T=106(LC 9), L-106(LC 9) Max Gray All reactions 250 Ib or less at joint(s) except A=459(LC 2). K=459(LC 3), P=456(LC 1), Q=713(LC 2), R=727(LC 2), S=538(LC 2), T=1121(LC 2). 0=713(LC 3), N=727(LC 3), M=538(LC 3), L=1121(LC 3) FORCES (lb) - Max. Comp,/Max. Ten. - All forces 250 (Ib) or less except when shown. WEBS •F -P=-37410, E -Q=637198, D -R=63311 11, C -S=511190, B -T=-9081149, G-0=-637/98, H -N= -633/111,t -M= -511190,.!-L=-9081149 BRACING TOP CHORD 2-0-0 oc purlins (6-0-0 max.) (Switched from sheeted: Spacing > 2-0.0). BOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. JOINTS 1 Brace at JI(s): F NOTES 1) Wind: ASCE 7-02; 90mph; TCDL=5.Opsf; BCDL=5.Opsf; h=2511', B=4511; L=2411; eave=2(1; Cat. It; Exp C; enclosed; MWFRS (all heights); cantilever left and right exposed ; end vertical left and right exposed; Lumber DOL=1.33 plate grip DOL=1.33 2) Truss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. Far studs exposed to wind (normal to the face), see Standard Industry Gable End Details as applicable, or consult qualified building designer as per ANSI/TPI 1-2002. 3) TCLL: ASCE 7-02; P1=40.0 psf (flat roof snow); Calegory II; Exp C; Fully Exp.; CI=1.1 4) Unbalanced snow loads have been considered for this design. 5) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing. 6) Gable studs spaced at 2.0.0 ac. 7) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load noncancurrent with any other live loads. 8) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 Ib uplift at joint(s) A, K, Q, R, S, 0, N, M except (jt=lb) T=106, L=106. 9) This truss is designed in accordance with the 2003 International Residential Code sections R502.11.1 and R802.10.2 and referenced standard ANSIFTPI 1. 10) Design assumes 4x2 (flat orientation) purlins at oc spacing Indicated, fastened to truss TC w/ 2-10d nails. LOAD CASE(S) Standard July 13,2010 A WARNING - Verify design parameters and READ NOTES ON TRIS AND INCLUDED 6HTEK REFERENCE PAGE AIN -7478 rro. IO -'08 BEFORE LEE. Design valid for use only wllh Mitek connectors. This design is based only upon poromelers shown, and Is for an Individual building campcnenl. Appllcablily al design poramenlen and proper incoiporalion of component h responsibrltty or building designer • nor truss designer. Bracing shown Is for 1010291 supporl of Individual web members only. Addlllonal lemperary bracing lo Insure slobilliy during conslruclion is the responsibility of the erector. Addlllonol permanent bracing of the overall slruelure Vs the responsibillly of the building designer. For general guidance regarding lobdcation, quality control storage. delivery. erection and bracing. consult AN51/TPI1 Ouailly Cdleria. 055-8? and SCSI Iurldtng Camponenl Solely lntormelron available irom Tens Plate Inslitule, 281 N. Lee Street, Sude 312 Alexandria. VA 22314. MiTek' s tat rohx•.pe,1- 7777 Greenback Lena, SuIe 100 Gitrus Helghis, CA, 85610